Francesco/who-killed-jfk huggingface dataset:
[104-10222-10002.pdf — page 83]
# SECRET# FITNESS REPORT# SECTION A1. NAME   Christ David L2. OFFICIAL POSITION TITLE   Phys Scientist Res Ch9. CHECK (X) TYPE OF APPOINTMENTX CAREER RESERVE TEMPORARYCARKEN PROVISIGNAL (See instructions Section C)SPECIAL (Specily)11. DATE REPORT DUE IN O.P.    30 April 1966# GENERAL2. DATE OF BIRTH 3. SEX   01/20/18 M7. OFF/DIV/BR OF ASSIGNMENT 8. CURRENT STATION   DD/S&T/ORD Hqz10. CHECK (X) TYPE OF REPORTX ANNUAL INITIAL REASSIGNMENT SUPERVISOR REASSIGNMENT EMPLOYEESPECIAL (Specily):12. REPORTING PERIOD (From - to)    1 April 1965 - 31 March 1966# SECTION B# PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONW - Weak Performance ranges from wholly inadequate to slightly less than satisfactory. A rating in this category requires positive remedial action. The nature of the action could range from counseling, to further training, to placing on probation, to reassignment of to separation. Describe action taken or proposed in Section C.A - Adequate Performance meets all requirements. It is entirely satisfactory and is characterized neither by deficiency nor excellence.P - Proficient Performance is more than satisfactory. Desired results are being produced in a proficient manner.S - Strong Performance is characterized by exceptional proficiency.O - Outstanding Performance is so exceptional in relation to requirements of the work and in comparison to the performance of others doing similar work as to warrant special recognition.# SPECIFIC DUTIESList up to six of the most important specific duties performed during the rating period. Insert rating letter which best describes the manner in which employee performs EACH specific duty. Consider ONLY effectiveness in performance of that duty. All employees with supervisory responsibilities MUST be rated on their ability to supervise (indicate number of employees supervised).SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 1Initiates and promotes new intelligence collection program areasRATINGLETTERSSPECIFIC DUTY NO. 2Develops and advances fundamental technological projects in support of intelligence collectionRATINGLETTERSSPECIFIC DUTY NO. 3Recruits, manages and develops technical personnelRATINGLETTERSSPECIFIC DUTY NO. 4Establishes and maintains high level inter and intra agency liaisonRATINGLETTERSSPECIFIC DUTY NO. 5Generates major technical, fiscal, and budgetary planning reportsRATINGLETTERSSPECIFIC DUTY NO. 6Provides consultation on specialized electronic techniquesRATINGLETTERS# OVERALL PERFORMANCE IN CURRENT POSITIONTake into account everything about the employee which influences his effectiveness in his current position such as performance of specific duties, productivity, conduct on job, cooperativeness, pertinent personal traits or habits, and particular limitations of talents. Based on your knowledge of employee's overall performance during the rating period, place the letter in the rating box corresponding to the statement which most accurately reflects his level of performance.RATINGLETTERS
[104-10222-10002.pdf — page 84]
# SECTION CSECRETNARRATIVE COMMENTSIndicate significant strengths or weaknesses demonstrated in current position keeping proper perspective their relationship to overall performance. State suggestions made for improvement of work performance. Give OFFICE OF PERSONNEL provide best basis for determining future personnel action. Manner of performance of managerial or supervisory duties and cost consciousness in the use of personnel, space, equipment and funds, must be commented on, if applicable. If extra space is needed to complete Section C, attach a separate sheet of paper.Mr. Christ has been under my direct supervision for 2-1/2 36:PM bringing the continuing period of growth and expansion in the Office of Research and Development, in which he played a major role. During the past year, Mr. Christ has given up his responsibilities in the Radio-Physics