Francesco/who-killed-jfk huggingface dataset:
[104-10222-10012.pdf — page 205]
# SECRETwhen released InsFIELD FITNESS REPORTThe Fitness Report is an important factor in organization personnel management. It seeks to provide:1.  The organisation selection board with information of value when considering the application of an individual for neadership in the career stall, and2.  A periodic record of joh performance as an aid to the effective utilization of personnel.INSTRUCTIONSTO THE FIELD ADMINISTRATIVE OR PERSONVIL OFFICER: Consult current field administrative instructions regarding the initiation and tranmittal of this report to headquarters.TO THE FIELD SUPERVISOR: Read the entire form before attempting to complete or item. As the supervisor who assigns, directs and reviews the work of the individual, you have primary responsibility for evaluating his strengths, weaknesses, and on-the-job effectiveness as revealed by his day-to-der activities. If this individual has been under your supervision for less than 30 days, you will collaborate, il practicable, with his previous supervisors to ante care the report is accurate and complete. Primary responsibility rests with the current supervisor. It is assumed that, throughout the period this individual has been under your supervision, you have discharged your supervisory responsibilities by frequent discussions of work, so n ral way he knows where he stands.Posted Pos. ControlIT IS OPTIONAL WHETHER OR NOT THIS FITNESS REPORT IS SHOWN, TO THE PERSON BEING RATEDReviewed bySECTION ILEAVE BLANK - FOR HEADQUARTERS USE ONLYFrederick C. Randall1. DATE OF BIRTH   28 Oct 19262. SEX   X3. SERVICE DESIGNATION   KUTIBE4. GRADE   GS-125. STATION DESIGNATION (Current)   Dakarta, Indone a6. DUE DATE OF THIS REPORT   Sopte ber 1956.7. PERIOD COVERED BY THIS REPORT (Inclusive dates)   June--Conte 12:6SECTION 11 (To be completed by field supervisor)1. CURRENT POSITION   10.(۴۱):2. DATE ASSUMED RESPONSIBILITY FOR POSITION   Jace bow3. STATE THE SPECIFIC ASSIGNMENTS OR TASKS WHICH ARE TYPICAL OF THOSE GIVEN TO THE EMPLOYEE DURING THE PAST THREE TO SIX MONTHS (List in order of frequency)1.  Responsible field case officer for follow'r proforts:    A. ABOUKSER-1.    B. CAF CLOOX.    C. CARTIAN    D. FLUKE-3 (dovalo nenial).    E. SARACIONS (uovelorntal)2.  Posronsible field case officer for follow regrets    A. Costen miversity students (develoματα).3.  Ail hoe assicalos:    A. testors.bie fiols case oficer for AMOKSILD (ran 1 ont DR PA(ant).    B. Procrasia oficer for wither iufitration and/o operation to Inonesian Arun office to Dakaria Station.SECTION 11 (To be completes at deadquarters onlylDO NOT COUPLETE - FOR HEADQUARTERS USS ONLAUTHENTICATION OF RIPONY AND SIGNATURES1.  HAGL OF MATER (True) Robert C. Pierson    Robert C. Pierson3.  INIS REPORT4.  DATE REPORT AUTHENTICATED 48 M35.    24 Oct. 19565.  NAME AD 4:10 AUTHORIZEDמלת כן אNTICATE FITUES    R. H. Linn, Chief, FF/5DO NOT COMPLETE - FOR HEADQUARTERS USE OLYFORM NO. 45a1 jwl 54SECRET
[104-10222-10012.pdf — page 207]
SECRET26. CAN THINK ON HIS FEET.27. COMES UP WITH SOLUTIONS TO PROBLEMS.28. STIMULATING TO ASSOCIATES: A "SPARK PLUG".29. TOUGH MINDED.30. OBSERVANT.31. CAPABLE.32. CLEAN THINKING.33. COMPLETED ASSIGNMENTS WITHIN ALLOWABLE TIME LIMITS.34. EVALUATES SELF REALISTICALLY.35. WELL INFORMED ABOUT CURRENT EVENTS.36. DELIBERATE.37. EFFECTIVE IN DISCUSSIONS WITH ASSOCIATED.38. IMPLEMENTS DECISIONS REGARDLESS OF OWN FEELINGS.39. THOUGHTFUL OF OTHERS.40. WORKS WELL UNDER PRESSURE.41. DISPLAYS JUDGEMENT.42. GIVES CREDIT WHERE CREDIT IS DUE.43. HAS DRIVE.44. IS SECURITY CONSCIOUS.45. VERSATILE.46. HIS CRITICISM IS CONSTRUCTIVE.47. ABLE TO INFLUENCE OTHERS.48. FACILITATES SMOOTH OPERATION OF HIS OFFICE.49. DOES NOT REQUIRE STRONG AND CONTINUOUS SUPERVISION.50. A GOOD SUPERVISOR.SECTION VA. WHAT ARE HIS OUTSTANDING STRENGTHS?He is able to handle fine detail without overlooking, remaining solely on project objectives. He is a good officer and by the end of his present tour will be a first class area officer.B. WHAT ARE HIS OUTSTANDING WEAKNESSES?A little slow to get started; but when he does, performs a thorough job.SECRET
[104-10222-10012.pdf — page 213]
