Francesco/who-killed-jfk huggingface dataset:
[104-10224-10007.pdf — page 252]
# MEMORANDUM IN LIEU OF FITNESS REPORTSUBJECT: Newton Scott MILER1 May 1959 - 31 December 1960The performance of this officer since his last Fitness Report has continued to be outstanding in every respect, as indicated in repeated CI Staff recommendations for his promotion to Grade 15 attached hereto. The additional seasoning which he has gained in his present position during this period qualifies him to be Chief of Station in an area having an active unilateral operational program and fruitful liaison relationships.James R. Hunt, Jr.Chief, CI OperationsReviewing Official:S. H. HortonActing Chief, CI Staff
[104-10224-10007.pdf — page 254]
# SECRETWhen Filled In## SECTION E NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF MANNER OF JOB PERFORMANCEStress strengths and weaknesses demonstrated in current position. Indicate suggestions made to employee for improvement of his work. Give recommendations for his training. Describe, if appropriate, his potential for development and for assuming greater responsibilities. Amplify or explain, if appropriate, ratings given in SECTIONS B, C, and D to provide the best basis for determining future personnel actions.This officer has had wide operational experience and, given his age (33), has outstanding potential. He is forceful, confident, and resourceful. With a little more seasoning in Headquarters he will be qualified to be a chief of Station in a large post.## SECTION F CERTIFICATION AND COMMENTS1. BY EMPLOYEEI certify that I have seen Sections A, B, C, D and E of this Report.DATE28 April 1959SIGNATURENewton S. Miler2. BY SUPERVISORMONTHS EMPLOYER HAS BEEN UNDER MY SUPERVISIONIF THIS REPORT HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN TO EMPLOYER, GIVE EXPLANATIONIF REPORT IS NOT BEING MADE AT THIS TIME, GIVE REASON.EMPLOYEE UNDER MY SUPERVISION LESS THAN 90 DAISOTHER (Specify):REPORT MADE WITHIN LAST 90 DAISDATE21 April 1959OFFICIAL TITLE OF SUPERVISORS.A. to Chief, CI StaffChief, CI OperationsTYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATUREC. H. TenneyJ. R. Hunt, Jr.3. BY REVIENING OFFICIAL[✓] I WOULD HAVE GIVEN THIS EMPLOYEE ABOUT THE SAME EVALUATION.[ ] I WOULD HAVE GIVEN THIS EMPLOYEE A HIGHER EVALUATION.[ ] I WOULD HAVE GIVEN THIS EMPLOYEE A LOWER EVALUATION.[ ] I CANNOT JUDGE THESE EVALUATIONS. I AM NOT SUFFICIENTLY FAMILIAR WITH THE EMPLOYEE'S PERFORMANCE.COMMENTS OF REVIEING OFFICIALDATEChiof, CI StaffJames AngletonSECRET
[104-10224-10007.pdf — page 255]
# SECRET# FITNESS REPORT (Part I) PERFORMANCEINSTRUCTIONSFOR THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER: Consult current instructions for completing this report.FOR THE SUPERVISOR: This report is designed to help you express your evaluation of your subordinate and to trensmit this evaluation to your supervisor and senior officials. Organization policy requires that you inform the subordinate where he stands with you. Completion of the report con help you prepare for a discussion with him of his strengths and weaknesses. It is also organisation policy that you show Part I of this report to the emploxes recept under comditions specified in Regulation 20-370. Any question. If this is the Initial report on the employee, it must be completed and forwarded to the Office of fersonnel no later than 30 days after the date indicated in atent 8. of Section "A" below.SECTION A.GENERAL1. NAMEMILZR Newton Scott5. OFFICE DIVISION/BRANCH OF ASSIGNMENTFE/4/Thailand7. GRADEGS-1410. TYPE OF REPORT(Check one)SECTION B.1. FOR THE RATERI THIS REPORTNOT:A. CHECK (X) APPROPRIATE STATEMENTS:THIS REPORT REFLECTS MY OWN OPINIONS OF THIS INDIVIDUAL.THIS REPORT REFLECTS THE COMBINED OPINIONS OF MYSELF AND PREVIOUS SUPERVISORS.HAVE DISCUBBED WITH THIS EMPLOYEE HIS STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES 50 PHAT WE STANDSB. THIS DATE29 June 19572. FOR THE REVIEDING GOFFICIAL. RECORD ANY SUBSTANTIAL ENLACE OF OP NION WITH THE SUPERVISOR, OR ANY OTHER INFORMATION. WHICH #ILL LEAD TO A GETTER UNDERSTANDING CR THIS REPORT.