[104-10225-10006.pdf — page 145]
# OFFICE "CONFIDENTIAL"## SECTION C NARRATIVE COMMENTSIndicate significant strengths or weaknesses demonstrated in current position proper perspective their relationship to overall performance. State suggestions made for improvement of work performance. Training Comment on foreign language competence, if required for current position. Amplify or explain ratings given in section B to provide best basis for determining future personnel action. Manner of performance of managerial or supervisory duties and cost consciousness in the use of personnel, space, equipment and funds, must be commented on, if applicable. If extra space is needed to complete Section C, attach a separate sheet of paper.Subject's tour in Lima has been cut short by the serious illness of his daughter. As a result of this illness it was also necessary for him to spend the months of December and January on emergency leave in the United States, returning without his family in February in order to transfer his ops workload and pack out his personal effects for PCS transfer to Headquarters on 4 March.Although the undersigned had the privilege of working with Subject only briefly, as rating officer he had the advantage of taking over handling of most of Subject's cases following the departure on emergency leave. Thus he was able to observe first hand and in detail the human material with which Subject had worked, the progress he had made in developing their access and capabilities, and the respect these agents had for him.During the period covered by this report, Subject continued his pursuit of the MPCHEEK target as his primary operational responsibility. He developed and recruited a prominent member of the local MPCHEEK community who has good access to the MPCHEEK embassy and handled four other access agents. He also handled a unilateral surveillance team and the Station's press placement assets via a principal agent who in turn handled three sensitive assets.(Continued)## SECTION D CERTIFICATION AND COMMENTSBY EMPLOYEE1. I CERTIFY THAT I HAVE SEEN SECTIONS A, B, AND C OF THIS REPORT| DATE     | SIGNATURE OF EMPLOYEE || -------- | --------------------- || 4 Mar 74 | /s/ Daniel Flores     |2. | MONTHS EMPLOYEE HAS BEEN UNDER MY SUPERVISION | IF THIS REPORT HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN TO EMPLOYEE, GIVE EXPLANATION || --------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------- || DATE     | OFFICIAL TITLE OF SUPERVISOR | TYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE || -------- | ---------------------------- | ----------------------------------- || 4 Mar 74 | DCOS                         | /s/ Arthur T. Ladenburg             |3. BY REVIEWING OFFICIAL COMMENTS OF REVIEWING OFFICIALAs the rater makes clear, Subject will be missed in Lima and we can only sympathize with the reasons why he must now leave. He was doing the Station a great deal of good and advancing his own career nicely as well. It is worth recalling that Subject pre-sided here in Lima over what we understand is still a unique operational feat, a staged recruitment approach to an MPCHEEK official. Also, Subject was often used on a variety of operational tasks having little to do with his assigned targets because, in the(Continued)| DATE     | OFFICIAL TITLE OF REVIEWING OFFICIAL | TYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE || -------- | ------------------------------------ | ----------------------------------- || 4 Mar 74 | COS                                  | /s/ Richard S. Welch                |CONFIDENTIAL