Francesco/who-killed-jfk huggingface dataset:
[104-10176-10073.pdf — page 152]
SECRETCOMMITTEE ON CIVIL COMMITMENTSDate 5 March 1965TO: Chief, Finance DivisionVIA: Contract Approving OfficerFROM: Chief of Station, Mexico CitySUBJECT: "harerment of" As Independent Contractor.1. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Subject individual has been engaged under oral contract for use under Project LIPAYEE and is chargeable to LIMITED.   The effective date of the oral contract is 1 March 1965 subject to termination by giving 30 days' actual notice.2. SECURITY APPROVAL: The appropriate security approval for subject's use has been obtained. Type POI in process Date3. CITIZENSHIP: Subject (X) is ( ) is not a foreign national.4. COMPENSATION: The subject will be paid 5000 Pesos per month. The approximate equivalent of this amount in PAPEL currency is dollars. Subject (X) will ( ) will not receive a Christmas bonus equivalent to one month's pay. Other compensations in the nature of bonus commitments, gifts, paid vacations, etc., include: Small Christmas, birthday gifts may be give. No commitment.5. TAXES: Subject ( ) is (X) is not subject to PAPEL income taxes. If Subject to PAPEL income taxes, payments and/or deductions will be made in the following manner:6. QUARTERS AND/OR SUBSISTENCE: (a) Subject ( ) will (X) will not be furnished quarters and/or subsistence allowances. (b) The following commitments have been made regarding additional compensation to accommodate increase cost-of-living and quarters expenses: None7. OPERATIONAL EXPENSES: (a) Subject (X) will ( ) will not be reimbursed for operational travel. (b) Subject (X) will ( ) will not be reimbursed for operational expenses. State nature of any operational expenses for which Subject will be reimbursed: Any minor operational expense approved by the Case Officer such as transportation to meeting site. Note: Subject has never submitted a claim for any such expense to date.8. COMMENTS ON CONDITIONS: The following have not been promised the individual but may have to be met by options. Give reason for each contingent obligation: Subject may have to be provided safe haven if his commitment becomes aware of his activities for colors. This does not imply asylum in PAPEL.9. No ecommitments other than those stated above have been made to the Subject.10. Comment: This MOC submitted because Subject's salary was raised from $4000 to $ 5000 a month effective 1 March 1965. Authority: DIR 89922 (IN 5455) of 5 March 1965.SIGNED:Case OfficerAPPROVED:Field Contracting Officer (003)TYPED:Contract Approving OfficerDISTRIBUTION: 3 Authentic copies to Hqs.1 File P 60791 Support
[104-10176-10073.pdf — page 153]
# DISPATCHTO: Chief of Station, Mexico CityFROM: Chief, WE DivisionSUBJECT: PBRUMEN/LIRAVINE/Operations/LITAKIL-9ACTION REQUIRED REFERENCESAC REQ: See para 21.  A Provisional Operational Approval for LITAMIL-9 as a reporting source in PERIMA haham ao ve o duty 1965.2.  Since the PEQ Part II for LITAMIL-9 in our file dates from June 1963, and in view of his changed mission, Headquarters would appreciate the thoughtful preparation of a revised PRQ Part I for LITAMIL-9. This should reach Headquarters perhaps sixty ways prior to the expiration of this POA on 8 January 1966.Anthony R. PONCHAYDistribution:O & 1 -COS, Mexico CityCS COPY FILED IN 20-6-128/3FILE IN 201-239609| DISPATCH SYMBOL AND NUMBER | DATE         || -------------------------- | ------------ || BKNY-13795                 | 12 July 1965 |CLASSIFICATION: SECRET
[104-10176-10073.pdf — page 154]
