Francesco/who-killed-jfk huggingface dataset:
[104-10194-10019.pdf — page 113]
# SECRET(When Filled In)## SECTION E NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF MANNER OF JOB PERFORMANCEStress strengths and weaknesses demonstrated in current position. Indicate suggestions made to employee for improvement of his work. Give recommendations for his training. Describe, if appropriate, his potential for development and for assuming greater responsibilities. Amplify or explain, if appropriate, ratings given in SECTIONS B, C, and D to provide the best basis for determining future personnel actions.Subject continues as one of the most capable, professionally and hard working of the branch chiefs in the Station. Working against a tough denied area problem, he demonstrates imagination, drive, excellent area background and knowledge, and a high degree of productivity. He definitely has the potential for an even more responsible position.## SECTION F CERTIFICATION AND COMMENTS1. BY EMPLOYEEI certify that I have seen Sections A, B, C, D and E of this Report.| DATE          | SIGNATURE OF EMPLOYEE || ------------- | --------------------- || 27 April 1959 | signed on transmittal |2. BY SUPERVISORIF THIS REPORT HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN TO EMPLOYEE, GIVE EXPLANATION| MONTHS EMPLOYEE HAS BEEN UNDER MY SUPERVISION | IF REPORT IS NOT BEING MADE AT THIS TIME, GIVE REASON. || --------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------ || 22                                            | REPORT MADE WITHIN LAST 90 DAYS                        |EMPLOYEE UNDER MY SUPERVISION LESS THAN 90 DAYSOTHER (Specify):| DATE          | OFFICIAL TITLE OF SUPERVISOR | TYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE  || ------------- | ---------------------------- | ------------------------------------ || 27 April 1959 | DC Tokyo Station             | William Nelson signed on transmittal |3. BY REVIEWING OFFICIALI WOULD HAVE GIVEN THIS EMPLOYEE ABOUT THE SAME EVALUATION.I WOULD HAVE GIVEN THIS EMPLOYEE A HIGHER EVALUATION.I WOULD HAVE GIVEN THIS EMPLOYEE A LOWER EVALUATION.I CANNOT JUDGE THESE EVALUATIONS. I AM NOT SUFFICIENTLY FAMILIAR WITH THE EMPLOYEE'S PERFORMANCE.COMMENTS OF REVIEWING OFFICIAL| DATE          | OFFICIAL TITLE OF REVIEWING OFFICIAL | TYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE || ------------- | ------------------------------------ | ----------------------------------- || 27 April 1959 | C/Tokyo Station                      | John E. Baker signed on transmittal |SECRET
[104-10194-10019.pdf — page 128]
SECRET26. LÂN THINK ON HIS FEET. ☑27. COMES UP WITH SOLUTIONS TO PROBLEMS. ☑28. STIMULATING TO ASSOCIATES: A "SPARK PLUG". ☑29. TOUGH MINDED. ☑30. OBSERVANT. ☑31. CAPABLE.. ☑32. CLEAR THINKING. ☑33. COMPLETES ASSIGNMENTS WITHIN ALLOWABLE TIME LIMITS. ☑34. EVALUATES SELF REALISTICALLY. ☑35. WELL INFORMED ABOUT CURRENT EVENTS. X36. DELIBERATE. ☑37. EFFECTIVE IN DISCUSSIONS WITH ASSOCIATES. ☑38. IMPLEMENTS DECISIONS REGARD- LESS OF OWN FEELINGS. ☑39. THOUGHTFUL OF OTHERS. X40. WORKS WELL UNDER PRESSURE. ☑    41 DISPLAYS JUDGEMENT. X42. GIVES CREDIT #HERE CREDIT 15 DUE. ☑43. NAS DRIVE. X44. IS SECURITY CONSCIOUS. ☑45. VERSATILE. X46. HIS CRITICISM IS CONSTRUCTIVE. ☑47. ABLE TO INFLUENCE OTHERS. X48. FACILITATES SMOOTH OPERATION OF HIS OFFICE. ☑49. DOES NOT REQUIRE STRONG AND CONTINUOUS SUPERVISION. X50. A GOOD SUPERVISOR. ☑SECTION VA. WHAT ARE HIS OUTSTANDING STRENGTH SPCapable operations officer with broad understanding of Soviet problems.B. WHAT ARE HIS OUTSTANDING WEAKNESSESTSECRET
[104-10194-10019.pdf — page 130]
