Francesco/who-killed-jfk huggingface dataset:
[104-10188-10001.pdf — page 98]
CONFIDENTIAL(COLLECTOR/EUAT RECLASSIFY ACCORDING TATA DED BELOW)CIA REQUEST FOR EVALUATION BY State DepartmentEVALUATING AGEACYDATE OF DISSEM. 27 January. 1961FUNSER CS-3/463,061ChiefFIELD NUMBER HM-5400Country Mexico/CubaSubject Mexican Technicians Going to work in CubaEVALUATOR: Please complete this evaluation within 60 cys of receipt of request. Need for completion within thistime is prioritystandard. Indicate choices by x. If iton marked is printed in italics, please explain under"Evaluator's Corvents. Normally, put one x in each appropriate section. Otherwise, please cover each of theseaspects in your comments. For further NOTES on use of this form, see reverse.SUBJECT OF THIS REPORT IS OF:IMPORTANCE INRELATION TOOUR NEEDS.1. //2. MODERATED. LITTLE4. INFORMATION IN THIS REPORT:CONTRIBUTES TO OUR BROBLEDGE OF THE SUBJECT.1. SIGNIFICANTLY2. MODERATELY**x** 3. SUBSTANTIALLY4. NEGLIGIBLYACCURAT٧.1. SUBSTANTIALLY TOUE**x** 2. CREDIBLE3. Joulilol4. Faloo9. CANNOT BE JUDGED. SEE D.PELATION TO OTHER INFORMATION.1. USEFUL FOR CONFIRMATION**x** 2. USEFUL FCO of INFORMATION3. Sulliciently down4. AT PRESENT DE LACE OTHER INFORMATION   TO JUDGE ACCURACY OR USEFULNESS3. Conflicts with previous information• Appears to be fabricationUSEFULNESS WOULD HAVE BEEN GREATER WITH**x** 1. boro detall1. Less detail, more summery3. Loss foary approach4. Butter organisations. Detter aberration or better spol.tation of source, or both.6. ISTATED IN CONVENTI7. NO DEFECT AFFECTING USEFULNESS.OUR COLLECTION NEEDSOTHER REPORTING MEETS:1. OUR IMPORTANT NEEDS.2. CUR MIRINN SEEDS.3. MOST OF OUR VINIMUM NEEDS.4. OR NONE OF OUR NEEDS.CONLY IF YOUR REQUIREMENT IS CITED.) REPORTSATISTICS ۱۲۰1. FULLY, REQUIREMENT CAN BE CLOSED.1. Partially. Portson of requiresent   asy be closed.3. PARTIALLY, BUT NEED CONTINUES.4. NEGLIGIOLYFIR SUBJECT IS IMPORTANT TO YOU. OTHER REPORTING DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM NEEDS. ANDYOU HAVE FILED NO REQUIREMENT:)1. SE FILL PRESENT A REQUIREMENT SOON.8. OUR NEED QUES NOT WARRANT A REQUIRE   MENT FOR CS REPORTING.COLLECTOR'S COMMENTS AND QUESTIONSEVALUATORS COLMENTS AND FOLLOW UP QUESTIONSThis report would have been of greater value ifit had included some comment on the politicalorientation of the technicians (if any) and whetherthey were being sent by the Mexican Government orwere hired on a purely personal basis.NAME (Please print)COMPONENT PHONEEVALUATORLawrence S. EagleburgerState,/INR/RAR/MAB 182-2097DATE REQUEST RECEIVEDMarch 17, 1961DATE EVALUATION FORWARDEDMarch 22, 1961.12(20)
[104-10188-10001.pdf — page 99]
