Francesco/who-killed-jfk huggingface dataset:
[104-10187-10003.pdf — page 75]
ORGS:UNIT:EXT:DATE:TO:FROM: DIRECTOR PAGE 2CONF:INFO:TO INFO CITE DIR 2481124311OF EUROPE, WOULD FACILITATE AGREEMENT ON DISARMAMENT AND CESSATION NUCIZARTESTS, AND WOULD "HELP IMPROVE RELATIONS AND BRING CLOSER TOGETHER" THE TWOGERMAN STATES.C. THE PROPOSAL WAS FORMALIZED IN 9 DEC 57 POLISH GOVERNMENTMEMORANDUM, PRESENTED BY RAPACKI TO US, BRITISH, AND FRENCH AMBASSADORS INWARSAW. SOVIET PREMIER BULGANIN PROMPTLY ENDORSED PROPOSAL IN SERIES OFLETTERS TO HEADS OF GOVERNMENTS THROUGHOUT THE WORLDD. IN 1958 RAPACKI MODIFIED HIS PLAN, ALLEGEDLY TO MAKE IT MOREPALATABLE TO WESTERN POWERS. NEW VERSION PUBLISHED NOV 58, CALLED FORTWO-STAGE PROGRAM IN WHICH: (1) CURRENT NUCLEAR STOCKPILES AND BASES WOULDBE FROCEN AND PRODUCTION OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS BANNED IN POLAND, CZECHOSLOVAKIA,EAST AND WEST GERMANY, AND (2) EXISTING NUCLEAR STOCKPILES AND WEAPONS WOULDBE ELIMINATED AS PART OF CENERAL DISARMAMENT AGHEEMENT FOR THE FOUR-NATIOAREA. REVISED VERSION ALSO CALLED FOR PAIR AND GROUND CONTROL" WITH NATOAND WARSAW PACT COUNTRIES PARTICIPATING IN CONTROL SYSTEM.E. FOLISH LEADERS HAVE SINCE 1957 PRESSED FOR FORMAL AGREEMENT ONRAPACKI PLAN. SHORTLY AFTER OPENING OF GENEVA DISARMAMENT CONFERENCE POLISH
[104-10187-10003.pdf — page 76]
ORIO:UNIT:EXT:DATE:TO:FROM: DIRECTOR PAGE 3CONF:INFO:                                  CLASSIFIED MESSAGE                                  SECRET                                  KOUTING                                  DEFERRED                                  ROUTINETO INFO CITE DIR 24811DELEGATION SUBMITTED MEMO URGING CREATION NUCLEAR-FREE ZONE IN CENTRAL EUROPE. MEMO BASICALLY FOLLOWS LINES OF FORMER PROPOSALS RAPACKI PLAN.SOVIET DELEGATION IS CURRENTLY URGING GENEVA DISARMAMENT CONFERENCE TAKE UP QUESTION NUCLEAR-FREE ZONES IN VARIOUS AREAS OF WORLD.F. SINCE RAPACKI PLAN INTRODUCED HAS HAD STRONG SUPPORT FROM MOSCOW.SOVIETS HAVE EVEN URGED EXTENDING ZONE TO INCLUDE BALTIC AND BALKAN COUNTRIES.SOVIET LEADERS UNDOUBTEDLY VIEW PROPOSAL AS MEANS ELIMINATING GERMAN POWER AND REMOVING US MILITARY POWER AND INFLUENCE FROM ANY IN CENTRAL EUROPE - ONE OF MOSCOW'S MAJOR FOREIGN POLICY OBJECTIVES.G. US STRONGLY OPPOSES RAPACKI PLAN, VIEWING IT AS BLOC DEVICE TO NEUTRALIZE GERMANY, DEEPEN AND EVEN PERPETUATE DIVISION OF GERMANY, AND TO SECURE DE FACTO RECOGNITION OF EAST GERMANY. IMPLEMENTATION OF PROPOSAL WOULD ALSO BE MILITARILY DISADVANTAGEOUS TO WEST. US MILITARY POWER IN EUROPE WOULD BE DIMINISHED WITHOUT A CONCURRENT DECREASE OF SOVIET STRENGTH. IT WOULD WEAKEN NATO.H. WEST GERMAN GOVERNMENT ALSO VIGOROUSLY OPPOSED TO RAPACKI PLAN, AND ALL SUCH "DISENGAGEMENT" PLANS IN CENTRAL EUROPE FOR SAME REASONS. BONN ALSO CONSIDERS SUCH PROPOSALS AS SINISTER AND SUBTLY INTIMIDATORY TO WEST GERMANS, WHO DO NOT CHOOSE BE DEALT WITH AS IF MERE OBJECTS, ANDRELEASING OFFICER SECRET AUTHENTICATINGREPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED. OFFICERCopy No
[104-10187-10003.pdf — page 77]
