FangyuLei/tatqa huggingface dataset:
Notes
2019
2018
Change
Debt to assets ratio
A
67.8%
53.1%
14.7%
Interest cover
B
1.67x
1.91x
–0.24x
Weighted average debt maturity
5.0 years
5.8 years
–0.8 years
Weighted average cost of gross debt (excluding RCF)
4.3%
4.2%
–0.1%
Proportion of gross debt with interest rate protection
88%
84%
4%
Immediately available cash and facilities
C
£241.5m
£246.8m
£(5.3)m
subsequent to the year end we have received the final ratifications required for full planning to become effective and therefore we expect the positive impact on retained earnings to reverse once these arrangements are formally concluded .
in this event epra nav per share would have been 143 pence .
debt measures .
a debt to asset ratio .
our debt to assets ratio increased to 67 .
8 per cent in 2019 due to the property revaluation deficit in the year .
this reduces to 65 .
3 per cent when adjusted for expected disposal proceeds from intu puerto venecia and intu asturias .
b interest cover .
interest cover of 1 .
67x remains above our target minimum level of 1 .
60x although it has reduced in 2019 as a result of the reduction in net rental income .
c immediately available cash and facilities .
immediately available cash and facilities has reduced in the year by £ 5 .
3 million to £ 241 .
5 million at 31 december 2019 .
this excludes the rents collected at the end of december 2019 which relate to the first quarter of 2020 and remain in the debt structures until interest payments are made .
at 10 march 2020 immediately available cash and facilities is £ 200 .
3 million which will be augmented by the intu puerto venecia sales proceeds expected to be received in early april .

Question: What is the change in the proportion of gross debt with interest rate protection from 2018 to 2019?
Answer: 4
2019
2018
$ million
$ million
Networks & Security
73.4
72.0
Lifecycle Service Assurance
37.6
37.6
Connected Devices
46.1
46.1
157.1
155.7
13 .
intangible assets continued .
goodwill has been allocated to three cgus which align with the reportable operating segments as follows : .

Question: What is the amount of intangible assets under Networks & Security in 2019?
Answer: 73.4
Three months ended August 31,
2019
2018
Change
Change in constant currency(2)
(in thousands of dollars, except percentages)
$
$
%
%
Canadian broadband services
79,132
89,405
(11.5)
(11.7)
Capital intensity
24.7%
28.0%
American broadband services
65,967
72,914
(9.5)
(10.5)
Capital intensity
25.0%
29.6%
Consolidated
145,099
162,319
(10.6)
(11.2)
Capital intensity
24.9%
28.7%
acquisitions of property plant and equipment .
the acquisitions of property plant and equipment as well as the capital intensity per operating segment are as follows : .
-1 fiscal 2018 was restated to comply with ifrs 15 and to reflect a change in accounting policy .
for further details please consult the " accounting policies " section .
-2 fiscal 2019 actuals are translated at the average foreign exchange rate of the comparable period of fiscal 2018 which was 1 .
3100 usd / cdn .
fiscal 2019 fourth-quarter acquisitions of property plant and equipment decreased by 10 .
6 % -11 .
2 % in constant currency mainly due to lower capital expenditures in the canadian and american broadband services segments .
fiscal 2019 fourth-quarter capital intensity reached 24 .
9 % compared to 28 .
7 % for the same period of the prior year mainly as a result of lower capital capital expenditures combined with higher revenue .

Question: Why did the Fiscal 2019 fourth-quarter acquisitions of property, plant and equipment decreased?
Answer: lower capital expenditures in the Canadian and American broadband services segments.
2019
2018
Beginning balance
$65,542
$22,173
Provision charged to expense
29,849
55,152
Deductions
(40,352)
(11,783)
Ending balance
55,039
$65,542
accounts receivable .
accounts receivable are uncollateralized customer obligations due under normal trade terms .
the company records allowances for doubtful accounts based on customer-specific analysis and general matters such as current assessment of past due balances and economic conditions .
the company writes off accounts receivable when they become uncollectible .
the allowance for doubtful accounts was $ 55039 and $ 65542 at december 31 2019 and 2018 respectively .
management identifies a delinquent customer based upon the delinquent payment status of an outstanding invoice generally greater than 30 days past due date .
the delinquent account designation does not trigger an accounting transaction until such time the account is deemed uncollectible .
the allowance for doubtful accounts is determined by examining the reserve history and any outstanding invoices that are over 30 days past due as of the end of the reporting period .
accounts are deemed uncollectible on a case-by-case basis at management ’ s discretion based upon an examination of the communication with the delinquent customer and payment history .
typically accounts are only escalated to “ uncollectible ” status after multiple attempts at collection have proven unsuccessful .
the allowance for doubtful accounts for the years ended december 31 are as follows : .