CONFIDENTIAL(COLLECTOR/EVA TO RECLASSIFY ACCORDING TO 'A ED BELOW)# CIA REQUEST FOR EVALUATION BY Department of StateDATE OF DISTRID.: 2 November 1960EVALUATING AGENCYDISSEM. NUMBER: CS-3,454,933Chief Country: Mexico/MicaraguaFIELD NUMBER: HMM-5264Subject: Nicaraguan Revolutionary Activities in MexicoEVALUATOR: Please complete this evaluation within 60 days of receipt of request. Need for completion within this line is XXXLX/standard. Indicate choices by "x." If item marked is printed in italics, please explain under "Evaluator's Comments." Normally, put one x in each appropriate section. Otherwise, please cover each of these aspects in your comments. For further NOTES on use of this form, see reverse.SUBJECT OF THIS REPORT IS OF:*   Major*   MODERATE*   LITTLE*   NOIMPORTANCE IN RELATION TO OUR NEEDS.INFORMATION IN THIS REPORT:CONTRIBUTES TO OUR KNOWLEDGE OF THE SUBJECT:1.  SIGNIFICANTLY2.  SUMSTANTIALLY3.  MODERATELY4.  NEGLIGIBLYCOLLECTOR'S COMMENTS AND QUESTIONSACCURACY.1.  SUBSTANTIALLY TRUE2.  CREDIBLE3.  Doubtfol4.  False5.  CANNOT BE JUDGED. SEE D.RELATION TO OTHER INFORMATION.1.  USEFUL FOR CONFIRMATION2.  USEFUL FOR NES INFORMATION3.  Sulliciently known4.  AT PRESENT WE LACK OTHER INFORMATION TO JUDGE ACCURACY OR USEFULNESS5.  Conflicts with previous information6.  Appears tu be fabricationUSEFULNESS WOULD HAVE BEEN GREATER WITHI1.  wore detail2.  Less detail, more summary3.  Loss fragmentary approach4.  Better organisation5.  Better observation or better exploi-tation of source, or both.6.  ISTATED IN COMMENT)7.  NO DEFECT AFFECTING LISEFULNESS.OUR COLLECTION NEEDSOTHER REPORTING MEETSI1.  OUR IMPORTANT NEEDS.2.  OUR MINIMUM NEEDS.3.  MOST OF OUR MINIMUM NEEDS.4.  FEW OR NONE OF OUR NEEDS.(ONLY IF YOUR REQUIREMENT IS CITED.) REPORT SATISFIES ITI1.  FULLY. REQUIREMENT CAN BE CLOSED.2.  Partially. Portion of requirement may be closed.3.  PARTIALLY, BUT NEED CONTINUES.4.  NEGLIGIBLY(IF SUBJECT IS IMPORTANT TO YOU. OTHER REPORTING DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM NEEDS. AND YOU HAVE FILED NO REQUIREMENT)1.  WE WILL PRESENT A REQUIPEMENT SOON.2.  OUR NEED DOES NOT WARRANT A REQUIREMENT FOR CS REPORTING.EVALUATOR'S COMMENTS AND FOLLOW-UP QUESTIONSNAME (Please print) RT MorrisonCOMPONENT: INR/RAR-PPHONE: 3327DATE REQUEST PECEIVED: 15-160DATE EVALUATION FORWARDED: 16/60
[104-10188-10001.pdf — page 100]
# CONFIDENTIAL(COLLECTOR/E. QUA: RECLASSIFY ACCORDING TO DATA ADDED BELOW)CIA REQUEST FOR EVALUATION BY Department of StateEVALUATING AGENCYDATE OF DISTRIB. 1 November 1960DISSEM. NUMBER CS-3/454,903Chief Country México/CubaFIELD NUMBER HM-5245Subject Propaganda Activities of the Cuban Embassy in MexicoEVALUATOR: Please complete this evaluation within 60days of receipt of request. need for completion within this time is standard. Indicate choices by "x". If item marked is printed in italics, please explain under "Evaluator's Comments." Normally, put one x in each appropriate section. Otherwise, please cover each of these aspects in your comments. For further NOTES on use of this form, see reverse..SUBJECT OF THIS REPORT IS OF:COLLECTOR'S COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS1. Major2. MODERATE3. LITTLE4. NOIMPORTANCE IN RELATION TO OUR NEEDS.INFORMATION IN THIS REPORT:CONTRIBUTES TO OUR KNOWLEDGE OF THE SUBJECT:1.  SIGNIFICANTLY2.  SUBSTANTIALLY3.  MODERATELY4.  