ORIG: N. JUDKINSUNIT:EXT:DATE:CLASSIFIED MESSAGESECRETROUTING123456TO:FROM: DIRECTOR PAGE 4CONF:INFO:DEFERREDROUTINETO INFO CITE DIR 24811WHO DETECT IN SUCH SCHEMES A CREATION OF CONDITIONS FOR THEIR EVENTUALCOMMUNIZATION.I. PUBLIC ENDORSEMENT OF RAPACKI PLAN BY MEXICAN PRESIDENT WOULDMARK FIRST SUCH SPECIFIC APPROVAL BY GOVERNMENT LEADER OUTSIDE SOVIET BLOCHIS ENDORSEMENT WOULD BE WIDELY PROPAGANDIZED BY POLES AND SOVIETS ANDCOULD SET PRECEDENT FOR THEM TO SECURE SUCH APPROVAL BY OTHER NONBLOC LEADERS.END OF MESSAGEC/S COMMENT: *REQUESTED INCLUDE POINTS THAT COULD BE MADE BY COS TO DISSUADELITENSOR FROM POSSIBLE PUBLIC BACKING OF RAPACKI FLAN DURING HIS FORTHCOMINGTRIP POLAND.EE/PC/EE/PWA/COPSR W he hentJ. C. KINGC/WHDRELEASING OFFICERCOORDINATING OFFICERSSECRETGROUP 1Excluded from automaticdowngrading anddeclassificationJOHN M. WHITTENC/WH/3AUTHENTICATINGOFFICERREPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED.Copy No.
[104-10187-10003.pdf — page 78]
Prepared ioy Tom Cawurlin! LIENVY support13 March 1963Sve Calle 14 Mar63## The Rapacki Plan1.  The Polish proposal for a Central European    nuclear-free zone was introduced at the 2 October 1957    session of the UN General Assembly by the Polish Foreign    Minister, Adam Rapack1. Acting as spokesman for the    Polish Government, he formulated the proposal: should    both East and West Germany agree to a ban on the produc-    tion and storage of nuclear weapons on their territories,    Poland would simultaneously introduce an identical ban on    her territory. Rapacki did not mention Czechoslovakia,    but the head of the Czechoslovak UN delegation, speaking    after Rapacki, supported his proposal, declaring that his    country would join the agreement, extending the ban over    her territory, too. The East Germans subsequently warmly    endorsed the proposal.2.  Rapacki's proposal had obviously been cleared and    coordinated with Soviet leaders prior to its introduction.    Moscow promptly reported the proposal approvingly and the    Soviet press stressed that such an agreement would be wel-    comed by the peoples of Europe, would facilitate agreement    on disarmament and cessation of nuclear tests, and would    "help improve relations and bring closer together" the two    German states.3.  The proposal was formalized in a 9 December 1957    Polish government memorandum, which was presented by Rapacki    to the US, British, and French ambassadors in Warsaw. The    then Soviet Premier, Bulganin, promptly endorsed the pro-    posal in a series of letters to heads of governments through-    out the world.4.  In 1958 Rapacki modified his plan, allegedly to make    it more palatable to the Western powers. The new version    of the plan, published in November 1958, called for a two-    stage program, in which: (1) current nuclear stockpiles and    bases would be frozen and production of nuclear weapons would    be banned in Poland, Czechoslovakia, East and West Germany,    and (2) existing nuclear stockpiles and weapons would be
[104-10187-10003.pdf — page 79]