area and has devoted himself to expansion and growth problems of the Audio-Physics Division, which encompasses effort in positive audiosurveillance, countermeasures, and emplacement problems.Mr. Christ continues to be conscientious, responsive, and alert to the needs of the Agency in terms of the substantive content of technical programs under his direction and supervision. He couples this with a vigorous managerial attitude that encompasses the recruiting, programming, coordination, and other factors necessary to implement these programs in an effective manner. His cost-consciousness is a continuing effort throughout the year and is best exemplified by his careful over-all planning and charting of total program efforts in order that projects lead directly to productive intelligence efforts.Mr. Christ has had an unusually difficult position in one respect, in that his technical surveillance effort was a major interface area with the DD/P in a realm where political and bureaucratic considerations could have deleteriously affected the content of his programs. He handled these problems in a manner that was favorable for the over-all good of the Agency in terms of technical progress in numerous areas and which far exceeded what might be called "par" for the course,# SECTION DCERTIFICATION AND COMMENTSBY EMPLOYEE1. I CERTIFY THAT I HAVE SEEN SECTIONS A, B, AND C OF THIS REPORTDATE5/3/66![signature of Mard J. Christ]BY SUPERVISOR2. MONTHS EMPLOYEE HAS BEEN UNDER MY SUPERVISIONIF THIS REPORT HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN TO EMPLOYEE, GIVE EXPLANATION30DATE5.3.66OFFICIAL TITLE OF SUPERVISORDirector of Researchand DevelopmentTYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE![signature of Robert M. Chapman]Robert M. Chapman3. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING OFFICIAL BY REVIEWING OFFICIALMr. Christ has done an extremely good job in developing a truly exciting program and capable staff focused on advanced audio and counteraudio techniques, in the face of a difficult environment. I would hope that during the coming year he could develop a tighter managerial control over the many small diverse elements of the large program.DATE3 June 1966OFFICIAL TITLE OF REVIEWING OFFICIALDD/Science & TechnologyTYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE![signature of a man]SECRET
[104-10222-10002.pdf — page 85]
SECRET# FITNESS REPORTSECTION A1. NAMECHRIST, David L.6. OFFICIAL POSITION TITLE10 Physical Scien9. CHECK (X) TYPE OF APPOINTMENTCAREERTEMPORARYRESERVECAREER PROVISIONALSPECIAL (Specify):11. DATE REPORT DUE IN O.P.30 April 1965GENERAL2. DATE OF BIRTH 3. SEX01/20/18 M7. /DIV/BR OF ASSIGNMENT 8. CURRENT STATIONDD/S&T/ORD Hqs10. CHECK (X) TYPE OF REPORTINITIALANNUALSPECIAL (Specify):12. REPORTING PERIOD31 March 64 - 31 March 65SECTION B PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONPerformance ranges from wholly inadequate to slightly less than satisfactory. A rating in this category requires positive remedial action. The nature of the action could range from counseling, to further training, to placing on probation, to reassignment of to separation. Describe action taken or proposed in Section C..Performance meets all requirements. It is entirely satisfactory and is characterized neither by deficiency nor excellence.Performance is more than satisfactory. Desired results are being produced in a proficient manner.Performance is characterized by exceptional proficiency.Performance is so exceptional in relation to requirements of the work and in comparison to the performance of others doing similar work as to warrant special recognition.SPECIFIC DUTIESList up to six of the most important specific duties performed during the rating period. Insert rating letter which best describes the manner in which employee performs EACH specific duty. Consider ONLY effectiveness in performance of that duty. All employees with supervisory responsibilities MUST be