FangyuLei/tatqa huggingface dataset:
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Name (1)
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)
Stock Awards ($) (2)
Total ($)
Keith Barnes
102,500
178,317
280,817
Richard E. Belluzzo
160,000
178,317
338,317
Laura Black
67,500
178,317
245,817
Tor Braham
67,500
178,317
245,817
Timothy Campos
77,500
178,317
255,817
Donald Colvin
97,500
178,317
275,817
Masood A. Jabbar
90,000
178,317
268,317
the director compensation policies summarized above resulted in the following total compensation for our non-management directors in fiscal year 2019 : .
director compensation table .
-1 oleg khaykin president and chief executive officer is not included in this table as he was an employee of the company and as such received no compensation for his services as a director .
his compensation is disclosed in the summary compensation table .
-2 the amounts shown in this column represent the grant date fair values of rsus issued pursuant to the company ’ s 2003 equity incentive plan computed in accordance with financial accounting standards board accounting standards codification topic 718 - “ fasb asc topic 718 ” excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures .
there can be no assurance that these grant date fair values will ever be realized by the non-employee directors .
for information regarding the number of unvested rsus held by each non-employee director as of the end of fiscal year 2019 see the column “ unvested restricted stock units outstanding ” in the table below .

Question: How much did Donald Colvin earn in cash?
Answer: 97,500
USDm
2019
2018
Partners and commercial managements
0.5
1.2
Accrued operating expenses
14.1
9.1
Accrued interest
4.0
4.6
Wages and social expenses
14.3
16.1
Derivative financial instruments
12.3
3.4
Payables to joint ventures
0.1
0.1
Other
2.0
2.0
Balance as of 31 December
47.3
36.5
note 14 – other liabilities .
the carrying amount is a reasonable approximation of fair value due to the short-term nature of the receivables .
please refer to note 21 for further information on fair value hierarchies .

Question: Why is the carrying amount a reasonable approximation of fair value?
Answer: due to the short-term nature of the receivables.
Commitments by Period
July 27, 2019
July 28, 2018
Less than 1 year
$4,239
$5,407
1 to 3 years
728
710
3 to 5 years
—
360
Total
$4,967
$6,477
-b purchase commitments with contract manufacturers and suppliers .
we purchase components from a variety of suppliers and use several contract manufacturers to provide manufacturing services for our products .
during the normal course of business in order to manage manufacturing lead times and help ensure adequate component supply we enter into agreements with contract manufacturers and suppliers that either allow them to procure inventory based upon criteria as defined by us or establish the parameters defining our requirements .
a significant portion of our reported purchase commitments arising from these agreements consists of firm noncancelable and unconditional commitments .
certain of these purchase commitments with contract manufacturers and suppliers relate to arrangements to secure long-term pricing for certain product components for multi-year periods .
in certain instances these agreements allow us the option to cancel reschedule and adjust our requirements based on our business needs prior to firm orders being placed .
the following table summarizes our purchase commitments with contract manufacturers and suppliers -in millions : .
we record a liability for firm noncancelable and unconditional purchase commitments for quantities in excess of our future demand forecasts consistent with the valuation of our excess and obsolete inventory .
as of july 27 2019 and july 28 2018 the liability for these purchase commitments was $ 129 million and $ 159 million respectively and was included in other current liabilities .

Question: What were the purchase commitments with commitments that were 1 to 3 years in 2019?
Answer: 728
2017
2018
(In Thousands)
(In Thousands)
Audit Fees (1)
$3,747
$4,476
Audit-Related Fees (2)
—
—
Tax Fees (3)
—
—
All Other Fees (4)
$3
$3
Total Fees
$3,750
$4,479
fees paid to the independent registered public accounting firm .
the following table presents fees for professional audit services and other services rendered to our company by kpmg for our fiscal years ended december 31 2017 and 2018 .
-1 audit fees consist of professional services rendered in connection with the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements including audited financial statements presented in our annual report on form 10-k for the fiscal years ended december 31 2017 and 2018 and services that are normally provided by the independent registered public accountants in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for those fiscal years .
-2 audit-related fees consist of fees for professional services for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our consolidated financial statements and are not reported under “ audit fees .
” these services could include accounting consultations concerning financial accounting and reporting standards due diligence procedures in connection with acquisition and procedures related to other attestation services .
-3 tax fees consist of fees for professional services for tax compliance tax advice and tax planning .
these services include consultation on tax matters and assistance regarding federal state and international tax compliance .
-4 all other fees consist of license fees for the use of accounting research software .

