Francesco/who-killed-jfk huggingface dataset:
[104-10173-10104.pdf — page 263]
# 12. Sexual Attitudes12.01 General:12.01.01 Are his attitudes about sexVery obscureDifficult to determineAbout average for his culture and backgroundClearly uninterestedIndifferentClearly interested X12.01.02 In the presence of women, he isStilted ConventionalFlirtatious X VulgarHostile Indifferent12.01.03 Does he go to "girlie" showsOften NeverSometimes with a groupCan't imagine him ever goingI have no idea what he thinks of "girlie" shows12.01.04 Does he, in the presence of male companions, talk about sex?Often X SometimesRarely Never12.01.05 Is there any change in his sexual behavior and/or attitudes after he has been drinking?Yes No Have no ideaIf Yes, describe the change:-42-
[104-10173-10104.pdf — page 264]
12.01.06 Do you have any idea how he feels about prostitutes?YesNo12.01.07 If No, do you think he is the type who would go to a prostituteCannot imagine him visiting a prostitutėHave nothing to base an opinion on12.01.08 If Yes, is heObviously negativistic toward prostitutesIndifferent toward prostitutesInterested in prostitutes12.01.09 In his relations with women, does heGenerally act in accordance with his age and experienceGenerally act somewhat immature and inappropriate forhis age and experienceShow considerable facility and poise ✗Show considerable uneasiness or awkwardness12.01.10 In describing an attractive woman, is he most likely to mentionHer hairBreastsEyesClothesFigure ✗PersonalityLegsHave no idea12.01.11 Have you ever heard him described in any way by a woman? Yes ✗NoIf Yes, what did she say?athletic, virile, manly.12.02 Overall impression: Which of the following best describes him?12.02.01 He is an earthy, lusty man who shows little embarrassment aboutsex. He treats women appropriately, but makes little effort toconceal his admiration and attraction. He appears virile andself-confident with women, and most women seem to like it. ✗12.02.02 He is an earthy, lusty man who on occasion can be crude oreven vulgar. He treats women rather harshly, und can becomequite pushy when attracted to a woman. He seems to be veryproud of his virility. Many women would be offended or re-buffed by his aggressiveness, but this does not seem to botherhim.-43-
[104-10173-10104.pdf — page 265]
12.02.03 He is a somewhat sensual, rather soft man who is very consid-erate of women. He is prone to hold a woman's hand overlylong when talking to her and frequently puts his arms aroundwomen he admires. He often uses flattery and complimentsbut does so rather graciously. Most women usually like hisattentiveness.12.02.04 He is a sensual person, but is embarrassed and insecure aboutit. He is a rather soft man who tries hard to be inoffensive.However, he will frequently follow attractive women with hiseyes when he thinks no one is looking. He is also prone tobrush against or touch women "accidentally" whenever he getsa chance.12.02.05 He is a self-confident, rather polished person who is properand conventional with either men or women. He is alwaysconsiderate and polite with all women and it is difficult toascertain what his sexual attitudes and interests might be.In a group, he always behaves according to protocol andusually can be quite efficient in doing so.12.02.06 He is a self-confident and precise person who has somethingof the air of a professional man about him. He is polite,almost to a fault, and is inclined to go out of his way tolight a woman's cigarette or see that she is properly takencare of. Nevertheless, he shows considerable distance inhis relations with women. Sometimes his formality is outof place, but he will rarely, if ever, change his mannersor procedures to fit the situation.12.02.07 He is a charming, urbane person and both friendly andsophisticated. He deals with women in a cultured waybut shows little sensuality or sexual inappropriateness.He is neat, even dapper, and can be quite fastidious.Most of his relations with women appear to be quite pla-tonic. He is the kind of person who likely has severalvery close friends who are women.12.02.08 He is a somewhat shy and indifferent person whom somepeople consider odd or unusual. He shows little or nointerest in women in public. In general, he is a preoc-cupied person who only seeks out people with similarinterests. There is an ascetic, asexual air about himmost of the time.12.02.09 None of these fit. I would describe him as:
[104-10173-10104.pdf — page 266]
