Francesco/who-killed-jfk huggingface dataset:
[104-10222-10040.pdf — page 29]
# SECTION CSECRET(When Filled In)NARRATIVE COMMENTSIndicate significant strengths or weaknesses demonstrated in current position keeping in proper perspective their relationship to overall performance. State suggestions made for improvement of work performance. Give recommendations for training. Comment on foreign language competence, if required for current position. Amplify or explain ratings given in Section B to provide best basis for determining future personnel action. Manner of performance of managing or supervisory duties must be described, if applicable.JUN 16 '11 15 AM '65During the past year, this officer has continued to demonstrate his dedication and highly developed professional skills.Subject has been called upon to meet a variety of requirements. The spectrum of his activity has been so broad that it has run from the exploitation of his manual dexterity (in installing technical devices) to the most sophisticated and demanding agent handling. Throughout the year, Subject has demonstrated his awareness of the value of KUBARK funds, which he spends as needed but always conscientiously. His reporting on his activities has been especially commendable, and his mastery of tradecraft has been continually in evidence.Subject has now become Chief of PBRUMEN operations for Station Mexico. This slot was formerly held by a GS-15 officer. It is requested that Subject be promoted to the grade of GS-15, not only because of his present assignment, but in recognition of his fine past performance.# SECTION DCERTIFICATION AND COMMENTS1. BY EMPLOYEE:I CERTIFY THAT I HAVE SEEN SECTIONS A, B, AND C OF THIS REPORTDATE3 June 65SIGNATURE OF EMPLOYEERobert T. Shaw /s/2. BY SUPERVISORMONTHS EMPLOYEE HAD BEEN UNDER MY SUPERVISIONIF THIS REPORT HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN TO EMPLOYEE, GIVE EXPLANATIONDATE3 June 65OFFICIAL TITLE OF SUPERVISOROperations OfficerTYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATUREDavid A. Phillips /s/3. BY REVIEWING OFFICIALCOMMENTS OF REVIEWING OFFICIALPara 2 of covering dispatch HRRT 5493 in its entirety:"CCS is in complete agreement with this excellent report on Shaw and recommends that Shaw be promoted to GS-15."DATE3 June 65OFFICIAL TITLE OF REVIEWING OFFICIALCOSTYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATUREWinston M. Scott /s/SECRET
[104-10222-10040.pdf — page 30]
6 September 1966SUBJECT: Memorandum in Lieu of Final Fitness Report on Robert T. Shaw1. Robert T. Shaw is under (PCS) transfer to the position of COS, Managua, and is scheduled to depart Mexico City on or about 17 September 1966.2. This memorandum is to report that Shaw has continued to perform duties assigned to him at the Mexico City Station in the same exceptional manner reported in HMMT-6516 In which he was rated as outstanding for the year April 1965-April 1966. His duties have been the same as reported in HMMT-6516 and a detailed report on his performance would be a repetition of his previous report.3. It is again recommended that Shaw be promoted to GS-15 in view of his performance and qualifications.RATING OFFICER: ( September 1966) Winston M. Scott/s/EMPLOYEE: (6 September 1966) Robert T. Shaw /s/Employee Number: 055495
[104-10222-10040.pdf — page 32]
