FangyuLei/tatqa huggingface dataset:
2015 Grant
2016 Grant
2017 Grant
2018 Grant
2019 Grant
Grant date
11th June
5th April
26th May
4th April
15th May
Mid market share price at grant date
3,460.0p
3,550.0p
5,256.0p
5,560.0p
8,161.0p
Number of employees
15
13
12
12
12
Shares under scheme
70,290
69,890
62,356
60,899
60,626
Vesting period
3 years
3 years
3 years
3 years
3 years
Probability of vesting
71.5%
70.8%
73.1%
73.5%
74.1%
Fair value
2,473.9p
2,513.4p
3,842.1p
4,084.4p
6,048.9p
performance share plan .
the relevant disclosures in respect of the performance share plan grants are set out below .

Question: What was the number of employees under the 2015 Grant?
Answer: 15
Acquisitions 2017–2019
Acquisitions 2017–2019
Acquisitions 2017–2019
Acquisitions 2017–2019
2019
2019
2018
2017
Total consideration, including cash
1,957
1,314
62
Net assets acquired
Cash and cash equivalents
142
94
–
Property, plant and equipment
353
4
12
Intangible assets
497
481
101
Investments in associates
101
64
–
Other assets
1,357
254
1
Provisions, incl. post-employment benefits
–102
–
–
Other liabilities
–743
–494
25
Total identifiable net assets
1,605
403
139
Costs recognized in net income
153
–
–
Goodwill
199
911
–77
Total
1,957
1,314
62
Acquisition-related costs 1)
85
24
49
acquisitions and divestments acquisitions .
in 2019 ericsson made acquisitions with a negative cash flow effect amounting to sek 1815 -1220 million .
the acquisitions presented below are not material but the company gives the information to provide the reader a summarized view of the content of the acquisitions made .
the acquisitions consist primarily of : .
kathrein : on october 2 2019 the company acquired assets from kathrein a world leading provider of antenna and filter technologies with approximately 4000 employees .
kathrein ’ s antenna and filters business has a strong r & d organization with extensive experience in antenna design and research coupled with a strong ipr portfolio .
in addition to broadening ericsson ’ s portfolio of antenna and filter products the acquisition will bring vital competence for the evolution of advanced radio network products .
the acquired kathrein business has had a negative impact of sek – 0 .
5 billion since the acquisition corresponding to – 1 percentage point in networks operating margin .
balances to facilitate the purchase price allocation are preliminary .
csf : on august 20 2019 the company acquired 100 % of the shares in csf holdings inc .
a us-based technology company with approximately 25 employees .
csf strengthens iconectiv ’ s business to consumer -b2c product platforms to enable growth in messaging and toll-free number -tfn management .
balances to facilitate the purchase price allocation are final .
st-ericsson : before st-ericsson was a joint venture where ericsson and st microelectronics had a 50 / 50 ownership .
this joint venture consisted of a number of legal entities where the two parties owned different stakes in the different legal entities .
in december 2019 the company initiated transactions to wind-down the legal structure of st-ericsson by acquiring the remaining shares in two legal st-ericsson entities and costs of sek – 0 .
3 billion impacted the result .
the company now owns 100 % of the shares in those entities .
in order to finalize a purchase price allocation all relevant information needs to be in place .
examples of such information are final consideration and final opening balances they may remain preliminary for a period of time due to for example adjustments of working capital tax items or decisions from local authorities .
1 acquisition-related costs are included in selling and administrative expenses in the consolidated income statement .