V. FAMILY SET# 13. Marital Status13.01 Is he married?Yes X No.13.01.01 Is his wife with him?Yes X No13.01.02 Does his wife go out socially with him:Never Seldom X Average Offen13.01.03 Is his wife: older than he X about his ageyounger than he can't tell13.01.04 Is his wife: unusually attractive attractive to an average degree Xunusually unattractive13.01.05 Generally speaking, is his wife: socially poisedsocially adequate Xsocially gauche,13.01.06 What languages other than her native language does his wife speak? Spanish13.01.07 Is his wife: better educated than he X less educatededucated about the same13.01.08 Has he been married before:If yes, give details if known:Yes NoCan't tell X13.02 Does his wife seem to: have many friends a few friendsalmest no friends X13.02.01 In public, is he: very attentive to his wifeappropriately attentive to his wife Xindifferent towards his wife13.02.02 In public, is his wife: very attentive to himappropriately attentive to him Xindifferent to him13.02.03 Would you characterize his wife as:aggressive domineering independent•complacent submissive X dependent-45-
[104-10173-10104.pdf — page 267]
13.02.04 In the area in which she lives, does she appear to be:very satisfied ______ normally satisfied X very dissatisfied ______13.03 Have you been to their home? Yes ______ No XIf Yes, how often? ______13.03.01: Are their living quarters: unusually nice for the area ______typical of the area ______unusually poor for the area. ______13.03.02 Are they, os a couple: unusually good hosts ______ good hosts ______adequate hosts ______ somewhat inadequate hosts ______unusually poor hosts ______13.03.03 Does the wife seem: very comfortable as a hostess ______adequate as a hostess ______ somewhat tense as a hostess. ______very uncomfortable as a hostess ______13.03.04 Are their living quarters: a reflection of his personality ______a reflection of both their personalities ______a reflection of neither of their personalities ______13.03.05 In general, their furnishings are: unusually drab ______conventional ______ Unusually nice ______13.03.06 Is his wife: obviously very interested in her home ______about as interested in her home as most women in the area ______obviously very uninterested in her home ______cannot really tell whether she is interested or not ______13.03.07 Is her social behavior at heme:about the same as when away from home ______more comfortable than away from home ______less comfortable ______13.03.08 Under ordinary circumstances, are they:the kind of people who entertain often and like it ______the kind of people who meet their social obligations and rather enjoy it ______the kind of people who enjoy entertaining only close friends ______the kind of people who entertain only when they have to ______the kind of people who really dislike to entertain ______13.04 Does he ever criticize his wife: Yes ______ No ______If so, what is he most likely to criticize:-46-
[104-10173-10104.pdf — page 268]
13.04.01 In general, as a couple are they: obviously very compatibleas compatible as most ________ obviously not very compatible X13.04.02 Is he inclined to: never appear jealous of herrarely appear jealous of her ☑often appear jealous of her ________13.04.03 Is she inclined tos never appeur jealous of him ________rarely appear jealous of him ☑often appear jealous of him ________13.04.04. Is there anything about his wife that deserves special mention or description?13.05 As a husband, he is best described as:An outgoing man who obviously is the dominant partner in the marriage. He is protective of his wife and always includes her when possible in his social activities.An active man who is authoritarian and dominant as a husband. He is possessive of his wife and tends to be demanding in their relationship.An outgoing man who is quite dependent upon his wife. She tends to be the more dominant partner and he seems to like it and expect it.An active but somewhat surly man who is obviously very dependent upon his wife but will rarely admit it. He may have some tendency to be jealous and possessive about his wife.A conventional husband who treats his wife with respect. He rarely shows his feelings in public. It is difficult to tell how he really feels about her.A conscientious husband who takes his marriage quite seriously. His wife is obviously part of the team and they both take family and social responsibilities seriouslyA socially active man who can be quite charming with the ladies even when his wife is present. They both seem to lead separate but quite compatible lives.A quiet man who is obviously very dependent upon his wife. She looks after him rather unostentatiously but it is obvious that she has considerable influence on his behavior and attitudes.X None of these fit, he is best described as:dominant partner.. Independent ofwite. Indifferent to here needs-47-
[104-10173-10104.pdf — page 269]
