Francesco/who-killed-jfk huggingface dataset:
[104-10217-10223.pdf — page 119]
# RICHARD GIBSONAge: 34. Born: Los Angeles, Calif., U.S.A., 13 May 1931.Married - wife English. Three children - ages 7, 9 and 5 mos.Education: Primary schools, Philadelphia, Pa., U.S.A.Central High School, Philadelphia, Pa.Kenyon College, Gambier, Ohio (read English lit.)University of Rome (Italian lit., 1951-52)Sorbonne, Paris (French studies, 1955)Columbia University Graduate School, New York (CBS Fellowship, 1960-61)First entered journalism in 1950 as reporter-clerk for Philadelphia Afro-American, a Negro weekly.In 1951-52, while attending the University of Rome, I worked as legman for Edmund Stevens, then chief of the Mediterranean News Bureau of the Christian Science Monitor of Boston. I also did parttime work -- English-language public relations -- for Italian Films Export, a semi-governmental Italian agency for the export of Italian films to English-speaking countries.1953-54: drafted into U.S. Army. Served as non-com in Trieste, West Germany and U.S.A.1955-58: English-language editor, Agence France-Presse, the French national news agency in Paris. Also wrote for the Agence Intercontinentale, AFP's feature service.1959-61: Rewritten for Columbia Broadcasting System for radio and television in New York. Fired from this job because of my activities in founding the Fair Play for Cuba Committee in the U.S.A. to support the Cuban Revolution.1961-62: Secretary-treasurer of the Institute for the Improvement of Inter-American Relations, Inc., chartered as an "educational committee" under the laws of the State of New York. The Fair Play for Cuba Committee was a permanent committee of the Institute. As the chief paid officer of the organization, I directed a public relations campaign aimed at countering U.S. propaganda against Cuba. I published books, newsletters and placed advertizing on behalf of Cuba in the U.S. press.1962-64: English-language editor of the international review Revolution. Was one of the founding editors of Revolution Africaine in Algiers and was later sent to Switzerland to edit a monthly in English. Directed all aspects of the editing, publishing and distribution of the magazine.1965-: Publisher of Richard Gibson Reports, a regular news and features service, mainly for Afro-American newspapers.
[104-10217-10223.pdf — page 120]
# MESSAGE FORMTOTAL COPIES: 31ORIG : JAMES M. MURPHYUNIT : C./CFEXT: 7767DATE: 9 DEC 1965TO: PARIS/LCPIPIT LONDONFROM: DIRECTORCONF: CA/04 INFO: VR FILE RID COPY, WE 8, WH/C8, CA2, CI/OPS,TO PALP INFO LONDDIDORIC QRPREY QREBONYREFS: A. LOND 0723 (IN 00407)B. DIR 616371. CONSULTATION WITH STATE CONTACT YIELDS FOLLOWING:A. TRAVEL WITH U.S. PASSPORT FROM AREA OUTSIDE U.S. CONSIDERED TECHNICAL VIOLATION, NOT BASIS FOR CRIMINAL PROSECUTION.B. EVIDENCE OF SUCH TRAVEL, E.G. CUBAN VISA STAMP, IS BASIS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION BY STATE DEPT AGAINST HOLDER OF PASSPORT.I.E. WHEN HE PRESENTS HIS PASSPORT FOR RENEWAL, EMBASSY WILL REFER TO DEPARTMENT FOR GUIDANCE,GOOD ONLY FOR ONE WAY TRAVEL HOME.C. DESPITE REF A REPORT FROM ODENVY THAT LOND PASSPORT FILE IS CLEAN, DEPARTMENT CONTACT HERE CANNOT ASSURE THAT LOND PASSPORT OFFICE PROCEDURES WOULD AUTOMATICALLY RENEW QREBONY PASSPORT ON REQUEST,WITHOUT REFERRAL THERE MAY EXIST DEROG IN EBONY PASSPORT FILE HERE RESULTING IN INSTRUCTIONS TO LOND EMBASSY ISSUE LIMITED PASSPORT FOR TRAVEL HOME. CAN NOT CLARIFY FURTHER STATUS KBONY FILE HERE WITHOUT DIVULGING TRUE NAME.COORDINATING OFFICERSSECRETREPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED.
