FangyuLei/tatqa huggingface dataset:
(In thousands)
December 31, 2019
December 31, 2018
Current minimum lease payments receivable(1)
$1,201
$11,339
Non-current minimum lease payments receivable(2)
889
1,670
Total minimum lease payments receivable
2,090
13,009
Less: Current unearned revenue(1)
365
631
Less: Non-current unearned revenue(2)
163
473
Net investment in sales-type leases
$1,562
$11,905
sales-type leases .
we are the lessor in sales-type lease arrangements for network equipment which have initial terms of up to five years .
our sales-type lease arrangements contain either a provision whereby the network equipment reverts back to us upon the expiration of the lease or a provision that allows the lessee to purchase the network equipment at a bargain purchase amount at the end of the lease .
in addition our sales-type lease arrangements do not contain any residual value guarantees or material restrictive covenants .
the allocation of the consideration between lease and nonlease components is determined by stand-alone selling price by component .
the net investment in sales-type leases consists of lease receivables less unearned income .
collectability of sales-type leases is evaluated periodically at an individual customer level .
the company has elected to exclude taxes related to sales-type leases from revenue and the associated expense of such taxes .
as of december 31 2019 and 2018 we did not have an allowance for credit losses for our net investment in sales-type leases .
as of december 31 2019 and 2018 the components of the net investment in sales-type leases were as follows : .
-1 included in other receivables on the consolidated balance sheet .
-2 included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheet .

Question: Where was current minimum lease payments receivable included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet?
Answer: other receivables
2019
2018
£m
£m
Cost:
At 1st January
445.8
269.4
Share options issued to subsidiary company employees
2.2
2.6
Additions
214.0
173.8
At 31st December
662.0
445.8
2 investments in subsidiaries .
investments are stated at cost less provisions for any impairment in value .
additions in the year relate to investments in gestra holdings limited £ 1 .
6m and spirax sarco america investments limited £ 212 .
4m .
spirax sarco america investments limited was incorporated on 24th october 2018 with the purpose of holding group us $ investments and loans .
gestra holdings limited was incorporated on 9th october 2018 with the purpose of holding other gestra companies .
details relating to subsidiary undertakings are given on pages 207 to 211 .
except where stated all classes of shares were 100 % owned by the group at 31st december 2019 .
the country of incorporation of the principal group companies is the same as the country of operation with the exception of companies operating in the united kingdom which are incorporated in great britain .
all operate in steam electrical thermal energy solutions fluid path technologies or peristaltic pumping markets except those companies identified as a holding company on pages 207 to 211 .

Question: What was the change in the cost at 31st December in 2019 from 2018?
Answer: 216.2
As of
(In thousands)
December 29, 2019
December 30, 2018
Equity investments with readily determinable fair value:
Enphase Energy, Inc
$173,908
$36,225
Total equity investments with readily determinable fair value
173,908
36,225
Equity investments without readily determinable fair value:
Project entities
2,677
2,951
Other equity investments without readily determinable fair value
5,859
5,859
Total equity investments without readily determinable fair value
8,536
8,810
Equity investments with fair value option:
SunStrong Capital Holdings, LLC
8,000
8,831
SunStrong Partners, LLC
9,500
—
8point3 Solar Investco 3 Holdings, LLC
—
—
Total equity investment with fair value option
17,500
8,831
Equity method investments
Huansheng Corporation
26,533
32,784
Project entities
125
2,044
Total equity method investments
26,658
34,828
Total equity investments
$226,602
$88,694
note 10 .
equity investments .
our equity investments consist of equity investments with readily determinable fair value investments without readily determinable fair value equity investments accounted for using the fair value option and equity method investments .
our share of earnings -losses from equity investments accounted for under the equity method is reflected as ‘ ‘ equity in earnings -losses of unconsolidated investees ’ ’ in our consolidated statements of operations .
mark-to-market gains and losses on equity investments with readily determinable fair value are reflected as ‘ ‘ other net ’ ’ under other income -expense net in our consolidated statements of operations .
the carrying value of our equity investments classified as ‘ ‘ other long-term assets ’ ’ on our consolidated balance sheets are as follows : .

