[104-10194-10012.pdf — page 256]
# CONFIDENTIALSTATUS AND EFFICIENCY REPORTSECTIONS 1 THROUGH 6 WILL BE COMPLETED BY EMPLOYEE. TYPEWRITER WILL BE USED IF POSSIBLE.1. NAME. (PRINTED)   LAST FIRST MIDDLE CAT RATING SALARY DATE TO COVER PERIOD   Moore James W. CAF-12 Apr. 492. DESCRIPTION OF DUTIES SINCE LAST EFFICIENCY REPORT. (LIST MOST RECENT FIRST. DESCRIBE CONCISELY BUT FULLY)   Chief of Station, Calcutta: planning projects: briefing and handling agents:   liaison with Indian officials; monthly Comunist report..3. IF COURSES OF INSTRUCTION WERE COMPLETED DURING PERIOD OF THIS REPORT, LIST TITLE, LOCATION OF SCHOOL, LENGTH OF COURSE AND DATE COMPLETED.4. PREFERENCE' FOR NEXT DUTY AFTER TERMINATION OF CURRENT ASSIGNMENT IS: (IF IN US-SO STATE)   TYPE OF DUTY LOCATION5. HAVE THERE BEEN ANY CHANGES IN PERSONAL STATUS SINCE ORIGINAL EMPLOYMENT OR LAST REPORT - WHICHEVER IS LATER?   MARITAL STATUS YES NUMBER OF DEPENDENTS YES EMERGENCY ADDRESSEE YES LEGAL ADDRESS YESIF THE ANSWER TO ANY OF THE ABOVE IS YES, ATTACH A SEPARATE DETAILED REPORT IN DUPLICATE HERETO. IN THE CASE OF MARRAIGE. THE REPORT WILL INCLUDE NAMES. ADDRESSES, AND CITIZENSHIP OF SPOUSE. FATHER-IN-LAW, MOTHER-IN-LAW. BROTHERS-IN-LAW AND SISTERS-IN-LAW.20 August 1949Walton MooreSIGNATURE OF EMPLOYEESECTIONS 7 THROUGH 11 TO BE COMPLETED BY IMMEDIATE SUPERVISOR7. PERIOD COVERED BY THIS REPORT   DATE FROM DATE TO OCCASION FOR REPORT   April 48 Aug 49 ANNUAL REASSIGNMENT OF REPORTING OFFICER PROPOSED REASSIGNMENT OF EMPLOYEE REPORTED ON COVERING INITIAL 90 DAYS OF EMPLOYMENT8. IS THIS EMPLOYEE QUALIFIED TO YES IS EMPLOYEE BETTER QUALIFIED YES IF SO, WHAT DUTY OR DUTIES   PERFORM ALL PRESENT DUTIES? NO FOR OTHER DUTIES? NO9. DO YOU CONCUR IN EMPLOYEES DESCRIPTION OF DUTIES UNDER SECTION 2? YES NO IF NO. EXPLAIN IN SECTION 11   HAS EMPLOYEE STRIVEN FOR YES DO YOU RECOMMEND EMPLOYEE YES IF SO, TO WHAT GRADE AND FOR WHAT POSITION?   PROFESSIONAL IMPROVEMENT? NO FOR PROMOTION? NO9. FOR EACH FACTOR OBSERVED CHECK THE APPROPRIATE BOX TO INDICATE HOW THE EMPLOYEE COMPARES WITH ALL OTHERS OF THE SAME CLASSIFICATION WHOSE PROFESSIONAL ABILITIES ARE KNOWN TO YOU PERSONALLY. DO NOT LIMIT THIS COMPARISON TO THE OTHERS NOW UNDER YOUR SUPERVISION. DO NOT HESITATE TO MARK "NOT OBSERVED" ON ANY QUALITY WHEN APPROPRIATE.RATING FACTORS OUT- UNDSAT- FAIR GOOD VERY EXCEL- STAND-ISFAC- FACTORY LENT DINGTORY GOODA. ABILITY TO WORK AND GET ALONG WITH PEOPLE XB. INTEREST AND ENTHUSIASM IN WORK XC. SECURITY CONSCIOUSNESS XD. ABILITY TO GRASP INSTRUCTIONS AND PLANS XE. ATTENTION TO DUTY XF. JUDGMENT AND COMMON SENSE XG. ABILITY TO OBTAIN RESULTS AND GET THINGS DONE XH. DISCRETION XI. INITIATIVE XJ. ABILITY TO HANDLE AND DIRECT PEOPLE. XK. PERFORMANCE OF PRESENT DUTIES (ITEM 2) XL. ABILITY TO EVALUATE INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION XM. TACT XN. SAGACITY (NON-GULLIBILITY) XO. LEADERSHIP XP. PHYSICAL STAMINA XQ. MENTAL STAMINA X10. INDICATE YOUR ATTITUDE TOWARD HAVING THIS EMPLOYEE UNDER YOUR COMMAND OR SUPERVISION. WOULD YOU -    DEFINITELY: PREFER NOT BE SATISFIED BE PLEASED PARTICULARLY    NOT WANT HIM? TO HAVE HIM? TO HAVE HIM? TO HAVE HIM? DESIRE HIM?11. ENTER HERE ANY DESIRED REMARKS PERTAINING TO PARTICULAR QUALIFICATIONS OR LACK THEREOF WHICH ARE CONSIDERED PERTINENT TO THE EVALUATION OF THIS EMPLOYEE. OUTSTANDING ASSETS AND/OR SERIOUS LIMITATIORS SHOULD BE STATED ALSO REASONS FOR AND RECOMMENDATIONS AS TO REASSIGNMENT BILL BE GIVEN IF APPROPRIATE TO THIS REPORT.14 October 1949Byron C. JannisSyron 1. FORTESA