FangyuLei/tatqa huggingface dataset:
Useful life (in years)
December 31, 2019
December 31, 2018
Equipment
1-3
$22,702
$49,804
Software
1-3
726
4,088
Furniture and fixtures
1-3
459
967
Leasehold improvements
2-8
5,440
3,832
Construction in progress
--
160
Property and equipment, gross
29,327
58,581
Less: accumulated depreciation
(21,671)
(51,589)
Property and equipment, net
$7,656
$7,262
property and equipment net .
property and equipment net consisted of the following -in thousands : .
depreciation expense on property and equipment was $ 5 .
0 million $ 6 .
4 million and $ 7 .
1 million for the years ended december 31 2019 2018 and 2017 respectively .

Question: What is the depreciation expense on property and equipment as at December 31, 2018?
Answer: $6.4
For the year ended
For the year ended
2017
2018
Amounts in thousands of U.S. Dollars
Pool gross revenues (included in Revenues)
38,046
102,253
Pool gross voyage expenses and commissions (included in Voyage expenses and commissions)
(9,122)
(10,154)
GasLog’s adjustment for net pool allocation (included in Net pool allocation)
7,254
17,818
GasLog’s total net pool performance
36,178
109,917
net pool allocation : net pool allocation increased by $ 10 .
5 million from $ 7 .
3 million during the year ended december 31 2017 to $ 17 .
8 million during the year ended december 31 2018 .
the increase in net pool allocation was attributable to the movement in the adjustment of the net pool results earned by the gaslog vessels in accordance with the pool distribution formula .
gaslog recognized gross revenues and gross voyage expenses and commissions of $ 102 .
3 million and $ 10 .
2 million respectively from the operation of its vessels in the cool pool during the year ended december 31 2018 -december 31 2017 : $ 38 .
0 million and $ 9 .
1 million respectively .
the increase in gaslog ’ s total net pool performance was driven by higher spot rates and higher utilization achieved by all vessels trading in the cool pool .
gaslog ’ s total net pool performance is presented below : .
voyage expenses and commissions : voyage expenses and commissions increased by 32 .
5 % or $ 5 .
0 million from $ 15 .
4 million during the year ended december 31 2017 to $ 20 .
4 million during the year ended december 31 2018 .
the increase in voyage expenses and commissions is mainly attributable to an increase of $ 3 .
6 million in bunkers consumed and voyage expenses during certain unchartered and off-hire periods an increase of $ 0 .
3 million in voyage expenses of the vessels operating in the spot market and an increase of $ 1 .
1 million in brokers ’ commissions .

Question: Which year was the pool gross revenues higher?
Answer: 2018
Fiscal years ended
Fiscal years ended
Fiscal years ended
Fiscal years ended
Fiscal years ended
February 28,
February 28,
February 28,
February 28,
February 28,
(In thousands)
2019
2018
$ Change
% Change
Segment
Telematics Systems
$40,821
$48,943
$(8,122)
(17.0%)
Software & Subscription Services
13,093
8,233
4,860
59.0%
Corporate Expense
(5,699)
(4,794)
(905)
19.0%
Total Adjusted EBITDA
$48,215
$52,382
$(4,167)
(8.0%)
profitability measures .
net income : .
our net income in the fiscal year ended february 28 2019 was $ 18 .
4 million as compared to net income of $ 16 .
6 million in the same period last year .
the increase is due to a $ 11 .
7 million increase in operating income $ 3 .
0 million increase in investment income and $ 12 .
0 million decrease in income tax provision .
the increase in operating income was primarily attributable to $ 21 .
0 million decrease in general and administrative expense due to reduced legal provision and related costs as further discussed in note 19 and partially offset by $ 8 .
0 million of restructuring expense .
adjusted ebitda for telematics systems in the fiscal year ended february 28 2019 decreased $ 8 .
1 million compared to the same period last year due to lower revenues as described above and the impact of high margin revenue earned on a strategic technology partnership arrangement in fiscal 2018 .
these factors were coupled with higher operating expenses in telematics systems as a result of increased headcount and outsourced professional service fees .
adjusted ebitda for software and subscription services increased $ 4 .
9 million compared to the same period last year due primarily to continued growth in revenues and gross profit from our italia market and higher gross profit from our fleet management services .
see note 20 for reconciliation of adjusted ebitda by reportable segments and a reconciliation to gaap-basis net income -loss .

