FangyuLei/tatqa huggingface dataset:
Three Months Ended
Three Months Ended
Three Months Ended
December 31, 2019
September 29, 2019
December 31, 2018
(Unaudited, in millions)
(Unaudited, in millions)
(Unaudited, in millions)
Income tax expense
$(62)
$(28)
$(28)
during the fourth and third quarters of 2019 and the fourth quarter of 2018 we recorded an income tax expense of $ 62 million $ 28 million and $ 28 million respectively reflecting -i in the third quarter of 2019 the estimated annual effective tax rate in each of our jurisdictions applied to the consolidated results before taxes in the third quarter of 2019 and -ii in both fourth quarters the actual tax charges and benefits in each jurisdiction as well as the true-up of tax provisions based upon the most updated visibility on open tax matters in several jurisdictions .
and -ii in both fourth quarters the actual tax charges and benefits in each jurisdiction as well as the true-up of tax provisions based upon the most updated visibility on open tax matters in several jurisdictions .
and -ii in both fourth quarters the actual tax charges and benefits in each jurisdiction as well as the true-up of tax provisions based upon the most updated visibility on open tax matters in several jurisdictions .
income tax expense .

Question: What is the increase/ (decrease) in Income tax expense from the period December 31, 2018 to 2019?
Answer: 34
$ million
2019
2018
Product development
96.5
96.9
Selling and marketing
129.2
123.9
Administration1
50.0
46.6
Adjusted operating costs1
275.7
267.4
Networks & Security
158.4
148.9
Lifecycle Service Assurance
70.5
70.5
Connected Devices
38.2
40.8
Corporate
8.6
7.2
Adjusted operating costs1
275.7
267.4
operating costs .
total group adjusted operating costs were up $ 8 .
3 million or 3 .
1 per cent in 2019 compared to last year broadly in line with inflation .
the emphasis remained on effective resource allocation and careful cost management .
the overall investment in product development was maintained with continuing focus on high-growth high-margin areas .
investment in the sales and marketing organisation was targeted on expanding our key account management programme to drive incremental business with our most valuable customers and developing routes to market for our new technologies to a broadening customer base .
administration costs in 2019 reflected an inflationary increase and higher corporate costs primarily due to ceo transition .
segmentally investment continued in networks & security where we see the most near-term opportunities for growth particularly in relation to 400g high-speed ethernet and our positioning business .
a new general manager joined lifecycle service assurance in october and a review is in progress to evolve the business and optimise the organisational structure to expand the customer base and deliver on our growth agenda .
proactive cost management has once again been demonstrated within connected devices where we have seen a decrease in legacy product revenue year-on-year .
as stated above corporate costs in 2019 included costs associated with ceo transition .
note .
1 .
before exceptional items acquisition related costs acquired intangible asset amortisation and share-based payment amounting to $ 4 .
3 million in total -2018 $ 19 .
6 million .

Question: What was the change in costs under Corporate?
Answer: 1.4
CHAIR
MEMBER
F19 FEE
F20 FEE
F19 FEE
F20 FEE
BOARD AND COMMITTEE FEES ($)
INCL. SUPER
INCL. SUPER
INCL. SUPER
INCL. SUPER
Board
$790,531
$790,531
$254,990
$254,990
Audit, Risk Management and Compliance Committee
$65,000
$65,000
$32,500
$32,500
People Performance Committee
$54,525
$65,000
$27,265
$32,500
Sustainability Committee
$45,000
$65,000
$22,500
$32,500
Nomination Committee
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
non ‐ executive director fees are paid from an aggregate annual fee pool of $ 4000000 as approved by shareholders at the agm on 18 november 2010 .
total board and committee fees paid during f19 were $ 2859903 -refer to section 5 .
1 .
non ‐ executive directors do not receive variable pay and no directors ’ fees are paid to executive directors .
in recognition of the equal importance and workload of all of the board ’ s committees the board reviewed non ‐ executive director fees and determined to increase chair and member fees for the people performance committee and sustainability committee as detailed in the table below effective 1 july 2019 .
the table below provides a summary of f19 and f20 board and committee fees : .