SECRETSECURITY INFORMATIONPERSONNEL EVALUATION REPORT1. NAME   Ridall2. POSITION TITLE   GS-113. OFFICE   Branch 54. BRANCH   Indo F.U.5. PERIOD COVERED BY REPORT   From 9 Sept 54   To 9 Oct 546. TYPE OF REPORT* Annual7. LIST YOUR MAJOR DUTIES: IN APPROXIMATE ORDER OF IMPORTANCE, WITH A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF EACH. CHIT WINCH DUTIES.In June 1954 transferred as Chief FB/5/CE Section to Indonesia FI Desk Officer. As of June 1954 major duties includès1.  Responsibility to initiate and act as Washington case officer for all FI operations operating from the Djakarta station.2.  In cooperation with the Chief FE/5 Reports, to insure that all intelligence reports are properly disseminated to customer agencies and foreign friendly intelligence services.3.  To share in the planning of the FI program for Indonesia.8. LIST COURSES OF INSTRUCTION COMPLETED DURING REPORT PERIO0.| Name of Course | Location          | Length of Course | Date Completed       || -------------- | ----------------- | ---------------- | -------------------- || Dutch reading  | CIA Language Lab. | 2 months         | Approx. January 1954 |9. IN WHAT TYPE OF WORK ARE YOU PRIMARILY INTERESTED?IF DIFFERENT FROM YOUR PRESENT JOB, EXPLAIN TOUR QUALIFICATIONS CAPTITUDE, KNOWLEDGE, SKILLSI.Desire and plan to continue as a FI desk officer until opportunity for a field assignment arises. At that time desire to do both FI and FP case officer work in the field.10. 20 September 1954Frederick P. RandallSubject has performed his duties as listed in Section (7) in a very creditable manner.The monthly letter of the Senior Representative to the Director has, without exception, stated that Headquarters support of the Djakarta Station has been more than adequate.Since Subject is a relative newcomer to his present position and has had no field experience, he occasionally is hesitant to initiate action. However, he is clearly willing to assume responsibility when he is sure of his footing, and it will be only a question of time before he is willing and able to act in full capacity in all situation.
[104-10222-10012.pdf — page 214]
# SECRETSECURITY INFORMATIONOFFICE OF PERSONNEL12. IN WRAT RESPECT IS "'S PERSON'S PLUFORMANCE ON PRESENT JOB MOST NOTICEABLY SOSSIP OUTSTANDING    Subject's perfomance is characterized by a high degree of industriousりthoroughness. Se is one of those supremely useful individuals to when a superviseor can assign a task, and then turn to other matters with sure confidence that the job will be completed, to the last detail and on time. MAIL ROOM13. ON GMAT ASPECT OF JAMANCE SHOULD THIS PERSON CONCENTRATE EFFORT FOR SELF tuPACVEMENT?    Subject's command of written English can stand improvement. His writing is by no means deficient in basic requirements, but practice will be needed to insure consistent production of clear and well constructed prose....14. COMMENT ON THIS PERSIA'S ABILITY TO HANDLE GREATER RESPONSIBILITIES NOW OR IN THE FUTURE.    Subject demonstrates clearly his growing ability to handle larger responsibilities. Ris transistion from a CE Unit Chiefs job, to that of the Indonesia Desk FI Chief, has been a markedly smooth one. Once a new technique or precedural method is learned, subject can put it into operation. when required. He is definitely potential material for a COS slot in the field.15. ARE THERE OTHER DUTIES ICH BETTER SUIT THIS PERSON'S QUALIFICATIONS? (Recommend appropriate reassignment, possible.sNo16. WHAT TRAINING OR ROTATION 20 YOU RECOMMEND FOR THIS PERSON?    Recommended traåring includes Communist Party Operations and Anti Comunist Party Operations. Recommend rotation to an Indonesian field slot. Subject has now, and is increasing his knowledge of Headquarters tasks and procedures. In approximately a year, he should put such knowledge and training into effect in the field. There is every reason to believe that he will make an excellent field case cfficer,17. IF PERFONNANCE DURING SCAT PERIOD HAS BEEN UNSATISFACTORY, THERE IS ATTACHED COPY OF HEMORANDUM NOTIFVING THIS PENSON OF UNSATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE.18. THIS PERSONNEL EVALUATIC REPOST PAS BEEN DISCUSSED WITH THE PERSON SVALUATED. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS INCLUDING CCUMENT ON ITEMS 7, 8 12 3, A4E SHOON BELOS UNDER ITEM 20.![signature] Supt 18, 1954 William M. Decker.![signature] 28/9/5919. 1 MAVE REVIEWED THE 5:04. Kasnents, if ang, are shown in iteo 20.1![signature] J. Goodell20. Counts: it mecostarp, tos to continues on reverse side of cover shast.1SECRET
[104-10222-10012.pdf — page 215]
