Francesco/who-killed-jfk huggingface dataset:
[104-10150-10004.pdf — page 273]
nothing in either the form or substance of the papers which provides a basis for suspicion as to their authenticity. In addition, the form and substance of the papers are in keeping with the description by NOSENKO of the day-to-day operation of the First Section, First Department.During current interviews, the CHEREPANOV case has been covered in detail with NOSENKO. The Cherepanov Papers, which were originally shown to NOSENKO in 1964 after his defection, have also been covered in detail on a separate item-by-item basis. Although NOSENKO does not claim to have specifically seen any particular item prior to 1964, his statements in regard to the various handwritings,types of notes, and draft memoranda leave no doubt that NOSENKO was very familiar with personnel in the First Section, First Department, and with First Department procedures.Certain additional research has been conducted in regard to the papers and a detailed analysis will be prepared at a later date. It should be noted that a considerable amount of personal judgment has been necessary in making an assessment of the Cherepanov Papers since there are no exemplars with which to compare any of the material. However, based on information developed thus far, and there is no reason to believe additional work will alter the conclusion, there is not an adequate basis for an opinion that CHEREPANOV was under KGB control, that the Cherepanov Papers contain "deceptive informatigen"3
[104-10150-10004.pdf — page 274]
or that the papers were other than the collection of material by a disgruntled employee which he very carefully selected or accumulated, the removal of which would only have constituted a minimal risk to CHEREPANOV.The entire Cherepanov Papers have been reviewed to determine if there is any information which could be considered "deceptive information" either by direct statement or implication. Two possible areas have been noted and given full considerati:(a) There is no specific info were any recruitments by the KGB personnel in the United States Embassy; nor is there any information suggesting an American source or American agent during that period of time.(b) Petr S. POPOV, a GRU an extremely valuable CIA source from 1953 on, was, according to the papers, exposed to the KGB in January 1959 as a result of a letter mailing by George Payne WINTERS, Jr. WINTERS was a CIA employee under Department of State cover assigned to the Embassy in Moscow. The letter, which was to POPOV, was obtained by the KGB after mailing by WINTERS and was a direct result of KGB surveillance of WINTERS.
[104-10150-10004.pdf — page 275]
In regard to (a), the papers are only a rather minute part of the total papers prepared in the First Section during 1958 - 1960.The lack of any information in these papers which directly or indirectly indicates that the KGB made a recruitment of an American in the Embassy or had an American source in the Embassy during the 1958 - 1960 period is only a matter for consideration. It is not conclusive proof that a recruitment was not made or that an American source did not exist. The papers do not contain a positive statement on either matter.In regard to (b), the quite specific information in the papers that Petr S. POPOV was uncovered by the KGB as a result of KGB surveillance on George Payne WINTERS, Jr., who mailed a letter to POPOV in January 1959, this information should be considered as possibly information of a deceptive nature unless an adequate explanation can be made for its presence in the papers. POPOV was recalled to Moscow from East Germany in November 1958 ostensibly for TDY. The circumstances under which he was recalled and collateral information have given adequate grounds for a belief that by November 1958 POPOV was suspected by the KGB of cooperating with Western Intelligence or that the KGB may even have been sure POPOV had been cooperating with United States Intelligence.It may be presumed that any lead to the KGB in regard to POPOV or the fact that United States Intelligence, more specifically,
[104-10150-10004.pdf — page 276]
CIA, had a source in the GRU would have come from an agent or source of the FCD, KGB, not the SCD. It can also be presumed that a source or agent of the FCD in a position to furnish a lead to a penetration of the GRU by Western Intelligence would be carefully protected even within the KGB. The possibility of course exists that a lead from George BLAKE, an FCD agent, resulted in the exposure of POPOV to the KGB, but it is not established that it did nor is there any reason to believe the FCD could not or did not have another agent or agents who furnished information to the KGB pertinent to development of the case against POPOV.The primary question, however, as regards the Cherepanov Papers is whether, even if it is presumed the KGB obtained information from an FCD source or agent which led to suspicion of POPOV or identification of POPOV, this would be incompatible with information in the papers and could only lead to the conclusion that the papers contain "deceptive information."The conclusion in regard to the above is that the fact the papers attribute the exposure of POPOV to the KGB to surveillance on WINTERS when he mailed the letter to POPOV in January 1959 is not incompatible with the distinct possibility that the KGB had previously obtained information from an FCD agent or agents which actually led to suspicion in regard to POPOV or actual identification of POPOV.
