FangyuLei/tatqa huggingface dataset:
2019 STI Bonus Amounts
Named Officer
Target Bonus Opportunity (1)
X
Company Performance % (2)
X
Discretionary Adjustment for Individual Performance(3)
=
STI Bonus Amount
Current Executives:
Jeffrey K. Storey
$3,600,022
97%
100%
$3,492,021
Indraneel Dev
780,000
97%
110%
832,260
Stacey W. Goff
720,021
97%
100%
698,420
Scott A. Trezise
439,654
97%
110%
469,111
Shaun C. Andrews
461,442
97%
110%
492,359
actual sti bonus amounts authorized .
the actual amounts of the neos ’ 2019 bonuses were calculated as follows : .
-1 determined based on earned salary and applicable sti target bonus percentage during 2019 and includes pro-rations for any changes to salary and / or sti target bonus percentage described below .
a target bonus opportunity for mr .
storey reflects his salary earned during 2019 of $ 1800011 and a sti target bonus percentage of 200 % .
b target bonus opportunity for mr .
dev reflects his salary earned during 2019 of $ 650000 and a sti target bonus percentage of 120 % .
c target bonus opportunity for mr .
goff reflects his salary earned during 2019 of $ 600018 and a sti target bonus percentage of 120 % .
d target bonus opportunity for mr .
trezise reflects his salary earned during 2019 with a salary increase from $ 475010 to $ 500011 effective on february 23 2019 and an increase of sti target bonus percentage from 80 % to 90 % also effective on february 23 2019 .
e target bonus opportunity for mr .
andrews reflects his salary earned during 2019 with a salary increase from $ 425006 to $ 525000 effective on august 21 2019 and a sti target bonus percentage of 100 % .
-2 calculated or determined as discussed above under “ — 2019 performance results .
” .
-3 determined based on achievement of individual performance objectives as described further above in this subsection .
committee discretion to pay in cash or shares .
the committee may authorize the payment of annual bonuses in cash or shares of common stock .
since 2000 the committee has paid these bonuses entirely in cash principally to diversify our compensation mix and to conserve shares in our equity plans .
recent actions -february 2020 .
in connection with establishing targets for the 2020 sti program the committee increased mr .
dev ’ s sti target bonus percentage to 125 % in light of his position to market and performance as cfo and made no changes to the target bonus percentage for any of our other neos .

Question: Which current executives have a STI target bonus percentage of 120%?
Answer: Indraneel Dev Stacey W. Goff
Year Ended
Balance at Beginning of Year
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)
Reversal for State NOL Expiration and Utilization
Balance at End of Year
September 30, 2019
$104,858
$10,448
$(68,292)
$47,014
September 30, 2018
159,154
79,377
(133,673)
104,858
September 30, 2017
322,404
(32,154)
(131,096)
159,154
the valuation allowance activity for the years ended september 30 2019 2018 and 2017 is as follows : .
the company completed an internal revenue code section 382 analysis of the loss carry forwards in 2009 and determined then that all of the company ’ s loss carry forwards are utilizable and not restricted under section 382 .
the company has not updated its section 382 analysis subsequent to 2009 and does not believe there have been any events subsequent to 2009 that would impact the analysis .
the company is required to recognize the financial statement benefit of a tax position only after determining that the relevant tax authority would more likely than not sustain the position following an audit .
for tax positions meeting the more likely than not threshold the amount recognized in the financial statements is the largest benefit that has a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the relevant tax authority .
the company applies the interpretation to all tax positions for which the statute of limitations remained open .
the company had no liability for unrecognized tax benefits and did not recognize any interest or penalties during the years ended september 30 2019 2018 or 2017 .
the company is subject to income taxes in the u .
s .
federal jurisdiction and various state jurisdictions .
tax regulations within each jurisdiction are subject to the interpretation of the related tax laws and regulations and require significant judgment to apply .
with few exceptions the company is no longer subject to u .
s .
federal state and local income tax examinations by tax authorities for fiscal years ending prior to 2004 .
we are generally subject to u .
s .
federal and state tax examinations for all tax years since 2003 due to our net operating loss carryforwards and the utilization of the carryforwards in years still open under statute .
during the year ended september 30 2018 the company was examined by the u .
s .
internal revenue service for fiscal year 2016 .
this examination resulted in no adjustments .
the company changed its fiscal year end in 2007 from march 31 to september 30 .