# DISPATCHTO: Chief, WH DivisionINFO:FROM: Chief of Station, Mexico CitySUBJECT: PBRUMEN/LITAMIL-9/Operational Progress ReportCLASSIFICATION: SECRETPROCESSING ACTION:XXX NO INDEXING REQUIREDACTION REQUIRED-REFERENCES1. /LITAMIL-9 remains in PBRUMEN. On 19 June 1965 the C/O met with L-9's brother who reported he had talked with L-9 by telephone about 1 June. At that time L-9 was in good health and spirits and key words in his conversation indicated that he had not been bothered in any way by the PBRUMEN Security Service since his return. L-9 said that he was easy for about 3 months at which time he would probably be given a new assignment. He did not reveal whether he expected this to be a foreign assignment.2. A PRQ Part II on L-9's brother was recently submitted with a request for Operational Approval. As noted therein, it is contemplated that he will be used only as a channel for communications to/from 1-9.3. Any new developments in this operation will be reported promptly.Laurence F. BakerWillard C. CURTISDistribution:3 - C/WaD2 - FilesCS COPYDISPATCH SYMBOL AND NUMBER: 100MA 26552CLASSIFICATION: SECRETDATE: 8 July 1965MOS FILE NUMBER: 201 - 329609
[104-10176-10073.pdf — page 155]
SECRET# PROVISIONAL OPERATIONAL APPROVALMEMORANDUM FOR: Chief,WH/1/Mexico - R. E. Scutt|                        |               || ---------------------- | ------------- || NUMBER                 | C-101331      || SUBJECT                |               || REFERENCE              | MITANIL/9     || Your Memorandum, Dated | 19 April 1965 |A Provisional Operational Approval is granted for the use of this Subject as set forth below.A Provisional Operational Approval issued by CI Staff grants the same authority, on a temporary basis, for the use of an individual as the authority granted in an Operational Approval unless otherwise specified by CI/OA. It is subject to a further final review when all investigation is completed.For use as a reporting source from within Cuba.> [Figure: A handwritten 'PRQ II 24 June 65']> [Figure: A handwritten '17 JUL 1965 Hmmm']To process the Operational Approval, full information (completed PRQ Parts I and II) must be submitted as soon as possible and not later than six (6) months from this date. An Operational Approval will follow when all investigation is completed and upon the receipt of satisfactory PRQ Parts I and II. Cancellation must be requested if use of Subject by interested Divisions ceases.| Edward E.                                    |             || -------------------------------------------- | ----------- || BY                                           |             || APPROVAL                                     | DATE        || CI/OPERATIONAL APPROVAL AND SUPPORT DIVISION | 8 July 1965 |FORM 125 USE PREVIOUS EDITIONS1-64SECRET![seal](9)
[104-10176-10073.pdf — page 156]
