FangyuLei/tatqa huggingface dataset:
Year ended March 31,
Year ended March 31,
Year ended March 31,
Year ended March 31,
Year ended March 31,
(In thousands, except per share data)
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
Operating results
Net revenue
$140,842
$127,360
$127,678
$120,366
$103,514
Gross profit
73,880
64,417
63,785
68,106
60,081
Operating loss
(13,081)
(12,080)
(11,408)
(4,313)
(12,467)
Operating loss, net of taxes
(13,164)
(8,350)
(11,721)
(3,765)
(11,497)
Net loss
$(13,164)
$(8,350)
$(11,721)
$(3,765)
$(11,497)
Per share data (1)
Basic and diluted
Net loss
$(0.57)
$(0.37)
$(0.52)
$(0.17)
$(0.51)
Weighted-average shares outstanding - basic and diluted
23,037
22,801
22,615
22,483
22,338
Balance sheet data at year end
Cash and cash equivalents
$40,771
$39,943
$49,255
$60,608
$75,067
Working capital
20,707
19,343
27,183
41,401
54,407
Total assets
163,591
157,207
167,305
185,157
181,525
Total debt
57
177
237
333
189
Total shareholders’ equity
100,622
108,431
113,669
123,473
124,188
item 6 .
selected financial data .
the following selected consolidated financial and operating data was derived from our audited consolidated financial statements .
the selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and item 7 contained in part ii of this annual report .
-1 when a loss is reported the denominator of diluted earnings per share cannot be adjusted for the dilutive impact of share-based compensation awards because doing so would be anti-dilutive .
in addition when a loss from continuing operations is reported adjusting the denominator of diluted earnings per share would also be anti-dilutive to the loss per share even if the entity has net income after adjusting for a discontinued operation .
therefore for all periods presented basic weighted-average shares outstanding were used in calculating the diluted net loss per share .

Question: What is the average gross profit for 2018 and 2019?
Answer: 69148.5
AUSTRALIA
ASIA
TOTAL
$’000
$’000
$’000
30 June 2019
Revenue
149,295
4,864
154,159
Non-current assets1
44,061
15,899
59,960
30 June 2018
Revenue
174,776
2,155
176,931
Non-current assets1
49,235
15,245
64,480
2 .
1 segment information .
segment information is based on the information that management uses to make decisions about operating matters and allows users to review operations through the eyes of management .
we present our reportable segments and measure our segment results on continuing operations basis i .
e .
the same basis as our internal management reporting structure .
we have four reportable segments which offer a service that includes comparison purchase support and lead referrals across : .
• health -private health insurance .
• life and general insurance .
• energy and telecommunications and .
• other predominately offering financial service products including home loans in australia and asia .
in the current year unallocated corporate costs include costs associated with the business restructure and other one-off transactions .
1 non-current assets other than financial instruments and deferred tax assets .

Question: What do the unalloacated corporate costs include in the current year?
Answer: costs associated with the business restructure and other one-off transactions
April 26, 2019
April 27, 2018
Fair value of plan assets
$ 31
$ 25
Benefit obligations
(61)
(53)
Unfunded obligations
$(30)
$(28)
other defined benefit plans .
we maintain various defined benefit plans to provide termination and postretirement benefits to certain eligible employees outside of the u .
s .
we also provide disability benefits to certain eligible employees in the u .
s .
eligibility is determined based on the terms of our plans and local statutory requirements .
funded status .
the funded status of our postretirement health care and other defined benefit plans which is recognized in other long-term liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets was as follows -in millions : .

