Francesco/who-killed-jfk huggingface dataset:
[104-10173-10135.pdf — page 204]
said that he had not. My inclination was to believe Subject, and I went away thinking that either GAZIYEV and LOGINOV had been talking about someone else over the phone or that they had never gone boyond the stage of simply talking about Subject.10. On 1 November 1967, I ran into Subject and his brother Javior in Sanborns-Insurgentes. They were about to have a quick lunch and insisted that I join them for a cup of coffee. As soon as we sat down, Subject told me he had a problem and would like my advice. He said GAZIYEV had given him an invitation to the 7 November celebration of the Revolution at the Soviet Embassy, and although he would like to go for the experience, he was very concerned that his name would be put on "the black list" at the U.S. Embassy if he went. He said that he had tried to call me at the Embassy after he got the invitation to ask my advice, but had been told I was out of town. (I was in El Paso from 25-29 October.) He stated that if he had not been able to reach me in the next day or two, he was going to simply walk into the Embassy and ask to see someone from the "security department" about his predicament. What did I think he should do?11. I told Subject to relax and forget about going to the U.S. Embassy, as the Embassy would not give him any advice other than to tell him that it was entirely his own business whether he went to the Soviet reception or not. Besides, I asked, what made Subject think his name would be put on a "black list" if he went. Subject replied that he didn't know how the U.S. Embassy did it, but "everyone knew" the U.S. Embassy obtained the names of everyone who went in and out of
[104-10173-10135.pdf — page 205]
the Soviet Embassy. Moreover, he said, even if the U.S. Embassy refused to give him any advice, at least it would make a record of his visit and anyone who was ever interested would his heart was in the right place. He simply did not want and couldn't afford to get into any trouble with the U.S. Embassy, he said. After all, he had an American wife, he might want to go to the States to study sometime, and they might even want to go to the States to live someday. Seeing that Subject was indeed very serious, I became more serious myself and told him that just so he wouldn't worry, I'd write a memo to the proper Embassy department stating for the sake of the record that Subject had told me he planned to attend a Soviet Embassy reception, but wished the U.S. Embassy to know he was doing it solely out of curiosity and was in no way in sympathy with the Soviet Union. Subject seemed greatly relieved and thanked me very much.12. Seizing of the fact that GAZIYEV had given Subject the invitation, I asked if Subject saw much of him anymore. Subject replied that yes, he still saw him occasionally, as GAZIYEV was now studying English at the Institute. Subject added, on his own initiative, that he had also been to GAZIYEV's apartment twice and had met another Soviet there on one occasion. He said that the first time he went to GAZIEV's was shortly before he (Subject) got married (Subject was married about mid-April 1967) and the second time was shortly after his marriage, as he and his wife had gone to dinner at the GAZIYEVS'. Subject finished eating about this time, and since he was in a hurry and had his brother with him, I didn't try to question him any further, but decided to wait and have a second go at him alone another
[104-10173-10135.pdf — page 206]
time.13. My wife and I entertained Subject and his wife at our home on 27 November, but the evening was not meant to and did not afford an opportunity to discuss the Soviets any further. Subject did tell me, however, that he had not gone to the 7 November Soviet reception afterall, because, despite by assurances that there was no reason for him not to go, he felt it was simply safer to stay away from the Soviet Embassy altogether. At my suggestion, we agreed to get together for lunch sometime in the near future.14. For various reasons, including the poor state of Subject's health when I called him one day in January, we did not get together for the lunch until 7 March. This time, I played it straight with Subject, told him that I was interested in anything he could tell me about GAZIYEV and the otherSoviet he had met, and questioned him closely regarding the details. Subject was completely cooperative, and I am satisffed he answered my questions to the best of his ability. It seemed to me, and still does, that there was only one possible reason why Subject had not told me on 11 July what he subsequently told me on 1 November (1.e., that he had been to GAZIYEV's home twice and on one occasion had met another Soviet there).. This was that he felt somewhat guilty about going to GAZIYEV's and meeting the other Soviet there, and as long as I didn't push him too hard (which I didn't on 11 July), he felt more comfortable ignoring it. The reason he so readily mentioned the two visits and the other Soviet on 1 November was, I think, that he was genuinely concerned not to "get into any trouble" with the U.S.