# DISPATCHTOChief, WH DivisionINFO.FROMChief of Station, Mexico CitySUBJECTO PERUMEN/LITAMIL-9 Operational Progress ReportACTION REQUIRED-REFERENCESCLASSIFICATIONSECRETPROCESSING ACTIONMARKED FOR INDEXINGXXNO INDEXING REQUIREJONLY QUALIFIED DESACAN JUDGE INDEXINGMICROFILAR11References: (A) MEXI-2967, 31 March 1965(Β) ΕΜΜΑ 25761, 1 April 19651.  On 6 Kay 1965 the brother of LITAMIL-9 (Subject of reference B),    contacted the case officer. A meeting was held in Mexico City on the    night of 7 Fay. 19's brother turned over a postcard dated 25 March and    a letter dated 8 April, both from I-9. These had been meiled in Mexico    City on 20 April, presumably by a PERUMEN Airline pilot.2.  The card and letter revealed that L-9 is still on vacation and    unmolested by PERUMEN Security forces. His mother and urmarried sister    returned to PERUMEN from Madrid on 22 March and will presumably remain    in PERUMEN. L-9 does not know when he will be leaving PERUMEN or where    he will be stationed but the tone of his letter conveys the impression    that he will be posted abroad.3.  In the letter 1-9 again used a code phrase indicating that    the regime appears to be leaning away from the Communist bloc.4.  A PRQ, Part II, will be forwarded soon on L-9's brother.Lawrence F. Barkerfor Willard C. CURTISDistribution:3-C/MED2.- FilesCS COPYCROSS REFERENCE TODISPATCH SYMBOL AND PLUMBER201-329609HMMA-26080DATE12 May 1965CLASSIFICATIONHQS FILE NUMBERSECRET201-329609
[104-10176-10073.pdf — page 157]
SECRET(When Filled In)DOCUMENT TRANSFER AND CROSS REFERENCE| SUBJECT OF DOCUMENT                   | DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION                             |          || ------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------- | -------- || 2. RI FILE NO.                        |                                                     |          || 3. DISPATCH OF COURCE DOC. SYWBIL NO. | 4. DATE                                             |          || 7. SOURCE CRYPICKYM                   | 8. DATE OF INFO. 9. EVALDATION                      |          || 5. ANALYST                            | 6. DATE PROCESSED 10. DISSEMINATED IN               | 11. JATE || 12- CROSS REFERRED TO THIS FILE       | DOCUMENT DISPOSITION 13. TRANSFERRED TO RI FILE NO. |          |14. PERTINENT INFORMATIONALBERU SOUTO, LUIS201-329609SEX M DO8 ?050-009-012UFGA-2149310 MAY 65019-6-95/4CIT ?OCC 7CULTURAL ATTACHE.SUBJ HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED BACK TO CUBA FROMCUBAN EMBASSY IN MEXICO.R 650517127618. FILE THIS FORM IN FILE NO.![arrow]SECRET
[104-10176-10073.pdf — page 158]
# DISPATCHTO: Chief, WH DivisiINFO:FROM: Chief of Station, Mexico CitySUBJECT: LITAMIL-9CLASSIFICATION: SECRETPROCESSING ACTION:* MARKED FOR INDEXING* NO INDEXING REQUIRED* ONLY QUALIFIED DESK CAN JUDGE INDEXING* MICROFILMACTION REQUIRED-REFERENCESReferences: EMM 13,549 15 April 19651. The Station is puzzled by the statement of references that operational reporting on the LITAMIL-9 operation has been "consistently neglected".2. Using 1 January 1964 as a point of departure, the files of the Station reflect the following dispatches transmitting detailed reports| Dispatch                | Covering memo  || ----------------------- | -------------- || HMA22768, 17 January 64 | 27 December 63 || HMA22831, 30 January 64 | 6 January 64   || HMA 23018, 4 March 64   | 16 January 64  ||                         | 30 January 64  ||                         | 5 February 64  ||                         | 1 March 64     || HMA 23268, 23 April 64  | 11 March 64    ||                         | 28 March 64    ||                         | 2 April 64     || HMA 23691, 16 June 64   | 13 April 64    ||                         | 8 May 64       ||                         | 27 May 64      || HMA 23786, 30 June 64   | 8 June 64      ||                         | 28 April 64    ||                         | 19 June 64     || HMA 23878, 14 July 64   | 7 July 64      || HMA 24015, 30 July 64   | 16 July 64     ||                         | 21 July 64     |Distribution:3 - C/MED2 - Files![signature]Rs Cy filed 50-6-105/3 jr.# 66-4/10 (continued). GESCROSS REFERENCE TO.DISPATCH SYMBOL AND NUMBER: HMA- 25938DATE: 23 April 1965CLASSIFICATION: SECRETHOIS FILE NUMBER: 201-
[104-10176-10073.pdf — page 159]
