[104-10224-10006.pdf — page 127]
# SECRET(when Filled In)..## FITNESS REPORT (Part I) PERFORMANCEINSTRUCTIONS.FOR THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER: Consult current instructions for completing this report.FOR THE SUPERVISOR: This report is designed to help you express your evaluation of your subordinate and to transmit this evaluation to your supervisor and senior officials. Organization policy requires that you inform the subordinate where he stands with you. Completion of the report can help you prepare for a discussion with him of his strengths and weaknesses. It is also organisation policy that you show Part-of-this-report to the employee except under conditions specified-in-Regulation-20-370. It is recommended that you read the entire form before completing any question. If this is the initial report on the employee, it must be completed and forwarded to the Office of Personnel no later than 30 days after the date indicated in item 8. of Section "A" below.SECTION A.1. NAME(Last) (First) (Middle)Meccan James Jr.5. OFFICE/DIVISION/BRANCH OF ASSIGNMENT 6. OFFICIAL POSITION TITLE 4. SERVICE DESIGNATIONGS/Security Research Staff Investigator SD-SS7. GRADE 8. DATE REPORT DUE IN OP 9. PERIOD COVERED BY THIS REPORT (Inclusive dates)GS-12 22 August 1956 22 August 1955 - 21 August 195610. TYPE OF REPORT ANNUAL SPECIAL (Specify)(Check one) X INITIALSECTION B. CERTIFICATION1. FOR THE RATER: THIS REPORT X HAS HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN TO THE INDIVIDUAL RATED. IF NOT SHOWN, EXPLAIN WHYNOT:A. CHECK (X) APPROPRIATE STATEMENTS:X THIS REPORT REFLECTS MY OWN OPINIONS OF THIS INDIVIDUAL. IF INDIVIDUAL IS RATED "" C; or D. a WRITTEN LETTERWAS SENT TO HIM/HER A COPY ATTACHED TO THIS REPORT.THIS REPORT REFLECTS THE COMBINED OPINIONS OF MYSELFI CANNOT CERTIFY THAT THE RATED INDIVIDUAL KNOWS HOWAND PREVIOUS SUPERVISORS. I EVALUATE HIS JOB PERFORMANCE. BECAUSE (Specify):I HAVE DISCUSSED WITH THIS EMPLOYEE HIS STRENGTHSAND WEAKNESSES SO THAT HE KNOWS WHERE HE STANDS.B. THIS DATE C. TYPED OR PRINTED NAME D. SUPERVISOR'S OFFICIAL TITLE27 August 1956 Harlan A. Westrell Harlan A. Westrell Chief, CI/SRS2. FOR THE REVIEWING OFFICIAL: RECORD ANY SUBSTANTIAL DIFFERENCE OF OPINION WITH THE SUPERVISOR, OR ANY OTHER IN- FORMATION, WHICH WILL LEAD TO A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF THIS REPORT.BY DATEPosted Pos. Control EAL 5 SEPReviewed by PUD 7I certify that any substantial difference of opinion with the supervisor is reflected in the above section. CONTINUEO ON ATTACHED SHEETA. THIS DATE B. TYPED OR PRINTED NAME C. OFFICIAL TITLE OF REVIEWING OFFICIAL27 August 1956 Paul Camer Chief, Security Research StaffSECTION C. JOB PERFORMANCE EVALUATION1. RATING ON GENERAL PERFORMANCE OF DUTIESDIRECTIONS: Consider ONLY the productivity and effectiveness with which the individual being rated has performed his duties during the rating period. Compare him ONLY with others doing similar work at a similar level of respon- sibility. Factors other than productivity will be taken into account later in Section D.1 - DOES NOT PERFORM DUTIES ADEQUATELY. HE IS INCOMPETENT.2 - BARELY ADEQUATE IN PERFORMANCE! ALTHOUGH HE HAS HAD SPECIFIC GUIDANCE OR TRAINING, HE OFTEN FAILS TOCARRY OUT RESPONSIBILITIES.3 - PERFORMS MOST OF HIS DUTIES ACCEPTABLY. OCCASIONALLY REVEALS SOME AREA OF WEAKNESS.6 4 - PERFORMS DUTIES IN A COMPETENT, EFFECTIVE MANNER.INSERT 5 - A FINE PERFORMANCE. CARRIES OUT MANY OF HIS RESPONSIBILITIES EXCEPTIONALLY WELL.RATINGNUMBER 6 - PERFORMS HIS DUTIES IN SUCH AN OUTSTANDING MANNER THAT HE IS EQUALLED BY FEW OTHER PERSONS KNOWN TOTHE SUPERVISOR.COMMENTS:FORM NO. 45 (Part 1) SECRET Performance(41) 0.5. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 16-07291-1