FangyuLei/tatqa huggingface dataset:
€ thousands
2019
2018
2017
Total compensation
3,770
3,702
3,663
Thereof fixed compensation
3,218
3,162
3,135
Thereof committee remuneration
553
540
528
the total annual compensation of the supervisory board members is as follows : .
supervisory board compensation .
the supervisory board members do not receive any share-based payment for their services .
as far as members who are employee representatives on the supervisory board receive share-based payment such compensation is for their services as employees only and is unrelated to their status as members of the supervisory board .

Question: What was the percentage change in the amount Thereof committee remuneration in 2019 from 2018?
Answer: 2.41
Year Ended December 31,
Year Ended December 31,
Year Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017(1)
Connected home
$152,674
$207,336
$288,610
% of net revenue
48%
54%
69%
Infrastructure
85,369
82,388
71,779
% of net revenue
27%
21%
17%
Industrial and multi-market
79,137
95,273
59,929
% of net revenue
25%
25%
14%
Total net revenue
$317,180
$384,997
$420,318
revenue by market the table below presents disaggregated net revenues by market -in thousands : .
-1 due to the adoption of asc 606 on january 1 2018 using the modified retrospective method amounts prior to 2018 have not been adjusted to reflect the change to recognize certain distributor sales upon sale to the distributor or the sell-in method from recognition upon the company ' s sale to the distributors ' end customers or the sellthrough method which required the deferral of revenue and profit on such distributor sales .
revenues from sales to the company ’ s distributors accounted for 52 % 42 % and 34 % of net revenue for the years ended december 31 2019 2018 and 2017 respectively .

Question: What was the change in Connected home from 2018 to 2019?
Answer: -54662
December 31, 2019
Customer Relationships
Developed Technologies
Trade Name
Total
Gross carrying amount
$52,000
32,000
3,000
87,000
Accumulated amortization
(13,866)
(18,286)
(3,000)
(35,152)
Intangible assets, net
$38,134
$13,714
$—
$51,848
note 9 .
intangible assets net .
the company ’ s definite-lived intangible assets as of december 31 2019 and 2018 consisted of the following : .
amortization of definite-lived intangible assets is provided over their estimated useful lives on a straight-line basis or the pattern in which economic benefits are consumed if reliably determinable .
the company reviews its definite-lived intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable .
amortization expense from continuing and discontinued operations was $ 8879 and $ 9150 for the years ended december 31 2019 and 2018 respectively .

Question: What is the average gross carrying amounts of Customer Relationships and Developed Technologies in 2019?
Answer: 42000
Fiscal Year Ended January 31,
Fiscal Year Ended January 31,
2019
2018
Plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets:
Accumulated benefit obligations
$75.6
$130.7
Plan assets
70.0
112.1
Plans with projected benefit obligations in excess of plan assets:
Projected benefit obligations
$91.6
$158.1
Plan assets
80.8
121.1
on a worldwide basis the company ' s defined benefit pension plans were 88 % funded as of january 31 2019 .
as of january 31 2019 the aggregate accumulated benefit obligation was $ 85 .
1 million for the defined benefit pension plans compared to $ 139 .
5 million as of january 31 2018 .
included in the aggregate data in the following tables are the amounts applicable to the company ' s defined benefit pension plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets as well as plans with projected benefit obligations in excess of plan assets .
amounts related to such plans at the end of each period were as follows : because their exercise prices are higher than the average market value of autodesk ’ s stock during the fiscal year .

