Francesco/who-killed-jfk huggingface dataset:
[104-10222-10005.pdf — page 197]
# OFFICE OF PERSONNELSECRET(When Filled In)## NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF MANNER OF JOB PERFORMANCEStress strengths and weaknesses demonitruted in current position. Indicate suggestions might his work. Give recommendations for his training. Describe, if arvopriate, his potential for dement nmcibilities. Amplify of explain, if appropriate, ratings given in SECTIONS B, C, and D to provide the bool basis for future personnel actions.Subject is a young, aggresive Case Officer assignatippaggia sinc 3 l'ebruary 1960. Prior to his assignment to this post, he was a JUT. Subject's greatest strength lies in the fact that he is extremely willing to undertake any tank assigned to hiin regardless of its desireability, difficulty or the project;s time consuming propertles. Once given an assignment, Subject requires a minimum supervision. Subject is especially suited to new assignments because of his adaptability to new circumstances. Subject's worst handicap is his youth coupled with his low grade in respect to the supervisory responsibilities assigned him, IL is belleved this person is a good candidate for advancement In view of his outstanding performance at this Station.It will be noted that Subject is rated very highly in Sections B, C and D, These ratings are well carned by Subject in his own right and are even more pronounced when considered in respect to the performance of other more senior officers at this Station.## CERTIFICATION AND COMMENTS### BY EMPLOYEEI certify that I have seen Sections A, B, C, D and E of this Report.DATE19 December 1960BIGNATURE OF EMPLOYEE/s/Thomas J. Keenan### BY SUPERVISORIF THIS REPORT HAS NOT BREN SHOWN TO EMPLOYEE, GIVE EXPLANATIONMONTHS EMPLOYER HAS OERNUNDER MY SUPERVISION10 months.IF REPORT IS NOT DEING MADE AT THIS TIME, GIVE REASON.EMPLOYEL UNDER MY LUPRAVISION LESS THAN 90 DAYSOTURN (Specify);REPORT MADE WITHIN LAST BO DAYSDATE19 December 1960OFFICIAL TITLE OF SUPERVISORIO/PITYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE// Frank R. Estancona### BY REVIEWING OFFICIAL[X] I WOULD HAVE GIVEN THIS EMPLOYEE ABOUT THE SAME EVALUATION.[] I WOULD HAVE GIVEN THIS EMPLOTRE A HIGHER EVALUATION.[] I HOULD HAVE GIVEN THIS EMPLOYEE A LOWER EVALUATION.[] I CANNOT JUDOR THESE EVALUATIONS, FAM NOT SUFFICIENTLY FAMILIAR WITH THE EMPLOYEE'S PERFORMANCE.COMMENTS OF REVIEWING OFFICIALDATE19 December 1960OFFICIAL TITLE OF REVIEWING OFFICIALChief of StationTYPED ON PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE:/3/Winston N. SCOTTSECRET
[104-10222-10005.pdf — page 198]
# DEPARTMENT OF STATEFOREIGN SERVICE INSTITUTELANGUAGE PROFICIENCY REPORTACHIEVEMENT RATINGLANGUAGE COURSESpoken Spanish| CLASS HOURS PER WEEK || :------------------: ||          30          || LENGTH OF COURSE || :--------------: ||    16   WEEKS    || AMOUNT COMPLETED || :--------------: ||  15 1/2 MONTHS   || NO OF CLASS HOURS COMPLETED || :-------------------------: ||             408             || NO OF LAB HOURS COMPLETED || :-----------------------: ||                           |COURSE MATERIALPSI Spardah - Basic Course| NO OF UNITS TO COURSE || :-------------------: ||          60           || NO OF UNITS COMPLETED || :-------------------: ||          45           |OTHER MATERIALS COMPLETEDSpecial ProgramNAMEKEENAN, Thomas J.AGENCYArmyGRADEGS-9PLACEPSI, Washington, U.V.DATE3-10-60DATES COVERED BY COURSEFROM9-21-5TO1-5-60EVALUATIONA EXCELLENTB VERY GOODC GOODD FAIRE POORSPOKEN LANGUAGE|                             |  A  |  B  |  C  |  D  |  E  || --------------------------- | :-: | :-: | :-: | :-: | :-: || PRONUNCIATION               |     | *X* |     |     |     || GRAMMATICAL ACCURACY        |     | *X* |     |     |     || ASSIMILATION OF VOCABULARY  |     |     | *X* |     |     || CONTROL OF FIXED UTTERANCES |     | *X* |     |     |     || VERSATILITY                 |     | *X* |     |     |     || COMPREHENSION               |     | *X* |     |     |     || OVERALL FLUENCY             |     | *X* |     |     |     |WRITING SYSTEM|                                             |  A  |  B  |  C  |  D  |  E  || ------------------------------------------- | :-: | :-: | :-: | :-: | :-: || SIGHT READING OF MATERIAL COVERED           |     | *X* |     |     |     || AIDED READING OF NEW MATERIAL ON NEXT LEVEL |     | *X* |     |     |     || SIGHT READING OF NEW MATERIAL ON SAME LEVEL |     | *X* |     |     |     || GENERAL COMPREHENSION                       |     | *X* |     |     |     |GENERAL ACHIEVEMENT RATING|                           |  A  |  B  |  C  |  D  |  E  || ------------------------- | :-: | :-: | :-: | :-: | :-: || NATURAL LANGUAGE APTITUDE |     | *X* |     |     |     || APPLICATION               | *X* |     |     |     |     || MOTIVATION                |     | *X* |     |     |     || OVERALL ACHIEVEMENT       |     | *X* |     |     |     ||                         |                              || ----------------------- | ---------------------------- || NO OF STUDENTS IN CLASS | STANDING OF STUDENT IN CLASS || 11                      | lower third                  |ATTENDANCE OF STUDENTREGULARIRREGULARREASON(S) FOR IRREGULAR ATTENDENCETO ACHIEVE MINIMUM ABSOLUTE RATING OF S-3 AND R-3 (SEE REVERSE SIDE) THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL TRAINING OR EXPERIENCE IS NEEDEDREVIEWED BYFrank A. RiceHead, Language Testing UnitRATED BYDavid A. GriffinLinguistic Scientist(See reverse side)
[104-10222-10005.pdf — page 199]
# LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY REPORT: ABSOLUTE RATING*Rating based on classroom performance.*## ABSOLUTE CATEGORIES|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    || ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- || 1.  Speaks so slowly and/or haltingly that only short phrases or individual words can be understood or that most of what is said is unintelligible even to a sympathetic listener.                                                                                                 || 2.  Speaks haltingly, can maintain simple face-to-face conversations. Makes frequent errors affecting intelligibility and causing misunderstanding. Has noticeable accent.                                                                                                         || 3.  Can converse on uncomplicated topics. Comprehension is fairly complete. Makes errors but can be understood by native speakers accustomed to dealing with foreigners. Can handle simple tasks and transactions. Can order a meal, ask directions, make purchases.               || 4.  Comprehension is complete and accurate. Can participate effectively in most formal and informal conversations on practical, social, and professional topics. Can discuss particular interests of competence with ease and reasonable fluency. Speaks with a noticeable accent. || 5.  Has complete fluency in speaking and understanding. Can adapt his/her language to fit the audience and can play a role in any conversation even one with a highly specialized or technical topic. Language usage approximates that of a well-educated native speaker.          || GRADE & AGENT | GRADE   | AGENT   || ------------- | ------- | ------- || NAME & AFO    | SERIAL# | STATION |
[104-10222-10005.pdf — page 201]
