[104-10195-10002.pdf — page 101]
# 14-00000INDICATE significant strengths o...esses demonstrated in current position kee... proper perspective their relution...OVERALL performance. State suggestions made for improvement of work performance. Give recommendations for training. Commenton foreign language competence, if required for current position. Amplify or explain ratings given in Section 8 to provide basebasis for determining future personnel action. Manner of performance of managerial or supervisory duties and lessin the use of personnel, space, equipment and funds, must be commented on, if applicable. If extra space is needed to completeSection C, attach a separate sheet of paper.The comments of the rating officer are limited to the period from October 1969 to March 1970 during which he worked with Subject. The previous rating officer has added his comments to allow coverage of the total indicated period from April 1962 to March 1970. During this period Subject was integrated in a new team assigned to the local S&T and Commercial [REDACTED] target. Subject's recent activity has been very productive indeed. Subject used the excellent potential given to him by his cover to skillfully spot and assess access agent candidates. As Subject's operational situation in Paris precludes making recruitment, the most promising of these candidates was placed in contact with a Station officer during social events Subject organized. At the same time, Subject continued his efforts to develop personal relationship with several [REDACTED] The beginning of personal, as opposed to purely professional, relations with a major [REDACTED] target enabled him to obtain insight into the target's beliefs and personality which was the best the Station had to date. Subject also managed to establish contact with two other [REDACTED] representatives of interest. This, in one case, required almost six months to accomplish via a combination of patience, skill and determination. Subject is an experienced officer. He is also cart conscious and practices good security. The Station has no other agent with the necessary scientific and editorial know-how, fluent French and local knowledge to replace Subject. In view of this and the recent progress made by Subject in response to very specific requirements and his willingness to try to establish personal and, hopefully, social relations with access prospects and [REDACTED] targets, the Station recently recommended that he be extended in Paris. At the same time, the Station recommended that Subject's cover be reinforced by full-time employment withSECTION DCERTIFICATION AND COMMENTSBY EMPLOYEE1. I CERTIFY THAT I HAVE SEEN SECTIONS A, B, AND C OF THIS REPORTSIGNATURE OF EMPLOYEEDATEBY SUPERVISOR2. IF THIS REPORT HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN TO EMPLOYEE, GIVE EXPLANATIONWAS EMPLOYEE HAS BEENDATEOFFICIAL TITLE OF SUPERVISORTYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATUREOfficer/s/ Francis Cherry3. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING OFFICIALAs previous Station correspondence and fitness reports will reflect, this officer has been the subject of varying evaluations and projections in recent years. In fairness to him, however, it is equally true that an officer under non-official cover reflects, in the level and quality of his performance, the amount and type of influence, direction and push he receives from the responsible inside case officer. Making allowances for these variables, this officer's past record has not been impressive; however, it is also correct to note that he has improved substantially during the latter part of the period under review, and that if the Station can work out some fiscal arrangement which will reduce the heavy financial input.DATEOFFICIAL TITLE OF REVIEWING OFFICIALTYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE18 May 1970[REDACTED]/s/ Hugh Montgomery