[104-10217-10223.pdf — page 121]
ORIG:UNIT:EXT:DATE:MESSAGE FORMTOTAL COPIES:*   DESTROY RETURN TO BRANCH FILE RID    XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX    ROUTINGINDEXSECRET15NO INDEX26FILE IN CS FILE NO.37DEC 14 8 56 AM 654 538PAGE TWOFROM: DIRECTORCONF:INFO: VR FILE RID COPYTOINFOCITE DIR 643692. IN ANY CASE WE ABLE PROTECT QREPONY THRU CLEARED STATE CONTACT.IF EBONYS REQUEST FOR RENEWAL IS REFERRED TO DEPARTMENT BECAUSE OF CUBANTRAVEL OR SOME OTHER CAUSE, WE CAN HAVE DEPT INSTRUCT IAB ISSUE FULLRENEWAL ON BASIS THERE INSUFFICIENT LEGAL GROUNDS PROCEED OTHERWISE.3. PLEASE ADVISE WHEN EBONY PASSPORT EXPIRES. IF IT HAS BEEN   RENEWED RECENTLY, CUBAN VISA WILL PRESENT NO PROBLEM FOR LIFE OF   DOCUMENT. EBONY SHOULD NOT ATTEMPT RENEW WITHOUT PRIOR COORDINATION.   WITH HQS.4. PLEASE ADVISE ALSO WHETHER EBONY HAS RECEIVED CUBAN VISA FOR   TRAVEL, HOW ACQUIRED, AND WHAT ARRANGEMENTS HE PLANS FOR TRAVEL.APPRECIATE/ESTIMATED TRAVEL COSTS.BREAKDOWNEND OF MESSAGECCSCI/ICWB/BC/U![signature of Cord Meyer, JR.]CORD MEYER, JR.C/CARELEASING OFFICERCOORDINATING OFFICERSSECRET![signature of James M. Murphy]JAMES M. MURPHYCA/CFAUTHENTICATINGOFFICERREPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED.COPY NO.
[104-10217-10223.pdf — page 122]
# SECRETChief, KUNOLPChiefs: KURSK; EBRIOT; CSB, FRANKFURT (METOPAZ for OVERSORY);WE. Chiefs of Station: Germany; Paris (TECHS).Chief of Station, Paris/LCPIPIT.DTDORIC/OperationalQEEBONY/Security of QEEBONY/1 S/W Communications SystemsReferences:A. OFTA 3044 (Not sent Chief, CSB, Frankfurt; COS, Germany; COS, Paris)B. PEAR 92401. Forwarded herewith is a Memorandum for the record concerning Paris/LCPIPIT's investigation of the security of QEEBONY/1's S/W communications system following an episode involving an 11 October 1965 message received from him by LCPIPIT.2. We request Headquarters' guidance concerning this situation, with special reference to Paragraph 3 of the attached Memorandum, in order that we may take all appropriate steps to resolve the problem of maintaining secure communications with QEEBONY/1, especially in view of the plans to send QEEBONY/1 on an extended visit to Cuba commencing sometime in mid-December 1965.Harvey G. FARMRICHAttachment:Memorandum hwDistribution:71 - C, KURSK w/att. hw1 - C, KURIOT w/att. hw1 - C, CSB, Frankfurt w/att. hw1 - COS, Germany w/att. hw1 - COS, Paris w/att. hw1 - C, WE w/o att.3 - C, KUWOLFOFLA 3152NOV 26 196524 November 1965200-180/156/2SECRET
[104-10217-10223.pdf — page 123]
# MEMORANDUM FOR: The RecordFROM: Harvey G. FAHNRICHSUBJECT: Security of QREBONY/1 S/W Communications SystemREFERENCES: A. OFLA 3044B. PALP 4385C. FRAN 50871. In early June of this year KUWOLF developmental agent QREBONY/1 (formerly STEBONY/1) was trained by KUWOLF Career Agent Rufus F. RODIGAST in the use of the S/W system prescribed by HKTOPAZ per Reference C. QREBONY/1 took one carbon sheet of the system with him on a brief trip to North Africa and used it for four messages in the latter part of June. Concurrently, Paris Station TECHS, on LCPIPIT's behalf, requested in OFPT 10348 that HKTOPAZ prepare for QREBONY/1's use an S/W carbon pad which would alleviate the carbon concealment problem for the agent. The pad was received subsequently and passed to QREBONY/1 on 18 July 1965, at which time his original single carbon sheet was withdraw.2. QREBONY/1 first used his new S/W pad for a message dated 22 July 1965, comments on which were transmitted to interested KUBARK Headquarters and Field components in Reference B. QREBONY/1 underwent a corrective briefing on the use of his pad on 4 August 1965, carbon No. 1 (rearmost of three in the back of his pad) was withdrawn since it bore an imprint of the 22 July message, and QREBONY/1 was authorized to use carbon No. 2 (middle of three) but only for "essential" messages. (a 24 July S/H message was also critiqued at the 4 August meeting-because the carbon impression was relatively weak.)3. On the basis of LCPIPIT's instruction to refrain from using his S/W pad except for "essential" messages, QREBONY/1 did not employ it again until 11 October 1965. The