FangyuLei/tatqa huggingface dataset:
Year Ended December 31,
Year Ended December 31,
Year Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
Stock options
223,259
229,294
258,917
Restricted stock awards
—
—
129
Restricted stock units
136,600
148,175
188,050
Common stock subject to repurchase
250
957
13,281
the following securities have been excluded from the calculation of diluted weighted average common shares outstanding as the inclusion of these securities would have an anti-dilutive effect : .
participating securities are composed of certain stock options granted under the 2015 plan and previously granted under the 2009 equity incentive plan that may be exercised before the options have vested .
unvested shares have a non-forfeitable right to dividends .
unvested shares issued as a result of early exercise are subject to repurchase by us upon termination of employment or services at the original exercise price .
the common stock subject to repurchase is no longer classified as participating securities when shares revert to common stock outstanding as the awards vest and our repurchase right lapses .
our redeemable noncontrolling interest relates to our 85 % equity ownership interest in openeye .
the openeye stockholder agreement contains a put option that gives the minority openeye stockholders the right to sell their openeye shares to us based on the fair value of the shares .
the openeye stockholder agreement also contains a call option that gives us the right to purchase the remaining openeye shares from the minority openeye stockholders based on the fair value of the shares .
the put and call options can each be exercised beginning in the first quarter of 2023 .
this redeemable noncontrolling interest is considered temporary equity and we report it between liabilities and stockholders ’ equity in the consolidated balance sheets .
the amount of the net income or loss attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests is recorded in the consolidated statements of operations .

Question: What was the percentage change in Common stock subject to repurchase between 2018 and 2019?
Answer: -73.88
2019
2018
2017
Amount computed using statutory rate
$841
$2,122
$(1,078)
Net change in valuation allowance for net deferred tax assets
(459)
(367)
10,058
AMT and other
—
(191)
20
Foreign rate differential
664
22
(169)
Non-deductible items
(151)
(276)
(370)
State income tax
(370)
50
(34)
Impact of tax reform on deferred taxes
—
(4,901)
—
Research and development credits
1,694
475
2,494
Foreign income tax
(494)
—
—
Stock compensation, net
1,539
—
—
Income tax benefit (provision)
$3,264
$(3,066)
$10,921
income tax provision reconciliation .
the difference between the income tax benefit -provision and income taxes computed using the u .
s .
federal income tax rate was as follows for the years ended september 30 2019 2018 and 2017 -amounts shown in thousands : .

Question: What are the income tax benefits (provision), for the fiscal years 2017, 2018, and 2019, respectively?
Answer: $10,921 $(3,066) $3,264
2015 Grant
2016 Grant
2017 Grant
2018 Grant
2019 Grant
Grant date
11th June
5th April
26th May
4th April
15th May
Mid market share price at grant date
3,460.0p
3,550.0p
5,256.0p
5,560.0p
8,161.0p
Number of employees
15
13
12
12
12
Shares under scheme
70,290
69,890
62,356
60,899
60,626
Vesting period
3 years
3 years
3 years
3 years
3 years
Probability of vesting
71.5%
70.8%
73.1%
73.5%
74.1%
Fair value
2,473.9p
2,513.4p
3,842.1p
4,084.4p
6,048.9p
performance share plan .
the relevant disclosures in respect of the performance share plan grants are set out below .

Question: In which year's grant had the largest number of employees?
Answer: 2015
rTSR
SALES/SQM
ROFE
Entry
16.66%
6.66%
6.66%
Target
n/a
20%
20%
Stretch
33.33%
33.33%
33.33%
it rewards executives subject to performance against three equally weighted measures over a three year performance period : .
relative tsr is used as a measure in our lti plan to align executive outcomes and long ‐ term shareholder value creation .
the peer group is the asx30 excluding metals and mining companies .
peer group ranking at the 75th percentile or higher 100 % vesting is achieved and ranking at the median 50 % vesting is achieved .
between the 75th and median pro-rata vesting is achieved from 50 % to 100 % .
peer group ranking below the median results in zero vesting .
sales per square metre measures sales productivity improvements across the food and drinks businesses .
efficient use of our physical network for in ‐ store and online sales is core to our success .
rofe is an important measures to drive behaviours consistent with the delivery of long ‐ term shareholder value .
rofe improvements can be delivered through earnings growth as well as the disciplined allocation of capital and management of assets which is important for a business that is building capabilities for the future .
lease ‐ adjusted rofe measures the balance between our earnings growth and the disciplined allocation and application of assets used to generate those earnings .
we adjust for leases to recognise that a very significant portion of our sites are leased .
this approach is also similar to the accounting standard definition of rofe that will change to incorporate a lease-adjusted definition from f20 .
the sales / sqm and rofe targets are published following the end of the performance period given the commercial sensitivity of this information .

