Francesco/who-killed-jfk huggingface dataset:
[104-10174-10065.pdf — page 30]
-3-his hats, Subject asked ? was it possible to get those hats for him.? said he did not know if it can be done.7. Subject asked ? what type of a reception will be given on the 4th of July by the Emb and was there something arranged that any American could drop in, as signing the book at the Emb. promised to prove to Subject in case there was something like that.8. After covering the ground as contained in the 3 attachments ? asked Subject was he willing to back his statements with a polygraph test ( ? used the expression 'lie detector test' ). Subject reacted by asking when did we want him to take the test. ? commented that he did not say that Subject would be given one, he only asked would he be willing to take one, if we asked him to do it. Subject stated that he was willing to take the test at any time. Then, he started asking questions about the test, especially, who usually gets it and how it works. With regard to who gets ? stated that anyone involved in matters having hearing on the security of the U.S. and as to how it works, there is nothing to it: it registers when a person says a lie as the stomach digests automatically anything a persons eats..9. Comments by FERNALD:a. This meet enables us to have a better insight of Subject's personality.b. There are valid indications that Subject is not withholding important info concerning his personal history nor his activity.c. His claim to have numerous and to an extention influential contacts appears to be acceptable.d. He also appears to be cooperative, but has a tendency to deviate from the instruction given to him concerning his attitude toward LCCINCT. It is possible what thin is due to his conviction that he knows LCI better than we do and that we are too dogmatic and not enough flexible. At the same time this may be due to the fact that he loves clandestine activity for the sake of pleasure he gets out of the game as such on one hand and on the other, he might fear that our proposed course of action may all-late LCI from him, in which case he could be left without a game he likes.e. It appears quite obvious that Subject's financial conditions are not rosy, but, apparently, he has a shelter, is well dressed and does not have to worry about being hungry. Therefore there is left enough room for him to lead the life as he pleases.SlFernald
[104-10174-10065.pdf — page 31]
# PAG. 12CMexico, D F., Viernes 27 de Junio de 1969![photo of people holding drinks]![photo of people sitting]## Torneo Mixto de Tenisen el Club FranceEl Tercer Torneo Mixto de Tenis 1969 "AMISTAD", que concluyó en días pasados, estuvo muy animado.El organizador de este evento deportivo, fue Adrián Aguilar, para despedir a Valentin Longulnov, quien próximamente partirá al extranjero.Resultaron triunfadores: Hans Kesparek y Beatriz de Bacon; Valentin Longinov y Meche Pinio; Ralph Wiegandt y Gloria de Pinto, quienes obtuvieron el primero, segundo y tercer digares, respectivamente.Por la noche, los esposos Pinto, Jose y Giorta ofrecieron una flesta en su residencia, donde fueron entregados los trofeos.![group of people]I Hans Kasparck, Beatrit Baron y Vety Aguilar.a7n ale gruppa... ... el d tot luis Gone, Nhis do Curoa Man. Ruben Hoan, Chalade Mnia Adnan Aguilar Valenen longuinos) H H 3d 1w ganatura del
[104-10174-10065.pdf — page 32]
# Contact ReportSubject: James SABORIDate of Meet: June 23 at Subjects Apt at Bahia de Sta Barbara 20/5081. Arrangements for this meet were made through the office and the fact that the phone which Subject left with cur office was out of order made it necessary that FERRALD call on Subject at his apt. It may be noted that Subject is in the process of moving and the only furniture in the living room of the above mentioned apt consisted of two beaten up easy chairs w/o arm rest and a sort of an end table loaded with papers and a telephone; another phone was on the floor in the corner of the room. There was so much dust on the floor that it is difficult to believe that the apt was in any use during the last 10 days.2. Subjects NEW ADDRESS: Leibnitz 297 apt 7 phone 31-53-93Office: Fraccionadora de Bajio, Insurgentes Sur 429 office 12 (first floor), phone 64-63-47.Subject can be reached home until 0930 in the morning and in the office between 1100 and 1400 hrs and in the afternoon between 1700 and 2000 hrs. Subject stated that it would be rather difficult to find him in his office because of his frequent "in and out" work.3. COMMO with us: Subject was told that once he was placed in contact with the "proper people" he should use from now on the extention 870. He will identify himself as Sr. ARVIZO ( allegedly his