eliminated as a part of a general disarmament agreementfor the four-nation area. The revised version of theplan also called for "air and ground control' with NATOand Warsaw Pact countries participating in the controlsystem.5. Polish leaders have since 1957 pressed for a formal   agreement on the Rapacki plan. Shortly after the opening   of the Geneva disarmament conference in March 1962, the   Polish delegation submitted a memorandum urging creation   of a nuclear-free zone in Central Europe. The memorandum   basically follows the lines of the former proposals of the   Rapacki plan. The Soviet delegation is currently urging   that the Geneva disarmament conference take up the question   of nuclear-free zones in various areas of the world.6. Since the Rapacki plan was introduced, it has had   strong support from Moscow. The Soviets have even urged   extending the zone to include Baltic and Balkan countries.   Soviet leaders undoubtedly view the proposal as a means of   eliminating German power in Central Europe--one of Moscow's   major foreign policy objectives.7. The US strongly opposes the Rapacki plan, viewing   it as a Bloc device to neutralize Germany, to deepen and   even perpetuate the division of Germany, and to secure   de facto recognition of East Germany. Implementation of the   proposal would also be militarily disadvantageous to the   West. US military power in Europe would be diminished with-   out a concurrent decrease of Soviet strength. It would   weaken NATO.8. The West German government is also vigorously op-   posed to the Rapacki plan and all such 'disengagement" plans   in Central Europe for the same reasons. Bonn also considers   such proposals as sinister and subtly intimidatory to the   West Germans, who do not choose to be dealt with as if they   were inert objects, and who detect in such schemes a creation   of conditions for their eventual communization.9. Public endorsement of the Rapacki plan by the Mexican   president would mark the first such specific approval by a   government leader outside the Soviet Bloc. His endorsement   would be widely propagandized by the Poles and the Soviets   and could set a precedent for them to secure such approval   by other nonbloc leaders.
[104-10187-10003.pdf — page 80]
ACTION: C/WH 5 (WH COPY SLOTTED AT 1815 12 MAR 63 BP)INFO: ADDP, C/CI, C/FI 2, C/EE 3, S/C 2SECRET 1222152PRITY DIR CITE MEXI 3743RYBAT BEDOX 13 MAR 1963 !IN84727REF MEXI 3575 (W7531)1. SUGGEST INCLUDE IN MATERIAL REQUESTED REF POINTS THAT CAN BE MADE BY COS TO DISSUADE LITENSOR FROM POSSIBLE PUBLIC BACKING OF RAPASKI PLAN DURING HIS FORTHCOMING TRIP POLAND. PARTICULARLY WISH PRESS THIS POINT SINCE LITENSOR, WHO ANXIOUS BE RECIPIENT NOBEL PEACE PRIZE, MIGHT OTHERWISE BE TEMPTED REACT FAVORABLY TO SUCH A PROPOSAL. POLISH SEJM JUST MADE PUBLIC DECLARATION IN FAVOR MEXICOS AIMS FOR DISARMAMENT.2. IF ABOVE MATERIAL CANNOT BE POUCHED IN TIME MEET 15 MARCH DEADLINE PLS CABLE HIGHLIGHTS AND POUCH REST.3. LITENSOR ON 11 MARCH EXPRESSED AGAIN HIS INTEREST IN BRIEFINGS. REQUEST ETA MATERIALS REQUESTED REF.SECRETC/S COMMENT: LITENSOR HAS ASKED VIA LIELEGANT FOR BRIEFING PAPERS KUBARK CAN GIVE ON FRANCE, YUGOSLAVIA AND POLAND.SECRETREPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED
[104-10187-10003.pdf — page 81]