Question: What is the total acquisition-related costs from 2017 to 2019?
Answer: 158
2019
2019
2018
2018
Capital additions
Depreciation, amortisation and impairment
Capital additions
Depreciation and amortisation
£m
£m
£m
£m
Steam Specialties
57.7
35.8
27.9
30.1
Electric Thermal Solutions
81.6
18.4
6.0
13.6
Watson-Marlow
40.6
22.4
18.6
14.4
Group total
179.9
76.6
52.5
58.1
3 segmental reporting continued .
capital additions depreciation amortisation and impairment .
capital additions include property plant and equipment of £ 59 .
0m -2018 : £ 33 .
5m of which £ 8 .
1m -2018 : £ 0 .
2m was from acquisitions in the period and other intangible assets of £ 72 .
0m -2018 : £ 19 .
0m of which £ 60 .
2m -2018 : £ 9 .
1m relates to acquired intangibles from acquisitions in the period .
right-of-use asset additions of £ 48 .
9m occurred during the 12 month period to 31st december 2019 of which £ 36 .
1m relates to additions on 1st january 2019 as a result of transition to ifrs 16 £ 11 .
7m relates to new leases entered into in 2019 and £ 1 .
1m from acquisitions .
capital additions split between the uk and rest of the world are uk £ 36 .
8m -2018 : £ 20 .
1m and rest of the world £ 143 .
1m -2018 : £ 32 .
4m .

Question: What does capital additions include?
Answer: property, plant and equipment of £59.0m (2018: £33.5m), of which £8.1m (2018: £0.2m) was from acquisitions in the period, and other intangible assets of £72.0m (2018: £19.0m) of which £60.2m (2018: £9.1m) relates to acquired intangibles from acquisitions in the period
Years ended August 31,
2019 (1)
2018 (2)
Change
Change in constant currency (3)
Foreign exchange impact (3)
(in thousands of dollars, except percentages)
$
$
%
%
$
Revenue
2,331,820
2,147,404
8.6
6.8
37,433
Operating Expenses
1,203,980
1,121,625
7.3
5.4
21,636
Management fees – Cogeco Inc.
19,900
18,961
5.0
5.0
-
Adjusted EBITDA
1,107,940
1,006,818
10.0
8.5
15,797
Adjusted EBITDA margin
47.5%
46.9%
3 .
1 operating results .
-1 fiscal 2019 average foreign exchange rate used for translation was 1 .
3255 usd / cdn .
-2 fiscal 2018 was restated to comply with ifrs 15 and to reflect a change in accounting policy as well as to reclassify results from cogeco peer 1 as discontinued operations .
for further details please consult the " accounting policies " and " discontinued operations " sections .
-3 fiscal 2019 actuals are translated at the average foreign exchange rate of fiscal 2018 which was 1 .
2773 usd / cdn .

Question: What was the adjusted EBITDA margin in 2019?
Answer: 47.5%
2019
2018
2017
Currently payable:
Federal
$1,995
$1,163
$5,617
State
557
114
1,022
Foreign
13,448
107,487
116,022
16,000
108,764
122,661
Deferred and other:
Federal
(407)
26,334
1,413
State
516
(489)
(153)
Foreign
(9,886)
(20,414)
(30,510)
(9,777)
5,431
(29,250)
Provision for income taxes
$6,223
$114,195
$93,411
16 .
income taxes .
the provision for -benefit from income taxes on income from continuing operations before income taxes consists of the following -in thousands : .

Question: In which years was provision for income taxes calculated?
Answer: 2019 2018 2017
Strategic objective
Strategic objective weighting
Key performance indicator
Key performance indicator weighting
Score = 50%
Score = 100%
Score = 200%
Growth*,**
60%
Sales volume growth
10%
40,0%
100,0%
140,0%
Absolute gross margin
10%
96,8%
100,0%
103,6%
PBIT
40%
98,6%
100,0%
103,6%
Efficiency*,**
10%
Cost savings initiatives
5%
98,6%
100,0%
123,4%
Net working capital
5%
101,2%
100,0%
97,7%
Reduction in execution-related marketplace incidents year-on-year by
People and sustainability*
30%
Quality
10%
10%
15%
20%
Safety (LTIFR)
10%
120,0%
100,0%
80,0%
BBBEE score
10%
Level 7 (60 to 61)
Level 7 (61.1 to 65)
Level 6
group and business unit performance factors .
the underlying values and weightings for each kpi are set and approved by the remuneration committee in advance of each year to determine parameters for the sti in the form of a balanced scorecard .
below is the group sti scorecard for fy19 that applied to the ceo cfo executive directors prescribed officers and other participants : .
* the actual targets have not been provided as they are linked to budget and considered commercially sensitive information .
* * for the key performance indicators within the growth and efficiency strategic objectives the targeted percentages for “ threshold ” “ on-target ” and “ stretch ” as set out above per key performance indicator represent the targeted percentage achievement of the underlying budgeted amounts .