Question: When are accounts escalated to "uncollectible" status?
Answer: after multiple attempts at collection have proven unsuccessful
Years Ended December 31,    
Years Ended December 31,    
Years Ended December 31,    
All figures in USD '000, except TCE rate per day 
2018
2017
Variance 
Voyage Revenue  
289,016
297,141
(2.7%)
Less Voyage expenses  
(165,012)
(142,465)
15.8%
Net Voyage Revenue  
124,004
154,676
(19.8%)
Vessel Calendar Days (1)  
9,747
10,892
(10.5%)
Less off-hire days  
277
867
(68.1%)
Total TCE days  
9,470
10,025
(5.5%)
TCE Rate per day (2) 
$13,095
$15,428
(15.1%)
Total Days for vessel operating expenses  
9,747
10,892
(10.5%)
reconciliation of net voyage revenues to voyage revenues : .
-1 vessel calendar days is the total number of days the vessels were in our fleet .
-2 time charter equivalent - " tce " rate results from net voyage revenue divided by total tce days .

Question: What is the value of the voyage expenses in 2017 as a percentage of the expenses in 2018?
Answer: 86.34
Commitments by Period
July 27, 2019
July 28, 2018
Less than 1 year
$4,239
$5,407
1 to 3 years
728
710
3 to 5 years
—
360
Total
$4,967
$6,477
the following table summarizes our purchase commitments with contract manufacturers and suppliers as of the respective period ends -in millions : .
purchase commitments with contract manufacturers and suppliers decreased by approximately 23 % compared to the end of fiscal 2018 .
on a combined basis inventories and purchase commitments with contract manufacturers and suppliers decreased by 24 % compared with the end of fiscal 2018 .
inventory and supply chain management remain areas of focus as we balance the need to maintain supply chain flexibility to help ensure competitive lead times with the risk of inventory obsolescence because of rapidly changing technology and customer requirements .
we believe the amount of our inventory and purchase commitments is appropriate for our revenue levels .

Question: What was the change in purchase commitments that were less than 1 year between 2018 and 2019?
Answer: -1168
Years Ended December 31,
Years Ended December 31,
Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
Service cost
$405
$448
$443
Interest cost
254
196
194
Recognized actuarial (gains)
(86)
(58)
(43)
Net periodic benefit cost
573
586
594
Unrealized net actuarial (gains), net of tax
(2,324)
(2,256)
(1,574)
Total amount recognized in net periodic benefit cost and accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
$(1,751)
$(1,670)
$(980)
the company evaluates these assumptions on a periodic basis taking into consideration current market conditions and historical market data .
the discount rate is used to calculate expected future cash flows at a present value on the measurement date which is december 31 .
this rate represents the market rate for high-quality fixed income investments .
a lower discount rate would increase the present value of benefit obligations .
other assumptions include demographic factors such as retirement mortality and turnover .
the following table provides information about the net periodic benefit cost and other accumulated comprehensive income for the pension plans -in thousands : .
in march 2017 the fasb issued asu 2017-07 compensation – retirement benefits -topic 715 – improving the presentation of net periodic pension cost and net periodic postretirement benefit cost - “ asu 2017-07 ” .
these amendments require that an employer report the service cost component in the same line item or items as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by the pertinent employees during the period .
the other components of net periodic benefit cost are required to be presented in the income statement separately from the service cost component outside of a subtotal of income from operations .
if a separate line item is not used the line items used in the income statement to present other components of net benefit cost must be disclosed .
these amendments are effective for annual periods beginning after december 15 2017 including interim periods within those annual periods .
these amendments were applied retrospectively for the presentation of the service cost component and the other components of net periodic pension cost and net periodic postretirement benefit cost in the income statement and prospectively on and after the effective date for the capitalization of the service cost component of net periodic pension cost and net periodic postretirement benefit in assets .
the amendments allow a practical expedient that permits an employer to use the amounts disclosed in its pension and other postretirement benefit plan note for the prior comparative periods as the estimation basis for applying the retrospective presentation requirements .