Question: Which year is the total equity investment with fair value option higher?
Answer: 2019
Group
2019
2018
S$ Mil
S$ Mil
Mobile service (1)
5,395.7
5,737.3
Sale of equipment
2,876.7
2,414.5
Handset operating lease income
140.5
25.2
Mobile
8,412.9
8,177.0
Data and Internet
3,340.9
3,435.7
Business solutions
604.1
560.7
Cyber security
548.7
527.1
Other managed services
1,880.8
1,920.0
Infocomm Technology (“ICT”) (2)
3,033.6
3,007.8
Digital businesses (3)
1,245.3
1,113.1
Fixed voice
899.0
1,084.3
Pay television
372.7
369.4
Others (4)
67.3
80.7
Operating revenue
17,371.7
17,268.0
Operating revenue
17,371.7
17,268.0
Other income
224.7
258.8
Interest and investment income (see Note 10)
38.1
45.5
Total
17,634.5
17,572.3
operating revenue .
notes : -1 includes revenues from subscription -prepaid / postpaid interconnect outbound and inbound roaming wholesale revenue from mvnos -mobile virtual network operators and mobile content services such as music and video .
-2 includes equipment sales related to ict services .
-3 mainly from provisions of digital marketing and advertising services and regional premium ott video .
-4 includes energy reselling fees .
as at 31 march 2019 the transaction price attributable to unsatisfied performance obligations for ict services rendered by ncs pte .
ltd .
is approximately s $ 3 billion which will be recognised as operating revenue mostly over the next 5 years .
as at 31 march 2019 the transaction price attributable to unsatisfied performance obligations for ict services rendered by ncs pte .
ltd .
is approximately s $ 3 billion which will be recognised as operating revenue mostly over the next 5 years .
service contracts with consumers typically range from a month to 2 years and contracts with enterprises typically range from 1 to 3 years .

Question: What is the transaction price attributable to unsatisfied performance obligations for ICT services rendered by NCS Pte. Ltd.?
Answer: S$3 billion
Years Ended December 31,
Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities from continuing operations
$47,899
$151,427
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities from discontinued operations
493
(156)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
48,392
151,271
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities from continuing operations
(393,847)
(113,592)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities from continuing operations
338,840
(97,134)
EFFECT OF CURRENCY TRANSLATION ON CASH
(1,496)
(1,030)
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
(8,111)
(60,485)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period
354,552
415,037
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period
346,441
354,552
Less cash and cash equivalents from discontinued operations
—
5,251
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS, end of period
$346,441
$349,301
share repurchase .
on december 18 2019 the board of directors authorized to remove the expiration date to the company ’ s common stock share repurchase program and increase the authorized amount by $ 25 .
1 million increasing the authorization to repurchase shares up to a total of $ 50 .
0 million .
as of december 31 2019 a total of $ 50 .
0 million remained available for future share repurchases .
we repurchased 1 .
7 million shares for $ 95 .
1 million and 0 .
4 million shares for $ 30 .
0 million in fiscal 2018 and 2017 respectively .
there were no shares repurchased in fiscal 2019 .
cash flows .
a summary of our cash provided by and used in operating investing and financing activities is as follows -in thousands : .

Question: What did the Board of Directors authorize in 2019?
Answer: to remove the expiration date to the Company’s common stock share repurchase program and increase the authorized amount by $25.1 million increasing the authorization to repurchase shares up to a total of $50.0 million.
(In thousands)
2019
2018
2017
Income tax benefit at the US Federal statutory rate
$(2,718)
$(3,654)
$(4,019)
Benefit for state taxes
(304)
(642)
(142)
Impact of foreign operations
(310)
38
158
Indefinite life assets
130
335
102
Officer life insurance
3
(5)
(6)
Change in valuation allowance
3,302
3,328
4,007
Change in liability for unrecognized tax benefits
(400)
40
9
Impact of Tax Act, net
226
(3,287)
—
Meals and entertainment
60
81
163
Equity
2
476
—
Global intangible low-taxed income
94
—
—
Other
136
39
(36)
Total income tax expense (benefit)
$221
$(3,251)
$236
the following table presents the principal components of the difference between the effective tax rate to the u .
s .
federal statutory income tax rate for the years ended march 31 : .
during fiscal 2018 we recorded a provisional tax benefit of approximately $ 3 .
3 million as a result of the enactment of the tax cuts and jobs act - " tax act " on december 22 2017 .
we completed the accounting for the tax act during q3 fiscal 2019 and recorded an adjustment on december 31 2018 of $ 0 .
2 million to increase our deferred tax liability associated with certain indefinite lived intangibles .
we have elected to account for global intangible low-taxed income -gilti inclusions in the period in which they are incurred .
our tax provision includes a provision for income taxes in certain foreign jurisdictions where subsidiaries are profitable but only a minimal benefit is reflected related to u .
s .
and certain foreign tax losses due to the uncertainty of the ultimate realization of future benefits from these losses .
the 2019 tax provision results primarily from foreign tax expense the reversal of reserves for uncertain tax positions and the completion of our accounting for the tax act .
the 2019 tax provision differs from the statutory rate primarily due to the recognition of net operating losses as deferred tax assets which were offset by increases in the valuation allowance state taxes and other u .
s .
permanent book to tax differences .
the 2018 tax provision primarily results from a reduction in the deferred rate and the ability to offset indefinite lived deferred tax liabilities with certain deferred tax assets due to passage of the tax act .
the 2018 effective rate differs from the statutory rate primarily due to the impact of the tax act recognition of net operating losses as deferred tax assets which were offset by increases in the valuation allowance certain foreign and state tax effects including a benefit of $ 0 .
4 million related to a settlement with the california franchise tax board and other u .
s .
permanent book to tax differences .
the 2017 tax provision primarily results from state taxes taxes withheld in foreign jurisdictions and foreign tax expense .
the 2017 tax provision differs from the statutory rate primarily due to the recognition of net operating losses as deferred tax assets which were offset by increases in the valuation allowance state taxes and other u .
s .
permanent book to tax differences .

