[104-10048-10124.pdf — page 1]
# CONTINUATION OF DISPATCHDecember 1962, all of JMWAVE's business with the Identity 3was handled via AMCARDON-2. In mid-December 1962, AMCARPON-2made the suggestion that he introduce REUTEMAN to AMCARDON-1in order that there be a backup contact, in the event thatAMCARBON-2 were out of town or unavailable at such times asREUTEMAN might require assistance from the Identity 3. REUTEMANagreed to AMCARBON-2's suggestion, and, as a result, AMCARDON-2hosted a luncheon on 12 December 1962 at the Miami Club in theHotel Columbus, Miami, Florida, at which AMCARBON-2 introducedAMCARBON-1 to REUTEMAN. As a result of this initial meeting on12 December 1962, an operational relationship has developed withAMCARBON-1, and it is believed that this relationship contributesto the fulfillment of the over-all JMWAVE mission. In view ofthis, a special activities report is being submitted to cover thenature of JMWAVE's relationship with AMCARDON-1 during theperiod December. 1962 to March 1964.## FRAME OF REFERENCE FOR JMWAVE'S RELATIONSHIP WITH AMCARDON-1When AMCARBON-2 introduced AMCARCON-1 to REUTEMAN, AMCARLON-2reviewed the ground rules under which he had been cooperatingwith REUTEMAN. This review was conducted for AMCARBON-1'sbenefit, in order that he might clearly understand the frame ofreference which should prevail in his relationships with REUTEMAN.In this review, AMCAREON-2 pointed out that it was the policyof the Identity 3 that it would take no action which wouldpurposely embarrass KUBARK or its South Florida operations. Asa result, if any embarrassing items relative to KUBARK's operationsin South Florida did come to the attention of the Identity 3, thismaterial would be brought to REUTEMAN's immediate attention.AMCARBON-2 made it clear to AMCARBON-1 that such items should bediscussed with REUTEMAN in a frank manner. In addition, AMCARBON-2made the point that, after an item was discussed, AMCARBON-1should follow REUTEMAN's guidance relative to how any particularlyembarrassing item might be handled by the Identity 3, so that itwould not expose KUBARK operations and, at the same time, wouldnot jeopardize the journalistic reputation of the Identity 3.In addition, AMCARBON-2 pointed out that, if AMCARBON-1 broughta potentially embarrassing item to REUTELMAN's attention andremedial action on the matter was not taken, by REUTEMAN withina reasonable period of time, then the Identity 3 would feel freeto expose any ineptness on KUBARK's part. AMCARBON-2 pointedout that in return for this cooperation from the Identity 3,REUTEMAN had agreed that he would be available for contact bytelephone or periodic personal meetings at which AMCAREON-1and AMCARBON-2 could discuss broad trends and developments inLatin American affairs. AMCARBON-2 advised AMCARBON-1 that thisarrangement did not mean that AMCARBON-1 could expect to obtainany classified information from REUTEMAN. The point was alsomade that AMCARBON-1 should not press for the obtaining ofclassified information, but he should be alert to steering tipswhich REUTEMAN might furnish him on fast-breaking news stories.AMCARBON-1 indicated that he understood the frame of referencewhich had been outlined by AMCARBON-2. This frame of referencehas prevailed throughout JMWAVE's relationship with AMCAREON-1during the period December 1962 to March 1964.## AMCARBON-1'S JOURNALISTIC CAREER.AMCARBON-1 originallystarted to work for the Identity 3 in 1957 on the City Desk,and subsequently advanced from this assignment to an assignmentwhich entailed covering major political developments in Florida.At a later date, ANCARBON-1 became a feature writer for theIdentity 3. Then in July or August 1962, AMCARBON-1 was madethe Identity 4. This assignment was considered to be a significant