FangyuLei/tatqa huggingface dataset:
Years Ended December 31,
Years Ended December 31,
Years Ended December 31,
Years Ended December 31,
Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
(in thousands of U.S.$, except number of shares, per common share data, fleet and other financial data)
(in thousands of U.S.$, except number of shares, per common share data, fleet and other financial data)
(in thousands of U.S.$, except number of shares, per common share data, fleet and other financial data)
(in thousands of U.S.$, except number of shares, per common share data, fleet and other financial data)
(in thousands of U.S.$, except number of shares, per common share data, fleet and other financial data)
Total operating revenues
448,750
430,604
143,537
80,257
102,674
Less: Liquefaction services revenue
(218,096)
(127,625)
—
—
—
Less: Vessel and other management fees
(21,888)
(24,209)
(26,576)
(14,225)
(12,547)
Net time and voyage charter revenues
208,766
278,770
116,961
66,032
90,127
Voyage and commission expenses (i)
(38,381)
(104,463)
(48,933)
(25,291)
(23,434)
170,385
174,307
68,028
40,741
66,693
Calendar days less scheduled off-hire days
3,840
3,987
3,885
4,034
4,481
Average daily TCE rate (to the closest $100)
44,400
43,700
17,500
10,100
14,900
our calculation of tce may not be comparable to that reported by other entities .
the following table reconciles our total operating revenues to average daily tce : .
-i " voyage and commission expenses " is derived from the caption " voyage charterhire and commission expenses " and " voyage charterhire and commission expenses - collaborative arrangement " less -i charterhire expenses -net of the effect of the related guarantee obligation of $ nil $ nil and $ 12 .
4 million for the years ended december 31 2019 2018 and 2017 respectively which arose on the charter-back of the golar grand from golar partners and -ii voyage and commission expenses in relation to the hilli episeyo of $ 0 .
5 million $ 1 .
4 million and $ nil for the years ended december 31 2019 2018 and 2017 respectively .
-5 we calculate average daily vessel operating costs by dividing vessel operating costs by the number of calendar days .
calendar days exclude those from vessels chartered in where the vessel operating costs are borne by the legal owner and those of vessels undergoing conversion .

Question: What was the percentage change in average daily TCE rate from 2018 to 2019?
Answer: 1.6
Years Ended December 31,
Years Ended December 31,
Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
Net loss
$(17,819)
$(27,617)
$(10,751)
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax:
Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities
395
(21)
(78)
Comprehensive loss
$(17,424)
$(27,638)
$(10,829)
a10 networks inc .
consolidated statements of comprehensive loss .
-in thousands .

Question: What is the company's net loss in 2019?
Answer: $(17,819)
Fiscal Year ended March 31,
US Plans
International Plans
2020
$2,295
$7,055
2021
2,333
7,197
2022
2,353
7,337
2023
2,371
7,624
2024
2,388
7,624
2025-2029
11,880
40,364
we make contributions to our defined benefit plans as required under various pension funding regulations .
we expect to make contributions of approximately $ 1420 to the international plans in fiscal 2020 based on current actuarial computations .
estimated future benefit payments are as follows : .
savings plans : .
we sponsor retirement savings plans which allow eligible employees to defer part of their annual compensation .
certain contributions by us are discretionary and are determined by our board of directors each year .
our contributions to the savings plans in the united states for the fiscal years ended march 31 2017 2018 and 2019 were approximately $ 4367 $ 4421 and $ 4913 respectively .
we also sponsor a nonqualified deferred compensation program which permits certain employees to annually elect to defer a portion of their compensation until retirement .
a portion of the deferral is subject to a matching contribution by us .
the employees select among various investment alternatives which are the same as are available under the retirement savings plans with the investments held in a separate trust .
the value of the participants ’ balances fluctuate based on the performance of the investments .
the market value of the trust at march 31 2018 and 2019 of $ 6649 and $ 4693 respectively is included as an asset and a liability in our accompanying balance sheet because the trust ’ s assets are both assets of the company and a liability as they are available to general creditors in certain circumstances .

