FangyuLei/tatqa huggingface dataset:
Year Ended June 30,
2019
2018
2017
Federal statutory rate
21.0%
28.1%
35.0%
Effect of:
Foreign earnings taxed at lower rates
(4.1)%
(7.8)%
(11.6)%
Impact of the enactment of the TCJA
0.4%
37.7%
0%
Phone business losses
0%
0%
(5.7)%
Impact of intangible property transfers
(5.9)%
0%
0%
Foreign-derived intangible income deduction
(1.4)%
0%
0%
Research and development credit
(1.1)%
(1.3)%
(0.9)%
Excess tax benefits relating to stock-based compensation
(2.2)%
(2.5)%
(2.1)%
Interest, net
1.0%
1.2%
1.4%
Other reconciling items, net
2.5%
(0.8)%
(1.3)%
Effective rate
10.2%
54.6%
14.8%
effective tax rate .
the items accounting for the difference between income taxes computed at the u .
s .
federal statutory rate and our effective rate were as follows : .
the decrease from the federal statutory rate in fiscal year 2019 is primarily due to a $ 2 .
6 billion net income tax benefit related to intangible property transfers and earnings taxed at lower rates in foreign jurisdictions resulting from producing and distributing our products and services through our foreign regional operations centers in ireland singapore and puerto rico .
the increase from the federal statutory rate in fiscal year 2018 is primarily due to the net charge related to the enactment of the tcja in the second quarter of fiscal year 2018 offset in part by earnings taxed at lower rates in foreign jurisdictions .
the decrease from the federal statutory rate in fiscal year 2017 is primarily due to earnings taxed at lower rates in foreign jurisdictions .
our foreign regional operating centers in ireland singapore and puerto rico which are taxed at rates lower than the u .
s .
rate generated 82 % 87 % and 76 % of our foreign income before tax in fiscal years 2019 2018 and 2017 respectively .
other reconciling items net consists primarily of tax credits gilti and u .
s .
state income taxes .
in fiscal years 2019 2018 and 2017 there were no individually significant other reconciling items .
the decrease in our effective tax rate for fiscal year 2019 compared to fiscal year 2018 was primarily due to the net charge related to the enactment of the tcja in the second quarter of fiscal year 2018 and a $ 2 .
6 billion net income tax benefit in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2019 related to intangible property transfers .
the increase in our effective tax rate for fiscal year 2018 compared to fiscal year 2017 was primarily due to the net charge related to the enactment of the tcja and the realization of tax benefits attributable to previous phone business losses in fiscal year 2017 .

Question: Why did effective tax rate in fiscal 2019 decrease from 2018?
Answer: The decrease in our effective tax rate for fiscal year 2019 compared to fiscal year 2018 was primarily due to the net charge related to the enactment of the TCJA in the second quarter of fiscal year 2018
(In millions)
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments
Unrealized Gain (Loss) On Available- For-Sale Securities
Equity Method Investee
Total AOCI
Balance as of March 31, 2017
$7
$5
$—
$12
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications
(4)
(5)
—
(9)
Reclassification to net income (loss)
5
(4)
—
1
Balance as of March 30, 2018
8
(4)
—
4
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications
(13)
3
(1)
(11)
Balance as of March 29, 2019
$(5)
$(1)
$(1)
$(7)
accumulated other comprehensive income -loss .
components and activities of aoci net of tax were as follows : .
during fiscal 2018 a net foreign currency translation loss of $ 8 million related to foreign entities sold in the divestiture of our wss and pki solutions was reclassified to gain on divestiture and a net gain of $ 3 million related to liquidated foreign entities was reclassified to other income -expense net .
a realized gain of $ 7 million on securities sold in connection with the divestiture of our wss and pki solutions was reclassified to gain on divestiture .
the tax effect of $ 3 million was reclassified to income tax expense -benefit .

Question: What units are used in the table?
Answer: millions
Fiscal
Fiscal
Fiscal
2019
2018
2017
(in millions)
(in millions)
(in millions)
Restructuring charges, net
$ 255
$ 140
$ 146
Gain on divestiture
—
(2)
—
Other charges (credits), net
—
(12)
1
Restructuring and other charges, net
$ 255
$ 126
$ 147
3 .
restructuring and other charges net .
net restructuring and other charges consisted of the following : .