Question: What does the Sales per square metre measure?
Answer: Measures sales productivity improvements across the Food and Drinks businesses.
Number of Options Outstanding (in thousands)
Weighted- Average Exercise Price Per Share
Weighted- Average Contractual Term (in Years)
Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in thousands)
Outstanding at December 31, 2016
7,384
$10.59
5.3
$74,065
Granted
25
23.99
Exercised
(1,722)
10.39
Canceled/Forfeited
(401)
16.04
Outstanding at December 31, 2017
5,286
$10.30
4.2
$201,480
Granted
-
-
Exercised
(1,138)
8.17
Canceled/Forfeited
(17)
18.79
Outstanding at December 31, 2018
4,131
$10.86
3.3
$295,921
Granted
-
-
Exercised
(1,742)
8.53
Canceled/Forfeited
(132)
2.73
Outstanding at December 31, 2019
2,257
$13.13
2.5
$351,428
Vested and expected to vest as of December 31, 2019
2,259
$13.13
2.5
$351,362
Excercisable as of December 31, 2019
2,243
$13.10
2.5
$349,002
a summary of option activity under all of the company ’ s equity incentive plans at december 31 2019 and changes during the period then ended is presented in the following table : .
there were no options granted for the year ended december 31 2019 and 2018 .
the total intrinsic value of options exercised during year ended december 31 2019 2018 and 2017 were $ 215 .
5 million $ 74 .
6 million and $ 41 .
2 million respectively .

Question: What is the percentage change in the number of outstanding options between December 31, 2016 and 2017?
Answer: -28.41
Executive Officer
Ownership Requirement (1) (# of shares)
Holdings as of October 25, 2019(# of shares)
Samir Kapuria
39,665
186,735
Vincent Pilette
85,941
785,906
Scott C. Taylor
52,887
408,724
stock ownership requirements .
we believe that in order to align the interests of our executive officers with those of our stockholders our executive officers should have a financial stake in our company .
we have maintained stock ownership requirements for our executive officers since october 2005 .
for fy19 our executive officers were required to hold the following minimum number of shares : .
• ceo : 6x base salary ; • cfo coo and president : 3x base salary ; and • executive vice presidents : 2x base salary .
stock options and unvested rsus and prus do not count toward stock ownership requirements .
the executive officer is required to acquire and thereafter maintain the stock ownership required within four years of becoming an executive officer of nortonlifelock -or four years following the adoption date of these revised guidelines .
during the four-year transitional period each executive officer must retain at least 50 % of all net -after-tax equity grants until the required stock ownership level has been met .
as of october 25 2019 messrs .
kapuria pilette and taylor reached the stated ownership requirements for fy19 .
transitioning or former executive officers and non-executive officers are not included in the table below .
see the table below for individual ownership levels relative to the executive ’ s ownership requirement .
-1 based on the closing price for a share of our common stock of $ 22 .
69 on october 25 2019 .

Question: What is the value of Samir Kapuria's shares as of October 25, 2019?
Answer: 4237017.15
Fiscal Year
Fiscal Year
Fiscal Year
Variance in
2019
2019
2018
Dollars
Percent
(In millions, except for percentages)
Sales and marketing
$1,493
$1,593
$(100)
(6)%
Research and development
913
956
(43)
(4)%
General and administrative
447
574
(127)
(22)%
Amortization of intangible assets
207
220
(13)
(6)%
Restructuring, transition and other costs
241
410
(169)
(41)%
Total
$3,301
$3,753
$(452)
(12)%
operating expenses .
sales and marketing expense decreased primarily due to a $ 51 million decrease in stock-based compensation expense and a $ 41 million decrease as a result of the divestiture of our wss and pki solutions .
research and development expense decreased primarily due to a $ 66 million decrease in stockbased compensation expense .
general and administrative expense decreased primarily due to a $ 130 million decrease in stock-based compensation expense .
amortization of intangible assets decreased primarily due to the intangible assets sold with the divestiture of wss and pki solutions .
restructuring transition and other costs reflect a decrease of $ 70 million in fiscal 2019 compared to fiscal 2018 in severance and other restructuring costs .
in addition fiscal 2018 costs included $ 88 million of transition related costs related to our fiscal 2018 divestiture of our wss and pki solutions compared to $ 3 million in fiscal 2019 .

