Francesco/who-killed-jfk huggingface dataset:
[104-10182-10004.pdf — page 170]
This love of excitement was not strong enough, just as was not the political motivation, to bring him to more dangerous, and more demanding acts.(C 4, 8; E 2.)Besides, this longing for excitements has decreased with the age. When during the school age he did not care what his parents felt when he was being thorwn out of all schools, when he caused brands, stole, was arrested by the police (B6,19) and when in 1939 he was bold enough to volunteer to the Foreign legion, then, in later years, he is not so bold any longer,as mentioned before, and he is held back by the thought of his mother's and his wife s feelings. ( Е 5, 10.) He even needs the repeated approaches of Jean Adamx, and coersion,to get over the restraining influence of his wife.During the debriefing, although he was left in full freedom to tell his story, to feel, to live it once more, he did not show any excitement; he spoke as if telling the story of an other person, leaving the impression of a man weary of his turbulent past, possibly longing for the family (he mentioned having not seen his wife since 1950)...3. Lack of initiative.His troubles in the schools seem having started when he got acquainted with Jean ADAM whose plans he followed, although he "was sure that he could have made better plans".(В 11.)In Germany he had PASCAL who did not like the jobs, spoke of leaving those, whereupon"they"then decided to flee. (C 6,22.)Later Jean ADAM is back again with his bad ideas and in- tentions, even blackmailing David into action.( E 5, 11.)4. Lack of planning.He often acts under the effect of a momentary thought, without planning, or he changes the plans if there were any.Sometimes those acts or changes are just ridiculous, and show how bad was the "planning" itself. (C 26, 30,34.)Thereby he neglects the neccessary security precautions, and takes unneccessary risks. (C 10, 13, 16, 17, 77, 78, 81, 84, 87, E 1.)Sometimes, when his "plan" does not work, he gets lost and remains inactive, lets things go their own way. (C 15.)
[104-10182-10004.pdf — page 171]
-36-# H. RELIABILITY OF THE STORY.1. His story gets unbelievable because too often:a/ he has "good luck" which helps him (C 15,16,27,30,78,a.o.),b/ his opponent is stupidly derelict, which enables David always to come out a winner, to escape the danger of being captured. (C 10,23,23,29,36,37,44,45,52,58,77.)2. There are statements in his story which are not well believable, f.i.:- that he and Pascal got leave- or travel-documents from the Police in Stettin without having had any leave certificate from the factory; or that he,having been only for a few months in Germany, knew the language well enough and could prepare forged leave certificates for himself and Pascal. (C 7.)- that he does not remember where he did live in Berlin when employed as a photographer, when this place was searched.(C 18)- that "Passports for Foreigners" were issued by the German authorities so easily, without any checks, on so lomited purpose as was theirs: only for a short leave in Paris. (C 25, 29.)- His tutoring of Pascalconcerning the map:this was not necessary at all, because it really was hea, David, who bought the map, Pascal could not have stated wrongly. (C 28.).- that he was allowed to go from the NSKK penal camp to Police H.; that the Police engaged him without any investigation of his past; that the NSKK penal camp released him simply on the basis of a note that he had registered for work with the Police. (C 44-46.)- that he, at this time, knew the trick with the combination of a false and a true document, (C 57.) and -- that the higher an officer, the easier is to fool him (D 6), that one has to use the "lack of link" between different authorities: to present alforged)document of one authority to an officer of an other authority, who would not find the forging. (This was mentioned in connection with D 6.)- that the officer in OKW ABW gave him the top-secret location of the installation without having asked for the purpose of his visit. (C 77.)- that he was so security conscious and did not meet the patrons in his living place, that the "Belgian girl", Allumes and others had not been to this place before. (C 80,81,82.)- that he had ordered through Allou forged letter-forms of different offices by thousands of copies.(60).