[104-10150-10004.pdf — page 277]
If information was received from an important FCD agentsuch as George BLAKE or through another valuable FCD agent whichled to KGB suspicion of POPOV prior to his return to Moscow inNovember 1958, it is highly unlikely such information would receivewide distribution within the KGB, either in the FCD or the SCD. Itis also possible the limited group within the KGB who would be awarethat the KGB had received information leading to suspicion of POPOVfrom a valuable agent would be very interested in attributing theexposure of POPOV to the fortuitous mailing of the letter to POPOVby WINTERS. The possibility should be considered that prior to theretrieval by the KGB of the letter to POPOV there was only a deepsuspicion of POPOV but that the letter completely solidified the caseagainst POPOV.Consideration has been given to the possibility that CHEREPANOVwas under KGB control when he passed the papers to the Americantourist and that it was done by the KGB with the hope of involving CIAin a KGB-controlled operation within the USSR. In that event, thepapers passed by CHEREPANOV would most likely be genuine sincethis would have been the initial step in what the KGB hoped would becomea successful operation..The above theory has been rejected since there are a numberof factors which militate against it. These factors include the fact that
[104-10150-10004.pdf — page 278]
the latest information in the papers was at least three years old,which would indicate CHEREPANOV had no current access and therewas no indication CHEREPANOV was interested in a future contact.
[104-10150-10004.pdf — page 279]
![photo description]
[104-10150-10004.pdf — page 280]
SECRETINDEXABIDIAN, John - IV, E, 5, 7-15,19,20,52"ANDREY" (Dayle Wallis SMITH) - IV, G,1-4ARTAMONOV, Nikolay - III, A, 2ARTEMOV, Vladimir Lvovich - IV, F, 6,12,13BAKHVALOV, Mikhail - IV, E, 3, 4BALDIN, Boris Andreyevich - IV, F, 2BARRETT, Robert - III, F, 14, 15BEGGS, Frank - IV, E, 36, 37BELITSKIY, Boris - IV, F, 6-12BERIYA, Lavrentiy Ivanovich - IV, B, 2,3,5-7BIENSTOCK, Natalie - IV, F,3,4BIRSE, Arthur - IV, D, 1, 2BLAKE, George - IV, D, 9; IV, F, 9; V, C, 6, 7BOBKOV, Filip Denisovich - IV, F, 15, 16; V, B, 3BOHLEN, Ambassador - III, F, 10BOWDEN, Lewis - IV, E, 53, 54BRAUNS, Horst - IV, F, 3-6BROWN, G. Stanley - IV, E, 43
[104-10150-10004.pdf — page 281]
BUGAYEVA, Ludmila - IV, F, 4BURGI, Richard - IV, D, 1BURTIN, Sipe - IV, E, 49, 50BURTIN, Will) - IV, E, 49, 50CECCHI, Pietro - IV, E, 39, 40, 42CHELNOKOV, Vladimir Dmitriyevich - IV, F, 2,16CHEREPANOV, Aleksandr N. - Ш, Н, 4; V, C, 1-4,6-8CHERNETSEV, Y. E. IV, E, 49CHURANOV, Vladimir A. - Ш, В, 4DAY, Frank - IV, E, 41, 43DEMKIN, Vladimir - IV, E, 20, 45DERYABIN, Petr Sergeyevich - IV, B,5,6DOUGLAS, William O. - IV, D, 3DREW, George - IV, D, 1DWELLY, Robert - IV, E, 41, 44, 45FARMAKOVSKAYA, Olga A. - V, A,1FEDOROVICH, Tatyana - IV, E, 8, 9FEDOSEYEV, Sergey M. - IV, E, 49-51; IV, F,1FISK, Norman) - IV, D, 5FRIPPEL, Arsene - IV, D, 2GAFFEY, Joseph - IV, E, 41, 45, 46
[104-10150-10004.pdf — page 282]
SECRETGARBLER, Paul - IV, E, 52GARCIA, Anthony A. - IV, E, 39GARLAND, John - III, F, 17; IV, E, 31, 33-36GINSBURG, Michael - IV, D, 5, 6GOLITSYN, Anatoliy Mikhaylovich - III, B, 3, 4; III, E, 9-11; III, F, 5-13,15-19; IV, B, 5, 6; IV, D, 9, 10; IV, E, 21, 23, 31-34; V, A, 1GRIBANOV, Oleg M. - III, F, 3, 4; IV, 6; IV, 6; IV, E, 4, 5, 21; IV, F, 1, 2"GRIGORIY" - III, F, 13; IV, D, 3, 6; IV, F, 4GROMAKOVSKIY, Yevgeniy - III, B, 4; IV, E, 20GRYAZNOV, Gennadiy I. - III, B, 4; III, F, 8-13, 15; IV, E, 5, 12, 19-21, 26-28, 30, 43-45; IV, G, 3; V, B, 3, 4GUK, Yuriy I. - III, B, 4HAMILTON, Victor Norris - III, E, 9(aka: HINDAL, Fouzi Mitri)"HANNA" - IV, E, 27HARRIS, Gisella - IV, D, 1, 7, 8HORBALY, William - IV, E, 53HOWARD, Herbert - III, E, 8; III, F, 20; IV, G, 1, 3, 4IVANOVA, Svetlana - IV, E, 38, 39, 45, 46JENNER, Paul - IV, E, 28-31, 35-36JOHNSON, Robert Lee - III, E, 8; III, G, 5JOHNSON, Wallace Everett - IV, F, 3, 4JONES, William Carroll - IV, F, 3, 43SECRET