# SECRETSECURITY INFORMAT LONPERSONNEL EVALUATION REPORTIteas I through & will be completed by Administrative or Personnel Officer....1.  NAME    (Last) (First) (Middlel    Richardson Jacques G.2.  GRADE    GS-133.  POSITION TITLE    Area Ops, Officer CD-FI4.  OFFICE    DDP    STAFF OR DIVISION    SR    BRANCH    SR/5    DEPT L.    FIELD    IF FIELD, SPECIFY STATION5. PERIOD COVERED BY REPORT   From To6. TYPE OF REPORT   Initial   Annual   Special18 July 1953 17 July 1954ReassignmentReassignment of SupervisorItems 7 through. 10 will be completed by the person evaluated7. LIST YOUR MAJOR DUTIES IN APPROXIMATE ORDER OF IMPORTANCE, WITH A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF EACH. OMIT MINOR DUTIES.18 July 53 - 31 Jan 54a.  Manage and direct the activities of an overseas operating branch.b. Assist the division chief of operations in the planning of new and continued oper'ns.c.  Assist the division chief in personnel programming in support of branch and field station activities.1 Feb 54 - 17 Jul 54a.  Establish new domestic activities branch.b. Develop and manage operational program of this branch, insuring (1) continuity of treatment by qualified personnel, (2) processing of intelligence requirements, and (3.) expeditious movement of finished intelligence.c.  Kultilateral liaison with other elements of CIA, the Government, and foreign IS.8. LIST COURSES OF INSTRUCTION COMPLETED DURING REPORT PERIOD.| Hame of Course         | Location   | Length of Course | Date Compluted  || ---------------------- | ---------- | ---------------- | --------------- || Counterespionage (OTR) | Washington | 3 weoks          | 22 January 1954 |(In addition to the duties indicated in $7 above, I also give a 3-hour lecture at the CE course (advanced phase) approximately every six weeks.)9. IN WHAT TYPE OF WORK ARE YOU PRIMARILY INTERESTED? I am primarily interested in a foreign assignment where I could apply the various espionage and CE techniques it has been my responsibility.   My work at headquarters has become somewhat narcowing in that I am losing language abilities and opportunity for direct contact with foreigners.10. 11. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE THIS PERSON'S PERFORMANCE ON THE MAJOR DUTIES LISTED UNDER ITEM 7 ABOVE.Richardson is a superior officer in the performance of his duties. He is efficient, precise, and energetic, and brings considerable imagination and foresight to the operational problems confronting him. His concept of staff organization and responsibility is of a high caliber. In handling personnel, he is perceptive and serious, and his judgment and motivation are of the highest quality.FORM 10. 37-151NAY 1962SECRET
[104-10194-10019.pdf — page 131]
SECRETSECURITY INFORMATION12. IN WHAT RESPECT IS THIS PERSON'S PERFORMANCE ON PRESENT JOB MOST NOTICEABLY GOOD OR OUTSTANDING?This officer has been cutstanding as a staff officer. He is unusually talented in his balancing of Jurisdictional emuities. This ability reflects a broad competence, however, and should not be construed so as to limit his future duties.13. ON WHAT ASPECT OF PERFORMANCE SHOULD THIS PERSON CONCENTRATE EFFORT FOR SELF IMPROVEMENT?This officer's devotion to his duties and professional convictions sometimes inclines him toward inflexible declarations of position. This fault, a minor one in officers of considerable potential, will be corrected by increased responsibility and experience.14. COMMENT ON THIS PERSON'S ABILITY TO MANDLE GREATER RESPONSIBILITIES NOW OR IN THE FUTURE.This officer is prepared for prenotion and for increased responsibilities in command or staff duties.15. ARE THERE OTHER CUTIES WHICH BETTER SUIT THIS PERSON'S QUALIFICATIONS? (Recommend appropriate reassignment, if possible.IRichardson is presently well placed. See below.16. WHAT TRAINING OR ROTATION DO YOU RECOMMEND FOR THIS PERSON?Tradecraft training and a field assignment. Both are planned in the next six months.![FI Training]17. IF PERFORMANCE DURING REPORT PERICO NAS BEEN UNSATISFACTORY. THERE IS ATTACHED COPY OF MEMORANDUM NOTIFYING THIS PERSON OF UNSATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE、18. THIS PERSONNEL EVALUATION REPOST HAS BEEN DISCUSSED WITH THE PERSON EVALUATED. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS INCLUDING COMMENT ON ITEMS 7. 8 AND 9, ARE SNCON SELON LUNDER ITEM 20.![date] 29 July 54![signature of supervisor]19. I NAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REPORT. Comments, if any, are shown in ites 20.1![date] 21 July 54![signature of reviewing official]20. COMMENTS: (if necessary, may be continued on reverse side of cover sheet.SECRET
[104-10194-10019.pdf — page 133]
SECRETSECURITY INFORMATION12. IN WHAT RESPECT IS THIS PERSON'S PERFORMANCE ON PRESENT JOB MOST NOTICEABLY GOOD OR OUTSTANDING?He is a good organizer and a good leader. He is methodical and thorough in his planning and supervision of substantive activities, while at the same time he maintains close and sympathetic relations with his subordinates. His knowledge of them and of their personalities and problems is outstanding.13. ON WHAT ASPECT OF PERFORMANCE SHOULD THIS PERSON CONCENTRATE EFFORT FOR SELF IMPROVEMENT?He should continue to develop his knowledge of operations and operational procedures.14. COMMENT ON THIS PERSON'S ABILITY TO HANDLE GREATER RESPONSIBILITIES NOW OR IN THE FUTURE.He is well equipped to advance through increasing levels of responsibility.15. ARE THERE OTHER DUTIES WHICH BETTER SUIT THIS PERSON'S QUALIFICATIONS? (Recommend appropriate reassignment, if possible.tWell placed at present.16. WHAT TRAINING OR ROTATION DO YOU RECOMMEND FOR THIS PERSONP."ssignment to a field position in the not-too-distant future.17. IF PERFORMANCE DURING REPORT PERIOD HAS BEEN UNSATISFACTORY, THERE IS ATTACHED COPY OF MEMORANDUM NOTIFYING THIS PERSON OF UNSATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE.18. THIS PERSONNEL EVALUATION SEFORT HAS BEEN DISCUSSED WITH THE PERSON EVALUATED. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS INCLUDING COMMENT ON ITEMS 7, 8 AND 9, ARE SHOWN BELOR UNDER ITEM 20.26 October 1953DATEJaPanettSIGNATURE OF SUPERVISOR19. I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REPORT. (Comments, if any, are shown in item 20.)26 October 1953.DATEDanaB. MuandSIGNATURE. OF REVIEWING OFFICIAL20. COMMENTS: (If necessary, may be continued on reverse side of cover sheet..SECRET
[104-10194-10019.pdf — page 135]
SECRETSECURITY INFORMATION12. IN SMAT RESPECT IS THIS FERSON'S PERFORMANCE ON PRESENT JOB MOST NOTICEABLY GOOD OR OUTSTANDING?Mr. Richardson's performance was noticeably outstanding with respect to his thorough knowledge of every activity of the Branch. He was in position to asзите direction of Branch activities at any time. lie also kept himself thoroughly briefed on Division policies and planning in order to give timely instruction and guidance to the Branch overseas stations.13. ON GMAT ASPECT OF PERFORMANCE SHOULD THIS PERSON CONCENTRATE EFFORT FOR SELF IMPROVEMENT?Mr. Mchardson has a very thorough background in two (2) languages, French and Japanese. He would benefit substantially by learning the lussian language. He is meticulous with res-rect to his attention to details, sometimes to the point of concooling the broader picture from his view. It would be well for Mr. Hichardson to direct his attention to the broad score of Branch activities rather than to concentrate on its details.14. COMMENT ON THIS PERSON'S ABILITY TO MANDLE GREATER RESPONSIBILITIES NO OR IN THE FUTURE.Mr. Kichardson is fully qualified to assume the duties of the chief SR Division representative at a field station. In order to assume this responsibility in the most efficient manner, it is recommended that Mr. Richardson serve a minimum