# 2-E-2-B-E-ITRAINING EVALUATIONCourse on World Communism No.| NAME                                      | SEX   | DATES OF COURSE             | NO. STUDENTS || ----------------------------------------- | ----- | --------------------------- | ------------ || DATE OF RABEELL, Frederick 05/2/7         | M     | 23 August-04 September 1951 | 30           || From 22 October 1951 to 11 September 1951 | 05-11 |                             | 72/72        |FE Case Officer## OBJECTIVES OF THE COURSEThe Course on World Communism is a four week'n course designed to provide adequate background and understanding of the World Communist Movement, and to increase the effectiveness of staff personnel in their ability to interpret and analyze Communist Party and Front organizational structures and the strategy/ and tactics of the World Communist Movement.## CHARACTERISTICS OF THE COURSEThe material in this course is presented by lecture and in seminar discussion. Students are required to prepare written assignments, which are designed to measure the student's ability to apply the knowledge acquired in the course to his special field of activity.## RATING OF STUDENT ACHIEVEMENTStudents are rated according to the five-point adjectival rating scale (Superior, Excellent, Satisfactory, Work, Failure) in indicating the degree to which they have achieved the course objectives. The meaning of those adjectival ratings are as follows:SUPERIOR: The student demonstrated outstanding ability or proficiency in meeting this course goal or objective; he indicated an unusually thorough knowledge of the material presented; or, if skills are involved, he demonstrated that he is one of the most effective individuals in this area.EXCELLENT: The student showed unusual competence, skill, or ability in meeting this objective or goal; he demonstrated a thorough grasp of the presented material, or, if skills are involved, he demonstrated that he can perform in an extremely effective manner in this area.SATISFACTORY: The student met this objective in a competent and adequate manner; he demonstrated a good understanding and grasp of the information presented, or, if skills are involved, he demonstrated sufficient competence to operate effectively in this area.X-2-8-5-2-5
[104-10222-10012.pdf — page 216]
S-E-C-R-E-TWEAK: Although the student may have met some of the standards set for minimum achievement of this course goal or objective, he demonstrated serious gaps in knowledge or sufficient lack of skill to be of doubtful competence.FAILURE: The student was unable to grasp the concepts or information presented, or demonstrated that he had not acquired the necessary information and skills to operate at even a minimum capacity in this area.STUDENT'S PERFORMANCE IN THE COURSE| I. Current Communist Ideology      | FAIL | WEAK | SAT | EXC | SUP || ---------------------------------- | ---- | ---- | --- | --- | --- || Ratings in this class              |      |      | 6   | 12  | 9°  || Ratings in 2 classes               |      |      | 28  | 24  | 27  || II. CF Structure & Functions       | FAIL | WEAK | SAT | EXC | SUP || Ratings in this class              |      | 1    | 3   | 16  | 5°  || Ratings in 2 classes               |      |      | 9   | 21  | 19  || III. Communist Methods & Technique | FAIL | WEAK | SAT | EXC | SUP || Ratings in this class              |      |      | 8   | 14  | 11° || Ratings in 2 classes               |      |      | 3   | 24  | 16  |(An asterisk * indicates this student's ratings.)INSTRUCTORS' OVER-ALL COMMENT:![signature of chief instructor]FOR THE DIRECTOR OF TRAINING:
[104-10222-10012.pdf — page 217]
