Francesco/who-killed-jfk huggingface dataset:
[104-10174-10065.pdf — page 453]
V. VIDA FAMILIAR13. Estado civil13.01 ¿Está casado? Sí ⬜ No13.01.01 ¿Vive su esposa con él? Sí ✅ No ⬜13.01.02 ¿Va su esposa a funciones sociales con él?Nunca ⬜ Raramente ⬜ Normalmente ⬜ A menudo ✅13.01.03 Su esposa es Mayor que él ⬜ Más o menos de su edad ✅Más joven que él ⬜ No sé ⬜13.01.04 Su esposa es Extremadamente atractiva ⬜ Normalmente ⬜Atractiva ✅ Extremadamente poco atractiva ⬜13.01.05 En general, su esposa es socialmente Diestra ⬜ Acertable ✅ Inepta ⬜13.01.06 Además de su lengua materna, ¿qué otros idiomas habla su esposa?13.01.07 Se esposa es Mis instruida que él ⬜ Tan instruida ✅como él ⬜ Menos instruida que el ⬜13.01.08 ¿Estuvo él casado anteriormente: Sí ✅ No ⬜ No sé ⬜En caso afirmativo sírvase dar detalles si los conoce.13.02 Su esposa parece Tener muchas amistades ✅ Tener pocasamistades ⬜ No tener casi amistades ⬜13.02.01 En público, para con su esposa, él es Muy atento ⬜ Bastante atento ✅ Indiferente ⬜13.02.02 En público, para con él, su esposa es Muy atenta ⬜ Bastante atenta ⬜ Indiferente ✅13.02.03 Describiría usted a su esposa como Agresiva ⬜ Dominante ✅ Independiente ⬜Complaciente ⬜ Sumisa ⬜ Dependiente ⬜45
[104-10174-10065.pdf — page 454]
45413.02.04 En la zona donde ella vive, parece estar. Muy contentaNormalmente contenta y May descontenta13.03 ¿Ha estado usted alguna vez en su casa?En caso afirmativo, con cuánta frecuencia?13.03.01 Ia vivienda de ellos es En extremo elegante para la zonaTípica de la comaEn extremo pobre para la zona13.03.02 Como anfitriones, les esposos son: Inusitadamente buenosBuenos Adecuados Algo dericicatesEn extremo deficientes13.03.03 Como anfitriona, la señorá parece: May en su ambienteBien adaptada V Algo nerviosaMay incómoda13.03.04 Su vivienda Refleja la personalidad de élRefleja la personalidad de ambosNo refleja la personalidad de ninguno13.03.05 En general el mobilisrio es DescoloridoConvencional V De inusitado buen gusto13.03.06 La señora está :Visiblemente interesada en su casaTan interesada en su casa como lamayoría de sus vecinasVisiblemente indiferente a ia casaNo sé si realmente se interesa o no13.03.07 El comportamiento social de ella en casa esMás o menos el mismo que fuera de ellaMás en su ambiente que fuera de ellaMenos en su ambiente13.03.08 Normalmente son gente queRecibe a renudo y le gusta hacerloCumple con sus compromisos sociales y le gusta"bastantePrefiere invitar sólo a sus íntimosRecibe sólo cuando es de obligaciónPrefiere no recibir a nadie13.04 ¿Critica él a su esposa? Sí No VEn caso afirmativo, ¿qué es lo que se inclina más a criticart46
[104-10174-10065.pdf — page 455]
13.04.01 En general, como matrimonio son:Visiblemente compatiblesVisiblemente poco compatiblesNormalmente compatibles13.04.02 El se inclina a: Nunca parecer celoso de ellaRaramente parecer celoso de ellaParecer a menudo celoso de ella13.04.03 Ella se inclina a: Nunca parecer celosa de élRaramente parecer celosa de élParecer a menudo celosa de él13.04.04 ¿Tiene la esposa alguna característica que requiera zención o descripción especial?13.05 Como esposo, se le puede describir más bien como:- Hombre expresivo que es visiblemente el cónyuge dominante en el matrimonio. Tiende a protèger a su esposa y cuando es posible siempre la incluye en sus actividades sociales.- Hombre activo que como esposo es autoritario y dominante. Es poseyente con su esposa y tiende a ser exigente con ella.- Hombre expresivo que depende mucho de su esposa. Ella tiende a ser el cónyuge dominante y él parece estar a gusto y esperar que así sea.- Hombre activo pero de genio algo áspero que visiblemente depende mucho de su esposa pero raramente lo confiesa. Puede tener alguna tendencia a ser celoso y poscyente con su esposa.- Marido como la mayoría que trata a su esposa con respeto. Raramente delata en público lo que siente. Es difícil conocer sus verdaderos sentimientos por ella.- Marido consciente de sus deberes que toma su matrimonio muy seriamente. Su esposa corre parejas con él y ambos toman en serio las obligaciones de familia y sociclés.- Hombre socialmente activo que puede ser muy galante con las daras aun en presencia de su esposa. Parecen llevar vidas separadas pero muy compatibles.47