# SECRET## SECTION CIndicate significant strengths or weaknesses demonstrated in current position keeping in proper perspective their relationship to overall performance. State suggestions made for improvement of work performance or recommendations for training. Comment on foreign language competence, if required for current position. Amplify or explain ratings given in Section B to provide best basis for determining future personnel action. Manner of performance of managerial or supervisory duties and cost consciousness in the use of personnel, space, equipment and funds, must be commented if inapplicable. If extra space is needed to complete Section C, attach a separate sheet of paper.MAY 24 3:27 PM '66MAIL ROOMThis officer possesses highly developed professional skills. He is dedicated; his work is always well done and his reports are well written.Subject has repeatedly demonstrated that he is aware of the value of government funds which he spends as necessary but always conscientiously.This officer is articulate in speech and in his writing. He has excellent Spanish, an essential in the position he has occupied.This officer is an asset to KUBARK and his family are excellent representatives abroad.Subject could assume command of a station and he would make an excellent Chief of Station in the opinion of the rating officer.It is again recommended that this officer be promoted to GS-15.## SECTION D1. CERTIFICATION AND COMMENTSBY EMPLOYEEI CERTIFY THAT I HAVE SEEN SECTIONS A, B, AND C OF THIS REPORTDATESIGNATURE OF EMPLOYEE21 April 1966/s/ Robert T. Shaw2. BY SUPERVISORMONTHS EMPLOYEE HAS BEEN UNDER MY SUPERVISIONIF THIS REPORT HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN TO EMPLOYEE, GIVE EXPLANATIONDATEOFFICIAL TITLE OF SUPERVISORTYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE21 April 1966Chief of Station/s/ Winston M. Scott3. BY REVIEWING OFFICIAL   COMMENTS OF REVIEWING OFFICIALI concur generally with the assessment made of Mr. Shaw and agree that Shaw has turned in a highly commendable job and is an excellent operations officer. From here and not having the advantage of on-scene observation I would have rated Shaw with straight S' and overall rating of 'Strong' as compared to 'Outstanding.' Nevertheless, I strongly endorse the COS' recommendation for promotion for Shaw.DATEOFFICIAL TITLE OF REVIEWING OFFICIALTYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE10 MAC/WR/1W.J. Kaufman
[104-10222-10040.pdf — page 33]
SECRETSection C (Continued)Overall, this officer is still turning in a performance of high quality under difficult conditions and is a distinct asset to the Station.SECRET
[104-10222-10040.pdf — page 34]
# SECRET EV'S ONLYFITNESS REPORT EMPLOYEE SERIAL NUMBER055405## SECTION A GENERAL1. NAME(Last) (First) (Middle)SIAW Robert T.2. DATE OF BIRTH 3. SEX 4. GRADE 5. OD18 Jun 1925 N GS-14 D6. OFFICIAL POSITION TITLE 7. OFF/DIV/OR OF ASSIGNMENT 8. CURRENT STATIONInstructor Operations OTR ISOLATION/S9. CHECK (X) TYPE OF APPOINTMENT 10. CHECK (X) TYPE OF REPORTCAREER RESERVE INITIAL REASSIGNMENT SUPERVISORTEMPORARY ANNUAL XX REASSIGNMENT EMPLOYEECAREER-PROVISIONAL (See instructions Section C)SPECIAL (Specify)SPECIAL (Specify)11. DATE REPORT DUE IN O.P. 12. REPORTING PERIOD (From to)Jul 17- 21 July 1962- 25 January 1963## SECTION B PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONW- Weak Performance ranges from wholly inadequate to slightly less than satisfactory. A rating in this category requirespositive remedial action. The nature of the action, could range from counseling, to further training, to placing onprobation, to reassignment or to separation. Describe action taken or proposed in Section C.A - Adequate Performance meets all requirements. It is entirely satisfactory and is characterized neither by deficiency norexcellence.P - Proficient Performance is more than satisfactory. Desired results are being produced in a proficient manner.S - Strong Performance is characterized by exceptional proficiency.O - Outstanding Performance is so exceptional in relation to requirements of the work and in comparison to the performance ofothers doing similar work as to warrant special recognition.