Question: What was the change in interest cost in 2019 from 2018?
Answer: 58
Title
Identity of Person
No. of Shares
Percent of Class(1)
Common
Hansson family(2)
4,380,659
2.98%
Jim Kelly
* 
Richard Vietor
0
* 
David Workman
0
* 
Bjørn Giæver
0
* 
item 7 .
major shareholders and related party transactions .
a .
major shareholders .
the following table sets forth information regarding beneficial ownership of our common shares for -i owners of more than five percent of our common shares and -ii our directors and officers of which we are aware of the date of this annual report .
-1 based on 147230634 common shares outstanding as of the date of this annual report .
-2 the holdings of high seas as which are for the economic interest of members of the hansson family as well as the personal holdings of our chief executive officer and chairman mr .
herbjorn hansson and our director alexander hansson are included in the amount reported herein .
* less than 1 % of our common outstanding shares .
as of april 14 2020 we had 575 holders of record in the united states including cede & co .
which is the depositary trust company ’ s nominee for holding shares on behalf of brokerage firms as a single holder of record .
we had a total of 147230634 common shares outstanding as of the date of this annual report .

Question: How many shares are owned by the Hansson family?
Answer: 4,380,659
Weighted Average Company Performance Funding
Company Performance Metric
Target ($) (millions)
Threshold ($)(millions)
Actual ($) (millions)
Threshold Funding (%)
Funding (%)
Non-GAAP Operating Income
1,630
1,428
1,427(1)
40
0.0
Non-GAAP Revenue
4,943
4,760
4,804(2)
40
71.2
FY19 Funding
.
.
.
.
35.6
fy19 eaip payout results : .
-1 calculated in fy19 plan exchange rates and excludes stock-based compensation expense charges related to the amortization of intangible assets restructuring separation transition and other related expenses contract liabilities fair value adjustment acquisition-related costs and certain litigation settlement gains .
-2 calculated in fy19 plan exchange rates and excludes contract liabilities fair value adjustment .

Question: What is the difference between Actual and Target for Non-GAAP Operating Income?
Answer: 203
2019
2018
2017
Year ended 31 March
£m
£m
£m
Revenue
23,428
23,723
24,062
Operating costs a
(16,461)
(16,828)
(17,323)
Depreciation and amortisation
(3,546)
(3,514)
(3,572)
Operating profit
3,421
3,381
3,167
Net finance expense
(756)
(764)
(804)
Associates and joint ventures
1
(1)
(9)
Profit before tax
2,666
2,616
2,354
Tax
(507)
(584)
(446)
Profit for the period
2,159
2,032
1,908
revenue .
both reported and adjusted revenue fell by 1 % as growth in our consumer business was more than offset by regulated price reductions in openreach and declines in our enterprise businesses in particular in fixed voice and also reflecting our strategy to reduce low margin activity such as equipment sales .
excluding the negative impact of £ 35m from foreign exchange movements underlying revenue fell 0 .
9 % -2017 / 18 : fell 1 % which exceeds our expectation of down around 2 % .
you can find details of revenue by customer-facing unit on pages 40 to 41 .
note 6 to the consolidated financial statements shows a full breakdown of reported revenue by all our major product and service categories .
operating costs .
reported operating costs were down 2 % and adjustedb operating costs before depreciation and amortisation were down 1 % .
this was mainly driven by restructuring related cost savings and lower payments to telecommunications operators driven by global services strategy to de-emphasise low margin business partly offset by higher costs of recruiting and training engineers to support openreach ’ s ‘ fibre first ’ programme and help deliver improved customer service .
our cost transformation programme remains on track .
c4000 roles were removed in the year with the largest elements being in global services and our corporate units .
overall savings from the programme are currently an annualised benefit of £ 875m with an associated cost of £ 386m .
note 7 to the consolidated financial statements shows a detailed breakdown of our operating costs .
note 7 to the consolidated financial statements shows a detailed breakdown of our operating costs .
a excluding depreciation and amortisation .

