Francesco/who-killed-jfk huggingface dataset:
[104-10222-10012.pdf — page 174]
SECRETFITNESS REPORTEMPLOYEE SERIAL NUMBER012170SECTION A1. NAMERANDALL (Last) Frodorick (First) c. (Middle)2. DATE OF BIRTH 3. SEX28 Oct. 1926 M4. GRADE 5.80GS-13 D6. OFFICIAL POSITION TITLEOps Officer7. OFF. DIV'OR OF ASSIGNMENT 8. CURRENT STATIONUS/FE Washington, D. C.9. CHECK (X) TYPE OF APPOINTMENTX CAREER RESERVE TEMPORARY10. CHECK (X) TYPE OF REPORTINITIAL REASSIGNMENT SUPERVISORANNUAL REASSIGNMENT EMPLOYEECAREER-PROVISIONAL (See Instructions - Section C)X SPECIAL (Specify) Rocommondation for Promotion11. DATE REPORT DUE IN O.P.12. REPORTING PERIOD (From 10-)February 1966 to September 1966SECTION BPERFORMANCE EVALUATIONW - WeekPerformance ranges from wholly inadequate to slightly less than satisfactory. A rating in this category requires positive remedial action. The nature of the action could range from counseling, to further training, to placing on probation, to reassignment or to separation. Describe action taken or proposed in Section C.A - AdequatePerformance meets all requirements. It is entirely satisfactory and is characterized neither by deficiency nor excellence.P - ProficientPerformance is more than satisfactory. Desired results are being produced in a proficient manner.S - StrongPerformance is characterized by exceptional proficiency.O - OutstandingPerformance is so exceptional in relation to requirements of the work and in comparison to the performance of others doing similar work as to warrant special recognition.SPECIFIC DUTIESList up to six of the most important specific duties performed during the rating period. Insert rating letter which best describes the manner in which employee performs EACH specific duty. Consider ONLY effectiveness in performance of that duty. All employees with supervisory responsibilities MUST be rated on their ability to supervise (indicate number of employees supervised).SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 1RATINGLETTEROperational exploitation of foreign and American contacts.SSPECIFIC DUTY NO. 2RATINGLETTERPreparation of operational and administrativo corros- pondence involving domestic operations in the FE field.SSPECIFIC DUTY NO. 3RATINGLETTERSupervision of one socrotary/stenographer.SSPECIFIC DUTY NO. 4RATINGLETTERLiaison with Washington Field Office of the FBI and with US Air Force Foreign Liaison Branch.0SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 5RATINGLETTERSPECIFIC DUTY NO. 6RATINGLETTEROVERALL PERFORMANCE IN CURRENT POSITIONTake into account everything about the employee which influences his effectiveness in his current position such as performance of specific duties, productivity, conduct on job (cooperativeness, pertinent personal traits or habits, and particular limitations or talents). Based on your knowledge of employee's overall performance during the rating period, place the letter in the rating block corresponding to the statement which most accurately reflects his level of performance.RATINGLETTERSSECRET45![photo of an approval stamp]
[104-10222-10012.pdf — page 175]
# SECRET## NARRATIVE COMMENTSIndicate significant strengths or weaknesses demonstrated in current position keeping in proper perspective their relationship to overall performance. State suggestions made for improvement of work performance. Give recommendations for training. Comment on foreign language competence, if required for current position. Amplify or explain ratings given in Section B, to provide best bases for determining future personnel action. Manner of performance of managerial or supervisory duties and loss consciousness in the use of personnel, space, equipment and funds, must be commented on, if applicable. If more space is needed to complete Section C, attach a separate sheet of paper.Subject has US Station responsibility for Far Eastern operations. He continues to do an excellent job of exploiting his foreign and American contacts for operational and intelligence objectives. His handling of a difficult penetration agent in the Indonesian Embassy (HASHARK) has received high praise in formal traffic from Headquarters. A previously unproductive Station agent (WUALLOY/1) has improved his reporting and his access since Subject has taken him over, and was the Station's only agent at the Havana Tri-Continent Conference. Subject's handling of a potential penetration operation against the Indonesian Embassy showed balanced judgment and a good appreciation of the CE and FI factors involved. His knowledge of Far Eastern politics, geography and contemporary history is encyclopedic, and his handling of orientals in the USA confirms the high marks given him by FE supervisors in earlier reports. He has begun to use his cover in initiating new contacts within the diplomatic community, as well as continuing to assess several WUENVOY candidates within the academic community. His handling of confidential funds is characterised by good judgment and prompt accountings. He has excellent working relations with his colleagues at the Station and in Headquarters.