Question: What are the future benefit payments of International Plans for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2020 to 2022?
Answer: 7,055 7,197 7,337
At August 31,
2019
2018
(In thousands of Canadian dollars)
$
$
Trade accounts receivable
74,021
95,541
Allowance for doubtful accounts
(6,759)
(6,497)
67,262
89,044
Other accounts receivable
8,390
8,250
75,652
97,294
the corporation is also exposed to credit risk in relation to its trade accounts receivable .
to mitigate such risk the corporation continuously monitors the financial condition of its customers and reviews the credit history or worthiness of each new large customer .
the corporation establishes an allowance for lifetime expected credit losses related to doubtful accounts .
the doubtful accounts allowance is calculated on a specific-identification basis for larger customer accounts receivable and on a statistically derived basis for the remainder .
factors such as the current economic conditions forward-looking macroeconomic data and historical information -number of overdue days of the customer ’ s balance outstanding as well as the customer ’ s collection history are examined .
the corporation believes that its allowance for doubtful accounts is sufficient to cover the related credit risk .
the corporation has credit policies in place and has established various credit controls including credit checks deposits on accounts and advance billing and has also established procedures to suspend the availability of services when customers have fully utilized approved credit limits or have violated existing payment terms .
since the corporation has a large and diversified clientele dispersed throughout its market areas in canada and the united states there is no significant concentration of credit risk .
the following table provides further details on trade and other receivables net of allowance for doubtful accounts : .

Question: What is the average other accounts receivable from 2018 to 2019?
Answer: 8320
Year ended March 31, 
Year ended March 31, 
Year ended March 31, 
2019
2018
2017
Tax at statutory rate
19.0%
19.0%
20.0%
U.S. state taxes, net of federal
31.1
14.1
(1.0)
Foreign rate differential  
26.3
36.8
(39.3)
Meals and entertainment  
(11.4)
(3.1)
(7.4)
Branch income / loss  
(0.6)
0.4
0.9
Share-based compensation
172.3
105.3
(4.0)
Foreign exchange  
—
—
(24.8)
Non-deductible interest expense  
—
—
(3.3)
Tax credits
7.7
8.1
15.6
Unremitted earnings  
(3.8)
(1.2)
—
Change in valuation allowance  
(249.9)
(110.7)
124.7
Deferred tax true-ups  
(3.5)
8.4
(12.4)
Tax reserves  
(4.9)
(21.5)
(117.7)
Provision to return  
(0.1)
0.4
(0.7)
Withholding taxes  
(2.6)
(3.5)
—
Other foreign taxes  
—
—
(6.7)
Non-deductible expenses  
(5.2)
(2.4)
(10.6)
Deferred tax rate change  
(6.3)
(77.8)
(1.3)
Acquisition related costs  
(7.6)
—
—
Other  
(0.5)
(0.2)
—
Effective Tax Rate  
(40.0)%
(27.9)%
(68.0)%
the reconciliation of the united kingdom statutory tax rate to the company ’ s effective tax rate included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations is as follows : .
although the company ’ s parent entity is organized under jersey law our affairs are and are intended to be managed and controlled ongoing in the united kingdom .
therefore the company is resident in the united kingdom for tax purposes .
the company ’ s parent entity is domiciled in the united kingdom and its earnings are subject to 19 % 19 % and 20 % statutory tax rate for the years ended march 31 2019 2018 and 2017 respectively .
the company ’ s effective tax rate differs from the statutory rate each year primarily due to windfall tax benefits on equity award exercises the valuation allowance maintained against the company ’ s net deferred tax assets the jurisdictional earnings mix tax credits withholding taxes and other permanent differences primarily related to non-deductible expenses .

