Francesco/who-killed-jfk huggingface dataset:
[104-10193-10079.pdf — page 202]
IV. COMMENTS: Miss Goodpasture's handling of the problems indicated thatshe is capable of shrewd analysis. She overlooked some points whichmight have been considered in one problem and dealt with the otherproblem in too brief fashion, but in general her analysis reflectedher actual experience and suggested that she is perhaps stronger inanalysis than in making operational decisions. She presented a rathercomplex case and demonstrated that she not only understood the casebut was able to give a clear account of it.1. EXPLANATION OF ADJECTIVAL RATINGS:SUPERIOR The student demonstrated outstanding ability or proficiencyin meeting this course goal or objective; he indicated a thorough knowledge of the material presented, or, if skills are involved,he demonstrated that he is one of the most effective individuals inthis area.EXCELLENT The student showed unusual competence, skill, or ability inmeeting this objective or goal; he demonstrated a thorough grasp of thepresented material, or if skills are involved, he demonstrated that hecan perform in an extremely effective manner in this area.SATISFACTORY The student met this objective in a competent and adequatemanner; he demonstrated a good understanding and grasp of the informationpresented, or, if skills are involved, he demonstrated sufficient competenceto operate effectively in this area.POOR Although the student may have met some of the standards set forminimum achievement of this course goal or objective, he demonstratedserious gaps in knowledge or sufficient lack of skill to be of competentcompetence.FAILURE The student was unable to grasp the concepts or informationpresented, or demonstrated that he had not acquired the necessary infor-mation and skills to operate at even minimum capacity in this area.FOR THE DIRECTOR OF TRAINING:Shown & subject on 7 May 1956.F.G. AltmanCINFIFI![signature]Chief InstructorCOUNTER ESPIONAGE OPERATIONS COURSES-E-C-R-E-T
[104-10193-10079.pdf — page 206]
# S-E-C-R-E-T## TRAINING EVALUATION### COUNTERESPIONAGE OPERATIONS COURSE NO: 1| NUS                                      | SEX           | DATES OF COURSE         | NO. OF STUDENTS || ---------------------------------------- | ------------- | ----------------------- | --------------- || Goodpasture, Ann L.                      | Female        | 19 March - 6 April 1956 | 15              || DATE OF BIRTH                            | EOD DATE      | GRADE OR RANK           | OFFICE          || 28 November 1918                         | February 1944 | GS-11                   | HE/71           || PROJECTED ASSIGNMENT OR PRESENT POSITION |               |                         |                 || FI Operations Officer                    |               |                         |                 |I. Course Objectives: to familiarize the student with the various types of CS operations and with methods and procedures peculiar to CE in the field and at Headquarters, to outline CE objectives, and to increase proficiency in the recognition and exploitation of leads.II. Course Characteristics: The Counterespionage Operations Course is of three weeks duration. The curriculum material is presented by means of lectures, seminars, and directed reading. It is divided into sections as follows:A. Introduction (definition of terms, the CI Staff, operational Security and risk assessment, sources of CE leads, CE reporting and records)B. InterrogationC. Foreign Intelligence Services (with emphasis on currently hostile services including a lecture on CE in Liaison)D. Penetration and DefectionE. Double Agent OperationsDuring the course each student is required to present orally a CE case and to submit a written version of the case. Evaluations are based on problems, the case analysis presented by the student, and objective tests.S-E-C-R-E-T
[104-10193-10079.pdf — page 207]
