Francesco/who-killed-jfk huggingface dataset:
[104-10173-10104.pdf — page 200]
for or to have any special interest in the Conference. Subject replied that he had been at the Soviet Embassy about the middle of September on visa business and had seen the Soviet he always deals with on visa matters, but that this individual seemed surprised to hear Subject had been invited to Moscow and claimed to know nothing--or at least none of the details--about the Intoruist Conference. Subject claimed not to be able to remember the Soviet's name, hunted around in his wallet unsuccessfully for the Soviet's card, and then said, well, in any case it was the individual he had mentioned last time as having just gotten a promotion to Consul. I finally asked him if he meant LOGINOV--whose name he had given me last time--and after thinking for a moment, he rolled that yes, that sounded right. I then asked him if LOGINOV had shown any more interest in him or in any way been more friendly toward him in the last couple of months or since he had received the Intourist invite, Subject replied that he had not.5. Subject seemed a little sensitive to this question, and I stated that I was sure he understood why I was asking, since I knew he had been thoroughly briefed by one of my predecessors prior to his 1963 trip to the Soviet Union on Soviet interest in visitors to the USSR. I explained that we had no intention to ask him to do what he had agreed to do on his last trip to the USSR (accept recruitment if offered) and that we did not want to burden him with any instructions on how to behave or respond while there. However, I said, we continued to feel he was of potential interest to the Soviets and wanted to make sure he was aware of this when he went over, had a healthy respect for the leverage the Soviets have on their home ground, andLICANN-1 Contact Report 3 18 Oct 66
[104-10173-10104.pdf — page 201]
# CARDEDSUBJECT: CONTACT Report/ LICOZY-5 - P-271214 Oct 1200-1245, Subj's office14 October 19661.  Subj reported that Valentir Loginov had dropped by the office during the week and went to have coffee with Subj (Subj remarked that Loginov doesn't seem to want to talk in the office). Loginov had brought along visa application forms for Subj, and Subj filled them out for himself and his son, Marcos, and turned them over to Loginov, along with the passports (attached are copies of the visas- notes: the visas are good for over 20 days in the Soviet Union, although the INTURIST conference is from 24 Oct to 29 Oct).Loginov told Subj that Pavel Yatskov wanted to see him (presumably Yatskov has brought something back for Subj). Subj asked Loginov what Yatskov is doing.The Soviet replied that Yatskov has a job in the Embassy. Subj pressed: "what kind of a job. It's worthwhile that you gave him a good job." Loginov replied: "You want to know too much."2.  The C/O asked Subj what decided him to go to the Soviet Union. Subj replied that he had a commission from the Petroleum Congress (Subj is involved in organizing the Congress for Mexico for 2 to 8 April 1967), actually in behalf of KLI and his own interests, to persuade the Soviets that they use some other airline than Aeroflot to transport the Soviet delegates to Mexico. /Comments: the C/O saw a confidential letter from KLI which set out the probability that the Soviets would want to use Aeroflot but that they had not committed themselves as yet as to number of delegates that would attend or the means by which they would transport delegates; attached is a copy of a letter to Dr. H.S. Namotkin appointing Subj in his visit to Moscow to talk to Dr. Nametkin - the letter states that "the future visit of Subj is exclusively connected to assist the National Committee which is patently not the case since Subj is attending the INTURIST conference/."At any rate Subj has decided to go to Moscow, and is taking his sons along.* Subj repeated his tactic in Moscow as far as contacts with the Soviets are concerned. He will not seek them out, not even Nechiporenko, and if contacted by them he will be affable and non-committal, and not put the sharp issue to them that he is through.He said the latter remains his position in Mexico, or anywhere else but in the Soviet Union.3.  The attached booklet of the World Petroleum Congress contains the names of the National Committees of the Iron Curtain countries. Attached are listings of the Czechoslovak delegates and a letter detailing the Hungarian delegates along with financial arrangements for them.4.  The C/O will see Subj before he leaves Mexico on 22 October.