[104-10173-10135.pdf — page 207]
Embassy over attending the Soviet Embassy reception, wished to impress me with his sincerity about whose side he was on, and felt obliged to completely clear the record by mentioning the visits to GAZIYEV's home and meeting the other Soviet there.15. Subject stated that GAZIYEV had invited him to his apartment for dinner about a month before he (Subject) went to Chicago to get married. This means that the dinner took place about mid-March 1967. Subject said he had expected to find only GAZIYEV and his wife in the apartment, but that a third person was there when Subject arrived. Subject said GAZIYEV introduced the third person as Valentin "something." When I asked if the last name were LOGINOV, Subject immediately reacted and said he was almost positive that was it. Subject's description of the Soviet also fit LOGINOV. GAZIYEV stated that LOGINOV was with the Embassy (Subject couldn't remember in what capacity) and described LOGINOV as a good friend. Subject said that the evening started off very casually, with LOGI NOV expressing interest in the Spanish courses at the Mexican-North American Institute. LOGINOV, who Subject noted spoke almost as good Spanish as most of the Spanish teachers at the Institute, said he'd like to get a certificate in Spanish from the Institute and asked Subject if he could help him enroll, choose the best course for him to start with, etc. Subject replied that he'd be happy to, although it didn't seem to him that LOGINOV needed much instruction in Spanish. LOGINOV simply laughed this off, and it was agreed LOGINOV would drop around to the Institute sometime soon. LOGINOV, who took the lead in the conversation most of the evening, then began to ask Subject questions which left Subject
[104-10173-10135.pdf — page 208]
209with "no doubt" that he (LOGINOV) was trying to feel Subject out on his political views. Subject said that he couldn't remember most of LOGINOV's questions, but he did recall that LOGINOV began the feeling-out procedure by asking Subject if he didn't find that the Americans were much poorer at learning Spanish than other nationalities. He also made various derogatory remarks about the extent of American influence in Mexico. Subject said that after about ten minutes, LOGINOV's purpose became so blatantly obvious, that he (Subject) stopped the conversation and told LOGINOV that before they went any farther, he thought LOGINOV should know that he was talking to someone who was "100% capitalist," completely pro-American, and had absolutely no sympathy with Communism. (While this sounds awfully blunt and Subject was unquestionably trying to make himself look good in my eyes, the fact of the matter is that Subject does tend to be *** a bit blunt at times, and khowing his ideological leanings, I would not put it past him to have said exactly this.) Subject said that LOGINOV tried to backtrack a bit after this, but the conversation heated up again a few minutes later when Subject commented that he had a pretty good idea of what the Soviets were up to in Mexico. When LOGINOV asked what Subject meant, Subject related the story he once told me about having been in Veracruz a few years ago when a Soviet ship was actually or virtually put under arrest there. Subject told LOGINOV that "everyone knew the ship was loaded with Communist propaganda."16. After about twenty minutes, according to Subject, politics were dropped and the conversation turned to more innocuous topics.