mother's family name ) and will asks for Sr. Virgil (FALDINI) FZRNAIDS alias.4. FERRALD showed Subject his official looking credentials under alias of Virgil 2. BALDINI and after he read them quite carefully, stated that now Subject knew that he was speaking to the right person an. Subject commented that he was satisfied with is bona fide.5. F first asked Subject few personal questions; the phone is out of order because he requested that it be transfered to his new apt and on Saturday (June 21 when he saw that the phone was not in operation he called "his friend Carlos acier" to put pressure on the Telephone Co but nothing could be done in view of the week-end: the elevator in the
[104-10174-10065.pdf — page 33]
-2-building is often out of crder, because there are too many children in the building: Subject is married and has 2 children, but he is prescatly separated from his wife; as the children finished the liigh School his wife wanted them to continue their schooling in the U.S.; Subject avoided specifying what school his children attended here and called the school "the American High School: Subject has been in Mexico 4 years and his wife only 2 years; as much as he loves l'exico so much his wife did not get used to Mexico and did not want to remain any longer here; the fact that he did not want to leave Mexico resulted in their physical separation; according to Subject it is only a matter of days that his family left for San Jose, California, which Subject called his home town; Subject claims that his family ( paternal side ) comes from Milan, Italy; his great grand father came to New York, NY, and fellowed the gold rush to California where he apparently did well; for reesons unknown to Subject his grand father noved from California to Arizona and then to Mexico (Sinaloa) were Subjects father was born; in the same breath Subject stated that he, too, was born in Mexico and when commented that it would be logical that he... have a dual citizenship, Subject did quite bit of talking to confuse the the previous statement: during the revolution all the records were burned. and he has only the certificate of baptism issued by a Mexican church and in fact it was possible that he was born on the U.S. side of the border; Subject claims he could not care less about the possibility of claiming Mexican citizenship, he is an American and it suits him well to live in this country as a TOURIST: in the Fraccionadora de Pajio he works with a partner, who entered the company as owner of 2 large chunks of land; Subject had no money but he is the person who through his connections obtained from a Mexican bank a decision that the bank would mortgage up to 90 per cent every structure he and his partner complete; now he is in the stage of obtaining American investment capital to carry out the construction of low income housing (2 does not recall the location Subject mentioned); of course Subject went through financial difficulties and is still facing some of them, but nothing serious; He has a car of his own; he is roving out of this apt and will sub-let it and make few hundred pesos per month on the difference of prerent price and what he is paying: this type of transactions cennot get him in troubles, because Lexicans do not care about much thingr; he has a friend in the Schernacion
[104-10174-10065.pdf — page 34]
-3-The once showed him that the Gobernacion bed more than a foot highfile on him and Subject told him they should not bother trying to dosomething against him beceure they concot even kick him out of the country:he has a friend to whom he is authorised to turn if he is in any kind oftrouble and he asked his Gobernacion to dial the phone which he gave himand the phone was answered by CISNLROS of the Presidency: Subject claimsthat he has influential friendsin practically every ministry (Secretaria)of the Federal government; Subject also prides himself with women friendshe has and the also influencial.6. In answer to Es quetion Subject stated that he called on Mr. at the U.S. Erbassy because he had a fairly close relation with Valentin   LOGINOV (P-11,712) of the Soviet Embassy and he would not want to be   judged wrongly if the WOFIRM people get to know about his friendly relation   with LOGINOV...7. F. commented that he hoped that Subject realized that the title   on his credentials really spells Counter Intelligence, which, for example,   means that if F saw Subject robbing a bank he could not care less because   that would be the matter concerning the criminal police, or if was charged   for having a child out of wedlock, because that would be a catter for."   the judiciary authority, but when it comes to spies than that is a matter   which