[104-10150-10004.pdf — page 283]
SECRETKADERA, Fred) - IV, E, 45KANTOR, Marvin - IV, D, 5, 6(KARLOV, fnu) - IV, D, 5KASHPEROV, Mikhail - III, H, 4KEMMER, Myra - IV, E, 9KEYSERS, James - IV, E, 22-26, 55, 56KLYPIN, Vladimir Alekseyevich - IV, E, 5, 48-51KOBULOV, Bogdan Zakharovich (General) - IV, B, 1-4, 7KOLOSSOV, Viktor - IV, E, 30, 34(Alias used by KOSOLAPOV)KOSOLAPOV, Vadim V. - III, B, 4; III, F, 8, 16, 17; IV, E, 5, 19-21, 28-32, 34-39, 42-44KOSYGINA, Madame - III, A, 1KOVSHUK, Vladislav M. - III, B, 4; III, F, 5, 11, 12; IV, E, 3, 4, 6, 12, 18, 21, 23, 49, 52, 53; IV, F, 1, 2; IV, G, 3; V, C, 2KOZLOV, Veniamin - IV, E, 12KRUGLOV, Sergey Nikiforovich - IV, B, 5LANE, Allen) - IV, D, 1, 2LANGELLE, Russell - III, F, 3; IV, E, 8"LILLIAN" - IV, E, 26(LUBIN, George) - IV, E, 49, 50LUNT, Horace - III, F, 3MAHONEY, Eugene - IV, E, 53MALIA, Martin - IV, D, 2SECRET
[104-10150-10004.pdf — page 284]
SECRETMARK, David - III, C, 4MATLAW, Ralph IV, D, 5MERTENS, Gerard - IV, D, 2MIKHAYLOV, A. A. - IV, E, 49MINTKENBAUGH, James Allen III, Е, 8; Ш, G, 5MORELL, William Ν. IV, E, 52MORONE, Joseph IV, E, 22, 27, 36, 37, 39, 40, 55MULE, Walter (Capt.) - IV, C, 4MC GOWAN, Edward - IV, F, 13PECHTER, Bernard) - IV, D, 5, 6PENKOVSKIY, Oleg Vasilyevich - IV, E, 13PETROV, Vladimir Ivanovich - III, B, 4; IV, E, 48, 49POPOV, Petr S. - IV, E, 7, 10; V, C/4-7PREISFREUND, Johan) - III, F, 5, 11, 12PRESSMAN, Patrick - IV, D, 5, 7"RAKETA" - IV, C, 5RASTVOROV, Yuriy - IV, B,5,6RHODES, Roy III, F, 4RUFE, John/- IV, D, 5, 6SCHWARZENBACH, Collette - III, F, 100001262SECRET
[104-10150-10004.pdf — page 285]
SERGEYEV (SERGEEV), FNU - IV, E, 32, 33(Very possibly Igor Alekseyevich ZENKIN, but is now considered also identical to Igor Alekseyevich SERGEYEV, Igor Alekseyevich SUKHOV and very possibly Igor A. SMIRNOV.)SHAPIRO, Isaac Henry - III, F, 6SHATTAUER, Sofia - IV, D, 5,7SHAZLY, Sarwat el - IV, E, 40SHELEPIN, Aleksandr Nikolayevich - III, F, 13"SHMELEV" - III, F, 13; IV, D, 3, 6; IV, F, 4SHUBIN, John - IV, D, 11SHULGINA, Nataliya - IV, F, 11, 12SMITH, Dayle Wallis - III, F, 4, 20; IV, G,1SMITH, Edward Ellis - III, F, 4SMITH, John Discoe - III, E, 9; IV, E, 49, 50STALIN - IV, B, 5STEVENS, Edmund - III, F, 4, 6STORSBERG, James - III, F, 3, 5, 11-13; IV, E, 21-24, 26, 43, 55, 56TARASKA, William - IV, D, 5,6TAYLOR, David - IV, D, 2TAYLOR, John - IV, E, 42, 43UMANETS, Ella - IV, E, 38
[104-10150-10004.pdf — page 286]
SECRET(URBAN, (Colonel) - IV, E, 24, 25VASSALL, William - ІШ, Е, 9; II, G, 5; IV, D, 9WASHENKO, Steve IV, E, 53WILBY, William Stanley - IV, D, 2WINTERS, George Payne, Jr. - IV, E, 53; V, C, 4-7ZENKIN, FNU IV, E, 32-34(Very possibly Igor Alekseyevich ZENKIN, but is now considered also identical to Igor Alekseyevich SERGEYEV, Igor Alekseyevich SUKHOV and very possibly Igor A. SMIRNOV.)(ZUJUS, Matthew) - IV, E, 26-28ZWANC, Maurice - IV, E, 40-427SECRET
[104-10150-10038.pdf — page 0]
# 104-10150-10038 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992SC-02164-58> RETURN TO CIA> Background Use Only> Do Not ReproduceSummary of Initial MissionsIn the period from 20 June to 10 July 1956 the Soviet Bloc air defense system was subjected to eight penetrations of an unprecedented nature, seven occurring within a period of only eight days. It must be remembered that 24 (COMINT) provides the only basis of judging the performance of the Soviet system. This is important because it is clear from REGAL material that considerable air defense business is conducted over landlines and thus not observed by COMINT. However, some tentative conclusions may be drawn from these initial flights and these are indicated as follows:1.  In spite of the fact that these missions come as a surprise, none of them went undetected. This is clear evidence that their radar coverage extends above (72,000) feet.24- 23 -TOP SECRET - EIDER - CHESS
[104-10150-10038.pdf — page 2]