Question: What is the balance at the beginning of 2018 and 2017 respectively?
Answer: 159,154 322,404
Year Ended
Year Ended
Year Ended
September 28,2019
September 29,2018
September 30,2017
Net income
$53,825
$247,358
$207,122
Other comprehensive income (loss):(1)
Translation adjustment, net of taxes(2)
(32,609)
(18,065)
24,923
Changes in unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities, net of taxes(3)
—
(4)
(3,330)
Defined benefit pension plans, net of taxes(4)
(6,560)
996
3,613
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
(39,169)
(17,073)
25,206
Comprehensive income
$14,656
$230,285
$232,328
coherent inc .
and subsidiaries consolidated statements of comprehensive income -in thousands .
-1 reclassification adjustments were not significant during fiscal 2019 2018 and 2017 .
-2 tax benefits of $ -5161 $ 0 and $ -326 were provided on translation adjustments during fiscal 2019 2018 and 2017 respectively .
-3 tax benefits of $ 0 $ -2 and $ -1876 were provided on changes in unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities during fiscal 2019 2018 and 2017 respectively .
-4 tax expenses -benefits of $ -2371 $ 202 and $ 1747 were provided on changes in defined benefit pension plans during fiscal 2019 2018 and 2017 respectively .

Question: What was the percentage change in Net income in 2018 from 2017?
Answer: 19.43
Protected Period
Multiple of Annual Cash Compensation
Years of Welfare Benefits
CEO
2 years
3 times
3 years
Other Executives
1.5 years
2 times
2 years
Other Officers
1 year
1 time
1 year
compensation discussion and analysis iv .
our 2019 compensation program and components of pay the table below shows -i the length of the “ protected period ” afforded to officers following a change of control and -ii the multiple of salary and bonus payment and years of welfare benefits to which officers will be entitled if change of control benefits become payable under our agreements and related policies : .
for more information on change of control arrangements applicable to our executives including our rationale for providing these benefits see “ executive compensation — potential termination payments — payments made upon a change of control .
” for information on change of control severance benefits payable to our junior officers and managers see “ — severance benefits ” in the next subsection below .

Question: Under what conditions would officers be entitled to the years of welfare benefits?
Answer: if change of control benefits become payable under our agreements and related policies
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
Cash and cash equivalents
$0.7
$77.7
$—
$78.4
Equity securities:
U.S. equity securities
56.3
91.8
—
148.1
International equity securities
87.8
0.4
—
88.2
Fixed income securities:
Government bonds
—
748.3
—
748.3
Corporate bonds
—
2,255.5
—
2,255.5
Mortgage-backed bonds
—
31.1
—
31.1
Real estate funds
0.4
—
—
0.4
Net receivables for unsettled transactions
5.6
—
—
5.6
Fair value measurement of pension plan assets in the fair value hierarchy
$150.8
$3,204.8
$—
$3,355.6
Investments measured at net asset value
245.9
Total pension plan assets
$3,601.5
plan assets the fair value of plan assets summarized by level within the fair value hierarchy described in note 20 as of may 26 2019 was as follows : .
level 1 assets are valued based on quoted prices in active markets for identical securities .
the majority of the level 1 assets listed above include the common stock of both u .
s .
and international companies mutual funds master limited partnership units and real estate investment trusts all of which are actively traded and priced in the market .
level 2 assets are valued based on other significant observable inputs including quoted prices for similar securities yield curves indices etc .
level 2 assets consist primarily of individual fixed income securities where values are based on quoted prices of similar securities and observable market data .
level 3 assets consist of investments where active market pricing is not readily available and as such fair value is estimated using significant unobservable inputs .
certain assets that are measured at fair value using the nav -net asset value per share -or its equivalent practical expedient have not been classified in the fair value hierarchy .
such investments are generally considered long-term in nature with varying redemption availability .
for certain of these investments with a fair value of approximately $ 51 .
0 million as of may 26 2019 the asset managers have the ability to impose customary redemption gates which may further restrict or limit the redemption of invested funds therein .
as of may 26 2019 funds with a fair value of $ 4 .
2 million have imposed such gates .
as of may 26 2019 we have unfunded commitments for additional investments of $ 48 .
3 million in private equity funds and $ 17 .
0 million in natural resources funds .
we expect unfunded commitments to be funded from plan assets rather than the general assets of the company .
notes to consolidated financial statements - -continued fiscal years ended may 26 2019 may 27 2018 and may 28 2017 -columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts .

Question: What is the ratio of Level 1 assets to Level 2 assets?
Answer: 0.05
2019
2018
2017
Net income
108,616
13,040
112,062
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding
30,271
33,003
33,612
Dilutive effect of share-based awards and options outstanding 
803
916
941
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding
31,074
33,919
34,553
Earnings per share:
Basic
3.59
0.40
3.33
Diluted
3.50
0.38
3.24
7 .
earnings per share .
the following is a reconciliation of the amounts utilized in the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for fiscal2 019 2018 and 2017 -in thousands except per share amounts : .
in each of the fiscal years 2019 2018 and 2017 share-based awards for approximately 0 .
1 million shares were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share as they were antidilutive .

Question: Which years does the table provide information for the amounts utilized in the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share?
Answer: 2019 2018 2017
December 31, 2019
Gross Cost
Accumulated Depreciation
Net Cost
Land
78
—
78
Buildings
905
(505)
400
Facilities & leasehold improvements
3,193
(2,762)
431
Machinery and equipment
15,336
(12,790)
2,546
Computer and R&D equipment
382
(335)
47
Operating lease right-of-use assets
266
(60)
206
Other tangible assets
110
(93)
17
Construction in progress
282
—
282
Total
20,552
(16,545)
4,007
December 31, 2018
Gross Cost
Accumulated Depreciation
Net Cost
Land
79
—
79
Buildings
902
(487)
415
Facilities & leasehold improvements
3,170
(2,748)
422
Machinery and equipment
14,882
(12,582)
2,300
Computer and R&D equipment
381
(334)
47
Other tangible assets
123
(93)
30
Construction in progress
202
—
202
Total
19,739
(16,244)
3,495
the line “ construction in progress ” in the table above includes property plant and equipment under construction and equipment under qualification before operating .
on january 1 2019 the company adopted the new guidance on lease accounting and lease right-of-use assets are included in plant property and equipment .
the impact of the adoption of this new guidance is further described in note 11 .
the depreciation charge was $ 785 million $ 727 million and $ 592 million in 2019 2018 and 2017 respectively .
as described in note 7 the acquisition of norstel resulted in the recognition of property plant and equipment of $ 11 million .

Question: What is the average Gross Cost?
Answer: 20145.5
2019
(In thousands)
Network Solutions
Services & Support
Total
Access & Aggregation
$289,980
$58,894
$348,874
Subscriber Solutions & Experience (1)
144,651
8,269
152,920
Traditional & Other Products
20,595
7,672
28,267
Total
$455,226
$74,835
$530,061
sales by category .
in addition to the above reporting segments we also report revenue for the following three categories – -1 access & aggregation -2 subscriber solutions & experience and -3 traditional & other products .
the following tables disaggregates our revenue by major source for the years ended december 31 2019 2018 and 2017 : .
-1 subscriber solutions & experience was formerly reported as customer devices .
with the increasing focus on enhancing the customer experience for both our business and consumer broadband customers and the addition of smartrg during the fourth quarter of 2018 subscriber solutions & experience more accurately represents this revenue category .

