[104-10222-10012.pdf — page 127]
# SECTION DNARRATIVE COMMENTSIndicate significant strengths or weaknesses demonstrated in current position beeping in proper perspective their relationship te overall performance. State suggestions made for improvement of work performance. Give recommendations for framing Comment on foreign language competence, coked for current position Amplify or explain ratings green in Section C to provide best basis for determining future personnel action. Monner of performance of managerial or supervisory duties and row sonkiowoness in the use of personnel, spores, equipment and lunds must be commented on, if oppixable # extra space is needed to complete Secinen 6, umach a seperate sheet of paper.I rate Mr. Randa "outstanding" for Duty Number 1 (his principal responsibility) for this period. He had done an exceptional job of supervising, motivating, training and guiding his group in a remorseless and pressure-laden atmosphere, requiring both close attention to detail and constant altertness to broad operational and policy implications. The workload is larger and more complicated than anything I know of handled by any line operational officer with equivalent grade and responsibility. The preceding two fitness reports describe well the nature of the job. It remains only to be noted that Mr. Randall is the perfect man for the job, combining a remarkable match of leadership, operational savvy, legal and policy awareness and, perhaps most important, negotiating ability with both the Agency lawyers and legislative counsels, and the operating divisions in a bizarre situation that completely transcends the DO's need-to-know practices (Top Secret and compartmented, bigotted information must be reviewed) and yet requires the protection of our sources and methods. Dedicated, discreet, smart, and honest, Mr. Randall is very likely one of very few DO officers of his grade who could have handled this job from scratch, done so with virtually flawless output, and created a body of judgments and advice that is trusted, proven and amounts to de facto 10 policy on how to protect our secrets. Mr. Randall also has major planning obligations within INS, serving as a voting member of the PMC and three times a week with Chief, IMS and other (continued)# SECTION ECERTIFICATION AND COMMENTS1. BY SUPERVISORIF THIS REPORT HAS NOT DERN SHOWN TO EMPLOYER, GIVE EXPLANAΓΙΟΝMONTHS EMPLOYER HAD BEENUNDER MY SUPERVISION9 monthsDATEOFFICIAL TITLE OF SUPERVIGORTYPEDOR PRINTE NAME AND SIGNATURE18 December 1978Deputy Chief, INSJames-B/Fletcher, Jr.HAVE [ ] OR HAVE NUT [X] АЕРАΓΩΓΟ АSTATEMENT CONCERNING THE SUPERVISON'SEVALIIATION OF MY PERFORMANCE.2. BY EMPLOYEEDATECIGNATURE OF EMPLOYER18/Dec/1978Juderich C.Randall3. BY REVIEWING OFFICIALI agree with the letter ratings and the parrative comments above, particularly those In paragraph 1 of the narrative.Mr. Randall is a dedicated, forceful, purposeful, dependable, disciplined officer. Although his personal preference would have been to do something else, he effectively manages and leads the Freedom of Information and Privacy Group of IMS--demonstrating a self reliant style which has brought great credit to work in this area in the DO and to himself. Mr. Randall's past several fitness reports attested to his talents and growth in this assignment..An was observed in Mr. Randall'a last, fitnesa réport, a new assignment must be foundDATEJYFICIAL TITLE OF REVIEWING OFFICIALTOPED OF PRINTSO NAME AND SIGNATURE30 January 1979Chief, INSWilliam F. Donnelly4. BY EMPLOYEESIGNATURE OF SUPLOVCLASUICATIONCONFIDENTIAL