Question: Which key performance indicator accounts for two thirds in Growth?
Answer: PBIT
2019 %
2018 %
2017 %
Weighted average actuarial assumptions used at 31 March1:
Rate of inflation2
2.9
2.9
3.0
Rate of increase in salaries
2.7
2.7
2.6
Discount rate
2.3
2.5
2.6
actuarial assumptions .
the group ’ s scheme liabilities are measured using the projected unit credit method using the principal actuarial assumptions set out below : .
notes : 1 figures shown represent a weighted average assumption of the individual schemes .
2 the rate of increases in pensions in payment and deferred revaluation are dependent on the rate of inflation .

Question: What is the 2019 average rate of inflation?
Answer: 2.9
Year Ended December 31
Year Ended December 31
Year Ended December 31
Year Ended December 31
Year Ended December 31
2019
% Change
2018
% Change
2017
(In thousands, except percentage data)
(In thousands, except percentage data)
(In thousands, except percentage data)
(In thousands, except percentage data)
(In thousands, except percentage data)
Cost of revenue
$704,535
(1.8)%
$717,118
(2.0)%
$731,453
Gross margin percentage
29.5%
32.3%
29.6%
2019 vs 2018 .
cost of revenue decreased for the year ended december 31 2019 compared to the prior year primarily due to net revenue declining .
gross margin decreased for the year ended december 31 2019 compared to the prior year .
gross margin was negatively impacted by the imposition of section 301 tariffs originally announced in late 2018 and cost inefficiencies experienced in our new manufacturing locations outside of china an increase in channel promotional activities relative to revenue as well as foreign exchange headwinds due to the strengthening of the u .
s .
dollar .
2018 vs 2017 .
cost of revenue decreased for the year ended december 31 2018 primarily due to improved product margin performance lower proportionate provisions for warranty expense and lower air freight costs compared to the prior year .
gross margin increased for the year ended december 31 2018 compared to the prior year primarily due to improved product margin performance lower proportionate provisions for sales returns and warranty expense favorable foreign exchange rate movements and lower air freight costs compared to the prior year .
for fiscal 2020 we expect gross margins to improve from fiscal 2019 primarily as our u .
s .
bound inventory will primarily not be subject to section 301 tariffs in fiscal 2020 .
forecasting gross margin percentages is difficult and there are a number of risks related to our ability to maintain or improve our current gross margin levels .
our cost of revenue as a percentage of net revenue can vary significantly based upon factors such as : uncertainties surrounding revenue levels including future pricing and / or potential discounts as a result of the economy or in response to the strengthening of the u .
s .
dollar in our international markets and related production level variances ; import customs duties and imposed tariffs ; competition ; changes in technology ; changes in product mix ; variability of stockbased compensation costs ; royalties to third parties ; fluctuations in freight and repair costs ; manufacturing and purchase price variances ; changes in prices on commodity components ; warranty costs ; and the timing of sales particularly to service provider customers .
we expect that revenue derived from paid subscription service plans will increase in the future which may have a positive impact on our gross margin .
from time to time however we may experience fluctuations in our gross margin as a result of the factors discussed above .

