Francesco/who-killed-jfk huggingface dataset:
[104-10221-10022.pdf — page 121]
ATL-39-7420 February 19745.  In the meantime the R & Murphy kidnapping come up to occupy his time until 26 February when he called to try he had come sensitive information of definite interest to CIA. Wien told we could not go into his office the following day due to a lack of transportation/he said he would come to our office. He reluctantly agreed. Late the coming of 27 February he came to our office and presented us with the information in Kosure No. 4 (rough draft--the tape will be saved in case it is needed at a later date).6. Not on the transcript. but of possible interest. before leaving mur office he told he was afraid he might be fired by Coca Cola on March 1974. Briefly. What apparently happened (and this in his story) was:a. Then it was learned Peg Murphy had been kidnapped. Chief John Inman of the Atlanta Police Départant called Van Cleave requesting his assistance. He asked Van Cleave to come to headquarters and work with Assistant Chief Mullins (we believe this is the correct name) on the Murphy kidnapping,b. Van Cleave apparently expressed concern to the Assistant Chief that prominent members of Coca Cola Company residing in the Atlanta area might be targets for the same kidnappers;c. The Assistant Chief agreed and went along with Ven Cleave notifying, by phone, Coke officials,d. Van Cleave had not cleared this action with his immediate supervisor at the Coca Cola Company,e. Apparently the phone calls were made very late in the evening,f. When the Murphy kidnapping was resolved, Van Cleave was called in by his boss to account for his actions. He apparently has not been able to justify the calls and this will be discussed at the meeting on 4 March. We suspect this may be his last official action for the Coca Cola Company.E 2 IMMEDIATE CL BY 0106504.51
[104-10221-10022.pdf — page 122]
SECRETATL-30-7423 February 19747. Since receiving the 27 February 1974 call from 033, we have checked with Charles Haynes and Bob Perry of the FBI. Both are familiar with Van Cleave and his operations. Perry confirmed that Van Cleave had passed the information contained in Enclosure No. 4 to the FBI. Perry had a few other things to say about Van Cleave that probably do not need to be repeated in this memorandum.8. Concerning the future, we intend to be hard to reach when Van Cleeve calls; if necessary, talk to him on the phone a few times to see if he gets the idea; then if all fails simply tell him we have been told to stay out of this business.A.G. CONRADWFongburnamBielicare(as stated)E 2 EXEMPT CL BY 010650SECRET4.51
[104-10221-10022.pdf — page 123]
# SECRETOSSATL-4-7514 January 1975MEMORANDUM FOR RECORDJohn R. PotersonAtlanta Resident OfficeResponse to Call-in to Agency Headquarters/Initial Contact (Telephone) with John Daniel Williasson, Carrollton, Georgia1.  On January 1975 Albert S. Coleman of the Washington Field Offico called da to pass on inforration that he had just been given by Dale Zelmer, Leadquarters, reperding a call/received by the Agency duty officer on Le Year's Eve from one John antal Willison of Carrollton, Cor 11110 1dentified Mocalf as a Methodiot ministar and gave his address on Route 12, for 3946, Carrollton, Coorgia, Phone: (404) 54-0443.2.  In his call to Arency lHeadquarters, Williamsou said that he had a friend who had information on the speeding overthrow of a foreign sovorn ment. The information recarded illegal shipment of ancs from the US to the foruien country. Willingon said that his friend had wanted to try to poll the information to the foreing country concerned but that when the friend told Williasson about it lison prevailed on him to let him (Williamson) bring it to the attention of the proper government agency, resulting in hio call to our ligniquarters on New Year's Eve. Hilliamson asked that aozione from the Agency by put in contact with him.3.  On the afternoon of 7 January 1975, after verifying through the phone operator that Willion was listed in the Carrollton area (ho actually lives at koopvilde, Georgia, on True Road, but tha Roopvillo phones are handled under the Carrollton exchange). wo called his number. We were inforced by a young walo walo voice, apparently his son, that williamson uns indeed a Methodief minister, but that he taught achool every day during the week in the high school at Frouklin, Georgih, except on Saturdays whon he worked all day of a hardware store et Rockhard, Georgia. Wa were cold that ho proached on Sunday morning. We were not told what he does on Sunday afternooup. Since he was not to be at home optil after 5 Pil, wa called him from our own home that some evening.4.  