(3) Jobaph W. SmithI certify that any substantial difference of opinion with the supervisor is reflected in the above section.A. THIS DATE29 June 1957SECTION C.B. TYPED OR PH OFFICIALREVIERING C. OFFICIAL TITLE OF REVIERING OFFICIALJOB PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONChief of Station, Thailand1. RATING ON GENERAL PERFORMANCE OF DUTIESDIRECTIONS: Consider (NLY the productivity and effectiveness with which the individual being rated has performed his duties during the rating period. Compare him ONLY with others doing similar work at a similar level of responsibility. Factors other than productivity will be taken into account later in Section D.INSERT1. DOES NOT PERFORM OUTIES ADEQUATELY. HE IS INCOMPETENT.2. BARELY ACEQUATE IN PERFORMANCE. ALTHOUGH HE HAS HAD SPECIFIC QUIDANCE OR TRAINING. HE OFTEN FAILS TO CARRY OUT RESPONSIBILITIES.3. PERFORMS Most of HIS OUTIES ACCEPTABLY, OCCASICALLY DEVEALS SOME AREA OF SEAKNESS.4. Plataus Duties IN A COMPETENT. EFFECTIVE DANNED5. A FINE POPORMANCE. CARS Out war OF HIS OFSPONSIBILITIES ECEPTIONALLY BELL.Dessus outils in Scan OutSTANDING MANNER THAT HE IS EQUALLEDCEMENTS.SECRETPerformance
[104-10224-10007.pdf — page 256]
SECRET## RATINGS ON PERFORMANCE OF SPECIFIC DUTIES**DIRECTIONS:**a. State in the spaces below up to six of the more important SPECIFIC duties performed during this. Place the most important first. In not include minor of unimportant duties.b. Rate performance on each specific duty considering ONLY effectiveness in performance of this specific duty.c. For supervisors, ability to supervise will always be rated as a specific duty (do Jul 31 supervisors those who supervise a secretary only).d. Compare in your mind, when possible, the individual being rated with others performing at a similar level of responsibility.e. Two individuals with the same job title may be performing different duties. If so, rate them on different duties.f. Be specific. Examples of the kind of duties that might be rated are:ORAL BRIEFING HAS AND USES AREA KNOWLEDGE CONDUCTS INTERROGATIONSGIVING LECTURES DEVELOPS NEW PROGRAMS PREPARES SUMMARIESCONDUCTING SEMINARS ANALYZES INDUSTRIAL REPORTS TRANSLATES GERMANWRITING TECHNICAL REPORTS MANAGES FILES DEBRIEFING SOURCESCONDUCTING EXTERNAL LIAISON OPERATES RADIO KEEPS BOOKSTYPING COORDINATES WITH OTHER OFFICES DRIVES TRUCKTAKING DICTATION WRITES REGULATIONS MAINTAINS AIR CONDITIONINGSUPERVISING PREPARES CORRESPONDENCE EVALUATES SIGNIFICANCE OF DATAg. For some jobs, duties may be broken down even further if supervisor considers it advisable, e.g., combined key and phone operation, in the case of a radio operator.1 INCOMPETENT IN THE PERFORMANCE OF THIS DUTY2 BARELY ADEQUATE IN THE PERFORMANCE OF THIS DUTY3 PERFORMS THIS DUTY ACCEPTABLY4 PERFORMS THIS DUTY IN A COMPETENT MANNER5 PERFORMS THIS DUTY IN SUCH A FINE MANNER THAT HE IS A DISTINCT ASSET ON HIS JOB6 PERFORMS THIS DUTY IN AN OUTSTANDING MANNER7 EXCELS ANYONE I KNOW IN THE PERFORMANCE OF THIS DUTYChief, Project MONOTONY5Chief, FI element, MOCAR5Case Officer53. NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF MANNER OF JOB PERFORMANCEDIRECTIONS: Stress strengths and weaknesses, particularly those which affect development on present job.Subject is a highly competent and professional officer. In the short time he has been in Bangkok he has shown a command of his job with energy and enthusiasm in its pursuit.SECTION D. SUITABILITY FOR CURRENT JOB IN ORGANIZATIONDIRECTIONS: Take into account here everything you know about the individual....productivity, conduct in the job, pertinent personal characteristics or habits, special defects or