NEGLIGIBLYACCURACY.1. SUBSTANTIALLY TRUE2. CREDIBLE3. Doubtful4. False5. CANNOT BE JUDGED. SEE D.RELATION TO OTHER INFORMATION.1. USEFUL FOR CONFIRMATION2. USEFUL FOR NEW INFORMATION3. Sufficiently known4. AT PRESENT WE LACK OTHER INFORMATION TO JUDGE ACCURACY OR USEFULNESS5. Conflicts with previous information6. Appears to be fabricationUSEFULNESS WOULD HAVE BEEN GREATER WITHI1. More detail2. Lesa detest, more summary3. Less fragmentary approach4. Better organization5. Better observation or better exploi- tation of source, or both.6. ISTATED IN COMMENT)7. NO DEFECT AFFECTING USEFULNESS.OUR COLLECTION NEEDSOTHER REPORTING MEETS:1. OUR IMPORTANT NEEDS.2. OUR MINIMUM NEEDS.3. MOST OF OUR MINIMUM NEEDS.4. FEW OR NUNE OF OUR NEEDS.(ONLY IF YOUR REQUIREMENT IS CITED.) REPORT SATISFIES 1711. FULLY. REQUIREMENT CAN BE CLOSED.2. Partially. Portion of requirement may be closed.3. PARTIALLY. BUT NEED CONTINUES.4. NEGLIGIBLY(IF SUBJECT IS IMPORTANT TO YOU. OTHER RE- POATING DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM NEEDS. AND YOU HAVE FILED NO REQUIREMENT:)1. DE VILL PRESENT A REQUIREMENT SOON.2. OUR NEED DOES NOT WARRANT A REQUIRE- MENT FOR CS REPORTING.EVALUATORNAME (Please print) RT MorrisonDATE REQUEST RECEIVEDVi.v 18160EVALUATOR'S COMMENTS AND FOLLOW-UP QUESTIONSCOMPONENTPHONEIINTP/RARP 3327DATE EVALUATION FORWARDEDnor19160
[104-10188-10001.pdf — page 101]
# CONFIDENTIAL(CLOTOR/EATOR: RECLASSIFY ACCORDING TO  ADDED PELOW)CIA REQUEST FOR EVALUATION BYOSIEVALUATING AGENCYDATE OFREQUEST26 September 1960DISSEMNUMBERC8 3/451,014FIELDCOUNTRYMexico/Soviet UnionHMM 5159SubjectMexican Government Purchase of Soviet RadioisotopesEVALUATE: Please complete this evaluation within days of receipt of request. Used for completion within thistime is standard. Indicate choices by "x". If item marked is printed in italics, please explain under"Evaluator's Comments." Normally, put one x in each appropriate section, otherwise, please cover each of theseaspects in your comments. For further NOTES on use of this form, see reverse.SUBJECT OF THIS REPORT IS OF:1. Major2. Moderate**A3** 3. Little4. NoIMPORTANCE INRELATION TOOUR NEEDS.INFORMATION IN THIS REPORT:CONTRIBUTES TO OUR KNOWLEDGE OF THE SUBJECT:1. Significantly2. Substantially3. Moderately**B4** 4. NegligiblyACCURACY:1. Substantially True**C2** 2. Credible3. Doubtful4. False5. Cannot be judged. See D.RELATION TO OTHER INFORMATION:1. Useful for confirmation2. Useful for new information**D3** 3. Sufficiently known4. At present we lack other information   to judge accuracy or usefulness5. Conflicts with previous information   appears to be fabricationUSEFULNESS WOULD HAVE BEEN GREATER WITH:1. More detail2. Less detail...more summary3. Less fragmentary approach4. Better organization5. Better observation or better exploi-   tation of source, or both.6. (Stated in comment)E7 7. No defect affecting usefulness.OUR COLLECTION NEEDSOTHER REPORTING MEETS:**F1** 1. One Important needs.2. Two Minimum needs.3. Most of our minimum needs.4. Few or none of our needs.