Francesco/who-killed-jfk huggingface dataset:
[104-10194-10012.pdf — page 177]
WAR DEPARTMENTREPORT OF PERSONNEL ACTION(FIELD)CONFIDENTIAL1. Date 17 October 19462. TO J. Walton Moore 3. S S NO.4 THROUGH. SSUThis is to notify you of the following action concerning your employment, which is subject to the.provisions on the reverse hereet This form is an official record of your service history in the WarDepartment and should be retained for future reference.5. NATURE OF ACTION (Use standard terminology)   Involuntary Separation*6. EFFECTIVE DATE   19 Ootcber 1946   (TO)7. POSITION TITLE Intelligence Officer CAF-12   (FROM)8. SERVICE GRADE AND SALARY CAF-12 $5905.20 per annum9 FORCE AND SERVICE OR COMMAND SSU10 INSTALLA TION AND LOCATION11 ORGAN IZATION UNIT12 DUTY STA TION AND LOCATION Shanghai, China13 REMARKSCONFIDENTIAL*LiquidationLAST WORKING DAY: 18 October 1946TERMINAL LEAVE : 8:30 21 October thru COB 23 Oxtober 1946(Twenty-four hours,)![signature of WM, G. Tharp]WM, G. Tharp, Chief of PersonnelEMPLOYEE
[104-10194-10012.pdf — page 178]
OSS: 1001OSS PERSONNEL ACTION REQUEST(To be Signed and Submitted in Triplicate)NAME: JAMES WALTON MOORENATURE OF ACTION: AppointmentEFFECTIVE: 29 June 1946TITLEGRADE AND SALARY: By discharge from the NavyBRANCHOFFICIAL STATIONDEPT. or FIELDTO:Intelligence OfficerField Representative$3905.80CAF-12, $5180.p.s.SI Branch-FSEO-FDZShanghaiFEG-AFieldREMARKS:Plus Living and Quarters Allowance in accordance with Bureau of the Budget directive A-8RECOMMENDED:AMOS P. BOSCRIP JR.Lt ColonelInfCommandingDATE: 10 June 1946![photo of stamp, RECEIVED, JUL 10 1946]![photo of a signature]![photo of stamp, RECEIVED, JUL 9 1946]
[104-10194-10012.pdf — page 179]
OSS PERSONNEL ACTION REQUEST(TO BE SIGNED AND SUBMITTED IN TRIPLICATE)NAME: MOORE, James WaltonCLASSIFICATION:NATURE OF ACTION: AppointmentEFFECTIVE DATE: As soon as possibleFOR SEPARATIONS, TRANSFERS OUT, AND RESIGNATIONSLAST WORKING DAY:FOR RESIGNATIONS FROM FEDERAL SERVICE ONLYSIGNATURE OF EMPLOYEE:SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS:1 FOR MILITARY LEAVE WITHOUT PAY- ATTACH 3 COPIES OF MILITARY ORDERS AT LEAST ONE OF WHICH MUST BE A PHOTOSTAT OR CERTIFIED COPY.2. EFFECTIVE DATE SHALL BE FILLED IN BY THE LEAVE UNIT, FINANCE BRANCH, FOR SEPARATIONS OR RESIGNATIONSEMPLOYMENTCHIEF, CIVILIANPERSONNEL BRANCH|                  | FROM                       | TO                   || ---------------- | -------------------------- | -------------------- || TITLE            |                            | Field Representative || GRADE AND SALARY | By discharge from the Navy | CAF-12, $5180.p.a.   || BRANCH           |                            | SI Branch            || DIVISION         | in the field               | Shangk               || SECTION          |                            | Shanghai             || OFFICIAL STATION |                            |                      || DEPT OR FIELD    |                            | Field                |REMARKS OR PROPOSED DUTIES:Plus Living and Quarters allowance in accordance with Bureau of the Budget directive A-8RECOMMENDED. Amos D. Woscrip Jr. Lt Col Inr, Cozzand. DATE 10 June 1946
[104-10194-10012.pdf — page 180]
# CONFIDENTIALCLASSIFICATION# FITNESS REPORT## GENERAL INFORMATION**1. EMPLOYEE NUMBER**003820**2. NAME (Last, first, middle)**Moore J. Walton**3. DATE OF BIRTH** 5 Oct 19**4. SEX** M**5. GRADE** GS-15**6. SD** DYD**7. OFFICIAL POSITION TITLE**IO. Contact Ch**8. OFF/DIV/BR OF ASSIGNMENT**DDO/DCD/Dallas**9. CURRENT STATION**Dallas**10. CODE (Ch. 1)**NOS. X OP**11. TYPE OF APPOINTMENT**CAREER XRESERVETEMPORARYINITIALANNUAL X**12. TYPE OF REPORT**SupervisorREASSIGNMENTSPECIALCONTRACTSPECIALOTHER**13. REPORTING PERIOD (FROM-TO)**1 Jan 77 - 31 May. 77**14. DATE REPORT DUE IN O.P.