Williamson seemed to be expecting our call although we had not identified gurselves during the ecriter call. He gave us assentially the saza information furnished during his Rew Year's Eve call. Ne said that the friend about idiom ho called is a 'former parishioner and lives in the Carrollton area." He preferred not to provide us with the friend's nano and aduress. The inforantion, however that which we were able to ascertain--sounded on the up-and-up, as far as tir. Williamson's part in it was concerned, for be acemad to be a sincere and well intentioned Individ-nay. Man we tried to at least learn the rame of the foreign country involved, Williamson said that his friend vould not give him that Information.E 2 INPDET CL 0106504.51SELMET C/S TEEI)
[104-10221-10022.pdf — page 124]
# SECRETATL-4-7514 January 1975We did learn that the friend whom Williamson described as a business consultant, "a kind of a high-finance man involved in setting up corporations," who often travels abroad, had been approached by someone locally, i.e., in the Carrollton-West Atlanta area (Carrollton is about 40 miles west of Atlanta). The friend was said to be "a good friend, a reliable man, a college graduate, an established man in the community. According to Williamson, the friend was approached because of the nature of his work to perform some sort of tank for the group, and he knew that something was wrong. The friend then learned all he could about the planned operation and eventually talked with Williamson about it. The friend told Williamson that the gun-running operation had been going on for about a year.6. At one point Williamson said that his friend told him that "the people involved in this thing won't hesitate to kill him (the friend) and he knows that they're going to have to leave this part of the country when it comes to light." Williamson told us: "I feel like I've got this man's life in my hands and I don't want to do anything to jeopardize his life, because I know him and his family and all." Williamson suggested that we meet his friend at the Cope and Sword Hotel restaurant on I-20, near Six Flags Over Georgia, west of Atlanta, and he said that the two of them had already talked of this as a good meeting place. We told Williamson that we would be glad to meet with his friend but first we would like for his friend to give us a call so that we may talk with him. We gave our office phone number to Williamson. As of the writing of this memorandum, we have had no call.7. From the information that Williamson provided, e.g., location of people involved, an attempt to meet with an Agency representative (to possibly get us involved merely by association), we believe that much of the substance of the matter could be the same as that which was reported from this office to OSS as related by Stephen Van Cleave regarding Mitch Werbell, et al. (See ATL-39-74, 28 February 1974, Resume of Contacts with Stephen Van Cleave; ATL-53-74, 9 April 1974, Stephen Van Cleave.) Hitch Werbell's operation, which has been described locally as a "machine-gun factory," is located at Powder Springs, Georgia, about ten miles north of the I-20 Cope and Sword Motel. At any rate, Mr. Williamson's friend has been given the opportunity to contact us and we are awaiting his call.JOHN R. PETERSONcc: Office of Chief, DCD (D. Zeimor)/OSSServicesR 2 IMDET CL BY 010650SECRET4.51
[104-10221-10022.pdf — page 125]
# CONFIDENTIALCONFIDENTIAL 051345Z MAR 74 STAFFCITE DCD/MIAMI 12494DCD/WASHINGTONATTN: SUPPORT BRANCH/OSS (GRANT) A-182014SUBJ: STEVEN VAN CLEAVE, INTELLIGENCE SERVICES, LTD., ATLANTA, GEORGIAREF: GRANT/HENNESSEY TELCON, 28 FEBRUARY, SAME SUBJECT1. DURING THE AFTERNOON OF 21 JANUARY 1974 WE RECEIVED A   A177650   TELEPHONE CALL FROM ANSELMO ALLIEGRO, 8550 POCKERMAN ROAD, MIAMI,   FLORIDA, (A CONTACT OF THE MIAMI FIELD OFFICE) WHO ADVISED US THAT AN ACQUAINTANCE OF HIS IN ATLANTA, GEORGIA, STEVEN VAN CLEAVE, WANTED TO SPEAK WITH US IN CONNECTION WITH INTELLIGENCE MATTERS CONCERNING LATIN AMERICA. WE TOLD ALLIEGRO THAT VAN CLEAVE SHOULD CONTACT OUR OFFICE IN ATLANTA; HOWEVER, ALLIEGRO SAID THAT VAN CLEAVE DIDN'T WANT TO DEAL WITH "RECRUITERS", RATHER HE WANTED TO SPEAK WITH A CIA OFFICER "IN THE BUSINESS OF INTEL- LIGENCE COLLECTION". WE TOLD ALLIEGRO THAT OUR ATLANTA OFFICE HAS THE SAME STATURE AS THE MIAMI FIELD OFFICE, AND THAT HE SHOULD URGE VAN CLEAVE TO CONTACT OUR REPRESENTATIVE IN ATLANTA. ALLIEGRO WOULDN'T ACCEPT THIS RESPONSE ON OUR PART AND INSISTED THAT WE AT LEAST HEAR WHAT VAN CLEAVE HAD TO SAY. FINALLY. WE AGREED TO ACCEPT A CALL FROM VAN CLEAVE SO THAT WE COULD TELL HIM TO CONTACT OUR ATLANTA REPRESENTATIVE.