(ONLY IF NO UOLA REQUIREMENT IS CITED.) REPORTSATISFIES IT:1. Fully. Requirement can be closed.2. Partially. Portion of requirement   may be closed.3. Partially. Only need continues.4. NegligiblyIF SUBJECT IS IMPORTANT TO YOU. OTHER RE-PORTING DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM NEEDS. ANDYOU HAVE FILED NO REQUIREMENT:**B2** 1. We will present a requirement soon2. Our need does not warrant a require-   ment cs. reporting.EVALUATORWALLACE W. HOWARDCIA REQUEST RECEIVEDCOLLECTOR'S COMMENTS AND QUESTIONSEVALUATOR'S COMMENTS AND FOLLOW-UP QUESTIONSCoordinated with LSD/SI - C. W. DelongCOMPONENTOSI/MEDPHONE3955DATE EVALUATION FORWARDEDCONFIDENTIAL
[104-10188-10001.pdf — page 102]
# CIA REQUEST FOR EVALUATION BYUnited States Information AgencyDATE OF DISTRIB. 1 November 1950Chief Country Mexico/CubaDISSEM. NUMBER CS-3/45,903FIELD NUMBER 304-5245Subject Propaganda Activities of the Cuban Embassy in MexicoEVALUATOR: Please complete this evaluation within days of receipt of request. Need for completion within this time is standard. Indicate choices by "x." If item marked is printer in italics, please explain under "Evaluator's Comments." Normally, put one X in each appropriate section. Otherwise, please cover each of these aspects in your comments. For further NOTES on use of this form, see reverse.SUBJECT OF THIS REPORT IS OF:X 1. Major2. MODERATE3. LITTLE4. NOCOLLECTOR'S COMMENTS AND QUESTIONSIMPORTANCE IN RELATION TO OUR NEEDS.INFORMATION IN THIS REPORT:CONTRIBUTES TO OUR KNOWLEDGE OF THE SUBJECT:1. SIGNIFICANTLYX 2. SUBSTANTIALLY3. MODERATELY4. NEGLIGIBLYACCURACY:EVALUATOR'S COMMENTS AND FOLLOW-UP QUESTIONS1. SUBSTANTIALLY TRUE2. CREDIBLE3. Doubtful4. FalseX 5. CANNOT BE JUDGED. SEE 0.RELATION TO OTHER INFORMATION.1. USEFUL FOR CONFIRMATIONX 2. USEFUL FOR NEW INFORMATION3. Sufficiently known4. AT PRESENT OE LACK OTHER INFORMATION TO JUDGE ACCURACY OR USEFULNESS5. Conflicts with previous information6. Appears to be fabricationUSEFULNESS WOULD HAVE BEEN GREATER WITH:Information on Cuban propaganda activities in Latin America is of major and continuing importance to this office, which must evaluate the nature, scope, and extent of these activities in order to combat them.1. More detail2. Lese detail, more summary3. Less fragmentary approach4. Better organization5. Better observation or better exploitation of source, or both.6. [STATED IN COMMENT]X 7. NO DEFECT AFFECTING USEFULNESS.OUR COLLECTION NEEDSOTHER REPORTING WEETS:1. OUR IMPORTANT NEEDS.X 2. OUR MINIMUM NEEDS.3. MOST OF OUR MINIMUM NEEDS.4. FEW OR NONE OF OLD NEEDS.(ONLY IF YOUR REQUIREMENT IS CITED.) REPORT SATISFIES IT:1. FULLY. REQUIREMENT CAN BE CLOSED.2. partially. Portion of requirement may be closed.3. PARTIALLY. BUT NEED CONTINUES.4. NEGLIGIBLY(IF SUBJECT IS IMPORTANT TO YOU, OTHER REPORTING DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM NEEDS, AND YOU HAVE FILED NO REQUIREMENT.)1. WE WILL PRESENT A REQUIREMENT SOON.2. OUR NEED DOES NOT WARRANT A REQUIREMENT FOR REPORTING.NAME (Please print)Flora M. RothOffice of Research and Analysis, USIADATE REQUEST RECEIVED November 8, 1960DATE EVALUATION FORWARDED November 14, 1960
[104-10188-10001.pdf — page 103]