# SECRETTRAINING VALUATION:Audio-Surveillance Seminar #2SECTION I IDENTIFYING INFORMATION| Name                                      | Sex               | Dates of Seminar | No. Students || ----------------------------------------- | ----------------- | ---------------- | ------------ || RANDALL, Frederick C.                     | Male              | 6-24 June 1955   | 12           || Date of Birth                             | EOD Date          | Grade or Rank    | Office       || 28 October 1926                           | 10 September 1951 | GS-11            | DDP/FB/5     || Projected Assignment of Present Position  |                   |                  |              || FI case officer for Indonesian field unit |                   |                  |              |SECTION II COMMENTSubject has completed a three-week Seminar which covered the operational and technical aspects of audio-surveillance.1. Subject is qualified to plan telephone tap and microphone operations. (He, himself, planted microphones during the Seminar and familiarised himself with telephone tapping procedures.)2. Subject is qualified to install a microphone under controlled conditions, that is, in a safehouse. However, he himself is not authorized to make an installation against a proper denied area target without specific Headquarters concurrence.3. Subject is qualified to process the product in accordance with procedures outlined in the ZONAR Manual and CA 52-51, and to supervise the processing installation, that is, translators, carders and the like.FOR THE DIRECTOR OF TRAININGFOR FI William G. Bulaga
[104-10222-10012.pdf — page 218]
# CONFIDENTIALSECURITY INFORMATION# LANGUAGE ACHIEVEMENT REPORTNAME: RANDALLOFFICE: FrederickDATE: 17 February 1954DIVISION: Ft/SOFFICE: CoLANGUAGE: DutchLEVEL OF INSTRUCTION: Elementary ReadingLENGTH OF COURSE: 32 weeksNUMBER OF HOURS PER WEEK: 3INSTITUTION: ELTD/OTRPRESENT PROFICIENCY IN THE LANGUAGE:SPEAKS: NA - FLUENTLY AVERAGE SLOWLYWRITES: NA - WELL POORLY NILREADS: - FLUENTLY FAIR POORLYUNDERSTANDS: NA - EASILY AVERAGE POORLYTRANSLATES INTO ENGLISH: - WELL FAIR X NILRATINGS: SUPERIOR NORMAL LOW1. INTEREST IN LANGUAGE STUDY: X2. ACHIEVEMENT IN LEARNING SPOKEN LANGUAGE: NA3. ACHIEVEMENT IN LEARNING WRITTEN LANGUAGE: X4. ABILITY TO UNDERSTAND GRAMMATICAL EXPLANATION: X5. ABILITY TO LEARN AND RETAIN VOCABULARY FORMS AND STRUCTURE: X6. ABILITY TO SPEAK SPONTANEOUSLY AND NATURALLY: NA7. DEGREE OF APPLICATION AND EFFORT: XSKILL DESIRED IN LANGUAGE TRAINING REQUEST: Elementary ReadingFURTHER LANGUAGE TRAINING NECESSARY:FURTHER LANGUAGE TRAINING RECOMMENDED:FURTHER LANGUAGE TRAINING NOT RECOMMENDED: X![Signature]
[104-10222-10012.pdf — page 219]
# SECRETSECURITY INFORMATION# PERSONNEL EVALUATION REPORTItems 1 through 6 will be completed by Administrative or Personnel Officer1. NAME (Last) (First) (Middle) 2. GRADE 3. POSITION TITLE   RANDALL Frederick C. GS-9 Intel. Officer (CZ) CD-FI4. OFFICE STAFF OR DIVISION BRANCH (If FIELD, SPECIFY STATION)   DDP FE 5 (Indon & Malaya) FIELD5. PERIOD COVERED BY REPORT 6. TYPE OF REPORT   From 2-10-53 to 9-10-53 Initial Annual Special   Reassignment Reassignment of SupervisorItems 7 through 10 will be completed by the person evaluated7. LIST YOUR MAJOR DUTIES IN APPROXIMATE ORDER OF IMPORTANCE, WITH A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF EACH. OMIT MINOR DUTIES.Same as listed in previous report.8. LIST COURSES OF INSTRUCTION COMPLETED DURING REPORT PERIOD.| Name of Course                 | Location        | Length of Course | Date Completed || ------------------------------ | --------------- | ---------------- | -------------- || A. M. Degree (Foreign Affairs) | George Wash Un. |                  | May 1953       || C. P. Briefing                 | T-30            | Approx 8 days    | June-1953      |9. IN WHAT TYPE OF WORK ARE YOU PRIMARILY INTERESTED?Same as listed in previous report.IF DIFFERENT FROM YOUR PRESENT JOB, EXPLAIN YOUR QUALIFICATIONS (APTITUDE, KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS).10. 25 August 1953DATEFrederick C RandallSIGNATUREItems 11 through 12 will be completed by Supervisor11. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE THIS PERSON'S PERFORMANCE ON THE MAJOR DUTIES LISTED UNDER ITEM 7 ABOVE.Same as listed in previous report.