Question: What was the percentage change in cost of revenue from 2017 to 2019?
Answer: -3.68
December 31, 2019
December 31, 2018
Level
Carrying Value
Fair Value
Carrying Value
Fair Value
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents(1)
1
$195,760
$195,760
$303,390
$303,390
Loan receivables held for sale, net(2)
2
51,926
55,958
2,876
3,552
Servicing assets(3)
3
30,459
30,459
—
—
Liabilities:
Finance charge reversal liability(3)
3
$206,035
$206,035
$138,589
$138,589
Term loan(1)
2
384,497
392,201
386,822
386,234
Interest rate swap(3)
2
2,763
2,763
—
—
Servicing liabilities(3)
3
3,796
3,796
3,016
3,016
greensky inc .
notes to consolidated financial statements — -continued -united states dollars in thousands except per share data unless otherwise stated .
note 3 .
fair value of assets and liabilities .
the following table summarizes by level within the fair value hierarchy the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of our assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring or nonrecurring basis or disclosed but not carried at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets as of the dates presented .
there were no transfers into out of or between levels within the fair value hierarchy during any of the periods presented .
refer to note 4 note 7 note 8 and note 9 for additional information on these assets and liabilities .
-1 disclosed but not carried at fair value .
-2 measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis .
-3 measured and carried at fair value on a recurring basis .

Question: What was the fair value of the interest rate swap in 2019?
Answer: 2,763
2019
2018
$’000
$’000
Current employee benefits1
13,859
12,710
Non-current employee benefits2
189
675
Total employee benefits liability
14,048
13,385
section d : people .
this section provides information about our employee benefit obligations including annual leave long service leave and post-employment benefits .
it also includes details about our share plans and the compensation paid to key management personnel .
15 .
employee benefits .
1 .
included within current provisions in the statement of financial position .
2 .
included within non-current provisions in the statement of financial position .
employee benefits liability .
employee benefits liability represents amounts provided for annual leave and long service leave .
the current portion for this provision includes the total amount accrued for annual leave entitlements and the amounts accrued for long service leave entitlements that have vested due to employees having completed the required period of service .
based on past experience the group does not expect the full amount of annual leave or long service leave balances classified as current liabilities to be settled within the next 12 months .
these amounts are presented as current liabilities since the group does not have an unconditional right to defer the settlement of these amounts in the event employees wish to use their leave entitlement .

Question: What do employee benefits liability represent?
Answer: amounts provided for annual leave and long service leave.
Taxation
2019 €m
2018 €m
Income tax (expense)/credit:
(1,496)
879
Tax on adjustments to derive adjusted profit before tax
(206)
(188)
Deferred tax following revaluation of investments in Luxembourg
(488)
(330)
Luxembourg deferred tax asset recognised
–
(1,603)
Deferred tax on use of Luxembourg losses in the year
320
304
Tax on the Safaricom transaction
–
110
Derecognition of a deferred tax asset in Spain
1,166
–
Adjusted income tax expense for calculating adjusted tax rate1
(704)
(828)
Loss)/profit before tax
(2,613)
3,878
Adjustments to derive adjusted profit before tax (see earnings per share)
5,149
530
Adjusted profit before tax1
2,536
4,408
Share of adjusted results in associates and joint ventures
348
(389)
Adjusted profit before tax for calculating adjusted effective tax rate
2,884
4,019
Adjusted effective tax rate1
24.4%
20.6%
note : 1 see “ alternative performance measures ” on page 231 for further details and reconciliations to the respective closest equivalent gaap measure .
the group ’ s adjusted effective tax rate for its controlled businesses for the year ended 31 march 2019 was 24 .
4 % compared to 20 .
6 % for the last financial year .
the higher rate in the current year is primarily due to a change in the mix of the group ’ s profit driven by the financing for the liberty global transaction .
the tax rate in the prior year also reflected the consequences of closing tax audits in germany and romania .
we expect the group ’ s adjusted effective tax rate to remain in the low-mid twenties range for the medium term .
the group ’ s adjusted effective tax rate for both years does not include the following items : the derecognition of a deferred tax asset in spain of € 1166 million -2018 : € nil ; deferred tax on the use of luxembourg losses of € 320 million -2018 : € 304 million ; an increase in the deferred tax asset of € 488 million -2018 : € 330 million arising from a revaluation of investments based upon the local gaap financial statements and tax returns .
the group ’ s adjusted effective tax rate for the year ended 31 march 2018 does not include the recognition of a deferred tax asset of € 1603 million due to higher interest rates ; and a tax charge in respect of capital gains on the transfer of share in vodafone kenya limited to the vodacom group of € 110 million .

