FangyuLei/tatqa huggingface dataset:
Number of Options Outstanding
Weighted Average Exercise Price
Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)
Aggregate Intrinsic Value (thousands)
Outstanding – December 31, 2017
2,341,340
$1.77
5.78
$1,087
Options granted
376,667
2.41
Options exercised
224,400
1.59
Options forfeited
6,961
1.42
Outstanding – December 31, 2018
2,486,646
$1.89
7.01
$1,550
Options granted
50,832
3.02
Options exercised
-
Options forfeited
181,281
2.23
Outstanding – December 31, 2019
2,356,197
$1.89
5.93
$628
Exercisable – December 31, 2019
1,843,468
$1.75
5.34
$624
stock options .
the following is a summary of stock option activity during the years ended december 31 2019 and 2018 : .

Question: What are the respective outstanding options as at December 31, 2018 and 2019?
Answer: 2,486,646 2,356,197
For the year ended
2019
2019
2018
2018
2017
2017
CNBU
$4,645
47%
$9,773
64%
$3,755
44%
MBU
2,606
41%
3,033
46%
927
21%
SBU
(386)
(10)%
964
19%
552
12%
EBU
923
29%
1,473
42%
975
36%
All Other
13
18%
—
—%
23
35%
$7,801
$15,243
$6,232
operating income -loss by business unit .
percentages reflect operating income -loss as a percentage of revenue for each business unit .
cnbu operating income for 2019 decreased from 2018 primarily due to declines in pricing and higher r & d costs partially offset by cost reductions .
mbu operating income for 2019 decreased from 2018 primarily due to declines in pricing partially offset by increases in sales of high-value managed nand products and manufacturing cost reductions .
sbu operating margin for 2019 declined from 2018 primarily due to declines in pricing which were partially offset by manufacturing cost reductions and increases in sales volumes .
sbu operating results for 2019 and 2018 were adversely impacted by the underutilization charges at imft .
ebu operating income for 2019 decreased from 2018 as a result of declines in pricing and higher r & d costs partially offset by manufacturing cost reductions and increases in sales volumes .
cnbu operating income for 2018 improved from 2017 primarily due to improved pricing and higher sales volumes resulting from strong demand for our products combined with manufacturing cost reductions .
mbu operating income for 2018 improved from 2017 primarily due to increases in pricing and sales volumes for lpdram products higher sales of high-value managed nand products and manufacturing cost reductions .
sbu operating income for 2018 improved from 2017 primarily due to manufacturing cost reductions enabled by our execution in transitioning to 64-layer tlc 3d nand products and improvements in product mix .
sbu operating income for 2018 was adversely impacted by higher costs associated with imft ' s production of 3d xpoint memory products at less than full capacity .
ebu operating income for 2018 increased as compared to 2017 as a result of increases in average selling prices manufacturing cost reductions and increases in sales volumes partially offset by higher r & d costs .

Question: What was the primary cause of CNBU operating income for 2019 decreased from 2018?
Answer: declines in pricing and higher R&D costs, partially offset by cost reductions
($ in millions)
($ in millions)
($ in millions)
($ in millions)
($ in millions)
For the year ended December 31:
2018
2017
Yr.-to-Yr. Percent Change
Yr.-to-Yr. Percent Change Adjusted for Currency
Global Technology Services external revenue
$29,146 *
$29,213 *
(0.2)%
(0.8)%
Infrastructure & Cloud Services
$22,185*
$22,016*
0.8%
0.0%
Technology Support Services
6,961
7,196
(3.3)
(3.5)
* recast to reflect segment changes .
global technology services revenue decreased 0 .
2 percent as reported -1 percent adjusted for currency in 2018 compared to the prior year with infrastructure & cloud services up 0 .
8 percent as reported -flat adjusted for currency offset by a decline in technology support services .
in infrastructure & cloud services the business focused on prioritizing the portfolio to deliver high-value solutions to bring productivity to clients and allow for expanding workloads while it exited some lower-value offerings .
technology support services was impacted by the hardware product cycle dynamics in 2018 but grew its multivendor services offerings .
within gts cloud revenue of $ 8 .
0 billion grew 22 percent as reported and 21 percent adjusted for currency compared to the prior year .

