FangyuLei/tatqa huggingface dataset:
Reported change
Other activity (including M&A)
Foreign exchange
Organic* change
%
pps
pps
%
Revenue – Europe
(1.9)
4.1
0.8
3.0
Service revenue
Germany
2.6
–
–
2.6
Italy
1.0
0.2
–
1.2
UK
(8.1)
0.1
4.5
(3.5)
Spain
1.8
0.3
–
2.1
Other Europe
(19.6)
22.9
(0.4)
2.9
Europe
(3.9)
4.0
0.8
0.9
Adjusted EBITDA
Germany
10.9
(0.1)
(0.1)
10.7
Italy
4.5
0.1
–
4.6
UK
45.4
(1.2)
7.6
51.8
Spain
4.4
0.6
–
5.0
Other Europe
(18.8)
26.8
(0.3)
7.7
Europe
7.3
5.1
0.6
13.0
Europe adjusted operating profit
53.2
34.8
(1.7)
86.3
european revenue decreased by 1 .
9 % .
foreign exchange movements contributed a 0 .
8 percentage point negative impact and the deconsolidation of vodafone netherlands contributed a 4 .
1 percentage point negative impact offset by 3 .
0 % organic growth .
service revenue increased by 0 .
9 % * or 0 .
6 % * excluding a legal settlement in germany in q4 driven by strong fixed customer growth and the benefit of the group ’ s “ more-for-more ” mobile propositions in several markets which offset increased regulatory headwinds following the implementation of the eu ’ s “ roam like at home ” policy in june and the impact of the introduction of handset financing in the uk .
excluding regulation and uk handset financing as well as a legal settlement in germany in q4 service revenue growth was 2 .
0 % * -q3 : 1 .
9 % * q4 : 1 .
7 % * .
adjusted ebitda increased 7 .
3 % including a 5 .
1 percentage point negative impact from the deconsolidation of vodafone netherlands and a 0 .
6 percentage point negative impact from foreign exchange movements .
on an organic basis adjusted ebitda increased 13 .
0 % * supported by the benefit of the introduction of handset financing in the uk regulatory settlements in the uk and a legal settlement in germany .
excluding these items as well as the net impact of roaming adjusted ebitda grew by 7 .
9 * reflecting operating leverage and tight cost control through our “ fit for growth ” programme .
adjusted ebit increased by 86 .
3 % * reflecting strong adjusted ebitda growth and stable depreciation and amortisation expenses .

Question: Between Germany and Italy, which has higher reported change in adjusted EBITDA?
Answer: Germany
Year Ended December 31,
Year Ended December 31,
Year Ended December 31,
% Variation
% Variation
2019
2018
2017
2019 vs 2018
2018 vs 2017
(in millions)
(in millions)
(in millions)
(in millions)
(in millions)
Net sales
$9,529
$9,612
$8,308
(0.9)%
15.7%
Other revenues
27
52
39
(49.0)
36.1
Net revenues
$9,556
$9,664
$8,347
(1.1)%
15.8%
our 2019 net revenues decreased 1 .
1 % compared to the prior year primarily due to a decrease in volumes of approximately 8 % partially compensated by an increase in average selling prices of approximately 7 % .
the increase in the average selling prices was driven by favorable product mix of approximately 10 % partially offset by a negative pricing effect of approximately 3 % .
our 2018 net revenues increased 15 .
8 % compared to the prior year primarily due to increase in average selling prices of approximately 16 % while volumes remained substantially flat .
the increase in the average selling prices was driven by favorable product mix of approximately 18 % partially offset by a negative pricing effect of approximately 2 % .
our net revenues registered double-digit growth across all product groups and geographies .
in 2019 2018 and 2017 our largest customer apple accounted for 17 .
6 % 13 .
1 % and 10 .
5 % of our net revenues respectively reported within our three product groups .