Question: What is the value of the aggregate annual fee pool used to pay non-executive Director fees?
Answer: $4,000,000
DRAM
NAND
(percentage change in average selling prices)
2019 from 2018
(30)%
(44)%
2018 from 2017
37%
(8)%
2017 from 2016
19%
(7)%
2016 from 2015
(35)%
(19)%
2015 from 2014
(11)%
(15)%
volatility in average selling prices for our semiconductor memory and storage products may adversely affect our business .
we have experienced significant volatility in our average selling prices including dramatic declines as noted in the table below and may continue to experience such volatility in the future .
in some prior periods average selling prices for our products have been below our manufacturing costs and we may experience such circumstances in the future .
average selling prices for our products that decline faster than our costs could have a material adverse effect on our business results of operations or financial condition .

Question: What is the percentage change in average selling price of DRAM from 2016 to 2017?
Answer: 19%
($ in millions)
($ in millions)
($ in millions)
($ in millions)
($ in millions)
For the year ended December 31:
2019
2018
Yr.-to-Yr. Percent Change **
Yr.-to-Yr. Percent Change Adjusted for Currency **
Cloud & Cognitive Software external revenue
$23,200
$22,209
4.5%
6.2%
Cognitive Applications
$ 5,765
$ 5,633
2.3%
3.9%
Cloud & Data Platforms
9,499
8,603
10.4
12.3
Transaction Processing Platforms
7,936
7,974
(0.5)
1.4
cloud & cognitive software .
* recast to reflect segment changes .
* * 2019 results were impacted by red hat purchase accounting .
cloud & cognitive software revenue of $ 23200 million increased 4 .
5 percent as reported -6 percent adjusted for currency in 2019 compared to the prior year .
there was strong growth in cloud & data platforms as reported and at constant currency driven primarily by the acquisition of red hat in the third quarter of 2019 .
red hat had continued strong performance since the acquisition in red hat enterprise linux -rhel application development and emerging technologies led by openshift and ansible .
red hat and ibm are driving synergies with strong adoption of cloud paks since their introduction expansion of our combined client base and more than 2000 clients using our hybrid cloud platform .
cognitive applications also grew as reported and at constant currency .
transaction processing platforms declined year to year as reported but grew 1 percent adjusted for currency driven by strong fourth-quarter performance .
cognitive applications revenue of $ 5765 million grew 2 .
3 percent as reported -4 percent adjusted for currency compared to the prior year driven by double-digit growth as reported and adjusted for currency in security and growth in industry verticals such as iot .
the security performance included continued strong results in threat management software and services offerings .
within iot we had good revenue performance across the portfolio as we continued to invest in new offerings and industry-specific solutions .
cloud & data platforms revenue of $ 9499 million increased 10 .
4 percent as reported -12 percent adjusted for currency compared to the prior year .
performance was driven by the addition of rhel and openshift and the continued execution of the combined red hat and ibm hybrid strategy .
transaction processing platforms revenue of $ 7936 million decreased 0 .
5 percent as reported but grew 1 percent adjusted for currency in 2019 compared to the prior year .
revenue performance reflects the ongoing investment in ibm platforms and the timing of larger transactions that are tied to client business volumes and buying cycles .
within cloud & cognitive software cloud revenue of $ 4 .
2 billion grew 40 percent as reported and 42 percent adjusted for currency year to year reflecting the acquisition of red hat and client adoption of our hybrid cloud offerings .