Question: What is the increase/ (decrease) in Global Technology Services external revenue from 2017 to 2018
Answer: -67
Fiscal Year Ended
Fiscal Year Ended
Fiscal Year Ended
December 28, 2019
December 29, 2018
December 30, 2017
Balance at beginning of year
$2,102
$ 3,662
$2,972
Accruals
3,881
3,181
8,115
Settlements
(4,041)
(4,741)
(7,425)
Balance at end of year
$1,942
$2,102
$3,662
warranty obligations .
we offer warranties on certain products and record a liability for the estimated future costs associated with warranty claims at the time revenue is recognized .
the warranty liability is based upon historical experience and our estimate of the level of future costs .
while we engage in product quality programs and processes our warranty obligation is affected by product failure rates material usage and service delivery costs incurred in correcting a product failure .
we continuously monitor product returns for warranty and maintain a reserve for the related expenses based upon our historical experience and any specifically identified field failures .
as we sell new products to our customers we must exercise considerable judgment in estimating the expected failure rates .
this estimating process is based on historical experience of similar products as well as various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances .
we provide for the estimated cost of product warranties at the time revenue is recognized .
warranty costs are reflected in the consolidated statement of income as a cost of revenues .
a reconciliation of the changes in our warranty liability is as follows -in thousands : .

Question: Where are the warranty costs reflected?
Answer: Consolidated Statement of Income as a Cost of revenues
Year Ended December 31, 2019 Revenues
On-net
Off-net
Non-core
Total
North America
$319,330
$131,815
$422
$451,567
Europe
72,320
16,323
53
88,696
Asia Pacific
4,615
778
—
5,393
Latin America
488
15
—
503
Total
$396,753
$148,931
$475
$546,159
Year Ended December 31, 2018 Revenues
On-net
Off-net
Non-core
Total
North America
$299,021
$128,510
$572
$428,103
Europe
72,958
15,918
62
88,938
Asia Pacific
2,562
576
—
3,138
Latin America
14
—
—
14
Total
$374,555
$145,004
$634
$520,193
Year Ended December 31, 2017 Revenues
On-net
Off-net
Non-core
Total
North America
$278,714
$122,683
$797
$402,194
Europe
66,588
14,867
41
81,496
Asia Pacific
1,143
342
—
1,485
Total
$346,445
$137,892
$838
$485,175
10 .
geographic information : .
operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing the company ’ s performance .
the company has one operating segment .
revenues are attributed to regions based on where the services are provided .
below are the company ’ s service revenues and long lived assets by geographic region -in thousands : .

Question: What is the value of the revenue from the off-net segment from North America as a percentage of the total revenue earned in North America in 2019?
Answer: 32.77
Year-ended 31 March 2019
Year-ended 31 March 2018 Restated See note 2
$M
$M
Profit / (loss) for the year before taxation
53.6
(41.0)
Loss for the year before taxation multiplied by the standard rate of corporation tax in the UK of 19% (2018: 19%)
10.2
(7.7)
Effects of:
Adjustments in respect of previous years
0.8
7.1
Change in tax rate during the year
1.4
3.6
Expenses not deductible for tax purposes
11.8
9.4
Losses not recognised
(0.9)
–
Higher tax rates on overseas earnings
7.7
3.8
Research and development and other tax credits
(1.9)
(0.6)
Impact of US tax reform on deferred tax
–
5.4
Other movements
(2.4)
(1.1)
Charge for taxation on profit / (loss) for the year
26.7
19.9
the following table reconciles the theoretical corporation tax expense to the reported tax expense using the uk corporation tax rate .
the reconciling items represent the impact of rate differentials in tax jurisdictions and the impact of non-taxable benefits and non-deductible expenses arising from differences between the local tax base and the reported financial statements .
the group ’ s taxation strategy is published at www .
sophos .
com / en-us / medialibrary / pdfs / legal / sophos-group-tax-poli the group ’ s taxation strategy is published at www .
sophos .
com / en-us / medialibrary / pdfs / legal / sophos-group-tax-policyfy19 .
pdf and is aligned to its business strategy and operational needs .
oversight of taxation is within the remit of the audit and risk committee .
the chief financial officer is responsible for tax strategy supported by a global team of tax professionals .
sophos strives for an open and transparent relationship with all revenue authorities and is vigilant in ensuring that the group complies with current tax legislation .
the group proactively seeks to agree arm ’ s length pricing with tax authorities to mitigate tax risks of significant cross-border operations .
the group actively engages with policy makers tax administrators industry bodies and international institutions to provide informed input on proposed tax measures so that it and they can understand how those proposals would affect the group .
however a tax authority may seek adjustment to the filing position adopted by a group company and it is accepted that interpretation of complex regulations may lead to additional tax being assessed .
uncertain tax positions are monitored regularly and a provision made in the accounts where appropriate .