### ΙΙΙ. EvaluationA. Two double agert problems requiring case analysis. This analysis involves thorough study of the caser1.  To determine areas of missing, inadequate, or questionable information2.  To pick out information which can be checked through other sourcea3.  To recognise all possible leada4.  To assess the risk involved5.  То ргорозе appropriate action (operational decisions)| Ratings in this class | Fail | Foor | Satis | Exc | Sup || --------------------- | ---- | ---- | ----- | --- | --- ||                       |      |      | 12*   | 3   |     |B. Cese analysis (student presentation):| Ratings in this clens | Fail | Foor | Satis | Exc | Sup. || --------------------- | ---- | ---- | ----- | --- | ---- ||                       |      |      | 10    | 5*  |      |C. Objective teats based on all sections of the course:| fetings in this class | Hail | Poor | Satis: | Exc | Sup || --------------------- | ---- | ---- | ------ | --- | --- ||                       |      | 3    | 8*     | 4   |     |This student's rating is indicated by asterisk.S-E-C-R-R-T
[104-10193-10079.pdf — page 208]
S-E-C-R-E-TIV. COMMENT: Miss Goodpasture's handling of the problems indicated that she is capable of shrewd analysis. She overlooked some points which might have been considered in one problem and dealt with the other problem in too brief fashion, but in general her analysis reflected her actual experience and suggested that she is perhaps stronger in analysis than in making operational decisions. She presented a rather complex case and demonstrated that she not only understood the case but was able to give a clear account of it.V. EXPLANATION OF ADJECTIVAL RATTINGS:**SUPERIOR** The student demonstrated outstanding ability or proficiency in meeting this course goal or objective; he indicated an unusually thorough knowledge of the material presented, or, if skills are involved, he demonstrated that he is one of the most effective individuals, in this area.**EXCELLENT** The student showed unusual competence, skill, or ability in meeting this objective or goal; he demonstrated a thorough grasp of the presented material, or if skills are involved, he demonstrated that he can perform in an extremely effective manner in this area.**SATISFACTORY** The student met this objective in a competent and adequate manner; he demonstrated a good understanding and grasp of the information presented, or, if skills are involved, he demonstrated sufficient competence to operate effectively in this area.**POOR** Although the student may have met some of the standards set for minimum achievement of this course goal or objective, he demonstrated serious gaps in knowledge or sufficient lack of skill to be of doubtful competence.**FAILURE:** The student was unable to grasp the concepts or information presented, or demonstrated that he had not acquired the necessary information and skills to operate at even minimum capacity in this area.FOR THE DIRECTOR OF TRAINING:![signature of director of training]Chief InstructorCOUNTERESPIONAGE OPERATIONS COURSES-E-C-R-E-T
[104-10193-10079.pdf — page 211]
26. CAN THINK ON HIS FEET.27. COME'S UP WITH SOLUTIONS TO PROBLEMS.28. STIMULATING TO ASSOCIATES: A "SPARK PLUG"29. TOUGH MINDED.30. OBSERVANT.31. CAPABLE.32. CLEAR THINKING.33. COMPLETES ASSIGNMENTS WITHIN ALLOWADLE TIME LIMITS.34. EVALUATES SELF REALISTICALLY.35. WELL INFORMED ABOUT CURRENT EVENTS.36. DELIBERATE.37. EFFECTIVE IN DISCUSSIONS WITH ASSOCIATES.38. IMPLEMENTS DECISIONS REGARDLESS OF OWN FEELINGS.39. THOUGHTFUL OF OTHERS.40. WORKS WELL UNDER PRESSURE.41 DISPLAYS JUDGEMENT.42. GIVES CREDIT WHERE CREDIT IS DUE.43. HAS DRIVE.44. IS SECURITY CONSCIOUS.45. VERSATILE.46. HIS CRITICISM IS CONSTRUCTIVE.47. ABLE TO INFLUENCE OTHERS.48. FACILITATES SMOOTH OPERATION OF HIS OFFICE.49. DOES NOT REQUIRE STRONG AND CONTINUOUS SUPERVISION.50. A GOOD SUPERVISOR.SECTION VA. WHAT ARE HIS OUTSTANDING STRENGTHS?1. A great capacity for work and responsibility.2. Initiative3. An interest in and ability for making cogent operational analyses.4. A cheerful willingness to accept suggestion.B. WHAT ARE HIS OUTSTANDING WEAKNESSES?No outstanding weaknesses have been observed.
