[104-10234-10102.pdf — page 4]
# CONTINUATION OF DISPATCH## SECRETATT TO UFGA-19569 PG 4OROZCO NOT TO TELL THIS TO "LOS MUCHACHOS", PRESUMABLY OROZCO'S CREW MEMBERS. THE NOTE MENTIONCO A PERSON ANMED "ALDC" AND ALSO "JORGE". MRS. CROZCO SAID SHE DID NOT THINK ORIZONDO REALIZED THAT SHE /MPS. OROZCO/ HAS STILL IN POSSESSION OF THIS NOTE.19. MRS. OROZCO REPORTED THAT ORIZONDO HAD RETURNED TO HER HOUSE THE MORNING AFTER HER VISIT WITH "JORGE". MRS. OROZCO SAI0 THAT ORIZONDO HAD BEEN VERY WATCHFUL AND THAT IT SEEMLO TO MRS. OROZCO THAT THE PURPOSE OF ORIZONDO'S TRIP WAS TO ATTEMPT TO WHITE-WASH JURGE OF ANY CONNECTION WITH ORCZCO'S TRIP. /THIS INFORMATION WAS VOLUNTEERED FREELY TO CAS SOURCE AS AN OBSERVATION OF MRS. OROZCO/. URIZONDO TOLD MRS. OROZCO THAT ''JORGE HAD ONLY COME ALONG WITH HER THE PREVIOUS EVENING BECAUSE HE WAS INTEREST-ED IN WHAT HAD HAPPENED TO OROZCO AND THAT HE "JORGE" HAD HAD NOTHING WHATEVER TO DO WITH OROZCO'S TRIP. MRS. OROZCO REMINDED ORIZONDO THAT IT HAD BEEN JORGE WHO HAD ORIGINALLY CCME TO SEE CROZCO TO TELL HIM ABOUT VASQUEZ'S PLIGHT AND THAT "JORGE" HAD VISITED OROZCO SEVERAL TIMES THEREAFTER. HOW WAS IT POSSIBLE THAT "JORGE" HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH CROZCO'S TRIP, ASKED MRS. OROZCO. CRIZONDO PROTESTED THAT JORGE " WAS ONLY INVOLVED IN TRYING TO GET INFORMATION ABOUT VASQUEZ.20. MRS. CROZCO REMARKED SOMETHING TO THE EFFECT THAT SHE DID NOT KNOW IF ORIZONDO CONSIDERED HER A COMPLETE FOOL BUT SHE /MRS. OROZCO/ KNEW THAT SUCH A TRIP REQUIRED A CONSIDERABLE AMOUNT OF MONEY, AT LEAST $1000.00, AND THAT SHE WAS CERTAIN THAT ORIZONDO CID NOT HAVE THAT KIND OF MONEY OF HER OWN. CRIZONDO REPORTEDLY REPLIED THAT SHE HAD RAISED THE MONEY FROM FRIENDS. MRS. OROZCO PERSISTED AND STATED THAT SHE WAS COMPLETELY SURE IN HER OWN MIND THAT IT HAD BEEN 'THIS GENTLEMAN JORGE WHO HAD SUPPLIED THE MONEY. ORIZONDO DID NOT ANSWER. /SEE PARA 26 BELOW IN WHICH MRS. OROZCO CLAIMED TO HAVE OVERHEARD A CONVERSATION BETWEEN JORGE AND GROZCO IN WHICH JORGE STATED HE COULD NOT SUPPORT OROZCO'S TRIP DIRECTLY BUT COULD SUPPLY FUNDS/.21. MRS. OROZCO TOLD ORIZONDO THAT SHE WAS STILL UNCERTAIN OF "JORGE'S CREDENTIALS. MRS. GROZCO TOLD ORIZONDO THAT HER HUSBAND HAD HAD GREAT TRUST IN ORIZONDO AND SHE /MRS. OROZCO/ REALIZED THAT ANYTHING ORIZONDO WAS INVOLVED IN WAS TO HER HUSBAND'S BEST ADVANTAGE BUT AT THE SAME TIME SHE COULD NOT BRING HERSELF TO FEEL THE SAME CONFIDENCE IN JORGE AS SHE FELT IN ORIZONDO. ORIZONDO TOLD MRS. OROZCO THAT "JORGE WAS NOT CUSAN PUT PUERTO RICAN, AN AMERICAN CITIZEN WHO WORKED FOR THE PENTAGON''. ORIZONDO SAID THAT SHE HERSELF WAS NOT ACTIVELY WORKING FOR THE "PENTAGON" ANY LONGER BUT THAT THERE ARE TIMES WHEN HER FORMER EMPLOYERS NEED HELP AT WHICH TIMES THEY CALL UPON HER /ORIZONDO/. MRS. CROZCO SAID THAT HER HUSBAND HAD TOLD HER THAT BOTH ORIZONDO AND JORGE WORKED FOR THE PENTAGON'י.22. ORIZONDO TOLD MRS. OROZCO THAT SHE WOULD PROVIDE TO MRS. OROZCO ANY MONEY THAT SHE NEEDED TO SUPPORT THE FAMILY. ON 4 CR 5 JANUARY, CRIZONDO HAD GIVEN MRS. OROZCO $100.00 TO PAY HER RENT /FOR WHICH SUM MRS. OROZCO DID NOT SIGN A RECEIPT/. ORIZONDO ALSO TOLD MRS. OROZCO THAT ''JORGE WOULD BE OUT OF TOWN FOR AN UN-SPECIFIED PERIOD.23. OROZONDO PAID ARS. OROZCO ANOTHER VISIT ON 11 JANUARY. ACCORDING TO MRS. CROZCO, ORIZONDO NOW CLAIMED THAT NEITHER SHE NOR JORGE HAD HAD ANYTHING TO DO WITH CROZCO'S TRIP, THAT IN FACT THEY HAD BOTH TRIED TO TALK HIM OUT OF MAKING THE TRIP.24. ANOTHER SUB-SOURCE PAID A SOCIAL VISIT TO MRS. OROZCO ON THE EVENING OF 11 JANUARY. MRS. CROZCO SHOWED THIS SUB-SOURCE THE SAME NOTE WHICH INDICATED THAT ORIZONDO HAD GIVEN ORCZCO $500.00 FOR THE INITIAL PREPARATIONS FOR HIS TRIP. MRS. OROZCO TOLD THIS