Shri R.T. Thanewala, learned counsel for the objector.This is a petition under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'The Code') praying for quashment of F.I.R bearing crime no.627/2015 dated 03/09/2015, registered at police-station Madhav Nagar, District Ujjain for offences under Sections 306/34 of IPC and consequent proceedings taken up in S.T. No.128/2016, pending before the XI Additional Sessions Judge, Ujjain.The learned counsel for the petitioner has invited the attention of this Court to order dated 31/08/2016 passed in Cr.R. No.1086/2016, whereby the charge with regard to offence under Section 306 of IPC in S.T. No.128/2016 was quashed, on a petition preferred by co-accused Dilip and Madhu Gupta.It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that on the basis of same allegations in the same case, trial for offence under Section 306 of IPC is still going on against petitioner Subhash Yadav.C. No.10306/2016 2Though the prayer is not opposed by the learned Public Prosecutor, however, the learned counsel for the objector, Asha Rani-wife of deceased Gyaneshwar Prasad Mittal, has strongly opposed the prayer for quashment.It is submitted that earlier, Cr.R. No.904/2016, preferred by the petitioner before this Court against the order of framing charge was dismissed, on 26/07/2016, as withdrawn, therefore, identical prayer for quashment cannot be entertained under Section 482 of 'The Code'.Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.The law is well settled that the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of 'The Code' is wide enough and that if the proceedings are going to result in abuse of process of the Court, then the high Court in exercise of powers under Section 482 of 'The Code' can quash such proceedings and nothing will come in the way.No doubt, the revision preferred by the petitioner against charge was dismissed as withdrawn by this Court vide order dated M.Cr.C. No.10306/2016 3 26/07/2016, however, thereafter another petition being Cr.R. No.1086/2016, filed by co-accused Dilip and Madhu Gupta was allowed by this Court vide order dated 31/08/2016 after elaborate consideration of factual and legal position obtaining in the matter.Relevant part of the order dated 31/08/2016 runs as under:C. No.10306/2016 3"As per prosecution, Gyaneshwar Prasad Mittal aged about 75 years residing at 72, Dussehra Maidan, Ujjain committed suicide on 27/08/2015 at around 1.30 a.m. inside his house by strangulation as a result of hanging.His wife Asha Rani also attempted to commit suicide.Merg was registered in this connection with police station Madhav Nagar, Ujjain.The sale consideration of Rs.55.00 lakhs, as per the agreement, was to be paid in four installments.The petitioners had already paid an amount of Rs.41.25 lakhs against first three installments and forth installment was to be paid at the time of registration of sale deed.As per prosecution, Gyaneshwar Prasad Mittal (deceased) and his wife Asha Rani had requested the petitioners many a times to pay the fourth installment and get the sale deed executed, however, they refused to pay the fourth installment, and further pressurised Gyaneshwar Prasad Mittal (deceased) to vacate his house.Allegedly, thereafter, almost three months prior to the incident, they suddenly vacated the house saying that they have handed over its possession M.Cr.C. No.10306/2016 4 to one Subhash Yadav, advocate so that he can manage to get it vacated from Gyaneshwar Prasad Mittal (deceased).It is further alleged that Subhash Yadav has opened an office in the premises and anti-social elements used to assemble there.Gyaneshwar Prasad Mittal (deceased) was also being obstructed from using common pathway and thus a lot of nuisance was being caused.C. No.10306/2016 5M.Cr.C. No.10306/2016 8The proceedings pending before XI Additional Sessions Judge, against the petitioner are hereby quashed.Certified copy as per rules.(Ved Prakash Sharma) Judge sumathi

Sections cited: Section 306 in The Indian Penal Code, Section 482 in The Indian Penal Code, Section 107 in The Indian Penal Code, Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code