nature of the message indeed met the criteria for use of the pad, but as in the 22 July letter the message was clearly legible without development. To quote Paris Station TECHS:"SW impressions were clearly visible under Ultraviolet Light (short wave and long wave) and also under a plain desk light."On the basis of this report, QREBONY/1's previous performance in use of the pad, and the fact that the next point from which he was to use the pad would be Algiers, LCPIPIT determined that the risk of compromise outweighed the necessity of QREBONY/1 carrying this communications system with him and withdrew the S/W pad on 20 October 1965. LCPIPIT retains possession of
[104-10217-10223.pdf — page 124]
2the pad which contains the two remaining carbon sheets (No. 2 detached andinserted in the back of the pad, No. 3 still bound in the pad.) The 11 Octobermassage is clearly legible to the naked eye on carbon No. 2.4. Of greater concern to LCPIPIT, however, were the folloring   additional comments of Paris Station TECHS regarding the 11 October messages:> "The envelope you sent has evidence of tampering. There was glua> bleeding plus fiber tears. Plus, additional glue had been added> to the upper flap (glus must have run and was sticking inside on> the letter.)"5. In the 20 October meeting at which his S/W pad was withdrawn   QREBONY/1 stated that he had written the 11 October message on a sheet of glass,   perhaps with a pencil that was too soft. He conceded that there was some imprint   on the carbon, but nothing which could be read on the actual message sheet. He   said he wrote the message at 1100 hours when he was alone at his home and burned   the remainder of the message stack immediately. He said he then put the message   in an envelope immediately and sealed it gently under another sheet of paper to   avoid rubbing it. He added that he then placed the proper postage on the envelope,   placed it in his pocket, and mailed it two hours later at the closest mailbox   to him home. QREBONY/1 asserted that he did not reopen the letter after sealing   and was certain that his wife had not seen it.6. Pursuant to LCPIPIT's exploration of this question with QREBONY/1   we sent an informal note to MKTOPAZ via a Paris Station Officer on 20 October   1965 requesting assistance in efforts to determine whether QREBONY/l's   correspondence was indeed subject to tampering. MKTOPAZ prepared five "booby-   trapped" envelopes for our use. Two of these were mailed to the LCPIPIT letter   drop from two different cities on the continent, and the remaining three were   passed to QREBONY/1 on 5 November for him to mail from his home.7. The five "boody-trapped" envelopes were picked up at the LCPIPIT   letter drop over a period of a week and were handcarried by a Paris Station Officer   to Frankfurt on 18 November for processing by HKTOPAZ. Paris/LCPIPIT asked the   opinion of MKTOPAZ on the following points:a) Was there evidence of tampering with any of the five envelopes?b) If so, which envelopes bore evidence of tampering?c) Was it possible to determine from a study of the cachets whethersuch tampering occurred before or after the cachets were applied?d) Did such tampering appear to be of a professional or ofamateur nature?e) Any other HKTOPAZ observations which would help LCPIPIT determinathe source of any tampering that may have taken place.8. ΜΚΤΟΡΑZ advised LCPIPIT on 19 November via FRAN 9240 that there   vas Bo evidence of tampering on the five booby-trapped letters."
[104-10217-10223.pdf — page 125]
OFLA-3146/130 Nov. 1965Report Q REBONY/1: Security AspectsIn reply to the attached (Memo on Home Situation) Rodigest told QREBCNY/1:1. We can't do anything about his housing problem in view of non-permanent nature of our present arrangement.2. Avoid formalizing periodical at this point; it should require no authorizations for publication as it is merely a news correspondent's report, mimeographed for convenience-not a magazine.3. In order to control content, Q alone should have responsibility for putting out issues-can't delegate to wife and above all to other contacts.CS C201-306052.