[104-10174-10065.pdf — page 456]
Nombre tranquilo que visiblemente depende de su esposa en alto grado. Ella se ocupa de él de manera poco ostentosa pero es visible que influye bastante en su comportamiento y actitudes.Ninguna de las anteriores descripciones le viene bien. Yo lo describiría como sigue:
[104-10174-10065.pdf — page 457]
# 13.06 Hogar:¿Se ocupa él de la apariencia o el funcionamiento de su casa?Sí No¿Hace reparaciones de poca importancia por sí mismo?Sí NoEn caso afirmativo, les hace Medianamente bien?Torpemente? (según su esposa)# 14. Hijos14.01 ¿Tiene él hijos?14.01.01 Número de hijos 2 Edades 17, 11 Sexo H/M14.01.02 ¿Viven todos sus hijos con él? Sí NoEn caso negativo, ¿dónde viven? (ahora)14.01.03 Se ocupa de sus hijosDe manera inusitadaDe manera normalPoco14.01.04 Su esposa esMadre inusitadamente atentaMadre normalMadre inusitadamente indiferente14.01.05 Los hijos se comportanInusitadamente bienNormalmente bienEn extremo camorristas, difíciles14.01.06 Diga si élNunca habla de sus hijos Rara vez habla de sus hijosHabla de sus hijos Habla de sus hijos cuando correspondeHabla de sus hijos con frecuencia Parece muy preocupado por sus hijos14.01.07 ¿Tiene alguno de sus hijos algo anormal (constitución enfermiza, alergias, defecto mental, deformidad o parálisis, especial inteligencia)? Sí NoEn caso afirmativo, descríbalo:Su hijo padece de epilepsia desde muy niño. Por lo general tiene 1-2 ataques al año.48
[104-10174-10065.pdf — page 458]
45814.02Cuando esposa y familia están ausentes de casaSe ve muy solo y sin saber qué hacerMantiene probablemente su rutinaProbablemente intensifica su actividad socialNo sé lo que hace14.03Como padre, se le puede describir mejor así:Padre de familia activo y feliz, orgulloso de su familia.Padre de familia activo que tiende a ser estricto y exigente con sus hijos.Padre de familia activo que pasa mucho tiempo con ella. Tiende a malcriar a sus hijos.Padre de familia activo pero inseguro que se preocupa mucho con sus hijos.Padre activo y responsable, pero que no tolera tonterías. Su trabajo es primero y la familia lo sabe.Padre responsable y cuidadoso, cumplidor con su familia pero no muy afectuoso o expresivo.Padre despreocupado que no pierde sueño por la familia. La mayoría del tiempo sus miembros se las arreglan por su cuenta, con buen éxito.Padre indiferente que a veces parece no darse cuenta de su familia.Ninguna de las anteriores descripciones le viene bien. Puede ser descrito mejor como signo:14.04Diga si lleva fotos deSu familiaSus hijosSu esposaSí mismo14.05En su oficina o cuarto exhibe fotos deSu esposaSus hijosSu familiaSí mismo14.06¿Hay alguna característica en sus relaciones con su esposa o su fanilia que requiera mención o descripción especial?49
[104-10174-10065.pdf — page 459]
VI. POSICION IDEOLOGICA25. General15.C In general:*   Es hombre de opiniones francas y evidentes. Es capaz de expresar dichas opiniones sin importarle al parecer los sentimientos y actitudes de otros.*   Es hombre de muchos prejuicios e ideas dogmáticas. Puede expresarlos acalorada y resueltamente cuando es necesario.*   Es hombre que posiblemente desvía opiniones de controversia con ligereza o buen humor. A veces es difícil conocer sus opiniones porque es difícil hacerlo hablar con seriedad.*   Es hombre que puede tener muchas opiniones firmes pero se le hace difícil mostrarlas. Tiende a disculparse y a mostrar timidez y desasosiego cuando se avecina una discusión.*   Es hombre cuyas verdaderas opiniones son difíciles de conocer. Usualmente es diplomático y convencional cuando se discuten temas polémicos o prohibidos.*   Es hombre serio y resuelto a portarse en forma apropiada y convencional. Tiene las maneras de una persona bien disciplinada que solamente dice lo que se supone decir o lo que otros esperan que diga.*   Es un hombre de opiniones muy educadas. Está bien informado y es capaz de sostener un argumento de manera considerablemente articulada, pero a veces se vuelve cínico o sutilmente sarcástico.*   Es hombre tímido y taciturno en cuanto a sus opiniones. Es muy difícil hacerlo expresarse sobre un tema, particularmente si es tema polémico.Ninguna de las anteriores descripciones sirve; se le describe mejor como sigue