[104-10182-10004.pdf — page 172]
J. SECURITY RISK.1. Whether the story is right or invented, or "beautified", there are points in it which indicate to some security risks connected with this person:2. His father, sister, her husband, and probably their children are in the USSR, whereto they repatriated from France in 1948.(A3)3. His father, although a theoretical "pretender to the Throne of Georgia", is in so good relation with, and so well trusted by, the communists government of the USSR and of Soviet Georgia, that he is allowed to live permanently (over 10 years) in Tiflis, Georgia. (A 3.)4. His cousin Mathée Keresselidze, who was sent by the Germans as a spy to USSR, was caught there, and sentenced to 15 years in prison or hard labor, was later free to come to Moscow and to repatriate to France. (A 7.)5. His sister Helen, after she repatriated, was used by the communists as a teacher of languages in Georgia. Then, convicted for insulting talk about Stalin, and sentenced to 5 years in a detention area, she was later vindicated, received retroactively the salary for those five years, was allowed to come back to Tiflis, was occasionally at the same time in Moscow when Nathée was there, and they, occasionally, met there. (A 5.)6. Helen's husband Irakli Lordkipanidze, a former German SD man, repatriated to USSR together with his wife. (See p.l above.) However, Mathé shall allegedly having heard nothing about his fathe when he met Helen in Moscow. ( A 7.)7. Such things happen sometimes, but they are far from belonging to everyday's pattern in Soviet life. The concentration of all those happenings on a very limited circle of David's relatives could hardly be occasional. This should have special reasons.8. The question arises: If this concentration is not occasional, then what is its purpose or reason, and how much is David involved?9. Concerning David himself:a/ According to this story he has acted in so many cases imprudently, just relaying on his "good luck" only, and the stupidity of his opponents, that this could have developed into a habit of his.b/ He has spoker of having been very cautious and security minded when taking people to his living place (that only two friends have been there), and when meeting people. (C 80.)
[104-10182-10004.pdf — page 173]
-38-But he, probably, has not thought of how dangerous it was for him to re-register two times in Paris under his right name for re-employment in Germany after he had abandoned there two working places. For has he thought how dangerous it was for him to visit his parents or those occasions in Faris, at the addresses on which he might have been wanted, while these addresses,probably, were registered as his home addresses when he applied for work In Germany.c/ David has shown during the debriefing broad knowledge of different advanced techniques and tactics of clandestine work, which he claims having used. If believing his story, then the question arises: where could he have learned all this knowledge at that early time, before 1944?d/ The incident of having instructed Pascal through the cellar wall what to say during the interrogation about the map, with no other items mentioned on what more he had instructed Pascal at the same occasion, makes one think that this part of the story is invented. It looks that David had been told of such pre- coordination of testimonies, that he had not quite understood the matter, and relying on his "intelligence", was telling nonsense. C 23 and H 2, related item.)e/ David's acclaimed broad knowledge of different "psychologi- cal" tricks on one side, and on the other side his unwittingly demonstrated lack of understanding of many basic principles of clandestine work, leave the impression that David has heard of most of those clever things after he had used his primitive knowledge during WW II, and is simply trying to impress us by telling "clever" stories. This would be in line with his need of showing up. ( G2; B7a, 16.)f/ This could be true if he still is a "honest" crook, and the story is right in its main lines.However, the too tight concentration of events, different infor- mation and alleged knowledge in this story, together with the unexcited, unpartial way of telling the exciting story by David, give also reason to think that the story is a "too good" cover- story of a penetration agent.10. What could happen when David, being taken for a"honest crook", would be used in a clandestine operation?a/ Due to his general instabilty and the trend to act under the effect of some cmentary thought, he might easily deviate of the pre-arranged, secure plan of action, and may fall into difficul- ties through his irrational steps.b/ Due to the lack of solid, binding motivation, and the trend to use his own"cleverness", he may somehow" come to the splendid idea of contacting the "other side" and carry out the assignment
[104-10182-10004.pdf — page 174]
-39-in his own, a better, perhaps less straining, easier way.In his eyes this does not need to be urhonest, because theboss knows that he is a crock, a honest, but clever one.c/ If this analysis is right, then this hypothetical case of"honest" David is mooving along the road of a wise mans workwhich David likes to go: not too dangerous and straining phy-sically, however, well exciting.d/ If, however, David is a double agent, then he would not needany of the found traits in his past activity, and his way tothe other side is simple, provided that he will not be detectedhere before.K. SUGGESTED NEXT STEPS.To avaid possible errors, the following steps are suggested:1.  A cross-check of all debriefing reports and other informa-    tion available on David.2.  Drafting a list of additional fact-finding and control ques-    tions.3.  Asking these questions under simultaneous application of    consealed tape recording, thus providing an opportunity for    detailed study of the answers and reactions of David.4.  Secret checks on persons mentioned in David's story, espe-    cially on Mathée Keresselidze.5.  Secret checks with the French authorities on the last 10    years of David's whereabouts, activities and contacts, in-    cluding the time in jails.