[104-10221-10022.pdf — page 126]
RAGE 2 DCD/MIAMI 12494 CONFIDENTIAL2. VAN CLEAVE CALLED US AT HIS EXPENSE FROM ATLANTA ALOUT   FIVE NOUTES LATER. WE ADVISED HIM AT THE CUTSET THAT HE   SHOULD SPEAK WITH BILL PANGEURN IN THE ATLANTA PESIDENT OFFICE   AT HIS EARLIEST CONVENIENCE. WE EXPLAINED THAT OUR WORK FORCE   IS DIVIDED GEOGRAPHICALLY RATHER THAR FUNCTIONALLY, AND THAT   SINCE HE LIVES IN ATLANTA, HE MUST DEAL WITH THE ATLANTA RO. V   PROVIDED HIM WITH THE TELEPHONE NUMBER FOR THE ATLANTA FO, AND   HE INDICATED THAT HE WOULD CONTACT PANGEUEN THE SAME DAY. E   CALLED PANGPURN TO ADVISE HIM OF VAN CLEAVE'S INTERTION TO   CONTACT HIS. WE LATER LEARNED FROM BOTH PANGEURN AND VAN CLEAVE   THAT THE CONTACT WAS MADE.3. WE PRESUMED THAT WE WOULD HAVE NO FURTHER CONTACT WITH   VAN CLEAVE. HOWEVER, WE WERE MISTAKE. VAN CLEAVE PLACED AT   LEAST TWO MORE TELEPHONE CALSS TO US FROM ATLANTA CAT FIS   EXPENSE), AND ONE FROM DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. EACH TIME WE   ADVISED HIM TO CALL PANGBURY FATHER THAN 65. HIS SESPONSE ON   THESE OCCAS1043 WAS THAT HE ALREADY HAD OR INTERMED TO KEEF   PANGBUR ADVISED BUT THAT HE WANTED TO KEEP US INFORMED ALSC.   THE LOCAL DADE COUNTY CALL WAS MADE TO ADVISE US THAT VAN   CLEAVE WAS IN MIAMI IN THE COMPANY OF TWO ARGENTINE POLICE   OFFICIALS, WHOM WE COULD DEERIEF IF WE SO DESIRED. WE AGAIN   FOLD HIM THAT HE COULD REPORT TO ATLANTE.4.51
[104-10221-10022.pdf — page 127]
RAGE 3 DCD/MIAMI 12494 CONFIDENTIALVAN CLEAVE TOLD US DURING ONE OF THE AFOREMENTIONEDCONVERSATIONS THAT HE IS ACQUAINTED WITH MITCHELL WEREZIL,FOLDER SAPINGS, GEORGIA, AND THAT HE HAD BEEN *"PRESCUEZD"*INTO TAXING WERBELL TO ARGENTILA WITH HIM IN LATE JAKUARY1974 EY OFFICIALS IN THE COCA COLA COMPANY, CORAL CARLES,FLORIDA, WITH WHICH VAN CLEAVE FAD (OR FAS) A CONSULTINGCONTRACT IN CORRECTION WITH COCA COLA'S SECURITY SYSTEM INARGENTINA. VAN CLEAVE ADVISED US THAT HE NEVER AGAIN WOULDHAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH VERDELL BECAUSE THE LATTER FAD ACTEDSO BADLY DURING THIS TRIP. HE TOLD US THAT WERBELL HADCOMMENTED TO ARGENTINE OFFICIALS THAT HE (VERDELL) WAS SOME-HOW CONNECTED WITH THE CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, AND ONA FIRST NAME BASIS WITE *BILL* COLEY, OCT. VAN CLEAVE TOLDUS THAT MATTERS HAD DEGENERATED TO SUCH A DEGREE THAT HERETURNED TO THE US WITHOUT FERDELL. (OUR MEMORY IS A EITFUZZY ON THE CONTENTS OF THIS DISCUSSION, PUT WE RECALLSOMETHING TO THE EFFECT THAT WERDELL WAS INVOLVED WITH CINE,WOMEN, AND SONG, AND VAN CLEAVE WAS AFRAID THAT VERFALL MICHIBE ARRESTED BY ARGENTINE POLICE BEFORE IT WAS OVER.) VANCLEAVE TOLD US THAT HE PERSONALLY DEVER PAS 50 ALCH ASIMPLIED A RELATIONSHIP WITH THE AGENCY TO ANY CUISIDER.4.51
[104-10221-10022.pdf — page 128]