13.03 Household:Is he concerned about the appearance or functioning of the household?Yes __ No __Does he make minor repairs himself?Yes __ No __If Yes, Fairly competently __ Awkwardly __14. Children14.01 Does he have any children.Yes X No __14.01.01 How many 2 What ages 10+18 Sex of children male + fem.14:01.02 Are all the children with him?Yes __ No XIf not, where are they? girl/moscow14.01.03 Does he: pay unusual attention to his children __pay normal attention to his children Xpay little attention to his children __14.01.04 Is his wife: an unusually attentive mother __an average mother Xan unusually unattentive mother __14.01.05 Are the children: unusually well behaved __normally well behaved XUnusually rowdy or difficult __14:01.06 Does he: never talk about his children __ rarely talk about his children __talk about his children as normal and appropriate Xfrequently talk about his children __seem quite preoccupied about his children __14.01.07 Are any of his children unusual in any way (frequent illness, allergies, mentally defective, crippled or deformed, unusually bright, etc.)Yes __ No XIf yes, describe circumstances:
[104-10173-10104.pdf — page 270]
14.02 When his wife and family are away, he is:- obviously very lonely and at loose ends- unlikely to vary his routine- likely to become more active and socially aggressive- have no idea14.03 As a father, he is best described as:- An active, happy family man who is proud of his family.- An active family man who is inclined to be strict and demanding with his children.- An active family man who spends a great deal of time with his family. He tends to spoil his children.- An active but insecure family man who worries a good deal about his children.- An active, responsible father, but has a no-nonsense attitude. His work comes first and his fumily knows it.- A careful, responsible father who is conscientious about his family but not particularly warm or demonstrative.- X A carefree father who takes his family for granted. Most of the time they fend for themselves and do a pretty good job of it.- An indifferent father, who sonmetimes seems oblivious of his family.- None of these fit, he is best described as:14.04 Does he carry pictures of his family ______ wife ______ children ______ himself14.05 In his office or room, does he display pictures of his family ______ wife ______ children ______ himself14.06 Is there anything about his relations with wife or family that requires 'special mention or description?-49-
[104-10173-10104.pdf — page 271]
VI. IDEOLOGICAL SET15. General15.01 In general:He is a man with forthright and obvious opinions. He is capable of expressing these opinions with little apparent regard for the feelings and attitudes of others.He is a man with many prejudices and dogmatic ideas. He can express them with heat and determination when necessary.He is a man who is likely to turn aside controversial opinions with flippancy or humor. It is sometimes difficult to determine his opinions because it is hard to get him really serious.He is a man who may have many strong opinions but it is difficult for him to show them. He is apologetic, diffident and often uncomfortable when an argument is in the offing.He is a man whose true opinions are difficult to determine. He is usually diplomatic and conventional when controversial subjects or taboo subjects are discussed.He is a man who is serious and determined to be proper and conventional. He has the manner of a well disciplined person who only says what he is supposed to say or expected to say.He is a man who has quite sophisticated opinions. He is well read, capable of considerable articulate argument, but at times can be quite cynical or subtlely sarcastic.He is a man who is shy or taciturn about his opinions. It is very hard to get him to open up on any subject, particularly if it is controversial.Noreof these fit, he is best described as:
[104-10173-10104.pdf — page 272]
15.01.01. Is there any subject that tends to get his dander up?If so, what is it?Yes___ No___15.02 Is he a man whose patriotism:is obvious and intenseis like that of most of his colleaguesis guarded and not too intenseis difficult to determine15.02.01 On general political issues, is he:unusually well informed on his country's position and attitudesas informed as most of his colleaguesunusually poorly informed-51-
[104-10173-10104.pdf — page 273]