Question: What is the decrease in  Sales and marketing from Fiscal year 2018 to 2019?
Answer: 100
For the year ended March 31, 2019
For the year ended March 31, 2019
Income Statement
As reported
Balances without adoption of New Revenue Standard
Effect of Change Higher / (Lower)
Net sales
$5,349.5
$5,380.1
$(30.6)
Cost of sales
$2,418.2
$2,434.0
$(15.8)
Gross profit
$2,931.3
$2,946.1
$(14.8)
Income before income taxes
$204.5
$219.3
$(14.8)
Income tax (benefit) provision
$(151.4)
$(149.0)
$(2.4)
Net income from continuing operations
$355.9
$368.3
$(12.4)
recently adopted accounting pronouncements .
on april 1 2018 the company adopted asu 2014-09-revenue from contracts with customers -asc 606 and all related amendments - “ new revenue standard ” using the modified retrospective method .
the company has applied the new revenue standard to all contracts that were entered into after adoption and to all contracts that were open as of the initial date of adoption .
the company recognized the cumulative effect of initially applying the new revenue standard as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings .
the comparative information has not been restated and continues to be reported under the accounting standards in effect for those periods .
the adoption of the new standard impacts the company ' s net sales on an ongoing basis depending on the relative amount of revenue sold through its distributors the change in inventory held by its distributors and the changes in price concessions granted to its distributors .
previously the company deferred revenue and cost of sales on shipments to distributors until the distributor sold the product to their end customer .
as required by the new revenue standard the company no longer defers revenue and cost of sales but rather estimates the effects of returns and allowances provided to distributors and records revenue at the time of sale to the distributor .
sales to non-distributor customers under both the previous and new revenue standards are generally recognized upon the company ’ s shipment of the product .
the cumulative effect of the changes made to the consolidated april 1 2018 balance sheet for the adoption of the new revenue standard is summarized in the table of opening balance sheet adjustments below .
in accordance with the new revenue standard requirements the disclosure of the impact of adoption on the consolidated income statement and balance sheet for the period ended march 31 2019 was as follows -in millions : .
the significant changes in the financial statements noted in the table above are primarily due to the transition from sellthrough revenue recognition to sell-in revenue recognition as required by the new revenue standard which eliminated the balance of deferred income on shipments to distributors significantly reduced accounts receivable and significantly increased retained earnings .
prior to the acquisition of microsemi microsemi already recognized revenue on a sell-in basis so the impact of the adoption of the new revenue standard was primarily driven by microchip ' s historical business excluding microsemi .

Question: What was the difference between Net income from continuing operations and Income before income taxes?
Answer: 151.4
(dollars in millions)
(dollars in millions)
Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
Net cash provided by operating activities
$ 35,746
$ 34,339
Less Capital expenditures (including capitalized software)
17,939
16,658
Free cash flow
$ 17,807
$ 17,681
free cash flow .
free cash flow is a non-gaap financial measure that reflects an additional way of viewing our liquidity that when viewed with our gaap results provides a more complete understanding of factors and trends affecting our cash flows .
free cash flow is calculated by subtracting capital expenditures from net cash provided by operating activities .
we believe it is a more conservative measure of cash flow since purchases of fixed assets are necessary for ongoing operations .
free cash flow has limitations due to the fact that it does not represent the residual cash flow available for discretionary expenditures .
for example free cash flow does not incorporate payments made on finance lease obligations or cash payments for business acquisitions or wireless licenses .
therefore we believe it is important to view free cash flow as a complement to our entire consolidated statements of cash flows .
the following table reconciles net cash provided by operating activities to free cash flow : .
the increase in free cash flow during 2019 is a reflection of the increase in operating cash flows partially offset by the increase in capital expenditures discussed above .