[104-10193-10079.pdf — page 214]
# SECRETCUMULATIVE TRAINING RECORDDATE 1 Jan 1970NAME GOOD SPE, Ann I.FROM: Avda One 098-11PROJECTED PERSONNEL ACTIONPROMOTION REASSIGNMENT OTHER (Explain):ROTATION TRAVEL AOSTO:X COURSE DATE TAKEN X OTHER TRAINING COURSES DATE TAKEN REMARKS:BICICS) ALSO 49 050 47 1. CONSTRUCTIVE CREDIT (C.) HAS BEEN AUTHOR-IZED FOR COURSES SO MARKED BASED UPON SUBJECT'SBIC: BITC SOC. PREVIOUS TRAINING,STP AND DOC BACK GROUND EXPERIENCE.OTP 11, ALSO OC 2. SUBJECT HAS COMPLETED TRAINING OR RECEIVEDCONSTRUCTIVE CREDIT AS SHOWN AT THE LEFT.OTP 111. ALSO 49AIO, AITC. AOCAND CAI STAFF TRAINING OFFICE COMMENTS:PO, ALSO PM 1, A. THIS ☐ GOES ☐ DOES NOT MEETMINIMUM TRAINING STANDARDS RE QUALIFII.I. 111 AND RAFTITC ALSO CI 51 CATION FOR THE PROJECTED-ACTION.TECH B. SUBJECT IS CURRENTLY ENROLLED INCOURSES MARKED WITH AN S. THE COMPLE-ADMIN 51 TION OF WHICH WILL SATISFY MINIMUMSTANDARDS..SICSUP ☑ C. UNLESS SUBJECT HAS HAD PREVIOUS HO.OR FIELD EXPERIENCE, WHICH CAN BE AC.GEACEPTED IN LIEU OF TRAINING. SUBJECTRPTS SHOULD BE REQUIRED TO TAKE08 QUALIFYING ☑ REFRESHER. TRAIN-OSC (CE) ING AS CHECKED AT THE LEFT.E & RCPWPSOC 51CPOSTBCEWITGWSABAOMOSUR 46BFOTDOCLOCKS 51S/wF & SSAFTO: Personnel Officer,SIGNATURE OF STAFF TRAINING OFFICERFROM: Capéer Management OfficerF.C. JeromaThe above projected personnel action has been ☑ approved ☐ disapproved by the Career Service Board. Additional training as indicated above has been recommended by the Training Officer to satisfy requirements of the proposed personnel action.Please schedule these courses as soon as possible through your Division Training Officer who will coordinate with the Senior Staff Training Officer.DATESIGNATURE OF CAREER MANAGEMENT OFFICERFORM NO. PREVIOUS EDITION MAY BE USED1 JAN 54 59-77 REPLACES FORM NO. 59-112AUG 1953 WHICH MAY BE USEDSECRET (2-4-45)
[104-10193-10079.pdf — page 217]
# STATUS AND EFFICIENCY REPORTSECTIONS 1 THROUGH 6 TO BE COMPLETED BY EMPLOYEECAF RATING CAF-3SALARY $5310. 8 June 1951PORT, (LIST MOST RECENT FIRST. DESCRIBE CONCISELY BUT FULLY)## DESCRIPTION OF DUTIESNo change, Administrative assistant, Substation, Monterrey, Mexico## IF COURSES OF INSTRUCTION WERE COMPLETED DURING PERIOD OF THIS REPORT, LIST TITLE, LOCATION OF SCHOOL, LENGTH OF COURSE AND DATE COMPLETED.None## PROFICIENCY IN FOREIGN LANGUAGENone## MY PREFERENCE FOR NEXT DUTY AFTER TERMINATION OF CURRENT ASSIGNMENT (IST/LIF IN US-50 STATE) LOCATIONNone## HAVE THERE BEEN ANY CHANGES IN PERSONAL STATUS SINCE ORIGINAL EMPLOYMENT OR LAST REPORT - WHICHEVER IS LATER?MARITAL STATUS18 March 1953SECTIONS 7 THROUGH 11 TO BE COMPLETED BY IMMEDIATE SUPERVISOR.## PERIOD COVERED BY THIS REPORT1 July, 52 28 Feb, 53OCCASION FOR REPORTPROPOSED REASSIGNMENTCOVERING INITIAL 90 DAYS OF EMPLOYMENT## IS THIS EMPLOYEE QUALIFIED TO PERFORM ALL PRESENT DUTIES?IF SO, WHAT DUTY OR DUTIESIntelligence officer## IS EMPLOYEE BETTER QUALIFIED FOR OTHER DUTIES?## DO YOU CONCUR IN EMPLOYEE'S DESCRIPTION OF DUTIES UNDER SECTION 2?## HAS EMPLOYEE STRIVEN FOR PROFESSIONAL IMPROVEMENT?## DO YOU RECOMMEND EMPLOYEE FOR PROMOTION?IF NO, EXPLAIN IN SECTION 11IF SO, TO WHAT GRADE AND FOR WHAT POSITION?S-11 Intelligence officer## FOR EACH FACTOR OBSERVED CHECK THE APPROPRIATE BOX TO INDICATE HOW THE EMPLOYEE COMPARES WITH ALL OTHERS OF THE SAME CLASSIFICATION. THOSE PROFESSIONAL ABILITIES ARE KNOWN TO YOU PERSONALLY. DO NOT LIMIT THIS COMPARISON TO THE OTHERS NOW UNDER YOUR SUPERVISION. DO NOT HESITATE TO MARK 'NOT OBSERVED' ON ANY QUALITY WHEN APPROPRIATE.RATING FACTORSA. ABILITY TO WORK, AND GET ALONG WITH PEOPLEB. INTEREST AND ENTHUSIASM IN WORKC. SECURITY CONSCIOUSNESSD. ABILITY TO GRASP INSTRUCTIONS AND PLANSE. ATTENTION TO DUTYF. JUDGMENT AND COMMON SENSEG. ABILITY TO OBTAIN RESULTS AND GET THINGS DONEH. DISCRETIONI. INITIATIVEJ. ABILITY TO HANDLE AND DIRECT PEOPLEK. PERFORMANCE OF PRESENT DUTIES (ITEM 2)L. ABILITY TO EVALUATE INTELLIGENCE INFORMATIONM. TACTN. SAGACITY (NON-GULLIBILITY)O. LEADERSHIPP. PHYSICAL STAMINAQ. MENTAL STAMINA## INDICATE YOUR ATTITUDE TOWARD HAVING THIS EMPLOYEE UNDER YOUR COMMAND OR SUPERVISION. WOULD YOU## ENTER HERE ANY DESIRED REMARKS PERTAINING TO PARTICULAR QUALIFICATIONS OR LACK THEREOF - WHICH ARE CONSIDERED PERTINENT TO THE EVALUATION OF THIS EMPLOYEE. OUTSTANDING ASSETS AND/OR SERIOUS LIMITATIONS SHOULD BE STATED ALSO REASONS FOR AND RECOMMENDATIONS AS TO REASSIGNMENT WILL BE GIVEN IF APPROPRIATE TO THIS REPORT.Note: This report is occasioned by the resignation of the Chief of Mission, Mexico City, under whose supervision the Substation Monterrey operates.He suggested that the undersigned submit this report as being more familiar with Rios' work than he is.19 March 1953
[104-10193-10079.pdf — page 220]
SECRETTO : Chief, FDTFROM : Chief, Investigative Techniques Section, TRDSUBJECT: Counterintelligence Techniques Course1. Ann Goodpasture was enrolled in the counterintelligence techniques course for the period 29 May through 5 June 1951. He received instruction in the following elements:a. Familiarisation with the techniques of long range photography (taking of telephoto pictures)  Xb. Instruction in methods of intensifying and reducing of negatives Xc. Field expedient for the taking of extremely long range pictures  Xd. Simple technique for producing small images of documents for concealment purposes Xe. Work with the Speed Graphic camera and accessories Xf. Practice in the taking of photo-flash pictures  Xg. Work with the Photo-Record and Recordak cameras Xh. Continued practice in darkroom techniques  Xi. Locking devices, their relative security, methods of picking safes and combination locks Xj. Instruction and demonstration of microphones and wire-tapping and recording equipmentk. Surreptitious entry methods, opening of sealed documentsl. Fingerprints, possibilities, limitations, and laboratory practicem. Scientific aids, identification of tool marks, string, paper, etc.2. This student completed all phases of the training in a satisfactory manner.3. Additional comments: Miss Goodpasture had to leave the course before the end of the second week.SECRETR. L. MALERO
[104-10193-10079.pdf — page 221]
CONFIDENTIALTO: Chief, FDTFROM: Chief, Investigative Techniques Section, TRDSUBJECT: Basic Photographic Course (Second Week)1. Miss Ann Goodpasture was enrolled in the Basic Photographic Course (second week) for the period 21 May through 23 May 19512. This course provides intensive practice in all the techniques covered in the first week Basic Photographic Course. The student works under a minimum of supervision and field conditions are simulated as nearly as possible.3. Other photographic techniques in which this student received training:4. This student completed all phases of this course in a satisfactory manner.Although Miss Goodpasture was present for only three days of the second week's course she appeared to have a working knowledge of the work covered.![signature]R. L. MELBERGCONFIDENTIAL
[104-10193-10079.pdf — page 222]
SECRETDate 29 May 1981MEMORANDUMTO : Chief, Foreign Division TFROM : Chief, Communications DivisionSUBJECT: Completion of Communications Training1. Ann L. Goodpasture has satisfactorily completed the cryptographic and communications security Briefing Course which was given for a specific assignment at Monterrey, Mexico.2. Student listed above is/know qualified to perform cryptographic duties.