Francesco/who-killed-jfk huggingface dataset:
[104-10195-10002.pdf — page 127]
SECRET## SECTION E NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF MANNER OF JOB PERFORMANCEStress strengths and weaknesses demonstrated in current position. Indicate suggestions made to employee for improvement of his work. Give recommendations for its training. Describe, if appropriate, his potential for development and for assuming greater responsibilities. Amplify of explain, If appropriate, ratings given in SECTIONS B, C, and D to provide the best basi's for determining future porsonnel actions.In most respects, this officer is one of the best I have known in this agency. lhe has a broad and deep knowledge of his target ared, as well as of his host country) an excellent and proven decree of operational "low-how" te ability to write and epeak Incidly and effectively and with apparent cases and a very high degree of motivation and devotion to duty. lle can be expected to continue his dynade and Leaginative pursuit of a most difficult target. It is sy opinion that this officer haa great potential and is ready for increased responsibilities which would involve the promotion for which he has been recomended. As for training, a good sanagerial course adght help to bring into even sharper focus his rary talents.## SECTION F CERTIFICATION AND COMMENTSBY EMPLOYEE1. I certify that I have seen Sections A, B, C, D and E of this Report.DATE 23 June 1960 son transmittalBY SUPERVISOR2. IF THIS REPORT HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN TO EMPLOYEE, GIVE EXPLANATIONMONTHS EMPLOYEE HAS BEENUNDER MY SUPERVISIONIF REPORT IS NOT BEING MADE AT THIS TIME, OIVE REASON.EMPLOYEE UNDER MY SUPERVISION LESS THAN 90 DAYS REPORT MADE WITHIN LAST 90 DAYSOTHER (Specify):DATE OFFICIAL TITLE OF SUPERVISOR TYPED OR PRINTED, NAME AND SIGNATURE23 June 1960 plew was signed.onLine() traneniital3. BY REVIEWING OFFICIALI WOULD HAVE GIVEN THIS EMPLOYEE ABOUT THE SAME EVALUATION.I WOULD HAVE GIVEN THIS EMPLOYEE A HIGHER EVALUATION.I WOULD HAVE GIVEN THIS EMPLOYEE A LOWER EVALUATION.I CANNOT JUDGE THESE EVALUATIONS. I AM NOT SUFFICIENTLY FAMILIAR WITH THE EMPLOYEE'S PERFORMANCE.COMMENTS OF REVIEWING OFFICIALDATE OFFICIAL TITLE OF REVIEWING OFFICIAL TYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURECOS, Tokyo John Baicer/a/ on transmittelSECRET
[104-10195-10002.pdf — page 144]
SECRET(Open Folded In)26. CAN THINK ON HIS FEET. [x]27. COMES UP WITH. SOLUTIONS TO PROBLEMS. [x]28. STIMULATING TO ASSOCIATES, A "SPARK PLUG". [x]29. TOUGH MINDED. [x]30. OBSERVANT. [x]31. CAPABLE. [x]32. CLEAR THINKING. [x]33. COMPLETES ASSIGNMENTS WITHIN ALLOWABLE TIME LIMITS. [x]34. EVALUATES SELF REALISTICALLY. [x]35. WELL INFORMED ABOUT CURRENT EVENTS. [x]36. DELIBERATE. [x]37. EFFECTIVE IN DISCUSSIONS WITH ASSOCIATES. [x]38. IMPLEMENTS DECISIONS REGARD- LESS OF OWN FEELINGS. [x]39. THOUGHTFUL OF OTHERS. [x]40. WORKS WELL UNDER PRESSURE. [x]41. DISPLAYS JUDGEMENT. [x]42. GIVES CREDIT WHERE CREDIT IS -DUE. [x]43. HAS DRIVE. [x]44. IS SECURITY CONSCIOUS. [x]45. VERSATILE. [x]46. HIS CRITICISM IS CONSTRUCTIVE. [x]47. ABLE TO INFLUENCE OTHERS. [x]48. FACILITATES SMOOTH OPERATION OF HIS OFFICE. [x]49. DOES NOT REQUIRE STRONG AND CONTINUOUS SUPERVISION. [x]50. A GOOD SUPERVISOR.SECTION VA. WHAT ARE HIS OUTSTANDING STRENGTHS?Capable operations officer with broad understanding of Soviet problems.B. WHAT ARE HIS OUTSTANDING WEAKNESSES?
