[104-10193-10077.pdf — page 89]
# SECRET## NARRATIVE COMMENTSIndicate significant strengths & weaknesses demonstrated in current position keeping 'in proper perspective' their relationship to overall performance. State suggestions made for improvement of weak performance. Give recommendation's for training. Comment on foreign language competence, if required for current assignment. Clarify or explain ratings. given in Section B to provide best basis for determining future personnel action. Manner of performance of managerial or supervisory duties and cost consciousness in exercise of personnel, space, equipment and funds, must be completely applicable. If extra space is needed to complete Section C, attach a separate sheet of paper.MR. HICKS' PERFORMANCE DURING THE 35 MONTHS UNDER MY SUPERVISION HAS CONTINUED AT THE SAME HIGH LEVEL NOTED IN HIS LAST FITNESS REPORT. HE EXERCISES GREAT CARE AND ATTENTION TO THE MULTITUDE OF DETAILS DETAILED IN THE PROCESSING OF INTEL CABLES. HE WORKS WELL UNDER PRESSURE AND IS CONGENIAL AND TACTFUL IN DEALING WITH DIVISIONAL PERSONNEL.HIS TOUR IN IW WILL BE EXTENDED FOR ANOTHER TWO YEARS. HIS CONTINUED PRESENCE IN IW WILL BE OF INESTIMABLE VALUE TO NEW OFFICERS WHO WILL BE JOINING THE INTELLIGENCE WATCH AS OTHERS ARE REASSIGNED OR RETIRE.I STRONGLY RECOMMEND THAT HE BE RECONSIDERED FOR PROMOTION TO GS-14, THERE IS NO QUESTION THAT HE HAS BEEN PERFORMING AT THIS LEVEL FOR A CONSIDERABLE PERIOD OF TIME.There has been frequent consultation with Mr. Hicks concerning his performance of his duties. He has no supervisory duties and is cost-conscious.SECTION D|                                        | CERTIFICATION AND COMMENTS                                      || -------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------- || 1.                                     | BY EMPLOYEE                                                     || DATE                                   |                                                                 || 16 JANUARY 1970                        | *I CERTIFY THAT I HAVE SEEN SECTIONS A, B, AND C OF THIS REPORT ||                                        | SIGNATURE OF EMPLOYEE                                           ||                                        | ![signature of employee]                                        || EMPLOYEE HAS BEEN UNDER MY SUPERVISION | BY SUPERVISOR                                                   || 3 1/2 MO.                              | IF THIS REPORT HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN TO EMPLOYEE, GIVE EXPLANATION || DATE                                   | OFFICIAL TITLE OF SUPERVISOR                                    || 16 JANUARY 1970                        | CHIEF/INTELLIGENCE WATCH                                        ||                                        | TYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE                             ||                                        | ![signature of supervisor]                                      ||                                        | JOSEPH A. PROCACCINO                                            |COMMENTS OF REVIEWING OFFICIALI do not know Mr. Hicks well having been assigned to the FI staff only a relatively short period of time, plus the fact that direct contacts with officers of the Intelligence Watch are not always frequent owing to their schedules. I would concur however in the rating and narrative comments above in view of my knowledge of the supervisors.| DATE            | OFFICIAL TITLE OF REVIEWING OFFICIAL | TYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE || --------------- | ------------------------------------ | ----------------------------------- || 20 January 1970 | Deputy Chief, FI/INT                 | ![signature of reviewing official]  ||                 |                                      | Raymond Villemarette                |SECRET