[104-10225-10007.pdf — page 168]
# SECRETDec 3 4 02 PH "57"OFFICE OF PERSONNELDIRECTIONS:a. State in the spaces below up to six of the more important SPECIFIC duties.Place the most important first. Do not include minor or unimportant duties.b. Rate performance on each specific duty considering ONLY effectiveness in performance of this specific duty.c. For supervisors, ability to supervise will always be rated as a specific duty (do not choose who supervises a secretary only).d. Compare in your mind, when possible, the individual being rated with others performing the same or similar level of responsibility.e. Two individuals with the same job title may be performing different duties. If so, rate them on different duties.f. Be specific. Examples of the kind of duties that might be rated are:ORAL BRIEFINGHAS AND USES AREA KNOWLEDGECONDUCTS INTERROGATIONSGIVING LECTURESDEVELOPS NEW PROGRAMSPREPARES SUMMARIESCONDUCTING SEMINARSANALYZES INDUSTRIAL REPORTSTRANSLATES GERMANWRITING TECHNICAL REPORTSMANAGES FILESDEBRIEFING SOURCESCONDUCTING EXTERNAL LIAISONOPERATES RADIOKEEPS BOOKSTYPINGCOORDINATES WITH OTHER OFFICESDRIVES TRUCKTAKING DICTATIONWRITES REGULATIONSMAINTAINS AIR-CONDITIONINGSUPERVISINGPREPARES CORRESPONDENCEEVALUATES SIGNIFICANCE OF DATAg. For some jobs, duties may be broken down even further if supervisor considers it advisable, e.g., combined key and phone operation, in the case of a radio operator.1. INCOMPETENT IN THE PERFORMANCE OF THIS DUTY2. BARELY ADEQUATE IN THE PERFORMANCE OF THIS DUTY3. PERFORMS THIS DUTY ACCEPTABLY4. PERFORMS THIS DUTY IN A COMPETENT MANNER5. PERFORMS THIS DUTY IN SUCH A FINE MANNER THAT HE IS A DISTINCT ASSET ON HIS JOB6. PERFORMS THIS DUTY IN AN OUTSTANDING MANNER7. FOUND IN VERY FEW INDIVIDUALS HOLDING SIMILAR JOBS8. EXCELS ANYONE I KNOW IN THE PERFORMANCE OF THIS DUTY| DESCRIPTIVE RATING NUMBER                     | RATING NUMBER || --------------------------------------------- | ------------- || SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 1                           |               || Deputy Chief of Station                       | 5             || SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 2                           | RATING NUMBER || Liaison with Department of Investigation      | 5             || SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 3                           | RATING NUMBER || Contact and development of operational assets | 6             || SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 4                           | RATING NUMBER || Handling agents and ops                       | 5             || SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 5                           | RATING NUMBER || Reporting                                     | 4             || SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 6                           | RATING NUMBER |3. NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF MANNER OF JOB PERFORMANCELIMITATIONS: Stress strengths and weaknesses, particularly those which affect development on present job.Subject is an excellent Deputy Chief of Station. He is liked and respected by his co-workers in the Station and by superiors and colleagues in the cover establishment. His perseverance in developing and maintaining operational contacts in all fields has paid dividends. He has contributed sound advice and operational know-how to all Station officers' operations and has maintained our liaison on a productive basis. He is extremely thoughtful. He prefers (and excels at) operational work as contrasted to routine paper work.SECTION D. SUITABILITY FOR CURRENT JOB IN ORGANIZATIONLIMITATIONS: Take into account here everything you know about the individual... productivity, conduct in the job, pertinent personal characteristics or habits, special defects or talents... and how he fits in with your team. Compare him with others doing similar work of about the same level.1. DEFINITELY UNSUITABLE - HE SHOULD BE SEPARATED2. OF DOUBTFUL SUITABILITY...WOULD NOT HAVE ACCEPTED HIM IF I HAD KNOWN WHAT I KNOW NOW3. A BARELY ACCEPTABLE EMPLOYEE...DELIVERS AVERAGE OUTPUT WITH NO WEAKNESSES SUFFICIENTLY OUTSTANDING TO WARRANT HIS SEPARATION4. OF THE SAME SUITABILITY AS MOST PEOPLE IN THE ORGANIZATION5. A FINE EMPLOYEE - HAS SOME OUTSTANDING STRENGTHS6. AN UNUSUALLY STRONG PERSON IN TERMS OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ORGANIZATION7. EXCELLENT - RARE IN SUITABILITY FOR THIS JOB IN THE ORGANIZATIONSECRET