talents....and how he fits in with your team. Compare him with others doing similar work of about the same level.1. DEFINITELY UNSUITABLE. HE SHOULD BE SEPARATED2. OF DOUBTFUL SUITABILITY... WOULD NOT HAVE ACCEPTED HIM IF I HAD KNOWN THAT, I KNOW NOR.3. A BARELY ACCEPTABLE EMPLOYEE... BELOW AVERAGE BUT WITH NO WEAKNESSES SUFFICIENTLY OUTSTANDING TO WARRANT HIS SEPARATION4. OF THE SAME SUITABILITY AS MOST PEOPLE I KNOW IN THE ORGANIZATION5. A FINE EMPLOYEE HAS SOME OUTSTANDING STRENGTHS6. AN UNUSUALLY STRONG PERSON IN TERMS OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ORGANIZATION7. EXCELLED BY ONLY A FEW IN SUITABILITY FOR WORK IN THE ORGANIZATION5IS THIS INDIVIDUAL BETTER SUITED FOR WORK IN SOME OTHER POSITION IN THE ORGANIZATION?SECRET
[104-10224-10007.pdf — page 259]
SECRET(When Filled In)# FIELD FITNESS REPORTThe Fitness Report is an important factor in organization personnel management. It seeks to provide:1. The organization selection board with information of value when considering the application of an individual for membership in the career staff; and2. A periodic record of job performance as an aid to the effective utilization of personnel.## INSTRUCTIONSTO THE FIELD ADMINISTRATIVE OR PERSONNEL OFFICER: Consult current field administrative instructions regarding the initiation and transmittal of this report to headquarters.TO THE FIELD SUPERVISOR: Read the entire form before attempting to complete any item. As the supervisor who assigns, directs and reviews the work of the individual, you have primary responsibility for evaluating his strengths, weaknesses, and on-the-job effectiveness as revealed by his day-to-day activities. If this individual has been under your supervision for less than 30 days, you will collaborate, if practicable, with his previous supervisor to be sure the report is accurate and complete. Primary responsibility rests with the current supervisor. It is assumed that, throughout the period, the individual has been under supervisory responsibilities by frequent discussions of his work, so that in a general way he knows where he stands.Posted For:IT IS OPTIONAL WHETHER OR NOT THIS FITNESS REPORT IS SHOWN TO THE PERSON BEING RATED.SECTION I4. NAME ("SCOTT" USE ONLY)   NEWTON A. HILER5. GRADE   GS-136. STATION DESIGNATION (Current)   China Station, Subic Bay7. DATE OF BIRTH   1 March 19268. SEX   M9. SERVICE DESIGNATION   AZ8. DUE DATE OF THIS REPORT   9 January 1956 - 15 June 1956SECTION II (To be completed by field supervisor)1. CURRENT POSITION   Chief, China Independent, China Station2. DATE ASSUMED RESPONSIBILITY FOR POSITION   1 October 19553. STATE THE SPECIFIC ASSIGNMENTS OR TASKS WHICH ARE TYPICAL OF THOSE GIVEN TO THE EMPLOYEE DURING THE PAST THREE TO SIX MONTHS (List in order of frequency)Subject is responsible for all China operational activities outside of the framework of activities with the Chinese Nationalist Government. This includes the China Station Headquarters support responsibility for a field station complement of approximately 50 staff personnel located in scattered Far Eastern areas. Also, it includes the responsibility of supporting, guiding and stimulating LCHARTIST operations in the Far East. His position requires an understanding and appreciation of JuKIC policies vis-a-vis many Asiatic governments.SECTION III (To be completed at headquarters only)DO NOT COMPLETE - FOR HEADQUARTERS USE ONLYAUTHENTICATION OF REPORT AND SIGNATURES1. NAME OF RATING (First)   Grant A. FIELDEN1. NAME OF APPRAISING OFFICIAL IN FIELD (First)   Desmond FITZGERALD5. DATE SIGNED (Name and Signature to indicate that Report read and transmitted to Headquarters)   12 July 56MARY A. WICKHAMDO NOT COMPLETE - FOR HEADQUARTERS USE ONLYSECRET
[104-10224-10007.pdf — page 261]