# CONFIDENTIAL(COLLECTOR/EVALUATOR: RECLASSIFY ACCORDING TO DA&DD BELOW)# CIA REQUEST FOR EVALUATION BY Department of State.DATE OF EVALUATING AGENCY3 October 1960COUNTRY DISSEM. CS-3/L51,671Name/Poland NUMBERFIELD HG1-5186SUBJECTProjected Arrival in.Mexico of Polish Travel OfficialsEVALUATOR: Please complete this evaluation within days of receipt of request. Need for completion within this time is. Indicate choices by "X." If item marked is printed in italics, please explain under 'Evaluator's Comments.' Normally, put one X in each appropriate section. otherwise, please cover each of these aspects in your comments. For further NOTES on use of this form, see reverse.SUBJECT OF THIS REPORT IS OF: COLLECTOR'S COMMENTS AND QUESTIONSA * Is this information of sufficient use or value to warrant dissemination?  1. Major✔ 2. MODERATE IMPORTANCE INRELATION TO  3. LITTLE. OUR NEEDS.  4. NOINFORMATION IN THIS REPORT:B CONTRIBUTES TO OUR KNOWLEDGE OF THE SUBJECTI  1. SIGNIFICANTLY  2. SUBSTANTIALLY  3. MODERATELY  4. NEGLIGIBLYC ACCURACY.  1. SUBSTANTIALLY TRUE✔ 2. CREDIBLE  3. Doubtful  4. False  5. CANNOT BE JUDGED. SEE D.D RELATION TO OTHER INFORMATION.  1. USEFUL FOR RE-CONFIRMATION✔ 2. USEFUL FOR NEW INFORMATION  3. Sufficiently known  4. AT PRESENT WE LACK OTHER INFORMATION TO JUDGE ACCURACY OR USEFULNESS  5. Conflicts with previous information  6. Appears to be fabricationE USEFULNESS COULD HAVE BEEN GREATER If m.✔ 1. More detail  2. Less detail, more summary  3. Less fragmentary approach  4. Better organization  5. Better observation, better exploitation of source, or both  6. STATED IN COMMENTS  7. NO DEFECT AFFECTING USEFULNESS.F OUR COLLECTION NEEDSOTHER REPORTING MEETS:  1. CUR IMPORTANT NEEDS.  2. CUR MINIMUM NEEDS.  3. MOST OF OUR MIN NEEDS.  4. FEW OR NONE OF CUR NEEDS.G ONLY IF YOUR REQUIREMENT IS CITED REPORT SATISFIES IT:  1. FULLY. REQUIREMENT CAN BE CLOSED  2. Partially. Portion of requirement may be closed.  3. PARTIALLY, BUT NEED CONTINUES.  4. NEGLIGIBLYH (IF SUBJECT IS IMPORTANT TO YOU, OTHER RE-PORTING DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM NEEDS, AND YOU HAVE FILED NO REQUIREMENT):  1. WE WILL PRESENT A REQUIREMENT SOON.  2. OUR NEED DOES NOT WARRANT A REQUIREMENT FOR CS REPORTING.EVALUATOR'S COMMENTS AND FOLLOW-UP QUESTIONSInformation of this nature is of value to PAR, for it provides new data and/or corroboration of information from other sources onLatin American - Poloe contents. PAR has continuing interest in receipt of reports of this nature.NAME (Please print) COMPONENT PHONEEVALUATOR DATE REQUEST RECEIVED DATE EVALUATION FORWARDED
[104-10188-10001.pdf — page 104]