period of time of approximately six (6) months as the assistant to the present chief of the field station.15. ARE THERE OTHER DUTIES WHICH BETTER SUIT THIS PERSON'S QUALIFICATIONS? (Recommend appropriate reussignment, If possiblo.lMr. Richardson could serve effectively in a staff function for either FI or PP activities. This does not mean, however, that his present duties are not better suited to his qualifications.16. WHAT TRAINING OR RUTATION DO YOU RECOMMEND FOR THIS PERSON?Mr. Richardson has already been recommended for overseas assignment in the For East during the past year. He has area knowledge and command of the Japanese language, having served in Japan previously with the United States Army. ilis duties at Headquarters have been 30 pressing that his departure for overseas assignment is being delayed until an adoquate replacement may be trained.17. IF PERFORMANCE DURING REPORT PERIOD HAS BEEN UNSATISFACTORY, THERE IS ATTACHED COPY OF MEMORANDUM NOTIFYING THIS PERSON OF UNSATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE.18. THIS PERSONNEL EVALUATION REPORT HAS BEEN DISCUSSED WITH THE PERSON EVALUATED. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS INCLUDING COMMENT ON ITEMS 7, 8 AND 9. ARE SHOWN BELOW UNDER ITEM 20.![signature]March 31 1953DATE![signature]SIGNATURE OF SUPERVISOR19. I HAVE REVIS THE ABOVE REPORT. (Comments, if any, are shown Item/20.1![signature]March 20 1953DATE![signature]SIGNATURE OF REVIEWING OFFICIAL20. COMMENTS: 119 necessary, may be continued on reverse side of cover sheet.)SECRET
[104-10194-10019.pdf — page 136]
# DESIGNATION OF BENEFICIARYCIVIL SERVICE RETIREMENT SYSTEMWARNING-Do not fill out this form until you have read all instructions.## A. INFORMATION CONCERNING THE DESIGNATORSTANDARD FORM NO. 2808 JUNE 1966US Civil Service CommissionPPM Supplement 831-1 2808-1041. NAME(Last)RICHARDSON(First) Jacques(Middle) Gabriel2 DATE OF BIRTH(Month) Jan(Day) 20(Year) 19243 SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER 042 20 53394. DEPARTMENT OR AGENCY IN WHICH PRESENTLY OR LAST EMPLOYED, INCLUDING BUREAU OR DIVISION5. CLAIM NUMBER IF RETIRED CSA-I, the employee or former employee identified above, canceling any and all previous designations of beneficiary heretofore made by me, do now designate the beneficiary or beneficiaries named below to receive any lump-sum benefit which may become payable under the Civil Service Retirement Act after my death. I understand that this designation of beneficiary will not affect the rights of any survivors who may qualify for annuity benefits after my death, and that this designation will remain in full force and effect unless or until canceled by me in writing.## B. INFORMATION CONCERNING THE BENEFICIARY OR BENEFICIARIESTYPE OR PRINT FIRST NAME, MIDDLE INITIAL, AND LAST NAME OF EACH BENEFICIARYTYPE OR PRINT ADDRESS (Including ZIP Code) OF EACH BENEFICIARYRELATIONSHIPSHARE TO BE PAID TO EACH BENEFICIARY(See Example)Pamela A. Richardson5 villa Madrid, Neuilly, FranceDau One halfMichelle D. Richardson5 villa Madrid, Neuilly, FranceDau One halfI hereby direct, unless otherwise indicated above, that, if more than one beneficiary is named, the share of any deceased beneficiary or beneficiaries who may die before a lump-sum benefit becomes payable shall be distributed equally among the surviving beneficiaries, or entirely to the survivor. If none of the beneficiaries are alive when the lump-sum benefit becomes payable, this designation shall be void.January 12, 1972DATE OF THIS DESIGNATION(MONTH) (DAY) (YEAR)## C. WITNESSES(t witness is ineligible to receive payment as a beneficiary)WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, CERTIFY THAT THIS INSTRUMENT WAS SIGNED IN OUR PRESENCE.![signature of witness]13219 Marllon Ave.Rockville, md.(SIGNATURE OF WITNESS-DO NOT PRINT)(NUMBER AND STREET)(CITY, STATE, AND ZIP CODE)PRINT OR TYPE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS (Including ZIP Code) TO INSURE RETURN OF COPY![signature of witness](Reserved for Receiving Stamp of U. S. Civil Service Commission)Jacques G. Richardsonc/o Mrs T. G. Driscoll722 South Royal StreetAlexandria VA 22134THIS DUPLICATE WILL BE RETURNED TO YOU
[104-10194-10019.pdf — page 137]