## SPECIFIC DUTIESList up to six of the most important specific duties performed during the rating period. Insert rating letter which best describes themanner in which employee performs EACH specific duty. Consider ONLY effectiveness in performance of that duty. All employeeswith supervisory responsibilities MUST be rated on their ability to supervise (indicate number of employees supervised).SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 1 RATINGLETTERSupervises a group of instructors as departmental chairman in the Operations 8Branch DANOSPECIFIC DUTY NO. 2 RATINGLETTERInstructs clandestine operations by lecture, seminar and practical exercises. PSPECIFIC DUTY NO. 3 RATINGLETTERInstructs by role-playing as agent or operations officer opposite student case 8officersSPECIFIC DUTY NO. 4 RATINGLETTERCounsels and guides students individually. SSPECIFIC DUTY NO. 5 RATINGLETTERParticipates in course planning and contributes to course substance. SSPECIFIC DUTY NO. 6 RATINGLETTERPrepares instructional presentations and materials for use in clandestine Poperations courses.## OVERALL PERFORMANCE IN CURRENT POSITION RATINGLETTERTake into account everything about the employee which influences his effectiveness in his current position such as per-formance of specific duties, productivity, conduct on job, cooperativeness, pertinent personal habits or traits, andparticular limitations or talents. Based on your knowledge of employee's overall performance during the rating period.Place the letter to the rating box corresponding to the statement which most accurately reflects his level of performance. 0SECRET
[104-10222-10040.pdf — page 35]
# SECTION CSECRETNARRATIVE COMMENTSIndicate significant strengths or weaknesses demonstrated in current position keeping in proper perspective their relationship to overall performance. State suggestions made for improvement of work performance. Give recommendations for training. Comment on foreign language competence, if required for current position. Amplify or explain ratings given in Section B to provide best basis for determining future personnel action. Manner of performance of managerial or supervisory duties must be described, if applicable.Mr. Shaw did an excellent job of course planning and personal supervision as a supervisor of instruction in the field of operational tradecraft. He is a first-rate spark plug and idea man, with good talent as a speaker, teacher and student counselor. His field experience, enthusiasm and loyalty have made him a particularly valuable member of the Operations Branch StaffIn addition to his duties in the Operations Branch, Mr. Shaw also participated in the training of infiltration teams for Task Force W, using the Spanish language.# SECTION DCERTIFICATION AND COMMENTSBY EMPLOYEEI CERTIFY THAT I HAVE SEEN SECTIONS A, B, AND C OF THIS REPORTDATE30 January 1963SIGNATURE OF EMPLOYEEBY SUPERVISOR2. MONTHS EMPLOYEE HAS BEEN UNDER MY SUPERVISIONIF THIS REPORT HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN TO EMPLOYEE, GIVE EXPLANATION6DATEOFFICIAL TITLE OF SUPERVISOR28 January 1963Chief, Operations BranchTYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATUREHARRINGTON LITTELL3. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING OFFICIALBY REVIEWING OFFICIALIn general I agree with Mr. Littell's evaluation of Mr. Shaw's performance. I would have given him a higher rating, however, on Specific Duty No. 2, which covers his over-all performance as an instructor. I think that Mr. Shaw has been one of our best seminar leaders and lecturers. I would, therefore, rate him as "Strong."DATE31 January 1963OFFICIAL TITLE OF REVIEWING OFFICIALDeputy for Training, ISOLATIONSECRETTYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATUREKENNETH P. MILLER
[104-10222-10040.pdf — page 36]
Pre. 1963 Fitness Rpts
[104-10222-10040.pdf — page 37]
Post 1966 Training at insurance loss.