[104-10173-10104.pdf — page 202]
# Contact Report/LICOZY-5 - P-2712SyorichiRice7 October 19667 Oct 1145-1230, Sudj's office1. Subj had been to Los Angeles, California for a few days and had returned to Mexico on 5 Oct. Evidently he had accompanied a iuebla delegation that visited Douglas and Lockheed aircraft factories in California, He mentioned that Acronaves had purchased two DC#8's from Douglas, and ordered some DC-918. At the Lockheed plant they saw the new super-sontt airplane.2. Subj had received on 6 Oct a confirmatory telegram from INTURIST, for Subj and his son (cony attached), re attendance at the INTURIST conference in loscow. Also, in the mail of 7 Oct Subj had received INTURIST releases on travel romulations for tourists to the Soviet Union, promotional plans, tours, etc. (Sudj will make copies of these for turnover to the C/O)Subj reported that Valentin Loginoy came by the office on 29 Sept. Subj was with a friend, Peter Poter Barr, of New York, so he went to have coffee with Losinov, taking along his friend. The discussion was innocuous, but Loginov asked Subj if he would be going to see his friends, which Subj took to mean that all was: O.K. as far as Sudj's attendance in Moscow for the I'TUPEST conference. Subi answered "yes". Loginov jokingly asked Subf whey Husk had come to Nexico. Subj bantered a reply that the Mexican Ministry of Foreign Affairs was going to serve some rare Champagne that ask liked. Lovrinov pressed Subj for the real reason. July said cagily that he knew, but he wasn't roing to tell lepinov. /Comment: his hanter is inclulo to de onstrate the time of relationship that exist between Sul. Art.in fron from Loginov that borders on ri ervire for information or involving Subj, the latter turns away with a joking answer. Leinov accepts this in offood-naturedly, jokingly calling Subj "a son of a bitch" or worse./3. Subi discussed it, the e C/O the prospect of his going to the Soviet Union. He was debating in it on mind the advisability of it. The C/O probed to see has Sutj retarded it from sinens standpoint, putting the question "if you didn't go, do you think it would hurt you from the standpoint of business." Subj said he just didn't know. The C/O asked if others went (Subj had just said that possibly Garza, Chine end kov (Phonetic) would go although they were not certain) did Subj think the Soviets right throw the bulk of the business their way. Again Subj daid he didn't knez. The C/O then said that unless there were some overriding business reason, Subj should take into account our view that there was a margin of hazardCOPIES MADE CARDFiles F11702Kitz (pany) P-581
[104-10173-10104.pdf — page 203]
2. to Subj's being inside the Soviet Union. Subj said that personally he had no great desire to go to the Soviet Union, on three counts: 1) the climate 2) "the pleasant atmosphere" (his way of saying that if he was out of trace with the Soviets they wouldn't put out the red carpet for him as they did previously) and 3) he was plain afraid.The latter apparently touched some hidden spring in Subj. Heretofore Subj had limited himself to calling the Soviets "boutards" etc. and anti-semitic. Now, Subj chided himself for doing so little to alleviate the lot of the Jews in the Soviet Union. He declared that the Soviet Union was the worst offender against the Jews, because they were eliminating the race, not through physical extermination, but through forcing assimilation. His own view was that the Soviets were more dangerous to the Jews and Israel than were the Arabs, for instance Lebanon or Jordan, who if it weren't for fear of Nasser would make their peace with Israel.The C/O tried to counter the self-recrimination of Subj by telling him that he had accomplished a superb job in the duel of the West with the Soviets through his cooperation with us. That, in view of his real feelings about the Soviets, his dealing with them had been masterful. Subj shook off the C/O's optimistic view of Subj's contribution to the "cause."4. The C/O brought up the request to get full details on the travel of all non-Soviets to the Soviet Union - and suggested that Subj automatically have duplicates made of the visa requests for such people. Subj said that would be simple - and he would instruct "Miriam" (the employee who handles INTUPIST travel) to make copies of all applications for visas. Comments the C/O asked Subj if Kiriam (Avila Katz) were going to remain in his employ, not taking a job at the Israeli Embassy - and Subj replied that she was going to stay on in Subj's firm/.Subj had remarked that he was going to discuss the matter of making the Moscow trip with his wife. The C/O asked that Subj advise us as soon as he had come to a decision- either for or against going to the Soviet Union.The C/O told Subj that he would pass by his office next week to pick up the copies of the INTURIST material.