Question: What was the change in Restructuring charges, net in 2019 from 2018?
Answer: 115
Post-Retirement Plans
Years Ended December 31,
Years Ended December 31,
Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
(Dollars in milions)
Service cost
$15
18
18
Interest cost
110
97
100
Expected return on plan assets
(1)
(1)
(2)
Recognition of prior service cost
16
20
20
Net periodic post-retirement benefit expense
$140
134
136
net periodic benefit expense for our post-retirement benefit plans includes the following components : .
we report service costs for our combined pension plan and post-retirement benefit plans in cost of services and products and selling general and administrative expenses in our consolidated statements of operations for the years ended december 31 2019 2018 and 2017 .
additionally a portion of the service cost is also allocated to certain assets under construction which are capitalized and reflected as part of property plant and equipment in our consolidated balance sheets .
the remaining components of net periodic benefit expense -income are reported in other income net in our consolidated statements of operations .
as a result of ongoing efforts to reduce our workforce we recognized a one-time charge in 2019 of $ 6 million and in 2018 of $ 15 million for special termination benefit enhancements paid to certain eligible employees upon voluntary retirement .

Question: What is the average amount of service costs across 2017, 2018 and 2019?
Answer: 17
Fiscal year
Fiscal year
(in millions of €)
2019
2018
Real Estate Services
145
140
Corporate items
(562)
631
Centrally carried pension expense
(264)
(423)
Amortization of intangible assets acquired in business combinations
(1,133)
(1,164)
Eliminations, Corporate Treasury and other reconciling items
(215)
(318)
Reconciliation to Consolidated financial Statements
(2,028)
(1,135)
a .
3 .
10 reconciliation to consolidated financial statements .
the negative swing in corporate items was mainly due to large positive effects in fiscal 2018 – the gain of € 900 million resulting from the transfer of siemens ’ shares in atos se to siemens pension- trust e .
v .
and the gain of € 655 million from the sale of osram licht ag shares .
these effects substantially outweighed a positive result in fiscal 2019 from the measurement of a major asset retirement obligation which was previously reported in centrally managed portfolio activities .
severance charges within corporate items were € 99 million - € 159 million in fiscal 2018 .

Question: What were the severance charges within Corporate items?
Answer: 99
December 31,
December 31,
(in thousands)
(in thousands)
2019
2018
Finished Goods
$8,320
$12,472
Work in process
—
67
Component parts
6,768
4,716
Service parts
4,238
5,482
$19,326
$22,737
note 7 — inventories net .
inventories are used in the manufacture and service of restaurant / retail products .
the components of inventory net consist of the following : .
at december 31 2019 and 2018 the company had recorded inventory write-downs of $ 9 .
6 million and $ 9 .
8 million respectively against restaurant / retail inventories which relate primarily to service parts .

Question: What is the value of Finished Goods in 2019 and 2018 respectively?
Answer: $8,320 $12,472
Years Ended December 31,
Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
Balance of unrecognized tax benefits as of January 1,
$1,226
$37,240
Increases for positions taken in prior years
1,353
657
Rate change
(84)
—
Amount of decreases related to settlements
—
(36,671)
Balance of unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31,
$2,495
$1,226
the following is a tabular reconciliation of the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits -excluding interest and penalties : .
included in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits as of december 31 2019 and 2018 are $ 2495 and $ 220 respectively of tax benefits that if recognized would affect the effective tax rate .
the company records interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits in its provision for income taxes .
accrued interest and penalties are included within the related liability for unrecognized tax benefit line on the consolidated balance sheets .
during the years ended december 31 2019 and 2018 the company accrued interest of $ 114 and $ 0 respectively and recorded liabilities for interest and penalties of $ 252 and $ 0 respectively .
after taking into consideration tax attributes such as net operating loss carryforwards and interest the company ’ s unrecognized tax benefits represent a noncurrent reserve for uncertain tax positions of $ 864 and $ 220 as of december 31 2019 and 2018 respectively .
the u .
s .
internal revenue service completed exams on the company ' s u .
s .
federal income tax returns for years 2012 - 2015 .
with few exceptions the company is no longer subject to state and local income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2015 .
the company conducts business and files income tax returns in numerous states .
currently one of the company ' s state tax returns is under examination by a state as part of routine audits conducted in the ordinary course of business .
the future utilization of state net operating losses could potentially subject the company to state examinations prior to the otherwise applicable statute of limitation .
states vary in carryforward periods but generally extend up to 20 years or a period consistent with the federal limits under the tax cuts and jobs act .