[104-10174-10065.pdf — page 460]
46015.01.01. ¿hay algún tema que tiende a ponerlo colérico?En caso afirmativo, ¿cuál es? Sí No15.02 Es hombre cuyo patriotismo es*   Patente e intenso*   Como el de la mayoría de sus colegas*   Cauteloso y no muy intenso*   Difícil de precisar15.02.01 En asuntos generales de política*   Generalmente está bien informado sobre la posición y actitud de su país*   Está tan bien informado como la mayoría de sus colegas*   Está extremadamente mal informado51
[104-10174-10065.pdf — page 461]
VII. HISTORIAL MEDICO16. Estado de salud16.01 Que usted sepa, ¿tiene él algún problema de salud? Sí ___ No √En caso afirmativo, explique:16.02 ¿Tienen su esposa o hijos algún problema de salud: Sí √ No ___En caso afirmativo, explique:_Su esposa es mild de Higado y ortinga__Su hijo padece de sintossia_16.03 ¿Ha indicado alguna vez haber tenido problemas de salud en el pasado?Sí ___ No √En caso afirmativo, explique:16.04 Que usted sepa, ¿toma regularmente píldoras o medicina de alguna clase?Sí ___ No √En caso afirmativo, explique:16.05 Es persona que: Nunca habla de su salud o de lo que siente ___Habla como todos de su salud o de lo que siente ___habla de su salud o de lo que siente √Frecuentemento ___16.06 Cuando se siente mal: Todos se percatan ___Se nota de modo ___normal √ La mayoría de la gente no lo notaría ___Nunca he sabido que se sienta mal ___53
[104-10174-10065.pdf — page 462]
14-0000016.07 Su aspecto esRobusto y saludableEsencialmente como la mayoría a su edadEnfermizo16.08 TieneCara saludableBarriga grandeTendencia a faltarle el aliento al esforzarseManos frías y húmedas Tendencia a sudar demasiadoMal aliento16.09 Que usted sepa, ¿tiene dieta o régimen especial?Si NoEn caso afirmativo, explique:16.10 De manera general, le parece individuo queTiene mucha energía y no se cansa nuncaTiene energía, pero no siempreTiene energía moderadaEs letárgico, indiferente16.11 ¿Hay algo en cuanto a su salud o la de su familia que deba ser comentado en detalle?1) Hace aunado días en wygaga es mal de hígado y estomago. Tiene dieta expective de vegetables y otras llamadas medicinas.2) Es hija padece de epilepsia desde muy niño. Tiene 1-2 ataques al año.53BBSEP 25 70
[104-10174-10065.pdf — page 463]
SECRET23 April 1970Soviet Crerational Contacts:AEMIPRIFS made the following comments concerning what appeared to her to be operational contacts and/or modus operandi of Soviet intelligence officers in Honico:Debriefing conducted 25-26 April 1970:LOGINOV - During the affair between AEMIDRIFF and LOGINOV, they went to the movies once or twice a week, the Futurama and Cine Mod being the theaters most frequently attended. LOGINOV always made some sort of contact during these outings, according to AEMIDRIFF. She stated that he usually left his seat about 2300 hours and went out to the lobby for some time. She did not know where the contacts were actually made.. Once she and LOGINOV encountered, apparently accidentally, outside the Cine Mod theater, a Mexican Army Colonel, who was introduced to her by LOGINOV as "Col. Sergio." In this instance LOGINOV did not excuse himself to have a private conversation with the Mexican. "Col. Sergio" was described by AEMIDRIFF as about 40, tall, no moustache or glasses, thick, curly hair, appeared to be of Spanish descent. The woman with "Col. Sergio" appeared to be about 25 years old and was introduced as his wife (which AEMIDRIFF doubted because, es she put it, he didn't treat her as one would a wife, but rather as a mistress). AENIDRIFF knew nothing more about this Mexican and never saw him again.On another occasion, LCGINOV and AEMIDRIFF met an American in front of the Futurama theater. LOGINOV introduced him to her as "Col. Michael." AEMIDRIFY stated that he was dressed in civilian clothes. HeSECRET01255412
