[104-10164-10002.pdf — page 65]
# SECRETSECTION 11 MOTIVATION AND CONTROL1. ESTIMATE SUBJECT'S MOTIVATION. (Be detailed, if possible cite evidence. Do not use stock comment such as "anti-cubaunist.")Estimate Subject's primary motivation is financial. He has large family (wife and seven children) and has, in the past, been accustomed to high standard of living. Possibly his present occupation in real estate is not meeting his requirements for income and status. Also, he probably has continuing ideological interest in deposing Castro.2. INDICATE WHAT CONTROL, IF ANY. EXISTS OVER THE SUBJECT. (If no control, or if there is a lack of real control explain.)No real control exists over subject other than financial. He needs guaranteed employment to provide for his family. However, manipulation of his resident alien status, aviation occupation property, and U.S. licenses could offer control elements.SECTION 111 COVER1. COVER USED BY SUBJECT AND CASE OFFICER IN THEIR MEETINGS.The principal agent represents himself as an employee of the WAVE case officer, who in turn is documented as an agent of the Government of the Republic of the Congo. However although no U.S. Government interest is overtly manifested, it is realistic to assume that Subject suspects2. COVER USED BY SUBJECT IN OBTAINING HIS INFORMATION AND IN CONTACTING HIS INFORMANTS:NA3. INDICATE SERVICE FOR WHICH SUBJECT THINKS HE (will work) (is working).In all probability he is or will become aware that the GOC air Program is sponsored by KUBARK.SECTION IV INTELLIGENCE CONNECTIONS AND TRAINING1. EXPLAIN SUBJECT'S KNOWN PAST OR PRESENT CONNECTION WITH ANY OTHER INTELLIGENCE SERVICE. INDICATE THE EXTENT SUCH CONNECTION IS KNOWN OVERTLY. Subject was a leader in one of the anti-castro resistance cells in Cuba prior to 1960. He was also a leader of an anti-Castro resistance group in New Orleans after emigration. His file indicates liaison with the FBI concerning thingroups willingness to cooperate with the U.S. Government in operations against Cuba. He was extremely conscious of all aspects of security.2. LIST OTHER INDIVIDUALS (Agents, relatives, friends) WHO KNOW OF SUBJECT'S PRESENT INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES.Lack of security or evidence of collusion. His record indicates no connection with any other national intelligence service.Probably wife and brother, Mario, and possibly some housing residing in the Miami area. However, Subject's file indicates attention to control of information concerning political affiliations and objectives.3. EXPLAIN ANY TRAINING SUBJECT HAS HAD IN CLANDESTINE OPERATIONS.Subject has no KUBARK training in clandestine operations. However while residing in Cuba he participated in resistance operations against Castro. His planning in sabotage shows change, originality, and initiative.SECTION V COLLABORATION POTENTIAL1. INDICATE OTHER FOREIGN POWERS SUBJECT WOULD BE MOST LIKELY TO COLLABORATE WITH BECAUSE OF HIS IDEOLOGY OR PAST ASSOCIATIONS. EXPLAIN.Subject may collaborate with any government or group presenting a well conceived, financed, and disciplined program for re-invasion of Cuba. Still, prospects of collaboration become less likely as his personal contacts in Cuba are lost and urgent political issues cool.