SC-02164-587. Confusion and track loss seemed to be related to the 99   presence of large numbers of fighters although the saturation point   has not been determined because of insufficient data.8. The question of radars for height finding, the capabilities   of TOKEN in this role, the introduction of ROCK CAKES and later   developments are discussed in another section. It is believed,   however, that these missions were a catalyst in the introduction   of ROCK CAKES.99- 25 -TOP SECRET-EIDER-CHESS
[104-10150-10136.pdf — page 0]
# 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992CLASSIFIED when blank-TOP SECRET when attached to Top Secret Document-Automatically downgraded or declassi-when filled in form is detached from controlled document.# CONTROL AND COVER SHEET FOR TOP SECRET DOCUMENTDOCUMENT DESCRIPTIONRCE![document description]JOC. NO. TS197124DOC. DATE Feb-68COPY NO. 020 cy #1 of 1 cy #10NUMBER OF PAGES 147NUMBER OF ATTACHMENTS NoneREGISTRYCIA CONTROL NO.TS197124DATE DOCUMENT RECEIVED31 May 78LOGGED BY![signature]ATTENTION: This form will be placed on top of and attached to each Top Secret document received by the Central Intelligence Agency or classified Top Secret within the CIA and will remain attached to the document until such time as it is downgraded, destroyed, or transmitted outside of CIA. Access to Top Secret matter is limited to Top Secret Control personnel and those individuals whose official duties relate to the matter. Top Secret Control Officers who receive and/or release the attached Top Secret material will sign this form and indicate period of custody in the left-hand columns provided. Each individual who sees the Top Secret document will sign and indicate the date of handling in the right-hand columns.| REFERRED TO | RECEIVED  | RELEASED  | SEEN BY   |           |             |      || ----------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | ----------- | ---- || OFFICE      | SIGNATURE | DATE TIME | DATE TIME | SIGNATURE | OFFICE/DIV. | DATE ||             |           |           |           |           |             |      ||             |           |           |           |           |             |      ||             |           |           |           |           |             |      ||             |           |           |           |           |             |      ||             |           |           |           |           |             |      ||             |           |           |           |           |             |      ||             |           |           |           |           |             |      ||             |           |           |           |           |             |      |NOTICE OF DETACHMENT: When this form is detached from Top Secret material it shall be completed in the appropriate spaces below and transmitted to Central Top Secret Control for record.| DOWNGRADED               | DESTROYED      | DISPATCHED (OUTSIDE CIA) || ------------------------ | -------------- | ------------------------ || TO                       | TO             | TO                       || BY (Signature)           | BY (Signature) | BY (Signature)           || WITNESSED BY (Signature) |                |                          || OFFICE                   | OFFICE         | OFFICE                   || DATE                     | DATE           | DATE                     |FORM 26 USE PREVIOUS EDITIONS.8-73TOP SECRET
[104-10150-10136.pdf — page 1]