Question: What was the fair value of plan assets in 2019?
Answer: 31
Fair Value Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Derivative Contracts
Convertible Debt Securities
Total
Balances, January 31, 2018
$1.0
$7.8
$8.8
Settlements
—
(3.5)
(3.5)
(Losses) Gains included in earnings (1)
(0.2)
0.5
0.3
Losses included in OCI
—
(0.4)
(0.4)
Balances, January 31, 2019
$0.8
$4.4
$5.2
autodesk applies fair value accounting for certain financial assets and liabilities which consist of cash equivalents marketable securities and other financial instruments on a recurring basis .
the company defines fair value as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date .
fair value is estimated by applying the following hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value into three levels and bases the categorization within the hierarchy upon the lowest level of input that is available and significant to the fair value measurement : -level 1 observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets ; -level 2 inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities ; and -level 3 unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data which require autodesk to develop its own assumptions .
when determining fair value autodesk uses observable market data and relies on unobservable inputs only when observable market data is not available .
autodesk reviews for any potential changes on a quarterly basis in conjunction with our fiscal quarter-end close .
autodesk ' s cash equivalents marketable securities and financial instruments are primarily classified within level 1 or level 2 of the fair value hierarchy .
autodesk values its securities on pricing from pricing vendors who may use quoted prices in active markets for identical assets -level 1 or inputs other than quoted prices that are observable either directly or indirectly in determining fair value -level 2 .
autodesk ' s level 2 securities are valued primarily using observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities .
autodesk ' s level 3 securities consist of investments held in convertible debt securities and derivative contracts .
a reconciliation of the change in autodesk ’ s level 3 items for the fiscal year ended january 31 2019 was as follows : .
-1 included in “ interest and other expense net ” in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations .

Question: Of the total balances as of January 31, 2019, what percentage came from convertible debt securities?
Answer: 84.62
(dollars in millions) Increase/ (Decrease)
(dollars in millions) Increase/ (Decrease)
(dollars in millions) Increase/ (Decrease)
(dollars in millions) Increase/ (Decrease)
Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2019 vs. 2018
2019 vs. 2018
Cost of services 
$10,655
$10,859
$(204)
(1.9)%
Cost of wireless equipment 
4,733
4,560
173
3.8
Selling, general and administrative expense 
8,188
7,689
499
6.5
Depreciation and amortization expense 
4,105
4,258
(153)
(3.6)
Total Operating Expenses 
$ 27,681
$ 27,366
$ 315
1.2
cost of services cost of services decreased $ 204 million or 1 .
9 % during 2019 compared to 2018 primarily due to lower access costs resulting from a decline in voice connections as well as lower employee-related costs associated with the lower headcount resulting from the voluntary separation program offset by an increase in regulatory fees .
cost of wireless equipment cost of wireless equipment increased $ 173 million or 3 .
8 % during 2019 compared to 2018 primarily driven by a shift to higher priced units in the mix of wireless devices sold and an increase in the number of wireless devices sold .
selling general and administrative expense selling general and administrative expense increased $ 499 million or 6 .
5 % during 2019 compared to 2018 due to increases in advertising expenses and sales commission expense which were partially offset by decreases in employee-related costs resulting from the voluntary separation program .
the increase in sales commission expense was primarily due to a lower net deferral of commission costs in 2019 as compared to 2018 as a result of the adoption of topic 606 on january 1 2018 using a modified retrospective approach .
depreciation and amortization expense depreciation and amortization expense decreased $ 153 million or 3 .
6 % during 2019 compared to 2018 driven by the change in the mix of total verizon depreciable assets and business ’ s usage of those assets .

Question: How much was the Selling, General and Administrative Expense in 2019?
Answer: 8,188
Years Ended December 31,
Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
Interest before impact of interest rate caps
$25,633
$30,709
Impact of interest rate caps
—
181
Interest expense
$25,633
$30,890
interest expense .
the components of interest expense are as follows : .
interest expense including administrative and other fees was $ 25633 for 2019 compared with $ 30890 in 2018 .
the decrease in interest expense was primarily associated with the impact of the refinancing of our term loan at the end of 2018 and interest capitalized during 2019 due to vessels under construction .