# CONFIDENTIAL(COLLECTOR: EVA TOR: RECLASSIFY ACCORDING TO. A ADDED BELOW)# CIA REQUEST FOR EVALUATION BYORREVALUATING AGENCY: Peo in OR 5-60DATE OF DISTRIB: 26 September 1960DISSEM. NUMBER: CS-3/51,014LIFEAT ProductionChief Country: Mexico/Soviet UnionFIELD NUMBER: HMX-5159LifiatSubject: Mexican Government Purchase of Soviet RadioisotoposI 27 October 1960EVALUATOR: Please complete this evaluation within 60 days of receipt of request. wred for completion within thisime is standard. Indicate choices by "x." If item marked is printed in italics, please explain under "Evaluator's Comments." sormally, put one in each appropriate section. otherwise, please cover each of these aspects in your comments. For further notes on use of this form, see reverse.SUBJECT OF THIS REPORT IS OF:*   MODERATE*   LITTLE*   NOIMPORTANCE IN RELATION TO OUR NEEDS.FORMATION IN THIS REPEAT:CONTRIBUTES TO OUR ANCOLEOCE OF THE SUBJECT:*   SIGNIFICANTLY.*   SUBSTANTIALLY*   MODERATELY*   NEGLIGIBLYACY:*   SUBSTANTIALLY TALE*   CREDIBLE*   Doubtful*   False*   CANNOT BE JUDGED. SEE 0.ATTION TO OTHER INFORMATION:*   USEFUL FOR CONFIRM*   USEFUL FOR NEC*   Sufficiently dosa*   AT PRESENT DE LACE OTHER INFORMATION TO JUDGE ACCURACY DE SEFULNESS*   Conflicte with pro..... information*   Appears to be labrecatioCULNESS WOULD HAVE BEEN COLAPCO DITHI*   More detail*   Less detail, warr*   Loss fragmentary*   Better organstal*   Better observation or better explai tatson of source, or both.*   ISTATED IN COMM*   NO DEFECT AFFECTING FUNES.COLLECTION NEEDS:RIPCAPING MEETS OUR IMPORTANT NEEDS. LA MINIMUM NEEDS. Must of OUR MINIMAL28. NONE OF OUR LOS. YOUR REQUIREMENT IS CITED.) REPORTFULLY REQUIREA DE CLOSED. partenlly, portionement may be closed. PanfiaLLY, BUT ConTINURS. NEULIGIGLY FORCIERRE QUES NOT MET EDS, AND PILED NG REQUIDE BILL PRESENT & SOON. •S DOIS 7 ..? & REQUIREEVALUATOR'S COMMENTS AND FOLLOW UP QUESTIONSIt is impossible to tell if the USSR prices to Mexico are in line with world prices or not. According to a 1957 Soviet price list, potassium is 3 rubles per millicurie, fodine is 8-to 13 rubles per millicurie and gold is 1 to 3 rubles per millicurie.depending upon the form of the carrier. According to the report the average price is $0.15 per aillicurie. The quantities of each isotope however, are not given.Radio isotope prices have changed in the US markedly over the past few years. For example, the price for gold 193 has changed. from 20 cents per millicurie priori to Hay 1959 to 6 cents per millicurie after May 1959. Unless more detailed information is obtained, the information has only moderate value to us.COMPONENTPHONE x3942RD S. STHToate to AION FOREARDED
[104-10188-10001.pdf — page 105]
CONFIDENTIALRECLASS ACCORDING TO DA ADDED ON FRONT) 17 JURY 1962CIA REQUEST FOR EVALUATION BY: OPRIssue Number: 05-30-39,051Date of Distrib: 1 June 1960Evaluating Agency:Field Number: HO4-L943Chief Country: Mexico/Soviet UnionDate: July 1960 19 July 60Subject: Mex. Policy of Soviet Commercial Office in MexicoEvaluation: Please complete this valuation within 60 days of receipt of request. Need for completion within this time is priority/standard. Indicate choices by "x." If item marked is printed in italics, please explain under "Evaluator's comments." Normally, put one x in each appropriate section. Otherwise, please cover each of these aspects in your comments. For further NOTES on use of this form, see reverse.SUBJECT OF THIS REPORT IS