Question: What is the difference in the total revenue from Access & Aggregation and Traditional & Other Products?
Answer: 320607
Years Ended December 31,
Years Ended December 31,
Years Ended December 31,
2019
2019
2018
(in thousands)
Beginning balance
$4,400
$4,400
Transfers to developed technology from IPR&D
(4,400)
—
Ending balance
$—
$4,400
indefinite-lived intangible assets .
indefinite-lived intangible assets consist entirely of acquired in-process research and development technology or ipr & d .
the following table sets forth the company ’ s activities related to the indefinite-lived intangible assets : .
the company performs its annual assessment of indefinite-lived intangible assets on october 31 each year or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired utilizing a qualitative test as a precursor to the quantitative test comparing the fair value of the assets with their carrying amount .
based on the qualitative test if it is more likely than not that indicators of impairment exists the company proceeds to perform a quantitative analysis .
based on the company ’ s assessment as of october 31 2019 no indicators of impairment were identified .
in the years ended december 31 2019 and 2018 no ipr & d impairment losses were recorded .
in the year ended december 31 2017 the company recognized impairment losses of $ 2 .
0 million related to the company ' s abandonment of a single ipr & d project .

Question: When does the company perform its annual assessment?
Answer: October 31
April 26, 2019
April 27, 2018
U.S.
$ 572
$ 566
International
187
190
Total
$ 759
$ 756
16 .
segment geographic and significant customer information .
with the exception of property and equipment we do not identify or allocate our long-lived assets by geographic area .
the following table presents property and equipment information for geographic areas based on the physical location of the assets -in millions : .

Question: What was the percentage change in the total amount of property and equipment between 2018 and 2019?
Answer: 0.4
Payments due by period
Payments due by period
Payments due by period
Payments due by period
Contractual Cash Obligations (1)
Total
Less than 1 year
1-3 years
3-5 years
More than 5 years
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
Long-term debt
$23
$6
$11
$6
Operating leases
3,840
688
1,114
792
1,246
Retirement obligations (2)
95
10
20
20
44
Purchase obligations and other commitments (3)
286
206
61
12
6
Total
$4,244
$910
$1,206
$830
$1,296
obligations and commitments .
as of august 31 2019 we had the following obligations and commitments to make future payments under contracts contractual obligations and commercial commitments : .
amounts in table may not total due to rounding .
the liability related to unrecognized tax benefits has been excluded from the contractual obligations table because a reasonable estimate of the timing and amount of cash outflows from future tax settlements cannot be determined .
for additional information see note 10 -income taxes to our consolidated financial statements under item 8 “ financial statements and supplementary data .
” .
amounts represent projected payments under certain unfunded retirement plans for former pre-incorporation partners .
given these plans are unfunded we pay these benefits directly .
these plans were eliminated for active partners after may 15 2001 .
other commitments include among other things information technology software support and maintenance obligations as well as other obligations in the ordinary course of business that we cannot cancel or where we would be required to pay a termination fee in the event of cancellation .
amounts shown do not include recourse that we may have to recover termination fees or penalties from clients .

Question: How much does operating leases account for total contractual cash obligations for period of less than 1 year?
Answer: 75.6
(In millions)
(In millions)
(In millions)
(In millions)
Year Ended June 30,
2019
2018
2017
Interest and dividends income
$    2,762
$    2,214
$   1,387
Interest expense
(2,686)
(2,733)
(2,222)
Net recognized gains on investments
648
2,399
2,583
Net gains (losses) on derivatives
144
(187)
(510)
Net losses on foreign currency remeasurements
(82)
(218)
(111)
Other, net
(57)
(59)
(251)
Total
$  729
$ 1,416
$  876
other income -expense net .
the components of other income -expense net were as follows : .
we use derivative instruments to : manage risks related to foreign currencies equity prices interest rates and credit ; enhance investment returns ; and facilitate portfolio diversification .
gains and losses from changes in fair values of derivatives that are not designated as hedging instruments are primarily recognized in other income -expense net .
fiscal year 2019 compared with fiscal year 2018 interest and dividends income increased primarily due to higher yields on fixed-income securities .
interest expense decreased primarily driven by a decrease in outstanding long-term debt due to debt maturities offset in part by higher finance lease expense .
net recognized gains on investments decreased primarily due to lower gains on sales of equity investments .
net gains on derivatives includes gains on foreign exchange and interest rate derivatives in the current period as compared to losses in the prior period .
fiscal year 2018 compared with fiscal year 2017 dividends and interest income increased primarily due to higher average portfolio balances and yields on fixed-income securities .
interest expense increased primarily due to higher average outstanding long-term debt and higher finance lease expense .
net recognized gains on investments decreased primarily due to higher losses on sales of fixed-income securities offset in part by higher gains on sales of equity securities .
net losses on derivatives decreased primarily due to lower losses on equity foreign exchange and commodity derivatives offset in part by losses on interest rate derivatives in the current period as compared to gains in the prior period .