Question: What was the adjustment against the tax act in Q3 2019?
Answer: $0.2 million
FY19
FY18
FY17
FY16
Scope 1
263
390
491
565
Manchester
213
281
361
357
London
44
60
76
88
Scope 2
258
340
437
445
Total
521
731
928
1,010
Revenue
355.1
330.1
311.5
281.6
Carbon intensity
1.47
2.21
2.98
3.59
Year-on-year change
-34%
-26%
-17%
total co2 emissions fy19 .
1 tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent .
2 absolute carbon emissions divided by revenue in millions .
auto trader is required to measure and report its direct and indirect greenhouse gas - ‘ ghg ’ emissions by the companies act 2006 -strategic report and directors ’ report regulations 2013 .
the greenhouse gas reporting period is aligned to the financial reporting year .
the methodology used to calculate our emissions is based on the financial consolidation approach as defined in the greenhouse gas protocol a corporate accounting and reporting standard -revised edition .
emission factors used are from uk government - ‘ beis ’ conversion factor guidance for the year reported .
auto trader is required to measure and report its direct and indirect greenhouse gas - ‘ ghg ’ emissions by the companies act 2006 -strategic report and directors ’ report regulations 2013 .
the greenhouse gas reporting period is aligned to the financial reporting year .
the methodology used to calculate our emissions is based on the financial consolidation approach as defined in the greenhouse gas protocol a corporate accounting and reporting standard -revised edition .
emission factors used are from uk government - ‘ beis ’ conversion factor guidance for the year reported .
the report includes the ‘ scope 1 ’ -combustion of fuel in relation to company cars and ‘ scope 2 ’ -purchased electricity and gas emissions associated with our offices .
we have chosen to include the emissions associated with leased company cars in scope 1 as we are responsible for these emissions .
we have chosen to present a revenue intensity ratio as this is a relevant indicator of our growth and is aligned with our business strategy .
the reduction in our ghg emissions is due to a reduction in the fuel emissions from our company car fleet as the fleet has reduced .
we have also reduced the amount of electricity we use and this coupled with a decrease in beis conversion factors has also contributed to our scope 2 reduction .

Question: In which year was the CO2 emissions amount in London largest?
Answer: FY16
Year Ended December 31,
Year Ended December 31,
2019
2018
$
$
Fair value at the beginning of the year
12,026
30,749
Fair value on acquisition/issuance
—
2,330
Unrealized gain (loss) included in earnings
26,900
(21,053)
Realized loss included in earnings
(25,559)
—
Settlements
(13,367)
—
Fair value at the end of the year
—
12,026
stock purchase warrants .
prior to the 2019 brookfield transaction teekay held 15 .
5 million common unit warrants -or the brookfield transaction warrants issued by altera to teekay in connection with the 2017 brookfield transaction -see note 4 and 1755000 warrants to purchase common units of altera issued to teekay in connection with altera ' s private placement of series d preferred units in june 2016 -or the series d warrants .
in may 2019 teekay sold to brookfield all of the company ’ s remaining interests in altera which included among other things both the brookfield transaction warrants and series d warrants .
changes in fair value during the years ended december 31 2019 and 2018 for the company ’ s brookfield transaction warrants and the series d warrants which were measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs -level 3 are as follows : .