Question: What was the Total Adjusted EBITDA for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2018?
Answer: 52,382
Fiscal 2018
Fiscal 2017
% Change
(in millions)
(in millions)
(in millions)
Sales
$  325.2
$  360.2
(10)%
Operating income
16.6
28.1
(41)
Adjusted EBITDA
26.3
39.4
(33)
cubic global defense .
sales : cgd sales decreased 10 % to $ 325 .
2 million in 2018 compared to $ 360 .
2 million in 2017 .
the year-over-year comparative sales and operating income were significantly impacted by an $ 8 .
0 million gain recognized on an equitable contract adjustment in fiscal 2017 for our littoral combat ship virtual training contract with the u .
s .
navy .
sales were lower in fiscal 2018 on virtual training sales air combat training system sales and ground combat training system sales while sales of international training support services increased between fiscal 2017 and 2018 .
the average exchange rates between the prevailing currency in our foreign operations and the u .
s .
dollar had no significant impact on cgd sales between 2017 and 2018 .
amortization of purchased intangibles : amortization of purchased intangibles included in the cgd results amounted to $ 1 .
1 million in 2018 and $ 0 .
9 million in 2017 .
operating income : cgd had operating income of $ 16 .
6 million in 2018 compared to $ 28 .
1 million in 2017 .
the decrease in operating income was primarily caused by the gain of $ 8 .
0 million recognized in fiscal 2017 due to the approval of a contract adjustment with the u .
s .
navy described above .
in fiscal 2018 an arbitrator awarded $ 1 .
7 million to a former reseller of our air combat training systems in the far east which was recorded as sg & a expense by cgd in 2018 .
in addition cgd ’ s r & d expenditures increased approximately $ 1 .
8 million year-over-year .
the increase in r & d expenditures is indicative of the acceleration of our development of next generation live virtual constructive and game-based training systems .
these decreases in operating income in fiscal 2018 were partially offset by increased operating income from ground combat training systems which was higher primarily due to improvements in expected total costs for the development of two ground combat training system contracts in the far east .
the average exchange rates between the prevailing currency in our foreign operations and the u .
s .
dollar had no significant impact on cgd operating income between 2017 and 2018 .
adjusted ebitda : cgd adjusted ebitda was $ 26 .
3 million in 2018 compared to $ 39 .
4 million in 2017 .
the decrease in adjusted ebitda was primarily driven by the same factors that drove the decrease in operating income described above excluding the increase in amortization which is excluded from adjusted ebitda .

Question: What is the average adjusted EBITDA in 2017 and 2018?
Answer: 32.85
Fiscal years ending June 30,
CDT
GXS GER
GXS PHP
2020
$675
$1,012
$161
2021
758
1,011
153
2022
832
1,044
352
2023
933
1,043
208
2024
1,041
1,050
272
2025 to 2028
6,009
5,308
2,389
Total
$10,248
$10,468
$3,535
pensions .
as of june 30 2019 our total unfunded pension plan obligations were $ 77 .
5 million of which $ 2 .
3 million is payable within the next twelve months .
we expect to be able to make the long-term and short-term payments related to these obligations in the normal course of operations .
our anticipated payments under our most significant plans for the fiscal years indicated below are as follows : .
for a detailed discussion on pensions see note 11 " pension plans and other post retirement benefits " to our consolidated financial statements .