Question: What was the reason for a higher adjusted effective tax rate in 2019?
Answer: change in the mix of the Group’s profit, driven by the financing for the Liberty Global transaction
Airtel
Telkomsel
Globe
AIS
Group - 2017
S$ Mil
S$ Mil
S$ Mil
S$ Mil
Statement of financial position
Current assets
4,378.4
3,546.3
1,481.6
1,368.4
Non-current assets
45,611.2
6,169.6
5,548.1
10,027.2
Current liabilities
(13,568.3)
(2,547.9)
(2,344.3)
(2,994.1)
Non-current liabilities
(20,676.7)
(886.5)
(2,909.5)
(6,816.6)
Net assets
15,744.6
6,281.5
1,775.9
1,584.9
Less: Non-controlling interests
(1,399.0)
-
0.4
(5.7)
Net assets attributable to equity holders
14,345.6
6,281.5
1,776.3
1,579.2
Proportion of the Group’s ownership
36.5%
35.0%
47.1%
23.3% (1)
Group’s share of net assets
5,230.4
2,198.5
837.4
368.2
Goodwill capitalised
1,229.0
1,403.6
381.7
293.3
Others (2)
387.6
-
(139.9)
(2.4)
Carrying amount of the investment
6,847.0
3,602.1
1,079.2
659.1
Other items
Cash and cash equivalents
348.7
2,371.9
229.1
522.0
Non-current financial liabilities excluding trade  Current financial liabilities excluding trade and other payables
(19,774.0)
(570.2)
(2,658.7)
(3,690.1)
Current financial liabilities excluding trade and other payables
(3,884.7)
(76.6)
(353.6)
(187.4)
Group's share of market value
10,995.3
NA
3,544.1
5,013.9
22 .
joint ventures -cont ’ d .
‘ ‘ na ’ ’ denotes not applicable .
notes : -1 based on the group ’ s direct equity interest in ais .
-2 others include adjustments to align the respective local accounting standards to sfrs-i .

Question: Does the 23.3% of the group's ownership in AIS include any indirect equity interest?
Answer: No
NUMBER OF DSUs
2019
2018
Outstanding, January 1
4,391,997
4,309,528
Issued (1)
84,588
94,580
Settlement of RSUs/PSUs
146,960
112,675
Dividends credited
236,079
240,879
Settled
(236,525)
(365,665)
Outstanding, December 31
4,623,099
4,391,997
dsus .
eligible bonuses and rsus / psus may be paid in the form of dsus when executives or other eligible employees elect to or are required to participate in the plan .
the value of a dsu at the issuance date is equal to the value of one bce common share .
for non-management directors compensation is paid in dsus until the minimum share ownership requirement is met ; thereafter at least 50 % of their compensation is paid in dsus .
there are no vesting requirements relating to dsus .
dividends in the form of additional dsus are credited to the participant ’ s account on each dividend payment date and are equivalent in value to the dividends paid on bce common shares .
dsus are settled when the holder leaves the company .
the following table summarizes the status of outstanding dsus at december 31 2019 and 2018 .
-1 the weighted average fair value of the dsus issued was $ 59 in 2019 and $ 55 in 2018 .