(Continued on attachment)## CERTIFICATION AND COMMENTS**BY EMPLOYEE**I CERTIFY THAT I HAVE SEEN SECTIONS A, B, AND C OF THIS REPORTDATE15 September 1966SIGNATURE OF EMPLOYEE**BY SUPERVISOR**IF THIS REPORT HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN TO EMPLOYEE, GIVE EXPLANATIONNot shown to employee because of promotion request.MONTHS EMPLOYEE HAS BEEN UNDER MY SUPERVISION12OFFICIAL TITLE OF SUPERVISORDATE15 September 1966 Chief, US/NOGSIGNATURERobert E. Boios**BY REVIEWING OFFICIAL**COMMENTS OF REVIEWING OFFICIALMr. Randall is an experienced, calm and sober individual who has raised the level of the quality of operational work in this Station. I concur in the above evaluation.DATE16 September 1966 ACOSOFFICIAL TITLE OF REVIEWING OFFICIALSIGNATUREJoseph J. HillSECRET
[104-10222-10012.pdf — page 176]
SECRETContinuation of Section C   Fitness Report   F. C. RandallHis contactswith FBI and Pentagon officials have been handled in a manner reflecting credit on this Agency, and both the FBI and the Air Force officers concerned have praised Subject's ability to the undersigned.No training is contemplated at this time.SECRET
[104-10222-10012.pdf — page 177]
# SECRET(When Filled In)FITNESS REPORTEMPLOYER SERIAL NUMBER012170SECTION AGENERAL1. NAME(Last)(First)(Middle)2. DATE OF BIRTH 3. SEX4. GRADE5. SORANDALL, Frederick C.28 Oct. 1926 MGS-13 D6. OFFICIAL POSITION TITLE7. OFF/DIV/BR OF ASSIGNMENT 8. CURRENT STATIONOps OfficerUS/FEWashington, D. C.9. CHECK (X) TYPE OF APPOINTMENT10. CHECK (X) TYPE OF REPORTCAREERRESERVE.TEMPORARYINITIALREASSIGNMENT SUPERVISORCAREER-PROVISIONAL (See Instructions - Section C)ANNUALREASSIGNMENT EMPLOYEESPECIAL (Specify)X SPECIAL (Specify): Recommendation for Promotion11. DATE REPORT DUE IN O.P.12. REPORTING PERIOD (From - To)    January 1966 - 14 February 1966SECTION BPERFORMANCE EVALUATIONW - WeakPerformance ranges from wholly inadequate to slightly less than satisfactory. A rating in this category requires positive remedial action. The nature of the action could range from counseling, to further training, to placing on probation, to reassignment or to separation. Describe action taken or proposed in Section C.A - AdequatePerformance meets all requirements. It is entirely satisfactory and is characterized neither by deficiency nor excellence.P - ProficientPerformance is more than satisfactory. Desired results are being produced in a proficient manner.S - StrongPerformance is characterized by exceptional proficiency.O - OutstandingPerformance is so exceptional in relation to requirements of the work and in comparison to the performance of others doing similar work as to warrant special recognition.SPECIFIC DUTIESList up to six of the most important specific duties performed during the rating period. Insert rating letter which best describes the manner in which employee performs EACH specific duty. Consider ONLY effectiveness in performance of that duty. All employees with supervisory responsibilities MUST be rated on their ability to supervise (Indicate number of employees supervised).SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 1RATINGLETTEROperational exploitation of domestic contacts--foreign and American.SSPECIFIC DUTY NO. 2RATINGLETTERPreparation of operational and administrative correspondence involving domestic operations in the FE field.SSPECIFIC DUTY NO. 3RATINGLETTERSupervision of one secretary/stenographer.SSPECIFIC DUTY NO. 4RATINGLETTERSPECIFIC DUTY NO. 5RATINGLETTERSPECIFIC DUTY NO. 6RATINGLETTEROVERALL PERFORMANCE IN CURRENT POSITIONTake into account everything about the employee which influences his effectiveness in his current position such as performance of specific duties, productivity, conduct on job, cooperativeness, pertinent personal habits and talents. Based on your knowledge of employee's overall performance during the rating period, place the letter in the rating box corresponding to the statement which most accurately reflects his level of performance.RATINGLETTERSSECRET
[104-10222-10012.pdf — page 178]