Question: What led to the decrease in interest expense?
Answer: primarily associated with the impact of the refinancing of our term loan at the end of 2018 and interest capitalized during 2019 due to vessels under construction.
Fair Value Measurement Using
Carrying Value
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
Marketable securities
0
0
0
0
0
Derivative warrants liabilities
$(332,222)
$-
$-
$(332,222)
$(332,222)
the three levels are described below : .
level 1 inputs – unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that is accessible by the company ; .
level 2 inputs – quoted prices in markets that are not active or financial instruments for which all significant inputs are observable either directly or indirectly ; .
level 3 inputs – unobservable inputs for the asset or liability including significant assumptions of the company and other market participants .
the carrying amount of the company ’ s financial assets and liabilities such as cash accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate their fair value because of the short maturity of those instruments .
the carrying amount of the company ’ s financial assets and liabilities such as cash accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate their fair value because of the short maturity of those instruments .
transactions involving related parties cannot be presumed to be carried out on an arm ’ s-length basis as the requisite conditions of competitive free-market dealings may not exist .
representations about transactions with related parties if made shall not imply that the related party transactions were consummated on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm ’ s-length transactions unless such representations can be substantiated .
the assets or liability ’ s fair value measurement within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement .
the following table provides a summary of financial instruments that are measured at fair value as of december 31 2019 .

Question: What is the difference in Level 1 and Level 2 marketable securities?
Answer: 0
2019
2018
Profit attributable to equity shareholders (£m)
166.6
223.1
Weighted average shares (million)
73.7
73.6
Dilution (million)
0.2
0.2
Diluted weighted average shares (million)
73.9
73.8
Basic earnings per share
226.2p
303.1p
Diluted earnings per share
225.5p
302.0p
10 earnings per share .
basic and diluted earnings per share calculated on an adjusted profit basis are included in note 2 .
the dilution is in respect of unexercised share options and the performance share plan .

Question: What is the dilution of earnings per share in respect of?
Answer: unexercised share options and the Performance Share Plan.
Year-ended 31 March 2019
Year-ended 31 March 2018
Number
WASP
Number
WASP
Performance share units
000’s
£ pence
000’s
£ pence
Outstanding at the start of the year
7,546
269.65
6,024
219.41
Awarded
1,721
506.74
1,719
440.50
Forfeited
(2,234)
414.51
(197)
223.96
Released
(2,949)
262.64
–
–
Outstanding at the end of the year
4,084
295.41
7,546
269.65
performance share units .
the following table illustrates the number and wasp on date of award and movements in performance share units - “ psus ” granted under the 2015 ltip : .
psus vest on one vesting date following a three year vesting period which will comprise three financial years .
the awards are divided into three equal parts which will each be subject to a separate annual performance condition linked to the financial performance of the group .

Question: What are the types of movements in performance share units (“PSUs”) illustrated in the table?
Answer: Awarded Forfeited Released
(In millions)
Food Care
Product Care
Total
Gross Carrying Value at December 31, 2017
$ 576.5
$ 1,554.1
$ 2,130.6
Accumulated impairment
(49.6 )
(141.2)
(190.8)
Carrying Value at December 31, 2017
$ 526.9
$ 1,412.9
$ 1,939.8
Acquisition, purchase price and other adjustments
(0.6 )
18.2
17.6
Currency translation
(6.6 )
(3.2)
(9.8)
Gross Carrying Value at December 31, 2018
$ 568.9
$ 1,568.9
$ 2,137.8
Accumulated impairment
(49.2 )
(141.0)
(190.2)
Carrying Value at December 31, 2018
$ 519.7
$ 1,427.9
$ 1,947.6
Acquisition, purchase price and other adjustments
6.3
257.0
263.3
Currency translation
2.0
4.1
6.1
Gross Carrying Value at December 31, 2019
$ 577.2
$ 1,830.0
$ 2,407.2
Accumulated impairment
(49.3 )
(141.0)
(190.3)
Carrying Value at December 31, 2019
$ 527.9
$ 1,689.0
$ 2,216.9
allocation of goodwill to reporting segment .
the following table shows our goodwill balances by reportable segment : .
as noted above it was determined under a quantitative assessment that there was no impairment of goodwill .
however if we become aware of indicators of impairment in future periods we may be required to perform an interim assessment for some or all of our reporting units before the next annual assessment .
examples of such indicators may include a decrease in expected net earnings adverse equity market conditions a decline in current market multiples a decline in our common stock price a significant adverse change in legal factors or business climates an adverse action or assessment by a regulator unanticipated competition strategic decisions made in response to economic or competitive conditions or a more likely than not expectation that a reporting unit or a significant portion of a reporting unit will be sold or disposed of .
in the event of significant adverse changes of the nature described above we may have to recognize a non-cash impairment of goodwill which could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition and results of operations .