Question: What is the reason for the company's effective tax to differ from the statutory rate?
Answer: primarily due to windfall tax benefits on equity award exercises, the valuation allowance maintained against the Company’s net deferred tax assets, the jurisdictional earnings mix, tax credits, withholding taxes, and other permanent differences primarily related to non-deductible expenses.
As at December 31,
Pension 2019
Other 2019
Pension 2018
Other 2018
Actuarial benefit obligation
Discount rate
3.20%
2.95% to 3.20%
3.80%
3.80% to 4.00%
Benefit costs for the year ended
Discount rate
3.90%
3.90% to 4.00%
3.60%
3.25% to 3.60%
Future salary growth
2.50%
N/A
2.50%
N/A
Health care cost trend rate
N/A
3.49% to 5.49%
N/A
4.50%
Other medical trend rates
N/A
4.00% to 4.56%
N/A
4.50%
the following are the significant assumptions adopted in measuring the company ’ s pension and other benefit obligations : .
for certain canadian post-retirement plans the above trend rates are applicable for 2019 to 2024 which will increase linearly to 4 .
75 % in 2029 and grading down to an ultimate rate of 3 .
57 % per annum in 2040 and thereafter .

Question: How will the trend rates for Canadian post-retirement plans change between the current period to 2029 and in 2040 and after respectively?
Answer: Increase linearly to 4.75% grading down to an ultimate rate of 3.57% per annum in 2040 and thereafter.
Number of Units
Grant Date Fair Value
Outstanding at January 1, 2019   
997,173
$52.22
Granted   
945,159
49.48
Vested   
(386,060)
51.79
Forfeited   
(59,579)
50.56
Outstanding at December 31, 2019   
1,496,693
$50.67
restricted stock awards we present below a summary of changes in unvested units of restricted stock during 2019 : .
the company recorded equity-based compensation expense related to restricted stock and rsus -collectively “ restricted stock awards ” of $ 31 .
8 million $ 19 .
9 million and $ 16 .
2 million in 2019 2018 and 2017 respectively .
the total fair value of restricted stock awards vested in 2019 2018 and 2017 based on market value at the vesting dates was $ 18 .
2 million $ 18 .
1 million and $ 18 .
8 million respectively .
the weighted average grant-date fair value of rsus granted during fiscal year 2019 2018 and 2017 was $ 49 .
48 $ 51 .
72 and $ 49 .
01 respectively .
as of december 31 2019 unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested rsu totaled $ 47 .
5 million and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2 .
5 years .
in january 2017 we elected to recognize forfeitures of equity-based payments as they occur .
awards ” of $ 31 .
8 million $ 19 .
9 million and $ 16 .
2 million in 2019 2018 and 2017 respectively .
the total fair value of restricted stock awards vested in 2019 2018 and 2017 based on market value at the vesting dates was $ 18 .
2 million $ 18 .
1 million and $ 18 .
8 million respectively .
the weighted average grant-date fair value of rsus granted during fiscal year 2019 2018 and 2017 was $ 49 .
48 $ 51 .
72 and $ 49 .
01 respectively .
as of december 31 2019 unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested rsu totaled $ 47 .
5 million and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2 .
5 years .
in january 2017 we elected to recognize forfeitures of equity-based payments as they occur .
included in rsu grants for the year ended december 31 2019 are 282327 units that have performance-based vesting criteria .
the performance criteria are tied to our financial performance .
as of december 31 2019 the associated equity-based compensation expense has been recognized for the portion of the award attributable to the 2019 performance criteria .

Question: What is the value difference between granted share and vested share?
Answer: 2.31
April 26, 2019
April 27, 2018
Fair value of plan assets
$ 31
$ 25
Benefit obligations
(61)
(53)
Unfunded obligations
$(30)
$(28)
other defined benefit plans .
we maintain various defined benefit plans to provide termination and postretirement benefits to certain eligible employees outside of the u .
s .
we also provide disability benefits to certain eligible employees in the u .
s .
eligibility is determined based on the terms of our plans and local statutory requirements .
funded status .
the funded status of our postretirement health care and other defined benefit plans which is recognized in other long-term liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets was as follows -in millions : .

