[104-10225-10007.pdf — page 184]
# 14-00000Operation's officer, (case officer for one agent, liaison duties with localsecurity organizations. Developmental work on additional sources of intell-igence information. Research work on leading communist party personalitiesto exaring penetration potentialities.3. IF COURSES OF INSTRUCTION WERE COMPLETED DURING PERIOD OF THIS REPORT, LIST TITLE, LOCATION OF SCHOOL. LENGTH OF   COURSE AND DATE COMPLETED.   None4. PROFICIEICY5. MY PREFERENCE FOR NEXT DUTY AFTER TERMINATION OF CUR-   RENT ASSIGNMENT (SIF IN US-SO STATE)|           |     || --------- | --- || EXCELLING | X   || EXCELLING | X   || EXCELLING | X   |TYPE OF DUTYOperation OfficerLOCATIONChilePeruMexico6. HAVE THERE BEEN ANY CHANGES IN PERSONAL STATUS SINCE ORIGINAL EMPLOYMENT OR LAST REPORT (WHICHEVER IS LATER?| MARITAL STATUS | NUMBER OF DEPENDENTS | EMERGENCY ADDRESSEE | LEGAL ADDRESS || -------------- | -------------------- | ------------------- | ------------- || YES NO  X      | YES NO               | YES  X NO           | YES X NO      |IF THE ANSWER TO ANY OF THE ABOVE IS YES. ATTACH A SEPARATE DETAILED REPORT IN DUPLICATE HERETO. IN THE CASE OFMARRIAGE. THE REPORT WILL INCLUDE NAMES, ADDRESSES, AND CITIZENSHIP OF SPOUSE. FATHER-IN-LAW, MOTHER-IN-LAW,BROTHERS-IN-LAW AND SISTERS-IN-LAW.June 19597. PERIOD COVERED BY THIS REPORT   SECTIONS 7 THROUGH 11 TO BE COMPLETED BY IMMEDIATE SUPERVISOR| DATE FROM    | DATE TO    || ------------ | ---------- || 20 April '53 | 1 June '53 |ANNUALREASSIGNMENT OF REPORTING OFFICEROCCASION FOR REPORTPROPOSED REASSIGNMENTOF EMPLOYEE REPORTED ONCOVERING INITIAL 90DAYS OF EMPLOYMENT8. IS THIS EMPLOYEE QUALIFIED TO   PERFORM ALL PRESENT DUTIES?   YES   NO   IS EMPLOYEE BETTER QUALIFIED   FOR OTHER DUTIES?   YES   NO   IF SO, WHAT DUTY OR DUTIESDO YOU CONCUR IN EMPLOYEE'S DESCRIPTION OF DUTIES UNDER SECTION 2?HAS EMPLOYEE STRIVEN FORPROFESSIONAL IMPROVEMENT?YES XNODO YOU RECOMMEND EMPLOYEEFOR PROMOTION?YESNO XIF NO, EXPLAIN IN SECTION 11IF SO, TO WHAT GRADE AND FOR WHAT POSITION?Due to short time in field9. FOR EACH FACTOR OBSERVED CHECK THE APPROPRIATE BOX TO INDICATE HOW THE EMPLOYEE COMPARES WITH ALL OTHERS OF THE   SAME CLASSIFICATION WHOSE PROFESSIONAL ABILITIES ARE KNOWN TO YOU PERSONALLY. DO NOT LIMIT THIS COMPARISON TO THE   OTHERS NOR UNDER YOUR SUPERVISION. DO NOT HESITATE TO MARK "NOT OBSERVED" ON ANY QUALITY WHEN APPROPRIATE.RATING FACTORS|                                                  | NOT OBSERVED | UNSAT. ISFAC. TORY | FAIR | GOOD | VERY GOOD | OUT- STAN DING || ------------------------------------------------ | ------------ | ------------------ | ---- | ---- | --------- | -------------- || A. ABILITY TO WORK AND GET ALONG WITH PEOPLE     |              |                    |      |      | X         |                || B. INTEREST AND ENTHUSIASM IN WORK               |              |                    |      |      | X         |                || C. SECURITY CONSCIOUSNESS                        |              |                    |      |      | X         |                || D. ABILITY TO GRASP INSTRUCTIONS AND PLANS       |              |                    |      |      | X         |                || E. ATTENTION TO DUTY                             |              |                    |      |      | X         |                || F. JUDGMENT AND COMMON SENSE                     |              |                    |      |      | X         |                || G. ABILITY TO OBTAIN RESULTS AND GET THINGS DONE |              |                    |      |      | X         |                || H. DISCRETION                                    |              |                    |      |      | X         |                || I. INITIATIVE                                    |              |                    |      | X    |           |                || J. ABILITY TO HANDLE AND DIRECT PEOPLE           |              |                    |      | X    |           |                || K. PERFORMANCE OF PRESENT DUTIES (ITEM 2)        |              |                    |      | X    |           |                || L. ABILITY TO EVALUATE INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION  |              |                    |      | X    |           |                || M. TACT                                          |              |                    |      | X    |           |                || N. SAGACITY. (NON-GULLIBILITY)                   |              |                    |      |      | X         |                || O. LEADERSHIP                                    |              |                    |      |      | X         |                || P. PHYSICAL STAMINA                              |              |                    |      |      |           |                || Q. MENTAL STAMINA                                |              |                    |      |      |           |                |10. INDICATE YOUR ATTITUDE TOWARD HAVING THIS EMPLOYEE UNDER YOUR COMMAND OR SUPERVISION. WOULD YOU| DEFINITELY NOT WANT HIM | PREFER NOT TO HAVE HIM | BE SATISFIED TO HAVE HIM | BE PLEASED TO HAVE HIM | PARTICULARLY DESIRE HIM || ----------------------- | ---------------------- | ------------------------ | ---------------------- | ----------------------- ||                         |                        |                          |                        | X                       |11. ENTER HERE ANY DESIRED REMARKS PERTAINING TO PARTICULAR QUALIFICATIONS OR LACK THEREOF WHICH ARE CONSIDERED    PERTINENT TO THE EVALUATION OF THIS EMPLOYEE. OUTSTANDING ASSETS AND/OR SERIOUS LIMITATIONS SHOULD BE STATED    ALSO REASONS FOR AND RECOMMENDATIONS AS TO REASSIGNMENT WILL BE GIVEN IF APPROPRIATE TO THIS REPORT.