[104-10182-10004.pdf — page 175]
L. PERSONAL IMPRESSIONMADE BY DAVID ON THE DEBRIEFER.1.  Soon after the second session of the debriefing,on 29 Apr, the debriefer was asked by the assigner whether the debriefer, if he were in the situation of an agent to go together with David on a clandestine operation, replied:2.  NO, there is no rely on this man.    This reply stands at this day of closing of this report!a/ it is dangerous to go with him, even if warned that he is or might be a double-agent and when,thus,prepared for the resulting special dangers -- he may add many more, unpredictable dangers by his irrational, flash-of-thought actions.b/ it is still more dangerous to go with him if knowing his weaknesses, however taking him for a "honest" crook. No matter whether he be boss or subordinate, one can not rely on his adherence to the prepared plan and given orders.c/ It is suicidal (unwittingly, of course) for a person who would be sent with him without being informed of his weaknesses, in full trust of his knowledges experience, rationality and all other necessary qualities which he does not have.3.  Despite of this rather negative impression, it must be said that David could still prove to be a satisfactory performer, and an acceptable calculated risk on many one-man special operations, this especially in view of the rather general shortage of "excellent" stock of candidates.
[104-10182-10007.pdf — page 0]
# 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992FILE TITLE/SUBJECT/VOLUME: LAMMEHOUSE-1, SIA, EDUARDO MELESAll Poet-14INCLUSIVE DATES: 1960-1921CUSTODIAL UNIT/LOCATION:ROOM:DELETIONS, IF ANY: THIRD JCCICY DOCUMENTS| DATE RECEIVED | DATE RETURNED | REVIEWED BY (PRINT NAME) | SIGNATURE OF REVIEWING OFFICIAL || ------------- | ------------- | ------------------------ | ------------------------------- || manchlin      | 2             |                          | 20                              || 3/13/78       | 3/13/78       | Lolie Wizelman           | Lishe Wyekman                   |NO DOCUMENTS MAY BE COPIED OR REMOVED FROM THIS FILE.![APPROVED FOR RELEASE 1994 CA-REVIEW PROGRAM]
[104-10182-10007.pdf — page 1]
# MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORDSUBJECT: Eduardo WHITEHOUSE Insua24 June 19711. On 22 June 1971. Mr. Ed Sullivan, WH/Security officer, informed DC/WH/COG that he had been advised by SOD that Mr. WHITEHOUSE was in Miami and had some information which he would like to pass to the Agency. Mr. WHITEHOUSE, a Cuban, was a pilot during the Bay of Pigs Invasion and was under contract with the Agency from November 1964 to April 1965 as a pilot under the WITHRUSH Project in the Congo. He has not worked for the Agency since that time.2. Mr. Sullivan requested SOD to have Mr. WHITEHOUSE use the Domestic Contact Service channel in Miami for passing his information to us.3. File: 201-300614.![signature of Chris Hopkins]Chris HopkinsWH/COG/SA
[104-10182-10007.pdf — page 2]
# SECRETORIG: RICHARD HARRINGTON:ljoUNIT: WH/2/HD&ESEXT: 7163/1946DATE: 23 JULY 1969CABLE SECRETARIAT DISSEMINATIONCONFI: WHSFILE. VR. FLAN, POP. HOOP ES/OC Sone aculopsalizne.SECRETTO PRIORITY WH/MIAMI INFO PRIORITY TEGUCIGALPA, SAN SALVADORIUSTEER1. MORNING 23 JULY 1969, IUSTEER PHONED HQS CASE OFFICER AND STATED TEDDY WHITEHOUSE (201-300614) AND UNIDENTIFIED AMERICAN ATTEMPTING HIRE CUBAN PILOTS MIAMI AREA TO FLY F-51 AIRCRAFT TO EL SALVADOR. IUSTEER SOURCES, WHO WERE FOUR CUBAN PILOTS WHO REFUSED OFFER, SAID WHITEHOUSE AND ASSOCIATE BEGAN RECRUITMENT EFFORT CIRCA 14 JULY 1969. WHITEHOUSE OFFERING DEPOSIT $20,000. IN PILOTS BANK ACCOUNT PRIOR HIS DEPARTURE FOR EL SALVADOR IF PILOT AGREES FLY PLANE TO ELSALVADOR AND IN COMBAT.2. IUSTEER PHONED INFO TO HQS CASE OFFICER WHEN UNABLE CONTACT WH/MIAMI. HQS ATTEMPTING RECONTACT IUSTEER VIA PHONE ORDER OBTAIN FOLLOWUP INFO INCLUDING IDENTITIES ANY PILOTS WHO HAVE ACCEPTED, NAME OF AMERICAN WHO WORKING WITH WHITEHOUSE, IDENTITY OF THEIR EL SALVADOR CONTACT, LOCATION OF PLANES, ETC. IUSTEER DUE DEPART MIAMI BY END OF WEEK AND NOT AVAILABLE TO WH/MIAMI AFTER 25 JULY 1969.MICROFILMEDSEP 11 1969DOC. MICRO. SER.CS COPYSECRETCONTINUEDREPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED.(OVER)
[104-10182-10007.pdf — page 3]
