[104-10194-10001.pdf — page 97]
# SECRET(Bhen Filled In)2. RATINGS ON PERFORMANCE OF SPECIFIC OUTILSDIRECTIONS:a. State in the spaces below up to six of the more important SPECIFIC duties performed OFFICE OF PERDONNELing period.first. Do not include minor or unimportant duties.b. Place the most importach prettic duty considering ONLY effectiveness in performance of this specific duty Dec 11 10.12 AM 56c. For supervisors, ability to supervise will always be rated as a specific duty at a rate as supervisors those who supervise a secretary only).d. Compare in your mind, when possible, the individual being rated with th others performing same duty at a similar level of responsibility.e. Two individuals with the job title may be performing different duties. If so, rate them on different duties.f. Be specific. Examples of the kind of duties that might be rated are:ORAL BRIEFING HAS AND USES AREA KNOWLEDGE MAIL ROOMGIVING LECTURES DEVELOPS NEW PROGRAMS CONDUCTS INTERROGATIONSCONDUCTING SEMINARS ANALYZES INDUSTRIAL REPORTS PREPARES SUMMARIESWRITING TECHNICAL, REPORTS MANAGES FILES TRANSLATES GERMANCONDUCTING EXTERNAL LIAISON OPERATES RADIO DEBRIEFING SOURCESTYPING KEEPS BOOKS DRIVES TRUCKTAKING DICTATION COORDINATES WITH OTHER OFFICES MAINTAINS AIR CONDITIONINGSUPERVISING WRITES REGULATIONS EVALUATES SIGNIFICANCE OF DATAPREPARES CORRESPONDENCEg. For some jobs, duties may be broken down even further if supervisor considers it advisable, e.g.. combined key and phone operation, in the case of a radio operator.1. INCOMPETENT IN THE PERFORMANCE OF THIS DUTY 6. PERFURMS THIS DUTY IN AN OUTSTANDING MANNER2. BARELY ADEQUATE IN THE PERFORMANCE OF THIS FOUND IN VERY FEW INDIVIDUALS HOLDING SIMI- DESCRIPTIVE DUTY LAR JOBS   RATING 3. PERFORMS THIS OUTY ACCEPTABLY 7. EXCELS ANYONE I KNOW IN THE PERFORMANCE OF NUMBER 4. PERFORUS THIS OUTY IN A COUPETENT MANNER THIS DUTY5. PERFORMS THIS OUT IN SUCH A FINE MANNERSPECIFIC DUTY NO. 1 extracts information RATING SPECIFIC Duty No. 4 RATINGfrom Soviet documents NUMBER 4 NUMBERSPECIFIC DUTY NO. 2 compiles technical RATING SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 5 RATINGintelligence reports NUMBER 5 NUMBERSPECIFIC DUTY NO. 3 maintains files of RATING SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 6 RATINGmachine models and plants NUMBER NUMBER3. NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF MANNER OF JOB PERFORMANCEDIRECTIONS: Stress strengths and weaknesses, particularly those which affect development on job. I feel that Mr. T. has not yet been on the job long enough to demonstrate his maximum capacities. Although he came with no background in his specialized field, he has shown considerable facility in acquiring technical information and building up his technical vocabulary. He has a good eye for intelligence. Although he has not native English fluency, his reports are pointed, concise, and, except for occasional minor points of grammar, very well expressed indeed. Owing to his persistence and application, he was rated second highest in a class in English usage, Soon after his EOD, the analyst whom Mr. T. was assisting was transferred, leaving him with full responsibility for covering a field which was still very new to him. He has done an exceedingly good job under the most unpropitious circumstances. He needs to develop fuller utilization of varied research methods, but this will be easier as he becomes more familiar with the materials and problems with which he has to deal. His native Russian fluency is a decided asset. He is calm, cooperative, and easy to work with.SECTION D.SUITABILITY FOR CURRENT JOB IN ORGANIZATIONDIRECTIONS: Take into account here everything you know about the individual....productivity, conduct in the job, pertinent personal characteristics or habite, special defecte or talents....and how he fits in with your team. Compare him with others doing similar work of about the same level.1. DEFINITELY UNSUITABLE - HE SHOULD BE SEPARATED2. OF DOUBTFUL SUITABILITY... WOULD NOT HAVE ACCEPTED HIM IF I HAD KNOWN WHAT I KNOW NOW3. A BARELY ACCEPTABLE EMPLOYEE...BELOW AVERAGE BUT WITH NO WEAKNESSES SUFFICIENTLY OUTSTANDING TO WAR- RANT HIS SEPARATION4. OF THE SAME SUITABILITY AS MOST PEOPLE I KNOW IN THE ORGANIZATION5. A FINE EMPLOYEE HAS SOME OUTSTANDING STRENGTHS   RATING 6. AN UNUSUALLY STRONG PERSON IN TERMS OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ORGANIZATION   NUMBER 7. EXCELLED BY ONLY A FEW IN SUITABILITY FOR WORK IN THE ORGANIZATIONIS THIS INDIVIDUAL BETTER SUITED FOR WORK IN SOME OTHER POSITION IN THE ORGANIZATION? [X] YES [] NO. IF YES. EXPLAIN FULLYHis native Russian fluency might be better utilized in some other type of position, although his performance on his present job is entirely satisfactory.SECRET