[104-10173-10135.pdf — page 209]
Subject said that LOGINOV seemed somewhat irritated with him, but on the whole kept his composure very well and treated Subject politely for the two hours or less Subject remained. As Subject was leaving, LOGINOV again said ho'd come by the Institute to ame Subject in the near future, but he nover did. "One day in late 1967 Subject saw LOGINOV at the gas station on the corner of Tacubaya and Juanacatlan, and LOGINOV greeted Subject by name. However, they did not converse with each other.17. Subject said that GAZIYEV left most of the politically related part of the conversation to LOGINOV and never referred to the evening again. However, a few weeks after Subject returned to Moxico with his bride, GAZIYEV had Subject and his wife over to dinner (this would place the second dinner in about mid-May). This time GAZIYEV and his wife were the only others present, and the evening passed without any reference to politics. Subject shated that he still occasionally goes across the street for a cup of coffee with GAZIYEV betweem evening classes at the Institute, but that he has not been to GAZIYEV's apartment again and has never had GAZIYEV to his home.18. Although Subject was very aware that LOGINOV's purpose in meeting him was to assess his exploitability, he did not seem to fully appreciate that GAZIYEV had both fingered him for LOGINOV and set up the situation for LOGINOV to meet him. I spelled this out for Subject and also informed him that LOGINOV'was an exceptionally capable Soviet intelligence officer. I also explained that it was very possible GAZIYEV was using the Institute to spot other candidates for interviews with Soviet
[104-10173-10135.pdf — page 210]
intelligence officers, and questioned Subject about GAZIYEV'S activities and contacts at the Institute. However, Subject said that as far as he could tell GAZIYEV pretty much stuck to himself at the Institute and did not have any particudar friends there whom Subject knew about. Subject said he would keep his eyes open for the type of thing I was looking for, however, and would let me know if he came onto anything interesting. Subject also offered to "play up to" GAZIYEV and/or LOGINOV under my guidance if I wished, but I declined the offer with appropriate expressions of appreciation.19. The question that remins unanswered after all this is, of course, why LOGINOV and GAZIYEV were talking about Subject over the phone on 24 April 1967. According to Subject, the dinner which LOGINOV attended took place in March 1967, while LOGI NOV did not attend GAZIYEV's second dinner, which took place about mid-May. Since I am satisfied Subject told me the truth, it would appear that the "certain things" which LOGINOV told GAZİYEV on 24 April he wished to discuss with GAZIYEV concerned how to handle Subject in the light of the LOGINOV-Subject encounter in March. Whatever LOGINOV had in mind on 24 April, it would appear that it was finally decided that GAZIYEV and his wife should simply have Subject and his wife over to a peaceful dinner in order to at least partially erase the memory of the first dinner.LSB/L
[104-10173-10135.pdf — page 211]
212![logo of The American School Foundation A. C.]THE AMERICAN SCHOOL FOUNDATION A. C.JONOR ANIAS BUERBACOMMUNITY SERVICES PROGRAMPROGRAMA DE EDUCACION PARA ADULTOSCALLE OUR TE NUM. DeTACUBAYA 18. b.. P.10-70-14ling prward I had bepreelttent roping conta201-285412
[104-10173-10135.pdf — page 212]