Question: What is the average total fees paid to KPMG from 2017 to 2018?
Answer: 4114.5
2019
2018
$ million
$ million
Neither impaired nor past due
115.3
99.8
Past due but not impaired:
– Less than 30 days overdue
8.6
16.8
– 30 to 60 days
3.6
3.2
– Over 60 days
1.2
3.6
Trade receivables
128.7
123.4
30 .
financial instruments and financial risk management continued .
b credit risk continued .
the composition of trade receivables at 31 december is as follows : .
the group closely monitors amounts due from customers and performs activities such as credit checks and reviews of payment history and has put in place appropriate credit approval limits .
based on these procedures management assessed the quality of those receivables that are past due but not impaired as low risk .
the receivables ’ provision is based on expected credit losses .
the movement on the provision during the year is given in note 20 .
the value of impaired trade receivables is $ 1 .
4 million -2018 $ 0 .
9 million .
for all other financial assets the maximum exposure to credit risk is represented by the carrying amount .

Question: What activities does the Group perform when it closely monitors amounts due from customers?
Answer: performs activities such as credit checks and reviews of payment history and has put in place appropriate credit approval limits
2019
Americas
Europe
Asia
Total
% of total
(Amounts in thousands)
TS
$67,728
$3,285
$646
$71,159
90%
HPP
5,294
771
1,837
7,902
10%
Total
$72,522
$4,056
$2,483
$79,061
100%
% of total
92%
5%
3%
100%
2018
TS
$52,034
$9,059
$1,344
$62,437
86%
HPP
8,424
1,266
789
10,479
14%
Total
$60,458
$10,325
$2,133
$72,916
100%
% of total
83%
14%
3%
100%
the following table details the company ’ s sales by operating segment for fiscal years ended september 30 2019 and 2018 .
the company ’ s sales by geographic area based on the location of where the products were shipped or services rendered are as follows : .
substantially all americas amounts are united states .

Question: How does the company determine its sales by geographic area?
Answer: Based on the location of where the products were shipped or services rendered
Year Ended December 31
Year Ended December 31
Year Ended December 31
Year Ended December 31
Year Ended December 31
2019
2018
2018
2018 to 2019 % change
2017 to 2018 % change
(In thousands, except percentages)
(In thousands, except percentages)
(In thousands, except percentages)
(In thousands, except percentages)
(In thousands, except percentages)
General and Administrative
$ 141,076
$ 103,491
$ 81,680
36%
27%
general and administrative expenses .
general and administrative expenses increased $ 38 million or 36 % in 2019 compared to 2018 .
the overall increase was primarily due to increased employee compensation-related costs of $ 15 million driven by headcount growth and a one-time termination-related charge of $ 3 million during 2019 .
the overall increase was also driven by costs associated with our acquisition of smooch in 2019 including transaction costs of $ 3 million and a one-time share-based compensation charge of $ 3 million related to accelerated stock options of smooch .
further contributing to the overall increase was an increase in allocated shared costs of $ 3 million .
general and administrative expenses increased $ 22 million or 27 % in 2018 compared to 2017 .
the overall increase was primarily due to increased employee compensation-related costs of $ 15 million driven by headcount growth and increased allocated shared costs of $ 3 million .