Question: What is the change in Balance of unrecognized tax benefits as of January 1, from Years Ended December 31, 2018 to 2019?
Answer: -36014
March 31,
March 31,
2019
2018
Deferred tax assets:
Deferred income on shipments to distributors
$—
$39.1
Inventory valuation
45.0
10.7
Net operating loss carryforward
94.3
101.1
Capital loss carryforward
9.6
10.6
Share-based compensation
42.4
31.4
Income tax credits
376.5
178.4
Property, plant and equipment
23.6
25.7
Accrued expenses and other
91.4
91.2
Intangible assets
1,608.1
—
Other
12.6
—
Gross deferred tax assets
2,303.5
488.2
Valuation allowances
(332.1)
(204.5)
Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowances
1,971.4
283.7
Deferred tax liabilities:
Convertible debt
(279.3)
(304.4)
Intangible assets
(721.0)
(66.6)
Other
—
(18.3)
Deferred tax liabilities
(1,000.3)
(389.3)
Net deferred tax asset (liability)
$971.1
$(105.6)
Reported as:
Non-current deferred tax assets
$1,677.2
$100.2
Non-current deferred tax liability
(706.1)
(205.8)
Net deferred tax asset (liability)
$971.1
$(105.6)
the tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the company ' s deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are as follows -amounts in millions : .
in assessing whether it is more likely than not that deferred tax assets will be realized the company considers all available evidence both positive and negative including its recent cumulative earnings experience and expectations of future available taxable income of the appropriate character by taxing jurisdiction tax attribute carryback and carryforward periods available to them for tax reporting purposes and prudent and feasible tax planning strategies .

Question: What was the change in Net operating loss carryforward between 2018 and 2019?
Answer: -6.8
Years Ended
Years Ended
September 30, 2019
September 30, 2018
(Amounts in thousands)
(Amounts in thousands)
Cost of sales
$7
$5
Engineering and development
49
32
Selling, general and administrative
736
654
Total
$792
$691
the following table summarizes stock-based compensation expense in the company ’ s consolidated statements of operations : .
for the year ended september 30 2019 the company granted 33000 nonvested shares to certain key employees 55000 nonvested shares to certain officers including 35000 shares granted to the chief executive officer and 20000 nonvested shares to its non-employee directors .
for the year ended september 30 2018 the company granted 12000 nonvested shares to certain key employees 40000 nonvested shares to certain officers including 30000 to its chief executive officer and 20000 nonvested shares to its non-employee directors .
the company measures the fair value of nonvested stock awards based upon the market price of its common stock as of the date of grant .
the company used the black-scholes option-pricing model to value stock options .
the black-scholes model requires the use of a number of assumptions including volatility of the company ’ s stock price the weighted average risk-free interest rate and the weighted average expected life of the options at the time of grant .
the expected dividend yield is equal to the divided per share declared divided by the closing share price on the date the options were granted .
all equity compensation awards granted for the years ended september 30 2019 and september 30 2018 were nonvested stock awards .