Question: What is the weighted average fair value of the DSUs issued in 2018?
Answer: $55
Payments Due By Period
Payments Due By Period
Payments Due By Period
Payments Due By Period
(Dollars in Millions)
Total
Less than 1 year
1-3 years
3-5 years
More than 5 years
Capital Leases
$1.7
$0.6
$0.9
$0.2
$—
Operating Leases
34.2
7.8
10.5
7.5
8.4
Debt (1)
295.5
15.7
28.8
247.7
3.3
Estimated Interest on Debt (2)
46.8
11.7
20.7
14.2
0.2
Deferred Compensation
8.5
1.2
3.2
1.6
2.5
Total
$386.7
$37.0
$64.1
$271.2
$14.4
contractual obligations .
the following table summarizes contractual obligations and commitments as of april 27 2019 : .
-1 assumes the outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility will be repaid upon maturity of the credit agreement in september 2023 .
-2 amounts represent estimated contractual interest payments on outstanding debt .
interest rates in effect as of april 27 2019 are used for floating-rate debt .
we enter into agreements with suppliers to assist us in meeting our customers ' production needs .
these agreements vary as to duration and quantity commitments .
historically most have been short-term agreements which do not provide for minimum purchases or are requirements-based contracts .

Question: What was the total operating leases?
Answer: 34.2
Cost
Accum. amort.
Net book value
Assets subject to amortization:
Customer related intangibles
$3,926.8
$(1,083.6)
$  2,843.2
Unpatented technology
504.0
(199.5)
304.5
Software
172.0
(93.2)
78.8
Patents and other protective rights
9.7
(7.5)
2.2
Trade names
7.3
(2.8)
4.5
Assets not subject to amortization:
Trade names
608.9
—
608.9
Balances at December 31, 2018
$  5,228.7
$(1,386.6)
$  3,842.1
Assets subject to amortization:
Customer related intangibles
$  4,955.4
$(1,349.4)
$  3,606.0
Unpatented technology
613.0
(279.6)
333.4
Software
172.2
(111.5)
60.7
Patents and other protective rights
12.0
(8.0)
4.0
Trade names
7.9
(4.1)
3.8
Assets not subject to amortization:
Trade names
659.8
—
659.8
Balances at December 31, 2019
$ 6,420.3
$(1,752.6)
$ 4,667.7
other intangible assets were comprised of : .
amortization expense of other intangible assets was $ 364 .
7 $ 316 .
5 and $ 294 .
3 during the years ended december 31 2019 2018 and 2017 respectively .
amortization expense is expected to be $ 400 in 2020 $ 383 in 2021 $ 379 in 2022 $ 347 in 2023 and $ 321 in 2024 .

Question: What is the proportion of the cost of software and trade names over total cost in 2018?
Answer: 0.03
NUMBER OF RSUs/PSUs
2019
2018
Outstanding, January 1
2,812,697
2,740,392
Granted (1)
975,348
1,006,586
Dividends credited
149,648
149,258
Settled
(932,133)
(1,027,321)
Forfeited
(90,442)
(56,218)
Outstanding, December 31
2,915,118
2,812,697
Vested, December 31 (2)
904,266
880,903
rsus / psus .
rsus / psus are granted to executives and other eligible employees .
the value of an rsu / psu at the grant date is equal to the value of one bce common share .
dividends in the form of additional rsus / psus are credited to the participant ’ s account on each dividend payment date and are equivalent in value to the dividend paid on bce common shares .
executives and other eligible employees are granted a specific number of rsus / psus for a given performance period based on their position and level of contribution .
rsus / psus vest fully after three years of continuous employment from the date of grant and in certain cases if performance objectives are met as determined by the board of directors .
the following table summarizes outstanding rsus / psus at december 31 2019 and 2018 .
-1 the weighted average fair value of the rsus / psus granted was $ 58 in 2019 and $ 57 in 2018 .
-2 the rsus / psus vested on december 31 2019 were fully settled in february 2020 with bce common shares and / or dsus .

Question: What is the change in the weighted average fair value of the RSUs/PSUs granted?
Answer: 1