Question: What was the increase in general and administrative expenses from 2017 to 2018?
Answer: 22
December 31,
December 31,
December 31,
(In millions)
2019
2018
Accruals not yet deductible for tax purposes
$ 17.4
$ 17.5
Net operating loss carryforwards
245.9
265.5
Foreign, federal and state credits
8.4
10.4
Employee benefit items
79.5
77.0
Capitalized expenses
32.2
8.9
Intangibles
21.8
—
Derivatives and other
47.7
38.0
Sub-total deferred tax assets
452.9
417.3
Valuation allowance
(197.6)
(218.4)
Total deferred tax assets
$ 255.3
$ 198.9
Depreciation and amortization
$ (37.0)
$ (26.8)
Unremitted foreign earnings
(10.0)
—
Intangible assets
—
(21.7)
Other
(0.4)
(0.4)
Total deferred tax liabilities
(47.4)
(48.9)
Net deferred tax assets
$ 207.9
$ 150.0
deferred tax assets -liabilities consist of the following : .
a valuation allowance has been provided based on the uncertainty of utilizing the tax benefits mainly related to the following deferred tax assets : • $ 183 .
4 million of foreign items primarily net operating losses ; and • $ 7 .
7 million of state tax credits .
for the year ended december 31 2019 the valuation allowance decreased by $ 20 .
8 million .
this is primarily driven by our reinvent see initiatives and decreases in foreign tax rates .
as of december 31 2019 we have foreign net operating loss carryforwards of $ 899 .
4 million expiring in years beginning in 2020 with the majority of losses having an unlimited carryover .
the state net operating loss carryforwards totaling $ 569 .
3 million expire in various amounts over 1 to 19 years .

Question: What is the value of Sub-total deferred tax assets as a percentage of Net deferred tax assets for 2019?
Answer: 217.85
€ million
2017/2018
2018/2019
Current service cost1
24
21
Net interest expenses2
11
9
Past service cost (incl. curtailments and changes)
0
0
Settlements
0
0
Other pension expenses
1
1
Pension expenses
36
31
the pension expenses of the direct and indirect company pension plan commitments can be broken down as follows : .
1 netted against employees ’ contributions .
2 included therein : interest effect from the adjustment of the asset ceiling .
the entire loss to be recognised outside of profit or loss in the other comprehensive income amounts to € 90 million in financial year 2018 / 19 .
this figure is comprised of the effect from the change in actuarial parameters in the amount of € + 247 million and the experience-based adjustments of € + 4 million .
it was offset by income from plan assets of € 103 million and a gain of € 58 million resulting from the change in the effect of the asset ceiling in the netherlands .
in addition to expenses from defined benefit commitments expenses for payments to external pension providers relating to defined contribution pension commitments of € 82 million in financial year 2018 / 19 -2017 / 18 : € 82 million were recorded .
these figures also include payments to statutory pension insurance .
the provisions for obligations similar to pensions essentially comprise commitments from employment anniversary allowances death benefits and partial retirement plans .
provisions amounting to € 34 million -30 / 9 / 2018 : € 41 million were allocated for these commitments .
the commitments are valued on the basis of actuarial expert opinions .
the valuation parameters used for this purpose are generally determined in the same way as for the company pension plan .

Question: What was the percentage change in pension expenses in FY2019 from FY2018?
Answer: -13.89
2019
2018
£m
£m
Retailers
20.4
21.7
Manufacturer and Agency
3.2
3.0
Other
1.3
0.7
Total
24.9
25.4
the maximum exposure to credit risk for trade receivables at the reporting date by type of customer was : .
the group ’ s most significant customer accounts for £ 0 .
5m -2018 : £ 0 .
6m of net trade receivables as at 31 march 2019 .

Question: How much did the Group's most significant customer account for?
Answer: £0.5m (2018: £0.6m) of net trade receivables
Year ended December 31,
Year ended December 31,
2019
2018
Federal statutory tax rate
21.0%
21.0%
State taxes
(4.5)
4.4
Non deductible expenses
(0.3)
(0.6)
Tax credits
4.0
4.6
Expired tax credit
(1.3)
(3.9)
Deferred tax adjustment
(4.8)
—
Stock based compensation
1.9
0.8
Valuation allowance
3.2
(167.0)
Contingent purchase revaluation
—
(1.0)
Other
(0.3)
(0.1)
18.9%
(141.8)%
the provision for income taxes differed from the provision computed by applying the federal statutory rate to income -loss from continuing operations before taxes due to the following : .
the effective income tax rate was 18 .
9 % and -141 .
8 % during the years ended december 31 2019 and december 31 2018 respectively .
the decrease in 2019 compared to statutory tax rate of 21 % was primarily due to deferred tax adjustments related to foreign tax credit carryforwards and state taxes offset by changes in the valuation allowance and excess tax benefits resulting from the exercise of non-qualified stock options .
the effective tax rate for the year ended december 312018 was significantly impacted by recording a substantial increase in a valuation allowance on the entire deferred tax assets .

