FangyuLei/tatqa huggingface dataset:
2019
2018
2017
(in thousands)
(in thousands)
(in thousands)
Revenues from customers (1):
China
$514,327
$348,942
$260,451
Taiwan
485,681
516,322
687,031
United States
333,059
282,869
252,516
Korea
239,504
163,224
206,819
Europe
219,015
223,207
163,715
Japan
175,322
158,281
169,093
Thailand
87,503
59,184
29,566
Singapore
84,111
108,618
101,085
Malaysia
58,200
122,797
124,048
Philippines
54,560
77,996
105,850
Rest of the World
43,683
39,362
36,432
$2,294,965
$2,100,802
$2,136,606
information as to teradyne ’ s revenues by country is as follows : .
-1 revenues attributable to a country are based on location of customer site .
in 2019 and 2018 no single direct customer accounted for more than 10 % of teradyne ’ s consolidated revenues .
in 2017 revenues from taiwan semiconductor manufacturing company ltd .
accounted for 13 % of its consolidated revenues .
taiwan semiconductor manufacturing company ltd .
is a customer of teradyne ’ s semiconductor test segment .
teradyne estimates consolidated revenues driven by huawei technologies co .
ltd .
- “ huawei ” combining direct sales to that customer with sales to the customer ’ s osats accounted for approximately 11 % and 4 % of its consolidated revenues in 2019 and 2018 respectively .
teradyne estimates consolidated revenues driven by another oem customer combining direct sales to that customer with sales to the customer ’ s osats -which include taiwan semiconductor manufacturing company ltd .
accounted for approximately 10 % 13 % and 22 % of its consolidated revenues in 2019 2018 and 2017 respectively .

Question: What was the change in Rest of the World in 2019 from 2018?
Answer: 4321
Year Ended December 31,
Year Ended December 31,
Year Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
Cost of revenue
$10.6
$7.0
$6.0
Research and development
17.0
14.3
12.5
Selling and marketing
14.8
14.1
11.7
General and administrative
37.0
42.9
39.6
Share-based compensation expense
79.4
78.3
69.8
Related income tax benefits at federal rate (1)
(16.7)
(16.4)
(24.4)
Share-based compensation expense, net of taxes
$62.7
$61.9
$45.4
note 11 : share-based compensation .
total share-based compensation expense related to the company ' s stock options rsus stock grant awards and espp were recorded within the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income as follows -in millions : .
-1 recognition of related income tax benefits are the result of the adoption of asu 2016-09 during the first quarter of 2017 through a cumulative effect adjustment of $ 68 .
1 million recorded as a credit to retained earnings as of january 1 2017 .
tax benefit is calculated using the federal statutory rate of 21 % during the years ended december 31 2019 and december 31 2018 and 35 % for the year ended december 31 2017 .
at december 31 2019 total unrecognized share-based compensation expense net of estimated forfeitures related to non-vested rsus with service performance and market conditions was $ 74 .
9 million which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1 .
3 years .
the total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the year ended december 31 2019 was $ 3 .
9 million .
the company received cash of $ 1 .
7 million and $ 26 .
2 million from the exercise of stock options and the issuance of shares under the espp respectively .
upon option exercise vesting of rsus stock grant awards or completion of a purchase under the espp the company issues new shares of common stock .

Question: How much was the total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the year ended December 31, 2019?
Answer: $3.9 million
USDm
2019
2018
2017
Cash and cash equivalents, including restricted cash
72.5
127.4
134.2
Undrawn credit facilities
173.1
278.7
270.7
Liquidity
245.6
406.1
404.9
alternative performance measures – continued .
liquidity : torm defines liquidity as available cash comprising cash and cash equivalents including restricted cash as well as undrawn credit facilities .
torm finds the apm important as the liquidity expresses torm ’ s financial position ability to meet current liabilities and cash buffer .
furthermore it expresses torm ’ s ability to act and invest when possibilities occur .

Question: In which year was liquidity the largest?
Answer: 2018
December 31,
December 31,
2019
2018
Cash
$8.2
$9.5
Cash equivalents
7.2
10.8
Cash and cash equivalents
$15.4
$20.3
cash and cash equivalents .
highly liquid instruments purchased with original maturities of three months or less are considered cash equivalents .
cash equivalents are invested with high credit quality financial institutions and consist of short-term investments such as demand deposit accounts money market accounts money market funds and time deposits .
the carrying amounts of these instruments reported in the consolidated balance sheets approximate their fair value because of their immediate or short-term maturities .
cash and cash equivalents are unrestricted and include the following -in millions : .