Question: What was the reason for change in operating costs?
Answer: mainly driven by restructuring related cost savings and lower payments to telecommunications operators driven by Global Services strategy to de-emphasise low margin business, partly offset by higher costs of recruiting and training engineers to support Openreach’s ‘Fibre First’ programme and help deliver improved customer service.
For the Years Ended December 31,
For the Years Ended December 31,
For the Years Ended December 31,
For the Years Ended December 31,
For the Years Ended December 31,
2019
2019
2018
Change
% Change
(In millions, except percentages)
Revenues
$13.2
$82.3
$(69.1)
(84)%
Cost of revenues
1.9
15.3
(13.4)
(88)%
Gross profit
11.3
67.0
(55.7)
(83)%
Gross margin
86 %
81 %
Operating expenses:
Selling, general and administrative
31.7
32.2
(0.5)
(2)%
Research and development
2.0
2.1
(0.1)
(5)%
Total operating expenses
33.7
34.3
(0.6)
(2)%
Other expense
(0.3)
(4.0)
3.7
(93)%
Income (loss) before income taxes
(22.7)
28.7
(51.4)
(179)%
Income tax provision (benefit)
(6.2)
8.0
(14.2)
(178)%
Net income (loss)
$(16.5)
$20.7
$(37.2)
(180)%
year ended december 31 2019 compared with the year ended december 31 2018 : .
revenue in 2019 is derived from license agreements that we entered into with third-parties following negotiations pursuant to our patent licensing and enforcement program .
the revenue decrease is primarily due to timing of revenues as further described in " item 1 .
business " - " licensing and enforcement - current activities post 2013 " .
cost of revenues includes contingent legal fees directly associated with our licensing and enforcement programs .
cost of revenues primarily decreased in proportion to the decrease in revenues .
operating expenses consists of sales and marketing general and administrative and research and development .
selling general and administrative expenses - " sg & a " consisted primarily of legal fees incurred in operations and employee headcount related expenses .
these comprise approximately 60 % of total sg & a expense .
litigation expenses increased $ 3 .
0 million to $ 19 .
4 million in 2019 compared to 2018 and are primarily due to the timing of various outstanding litigation actions .
see " item 3 .
legal proceedings " .
employee headcount related expenses decreased $ 2 .
0 million to $ 3 .
6 million in 2019 compared to 2018 primarily due to lower incentive bonuses .
research and development expense remained flat between years .
other expense decreased in 2019 as we no longer have exposure from the warrant liability and included $ 0 .
7 million related to the sale of our investment in jvp offset by $ 0 .
3 million of net interest income .
income tax provision -benefit is primarily a function of income -loss before income state income tax expense -benefit and federal benefit of foreign derived intangible tax benefit related to 2018 .