[104-10222-10040.pdf — page 38]
DEPARTMENT OF STATEFOREIGN SERVICE INSTITUTEWASHINGTONJune 28, 1966Dear Mr. Shaw:Friday we received your grade from the United States Department of Agriculture Graduate School in Modern Supervisory Practice.We wish to congratulate you on making an A+ in the course. To my knowledge, this is the first A+ received in any correspondence study course to be taken by Department personnel.We trust that the course will be useful to you--and again congratulations.Sincerely,Evert T. LittleChiefExtension Training DivisionMr. Robert T. ShawAmerican EmbassyMEXICOFor inclusion in Robert T. Shaw's official folder.Kch. Wamlold10/16/61
[104-10222-10040.pdf — page 39]
# SECRET(When Filled In)# VERIFIED RECORD OF OVERSEAS SERVICETO: Office of Personnel, Statistical Reporting Branch, ROOM 5 E 2506 Readquarters| EMPLOYEE SERIAL NO. | NAME OF EMPLOYEE | OFFICE/COMPONENT |        |       || ------------------- | ---------------- | ---------------- | ------ | ----- || 1-6                 | LAST             | FIRST            | MIDDLE | 25-26 || 055495              | Shaw             | Robert           | T      | 51    |INSTRUCTIONSUSE APPROPRIATE SPACE BELOR TO REPORT DATA FOR EITHER PCS OR TOY. INSERT APPROPRIATE CODE NUMBER IN "CODE" COLUMN TO DESIGNATE WHETHER SUBMISSION IS OF DASIC DATA, CORRECTION, OR CANCELLATION (One only), REPORT DATES BY USING THE NUMBER FOR THE MONTH, AND LAST, TWO DIGITS ONLY FOR YEAR.|     | TYPE OF DATA  | CODE | MONTH | DAY   | YEAR  | MONTH | DAY   | YEAR  | COUNTRY   | OMIT  || --- | ------------- | ---- | ----- | ----- | ----- | ----- | ----- | ----- | --------- | ----- || 1.  | PCS (Basic)   | 27   |       |       |       |       |       |       |           | 40-42 || 2.  | CORRECTION    |      | 28-29 | 30-31 | 32-33 | 34:35 | 36-37 | 38-39 |           |       || 4.  | CANCELLATION. | 1    | 09    | 20    | 66    |       |       |       | Nicaragua | 520   ||     | TYPE OF DATA | CODE | MONTH | DAY   | YEAR  | MONTH | DAY   | YEAR  | AREA(S) | OMIT  || --- | ------------ | ---- | ----- | ----- | ----- | ----- | ----- | ----- | ------- | ----- || 2.  | TDV (Basic)  | 27   |       |       |       |       |       |       |         | 40-42 || 4.  | CORRECTION   |      | 28-29 | 30-31 | 32-33 | 34-35 | 36-37 | 38-39 |         |       || 6.  | CANCELLATION |      |       |       |       |       |       |       |         |       |[X] TRAVEL VOUCHERSOURCE OF RECORD DOCUMENT[ ] CABLE DISPATCH[ ] OTHER (Specify) DUTY STATUS OR TIME AND ATTENDANCE REPORT| DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION NO. | DOCUMENT DATE/PERIOD || --------------------------- | -------------------- || IN 99956                    | 9/20/66              |REMARKS| PREFADEO BY        | [X] REPORT AЧНОТАТКО см SOURCE COCUREUR | ABOVE DATA VERIFIED CORRECT, BASED PON SOURCE DOCUMENT CITED || ------------------ | --------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------ || C & L DIVISION     | DATE: 9/22/66                           | SIGNATURE                                                    || [X] C & T DIVISION |                                         | Jackie E Persinger                                           |FORM 1451aSECRET
[104-10222-10040.pdf — page 40]
SECRET# REQUEST FOR PCS OVERSEAS EVALUATION1. NAME (Last, First, Middle)SFAW, ROBERT T.2. DATE OF BIRTH27 AUGUST 19253. GRADE35-14 44. OFFICE, DIVISION, BRANCH (Overseas station and existing cover if lateral assignment)Employee ExtensionDDP/WH/MEXICO CITY STATION (ODACID)5. PRESENT POSITIONCPS OFFICER/340FIELD7. PROPOSED STATIONMANAGUA, NICARAGUA8. PROPOSED POSITION (title, number, grade)COS, OPS OFFICER/0141/03-009. TYPE OF COVER AT NEW STATIONDEPARTMENT OF STATE10. ESTIMATED DATE OF DEPARTURE1 JULY 196611. NO. OF DEPENDENTS TO ACCOMPANY412. NAME OF DEPENDENT TO ACCOMPANY13. RELATIONSHIP14. DATE OF BIRTH15. REPORT OF MEDICAL (SP 89) ATT:MONTHYEARNOJANET L.WIFEAPR27XXBARBARA L.DAUGJUL52XXRICHARD W.SONAUG55XXTHOMAS R.SONAUG55XX16. COMMENTSSUBJECT AND DEPENDENTS WILL TAKE PHYSICALS IN THE FIELD IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE REGULATIONS.17. GATE OF REQUEST2 MAY 196618. SIGNATURE OF REQUESTING OFFICIALFrank A. LaneWH/PERS19. ROOM NUMBER AND BUILDINGGH-56, Hq.20. EXTENSION681521. EVALUATION AND SIGNATURE OF APPROVING OFFICIAL![signature]![text]