Question: Why did the 2019 net revenues decreased 1.1% compared to the prior year?
Answer: a decrease in volumes of approximately 8%, partially compensated by an increase in average selling prices of approximately 7%.
December 31,
December 31,
2019
2018
Cable-ships and submersibles
$ 246.5
$ 251.1
Equipment, furniture and fixtures, and software
214.1
148.0
Building and leasehold improvements
48.9
47.3
Land
36.8
32.8
Construction in progress
14.3
12.9
Plant and transportation equipment
13.5
12.0
574.1
504.1
Less: Accumulated depreciation
168.3
127.8
Total
$ 405.8
$ 376.3
property plant and equipment consists of the following -in millions : .
depreciation expense was $ 52 .
3 million and $ 46 .
6 million for the years ended december 31 2019 and 2018 respectively .
these amounts included $ 9 .
1 million and $ 7 .
0 million of depreciation expense recognized within cost of revenue for the years ended december 31 2019 and 2018 respectively .
as of december 31 2019 and 2018 total net book value of equipment cable-ships and submersibles under capital leases consisted of $ 35 .
1 million and $ 40 .
0 million respectively .
for the year ended december 31 2018 our energy segment recorded an impairment expense of $ 0 .
7 million of which $ 0 .
4 million was due to station performance and $ 0 .
3 million was related to the abandonment of a station development project .

Question: What is the average Equipment, furniture and fixtures, and software for 2018 and 2019?
Answer: 181.05
2019
2018
Land, buildings and improvements
$289,051
$267,809
Machinery and equipment
381,656
364,034
Computer hardware and software
136,227
130,645
Capital assets in progress
49,599
38,469
Total property, plant and equipment, gross 
856,533
800,957
Less: accumulated depreciation 
(472,309)
(459,651)
Total property, plant and equipment, net
384,224
341,306
3 .
property plant and equipment .
property plant and equipment as of september 28 2019 and september 29 2018 consisted of the following -in thousands : .

Question: Which years did Machinery and equipment exceed $300,000 thousand?
Answer: 2019 2018
Years Ended December 31,
Years Ended December 31,
Years Ended December 31,
Years Ended December 31,
Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
(in thousands of U.S.$, except number of shares, per common share data, fleet and other financial data)
(in thousands of U.S.$, except number of shares, per common share data, fleet and other financial data)
(in thousands of U.S.$, except number of shares, per common share data, fleet and other financial data)
(in thousands of U.S.$, except number of shares, per common share data, fleet and other financial data)
(in thousands of U.S.$, except number of shares, per common share data, fleet and other financial data)
Total operating revenues
448,750
430,604
143,537
80,257
102,674
Less: Liquefaction services revenue
(218,096)
(127,625)
—
—
—
Less: Vessel and other management fees
(21,888)
(24,209)
(26,576)
(14,225)
(12,547)
Net time and voyage charter revenues
208,766
278,770
116,961
66,032
90,127
Voyage and commission expenses (i)
(38,381)
(104,463)
(48,933)
(25,291)
(23,434)
170,385
174,307
68,028
40,741
66,693
Calendar days less scheduled off-hire days
3,840
3,987
3,885
4,034
4,481
Average daily TCE rate (to the closest $100)
44,400
43,700
17,500
10,100
14,900
our calculation of tce may not be comparable to that reported by other entities .
the following table reconciles our total operating revenues to average daily tce : .
-i " voyage and commission expenses " is derived from the caption " voyage charterhire and commission expenses " and " voyage charterhire and commission expenses - collaborative arrangement " less -i charterhire expenses -net of the effect of the related guarantee obligation of $ nil $ nil and $ 12 .
4 million for the years ended december 31 2019 2018 and 2017 respectively which arose on the charter-back of the golar grand from golar partners and -ii voyage and commission expenses in relation to the hilli episeyo of $ 0 .
5 million $ 1 .
4 million and $ nil for the years ended december 31 2019 2018 and 2017 respectively .
-5 we calculate average daily vessel operating costs by dividing vessel operating costs by the number of calendar days .
calendar days exclude those from vessels chartered in where the vessel operating costs are borne by the legal owner and those of vessels undergoing conversion .