Question: What is the average Non deductible expenses for December 31, 2018 and 2019?
Answer: 0.45
Business
Consumer
Total
(Dollars in millions)
As of December 31, 2017(1)
$20,197
10,278
30,475
Purchase accounting and other adjustments(2)(3)
250
32
282
Impairment
—
(2,726)
(2,726)
As of December 31, 2018
$20,447
7,584
28,031
we completed our qualitative assessment of our indefinite-lived intangible assets other than goodwill as of december 31 2019 and 2018 and concluded it is more likely than not that our indefinite-lived intangible assets are not impaired ; thus no impairment charge for these assets was recorded in 2019 or 2018 .
the following tables show the rollforward of goodwill assigned to our reportable segments from december 31 2017 through december 31 2019 .
-1 goodwill is net of accumulated impairment losses of $ 1 .
1 billion that related to our former hosting segment now included in our business segment .
-2 we allocated $ 32 million of level 3 goodwill to consumer as we expect the consumer segment to benefit from synergies resulting from the business combination .
-2 we allocated $ 32 million of level 3 goodwill to consumer as we expect the consumer segment to benefit from synergies resulting from the business combination .
-3 includes $ 58 million decrease due to effect of foreign currency exchange rate change .

Question: What is the average total amount of goodwill for 2017 and 2018?
Answer: 29253
Years ended August 31,
2020 Guidelines(1)
2019
2018
Average cost of indebtedness(2)
4.4%
4.4%
4.4%
Fixed rate indebtedness(3)
78%
78%
72%
Average term: long-term debt (in years)
3.9
4.9
5.7
Net indebtedness(4) / adjusted EBITDA(5)
2.3
2.6
3.8
Adjusted EBITDA / financial expense(5)
N/A (6)
6.3
5.4
8 .
1 capital structure .
the table below summarizes debt-related financial ratios over the last two fiscal years and the fiscal 2020 guidelines : .
-1 based on mid-range guidelines .
-2 excludes amortization of deferred transaction costs and commitment fees but includes the impact of interest rate swaps .
potential variations in the us libor rates in fiscal 2020 have not been considered .
-3 taking into consideration the interest rate swaps in effect at the end of each fiscal year .
-4 net indebtedness is defined as the aggregate of bank indebtedness balance due on business combinations and principal on long-term debt less cash and cash equivalents .
-5 adjusted ebitda and financial expense for fiscal year 2018 include only eight months of metrocast operations .
-6 specific guidance on interest coverage cannot be provided given that financial expense guidance is not provided .
in fiscal 2019 the financial leverage ratio relating to net indebtedness over adjusted ebitda has declined as a result of the sale of cogeco peer 1 on april 30 2019 for a net cash consideration of $ 720 million and to a lesser extent growing adjusted ebitda and a reduction in net indebtedness from generated free cash flow .
in fiscal 2020 prior to the adoption of ifrs 16 leases the financial leverage ratio relating to net indebtedness over adjusted ebitda should continue to decline as a result of growing adjusted ebitda and a projected reduction in net indebtedness from generated free cash flow .

Question: How much was the net cash consideration in 2019?
Answer: $720 million
2019
2018
$M
$M
Capital expenditure commitments
Estimated capital expenditure under firm contracts, payable:
Not later than one year
398
416
Later than one year, not later than two years
–
–
Later than two years, not later than five years
–
–
Total capital expenditure commitments
398
416
Operating lease commitments
Future minimum rentals under non-cancellable operating leases, payable:
Not later than one year
1,998
2,089
Later than one year, not later than five years
7,415
7,484
Later than five years
12,378
13,331
Total operating lease commitments
21,791
22,904
Total commitments for expenditure
22,189
23,320
this section presents the group ’ s contractual obligation to make a payment in the future in relation to purchases of property plant and equipment and lease commitments .
capital expenditure and operating lease commitments of the group at the reporting date are as follows : .
the commitments set out above do not include contingent turnover rentals which are charged on many retail premises leased by the group .
these rentals are calculated as a percentage of the turnover of the store occupying the premises with the percentage and turnover threshold at which the additional rentals commence varying with each lease agreement .
the group leases retail premises and warehousing facilities which are generally for periods up to 40 years .
the operating lease commitments include leases for the norwest office and distribution centres .
generally the lease agreements are for initial terms of between five and 25 years and most include multiple renewal options for additional five to 10-year terms .
under most leases the group is responsible for property taxes insurance maintenance and expenses related to the leased properties .
however many of the more recent lease agreements have been negotiated on a gross or semi-gross basis which eliminates or significantly reduces the group ’ s exposure to operational charges associated with the properties .
from 1 july 2019 the group adopted aasb 16 leases and as a result the operating lease commitments set out above have been recognised in the consolidated statement of financial position with the exception of the service component of lease payments .
refer to note 1 .
2 .
6 for a reconciliation between the operating lease commitments at 30 june 2019 and the lease liabilities recognised at 1 july 2019 .

