[104-10224-10002.pdf — page 194]
14-000004. 1. IF COURSES OF INSTRUCTION WERE COMPLETED DURING PERIOD OF THIS REPORT, LIST TITLE, LOCATION OF SCHOOL, LENGTH OF COURSE AND DATE COMPLETED.8.  HAVE THERE BEEN ANY CHANGES IN PERSONAL STATUS SINCE ORIGINAL EMPLOYMENT OF LAST REPORT - WHICHEVER IS LATER?    * MARITAL STATUS    * NUMBER OF DEPENDENTS    IF THE ANSWER TO ANY OF THE ABOVE IS YES. ATTACH A SEPARATE DETAILED REPORT IN DUPLICATE HERETO. IN CASE OF MARRIAGE. THE REPORT WILL INCLUDE NAMES, ADDRESSES, AND CITIZENSHIP OF SPOUSE, FATHER-IN-LAW, MOTHER-IN-LAW, BROTHERS-IN-LAW AND SISTER-IN-LAW.SECTIONS 7 THROUGH 11 TO BE COMPLETED BY IMMEDIATE SUPERVISOR7. PERIOD COVERED BY THIS REPORT   * DATE FROM: Jul 49   * DATE TO: Feb 50   * OCCASION FOR REPORT:     * [X] ANNUAL     * [ ] REASSIGNMENT OF REPORTING OFFICER     * [ ] PROPOSED REASSIGNMENT OF EMPLOYEE REPORTED ON     * [ ] COVERING INITIAL 90 DAYS OF EMPLOYMENT8. IS THIS EMPLOYEE QUALIFIED TO [X] PERFORM ALL PRESENT DUTIES?   IS EMPLOYEE BETTER QUALIFIED FOR OTHER DUTIES?   IF SO, WHAT DUTY OR DUTIES?DO YOU CONCUR IN EMPLOYEE'S DESCRIPTION OF DUTIES UNDER SECTION 2? [X]HAS EMPLOYEE STRIVEN FOR PROFESSIONAL IMPROVEMENT? [X]DO YOU RECOMMEND EMPLOYEE FOR PROMOTION? [X]IF NO, EXPLAIN IN SECTION 11WHAT GRADE AND TYPE POST/ITORYi. Position now filling.9. FOR EACH FACTOR OBSERVED CHECK THE APPROPRIATE BOX TO INDICATE HOW THE EMPLOYEE COMPARES WITH ALL OTHERS OF THE SAME CLASSIFICATION WHOSE PROFESSIONAL ABILITIES ARE KNOWN TO YOU PERSONALLY. DO NOT LIMIT THIS COMPARISON TO THE OTHERS NOW UNDER YOUR SUPERVISION, DO NOT HESITATE TO MAKE 'NOT OBSERVED' ON ANY QUALITY WHEN APPROPRIATE.RATING FACTORS|                                                  |     |     |     | VERY GOOD | EXCELLENT | OUTSTANDING || ------------------------------------------------ | :-: | :-: | :-: | :-------: | :-------: | :---------: || A. ABILITY TO WORK AND GET ALONG WITH PEOPLE     |     |  X  |     |           |           |      X      || B. INTEREST AND ENTHUSIASM IN WORK               |     |     |     |     X     |           |      X      || C. SECURITY CONSCIOUSNESS                        |     |     |     |           |     X     |             || D. ABILITY TO GRASP INSTRUCTIONS AND PLANS       |     |     |     |           |     X     |             || E. ATTENTION TO DUTY                             |     |     |     |           |     X     |             || F. JUDGMENT AND COMMON SENSE                     |     |     |     |     X     |           |             || G. ABILITY TO OBTAIN RESULTS AND GET THINGS DONE |     |     |     |     X     |           |             || H. DISCRETION                                    |     |     |  X  |           |           |             || I. INITIATIVE                                    |     |     |     |     X     |           |             || J. ABILITY TO HANDLE AND DIRECT PEOPLE           |     |  X  |     |           |           |      X      || K. PERFORMANCE OF PRESENT DUTIES (ITEM 2)        |     |     |     |     X     |           |             || L. ABILITY TO EVALUATE INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION  |     |     |     |     X     |           |             || M. TACT                                          |     |     |     |           |     X     |             || N. SAGACITY (NON-GULLIBILITY)                    |     |     |     |     X     |           |             || O. LEADERSHIP                                    |     |     |     |           |     X     |             || P. PHYSICAL STAMINA                              |     |     |     |           |     X     |             || Q. MENTAL STAMINA                                |     |     |     |           |     X     |             |10. INDICATE YOUR ATTITUDE TOWARD HAVING THIS EMPLOYEE UNDER YOUR COMMAND OR SUPERVISION. WOULD YOU   * [ ] DEFINITELY NOT WANT HIM!   * [ ] PREFER NOT TO HAVE HIM!   * [ ] BE SATISFIED TO HAVE HIM!   * [X] BE PLEASED TO HAVE HIM!   * [ ] DESIRE NOT TO HAVE HIM!11. ENTER HERE ANY DESIRED REMARKS PERTAINING TO PARTICULAR QUALIFICATIONS OR LACK THEREOF WHICH ARE CONSIDERED PERTINENT TO THE EVALUATION OF THIS EMPLOYEE. OUTSTANDING ASSETS AND/OR SERIOUS LIMITATIONS SHOULD BE STATED. ALSO REASONS FOR AND RECOMMENDATIONS AS TO REASSIGNMENT WILL BE GIVEN IF APPROPRIATE TO THIS REPORT.Subject's aggressiveness and intense interest in the detail of his work, do at times, make it difficult for employee to work with some individuals on first contact. It was therefore necessary to rate him as only good under 9a. This Reporting Officer feels that this is no particular down-grading in this case because time usually heals any difficulties in this regard. Respect for the individual's abilities tends to override the personality weaknesses particularly with his close associates. This Reporting Officer considers this employee as outstanding in our field because, first, his intense interest, second, his innate ability and knack for the work, his training and background, and his great devotion.UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES IS THIS REPORT TO BE SHOWN TO THE EMPLOYEE REPORTED ONCONFIDENTIAL