(Comments: Has previous experience. Is capable of performing communications duties with limited supervision or the use of reference materials.3. Prior to departure for the field, the above-named person should report to Communications Security Branch, Communications Division, for final briefing. This briefing will require approximately two hours, and must be scheduled in advance at least one week before departure. Appointments can be made by contacting the Communications Security Branch. If training was given outside CIA headquarters, arrangements should be made for a final briefing on the outside.4. If departure has not occurred within two months after completion of the course, student will be required to return to Training branch, Communications Division, as soon as possible for a review. This review will require approximately 8 hours, and will be repeated at the end of each two-month delay. The foreign division will be notified when a two-month period has elapsed and arrangements for the review will be made.)5. It is requested that this office be notified at once, in writing, of any changes in assignment. The training given was specific for the assignment indicated in Paragraph 1 and additional training may be required if the assignment is changed.6. If the assignment is cancelled, it is requested that this office be notified at once, in writing, and that the student report to Communications Security Branch as soon as possible for a communications debriefing.FOR THE CHIEF, COMMUNICATIONS DIVISIONJOSEPH J. CANDELAChief, Communications/Training BranchCC: CSBFORM NO. 35-71NOV 1950SECRET(45)
[104-10193-10079.pdf — page 223]
Chief, FDT CONFIDENTIAL 23 May 1951SUBJECT: 1 day Photography Course1. Miss Ann Goodpasture 14 May   17 May*   heard about X*   in file labex X*   tell of the charge about net X*   one is workable X*   in filing method X*   on file because X*   tion of file X*   in fire of X*   in case of an X*   in use of X*   photography X*   tona and verifies film X*   photography of a camera film X*   photography will A a 2 camera X*   copies of camera X*   of photography which leaves camera film X*   reverts, section and section into range X*   tion of the Adox camera X*   camera X*   in color and X*   tion in case X*   tion in section X*   section of camera and X*   rights section will X7. Other photographic techniques in which this are not completed8. This student completed all phases of this course in satisfactory   manner.Although Miss Goodpasture was out for a day and 1/2 on sick leave she has a working knowledge of the material covered during her absence.CONFIDENTIALR. L. MELBERG
[104-10193-10079.pdf — page 224]
# SECRET## TRAINING EVALUATION1. The official to whom this report is entrusted is personally responsible for it. alincuch ne may altrin nis discretion show it to other mencer's of als staff, the report should never be shown to the student whom it concorns.The report summarizes the findings, observations, and arintons of the verlous Instructors during the course listes only, plin no reference to other facts of findings scout the student. More complete data is available the files of the the training Division and and may be examined after contacting the Records and scheduling. Officer.STUDENT'S NAME GOODPASTURE, Ann DATE OF REPORT 1 May 1951TRAINING COURSE Administration Course #22 DIVISION FOT/OSO GRADE GS-9TRAINING PERIOD 16- 28 April 1951 PROJECTED ASSIGNMENT Admin, Ass't - Monterrey, Mexico1. PERFORMANCE RECOND. The following grades show the achievement of the student in class problems and examina   tlois. The total possible score is broken down to Indicate the relative weighting of various factors. The overall adjectival rating is based on the following seates 10 to 998 unsatisfactorys 60 to 795 Satisfactory: 80 to 898 Excellents 90 to 2008 Superior.Possible Score Achieved ScoreHeadquarters and Field Problem 100 86General Exam 100 89175Overall Adjectival Rating - Excellent - 872. TRAIT CHARACTERISTICS RECORD. The following indicates the various personality traits as observed by the Instructors during the training period. The observations include the student's participation and conduct in training as well as his reactions to