213CABLE SECRETARIAT DISSEMINATIONPERSONAT NOTIO)CLASSIFIED MESSAGESECRETWhen Pillan liefTOTAL COMINADVANCE CLIPYINDE 11CLABBIPY TO PILE NOAR TO PILE NID20DISSEM BYACTIONPERFILE RIO REF TOBRANCHDESTROY SIOINFOWH8RID COPYFILE VARi/GN SBP FiZ CI CIlUPS CIVIC 219SECRET 0800102 NOV 68 CITE MEXICO CITY 7994DIRECTORIN302158 Nov 68 IN 30215MREDCOATREFS: A. MEXICO CITY 7965 IN2845.B. DIRECTOR 484271. REVIEW OF LIENVOY TAPES REVEAL NAME OF SUBJECT CALLING   LA   PROVOROV IS DOUGALS PATILLO. PATILLO SPEAKS GOOD SPANISH WITH   DEFINITE AMERICAN ACCENT. CONVERSATIONS ARE IN SPANISH. ON   5 NOVEMBER PATILLO CALLED PROVOROV AT SOVIET EMBASYY TO ASK   WHY PROVOROV HAD NOT GONE TO SEE HIM EVENING 4 NOVEMBER   PROVOROV STATED HE WOULD GO EVENING.5 NOVEMBER 68.2. LIEMBRACE SURVEILLANCE DOUGALS PATILLO INITIATED   MORNING 6 NOVEMBER. HE IDENTIFIED HIMSELF AS PATILLO TO   LIEMBRACE TEAM MEMBER WHO KNOCKED ON HIS DOOR LOOKING FOR   SOMEONE ESLE. ON AFTERNOON 6 NOVEMBER LIEMBRACES FOLLOWED   PATILLO TO SOVIET EMBASSY.. PATILLO WALKED UP TO SOVIET EMBASSY   AND SPOKE TO THREE SOVIETS AT GATE, ONE OF WHOM WAS VALENTIN   SERGEYEVICH LOGINOV (KNOWN KGB). PATILLO SHOWED LOGINOV SOME   PAPERS HE HAD IN HIS SUIT JACKET THEN ENTERED SOVIET EMBASSY   GROUNDS AT 1311 HOURS. HE EXITED THE SOVIET EMBASSY AT 135KSECRET201-285-412Provorov
[104-10173-10135.pdf — page 213]
PAGE 2 MEXICO CITY 7994 SECRETHOURS. SUBJECT THEN WALKED BACK TO THE HOTEL. VERYSURVEILLANCE CONSCIOUS IN AREA OF EMBASSY COMING AND GOING.3. IN 5 NOVEMBER CONVERSATION WITH PROVOROV, SUBJECT   STATED THAT PERHAPS HE WAS GOING TO OAXACA (CITY IN STATE   OF OAZACA ABOUT 300 KILOMETERS SOUTH OF MEXICO CITY)   AFTERNOON OR EVEING 6 NOVEMBER, THAT HE HAS TO LEAVE MEXICO   CITY FOR LOS ANGELES ON MORING OF SATURDAY, 9 NOVEMBER.4. LIEMBRACE SURVEILLANCE WILL CONTINUE UNTIL SUJBECT   ME   LEAVES MEXICO. LIEMBRACE PHOTOS AS WELL AS RESUEM OF   SURVEILLANCE WILL BE POUCHED HQS.5. LILYRIC PHOTOS WILL BE CHECKED FOR SOVIET EMBASSY.   TO   VISIOTRS ON 6 NOVEMBER. LIENVOY TAPE WILL BE POUCHED HEAD-   QUARTERS.6. IF LNERGO UNABLE TO RESOLVE ADDRESS REPORTED PARA   2 RE (A) SUGGEST LNERGO CODER ALL FLIGHTS ARRIVING LOS   ANGELES FROM MEXICO CITY ON 9 NOV, DATE PATILLO SAYS HE HAS   TO RETURN TO LOS ANGELS. STATION WILL CABLE İMMEDIATE, IF   ABLE LEARN TRAVEL PLANS IN ADVANCE.7. PATILLO DESCRIPTION FROM LIEMBRACES CA 30 YEARS OLD,   CA 18 CM, CA 176 LBS, REDDISK BLOND HAIR, PALE COMPLEXION,SECRET
[104-10173-10135.pdf — page 214]
SECRETPAGE 3 MEXIO CITY 7994 SECRETWEARING SUN GLASSES IN PHOTOS.8. FILE: 50-8-21SECRETSECRET
[104-10173-10135.pdf — page 215]
# SECRETChief of Station, Mexico CityChief, SB via Chief, WI DivisionBELTOP AESICKVladimir Ivanovich Silantyev (201-770128)Reference: Mexico City 6054 (IN 39508)Forwarded under separate cover is a LNERGO report concerning subject. Persons mentioned by surname on page six of the report are identified at Headquarters as the subjects of 201-205304, 201-132139, 201-763035 and 201-285412 respectively. Can the Station identify any of the other persons mentioned on pages five and six?Ambrose T. SIBARICHAttachment: as stated u/s/cDistribution:2 - COS, Mexico Cityw/attachments w/u/s/c201-205304,201-132139, 201-763035,201-285412HMAW-1877918 October 1968SECRET201-770130Internal Dist:1 - 201-770129SE/CI/KF. Waltersrah69911 - 201-2053041 - 201-1321391 - 201-763035C/SB/CI1 - 201-2854121 - SB/X/WHSB/W/WH1 - SB/CI/KC/WH/11 - C/WH/1
[104-10173-10135.pdf — page 216]
# DISPATCH## SECRETChief of Station, Mexico CityChief, Western Hemisphere DivisionLYSUITCAGE/LIREAL-11. Headquarters has carefully considered the case of LIREAL-1 from the standpoint of ramifications of the compromise of January 1968 and of his operational utilization by the Station. With regard to the compromise, Headquarters tends to believe that the damage done by that occurrence is somewhat greater than the Station estimates. It is obvious, however, that no one now or probably even in the future can arrive at a hard estimate of the degree to which LIREAL-1 was blown. We can all agree and must assume that he has been compromised to some degree. The minimum degree of compromise would presumably be a listing of LIREAL-1's name in local Soviet