# CONTINUATION OF DISPATCH## SECRETHMMA-25938HMMA 24254, 3 September 64HMMA 25001, 19 January 6512 August 6427 August 6430 Noveacer 647 December 6420 December 6422 December 6423 Decenzer 64Note: This dispatch explained why reports had not been forvaried sirce HMMA 24254, see above-in accordance with Headquarters request that contact reports not be forwarded in the futute. HMMA 25001 explained that henceforth 1 copy only of LITAMIL-9 CR's would be forwarded to WH/EA, attention Urquhart and Labanow. Both of these officers had specifically requested that LITAMIL-9 CR's be forwarded to WH/SA. In the interim, betarean September and January, CR's for the following seetings were placed in Station files: 10 September 64, 21 September 64, 1 Cctober 64, 4 Cetoper 64, 23 October 64, 29 October 64, 5 Hovescer 64, and 16 Kwanhar tНИКА 25238, 28 Jamary 65ΗΡΙΑ 25408, 18 February 65ΗΡΙΑ 25670, 23 March 657 Jaraary 6518 January 6526 January 6528 January 651 February 652 February 659 February 6511 February 6512 February 6517 February 6519 February 6526 February 652 March 653 March 658 Karch 6510 March 65Commo Plan3. It is realized that an operational progress report and a contact report are two different items; however, in view of the detailed nature of the LITAKIL-9 CR's the Station has felt that their submission has satisfied the requirements of operational reporting. The criticism of reference is all the more puzzling since such visitors to the Saztion as Chester D. Dainold, Chief, WHD; Kortan A. Wociley, erstahile Chief of Operations, HD; and Thomas W. Land, present Mexico Branch Chief, have all expressed their approval of the detailed operational reporting on this operation during visits they have made to the Station at which time the reports in question have been brought to their attention.4. When LITANII-9 next exits PERUMEN, the Station will begin to prepare formal operational progress reports on the operation.5. As for the questions raised in paragraph 2 of refusence regarding operational security, sdvance information on LITAKIL-9's recall cane from LIENVOY but he was not informed of the imminence of his transfer until it was reported routinely by LITAMIL-7 and was generally known by his calles-gues, is for the inglication that LITAKIL-9 was informed of the Station's capability to intercept Embassy telephone conversations, a careful reading of the Memorandum under critique will show that no such acknowledgement was made, LITANI was informed that "we have a good chance of being told about such a conversation by one of our friends," 1.6. that word will probably get around in Embassy circles that LIFANIL-9 is about to travel to such-and-such a point.CLASSIFICATIONFORM540 530USE PREVIOUS EDMONSECRET(continued)PAGE TO2CONTINUO
[104-10176-10073.pdf — page 160]