Question: How much are the projected benefit obligations for 2019?
Answer: $91.6
2019
2019
2018
2018
Capital additions
Depreciation, amortisation and impairment
Capital additions
Depreciation and amortisation
£m
£m
£m
£m
Steam Specialties
57.7
35.8
27.9
30.1
Electric Thermal Solutions
81.6
18.4
6.0
13.6
Watson-Marlow
40.6
22.4
18.6
14.4
Group total
179.9
76.6
52.5
58.1
3 segmental reporting continued .
capital additions depreciation amortisation and impairment .
capital additions include property plant and equipment of £ 59 .
0m -2018 : £ 33 .
5m of which £ 8 .
1m -2018 : £ 0 .
2m was from acquisitions in the period and other intangible assets of £ 72 .
0m -2018 : £ 19 .
0m of which £ 60 .
2m -2018 : £ 9 .
1m relates to acquired intangibles from acquisitions in the period .
right-of-use asset additions of £ 48 .
9m occurred during the 12 month period to 31st december 2019 of which £ 36 .
1m relates to additions on 1st january 2019 as a result of transition to ifrs 16 £ 11 .
7m relates to new leases entered into in 2019 and £ 1 .
1m from acquisitions .
capital additions split between the uk and rest of the world are uk £ 36 .
8m -2018 : £ 20 .
1m and rest of the world £ 143 .
1m -2018 : £ 32 .
4m .

Question: What was the percentage change in capital additions in 2019 from 2018 for Steam Specialties?
Answer: 106.81
USDm
2019
2018
2017
Reconciliation to net profit/(loss)
Net profit/(loss) for the year
166.0
-34.8
2.4
Tax
0.8
1.6
0.8
Financial expenses
41.9
39.3
40.6
Financial income
-2.8
-3.3
-4.3
Depreciation
110.1
114.5
114.5
Impairment (reversal)/losses on tangible assets
-114.0
3.2
3.6
EBITDA
202.0
120.5
157.6
ebitda : torm defines ebitda as earnings before financial income and expenses depreciation impairment amortization and taxes .
the computation of ebitda refers to financial income and expenses which the company deems to be equivalent to “ interest ” for purposes of presenting ebitda .
financial expenses consist of interest on borrowings losses on foreign exchange transactions and bank charges .
financial income consists of interest income and gains on foreign exchange transactions .
ebitda is used as a supplemental financial measure by management and external users of financial statements such as lenders to assess torm ' s operating performance as well as compliance with the financial covenants and restrictions contained in the company ' s financing agreements .
torm believes that ebitda assists management and investors by increasing comparability of the company ' s performance from period to period .
this increased comparability is achieved by excluding the potentially disparate effects of interest depreciation impairment amortization and taxes .
these are items that could be affected by various changing financing methods and capital structure and which may significantly affect profit / -loss between periods .
including ebitda as a measure benefits investors in selecting between investment alternatives .
ebitda excludes some but not all items that affect profit / -loss and these measures may vary among other companies and not be directly comparable .
the following table reconciles ebitda to net profit / -loss the most directly comparable ifrs financial measure for the periods presented : .

Question: In which year was the amount of Financial expenses the largest?
Answer: 2019
Year Ended December 31,
Year Ended December 31,
Year Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
$
$
$
Net loss attributable to shareholders of Teekay Corporation for basic loss per share
(310,577)
(79,237)
(163,276)
Reduction in net earnings due to dilutive impact of stock-based compensation in Teekay LNG, Altera and Teekay Tankers and stock purchase warrants in Altera
—
—
(90)
Net loss attributable to shareholders of Teekay Corporation for diluted loss per share
(310,577)
(79,237)
(163,366)
Weighted average number of common shares
100,719,224
99,670,176
86,335,473
Dilutive effect of stock-based compensation
—
—
—
Common stock and common stock equivalents
100,719,224
99,670,176
86,335,473
Loss per common share - basic and diluted
(3.08)
(0.79)
(1.89)
20 .
net loss per share .
the company intends to settle the principal of the convertible notes in cash on conversion and calculates diluted earnings per share using the treasury-stock method .
stock-based awards and the conversion feature on the convertible notes that have an anti-dilutive effect on the calculation of diluted loss per common share are excluded from this calculation .
for the years ended december 31 2019 2018 and 2017 the number of common stock from stock-based awards and the conversion feature on the convertible notes that had an anti-dilutive effect on the calculation of diluted earnings per common share were 3 .
5 million 4 .
0 million and 3 .
6 million respectively .
in periods where a loss attributable to shareholders has been incurred all stock-based awards and the conversion feature on the convertible notes are anti-dilutive .
-all tabular amounts stated in thousands of u .
s .
dollars other than share data and unless otherwise indicated .