Question: What is the average total commitments for expenditures for 2018 and 2019?
Answer: 22754.5
December 31
December 31
2019
2018
(in thousands)
(in thousands)
Government
$1,012
$—
Asset Backed
4,854
1,786
Industrial
5,034
2,381
Financial
6,879
7,136
$17,779
$11,303
note 3 - short term investments .
the company ' s short term investments are classified as below with maturities of twelve months or less unrealized gains and losses were immaterial for the periods presented : .

Question: What are the respective values of the company's financial short term investments in 2018 and 2019 respectively?
Answer: 7,136 6,879
2018
2018
2018
2018
Increase
GM$
GM%
GM$
GM%
GM$
GM%
(Dollar amount in thousands)
(Dollar amount in thousands)
(Dollar amount in thousands)
(Dollar amount in thousands)
(Dollar amount in thousands)
(Dollar amount in thousands)
Products
$7,462
13%
$6,886
13%
$576
-%
Services
6,427
56%
5,376
55%
1,051
1
Total
$13,889
20%
$12,262
20%
1,627
-%
the impact of product mix within our ts segment on gross margins for the fiscal years ended september 30 was as follows : .
the overall ts segment gross margin as a percentage of sales remained the same in fiscal year 2019 when compared to fiscal year 2018 .
the $ 0 .
6 million increase in our ts segment product gross margins resulted from an increase in product revenues in the u .
s .
division partially offset by a decrease in the u .
k division .
the $ 1 .
1 million .
increase in the ts segment service gross margins primarily resulted from increased service revenues in the u .
s .
division .

Question: How many product mixes does the company have?
Answer: 2
Name
Age
Position
Christopher H. Atayan
59
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, Director
Andrew C. Plummer
45
President, Chief Financial Officer, Director
Charles J. Schmaderer
50
Vice President, Corporate Controller, Secretary
executive officers of the registrant .
executive officers of our company are appointed by the board of directors and serve at the discretion of the board .
the following table sets forth certain information with respect to all executive officers of our company .
christopher h .
atayan has served in various senior executive positions with the company since march 2006 including his service as chairman of the board since january 2008 and chief executive officer since october 2006 and has been a director of the company since 2004 .
mr .
atayan has served as the senior managing director of slusser associates a private equity and investment banking firm since 1988 and has been engaged in private equity and investment banking since 1982 .
he also serves on the board of eastek holdings llc a manufacturing company .
andrew c .
plummer has served as our president and chief operating officer since october 2018 as our chief financial officer since january 2007 and as our secretary from january 2007 to october 2018 .
from 2004 to 2007 mr .
plummer served our company in various roles including acting chief financial officer corporate controller and manager of sec compliance .
prior to joining our company in 2004 mr .
plummer practiced public accounting primarily with the accounting firm deloitte and touche llp -now deloitte .
charles j .
schmaderer has served as the company ’ s vice president and corporate controller since april 2018 and as secretary since october 2018 .
from 2006 to 2018 mr .
schmaderer served the company in various roles including as the vice president of financial reporting and assistant secretary and as the director of financial and sec reporting .
prior to joining amcon in 2006 mr .
schmaderer practiced public accounting primarily with the accounting firm grant thornton llp and also holds a master of business administration -mba .

Question: What is the average age of the company's Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officers?
Answer: 52