[104-10195-10002.pdf — page 139]
# SECRETDIRECTIONS:a. State in the spaces below up to six of the more important SPECIFIC duties performed during this rating period.b. Place the most important first. Do not include minor or unimportant duties.c. Rate performance on each specific duty considering ONLY effectiveness in performance of this specific duty.d. For supervisors, ability to supervise will always be rated as a specific duty (do not rate as supervisors those who supervise a secretary only).e. Compare in your mind, when possible, the individual being rated with others performing the same duty at a similar level of responsibility.f. Two individuals with the same job title may be performing different duties. If so, rate them on different duties.g. Be specific. Examples of the kind of duties that might be rated are:- ORAL BRIEFING- GIVING LECTURES- CONDUCTING SEMINARS- WRITING TECHNICAL REPORTS- CONDUCTING EXTERNAL LIAISON- TYPING- TAKING DICTATION- SUPERVISING- HAS AND USES AREA KNOWLEDGE- DEVELOPS NEW PROGRAMS- ANALYZES INDUSTRIAL REPORTS- MANAGES FILES- OPERATES RADIO- COORDINATES WITH OTHER OFFICES- WRITES REGULATIONS- PREPARES CORRESPONDENCE- CONDUCTS INTERROGATIONS- PREPARES SUMMARIES- TRANSLATES GERMAN- DEBRIEFING SOURCES- KEEPS BOOKS- DRIVES TRUCK- MAINTAINS AIR CONDITIONING- EVALUATES SIGNIFICANCE OF DATAh. For some jobs, duties may be broken down even further if supervisor considers it advisable, e.g., combined key and phone operation, in the case of a radio operator.| DESCRIPTIVE RATING NUMBER                                                           |     || ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- || 1 - INCOMPETENT IN THE PERFORMANCE OF THIS DUTY                                     |     || 2 - BARELY ADEQUATE IN THE PERFORMANCE OF THIS DUTY                                 |     || 3 - PERFORMS THIS DUTY ACCEPTABLY                                                   |     || 4 - PERFORMS THIS DUTY IN A COMPETENT MANNER                                        |     || 5 - PERFORMS THIS DUTY IN SUCH A FINE MANNER THAT HE IS A DISTINCT ASSET ON HIS JOB |     || 6 - PERFORMS THIS DUTY IN AN OUTSTANDING MANNER                                     |     || 7 - FOUND IN VERY FEW INDIVIDUALS HOLDING SIMILAR JOBS                              |     || 7 - EXCELS ANYONE I KNOW IN THE PERFORMANCE OF THIS DUTY                            |     |SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 1Deputy to Branch ChiefRATING NUMBER5SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 4SupervisingRATING NUMBER4SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 2Conducts Foreign LiaisonRATING NUMBER6SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 5Prepares correspondence and reportsRATING NUMBER6SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 3Prepares and manages projects.RATING NUMBER4SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 6Handles admin routineRATING NUMBER4NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF MANNER OF JOB PERFORMANCEDIRECTIONS: Stress strengths and weaknesses, particularly those which affect development on present job.Subject has really superb natural equipment for work in this Organization in terms of mental capacity, psychological bent and affinity for the things and people he comes against. He tops this off with industry and language ability among other natural aptitudes. On the debit side and measured against the best, he is a bit shy of humor and personal understanding in some situations, qualities which mitigate more against acceptability than job competence.SECTION D. SUITABILITY FOR CURRENT JOB IN ORGANIZATIONDIRECTIONS: Take into account here everything you know about the individual....productivity, conduct in the job, pertinent personal characteristics or habits, special defects or talents....and how he fits in with your team. Compare him with others doing similar work of about the same level.| RATING NUMBER                                                                                                              || -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- || 1 - DEFINITELY UNSUITABLE - HE SHOULD BE SEPARATED                                                                         || 2 - OF DOUBTFUL SUITABILITY...WOULD NOT HAVE ACCEPTED HIM IF I HAD KNOWN WHAT I KNOW NOW                                   || 3 - A BARELY ACCEPTABLE EMPLOYEE.. BELOW AVERAGE BUT WITH NO WEAKNESSES SUFFICIENTLY OUTSTANDING TO WARRANT HIS SEPARATION || 4 - OF THE SAME SUITABILITY AS MOST PEOPLE I KNOW IN THE ORGANIZATION                                                      || 5 - A FINE EMPLOYEE - HAS SOME OUTSTANDING STRENGTHS                                                                       || 6 - AN UNUSUALLY STRONG PERSON IN TERMS OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ORGANIZATION                                            || 7 - EXCELLED BY ONLY A FEW IN SUITABILITY FOR WORK IN THE ORGANIZATION                                                     || 7                                                                                                                          |IS THIS INDIVIDUAL BETTER SUITED FOR WORK IN SOME OTHER POSITION IN THE ORGANIZATION? [x] YES [] NO. IF YES, EXPLAIN FULLY:Subject is an all around performer capable of a primary, in place of his present secondary, responsibility.SECRET