Question: What was the total cash and cash equivalents in 2018?
Answer: 20.3
Year-ended 31 March 2019
Year-ended 31 March 2018 Restated See note 2
$M
$M
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment
11.8
11.6
Amortisation of intangible assets
16.9
25.2
Research and development expenditure
(143.9)
(140.3)
Operating lease rentals:
Property
14.0
12.5
Other
1.6
1.6
Pension scheme contributions
8.9
8.4
Impairment of trade receivables
0.6
0.6
Net foreign currency differences
(1.5)
6.9
9 profit / -loss on ordinary activities .
the profit -2018 : loss on ordinary activities before taxation is stated after charging : .

Question: What are the components under Operating lease rentals in the table?
Answer: Property Other
Fiscal Years
Fiscal Years
Fiscal Years
2019
2018
2017
Numerator:     
Loss from continuing operations
$(383,798)
$(133,762)
$(150,416)
Loss from discontinued operations
—
(6,215)
(19,077)
Net loss
(383,798)
(139,977)
(169,493)
Warrant liability gain
—
(27,646)
—
Net loss attributable to common stockholders
$(383,798)
$(167,623)
$(169,493)
Denominator:     
Weighted average common shares outstanding-basic
65,686
64,741
60,704
Dilutive effect of warrants
—
570
—
Weighted average common shares outstanding-diluted
65,686
65,311
60,704
Common stock earnings per share-basic:     
Continuing operations
$(5.84)
$(2.07)
$(2.48)
Discontinued operations
—
(0.10)
(0.31)
Net common stock earnings per share-basic
$(5.84)
$(2.16)
$(2.79)
Common stock earnings per share-diluted:
Continuing operations
$(5.84)
$(2.47)
$(2.48)
Discontinued operations
—
(0.10)
(0.31)
Net common stock earnings per share-diluted
$(5.84)
$(2.57)
$(2.79)
24 .
earnings per share .
the following table set forth the computation for basic and diluted net income -loss per share of common stock -in thousands except per share data : .
as of september 27 2019 we had warrants outstanding which were reported as a liability on the consolidated balance sheet .
during fiscal years 2019 and 2018 we recorded gains of $ 0 .
8 million and $ 27 .
6 million respectively associated with adjusting the fair value of the warrants in the consolidated statements of operations primarily as a result of declines in our stock price .
when calculating earnings per share we are required to adjust for the dilutive effect of outstanding common stock equivalents including adjustment to the numerator for the dilutive effect of contracts that must be settled in common stock .
during the fiscal year ended september 27 2019 we excluded the effects of the warrant gain and the 214303 of potential shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants as the inclusion would be anti-dilutive .
during the fiscal year ended september 28 2018 we adjusted the numerator to exclude the warrant gain $ 27 .
6 million and we also adjusted the denominator for the dilutive effect of the incremental warrant shares of 569667 under the treasury stock method .
for the fiscal years 2018 the table above excludes the effects of 375940 shares of potential shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of stock options restricted stock and restricted stock units as the inclusion would be anti-dilutive .
the table excludes the effects of 386552 and 1877401 shares for fiscal years 2019 and 2017 respectively of potential shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of stock options restricted stock restricted stock units and warrants as the inclusion would be anti-dilutive .

Question: What was the Loss from continuing operations in 2019?
Answer: $(383,798)
2019
2019
2018
2018
2018
Loss £m
Shares million
Loss per share pence
Loss £m
Shares million
Loss per Share pence
Basic1
(1950.9)
1,344.5
(145.1)p
(1,132.2)
1,343.7
(84.3)p
Diluted2
(1950.9)
1,344.5
(145.1)p
(1,132.2)
1,343.7
(84.3)p
12 earnings per share .
-a basic and diluted earnings per share .
1 the weighted average number of shares used has been adjusted to remove shares held in the esop .
2 diluted shares include the impact of any dilutive convertible bonds share options and share awards .
during 2017 the group incurred a £ 49 .
4 million share related charge in relation to its spanish development partner eurofund ’ s future interests in the share capital of the intu costa del sol development company .
the positive impact of this share related charge on equity attributable to owners of intu properties plc is a credit to retained earnings of £ 49 .
4 million .
subsequent to 31 december 2019 the group has received the final ratifications required for full planning to become effective and therefore we expect the positive impact on retained earnings to reverse once these arrangements are formally concluded .