# Standard Form No 1152Form prescribed by Comptroller General. U. S. October 23, 1950(Gen. Reg. No. 104, Supr. Na 1)# DESIGNATION OF BENEFICIARYUNFAID COMPENSATION OF DECEASED CIVILIAN EMPLOYEEIMPORTANTRead instructions on back of duplicate before filling in this formINFORMATION CONCERNING THE EMPLOYEE:NAME-RICHARDSON(Last)Jacques(First)Gabriel(Middle)DATE OF BIRTH (Month, day, year)Jan 20 1924DEPARTMENT OR AGENCY IN WHICH EMPLOYEDI, the employee identified above, canceling any and all previous Designations of Beneficiary heretofore made by me, do now designate the beneficiary or beneficiaries named below to receive any UNPAID COMPENSATION due and payable under existing law after my death. I understand that this Designation of Beneficiary relates solely to Unpaid Compensation as defined in section 2 of the act of August 3, 1950, Public Law 636, and in nowise will affect the disposition of any benefit which may become payable under the Retirement Act applicable to my Government service. I further understand that this Designation of Beneficiary will remain in full force and effect, unless or until canceled by me in writing, so long as I am continuously employed in the above department or agency.INFORMATION CONCERNING THE BENEFICIARY OR BENEFICIARIES:Type or print first name, middle initial, and last name of each beneficiaryType or print address of each beneficiaryRelationshipShare to be paid to each beneficiaryPamela A. Fichardson5 villa Madrid 92 Neuilly Prance!DauOne halfMichelle D. Richardson5 villa Madrid 92 Neuilly FranceDauOne halfI hereby direct, unless otherwise indicated above, that, if more than one beneficiary is named, the share of any deceased beneficiary who may predecease me shall be distributed equally among the surviving beneficiaries, or entirely to the survivor. I understand that this Designation of Beneficiary shall be void if none of the designated beneficiaries is living at the time of my death.I hereby specifically reserve the right to cancel or change any designation of beneficiary at any time in the manner and form prescribed by the Comptroller General of the United States, and without knowledge or consent of the beneficiary.January 12 1972(Date of execution-month, day. year)(Signature of employee)WITNESSES TO SIGNATURE:![signature of witness]![Number and street] Rochelle d' (City, zone number, and State)(Signature of witness)(Number and street)(City, zone number, and State)PRINT OR TYPE NAME AND ADDRESS OF EMPLOYEETHIS SPACE RESERVED FOR RECEIVING DATA OF EMPLOYING AGENCYJacques G. Richardson c/o Mrs. G. Driscoll 722 South Royal Street Alexandria VA 22314DELIVER BOTH COPIES TO THE PROPER OFFICER OF YOUR AGENCY-DUPLICATE WILL BE NOTED AND RETURNEDDUPLICATE
[104-10194-10019.pdf — page 139]
DISPATCHTO: Chief, European DivisionINFO:FROM: Chief of Station, ParisSUBJECT: ADMIN/Personnel - Change of Beneficiary FormsCLASSIFICATION: SECRETACTION REQUIRED-REFERENCES:Forwarded herewith and under separate cover are change of beneficiary forms completed.Since will be at Headquarters during home leave towards the end of February, it is suggested that he be contacted during his TDY if additional information is required.Carolyn A. TANZOLAAttachments:1. Flight & Accident Plan, h/w2. SF-2808, U/S/C via TNP3. SF-54, U/S/C via TNP4. SF-1152, U/S/C via TNPDistribution:3-Chief, Eur-Div w/att #1-h/w; #2,3,4-usc-tnpDISPATCH SYMBOL AND NUMBER: OFPT-17469DATE: 10 February 1972CLASSIFICATION: SECRET