PADE 4 DCD/MIAMI 12494 CONFIDENTIAL5. ALTHOUGH WE HAVE NOT NET VAN CLEAVE IN PERSON, BASED   UPON OUR TELEPHONE CONVERSATIONS WITH HIM HE APPEARED TO BE   AN INTELLIGENT AND REASONABLE MAN. WE ARE SORRY THAT WE   CANROF PROVIDE A MORE DETAILED ACCOUNT OF OUR CONVERSATIONS   WITH VAN CLEAVE, EUT AS WE MENTIONED IN REFERENCED TELECON   WE DID NOT MAKE NOTES DURING THE CONVERSATIONS NOR DID WE   FEEL IT NECESSARY AT THE TIME TO WRITE A MEMORASDEM FOR THE   RECORD SINCE WE BELIEVED THAT IT WAS A NORMAL, ALFEIT COMPLEX,   REFERRAL TO ANOTHER DOD OFFICE. E 2 APOST CL PY 713652COFIDENTIAL4.51
[104-10221-10022.pdf — page 129]
SEGREIF12-79-00Chief, Personnel Security Division, CCDirector, Domestic Contact Service(Chief, Services Division)22 May 1969IL, Mitchell L. - Local OSI Inquiry to DCS Miami Office for Information Concerning1.  The enclosed copy of memorandum from our Miami Office, regarding the OSI representative's inquiry for information concerning subject, is forwarded for your records and possible future reference.2.  Any questions pertaining to this memorandum should be directed to Mrs. Virginia Thorne, ext. 2733.SECURITYFRANK YOUNGEnclosure: As stated aboveVThorne: grw![stamp]4.51![illegible text]SECRET
[104-10221-10022.pdf — page 130]
SECRETChief, Miami Field Office 22 May 1962ATT: Mr. E. HoganDirector, Domestic Contact Service (Services Division)Mr. Hull, Mitchell L.REF: 182-008-69Thank you for the information reported in the referent. The suggestion made by your office that ORI direct its request through official security channels is entirely correct. In the future, however, it will be helpful and appreciated if you will forward correspondence pertaining to security matters directly to the Security Liaison Officer, rather than to support Staff. This saves time in getting the information to the appropriate channel for any action that may be indicated.SECURITYJohn R. NoyerVolkov:grvSECRET![stamp]
[104-10221-10022.pdf — page 131]
SECRETDirector, Domestic Contact ServiceATTN 033 15 May 1969MI-M-004-69Chief, Miami Field OfficeLocal OSI Inquiry Regarding Information on Mitchell L. Werbell1. On 15 May 1969, Special Agent Dave Ploumen, local OSI representative, USAF, visited the Miami Field Office to solicit any information we might have regarding Mitchell L. Werbell who apparently is undergoing a security clearance check as the result of presently being employed by a company with a government contract.2. Werbell was an unsolicited contact of this office beginning in 1959 and he reached peak notoriety in November 1967 as a result of his involvement in the Rolando Masferrer trial in connection with the abortive Haitian invasion. John Greaney, COG was in Miami at the time to oversee Agency interests.3. Ploumen in contacting other US Government agencies locally including the US Attorney's Office somehow received an indication that CIA had information on Werbell; thus Ploumen's visit to the Miami Field Office.4. It was indicated to Ploumen, who is known personally by several members of this staff, that we know of Werbell and that on occasion he had reported unsolicited information. It was suggested, however, that Ploumen direct his request officially through channels via OSI's agency liaison officer in Washington.5. This is for background and is being forwarded at the suggestion of local CIA security.Logan: pavJOSEPH F. GLEICHAUFSECRET4.51