SECRET(When Filled In)26. CAN THINK ON HIS FEET. X27. COMES UP WITH SOLUTIONS TO PROBLEMS. X28. STIMULATING TO ASSOCIATES, A "SPARK PLUG". X29. TOUGH MINDED. X30. OBSERVANT. X31. CAPABLE. X32. CLEAR THINKING. X33. COMPLETES ASSIGNMENTS WITHIN ALLOWABLE TIME LIMITS. X34. EVALUATES SELF REALISTICALLY. X35. WELL INFORMED ABOUT CURRENT EVENTS. X36. DELIBERATE. X37. EFFECTIVE IN DISCUSSIONS WITH ASSOCIATES. X38. IMPLEMENTS DECISIONS REGARD- LESS OF OWN FEELINGS. X39. THOUGHTFUL OF OTHERS. X40. WORKS WELL UNDER PRESSURE. X41. DISPLAYS JUDGEMENT. X42. GIVES CREDIT WHERE CREDIT IS DUE. X43. HAS DRIVE. X44. IS SECURITY CONSCIOUS. X45. VERSATILE. X46. HIS CRITICISM IS CONSTRUCTIVE. X47. ABLE TO INFLUENCE OTHERS. X48. FACILITATES SMOOTH OPERATION OF HIS OFFICE. X49. DOES NOT REQUIRE STRONG AND CONTINUOUS SUPERVISION. X50. A GOOD SUPERVISOR. XSECTION VA. WHAT ARE HIS OUTSTANDING STRENGTHS?As a result of ten years service with KUMARK in varied Headquarters and field operational positions, he has acquired a unique knowledge, based on experience, of KUBARK practices and procedures. He has an outstanding ability to relate specific operations to overall programs designed to accomplish head objectives. He has demonstrated qualities of operational and administrative leadership and management.B. WHAT ARE HIS OUTSTANDING WEAKNESSES?He is sometimes unnecessarily intolerant or impatient with persons or ideas he is not in agreement with.SECRET
[104-10224-10007.pdf — page 264]
# SECRETThis section is provided as an aid in describing the individual. Your description is not favorable or unfavorable instead but relates its meaning in relation to a particular job or assignment. The descriptive words are to be interpreted literally.On the left hand side of the page below are a series of statements that apply in some degree to most people. On the right hand side of the page are four major categories of descriptions. The scale within each category is divided into three small blocks; this is to allow you to make finer distinctions if you so desire. Look at the statement on the left - then check the category on the right which best tells how much the statement applies to the person you are rating. Placing an "X" in the "Not Observed" column means you have no opinion on whether a phrase applies to an individual. Placing an "X" in the "Does Not Apply" column means that you have the definite opinion that the description is not at all suited to the individual.| STATEMENTS     | NOT OBSERVED                | CATEGORIES                     |                                    |                                  |     || -------------- | --------------------------- | ------------------------------ | ---------------------------------- | -------------------------------- | --- || DOES NOT APPLY | APPLIES TO A LIMITED DEGREE | APPLIES TO A REASONABLE DEGREE | APPLIES TO AN ABOVE AVERAGE DEGREE | APPLIES TO AN OUTSTANDING DEGREE |     |SAMPLESA. ABLE TO SEE ANOTHER'S POINT OF VIEW. |  | X |  |  |B. PRACTICAL |  |  | X |  |1. A GOOD REPORTER OF EVENTS. |  |  | X |  |2. CAN MAKE DECISIONS ON HIS OWN WHEN NEED ARISES. |  |  |  | X |3. CAUTIOUS IN ACTION. |  |  |  | X |4. HAS INITIATIVE. |  |  |  | X |5. UNEMOTIONAL. |  |  |  | X |6. ANALYTIC IN HIS THINKING. |  |  |  | X |7. CONSTANTLY STRIVING FOR NEW KNOWLEDGE AND IDEAS. |  |  |  | X |8. GETS ALONG WITH PEOPLE AT ALL SOCIAL LEVELS. |  |  |  | X |9. HAS SENSE OF HUMOR. |  |  |  | X |10. KNOWS WHEN TO SEEK ASSISTANCE. |  | X |  |  |11. CALM. |  |  | X |  |12. CAN GET ALONG WITH PEOPLE. |  |  | X |  |13. MEMORY FOR FACTS. |  |  |  | X |14. GETS THINGS DONE. |  |  |  |  | X15. KEEPS ORIENTED TOWARD LONG TEAM GOALS. |  |  |  |  | X16. CAN COPE WITH EMERGENCIES. |  | X |  |  |17. HAS HIGH STANDARDS OF ACCOMPLISHMENT. |  |  | X |  |18. HAS STAMINA, CAN KEEP GOING A LONG TIME. |  |  |  | X |19. HAS WIDE RANGE OF INFORMATION. |  |  |  | X |20. SHOWS ORIGINALITY. |  |  |  |  | X21. ACCEPTS RESPONSIBILITIES. |  |  |  | X |22. ADMITS HIS ERRORS. |  |  |  | X |23. RESPONDS WELL TO SUPERVISION. |  |  |  | X |24. EVEN DISPOSITION. |  | X |  |  |SECRET
[104-10224-10007.pdf — page 265]