[104-10194-10019.pdf — page 140]
# ELECTION, DECLINATION, OR WAIVEROF LIFE INSURANCE COVERAGEFEDERAL EMPLOYEES GROUP LIFE INSURANCE PROGRAMTO COMPLETE THIS FORM-1. FOLLOW THESE GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS:*   Read the back of the "Duplicate" carefully before you fill in the form.*   Fill in BOTH COPIES of the form. Type or use ink.*   Do not detach any part.2. FILL IN THE IDENTIFYING INFORMATION BELOW (please print or type):   NAME (last) Richardsocie   DATE OF BIRTH (month, day, year)   20 Jun 1924   EMPLOYING DEPARTMENT OR AGENCY LOCATION (City, State, ZIP Code)3. MARK AN "X" IN ONE OF THE BOXES BELOW (do NOT mark more than one):Mark here if you WANT BOTH optional and regular insurance[X] (A)ELECTION OF OPTIONAL (IN ADDITION TO REGULAR) INSURANCEI elect the $10.000 additional optional insurance and authorize the required deductions from my salary, compensation, or annuity to pay the full cost of the optional insurance. This optional insurance is in addition to my regular insurance.Mark here if you DO NOT WANT OPTIONAL but do want regular insurance(B)DECLINATION OF OPTIONAL (BUT NOT REGULAR) INSURANCEI decline the $10,000 additional optional insurance. I understand that I cannot elect op tional insurance until at least 1 year after the effective date of this declination and unless at the time I apply for it I am under age 50 and present satisfactory medical evidence of insurability. I understand also that my regular insurance is not affected by this declina- tion of additional optional insurance.Mark here if you WANT NEITHER regular nor optional insurance(C)WAIVER OF LIFE INSURANCE COVERAGEI desire not to be insured and I waive coverage under the Federal Employees Group Life Insurance Program. I understand that I cannot cancel this waiver and obtain regular in surance until at least 1 year after the effective date of this waiver and unless at the time I apply for insurance I am under age 50 and present satisfactory medical evidence of in surability. I understand also that I cannot now or later have the $10.000 additional optional insurance unless I have the regular insurance.4. SIGN AND DATE. IF YOU MARKED BOX "A" OR "C". COMPLETE THE "STATISTICAL STUB." THEN RETURN THE ENTIRE FORM TO YOUR EMPLOYING OFFICE.   SIGNATURE   DATE 1 March 1968ORIGINAL COPY-Retain in Official Personnel FolderFOR EMPLOYING OFFICE USE ONLY(official receiving date stamp)See Table of Effective Dates on back of OriginalSTANDARD FORM No 176-8JANUARY 1963 (for use until April 18 1968)
[104-10194-10019.pdf — page 141]
31 July 1962THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE PROVISIONS OF REGULATION 11 DATED 31 JANUARY 1959 CONCERNING THE PERSONAL CONVEYANCE OF SOGEM EMPLOYEES OVERSEAS.
[104-10194-10019.pdf — page 142]
CABLE SECRETARIAT DISSEMINATIONPERSON UNT NOTIFIESIFIED MESSAGESECRET(When Filled In)TOTAL COPIES 17'ROUTING AND/OR INITIAL -SEN BYREPICTION OF THIS COPY PROHIBITEDADVANCE COPYISSUEDSLOTTEDDISSON BYACTION UNTCHEURSPERFILE, VRTRBS E C R E T 0116542 JUN 72 CITE PARIS 28959 (RILANDER ACTING)DIRECTORRYBAT ADMIN PERS TOPSY WODEEP WOGAMEREF: DIRECTOR 2719791 JUN IN 6254691. APPRECIATE REF ACTION WHICH WILL HELP AVOID ANY SECURITY   PROBLEM FOR CASASIN. RÉ PARA TWO REF THERE IS NO CHANCE THAT UNCA IRD   WILL QUERY FEDERAL RECORDS CENTER DIRECTLY. UNCAIRD CONDUCTS NO   APPLICANT INVESTIGATIONS ITSELF, SECURITY CLEARANCE FOR AMERICAN   APPLICANTS IS U.S. GOVT, NOT UNCAIRD, REQUIREMENT. THEREFORE,   BELIEVE UNNECESSARY TO TAKE ANY FURTHER ACTION TO BACKSTOP PRIOR   ENPLOYMENT. ONLY REQUIREMENT NOW IS FOR ROUTING REPORT FROM CIVIL   SERVICE COMMISSION INDICATING FAVORABLE SECURITY DETERMINATION   FOR:Richardson reque2. NO FILE. GP-1S E C R E TSECRET