Question: What does the company use derivative instruments for?
Answer: manage risks related to foreign currencies, equity prices, interest rates, and credit; enhance investment returns; and facilitate portfolio diversification.
Number of Shares
Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value
Balance of restricted stock units outstanding at December 31, 2018
505,000
$2.17
Grants of restricted stock units
70,000
2.45
Vested restricted stock units
(235,000)
(2.29)
Balance of unvested restricted stock units at December 31, 2019
340,000
2.15
note f – stockholders ’ equity -continued .
a summary of restricted stock units granted during the year ended december 31 2019 is as follows -each restricted stock unit represents the contingent right to receive one share of the company ’ s common stock : .
restricted stock unit compensation expense was $ 567000 for the year ended december 31 2019 and $ 687000 for the year ended december 31 2018 .
the company has an aggregate of $ 232000 of unrecognized restricted stock unit compensation expense as of december 31 2019 to be expensed over a weighted average period of 1 .
2 years .

Question: What was the total restricted stock unit compensation expense for the years 2018 and 2019?
Answer: 1254000
As at December 31,
2019
2018
Pension benefits
$8,566
$10,905
Other post-employment benefits
23,508
21,330
Accrued benefit liabilities
$32,074
$32,235
in october 2013 the company ceased to allow new employees to join certain defined benefit plans except under certain circumstances and commenced a defined contribution pension plan for new employees .
the company made contributions of $ 1 .
2 million for various defined contribution arrangements during 2019 -december 31 2018 — $ 0 .
9 million .
the company ’ s funding policy is to make contributions to its defined benefit pension funds based on actuarial cost methods as permitted and required by pension regulatory bodies .
contributions reflect actuarial assumptions concerning future investment returns salary projections and future service benefits .
plan assets are represented primarily by canadian and foreign equity securities fixed income instruments and short-term investments .
the company provides certain health care and life insurance benefits for some of its retired employees and their dependents .
participants are eligible for these benefits generally when they retire from active service and meet the eligibility requirements for the pension plan .
these benefits are funded primarily on a pay-as-you-go basis with the retiree generally paying a portion of the cost through contributions deductibles and coinsurance provisions .
the balance sheet obligations distributed between pension and other post-employment benefits included in other long-term liabilities -note 23 were as follows : .

Question: What is the company's percentage change in other post-employment benefits between 2018 and 2019?
Answer: 10.21
Employee Severance and Benefit Costs
Lease Costs
Asset Write-off Costs
Other Related Costs
Total
Balance as of August 31, 2017
$ 33,580
$1,665
$ —
$ 3,143
$38,388
Restructuring related charges
16,269
1,596
16,264
2,773
36,902
Asset write-off charge and other non-cash activity
(127)
525
(16,264)
25
(15,841)
Cash payments
(31,591)
(1,102)
—
(5,419)
(38,112)
Balance as of August 31, 2018
18,131
2,684
—
522
21,337
Restructuring related charges
16,029
(41)
(3,566)
2,071
14,493
Asset write-off charge and other non-cash activity
(494)
—
3,566
(18)
3,054
Cash payments
(30,504)
(663)
—
(1,786)
(32,953)
Balance as of August 31, 2019
$3,162
$1,980
$—
$789
$5,931
2017 restructuring plan .
on september 15 2016 the company ’ s board of directors formally approved a restructuring plan to better align the company ’ s global capacity and administrative support infrastructure to further optimize organizational effectiveness .
this action includes headcount reductions across the company ’ s selling general and administrative cost base and capacity realignment in higher cost locations -the “ 2017 restructuring plan ” .
the 2017 restructuring plan totaling $ 195 .
0 million in restructuring and other related costs is complete as of august 31 2019 .
the tables below summarize the company ’ s liability activity primarily associated with the 2017 restructuring plan -in thousands : .

Question: What was the total balance as of August 31, 2019?
Answer: $5,931