SECRET(When Filled In)NARRATIVE COMMENTSIndicate significant strengths or weaknesses demonstrated in current position keeping in proper perspective their relationship to overall performance. State suggestions made for improvement of work performance. Give recommendations for training. Comment on foreign language competence, if required for current position. Amplify or explain rationale in Section B or provide best basis for determining future personnel action. Manner of performance of managerial or supervisory described, if applicable.Subject has U.S. Station responsibility for Far Eastern operations. Since submission of the "Memorandum in Lieu of Fitness Report" at the end of 1965, Subject has worked well into the local operational environment and is doing an excellent job of initiating exploitable contacts. A previously unproductive Station agent (WUALLOY/1) has improved his reporting and his access since Subject has taken him over and was the Station's only agent at the Havana Tri-Continent Conference. Subject's handling of a potential penetration operation against the Indonesian Embassy showed balanced judgement and a good appreciation of the CE and FI factors involved. His knowledge of Far Eastern politics, geography and contemporary history is encyclopedic and his handling of orientals in the USA confirms the high marks given him by FE supervisors in earlier reports. He has begun to use his cover in initiating new contacts within the diplomatic community as well as continuing to assess several WUENVOY candidates within the academic community. His handling of confidential funds is characterized by good judgement and prompt accountings. He has excellent working relations with his colleagues at the Station and in Headquarters.No training is contemplated at this time beyond the Clandestine Services Review Course which Subject will take in March 1966.SECTION D1. DATE14 February 19662. MONTHS EMPLOYEE HAS BEEN UNDER MY SUPERVISION6DATE14 February 19663. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING OFFICIALCERTIFICATION AND COMMENTSBY EMPLOYEEI CERTIFY THAT I HAVE SEEN SECTIONS A, B, AND C OF THIS REPORT![signature of employee]BY SUPERVISORIF THIS REPORT HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN TO EMPLOYEE, GIVE EXPLANATIONOFFICIAL TITLE OF SUPERVISORChief, US/NOGTYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE![signature of Robert E. Boles]Robert E. BolesBY REVIEWING OFFICIAL:Concur. An active, hard-working and well-motivated case officer.DATE14 February 1966OFFICIAL TITLE OF REVIEWING OFFICIALChief of Station, U. S.TYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE![signature of Harry A. Rositaka]Harry A. RositakaSECRET
[104-10222-10012.pdf — page 179]
# SECRETMEMORANDUM IN LIEU OF FITNESS REPORTNAME : Frederick Randall 012170REPORTING PERIOD: 21 June 1965 - 31 December 1965DATE OF BIRTH : 28 October 1926SEX : MaleGRADE : GS-13SD : DOFFICIAL TITLE : Operations OfficerASSIGNMENT : DDP/DOD/USSCURRENT STATION : Washington, D. C.APPOINTMENT : CareerTYPE OF REPORT : AnnualSubject returned to the U.S. in August 1955, but did not begin substantive work in the Non-Orbit Group at the Station until late September 1965. Much of the time since his arrival has been spent on becoming acquainted with the work of the Station and in casing the operational possibilities among the FE Division targets in Washington. We, accordingly, prefer to delay until April 1966 submission of a formal Fitness Report which, hopefully, will give a more precise and meaningful evaluation of his performance than is now possible.Subject's predecessor left him with only one "agent" - and an unproductive one at that - plus one or two equally unproductive "contacts". Subject is thus starting essentially from scratch. He is making commendable inroads into the Indonesian student community and we hope that he will also soon get in some solid work on the Indonesian and Burmose diplomatic targets.We note that Fitness Reports submitted on Subject just before his departure from Tokyo gave him high marks for his operational support work in Japan and regrettel tant the situation in Tokyo did not permit him to be given as much active operational work as he wished. He will certainly
[104-10222-10012.pdf — page 180]
RANDALL, Frederick C.have the opportunity for aggressive agent operations in Washington, andis aware that this activity will not be limited to targets of interestto FE Division, but will give him the chance to participate actively inthe planning and execution of operations directed at the recruitmentand/or handling of other priority targets as well.No training is recommended at this time beyond the ClandestineService Review Course which Subject will take in March 1966.Subject exercises good judgement in his handling of official fundsand his accountings are prompt.He gets along well with his colleagues at the Station and inHeadquarters.CERTIFICATION AND CODEIFTSBY EMPLOYEEDate Signature of Employee3 January 1966BY SUPERVISORMonths Employee Has BeenUnder My Supervision4Date Signature29 December 1965 Chier, US/1100BY REVIEWING OFFICIALConcurDate Signature- 4 JAN 1966 COC, Washington