[104-10222-10040.pdf — page 41]
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTUREGRADUATE SCHOOLWASHINGTON, D. C. 20250Robert T. Shawc/o American EmbassyMexico City, MexicoInformation RecordTo whom it may concern:has taken the following courses in the Graduate School and has received the grades shown.This is an information record and not an official transcript. The student was admitted on the basis of his own statement of previous education and experience, subject to the approval of the instructor.For certification of academic credit, an official transcript should be requested. Students desiring academic credit must meet qualifications for admission to any standard college on the level of the courses for which they are registering.| COURSE NO. | COURSE TITLE                | SEMESTER | GRADE | NO. CREDITS || ---------- | --------------------------- | -------- | ----- | ----------- || 205 c      | Modern Supervisory Practice | 6/7/66   | A+    | 2           |Correspondence ProgramA – 90-100 EXCELLENTB – 80-89 GOODC – 70-79 FAIRD – 60-69 PASSABLEF – BELOW 60 FAILUREV – AUDITORI – INCOMPLETEW - WITHDRAWN![signature of Helen Kempfer]Helen Kempfer, HeadCorrespondence Program
[104-10222-10040.pdf — page 42]
AMORICAN EMBASSYNXICO, D. F.June 3, 1965EMPASSY MEMORANDUTO: All F80s, FSSs and FSRs in Mexico CityFROM: Ralph Scarritt, Administrative OfficerSUBJECT: FOREIGN SERVICE INSTITUTE; Correspondsince Course in ModernSupervisory Practice, Number 2050REF. : CA-12771 deted May 28, 1965Following is the text of the referenced communication:The Extension Training Division of the Foreign ServiceInstitute. is offering for the first time. a correspondence courseMODERN SUPERVISORY PRACTICE.The course is recommended for supervisors at all levels. It hasbeen developed by W. R. Ven tersal, N.A. Derg and J. B. Rogers of theUnited States Department of Agriculture Graduate School. Dr. Van Dersal16 a regular lecturer and discussion leader for management classes atthe Foreign Service Institute and is highly recommended by FSI as avalued contributor to their programs and..The authors have conducted supervisory training all over theUnited States for thousands of employees. They are experienced withthe Correspondence method.The average student will devote a total of 160::: to the course,which consists of 16 units and for which 2 credito are given. Thecourse should be completed within twelve months of receipt of the firstlesson.The follows is quoted from the course brochure, giving briefcontents of each unit:"1. WORKING WITH PEOPLE. Meie Principles.2. ORGANIZACIO!!. The organization chart. Supervisory ratios.Span of control. Line and staff. Handling rapidexpansion. Basic principle.. How to judge a goodorganization.3. COMMUNICATINUS T. Corferences: lanning and uses.Effective us: of spea is and discussion. Making one'sown te more persuasive. Problem solving. Efficientlistening.4. COMMUNICATIONS
[104-10222-10040.pdf — page 43]