[104-10222-10012.pdf — page 220]
SECRETSECURITY INFORMATION12. IN HAT RESPECT IS THIS PERSON'S PERFORMANCE ON PRESENT JOS MOST POTICEABLY GOOD OR OUTSTANDING?Same as listed in previous report.13. ON BHAT ASPECT OF PERFORMANCE SHOULD THIS PERSON CONCENTRATE EFFORT FOR SELP IMPROVEMENTY-Same as listed in previous report.15. COMMENT ON THIS PERSON'S ABILITY TO HANDLE GREATER RESPONSIBILITIES NOW OR IN THE FUTURE.Same as listed in previous report.15. ARE THERE OTHER DUTIES WHICH BETTER SUIT THIS PERSON'S QUALIFICATIONS? (Recommend appropriate reassignment, If possible.iRecommand, immediate assignment to Indonesian field Apppppppppll station.16. WHAT TRAINING OR ROTATION DO YOU RECOMMEND FOR THIS PERSON?Same as listed in previous report.17. IP PERFORMANCE DURING REPORT PERIOD HAS BEEN UNSATISFACTORY, THERE IS ATTACHED COPY OF MEMORANDUM NOTIFYING THIS PERSON OF UNSATISFACTORY PEREGRMANCE.18. THIS PERSONNEL EVALUATION REPORT HAS BEEN SISCUSSED BITH THE PERSON EVALUATED. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS INCLUDING COMMENT ON ITENS 1, 3 AND 9, ARE SHOWN BILD UNDER ITEM 20.25 Angust 1953DATE19. I HAVE REVIEWED THE ADOVE REPORT. IComments, if any, are shown in iteo 20.iRobert PSIGNATURE OF SUPERFICORJ.Q. GoodellSIGNATURE OF REVIEWING OFFICIAL20. COMMENTS: 114 necessary, may be continued on coverso side of corar sSECRET
[104-10222-10012.pdf — page 221]
# SECRETSECURITY INFORMATIONPERSONNEL EVALUATION REPORTItems 1 through 6 will be completed by Administrative or Personnel Officer.1. NAME   RANDALL, Fredrick C.2. GRADE   GS-93. POSITION TITLE   Intel Off (DB)4. STAFF OR DIVISION   FE5. BRANCH   56. TYPE OF REPORT   Initial   Annual   Special   Reassignment   Reassignment of SupervisorPERIOD COVERED BY REPORTfrom 2-10-52 to 2-10-53Items 7 through 10 will be completed by the person evaluated.7. LIST YOUR MAJOR DUTIES IN APPROXIMATE ORDER OF IMPORTANCE, WITH A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF EACH. OMIT MINOR DUTIES.   As Chief of CE Section of Branch 5, supervise and perform the followings:   a. Promulgate and coordinate espionage and counter espionage operations designed to obtain adequate coverage of the host and all other foreign intelligence services operating in Indonesia and Malaya.   b. Maintain CE card and index file, personality and subject dossiers, notebooks, etc.   c. Disseminate counter espionage information to interested customer agencies and appropriate sections of CIA.   d. Formulate research studies on host intelligence services, and plan and conduct operational analyses, etc.   e. Conduct correspondence on CE and personality cases with other government agencies and with field stations.8. LIST COURSES OF INSTRUCTION COMPLETED DURING REPORT PERIOD.| Name of Course    | Location                     | Length of Course                                     | Date Completed       || ----------------- | ---------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------- | -------------------- || Counter Espionage | CIA Washington               | 1 week (first week of two-week course taken in 1951) | 9 May 1952           || Thesis (AM)       | George Washington University | Indefinite                                           | To complete May 1953 |9. IN WHAT TYPE OF WORK ARE YOU PRIMARILY INTERESTED?I am interested in my present job as a Washington Counter Espionage Officer, but desire to broaden my knowledge of intelligence through future field tours as an intelligence and counter intelligence officer in the Far East.10. 2/23/53DATEFrederich C. RandallSIGNATUREItems 11 through 12 will be completed by Supervisor11. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE THIS PERSON'S PERFORMANCE ON THE MAJOR DUTIES LISTED UNDER ITEM 7 ABOVE.    Subject's performance is best described as excellent. He is doing competent work and is laying a good foundation for a career in intelligence.FORM NO. 37-151MAY 1952SECRET
[104-10222-10012.pdf — page 222]