Question: What is the total anticipated payments for all plans till fiscal year 2028?
Answer: 24251
Fiscal Year
Fiscal Year
2019
2018
Net revenues
100%
100%
Cost of revenues
22
21
Gross profit
78
79
Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing
32
33
Research and development
19
20
General and administrative
9
12
Amortization of intangible assets
4
5
Restructuring, transition and other costs
5
8
Total operating expenses
70
78
Operating income
8
1
Interest expense
(4)
(5)
Gain on divestiture
—
14
Other expense, net
(1)
—
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
2
9
Income tax expense (benefit)
2
(14)
Income from continuing operations
—
23
Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
—
—
Net income
1%
24%
fiscal 2019 compared to fiscal 2018 .
the following table sets forth our consolidated statements of operations data as a percentage of net revenues for the periods indicated : .
note : the percentages may not add due to rounding .

Question: What is the change in Total operating expenses from fiscal year 2018 to fiscal year 2019?
Answer: -8
Year ended December 31,
Year ended December 31,
Year ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
Basic:
Net earnings attributable to Black Knight
$108.8
$168.5
$182.3
Shares used for basic net earnings per share:
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding
147.7
147.6
88.7
Basic net earnings per share
$0.74
$1.14
$2.06
Diluted:
Earnings before income taxes and equity in losses of unconsolidated affiliates
$192.4
Income tax benefit excluding the effect of noncontrolling interests
(32.2)
Net earnings
$224.6
Net earnings attributable to Black Knight
$108.8
$168.5
Shares used for diluted net earnings per share:
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding
147.7
147.6
88.7
Dilutive effect of unvested restricted shares of common
stock
0.9
0.6
0.6
Weighted average shares of BKFS Class B common stock outstanding
—
—
63.1
Weighted average shares of common stock, diluted
148.6
148.2
152.4
Diluted net earnings per share
$0.73
$1.14
$1.47
-5 earnings per share .
basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net earnings attributable to black knight by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period .
for the periods presented potentially dilutive securities include unvested restricted stock awards and the shares of bkfs class b common stock prior to the distribution .
for the year ended december 31 2017 the numerator in the diluted net earnings per share calculation is adjusted to reflect our income tax expense at an expected effective tax rate assuming the conversion of the shares of bkfs class b common stock into shares of bkfs class a common stock on a one-for-one basis prior to the distribution .
the effective tax rate for the year ended december 31 2017 was -16 .
7 % including the effect of the benefit related to the revaluation of our net deferred income tax liability and certain other discrete items recorded during 2017 .
for the year ended december 31 2017 the denominator includes approximately 63 .
1 million shares of bkfs class b common stock outstanding prior to the distribution .
the denominator also includes the dilutive effect of approximately 0 .
9 million 0 .
6 million and 0 .
6 million shares of unvested restricted shares of common stock for the years ended december 31 2019 2018 and 2017 respectively .
the shares of bkfs class b common stock did not share in the earnings or losses of black knight and were therefore not participating securities .
accordingly basic and diluted net earnings per share of bkfs class b common stock have not been presented .
the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share is as follows -in millions except per share amounts : .

Question: What were the basic Net earnings attributable to Black Knight in 2017?
Answer: 182.3
Year ended 31 December
Year ended 31 December
Year ended 31 December
Year ended 31 December
2019
2019
2018
2018
% of
% of
% of
% of
segment
segment
Amount
revenues
Amount
revenues
(Restated)
(Restated)
(RMB in millions, unless specified)
VAS
94,086
47%
73,961
42%
FinTech and Business Services
73,831
73%
54,598
75%
Online Advertising
34,860
51%
37,273
64%
Others
6,979
92%
4,742
98%
Total cost of revenues
209,756
170,574
cost of revenues .
cost of revenues increased by 23 % year-on-year to rmb209 .
8 billion .
the increase primarily reflected greater content costs costs of fintech services and channel costs .
as a percentage of revenues cost of revenues increased to 56 % for the year ended 31 december 2019 from 55 % for the year ended 31 december 2018 .
the following table sets forth our cost of revenues by line of business for the years ended 31 december 2019 and 2018 : .
cost of revenues for vas increased by 27 % year-on-year to rmb94086 million .
the increase was mainly due to greater content costs for services and products such as live broadcast services online games and video streaming subscriptions as well as channel costs for smart phone games .
cost of revenues for fintech and business services increased by 35 % year-on-year to rmb73831 million .
the increase primarily reflected greater costs of payment-related and cloud services due to the enhanced scale of our payment and cloud activities .
cost of revenues for online advertising decreased by 6 % year-on-year to rmb34860 million .
the decrease was mainly driven by lower content costs for our advertising-funded long form video service resulting from fewer content releases and improved cost efficiency partly offset by other cost items .