Question: Which method is used for to settle the principal of the Convertible Notes in cash on conversion and calculates diluted earnings?
Answer: the treasury-stock method
Years ended August 31,
2019 (1)
2018 (2)
Change
Change in constant currency (3)
Foreign exchange impact (3)
(in thousands of dollars, except percentages)
$
$
%
%
$
Canadian broadband services
606,286
618,886
(2.0)
(2.2)
1,102
American broadband services
571,208
478,172
19.5
15.2
20,522
Inter-segment eliminations and other
26,486
24,567
7.8
7.8
12
1,203,980
1,121,625
7.3
5.4
21,636
operating expenses .
-1 fiscal 2019 average foreign exchange rate used for translation was 1 .
3255 usd / cdn .
-2 fiscal 2018 was restated to comply with ifrs 15 and to reflect a change in accounting policy as well as to reclassify results from cogeco peer 1 as discontinued operations .
for further details please consult the " accounting policies " and " discontinued operations " sections .
-3 fiscal 2019 actuals are translated at the average foreign exchange rate of fiscal 2018 which was 1 .
2773 usd / cdn .
fiscal 2019 operating expenses increased by 7 .
3 % -5 .
4 % in constant currency mainly from : .
• growth in the american broadband services segment mainly due to the impact of the metrocast acquisition which was included in operating expenses for only an eight-month period in the prior year combined with higher programming costs additional headcount to support growth higher marketing initiatives to drive primary service units growth and the fiberlight acquisition ; and .
• additional costs in inter-segment eliminations and other resulting from the timing of corporate projects and initiatives ; partly offset by .
• lower operating expenses in the canadian broadband services segment mainly attributable to lower programming costs resulting from a lower level of primary service units and lower compensation expenses resulting from an operational optimization program implemented in the first half of fiscal 2019 partly offset by higher marketing initiatives additional headcount costs in the first quarter of fiscal 2019 to support the stabilization phase of the new customer management system as well as retroactive costs related to higher rates than expected established by the copyright board of canada .
for further details on the corporation ’ s operating expenses please refer to the " segmented operating and financial results " section .

Question: What was the average American broadband services between 2018 and 2019?
Answer: 524690
($ in millions)
($ in millions)
($ in millions)
($ in millions)
($ in millions)
Corporate and Other
2019
2018
Yr.-to-Yr. Percent Change
Yr.-to-Yr. Percent Change Adjusted for Currency
Systems external revenue
$7,604
$8,034
(5.3)%
(4.1)%
Systems Hardware
$5,918
$6,363
(7.0)%
(5.9)%
IBM Z
(1.1)
(0.3)
Power Systems
(13.5)
(12.1)
Storage Systems
(8.9)
(7.6)
Operating Systems Software
1,686
1,671
0.9
2.6
systems revenue of $ 7604 million decreased 5 .
3 percent year to year as reported -4 percent adjusted for currency .
systems hardware revenue of $ 5918 million declined 7 .
0 percent as reported -6 percent adjusted for currency driven primarily by declines in power systems and storage systems .
operating systems software revenue of $ 1686 million grew 0 .
9 percent as reported -3 percent adjusted for currency compared to the prior year .
within systems hardware ibm z revenue decreased 1 .
1 percent as reported but was essentially flat adjusted for currency reflecting the mainframe product cycles .
revenue declined through the first three quarters due to the end of the z14 product cycle but there was strong growth in the fourth quarter driven by z15 shipments .
the z15 ’ s strong performance demonstrates client demand for technology that offers improved data privacy and resiliency in the hybrid cloud environment .
the z15 mainframe ’ s capabilities extend the platform ’ s differentiation with encryption everywhere cloud-native development and instant recovery .
in october we announced openshift for ibm z bringing together the industry ’ s most comprehensive enterprise container and kubernetes platform with the enterprise server platforms of ibm z and linuxone .
ibm z continues to deliver a high-value secure and scalable platform for our clients .
power systems revenue decreased 13 .
5 percent as reported -12 percent adjusted for currency year to year due to the strong performance during the second half of 2018 driven by linux and the introduction of the power9-based architecture in our mid-range and high-end products .
storage systems revenue decreased 8 .
9 percent as reported -8 percent adjusted for currency year to year with improvements in year-to-year performance in the fourth quarter of 2019 driven primarily by the launch of the next generation high-end storage system ds8900 in november .
within systems cloud revenue of $ 2 .
9 billion declined 4 percent as reported and 3 percent adjusted for currency .