ORIG:UNIT:DATE:CABLE SECRETARIAT DISSEMINATIONCONF:TO Γ(classification)SECRETMESSAGE FORMTOTAL COPIES:SECRETROUTING AND/OR INITIALS - SEEN BYINDEXNO INDEXRETURN TO BRANCHFILE RIDFILE IN CS FILE NO.(date and time filed)(site)(reference number)(place)CITE DIRECTOR 73281PAGE TWO3. REQUEST WH/MIAMI ADVISE ANY CONFIRMATION THIS REPORT AND   ANY FOLLOWUP DATA FROM IUSTEER IF POSSIBLE OR OTHER SOURCES.4. FILE: 201-283488 AND 201-300614.END OF MESSAGERobert H. LifeWILLIAM V. BROEC/WHDC/SOD/AB Paul Gottke (in draft)WH/COGJOHN C. MURRAYAC/WH/2RELEASING OFFICERCOPRODEDROLOSANCERSSECRETGROUP 1Excluded from automaticdowngrading anddeclassificationAUTHENTICATINGOFFICERREPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OF… IS PROHIBITED.COPY NO.
[104-10182-10007.pdf — page 4]
IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION NAME CHECKDATE: 7 APRIL 1967CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIEDSUBJECT: WHITEHOUSE, ROGELIO ENRIQUE
[104-10182-10007.pdf — page 5]
IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION NAME TRACEDATE: 7 APRIL 1967CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIEDSUBJECT: WHITEHOUSE, EDUARDO ROGELIO
[104-10182-10007.pdf — page 6]
Miami, Fla. August 23 1965Mr. Gerald SoundersP.0. Box 831Miami, Fla.Dear Jerry:Wish to thank you for your personal concern and satisfactory solution obtained in the financial settlement of my case.I consider it a privilege to have worked with you, cooperating in a small way to preserve Democracy in the Republic of Congo.If I can ever be of service to the United States -beloved country of my ancestors- I would consider it a high honor.Do let me hear from you and feel sure that I am your devoted friend.Sincerely,![signature of Eduardo J. Whitehouse]Eduardo J. Whitehouse446 N. E. 39th StMiami, Fla.MICROFICHE![23 AUG 65 201-300614]
[104-10182-10007.pdf — page 7]
20 August 1965MEMORANDUM TO: Chief/KUCURL/HENGENFROM : Edward W. LORENTZSUBJECT : Eduardo WhitehouseREFERENCE : Dir-354181. Edward W. LORENTZ met with Eduardo Whitehouse on 17 August 1965, relative to finalizing the Whitehouse claim for monies still due from his previous contract. LORENTZ emphasized that he was authorized to pay monies due per contract through 7 April 1965, plus a four day layover in Rome during Whitehouse's return to the U.S. This layover was due a Panam strike of which Whitehouse was inadvertently delayed through no fault of his own.2. The aforegoing authority is based on ref and calculated as follows:A. Base Pay for March - USD 800.B. Base Pay 7/30 for April - USD 186.66plus USD equivalent of USD 41.00 for actual expenses while 2½ days in Rome.C. Total USD 1027.66.3. Whitehouse although feeling that he should be allowed the full amounts due amounting to USD 1950.00 has accepted such adjudication of his claim. LORENTZ feels that possibly he was sufficiently satisfied that he received any funds, that probably in his sense of fair play that the case might be considered closed. For the record, what medical treatment received by Whitehouse amounted to under USD 200. To further complete the record the following attachments are enclosed:A. Letter from Dr. Elkhoury.B. Second letter from Whitehouse to Jack Anderson, Leop.C. Letter from Whitehouse to LORENTZ.D. Bills of actual charges in Rome.E. Receipt from Whitehouse for final payment.F. Station memo concerning newspaper inquiry.