**## SECTION BQUALIFICATIONS UPDATEIF QUALIFICATIONS UPDATE FORM IS BEING SUBMITTED WITH CHANGES, AND IS ATTACHED TO THIS REPORT, PLACE THE WORD "YES" IN THE BOX TO THE RIGHT. IF NO CHANGES ARE REQUIRED, PLACE THE WORD "NO" IN THE BOX AT RIGHT.## SECTION CPERFORMANCE EVALUATIONU-Unsatisfactory.Performance is unacceptable A rating in this category requires immediate and positive, remedial action. The nature of the action could range from counseling, to further training, to placing on probation, to reassignment or to separation. Describe action taken or proposed in Section D.M-Marginal"Performance is deficient in some aspects. The reasons for assigning this rating should be stated in Section D and remedial actions taken or recommended should be described.P-ProficientPerformance is satisfactory. Desired results are being produced in the manner expected.S-StrongPerformance is characterized by exceptional proficiency.O-OutstandingPerformance is so exceptional in relation to requirements of the work and in comparison to the performance of others doing similar work as to warrant special recognition.## SPECIFIC DUTIESList up to six of the most important specific duties performed during the rating period. Insert rating letter which best describes the manner in which employee performs EACH specific duty. Consider ONLY effectiveness in performance of that duty. All employees with supervisory responsibilities MUST be rated on their ability to supervise (indicate number of employees supervised).SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 1RATINGLETTERSEE ATTACHED MEMORANDUM IN LIEU OF FITNESS REPORTSPECIFIC DUTY NO. 2RATINGLETTERSPECIFIC DUTY NO. 3RATINGLETTERSPECIFIC DUTY NO. 4RATINGLETTERSPECIFIC DUTY NO. 5RATINGLETTERSPECIFIC DUTY NO 6RATINGLETTER## OVERALL PERFORMANCE IN CURRENT POSITIONTake into account everything about the employee which influences his effectiveness in his current position such as performance of specific duties, productivity, conduct on job cooperativeness, pertinent personal traits or habits, and particular limitations or talents. Based on your knowledge of employee's overall performance during the rating period, place the letter in the rating box corresponding to the statement which most accurately reflects his level of performance.RATINGLETTERSCLASSIFICATION12. IMPORT CL BY 018877
[104-10194-10012.pdf — page 181]
CONFIDENTIAL27 May 1977MEMORANDUM IN LIEU OF FITNESS REPORTSUBJECT: Moore, J. Walton1.  This is a reassignment report covering the period 1 January to 1 June 1977. It is prepared due to the reassignment of the rating officer.2.  During the period under review, Mr. Moore continued in his assignment as Chief of the Dallas Office. He has directed effectively the attention of the office to the collection of priority intelligence information which has resulted in the submission of an assortment of well-prepared reports on important intelligence topics. In managing the full range of collection and support functions, Mr. Moore's performance as Office Chief continues to be marked by exceptional proficiency.3.  Overall Rating: STRONG.![signature of Elbert H. Watts]ELBERT H. WATTSDeputy Chief of Operations, DCDI certify that I have seen this report.![illegible text]J. Walton MooreDateE 2 IMPDET CL BY 018877CONFIDENTIAL
[104-10194-10012.pdf — page 182]