[104-10174-10065.pdf — page 464]
SECRET-2-had blend hair, was of rediva height, no glasses, large grey eyes.(AMIDRIFF thought hin quite attractive). LOCINOV told "Michael" that hewould cell hin the next day ca urgent business. "Michael" was alone.AEMIDRIFF Omind that they did not have a private conversation. Sheesimated this encounter took place about September 1959.GOLOJZOV - AMIDRIFF stated that GOLCUZOV used her in thesame manner, i.e., tock her shout 3 times in all to Cine Chapultepec, thenleft her during the movie to make some sort of contact.Debriefing conducted 12-16 May 1970:Concerning Soviet Contacts in the Mexican Folice: AENIDRIFFstated that she overheard COLCUSOV and DYCMIN talk about many contacts whichthey had in the police here. She said she had also overheard KOLCMYAKOV,BAKULIN, AND CHAYKHOV talk about how many good police contacts the Sovietshave. However, each specific example which AFMIDRIFF could give concernedsome non-operational favor which the Soviets could get taken care of, e.g.,when the Soviets wanted to get something through Aduana; when some Sovietvas missing and police cooperation was needed; getting advance notice whensome demonstration hostile to the Soviets was about to take place, etc.She was not able to recall any hints that Soviets had operational contactsin the police; agents reporting on what the police were doing; assets whoassisted Soviets operatincally in some way. However, AEMIDRIFF thoughtthe Soviets probably have such assets.Concerning Soviet contects in West German Police: AENİDRIFFrecalled that when she went to Cercany as interpreter for Soviet surgeonand textbook writer, Pablo NASOV, in January 1963 (they went to CologneSECRET
[104-10174-10065.pdf — page 465]
SECRET-3-West Germany en Comercial Ministry rasinees), the Soviet Ambassador in West Germany stated that the Embassy hed scre paid agents within the lost Gemman police who lielped them to protect the Sovices (In context that it was dangereus there; some Soviet official could be kidnapped by the enemy, etc.) AUDRIFF noted that AMASOV was quite old and very.pro-repine.Miscellaneous operational notes - AMIDRIFF had no knowledge of Soviet safe houses or safe apartrents. She stated that many Soviet visitors stayed at the Hotel Virreyes or in two other hotels near the Soviet Embassy (she couldn't remember names). She did not know whether the Soviets had any sort of special artangement or contacts in these hotels.AEMİDRIFF stated that she had attended several parties at which Mexicans also were present (she recalled specifically parties at the homes of KOLOMYAKOV, EAKULIN, LOGINOV) and in each instance the Soviet officer, atome point during the evening, had a private conversation with a Mexican guest. (Unfortunately, AENIDRIFF was unable to recall the names of any of the Mexicans she met on these occasions, and of course there is no way of knowing whether such private conversations were operational meetings.) AEMIDRIFF commented that at purely Soviet parties, husbands all ways went off together and talked business, and if vives approached, they stopped their conversation.Debriefing conducted 1-6 June 1970:KORMUSHKIN - AEMIDRIFF commented that she thought KORMUSHKIN made operational meetings in the Bremen Fer, since she often say kia sitting in that bar, wearing dark glasses and trying to lor: inconspicuous.SECRET
[104-10174-10065.pdf — page 466]