concerns F and the service ne is working for. In view of the   well established fact that LOGINOV is a spy and Subject is his friend (sic)   this matter is of concern for the American Counter Intelligence. Therefore,   would appreciate if Subject stated clearly what was the purpose of his   visit to the U.S. Embassy. Subject answered without hesitation nor   embarrassment that he believed that he made himself clear even at the   Embassy that he wanted to cooperate with the U.S. Service and be of help   as much as it stood in his power. commented thet he would probably ask   Subject does he still want to help the U.S. Counter Intelligence before   we close our meet today.8. In reply to Fe questions Subject stated:a. He net LOGINCT in February 1969 at a social perty in the house ofDr. Frederico ARIK, who is as is commonly known aCommunist by his lieology. He does not know were thereother Soviet officiels at the party. LOGINCT first
[104-10174-10065.pdf — page 35]
- 4 -spoke to Subject in a heavy accented broken English and was delighted when Subject cuggested that they speak Spanish. LOGINOV8 general line of conv was that the essential thing in the life is understanding and to be able to understand others one must get to know them; this in turn calls for having as many friends as possible. The same applies to countries and nations. Before leaving the party LOGINOV stated that he would like to become friendly with Subject and asked hin would he be willing to meet with him. Subject agreed and they met next Friday at the Tecali Restaurant.b. The conv at the Tecali was to an extent dealing with the theme of friendship and understanding with an added emphasis that if there was understanding and, consequently, friendship between the U.S. and Soviet Union we would be living in a much better world. Subject stated his agreement with LOGS views. In a further part of the conv LOGINOV was interested in knowing whether Subject had many friends in Mexico Subject claims to have stated that he had many good friends here. (NOTE: It is quite likely that he bragged about the number of influential friends he had here). At the end LOGINOV told Subject that he would like to see him again and Subject asked him to come to his house. According to Subject, LOCINOV asked would not the fact of receiving a Sov official com- promise Subject or lead him into some kind of troubles. Subject assured him that the receiving of a Sov orany foreign official could not affect him in no way. Then, LOGINC asked Subject would they be alone and Subject answered affirmatively. (Note: At this point Subject indiceted that he received LOGINOV at the apt at the Icibuits 297). Finally, LOGINOV agreed to come to Subject's ept.c. In the apt LOGINOV did not feel at case for some tice. Intinliy, he did not drink from the Votka which
[104-10174-10065.pdf — page 36]
- 5-Subject poured and he drack only efter Subject tock a sip out of LCG's Class (Semark: This certainly sound exaggerated). Turing the evening La wes repeatedly speaking about his need to have friendsi zake new new friendships and was pointing cut that Subject was able to help in that respect. Subject stated to that he offered to LOG to introduce him to any friend of his he wished. In the course of conv LOG was asking Subject verions questions concerning politice, econom and trade in Nexico and Subject was answering with a degree of familiarity with topics. Jeg felt that Subject was well informed and he asked him how come that he was so well informed, is he perhaps a TOFIEN man. Subject laughed at the question and added that in fact he hated "OPIRI and everything associated with it. LOG gave Subject his phone (epparently the callin card) and told Subject that he should not be phoning to him and that it was better if they agreed in sa- vance when and where they would meet next.d. From this point Subject gave up describing chronolo- gically the developments. He stated that there were about 10 additional meets with LCG. The place they used most extensively was the La Cava. They usually were meeting at 2000 hrs, i.e. the time when the restaurants have the minimum of guests. Subject believ that LOG started using La Cava rere frequently for their meet because of the fact that the of the fact that the Tecall closee. Subject stated that out of pure curiosity he observer LOG coming to their meeting place: Leaves his car 5-7 blocks way from the place, beards a bus, gets out a block beyond the Greting place and comes walking slowly and making occasionel steps to observe whether he was followed. Then they get in a restauranしぐぐogether ives a good look to every person in the restaurant and remains especially watchful if he see two men together.