[104-10217-10223.pdf — page 126]
# MTG:## HOME SITUATIONOFLA 3146/1My wife was rather hostile to my news about my contacts with the Chinese comrades. She said she was sorry I couldn't work something out with metropolitan Features. I hadn't done enough work for them because i was lazy, she said. She said if i weren't careful I'd be treated by the Chinese just what future was there in that? she asked. Anyway, she added, I don't really give a damn about the Chinese.She pointed out the situation was difficult for us. The landlord in London was trying to evict us and we had no idea where we were going. I had no substantial funds from the Chinese and was still living on the generosity of the Americans (Metropolitan), she said.Moreover, she was tired of being a grass widow. I was keeping secrets from her, she had been certain for sometime, she said. She had had enough trouble with my "secrets" in the past, she said.However, she liked the idea of reports, but was sorry about the "objectivity" and the 50 copies only limit. There was no reason, if I could get some help from the Chinese, that I couldn't make a success of the newsletter and really be independent, she said.I emphasized to her that I had contacted with the Chinese without Hils' knowledge and that she should on no account ever mention the matter with him. She said that showed how the Chinese treated people. nobody was more honest than Hils, she added. What was happening to him now would happen to me one day, she said.However, she was genuinely pleased with the newsletter and spent some time trying to collect material for the dummy I was preparing. She wrote herself a piece on X.C.A.R.D. (I have the feeling that a lot of her resentment would be dissipated if she would allowed to handle most of the business involved with the newsletter.)The housing problem remains a serious one and we may have to move. A temporary furnished flat in London would cost us at least £25 to £30 a week today - at present, we pay £12-12-0 per week. We have given the case to a lawyer, but, because it is a furnished flat, we will probably have to get out sometime soon.The other important question to be settled is that of a mailing address for the Report. Should I get a London mail drop and run the risks of running into the Home Office or should I get a lawyer and set the thing up legally, perhaps under my wife's (British subject) name? In that case, I could take a one-room office somewhere around Fleet St. and my wife could take care of the mail with an occasional office temporary during my absence.
[104-10217-10223.pdf — page 127]
rtg-2# OFLA 3146/1I suggest that the report always be mailed out from the same address, London or whereever. My wife will be able to get sufficient copy from various people, such as Pomeroy and Jeanne Pyror [30-year old freelance journalist who specializes in african affairs, now married to a Kenya parásitologist studying in London, formerly worked for Dennis Phombean]. For my purposes, if can obtain press rates, I can wire copy to Lerion to from Havana or Dar es salaam, thus giving tangible evidence of my activities as a bonafide newsman. It would be helpful if I could get an American Cable & Radio System Credit (Transferred Account) Card, such as I got from revolucion in Havana for use at the U.K. in 1961.
[104-10217-10223.pdf — page 128]
# Copy te Katzenbach## OFLA 3146/17Subject: QREBONY/1 - Security at home18 Nov 651.  At his 17 November meeting with Rodigast QREBONY/1 (Q) was    asked some questions concerning keep of files and correspondence. He keeps    copies of all correspondence (except routine letters transmitting articles    he has ritten, for example) in a file to which his wife has access.    He maintains a minimum of questionable notes, and keeps his personal    notebook (with addresses, expenses, etc.) in his coat pocket day and night.2.  His wife has two brothers. The one to whom Q owes money is    Gordon, a chartered accountant, who during World War II was in British    Military Intelligence. He visits the Q home to tring gifts from the wife's    mother to the Q children, but has a cat-and-dog relationship with Q's    wife; indeed, he will not stay for a zeal because he can't stand talking    to her, and the feeling is mutual. Q is certain she would never think of    confiding in Gordon, for example to say: "Lock at these awful letters    Q has written!" Gordon is more likely to confide in Q himself. Gordon's    politics are apparently solidly conservative. (His wife's other brother,    less involved with them, works for Pank.)3.  Q mailed the three test letters as follows: one in the morning,    the two following on successive aftermoons, at the local box in the normal    way. One of the three envelopes actually contained a note: a simple    statement that "William" (Guillermo) had not defected but his brother had    (Cabrera Infante), information acquired from a Cuban official (see    separate contact reports).4.  Q wanted to get a lawyer's opinion on what regulations govern    publishing a periciical in his country of residence (he is not of course    officially a resident at all). Sensing additional costs and unnecessary    formality, Rodigast suggested that he keep it on the basis of being    a correspondent's reports, not a separate comercial press venture    requiring eventual licenses of payment of business taxes, at least for    the time being. Mailed first class, the material should require no permit    from the mail authorities. A contact had suggested he might have    difficilty with the locals (see report of Q's 15 November contact with WP).