CONTINUATION OFDISPATCHCLASSIFICATIONSECRETDISPATCH SYMBOL AND NUMBERHWM-25938As for the speculation that LITAMIL-3 suspects that Embassy phones are tapped, he has indicated his belief that this is the case ever since he was taken over by the present C/O. In fact, he is prone to say "I called so-and-so on such-and-such a matter, using the phone instead of the intercom so you could hear it!". In cases wherein he has spoken this way, he has been told that chances are we will never hear about the matter discussed unless he reports on it specifically in his meetings with his C/O.Willard C. CURTISFORM 8-62(4-65)USE PREVIOUS EDITIONCLASSIFICATIONSECRETCONTINUEDPAGE NO#3
[104-10176-10073.pdf — page 161]
SECRET19 April 1965MEMORANDUM FOR: C/CI/OASUBJECT : Operational Approval for LITAMIL-91. An Operational Approval is requested for LITANIL-9, who has recently returned to Cuba, and has accepted an FI mission from Kexico Station. The Station has expressed its reluctance to interview a Mexican officer who alleged in 1959 that LITAMIL-9 was a Communist, since this course of action would unnecessarily draw attention of this officer to our interest in LITAMIL-9. WH/1 has concurred in this decision, and considers that this unevaluated derogatory information on LITAKIL-9 is far outweighed by his perfor-2. Realizing the risk involved in working with any Cuban national, WH/1 feels that LITAMIL-9's excellent record of cooperation, plus his acceptance of the idea of continued cooperation in a denied area favor consideration of ru Operational Approval. Additionally, we have had audio coverage through the telephone in LITAMIL-9's office for the past two years or more, and during this time the Station has used the installation for spot checking his information, and is satisfied that there are no reasons to question his veracity and security or suspect that he is under control of the Cuban service.3. Attached for your review are several contact reports of LITANIL-9, as requested by är. Lally. Their prompt return will be appreciated. This office will be pleased to cooperate in any further review of this case which will facilitate the OA.W. J. KaufmanChief WH/1Attachments:Reports of LITAMIL-9Distribution:Orig & 1- Addressee1 - 201-3296091 - C 101331SECRET
[104-10176-10073.pdf — page 162]
# DISPATCHTO Chief of Station, MexicoFROM Chief, WH LivisionCLASSIFICATIONSECRETSUBJECTLITAMIL-9ACTION PEQUIRED REFERENCESAR: See Paras 3 and 4REF: HMMA-25,670 dated 23 March 19651. We are pleased that Barker has prevailed upon LITAMIL-9 to return to Cuba and even more important, of course, to agree to be alert to service the cause and again, still better, to agree to the use of a communications system. Considering LITAMIL-9's known reluctance for this sort of thing we understand that Barker had to be quite convincing with his arguments and also very possibly had to resort to some arm-twisting.2. Nevertheless, lacking operational progress reports and therefore not knowing the full background of Barker's procedures, we did note that in paragraph 3.ii, page 4, of the C/R attached to reference, the Station tipped off LITAMIL-9 that he would probably be requested to return to Cuba. We assume that the tip came from the LIENVOY of LIFEAT take, and, to complete the record here, would appreciate a note as to the origin of the information that LITAMIL-9 was to be transferred. We further note from paragraph 3 of the Memorandum for the Record dated 11 March, also attached to reference, that, in essence, a further acknowledgement was made to LITAMIL-9 that the Station has the capability to intercept Cuban Embassy telephone conversations.3. While there may be a simple explanation for this report we