[104-10195-10002.pdf — page 146]
# SECRETSECURITY INFORMATIONPERSONNEL EVALUATION REPORTItems 1 through 6 will be completed by Administrative or Personnel Officer1. NAME (Lost) (First) (Middle) 2. GRADE 3. POSITION TITLE:   Richardson Jacques Ho.4. OFFICE 5. STAFF OR DIVISION 5a. BRANCH 5b. OFFICE OR FIELD: IF FIELD, SPECIFY STATION   DDP SB SR/5 Field5. PERIOD COVERED BY REPORT 6. TYPE OF REPORT:   From To Initial Annual Special   18 July 1953 17 July 1954 Reassignment Reassignment of Supervisor   Items 7 through 10 will be completed by the person evaluated7. LIST YOUR MAJOR DUTIES IN APPROXIMATE ORDER OF IMPORTANCE, WITH A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF EACH. OMIT MINOR DUTIES.   18 July 53 - 31 Jan 54   a. Manage and direct the activities of an overseas operating branch.   b. Assist the division chief of operations in the planning of new and continued oper'ns.   c. Assist the division chief in personnel programming in support of branch and field station activities.1 Feb 54 - 17 Jul 54a. Establish new domestic activities branch.b. Develop and manage operational program of this branch, insuring (1) continuity of treatment by qualified personnel, (2) processing of intelligence requirements, and (3) expeditious movement of finished intelligence.c. Multilateral liaison with other elements of CIA, the Government, and foreign IS.8. LIST COURSES OF INSTRUCTION COMPLETED DURING REPORT PERIOD:Name of Course Location Length of Course Date CompletedCounterespionage (OTR) Washington 3 weeks 22 January 1954(In addition to the duties indicated in §7 above, I also give a 3-hour lecture at the CE course (advanced phase) approximately every six weeks.)9. IN WHAT TYPE OF WORK ARE YOU PRIMARILY INTERESTED? I am primarily interested in a foreign assignment where I could apply the various espionage and CE techniques it has been my responsibility to manage and plan for in recent years.   IF DIFFERENT FROM YOUR PRESENT JOB. EXPLAIN YOUR QUALIFICATIONS (APTITUDE, KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS).   My work at headquarters has become somewhat narrowing in that I am losing language abilities and opportunity for direct contact with foreigners.10. 3 July 1954DATESIGNATUREItems 11 through 18 will be completed by Supervisor11. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE THIS PERSON'S PERFORMANCE ON THE MAJOR DUTIES LISTED UNDER ITEM 7 ABOVE.Richardson is a superior officer in the performance of his duties. He is efficient, precise, and energetic, and brings considerable imagination and foresight to the operational problems confronting him. His concept of staff organisation and responsibility is of a high caliber. In handling personnel, he is perceptive and serious, and his judgment and motivation are of the highest quality.FORM NO. 37-151MAY 1962SECRET(Over)(4)
[104-10195-10002.pdf — page 147]
SECRETSECURITY INFORMATION14. IN WHAT RESPECT IS THIS PERSON'S PERFORMANCE ON PRESENT JOB MOST NOTICEABLY GOOD OR OUTSTANDING?This officer has been outstanding as a staff officer. He is unusually talented in his balancing of jurisdictional equities. This ability reflects a broad competence, however, and should not be construed so as to limit his future duties.15. ON WHAT ASPECT OF PERFORMANCE SHOULD THIS PERSON CONCENTRATE EFFORT FOR 'SELF IMPROVEMENT?This officer's devotion to his duties and professional convictions sometimes inclines him toward inflexible declarations of position. This fault, a minor one in officers of considerable potential, will be corrected by increased responsibility and experience.16. COMMENT ON THIS PERSON'S ABILITY TO HANDLE GREATER RESPONSIBILITIES NOW OR IN THE FUTURE.This officer is prepared for promotion and for increased responsibilities in command or staff duties.19. ARE THERE OTHER DUTIES WHICH BETTER SUIT THIS PERSON'S QUALIFICATIONS? (Recommend appropriate reassignment, if possible.)Richardson is presently well placed. See below.20. WHAT TRAINING OR ROTATION DO YOU RECOMMEND FOR THIS PERSON?Tradecraft training and a field assignment. Both are planned in the next six months.21. IF PERFORMANCE DURING REPORT PERIOD HAS BEEN UNSATISFACTORY, THERE IS ATTACHED COPY OF MEMORANDUM NOTIFTING THIS PERSON OF UNSATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE.28. THIS PERSONNEL EVALUATION REPORT HAS BEEN DISCUSSED WITH THE PERSON EVALUATED. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS INCLUDING COMMENT ON ITEMS 7, 8 AND 9, ARE SHOWN BELOS UNDER ITEM 20.![signature of supervisor]29 July 54DATESIGNATURE OF SUPERVISOR32. I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REPORT. (Comments, if any, are shown in item 20.)![signature of reviewing official]21 July 54DATESIGNATURE OF REVIEWING OFFICIAL33. COMMENTS: (If necessary, may be continued on reverse side of cover sheet.)SECRET
[104-10195-10002.pdf — page 148]
# SECRETSECURITY INFORMATION.PERSONNEL EVALUATION REPORTItems 1 through 6 will be completed by Administrative or Personnel Officer1. NAME   (Last)2. GRADE3. POSITION TITLE4. OFFICE DIVISION   BRANCH FIELD SPECIFY STATION5. PERIOD COVERED BY REPORT   From To SR6. TYPE OF REPORT   Initial Annual   Reassignment Reassignment of Supervisor SpecialItems 7 through 10 will be completed by the person evaluated7. Supervise and manage a foreign Geographic branch; this includes a total of 51 author-ised personnel at HQ and in the field stations. a. Direct and coordinate all project development. b. Detect and explore potential operational leads. c. Coordinate intra-division activities with appropriate branches, inter-division activities with appropriate divisions, senior staffs, and elements outside D/P and CIA. e. Determine the suitability of new personnel, continued employment and rotation of incumbent personnel, and make available incumbent personnel on loan basis to other divisions etc. f. Apportion the operational and administrative workloads within the branch sections and desks, and their personnel. g. Adapt changing field situations and problems to the organisation and operation of the branch, making the branch best serve the needs of the field stations. h. Review continuously all requirements imposed on the branch, and transmit them clearly to the field.8. LIST COURSES OF INSTRUCTION COMPLETED DURING REPORT PERIOD.Name of Course Location Length of Course Date CompletedNone (I was overseas part of the time covered by this report).9. In what type of work are you principally interested? I am principally interested in the building and successful operation of American Intelligence abroad, both in theory and in practice.The only remark/caveat that "more is the" and I stated in the previous report is that the administrative responsibilities of a branch chief do not enable him to be a purely operational individual. If it were possible to carry loss of an administrative load, I would enjoy devoting all of my time to the refinement of the intelligence process and its techniques in my area of concern.10. 22 October 1953DATE SIGNATUREItems 11 through 18 will be completed by Supervisor11. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE THIS PERSON'S PERFORMANCE ON THE MAJOR DUTIES LISTED UNDER ITEM 7 ABOVE.During this period Mr. Richardson was promoted from deputy branch Chief to Branch Chief, in recognition of his extremely good performance. Not enough time has elapsed to be able to evaluate him fully on all aspects of his new position. However, his handling of the branch has been unusually good from a management point of view and there is every reason to believe that in the planning and direction of operational activities the same high standard will prevail.FORM NO.MAY 1952 37-131SECRET(4)
[104-10195-10002.pdf — page 149]