Question: What is the percentage change in revenue between 2018 and 2019?
Answer: -83.96
Fiscal Year Ended January 31,
Fiscal Year Ended January 31,
Fiscal Year Ended January 31,
Fiscal Year Ended January 31,
Fiscal Year Ended January 31,
2019 (1)
2018
2017
2016
2015
(In millions, except per share data)
(In millions, except per share data)
(In millions, except per share data)
(In millions, except per share data)
(In millions, except per share data)
For the fiscal year:
Net revenue
$2,569.8
$2,056.6
$2,031.0
$2,504.1
$2,512.2
(Loss) income from operations
(25.0)
(509.1)
(499.6)
1.3
120.7
Net (loss) income
(80.8)
(566.9)
(582.1)
(330.5)
81.8
Cash flow from operations
$377.1
$0.9
$169.7
$414.0
$708.6
Common stock data:
Basic net (loss) income per share
$(0.37)
$(2.58)
$(2.61)
$(1.46)
$0.36
Diluted net (loss) income per share
$(0.37)
$(2.58)
$(2.61)
$(1.46)
$0.35
At year end:
Total assets
$4,729.2
$4,113.6
$4,798.1
$5,515.3
$4,909.7
Long-term liabilities
2,638.9
2,246.4
1,879.1
2,304.7
1,290.4
Stockholders’ (deficit) equity
$(210.9)
$(256.0)
$733.6
$1,619.6
$2,219.2
item 6 .
selected financial data .
the following selected consolidated financial data is not necessarily indicative of results of future operations and should be read in conjunction with item 7 “ management ' s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ” and the consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included in item 8 of this form 10-k to fully understand factors that may affect the comparability of the information presented below .
the financial data for the fiscal years ended january 31 2019 and 2018 are derived from and are qualified by reference to the audited consolidated financial statements that are included in this form 10-k .
the consolidated statements of operations and the consolidated statements of cash flows data for the fiscal year ended january 31 2017 are derived from and are qualified by reference to the audited consolidated financial statements that are included in this form 10-k .
the consolidated balance sheet data for the fiscal year ended january 31 2017 and the remaining financial data for the fiscal years ended january 31 2016 and 2015 are derived from audited consolidated financial statements which are not included in this form 10-k .
-1 reflects the impact of the adoption of new accounting standards in fiscal year 2019 related to revenue recognition .
see part ii item 8 note 1 business and summary of significant accounting policies accounting standards adopted of our consolidated financial statements for additional information .

Question: What is the average net income from 2015 to 2019?
Answer: -295.7
Year ended June 30,
Year ended June 30,
Year ended June 30,
(In thousands)
2019
2018
Audit fees (1)
$4,598
$4,701
Audit-related fees (2)
—
—
Tax fees (3)
108
116
All other fees (4)
40
101
Total
$4,746
$4,918
item 14 .
principal accountant fees and services .
the aggregate fees for professional services rendered by our independent registered public accounting firm kpmg llp for fiscal 2019 and fiscal 2018 were : .
-1 audit fees were primarily for professional services rendered for -a the annual audits of our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying attestation report regarding our icfr contained in our annual report on form 10- k -b the review of quarterly financial information included in our quarterly reports on form 10-q -c audit services related to mergers and acquisitions and offering documents and -d annual statutory audits where applicable .
-2 audit-related fees were primarily for assurance and related services such as the review of non-periodic filings with the sec .
-3 tax fees were for services related to tax compliance including the preparation of tax returns tax planning and tax advice .
-4 all other fees consist of fees for services other than the services reported in audit fees audit-related fees and tax fees .
opentext ' s audit committee has established a policy of reviewing in advance and either approving or not approving all audit audit-related tax and other non-audit services that our independent registered public accounting firm provides to us .
this policy requires that all services received from our independent registered public accounting firm be approved in advance by the audit committee or a delegate of the audit committee .
the audit committee has delegated the pre-approval responsibility to the chair of the audit committee .
all services that kpmg llp provided to us in fiscal 2019 and fiscal 2018 have been preapproved by the audit committee .
the audit committee has determined that the provision of the services as set out above is compatible with the maintaining of kpmg llp ' s independence in the conduct of its auditing functions .

Question: What company renders the professional service to Open Text Corporation
Answer: KPMG LLP
As at 31 December
As at 31 December
2019
2018
RMB’Million
RMB’Million
Included in non-current assets:
RMB term deposits
19,000
–
Included in current assets:
RMB term deposits
28,598
55,180
USD term deposits
16,325
6,349
Other currencies
1,988
1,389
46,911
62,918
65,911
62,918
term deposits .
an analysis of the group ’ s term deposits by currencies are as follows : .
the effective interest rate for the term deposits of the group with initial terms of over three months to three years during the year ended 31 december 2019 was 3 .
57 % -2018 : 4 .
08 % .
term deposits with initial terms of over three months were neither past due nor impaired .
as at 31 december 2019 the carrying amounts of the term deposits with initial terms of over three months approximated their fair values .

Question: How much did the total term deposits change by between 2018 year end and 2019 year end?
Answer: 2993