Question: How was the average daily vessel operating cost calculated?
Answer: By dividing vessel operating costs by the number of calendar days
CASH FLOW SUMMARY
2019 $’000
2018 $’000 RESTATED
CHANGE
Net cash provided  from operating  activities
4,709
8,790
46%
Net cash used in  investing activities
(12,337)
(20,092)
(39%)
Net cash used in financing activities
(3,471)
(36,014)
(90%)
Net change in cash and cash equivalent
(11,099)
(47,316)
(77%)
financial position and cash flow .
capital expenditure and cash flow .
net operating cash inflow was $ 4709000 which was $ 4081000 lower than last year .
the reduction in operating revenue was offset by lower operational costs .
however net cash was impacted by the increase in trail to upfront revenue mix .
in addition as a result of the loss position reported for fy18 the group received a net tax refund of $ 2327000 during the year compared to the prior year net tax paid of $ 172000 .
net investing cash outflows for the year was $ 12337000 .
the $ 7755000 decrease in spend in investing activities relates to the group ’ s controlling interest acquisition of imoney in december 2017 .
net financing cash outflows for the 2019 year totalled $ 3471000 .
this included $ 2839000 lease payments and $ 497000 interest expense related to leases .
the material decrease against the prior year comparative period relates to $ 32918000 paid in share buy-backs and dividends in the prior period .

Question: What is the percentage change in the net cash provided from financing activities?
Answer: (90%)
2019
2018
2017
Minimum rentals
$184,587
$184,106
$185,696
Contingent rentals
2,255
2,221
2,419
Total rent expense
186,842
186,327
188,115
Less rental expense on subleased properties
(170,651)
(162,640)
(145,728)
Net rent expense
$16,191
$23,687
$42,387
as lessee — we lease restaurants and other facilities which generally have renewal clauses of 1 to 20 years exercisable at our option .
in some instances these leases have provisions for contingent rentals based upon a percentage of defined revenues .
many of our restaurant and other facility leases also have rent escalation clauses and require the payment of property taxes insurance and maintenance costs .
we also lease certain restaurant and office equipment .
minimum rental obligations are accounted for on a straight-line basis over the term of the initial lease plus lease option terms for certain locations .
the components of rent expense were as follows in each fiscal year -in thousands : .

Question: What is the value of minimum rentals in 2019?
Answer: $184,587
Name
Fees earned or paid in cash ($) (1)
Stock Awards ($) (2) (3)
All other compensation ($) (4)
Total ($)
Emanuel Pearlman
$ 50,000
$ 39,000
$ 750
$  89,750
Niv Harizman
$ 46,250
$ 39,000
$ 750
$  86,000
Alison Hoffman
$ 48,890
$ 39,000
$ 750
$ 88,640
director compensation .
in 2019 we compensated each non-management director of our company by granting to each such outside director 15000 rsus .
the rsus vested in equal amounts of 3750 rsus on each of march 15 2019 june 15 2019 september 15 2019 and december 15 2019 .
in addition we pay our non-management directors cash director fees of $ 40000 per annum - $ 10000 per quarter .
non-management directors also receive additional cash compensation on an annual basis for serving on the following board committees : the audit committee chairperson receives $ 7500 and members receive $ 5000 ; the chairperson and members of each of the compensation committee and nominating and corporate governance committee receive annual fees of $ 3750 and $ 2500 respectively .
in consideration for serving as the sole member of our strategic development committee in june 2013 we issued to niv harizman a five-year stock option to purchase 300000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $ 1 .
88 per share which option vested 100000 shares on the date of grant 100000 shares on the first anniversary of the date of grant and vested 100000 shares on the second anniversary from the grant date .
on june 17 2018 mr .
harizman exercised the aforementioned stock option on a net -cashless exercise basis by delivering to us 181936 shares of our common stock and he received 118064 shares of our common stock .
the following table sets forth the compensation awarded to earned by or paid to all persons who served as members of our board of directors -other than our named executive officers during the year ended december 31 2019 .
no director who is also a named executive officer received any compensation for services as a director in 2019 .
-1 represents directors ’ fees payable in cash to each non-management director of $ 10000 per quarter - $ 40000 per annum for 2019 plus additional cash fees for serving on board committees as disclosed in the text above .
-2 the amounts included in this column represent the grant date fair value of restricted stock unit awards -rsus granted to directors computed in accordance with fasb asc topic 718 .
for a discussion of valuation assumptions see note b [ 11 ] to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report .
the 15000 rsus granted to each non-management director vested on a quarterly basis beginning march 15 2019 .
each restricted stock unit represents the contingent right to receive one share of common stock .
-3 as of december 31 2019 each of the above listed directors held outstanding stock options to purchase 35000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $ 2 .
34 per share .
-4 includes payment of dividends -dividend equivalent rights on rsus for 2019 .