Question: How does the company measure the value of the nonvested stock awards?
Answer: Based upon the market price of its common stock as of the date of grant.
2019
2018
2017
Balance at beginning of year
$112.2
$114.8
$136.7
Acquired balances
15.5
—
—
Additions for tax benefits related to the current year
9.4
7.4
23.6
Additions for tax benefits of prior years
8.0
2.8
4.7
Reductions for tax benefits of prior years
(0.2)
(1.9)
(1.6)
Lapse of statute
(8.2)
(10.9)
(16.3)
Settlements
(6.7)
—
(4.9)
Change in rate due to U.S. Tax Reform
—
—
(27.4)
Balance at end of year
$130.0
$112.2
$114.8
the activity for unrecognized gross tax benefits is as follows -in millions : .
included in the december 31 2019 balance of $ 130 .
0 million is $ 97 .
2 million related to unrecognized tax benefits that if recognized would impact the annual effective tax rate .
also included in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits as of december 31 2019 is $ 32 .
8 million of benefit that if recognized would result in adjustments to other tax accounts primarily deferred taxes .
although the company cannot predict the timing of resolution with taxing authorities if any the company believes it is reasonably possible that its unrecognized tax benefits will be reduced by $ 1 .
5 million in the next 12 months due to settlement with tax authorities or expiration of the applicable statute of limitations .
the company did not recognize any additional tax benefit or expense for interest and penalties during the year ended december 31 2019 .
the company recognized approximately $ 0 .
8 million of tax benefit and $ 1 .
5 million of tax expense for interest and penalties during the years ended december 31 2018 and 2017 respectively .
the company had approximately $ 5 .
1 million $ 5 .
1 million and $ 5 .
9 million of accrued interest and penalties at december 31 2019 2018 and 2017 respectively .
the company recognizes interest and penalties accrued in relation to unrecognized tax benefits in tax expense .
tax years prior to 2016 are generally not subject to examination by the irs except for items involving tax attributes that have been carried forward to tax years whose statute of limitations remains open .
the company is not currently under irs examination .
for state returns the company is generally not subject to income tax examinations for years prior to 2015 .
the company is also subject to routine examinations by various foreign tax jurisdictions in which it operates .
with respect to jurisdictions outside the united states the company ' s subsidiaries are generally no longer subject to income tax audits for years prior to 2009 .
the company is currently under audit in the following jurisdictions including but not limited to canada china the czech republic the philippines singapore and the united kingdom .

Question: How much was accrued interest and penalties at December 31, 2019?
Answer: $5.1 million
(In thousands)
2019
2018
Land
$4,575
$4,575
Building and land improvements
34,797
34,379
Building
68,157
68,183
Furniture and fixtures
19,959
19,831
Computer hardware and software
74,399
92,071
Engineering and other equipment
130,430
127,060
Total Property, Plant and Equipment
332,317
346,099
Less accumulated depreciation
(258,609)
(265,464)
Total Property, Plant and Equipment, net
$73,708
$80,635
note 8 – property plant and equipment .
as of december 31 2019 and 2018 property plant and equipment was comprised of the following : .
depreciation expense was $ 12 .
5 million $ 12 .
7 million and $ 12 .
8 million for the years ended december 31 2019 2018 and 2017 respectively which is recorded in cost of sales selling general and administrative expense and research and development expense in the consolidated statements of income .
we assess long-lived assets used in operations for potential impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by the asset are less than the asset ’ s carrying value .
during the year ended december 31 2019 the company recognized impairment charges of $ 3 .
9 million related to the abandonment of certain information technology projects in which we had previously capitalized expenses related to these projects .
the impairment charges were determined based on actual costs incurred as part of the projects .
no impairment charges were recognized during the years ended december 31 2018 and 2017 .

Question: What was the change in engineering and other equipment between 2018 and 2019?
Answer: 3370
Employee Severance and Benefit Costs
Lease Costs
Asset Write-off Costs
Other Related Costs
Total
Balance as of August 31, 2017
$ 33,580
$1,665
$ —
$ 3,143
$38,388
Restructuring related charges
16,269
1,596
16,264
2,773
36,902
Asset write-off charge and other non-cash activity
(127)
525
(16,264)
25
(15,841)
Cash payments
(31,591)
(1,102)
—
(5,419)
(38,112)
Balance as of August 31, 2018
18,131
2,684
—
522
21,337
Restructuring related charges
16,029
(41)
(3,566)
2,071
14,493
Asset write-off charge and other non-cash activity
(494)
—
3,566
(18)
3,054
Cash payments
(30,504)
(663)
—
(1,786)
(32,953)
Balance as of August 31, 2019
$3,162
$1,980
$—
$789
$5,931
2017 restructuring plan .
on september 15 2016 the company ’ s board of directors formally approved a restructuring plan to better align the company ’ s global capacity and administrative support infrastructure to further optimize organizational effectiveness .
this action includes headcount reductions across the company ’ s selling general and administrative cost base and capacity realignment in higher cost locations -the “ 2017 restructuring plan ” .
the 2017 restructuring plan totaling $ 195 .
0 million in restructuring and other related costs is complete as of august 31 2019 .
the tables below summarize the company ’ s liability activity primarily associated with the 2017 restructuring plan -in thousands : .