[104-10221-10026.pdf — page 0]
# 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992FILE RIDMESSAGE FORMTOTAL COPIES:CDO INDEXFILE IN CS FILE NO.SECRET/RYBAT![routing information]DESTROY RETURN TO BRANCHFROM: DIRECTORINFO: VR FILE: DC/WN/K5, D/ECUE 4,CONFI: 5023 RID COPYC/AF4401DATE AND TIME FILED(ELITE)REFERENCE NOMBERCLASSIFICATIONSECRET/RYBAT16 10 16Z CITE DIRECTOR 32999TO JHAVELYNS CHAPPIE WITHERUSH PERNJEN SECURREF: JHAVE 2812 (IH 86315) *BASED ON REVEW OF INTO DEVELOPED BY WOBOEZ IVESTICATION,SURJECT REP NOF CONSIDERED SUITABLE FOR FUTURE USE CY WITELNOSH.COSIVIRL RETEST LOT DESIRED. CA BEING CANCELLED.END OF MESSAGE*Requested Mars, reconsider use of Antonio (2010) Vazquez on WITHRUSHSOD/AB/G3 Jin Smith (telecom)SOD/AR/023 3 Larry Murthy (D)CI/OA Dick Huffner (telecon)03/103/ID Lou Vasaly (telecon)![signature of R.J. Goodhart]R.J. Goodhart* Chier, Support Steff, EOD![signature of Sidney D. Stambrige]Sidney D. StambrigeChier, Security/Cover, SODRELEASING OFFICERCOORDINATING OFFICERS![stamp with text SECRET/RYBAT]![stamp with text exempt from general declassification]AUTHENTICATINGOFFICERREPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED.
[104-10221-10026.pdf — page 1]
SECRETREQUEST FOR CANCELLATIONTO: CHIEF, CI/OASUBJECT'S NAME (Pseudo, crypt or true may be used) SOTO-Vazquez, AntonioFROM: SOD W. Wainwright 1175CI/OA NO. 90192201 NO. 294544NAME SHOWN IS X TRUE PROJECT WITHRUSH CRYPTDATE OF BIRTH 20 August 1934PLACE OF BIRTH Hava, CubaAGENT'S SERVICE RECORDREASON(S) FOR CANCELLATION IS ATTACHED BILL BE FORWARDED1. It is requested that OA on Subject be canceled as he is of no further operational interest to this office.Thank you for your assistance in this case.2. Green List Name Check canceled as of this date.2 September 1966SIGNATURE William T. WainwrightIF SUBJECT IS USED IN ANY CAPACITY, A NEW REQUEST FOR APPROVAL BILL BE SUBMITTED TO CI/OASECRET
[104-10221-10026.pdf — page 2]
SECRET201No. 291544MEMORANDUM FOR: Chief, SCD/A3/OPS/3 -- Larry MurphyOperational Approval is hereby granted in the case of ____________ SOTO Vasquez, Antonio ____________, for the purpose specified in your request dated 8 December 1965.This Approval is based upon evaluation of information available to this Office, and is granted under authority contained in CSI and CSI-F 10-5./s/ Edward P. BrownCI/OPERATIONAL APPROVAL AND SUPPORT DIVISIONDate: 14 December 1965 jabDistribution:Orig. to Addressee1 to FilesSECRET
[104-10221-10026.pdf — page 3]
# SECRETPERSONAL RECORD QUESTIONNAIREPART 11 - OPERATIONAL INFORMATIONINSTRUCTIONS TO CASE OFFICER1. This form must be filled in by the case officer of appropriate authority on the basis of the best available information. It not to be shown to the subject.2. Normally, headquarters will be unable to issue an approval untess requenter furnishes answers to all questione in PRO parts 1 and 11. However, in an emergency provisional approval may be obtained by complying with the applicable provisions of FR 10-215. paragraphe 60. 