Question: What do the diluted shares include?
Answer: impact of any dilutive convertible bonds share options share awards
Vessel
Built in 
Deadweight Tons  
Delivered to NAT in
Nordic Freedom
2005
159,331
2005
Nordic Moon
2002
160,305
2006
Nordic Apollo
2003
159,998
2006
Nordic Cosmos
2003
159,999
2006
Nordic Grace
2002
149,921
2009
Nordic Mistral
2002
164,236
2009
Nordic Passat
2002
164,274
2010
Nordic Vega
2010
163,940
2010
Nordic Breeze
2011
158,597
2011
Nordic Zenith
2011
158,645
2011
Nordic Sprinter
2005
159,089
2014
Nordic Skier
2005
159,089
2014
Nordic Light
2010
158,475
2015
Nordic Cross
2010
158,475
2015
Nordic Luna
2004
150,037
2016
Nordic Castor
2004
150,249
2016
Nordic Sirius
2000
150,183
2016
Nordic Pollux
2003
150,103
2016
Nordic Star
2016
159,000
2016
Nordic Space
2017
159,000
2017
Nordic Aquarius
2018
157,000
2018
Nordic Cygnus
2018
157,000
2018
Nordic Tellus
2018
157,000
2018
b .
business overview .
our fleet .
our fleet currently consists of 23 suezmax crude oil tankers of which the vast majority have been built in korea .
the majority of our vessels are employed in the spot market together with one vessel currently on a longer term time charter agreement expiring in 2021 or later .
the vessels are considered homogenous and interchangeable as they have approximately the same freight capacity and ability to transport the same type of cargo .

Question: What is the total weight of Nordic Freedom and Nordic Moon?
Answer: 319636
Pension
Other Benefits
2019
2018
2019
2018
Net actuarial loss (gain)
$16,864
$15,691
$(793)
$(879)
Prior service cost
1,325
1,413
—
—
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss
$18,189
$17,104
$(793)
$(879)
amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income -loss at march 31 2019 and 2018 consist of the following -amounts in thousands : .
although not reflected in the table above the tax effect on the pension balances was $ 2 .
4 million and $ 2 .
3 million as of march 31 2019 and 2018 respectively .

Question: What was the change in the Net actuarial loss  for Other Benefits between 2018 and 2019?
Answer: 86
2019
2018
Net sales 
$3,164.4
$2,873.5
Cost of sales 
2,872.6
2,615.9
Gross profit 
291.8
257.6
Gross margin 
9.2%
9.0%
Operating income 
142.1
118.3
Operating margin 
4.5%
4.1%
Other expense 
16.1
10.7
Income tax expense
17.3
94.6
Net income 
108.6
13.0
Diluted earnings per share 
$3.50
$0.38
Return on invested capital* 
13.1%
16.1%
Economic return*
4.1%
6.6%
item 7 .
management ’ s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations .
results of operations .
consolidated performance summary .
the following table presents selected consolidated financial data for the indicated fiscal years -dollars in millions except per share data : .
* non-gaap metric ; refer to " return on invested capital - " roic " and economic return " below for more information and exhibit 99 .
1 for a reconciliation .
net sales .
fiscal 2019 net sales increased $ 290 .
9 million or 10 .
1 % as compared to fiscal 2018 .
net sales are analyzed by management by geographic segment which reflects the company ' s reportable segments and by market sector .
management measures operational performance and allocates resources on a geographic segment basis .
the company ’ s global business development strategy is based on our targeted market sectors .