SECRET(When Filled In)|                                                         |     |     |     |     |     || ------------------------------------------------------- | :-: | :-: | :-: | :-: | :-: || 26. CAN THINK ON HIS FEET.                              |     |     |     |  /  |     || 27. COMES UP WITH SOLUTIONS TO PROBLEMS.                |     |     |     |     |  /  || 28. STIMULATING TO ASSOCIATES, A "SPARK PLUG".          |     |     |     |     |     || 29. TOUGH MINDED.                                       |     |     |     |  /  |     || 30. OBSERVANT.                                          |     |     |     |     |     || 31. CAPABLE.                                            |     |     |     |     |  /  || 32. CLEAR THINKING.                                     |     |     |  /  |     |     || 33. COMPLETES ASSIGNMENTS WITHIN ALLOWABLE TIME LIMITS. |     |     |  /  |     |     || 34. EVALUATES SELF REALISTICALLY.                       |     |  /  |     |     |     || 35. WELL INFORMED ABOUT CURRENT EVENTS.                 |     |     |     |     |     || 36. DELIBERATE.                                         |  /  |     |     |     |     || 37. EFFECTIVE IN DISCUSSIONS WITH ASSOCIATES.           |     |     |     |     |  /  || 38. IMPLEMENTS DECISIONS REGARD-LESS OF OWN FEELINGS.   |     |     |     |  /  |     || 39. THOUGHTFUL OF OTHERS.                               |     |     |     |     |     || 40. WORKS WELL UNDER PRESSURE.                          |     |  /  |     |     |     || 41. DISPLAYS JUDGEMENT.                                 |     |     |     |  /  |     || 42. GIVES CREDIT WHERE CREDIT IS DUE.                   |     |     |     |     |     || 43. HAS DRIVE.                                          |     |     |     |     |  /  || 44. IS SECURITY CONSCIOUS.                              |     |     |  /  |     |     || 45. VERSATILE.                                          |     |     |     |     |     || 46. HIS CRITICISM IS CONSTRUCTIVE.                      |     |     |     |  /  |     || 47. ABLE TO INFLUENCE OTHERS.                           |     |  /  |     |     |     || 48. FACILITATES SMOOTH OPERATION OF HIS OFFICE.         |     |     |     |     |     || 49. DOES NOT REQUIRE STRONG AND CONTINUOUS SUPERVISION. |     |     |     |  /  |     || 50. A GOOD SUPERVISOR.                                  |     |     |     |     |  /  |SECTION VA. WHAT ARE HIS OUTSTANDING STRENGTHS?An ability to apply the practices and principles of KUBARK to a particular task at hand. Positive qualities of leadership and management. The employee is superior in an operational sense. He is imaginative yet practical.B. WHAT ARE HIS OUTSTANDING WEAKNESSES?The employee has a tendency to be piqued if his prerogatives are challenged.SECRET
[104-10224-10007.pdf — page 269]
SECRET74. CAN THINE ON HIS FEET.21. COVERS UP WITH SOLUTIONS TO PROBLEMS.78. STIMULATING TO ASSOCIATES, A “SPARE PLUS”.29. TOUGH MINDED.30. OBSTAVANT.31. CAPABLE,17. CLEAR THINKING.11. COMPLETE ASSIGNMENTS WITHIN ALLOWABLE FIVE LIMITS.34. EVALUATED SELF DIALISTICALLY.35. WELL INFORMED ABOUT CURRENT EVENTS.36. DILIDERATE.1. EFFECTIVE IN DISCUSSIONS WITH ASSOCIATED.36. IMPLIMENTS DICIDICOS REGARD- LESS OF OWN FEELINGS.39. THOUGHTFUL OF OTHERS.40. WORKS WELL UNDER PRESSURE.41 DISPLAYS JUDGEMENT.42. GIVES CREDIT WHERE CREDIT IS DUE.43. HAS DRIVE.44. 15 SECURITY CONSCIOUS.45. VERSATILE.46. HIS CRITICISM IS CONSTRUCTIVE.47. ABLE TO INFLUENCE OTHERS.48. FACILITATES SMOOTH OPERATION OF HIS OFFICE.49. DOES NOT REQUIRE STRONG AND CONTINUOUS SUPERVISION.50. A GOOD SUPERVISOR.SECTION VA. WHAT ARE HIS OUTSTANDING STRENGTHS?One of China Branch's most outstanding employees. Subject has been the "spark plug" for the LCHARVEST program in Europe which represents one of the largost developments for China 618 in the last eight months. Professionally capable with plenty of drive.B. WHAT ARE HIS OUTSTANDING WEAKNESSES?N.A.SECRET