OF:A.1. Major2. Moderate3. LittleINFORMATION IN THIS REPORT:IMPORTANCE IN RELATION TO O.R. NEEDS.B. CONTRIBUTES TO OUR KNOWLEDGE OF THE SUBJECT:1. Significantly2. Moderately3. NegligiblyCOLLECTOR'S COMMENTS AND QUESTIONSC. ACCURACY:1. Substantially true2. Credible3. Doubtful4. False5. Cannot be judged. See D.D. RELATION TO OTHER INFORMATION1. Useful for confirmation2. Useful for new information3. Sufficiently known4. At present we lack other information to judge accuracy or usefulness5. Conflicts with previous information6. Appears to be fabricationE. USEFULNESS COULD HAVE BEEN GREATER WITH:1. More detail2. Less detail; more summary3. Less fragmentary approach4. Better organization5. Better observation or better exploitation of source, or both.6. Stated in comment7. No defect affecting usefulnessEVALUATOR'S COMMENTS AND FOLLOW-UP QUESTIONSREQUIREMENTSF. ONLY IF YOUR REQUIREMENT IS CITED IN REPORT SATISFIES IT:1. Fully, requirement can be closed.2. Partially. Part of requirement may be closed3. Partially, reporting continues.4. NegligiblyG. DEGREE TO WHICH REPORTING PROVIDES PERTINENT INFORMATION ON SUBJECT:1. Fully2. Substantially3. Little4. NoneH. IF IN D ABOVE YOU CITED "LITTLE" OR "NONE," AND REQUIREMENT IS?1. Met2. No requirementI. IF G ABOVE I CITED A REQUIREMENT WITH-1. In 3 days2. In 1 dayJ. IF G ABOVE 2 DOES NOT WARRANT A REQUIRE- MENT FOR 1 or 2 REPORTINGRobert NaperCOMPONENT: ORR/S/TF/SPPHONE: 5636Date evaluation forwarded
[104-10188-10001.pdf — page 106]
# CONFIDENTIALRECLASSIFY ACCORDING TO DATA (RED ON FRONT) 29 JUPCIA REQUEST FOR EVALUATION BY GRRFIELD NUMBER: HM-L963DATE OF DISTRIB: 8 June 1960EVALUATING AGENCY:Chief Country: Mexico/Soviet UnionDATE: 15 July 1960Subject: Disagreement between Mexican Businessman and Soviet Commercial Officer over Money Owed for Transfers Purchased by the Mexican Government.(EVALUATOR: Please complete this evaluation within 60 days of receipt of request. area for completion within this time is priority/standard. Indicate choices by "X." If item marked is printed in italics, please explain under "Evaluator's comments." normally, but one x in each appropriate section. Otherwise, please cover each of these aspects in your comments. For further notes on use of this form, see reverse.)SUBJECT OF THIS REPORT IS OF:1. Major2. Moderate3. LittleIMPORTANCE IN RELATION TO OUR NEEDSINFORMATION IN THIS REPORT:*   CONTRIBUTES TO OUR KNOWLEDGE OF THE SUBJECT    1.  Significantly    2.  Moderately    3.  Negligibly*   ACCURACY    1.  Substantially True    2.  Credible    3.  Doubtful    4.  False    5.  Cannot be judged. See D.*   RELATION TO OTHER INFORMATION    1.  Useful for confirmation    2.  Useful for new information    3.  Sufficiently known    4.  At present lack other information to judge accuracy or usefulness*   Conflicts with previous information*   Appears to be fabrication*   USEFULNESS WOULD HAVE BEEN GREATER WITH:    1.  More detail    2.  Less detail, more summary    3.  Less fragmentary approach    4.  Better organization    5.  Better observation or better exploitation of source, or both    6.  