[104-10173-10104.pdf — page 204]
SECRETLICOWL Ganeral Notes Turned in on 6 October 196622 September 1966 (Thursday)(LOGINOV) came in for cigarettes. He said that there are 52 Mexicans studying at Lusumba. These students are going to be the directors in the schools of the Politechnico Nacional since one of them has come back well prepared in physics. (Thote follows a diatribe against those bad Mexicana who want to make Mexico another Cuba.)23 September 1966 (Friday)The "Spanish' type" came in with a briefcase and bought Raleighs with filters. He had the same type of billfold as the other Soviets. He then went directly to the Dabassy. (I asked if he had a moustache; he said, yos. This is probably GAZIYEV).24 September 1966 (Saturday)In the afternoon SILNIKOV was there when (ISAYEV) came in.. I asked the latter about the watches and he said that they wouldn't arrive until the end of the year. SILNIKOV left at 1620.25 September 1966 (Sunday)Unimportant26 September (Monday)A useless blurb about an unnamed Soviet who came in and discoursed on MADRAZO, saying that he will set up a new party and an anti-Soviet blast.27 September (Tuesday)(DENISOV) came in at 1210 and made a phone call. I heard him mention Delicias and del Rio. Since these towns are near the border near San Diego, I think he was talking about smuggling arms to Guatemala (sic). Afterwards I asked after his wife. He said that she and their daughter are in Moscow and that he is a bafchelor. I asked if he was able to find a girl. He answered, of course, but they all want a house. He left at 1230.28 September 1986 (Wednesday)An account from a friend that a Soviet will be PNGed for being involved with the Guatemalan arms smuggling..SECRETAttachment toLICOCIL. ContactReport, 6 Oct 66P-11712
[104-10173-10104.pdf — page 205]
CONTACT REPORTSUBJECT: LICANNY-1- P-3415DATE OF MEETING: 28 September 19661. LICOZY-5 reported on 20 September that LICANNY-1 of Garza-Lopez Tours was one of those invited to attend the 24-29 Intourist Conference in Moscow. This was confirmed by LIENVOY on the same date. Since the Station had had no contact with Subject sine 6 January 1966, I contacted Don Lautz of the Visa Section on 27 September to see if Subject was still coming into the Embassy regularly on visa business. Lautz said that Subject had for some time now been sending an agent to the Embassy rather than coming himself. Lautz readily agreed to give Subject a call, however, and reached him late that afternoon. He told Subject that the "people" at the Embassy whom he had introduced Subject to earlier were interested in talking with him and asked if he could drop into the Embassy in the next few days. Subject immediately recognized which "people" Lautz was referring to, said that as a matter of fact he had something to discuss with "them," commented that it probably in fact involved the same matter, and agreed to come to Lautz's office at 11:00 the next day. As he had done with Irving A. Oronsky, Lautz agreed to let me use his office to talk to Subject.2. I went to Lautz's office at 11:00 on the 28th, but when Subject had not appeared by 11:15, Lautz agreed to call me in my office when Subject arrived. Lautz called about 11:30, and I went right down. By the time I got there, however, Subject had already explained to Lautz that he was sure I wanted to talk about his invitation toFiles: P-2712 P-11712 P-11996
[104-10173-10104.pdf — page 206]
the USSR and had given Lautz a list of three otherinvitees to the Intourist conference. Lautz introducedme by true name as Oronsky's replacement. Sutject, inwhat Lautz had forewarned me was his usuale over-enthusiasticmanner, greeted me with a "believe me, it is my pleasure"salutation and, upon confirming that it was the Intouristconference I was interest in, took off from there. Withoutthe slightest prompting, he rattled off the following:a) He had received a telegram from Moscow on6 September inviting him to an Intourist conference inMoscow from-24-29 October. He had immediately thoughtof informing the Embassy, but because of the pressureof business simply hadn't gotten around to it. WhenLautz called him, he knew immediately what we wereinterested in.b) He had prepared a Xerox copy of the telegram.for us, which he gave to me. He has not yet definitelymade up his mind about attending the conference, butthinks he probably will go. At the moment, he was stillawaiting the detailed letter on the conference which,according to the telegram, was to follow. (LICOZY-5 hasalready received his letter.) In reply to my questionas to whether he was sending enough people to the USSRto make the trip really worthwhile, he said that hehad sent only five people there so far this year, butthat he thought travel to the Soviet Union was definitelygoing to pick up. He said that LOGINOV who has beenthe Soviet official he has been dealing with about visas,
[104-10173-10104.pdf — page 207]
