[104-10222-10038.pdf — page 187]
# CONFIDENTIALSTATUS AND EFFICIENCY REPORT(SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE)1. NAME (PRINTED)   LAST   NOIR   FIRST   Douglas   MIDDLE   M.   CAF RATING   GS-9   SALARY   $4600.   TYPEWRITER WILL BE USED IF POSSIBLE   DATE OF ASSIGNMENT   TO PRESENT DUTY   15 June 19512. DESCRIPTION OF DUTIES SINCE LAST EFFICIENCY REPORT. (LIST MOST RECENT FIRST. DESCRIBE CONCISELY BUT FULLY)   Case officer; general operational functions; photography, reproduction, SM, and technical surveillance; document intelligence.3. IF COURSES OF INSTRUCTION WERE COMPLETED DURING PERIOD OF THIS REPORT LIST TITLE, LOCATION OF SCHOOL. LENGTH OF   COURSE AND DATE COMPLETED: None4. PROFICIENCY IN FOREIGN LAND   READING   SPEAKING   UNDERSTANDING   EXC GOOD FAIR EXC GOOD FAIR EXC GOOD FAIRFrenchXXXGermanXXXItalianXXX5. MY PREFERENCE FOR NEXT DUTY AFTER TERMINATION OF CUR-   RENT ASSIGNMENT IN (IF IN USSO STATE):   TYPE OF DUTY   LOCATION   Case officer.   Vienna(LIST ONE OR MORE IN ORDER OF PREFERENCE)6. HAVE THERE BEEN ANY CHANGES IN PERSONAL STATUS SINCE ORIGINAL EMPLOYMENT OR LAST REPORT. (WHICHEVER IS LATER)   MARITAL STATUS   NUMBER OF DEPENDENTS   EMERGENCY ADDRESSEE   LEGAL ADDRESSYESNOYESNOYESNOXXXIF THE ANSWER TO ANY OF THE ABOVE IS YES, ATTACH A SEPARATE, DETAILED REPORT IN DUPLICATE HERETO IN THE CASE OFMARRIAGE. THE REPORT WILL INCLUDE NAMES, ADDRESSES, AND CITIZENSHIP OF SPOUSE, FATHER-IN-LAW, MOTHER-IN-LAW,BROTHERS-IN-LAW AND SISTERS-IN-LAW.17 September 1951Douglas M. NoirSIGNATURE OF EMPLOYEESECTIONS 7 THROUGH 11 TO BE COMPLETED BY IMMEDIATE SUPERVISORPERIOD COVERED BY THIS REPORTDATE FROMDATE TO16 Jun '5118 Spet '51OCCASION FOR REPORTANNUALREASSIGNMENT OFREPORTING OFFICERPROPOSED REASSIGNMENT VETERING INITIALOF EMPLOYEE REPORTED ONDAYS OF EMPLOYMENTX8. IS THIS EMPLOYEE QUALIFIED TO   PERFORM ALL PRESENT DUTIES?   YES   NO   XIS EMPLOYEE BETTER QUALIFIEDFOR OTHER DUTIES?YESNOXIF SO, WHAT DUTY OR DUTIESTime could be better used as anops analyst.than doing routine photo work. This will be taken care-of-when T/O filled.DO YOU CONCUR IN EMPLOYEE'S DESCRIPTION OF DUTIES UNDER SECTION 2?HAS EMPLOYEE STRIVEN FORPROFESSIONAL IMPROVEMENT?YESNOXYESNOXDO YOU RECOMMEND EMPLOYEEFOR PROMOTION?YESNOXIF NO EXPLAIN IN SECTION 11IF SO, TO WHAT GRADE AND FOR WHATPOSITION?9. FOR EACH FACTOR OBSERVED CHECK THE APPROPRIATE BOX TO INDICATE HOW THE EMPLOYEE COMPARES WITH ALL OTHERS OF   THE SAME CLASSIFICATION WHOSE PROFESSIONAL ABILITIES ARE KNOWN TO YOU PERSONALLY. DO NOT HESITATE TO MARK NO   OBSERVED ON ANY QUALITY WHEN APPROPRIATE.RATING FACTORSNOTOBSER-VEDUNSAT-ISFAC-TORYFAIRGOODVERYGOODEXCEL-LENTOUTSTAN-DINGA. ABILITY TO WORK AND GET ALONG WITH PEOPLEXB. INTEREST AND ENTHUSIASM IN WORKXC. SECURITY CONSCIOUSNESSXD. ABILITY TO GRASP INSTRUCTIONS AND PLANSXE. ATTENTION TO DUTYXF. JUDGMENT AND COMMON SENSEXG. ABILITY TO OBTAIN RESULTS AND GET THINGS DONEXH. INITIATIVEXI. ABILITY TO HANDLE AND DIRECT PEOPLEXJ. PERFORMANCE OF PRESENT DUTIES (ITEM 2)XK. ABILITY TO EVALUATE INTELLIGENCE INFORMATIONXL. TACTXM. SAGACITY (NON-GULLIBILITY)XN. LEADERSHIPXO. PHYSICAL STAMINAXP. MENTAL STAMINAX10. INDICATE YOUR ATTITUDE TOWARD HAVING THIS EMPLOYEE UNDER YOUR COMMAND OR SUPERVISION. WOULD YOU    DEFINITELY    NOT WANT HIM?    PREFER NOT    TO HAVE HIM?    BE SATISFIED    TO HAVE HIM?    PLEASED    TO HAVE HIM?    PARTICULARLY    DESIRE HIM?    X11. ENTER HERE ANY DESIRED REMARKS PERTAINING TO PARTICULAR QUALIFICATIONS OR LACK THEREOF WHICH ARE CONSIDERED    PERTINENT TO THE EVALUATION OF THIS EMPLOYEE, OUTSTANDING ASSETS AND/OR SERIOUS LIMITATIONS SHOULD BE STATED    ALSO REASONS FOR AND RECOMMENDATIONS AS TO REASSIGNMENT WILL BE GIVEN IF APPROPRIATE TO THIS REPORTSubject appears to be an excellent prospect for operational work. He is intelligent, quick to learn and hard working. He approaches problems systematically and with forethought. He has an excellent background in history and is well up on current events. The lack of fluency in German is the only liability noted in his first 90 days here. At present subject is working hard on German.18 September 1951(SIGNATURE OF REPORTING OFFICER)DATEIF REVIEWING OFFICER OR CHIEF OF STATION DOES NOTCONCUR WITH THIS REPORT EXCEPTIONS WILL BE STATEDIN SPACE PROVIDED ON THE REVERSE SIDE HEREOF)UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES IS THIS REPORT TO BE SHOWN TO THE EMPLOYEE REPORTEDCONFIDENTIAL