8. 12b and 124. Thereafter the usual method to document or complete the case must be followed as and forth in FR 10-215.3. Three (3) completed copies of PRO part 1 (including copy in subject's handuriting, if possible) and to0 (2) coa. pleted copies of this form must be sent to headquarters4. Data acquired later must be sent to headquarters in PRO Forest in too (2) copies.5. Fill in all items, if information obtainable. If item not applicable write "NA." 11 additional space required for iten, use reverse side of page hoyed to appropriate item number.1. CRYPTONYM   T/N Antonio SOTO Vazquez2. PSEUDONYMSECTION ICONTACT AND. DEVELOPMEDIT1. INDICATE HOW, THEN, WHERE. WHY, AND BY WHOM SUBJECT WAS FIRST CONTACTED OR DEVELOPED.Subject submitted job application to Roberto Medell. (principal agent, WITHRUSH, Miami, Fla.) on 25 March 1965 for job as WITHRUSH pilot.2. INDICATE WHETHER SUBJECT COULD BE TURNED OVER QUICKLY AND IN A SCOURE MANNER TO ANY RESPONSIBLE CASE OFFICER FOR HANDLING. IF SO. INDICATE TO WHOW,Subject could be turned over to any resonsible case officer, A knowledge of Spanish and aviation would be most helpful.3. LIST OTHER CASE OFFICERS WHO HAVE HANDLED SUBJECT OR SUCH HE ANONS DR A GIVE NAMES BY WHICH THEY HAVE OLLA ANONGeorge N. Sohl known to Subject as Gerald Saunders.SECRET
[104-10221-10026.pdf — page 4]
# SECRETSECTION 11MOTIVATION. AND CONTROL1. ESTIMATE SUBJECT'S MOTIVATION. (Be detailed, if possible cite evidence Do cet use stuck conetul auch ...)Financial, desire to maintain flight status, and to a losser degree, political (anti-Castro, anti-communist).2. INDICATE WHAT CONTROL. IF ANY, EXISTS OVER THE SUBJECT. (If no control, or if there is a lack of real control explain.)No real control exists over Subject other than financial. His resident alien status could offer a factor of control if authorization were grauted for this maneuver.SECTION 111COVER1. COVER USED BY SUBJECT AND CASE OFFICER IN THEIR MEETINGS. The principal agent represents himself as an employee of the WAVE case officer, who in turn is documented as an agent of the Gov't of the Republic o of the Congo however, although no U.S. Gov't interest is overtly manifested, it is realistic to assume that Subject suspects U.S. Gov't collusion in, if not outright sponsorship of the operatic n.2. COVER USED BY SUBJECT IN OBTAINING HIS INFORMATION AND IN CONTACTING HIS INFORMANTS.NA3. INDICATE SERVICE FOR WHICH SUBJECT THANKS HE (Will work) (Is working).In all probability Subject is or will become aware that the GOC air program is under sponsorship by KUBARK,SECTION IVINTELLIGENCE CONNECTIONS AND TRAINING1. EXPLAIN SUBJECT'S KNOWN PAST OR PRESENT CONNECTION WITH ANY OTHER INTELLIGENCE SERVICE. INDICATE THE EXTENT SUCH CONNECTION IS KNOWN OVERTLY.None known.2. LIST OTHER INDIVIDUALS (Agents, rafataves. friends) PHO KNOW OF SUCT'S PAF SENT INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIS.Probably wife.3. EXPLAIN ANY TRAINING SUBJECT HAS HAD EN CLANDESTINE OPERATIONS,None known.SECTION VCOLLABORATION POTENTIAL1. INDICATE OTHER FORELIN PORER SUBJECT WOULD BE MOST LIKELY TO COLLABORATE WITH ALCAUSE OF HIS IDEOLOGY ON PAST ASSOCIATIONS. EXPLAIN.None.2SECRET
[104-10221-10026.pdf — page 5]
