[104-10188-10001.pdf — page 97]
# CONFIDENTIALCIA REQUEST FOR EVALUATION BY Department of StateDATE OF DISTRIO. February 1963CHIEF COUNTRY Yugoslavie/MexicoDISSEM. NUMBER C3-3/538,352FIELD NUMBER HANA-PLEASE RETURN EVALUATIONSUBJECT Yugoslav. Commercial Activities in MexicoEVALUATOR: Please complete this evaluation within days of receipt of request. BY WAY OF IDR/CS - ROOM 63 need for completion within this tire is priority standard. Indicate choices by "x." If item marked is printed in italics, please explain under Evaluator's Comments. Normally, put one & in each appropriate section. Otherwise, please cover each of these aspects in your comments. For further NOTES on use of this form, see reverse.SUBJECT OF THIS REPORT IS OF:|     |             |                                      || --- | ----------- | ------------------------------------ || X   | 1. MAJOR    | IMPORTANCE IN RELATION TO OUR NEEDS. ||     | 2. MODERATE |                                      ||     | 3. LITTLE   |                                      ||     | 4. NO       |                                      |INFORMATION IN THIS REPORT:B CONTRIBUTES TO OUR ANOWLEDGE OF THE SUBJECTI1. SIGNIFICANTLY٠2. SUBSTANTIALLY.X 2. MODERATELY.3. NELIGIBLY.C ACCURACY,X 1. SUBSTANTIALLY TRUE.2. CREDIBLE.3. Doubtful.4. Paleo.5. CANNOT BE JUDGED. SEE D.D RELATION TO OTHER INFORMATION.X 1. USEFUL FOR CONFIRMATION.2. USEFUL FOR NEO INFORMATION..3. Sufficiently known.4. AT PRESENT WE LACA UTHER INFORMATION TO JUDGE ACCURACY OR USEFULNESS.5. Conflicts with previous information.6. Appears to be fabrication.E USEFULNESS BOULD HAVE BEEN GREATER WITHI|     |                               |     || --- | ----------------------------- | --- || X   | 1. were detail.               |     ||     | 2. Less detail, more suveary. |     ||     | 3. Loss fragmentary approach. |     ||     | 4. Botter organisation.       |     |5. Detter observation or better exploitation of source, or both.6. (STATED IN COMMENT.)X 7. NO DEFECT AFFECTING USEFULNESS.OUR COLLECTION NEEDSF ٥٢:٠٤٨SPORTING MEETS|     |                         |     || --- | ----------------------- | --- || X   | 1. OUR IMPORTANT NEEDS. |     ||     | 2. OUR MINIMUM NEEDS.   |     |3. 4031 of Qua MINIMUM NEEDS.4 FER OR NONE OF OUR NEEDS.(ONLY IF YOUR REQUIREMENT IS CITED.) REPORTG SATISFIES IT:1. FULLY. NEQUIREMENT CAN BE CLOSED.2. Partially. Portion of requirement may be closed.3. PARTIALLY, BUT NEED CONTINUES.4. NEGLIGIBLY.(IF SUBJECT IS IMPORTANT TO YOU. OTHER RE-H PORTING DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM NEEDS. AND YOU HAVE FILED NO REQUIREMENT:)1. NE BILL PRESENT A REQUIREMENT SOON.2. OUR NEED DOLS NOT WARRANT A NEQUIREMENT FOR CS REPORTING.EVALUATOR NAME (Please print) P. AdlerDATE REQUEST RECEIVED. Mar 1COLLECTOR'S COMMENTS AND QUESTIONSWe vou'd appreciate your contents evaluating this report.EVALUATOR'S COMMENTS AND FOLLOW-UP QUESTIONSAs a status recrt, document is of moderate value. Generally neative progress of Yugo attempts to establist. a cormericial foothold 'n Mexico not in itself of great interest to this office, at this time, but would increase in interest in direct relation to information on decision of Belgrade to grant a lcan to Mexican govt.COMPONENT I/RSB/EADATE EVALUATION FORWARDED ar 6PHONE x 3503CONFIDENTIAL