# DISPATCH**SECRET**TO: Chief of Station, Mexico CityINFOFROM: Chief, WH DivisionSUBJECT: KUWOLF/LITENSOR Briefing MaterialsACTION REQUIRED REFERENCESACT: As required.REF: MEXI 3575DIR 219651. Headquarters is sending herewith materials which KUMONK and KUWOLF staffs have prepared for a briefing of LITENSOR on countries he will soon visit. In order to expedite the pouching of these materials we are not taking time to edit them into a finished product at Headquarters. We are providing more materials and references than will be necessary for this briefing. The Station may select, edit and translate the information it considers most appropriate.2. Attachment A. This is a list of references to pertinent articles in specific issues of the "Current Intelligence Weekly Summaries."3. Attachment B. With the exception of the item on Cuba, these KUWOLF-prepared materials were not sent to Station Mexico City. They may be used to promote the ODYOKE position on the Common Market, the Berlin problem, Cuba etu.4. Attachment C. KUMONK compiled these materials. They include a current description of the situation in each country involved and biographic sketches on many of the officials with whom LITENSOR will probably meet during his trip. The biographic information has been taken from KUDARK and ODACID files. The Station should not pass any biographic information through which a line has been drawn on those attachments.END OF DISPATCHRemoved from Project KAGIDESKCS Classification: 50-6-2012JOB # 23-172/24Box: 22 Fold: XAttachments:A. List of References, H/WB. KUWOLF-Prepared Material, H/WC. KUMONK compiled material, H/WDistribution:O&l - COS, MEXICO CITY, W/ATTS. A,B,C7 Mar. 63HMMW-1137450-6-75/2**SECRET**WH/3/Mex Judkins ds 5940CA/PROP 7 Mar 63 R. Ratliff by phoneOCI/SIDO 7 Mar 63 T. Loller by phoneFI/INT/IE 7 Mar 63 C. Harris by phoneWH/CA/PROP 7 Mar 63 R. ChamberlainC/WII/D J. C. King1 - RI1 - ChronoDISPATCH
[104-10187-10003.pdf — page 82]
# DISPATCHChief, WH DivisionChief, WONOLDChief of Station, Mexico CityLIENVOY/Forwarding of Trainee EvaluationACTION REQUIRED: For Your Information1.  Forwarded as a split transmission are copies of the Evaluation of Trainees prepared by Lee R. MYLECHRAINE for passage to LIRAMA and LITEMPO-8.2.  The attached document was translated into Spanish in the LIENVOY LP by LIENVOY-5 on 11 February 1969 for passage.Removed from Project KCS Classification: 50-6-75/2JOB # 73-17512Box: 19 Fold: 5Willard C. CurtisWillard C. CURTISAttachment (Via Split Transmission):Evaluation of Trainees Report1 - Left Side, h/w2 - Right Side, u.s.c.Distribution:2 - C/WHD, w/atts2- C/WOMOLD, w/atts24 Feb 69HMMA-3643712 February 1969SECRET50-6-75/2
[104-10187-10003.pdf — page 83]
## Identification of Course: Basic Tradecraft ... Activities## Date of Course: 13 January - 7 February 1969## Location of Training: Calle Tabasco #225, Colonia Roma, Postal Zone 7, MEXICO, D.F.## Names of Trainees:1. Felipe TREJO Gonzalez, Lt. Col., Mexican Army, Age 46.2. Leonardo LOPEZ y Lopez, Age 23.3. Mariano CLAVIRES Molina, Captain, Mexican Army, Age 39.4. Felix LOZANO Rangel, DFS, Age 33.5. Javier MANCERA Fuentes, DFS, Age 31.6. Esteban GUZMAN Salgado, DFS, Age7. Ladislao SALINAS Alor, Captain, Mexican Army, Age 31.8. Jorge MARGAIN Ortiz, Captain, Mexican Army, Age 29.9. Rogelio Rafael GARZA Hernandez, Licenciado, Mexican Army, Age 26.## Evaluation of Trainees:1. The three DFS trainees, LOZANO, MANCERA, and GUZMAN, because of their previous training and experience in security activities of the DFS, more readily under stood the training materials and lectures presented, and they were better able to incorporate the matters learned into the field exercises conducted by the instructors. Again, because of their previous experience and dedication.
