[104-10193-10079.pdf — page 233]
# REPORT OF EFFICIENCY RATINGStandard: Form No. 31, Rev.Approved Dec. 1948C. 8. C. Dept. Cir. No. 458Form approvedBudget Bureau No 50 R018.Approval expires Mar. 30, 1948,ADMINISTRATIVE-UNOFFICIALKFGL LAROFFRIALISPECIALPROBATIONAL or TRIAL PERIOD.As of 31 March 1945. based on performance during period from 26 Jan 1945 to 31 March 1945Ann L. GoodpastureClerk-Stono CAF-5 $2000.P.aOffice of stmteric Services ?A Now Delhi, India1. Study the instructions in the Rating Official's Guide, C. SC. Form   No. 3823A.2. Underline the clements which are especially Important in the position.3. Rate only on elements pertinent to the position:   a. Do not rate on clements' in italics except for employees in administrative, supervisory, or planning positions.8. Rate administrative, supervisory, and planning functions on elements in italics.CHECK ONE:Administrative, Code 24supervisory, orplanning.....All others.+ if outstandingt.. (1) Maintenance of equipment, tools, Instrumenta.(2) Mechanical skill.(21) Effectiveness in planning broad programs.(8) Skill in the application of techniques and pro- cedures.(22) Effectiveness in adapting the work program to broader or related programs.(4) Presentability of work (appropriateness of arrangement, and appearance of work);(5) Attention to broad phases of assignments.... (6) Attention to pertinent detail..... (7) Accuracy of operations.(8) Accuracy of final results.(9) Accuracy of judgments or decisions.-(10) Effectiveness in presenting ideas or facts.(11) Industry.1.(12) Rate of progress on or completion of assign ments.(18) Amount of acceptable work produced. (Is mark based on production records?(14) Ability to organize his work..) (Yes or no)....(15) Effectiveness in meeting and dealing withothers.4. (16) Cooperativeness.(17) Initiativa.(18) Resourcefulness,(23) Effectiveness in devising procedures.(24) Effectiveness in laying out work and establish ing stamlanis of performance for subordi nates.(25) Effectiveness in directing, reviewing, and check ing the work of subordinates.(26) Effectiveness in instructing, training, and developing subordinates in the work.(27) Effectiveness in promoting high working morale.(28) Effectiveness in determining space, personnel, and equipment needs,(29) Effectiveness in setting and obtaining adher ence to time limits and deadlines...... (30) Ability to make decisións.(31) Effectiveness in delegating clearly defined authority to act.(19) Dependability.(20) Physical fitness for the work.STATE ANY OTHER ELEMENTS CONSIDERED(A)(B)(C)STANDARDDeviatione must be explained en reverse side of this forms| Adjective rating |                      || ---------------- | -------------------- || Excellent        | Rating official E    || Very good        |                      || Good             | Reviewing official E || Fair             |                      || Unsatisfactory   |                      |Plus marks on all underlined elements, and no minus marks. EPlus marks on at least half of the underlined elements, and no minus marks..Check marks or better on a majority of underlined elements, and any minus marks overcompensated by plus marks.........Check marks or better on a majority of underlined elements, and minus marks not overcompensated by plus marks...Minus marks on at least half of the underlined elements..Rated by Joseph R. Coolidge Chief, RTA Sec. Dat 303 24 April 1945Leviewed by Gorkyan Major ul 24 April 1945Rating approved by efficiency rating committee. 6/1/4.5. Report to employee Excellent