Question: What was the Less Capital expenditures (including capitalized software) in 2019?
Answer: 17,939
Name
Fiscal Year
Maximum Possible Value of MSUs Using Grant Date Fair Value
Maximum Possible Value of PSUs Using Grant Date Fair Value
Oleg Khaykin
2019
4,067,526
—
2018
2,457,750
909,900
2017
659,618
—
Amar Maletira
2019
1,379,350
—
2018
1,015,870
454,950
2017
574,500
—
Paul McNab
2019
591,150
—
2018
442,395
—
2017
373,425
—
Luke Scrivanich
2019
591,150
—
2018
442,395
—
2017
393,600
—
Gary Staley
2019
591,150
—
2018
943,527
—
2017
303,948
—
the assumptions used to calculate these amounts for fiscal 2019 are set forth under note 16 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included in the company ’ s annual report on form 10-k for fiscal year 2019 filed with the sec on august 27 2019 .
-2 amounts shown do not reflect compensation actually received by the neo .
instead the amounts shown in this column represent the grant date fair values of stock options issued pursuant to the company ’ s 2003 equity incentive plan and certain inducement grants computed in accordance with fasb asc topic 718 .
the assumptions used to calculate these amounts for fiscal 2019 are set forth under note 16 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included in the company ’ s annual report on form 10-k for fiscal year 2019 filed with the sec on august 27 2019 .
-3 all non-equity incentive plan compensation was paid pursuant to the variable pay plan .
-4 the amounts in the “ all other compensation ” column for fiscal 2019 include : $ 4000 401-k matching contribution by the company for each neos other than mr .
mcnab .
-5 the compensation committee awarded mr .
maletira a one-time discretionary bonus in the amount of $ 180000 in connection with his work on the avcomm and wireless acquisition .
please see “ discretionary bonuses ” under the compensation discussion and analysis on page 36 of this proxy statement .
-6 mr .
staley was awarded a $ 60000 sign-on bonus when he joined the company in february 2017 .
the amounts in the salary bonus and non-equity incentive plan compensation columns of the summary compensation table reflect actual amounts paid for the relevant years while the amounts in the stock awards column reflect accounting values .
the tables entitled “ outstanding equity awards at fiscal year-end table ” and “ option exercises and stock vested table ” provide further information on the named executive officers ’ potential realizable value and actual value realized with respect to their equity awards .
the summary compensation table should be read in conjunction with the compensation discussion and analysis and the subsequent tables and narrative descriptions .

Question: What was the maximum possible value of MSU's using grant date fair value for Oleg Khaykin in 2018?
Answer: 2,457,750
Year Ended
Year Ended
Year Ended
April 26, 2019
April 27, 2018
April 28, 2017
Non-cash Investing and Financing Activities:
Capital expenditures incurred but not paid
$ 9
$ 24
$ 19
Non-cash extinguishment of sale-leaseback financing obligations
$ —
$ 130
$ 19
Supplemental Cash Flow Information:
Income taxes paid, net of refunds
$ 205
$ 87
$ 102
Interest paid
$ 53
$ 58
$ 44
statements of cash flows additional information -in millions : .
non-cash investing and financing activities and supplemental cash flow information are as follows : .

Question: What was the percentage change in income taxes paid, net of refunds between 2018 and 2019?
Answer: 135.63
Years Ended October 31,
Years Ended October 31,
Years Ended October 31,
2019
2018
2017
(In thousands) 
(In thousands) 
(In thousands) 
Income taxes at statutory rate
$13,408
$ 7,132
$148,585
Discrete benefit resulting from TCJA 
—
(37,505)
—
State income taxes
1,189
1,014
9,038
State income tax credits 
(2,139)
(804)
(606)
Expiration of state income tax credits 
4,121
4,117
642
Federal income tax credits 
(474)
(460)
(390)
Federal manufacturers deduction 
—
—
(11,527)
Excess tax benefits 
(1,388)
(1,638)
(3,345)
Nondeductible expenses
1,786
1,890
3,506
Change in valuation allowance 
(5,380)
(5,297)
(1,106)
Other 
(570)
677
(12)
Income tax expense (benefit) 
$10,553
$(30,874)
$144,785
at the end of each reporting period the company evaluates all available information at that time to determine if it is more likely than not that some or all of these credits will be utilized .
as of october 31 2019 2018 and 2017 the company determined that a total of $ 1 .
8 million $ 0 .
7 million and $ 0 .
6 million respectively would be recovered .
accordingly those amounts were released from the valuation allowance and benefited deferred tax expense in the respective periods .
the differences between the consolidated effective income tax rate and the federal statutory rate effective during the applicable year presented are as follows : .