[104-10174-10065.pdf — page 37]
f. Subject stated that the leitmotif of LOG during thosebeete was "helpne and I will be able to help you","get me (or provide me with) the info I need and I willprovide you with info you might need". Among the mostsaught info by LOG was personality info on Kexicanpoliticians and, especially, indications as to whowill be the next President of Mexico. LOG is verycuch interested does SCHOVARPIA stand a better chanceto become the next Fresident than CARRILLO FLOARS.Later it became an obsession to find out what wasSEAL reason for Rockefellers trip to LA countries,LOG discounted the fact-finding as any reason, because,according to him the U.S. embassies and the CIA inthose countries know everything that is to be known .Consequently, LOG is convinced that there must animportant reason for ROCKY's trip. Subject added thatthere very many other rinor questions concerning theNexican scene which interested LOC and to a fairextent he was able to get the answers. Nevertheless,LOG started asking Subject did he have friends in theU.S. Embassy here. Subject was answering casuallywith an "of course". On the reet Subject had withLOG on June 9 at la Cava LCG told him that he neededan Embassy phone directory and he anked Subject cánhe get him one. Subject promised to try. LOC broughtto Subject's attention that he needed the waw directorybecause the Embassy changes the directory every sixnonthe.E. In reply to 78 question Subject stated that CG toldhis that he needed all the info he was asking for toadvance politically in his career on one hand and onthe other to dispell misunderstanding to which thelack of info may easily lead.h. With regard to LOC Subject described him as a licableperson with quite liberal view on international po-litice; he passionately hates Krupichov and is
[104-10174-10065.pdf — page 38]
- 7 -deeply concerned over the danger Red China represents to the world; he advocates that the U.S and Sov Union Shouldesign a cutunl defense fact and liquidate the China until there is still time; he believes that Sov Frion and the E.S. are entitled to act in defense of their own interests and to hell with what the rest of the world snys", he acaires the determination and dynerise of Americane.9. After getting through this portion teld Subject does he still feel that he should ret end give LOG the Fab Fhone Directory. Ee stated that he was willing to do what we tell him to do, but he believed that if he came to the meet with LCG on June 25 without the directory, ECG would consider him as worthless, since was not able to obtain something which he can get in some other way. When I connented that the diredory was a tightly controled matter and to get one would practically mean to swipe one from somebody desk, Subject stated that he was convinced that LCG. would not care for a directory which ho stole, because he is interested in subject having a friend in the embarsy through whom he would have access to info, and presenting the directory would be an indication that Subject had a friend there.10. Then Subject replied negatively to a theoretical possibility of obtaining a directory "lerslly", told him that he must necessarily be aware of the fact that ICG could not be satisfied with ith a statement that he obtained the directory from fr a woman or man friend; LOG would insist in knowing the name and the redress of the person who is his friend. Subiect pretended not to be convinced about this but did not try to arque about it.11. Then I told Subject that whether ne odrits/it to himself or not That he was trying to maneuvre himself into was a double agent role stich is by no means an envious role. A person who is offering his cooperetion to the U.S. under such conditions should be aware that every piece of info passed to the opposition, in this case LOC, must be cleared end approved by an U.S. officer which, if nothing else, is a tire constmirz proposition. Subject sailing said "time is money". Ecocented that only productively used time is money.