to Moscow could consequently be made at relatively littleadditional expense.c) Subject continued that if he did go to Moscow,he would be glad to submit a report on his trip when hegot back, get (group) pictures, if we wanted them, ofhis eyes open. However, he said, as he told Oronsky, heis not interested in working for us on a permanent basis,meeting clandestinely with us, or taking any money. waswilling to help, he explained, because he believedbasically what we did about current world problems and,after all, had lived in the States for many years andregarded it as his "second home." He said he liked thearrangement of meeting in Lautz's office because it madeclandestine meetings unnecessary and because he had aperfectly legitimate reason for being there.d) Subject stated that he had already given Lautzthe names of the other travel agents in Mexico whom hehad heard had been invited to Moscow and said that oncehe received the Intourist letter giving the details onthe conference he would begin calling around to seeexactly who was going.3. Since a) Subject had already volunteered to do   primarily what I intended to ask him, b) had not yet   definitely decided to make the trip, c) Lautz gave no   indication of preparing to leave us alone, and d) I   clearly could not get any farther with Subject on a   personal level with Lautz present, I brought the meeting   to an end with a request to see Subject again after he   had received the Intourist letter, obtained the names of   those of his colleagues who were going, and decided   definitely whether or not he was going to go. Subject   said he would be happy to talk with me again, get the
[104-10173-10104.pdf — page 208]
information I wanted, and, if I liked," "be briefed"on the trip. It was agreed he would call Lautz to setup the meeting. (The situation was such that I do notblame Lautz for apparently thinking it unnecessary toleave us alone this time, but I made a special pointof requesting that he leave us to ourselves next time.Lautz, who seems to be thoroughly friendly and accommodating,readily agreed.)4. Subject impresses me as a very sharp, shrewd,   cool-headed, but probably basically sincere individual.   He had the situation figured perfectly when he arrived   in Lautz's office, had decided precisely what he would   be willing to do, knew exactly what he was going to say,   and wasted no words in saying it. I plan to try to get   to know him a little better next time, give him a defensive   briefing as well as one on what to keep his eyes open   for, and also explore his attitude toward a possible   recruitment pitch from the Soviets. (Prior to his trip   to the USSR in May 1963, Subject agreed to accept Soviet   recruitment if approached and to serve as a DA. Upon   his return, however, he reported that the Soviets made   no approach to him.) I also want to ask him about LOGINOV,   on whom he agreed to supply personality data   to Oronsky, but evidently never did. Subject mentioned   that LOGINOV had told him about ten days ago that he   had been promoted to Consul. Subject did not say if   he had been in touch with LOGINOV or anyone else at the   Soviet Embassy about the Intourist conference. I will   get this from him next time.5. Subject told Lautz that the following individuals   had been invited to the Intourist conference:(a) Moises Schuster of Nundos Tours.(b) Carlos IBARGUEN of De Carlo Tours (IBARGUENis also the president of the Mexican Travel Agents' Assoc.).
[104-10173-10104.pdf — page 209]
(c) Someone from the Garza Travel Service. Subject also gave me an Air France tourist pamphlet on the USSR in Spanish for my information.6. Subject mentioned in passing that he would be glad to furnish us (presumably on a regular basis) with the names of those people who book travel to the Soviet Union through his Agency, but said Oronsky had previously shown disinterest in such information. In view of Oronsky's alleged disinterest, I let the subject pass without comment, but I see no reason not take up his offer. Besides furnishing us with a few more names, it would give us a reason for continuing contact with Subject.Keith R. Levenderis
[104-10173-10104.pdf — page 210]
LOGINOV - Photographs# LOGINOV, Valantin SergeyevichAC: 22 Dec 22Wife: Alexandra DmitriyevnaSon: DmitriyCareer:Attache, Jovent, Havana5 Aug 65-7 Oct 693rd secy, Sovint, Mexico (ViceResidence:Car:Overt duties:LA![photo of woman]![photo of man]
[104-10173-10104.pdf — page 211]
> [Figure] Image of two men in suits. One of the men is talking.> [Figure] Image of two men in suits. One man is standing to the side while the other is holding papers.
[104-10173-10104.pdf — page 212]
Valentin S. LOGINOV (P-11/12) with Boris A. CHMYKHOV(P-6235) SOURCE: LICALLA 2 August 1968.P-11712
[104-10173-10104.pdf — page 213]
> [Figure] A photograph of two men in suits standing outside.Sualla 11/7.63Helgegren har dag navnS.11.762
[104-10173-10104.pdf — page 214]
> [Figure] A man in a suit, with a blurred background.> [Figure] A close-up of a man in a suit and tie, with a blurred background.VALENTIN SERGEYEVICH LOGINOWP-11712SOURCE: LILYRIC, 25 SEPT 1968> [Figure] A man in a suit, with a blurred background.