SECRETSECURITY INFORMATION12. IN WHAT RESPECT IS THIS PERSON'S PERFORMANCE ON PRESENT JOB MOST POTICEABLY GOOD OR OUTSTANDING?He is a cood organizer and a good loader. He is nothodical and thorough in hisplanning and supervision of substantive activities, while at the same time hemintains close and sympathetic relations with his oubordinates. Mis knowledgeof then and of their porconalities and problems 18 outstanding.13. ON WHAT ASPECT OF PERFORMANCE SHOULD THIS PERSON CONCENTRATE EFFORT FOR SELF IMPROVEMENTYHe should continue to dovolop his knowledge of operations and operationalprocedures.14. COMMENT ON THIS PERSON'S ABILITY TO MANDLE GREATER RESPONSIBILITIES NOW OR IN THE FUTURE.He is woll equipped to advance through incroaning levels of responsibility.15. ARE THERE OTHER DUTIES WHICH BETTER SUIT THIS PERSON'S QUALIFICATIONS? (Recommend appropriate reassignment, I possible.lWoll placed at prosent.16. WHAT TRAINING OR ROTATION DO YOU RECOMMEND FOR THIS PERSONTroaignment to a field position in the not-too-distant future.17. IF PERFORMANCE DURING REPORT PERIOD HAS BEEN UNSATISFACTORY, THERE IS ATTACHED COPY OF MEMORANDUM NOTIFYING THIS PERSON OF UNSATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE.18. THIS PERSONNEL EVALUATION REPORT HAS BEEN DISCUSSED BITH THE PERSON EVALUATED. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS INCLUDING COMMENT ON ITEMS 7, 8 AND 9, ARE SHOWN BELOW UNDER ITEM 20.26 October 1953JapanettDATESIGNATURE OF SUPERVISOR19. I MAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REPORT. (Comments, if ang, are shown in iten 20.126 Octoba 1953SIGNATURE OF REVIEWING OFFICIALDATE20. COMMENTS: Lif necessary, may be continued on reverse side of cover sheet..SECRET
[104-10195-10002.pdf — page 151]
14-00000SECRETSECURITY INFORMATION12. IN OMAT RESPECT IS THIS PERSON'S PERFORMANCE ON PRESENT JOB MOST NOTICEABLY GOOD OR OUTSTANDING!Mr. Richardsonto performance was noticeably outstanding with respect to his thorough knowledge of overy activity of the Branch. He was in position to assume direction of Branch activities at any time. He also kept himself thoroughly briefed on Division policies and planning in order to give timely instruction and guidance to the Branch overseas stations.13. ON WHAT ASPECT OF PERFORMANCE SHOULD THIS PERSON CONCENTRATE EFFORT, FOR SELF EMPROVEMENTT..Mr. Richardson has a very thorough background in two (2) languages, French and Japanese. Ho pwould benefit substantially by learning the Russian Languago. He is meticulons with respect to his attention to details, sometimes to the point of concealing the broader picture from his view. It would bo well for Mr. Pichardson to direct his attention to the broad scope of Branch activities rather than to concentrate on its details.14. COMMENT ON THIS PERSON'S ABILITY TO MANDLE GREATER RESPONSIBILITIES NOW OR IN THE FUTURE.Mr. Richardson is fully qualified to assume the duties of the chief St. Division representative at a field station. In order to assume this responsibility in the most efficient manner, it is recommended that Mr. Richardson serve a minimum period of time of approximate ly six (6) months as the assistant to the present chief of the flold station.15. ARE THERE OTHER DUTIES WHICH BETTER SUIT THIS PERSON'S QUALIFICATIONS? (Recommend appropriate reassignment, if possible.1Mr. Richardson could serve effectively in a staff function for either Fl or PP activities. This does not mean, however, that his prosent duties are not better suited to his qualifications.16. WHAT TRAINING OR ROTATION DO YOU RECOMMEND FOR THIS PERSON?Mr. Richardson has already been recommended for overseas assignment in the Far East during the past year. He has area knowledge and command of the Japanese language, having served in Japan previously with the United States Army. His duties at Headquaters nave been so pressing that his departure for overseas assignment is being delayed until an adequate replacement ray be trained.17. IF PERFORMANCE DURING REPORT PERIOD HAS BEEN UNSATISFACTORY, THERE IS ATTACHED COPY OF MEMORANDUM NOTIFYING THIS PERSON OF UNSATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE.18. THIS PERSONNEL EVALUATION REPORT HAS BEEN DISCUSSED WITH THE PERSON EVALUATED. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS INCLUDING COMMENT ON ITEMS 7, 8 AND 9, ARE SHOWN BELOW UNDER ITEM 20.![signature of supervisor]DATEMarch 31 195319. I NAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REPORT. (Comments, If any, are shown Item 20.1![signature of reviewing official]CATEMareh 30 195320. COMMENTS: (if necessary, may be continued on reverse side of cover sheet.)SECRET
[104-10195-10002.pdf — page 152]
SECRET(When Filled in)20 April 1966MEMORANDUM FOR: Thomas B. CASASIM (SA)THROUGH : Chief of Station, ParisSUBJECT : Notification of Designation as a Participant in the Organization Retirement and Disability SystemREFERENCE : Book Dispatch 5096, dated 12 August 1965Recent correspondence on the above subject informed you that I had determined that you met the criteria specified in the applicable regulation for designation as a participant in the Organization Retirement and Disability System. On the basis of this determination and your recently executed election to remain in the System, your designation as a participant was made effective 10 April 1966.![signature of Richard B. Egan]RICHARD B. EGANSECRET![GROUP 1 Excluded from automatic downgrading and declassification]
[104-10195-10002.pdf — page 153]
SECRET(When Filled In)MEMORANDUM FOR: Thomas B. CASABIH (SA)THROUGH : Chief of Station, ParisSUBJECT : Designation as a Participant in the Organization Retirement and Disability SystemREFERENCE : Book Dispatch 5096 dated 12 August 19651. Based on a review of your record and the recommendations of the Head of your Career Service and of the Organization Retirement Board, I have determined that you meet the criteria for designation as a participant in the Organization Retirement and Disability System.2. The regulation governing this retirement system provides that "Any participant who has completed fifteen years of service with the Organization and whose career at that time is adjudged by the Director of Personnel to be qualifying for the system may elect to remain a participant in the system for the duration of his employment by the Organization and such election shall not be subject to review or approval by the Director." Since you have already completed fifteen years of service with the Organization, your right to this election vests upon your designation as a participant and must be exercised immediately.3. If you should elect not to remain a participant in the system, you will be continued under the Civil Service Retirement System. Once your election has been made, you do not have the privilege of changing it at some later date.4. It is requested that you indicate your election by checking in the appropriate box and signing below. The original of this memorandum should be returned to Headquarters as soon as possible.![signature of Richard B. Egan]RICHARD B. EGANExercise of option of participant with fifteen years of service:I elect to remain in the Organization Retirement and Disability System for the duration of my employment by the Organization.I elect NOT to remain a participant in the Organization Retirement and Disability System: for the duration of my employment by the Organization.SignatureDateSECRET
[104-10195-10002.pdf — page 154]