Question: What is the average of Cloud & Data Platforms in 2019 and 2018?
Answer: 9051
Fiscal Years
Fiscal Years
Fiscal Years
2019
2018
2017
Revenue by product line (1) :
New products
$3,123
$5,735
$5,853
Mature products
7,187
6,894
6,296
Total revenue
$10,310
$12,629
$12,149
note 14-information concerning product lines geographic information accounts receivable and revenue concentration .
the company identifies its business segments based on business activities management responsibility and geographic location .
for all periods presented the company operated in a single reportable business segment .
the following is a breakdown of revenue by product family -in thousands : .
-1 new products include all products manufactured on 180 nanometer or smaller semiconductor processes efpga ip license quickai and sensiml ai software as a service -saas revenues .
mature products include all products produced on semiconductor processes larger than 180 nanometer .

Question: What is the total revenue from new products in 2018 and 2019?
Answer: 8858
Years Ended September 30,
Years Ended September 30,
Years Ended September 30,
2019
2018
2017
Weighted average shares - basic
30,495
27,229
27,106
Effect of dilutive securities
111
122
—
Weighted average shares - diluted
30,606
27,351
27,106
Number of anti-dilutive securities
—
—
967
net income -loss per share : basic net income -loss per share -eps is computed by dividing the net income -loss attributable to cubic for the period by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period including vested rsus .
in periods with a net income from continuing operations attributable to cubic diluted eps is computed by dividing the net income for the period by the weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding during the period .
common equivalent shares consist of dilutive rsus .
dilutive rsus are calculated based on the average share price for each fiscal period using the treasury stock method .
for rsus with performance-based vesting no common equivalent shares are included in the computation of diluted eps until the related performance criteria have been met .
for rsus with performance and market-based vesting no common equivalent shares are included in the computation of diluted eps until the performance criteria have been met and once the criteria are met the dilutive restricted stock units are calculated using the treasury stock method modified by the multiplier that is calculated at the end of the accounting period as if the vesting date was at the end of the accounting period .
the multiplier on rsus with performance and market-based vesting is further described in note 16 .
in periods with a net loss from continuing operations attributable to cubic common equivalent shares are not included in the computation of diluted eps because to do so would be anti-dilutive .
the weighted-average number of shares outstanding used to compute net income -loss per common share were as follows -in thousands : .

Question: For which years was the weighted-average number of shares outstanding used to compute net income (loss) per common share recorded?
Answer: 2019 2018 2017
Financial year
Amount of unclaimed dividend transferred (` lakh)
Number of shares transferred
2011
102.6*
3,028
2012
86.5
29,672
TOTAL
189.1
32,000
xvii .
transfer of unclaimed / unpaid amounts to the investor education and protection fund : .
pursuant to sections 124 and 125 of the act read with the investor education and protection fund authority -accounting audit transfer and refund rules 2016 - “ iepf rules ” dividend if not claimed for a consecutive period of 7 years from the date of transfer to unpaid dividend account of the company are liable to be transferred to the investor education and protection fund - “ iepf ” .
further all the shares in respect of which dividend has remained unclaimed for seven consecutive years or more from the date of transfer to unpaid dividend account shall also be transferred to iepf authority .
the said requirement does not apply to shares in respect of which there is a specific order of court tribunal or statutory authority restraining any transfer of the shares .
in the interest of the shareholders the company sends periodical reminders to the shareholders to claim their dividends in order to avoid transfer of dividends / shares to iepf authority .
notices in this regard are also published in the newspapers and the details of unclaimed dividends and shareholders whose shares are liable to be transferred to the iepf authority are uploaded on the company ’ s website -https : / / www .
tcs .
com / detailsunclaimed- dividend-transfer-iepf-account-2017 .
in light of the aforesaid provisions the company has during the year under review transferred to iepf the unclaimed dividends outstanding for 7 consecutive years of the company erstwhile tcs e-serve limited and cmc limited -since amalgamated with the company .
further shares of the company in respect of which dividend has not been claimed for 7 consecutive years or more from the date of transfer to unpaid dividend account have also been transferred to the demat account of iepf authority .
the details of unclaimed dividends and shares transferred to iepf during fy 2019 are as follows : .
* includes final dividend of erstwhile tcs e-serve limited and erstwhile cmc limited .
the members who have a claim on above dividends and shares may claim the same from iepf authority by submitting an online application in the prescribed form no .
iepf-5 available on the website www .
iepf .
gov .
in and sending a physical copy of the same duly signed to the company along with requisite documents enumerated in the form no .
iepf-5 .
no claims shall lie against the company in respect of the dividend / shares so transferred .
the members / claimants can file only one consolidated claim in a financial year as per the iepf rules .