Question: What is the impact of a significant adverse impairment of goodwill?
Answer: we may have to recognize a non-cash impairment of goodwill, which could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition and results of operations.
Weighted-average assumptions used to define the benefit obligations
2019
2018
%
%
Rate of increase in salaries
2.4
2.7
Rate of increase in pensions
2.8
2.9
Rate of price inflation
2.9
3.2
Discount rate
2.1
2.7
7 employee benefits .
pension plans .
the company is accounting for pension costs in accordance with international accounting standard 19 .
the disclosures shown here are in respect of the company ’ s defined benefit obligations .
other plans operated by the company were defined contribution plans .
the total expense relating to the company ’ s defined contribution pension plans in the current year was £ 0 .
7m -2018 : £ 0 .
6m .
at 31st december 2019 the post-retirement mortality assumptions in respect of the company defined benefit scheme follows 85 % / 96 % -male / female of saps s2 cmi 2017 projections with a long term trend of 1 .
25 % p .
a .
at 31st december 2018 the postretirement mortality assumptions in respect of the company defined benefit scheme follows 85 % of saps s2 light base table for males and 96 % of saps s2 base table for females with cmi core projection model 2016 improvements commencing in 2007 subject to a 1 .
25 % p .
a .
long-term trend .
these assumptions are regularly reviewed in light of scheme-specific experience and more widely available statistics .
the financial assumptions used at 31st december were : .
the assumptions used by the actuary are the best estimates chosen from a range of possible actuarial assumptions which due to the timescale covered may not necessarily be borne out in practice .

Question: What is the Company accounting for pension costs in accordance to?
Answer: with International Accounting Standard 19
€ million
30/9/2018
30/9/2019
Corporate tax losses
4,320
4,883
Trade tax losses
3,296
3,679
Interest carry-forwards
57
83
Temporary differences
104
120
no deferred tax assets were capitalised for the following tax loss carry-forwards and interest carry-forwards or temporary differences because realisation of the assets in the short-to-medium term is not expected : .
the loss carry-forwards as of the closing date predominantly concern the german consolidation group .
they can be carried forward without limitation .

Question: What do the loss carry-forwards as of the closing date predominantly concern?
Answer: the German consolidation group. They can be carried forward without limitation.
2019
2018
Notes
£ million
£ million
Due within one year
Trade debtors
5.2
7.0
Owed by subsidiaries
13.7
9.6
Other debtors
0.2
0.7
Prepayments
0.4
0.6
Current tax asset
1.0
0.6
Deferred tax
13
–
1.3
Assets recognised from costs to obtain a contract
0.1
0.1
20.6
19.9
Due after one year
Defined benefit pension plan surplus
3
8.8
2.0
9 .
debtors .
the directors consider that the carrying amount of trade and other debtors approximates their fair value .
the company has no significant concentration of credit risk attributable to its trade debtors as the exposure is spread over a large number of customers .
assets recognised from costs to obtain a contract relate to capitalised incremental costs to obtain a contract being sales commissions arising on contracts with customers of more than one year in length .
no assets were impaired or derecognised during the current year or prior year .

Question: What are the components under Due within one year?
Answer: Trade debtors Owed by subsidiaries Other debtors Prepayments Current tax asset Deferred tax Assets recognised from costs to obtain a contract
Long-lived Assets 
June 30, 2019
June 30, 2018
Americas 
$136,035
$178,251
EMEA  
28,744
15,106
APAC  
11,529
9,896
Total long-lived assets
$176,308
$203,253
12 .
information about segments of geographic areas .
the company operates in one segment the development and marketing of network infrastructure equipment .
revenue is attributed to a geographical area based on the location of the customers .
the company operates in three geographic theaters : americas which includes the united states canada mexico central america and south america ; emea which includes europe russia middle east and africa ; and apac which includes asia pacific china south asia and japan .
the company ’ s chief operating decision maker - “ codm ” who is its ceo reviews financial information presented on a consolidated basis for purposes of allocating resources and evaluating financial performance .
see note 3 .
revenues for the company ’ s revenues by geographic regions and channel based on the customers ’ ship-to location .
the company ’ s long-lived assets are attributed to the geographic regions as follows -in thousands : .

Question: What was the amount of Total long-lived assets in 2019?
Answer: 176,308
December 31, 2019
December 31, 2018
Cash and cash equivalents
$19,505
$18,017
Restricted cash
1,205
1,444
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash in the consolidated statements of cash flows
$20,710
$19,461
-l cash cash equivalents and restricted cash .
cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less on the date of purchase .
restricted cash includes cash and cash equivalents that is restricted through legal contracts regulations or our intention to use the cash for a specific purpose .
our restricted cash primarily relates to refundable deposits and funds held in escrow .
the following table provides a reconciliation of cash cash equivalents and restricted cash reported within the consolidated balance sheets to the total amounts shown in the statements of cash flows -in thousands : .

Question: What is the average restricted cash amount in 2018 and 2019?
Answer: 1324.5
(in thousands of $)
2019
2018
As of January 1
20,000
1,177,489
Additions
372,849
118,942
Transfer to vessels and equipment, net (note 16)
—
(1,296,431)
Transfer from vessels and equipment, net (note 16)
—
20,000
Transfer from other non-current assets (note 17)
31,048
—
Interest costs capitalized
10,351
—
As of December 31
434,248
20,000
15 .
asset under development .
in may 2018 upon the completion of the hilli flng conversion and commissioning we reclassified $ 1296 million to " vessels and equipment net " in our consolidated balance sheet as of december 31 2018 .
in december 2018 we entered into agreements with keppel for the conversion of the gimi to a flng and consequently reclassified the carrying value of the gimi of $ 20 .
0 million from " vessels and equipment net " to " asset under development " .
in february 2019 golar entered into an agreement with bp for the employment of a flng unit gimi to service the greater tortue ahmeyim project for a 20-year period expected to commence in 2022 .
in april 2019 we issued the shipyard with a final notice to proceed with conversion works that had been initiated under the limited notice to proceed .
we also completed the sale of 30 % of the total issued ordinary share capital of gimi ms corp to first flng holdings -see note 5 .
the estimated conversion cost of the gimi is approximately $ 1 .
3 billion .

Question: Which years did Golar enter into agreements with companies like Keppel and BP respectively?
Answer: 2018 2019
December 31
December 31
2019
2018
U.S. $ in thousands
Research and development
123
175
General and administrative
666
844
Total stock-based compensation expense
789
1,019
note 11 - stock capital -cont .
shares and warrants issued to service providers : .
on august 17 2017 the company issued to anthony fiorino the former ceo of the company for consulting services rendered a grant of 4327 shares of restricted stock under the 2014 u .
s .
plan which vests in eight equal quarterly installments -starting november 17 2017 until fully vested on the second anniversary of the date of grant .
compensation expense recorded by the company in respect of its stock-based service provider compensation awards for the year ended december 31 2019 and 2018 amounted to $ 25 and $ 102 respectively .
on march 26 2019 the company issued to its legal advisor 5908 shares of common stock under the 2014 u .
s .
plan for certain 2018 legal services .
the related compensation expense was recorded as general and administrative expense in 2018 .
on may 23 2019 the company granted to a former director in consideration for services rendered to the company an option under the 2014 global plan to purchase up to 4167 shares of common stock with an exercise price per share of $ 0 .
75 .
the option was fully vested and exercisable as of the date of grant .
total stock-based compensation expense : .
the total stock-based compensation expense related to shares options and warrants granted to employees directors and service providers was comprised at each period as follows : .

Question: What is the compensation expense recorded by the Company for the year ended December 31, 2019?
Answer: $25