[104-10234-10102.pdf — page 5]
# CONTINUATION OF DISPATCHSUB-SOURCE THAT BOTH ORIZONDO AND "JORGE" WORK FOR THE PENTAGONAND ALSO MENTIONED ORIZONDO'S VISITS ON & AND 11 JANUARY IN WHICHORIZONDO ATTEMPTED TO DISCLAIM ANY PART FOR HERSELF OR "JORGE" INOROZCO'S TRIP. MRS. OROZCO TOLD THIS SUB-SOURCE THAT SHE WAS GOINGTO PUT PRESSURE UPON THESE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE PENTAGON/CRIZONDO AND JORGE/, TO LITHER GET HER HUSBAND OUT OF CUBA ORFAILING THAT TO BUY HIM OUT.25. "JORGE" PAID AN UNANNOUNCED VISIT TO MRS. OROZCO ON 13JANUARY. DURING THIS VISIT, HE CONFIDED TO MRS. CROZCO THAT HISNAME WAS NOT JCRGE BUT TORRES". "TORRES SAID THAT HISORGANIZATION HAD NOT BEEN INTERESTED IN VASQUEZ BUT IN TWO AGENTSHE USED THE TERM AGENTES''/ WHO WERE IN HIDING IN THE SAME HOUSEWITH VASQUEZ. AT WHICH POINT MRS. CROZCO ASKED TORRES IICW HEHAPPENED TO KNOW ABOUT THIS IF HIS CLAIM WERE TRUE THAT HE HADNOTHING TO DO WITH HER HUSBAND'S TRIP. TORRES MADE NO REPLY,ACCORDING TO MRS. OROZCC.26. MRS. CROZCO THEN COMMENTED THAT SHE KNEW FROM PERSONALEXPERIENCE HOW DIFFICULT IT WAS TO RAISE EVEN A FEW HUNDRED DOLLARSIN THE EXILE COMMUNITY. SHE SAID THAT SHE KNEW CRIZONDO DID NOT HAVETHE $1000.00 CR MORE WHICH HAD BEEN SPENT FOR HER HUSBAND'S TRIP.THIS LED HER TO THE CONCLUSION, MRS. OROZCO SAID, THAT TORRESAND HIS ORGANIZATION HAD SUPPLIED THE FUNDS. AGAIN THERE WAS NOREPLY FROM TORRES". /CN 11 JANUARY 1964, MRS. OROZCO TOLO SAMECAS SCURCE MENTIONED IN INITIAL PARAGRAPHS THAT SHE HAD OVERHEARD ACONVERSATION BETWEEN HER HUSBAND AND TORRES" A WEEK OR TWO BEFOREOROZCO'S DEPARTURE IN WHICH TORRES TOLD ORGZCO THAT HE COULDNOT SUPPORT HIS TRIP "DIRECTLY BUT COULD PROVIDE MONEY WHICHOROZCO COULD USE TO MAKE HIS OWN PREPARATIONS/.27. MRS. OROZCO SAID THAT SHE HAD HAD TWO SPECIFIC PROPOSALSTO BRING UP TO TORRES". ONE, THAT IF WORD WERE RECEIVED FROM HERHUSBAND THAT HE WAS STILL HIDING OUT, TORRES' ORGANIZATIONSEND A BOAT IN TO HELP HIM EXFILTRATE. THE OTHER WAS THAT IF ITBECAME CONFIRMED THAT HER HUSBAND WAS A PRISONER, TORRES'ORGANIZATION NEGOTIATE FOR HIS RELEASE THROUGH DIPLCHATIC CHANNELS.AS PART OF THIS LAST PROPOSAL, MRS. OROZCO SUGGESTED THAT SHE BEPROVIDED WITH SUFFICIENT MONEY TO TRAVEL TO MEXICO TO TAKE UP HERHUSBAND'S CASE PERSONALLY WITH THE PRESIDENT OF MEXICO. TORRES"SAID THAT HE HAD TO TAKE THE MATTER UP WITH HIS ORGANIZATION.TORRES RE-EMPHASIZED THAT HE PERSONALLY HAD HAD NOTHING TO DOWITH HER HUSBAND'S TRIP. HE WAS STILL ATTEMPTING TO USE ALL THERESOURCES AT HIS COMMAND TO FIND OUT WHAT HAD HAPPENED TO OROZCOAND WHILE HE WAS VERY SORRY ABOUT HER HUSBAND'S MISFORTUNE, HESTATED THAT IT HAD BEEN CROZCO'S OWN DECISION TO GO ON THIS TRIP.28. UPON LEAVING, MRS. OROZCO TOOK NOTE OF THE LICENSENUMBER ON TORRES' BLACK VOLKSWAGEN. SHE ASSUMED BUT COULD NOTBE CERTAIN THAT IT WAS A FLORIDA LICENSE PLATE, NO.6801304 OR 68D1344. ACCORDING TO A CAS' INVESTIGATION, THE PREFIX 680"REPRESENTS A PLATE BLOCKED AT THE TALLAHASSEE LEVEL FOR THE COVERTUSE OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT.29. ORIZONDO VISITED MRS. OROZCO LATER THAT SAME EVENING OF13 JANUARY. SHE SEEMED SURPRISED TO LEARN THAT "JORGE" HADVISITED MRS. OROZCO EARLIER THAT DAY. ORIZONDO ATTEMPTED TO CON-VINCE MRS. OROZCO THAT THE JORGE MENTIONED IN A NOTE SHE HAD LEFTFOR OROZCO WAS ONE JORGE MAYO /OR MALLO/ CARDOSO, A FRIEND OFOROZCO'S IN THE REBEL-ARMY-IN-EXILE ORGANIZATION EJERCITOLIBERTADOR" TO WHICH ANOTHER CLOSE FRIEND OF CROZCO'S, JOSE LOPEZLEGON AKA PEPE EL TORO BELONGS. MRS. OROZCO REMARKED TOORIZONDO THAT SHE DID NOT KNOW HOW STUPID GRIZONDO CONSIDERED HER TOBE BUT THAT SHE WAS COMPLETELY CERTAIN THAT THE JORGE MENTIONEDIN THE NOTE WAS THE SAME JORGE WHO HAD VISITED HER AND HERHUSBAND. MRS. OROZCO ALSO TOLD ORIZONDO THAT JORGE HAD TOLDHER THAT HIS NAME WAS TORRES". ORIZONDO CONFIRMED THAT THISHAS HIS NAME.