[104-10194-10001.pdf — page 89]
# SECRET2. RATINGS ON PERFORMANCE OF SPECIFIC DUTIES**DIRECTIONS:**a. State in teurPlace the most important first. In not inclute minor or unimportant duties.b. Rate performance on each specific duty considering ONLY effectiveness in performance of this specific duty.c. For supervisors, ability to sipervise will always be rated as a specifiedyty do not supervisors those who supervise a secretary only).d. Compare in your mind, then possible, the individual being rated 146 600e. Two individuals with the same job title may be performing different duties. If so, rate them on different duties.f. Be specific. Fxamples of the kind of duties that might be rated are:OFFICE OF PERSONNELSrting roing perio..NOV 27 9.00 AM 50MAIL ROOMORAL BRIEFINGHAS AND USES AREA KNOWLEDGECONDUCTS INTERROGATIONSGIVING LECTURESDEVELOPS NEW PROGRAMSPRETARES SIWARIESCONDUCTING SEMINARSAVALYZES INDUSTRIAL REPORTSTRANSLATES GERMANBRITING TECHNICAL REPORTSMAVAGES FILESDEARIEFING SOURCESCONDUCTING EXTERNAL LIAISONOPERATES RADIOKEEPS BOOKSTYPINGCOORDINATES WITH OTHER OFFICESDRIVES TRUCKTAKING DICTATIONWRITES REGULATIONSMAINTAINS AIR CONDITIONINGSUPERVISINGFREPARES CORRESPONDENCEEVALUATES SIGNIFICANCE OF DATA. For some jobs, duties may be broken down even further il supervisor considers it advisable, e.g., combined key and phone operation, in the case of a radio operator.|                                                                                                   || ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- || 1 INCOMPETENT IN THE PERFORMANCE OF THIS DUTY                                                     || 2 RARELY ADEQUATE IN THE PERFORMANCE OF THIS DUTY                                                 || 3 PERFORMS THIS DUTY ACCEPTABLY                                                                   || 4 PERFORMS THIS DUTY IN A COMPETENT MANNER                                                        || 5 PERFORMS THIS DUTY IN SUCH A FINE MANNER THAT HE IS A DISTINCT ASSET ON HIS JOB                 || 6 PERFCHMS THIS DUTY IN AN OUTSTANDING MANNER FOUND IN VERY FER INDIVIDUALS MOLDING SIVI.LAR JOBS || 7 EFCELB ANYONE I KNOW IN THE PERFORMANCE OF THIS DUTY                                            |DESCRIPTIVERATINGNUMBERSPECIFIC DUTY NO. 1RATING SPECIFIC DUTY 2.4NUMBER5Scans, Soviet documents for intelligence material on a wide range of technical fieldsMaintains technical files5RATINGNUMBERSPECIFIC DUTY NO. 2RATING SPECIFIC Dura、5NUMBERWrites technical reports4RATINGNUMBERSPECIFIC OUTV NO. 3RATING SPECIFIC putr 0.6NUMBERServes as language consultant5RATINGNUMBER3. NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF MANNER OF JOB PERFORMANCE**DIRECTIONS:** Stress strengths and weaknesses, particularly those which affect development on present job. Works hard. Reads Russian rapidly and looks out for material of interest to others as he scans. Is adaptable and flexible and handles several different technical fields with equal facility. Can tackle almost any subject without previous experience and turn out a good job. His native knowledge of Russian is of considerable benefit to the whole section. Selects the salient points from masses of useless or repetitive material with intelligent judgment, and compiles reports which are pointed and concise. His only deficiency of any consequence is the slight awkwardness and occasional lack of clarity in his written English style. His English has improved considerably during the past two years, but sometimes the failure to use the most precise term or the right connective complicates for the reader a conception which is perfectly clear to the writer.SECTION D. SUITABILITY FOR CURRENT JOB IN ORGANIZATION**DIRECTIONS:** Take into account here everything you knor about the individual....productivity, conduct in the job. pertinent personal characteristics or habits, special defects or talente....and how he fits in with your team. Compare him with others doing similar work of about the same level.|                                                                                                                       || --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- || 1 DEFINITELY UNSUITABLE HE SHOULD BE SEPARATED                                                                        || 2 OF DOUBTFUL SUITABILITY... WOULD NOT HAVE ACCEPTED HIM IF I HAD KNOWN MHAT I KNOW NOW                               || 3 A BARELY ACCEPTABLE EMPLOYEE...BELOW AVERAGE BUT RITH NO PEAKNESSES SUFFICIENTLY OUTSTANDING TO RANT HIS SEPARATION || 4 OF THE SAME SUITABILITY AS MOST PEOPLE I KNOW IN THE ORGANIZATION                                                   || 5 A FINE EMPLOYEE HAS SOME OUTSTANDING STRENGTHS                                                                      || 6 AV UNUSUALLY STRONG PERSON IN TERMS OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ORGANIZATION                                         || 7 EXCELLED BY ONLY, A FEW IN SUITABILITY FOR WORK IN THE ORGANIZATION                                                 |RATINGNUMBER5IS THIS INDIVIDUAL BETTER SUITED FOR WORK IN SOME OTHER POSITION IN THE ORGANIZATION"IF YES.Not necessarily better suited, but a position requiring the use of native Russian speaking ability would also be suitable.SECRET