Question: What were the benefit obligations in 2018?
Answer: (53)
Year Ended May 31,
Year Ended May 31,
Percent Change
Percent Change
(Dollars in millions)
2019
Actual
Constant
2018
Provision for income taxes
$1,185
-87%
-86%
$8,837
Effective tax rate
9.7%
71.1%
provision for income taxes : our effective income tax rates for each of the periods presented were the result of the mix of income earned in various tax jurisdictions that apply a broad range of income tax rates .
in fiscal 2018 the tax act was signed into law .
the more significant provisions of the tax act as applicable to us are described above under “ impacts of the u .
s .
tax cuts and jobs act of 2017 ” .
refer to note 14 of notes to consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report for a discussion regarding the differences between the effective income tax rates as presented for the periods below and the u .
s .
federal statutory income tax rates that were in effect during these periods .
future effective income tax rates could be adversely affected by an unfavorable shift of earnings weighted to jurisdictions with higher tax rates by unfavorable changes in tax laws and regulations by adverse rulings in tax related litigation or by shortfalls in stock-based compensation realized by employees relative to stock-based compensation that was recorded for book purposes among others .
provision for income taxes decreased in fiscal 2019 relative to fiscal 2018 primarily due to the absence of the initial accounting charges related to the tax act that were recorded in fiscal 2018 .
to a lesser extent provision for income taxes also decreased in fiscal 2019 due to the net favorable impacts of our final accounting for the tax act in fiscal 2019 ; the net favorable impacts of the tax act on our tax profile during fiscal 2019 ; the favorable impact of a tax benefit arising from an increase in a deferred tax asset associated with a partial realignment of our legal structure in fiscal 2019 ; and lower income before provision for income taxes in fiscal 2019 .
these decreases to our provision for income taxes in fiscal 2019 relative to fiscal 2018 were partially offset both by lower excess tax benefits related to stock-based compensation expense in fiscal 2019 and by less favorable changes in net unrecognized tax benefits due to settlements with tax authorities and other events in fiscal 2019 relative to fiscal 2018 .

Question: How much was the total provision for income taxes across 2018 and 2019?
Answer: 10022
Leased land and buildings
Leased plants and machinery
Leased fixtures, fittings, tools and equipment
Total right-of-use assets
£m
£m
£m
£m
Cost:
Transition adjustment at 1st January 2019
27.2
7.0
1.9
36.1
Reclassification from long-term prepayments
5.1
–
–
5.1
Additions
7.2
4.2
0.3
11.7
Acquisitions
0.8
0.3
–
1.1
Disposals
(0.2)
(0.1)
–
(0.3)
Exchange adjustments
(1.5)
(0.4)
(0.1)
(2.0)
At 31st December 2019
38.6
11.0
2.1
51.7
Depreciation:
Charged in the year
7.0
3.7
0.6
11.3
Disposals
(0.1)
–
–
(0.1)
Exchange adjustments
(0.2)
(0.1)
–
(0.3)
At 31st December 2019
6.7
3.6
0.6
10.9
Net book value:
At 31st December 2019
31.9
7.4
1.5
40.8
14 leases .
right-of-use assets .
the vast majority of the right-of-use asset value relates to leased property where the group leases a number of office and warehouse sites in a number of geographical locations .
the remaining leases are largely made up of leased motor vehicles where the group makes use of leasing cars for sales and service engineers at a number of operating company locations .
the average lease term is 4 .
3 years .

Question: What is the average lease term?
Answer: 4.3 years
(In millions)
(In millions)
(In millions)
(In millions)
Year Ended June 30,
2019
2018
2017
Revenue
Productivity and Business Processes
$ 41,160
$ 35,865
$ 29,870
Intelligent Cloud
38,985
32,219
27,407
More Personal Computing
45,698
42,276
39,294
Total
$  125,843
$   110,360
$   96,571
Operating Income (Loss)
Productivity and Business Processes
$ 16,219
$ 12,924
$ 11,389
Intelligent Cloud
13,920
11,524
9,127
More Personal Computing
12,820
10,610
8,815
Corporate and Other
0
0
(306)
Total
$ 42,959
$ 35,058
$ 29,025
revenue and costs are generally directly attributed to our segments .
however due to the integrated structure of our business certain revenue recognized and costs incurred by one segment may benefit other segments .
revenue from certain contracts is allocated among the segments based on the relative value of the underlying products and services which can include allocation based on actual prices charged prices when sold separately or estimated costs plus a profit margin .
cost of revenue is allocated in certain cases based on a relative revenue methodology .
operating expenses that are allocated primarily include those relating to marketing of products and services from which multiple segments benefit and are generally allocated based on relative gross margin .
in addition certain costs incurred at a corporate level that are identifiable and that benefit our segments are allocated to them .
these allocated costs include costs of : legal including settlements and fines ; information technology ; human resources ; finance ; excise taxes ; field selling ; shared facilities services ; and customer service and support .
each allocation is measured differently based on the specific facts and circumstances of the costs being allocated .
certain corporate-level activity is not allocated to our segments including restructuring expenses .
segment revenue and operating income were as follows during the periods presented : .
corporate and other operating loss comprised restructuring expenses .