Question: In which year was the Charge for taxation on profit  for the year larger?
Answer: 2019
VMware Stock Options
Pivotal Stock Options
Number of Shares
Weighted-Average Exercise Price (per share)
Number of Shares
Weighted-Average Exercise Price (per share)
Outstanding, February 3, 2017
1,991
$69.38
39,361
$6.72
Granted
745
13.79
20,323
9.73
Forfeited
(36)
55.44
(2,380)
8.13
Expired
(3)
93.87
(1,290)
6.24
Exercised
(1,050)
53.50
(1,626)
5.99
Outstanding, February 2, 2018
1,647
54.63
54,388
7.82
Granted
574
16.07
2,832
14.03
Special Dividend adjustment
348
n/a
n/a
n/a
Forfeited
(31)
24.44
(2,028)
9.35
Expired
—
—
(273)
7.02
Exercised
(569)
46.73
(9,018)
6.89
Outstanding, February 1, 2019(1)
1,969
36.50
45,901
8.31
Granted(2)
1,571
73.19
—
—
Forfeited(3)
(149)
52.83
(10,822)
10.65
Expired
—
—
(128)
10.10
Exercised(4)
(776)
39.94
(34,951)
7.59
Outstanding, January 31, 2020
2,615
56.58
—
—
vmware and pivotal stock options .
the following table summarizes stock option activity for vmware and pivotal since february 3 2017 -shares in thousands : .
-1 the weighted-average exercise price of options outstanding as of february 1 2019 reflects the adjustments to the options as a result of the special dividend .
-2 stock option granted under the vmware equity plan includes 0 .
6 million options issued for unvested options assumed as part of the pivotal acquisition .
-3 stock options forfeited under the pivotal equity plan includes 6 .
2 million options converted to vmware options as part of the pivotal acquisition using a conversion ratio of 0 .
1 .
-4 stock options exercised under the pivotal equity plan includes 22 .
4 million of vested options that were settled in cash as part of the pivotal acquisition .
the above table includes stock options granted in conjunction with unvested stock options assumed in business combinations .
as a result the weighted-average exercise price per share may vary from the vmware stock price at time of grant .
the stock options outstanding as of january 31 2020 had an aggregate intrinsic value of $ 239 million based on vmware ’ s closing stock price as of january 31 2020 .

Question: What were the stock options outstanding value as of January 31, 2020?
Answer: aggregate intrinsic value of $239 million based on VMware’s closing stock price as of January 31, 2020
($ in millions)
($ in millions)
($ in millions)
($ in millions)
($ in millions)
For the year ended December 31:
2018
2017
Yr.-to-Yr. Percent Change
Yr.-to-Yr. Percent Change Adjusted for Currency
Global Business Services external revenue
$16,595
$16,073
3.2%
2.3%
Consulting
$7,705
$7,262
6.1%
5.1%
Application Management
7,852
7,821
0.4
(0.5)
Global Process Services
1,037
990
4.8
4.7
global business services .
* recast to reflect segment changes .
global business services revenue increased compared to 2017 driven by strong growth in consulting led by key offerings in digital global business services revenue increased compared to 2017 driven by strong growth in consulting led by key offerings in digital and cloud application where the business has brought together technology and industry expertise to help clients on their digital journey .
gps grew year to year while application management revenue was flat as reported and declined adjusted for currency compared to 2017 .
while we continued to help clients move to the cloud with offerings such as cloud migration factory and cloud application development there were continued declines in the more traditional application management engagements .
within gbs cloud revenue of $ 4 .
7 billion grew 20 percent as reported and 19 percent adjusted for currency compared to the prior year .

Question: What caused the increase in Global Business Services revenue?
Answer: driven by strong growth in Consulting, led by key offerings in digital Global Business Services revenue increased compared to 2017 driven by strong growth in Consulting, led by key offerings in digital and cloud application, where the business has brought together technology and industry expertise to help clients on their digital journey
Year Ended
Year Ended
Year Ended
December 27, 2019
December 28, 2018
December 29, 2017
Weighted average expected term
0.5 years
0.5 years
0.4 years
Risk-free interest rate
2.3%
1.9%
1.1%
Dividend yield
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Volatility
56.0%
52.7%
47.8%
2017 espp .
in may 2017 we adopted the 2017 employee stock purchase plan -the “ 2017 espp ” .
the 2017 espp grants employees the ability to designate a portion of their base-pay to purchase ordinary shares at a price equal to 85 % of the fair market value of our ordinary shares on the first or last day of each 6 month purchase period .
purchase periods begin on january 1 or july 1 and end on june 30 or december 31 or the next business day if such date is not a business day .
shares are purchased on the last day of the purchase period .
the table below sets forth the weighted average assumptions used to measure the fair value of 2017 espp rights : .
we recognize share-based compensation expense associated with the 2017 espp over the duration of the purchase period .
we recognized $ 0 .
3 million $ 0 .
3 million and $ 0 .
1 million of share-based compensation expense associated with the 2017 espp during 2019 2018 and 2017 respectively .
at december 27 2019 there was no unrecognized share-based compensation expense .