Question: What caused the Systems Hardware revenue to decline?
Answer: driven primarily by declines in Power Systems and Storage Systems.
2019
2018
2017
Amount computed using statutory rate
$841
$2,122
$(1,078)
Net change in valuation allowance for net deferred tax assets
(459)
(367)
10,058
AMT and other
—
(191)
20
Foreign rate differential
664
22
(169)
Non-deductible items
(151)
(276)
(370)
State income tax
(370)
50
(34)
Impact of tax reform on deferred taxes
—
(4,901)
—
Research and development credits
1,694
475
2,494
Foreign income tax
(494)
—
—
Stock compensation, net
1,539
—
—
Income tax benefit (provision)
$3,264
$(3,066)
$10,921
income tax provision reconciliation .
the difference between the income tax benefit -provision and income taxes computed using the u .
s .
federal income tax rate was as follows for the years ended september 30 2019 2018 and 2017 -amounts shown in thousands : .

Question: What are state income tax for the years 2018 and 2019, respectively?
Answer: 50 (370)
Preliminary
Measurement
Allocation
Period
Final Allocation
(In millions)
As of August 1, 2018
Adjustments
As of September 30, 2019
Total consideration transferred
$ 70.8
$ 3.3
$ 74.1
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
2.9
0.4
3.3
Trade receivables, net
30.8
—
30.8
Inventories, net
7.1
—
7.1
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
0.7
—
0.7
Property and equipment, net
3.5
(0.4)
3.1
Identifiable intangible assets, net
18.6
0.7
19.3
Goodwill
21.6
1.0
22.6
Other non-current assets
0.7
(0.4)
0.3
Total assets
$ 85.9
$ 1.3
$ 87.2
Liabilities:
Current portion of long-term debt
—
0.1
0.1
Accounts payable
13.8
(2.2)
11.6
Other current liabilities
1.3
(0.1)
1.2
Long-term debt, less current portion
—
0.2
0.2
Total liabilities
$ 15.1
$ (2.0)
$ 13.1
acquisition of afp .
on august 1 2018 the company acquired afp inc .
a privately held fabricator of foam corrugated molded pulp and wood packaging solutions to join its product care division .
this acquisition expands our protective packaging offerings in the electronic transportation and industrial markets with custom engineered applications .
we acquired 100 % of afp shares for an estimated consideration of $ 74 .
1 million excluding $ 3 .
3 million of cash acquired .
the following table summarizes the consideration transferred to acquire afp and the final allocation of the purchase price among the assets acquired and liabilities assumed .

Question: What is the liability to asset ratio as of August 1, 2018?
Answer: 17.58
Director
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash($)
Stock Awards ($)(1)(2)(3)
Total ($)
Roelof Botha
—
305,119
305,119
Paul Deighton
45,000
249,998
294,998
Randy Garutti
42,500
249,998
292,488
James McKelvey
—
290,041
290,041
Mary Meeker
—
305,119
305,119
Anna Patterson
50,000
249,988
299,988
Naveen Rao
45,000
249,988
294,988
Ruth Simmons (4)
—
300,132
300,132
Lawrence Summers
50,903
249,988
300,891
David Viniar (5)
—
382,610
382,610
2018 compensation .
the following table provides information regarding the total compensation that was earned by each of our non-employee directors in 2018 .
-1 the amounts included in the “ stock awards ” column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of rsu awards calculated in accordance with financial accounting standards board accounting standards codification topic 718 - “ asc 718 ” .
the amount does not necessarily correspond to the actual value recognized by the non-employee director .
the valuation assumptions used in determining such amounts are described in the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in our annual report on form 10-k for the fiscal year ended december 31 2018 .
-2 the amounts included in the “ stock awards ” column representing the annual awards or initial awards as applicable granted to our non-employee directors in 2018 are detailed below .
each of these awards vests and settles on the earlier of the first anniversary of the grant date or the date of our annual meeting subject to the director ’ s continued service through the vesting date .
-3 the amounts included in the “ stock awards ” column representing the awards of rsus granted to our non-employee directors in lieu of cash retainers in 2018 are described below .
each of these awards vested and settled in full on the grant date .
-4 as of december 31 2018 dr .
simmons also held a fully vested option to purchase 38000 shares of our class b common stock .
-5 as of december 31 2018 mr .
viniar also held 8750 rsus granted in 2015 to be settled in shares of our class b common stock which shares vest in full on the earlier of june 21 2019 or the 2019 annual meeting subject to mr .
viniar ’ s continued service with us through such vesting date .
as of december 31 2018 mr .
viniar also held a fully vested option to purchase 326950 shares of our class b common stock .