are constrained to make known our concern that such apparent revelations, however well-intentioned, obviously could cause unpleasant repercussions and are regarded under normal circumstances as basically unsound violations of operational compartmentation and procedure.Distribution:0 & 1 - COS, Mexico CityCS COPY 201-321609(CONTINUED)DISPATCH SYMBOL AND NUMBERHMMN-13,549CLASSIFICATIONSECRETDATE 15 April 1965HQS FILE NUMBER 201-321609OFFICE WH/1OFFICER N.J.Kaufran:repRI ChronoOFFICE SYMBOL C/WHDRELEASING Desmond Fitz-GeraldDISPATCH
[104-10176-10073.pdf — page 163]
CONTINUATION OFDISPATCHCLASSIFICATIONSECRETDISPATCH SYMBOL AND NUMBERHICN-13,5494. This all, of course, again raises the practical difficulties encountered in trying to provide meaningful support to the Station when proper operational reporting is consistently neglected as in the case in the LITANIL-9 op. Consistency has virtue only when in the right direction. While we are on it. please note that Cuban op dispatches should be addressed to C/wil; the branch will see that all items reach other interested components.Chester D. DAINOLD
[104-10176-10073.pdf — page 164]
ORIG. R. ScuttUNIT. WE/1EXT 4506DATE. 4 March 1965TO MEXICO CITY PRIORITYFROM: DIRECTORCONS. C/WH 6MESSAGE FORM27 SECRET/KAPOKROUTING12345678PRIORITY 102200 2DP, ADLP, DC/WH/C5, C/CI, VR, FILETO MEXI PRIORITYINFOCITE DIR 89922KAPOK PBRUMENREF: MEXI 2577 (IN 15123) File 201 LITAMIL-91. INCREASE LITAMIL NIWE SALARY AUTEORIZED. ALSO SUGGEST PAYMENT OF DONUS   UP TO FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS IN EES RECOGNITION EXCELLENT PAST WORK AND AS INCENTIVE   FUTURE COCPERATION.2. APPRECIATE LITAMIL KINE RELUCTANCE A CEPT SW, BUT ASSUME MEXI WILL   CONTINUE STRESS IMPORTANCE OF COMMO. AS MINIMUM MEXI SHOULD ESTABLISH OPEN .   CODE ARRANGEMENT THROUGH BROTEZR, SUCH AS DESCRIERED IN MEXI 3633 (IN 78021),   2 MARCH 1963.3. NEED CURRENT BIOG DATA AND STATION TRACES ON PROTHER LEONEL TO PROCESS   OPERATIONAL APPROVAL.   END OF MESSAGEDESMOND FITZGERALDC/WH/DC/WH/C/FI/J. Sherwood (phone)W. J. KAUFMANC/WH/1RELEASING OFFICERCOORDINATING OFFICERSSECRET/KAPOKAUTHENTICATING OFFICERREPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED
[104-10176-10073.pdf — page 165]
CLASSIFIED MESSAGETOTAL COPIES 183 SECRETPERSONNIT NOTIFIEDMAR 4 7 37 AM '65ADVANCE COPYISSUES SLOTTED TUBERFROM MEXICO CITYACTION clwt 6INFO VR. FILE, DOP, 4000 Delwiks, lai, C/FIZSECRET 331950ZFRIORITY DIR CITE MEXI 2677APOK PBRU1.  LITAMIL-3 HAS BEEN RECALLED PBRUMEN ON APPARENT PCS TRANSFER.    IS WILLING COMPLY AND PLANS LEAVE 8 MARCH.2.  AMBASSADOR TOLD 1-9 HE SHOULD CONSIDER KEEPING MEXI APARIMENT "SINCE, WHO KNOWS, YOU MAY BE BACK HERE IN SIX MONTHS."3.  L-9 FEELS RECALL MAY HAVE BEEN ENGINEERED BY SISTER-IN-LAW IN CONNECTION VICK REFUSAL OF L-9 SISTER TO OBEY RECALL FROM PERUMEN EMBASSY MADRID ALLEGING MEDICAL REASONS. L-9 FEELS POSSIBLE SISTER-IN-LAW MAY ARRANGE 1-9 EVENTUAL TRANSFER TO HADRID WHERE SISTER AND L-S MOTHER BOTH RESIDING. ANOTHER POSSIBILITY IS THAT L-9 BEING CALLED BACK FROM HOME LEAVE FOR WHICH HE NOW ELISIBLE ALTHOUGH AND SAID ORDERS APPEARED PCS.4.  C/C WAS INTRODUCED TO L-9 BROTHER NIGHT 2 MAR. HE WILL BE CHANNEL OF COMM TO/FROM L-S. AS BEFORE, L-9 REFUSES TAKE ANY S/W MATERIAL INTO FBRUMEN OR WRITE ONCE THERE. BELIEVES IF HE CAUGHT HARM MIGHT COME TO HIS RELATIVES. WILL BE STAYING AT HOME OF BROTHER AND SISTER-IN-LAW. LATTER, ONCE AGAIN SECRETARY TO ANTHUG-1, WILL BE PRIME SOURCE OF INFORMATION. IN VIEW POSSIBILITY
