FangyuLei/tatqa huggingface dataset:
€ million
2017/2018
2018/2019
Actual taxes
173
215
thereof Germany
(14)
(9)
thereof international
(159)
(206)
thereof tax expenses/income for the current period
(194)
(221)
thereof tax expenses/income of previous periods
(−21)
(−6)
Deferred taxes
43
83
thereof Germany
(39)
(104)
thereof international
(4)
(−21)
216
298
taxes .
at € 298 million -2017 / 18 : € 216 million recognised income tax expenses are € 81 million higher than the previous year ’ s figures .
during the reporting period the group tax rate for the continuing segment is 42 .
0 % -2017 / 18 : 37 .
6 % .
the group tax rate represents the relationship between recognised income tax expenses and earnings before taxes .
the increase in the ratio in the current financial year is mainly attributable to impairments on deferred taxes on loss carry-forwards in germany .
the comparatively low ratio in the previous year includes positive one-off tax effects such as tax rate changes abroad and the reduction for risk provisions .
for more information about income taxes see the notes to the consolidated financial statements in no .
12 – income taxes page 206 .
1 adjustment of previous year according to explanation in notes .

Question: What was the percentage change in total taxes in  2018/2019 from 2017/2018?
Answer: 37.96
USDm
2019
2018
2017
Net Asset Value per share
Total vessel values including newbuildings (broker values)
1,801.5
1,675.1
1,661.1
Committed CAPEX on newbuildings
-51.2
-258.0
-306.9
Cash position
72.5
127.4
134.2
Loans receivables
4.6
-
-
Bunkers
34.8
39.4
33.2
Freight receivables
89.8
86.0
71.3
Other receivables
6.2
7.5
11.8
Other plant and operating equipment
4.3
3.0
1.9
Land and buildings
8.1
-
-
Investments in joint ventures
1.2
0.1
0.3
Prepayments
3.5
2.9
4.4
Borrowings
-863.4
-754.7
-753.9
Trade payables
-47.1
-35.1
-26.2
Other liabilities
-47.3
-36.5
-33.8
Current tax liabilities
-1.5
-1.0
-1.4
Total Net Asset Value (NAV)
1,016.0
856.1
796.0
Total number of shares excluding treasury shares (million)
74.4
73.9
62.0
Total Net Asset Value per share (NAV/share) (USD)
13.6
11.6
12.8
net asset value per share -nav / share : .
torm believes that the nav / share is a relevant measure that management uses to measure the overall development of the assets and liabilities per share .
such measure may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies .
nav / share is calculated using broker values of vessels and excluding charter commitments .
nav / share is calculated as follows : .

Question: What was the change in the Total Net Asset Value (NAV) in 2019 from 2018?
Answer: 159.9
December 31,
December 31,
2019
2018
Software
$114,674
$170,327
Buildings
92,092
64,263
Equipment
60,661
100,421
Furniture and fixtures
34,768
38,200
Lease hold improvements
33,668
26,319
Land
31,374
5,124
367,237
404,654
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
(236,330)
(331,700)
Property and equipment, net
$130,907
$72,954
-4 property and equipment .
property and equipment consist of the following -in thousands : .
depreciation and amortization expense related to property and equipment was $ 22538000 $ 21721000 and $ 25787000 in 2019 2018 and 2017 respectively .
on november 1 2019 we completed the purchase of real estate in chandler arizona for approximately $ 48000000 that we intend to use as our global corporate headquarters .
the property contains a building and some infrastructure in place that we will complete readying for our use over the next year .
we intend to sell our current properties in tempe arizona .
included within the software buildings and land values presented above are assets in the process of being readied for use in the amounts of approximately $ 12138000 $ 27658000 and $ 11700000 respectively .
depreciation on these assets will commence as appropriate when they are ready for use and placed in service .