Question: What was the increase in net sales between 2018 and 2019?
Answer: 290.9
Fiscal Year 2019 ($)
Fiscal Year 2018 ($)
AuditFees(1)
4,703,830
4,605,495
Audit-RelatedFees(2)
27,000
90,500
TaxFees(3)
194,170
34,888
AllOtherFees
—
—
TOTAL
4,925,000
4,730,883
fees billed by ernst & young llp .
the table below shows the fees billed by ey for audit and other services provided to the company in fiscal years 2019 and 2018 .
figure 48 .
fy2019 / 2018 fees billed by ernst & young llp .
-1 audit fees represent fees for professional services provided in connection with the audits of annual financial statements .
audit fees also include reviews of quarterly financial statements audit services related to other statutory or regulatory filings or engagements and fees related to ey ’ s audit of the effectiveness of the company ’ s internal control over financial reporting pursuant to section 404 of the sarbanes-oxley act .
-2 audit-related fees represent fees for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the audit or review of the company ’ s financial statements and are not reported above under “ audit fees ” .
these fees principally include due diligence and accounting consultation fees in connection with our acquisition of coventor inc .
in 2018 and an information systems audit in 2019 .
-3 tax fees represent fees for professional services for tax planning tax compliance and review services related to foreign tax compliance and assistance with tax audits and appeals .
the audit committee reviewed summaries of the services provided by ey and the related fees during fiscal year 2019 and has determined that the provision of non-audit services was compatible with maintaining the independence of ey as the company ’ s independent registered public accounting firm .
the audit committee or its delegate approved 100 % of the services and related fee amounts for services provided by ey during fiscal year 2019 .

Question: What do tax fees represent?
Answer: fees for professional services for tax planning, tax compliance and review services related to foreign tax compliance and assistance with tax audits and appeals
VMware Stock Options
Outstanding Options
Exercise Price
Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Term (in years)
Aggregate Intrinsic Value(1)
Exercisable
945
$47.24
3.81
$95
Vested and expected to vest
2,589
56.13
6.41
238
options outstanding that are exercisable and that have vested and are expected to vest as of january 31 2020 were as follows -outstanding options in thousands aggregate intrinsic value in in millions : .
-1 the aggregate intrinsic values represent the total pre-tax intrinsic values based on vmware ' s closing stock price of $ 148 .
06 as of january 31 2020 which would have been received by the option holders had all in-the-money options been exercised as of that date .
the total fair value of vmware stock options that vested during the years ended january 31 2020 february 1 2019 and february 2 2018 was $ 64 million $ 35 million and $ 32 million respectively .
total fair value of pivotal stock options that vested during the years ended january 31 2020 february 1 2019 and february 2 2018 was $ 27 million $ 41 million and $ 23 million respectively .
the vmware stock options exercised during the years ended january 31 2020 february 1 2019 and february 2 2018 had a pre-tax intrinsic value of $ 103 million $ 56 million and $ 62 million respectively .
the pivotal options exercised during the years ended january 31 2020 and february 1 2019 had a pre-tax intrinsic value of $ 278 million and $ 97 million respectively and was not material during the year ended february 2 2018 .
the pre-tax intrinsic value of pivotal options exercised during the year ended january 31 2020 includes vested options that were settled in cash as part of the pivotal acquisition .

Question: What was the difference between the aggregate intrinsic value between exercisable and vested and expected to vest options? 
Answer: 143
For the year ended December 31,
For the year ended December 31,
For the year ended December 31,
2017
2018
2019
Basic earnings/(loss) per share
Profit/(loss) for the year attributable to owners of the Group
15,506
47,683
(100,661)
Less: Dividends on Preference Shares
(10,064)
(10,063)
(10,063)
Profit/(loss) for the year available to owners of the Group
5,442
37,620
(110,724)
Weighted average number of shares outstanding, basic
80,622,788
80,792,837
80,849,818
Basic earnings/(loss) per share
0.07
0.47
(1.37)
Diluted earnings/(loss) per share
Profit/(loss) for the year available to owners of the Group used in the calculation of diluted EPS
5,442
37,620
(110,724)
Weighted average number of shares outstanding, basic
80,622,788
80,792,837
80,849,818
Dilutive potential ordinary shares
643,342
844,185
—
Weighted average number of shares used in the calculation of diluted EPS
81,266,130
81,637,022
80,849,818
Diluted earnings/(loss) per share
0.07
0.46
(1.37)
gaslog ltd .
and its subsidiaries notes to the consolidated financial statements -continued for the years ended december 31 2017 2018 and 2019 -all amounts expressed in thousands of u .
s .
dollars except share and per share data .
29 .
earnings / -losses per share - ‘ ‘ eps ’ ’ .
basic earnings / -losses per share was calculated by dividing the profit / -loss for the year attributable to the owners of the common shares after deducting the dividend on preference shares by the weighted average number of common shares issued and outstanding during the year .
diluted eps is calculated by dividing the profit / -loss for the year attributable to the owners of the group adjusted for the effects of all dilutive potential ordinary shares by the weighted average number of all potential ordinary shares assumed to have been converted into common shares unless such potential ordinary shares have an antidilutive effect .
the following reflects the earnings / -losses and share data used in the basic and diluted earnings / -losses per share computations : .
the group excluded the effect of 2630173 sars and 367162 rsus in calculating diluted eps for the year ended december 31 2019 as they were anti-dilutive -december 31 2018 : 555453 sars and 0 rsus december 31 2017 : 998502 sars and 0 rsus .