rated on their ability to supervise (indicate number of employees supervised).SPECIFIC DUTY NO.1Develops advanced technical program areasRATING LETTERSSPECIFIC DUTY NO. 2Performs administrative planning - budget, finance, etc.RATING LETTERSSPECIFIC DUTY NO. 3Recruits, develops and supervises scientific personnelRATING LETTERSSPECIFIC DUTY NO.4Conducts internal and external liaisonRATING LETTERSSPECIFIC DUTY NO.5Prepares technical and administrative reportsRATING LETTERSSPECIFIC DUTY NO.6RATING LETTEROVERALL PERFORMANCE IN CURRENT POSITIONTake into account everything about the employee which influences his effectiveness in his current position such as performance of specific duties, productivity, conduct on job, cooperativeness, pertinent personal traits of habits, and particular limitations or talents. Based on your knowledge of employee's overall performance during the rating period, place the letter in the rating box corresponding to the statement which most accurately reflects his level of performance.RATING LETTERS12 MAY 1965
[104-10222-10002.pdf — page 86]
# SECRET## NARRATIVE COMMENTSIndicate significant strengths of weaknassas demonstrated in current position keeping in proper perspective their relationship to overall performance. Stato, suggestions made for improvement of work performance. Give recommendations for training. Comment on foreign language competence, if required for current position. Amplify or explain ratings given in Section B to provide best basis for determining future personnel action. Manner of performance of managerial or supervisory duties must be described, if applicable.Mr. Christ has been under my direct supervision for about eighteen months, during a continuing period of growth and expansion in the Office of Research and Development. During most of the past year Mr. Christ has doubled as group leader of the Radio-Physics area and has had responsibility for the tremendous growth of a separate Audio-Physics group, both of which continue to comprise about 40% of the effort of the Physical Sciences portion of the Office. Mr. Christ has performed these duties in a mangerial capacity in an extremely effective manner, so that both groups are well developed and capable of continuing growth on a self-sustaining basis.Mr. Christ is extremely conscientious, receptive, and alert to the needs of the Agency in terms of the substantive content of technical programs under his direction and supervision. His cost consciousness is a continuing effort throughout the year, and is best demonstrated by the manner in which he has reprogrammed funds internally and reduced the costs of a number of contracts. Also, he is not one to "rubber-stamp" approval of contractor efforts, and has called several of them to task this year for what he considered efforts below what he felt their capabilities should be.## CERTIFICATION AND COMMENTSDATE 27 APRI CERTIFY THAT I HAVE SEEN SECTIONS A, B, AND C OF THIS REPORTMONTHS EMPLOYEE HAS BEEN UNDER MY SUPERVISION 18BY EMPLOYEEDATE 27 APRBY SUPERVISORIF THIS REPORT HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN TO EMPLOYEE, GIVE EXPLANATIONOFFICIAL TITLE OF SUPERVISOR Assistant DirectorORD/DD/S&TTYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE Robert M. ChapmanBY REVIEWING OFFICIALFrom my own knowledge of Mr. Christ's work, I endorse the favorable comments of his supervisor. He has performed beyond call and stimulated important new areas of research and development for ORD.DATE 5 May 1965OFFICIAL TITLE OF REVIEWING OFFICIAL DD/S&TTYPED OR PRINTED NAMS AND SIGNATURESECRET
[104-10222-10002.pdf — page 88]