Question: How much did the total cost of revenues increase by from 2018 to 2019?
Answer: 39182
U.S.Pension Plans
Non-U.S.Pension Plans
Unrecognized Loss
Unrecognized Loss
Balance at January 1, 2018
$75,740
$1,898
Amortization of retirement benefits, net of tax
(4,538)
(126)
Settlements
—
—
Net actuarial gain
6,732
196
Foreign exchange impact
—
(52)
Tax impact due to implementation of ASU 2018-02
17,560
—
Balance at January 1, 2019
$95,494
$1,916
Amortization of retirement benefits, net of tax
(4,060)
(138)
Net actuarial (loss) gain
(2,604)
78
Foreign exchange impact
—
44
Balance at December 31, 2019
$88,830
$1,900
notes to consolidated financial statements -in thousands except for share and per share data .
we have also recorded the following amounts to accumulated other comprehensive loss for the u .
s .
and non-u .
s .
pension plans net of tax : .

Question: What was the difference in the balance at December 31, 2019 for Unrecognized losses between U.S and Non-U.S. Pension Plans?
Answer: 86930
Fiscal 2019 Restructuring Plan
Workplace reduction
Facility costs
Total
Balance payable as at June 30, 2018
$—
$—
$—
Accruals and adjustments
12,460
15,858
28,318
Cash payments
(10,420)
(4,739)
(15,159)
Non-cash adjustments
—
(3,393)
(3,393)
Foreign exchange
(221)
(2,438)
(2,659)
Balance payable as at June 30, 2019
$1,819
$5,288
$7,107
fiscal 2019 restructuring plan .
during fiscal 2019 we began to implement restructuring activities to streamline our operations -fiscal 2019 restructuring plan including in connection with our recent acquisitions of catalyst and liaison to take further steps to improve our operational efficiency .
the fiscal 2019 restructuring plan charges relate to workforce reductions and facility consolidations .
these charges require management to make certain judgments and estimates regarding the amount and timing of restructuring charges or recoveries .
our estimated liability could change subsequent to its recognition requiring adjustments to the expense and the liability recorded .
on a quarterly basis we conduct an evaluation of the related liabilities and expenses and revise our assumptions and estimates as appropriate .
as of june 30 2019 we expect total costs to be incurred in conjunction with the fiscal 2019 restructuring plan to be approximately $ 30 .
0 million of which $ 28 .
3 million has already been recorded within " special charges -recoveries " to date .
we do not expect to incur any further significant charges relating to this plan .
a reconciliation of the beginning and ending liability for the year ended june 30 2019 is shown below .

