[104-10194-10001.pdf — page 92]
# SECRET(When Filled In)# FITNESS REPORT (Part I) PERFORMANCEINSTRUCTIONSFOR THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER: Consult current instructions for completing this report.FOR THE SUPERVISOR: This report is designed to help you express your evaluation of your subordinate and to transmit this evaluation to your supervisor and senior officials. Organization policy requires that you inform the subordinate where he stands with you. Completion of the report can help you prepare for a discussion with him of his strengths and weaknesses. It is also organization policy that you show Part I of this report to the employee except under conditions specified in Regulation 20-370. It is recommended that you read the entire form before completing any question. If this is the initial report on the employee, it must be completed and forwarded to the Office of Personnel no later than 30 days after the date indicated in item 8. of Section A below.SECTION A.1. NAME(Last) TARASOFF (First) Boris (Middle) D.2. DATE OF BIRTH 2 November 19083. SEX M4. SERVICE DESIGNATION OD5. OFFICE DIVISION/BRANCH OF ASSIGNMENTCO/FDD/USSR Branch6. OFFICIAL POSITION TITLEForeign Documents Officer7. GRADE GS-98. DATE REPORT DUE IN OP 11 December 19579. PERIOD COVERED BY THIS REPORT (Inclusive dates) 21 November 1956 - 20 November 195710. TYPE OF REPORT (Check one) ANNUALSECTION B.INITIAL X1. FOR THE RATER: THIS REPORT HAS NOT HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN TO THE INDIVIDUAL RATED. IF NOT SHOWN, EXPLAIN WHYA. CHECK (X) APPROPRIATE STATEMENTS:*   THIS REPORT REFLECTS MY OWN OPINIONS OF THIS INDIVIDUAL.*   THIS REPORT REFLECTS THE COMBINED OPINIONS OF MYSELF AND PREVIOUS SUPERVISORS.*   I HAVE DISCUSSED WITH THIS EMPLOYEE HIS STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES SO THAT HE KNOWS WHERE WE STANDS.*   IF INDIVIDUAL IS RATED "1" IN C1, D. A WARNING LETTER WAS SENT TO HIM & A COPY ATTACHED TO THIS REPORT.*   I CANNOT CERTIFY THAT THE RATED INDIVIDUAL KNOWS HOW TO EVALUATE HIS PERFORMANCE BECAUSE (Specify):B. THIS DATE 13 Nov 57C. TYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE OF SUPERVISOR D. SUPERVISOR'S OFFICIAL TITLERosamund E. Deutsch Chief, Industrial Sec USSR Branch2. FOR THE REVIERING OFFICIAL: RECORD ANY SUBSTANTIAL DIFFERENCE OF OPINION WITH THE SUPERVISOR, OR ANY OTHER INFORMATION, WHICH WILL LEAD TO A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF THIS REPORT.BYDATEPosted Pos. Control JuReviewed by Pelt 11/19/57I certify that any substantial difference of opinion with the supervisor is reflected in the above section.A. THIS DATE 15 Nov 1957B. TYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE OF REVIERING OFFICIAL C. OFFICIAL TITLE OF REVIENING OFFICIALBielefeldt Chief USSR branchSECTION C. JOB PERFORMANCE EVALUATION1. RATING ON GENERAL PERFORMANCE OF DUTIESDIRECTIONS: Consider ONLY the productivity and effectiveness with which the individual being rated has performed his duties during the rating period. Compare him ONLY with others doing similar work at a similar level of responsibility. Factors other than productivity will be taken into account later in Section D.1. DOES NOT PERFORM DUTIES ADEQUATELY: HE IS INCOMPETENT.2. BARELY ADEQUATE IN PERFORMANCE: ALTHOUGH HE HAS HAD SPECIFIC GUIDANCE OR TRAINING, HE OFTEN FAILS TO CARRY OUT RESPONSIBILITIES.3. PERFORMS MOST OF HIS DUTIES ACCEPTABLY. OCCASIONALLY REVEALS SOME AREA OF WEAKNESS.4. PERFORMS DUTIES IN A COMPETENT, EFFECTIVE MANNER.5. A FINE PERFORMANCE. CARRIES OUT MANY OF HIS RESPONSIBILITIES EXCEPTIONALLY WELL.6. PERFORMS HIS DUTIES IN SUCH AN OUTSTANDING MANNER THAT HE IS EQUALLED BY FEWER OTHER PERSONS KNOWN TO THE SUPERVISOR.INSERT RATING NUMBERCOMMENTS:FORM NO. 45 (Part 1) REPLACES PREVIOUS EDITIONS OF FORMS 44 AND 454 WHICH ARE OBSOLETE.SECRETPerformance (4)