[104-10222-10012.pdf — page 181]
# FITNESS REPORTEMPLOYEE SERIAL NUMBER012170## SECTION A1. NAME   Randall, Frederick C.6. OFFICIAL POSITION TITLE   Ops Officer9. CHECK (X) TYPE OF APPOINTMENT   [X] CAREERGENERAL2. DATE OF BIRTH 3. SEX 4. GRADE 5. SO28 Oct 26 M GS-13 D7. OFF-DIV/OR OF ASSIGNMENT 8. CURRENT STATION   DDP/FE/JKO Tokyo10. CHECK (X) TYPE OF REPORT    [ ] INITIAL [X] REASSIGNMENT SUPERVISOR    [ ] ANNUAL [ ] REASSIGNMENT EMPLOYEE12. REPORTING PERIOD (From - to)    1 January - 20 June 1965## SECTION B PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONW- WeakPerformance ranges from wholly inadequate to slightly less than satisfactory. A rating in this category requires positive remedial action. The nature of the action could range from counseling, to further training, to placing on probation, to reassignment or to separation. Describe action taken or proposed in Section C.A- AdequatePerformance meets all requirements. It is entirely satisfactory and is characterized neither by deficiency nor excellance.P- ProficientPerformance is more than satisfactory. Desired results are being produced in a proficient manner.S- StrongPerformance is characterized by exceptional proficiency.O- OutstandingPerformance is so exceptional in relation to requirements of the work and in comparison to the performance of others doing similar work as to warrant special recognition.## SPECIFIC DUTIESList up to six of the most important specific duties performed during the rating period. Insert rating letter which best describes the manner in which employee performs EACH specific duty. Consider ONLY effectiveness in performance of that duty. All employees with supervisory responsibilities MUST be rated on their ability to supervise (indicate number of employees supervised).SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 1 RATING LETTERStation Agreed Activities Officer 0SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 2 RATING LETTERSupervisor of persons handling Registry and KURIOT Smatters.SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 3 RATING LETTERSupervisor of Area Central Source File. DC 52 SDA 11SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 4 RATING LETTERCase Officer as required. SSPECIFIC DUTY NO. 5 RATING LETTERCommanding Officer of Station's principal cover unit. S## OVERALL PERFORMANCE IN CURRENT POSITIONTake into account everything about the employee which influences his effectiveness in his current position such as performance of specific duties, productivity, conduct on job, cooperativeness, pertinent personal traits or habits, and professional knowledge of employee's overall performance during the rating period. Then consider what most accurately reflects the level of performance.
[104-10222-10012.pdf — page 182]
# SECTION CNARRATIVE COMMENTSIndicate significant strengths or weaknesses demonstrated in current position keeping in perspective their relationship to overall performance. State suggestions made for improvement of work performance and recommendations for training. Comment on foreign language competence, if required for current position. Amplify or explain ratings given in Section A to provide best basis for determining future personnel action. Manner of performance of managerial or supervisory duties should be described, if applicable.There is little I can add to the comments made, in the annual report prepared carlier this year. I would like to reiterate; however, at this time of Subject's departure, the Station's continued support for his promotion to GS-14 as first recommended in August 1963.# SECTION DCERTIFICATION AND COMMENTS1. DATE15 Jun 65.I CERTIFY THAT I HAVE SEEN SECTIONS A, B, AND C OF THIS REPORT/s/ Frederick RandallBY EMPLOYEESIGNATURE OF EMPLOYEEBY SUPERVISOR2. MONTHS EMPLOYEE HAS BEEN UNDER MY SUPERVISIONIF THIS REPORT HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN TO EMPLOYEE, GIVE EXPLANATION9DATE21 Jun 65OFFICIAL TITLE OF SUPERVISORDCOSTYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE/s/ Horace Z, Feldman3. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING OFFICIALBY REVIEWING OFFICIALI Concur.DATE15 Jun 63OFFICIAL TITLE OF REVIEWING OFFICIALCOSTYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE/s/ William V. Bro
[104-10222-10012.pdf — page 183]