SECRET(AEMIRIFF seartimes passed by this bar and would look inside, elthough she never went in.)KUPINAKOY - Possible PC Contact - ALMIDRIFF stated that she was told by inniel Montiel (Daniel MERDEZ Montiel, 201-230951), the Soviet's chauffeur, that his brother, who is a Central Committee mumber of the PCM and who worked on the PCM publication "La Voz de Mexico," was in contact with KUPLYAKOV. In addition, AEMIDRIFF stated that she believed that Armando VERDUGO (iden with Armando MARTINEZ Verdugo, 201-851726) had an uncle, also named Armando VERDUGO, who is First Secretary of the PCM and who is in contact with. KUPLYAKOV. At least this was strongly inferred by Montiel, according to AEMIDRIFF. (Editor note: Arnoldo MARTINEZ Verdugo, 201-06425h, who is brother of Armando, is First Secretary of PCM).AEMIDRIFF stated that KUPLYAKOV always seemed to be very interested in and knowledgeable of what appeared in "La Voz de Mexico" and in the FCM publi- cation "La Epoca." She stated that, in general, KUPLVAKOV paid so much attention to local politics and seered to be so well informed on PCM matters that she felt certain he had something to do with the FCM.AEMIDRIFF stated that KUPLYAKOV's wife was a good friend of Salvador GONZALEZ Marin, head of the Fondo de Cultura Popular. GONZALEZ' wife works in the Museum of Anthropology. GONZALEZ sold a lot of Soviet books, according to AEMIDRIFF, and for that reason was in contact with KUPLYAKOV, but she commented that GONZALEZ may also have been utilized by KUPLYAKOV in some other operational way. Most of KUPLY KCV's contacts seem to te journalists. (These were the people AMIDRIFF saw talking to him at receptions, etc.).SECRET
[104-10174-10065.pdf — page 467]
SECRET-5-AMIDRIFF stated that Leopoldo ARENAL, whose wife is the daughter of David Alfaro SIQUEIROS, is another Soviet asset who is handled by KUPLYAKOV (the Beard VAROVSKIY talk about this). AMIDRIFF said that ARENAL works with Eduardo ARAUJO (economic consultant for Minera Continental, S.A.", mentioned in Commercial Office). She also stated she knew that ARENAL went at times to the Embassy to see KURDYAKOV. AMIDRIFF said that ARENAL goes to Moscow every year or so. (ARENAL identical with Leopoldo ARENAL Faster, 201-117999).SECRET
[104-10174-10065.pdf — page 468]
SECRET-5-Soviet Involvered in Student Disorders of 1969:Tetelofing conducted 25-26 April 1970: AEMADMFS stated that LOGINOV went out at nights often during this period and told her it was to make "contacts."  [Illegible text] stated that his work during this period was some of the most dangerous he had ever done. ADMICHIFF was certain that these "contacts" involved in student riots. AMIDRIFF related that once at Auto Cine, LOGINOV made a meeting with a group of youths who came in another car (Falcon). Another time, some 2 or 3 days later, LOGINOV had MITOPOLSKI give him some shotguns which MITOPOLSKI had charge of. LOGINOV got the guns about 2200 or 2300; the guns were returned the next morning. Others who seemed to be going out all the time at night during the student riots (and talking about their meetings in general the next morning) were FOLSHAKOV, KORMOUSEKIN, HIKIPOROV. AEMIDRIFT never heard mention of money being passed during this period (i.e., to Soviet assets involved in riots) nor any mention of any names or positions of assets (This not in agreement with some of Dan James info). CHHYKOV seemed to be involved also.Debriefing conducted 12-16 May 1970: AEMIDRIFF was again questioned on her knowledge of Soviet activities during the 1968 student disorders. She reported that all she really knew was that the Soviets were very busy during this period; that LOGINOV told her he was going out every night to make "contacts;" that she overheard Coviet case officers talking at various times during this period to effect that they very busy, making many contacts; that the situation was potentially explosive and a dangerous time for them to be making such contacts. AEIDRIFF twice was with LOGINOVSECRET
[104-10174-10065.pdf — page 469]