Question: How much was Depreciation and amortization expense related to property and equipment  in 2017?
Answer: $25,787,000
Years Ended December 31,
Years Ended December 31,
Years Ended December 31,
Customer Type
2017
2018
2019
%
%
%
Fabless design companies
91.0
92.4
91.3
Integrated device manufacturers
9.0
7.6
8.7
Total
100.0
100.0
100.0
we believe our success in attracting these end customers is a direct result of our commitment to high quality service and our intense focus on customer needs and performance .
as an independent semiconductor foundry most of our operating revenue is generated by our sales of wafers .
the following table presented the percentages of our wafer sales by types of customers for the years ended december 31 2017 2018 and 2019 .
we focus on providing a high level of customer service in order to attract customers and maintain their ongoing loyalty .
our culture emphasizes responsiveness to customer needs with a focus on flexibility speed and accuracy throughout our manufacturing and delivery processes .
our customer oriented approach is especially evident in two types of services : customer design development services and manufacturing services .
for example in 2013 we expand our regional business by opening our umc korea office in order to provide local support to our customers in korea and shorten time-to-market for our korea-based customers designing and manufacturing on umc process technologies .
we believe that our large production capacity and advanced process technology enable us to provide better customer service than many other foundries through shorter turn-around time greater manufacturing flexibility and higher manufacturing yields .

Question: What is the major portion of the operating revenue?
Answer: wafers
Year Ended June 30,
Year Ended June 30,
Year Ended June 30,
Year Ended June 30,
Year Ended June 30,
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Thereafter
Total
(in millions)
(in millions)
(in millions)
(in millions)
(in millions)
Reportable Segment
Zayo Networks
621.4
295.9
117.4
36.7
14.1
17.5
1,103.0
zColo
21.7
11.0
6.2
3.5
2.5
2.0
46.9
Allstream
110.3
26.7
11.8
1.6
0.3
—
150.7
Total
$753.4
$333.6
$135.4
$41.8
$16.9
$19.5
$1,300.6
remaining performance obligation associated with non-lease arrangements .
a majority of the company ’ s revenue is provided over a contract term .
when allocating the total contract transaction price to identified performance obligations a portion of the total transaction price relates to performance obligations that are yet to be satisfied or are partially satisfied as of the end of the reporting period .
in determining the transaction price allocated to remaining performance obligations the company does not include non- recurring charges and estimates for usage .
remaining performance obligations associated with the company ’ s contracts reflect recurring charges billed adjusted to reflect estimates for sales incentives and revenue adjustments .
the table below reflects an estimate of the remaining transaction price of fixed fee non-lease revenue arrangements to be recognized in the future periods presented .
the table below does not include estimated amounts to be recognized in future periods associated with variable usage-based consideration .

Question: How much remaining transaction price of fixed fee, non-lease revenue arrangements does the company expect to recognize from Zayo Networks and zColo in 2020?
Answer: 643.1
2019
2018
£m
£m
Fair value of scheme’s assets
59.5
56.4
Present value of funded scheme’s liabilities
(53.9)
(52.7)
Retirement benefit asset recognised in the Statement of Financial Position
5.6
3.7
Related deferred tax
(0.9)
(0.6)
Net pension asset
4.7
3.1
£ 1 .
5m -2018 : £ 1 .
4m of scheme assets have a quoted market price in an active market .
the actual return on plan assets was a gain of £ 5 .
5m -2018 : £ 1 .
0m loss .
the amounts recognised in the company statement of financial position are determined as follows : .

Question: What was the percentage change in net pension asset from 2018 to 2019?
Answer: 51.61
Year Ended June 30,
Year Ended June 30,
Year Ended June 30,
2019
2018
2017
(in millions)
(in millions)
(in millions)
Included in:
Operating costs
$11.3
$9.9
$11.3
Selling, general and administrative expenses
98.0
86.8
102.8
Total stock-based compensation expense
$109.3
$96.7
$114.1
CII common and preferred units $ — $ — $10.1
$ —
$ —
$10.1
Part A restricted stock units
93.8
82.3
76.5
Part B restricted stock units
13.0
12.4
26.0
Part C restricted stock units
2.5
2.0
1.5
Total stock-based compensation expense
$109.3
$96.7
$114.1
-11 stock-based compensation .
the following tables summarize the company ’ s stock-based compensation expense for liability and equity classified awards included in the consolidated statements of operations : .
cii common and preferred units .
prior to the company ’ s ipo the company was given authorization by communications infrastructure investments llc - “ cii ” to award 625000000 of cii ’ s common units as profits interests to employees directors and affiliates of the company .
the common units were historically considered to be stock-based compensation with terms that required the awards to be classified as liabilities due to cash settlement features .
the vested portion of the awards was reported as a liability and the fair value was re-measured at each reporting date until the date of settlement with a corresponding charge -or credit to stock-based compensation expense .
on december 31 2016 the cii common units became fully vested and as such there is no remaining unrecognized compensation cost associated with cii common units for any period subsequent to december 31 2016 .
the value of the cii common units was derived from the value of cii ’ s investments in the company and onvoy llc and its subsidiaries - “ ovs ” a company that provided voice and managed services which the company spun off during the year ended june 30 2014 .
as the value derived from each of these investments was separately determinable and there was a plan in place to distribute the value associated with the investment in company shares separate from the value derived from ovs the two components were accounted for separately .
the ovs component of the cii awards was adjusted to fair value each reporting period .
on december 31 2015 cii entered into an agreement to sell ovs to a third party .
the sale was completed in may 2016 .
based on the sale price the estimated fair value of ovs awards was increased resulting in an increase to stock based compensation expense and corresponding increase to additional paid-in capital of $ 12 .
9 million for the year ended june 30 2016 .
proceeds from the sale to be distributed to the company ’ s employees was paid by cii .