# FITNESS REPORTEMPLOYEE SERIAL NUMBER0L:170SECTION A1. NAMERandall, Frederick C.6. OFFICIAL POSITION TITLEOps Officer8. CHECK (X) TYPE OF APPOINTMENTX CAREERRESERVECAREER-PROVISIONAL (Soo instructiane Secilan C)SPECIAL (Speelly)s11. DATE REPORT DUE IN O.P.28 February 1965GENERAL2. DATE OF BIRTH 3. SEX   23 Oct 26 M4. GRADE 5. 80   GS-13 D7. OFF/DIV/BR OF ASSIGNMENT 8. CURRENT STATION   DDP/FE/JEO Tokyo10. CHECK (X) TYPE OF REPORTINITIALREASSIGNMENT SUPERVISORX ANNUALRE ASSIGNMENT EMPLOVERSPECIAL (St12. REPORTING PERIOD (P)1 January - 31 December 1964SECTION BPERFORMANCE EVALUATIONW-WeckPerformance ranges from wholly inadequate to slightly less than satisfactory. A rating in this category requires positive remedial action. The nature of the action could range from eaunseling, to further training, to placing on probation, to reassignment or to separation. Describe action taken et prapased in Section C.A- AdeavatePerformance meets all requirements. It is entirely satisfactory and is characterized nalther by deficiency nor excellence.P. ProficientPerformance is more than satisfactory. Desired results are being preduced in a proficiant manner.S. StrongPerformance ls characterised by exceptional proficiency.O- OutstandingPerformance is so exceptional in relation to requirements of the work and in comparison to the performance of others doing similar work as to warrant spacial recognition.SPECIFIC DUTIESList up to six of the most Important specifle dutias performed during the rating period, lasert rating letter which bost describes the manner in which employee performs. EACH specific duty. Considor ONLY affectiveness la performance of that duty. All employees with supervisory responsibilislos MUST be rated on their ability to supervise (Indicate nimber of employees supervised).SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 1Station Agreed Activities Officer DB40RATINGLETTEROSPECIFIC DUTY NO. 8Supervisor of persons handling Registry and KURIOT matters.RATINGLETTERSSPECIFIC DUTY HO.Supervisor of Area Central Source File.RATINGLETTERSSPECIFIC DUTY NO. 4Caso officer as required.RATINGLETTERSswaCIFIC DUTY NO.8Commanding officer of Station's principal cover unit.RATINGLETTERSSPRCIPIC DUTY NG.OVERALL PERFORMANCE IN CURRENT POSITIONRATINGLETTERVote inte en 2000 thing above me employee which influences his effectivendas in his current position such as per yomitheatre, productivity, condute en job, tatters, partinant paranaat baits et habits, and Puitiatoria. Based on you need at smrtoon's overcil performancs dowing the roting period, store the letter by the rating bourregningaich most accurately relicets die level of porteroas8
[104-10222-10012.pdf — page 184]
# SECTION CNARRATIVE COMMENTSIndicate significant strengths of weaknesses demonstrated in current position keeping in proper periode πες το overall perfumance, State suggestions made for improvement of work performance. Give recommendations for fro on foreign language competence, if required for current position. Amplify of explain ratings given in Section B to provise basis for determining future personnel action. Mariner of performance of managerial a supervisory duties must be described, it applicable.Subject performs his principal duty -- handling Agreed Activities -- in outstanding fashion. In this field he represents not only this Station but other FE Stations and KUBARK to the U.S. military. Because of his sound operational background, presence of mind, forceful reasoning, and the consideration the military therefore holds for him, Subject has been able to play a prime part in our excellent Agreed Activities posture out here. As a result much valuable time -- and therefore money -- that would otherwise have had to be spent in negotiations with the U.S. military has been saved both by this Station and other KUBARK elements. For this reason the Station is recommending by separate correspondence that Subject be awarded a Quality Step Increase.Subject also performs his other duties in strong fashion. He is capable, versatile, and continues to show fine career potential.# SECTION DCERTIFICATION AND COMMENTSBY EMPLOYEEI CERTIFY THAT I HAVE SEEN SECTIONS A, B, AND C OF THIS REPORTDATE26 January 1965SIGNATURE OF EMPLOYER/s/ Frederick C. RandallBY SUPERVISORIF THIS REPORT HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN TO EMPLOYEE, GIVE EXPLANATIONDATE28 January 1965OFFICIAL TITLE OF SUPERVISORDOOCTYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE/s/Horace Z. FeldmanCOMMENTS OF REVIEWING OFFICIALI heartily concur with the statement made in Section C above. This employee's contribution to this Station has been of the highest caliber.DATE23 January 1965OFFICIAL TITLE OF REVIEWING OFFICIALCOCTYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE/s/willias Broe