# SECRETOFFICE DE PERSONNELSECTION E NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF MANNER OF JOB PERFORMANCEStress strengths and weaknesses demonstrated in current position: Indicase suggestions made to employee for Improvement of his work, recommendations for his training. Deserit, if appropriate, his potential for development and for assuming greater re-sponsibilities. Amplify or explain, if appropriate, ratings given in SECTIONS B, C, and D.27 APA '59This individual is short, Conscientious and reali MAIL ROOMTR ks and accomplished his chotives with Sherourings and Laster. valuable asrat and coin on well to his co-orkers. ha Lyears of Lein, a sound int liigenes afficer. De shore no weaknesses.SECTION F CERTIFICATION AND COMMENTS1. BY EMPLOYEEI certify that I have seen Sections A, B, C, D and E of this Report.DATE SIGNATURE OF EMPLOYEE2:BY SUPERVISORMONTHS EMPLOYED HAS BEEN IF THIS REPORT HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN TO EMPLOYRE, DIVE EXPLANATIONUNDER MY SUPERVISION6 months This orbloves his bion in treining sthe: 21 Leptember 1959.IF REPORT IS NOT BEING MADE AT THIS TIME, GIVE REASON.EMPLOYER UNDER MY SUPERVISION LESS THAN CATS REPORT MADE THIN LAST DAYSOTHER Specify):DATE OFFICIAL TITLE OF SUPERVISOR TYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE30 Septemba 1959 Ons Officer-man, Con A Walts Trenta3. BY REVIEDING OFFICIALI WOULD HAVE OIVEN THIS CUPLOYES ABOUT THE SAME EVALUATION.I WOULD HAVE GIVEN FINIS ANPLOYEE A HIGHER BVALUATIONI DOULO HAVE GIVEN THIS EMPLOYEE A LOSER EVALUATIONICANNGTUDOR THE KVALUATIONS AMATECOMMENTS OF REVIESINO OPPISIALDATE OFFICIAL TITLE OF REVIEWING OFFICIAL TYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE1 OCY 1951 CMC/HT Robert A. DahlgrenSECRET
[104-10222-10005.pdf — page 203]
Office Memorandum • UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT.TO : Director of Personnel DATE: 3 MAR 1959FROM : Director of TrainingSUBJECT: Summary of JOT Career of Thomas J. Keenan1. Statement of TransferJunior Officer Trainee Thomas J. Keenan has been reassigned from the T/O of the JOT Program to the T/O of WH Division effective 25 January 1959. Following is a summary of the accomplishments of Mr. Keenan while he was a Junior Officer Trainee2. Basis for Selection by JOTPKeenan came to the Agency on the JOT Program at OS-7 on 20 May 1957. He received his B.A. in History from Marquette in 1953. He spent four years in the Navy as a Lieutenant, He was a Commo officer, having supervision of thirty men. His high motivation - he turned down an 18 month training program with IBM - coupled with his fine personal attributes, made him appear to be a good JOT candidate.3. Formal TrainingAfter EOD Keenan attended IOC from 27 May to 21 June 1957, receiving two Excellent evaluations. From 24 to 28 June he was on interim assignment in FBID. He attended ITC from 1 to 28 July where he earned three Excellent grades. From 28 July to 23 August he was assigned on an interim basis to WE/Spain. From 26 August to 27 September he was registered in a special TSS course. He gained good ratings. After an interim assignment to the CI Staff for one month Keenan was attached for on-the-desk training to WH/1 on 8 January 1958. In March he entered the Operations Course, where he continued until 7 June. In this course ho received four high satisfactory and two medium satis- factory grades.4. On-the-Desk TrainingOn-the-desk training for Keenan in WH/1 was largely as assistant to the desk CS and FI Officer. In January 1959 he took over an Chief of the Costa Rican desk.
[104-10222-10005.pdf — page 204]
5. Evaluation of the Subject's TrainingKeenan's evaluations in formal training have been uniformly commendatory. The ITC instructors found that "although he was a bit slow in adjusting to the requirements of the course, during the last two weeks he showed definite progress...his final briefing was excellent...pleasant young man, interested and cooperative...gives promise of being a sound intelligence officer". In the OC his work was good - "performance was highly satisfactory...in face-to-face practical exercises he was effective...acquired a highly satis- factory understanding of the various kinds of Agency operations, revealing a particularly thorough knowledge of CI concepts and methods".On the desk he proved to be "intelligent, alert, con- scientious...enthusiastic and imaginative...gets on well with his co-workers and takes a healthy point of view toward his assignments. His motivation is high”.6. JOTP Opinion of the subject.Keenan has always made a good impression. He has worked diligently, has made for the smooth operation of the Program, and has received commendation from his supervisors on the dosk. It will be very surprising if Keenan does not prove to be a solid, effective officer who will make good progress in the Clandestine Services.![Signature of Matthew Baird]MATTHEW BAIRD69-1-740-3680
[104-10222-10005.pdf — page 209]
ADMINISTRATIVE - INTERNAL USE ONLYTRAINING REFORTOFFICE OF TRAININGFUNCTIONAL TRAINING DIVISIONThis certifies that Thomas J. Keenan (2600) has completed the two day Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Seminar for Supervisors held 28 - 29 March 1977. At the conclusion of this two-day session, each participant will be able to describe the following:a) The EEO Program and reasons for its existence;b) A supervisor's responsibility in implementing the program;c) The procedures for processing EEO complaints;d) The Agency's past record and the Agency's Affirmative Action Plans; ande) The significance of Upward Mobility, Federal Women's, and Hispanic Programs in the overall EEO Program.FOR THE DIRECTOR OF TRAINING:![signature of Donald R. Heady]DONALD R. HEADYCourse AdministratorVISTRATIVE - INTERNAL USE ONLY
[104-10222-10005.pdf — page 210]
# KEENAN, THOMAS.Ford du Lac,> > ![photo of the document table containing service data]National Defense Service RibbonRegister's Office, Fond du Lac, County, Wis.Received fuIn Vol. 16 of 7th page. at 10:30 o'clock A.M. and recorded.LeadershipShintond ComGen. CommucicationsClass C CertifierI certify that the information entered in Pit 200 for 1.7 #105 11/7/59.this File is correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
[104-10222-10005.pdf — page 211]
For convenience, a Certificate of Eligibility No. _______ has been issued by the Veterans Administration to be used for the future request of any Guaranty or Insurance Benefit under Title 38, United States Code that may be available to the person to whom this separation paper was issued.
[104-10222-10005.pdf — page 212]
SECRETREPORT OF SERVICE ABROADTO: Office of Personnel, Control Division, Statistical Reporting BranchSERIAL NO.LAST (Print)026090 KEENANNAMEFIRST7-24 THOMAS I.MIDDLEINSTRUCTIONSUSE APPROPRIATE SPACE BELOW TO REPORT DATA FOR EITHER PCS OR TDY. INSERT APPROPRIATE CODE NUMBER IN "CODE" COLUMN TO DESIGNATE WHETHER SUBMISSION IS OF BASIC DATA, CORRECTION, OR CANCELLATION (One only). REPORT DATES BY USING THE NUMBER FOR THE MONTH. AND LAST TWO DIGITS ONLY FOR YEAR. REFER TO OFI NO. 58. REVISED.PCS DATES OF SERVICE| ARRIVAL O/S |       |       | DEPARTURE O/S |       |       | TYPE OF DATA    | CODE | O/P USE ONLY | COUNTRY | CODE  |     || ----------- | :---: | :---: | ------------- | :---: | :---: | --------------- | ---- | ------------ | ------- | ----- | :-: || MONTH       |  DAY  | YEAR  | MONTH         |  DAY  | YEAR  |                 |      |              |         |       |     || 25-26       | 27-28 | 29-30 | 31-32         | 33-34 | 35-36 | 1. PCS (Basic)  | 37   | 38 39        |         | 40-42 |     ||             |       |       |               |       |       | 3. CORRECTION   |      |              |         |       |     ||             |       |       |               |       |       | 5. CANCELLATION |      |              |         |       |     |TDY DATES OF SERVICE| ARRIVAL O/S |       |       | DEPARTURE O/S |       |       | TYPE OF DATA    | CODE | O/P USE ONLY | AREA(S)    | CODE |     || ----------- | :---: | :---: | ------------- | :---: | :---: | --------------- | ---- | ------------ | ---------- | ---- | :-: || MONTH       |  DAY  | YEAR  | MONTH         |  DAY  | YEAR  |                 |      |              |            |      |     || 25-26       | 27-28 | 29-30 | 31-32         | 33-34 | 35-36 |                 |      |              |            |      |     || 10          |  29   |  76   | 11            |  11   |  76   | 2. TDY (Basic)  | 37   | 38 39        | WESTERN    | 91   |     ||             |       |       |               |       |       | 4. CORRECTION   |      |              | HEMISPHERE |      |     ||             |       |       |               |       |       | 6. CANCELLATION | 2    |              |            | 1    |     |OFFICE OF PERSONNEL USE ONLY - PUNCH AREASOURCE DOCUMENT AND CERTIFICATION[X] TRAVEL VOUCHERDISPATCHCABLEDUTY STATUS OR TIME AND ATTENDANCE REPORTOTHER (Specify)DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION NO.LA21-77DOCUMENT DATE/PERIOD 10/29-11/11/76REMARKSPREPARED BYREPORT ANNOTATED ON SOURCE DOCUMENT CITEDABOVE DATA CERTIFIED CORRECT, BASED UPON SOURCE DOCUMENT CITEDDATE 1/17/77SIGNATURE Mike ManamgaTHIS REPORT WILL BE FILED IN THE OFFICE OF PERSONNELIN THE INDIVIDUAL'S OFFICIAL PERSONNEL FOLDER.
[104-10222-10005.pdf — page 213]
# SECRETREPORT OF SERVICE ABROADTO: Office of Personnel, Control Division, Statistical Reporting BranchSERIAL NO.026070 KEENAN THOMAS JINSTRUCTIONSUSE APPROPRIATE SPACE BELOW TO REPORT DATA FOR EITHER PCS OR TOY. INSERT APPROPRIATE CODE NUMBER IN "CODE" COLUMN TO DESIGNATE WHETHER SUBMISSION IS OF BASIC DATA, CORRECTION, OR CANCELLATION (One only). REPORT DATES BY USING THE NUMBER FOR THE MONTH, AND LAST TWO DIGITS ONLY FOR YEAR REFER TO OFI NO. 30. REVISED.PCS DATES OF SERVICE| ARRIVAL O/S       | DEPARTURE O/S     | TYPE OF DATA                                 | O/P USE ONLY | COUNTRY   | CODE  || ----------------- | ----------------- | -------------------------------------------- | ------------ | --------- | ----- || MONTH DAY YEAR    | MONTH DAY YEAR    |                                              | CODE         |           | 40-42 || 25-26 27-28 29-30 | 31-32 33-34 35-36 | 1. PCS (Basic) 4. Correction 6. Cancellation | 37  38 39    | GUATEMALA | 300   || 11 04 76          |                   |                                              |              |           |       |TOY DATES OF SERVICE| ARRIVAL O/S       | DEPARTURE O/S     | TYPE OF DATA                                 | O/P USE ONLY | AREA(S) | CODE  || ----------------- | ----------------- | -------------------------------------------- | ------------ | ------- | ----- || MONTH DAY YEAR    | MONTH DAY YEAR    |                                              | CODE         |         | 40-42 || 25-26 27-28 29-30 | 31-32 33-34 35-36 | 2. TOY (Basic) 4. Correction 6. Cancellation | 37  38 39    |         |       |OFFICE OF PERSONNEL USE ONLY - PUNCH AREASOURCE DOCUMENT AND CERTIFICATIONTRAVEL VOUCHER DISPATCHCABLE DUTY STATUS OR TIME AND ATTENDANCE REPORTOTHER (Specify)DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION NO.GUAT 19966 INO90210 DOCUMENT DATE/PERIOD 4 NOV 76REMARKSPREPARED BY ABOVE DATA CERTIFIED CORRECT, BASED UPON SOURCE "DOCUMENT CITED"DATE11-5-76SIGNATURE x2007THIS REPORT WILL BE FILED IN THE OFFICE OF PERSONNEL IN THE INDIVIDUAL'S OFFICIAL PERSONNEL FOLDERSECRET
[104-10222-10005.pdf — page 214]
UNCLASSIFIEDCONFIDENTIALSECRETDEPUTY DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONSROUTING SHEETTO:|     |         | ACTION | INFO | DATE        | INITIALS || --- | ------- | ------ | ---- | ----------- | -------- || 1   | DDO     |        |      |             |          || 2   | ADDO    |        |      |             |          || 3   | C/PLANS |        |      |             |          || 4   | C/OPS   |        |      |             |          || 5   | C/SS    |        |      |             |          || 6   | C/CCS   |        |      |             |          || 7   | C/CI    |        |      |             |          || 8   | C/AF    |        |      |             |          || 9   | C/CD    |        |      |             |          || 10  | C/DIVD  |        |      |             |          || 11  | C/EA    |        |      |             |          || 12  | C/EUR   |        |      |             |          || 13  | C/FR    |        |      |             |          || 14  | C/NE    |        |      |             |          || 15  |         |        |      |             |          || 16  | C/LA    | X      |      | 13 JUL 1976 |          |C/LA/MCAFor KeenanC/PERS - cy filedSUSPENSE DATE  G ahead OTRREMARKS: The attached compliments, in-cluding a "thank you" fromDDCI, one for Mr. Keenan.Pls. see that they get intohis file. Congratulations!Thanks,SIGNATUREFA/1000DATE13 2 76FORM 3671 USE PREVIOUS4-76 EDITIONS
[104-10222-10005.pdf — page 215]
DCI/DDCIDDORouting slipTO:|     |           | ACTION | INFO |     |                 | ACTION | INFO || --- | --------- | ------ | ---- | --- | --------------- | ------ | ---- || 1   | DCI       |        |      | 11  | LC              |        |      || 2   | DDCI      |        |      | 12  | IG              |        |      || 3   | S/MC      |        |      | 13  | Compt.          |        |      || 4   | DDS&T     |        |      | 14  | Asst/DCI        |        |      || 5   | DDI       |        |      | 15  | AO/DCI          |        |      || 6   | DDM&S     |        |      | 16  | Ex/Sec          |        |      || 7   | DDO       | X      |      | 17  | D/Pers(for OPF) | X      |      || 8   | D/DCI/IC  |        |      | 18  |                 |        |      || 9   | D/DCI/NIO |        |      | 19  |                 |        |      || 10  | GC        |        |      | 20  |                 |        |      |SUSPENSERemarks:Please add my thanks to Mr. Keenan for ajob well done.![signature]SOCX/DDCI
[104-10222-10005.pdf — page 216]
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMYUS ARMY WAR COLLEGECARLISLE BARRACKS, PENNSYLVANIA 17013Office of the CommandantExecutive Registry76-274676/568Mr. George BushDirectorCentral Intelligence AgencyWashington, DC 20505Dear Mr. Bush:I am pleased to report that Mr. Keenan, Central Intelligence Agency Civilian, was among those who successfully completed the course of Instruction at the US Army War College during Academic Year 1976 and was awarded a diploma.This report is my evaluation of Mr. Thomas J. Keenan during his attendance at the US Army War College from 4 August 1975 to 7 June 1976. Attendance at the US Army War College is based on a highly selective process, and only a very small percentage of all those eligible is chosen. The evaluations herein are made in relation to this outstanding group of individuals. No attempt is made to distinguish between graduates on a rank order basis.Mr. Keenan was one of eight civilians (three from the foreign affairs community) in a class of 227. This total includes 187 Army, 16 Air Force, ten Navy, and six Marine officers of colonel or lieutenant colonel or equivalent Navy rank.In a class structure such as that outlined above, the task of the civilian student at the USAWC is an especially challenging one. Working in an area outside his normal milieu, hio was a dual responsibility. On the one hand, he had to acquaint himself in considerable detail with the military aspects of national security with which, in most instances, he has had relatively little, if any, previous experience. To accomplish this requirement, he did extensive background research in the areas of military policy, military strategy, and defense management to keep abreast of his professional military colleagues. On the other hand, his foreign policy expertise was in heavy demand by his military colleagues. In consequence, his contribution to various international relations aspects of seminar group efforts tended to be disproportionately large. Moreover, as the sole civilian voice in a seminar group of fourteen highly experienced military officers, he also ensured that adequate weight was given![American Revolution Bicentennial 1776-1976 logo]