[104-10224-10012.pdf — page 168]
# SECRETDIRECTIONS:a. State in the spaces below up to six of the more important SPECIFIC duties performed during the period.Place the most important first. Do not include minor or unimportant duties.b. Rate performance on each specific duty considering ONLY effectiveness in performance of this specific duty.c. For supervisors, ability to supervise will always be rated as a specific duty (do not rate as supervisors those who supervise a secretary only).d. Compare, in your mind, when possible, the individual being rated with others performing similar level of responsibility.e. Two individuals with the same job title may be performing different duties. If so, rate them on different duties.f. Be specific. Examples of the kind of duties that might be rated are:ORAL BRIEFINGHAS AND USES AREA KNOWLEDGECONDUCTS INTERROGATIONSGIVING LECTURESDEVELOPS NEW PROGRAMSPREPARES SUMMARIESCONTACTING SEMINARSANALYZES INDUSTRIAL REPORTSTRANSLATES GERMANWRITING TECHNICAL REPORTSMANAGES FILESDEBRIEFING SOURCESCONDUCTING EXTERNAL LIAISONOPERATES RADIOKEEPS BOOKSTYPINGCOORDINATES WITH OTHER OFFICESDRIVES TRUCKTAKING DICTATIONWRITES REGULATIONSMAINTAINS AIR CONDITIONINGSUPERVISINGPREPARES CORRESPONDENCEEVALUATES SIGNIFICANCE OF DATAg. For some jobs, duties may be broken down even further if supervisor considers it advisable, e.g., combined key and phone operation, in the case of a radio operator.1. INCOMPETENT IN THE PERFORMANCE OF THIS DUTY2. BARELY ADEQUATE IN THE PERFORMANCE OF THIS DUTY3. PERFORMS THIS DUTY ACCEPTABLY4. PERFORMS THIS DUTY IN A COMPETENT MANNER5. PERFORMS THIS DUTY IN SUCH A FINE MANNER THAT HE IS A DISTINCT ASSET ON HIS JOB.6. PERFORMS THIS DUTY IN AN OUTSTANDING MANNER FOUND IN VERY FEW INDIVIDUALS HOLDING SIMILAR JOBS7. EXCELS ANYONE I KNOW IN THE PERFORMANCE OF THIS DUTYDESCRIPTIVERATINGNUMBERSPECIFIC DUTY NO. 1Processing and dissemination of field information reports4SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 4Preparation of correspondence to the field3SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 2Handling of project outlines and renewals and other administrative details4SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 5SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 3Providing operational support to the station3SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 63. NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF MANNER OF JOB PERFORMANCEDIRECTIONS: Stress strengths and weaknesses, particularly those which affect development on present job. A large portion of Mr. Wigren's time is taken up with the processing of field information reports and the handling of administrative aspects of various FI projects, both of which he performs efficiently, although he requires supervision to ensure the prompt completion of project details. In the area of operational support for the field, which includes providing the station with requirements, with name traces, operational appraisal and operational guidance, Mr. Wigren performs acceptably but occasionally shows a lack of initiative and originality of ideas such as would be required to raise the rating in this category. As regards preparation of correspondence for the field, Mr. Wigren here again performs acceptably, but occasionally shows a lack of observance and attention to detail.SECTION D. SUITABILITY FOR CURRENT JOB IN ORGANIZATIONDIRECTIONS: Take into account here everything you know about the individual...productivity, conduct in the job, pertinent personal characteristics or habits, special defects or talents...and how he fits in with your team. Compare him with others doing similar work of about the same level.1. DEFINITELY UNSUITABLE...HE SHOULD BE SEPARATED2. OF DOUBTFUL SUITABILITY...WOULD NOT HAVE ACCEPTED HIM IF I HAD KNOWN WHAT I KNOW NOW3. A BARELY ACCEPTABLE EMPLOYEE...BELOW AVERAGE BUT WITH NO WEAKNESSES SUFFICIENTLY OUTSTANDING TO WARRANT HIS SEPARATION4. OF THE SAME SUITABILITY AS MOST PEOPLE I KNOW IN THE ORGANIZATION5. A FINE EMPLOYEE...HAS SOME OUTSTANDING STRENGTHS6. AN UNUSUALLY STRONG PERSON IN TERMS OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ORGANIZATION7. EXCELLED BY ONLY A FEW IN SUITABILITY FOR WORK IN THE ORGANIZATIONRATINGNUMBER4IS THIS INDIVIDUAL BETTER SUITED FOR WORK IN SOME OTHER POSITION IN THE ORGANIZATION?[X] NO. IF YES, EXPLAIN FULLY:Although this question has been answered in the negative, it is believed that Mr. Wigren's performance would be rated higher in a position involving more research-type work.SECRET