[104-10217-10223.pdf — page 129]
# 14-00000INDEX: ☐ YES ☐ NOCLASSIFY TO FILE NO.REF TO FILE NO.FILE RID ☐ RET. TO BRANCH ☐DESTROY ☐ SIG.CLIFIED MESSAGETOTAL COPIES2 SECRETPERSON/UNIT NOTIFIEDREPRODUCTION PROHIBITEDFROM:PARIS (LEPIPIT)ACTION:ADVANCE COPYCA/04 ☑ RID COPY☐ ISSUED ☐ BLOTTED ☐ INDEXEDUNITTIMEATINFO:FILE: AR CA2 WE 8 CI CAPS CI/102 FI FILINTOSECRET 171642ZDIR CITE PALP 503317 Nov 65:96553DIDORIC QREBONY KUDESKREF DIR 57747, PARA 32011. PALP POUCHING DETAILS FIELD LIAISON WITH ODENVY/PARIS RE EXCHANGE INFO PERTAINING QREBONY PBPRIME CITIZEN CONTACTS. QREBONY/1 (Q) IDENTITY NOT DIVULGED LOCALLY.2. AMONG INFO RECEIVED FROM ODENVY IS REPORT DATED 17 DEC 54 NEW YORK (FILE NO: BUFILE 180-434319) RE FREEDOMWAYS ASSOCIATES, INC (F). REQUEST HDORS STUDY THIS DOCUMENT WITH PURPOSE ASSESSING FEASIBILITY HAVING Q ENTER INTO CONTACT WITH F IN ATTEMPT SECURE SPONSORSHIP/OUTLET HIS JOURNALISTIC VENTURES, INCLUDING POSSIBLE COVER RE PROJECTED TRIP HAVANA.3. APPRECIATE Q-F LINK MAY BE INADVISABLE IN VIEW: A) F RELATIONSHIP CPUSA; B) Q'S CLAIM HE ON CPUSA ELACKLIST; C) SEEMING INCOMPATIBILITY BETWEEN INDIRECT ASSOCIATION CPUSA AND EFFORTS BUILD BONA FIDES AMONG PRO-PEKING ACTIVISTS AND ORGANIZATIONSSECRET
[104-10217-10223.pdf — page 130]
CLASSIFIED MESSAGESECRETIN NATIONAL LIBERATION MOVEMENT. ALSO APPRECIATE Q-F ASSOCIATION SHOULD BE DISCUSSED WITH ODENVY.4. FOREGOING NOT YET DISCUSSED WITH Q OR RODICAST AND WILL NOT BE RAISED WITH FORMER PENDING IDAS REPLY.5. NO INDEX.SECRETCFN 5033 57747 PARA 3 PALP ODENVY/PARIS RE AREBONY POPRIMEREPOVY/! (Q) NOT DIVULGED INFO ODENVY 17 DEC 64 NEW YORK SUFILE100-434819 RE FREEDOMWAYS INC (F) HDQS Q F RE HAVANA Q-FA) FCPUSA B) Q'S CPUSA C) CPUSA BONA FIDES PRO-PEKING Q-F ODENVY NOT YET Q RODIGAST NOT BE HDQS NO INDEXT
[104-10217-10223.pdf — page 131]
# SECHETChief, KUMOLPChiefs, AP, WE, KULESK, KURIOT; Chiefs of Station, LONDON,BRUSSELS, ALGIERS.Chief of Station, PARIS/LCPIPITDFDORIC/OperationalQFEBONY 20 October 1965 Contact with LCPIPIT1.  Forwarded herewith as Attachment A is Career Agent Rufus    P. RODIGAST's Contact Report of his 20 October 1965 meeting with QREBONY/1.2.  Forwarded as Attachment B (USC) is the identity list for    RODIGAST's Contact Repert.3.  Forwarded herewith as Attachment C is the "Progress Report"    submitted by QREBONY/1 to RODIGAST at the 20 October meeting. A careful    review of the report's content did not Justify KUIUBE dissemination of    any of the material therein.4.  Copies of recent esrrespondence addressed to and sent by    QREBONY/1 will be forwarded by nemacacuntable manifest as appropriate.5.  Paragraph 5 of Attachment A refers to a security flap watch bas    arisen in QREBONY/1's use of his S/W system. In a letter to ICPIPTT    dated and postmarked 11 October and pleked up by LCPIPIT 14 Osteber,    QRSBONY/1 had prepared an 3/4 message. LCPIPIT received the following repert    frem ISCHS in Faris concerning this letter: "The envelope you sent has    evidenes of tampering. There was glue bleeding plus fiber tears, plus    additional glus had been added to the upper flap (glus must have run and was    sticking inside on the letter). S/W impressions were clearly visible    under