[104-10193-10075.pdf — page 56]
# SECRET(when Filled In)# FITNESS REPORT (Part I) PERFORMANCEINSTRUCTIONSFOR THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER: Consult current instructions for completing this report.FOR THE SUPERVISOR this report is designed to help you express your evaluation of your subordinate and to transmit this evaluation to your supervisor and senior officials. Organization policy requires that you inform the subordinate where he stands with you. Completion of the report can help you prepare for a discussion with him of his strengths and weaknesses. It is also organization policy that you show Part I of this report to the employee except under conditions specified in Regulation 20:370: It is recommended that you read the entire form before completing any question. If this is the initial report on the employee, it must be completed and forwarded to the Office of Personnel no later than 30 days after the date indicated in item 8. of Section "A" below.## SECTION A.1. NAMECASASINGENERAL2. DATE OF BIRTH20 Jan. 1923. SEXM4. SERVICE DESIGNATIONPI5. OFFICE/DIVISION BRANCH OF ASSIGNMENTTokyo Station REDICOD6. OFFICIAL POSITION TITLEArea Operations Officer7. GRADE   GS-148. DATE REPORT DUE IN OP9. PERIOD COVERED BY THIS REPORT (Inclusive dates)1 October 1956 to 30 September 195710. TYPE OF REPORT    (Check one)ANNUALREASSIGNMENT SUPERVISORREASSIGNMENT-EMPLOYEESPECIAL (Specify)## SECTION B.1. FOR THE RATER: THIS REPORTCompleted at Headquarters; subject not available (Copy sent to field)CERTIFICATIONA. CHECK (3) APPROPRIATE STATEMENTS:THIS REPORT REFLECTS MY OWN OPINIONS OF THIS INDIVIDUAL.THIS REPORT REFLECTS THE COMBINED OPINIONS OF MYSELF AND PREVIOUS SUPERVISORS.I HAVE DISCUSSED WITH THIS EMPLOYEE HIS STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES SO THAT HE KNOWS WHERE HE STANDS.INDIVIDUAL IS RATED "I"IN CI OR D. A WARNING LETTER WAS SENT TO HIM A COPY ATTACHED TO THIS REPORT.I CANNOT CERTIFY THAT THE RATED INDIVIDUAL KNOWS HOW I EVALUATE HIS JOB PERFORMANCE BECAUSE (Specify)8. THIS DATE16 Oct 1957C. TYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE OF SUPERVISOR D. SUPERVISOR'S OFFICIAL TITLEEdward Markham, Chief SOV Branch Japan Station2. FOR THE REVIEWING OFFICIAL: RECORD ANY SUBSTANTIAL DIFFERENCE OF OPINION WITH THE SUPERVISOR, OR ANY OTHER INFORMATION, WHICH WILL LEAD TO A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF THIS REPORT.Posted For:Reviewed by:I certify that any substantial difference of opinion with the supervisor is reflected in the above section.A. THIS DATE23 Oct 57B. TYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND TITLE OF REVIEWING C. OFFICIAL TITLE OF REVIEWING OFFICIALLloyd George, COS, Tokyo## SECTION C.1. RATING ON GENERAL PERFORMANCE OF DUTIESJOB PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONDIRECTIONS: Consider ONLY the productivity and effectiveness with which the individual being rated has performed his duties during the rating period. Compare him ONLY with others doing similar work at a similar level of responsibility. Factors other than productivity will be taken into account later in Section D.6INSERT RATING NUMBER1. DOES NOT PERFORM DUTIES ADEQUATELY, HE IS INCOMPETENT.2. PARELY ADEQUATE IN PERFORMANCE, ALTHOUGH HE HAS HAD SPECIFIC GUIDANCE OR TRAINING, HE OFTEN FAILS TO CARRY OUT RESPONSIBILITIES.3. PERFORMS MOST OF HIS DUTIES ACCEPTABLY, OCCASIONALLY REVEALS 'SOME AREA OF WEAKNESS.4. PERFORMS DUTIES IN A COMPETENT, EFFECTIVE MANNER.5. A FINE PERFORMANCE CARRIES OUT MANY OF HIS RESPONSIBILITIES EXCEPTIONALLY WELL.6. PERFORMS HIS DUTIES IN SUCH AN OUTSTANDING MANNER THAT HE IS EQUALLED BY FEW OTHER PERSONS KNOWN TO THE SUPERVISOR.COMMENTS:FORM NO 45 (Part 1) REPLACES PREVIOUS EDITIONS OF FORMS 45 AND 45A WHICH ARE OBSOLETESECRETPerformance