Question: For Accruals and adjustments, What is difference between Workplace reduction & Facility costs?
Answer: -3398
Fiscal Year 2018
Fiscal Year 2019
Fiscal Year 2019
Named Executive Officer
Base Salary
Base Salary
Percentage Increase
Oleg Khaykin
$750,000
$800,000
6.7%
Amar Maletira
$425,000
$500,000
17.7%
Paul McNab
$435,000
$435,000
—
Luke Scrivanich
$372,000
$372,000
—
Gary Staley
$360,000
$375,000
4.2%
base salary .
the base salary for each neo is determined on the basis of the following factors : scope of responsibilities experience skills performance expected future contribution base salary levels in effect for comparable positions at the companies in the peer group -as described on page 42 below under “ use of peer group compensation data ” and other competitive market factors .
generally the committee reviews the base salary levels of our neos annually as part of the company ’ s performance review process as well as upon a promotion or other change of position or level of responsibility .
merit-based increases to the base salaries of our neos -other than our ceo are recommended by our ceo to the committee and all increases are based on the committee ’ s -and in the case of our ceo the board ’ s review and assessment of the factors described above .
the compensation committee reviews compensation levels at the beginning of each fiscal year and adjusts as needed based upon market data and executive achievement .
the committee reviewed the base salaries of our executive officers including our neos for fiscal year 2019 and increased the salaries of our ceo and cfo in light of their contributions in fiscal year 2018 including among other considerations the successful execution and integration of the avcomm and wireless acquisition and to reflect the committee ’ s review of current peer and market compensation data .
mr .
staley ’ s salary was also increased to reflect the committee ’ s review of current peer and market compensation data as well as his contributions in fiscal year 2019 including the integration of avcomm and wireless sales into our global sales organization .
the committee did not increase the salaries of any of our other neos because the committee determined that the existing base salaries were appropriate for each of these neos .
actual base salaries paid to our neos in fiscal year 2019 are set forth in the “ salary ” column of the fiscal 2019 summary compensation table on page 44 .

Question: What was the total base salary of all Named Executive Officers in 2018?
Answer: 2342000
Years Ended December 31,
Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
(in thousands)
(in thousands)
Beginning balance
$238,330
$237,992
Adjustments
—
338
Ending balance
$238,330
$238,330
goodwill .
goodwill arises from the acquisition method of accounting for business combinations and represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net assets and other identifiable intangible assets acquired .
the fair values of net tangible assets and intangible assets acquired are based upon preliminary valuations and the company ' s estimates and assumptions are subject to change within the measurement period -potentially up to one year from the acquisition date .
the following table presents the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the periods indicated : .
the company performs an annual goodwill impairment assessment on october 31st each year using a two-step quantitative assessment .
step one is the identification of potential impairment .
this involves comparing the fair value of each reporting unit which the company has determined to be the entity itself with its carrying amount including goodwill .
if the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds the carrying amount the goodwill of the reporting unit is considered not impaired and the second step of the impairment test is unnecessary .
if the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value the second step of the impairment test is performed to measure the amount of impairment loss if any .
the company determined there were no indications of impairment associated with goodwill .
as a resultn o goodwill impairment was recognized as of october 31 2019 .
in addition to its annual review the company performs a test of impairment when indicators of impairment are present .
as of december 31 2019 there were no indications of impairment of the company ’ s goodwill balances .

Question: When does the company perform an annual goodwill impairment assessment?
Answer: October 31st
NUMBER OF DSUs
2019
2018
Outstanding, January 1
4,391,997
4,309,528
Issued (1)
84,588
94,580
Settlement of RSUs/PSUs
146,960
112,675
Dividends credited
236,079
240,879
Settled
(236,525)
(365,665)
Outstanding, December 31
4,623,099
4,391,997
dsus .
eligible bonuses and rsus / psus may be paid in the form of dsus when executives or other eligible employees elect to or are required to participate in the plan .
the value of a dsu at the issuance date is equal to the value of one bce common share .
for non-management directors compensation is paid in dsus until the minimum share ownership requirement is met ; thereafter at least 50 % of their compensation is paid in dsus .
there are no vesting requirements relating to dsus .
dividends in the form of additional dsus are credited to the participant ’ s account on each dividend payment date and are equivalent in value to the dividends paid on bce common shares .
dsus are settled when the holder leaves the company .
the following table summarizes the status of outstanding dsus at december 31 2019 and 2018 .
-1 the weighted average fair value of the dsus issued was $ 59 in 2019 and $ 55 in 2018 .

Question: What is the value of a DSU at the issuance date?
Answer: equal to the value of one BCE common share