## VII. MEDICAL16. State of Health:16.01 To your knowledge, does he have any sort of health problem?If Yes, please explain:Yes ___ No X16.02 Does his wife or children have any sort of health problem?Yes X No ___If Yes, please explain:wife = ?16.03 Has he ever indicated that he had health problems in the past?.Yes ___ No XIf Yes, please explain:16.04 To your knowledge, does he regularly take pills or medication of any kind?Yes ___ No XIf Yes, please explain:16.05 Is he the kird of person who: Never talks about his health or how he feels.Talks about his health and feelings to an average degree XFrequently talks about his health and feelings ___16.06 When he feels bad: It is obvious to others ___ It is obvious to an average degree ___ Most people would never know it X Have never known him to feel bad-52-
[104-10173-10104.pdf — page 274]
16.07 In appearance, he looks Robust and healthy X Essentially like most people his age ____ Unhealthy ____16.08 Does he have A flushed face ____ A pot belly ____ A tendency to ____breathe hard with exertion ____ Cold clammy hands ____ A tendency ____to sweat to any unusual degree ____ Foul breath ____16.09 To your knowledge, does he adhere to a special diet or health regimen?Yes ____ No ____If Yes, please explain:16.10 As an overall impression, does he strike you as a person who isHighly energetic and tireless XEnergetic, but in spurts: ____Moderately energetic ____Lethargic, listless ____16.11 Is there anything about the state of his health or his family's health that warrants further comment?53
[104-10173-10104.pdf — page 275]
![photo of Gloria Prints & Valentin LOGITHOU]Gloria Prints & Valentin LOGITHOUSome. LIREALM-IFuliA-11712 (Photo Ride)
[104-10173-10104.pdf — page 276]
atalie de de 1948.V. Leguiner. 11.7.69,![photo with text beside it]de 1968Valentin Hogenon HandwritingSample... Taken from Passport.Date of signature is 11 July, 1969file SPR sideMP-11,712
[104-10173-10104.pdf — page 277]
Valentin S. LoquinerCorcer. Secretario de la Embajada de la U.R.S.S.Consul de la U.R.S.S.15-60-55-Siven to Licowe-1 on ca 27. Dec 1966 by Lobinou - Loginor nas trying to get Licone is full name.P-11712
[104-10173-10104.pdf — page 278]
FeldimarizingWhatna Alice hockSUBJECT: Contact/Report/LICOZYS-P-27128 Dec 1300- 1345, Sus office8 December 19661. The C/O arrived at Sudj's office while Sudj was on his way down to the street to meet Valentin Logines who had called by phone to ask Sudj to step down to the street. It turned out that all Loginor was interested in us to stre Sudj two tickets for the Ballet for 9 December. Loginov jokingly asked Sudj if he had gone to the passing of the two presidents at the border- and Sudj rejoined that he didn't make that meeting but would be on hand for the turning over of the Charizal. /Comment: the C/O was not aware of any Soviet iditering about as he entered Sudj's building.2. Sudj reported that Alexandr Frikhodko had dropped in to the office unexpectedly on 39 Dec, but was prevented from talking to Subj because Subj's wife and son were there. Prikhodko asked when he could have lunch with Subj, and-Sudj told him to call nax: week, but that he was terribly busy during the Christmas rush.The C/O took the opportunity to impress on Subj again that he was to do nothing, absolutely nothing, for the Soviets. Even if the Soviets only wanted to know about changed visa requirements for travel in Latin America - Subj was not to give them the time of day.3. The C/O brought up the subject of Jacobo Zabludovsky's mention to Subj of Echarerrid's interest in enlisting the support of influential Jews in his bid for the Presidency, and asked if Subj had heard anything further on this.Sudj said "no."But he related the story again for the C/O:Back in October 1965 Echevarria was attending a conference at which Subj was present. Echevarria came down off the presidium directly to Subj's table and greeted him.Subj related this to Zabludovsky, and it was then that Zabludovsky told Subj that Echevarria had spoken to him and said he feels he is a strong candidate for the Presidency, and would like to have a committee of five people in the Jewish community to coordinate with him. Zabludovsky told Subj he was intending to propose Sudj. Zabludovsky did not name any others.The C/O asked Subj who he thought some of the other likely Jewish leaders might be. Subj said it was hard to say, but he named two: Vickay Feldman, a banker and Fernando Jena, the head of Binal B'rith.The C/O asked Subj to check with Zabludovsky on the whole matter again, when he had the opportunity. Subj said he would do so.4. Sulj is intending to take a two day trip to Colombia, either 9 or 10 Dec, in connection with the petroleum Congress.File: cc F-11712 P-2270 P-7924P-5530PRMP-2712
[104-10173-10104.pdf — page 279]
Dillon:Source: Lienvoy/2Rec'd: 9 Déc. 1966.This was sent to Lirana by Lienvoy/2.The last comment pertains to Casamadrid's (former) association with the Legal Attache's Office, possibly; but I don't know how Lienvoy/2 knew of this.Interesting, no win.Files: Carlos CASAMADRID (P-10768)cc: Carlos BLANCO (P-4328)cc: LOGUINOV (P-11712-)cc: 50-8-75/2cc: 50-6-75/4