Question: What is the increase in number of shares transferred to IEPF from 2011 to 2012?
Answer: 26644
Year Ended December 31, 2019
Year Ended December 31, 2018
Year Ended December 31, 2017
Weighted average common shares—basic
45,542,315
45,280,161
44,855,263
Dilutive effect of stock options
32,222
33,134
31,534
Dilutive effect of restricted stock
505,858
467,659
297,406
46,080,395
45,780,954
45,184,203
1 .
description of the business and summary of significant accounting policies : -continued .
shares of restricted stock are included in the computation of basic eps as they vest and are included in diluted eps to the extent they are dilutive determined using the treasury stock method .
the following details the determination of the diluted weighted average shares : .

Question: What is the average number of basic weighted average common shares in 2018 and 2019?
Answer: 45411238
Fees (in thousands of U.S. dollars)
2019
2018
Audit Fees (1)
2,723
2,529
Audit-Related Fees (2)
33
59
Tax Fees (3)
23
32
Total
2,779
2,620
item 16c .
principal accountant fees and services .
our principal accountant for 2019 and 2018 was kpmg llp chartered professional accountants .
the following table shows the fees teekay and our subsidiaries paid or accrued for audit and other services provided by kpmg llp for 2019 and 2018 .
-1 audit fees represent fees for professional services provided in connection with the audits of our consolidated financial statements and effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting reviews of our quarterly consolidated financial statements and audit services provided in connection with other statutory or regulatory filings for teekay or our subsidiaries including professional services in connection with the review of our regulatory filings for public offerings of our subsidiaries .
audit fees for 2019 and 2018 include approximately $ 928300 and $ 859000 respectively of fees paid to kpmg llp by teekay lng that were approved by the audit committee of the board of directors of the general partner of teekay lng .
audit fees for 2019 and 2018 include approximately $ 588200 and $ 517000 respectively of fees paid to kpmg llp by our subsidiary teekay tankers that were approved by the audit committee of the board of directors of teekay tankers .
-2 audit-related fees consisted primarily of accounting consultations employee benefit plan audits services related to business acquisitions divestitures and other attestation services .
-3 for 2019 and 2018 tax fees principally included corporate tax compliance fees .
the audit committee has the authority to pre-approve audit-related and non-audit services not prohibited by law to be performed by our independent auditors and associated fees .
engagements for proposed services either may be separately pre-approved by the audit committee or entered into pursuant to detailed pre-approval policies and procedures established by the audit committee as long as the audit committee is informed on a timely basis of any engagement entered into on that basis .
the audit committee separately pre-approved all engagements and fees paid to our principal accountants in 2019 and 2018 .

Question: What fees was paid to KPMG LLP by Teekay LNG during 2019 and 2018?
Answer: $928,300 $859,000
2018
2019
As per January 1:
Issued shares
62,297,394
56,297,394
Treasury shares
6,157,241
6,978,496
Outstanding shares
56,140,153
49,318,898
Changes during the year:
Cancellation of treasury shares
6,000,000
5,000,000
Share buybacks
7,242,734
950,902
Treasury shares used for share based performance programs
421,479
498,224
As per December 31:
Issued shares
56,297,394
51,297,394
Treasury shares
6,978,496
2,431,174
Outstanding shares
49,318,898
48,866,220
share information .
on december 31 2019 the total number of issued common shares of asmi amounted to 51297394 compared to 56297394 at year-end 2018 .
the decrease was the result of the cancellation of 5 million treasury shares that was approved by the annual general meeting of shareholders -agm on may 20 2019 and became effective on july 23 2019 .
on december 31 2019 we had 48866220 outstanding common shares excluding 2431174 treasury shares .
this compared to 49318898 outstanding common shares and 6978496 treasury shares at year-end 2018 .
besides the cancellation of 5 million treasury shares in july 2019 the change in the number of treasury shares in 2019 was the result of approximately 951000 repurchased shares and approximately 498000 treasury shares that were used as part of share based payments .
on december 31 2019 48583340 of the outstanding common shares were registered with our transfer agent in the netherlands abn amro bank nv ; and 282880 were registered with our transfer agent in the united states citibank na new york .
on february 25 2020 asmi announced that it will propose to the agm 2020 the cancellation of 1 .
5 million treasury shares as the number of 2 .
4 million treasury shares held at that date was more than sufficient to cover our outstanding options and restricted / performance shares .