TOP SECRET DOCUMENTMATERIAL REVIEWED AT CIA HEADQUARTERS BYHOUSE SELECT COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS STAFF MEMBERSLE TITLE/NUMBER/VOLUME: The Examination of theBona Fides of a KGB DefectorICLUSIVE DATES: 1 Document - dated February 1968STODIAL UNIT/LOCATION: CIROOM:LETIONS, IF ANY:| DATE RECEIVED | DATE RETURNED | REVIEWED BY (PRINT NAME) | SIGNATURE OF REVIEWING OFFICIAL || ------------- | ------------- | ------------------------ | ------------------------------- || 3-14-78       |               | Kenneth Klein            | Kenneth K.                      || 3-15-78       |               | Kenneth Klein            | Kenneth K.                      || 3-16-78       |               | Kenneth Klein            | Kenneth K.                      ||               |               | Kenneth Klein            | Kenneth K.                      ||               |               | Sim Smith                | Sim Smith                       || 26 Apr 78     |               | JOHANNA SMITH            | Johanna Smith                   || 4-27-78       |               | G. Robert Blakey         | G. ROBERT BLAKEY                || 27 Apr 78     |               | Johanna Smith            | Johanna Smith                   || 1 May 78      |               | Johanna Smith            | Johanna Smith                   || 2 May 78      |               | SURELL BRADY             | Surell Brady                    || 16 May 78     |               | MARGO E. JACKSON         | Margo E. Jackson                |
[104-10150-10136.pdf — page 2]
# Top Secret# The Examination of the Bona Fides## of a KGB DefectorOLCCy#1 ofcy #10TS No. 197124Copy № 10Top Secret
[104-10150-10136.pdf — page 3]
TOP SECRET1.  Attached is copy number 10 of the February 1968    CIA study entitled "The Examination of the Bona Fides of    a KGB Defector - Yuriy I. Nosenko."2.  Please note that the CIA finds this study to be    inaccurate in many important details and to contain the    results of faulty judgements leading to unfounded conclusions.3.  We have deleted certain portions of this study    containing information which bears on the security of    ongoing, viable CIA operations, or is related thereto.4.  We request return of this study when it has served    your purposes.TOP SECRET0001266
[104-10150-10136.pdf — page 4]
# The Examination of the Bona Fidesof a KGB DefectorYuriy I. NOSENKOFebruary 1968Top Secret0001267TS No. 197124Copy 10
[104-10150-10136.pdf — page 5]
# Top SecretCONTENTSIntroduction 1Summary of Case 3I FOUNDATIONS OF NOSENKO'S CLAIMS 11NOSENKO's Statements About Himself 11Soviet Officials' Statements 20The Product of NOSENKO's Debriefing 21Positive Intelligence Information 21Counterintelligence Information 22Significant KGB Operations NotDirectly Related to NOSENKO'sClaimed Service 24"The KGB Agent in Paris"(Sgt. JOHNSON) 24"SASHA" (Identity Unknown) 28"The KGB Agent in the British Admiralty"(William VASSALL) 30The KGB Audio Attack on the West GermanEmbassy 31"ANDREY" (Dayle W. SMITH) 33Edward Ellis SMITH 37II EXAMINATION OF NOSENKO'S BONA FIDES 41Notes for the Reader 41III PRE-KGB BIOGRAPHY 45Birth to 1945 45Moscow Institute of International Relations(1945-ca. 1950) 48Naval RU Service (Ca. 1951-ca. 1953) 49Summary and Conclusion 58
[104-10150-10136.pdf — page 6]
