[104-10222-10041.pdf — page 117]
# OFFICERS EFFICIENCY REPORT WORK SHEETSECTION 11. LAST NAME, FIRST NAME, MIDDLE INITIAL: CONEIN, LUCIEN, F.6. UNIT, ORGANIZATION, AND STATION OF RATED OFFICER2. SERVICE NO.: 01297769 | 3. GRADE: LTC | 4. BRANCH: INF | 5. COMPONENT: USAR7. PERIOD OF REPORT:FROM: (Do, mo, yri) 18 Apr 71 | TO: (Do, mo, yri) 17 Apr 72 | DULY DAYS:  | OTHER DAYS: 38. REASON FOR REPORT:*   Annual*   Change duty rated officer*   PCS rated officer*   Change duty. rating officer*   PCS rating officer*   Other (Specify)9. BASIS FOR RATING OFFICER'S ENTRIES*   Close daily contad*   Infrequent observation*   Frequent observation*   Reports and records10. DUTIES ACTUALLY PERFORMED ON PRESENT JOB ASSIGNMENT (Line his duty MOS. A job assignment, and brisly describe major additional dutiee)Classified duties comfortable to a special forces troop commander on an isolated mission.11. OFFICER CHARACTERISTICS|                                                                                                                                                              | UNKNOWN | UNSATISFACTORY | SATISFACTORY | UNKNOWN | UNSATISFACTORY | SATISFACTORY || ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | :-----: | :------------: | :----------: | :-----: | :------------: | :----------: || a. How effective is this officer in the maintenance of supply discipline ?                                                                                   |    ☐    |       ☐        |      ☑       |    ☐    |       ☐        |      ☑       || b. How effective is this officer in utilization of personnel ?                                                                                               |    ☐    |       ☐        |      ☑       |    ☐    |       ☐        |      ☑       || c. FOR RATER ONLY - Does this officer possess the physical, mental, and moral qualities expected for his grade, branch, and length of commissioned service ? |    ☐    |      NO ☐      |    YES ☑     |    ☐    |       ☐        |      ☑       || d. FOR RATER ONLY - Could this officer be assigned to serve adequately in any normal branch assignment commensurate with his grade ?                         |    ☐    |       ☐        |      ☑       |    ☐    |       ☐        |      ☑       || If UNKNOWN or NO explain in detail in item 12a.                                                                                                              |         |                |              |         |                |              || If UNKNOWN or NO explain in datail in item 12b.                                                                                                              |         |                |              |         |                |              |12. DESCRIPTION OF RATED OFFICER AND COMMENTS. Remarks should cover any special strengths or weaknesses affecting performance of duty or ability to per- form other types of assignments. If officer served in combat during period, state number of days) and discuss strengths and weaknesses exhibited in combat.a. Comments of rating officerHas demonstrated outstanding leadership, including the ability to assess a situation correctly, make proper decisions on his own initiative and cope with emergencies skillfully. Much of his duties were performed in sensitive situations where enemy agents were active; demonstrated brave performance under enemy fire.b. Comments of indorsing officerI do not know the rated officer well enough to complete the reverse side of this reportAn outstanding officer, thoroughly qualified technically in his field, practical, adjested and tested. Understood difficult missions under most trying conditions and carried them out successfully.13. RATING OFFICER'S NAME, GRADE, SERVICE NUMBER, BRANCH, ORGANIZATION, AND DUTY ASSIGNMENTEdmund M. QuereauO-422977, INF, HALL-VIETNAMI CERTIFY THAT THIS IS THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEFALL ENTRIES MADE HEREON BY ME ARE TRUE AND IMPARTIAL AND ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH AR 623-205 AND AR 623-105.DATESIGNATURE14. INDORSING OFFICER'S NAME, GRADE, SERVICE NUMBER, BRANCH, ORGANIZATION, AND DUTY ASSIGNMENTEdward G. Lansdale, Colonel,2534A, USAF, MAAG-VIETNAMI CERTIFY THAT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEFALL ENTRIES MADE HEREON BY ME ARE TRUE AND IMPARTIAL AND ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH AR 623-205 AND AR 623-105.DATESIGNATURE15. THIS REPORT HAS: INCLOSURES: None **OR** if applicable16. DATE ENTERED ON DA FORM 68 PERSONNEL OFFICER'S INITIALSWORK SHEET FOR DA FORM 67-3