Question: What do the allocated costs include?
Answer: These allocated costs include costs of: legal, including settlements and fines; information technology; human resources; finance; excise taxes; field selling; shared facilities services; and customer service and support.
2019
2018
2017
Currency translation losses, net of reclassification adjustments
$(90.9)
$(94.7)
$(98.6)
Derivative adjustments, net of reclassification adjustments
34.0
1.0
(1.1)
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities
—
0.6
(0.3)
Pension and post-employment benefit obligations, net of reclassification adjustments
(53.4)
(17.4)
(112.9)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss 1
$(110.3)
$(110.5)
$(212.9)
comprehensive income — comprehensive income includes net income currency translation adjustments certain derivative-related activity changes in the value of available-for-sale investments -prior to the adoption of accounting standards update - " asu " 2016-01 and changes in prior service cost and net actuarial gains -losses from pension -for amounts not in excess of the 10 % " corridor " and postretirement health care plans .
on foreign investments we deem to be essentially permanent in nature we do not provide for taxes on currency translation adjustments arising from converting an investment denominated in a foreign currency to u .
s .
dollars .
when we determine that a foreign investment as well as undistributed earnings are no longer permanent in nature estimated taxes will be provided for the related deferred tax liability -asset if any resulting from currency translation adjustments .
the following table details the accumulated balances for each component of other comprehensive income net of tax : .
1 net of unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities reclassified to retained earnings as a result of the adoption of asu 2016-01 in fiscal 2019 and net of stranded tax effects from change in tax rate as a result of the early adoption of asu 2018-02 in fiscal 2018 in the amount of $ 0 .
6 million and $ 17 .
4 million respectively .
notes to consolidated financial statements - -continued fiscal years ended may 26 2019 may 27 2018 and may 28 2017 -columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts .

Question: What is the total balance of pension and post-employment benefit obligations from 2017 to 2019?
Answer: -183.7
Years ended December 31
Years ended December 31
Years ended December 31
2019 vs 2018
2018 vs 2017
2019
2018
2017
% Change
% Change
(in thousands, except percentages)
(in thousands, except percentages)
(in thousands, except percentages)
(in thousands, except percentages)
(in thousands, except percentages)
Gross profit
$ 865,643
$ 596,267
$ 380,253
45.2 %
56.8 %
Percentage of total revenues
54.9 %
55.6 %
56.5 %
gross profit .
gross profit increased $ 269 .
4 million or 45 .
2 % for the year ended december 31 2019 compared to the same period in 2018 .
as a percentage of total revenues gross profit decreased from 55 .
6 % in the year ended december 31 2018 to 54 .
9 % in the year ended december 31 2019 due to shopify payments representing a larger percentage of total revenue and an increase in amortization of technology related to the 6rs acquisition as well as other platform enhancements .
this was partly offset by lower third-party infrastructure and hosting costs and employee-related costs as a percentage of revenues as well as the relative growth of higher-margin merchant solutions products namely shopify capital and referral fees from partners .
gross profit increased $ 216 .
0 million or 56 .
8 % for the year ended december 31 2018 compared to the same period in 2017 .
as a percentage of total revenues gross profit decreased from 56 .
5 % in the year ended december 31 2017 to 55 .
6 % in the year ended december 31 2018 due to shopify payments representing a larger percentage of total revenue increasing the functionality and flexibility of our hosting infrastructure and higher product costs associated with expanding our product offerings .
this was partly offset by the relative growth of higher-margin merchant solutions products namely referral fees from partners shopify capital and shopify shipping .

Question: What is the gross profit as at year ended December 31, 2018?
Answer: $ 596,267