Question: When did the company adopt the 2017 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “2017 ESPP”)?
Answer: May 2017
For the Years Ended December 31,
For the Years Ended December 31,
For the Years Ended December 31,
(in thousands) 
2019
2018
Cash and cash equivalents
$4,777
$1,008
Restricted cash
72
70
Restricted cash included in other assets, noncurrent
--   
70
Total cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash in the balance sheet 
4,849
$1,148
cash and cash equivalents .
cash and cash equivalents consist of cash checking accounts money market accounts and temporary investments with maturities of three months or less when purchased .
as of december 31 2019 and 2018 the company had no cash equivalents .
restricted cash .
in connection with certain transactions the company may be required to deposit assets including cash or investment shares in escrow accounts .
the assets held in escrow are subject to various contingencies that may exist with respect to such transactions .
upon resolution of those contingencies or the expiration of the escrow period some or all the escrow amounts may be used and the balance released to the company .
as of december 31 2019 and 2018 the company had $ 72000 and $ 140000 respectively deposited in escrow as restricted cash for the shoom acquisition of which any amounts not subject to claims shall be released to the pre-acquisition stockholders of shoom pro-rata on the next anniversary dates of the closing date of the shoom acquisition .
as of december 31 2019 and 2018 $ 72000 and $ 70000 respectively was current and included in prepaid assets and other current assets on the consolidated balance sheets .
as of december 31 2019 and 2018 $ 0 and $ 70000 was non-current and included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheet .
the following table provides a reconciliation of cash cash equivalents and restricted cash reported in the balance sheets that sum to the total of the same amounts show in the statement of cash flows .

Question: What was the amount in escrow as restricted cash at 2019 and 2018 respectively?
Answer: 72,000 140,000
Col. A Description
Col B. Balance at Beginning of Period
Col. C Additions(A)
Col. D Deductions(B)
Col. E Balance at End of Period
At December 31, 2019
Allowances for sales returns and price protection and other allowances
$186
$11
$(79)
$118
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets
$61
$127
$(7)
$181
At December 31, 2018
Allowances for sales returns and price protection and other allowances
$274
$24
$(112)
$186
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets
$—
$61
$—
$61
At December 31, 2017
Allowances for sales returns and price protection and other allowances
$257
$83
$(66)
$274
valuation and qualifying accounts .
-amounts in millions .
-a includes increases and reversals of allowances for sales returns price protection and valuation allowance for deferred tax assets due to normal reserving terms .
-b includes actual write-offs and utilization of allowances for sales returns price protection and releases of income tax valuation allowances and foreign currency translation and other adjustments .