Question: Why did the Company's Board of Directors formally approve a restructuring plan on September 15, 2016?
Answer: to better align the Company’s global capacity and administrative support infrastructure to further optimize organizational effectiveness
USDm
2019
2018
2017
Borrowings
863.4
754.7
753.9
Loans receivables
-4.6
-
-
Cash and cash equivalents, including restricted cash
-72.5
-127.4
-134.2
Net interest-bearing debt
786.3
627.3
619.7
alternative performance measures .
net interest-bearing debt : .
net interest-bearing debt is defined as borrowings -current and noncurrent less loans receivables and cash and cash equivalents including restricted cash .
net interest-bearing debt depicts the net capital resources which cause net interest expenditure and interest rate risk and which together with equity are used to finance the company ’ s investments .
as such torm believes that net interest-bearing debt is a relevant measure which management uses to measure the overall development of the use of financing other than equity .
such measure may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies .
net interest-bearing debt is calculated as follows : .

Question: What does TORM believe net interest-bearing debt to be?
Answer: a relevant measure which Management uses to measure the overall development of the use of financing, other than equity
2019
2018
2017
Numerator:
Net income (loss)
$20,732
$(26,743)
$18,072
Net income (loss) per share:
Basic
$0.25
$(0.34)
$0.24
Diluted
$0.25
$(0.34)
$0.24
Denominator:
Weighted average shares used in computing net income (loss) per share:
Basic
81,447,998
77,709,592
73,994,577
Weighted average effect of diluted stock options
229,035
—
544,520
Weighted average effect of diluted stock awards
1,004,181
—
789,246
Diluted
82,681,214
77,709,592
75,328,343
5 .
net income -loss per share .
the company calculates basic earnings per share by dividing the net income -loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period .
the diluted earnings per share is computed by giving effect to all potential dilutive common stock equivalents outstanding for the period using the treasury stock method .
for purposes of this calculation options to purchase common stock stock awards and the convertible senior notes are considered to be common stock equivalents .
since the company has the intent and ability to settle the principal amount of the convertible senior notes in cash and any excess in shares of the company ’ s common stock the company uses the treasury stock method for calculating any potential dilutive effect of the conversion spread on diluted net income per share if applicable .
the conversion spread will have a dilutive impact on net income -loss per share of common stock when the average market price of the company ’ s common stock for a given period exceeds the conversion price of $ 113 .
75 per share for the convertible senior notes .
during the fiscal years ended july 31 2019 and 2018 the company ’ s weighted average common stock price was below the conversion price of the convertible senior notes .
the following table sets forth the computation of the company ’ s basic and diluted net income per share for the years endedj uly 31 2019 2018 and 2017 -in thousands except share and per share amounts : .

Question: How is the basic earnings per share calculated?
Answer: by dividing the net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period.
Payments Due by Year Ending December 31, 2020
Payments Due by Year Ending December 31, 2020
Payments Due by Year Ending December 31, 2020
Payments Due by Year Ending December 31, 2020
Payments Due by Year Ending December 31, 2020
Payments Due by Year Ending December 31, 2020
(In thousands)
Total
Year 1 (1)
Years 2 & 3
Years 4 & 5
Beyond 5 Years
Operating leases, including imputed interest
12,807
3,519
5,102
4,186
—
Finance leases, including imputed interest (1)
2,165
1,423
736
6
—
Total contractual obligations
$ 14,972
$ 4,942
$ 5,838
$ 4,192
$ —
contractual obligations and contingent liabilities and commitments .
our principal commitments consist primarily of obligations under operating and financing leases which include among others certain leases of our offices colocations and servers as well as contractual commitment related network infrastructure and data center operations .
the following table summarizes our commitments to settle contractual obligations in cash as of december 31 2019 : .
-1 finance leases are related to servers and network infrastructure and our data center operations .
as of december 31 2019 we had severance agreements with certain employees which would require us to pay up to approximately $ 6 .
4 million if all such employees were terminated from employment with our company following a triggering event -e .
g .
change of control as defined in the severance agreements .

Question: How much would the company have to pay up to as defined in the severance agreements as of December 31, 2019 following a triggering event in the company?
Answer: approximately $6.4 million