Question: Where are the outstanding common shares registered with in 2019?
Answer: Netherlands, ABN AMRO Bank NV United States, Citibank, NA, New York
2019
(Restated) 2018
£m
£m
Total segment Revenue
355.1
330.1
Total segment Operating profit
243.7
221.3
Finance costs – net
(10.2)
(10.6)
Profit on the sale of subsidiary
8.7
–
Profit before tax
242.2
210.7
4 .
segmental information .
ifrs 8 ‘ operating segments ’ requires the group to determine its operating segments based on information which is provided internally .
based on the internal reporting information and management structures within the group it has been determined that there is only one operating segment being the group as the information reported includes operating results at a consolidated group level only .
this reflects the nature of the business where the major cost is to support the it platforms upon which all of the group ’ s customers are serviced .
these costs are borne centrally and are not attributable to any specific customer type or revenue stream .
there is also considered to be only one reporting segment which is the group the results of which are shown in the consolidated income statement .
management has determined that there is one operating and reporting segment based on the reports reviewed by the operational leadership team - ‘ olt ’ which is the chief operating decision-maker - ‘ codm ’ .
the olt is made up of the executive directors and key management and is responsible for the strategic decision-making of the group .
the olt primarily uses the statutory measures of revenue and operating profit to assess the performance of the one operating segment .
to assist in the analysis of the group ’ s revenue-generating trends the olt reviews revenue at a disaggregated level as detailed within note 5 .
the revenue from external parties reported to the olt is measured in a manner consistent with that in the income statement .
a reconciliation of the one segment ’ s operating profit to profit before tax is shown below .
following the application of ifrs 16 profit before tax for the year ended 31 march 2018 has been restated -note 2 .

Question: What are the components in the table which are considered when reconciliating total segment revenue to profit before tax?
Answer: Total segment Operating profit Finance costs – net Profit on the sale of subsidiary
(dollars in millions)
(dollars in millions)
Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
Net cash provided by operating activities
$ 35,746
$ 34,339
Less Capital expenditures (including capitalized software)
17,939
16,658
Free cash flow
$ 17,807
$ 17,681
free cash flow .
free cash flow is a non-gaap financial measure that reflects an additional way of viewing our liquidity that when viewed with our gaap results provides a more complete understanding of factors and trends affecting our cash flows .
free cash flow is calculated by subtracting capital expenditures from net cash provided by operating activities .
we believe it is a more conservative measure of cash flow since purchases of fixed assets are necessary for ongoing operations .
free cash flow has limitations due to the fact that it does not represent the residual cash flow available for discretionary expenditures .
for example free cash flow does not incorporate payments made on finance lease obligations or cash payments for business acquisitions or wireless licenses .
therefore we believe it is important to view free cash flow as a complement to our entire consolidated statements of cash flows .
the following table reconciles net cash provided by operating activities to free cash flow : .
the increase in free cash flow during 2019 is a reflection of the increase in operating cash flows partially offset by the increase in capital expenditures discussed above .

Question: How is free cash flow calculated?
Answer: by subtracting capital expenditures from net cash provided by operating activities. We believe it is a more conservative measure of cash flow since purchases of fixed assets are necessary for ongoing operations.