Question: What was the sum of balances at the end of the period in 2019?
Answer: 299
As of December 31,
As of December 31,
As of December 31,
As of December 31,
As of December 31,
2018
2018
2018
2019
2019
Investee companies
Amount
Percentage of ownership or voting rights
Amount
Percentage of ownership or voting rights
NT$ (In Thousands)
NT$ (In Thousands)
NT$ (In Thousands)
NT$ (In Thousands)
Listed companies
CLIENTRON CORP.
$249,663
22.39
$276,515
21.90
FARADAY TECHNOLOGY CORP. (FARADAY) (Note A)
1,483,111
13.78
1,473,028
13.78
Unlisted companies
MTIC HOLDINGS PTE. LTD.
3,026
45.44
18,157
45.44
WINAICO IMMOBILIEN GMBH (Note B)
—
44.78
—
44.78
PURIUMFIL INC.
—
—
7,164
44.45
UNITECH CAPITAL INC.
568,005
42.00
642,660
42.00
TRIKNIGHT CAPITAL CORPORATION
1,520,575
40.00
2,281,631
40.00
HSUN CHIEH INVESTMENT CO., LTD.
1,608,551
36.49
1,686,502
36.49
YANN YUAN INVESTMENT CO., LTD.
2,032,013
30.87
2,761,821
30.87
HSUN CHIEH CAPITAL CORP.
161,319
30.00
122,060
30.00
VSENSE CO., LTD.
31,544
26.89
592
25.90
UNITED LED CORPORATION HONG KONG LIMITED
167,953
25.14
121,973
25.14
TRANSLINK CAPITAL PARTNERS I, L.P. (Note C)
120,440
10.38
172,414
10.38
WINAICO SOLAR PROJEKT 1 GMBH (Note B)
—
50.00
—
—
YUNG LI INVESTMENTS, INC.
2,213
45.16
—
—
Total
$7,948,413
$9,564,517
note a : beginning from june 2015 the company accounts for its investment in faraday as an associate given the fact that the company obtained the ability to exercise significant influence over faraday through representation on its board of directors .
note b : winaico solar projekt 1 gmbh and winaico immobilien gmbh are joint ventures to the company .
note c : the company follows international accounting practices in equity accounting for limited partnerships and uses the equity method to account for these investees .
the carrying amount of investments accounted for using the equity method for which there are published price quotations amounted to nt $ 1733 million and nt $ 1750 million as of december 31 2018 and 2019 respectively .
the fair value of these investments were nt $ 1621 million and nt $ 2244 million as of december 31 2018 and 2019 respectively .

Question: What is the average amount of investments of listed companies in 2019?
Answer: 874771.5
Year Ended December 31,
Year Ended December 31,
Year Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
(in thousands)
(in thousands)
(in thousands)
Interest income
$8,178
$7,796
$2,951
Interest expense
(21,559)
(28,176)
(14,762)
Other, net
84
(3,098)
1,478
Other expense, net
$(13,297)
$(23,478)
$(10,333)
other income -expense .
interest income in 2019 increased by $ 0 .
4 million due to an increase in interest income earned on investment securities and money market portfolios .
interest expense in 2019 decreased by $ 6 .
6 million due to the payoff of the 1 .
50 % convertible notes due july 1 2018 with a principal amount of $ 253 .
0 million -the “ 2018 notes ” in the third quarter of 2018 .
refer to the section titled “ liquidity and capital resources ” for additional information on the convertible notes .
other net primarily included foreign exchange gains and losses related to transactions denominated in foreign currencies as well as foreign exchange gains and losses related to our intercompany loans and certain cash accounts .
foreign exchange gains and losses for the years ended december 31 2019 2018 and 2017 were primarily driven by fluctuations in the euro and us dollar in relation to the british pound .

Question: What was interest income in 2017?
Answer: $2,951
Fiscal 2018
Fiscal 2019
High
Low
High
Low
4th Quarter
$100.00
$73.41
$89.00
$ 81.10
3rd Quarter
100.00
88.27
98.35
81.30
2nd Quarter
101.51
88.01
99.87
84.10
1st Quarter
99.75
77.92
97.85
86.61
item 5 .
market for registrant ’ s common equity related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities item 5 .
market for registrant ’ s common equity related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities .
market for common stock .
the company ’ s common stock trades on nyse american under the trading symbol “ dit ” .
as of october 31 2019 the closing price of our common stock on nyse american was $ 73 .
00 and there were 565942 common shares outstanding .
as of that date the company had approximately 521 persons holding common shares beneficially of which approximately 121 are shareholders of record -including direct participants in the depository trust company .
the following table reflects the range of the high and low closing prices per share of the company ’ s common stock reported by nyse american for fiscal 2019 and 2018 .

Question: What are the respective high and low closing prices per share of the Company’s common stock reported by NYSE American for the 1st Quarter of fiscal 2019?
Answer: 99.75 77.92
2019
2018
Notes
$ million
$ million
Employee benefit costs
8
220.5
208.9
Costs of inventories recognised as an expense
81.6
79.8
Write-down of inventories to net realisable value
19
1.6
0.1
Amortisation of intangible assets
13
2.1
4.3
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment
14
14.7
16.5
Depreciation of right-of-use assets
15
7.5
–
Amortisation of assets recognised from costs to obtain a contract
21
0.5
0.6
Operating leases – minimum lease payments
–
8.5
Expenses relating to short-term leases and leases of low-value assets
26
0.3
–
Product development costs
96.5
96.9
Net foreign exchange loss
0.6
0.6
4 .
profit before tax .
the following items have been charged in arriving at profit before tax : .

Question: For which years were the items that have been charged in arriving at profit before tax recorded in?
Answer: 2019 2018