# SECTION CSECRET*(When Filled In)*NARRATIVE COMMENTSIndicate significant strengths or weaknesses demonstrated in current position keeping in proper perspective their relationship to overall performance. State suggestions made for improvement of work performance. Give recommendations by training. Comment on foreign language competence, if required for current position. Amplify or explain ratings given in Section B to provide best basis for determining future personnel action. Manner of performance of managerial or supervisory duties must be described, if applicable.Mr. Christ has been under my direct supervision for about six months, during a difficult period of growth, expansion, and change in the Office of Research and Development. During the process of reorganization of the Office, Mr. Christ has emerged as acting group leader of both the Radio-Physics and Audio-Physics areas of effort, which comprise about 40% of the effort in the Physical Sciences portion of the Office.Considering his geographical location for the previous three years, Mr. Christ has done a remarkable job in organizing the Radio-Physics effort and in developing a new effort in Audio-Physics which promises to be one of the major programs in the Office. All of this required that he exercise considerable initiative and judgment in the delegation of responsibility for existing projects and in the formulation and organization of new projects with an extremely under-manned staff.Mr. Christ was extremely imaginative, vigorous, enthusiastic, and responsive in the performance of these difficult assignments, and demonstrated very clear ability to manage programs and develop teamwork against these continuing and new objectives. In the development of the organizations necessary to implement these programs, Mr. Christ has demonstrated a high degree of cost consciousness by organizing personnel of the two groups so that with a limited staff they could operate in both programs, and by vigorously combing the country to locate the best contractors to implement the program and to seek advice as to appropriate sources for such procurement.SECTION D1. DATEApril 23, 64CERTIFICATION AND COMMENTSBY EMPLOYEEI CERTIFY THAT I HAVE SEEN SECTIONS A, B, AND C OF THIS REPORTSIGNATURE OF EMPLOYEE2. MONTHS EMPLOYEE HAS BEEN UNDER MY SUPERVISIONBY SUPERVISORIF THIS REPORT HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN TO EMPLOYER, GIVE EXPLANATIONsixDATE23 APR 1964OFFICIAL TITLE OF SUPERVISORDeputy Assistant DirectorORD/DD/S&TTYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURERobert M. Chapman3. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING OFFICIAL   BY REVIEWING OFFICIALI am quite familiar with Mr. Christ's performance during the rating period and am in complete agreement with the supervisor's rating and analysis. He has done the tremendous job of organizing our research in the brand new area of audio physics. This program has a very high priority, and he has done a superior job of launching it in a very short time and with very modest resources.DATE1964OFFICIAL TITLE OF REVIEWING OFFICIALActing AD/ORDTYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATUREEdward B. GillerSECRET
[104-10222-10002.pdf — page 89]
22 May 1961MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORDSUBJECT: Fitness Report for David L. CHRIST,There was no significant change in subject's performance during the two months between the last report and his departure.ROBERT K. CRAVENAC/TSD/TAReviewed by:![signature of C.V.S. Roosevelt]C. V. S. ROOSEVELTChief, DD/P/TSD![signature on the right]SECRET 50
[104-10222-10002.pdf — page 90]
SECRETTSS EVALUATIONNAME: DAVID L. CHRIST DIVISION: TSS/ASDSURINT BASIC LOCK PICKING COURSEDATE TRAINED 4-8 January 1960EVALUATION:1. Comprehension of Principles EXCELLENT2. Alertness and Interest EXCELLENT3. Operational Appreciation of Subject EXCELLENT4. Manual Dexterity GOOD5. Care in Work VERY GOOD6. Attitude VERY GOOD7. Technician Potential VERY GOODNOTE: "Technician Potential" is an estimate of the technical ability the student might acquire after advanced instruction and practice-it is not an estimate of his current level of technique.VERY GOODRATING: Poor, Average, Good, ExcellentOVRST DISTRIBUTION1 - Senior Staff Training Officer1 - Division Training Liaison Officer1 - OTR/A&S1 - Records & Service Division/OR1 - TSS/T&TCSECRET