[104-10173-10104.pdf — page 215]
# Valentin S. LOGUINOVThird Secretary at the Soviet EmbassyBorn in 1927Wife Alexandra, born in 1928Son Dimitry, born in 1959LOGUINOV is tall and has very curly, light brown hair. He speaks fluent Spanish and some English. He drives a green 1965 Impala with diplomatic tags 19-DA.![Valentin S. Loguinov Portrait]![Alexandra Loguinov Portrait]> [Figure] Valentin S. Loguinov> Consul de la U.R.S.S> Tercer Secretario de la Embajada de la U.R.S.S> 15-60-55![Valentin S. Loguinov Portrait]
[104-10173-10104.pdf — page 216]
![photo of a person and palms trees]Lacha 5 Aug 28Kaljulan, vasarons, terrasse suite a melting party
[104-10173-10104.pdf — page 217]
> [Figure] A black and white photograph features two men in suits standing outside. The man on the left has dark hair and is clean-shaven, while the man on the right is wearing sunglasses. Both are wearing suits with ties.Chmython & LagenonC.11712healla - 22 foul. 6887.(2)
[104-10173-10104.pdf — page 218]
> [Figure] Two black and white portrait photos of a man with short hair, wearing a suit and tie. The photo on the left shows the man smiling, while the one on the right depicts him with his hand touching his forehead.
[104-10173-10104.pdf — page 219]
Contact reports, photos, etc., forwarded from the field.
[104-10173-10104.pdf — page 220]
SECRET# PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIREFORM12-67 2825Prepared byLIREALM-ISECRETLOGINOV-P. 11,712(4)Feb 69
[104-10173-10104.pdf — page 221]
SECRET# PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE1.  This is a new, experimental version of the Personality Assessment Questionnaire (sometimes informally called the PRQ III) which has been in use for several years. This new form is largely a checklist and thus requires far less essay-type reporting than the previous form.2.  For a number of years, our operational psychologists have been developing a system for indirect assessment of target personalities. The system employs-in lieu of psychological tests and interviews-observations of appearance, manner, and style of behavior. Such observations are used as if they were items in a psychological test, and like test items, are weighted and analyzed to yield a personality profile. Working from the. profile, operational psychologists describe the target personality's basic aptitudes, attitudes, motives and susceptibilities. The goal of the assessment is to identify feasible means of influencing the target person.3.  Reliability is vastly increased when two or more observers complete this questionnaire independently. All items need not be completed; in fact, it is a rare case where contact is sufficient to complete it fully. You are encouraged to guess where complete information is lacking. Mark such items with a "G," instead of the customary check mark or "X." Thus, an observer with very limited contact can be expected to enter more "G's" than "X's."SECRET
[104-10173-10104.pdf — page 222]
4. Before completing the enclosed PAQ form, please provide the following information about yourself:Age 39 Sex M Nationality USSocial-cultural background:Middle-classHow often have you observed the target individual?3 to 4 times per month over two years.When did you last observe the target individual?Last week. (week of 2 Feb 169)What is the nature of your contact? (direct acquaintance, embassy receptions/parties, informants, debriefing of others, etc.)Tennis club.5. Can you supply a specimen of the target individual's handwriting?Yes No X6. Please supply the name(s) of any person you believe qualified to provide information about the target person, that is, anyone sufficiently knowledgeable to complete this form at least in part.Gloria Pinto
[104-10173-10104.pdf — page 223]
# PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE## 1. DESCRIPTIONOverall Impression. (Check the most appropriate.)1.01 Virile, athletic, practical, and socially facile ("Hail fellow")1.02 Virile, rugged, practical, but socially guarded (authoritarian) X1.03 Rather soft and sensuous but socially pleasant and appropriate (good guy)1.04 Rather soft and sensuous but socially guarded and moody (a possible whiner)1.05 Manly, clean-cut, professional, and socially smooth (executive type)1.05 Austere, precise, and businesslike (dedicated worker type)1.07 Cultured, neat, artistic, and socially smooth (diplomatic type)1.08 Sensitive, intense, and self-preoccupied (artistic or absent-minded professor type)1.09 None of these fit.I would describe him as:## 2. Dress. (Check the most appropriate.)2.01 Well-groomed (natty)2.02 Neat (well-kept) X2.03. Fastidious (fussy)2.04 Overdressed (prissy)2.05 Nondescript (bländ)2.06 Underdressed (informal)2.07 Casual (indifferent)1