various problems and situations. A scale of 0 to 10 is used, O Indicating that the tralt has not been observed, the lower numbers Indicating below average, the higher Indicating above average.Rating(2) Ability to get along and work with people See Comment(21) Ability to grasp Instructions(3) Enthusiasm and Interest in cork(4) Industriousness(5) Practical Intelligence(6) Astuteness(7) Adaptability(8) Effectiveness(9) Staallity(1:01 initiative(11) Imagination(121 Aility to handle and direct pearle3. COMMENT. ITo.beased only in cases of outstanding strengths and weaknesses. This employee who has been with the Agency since 1944 and has had both Headquarters and Field experience exhibited outstanding cooperation, understanding and adaptability ding and adaptability of the highest degree throughout the entire course.APPROVED. L. B. SHALLCROSSREVIEWED.CHIEF INSTALCTURWILLIAM S. RENEHANFORM NO. 51-07JAN 1950SECRET
[104-10193-10079.pdf — page 228]
# TEST RECORDFORM NO. 37.42FEB 1949## A. EVALUATION OF TEST RESULTS:On the basis of test scores, subject appears qualified for assignment to position 1489, Reports to floor, P-2.R.J. "( ) yellowCONFIDENTIAL - Not to be DiscussedDATE 3/4/49NAME (Last, First, Middle Initial)Goodpasture, Ann L.## B. PERSONAL DATAAGE SEX STATUS EDUCATION MAJOR:30 MALE, FEMALE NEW EMPL. ELEM. H.SCH. COLLEGE DEGREE.## C. RAW TEST DATADATE TYPING SHORTHAND TOT. TIMEGROSS NET ERRORS 1 2 33/4/49| TYPE OF TEST      | RAW SCORE | PERCENTILE | TYPE OF TEST | RAW SCORE | PERCENTILE | TYPE OF TEST           | RAW SCORE | PERCENTILE || ----------------- | --------- | ---------- | ------------ | --------- | ---------- | ---------------------- | --------- | ---------- || DIRECTIONS        |           |            | DIRECTIONS   | 15        |            | AREA INFO (AFFAIRS)    |           |            || CAT: CLERICAL     |           |            | LA-5         | 70        | 94         | AREA INFO (PEOPLE)     |           |            || SPELLING          |           |            | GEN. TEST I  | 42        |            | BENNETT LIBRARY INFO   |           |            || SENTENCES         |           |            | GERMAN       |           |            | CIA CLASSIF. I         |           |            || NUMERICAL AB.     |           |            | FRENCH LL    |           |            | CIA CLASSIF. II        |           |            || ABSTR. REAS.      |           |            | FRENCH UL    |           |            | CORR. AND EFF. OF EXP. | 99        | 91         || SPACE ROL.        |           |            | ITALIAN LL   |           |            | OSU TEST: FORM         |           |            || VERB.REAS.        |           |            | SPANISH LL   |           |            | TECHNICAL READING      |           |            || MECH. REAS.       |           |            |              |           |            | WATSON-GLASER:         |           |            || S.P.V. TEST: FORM |           |            |              |           |            | GENERALIZATIONS        |           |            ||                   |           |            |              |           |            | INFERENCES             |           |            ||                   |           |            |              |           |            | DISC. ARGUMENTS        |           |            ||                   |           |            |              |           |            | RECOG. ASSUMPTIONS     |           |            ||                   |           |            |              |           |            | GEN, LOG, REAS.        |           |            ||                   |           |            |              |           |            | CONSISTENCY            |           |            ||                   |           |            |              |           |            | APPL. LOG. REAS.       |           |            |