SECRETSECURITY INFORMATION12. IN OMAT RESPECT IS THIS PERSON'S PERFORMANCE ON PRESENT JOB MOST NOTICEABLY GOOD OR CUTS ANDINGT    Subject is very thorough and industrious. He exhibits marked initiative and a very    high degree of interest.13. ON WHAT ASPECT OF PERFORMANCE SHOULD THIS PERSON CONCENTRATE EFFORT FOR SELP IMPROVEMENT?    Subject will profit by a continuing effort to relate his work to all aspects    of the Agency's intelligence function.14. COMMENT ON THIS PERSON'S ABILITY TO HANDLE GREATER RESPONSIBILITIES NOW OR IN THE FUTURE.    Subject has proven himself able to supervise the work of others and has handled well    the increasing responsibilities of his job.15. ARE THERE OTHER DUTIES WHICH BETTER SUIT THIS PERSON'S QUALIFICATIONS? (Recommend appropriate reassignment, if    possible.)    No change is recommended at this time. His easy, affable manter in dealing with others    make subject well qualified for duties requiring more contact with others than his    present assigriment demands.16. WHAT TRAINING OR ROTATION DO YOU RECOMMEND FOR THIS PERSON?    Further training is planned to include specialized courses given by the Agency.17. IF PERFORMANCE DURING REPORT PERIOD HAS BEEN UNSATISFACTORY, THERE IS ATTACHED COPE OF DEMORANDUM NOTIFYING THIS    PERSON OF UNSATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE.18. THIS PERSONNEL EVALUATION REPORT HAS BEEN DISCUSSED WITH THE PERSON EVALUATED. ACTICAL COMMENTS INCLUDING    COMMENT ON ITEMS 7, 8 AND 9, ARE SHOWN BELOW UNDER ITEM 20.![signature]30 March 1953![signature]John Flee HamellSIGNATURE OF SUPERVISOR19. I NAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REPORT, (Commonts, if any, are shown laites 20.1![signature]15 afrid 1953![signature]V.O. GodeSIGNATURE OF REVIEWING OFFICIAL20. COMMENTS: Ilf necessary, may be continued on reversa side of cover sheet.SECRET![signature]
[104-10222-10012.pdf — page 224]
# E. Ability to Write (NOT OBSERVED1Seemed unable to express thoughts clearly in written form.2Was weak in express-ing thoughts clearly in written form.3Written work showed no significant weakness.4Displayed ability to express thoughts thoroughly in written form.5Was outstanding in ability to express ideas in clear, correct, coherent, manner.# F. Facility of oral expression (NOT OBSERVED1Unable to express self clearly. Pre-sented ideas in groping and incoherent fashion.2Lacked fluency or ease in his speech, but meaning usually clear.3Displayed reasonable facility in oral expression.4Spoke confidently, conveying ideas clearly and read-ily.5Outstanding in fluency and clarity of oral expression.# G. Ability to Get Along With Associates. (NOT OBSERVED1Frequently alienated his associates.2Failed to win social acceptance but did not actively antagonize others.3Reasonably effective in his social relations.4Displayed definite ability to achieve harmonious relationships with his associates.5Unusually effective in his ability to win acceptance from others# H. Ability to Influence His Associates (NOT OBSERVED1Withdrew from group activities to a marked degree, failing to influence the thinking and actions of others.2Normally socially retiring, opinions rarely affected his associates.3Usually participated in group activities, was fairly successful in selling a point or himself.4Was excellent at influencing others by his own personality and thinking.5Was outstanding in ability to command respect and attention through his personality and thinking.# I. Tact (NOT OBSERVED1Markedly blunt and indiscreet.2Frequently said or did something which induced an unfavorable reaction.3Reasonably discreet and tactful.4Had good discernment for the appropriate thing to say or do.5Consistently demonstrates an even perception for fitting speech or210: SEARPET