Question: How much are the directors’ fees payable in cash to each non-management director, per quarter for 2019?
Answer: $10,000
Name
Fiscal Year
Maximum Possible Value of MSUs Using Grant Date Fair Value
Maximum Possible Value of PSUs Using Grant Date Fair Value
Oleg Khaykin
2019
4,067,526
—
2018
2,457,750
909,900
2017
659,618
—
Amar Maletira
2019
1,379,350
—
2018
1,015,870
454,950
2017
574,500
—
Paul McNab
2019
591,150
—
2018
442,395
—
2017
373,425
—
Luke Scrivanich
2019
591,150
—
2018
442,395
—
2017
393,600
—
Gary Staley
2019
591,150
—
2018
943,527
—
2017
303,948
—
the assumptions used to calculate these amounts for fiscal 2019 are set forth under note 16 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included in the company ’ s annual report on form 10-k for fiscal year 2019 filed with the sec on august 27 2019 .
-2 amounts shown do not reflect compensation actually received by the neo .
instead the amounts shown in this column represent the grant date fair values of stock options issued pursuant to the company ’ s 2003 equity incentive plan and certain inducement grants computed in accordance with fasb asc topic 718 .
the assumptions used to calculate these amounts for fiscal 2019 are set forth under note 16 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included in the company ’ s annual report on form 10-k for fiscal year 2019 filed with the sec on august 27 2019 .
-3 all non-equity incentive plan compensation was paid pursuant to the variable pay plan .
-4 the amounts in the “ all other compensation ” column for fiscal 2019 include : $ 4000 401-k matching contribution by the company for each neos other than mr .
mcnab .
-5 the compensation committee awarded mr .
maletira a one-time discretionary bonus in the amount of $ 180000 in connection with his work on the avcomm and wireless acquisition .
please see “ discretionary bonuses ” under the compensation discussion and analysis on page 36 of this proxy statement .
-6 mr .
staley was awarded a $ 60000 sign-on bonus when he joined the company in february 2017 .
the amounts in the salary bonus and non-equity incentive plan compensation columns of the summary compensation table reflect actual amounts paid for the relevant years while the amounts in the stock awards column reflect accounting values .
the tables entitled “ outstanding equity awards at fiscal year-end table ” and “ option exercises and stock vested table ” provide further information on the named executive officers ’ potential realizable value and actual value realized with respect to their equity awards .
the summary compensation table should be read in conjunction with the compensation discussion and analysis and the subsequent tables and narrative descriptions .