[104-10173-10104.pdf — page 280]
El 1. de noviembre de 196 -CARLOS-BLANCO reclama a su amigo el Vice-Consul LOGUNOV en la Embajada Rusa; que hace tiempo no se ven para platicar, LOGUNOV informa que acaba de regresar de un viaje a Mazatlán. Blanco tiene a su esposa todavía un poco delicada y también estuvo fuera de la ciudad; pero el miércoles próximo por la noche tiene tiempo para verse y para ello le puede llamar al 47-26-01 que es un negocio de su hermano y allí puede dejar el recado o bien en su oficina que es el 35-11-27 ext.112. LOGUINOV ofrece llamarle el miércoles por la mañana.(NOTA: El teléfono 47-26-01 corresponde a una tlapalería ubicada en la Calzada Noncaleo 338-D.El teléfono 35-11-37 es el conmutador del edificio #110 (hall?) de la avenida Herelou.)El 6 de diciembre de 1966, CARLOS BLANCO saluda a LOQUINOV y dice que: "El comandante CARLOS, tiene urgencia por localizar a PAVEL IATZKO". LOQUINOV informa que no está, pero que deja dicho donde poderlo llamar. BLANCO que al 10-33-62 o a la Guardia de Agentes que son el 21-28-09 y 21-28-10 y que le diga que es urgente y que puede llamar a la hora que guste, pues "vamos a estar de guardia". LOGUINOV se lo dirá para que les llame a las ocho y media de la noche. BLANCO está de acuerdo y pregunta: "...que pasó...con el asunto ese de cerca de Bellas Artes..?" LOQUINOV contestai "...si si.." BLANCO guarda silencio y después dice: "...okay...entonces adios..."(NOTA: Los teléfonos mencionados corresponden al Segundo Comandante y Guardia de Agentes de la Policía Judicial del Distrito Federal, respectivamente.)7 diciembre de 1966.CARLOS BLANCO SOLANO puede ser la misma persona quien estuvo comisionado por la Dirección Federal de Seguridad junto con CARLOS CASAMADRID MIRAS en un servicio en la Embajada de los Estados Unidos.P-10968
[104-10173-10104.pdf — page 282]
DOCUMENT TRANSFER AND CROSS REFERENCESLOJECT OF DOCUMENTLOGINOV, Valentin5. ANALYST12. CROSS REFERRED TO THIS FILEDOCUMENT IDENTIFICATIONRI FILE NO.3. DISPATCH OR SOURCE DOC. SYMBOL NO. 4. DATE7. SOURCE CRYPTONYMS. DATE OF INFO. D. EVALUATION6. DATE PROCESSED10. DISEMINATED IN11. DATEDOCUMENT CISPOSITION13. TRANSFERRED TO    RI FILE NO.PERTINENT INFORMATIONLista del Cuerop Diplomatico, Abril 1963, (Cuban) Ministerio de Relaciones ExterioresAttache, Sovemb Havana-- Valentin S. LOGINOV (LOGUINOV)Aleksandra LOGINOVA, wife (DE LOGUINOV)Address: Havana-Vedado, Paseo # 309, apto 4-BAPPROVED FOR RELEASE 1994CIA HISTORICAL REVIEW PROGRAM15. FILE THIS FORM IN FILE NO.201.285412SECRE
[104-10173-10130.pdf — page 0]
# 14-00000# 104-10173-10130# 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992SECRET20 December 1973MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORDSUBJECT: E. Howard Hunt1. I phoned Paul Burns, Special Assistant to the DDO, and said that we had some leads that could be followed by whoever has the action in the DDO in tracking down Hunt's activities during the fall of 1964, when he was alleged to have been engaged in surveillance activities of Barry Goldwater.2. I said that our files showed Hunt was in DO Division (Burns was not familiar with that title, but recognized it as the predecessor of FR Division) and in August 1964 was assigned to the Washington field office. I suggested that Stan Gaines, who was Deputy Division Chief of DO Division and now DCOS Bonn, might be in a position to give a few groups on what Hunt was supposed to be doing then. I suggested that he be queried by cable. Burns said Gaines is staying on under contract for a while, so would continue to be available.3. I said that Fig Coleman was on the Iberian desk when the Hunt assignment to Madrid was brought up in 1964 and when Hunt went to the field in 1965. He could give the background on the assignment, which seems to have been through Karamessines at Helms' direction. His recollection would give leads. I told him that Coleman became COS Madrid later, after Hunt left Spain, and could provide information on what Hunt did not do for the Agency during that period. I suggested that both Helms and Karamessines should be queried. I gave as a possible press treatment that Hunt was engaged in domestic operations (something Senator Baker is pursuing) and that, his assignment to Spain after the election could be presented as giving him time to cool off. I thought we had to pursue the matter to be sure we know the facts.4. I asked Burns to be sure that we are on information distribution of cables to the field on this, given our assigned responsibility for keeping files on Watergate. He said we are on the PLMHPLANK for messages to Helms. He would advise the action officer. I said we are available for any help we can give.S. D. Brecknridge