[104-10224-10012.pdf — page 115]
# SECTION DSECRETCLASSIFICATIONNARRATIVE COMMENTSIndicates significant strengths or weaknesses demonstrated in current position keeping in proper perspective their relationship to overall performance. State supportations made for improvement of work performance. Give recommendations for training. Comment on foreign language competence, if required for current mission. Amplify or explain ratings given in Section C to provide best judging future personnel action. Manner of performance of managerial or supervisory duties and cost consciousness in the use of personnel, space, equipment and funds, must be commented on, if applicable. If extra space is needed to complete Section D, attach a separate sheet of paper.Although Subject has only been under my supervision for some four months, I can but agree with earlier comments on his performance. Subject has an encyclopedic knowledge of the organization, function and history of the various Soviet intelligence and security organs. He is a highly skilled researcher and a gifted writer. His work in preparing classified studies on the various aspects of the Soviet intelligence services and operations has been consistently impressive.Subject has not had the field experience usually associated with his age and grade, but the lack of this has not been a drawback in his chosen research duties. In the future Subject will profit from seeking out opportunities for further activity rather than, as at present, waiting until assignments are given to him.In addition to his research abilities, Subject is a highly effective lecturer, much sought after by other agencies who are conducting training in the CI field.Subject has encountered some slight problems with his staff during the reporting period, but these are essentially minor. In my opinion Subject is in the forefront of research personnel at his grade level.# SECTION E CERTIFICATION AND COMMENTS| MONTHS EMPLOYEE HAS BEEN UNDER MY SUPERVISION |                                                                 || --------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------- || /                                             | IF THIS REPORT HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN TO EMPLOYEE, GIVE EXPLANATION || DATE                                          | OFFICIAL TITLE OF SUPERVISOR                                    ||                                               | AC/CIRA                                                         || STATEMENT CONCERNING THIS EVALUATION OF MY PERFORMANCE || ------------------------------------------------------ || HAVE ATTACHED                                          || COMMENTS OF REVIEWING OFFICIAL                         |DATE16 Jan 753.  BY REVIEWING OFFICIALTYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATUREWilliam HoodSIGNATURE OF EMPLOYEEI endorse Mr. Hood's Section D evaluation. I have found Mr. Wigren to be a very dependable and resourceful individual in undertaking the extensive research commitments that the staff has undertaken in meeting very heavy obligations of sensitive liaison exchanges over the past year. Mr. Wigren is above all a gentleman in his attitude toward and treatment of others. I would say in the long run his works to his disadvantage because his contribution and his modesty tend to be overridden by the pretentions and bluster of others. Mr. Wigren has what has now become a most precious commodity to the DDO in counterintelligence and that is a grasp on many of the aspects of the collegial memory. He is therefore in a position not only to contribute useful ideas for new projects, but to correct, amend, and modify suggestions and courses of action put up by others who do not have the facts. In other words, this is a man whose continued utility and potential are considerable in my judgment.|                                                        |                          |                                     || ------------------------------------------------------ | ------------------------ | ----------------------------------- || OFFICIAL TITLE OF REVIEWING OFFICIAL                   | DATE                     | TYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE || 17 Jan 75 ADC/CIOPS                                    |                          | Raymond G. Rocca                    || 4. BY EMPLOYEE                                         |                          | SIGNATURE OF EMPLOYEE               || I CERTIFY THAT I HAVE SEEN THE ENTRIES IN ALL SECTIONS | DATE                     |                                     || OF THIS REPORT.                                        | 17 Jan 75 CLASSIFICATION |                                     ||                                                        |                          |                                     |