[104-10187-10003.pdf — page 84]
- 2 -They also performed the other trainees in surveillance, counter-surveillance, deception, interrogation, and in all other aspects of tradecraft that were covered. These three worked harmoniously with the remainder of the group and made every effort to pass along to them on the occasion arose the good practices learned from their own experiences in security work. All three are considered to be intelligent, alert, imaginative, industrious, and dedicated, and it is the writer's opinion that it would be a pleasure to work with them. All three undoubtedly have a good basic understanding of the typical mission of a national security service, and they know how a security service should go about its work and activities.2. TREJO - Subject is a career Mexican Army officer and has had no previous experience in intelligence or security work. Throughout the course he was punctual, demonstrated a keen interest in the work, and took an active part in all classroom discussions and street exercises. It did appear, however, that in his discussions with his fellow class members he was usually quite opinionated and argumentative which might possibly indicate some inability on his part to get along well with his fellow workers in the unit. Based on his participation in the class as well as his written work, it is believed that he has a fairly good understanding now of the typical mission of a security service, and the tradecraft principles involved in security service work.3. LOPEZ Y LOPEZ - the only civilian in the group, excluding the DES trainees, is the youngest of the trainees and appears to have the least formal education. Although he did not participate in the classroom discussions as energetically as did most of the others, he did attend them from time to time and generally did a good job in all exercises carried out by the group. He appears to possess some of the drive and imagination necessary to act as an effective operator and handler of agents. He appeared reserved in his relations and conversations with members in the group, but the writer never noted any friction between him and others. It is suggested that he might be used as the "office keeper" and/or person in charge of files. Somewhat surprisingly, he did a fairly good job in the reporting exercises. His written work is neat and well organized..../
[104-10187-10003.pdf — page 85]
-3-4. CHAYMMERS - Subject is an intelligent, alert, imaginative and conscientious man, and it is believed that he will make a valuable contribution to the work of the unit. He participated actively in the classroom discussions and field exercises and made a real contribution to both. On exercises where he was in charge, he got along well with those working with him, and his planning and execution of the exercises indicates clearly that he is able to apply the lessons learned to the practical work. Assuming, it is believed, that he should develop a real interest in security work and would, after some experience, become an effective operator. It is believed, also, that he would be able to supervise others in such a way as to cause them to work together effectively and as a team. His written exercises were well prepared, indicating that he not only learned from the classroom reading and discussion but that he also spent considerable time on them.5. SALINAS - Subject seems to possess an average aptitude for security work. Like the others, he was always respectful, took an active part in the field exercises, but was somewhat less impressive in the classroom discussions. His prepared written exercises in an acceptable manner. Assuming that he should develop a real interest in security work, it is believed that he would make a worthwhile contribution to the work of the unit. He got along well with the others, including the occasions when he was in charge of exercises.6. MARGAIN - like SALINAS, Subject is capable and intelligent, and he gets along well with his fellow co-workers. His usefulness to the organization, it is believed will depend on the interest he develops in security work after the unit begins operations. As in the case of CHAYMMERS, MARGAIN in discussions and in field exercises seemed to give more consideration to the security factors involved in particular actions than did the others. Many of his questions in the classroom were related to security operation and conduct of surveillance activities, and the possibility of compromises that might result in embarrassment to the sponsor. It is believed that he would give careful consideration to any proposed operational activity from a security point of view before execution of any tasks involved. His written exercises were well prepared, indicating that he gave them considerable time and attention..../
[104-10187-10003.pdf — page 87]
-3-4. A copy of all the training materials was left with LOP82 y LOP82 for the unit. It is strongly suggested that an effort be made within the next three or four weeks to review the materials in a more or less formal classroom situation. Furthermore, it is suggested that until such time as the unit begins operations, the unit plan and carry out surveillance and other exercises designed to improve their capability.