[104-10182-10007.pdf — page 8]
4. Less than 24 hours after facing Whitehouse to advise him that his claim of USD 1950 had been reduced to 1027.66, Whitehouse reacted with the newspaper media in an exemplary manner when he could have reacted with a adverse feeling. The Subject despite difficulties encountered in the field with KUBARK advisors appears to be man of honor and certainly under controlled situations ASA professional pilot and could be an asset to KUBARK interests.![signature of Edward W. Lorentz]Edward W. LORENTZ
[104-10182-10007.pdf — page 9]
POLYCLINIQUE DUDOCTEUR L. ELKHOURYAvenue VanlaereLEOPOLDVILLE-KALINATéléphone 3259Boîte Postale 1178 Kin ILe soussigné certifieavoir soigné Mlle Whitthampour de très débiles mucus-végrétatives accompagnéesd'une forme suppurations.Comme le traitement n'apus amélioré son état desanté, je recommandeà Mlle Whittham de rentrerdans son pays pour son sesfuèsd'am mon avis il sichlierade nos soins spéciaux.201-300 614
[104-10182-10007.pdf — page 10]
Minn, Fla. June 10th 1565Col. J ck AvcrsonChief, Air OpcrationsLeej cilloCommc.Darr Jack:I also find attached a copy of my letter relatim S submitting my resime to Miami For Frop ?. If I'm lucky, I'll be able to return /s chip. Of course, this means that I had forwarded it to the "VIP", L.A. office. (George Miami) & the U.S.A. Better stop interest in writing-one last petition U.C.,-will visit Miami, otherwise I would have to know the move to the "VIP" for the notification.I am naturally wait the opinion of the B.S. & Miami. I see that nobody will be there. Since I cannot and regret my lap. I shall change this cure.I say that when I ask him to do so. I still I imagine your work is over in W. Gr.Do you will not about I C. residing at I Gols S/S. After Jack is the first on the back card who is will ask you with to incarrgec:Danny: Hope you are in good health. Do wish to see you.Reunion when I Landre
[104-10182-10007.pdf — page 11]
Miami, Fla. August 13 1965Mr. Jerry SoundersP.O. Box 331Miami Int. AirportMiami, Fla.Dear Mr. Sounders:Three months have passed by since my return from Leopoldville and as I explained to you in our past meetings, the amounts corresponding to the basic pay of March, April and up to the 13th of May, when my contract expired- are still unpaid therefore leaving an outstanding balance of $1950.00 in my favor.Although I appreciate your concern in this case, I wish to inform you about certain facts concerning my work in the Congo that will explain how every cent of the mentioned amount was earned.When pilot Fausto Gomez was shot down near Bunia -Dec. 17th 1964- that Air Base became paralized as two of the pilots resigned and the only one remaining was ready to leave. Every one refused to take charge of the Bunia Base because of the proximity of the rebels, dangerous terrain, living conditions below standards, improper food, etc. Under these adverse circumstances I accepted the position of Chief Pilot and left the confortable quarters of Stanleyville. Arrived to Bunia Dec. 25th 1964 and next day reasumed full air operations against the rebels flying two and three missions per day as squadron leader with new unexperienced pilots. Those pilots did not have shooting, combat maneuvering instruction, therefore I instructed them and also in Dead Reckoning, instrument flying, etc. We hit the enemy day by day forcing them to retreat to the very border of Northeast Congo. M. Godofreid Munongo -Minister of the Interior- personally congratulated us for our accomplishments in behalf of the Congo.When I became ill, due to improper food, parasites, etc.. I was ordered back to Leopoldville for medical treatment. Unable to recover and having lost 25 pounds, Dr. Elkhoury suggested Ię return to Miami for a more adequate treatment. Photostatic copy of certificate are attached. Left Leopoldville April 3 1965 with the understanding that my contract was not being cancelled.I sincerely believe that my work and dedication throughout the entire campaign in Northeast Congo deserved the full payment of the mentioned contract.Your consideration to this matter would be appreciated.Sincerely,E. J. Whitehousecc: Mr. H. R. TelfordMr. Robert Blake