files, and presumably also in the Moscow headquarters central registry, as "possible A. I. S." While such a label is unfortunate, could affect future assignments, and will limit his sphere of activity in Mexico, there remains a wide area of operations in which he can be employed. The Mexican authorities are, to the best of our knowledge, unaware of LIREAL-1's activities and sponsorship. Given the improved operational security patterns and overall professional handling which must accompany LIREAL-1's future use in the light of the unfortunate flap, we feel that he can continue to be of service at his present post. In spite of the obvious special need for a more careful weighing of operational risk versus gain factors (even more important here than in the case of the usual presumably "clean" non-official agent), we feel that neither the flap nor his LEOLODE status should inhibit the Station in the energetic use of his not inconsiderable talents. Headquarters can appreciate the necessarily slow pace of the developmental activity to which he has been assigned, as well as the required alterations of his targets both of which factors have been largely beyond Station control.(continued)Distribution:Original and one - COS, Mexico City|                    || ------------------ || CROSS REFERENCE TO || DISPATCH SYMBOL AND NUMBER | DATE         || -------------------------- | ------------ || HLNW-16-197                | 22 July 1968 || RYBAT                      |              || OFFICE                     | OFFICER      || WH/1/Nancy Perkins/lq      |              |RI CHRONO| OFFICE SYMBOL | DATE        | OFFICER'S NAME || ------------- | ----------- | -------------- || C/WH/F!       | 16 JUL 1963 |                || CCS/LFELCE    | 17 JUL 1    |                || CCS/          | 17 JUL 1968 |                || OFFICE SYMBOL | DATE       | OFFICER'S SIGNATURE || ------------- | ---------- | ------------------- || C/WH/1        | 13 July 68 |                     |
[104-10173-10135.pdf — page 217]
CONTINUATION OFDISPATCH2. In a written report on his visit to Mexico in December 1967, the visiting LIGLOSS case officer recapitulated the Station's Operational Flan for LIREAL-1 which included the following points:a. "Penetration, nonitoring, analysis and study of the PRI are to be LIRSAL-1's first objective".....b. (FRADYER) "urged LIRSALN to spot and assess potential legal travellers to Cuba."c. "A strong tertiary target is the (HEFAIRY) Embassy."d. "Indonesians, Egyptians and Soviets have been discarded as targets."When talking to members of the Branch, Lewis W. BEAUCHAMP confirmed the above and said that the Station was considering giving LIRCALI-1 a going Cuban operation to handle. Has he yet been assigned any contacts which dear on the Cuban target? LIREALM-1 was quoted as saying that he feels he can handle a heavier operational load, and so we are hoping that you have or will soon be ablo to turn over to him one or more established operations from which he can see tangible return, thus broadening his experience and increasing his self-confidence. Since LIRELIC-1 has been terminated we assume Subject is exploring new areas against the LIOGLE/LIRELIC target and we would appreciate advice on this.3. We recognize that very often one-time tasks, spotting, and research are performed by agents in the field without Headquarters' specific knowledge. Increased reporting on this kind of activity, which is valuable and necessary even though much of it may lead to dead ends, would give us a better under- standing than we now have of the contribution which LIREALU-1 is making to the Station. Headquarters appreciates the opera- tional reporting which the Station has been providing on LIREALM-1 and urges that it be continued on the same frequent basis.Thomas W. LUND
[104-10173-10135.pdf — page 218]