# SECRETCLASSIFICATION# FITNESS REPORT## GENERAL INFORMATION**SECTION A**1. EMPLOYEE NUMBER   0038202. NAME (Last, first, middle)   Moore J. Walton3. DATE OF BIRTH   5 Oct 19SEXM8. GRADE & SD   GS-15DTD7. OFFICIAL POSITION TITLE:   10 Contact Ch8. OFF/DIV/BR OF ASSIGNMENT & CURRENT STATION   DDO/DCD/Dallas9. CURRENT STATION   Dallas10. CODE (ck ane)    HQS. X DP11. TYPE OF APPOINTMENT    OTHER (Spec.)X CAREERRESERVECONTRACTTEMPORARYANNUALX13. REPORTING PERIOD (from-to-)    1 Jan 1976 - 31 Dec 197614. DATE REPORT DUE IN O.P.    1 Feb 197718. TYPE OF REPORT    REASSION. MENTSPECIAL**SECTION B**## QUALIFICATIONS UPDATEIF QUALIFICATIONS UPDATE FORM IS BEING SUBMITTED WITH CHANGES, AND IS ATTACH TO THIS REPORT, PLACE THE WORD "YES" IN THE BOX TO THE RIGHT. IF NO CHANGES ARE REQUIRED, PLACE THE WORD "NO" IN THE BOX AT RIGHT.**SECTION C**## PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONU-UnsatisfactoryPerformance is unacceptable. A rating in this category requires immediate a positive remedial action. The nature of the action could range from counseling, to further training, to placing on probation, to signment or to separation. Describe action taken or proposed in Section D.M-MarginalPerformance is deficient in some aspects The reasons for assigning this re should be stated in Section D and remedial actions taken or recommended should be described.P-ProficientPerformance is satisfactory. Desired results are being produced in ner expected.S-StrongPerformance is characterized by exceptional proficiency.O-OutstandingPerformance is so exceptional in relation to requirements of the work and in comparison to the performance of others doing similar work as to warrant special recognition.## SPECIFIC DUTIESList up to six of the most important specific duties performed during the rating period. Insert rating letter which best describes the manner in which employee performs EACH specific duty. Consider ONLY affectiveness in performance of that duty: All employees with supervisory responsibilities MUST be rated on their ability to supervise (indicate number of employees supervised).SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 1RATING LETTERSEE ATTACHED MEMORANDUM IN LIEU OF FITNESS REPORTSPECIFIC DUTY NO. 2RATING LETTERSPECIFIC DUTY NO. 3RATING LEFTERSPECIFIC DUTY NO. 4RATING LETTERSPECIFIC DUTY NO. 5RATING LETTERSPECIFIC DUTY NO. 6RATING LETTER## OVERALL PERFORMANCE IN CURRENT POSITIONTake into account everything about the employee which influences his effectiveness in his current position such as performance of specific duties, productivity, conduct on job, cooperativeness, pertinent personal traits or habin, and particular limitations or talents. Based on your knowledge of employee's overall performance during the rating period, place the letter in the rating box corresponding to the statement which most accurately reflects his level of performance.RATING LETTERCLASSIFICATIONE2, IMPDET CL BY 018877
[104-10194-10012.pdf — page 183]
# CLASSIFICATION## SECTION D NARRATIVE COMMENTSState suggestions made for improvement of work performance. Give recommendations for training. Comment on foreign language competence, if required for current position. Amplify or exploit ratings given in Section C to provide the best basis for determining future personnel action. Manner of performance of managerial or supervisory duties and cost consciousness in the use of personnel, space, equipment, and funds must be commented on, if applicable. If extra space is needed to complete Section D, attach a separate sheet of paper.## SECTION E CERTIFICATION AND COMMENTS**1. BY SUPERVISOR**MONTHS EMPLOYEE HAS BEEN UNDER MY SUPERVISION IF THIS REPORT HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN TO EMPLOYEE, GIVE EXPLANATIONDATE OFFICIAL TITLE OF SUPERVISOR TYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE**2. BY EMPLOYEE**STATEMENT CONCERNING THIS EVALUATION OF MY PERFORMANCEDATE SIGNATURE OF EMPLOYEEHAVE ATTACHED HAVE NOT ATTACHED**3. BY REVIEWING OFFICIAL**COMMENTS OF REVIEWING OFFICIALI concur in Mr. Watts' evaluation. Mr. Moore is a very good administrator and his office has performed its collection mission very well and provided excellent