[104-10224-10007.pdf — page 271]
SECRETSECURITY INFOMATIONPERSONNEL EVALUATION REPORT Reviewed by PUDItens I through 6 will be completed by Administrative or Personnel Officer1.  NAME (Last) (First) (Middles) 3. POSITION TITLE    Miller Howton Scott Upa off4.  OFFICE STAFF OR DIVISION REPORT 5. DEPTO'L 6. FIELD, SPECIFY STATION    DOP 2ITEM 7A. Creation and organisation of the China Branch CE section designed to provide a fuller exploitation of the potential against China. Requires planning and implementat of an overall program and the supervision, guidance and direction of 13 people in order to obtain the best operational results from analysin critiquing and developing available and new information, Inauguration of a operational security program designed to provide maximum protection to China operations in the FI, PP and PM fields.B. Case officer for a major CIA project (PM) which is being terminated on the basis of a definitive reasr-sessment in terms of basic potential, exulcitation and results acheived. The objectives of the perfect wara resistance but the implementation required the a lication of techniques nav standards which ann best be categorized in the FI field and which reouired a anjor C2 offort. Duties required operational and policy guidance to field n seion with ateriat duties of reviewing all activities from curatioral and security standpoints. Supervision of administrative and logistic support from indas.10. 19 March 1954Itens 11 through 18 will be completed by SupervisorU. Scott Miller11. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE THIS PERSON'S PERFORMANCE ON THE WALTED DUTIES LISTED UNDER ITEM 7 ABOVE.Subject is an outstandia, prava, with active aiit, leadership, and organizational abilities; an e fmission ant in erouly de sable. The contact of as funtic paralleled 1.100 so. clar caracteristics,SECRET
[104-10224-10007.pdf — page 272]
SECRETSECURITY SMATIO12. IN WHAT RESPECT IS THIS PERSON'S PERFORMANCE ON PRESENT JOB MOST NOTICEABLY GOOD OR OUTSTANDING?Leadership and organizational capabilities plus an e college professional knowled, gained ta tem fioli.MAR 5 11 0: 45413. ON WHAT ASPECT OF PERFORMANCE SHOULD THIS PERSON CONCENTRATE EFFORT FOR SELF IMPROVEMENT?BAL ROOMNoting tant a for more years of age, maturity (althomgh he is extremely mature for his are) and supervisory experience would not ordinarily improve.14. COMMENT ON THIS PERSON'S ABILITY TO MANDLE GREATER RESPONSIBILITIES NOW OR IN THE FUTURE.he is ready to become chief of a small station. Likewian, he would be excellent in a headquarters staff, particularly CE.15. ARE THERE OTHER DUTIES WHICH BETTER SUIT THIS PERSON'S QUALIFICATIONS? Recommend appropriate reassignment, if possible.He is now scheduled to go to the field in an operating capacity during the summer of 5416. WHAT TRAINING OR ROTATION DO YOU RECOMMEND FOR THIS PERSON?A training program is being planned for him and he will complete it before deporting for the field.17. IF PERFORMANCE DURING REPORT PERIOD HAS BEEN UNSATISFACTORY, THERE IS ATTACHED COPY OF MEMORANDUM NOTIFYING THIS PERSON OF UNSATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE.18. THIS PERSONNEL EVALUATION REPORT HAS BEEN DISCUSSED WITH THE PERSON EVALUATED. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS INCLUDING COMMENT ON ITEMS 7, 8 AND 9, ARE SHOWM BELOW UNDER ITEM 20.25 March 1954DATE19. I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REPORT. (Comments, if any, are shown in item 20.)25 March 1954DATESIGNATURE OF SUP150R20. COMMENTS: If necessary, may sa continues on reverse side of cover sheet.SECRET