Question: What does the following table summarize?
Answer: The following tables summarize the Company’s stock-based compensation expense for liability and equity classified awards included in the consolidated statements of operations:
Current
Long-Term  
Total 
CareSpeak Communications, Inc. 
$1,500,000
$1,500,000
$3,000,000
RMDY Health, Inc.  
-
3,720,000
3,720,000
Total 
$1,500,000
$5,220,000
$6,720,000
note 9 – contingent purchase price .
our purchase of carespeak communications contains a contingent element that will be paid only if the company achieves certain patient engagement revenues in 2019 and 2020 .
the total contingent payment may be up to $ 3 .
0 million .
the target patient engagement revenues were achieved in 2019 and are expected to be achieved in 2020 .
the calculated fair value of the contingent payment was $ 2365000 at december 31 2018 and $ 3000000 at december 31 2019 .
our purchase of rmdy health inc .
also contains a contingent element that will be paid only if the company achieves certain revenues in 2020 and 2021 related to the rmdy business .
the total contingent payment may be up to $ 30 .
0 million .
the minimum payment is $ 1 .
0 million in each of the two years .
the calculated fair value of the contingent payment was $ 3720000 at december 31 2019 .
we determined the fair value of the contingent purchase price payable at december 31 2019 using a geometric-brownian motion analysis of the expected revenue and resulting earnout payment using inputs that include the spot price a risk free rate of return of 1 .
4 % a term of 2 years and volatility of 40 % .
changes in the inputs could result in a different fair value measurement .
the total fair value of contingent purchase price payable at december 31 2019 is as follows .

Question: How did the company determine the fair value of the Contingent Purchase Price Payable on December 31, 2019?
Answer: using a Geometric-Brownian motion analysis of the expected revenue and resulting earnout payment using inputs that include the spot price, a risk free rate of return of 1.4%, a term of 2 years, and volatility of 40%
Fiscal year
Fiscal year
Fiscal year
(in millions of €)
2019
2018
% Change
Revenue
22,104
28,185
(22) %
Cost of Sales
(15,825)
(21,074)
25 %
Gross profit
6,279
7,111
(12) %
as percentage of revenue
28 %
25 %
Research and development expenses
(2,362)
(2,788)
15 %
Selling and general administrative expenses
(3,979)
(3,767)
(6) %
Other operating income (expenses), net
9,469
1
n / a
Financial income, net thereof Income from investments, net 3,754 (prior year 5,381)
3,188
4,643
(31) %
Income from business activity
12,596
5,199
142 %
Income taxes
(1,377)
(653)
(111) %
Net income
11,219
4,547
147 %
Profit carried forward
170
134
27 %
Allocation to other retained earnings
(6,005)
(1,451)
> (200) %
Unappropriated net income
5,384
3,230
67 %
a .
9 .
1 results of operations .
statement of income of siemens ag in accordance with german commercial code -condensed .
beginning of august 2018 siemens ag carved out its mobility business to siemens mobility gmbh by way of singular succession .
the decreases in revenue cost of sales gross profit and research and development -r & d expenses were mainly driven by this carve-out .
on a geographical basis 75 % of revenue was generated in the europe c .
i .
s .
africa middle east region 18 % in the asia australia region and 7 % in the americas region .
exports from germany accounted for 62 % of overall revenue .
in fiscal 2019 orders for siemens ag amounted to € 21 .
6 billion .
within siemens ag the development of revenue depends strongly on the completion of contracts primarily in connection with large orders .
the r & d intensity -r & d as a percentage of revenue increased by 0 .
8 percentage points year-over-year .
the research and development activities of siemens ag are fundamentally the same as for its fields of business activities within the siemens group respectively .
on an average basis we employed 9000 people in r & d in fiscal 2019 .
the decrease in financial income net was primarily attributable to lower income from investments net .
the main factor for this decrease was a significant income from the profit transfer agreement with siemens beteiligungen inland gmbh germany in fiscal 2018 .