operational services and support. They have not been tested in our emigre program because of a lack of potential but I am confident they will do the job well as required. I rate Mr. Moore superior in his ability to represent CIA and the Intelligence Community on the outside and he does a very good job in representing DCD within CIA and the Community. In a pinch I feel that I could depend on Mr. Moore more than almost any other DCD field chief of his grade.DATE OFFICIAL TITLE OF REVIEWING OFFICIAL TYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE14 April 1977 Chief, DCD Jackson R. Norton**4. BY EMPLOYEE**I CERTIFY THAT I HAVE SEEN THE ENTRIES IN ALL SECTIONS OF THIS REPORT. DATE SIGNATURE OF EMPLOYEECLASSIFICATIONSECRET
[104-10194-10012.pdf — page 184]
MEMORANDUM IN LIEU OF FITNESS REPORTSUBJECT: Mr. J. Walton Moore10 February 19771. During the period under review, Mr. Moore continued in his assignment as Chief of the DCD Field Office in Dallas, with responsibility for the supervision of a Resident Office in Tulsa and a Residency in Austin. The Houston Resident Office was raised to Field Office status on 1 September 1976, and the New Orleans Resident Office was placed under the newly formed Houston Field Office. Both of these offices were formerly subordinate to the Dallas Field Office.2. Under Mr. Moore's able direction, the Dallas Field Office has continued to perform the full range of collection and support tasks exceptionally well. The office produces well prepared reports on subjects of priority intelligence interest. Mr. Moore is a quiet and efficient manager with high personal and professional standards. He is well liked and respected.3. During this rating period, Mr. Moore and the Dallas Field Office were formally commended by the Office of Strategic Research for timely reporting of information which resulted in substantial improvement of an estimate on Soviet military medical staffing. The information supplied by Mr. Moore"...resulted in a reduction of over 500,000 in the Community's estimate of the total number of Soviet military personnel."4. Extraordinarily fine work has been done under Mr. Moore's direction during this rating period supporting the activities of the FR Base. The FR Base is relatively new and has depended heavily on Mr. Moore's readiness to support it in the early stages of development. In November 1976, Mr. Moore was formally commended by the FR Base Chief "...for his outstanding support to the new Dallas Base during the period October 1975 to October 1976. ... The level of overall support from DCD Dallas was consistently outstanding." Under Mr. Moore's management, the Dallas Office support of FR objectives is among the most effective and comprehensive in DCD.E 2 IMPDET CL BY 018877
[104-10194-10012.pdf — page 185]
SECRETMEMORANDUM IN LIEU OF FITNESS REPORTJ. Walton Moore, 10 February 19775. Mr. Moore is a strong supporter of the Emigre Task Force Program, and the Dallas Office is responsive to cases and requests assigned by this project. The potential in the Dallas area is not as great as in other major cities of equivalent size, but the office has performed very well against those targets available.6. Mr. Moore is an experienced and effective officer; the Dallas Field Office under his careful and tactful management is a productive and smooth functioning office.7. Rating: Strong.![signature]Elbert H. Watts, JR.Deputy Chief of Operations, DCDI certify that I have seen this report.that copy of this reportwith the Rating G's comments has beenfara.sed to the eniployee.J. Walton MooreDateSECRET2
[104-10194-10012.pdf — page 186]