# SECRET(When Filled In)# LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY AND AWARDS DATA1. PERSONNEL SERIAL NO (1-6)2. LD NO.   87073. NAME (7-24) LAST   Richardson, Jacques G.4. OFFICE OR DIVISION5. LANGUAGE   French6. LANG. CODE (23-27)   0627. DATE OF TEST 46-51   Feb. 14, 19678. ANNIVERSARY DATE   Feb. 14, 19679. GRADE   1610. DATE OF BIRTH    Jan, 20, 192611. REASON FOR TAKING TESTAPPLY FOR AWARDESTABLISH SKILL LEVEL12. TEST SCORESREADING (34)IIWRITING (35)IPRONUNCIATION (36)IISPEAKING (37)IIUNDERSTANDING (38)C13. ELIGIBILITY (39)AMNA14. TYPE OF AWARDACHIEVEMENTMAINTENANCE(A) ELEMENTARY(I) INTERMEDIATE(M) HIGH(E)I-IIREADING (R) SPEAKING (S)COMPREHENSIVE (C)BASED ON TRAINING THAT WASDIRECTED (D) OR VOLUNTARY (V)Y15. INELIGIBLE (REASON)16. I CERTIFY THIS EMPLOYEE FOR A PROFICIENCY AWARD OF $ 100.00 (40-45)SIGNATUREDATE17. I CERTIFY THAT FUNDS ARE AVAILABLEOBLIGATION REF. NO.CHARGE ALLOTMENT NO.SIGNATUREFORM 12735-60OBSOLETE PREVIOUSEDITIONSSECRET(10-45)TLO COPYREMARKS
[104-10195-10002.pdf — page 155]
SECRET(When Filled In)# LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY AND AWARDS DATA1. PERSONNEL SERIAL NO. (1-6)   061022. LD NO.   87873. NAME (7-24) LAST FIRST MIDDLE 4. OFFICE OR DIVISION 5. LANGUAGE 6. LANG. CODE (25-27)   Richardson, Jacques' C. Japanese 1707. DATE OF TEST (46-51) 8. ANNIVERSARY DATE 9. GRADE 10. DATE OF BIRTH   Aug. 5, 1962 Aug. 5, 1962 74 Jan. 30, 192611. REASON FOR TAKING TEST 12. TEST SCORES    APPLY FOR AWARD READING (34) WRITING (35) PRONUNCIATION (36) SPEAKING (37) UNDERSTANDING (38)    ESTABLISH SKILL LEVEL 1 1 113. ELIGIBILITY (39) 14 TYPE OF AWARD    A ACHIEVEMENT (A) ELEMENTARY (E) READING (R) SPEAKING (S) BASED ON TRAINING THAT WAS    M INTERMEDIATE (I) COMPREHENSIVE (C) DIRECTED (D) OR VOLUNTARY (V)    NA MAINTENANCE (M) HIGH (H)15. INELIGIBLE (REASON)    Award disapproved by CS Board16. I CERTIFY THIS EMPLOYEE FOR A PROFICIENCY AWARD ($ (40-45)    SIGNATURE DATE17. I CERTIFY THAT FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE    OBLIGATION REF. NO. CHARGE ALLOTMENT NO.    SIGNATUREFORM 1273 OBSOLETE PREVIOUS5-60 EDITIONSSECRET(10-45)TLO COPY
[104-10195-10002.pdf — page 156]
# S-F-C-R-E-T(When filled in)# TRAINING REPORTFrench Basic Reading, Speaking, Writing-II100 hours, part-time, 9 Apr 62 - 15 Jun 62Student : Harriette D. Richardson (Dependent)(wife of Jacques Richardson - SR)studentsYear of Birth: 1928OfficeCOURSE OBJECTIVES - CONTENT AND METHODS - Instructor: W. Ray ReckleyThis is the second phase in a three-phase basic sequence of 30 weeks, each phase lasting 10 weeks.The general aim of this course is to provide a thorough grounding for the student who has previously had either a reading course in French or an insufficient introduction to the language. The major objectives of this phase of the course are to develop an ability: (1) to distinguish and pronounce satisfactorily all the sounds of the language; (2) to use effectively a modest stock of French sentences and expressions; (3) to comprehend normal speed spoken French in a variety of everyday non-technical situations; (4) to begin to read and write basic French, applying the spoken vocabulary and grammatical material previously learned.Classes are held 2 hours per day, 5 days a week, requiring a minimum of 10 hours of preparation per week. To receive the maximum benefit from this course each student should plan to devote at least two-thirds of the class preparation time doing drill in the language laboratory.ACHIEVEMENT RECORDStudent progress is evaluated primarily on oral recitation in the form of drills and free conversation based on memorized material. In addition, several tests are given during the course. This student's rating is indicated by the asterisk.| Unsatisfactory | Satisfactory | Excellent | Incomplete || -------------- | ------------ | --------- | ---------- ||                |              | 3         | 10         |Mrs. Richardson was definitely a superior student. Her pronunciation was excellent and she had a solid command of the structure of French. She was somewhat hesitant in new language situations, but she more than made up for this through diligent and profitable laboratory and home preparation.FOR THE DIRECTOR OF TRAINING: /s/ RAY RACKLEYChief Instructor26 July 1962DateS-E-C-R-E-T(When filled in)