[104-10187-10003.pdf — page 88]
# DISPATCHTO:Chief, WH DivisionINFO:Chief, WOMOLDFROM:Chief of Station, Mexico CitySUBJECT:LIENVOY/Completion of Training Report (Training Cryptonym-DAVALILLO)ACTION REQUIRED:For Your InformationREFERENCE: DIRECTOR-65355, 12 January 19691. As indicated in Reference and other communications, a training request was made by the Station and approved by Headquarters, to train a group under the LIENVOY Project to follow up on leads produced by the joint LIENVOY operation and presumably other Mexican Government unilateral sources. Lee R. MYLECHRAINE, WOMOLD instructor who was assigned to the Mexico City Station until 8 July 1968, was selected as the instructor. MYLECHRAINE arrived in Mexico City on 9 January 1969; the training began on 13 January and ended on 10 February 1969. The training was conducted at a training site, Calle Tabasco #228, Colonia Roma, Postal Zone 7, Mexico City, provided by LIENVOY-2 and LIELEGANT; the building in which the training site apartment is located is owned by LIELEGANT, and the latter and LIENVOY-2 have their offices there. The unit, upon completion of the training, will use the apartment in which the training was conducted for their offices.Continued.....Distribution:2 - C/WHD, via split transmission, w/ct2 - C/WOMOLD, via split transmission,
[104-10187-10003.pdf — page 91]
# SECRETCABLE SECRETARIAT DISSEMINATIONPERSON UNIT NOTIFIEDASSILIKO MESSAGE TOTAL COPY 17 DUTING AND/OR INITIALS SENA(24) SECRETGROUP I(When Filled In)ADVANCE COPY ISSUED BLOTTEDINDEX DESENSITIZEDX-REF TO FILE NO PER CSN 43-43 BRANCHDISSEM BY DIR FILE RIO REF TO DESTROY SIGACTION C/ WHS INFO. C/alsp c/TSDS c/c/c/F2FILE. VR,465 MEXISECRET 262208Z MAY 69 CITE MEXICO CITY 0378 (LANGDON ACTING)DIRECTORWOACRE LIENVOY LIRAMA26 May 69 IN 65913REF: HMMA 36573, 8 APRIL 19691. ON 23 MAY GENERAL LUIS (GUTIERREZ) OROPEZA, JEFE   DEL ESTADO MAYOR PRESIDENCIAL, AGAIN REQUESTED THAT ARRANGE-   MENTS BE MADE TO REPLENSIH TRAINING MATERIALS PROVIDED PER   LOGISTICS 9780. ORIGINAL REQUEST REPORTED IN PARA 2 (B) OF   REFERENCE.2. GUTIERREZ CROPEZA INDICATED THAT REPLACEMENTS   COULD BE BROUGHT INTO MEXICO CITY WITH SAME ASSURANCES AS   WHEN ORIGINAL SHIPMENTS ARRIVED.3. PLS ADVISE.4. FILE: 50-6-75/2.SECRETRemoved from Project KABIDGERCS Classification: 50-6-75/2JOB # 73-175/14Box: Fold:CS COPYSECREThoney file26 May 6950-6-75/2
[104-10187-10003.pdf — page 92]
ORIG: JUDKINS: dsUNIT: WH/3/MEXEXT : 5940DATE: 1 MARCH 1963TO : MEXICOFROM: DIRECTORCONF: C/WH 5INFO: ADDP, C/CI, C/FI 2, S/CCLASSIFIED MESSAGESECRETTO MEXITRYBAXREF MEXI 3575CITE DIR 2196521965HQS PREPARING AND WILL POUCH LITENSOR FRIEFING PAPERSIN ENGLISH. PAPERS WILL INCLUDE SOME REFS TO PERTINENT DATAALREADY AVAILABLE AT STATION.END OF MESSAGEC/S COMMENT: *(IN 75331 (LITENSOR HAS ASKED FOR ANY BRIEFING PAFERS KUBARKCAN GIVE ON VARIOUS COUNTRIES NAMED.J. C. KingC/MIL/DRELEASING OFFICERC/WH/3WH/COPSCOORDINATING OFFICERSSECRETGROUP 1Excluded from automatic downgrading and declassificationREPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED.