Question: What was the maximum possible value of MSU's using grant date fair value for Paul McNab in 2019?
Answer: 591,150
2019
2018
Net taxable (loss) at effective tax rates
$(2,508)
$(1,567)
Stock compensation expense
119
358
Amortization of debt discount
94
10
Impairment of goodwill
-
519
Other
(223)
(153)
Valuation allowance
2,518
833
Income tax expense
$-
$-
13 .
income taxes .
the company files income tax returns in the u .
s .
federal jurisdiction and the state of california .
with few exceptions the company is no longer subject to u .
s .
federal state and local or non-u .
s .
income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2015 .
deferred income taxes have been provided by temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for tax purposes .
to the extent allowed by gaap the company provides valuation allowances against the deferred tax assets for amounts when the realization is uncertain .
included in the balances at december 31 2019 and 2018 are no tax positions for which the ultimate deductibility is highly certain but for which there is uncertainty about the timing of such deductibility .
because of the impact of deferred tax accounting other than interest and penalties the disallowance of the shorter deductibility period would not affect the annual effective tax rate but would accelerate the payment of cash to the taxing authority to an earlier period .
the company ’ s policy is to recognize interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and penalties in operating expenses .
during the periods ended december 31 2019 and 2018 the company did not recognize interest and penalties .
the income tax provision differs from the amount of income tax determined by applying the u .
s .
federal income tax rate to pretax income from continuing operations for the year ended december 31 2019 and 2018 due to the following : .

Question: What is the percentage change in the net loss at effective tax rates from 2018 to 2019?
Answer: 60.05
Amortized Cost
Unrealized Gains
Unrealized Losses
Fair Value
(U.S. $ in thousands)
Debt Investments
U.S. treasury securities
$52,809
$—
$(109)
$52,700
Agency securities
22,097
—
(82)
22,015
Certificates of deposit and time deposits
58,824
—
—
58,824
Commercial paper
35,372
—
—
35,372
Corporate debt securities
158,538
14
(669)
157,883
Total investments
$327,640
$14
$(860)
$326,794
as of june 30 2018 the group ’ s investments consisted of the following : .
as of june 30 2018 the group had $ 323 .
1 million of investments which were classified as short-term investments on the group ’ s consolidated statements of financial position .
additionally the group had certificates of deposit and time deposits totaling $ 3 .
6 million which were classified as long-term and were included in other non- current assets on the group ’ s consolidated statements of financial position .

Question: What is the amount of total investments based on fair value?
Answer: $326,794
Fiscal Year
Operating Leases
Capital Leases
Purchase Commitments
2020
$22,207
$241
$328,435
2021
13,382
1,220
24,005
2022
10,331
1,220
5,654
2023
8,224
1,220
3,596
2024
7,139
1,220
—
Thereafter
31,598
47,258
—
Total minimum payments
$92,881
$52,379
$361,690
notes to consolidated financial statements .
operating leases .
the company leases certain of its corporate manufacturing and other facilities from multiple third- party real estate developers .
the operating leases expire at various dates through 2034 and some of these leases have renewal options with the longest ranging up to two ten-year periods .
several of these leases also include market rate rent escalations rent holidays and leasehold improvement incentives all of which are recognized to expense on a straight-line basis .
leasehold improvements made either at the inception of the lease or during the lease term are amortized over the lesser of the remaining life of the lease term -including renewals that are reasonably assured or the useful life of the asset .
the company also leases various machinery and equipment and office equipment under non-cancelable operating leases .
the remaining terms of these operating leases range from less than one year to approximately 15 years .
rent expense under operating leases covering facilities and equipment was approximately $ 19 .
3 million $ 16 .
3 million and $ 14 .
8 million for fiscal years 2019 2018 and 2017 respectively .
capital leases .
in fiscal 2018 the company entered into a capital lease for a facility in beijing china that will allow the company to consolidate several leased facilities as well as provide additional manufacturing space .
the lease term is expected to commence in fiscal 2021 and therefore is not recorded on the consolidated balance sheet as of march 30 2019 .
the lease has an initial term of five years and includes multiple renewal options with the maximum lease term not to exceed 30 years .
the minimum future payments for this lease are included in the table below .
purchase commitments .
the company ’ s other purchase commitments include payments due for materials and manufacturing services .
the company also has commitments for the purchase of property and equipment a substantial majority of which will be due within the next 12 months .
the company ’ s minimum payments under non-cancelable leases and purchase commitments as of march 30 2019 are as follows -in thousands : .

Question: What are the company's respective operating leases and capital leases in 2022?
Answer: 10,331 1,220