SECRET-7-when he met with some "youths" in private conversations. However, AEMIDRIFF stated she did not ever hear any mention of any names of Soviet contacts in relation with the student disorders, any mention of the level of involvement of those contacts in the student organizations, any mention of Soviet guidance to the student movement, financing of the student movement, or the like. She really doesn't know that the Soviets had any contacts with direct access to information to these activities, but she strongly assumes that they did, based on their level of activity and the strong tenor that LOGINOV and other case officers gave to the idea that the contacts they were making were dangerous ones for them to be seen with during this period.Debriefing conducted 1-6 June 1970: AEMIDRIFF questioned re 1968 student disorders again, for clarification previously reported details. She stated that the Soviets had some different types of rifles in the Commercial Office which served as samples of guns which they were trying to sell commercially in Mexico. One night about 11 o'clock, during the period of student riots, LOGINOV came to the Commercial Office with MITOPOLSKI (AEMIDRIFF was there watching TV). They got "some" rifles - AEMIDRIFF could not see how many or what kind. They took them out in some sort of bags. The next morning "some" rifles were returned to the Commercial Office, but AEMIDRIFF doesn't know whether all of them were brought back. She doesn't know whether or not LOGINOV might have been duty officer for the Embassy for that night.AEMIDRIFF stated that MECHIPORENKO's trip back to the USSR during the 1968 riots may well have been to report on the riots. However, she didn't know that this was the case and noone specifically told her so.SECRET
[104-10174-10065.pdf — page 470]
S-E-C-R-E-TX-REF.SYM NUMBERDOC. DATECLASSIFICATION201-285412HMMA-3863706 APR 70201-789963THE ABOVE DOCUMENT (S) IS CROSS REFERENCED TO THE 201 FILE CITED UNDER LEFT MARGIN.DATE 05/05/70X-REF. SHEETS-E-C-R-E-T
[104-10174-10065.pdf — page 471]
# 471![Cable Secretariat Dissemination]SECRET 252314Z FEB 70 CITE MEXICO CITY 2565DIRECTOR -DESENSITIZEDREDTOP AEMIDRIFF FJPASTINE,REF: MEXICO CITY 2557 (IN 031735)1. PER REF, AEMIDRIFF CONTINUED REVIEW OF PHOTOS WITH HQS   DEBRIEFER AND LITEMPO-14. REVIEW OF 83 PHOTOS (INCLUDING WIVES)   DURING 20 AND 21 FEBRUARY SESSIONS PROVIDES FOLLOWING HIGHLIGHTS IN   ADDITION TO OTHER INFORMATION WHICH WAS ALREADY KNOWN:VALENTIN BAKULIN: CHIEF OF ONE OF AEGRIP SECTIONS.EXPERIENCE IN LATIN AMERICA FROM PRIOR TOURS BRAZIL AND ARGENTINA.LEV GOLOUZOV: WORKS UNDER BAKULIN (WHICH TENDS CONFIRM AEGRIP STATUS PREVIOUSLY SUSPECTED). WHILE DRUNK INFORMED AEMIDRIFF SHE BEING SENT HOME.SERGEY PROVOROV: WORKS UNDER BAKULIN. AEGRIP.NIKOLAY SOKOLOV: CHIEF OF REFERENTURA.LYUDMILA SHAPOVALOVA: WORKS UNDER SOKOLOV.SERVED IN CUBA AT ONE TIME.ALEKSANDR KOZLOV: WORKS IN REFERENTURA UNDER SOKOLOV. IN CHARGE OF PHOTO PROCESSING AND MICROFILMING. INTERNAL SECURITY AND AS WATCHDOG. HAPPY AND AGREEABLE PERSON.![PAL DISSEM DESENSIFILE CO COPY]
[104-10174-10065.pdf — page 472]
PAGE 2 MEXICO CITY 2565 SECRETVLADIMIR TSERADZE: WORKS IN REFERENTURA BUT IS ALSO UNDERORDERS OF BAKULIN. TIMID, DOMINATED BY WIFE.YURIY ROMANENKO: WORKS IN REFERENTURA. FREQUENTLY ACCOMPANIESPAVEL KOVALEV OUT AT NIGHT. DRINKS A LOT AND HAS TROUBLE WITHWIFE BECAUSE OF IT.YURIY KUPLYAKOV: HAS JOB SIMILAR TO KOLONYAKOV'S. VERYIMPORTANT PERSON WITHIN EMBASSY AND HAS ACCESS TO REFERENTURA.VERY REFINED AND CULTURED. MANY IICMU CONTACTS THROUGHOUTMEXICO AND ALSO CULTIVATES FRIENDSHIPS WITH DIRECTORS OFMUSEUMS, LIBRARIES AND OTHER SUCH INSTITUTIONS.BORIS CHMYKOV: VERY EXPERIENCED. SEEMS TO HAVE PERFORMEDBRILLIANTLY IN PAST WITH NO FAILURES. SOMETHING OF A LADIES'MAN AND HAS, ON OCCASION, BEEN MIXED UP IN INTERNAL SCANDAL.ENAMORED OF SOKOLINA. TRAVELS FREQUENTLY THROUGHOUT MEXICO.VLADISLAV KORMUSHKIN: AEKICK. SERVED IN BRAZIL, SEVERALMONTHS IN FRANCE AND FOUR TO SIX MONTHS IN ARGENTINA. SPEAKSSPANISH, FRENCH AND PORTUGUESE.VALERIY KOSTIKOV: AEKICKOLEG KOROLEV: AEKICKVLADIMIR MAKAROV: NOT CERTAIN, BUT PROBABLY AEGRIP. HOWEVER,FREQUENTLY ACCOMPANIES BOL'SHAKOV. APPEARS COLD AND CRUEL. ONESECRET