[104-10187-10003.pdf — page 93]
DATE: 27 FEB 63TO : DIRECTORFROM: MEXICO CITYACTION: C/WH 5INFO: ADDP, C/CI, C/CI/IC 2, C/FI 2, S/C 2CLASSIFIED MESSAGESECRETROUTING142536FEB 27 04112 63ROUTINEDIR CITE MEXI 3575 !N75331RYBATREF A DIR 35657B MEXI 1919 62 20593/1. LITENSOR HAS ASKED VIA LIELEGANT FOR ANY BRIEFING PAPERS KUBARK   CAN GIVE ON FRANCE, YUGOSLAVIA, POLAND, WEST GERMANY, HOLLAND AND   ENGLAND.2. CURTIS WOULD APPRECIATE ANYTHING HEADQUARTERS CAN MAKE   AVAILABLE AND BELIEVE HQS MAY WISH ATTEMPT INFLUENCE LITENSOR ON   CERTAIN POINTS IN SOME OF THESE COUNTRIES.3. WILL NEED REPLY SOON AND, IF HQS WISHES PREPARE PAPERS,   APPRECIATE RECEIPT BY 20 MARCH.JACKETGROUP 1EXCLUDED FROM AUTOMATIC DOWNGRADING &DECLASSIFICATIONREPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED.Copy No.
[104-10187-10003.pdf — page 94]
# DISPATCHTO: Chief of Station, Mexico CityFROM: Chief, VII DivisionSUBJECT: LITENSOR Request for Information on Ammunition for ZAPATA Movement.ACTION REQUIRED REFERENCE:HHW-11256Forwarded herewith is a bureau report containing additional information on the reported shipment of ammunition from Brownsville, Texas to Mexico.END OF DISPATCHAttachment:DBA-31071, 7 Jan. 63Distribution:O & 1 - COS, Mexico City, W/Att---DATE TYPED: 23 Jan. 63DISPATCH SYMBOL AND NUMBERHHW-11266HEADQUARTERS FILE NUMBER201-332-24950-6-75-3OFFICE: WH/3/Mex/J.R. Reoves:dsTYPIST: 59401 - RI W/Att1 - Chrono W/AttOFFICE SYMBOL: C/WH/DRELEASING: J. C. King
[104-10187-10003.pdf — page 95]
# SECRETDATE : 8 DEC 62TO : DIRECTORFROM: MEXICO CITY.ACTION: C/WH 5INFO : ADDP, C/CA 2, C/CI, C/FI 2, C/MS 2, S/C 2ROUTINGDEC 8 19082 62ROUTINEIN 32097DIR CITE MEXI 2787 AN32097REF DIR 03898*RYBAT LIENVOY1. COS HAD TWO HOURS ALONE WITH LITENSOR AND LITEMPO/2 ON 5 NOV   AT WHICH TIME LITENSOR VIGOROUS AS EVER. HE THIN; BUT HE SAID THIS   ON DOCTOR'S ORDERS TO LOSE WEIGHT. COS HAS NOTICED LITENSOR MUCH   THINNER AND HAS AGED RAPIDLY IN FOUR YEARS IN PRESENT POST;   BUT NO EVIDENCE HIS SLOWING DOWN.2. ON 8 DEC COS TALKED WITH LIELEGANT WHO SAW AND TALKED WITH   LITENSOR AT A WEDDING ON NIGHT OF 6 DEC. LIELEGANT SAYS LITENSOR   IN EXCELLENT HEALTH.3. STATION WILL REPORT ANY INDICATIONS ILL HEALTH.END OF MESSAGEC/S COMMENT: *DESIRED COS COMMENT ON REPORT THAT LITENSOR IN ILL HEALTH/
[104-10187-10003.pdf — page 96]
DATE: 3 DEC 62TO: DIRECTORFROM: MEXICO CITYACTION: C/WH 5 (COPY ISSUED TO WH AT 1320 3 DEC LMG)INFO: ADDP, C/CI, C/CI/IC 2, S/C 2PRITY DIR INFO GUAT CITE MEXI 2733 IN28460RYBAT/LIENVOY1. LITENSOR VIA LIELEGANT ASKED COS FOR A REPORT ON ACTIVITIES AND ASSOCIATES OF JUAN JOSE AREVALO IN MEXICO.2. REQUEST HOS ADVISE WHAT REPLY COS SHOULD GIVE; ALSO, REQUEST PERMISSION ADVISE AMB MANN OF REQUEST AND REPLY.END OF MESSAGESECRET