Question: What is the average Income taxes at statutory rate for fiscal years 2019 and 2018?
Answer: 10270
Fiscal 2018 Restructuring Plan
Workforce reduction
Facility costs
Total
Balance payable as at June 30, 2017
$—
$—
$—
Accruals and adjustments
8,511
1,643
10,154
Cash payments
(8,845)
(489)
(9,334)
Foreign exchange and other non-cash adjustments
892
11
903
Balance payable as at June 30, 2018
$558
$1,165
$1,723
Accruals and adjustments
(20)
535
515
Cash payments
(337)
(928)
(1,265)
Foreign exchange and other non-cash adjustments
(51)
(286)
(337)
Balance payable as at June 30, 2019
$150
$486
$636
fiscal 2018 restructuring plan .
during fiscal 2018 and in the context of our acquisitions of covisint guidance and hightail -each defined below we began to implement restructuring activities to streamline our operations -collectively referred to as the fiscal 2018 restructuring plan .
the fiscal 2018 restructuring plan charges relate to workforce reductions and facility consolidations .
these charges require management to make certain judgments and estimates regarding the amount and timing of restructuring charges or recoveries .
our estimated liability could change subsequent to its recognition requiring adjustments to the expense and the liability recorded .
on a quarterly basis we conduct an evaluation of the related liabilities and expenses and revise our assumptions and estimates as appropriate .
since the inception of the plan approximately $ 10 .
7 million has been recorded within " special charges -recoveries " to date .
we do not expect to incur any further significant charges relating to this plan .
a reconciliation of the beginning and ending liability for the year ended june 30 2019 and 2018 is shown below .

Question: What is the Balance payable as at June 30, 2019 for Workforce reduction expressed as a percentage of total Balance payable as at June 30, 2019? 
Answer: 23.58
2019
2018
Annual growth rate (after plan period)
3.0%
3.0%
Risk free rate of return
3.0%
3.0%
Market risk premium
5.0%
4.9%
Beta factor
0.83
0.79
Cost of debt
3.3%
3.3%
the pre-tax discount rate used within the recoverable amount calculations was 8 .
5 % -2018 : 8 .
0 % and is based upon the weighted average cost of capital reflecting specific principal risks and uncertainties .
the discount rate takes into account the risk-free rate of return the market risk premium and beta factor reflecting the average beta for the group and comparator companies which are used in deriving the cost of equity .
the same discount rate has been applied to both cgus as the principal risks and uncertainties associated with the group as highlighted on pages 30 to 33 would also impact each cgu in a similar manner .
the board acknowledges that there are additional factors that could impact the risk profile of each cgu which have been considered by way of sensitivity analysis performed as part of the annual impairment tests .
key drivers to future growth rates are dependent on the group ’ s ability to maintain and grow income streams whilst effectively managing operating costs .
the level of headroom may change if different growth rate assumptions or a different pre-tax discount rate were used in the cash flow projections .
where the value-in-use calculations suggest an impairment the board would consider alternative use values prior to realising any impairment being the fair value less costs to dispose .
the key assumptions used for value-in-use calculations are as follows : .
having completed the 2019 impairment review no impairment has been recognised in relation to the cgus -2018 : no impairment .
sensitivity analysis has been performed in assessing the recoverable amounts of goodwill .
there are no changes to the key assumptions of growth rate or discount rate that are considered by the directors to be reasonably possible which give rise to an impairment of goodwill relating to the cgus .

Question: What are the key assumptions used for value-in-use calculations in the table?
Answer: Annual growth rate (after plan period) Risk free rate of return Market risk premium Beta factor Cost of debt