[104-10176-10073.pdf — page 166]
IN 5123 PAGE 2L-9 MAY BE SUBJECT TO THOROUGH INVESTIGATION BY SECURITY SERVICES, STATION IS NOT PRESSING S/W MATTER SINCE DELAYS IN RECEIVING INFO FROM HIM WILL BE MORE THAN OVERCOME BY QUALITY OF INFO HE WILL BE IN POSITION TO OBTAIN.5. L-9 FEELS CERTAIN HE CAN ARRANGE TRIP OUTSIDE PBRUMEN IN NEXT FEW MONTHS. MEETING PLANS FOR POSSIBLE DESTINATIONS ARE BEING SET UP.6. L-9 BRIEFED THOROUGHLY ON POSSIBILITY DSE PROVOCATION ONCE HE INSIDE AND BEING GI EN GUIDANCE ON HANDLING SELF IN SUCH EVENT.7. IN VIEW 1-9 CLSOE ASSOCIATION WITH AMTHUG SECRETARY, REQUEST HQS CABLE PRIORITY INFORMATION COLLECTION BRIEFING REQUIREMENTS. BRIEFING WILL BE POOLED BY C/O. L-9 REFUSES MEET ANY OTHER PERSONS IN VIEW EXTREME RN FOR HIS SECURITY.8. STATION PLEASED BY L-9 DECISION RETURN. HE DOING THIS FOR KUBARK AS WOULD PREFER QUIETLY MELD INTO MEXI SCENE. STATION WOULD APPRECIATE HQS CABLED AUTHORIZATION INFORM L-9 THAT HIS SALARY BEING RAISED ADDITIONAL ONE SAMO PESOS MONTHLY TO NEW TOTAL FOUR HUNDRED DOLLARS. BELIEVE WORK TO DATE FULLY JUSTIFIES THIS EIGHTY DOLLAR RAISE AND BOOST WILL HELP HIS MORALE AT TIME WHEN MOST NEEDED. HAS NOT HAD RAISE SINCE BEGAN COOPERATING WITH STATION. SALARY
[104-10176-10073.pdf — page 167]
WILL BE HELD BY STATION DURING HIS STAY IN PBRUMEN.SECRETCFNIN 15123 Page 3
[104-10176-10073.pdf — page 168]
![photo of three men standing together in a crowd, left to right: person 1, person 2, person 3]From ATREDGE/1 See SCA to UPGA 18495, 4 Nov 1964filed in WH/SA/03LEFT TO RIGHT:1. Julio Antonio ALVAREZ, MINREX and DSE2. Evelio PEREZ Quintero, MINREX and DS33. LITATL-94. Antonio NUNEZ JIMENEZ, Pres, Cuban Academy of Science
[104-10176-10073.pdf — page 169]
ACTION:INFO: DDP, CI/CA, WE 4, SAS 5, S/C 2SECRET 2412252MEXI INFO DIR CITE MADR 8430PERUMEN LITAMILREF MEXI 4621 (IN 41326)25 MAY 1953. IN464311. REGRET MADR HAS NO FACILITIES LOCATE EMPLOYMENT FOR L-9. SISTER ALONG LINES OUTLINED PARA I REF.2. IF SHE IS QUALIFIED ENGLISH-SPANISH TRANSLATOR AND COULD BE CLEAPED WE COULD POSSIRI Y USE IN DIVER ACTIVITY. HONFUER. SALARY HO EXCEED ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS A MONTH.SECRETC/S COMMENT: *L-9 REQUESTED CO MAKE EVERY EFFORT FIND EMPLOYMENT FOR HIS SIERSECRETGROUP 1:EXCLUDED FROM AUTOMATIC DOWN-GRADING AND DECLASSIFICATION.REPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED
[104-10176-10073.pdf — page 170]
# CLASSIFIED MESSAGE**SECRET**RIG: WAYNE CARLEYUNIT: WI/3/MEXICOEXT: 5940DATE: 23 May 1963TO: MEXICO CITY MADRIDFROM: DIRECTORCONF: WH 8INFO: DD, CI/CA, SAS 5, WE 4, S/CTO: MEXI INFO: MADRPERIMEN LITANILREF MEXI 4621 (IN 41326)*1. IN VIEW LACK INFO HDQS ON SISTER LITANIL-9, SUGGEST MEXI OBTAIN MORE   DETAILED INFO ON SISTERS PROFESSIONAL CAPABILITIES, POLITICAL ORIENTATION,   RECRUITABILITY, ETC, PRIOR INVOLVING MADRID STATION IN KEF PROPOSAL.2. INASMUCH AS LITAMIL-9 DOES NOT CURRENTLY RECEIVE ANY SALARY FROM KUBARK,   MEXI SHOULD CONSIDER POSSIBILITY PUTTING HIM ON SALARY IN ORDER HELP SUPPORT MOTHER   AND SISTER. THIS WOULD ALSO SUPPLY CONTROL FACTOR OVER AGENT.END OF MESSAGE*WB COMMENT: Ref requested Hqs and Madrid comments on possibility of obtainingemployment in Spain for the sister of LIZANIL-9 with an American firm.SAS/BOB Bryant (by phone)C/WB/SWB/000WB/COPSRELEASING OFFICERSCOORDINATING OFFICERSAUTHENTICATINGOFFICERREPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED.