[104-10222-10002.pdf — page 95]
# SECRET(When Filled In)FITNESS REPORT (Part I) PERFORMANCEINSTRUCTIONSFOR THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER: Consult current instructions for completing this report.FOR THE SUPERVISOR: This report is designed to help you express your evaluation of your subordinate and to transmit this evaluation to your supervisor end senior officials. Organization policy requires that you inform the subordinate where he stands with you. Completion of the report can help you prepare for a discussion with him of his strengths and weakness... It is also organization policy that you show Fart I of this report to the employee except under conditions specified in Regulation 20-370. It is recommended that you read the entire form before completing any question. If this is the initial report on the employee, it must be completed and forwarded to the Office of Tersonnel no later than 30 days after the date indicated in item 8. of Section "A" below.SECTION A1. NAME(L'est) (Pirai) (Middle)CHRIST David L.B. OFFICE/DIVISION/BRANCH OF ASSIGNMENTDDP/TSS/R&D/Applied Physics Division7. GRADE 8. DATE NEPORT DUE IN OP 9. PERIOD COVERED BY THIS REPORT (Inclusive dates)GS-14 10 December 1957 25 November 1956 to 10 December 195710. TYPE OF REPORT INITIAL    (Check one) X ANNUALSECTION B1. FOR THE RATERS THIS REPORT NAS HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN TO THE INDIVIDUAL RATED. IF NOT SHOWN, EXPLAIN WHYCERTIFICATIONA. CHECK (X) APPROPRIATE STATEMENTSTHIS REPORT REFLECTS. NOW OPINIONS OF THIS INDI XXVIDUALTHIS REPORT REFLECTO THE COMBINED OPINIONS OF AND PREVIOUS SUPERVISOR.I HAVE DISCUSSED EMPLOYEE HIS STRENGTHS AND WEAKNEE985 60 THAT HE KNOWS WHERE HE STANDS.D. THIS DATE C. TYPED OR PRINTED NAME OF SUPERVISOR D. SUPERVISOR'S OFFICIAL TITLE2. FOR THE REVIERING OFFICIALI RECORD ANY SUBSTANTIAL DIFFERENCE OF OPINION WITH THE SUPERVISOR, OR ANY OTHER INFORMATION, WHICH WILL LEAD TO A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF THIS REPORT.Posted Pos. ControlDATE![date stamp: 17 JAN 1958, 21 JAN 1958]Reviewed by PUDCONTINUED ON ATTACHED SHEETI certify that any substantial difference of opinion with the supervisor is reflected in the above section.A. THIS DATE12/31/57H. TYPED OR PRINTED NAMEOF REVIEWING![signature: Yardley Hebel]C. OFFICIAL TITLE OF REVIEWING OFFICIALSECTION CJOB PERFORMANCE EVALUATION1. RATING ON GENERAL PERFORMANCE OF DUTIESDIRECTIONS: Consider ONLY the productivity and effectiveness with which the individual being rated has performed his duties during the rating period. Compare him ONLY with others doing similar work at a similar level of responsibility. Factors other than productivity will be taken into account later in Section D.1. DOES NOT PERFORM DUTIES ADEQUATELYI HE 15 INCOMPETENT:2. BARELY ADEQUATE IN PERFORMANCE, ALTHOUGH HE HAS HAD SPECIFIC GUIDANCE OR TRAINING, HE OFTEN FAILS TO CARRY OUT RESPONSIBILITIES.3. PLAFORMS MOST OF HIS DUTIES ACCEPTABILY, OCCASIONALLY REVEALS SOME AREA OF WEAKNESS.4. PERFORMS DUTIES IN A COMPETENT, EFFECTIVE MANNER.5. A FINE PERFORMANCE: CARRIES OUT MANY OF HIS RESPONSIBILITIES EXCEPTIONALLY WELL.6. PERFORMS HIS DUTIES IN SUCH AN OUTSTANDING MANNER THAT HE IS EQUALLED BY FEW OTHER PERSONS KNOWY TO THE SUPERVISOR.6INSERT RATING NUMBERCOMMENTS:FORM NO. 45 (Part 1) REPLACES PREVIOUS EDITIONS OF FORMS 45 AND 45A WHICH ARE OBSOLETE.SECRET Performance(4)