[104-10222-10012.pdf — page 160]
SECTION CSECRETNAPRATIVE COMMENTSIndicate significant strengths or weaknesses demonstrated in current position keeping in proper perspective their relationship to overall performance. State suggestions made for improvement of work performance. Give recommendations for training. Comment on foreign language competence, if required for current position Amplify or explain ratings given in Section B to provide best basis for determining future personnel action Manner of performance of managerial or supervisory duties and cost consciousness in the use of personnel, space, equipment and comp. it applicable. If extra space is needed to complete Section C, attach a separate sheet of paper.Mr. Randall continues to view his responsibilities with enthusiasm and serious concern. Given the complexities of dealing with every area division and staff within DDP on cover matters, academic approvals, targetting against foreign nationals, recruitment of support assets, secure operational approaches, etc. --I would characterize his overall performance as evincing exceptional proficiency. This was accomplished in a period which saw both Bases increase their striking power numerically rather significantly. In the ultimate, the real test of performance is in recruitment of foreign nationals. While recruitment is not part of Mr. Randall's duties there is no doubt that his support of the two Bases contributed to the highest record of recruitment that these Bases had as compared to any other year. At the same time, he consciously maintained an excellent balance in the outgo of funds for operational purposes. He is held in high regard by both Base Chiefs. Since much of the routine desk work is done by his Intal Assistant, it is a tribute to his supervisory capability that this service maintains a high rate of efficiency despite the significant increase in work, and the fact that during this perod there were three different intel assistants. Since the supervisor began phasing out of his job for several months prior to 31 March, a-rather conscious decision was made to have Mr. Randall in fact assume some of the responsibility of the Branch Chief. Not only has he taken these added tasks willingly and with the confidence of DO's management, but he has performed superbly.SECTION D1. DATE27/4/712. MONTHS EMPLOYEE HAS BEENUNDER MY SUPERVISIONCERTIFICATION AND COMMENTSBT EMPLOYEEI CERTIFY THAT I HAVE SEEN SECTIONS A, B, AND C OF THIS REPORT![signature of employee]BY SUPERVISORIF THIS REPORT HAS NOT HEEN SHOWN TO EMPLOYEE, GIVE EXPLANATIONDATE27 April 19713. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING OFFICIALOFFICIAL TITLE OF SUPEDISORC/DOI/1BY REVIEFING OFFICIAL![typed or printed name and signature]Joseph F. BulikI concur, generally, with the narrative portion of this report, However, I feel that it is somewhat overstated. Specifically, I would not rate his performance of Duty No. 1 as "outstanding", rather I would rate it "strong". I consider Mr. Randall a capable officer, but feel his overall performance falls somewhere on the border of a "low strong" and a "high proficient". Let me hasten to add that I am fully satisfied with Mr. Randall's performance in his present assignment, and I have every confidence that he will continue to do a completely satisfactory job.DATE22 May 1971Acting Chief, DO Division![signature of Walter L. O'Brien]Walter L. O'BrienSECRET