[104-10174-10065.pdf — page 39]
- 8 -12. In a heavy and serious tone 'F stated that he must ask now Subject whother after the explanation he gave he is still willing to cooperate with the U.S. Service under the condition that he would follow oure instruction and guidance without any reserve. Subject answered Yus and added that he was ready and willing to do whatever we tell him to dos13. F asked Subject did LOG tell him when he was leaving Mexico. Subject eteted that Loi did not rention hie departure and Sulject felt certain thet there was no inmediate departure in sight.14. F told Subject that he would went think this matter over and clocuse it with some of his colleagues and, therefore, would like to see him tomorrow. Subject stated that he would buisy in the morning and when I asked him what about the afternoon, Subject asked what about heving a lunch together. I agreed and picked up SZP-Paris ar the place and it was agreed that they would meet in the restaurant at 1400 hra.15. F feels that Subject is a sort of a Soldier of Fortune, a pleasant and long talker; among his lexicon contects not mentioned to the above are D.Fiqueira and Augustin PARRIOS Gomez. To impress F with closenees of bis relations with BARETOS Gomes, Subject scored F AGE annual par for all the movie houses in town and added that AEG gave hir the pace. This fact might be interesting but it does not dispell the temptation to consider Subject to be a neme dropper.Bruce E. FernaldP.S. Subject mentioned that LOC geve him some cavier and votka. ? commect- ed thet Subject should not be surprised if ? told him that we knew about it.In openzing about the directory: told Subject that he, end 200 an well, should realize that "To Fon todos que estas y no enten todea (to the embassy) and all those who do belors are not 117*   Inscription on e Jelapa Medhouse.
[104-10174-10065.pdf — page 40]
# Contact ReportSubject: LIBACON-1 (P-4305)Date of lieet: June 21 at the Cafeteria JET at 1100 hrs.1. This reet was held in lieu of the prearranged meet for Junels which L-l cancelled by phone. Due to the peculiarities of L-16 working habits I was not able to reach him by phone until June 20 at 1600 hrs when this meet was arranged.Noxt mect: Wednesday July 2 at 1615 hrs at the previous pick up place2. On June 18 1-1 was without car and he felt obliged to cancel the meet. He stated that he felt heppy to have made up with his wife and to be living again home. He told me about his arrangement to go to the Russian show with LIOVAL-1 and wife. He described me the developments as LIOVAL-1 reported them to me.3. With regard to his a "contact" with LOGINOV which he hinted by phone, there was nothing to it. L-l was at a party given by Andrea САТАÑO (P-13,545) I on June 14 at her house and YURIY CHIPNISH (P-13,042) was there and they exchanged few words about LOGINOV (see the attachment). L-1 stated that he was not with LOGIKOV since the encounter in Cueutia and did not speak to him since the attempt to reschedule the lunch which was missed on May S. Therefore, the story L-l gave to LICAL-1 on June 13 about LOGINOV being disappointed with the fact that he had to return home, etc, hae, quite likely, no connection with any recent developcents. Further, it 10 feftdro cuite te obvious odvi that L-l did not know then about the fact that LOGINCO was postponed 3 - 4 months.4. L-l stated thet A. CATANO and her mother told him that they had expected FOGATYZPEV (P-11,351) to attend their party, but he neither came nor excured himself by phone. L-l did not know how it came to the point that ECGATHEREV was invited to the party. L-l considered it as a significant fact that CERMISH came to that party with his wife. I-1 interpreted this fact to the effect that ChiRNISH gave up the idea of having a romance with. ANDREA CATARS, but wanted to preserve and caintain friendship with her and her fantly. According to i-l it is quite certain
[104-10174-10065.pdf — page 41]
Subject: LOGINOV (P-11,712)ATTACHMENTJune 22, 1969Source: LIRAGON-1 (P-4805)1. On June 14 Yuriy CHERNISH (P-15,042) told Source that LOGINOV departure from Mexico was postponed to October or November (L-1 does not remember which month Yo stated).2. L-1 requested CHERNISH to tell LOGINOV that L-1 was disappointed with LOGs attitude toward him: he promised to call him and he never did.3. CHERNISH promised to relay the message and commented that LOG should have more time for his friends now that he does not have the work which every departure and moving bring with them.Commet: L-1 was told he should try to contact LOC himself and instead of using other persons as messangers. Once more he promised to do it in a matter of days.