# SECRETCLASSIFICATIONFITNESS REPORTGENERAL INFORMATIONSECTION A1. EMPLOYEE 'NUMBER0038202. NAME (Lost, first, middle)MOORE, J. Walton3. DATE OF BIRTH 4. GRADE 4. SD10/05/19 M 15 D7. OFFICIAL POSITION TITLEIntelligence Officer (Chief)8. OFF/DIV/OR OF ASSIGNMENT 9. CURRENT STATION 10. CODE (ck one)DDO/DCD/Dallas Dallas11. TYPE OF APPOINTMENT 12. TYPE OF REPORT.CAREER RESERVE CONTRACT OTHER (Spor TEMPORARY ANNUAL REASSION. SPECIALMENTX X13. REPORTING PERIOD (from-to-) 14. DATE REPORT DUE IN O.P.1 January - 31 December 1975 31 January 1976SECTION B QUALIFICATIONS UPDATEIF QUALIFICATIONS UPDATE FORM IS BEING SUBMITTED WITH CHANGES, AND IS ATTACHED TO THIS REPORT, PLACE THEWORD "YES" IN THE BOX TO THE RIGHT. IF NO CHANCES ARE REQUIRED, PLACE THE WORD "NO" IN THE BOX AT RIGHT.SECTION C PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONU-Unsatisfactory Performance is unacceptable. A rating in this category reqüires immediate and positive remedial action. The nature of the actioncould range from counseling, to further training, to placing on probation, to reassignment or to separation. Describe action takenor proposed in Section D.M-Marginal Performance is deficient in some aspects The reasons for assigning this rating should be stated in Section D and remedial actionstaken or recommended should be describedP--Proficient Performance is satisfactory Desired results are being produced in the manner expected.S-Strong Performance is characterized by exceptional proficiency.O-Outstanding Performance is so exceptional in relation to requirements of the work and in comparison to the performance of ashers doing similarwork as to warrant special recognition.SPECIFIC DUTIESList up to six of the most important specific duties performed during the rating period. Insert rating latter which best describes the manner in which employeeperforms EACH specific duty. Consider ONLY effectiveness in performance of that duty. All employees with supervisory responsibilities MUST be rated ontheir ability to supervise (indicate number of employees supervised).SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 1RATINGLETTERSEE ATTACHED MEMORANDUM IN LIEU OF FITNESS REPORTSPECIFIC DUTY NO. 2RATINGLETTERSPECIFIC DUTY NO. 3RATINGLETTERSPECIFIC DUTY NO. 4RATINGLETTERSPECIFIC DUTY NO. 5RATINGLETTERSPECIFIC DUTY NO. 6RATINGLETTEROVERALL PERFORMANCE IN CURRENT POSITIONTake into account everything about the employee which influences his effectiveness in his current position such as performance of specific duties,productivity, conduct on job, cooperativeness, pertinent personal traits or habits, and particular limitations or talents. Based on your knowledgeof employee's overall performance during the rating period, place the letter in the rating box corresponding to the statement which most occurately reflects his level of performance.RATINGLETTERSFORM OBSOLETE PREVIOUS9-73 EDITIONSCLASSIFICATION--E2, IMPDET CL BY 018877
[104-10194-10012.pdf — page 187]
# SECTION DCLASSIFICATIONNARRATIVE COMMENTSIndicate significant stengths or weaknersas apmcestrated in current position keeping in proper perspective their relationship to overall performance. State suggessons made for improvement of wat certoumiance. Give recommendations for training: Comment on foreign language competence, if required for current position. Amplify or explain ratings given in Section C to provide beit basis for determining future personnel action. Manner of, performance of. anegerid, or surenisery duties and cost commovies in the use of personnel, spoce, equipment and funds, must be commented on, if caplicable. Η eita space a needed to complete Section D. amach a separate sheet of paper.