No defect affecting usefulness.COLLECTOR'S COMMENTS AND QUESTIONSEVALUATOR'S COMMENTS AND FOLLOW-UP QUESTIONSREQUIREMENTS1.  (ONLY IF YOUR REQUIREMENT IS CITED.) ARE/IS SATISFIED ITS:    1.  Fully. Requirement can be closed.    2.  Partially. Portion of requirement may be closed.    3.  Partially, but need continues.    4.  Negligibly*   DEGREE TO WHICH OTHER (NON-CS) REPORTING PROVIDES ESSENTIAL INFORMATION ON SUBJECT.    1.  Fully    2.  Substantially    3.  Little    4.  None*   (IF IN G YOU MARKED "LITTLE" OR "NONE," AND IF YOU WANT... DO REQUIREMENT.)    1.  Will present a requirement within 30 days.    2.  Our need does not warrant a requirement for CS reporting.NAME (Please print):Robert NapierCOMPONENT: ORR/S/TF/SPPHONE: 8036DATE REQUEST RECEIVED:DATE EVALUATION FORWARDED: 11 July 1960CONFIDENTIAL
[104-10188-10001.pdf — page 107]
# CIA REQUEST FOR EVALUATION BY(COLLECTOR/EVALUATO RECLASSIFY ACCORDING TO DATA)ORR EVALUATING AGENCYDATE OF DISTRIB. FIELD NUMBERCS-3/43,301 18 April 1960 HC-4858Chief Country Mexico/Soviet UnionSubject: Soviet plan to sell reprint to Mexican Government AgencyEvaluator: Please complete this valuation within 60 days of receipt of request. Need for completion within this time is priority/standard. Indicate choices by "X". If item marked is printed in italics, please explain under "Evaluators comments". Normally, put uses in each appropriate section. Otherwise, please cover each of these aspects in your comments. For further notes on use of this form, see reverse.SUBJECT OF THIS REPORT IS OF:1. MAJOR2. MODERATE3. LITTLE4. NONECOLLECTOR'S COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS.INFORMATION IN THIS REPORT.CONTRIBUTES TO OUR KNOWLEDGE OF THE SUBJECT:1. SIGNIFICANTLY2. MODERATELY3. NEGLIGIBLYRELIABILITY:1. SUBSTANTIALLY TRUE2. CREDIBLE3. DOUBTFUL4. FALSE5. CANNOT BE JUDGED. SEE D.RELATES TO OTHER INFORMATION:1. USEFUL FOR CONFIRMATION2. USEFUL FOR NEW INFORMATION3. SUFFICIENTLY KNOWN4. AT PRESENT WE LACK OTHER INFORMATION TO JUDGE ACCURACY OR USEFULNESS5. Conflicts with previous information6. Appears to be fabricationUSEFULNESS WOULD HAVE BEEN GREATER WITH:1. More detail2. Less detail, more summary3. Less fragmentary approach4. Better organization5. Better observation or better exploitation of source, or both6. (STATE IN COMMENTS)7. NO EFFECT AFFECTING USEFULNESS.REQUIREMENTS(ONLY IF YOUR REQUIREMENT IS CITED.) REPORT SATISFIES IT:1. Fully. Requirement can be closed2. Partially. Portion of requirement may be closed.3. Partially, but need continues.4. NegligiblyDESIRES TO WHICH OTHER SOURCE(S) REPORTING PROVIDES ESSENTIAL INFORMATION ON SUBJECT:1. Fully2. Substantially3. Little4. None(IF YOU CHECKED "LITTLE" OR "NONE," AND IF YOU HAVE FILED NO REQUIREMENT.)1. Will present a requirement within 1 to 30 days.2. CIA needs does not warrant a requirement for CS reporting.NAME (Please print)Eugene ErroEVALUATORDATE REQUEST RECEIVEDEVALUATOR'S COMMENTS AND FOLLOW-UP QUESTIONSCOMPONENT PHONEORR 5/143 4285DATE EVALUATION FORWARDED26 May 60![signature]