ultraviolet light (short wave and long wave) and alse under a plain    desk light."Attachments: As stated.Distributions2 - C, KUMOLF w/Atts. A,C, har; B use1 - C,AF /Atts. A,C, has Buse1 - C /Atts. A,C, hau; Buse1 - CO KUIESK /Atta A,C har; Buso1 - C, KURIOT w/Att. A has1 - COS, LONDON w/Atta. A,C, he; Buse1 - COS, BHUSSFLS /Atts. A,C hery Busc1 - COS, ALDIERS /Atts. A, tous Buse![CSCopy filci in 200-724-156/3]OFLA 3044SECHETOCT 28 1959File in 201-306052026 October 1965200-201-4563-
[104-10217-10223.pdf — page 132]
SECRETOPLA 30446. Because of CHEBOY/1's repeated carelessness in use of his S/W system and the obvious risk inherent in his seeking to use this system from Algeria, LCIPIII with the system from bir at the 30 October meeting. His carbon sheet carried deep impressions that were easily readable by the naked eye. Also, we have, in cooperation with KUSODA/ Paris, taken urgent action on a informal basis (to be followed up by dispatch) to have XTOPAZ prepare a set of envelopes in order that we may run a series of tests on the possibility, as well as the source, of tampering with QEEBONY/1's correspondence to us. A full report on this matter, including its resolution, will be forwarded appropriate addresses as soon as the investigation can be completed.Harvey G. PAHIRICHFile in: 201-306052
[104-10217-10223.pdf — page 133]
# DISPATCHTO: Chief, Kissak AFINFO: Chief, WE; Chief, AF; Chief, KUWOLF; Chief, LCPIPITFROM: Chief of Station, LondonSUBJECT: STEBONY QRPPREY JAGUAR JAGUAR Report on STEBONY/1ACTION REQUIRED-REFERENCES:Ref: A OELA 43,522, 2 July 1965B OELA 43,802, 11 August 19651. The following is the text of a JAGUAR report on STEBONY/1 and Marc SCHLEIFER. JAGUAR states that the information was received from a "most secret and delicate source which has been found reliable on previous occasions.""STEBONY/1 was in contact with Marc SCHLEIFER while the latter was staying in London with his family, en route for Algeria. SCHLEIFER had planned to leave London for Algiers via Paris on the 2nd June, but he deferred his departure in order to meet STEBONY/1. It seems that SCHLEIFER wanted, if possible, to visit Tanzania also. STEBONY/1 apparently was prepared to help SCHLEIFER and his family to find accommodation while they were in London because they had little money. He is also reported to have said that there was a possibility of his co-operating with SCHLEIFER in Africa.""According to our source, SCHLEIFER, while in London, arranged to contact the Tanzanian Mission, in connection with a job in Dar-es-Salaam which might be taken by either SCHLEIFER or STEBONY/1."2. Ref A contains previous JAGUAR comments about STEBONY/1 and SCHLEIFER, of about the same period. While TIFFANY was in London (which puts it at the right time) STEBONY/1 was in touch with SCHLEIFER, and TIFFANY should be able to compare JAGUAR's comments with what STEBONY/1 said at the time. Ref B reflects a different contact between the two, from a different source.Distribution:2-Chief, KUDESK3-Chief, WE2-Chief, AF2-Chief, KUWOLF2-Chief, LCPIPIT![signature of George H. KATZENBACH]![stamp of Excluded from automatic downgrading and declassification]OELA-44,03320 SEP 196529 September 1965