[104-10224-10002.pdf — page 178]
# SECRET## FITNESS REPORT (Part 1) PERFORMANCE EGBT-1003, 28 Sep 58### INSTRUCTIONSFOR THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER: Consult current instructions for completing this report.FOR THE SUPERVISOR: This report is designed to help you express your evaluation of your subordinate and to transmit this evaluation to your supervisor and senior officials. Organization policy requires that you inform the subordinate where he stands with you. Completion of the report can help you prepare for a discussion with him of his strengths and weaknesses. It is also organization policy that you show Part I of this report to the employee except under conditions specified in Regulation 20-370. It is recommended that you read the entire form before completing any question. If this is the initial report on the employee, it must be completed and forwarded to the Office of Personnel on later than 30 days after the date indicated in item A. of Section "A" below.### GENERAL1. NAME: MURPHY (Last), DAVID (First), E. (Middle)2. DATE OF BIRTH: 23 June 19213. SEX: M4. SERVICE DESIGNATION: Fl5. OFFICE/DIVISION/BRANCH OF ASSIGNMENT: Berlin Operations Base6. OFFICIAL POSITION TITLE: Deputy Chief of Base and Chief of Operations7. GRADE: 03-158. DATE REPORT DUE IN OP: 31 July 1955 - 28 September 19589. TYPE OF REPORT (Check one): X Annual10. SPECIAL (Specify): Promotion### SECTION B. CERTIFICATION1. FOR THE RATER: THIS REPORT X HAS HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN TO THE INDIVIDUAL RATED. IF NOT SHOWN, EXPLAIN WHY:2. CHECK (X) APPROPRIATE STATEMENTS:X THIS REPORT REFLECTS MY OWN OPINIONS OF THIS INDIVIDUAL.IF INDIVIDUAL IS RATED "IN C" OR D, A WARNING LETTER TO HIM & A COPY ATTACHED TO THIS REPORT.THIS REPORT REFLECTS THE COMBINED OPINIONS OF MYSELF AND PREVIOUS SUPERVISORS.I CANNOT CERTIFY THAT THE RATED INDIVIDUAL SHOWS HOW TO IMPROVE HIS PERFORMANCE BECAUSE (Specify):X I HAVE DISCUSSED WITH THIS EMPLOYEE HIS STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES SO THAT HE AT LEAST UNDERSTANDS.3. THIS DATE: 28 Sept 1958C. TYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE OF SUPERVISOR: /s/ WILLIAM K. HARVEYD. SUPERVISOR'S OFFICIAL TITLE: Chief of Base4. IF THE REVIEWING OFFICIAL RECORDS ANY SUBSTANTIAL DIFFERENCE OF OPINION WITH THE SUPERVISOR, OR ANY OTHER INFORMATION, WHICH WILL LEAD TO A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF THIS REPORT:CONTINUED ON ATTACHED SHEETI certify that any substantial difference of opinion with the supervisor is reflected in the above section.A. THIS DATE: 28 Oct 1958B. TYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE OF REVIEWING OFFICIAL: /s/ JOHN A. BROSSC. OFFICIAL TITLE OF REVIEWING OFFICIAL: Chief of Station### SECTION C. JOB PERFORMANCE EVALUATION1. RATING ON GENERAL PERFORMANCE OF DUTIESDIRECTIONS: Consider ONLY the productivity and effectiveness with which the individual being rated has performed his duties during the rating period. Compare him ONLY with others doing similar work at a similar level of responsibility. Factors other than productivity will be taken into account later in Section D.2. Does not perform duties adequately; he is incompetent.3. Barely adequate in performance. Although he was had specific guidance or training, he often fails to carry out responsibilities.4. Performs most of his duties acceptably; occasionally reveals some area of weakness.5. Performs duties in a competent, effective manner.6. Performs all his responsibilities exceptionally well.7. Performs his duties in such an outstanding manner that he is equalled by few other persons known to the Supervisor.6 Rating NumberCOMMENTS.45 (Part 1)SECRET Performance141