Question: In which years was the earnings/(losses) per share recorded for?
Answer: 2017 2018 2019
€ millions
2019
2018
2017
Current tax expense
Germany
625
733
935
Foreign
1,153
1,019
716
Total current tax expense
1,778
1,752
1,651
Deferred tax expense/income
Germany
–3
57
–584
Foreign
–549
–298
–84
Total deferred tax income
–552
–241
–668
Total income tax expense
1,226
1,511
983
-c .
5 income taxes .
judgments and estimates .
we are subject to changing tax laws in multiple jurisdictions within the countries in which we operate .
our ordinary business activities also include transactions where the ultimate tax outcome is uncertain due to different interpretations of tax laws such as those involving revenue sharing and cost reimbursement arrangements between sap group entities .
in addition the amount of income taxes we pay is generally subject to ongoing audits by domestic and foreign tax authorities .
in determining our worldwide income tax provisions judgment is involved in assessing whether to consider each uncertain tax treatment separately or together with one or more other uncertain tax treatments and whether to reflect the respective effect of uncertainty based on the most likely amount or the expected value .
in applying these judgments we consider the nature and the individual facts and circumstances of each uncertain tax treatment as well as the specifics of the respective jurisdiction including applicable tax laws and our interpretation thereof .
the assessment whether a deferred tax asset is impaired requires judgment as we need to estimate future taxable profits to determine whether the utilization of the deferred tax asset is probable .
in evaluating our ability to utilize our deferred tax assets we consider all available positive and negative evidence including the level of historical taxable income and projections for future taxable income over the periods in which the deferred tax assets are recoverable .
our judgment regarding future taxable income is based on assumptions about future market conditions and future profits of sap .
judgment is also required in evaluating whether interest or penalties related to income taxes meet the definition of income taxes and if not whether it is of financial nature .
in this judgment we particularly consider applicable local tax laws and interpretations on ifrs by national standard setters in the area of group financial reporting .
tax expense by geographic location .

Question: In which years was the Tax Expense by Geographic Location calculated?
Answer: 2019 2018 2017
Number of Shares
Weighted-Average Grant-Date
(in thousands)
Fair Value per Share
Outstanding at December 31, 2018
—
$—
Granted(1)
445
22.21
Outstanding at December 31, 2019
445
22.21
performance-based restricted stock units .
performance-based restricted stock units are eligible to vest at the end of each fiscal year in a three-year performance period based on the company ’ s annual growth rate in net sales and non-gaap diluted earnings per share -subject to certain adjustments over a multiple of four times the related results for the fourth quarter of 2018 relative to the growth rates for a peer group of companies for the same metrics and periods .
for the performance-based restricted stock units granted in 2019 60 % of each performance-based award is subject to the net sales metric for the performance period and 40 % is subject to the non-gaap diluted earnings per share metric for the performance period .
the maximum percentage for a particular metric is2 50 % of the target number of units subject to the award related to that metric however vesting of the performance stock units is capped at 30 % and 100 % respectively of the target number of units subject to the award in years one and two respectively of the three-year performance period .
as of december 31 2019 the company believes that it is probable that the company will achieve performance metrics specified in the award agreement based on its expected revenue and non-gaap diluted eps results over the performance period and calculated growth rates relative to its peers ’ expected results based on data available as defined in the award agreement .
a summary of the company ’ s performance-based restricted stock unit activity is as follows : .
-1 number of shares granted is based on the maximum percentage achievable in the performance-based restricted stock unit award .

Question: What was the change in the outstanding from 2018 to 2019?
Answer: 445