[104-10193-10079.pdf — page 226]
Standard Form No. 81August 1946U. S. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION# REPORT OF EFFICIENCY RATINGForm approved Budget Bureau No. 50-R212.5ADMINISTRATIVE-UNOFFICIAL ( )OFFICIAL: REGULAR (X) SPECIAL ( )PROBATIONAL ( )As of 9/21/49 based on performance during period from 3/21/49 to 9/21/49Anna L. Goodpasture(Name of employee)Intelligence Officer F-2 (Reports)(Title of position, service, and grade)OSO, COPS(Organization-Indicate bureau, division, section, unit, field station).ON LINES BELOW: 1. Study the instructions in the Rating Official's Guide, C. S. C. Form CHECK ONE:MARK EMPLOYEE No-SSRA✓ if adequate 2. Underline the elements which are especially important in the position. Administrative,... if weak 3. Rate only on elements pertinent to the position: istrative, supervisory, or+ if outstanding a. Do not rate on elements in italics except for employees in admin- planning  istrative, supervisory, or planning positions.  b. Rate administrative, supervisory, and planning functions on All others.  elements in italics.(1) Maintenance of equipment, tools, instruments.(2) Mechanical skill.(3) Skill in the application of techniques and pro- cedures.(4) Presentability of work (appropriateness of ar rangement and appearance of work).(5) Attention to broad phases of assignments.✓ (6) Attention to pertinent detail.(7) Accuracy of operations.(8) Accuracy of final results.(9) Accuracy of judgments or decisions.+(10) Effectiveness in presenting ideas or facts.(11) Industry.(12) Rate of progress on or completion of assign- ments.(13) Amount of acceptable work produced. (Is mark based on production records?(Yes or no)✓ (14) Ability to organize his work.+(15) Effectiveness in meeting and dealing with others.(16) Cooperativeness.+(17) Initiative.(18) Resourcefulness.(19) Dependability.(20) Physical fitness for the work.(21) Effectiveness in planning broad programs.+(22) Effectiveness in adapting the work program to broader or related programs.(23) Effectiveness in devising procedures.(24) Effectiveness in laying out work and establish- ing standards of performance for subordi nates.(25) Effectiveness in directing, reviewing, and check- ing the work of subordinates.(26) Effectiveness in instructing, training, and developing subordinates in the work.(27) Effectiveness in promoting high working morale.(28) Effectiveness in determining space, personnel, and equipment needs.(29) Effectiveness in setting and obtaining adher ence to time limits and deadlines.(30) Ability to make decisions.(31) Effectiveness in delegating clearly defined authority to act.STATE ANY OTHER ELEMENTS CONSIDERED✓ (A) Sense of security+ (B) Skill in English usage  (C)STANDARDDeviations must be explained on reverse side of this form| Adjective Rating | Rating official. | Adjective Rating | Reviewing official. || ---------------- | ---------------- | ---------------- | ------------------- || Excellent        | EX               | Very Good        | EX                  || Good             | Fair             | Unsatisfactory   |                     |Plus marks on. all underlined elements, and check marks or better on all other elements rated.Check marks or better on all elements rated, and plus marks on at least half of the underlined elements.Check marks or better on a majority of underlined elements, and all weak performance overcompensated by outstanding performance.Check marks or better on a majority of underlined elements, and all weak performance not overcompensated by outstanding performance.Minus marks on at least half of the underlined elements.Rated by Byron C. DavisChief, Er. I, FDZ/SEA 11 October 1949(Signature of rating official) (Title) (Date)Reviewed by Lloyd GeorgeChief, FDZ21 Oct 49(Signature of reviewing official)(Title)(Date)Rating approved by efficiency/rating committee 25 44. Report to employee(Adjective rating)G. S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 16-20177-8(Date)(See reverse side)ODC. ERO-RMB DEC 19.1949