# DISPATCH**CLASSIFICATION**SECRET**PROCESSING ACTION**X MARKED FOR INDEXINGNO INDEXING REQUIREDONLY QUALIFIED DESKCAN JUDGE INDEXINGMICROFILMChief,Chief, MIChief of Station, Mexico CityFROM Chief of Station, JMWAVESUBJECT Operational/TYPIC/AMSLOUCHAMSLOUCH/1 Debriefing on Soviet OfficialsACTION REQUIRED-REFERENCESAction Required: FYI1. During the April 1968 debriefing of AMSLOUCH/1 in the JMWAVE area, ANSLOUCH/1 provided the following information on Soviet officials with whom he is, or has been, acquainted:a. Valentin LOGINOV (201-285412): Assigned to the Soviet Embassy in Havana several years ago. He pursued AMSLOUCH/3 (daughter of AMSLOUCHes 1 and 2) when stationed in Havana, and later in Moscow. AMSLOUCH/1 described LOGINOV as a rough peasant type. AMSLOUCH/1 when in Mexico about a year ago was looking at the Mexico Diplomatic List and noticed that a LOGINOV was assigned to Mexico. AMSLOUCH/1 asked a girl working at a foreign consulate in Mexico (identity) if this was the same LOGINOV who had been stationed in Cuba. The girl replied in the affirmative, and stated the LOGINOV worked in the Soviet Consulate handling business dealings between her consulate and the Soviet Consulate. The girl described LOGINOV as "a very nice fellow."b. Colonel Fedor V. DREMOV: Military Attache, Soviet Embassy, Havana. ANSLOUCH/1 reported that he has conversed with DREMOV on several occasions, the last one being when Cosmonaut GUGARIN was killed. AMSLOUCH/1 described DREMOV as alert, smart, speaks good Spanish, charming and very proud that he is the son of a Cossak. DREMOV told AMSLOUCH/1 during one of their conversations that he had been a memberAttachment:Identity (USC)Distribution:3 - C/SB w/att.2 - WH/COG w/att.2 - CO3, Mexico City w/att.2 - C/WH w/att.CONTINUED.file in 201-255412.JUN 11 19687 June 1968HOS FILE NUMBER28-6-33/3
[104-10173-10135.pdf — page 219]
CONTINUATION OFDISPATCHCLASSIFICATIONSECRETDISPATCH SYMBOL AND NUMBERUFGA-30172of a Soviet PW camp where German soldiers were held during World War II, during which time he claimed to have learned the German language.2.  A photograph of DREMOV, provided by ANSLOUCH/1, was sent to Headquarters in UFGA-29721, 13 March 1968.![Signature of Hilda G. VAGIONAS]Hilda G. VAGIONAS
[104-10173-10135.pdf — page 220]
CONTINUATION OF DISPATCHINDEXING INFORMATIONCLASSIFICATIONSECRETDOCUMENT SYMBOL AND NUMBERUFGA-30172INSTRUCTIONS: Insert "ASSIGN" altor 201- if number neoded.SURNAME1 LOGINOV, ValentinGIVEN NAMEMIDDLE NAME201- 285412SEXMDATE OF BIRTHCOUNTRY OF BIRTHCITY/TOWN OF BIRTHCITIZENSHIPOCCUPATIONSoviet Consulate, MexicoRESIDENCEMexicoOTHER NAMES - STATE TYPE (AKA, ALIAS, MAIDEN)ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:Was assigned to the Soviet Embassy in Havana.SURNAME2 DREMOV, Fedor V. (Colonel)GIVEN NAMEMIDDLE NAME201-SEXDATE OF BIRTHCOUNTRY OF BIRTHCITY/TOWN OF BIRTHCITIZENSHIPOCCUPATIONMilitary Attache(Soviet EmbassyHavana)RESIDENCEHavanaOTHER NAMES - STATE TYPE (AKA, ALIAS, MAIDEN)ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:SURNAME3GIVEN NAMEMIDDLE NAME201-SEXDATE OF BIRTHCOUNTRY OF BIRTHCITY/TOWN OF BIRTHCITIZENSHIPOCCUPATIONRESIDENCEOTHER NAMES-STATE TYPE (AKA, ALIAS, MAIDEN)ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:SURNAME4GIVEN NAMEMIDDLE NAME201-SEXDATE OF BIRTHCOUNTRY OF BIRTHCITY/TOWN OF BIRTHCITIZENSHIPOCCUPATIONRESIDENCEOTHER NAMES STATE TYPE (AKA. ALIAS, MAIDEN)ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:SURNAME5GIVEN NAMEMIDDLE NAME201-SEXDATE OF BIRTHCOUNTRY OF BIRTHCITY/TOWN OF BIRTHCITIZENSHIPOCCUPATIONRESIDENCEOTHER NAMES-STATE TYPE (AKA, ALIAS, MAIDEN)ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
[104-10173-10135.pdf — page 221]
SECRETUnder Separate CoverAttachment to:UFGA-30172IDENTITY: Lisa HAGELBERG, employee of Finnish Consulate, Mexico CitySECRET00 filed 201-355911 filem 201-285412