# Top SecretCONTENTSPAGEVI SEVENTH DEPARTMENT (June 1955-January 1960) (Cont.)Operational Activities (1955-1958) 113Entrapment of *MALIA* 06 114Recruitment of *BURGI* 06 115Attempted Recruitment of *GEHRCKENS* 06 121Contact with *LANE* and *BIRSE* 06,06 122Recruitment of *SUNDAR* 06 123Travel to London (1957 and 1958) 124Operational Activities (1958-1960) 127Recruitment of *HARRIS* 06 128Compromise of *KRAFT* 06 129Recruitment of *DREW* 06 130Recruitment of *LUKIS* 06 131Recruitment of *WILBY* 06 131Recruitment of *TAYLOR* 06 132Recruitment of *MERTENS* 06 133Compromise of *BARRETT* 06 134Compromise of *WILLERFORD* 06 136Recruitment of *FRIPPEL* 06 137Lee Harvey OSWALD 143Summary 144Knowledge of other Seventh Department American Tourist Operations 145Seventh Department Counterintelligence Operations (1955-1960) 146NOSENKO's Information 146Information Furnished KGB by George BLAKE 148KGB Tourist Study 149Summary and Conclusion 150VII AMERICAN EMBASSY SECTION OF AMERICAN DEPARTMENT (January 1960-January 1962) 151Deputy Chief of Section 151Transfer to Section 152Predecessor as Deputy Chief 153Responsibilities 154Deputy and Occasional Acting Chief 156General Supervisory Duties 1590001269(iii)TS No. 197124Top SecretCopy 10
[104-10150-10136.pdf — page 7]
# Top SecretCONTENTSVII AMERICAN EMBASSY SECTION OF AMERICAN DEPARTMENT(January 1960-January 1962) (Cont.)PAGECryptologic Attack on Embassy Communications 236Knowledge of CIA Personnel within Embassy 240Suspected CIA Officers 241Unsuspected CIA Officers 244Personal Handler of Agents 248Temporary Assignments Abroad 251Planned Travel to U.S. 251Travel to Cuba (November-December 1960) 252Travel to Bulgaria (April-May 1961) 254Compromise of LUNT[^1] 256Promotion and Transfer to Seventh Department(January 1962) 259Summary and Conclusion 261VIII SEVENTH DEPARTMENT (January 1962-January 1964) 263Introductory Comment 263Chief of the American-British CommonwealthSection (January 1962-July 1962) 265NOSENKO'S Agents 265Operational Activities 268Entrapment of JOHNSON[^1] 268Entrapment of JONES[^1] 272Recruitment of BIENSTOCK[^1] 273Travel to Geneva (March-June 1962) 275Purpose of Trip 275Investigation of SHAKHOV 276Security Escort for Delegation 278Visits to KGB Legal Residency 279KGB Officers within Soviet Delegation 279Association with Other Soviets 280Supervising Case Officer for BELITSKIY 282Contact with CIA 286Operational Activities (continued) 288Attempted Recruitment of BRAUNS[^1] 288Summary and Conclusion 290[^1]: 06
[104-10150-10136.pdf — page 8]
# Top SecretCONTENTSPAGEVIII SEVENTH DEPARTMENT (January 1962-January 1964) (Cont.)Deputy Chief of Seventh Department (July 1962-January 1964)KGB Operations 291Recruitment of [SVENCHANSKIY]06 292Investigation of [SLESINGER]06 292Arrest and Interrogation of [KOTEN]06 293GRU Agent [SHUBIN]06 295Arrest of BARGHOORN 296Investigation of OSWALD 298Residence in USSR 303Request to Return to USSR 303Post-Assassination Review of KGB File 305The CHEREPANOV Papers 307Contents 309NOSENKO's Travel Document 314Return to Geneva (January-February 1964) 315Purpose of Trip 316Visits to KGB Legal Residency 317Availability for Meetings with CIA 318NOSENKO'S Written Notes 318NOSENKO's Defection 319Knowledge of Other Seventh Department Operations 320Operational Activities (July 1962-January 1964) 325KGB Counterintelligence Operations Among American Tourists 326Information Furnished the KGB by George BLAKE 326KGB Study of American Intelligence Tourist Operations 327NOSENKO's Information 327Summary 330Summary and Conclusion 331(vi)Top SecretTS No. 197124Copy
[104-10150-10136.pdf — page 9]
Top SecretCONTENTSIX OTHER ASPECTS OF NOSENKO'S CLAIMED KGB SERVICERelationship with General GRIBANOV 335Communist Party Status 335Knowledge of KGB Forms and Procedures 338Awards and Decorations 342Sourcing 345Ranks 349350X PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PSYCHIATRIC ASSESSMENT 355XI SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS: NOSENKO'S BONA FIDES 357Annex B - Summaries of Cases Not Examined in Text 399Index of Personalities 437