Question: On an average how many people are employed in R&D in fiscal in 2019?
Answer: 9,000
For the year ended
For the year ended
2017
2018
Amounts in thousands of U.S. Dollars
Pool gross revenues (included in Revenues)
38,046
102,253
Pool gross voyage expenses and commissions (included in Voyage expenses and commissions)
(9,122)
(10,154)
GasLog’s adjustment for net pool allocation (included in Net pool allocation)
7,254
17,818
GasLog’s total net pool performance
36,178
109,917
net pool allocation : net pool allocation increased by $ 10 .
5 million from $ 7 .
3 million during the year ended december 31 2017 to $ 17 .
8 million during the year ended december 31 2018 .
the increase in net pool allocation was attributable to the movement in the adjustment of the net pool results earned by the gaslog vessels in accordance with the pool distribution formula .
gaslog recognized gross revenues and gross voyage expenses and commissions of $ 102 .
3 million and $ 10 .
2 million respectively from the operation of its vessels in the cool pool during the year ended december 31 2018 -december 31 2017 : $ 38 .
0 million and $ 9 .
1 million respectively .
the increase in gaslog ’ s total net pool performance was driven by higher spot rates and higher utilization achieved by all vessels trading in the cool pool .
gaslog ’ s total net pool performance is presented below : .
voyage expenses and commissions : voyage expenses and commissions increased by 32 .
5 % or $ 5 .
0 million from $ 15 .
4 million during the year ended december 31 2017 to $ 20 .
4 million during the year ended december 31 2018 .
the increase in voyage expenses and commissions is mainly attributable to an increase of $ 3 .
6 million in bunkers consumed and voyage expenses during certain unchartered and off-hire periods an increase of $ 0 .
3 million in voyage expenses of the vessels operating in the spot market and an increase of $ 1 .
1 million in brokers ’ commissions .

Question: What accounted for the increase in voyage expenses and commissions?
Answer: Mainly attributable to an increase of $3.6 million in bunkers consumed and voyage expenses during certain unchartered and off-hire periods, an increase of $0.3 million in voyage expenses of the vessels operating in the spot market and an increase of $1.1 million in brokers’ commissions.
Three Months Ended
Three Months Ended
Three Months Ended
Three Months Ended
Three Months Ended
March 31,
June 30,
September 30,
December 31,
Year Ended, December 31,
2019:
Operating revenues
$1,813.4
$1,889.6
$1,953.6
$1,923.7
$7,580.3
Costs of operations (1)
543.4
563.3
559.9
550.2
2,216.8
Operating income
614.9
683.9
728.3
661.3
2,688.4
Net income
407.6
434.3
505.3
569.4
1,916.6
Net income attributable to American Tower Corporation stockholders
397.4
429.1
498.6
562.7
1,887.8
Net income attributable to American Tower Corporation common stockholders
397.4
429.1
498.6
562.7
1,887.8
Basic net income per share attributable to American Tower Corporation common stockholders
0.90
0.97
1.13
1.27
4.27
Diluted net income per share attributable to American Tower Corporation common stockholders
0.89
0.96
1.12
1.26
4.24
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements -tabular amounts in millions unless otherwise disclosed .
23 .
selected quarterly financial data -unaudited .
selected quarterly financial data for the years ended december 31 2019 and 2018 is as follows -in millions except per share data : .
-1 represents operating expenses exclusive of depreciation amortization and accretion selling general administrative and development expense and other operating expenses .

Question: What was the change in Diluted net income per share attributable to American Tower Corporation common stockholders between Three Months Ended  March and June?
Answer: 0.07
December 31,
December 31,
2019
2018
Contract assets
$3,208,206
$2,759,315
Contract liabilities
(3,887,685)
(2,486,111)
   Net contract assets
$(679,479)
$273,204
contract balances .
our contract assets consist of unbilled amounts for technology development contracts as well as custom product contracts .
also included in contract assets are royalty revenue and carrying amounts of right of returned inventory .
long-term contract assets include the fee withholding on cost reimbursable contracts that will not be billed within a year .
contract liabilities include excess billings subcontractor accruals warranty expense extended warranty revenue right of return refund and customer deposits .
the net contract -liabilities / assets changed by $ 1 .
0 million due primarily to increased contract liabilities in addition to a slight increase in contract assets .
the increase in contract liabilities is a result of the increased number of government research programs in addition to an increase in the number of our fixed-price contracts that have reached milestones as designated in their respective contracts but revenue has not yet been recognized .
the increase in contract assets is primarily driven by the unbilled fee required by our cost-reimbursable government contracts which cannot be fully billed until after the specific contract is complete .
the following table shows the components of our contract balances as of december 31 2019 and 2018 : .

Question: What was the change in net contract (liabilities)/assets?
Answer: $1.0 million
Year Ended February 28,
Year Ended February 28,
Year Ended February 28,
2019
2018
2017
Net income (loss)
$18,398
$16,617
$(7,904)
Basic weighted average number of common shares outstanding
34,589
35,250
35,917
Effect of stock options and restricted stock units computed on
treasury stock method
705
889
-
Diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding
35,294
36,139
35,917
Earnings (loss) per share:
Basic
$0.53
$0.47
$(0.22)
Diluted
$0.52
$0.46
$(0.22)
note 14 – earnings -loss per share .
basic earnings -loss per share is computed by dividing net income -loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period .
diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period plus the dilutive effect of outstanding stock options and restricted stock-based awards using the treasury stock method .
the following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings -loss per share -in thousands except per share amounts : .
all outstanding stock options and restricted stock-based awards in the amount of 1 .
0 million and 1 .
2 million respectively were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share for the fiscal year ended february 28 2017 because the effect of inclusion would be antidilutive .
shares subject to anti-dilutive stock options and restricted stock-based awards of 1 .
9 million and 0 .
2 million for the fiscal years ended february 28 2019 and 2018 respectively were excluded from the calculations of diluted earnings per share for the years then ended .
we have the option to pay cash issue shares of common stock or any combination thereof for the aggregate amount due upon conversion of the notes .
it is our intent to settle the principal amount of the convertible senior notes with cash and therefore we use the treasury stock method for calculating any potential dilutive effect of the conversion option on diluted net income -loss per share .
from the time of the issuance of the notes the average market price of our common stock has been less than the initial conversion price of the notes and consequently no shares have been included in diluted earnings per share for the conversion value of the notes .

Question: What was the percentage change in Basic weighted average number of common shares outstanding between 2018 and 2019?
Answer: -1.88
International
Pinnacle Foods
Corporate
Total
Other cost of goods sold
$—
$3.7
$—
$3.7
Total cost of goods sold .
—
3.7
—
3.7
Severance and related costs
0.7
0.6
110.8
112.1
Accelerated depreciation
—
—
4.7
4.7
Contract/lease termination .
—
0.8
0.3
1.1
Consulting/professional fees .
0.2
—
38.1
38.3
Other selling, general and administrative expenses .
0.1
—
8.2
8.3
Total selling, general and administrative expenses
1.0
1.4
162.1
164.5
Consolidated total
$1.0
$5.1
$162.1
$168.2
notes to consolidated financial statements - -continued fiscal years ended may 26 2019 may 27 2018 and may 28 2017 -columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts during fiscal 2019 we recognized the following pre-tax expenses for the pinnacle integration restructuring plan : .
included in the above results are $ 163 .
5 million of charges that have resulted or will result in cash outflows and $ 4 .
7 million in non-cash charges .

Question: What does the table show us in the fiscal year 2019?
Answer: pre-tax expenses for the Pinnacle Integration Restructuring Plan