[104-10222-10002.pdf — page 92]
# SECTION ESECRET(When Filled)NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF MANNER OF JOB PERFORMANCEStress strengths and weaknesses demonstrated in current position. Indicate suggestions made to employee of improvement of his work. Give recommendations for his training. Describe, if appropriate, his potential for development and for assigigger responsibilities. Amplify or explain, if appropriate, ratings given in SECTIONS B, C, and D to provide the best basis for retaining future personnel actions.Subject is a technical man who combines a taste for action with exceptional competence, producing excellent leadership for the specialized branch he serves.His treatment of personnel is direct, frank, unusually honest and just. He helps the men and their families in times of trouble and personal difficulties and has earned their respect for his technical competence. He is imaginative and bold in his approach to the responsibilities of his branch and is a fertile source of ideas. He has driven hard towards raising professional standards.Although he is a good innovator, he sometimes pushes harder on new approaches than on completion of programs in being, and on occasion his devotion to a program leads him to heavy emphasis on it and too little on other aspects equally as important. However, this was in the earlier part of the rated period rather than recently. I believe he will continue to grow with his job and that he can undertake more responsible and broader assignments.SECTION FCERTIFICATION AND COMMENTS1. BY EMPLOYEEI certify that I have seen Sections A, B, C, D and E of this Report.DATE:8 Aug 60SIGNATURE OF EMPLOYEELlaurd J. Christ2. BY SUPERVISORMONTHS EMPLOYEE HAS BEEN UNDER MY SUPERVISIONIF THIS REPORT HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN TO EMPLOYEE, GIVE EXPLANATIONIF REPORT IS NOT BEING MADE AT THIS TIME, GIVE REASON.EMPLOYEE UNDER MY SUPERVISION LESS THAN 90 DAYSREPORT MADE WITHIN LAST 90 DAYSOTHER (Specify):DATEOFFICIAL TITLE OF SUPERVISORTYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE22 July 1960AC/TSD/TARobert K. Craven3. BY REVIEWING OFFICIAL[ ] I WOULD HAVE GIVEN THIS EMPLOYEE ABOUT THE SAME EVALUATION.[ ] I WOULD HAVE GIVEN THIS EMPLOYEE A HIGHER EVALUATION.[ ] I WOULD HAVE GIVEN THIS EMPLOYEE A LOWER EVALUATION.[ ] I CANNOT JUDGE THESE EVALUATIONS. I AM NOT SUFFICIENTLY FAMILIAR WITH THE EMPLOYEE'S PERFORMANCECOMMENTS OF REVIEWING OFFICIALChrist contributed very substantially to the conception and establishment of EARWORT, the program under which TSD procures and supplies audio equipment for field use. He is learning how to convert the intense enthusiasm which he has at the start of a project to the steady continuous push required to carry the work through to completion.DATEOFFICIAL TITLE OF REVIEWING OFFICIALTYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE17 August 1960Chief, TSDC. V. S. RooseveltSECRET
[104-10222-10002.pdf — page 94]
# SECTION ESECREI(When Filled in)## NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF MANNER OF JOB PERFORMANCEStress strengths and weaknesses demonstrated in current position. Indicate suggestions made to employee for improvement of his work. Give recommendations for his training. Describe, if appropriate, his potential for development and for assuming greater responsibilities. Amplify or explain, il appropriate, ratings given in SECTIONS B, C, and D to provide the best basis for determining futwe personnel actions.Mr. Christ is an excellent Chief of our Audio Support Division. He is a leader of men, is loyal to his superiors, and is technically professional in his work.Mr. Christ has one short coming, which is not of his own making--he lacks field experience--only because his superiors have felt his services were more needed at Headquarters. It is some times hard for him to understand the operational aspects of things as outlined by his assistants. To his credit it must be said he realizes this lack of field experience and uses the advice of his men to best advantage.As soon as feasable he should be assigned to a responsible position at one of our overseas bases.