SECRETSECTION VI OPERATIONAL USE - CONTACT1. IF SUBJECT HAS BEEN USED OR CONTACTED BEFORE, INDICATE ACTIVITY IN WHICH HE WAS ENGAGED AND THE TYPE OF INFORMATION HE HAS FURNISHED.NA2. INDICATE HOW AND FROM WHOM SUBJECT OBTAINS INFORMATION.NA3. INDICATE WHAT HAS BEEN TOLD SUBJECT AS TO THE DISPOSITION OF INFORMATION HE FURNISHES.NA4. DETAIL SUBJECT'S PROPOSED FI OR CI TYPE USE OR DUTIES.NA5. DETAIL SUBJECT'S PROPOSED PP-PM TYPE USE OR DUTIES.As a pilot only.SECTION VII PROPOSED LIAISON OR OPERATIONAL ACTIVITY1. DETAIL SUBJECT'S PROPOSED LIAISON TYPE CONTACT OR OPERATIONAL USE.A. WHERE SUBJECT IS AN OFFICIAL MEMBER OF A FOREIGN GOVERNMENT:NAB. WHERE SUBJECT IS AN OFFICIAL MEMBER OF AN ODYOKE AGENCY:NASECTION VIII AGENCY RELATIONSHIP WITH SUBJECT1. EXPLAIN NATURE OF AGENCY RELATIONSHIP WITH SUBJECT: I.E. TRAINEE, OPPOSITE NUMBER, REMUNERATION, IF ANY: AGENCY PERSONNEL KNOWN TO SUBJECT.Subject under ostensible contract to GOC, although presumably he knows the project is being sponsored by the U.S. Government.
[104-10221-10026.pdf — page 6]
# SECRETSECTION IXQUALIFICATIONS FOR OTHER OPERATIONS1.  INDICATE SPECIAL ABILITIES, TALENTS, OR QUALIFICATIONS POSSESSED BY SUBJECT WHICH COULD CONCEIVABLY BE OF VALUE FOR OTHER OPERATIONS.He is a qualified fixed-wing and helicopter pilot.SECTION XCOMMITMENTS1.  IF IT IS PROPOSED TO PAY SUBJECT A REGULAR SALARY, INDICATE THE WEEKLY AMOUNT, IF PAYMENT TO BE MADE IN EXCHANGE COMMODITIES, SUBSIDY OR OTHER METHOD. SPECIFY AND GIVE DETAILS.Subject's contract calls for base pay of $800 per month, $10 per flight hour over sixty hours, $10 per flight hour which is considered hazardous. Contract additionally contains life insurance up to $40,000.2.  EXPLAIN ANY PROMISES, OTHERWISE NOT COVERED HEREIN, MADE TO SUBJECT. (Example: Commitments regarding evacuation of subject and family.)None known.SECTION XICE AND SECURITY1.  INDICATE THE FIELD AGENCIES AND FIELD FILES WITH WHICH SUBJECT'S NAME HAS BEEN CHECKED AND THE RESULTS.WAVE Station, FBI, INS, Credit, Miami Police and Hqs files.2.  INDICATE OTHER INVESTIGATIVE MEASURES TAKEN TO VERIFY BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION FURNISHED BY SUBJECT.None.3.  INDICATE WHETHER OR NOT PROVISIONAL OPERATIONAL APPROVAL ON OPERATIONAL AP. PROVAL FOR SUBJECT'S USE HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY OBTAINED.Yes. POA4.  DATE APPROVAL OBTAINED21 May 19655.  EVALUATE SUBJECT'S CHARACTER, RELIABILITY AND SECURITY, CITING EVIDENCE WHERE POSSIBLE.Subject believed reliable with no known adverse character traits. No known security problems to date.6.  EXPLAIN ANY SITUATION OR INDISCRETION IN WHICH SUBJECT MAY HAVE BEEN INVOLVED WHICH MUST BE EVALUATED FROM A CE/OPERATIONAL SECURITY VIEWPOINT.None.SECTION XIISUBJECT'S PERSONAL HABITS1.  USE OF LIQUOR. DRUGS: GAMBLING, PARAMOURS.No known excessive habits.SECRET