# SECTION ECERTIFICATION AND COMMENTSMONTHS ENPLOYEE HAS BEEN UNDER MY SUPERVISION1. BY SUPERVISORIF THIS REPORT HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN TO EMPLOYEE. GIVE EXPLANATIONDATEOFFICIAL TITLE OF SUPERVISORTYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURESTATEMENT CONCERNING THIS EVALUATION OF MY PERFORMANCE2. BY EMPLOYEEDATESIGNATURE OF EMPLOYEEHAVE ATTACHED HAVE NOT ATTACHED3. BY REVIEWING OFFICIALCOMMENTS OF REVIEWING OFFICIALWaltonllore.Mr. Moore's long and unique experience in the FBI, OSS, and CIA coupled with his background in China and his admirable personal qualities make him a very valuable asset to DCD. When he recommends something to me, I know he will be correct; when he is asked to represent the Agency in some highly important contact, I know he will do it well and rake an excellent, professional impression, and I can count on him to run a very good office with a high level of productive activity.I feel very comfortable and very confident with Jim Moore in Dallas.DATE22 April 1976OFFICIAL TITLE OF REVIEWING OFFICIALChief, Domestic Collection DivisionTYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATUREJACKSON R. HORTON4. BY EMPLOYEEDATESIGNATURE OF EMPLOYEEI CERTIFY THAT I HAVE SEEN THE ENTRIES IN ALL SECTIONS OF THIS REPORT.CLASSIFICATION
[104-10194-10012.pdf — page 188]
SECRET20 April 1976MEMORANDUM IN LIEU OF FITNESS REPORTSUBJECT: Mr. James Walton Moore1. Mr. Moore continued in his assignment as Chief of the DCD Field Office in Dallas, during the period under review, with responsibility for the supervision of the Resident Offices in Houston, New Orleans and Tulsa and a Residency in Austin. His Letter of Instruction remains current.2. The Dallas Field Office, under Mr. Moore's perceptive and competent direction, produces a good volume of quality foreign intelligence reporting. DCD headquarters officers consider the Dallas Field Office performance to be of high caliber. The office is highly responsive to headquarters direction, and there is a strong commitment to quality performance. Mr. Moore has the Dallas Field Office fitting smoothly into the DCD organizational framework. Morale is high and Dallas field personnel, both professional and clerical, feel a sense of importance in their mission. This spirit and pride in their work stems directly from the positive tone set by Mr. Moore.3. Mr. Moore has extended the hand of cooperation unstintingly to the FR Base which is in an embryonic phase of development. Base officers are enthusiastic about the cooperation received from the Dailas office and the willingness of Mr. Moore to be of assistance. Cooperation between the Dallas office and FR is among the very best in DCD. In addition to the fine support supplied to FR, Dallas had made an important contribution, during the period under review, to the cost-analysis program of Format. Support to operations, through the Operations Services Group, is excellent and a good variety of operational leads and operational reporting is received from the Dallas office.4. Mr. Moore is a capable and efficient manager. The Dallas office structure presents a complex and difficult management challenge. Through his experience and mature judgment, Mr. Mocre has directed the activities of the office smoothly and effectively.E2 IMPDET CL BY 018877SECRET
[104-10194-10012.pdf — page 189]
SECRETMEMORANDUM IN LIEU OF FITNESS REPORT,James Walton Moore, 20 April 19765. In the full range of intelligence activity during this period,   the Dallas Field Office has performed with exceptional proficiency.   Mr. Moore is involved in all phases of activity in the Dallas office,   yet encourages a healthy degree of independence by his officers.6. Rating: Strong.![Signature of ELBERT H. WATTS, JR.](image_placeholder)ELBERT H. WATTS, JR.,Deputy Chief of Operations, DCDI certify that I have seen this report.![Signature of James Walton Moore](image_placeholder)James Walton Moore![Signature of the Date](image_placeholder)May 5, 1976.Date-2-SECRET