[104-10194-10014.pdf — page 138]
# SECRET# FITNESS REPORT (Part 1) PERFORMANCEINSTRUCTIONSFOR THE SUPERVISOR: This report is designed to help you express your evaluation of your subordinate and to transmit this evaluation to your superviser and senior officials. Organization policy requires that you inform the subordinate where he stands with you. Completion of the report can help you prepare for a discussion with him of his strengths and weaknesses. It is also organization policy that you show l'art lof this report to the employee except under comditions specified in Regeiation 20-370. It is recommended that you read the entire form before completing any question. If this to the initial report on the employre. It must to completed ted and forwarded to the Office of Personnel no later than 30 days sfter the date indicated in item 8. of Section "A" below.## SECTION A.1. NAMEO'CONNELL(Lost)Janes(Farst)GENERALPJr.(Middle)2. DATE OF BIRTH19 Feb. 19173. SEXmale4. SERVICE DESIGNATIONSD SS5. OFFICE DIVISION BRANCH OF ASSEMENTQS/Sec, Sup Dive. Supper: Branch6. OFFICIAL POSITION TITLEInvestigator7. GRADEGS-148. DATE REPORT DUE IN Z?17 December 19579. PERIOD COVERED BY THIS REPORT (Inclusive dates)17. December 1950 - 17 December 1957.10. ΓΥΡΕ OF REPORT(Check one)XSPECIAL (Specify)## SECTION 8.CERTIFICATION1. FOR THE RATER: THIS REPORT 445 HAS NOT BEEN SHOPY TO THE INDIVIDUAL RATED. IF NOT SHOWN. EXPLAIN MYA. CHECK (X) APPROPRIATE STATEMENTS:THIS REPORT REFLECTS MINION VIDUAL.THIS REPORT REFLECTS THE COMBINAR OPINIONS OF wyst AMO PREVIOUS SUPERVISORS.IDUAL IR RATED IN COR DO. A BARNING LIPS LE WAS SENT TO HIM A COPY ATTACHED TO THIS RIPORT.CANNOT CERTIFY THAT THE RATED INDIVIDUAL KNOWs whe EVALUATE MIS 100 ORMANCE BECAUSE (Specify):DISCUSSED T$ しこE MIS STRENGTHS AND SANDD. THIS DATE25 November 1957C. TYPED PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE OF SUPERVISOR D. SUPERVISOR'S OFFICIAL TITLEAss't Dep. Dir. of Sec.(I&S)2. FOR THE REVIEWING OFFICIAL: FECORD おせきまたFFERENCE OF OPINION WITH THE SUPERVISOR, OR ANY OTHER INFORMATION, WHICH WILL LEAD TO A SETTER UNDERSTANDING OF THIS REPORT.![signature]I certify that any substantial difierence of opinion with the supervisor is reflected in the above section.A. THIS DATE25 November 1957B. AND SIGNAT DET REVIEWINGC. OFFICIAL TITLE OF REVIEWING OFFICIALDep. Dir, of Security (I&S)## SECTION с.ROP JOB PERFORMANCE EVALUATION1. RATING ON GENERAL PERFORMANCE SE JUTIESDIRECTIONS: Consister ONLY the productivity and effectiveness with which the individual being rated has performed nis duties during the rating perte. Compare him (NLY with others doing similar work at a similar level of responsibility. Factors other than proszctivity will be taken into account later in Section D|     || --- || 1   || 2   || 3   || 4   || 5   || 6   |DOES NOT PERFGAM DUTIES ADEQUATELY: HE IS INCOMPETENT.BARELY ADEQUATE IN PERFORMANCE, ALTHOUGH HE NAS HAD SPECIFIC GUIDANCE OR TRAINING, HE OFTEN FAILS TO CARRY OUT RESPONSIBILITIES.PERFORMS MOST OF HIS JUTIES ACCEPTABLY, OCCASIONALLY REVEALS SOME AREA OF DEAKNESS.PERFORUS DUTIES IN & COMPETENT. EFFECTIVE WASSER.A FIVE PERFORMANCE. CRURIES OUT MANY OF HIS RESPONSIBILITIES EXCEPTIONALLY BELL.PERFORMS HIS DUTIES SUCH AN OUTSTANDING WANNER THAT HE IS EQUALLED BY FEW OTHER PERSONS KNOWS Tכ THE SUPERVISOR.INSERTRATINGNUMBERCOMMENTS:FORM 13. INOV gaREPLACES EDITIONS 45 (Part 1) OF FORMS & AN2 454 MICH ARE OBSOLETE.SECRET Performance (4)