# SECTION F## CERTIFICATION AND COMMENTS1. BY EMPLOYEEI certify that I have soon Sections A, B, C, D and E of this Report.DATE5-7-59SIGNATURE OF EMPLOYEEHoward S. Christ2. BY SUPERVISORMONTHS EMPLOYEE HAS BEENUNDER MY SUPERVISIONIF THIS REPORT HAS NOT ODREN SHOWN TO EMPLOYEE, GIVE EXPLANATIONIF REPORT IS NOT ARING MADE AT THIS TIME, GIVE ARASON,DATEEMPLOYER UNDER MY SUPERVISION LESS THAN 90 DAYSOTHER (Specily):OFFICIAL TITLE OF SUPERVISORREPORT MACE THIN LAST BO DAYSTYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE6 May 1959AC/TSS/TAEdward P. Foster, Jr.3. BY REVIEWING OFFICIALI WOULD HAVE GIVEN THIS EMPLOYEE ABOUT THE SAME EVALUATION.XI WOULD HAVE GIVEN THIS EMPLOYEE A HIGHER EVALUATION,I WOULD HAVE GIVEN THIS EMPLOYEE A LOWER EVALUATION.I CANNOT JUDGE THESE EVALUATIONS. I AM NOT SUFFICIENTLY PAMILIAR WITH THE EMPLOYEE'S PERFORMANCE.COMMENTS-OF REVIEWING OFFICIAL In giving Mr. Christ a higher evaluation, I refer particularly to his outstanding technical training and unusual competence as an clectronics engineer which, in addition to his other characteristics (such as his willingness to undertake any assigned responsibilities and his ability to work well with fellow employees), make him a particularly valuable employee.DATE7 May 1959OFFICIAL TITLE OF REVIEWING OFFICIALChief, TSSTYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATUREC. V.S. RooseveltSECRET
[104-10222-10002.pdf — page 99]
# SECRET(When Filled In)LANGUAGE DATA RECORDPART I-GENERAL1590901. NAME (Last-First-Middle)Christ, David Lamar.2. DATE OF BIRTHJan 20 '183. LANGUAGEFrench 2654. TODAY'S DATEApr 16 '575. I HAVE NO PROFICIENCY   IN ANY FOREIGN LANGUAGEPART II-LANGUAGE ELEMENTSSECTION A. Reading (40)1. I CAN READ TEXTS OF ANY DIFFICULTY, OF A GENERAL NATURE OR IN FIELDS I AM FAMILIAR WITH, USING THE DICTIONARY ONLY RARELY.2. I CAN READ TEXTS OF MOST GRADES OF DIFFICULTY, OF A GENERAL NATURE OR IN FIELDS I AM FAMILIAR WITH, USING THE DICTIONARY OCCASIONALLY.3. I CAN READ TEXTS OF AVERAGE DIFFICULTY (newspapers, reference materials, etc.), USING THE DICTIONARY FREQUENTLY.4. I CAN READ SIMPLE TEXTS, SUCH AS STREET SIGNS, NEWSPAPER HEADLINES, ETC., USING THE DICTIONARY FREQUENTLY.5. I HAVE NO READING ABILITY IN THE LANGUAGE.SECTION B. Writing (41)1. I CAN WRITE PERSONAL LETTERS AND SIMILAR MATERIAL WITH COMPLETE SUCCESS WITHOUT USING THE DICTIONARY. I CAN WRITE FACTUAL NARRATIVE AND EXPOSITORY MATERIAL WITH REASONABLE CLARITY, WITH VERY FEW GRAMMATICAL ERRORS, IN NATIVE STYLE, USING THE DICTIONARY ONLY RARELY.2. I CAN WRITE PERSONAL LETTERS AND SIMILAR SIMPLE MATERIAL WITH COMPLETE SUCCESS, USING THE DICTIONARY ONLY RARELY. I CAN WRITE FACTUAL NARRATIVE AND EXPOSITORY MATERIAL WITH REASONABLE CLARITY, WITH FEW GRAMMATICAL ERRORS, BUT IN A STYLE WHICH MAY NOT BE NATIVE, USING THE DICTIONARY OCCASIONALLY.3. I CAN WRITE PERSONAL LETTERS AND SIMILAR SIMPLE MATERIAL, WITH REASONABLE SUCCESS IN CONVEYING MY MEANING, BUT WITH OCCASIONAL MINOR GRAMMATICAL ERRORS AND IN OBVIOUSLY FOREIGN, AWKWARD STYLE, USING THE DICTIONARY OCCASIONALLY.4. I CAN WRITE PERSONAL LETTERS AND SIMILAR SIMPLE MATERIAL, WITH REASONABLE SUCCESS IN CONVEYING MY MEANING, BUT WITH MANY GRAMMATICAL ERRORS AND IN A VERY FOREIGN, AWKWARD STYLE, USING THE DICTIONARY FREQUENTLY.5. I CANNOT WRITE IN THE LANGUAGE.SECTION C. Pronunciation (42)1. MY PRONUNCIATION IS NATIVE.2. WHILE NATIVES CAN DETECT AN ACCENT IN MY PRONUNCIATION THEY HAVE NO DIFFICULTY UNDERSTANDING ME.3. MY PRONUNCIATION IS OBVIOUSLY FOREIGN, BUT ONLY RARELY CAUSES DIFFICULTY FOR NATIVES TO UNDERSTAND.4. MY PRONUNCIATION IS OCCASIONALLY DIFFICULT FOR NATIVES TO UNDERSTAND.5. I HAVE NO SKILL IN PRONUNCIATION.CONTINUE ON REVERSE SIDEFORM NO. 444C1 FEB 57SECRET