[104-10194-10019.pdf — page 122]
# SECRET(When Filled In).# FITNESS REPORT (Part I) PERFORMANCEINSTRUCTIONSFOR THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER: Consult current instructions for completing this report.FOR THE SUPERVISOR: This report is designed to help you express your evaluation of your subordinate and to transmit this evaluation to your supervisor and senior officials. Organization policy requires that you inform the subordinate where he stands with you. Completion of the report can help you prepare for a discussion with him of his strengths and weaknesses. It is also organization policy that you show Part I of this report to the employee except under conditions specified in Regulation. 20-370. It is recommended that you read the entire form before completing any question. If this is the initial report on the employee, it must be completed and forwarded to the Office of Personnel no later than 30 days after the date indicated in item 8. of Section "A" below.SECTION A.1. NAMERICHARDSONJacques2. DATE OF BIRTH20 Jan. 19223. SEX   M4. SERVICE DESIGNATIONDI5. OFFICE/DIVISION BRANCH OF ASSIGNMENTJapan Station (NDIRO2)6. OFFICIAL POSITION TITLEArea Operations Officer7. GRADE 8. DATE REPORT DUE IN OPGS-149. PERIOD COVERED BY THIS REPORT (Inclusive dates)1 October 1955 to 30 September 195610. TYPE OF REPORT    (Check one)ANNUALSPECIAL (Specify)SECTION B.1. FOR THE RATER: THIS REPORT HAS HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN TO THE INDIVIDUAL RATED. IF NOT SHOWN, EXPLAIN WHY   NOT:A. CHECK (X) APPROPRIATE STATEMENTS:THIS REPORT REFLECTS MY OWN OPINIONS OF THIS INDIVIDUAL.THIS REPORT REFLECTS THE COMBINED OPINIONS OF MYSELFAND PREVIOUS SUPERVISORS.IF INDIVIDUAL IS RATED "C" OR D. A WARNING LETTER WAS SENT TO HIM & A COPY ATTACHED TO THIS REPORT.I CANNOT CERTIFY THAT THE RATED INDIVIDUAL KNOWS HOW HIS JOB PERFORMANCE BECAUSE (Specify):I HAVE DISCUSSED WITH THIS EMPLOYEE HIS STRENGTHSAND WEAKNESSES SO THAT HE KNOWS WHERE HE STANDS.B. THIS DATE15 November 1956C. TYPED OR PRINTED NAME & SIGNATURE OF SUPERVISOREdward M. AreliusD. SUPERVISOR'S OFFICIAL TITLEChief, Soviet Branch2. FOR THE REVIEWING OFFICIAL: RECORD ANY SUBSTANTIAL DIFFERENCE OF OPINION WITH THE SUPERVISOR, OR ANY OTHER IN FORMATION, WHICH WILL LEAD TO A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF THIS REPORT.![date]![signature]![date]CONTINUED ON ATTACHED SHEETI certify that any substantial difference of opinion with the supervisor is reflected in the above section.A. THIS DATE21 November 1956B. TYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE OF REVIEWINGOFFICIALC. OFFICIAL TITLE OF REVIEWING OFFICIALChief of OperationsSECTION C. JOB PERFORMANCE EVALUATION1. RATING ON GENERAL PERFORMANCE OF DUTIESDIRECTIONS: Consider ONLY the productivity and effectiveness with which the individual being rated has performed his duties during the rating period. Compare him ONLY with others doing similar work at a similar level of responsibility. Factors other than productivity will be taken into account later in Section D.1 - DOES NOT PERFORM DUTIES ADEQUATELY: HE IS INCOMPETENT.2 - BARELY ADEQUATE IN PERFORMANCE: ALTHOUGH HE HAS HAD SPECIFIC GUIDANCE OR TRAINING, HE OFTEN FAILS TO CARRY OUT RESPONSIBILITIES.3 - PERFORMS MOST OF HIS DUTIES ACCEPTABLY. OCCASIONALLY REVEALS SOME AREA OF WEAKNESS.4 - PERFORMS DUTIES IN A COMPETENT, EFFECTIVE MANNER.5 - A FINE PERFORMANCE. CARRIES OUT MANY OF HIS RESPONSIBILITIES EXCEPTIONALLY WELL.6 - PERFORMS HIS DUTIES IN SUCH AN OUTSTANDING MANNER THAT HE IS EQUALLED BY FEW OTHER PERSONS KNOWN TO THE SUPERVISOR.INSERTRATINGNUMBERCOMMENTS:FORM NO. 45 (Part 1)REPLACES PREVIOUS EDITIONS OF FORMS 45 AND 45A WHICH ARE OBSOLETE.SECRETPerformance