Question: What information does the table provide?
Answer: The total compensation that was earned by each of our non-employee directors in 2018
Fees Billed to NortonLifeLock
FY19
FY18
Audit fees(1)
$12,464,329
$11,370,525
Audit related fees(2)
1,142,383
753,689
Tax fees(3)
161,685
469,449
All other fees(4)
0
311,000
Total fees
$13,768,398
$12,904,663
principal accountant fees and services .
we regularly review the services and fees from our independent registered public accounting firm kpmg .
these services and fees are also reviewed with the audit committee annually .
in accordance with standard policy kpmg periodically rotates the individuals who are responsible for our audit .
our audit committee has determined that the providing of certain non-audit services as described below is compatible with maintaining the independence of kpmg .
in addition to performing the audit of our consolidated financial statements kpmg provided various other services during fiscal years 2019 and 2018 .
our audit committee has determined that kpmg ’ s provisioning of these services which are described below does not impair kpmg ’ s independence from nortonlifelock .
the aggregate fees billed for fiscal years 2019 and 2018 for each of the following categories of services are as follows : .
the categories in the above table have the definitions assigned under item 9 of schedule 14a promulgated under the exchange act and these categories include in particular the following components : .
-1 ‘ ‘ audit fees ’ ’ include fees for audit services principally related to the year-end examination and the quarterly reviews of our consolidated financial statements consultation on matters that arise during a review or audit review of sec filings audit services performed in connection with our acquisitions and divestitures and statutory audit fees .
-2 ‘ ‘ audit related fees ’ ’ include fees which are for assurance and related services other than those included in audit fees .
-3 ‘ ‘ tax fees ’ ’ include fees for tax compliance and advice .
-4 ‘ ‘ all other fees ’ ’ include fees for all other non-audit services principally for services in relation to certain information technology audits .
an accounting firm other than kpmg performs supplemental internal audit services for nortonlifelock .
another accounting firm provides the majority of nortonlifelock ’ s outside tax services .

Question: What is the percentage increase in Audit related fees from FY18 to FY19?
Answer: 51.57
Years ended December 31,
Years ended December 31,
Years ended December 31,
2019 vs 2018
2018 vs 2017
2019
2018
2017
% Change
% Change
(in thousands, except percentages)
(in thousands, except percentages)
(in thousands, except percentages)
(in thousands, except percentages)
(in thousands, except percentages)
Research and development
$ 355,015
$ 230,674
$ 135,997
53.9 %
69.6 %
Percentage of total revenues
22.5 %
21.5 %
20.2 %
research and development .
research and development expenses increased $ 124 .
3 million or 53 .
9 % for the year ended december 31 2019 compared to the same period in 2018 due to an increase of $ 114 .
4 million in employee-related costs - $ 45 .
1 million of which related to stock-based compensation and related payroll taxes a $ 7 .
4 million increase in computer hardware and software costs and a $ 2 .
5 million increase in professional services fees all as a result of growth in our research and development employee base and expanded development programs .
research and development expenses increased $ 94 .
7 million or 69 .
6 % for the year ended december 31 2018 compared to the same period in 2017 due to an increase of $ 89 .
6 million in employee-related costs an increase of $ 3 .
1 million in computer hardware and software costs and a $ 2 .
0 million increase in professional services fees all as a result of growth in our research and development employee base and expanded development programs .

Question: What is the average research and development expenses for 2017 and 2018?
Answer: 183335.5