CA-12771 -2-4. COMMUNICATIONS 2. Formal and informal communication channels. The grapevine. How to read better and faster. How to write more effectively. Testing your own writing.5. MOTIVATION, Basic principles. Drives, motives, and incentives. Selecting responses to reinforce. The pattern of successful motivation. Testing effectiveness of programs.6. SUPERVISION--PASIC PRINCIPLES FOR LINE OPERATORS AND MANAGERS. Inducting new employees. Seven principles of supervision. The Scanlon Plan. Using authority constructively. Praise versus punishment.7. GENERAL PRINCIPLES FOR STAFF OPERATORS. Staff functions. Line-staff relationships. Gaining acceptance. Getting the most value from staff officers. Effective consulting.8. SUPERVISORY TECHNIQUES. Handling problem employees."   What to do when personal problems affect work.9. TRAINING. Training responsibilities of supervisors.   How to plan training programs. Training new employees.   The supervisor's own career development program.   Handling training durire rapid expansion. "Justifying training time.10. PARTICIPATION. When and how to use participation in planning and decision making. Setting guideposts and limits.11. THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS. Eight steps to better decisions. Decisions making as a learned skill. How to train yourself to make better decisions.12. WORKLOAD AND ITS RELATION TO STAFFING. Workload analyses. Work plans. Short and long term schedules. Work-improvement studies. Staffing patterns and workload,13. PLANNING, SCHEDULING, ORGANIZING. Basic principles.    Steps in planning. Making and using schedules.    Evaluation for better time-use.14. QUALITY AND QUANTITY CONTROL--INCLUDING INSPECTIONS.    Purpose and importance. Theories. How standards control runction. Constructive inspection.15. BOOK REVIEW AND ANALYSIS. To help student integrate thinking and develop an, independent approach.16. SOLVING
[104-10222-10040.pdf — page 44]
CA-1277116. SOLVING PROBLEM CASES. Student pulls together all he    has learned in the course and uses it in solving a    Job problem.The course will be offered on a first come, first served basis.It is hoped that a number of applications will be received in time forenrollment during June.Students who fail, receive an incomplete, or withdraw from thiscourse for other than officially approved reasons will be expected toreimburse FSI for the course cost of $58.00. If a student fails tocomplete the course for official reasons, no record is sent to hisPersonnel File. If he fails to complete the course for other thanofficial and approved reasons and reimburses FSI for the costs of hiscourse, no record is sent to his Personnel File. However a record of"incocplete" or "failure" is sent to his file if he drops or fails thecourse for reasons not approved and fails to reimburse PSI. Thisrecord is then taken into consideration if training 10 requested at alater date.All interested officers are requested to submit their applicationsto the Department on form DS-1131 Field Training Application inaccordance with the instructions set forth in 2 FAM 551, 552.Further information on the course may be obtained by writing tothe Extension Training Division, Foreign Service Institute, Departmentof State, Washington, D. C. 20520.NOTE: Application forms may be obtained in the Personnel office.
[104-10222-10040.pdf — page 45]
# U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE## GRADUATE SCHOOLWASHINGTON, D. C. . 20250### Information RecordRobert T. ShawTo whom it may concern: c/o American EmbassyMexico City, Mexicohas taken the following courses in the Graduate School and has received the grades shown.This is an information record and not an official transcript. The student was admitted on the basis of his own statement of previous education and experience, subject to the approval of the instructor.For certification of academic credit, an official transcript should be requested. Students desiring academic credit must meet qualifications for admission to any standard college on the level of the courses for which they are registering.| COURSE NO. | COURSE TITLE                | SEMESTER | GRADE | CRD. || ---------- | --------------------------- | -------- | ----- | ---- || 205 c      | Modern Supervisory Practice | 6/7/66   | A+    | 2    |Correspondence ProgramA--90-100 EXCELLENTB--80-89 GOODC--70-79 FAIRD--60-69 PASSABLEF--BELOW 60 FAILUREP--AUDITORI--INCOMPLETEW--WITHDRAWN![signature of Helen Kempfer]Helen Kempfer, HeadCorrespondence Program