Question: What is the increase / (decrease) in the Fair value at the end of the year from 2018 to 2019?
Answer: -12026
Twelve Months Ended December 31,
Twelve Months Ended December 31,
Twelve Months Ended December 31,
Twelve Months Ended December 31,
Twelve Months Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
(Dollars in thousands)
(Dollars in thousands)
(Dollars in thousands)
(Dollars in thousands)
(Dollars in thousands)
Net loss
$(1,383)
$(5,361)
$(4,262)
$(3,161)
$(3,711)
Depreciation and amortization
15,921
14,068
12,692
9,887
7,574
Interest expense
991
296
910
698
455
Income tax expense
144
77
75
66
58
EBITDA
$15,673
$9,080
$9,414
$7,490
$4,376
Loss on disposal of equipment
787
142
104
190
94
Non-cash share-based compensation
7,834
6,808
4,438
4,193
3,924
Launch expense (a)
4,563
3,540
3,066
2,813
2,626
Plant start-up expenses (b)
—
—
—
1,628
—
Warrant fair valuation (c)
—
—
335
49
(503)
Secondary offering expenses (d)
302
362
—
—
593
Leadership transition expenses (e)
—
—
63
1,291
—
Litigation expense (f)
—
348
145
—
—
Adjusted EBITDA
$29,159
$20,280
$17,565
$17,654
$11,110
Adjusted EBITDA as a % of Net Sales
11.9%
10.5%
11.5%
13.6%
9.8%
the following table provides a reconciliation of ebitda and adjusted ebitda to net loss the most directly comparable financial measure presented in accordance with u .
s .
gaap : .
-a represents new store marketing allowance of $ 1000 for each store added to our distribution network as well as the non-capitalized freight costs associated with freshpet fridge replacements .
the expense enhances the overall marketing spend to support our growing distribution network .
-b represents additional operating costs incurred in connection with the start-up of our new manufacturing lines as part of the freshpet kitchens expansion project in 2016 that included adding two additional product lines .
-c represents the change of fair value for the outstanding common stock warrants .
all outstanding warrants were converted to common stock in september 2017 .
-d represents fees associated with secondary public offerings of our common stock .
-e represents charges associated with our former chief executive officer ’ s separation agreement as well as changes in estimates associated with leadership transition costs .
-f represents fees associated with two securities lawsuits .

Question: What financial items does EBITDA consist of as shown in the table?
Answer: Net loss Depreciation and amortization Interest expense Income tax expense
December 31, 2019
December 31, 2018
Deferred revenue:
Products
$6,593
$5,216
Services
94,571
92,750
Total deferred revenue
101,164
97,966
Less: current portion
(62,233)
(63,874)
Non-current portion
$38,931
$34,092
deferred revenue primarily consists of amounts that have been invoiced but not yet been recognized as revenue and consists of performance obligations pertaining to support and subscription services .
during the years ended december 31 2019 and 2018 we recognized revenue of $ 63 .
2 million and $ 60 .
2 million related to deferred revenue at the beginning of the period .
deferred revenue consisted of the following -in thousands : .

Question: What proportion of the revenue recognized related to deferred revenue is the non-current portion of the deferred revenue in 2019?
Answer: 62.34
Three Months Ended
Three Months Ended
Three Months Ended
% Variation
% Variation
December 31, 2019
September 29, 2019
December 31, 2018
Sequential
Year-Over-Year
(Unaudited, in millions)
(Unaudited, in millions)
(Unaudited, in millions)
Automotive and Discrete Group (ADG)
$924
$894
$967
3.3%
(4.5)%
Analog, MEMS and Sensors Group (AMS)
1,085
968
988
12.1
9.9
Microcontrollers and Digital ICs Group (MDG)
742
688
689
7.9
7.6
Others
3
3
4
—
—
Total consolidated net revenues
$2,754
$2,553
$2,648
7.9%
4.0%
on a sequential basis adg revenues were up 3 .
3 % driven by an increase in volumes of approximately 8 % partially offset by a decrease in average selling prices of approximately 5 % mostly attributable to product mix .
ams revenues increased 12 .
1 % driven by analog and imaging products .
ams increase was due to an increase of approximately 5 % in average selling prices entirely due to product mix and to higher volumes of approximately of 7 % .
mdg revenues increased by 7 .
9 % mainly driven by microcontrollers due to both higher average selling prices of approximately 6 % entirely due to product mix and higher volumes of approximately 2 % .
on a year-over-year basis fourth quarter net revenues increased by 4 .
0 % .
adg revenues decreased 4 .
5 % compared to the year-ago quarter on lower revenues in both automotive and power discrete .
the decrease was entirely due to lower average selling prices of approximately 4 % while volumes remained substantially flat .
the decrease in average selling prices was a combination of less favorable product mix and lower selling prices .
ams fourth quarter revenues grew 9 .
9 % year-over-year mainly driven by analog and imaging .
the increase was entirely due to higher average selling prices of approximately 18 % entirely attributable to product mix partially offset by lower volumes of approximately 8 % .
mdg fourth quarter revenues increased by 7 .
6 % mainly driven by microcontrollers .
the increase was due to higher average selling prices of approximately 9 % entirely due to improved product mix .

Question: What is the average net revenues from Analog, MEMS and Sensors Group (AMS) for the period December 31, 2019 and 2018?
Answer: 1036.5
Telkomsel
AIS
Airtel (1)
Globe
Country mobile penetration rate
123%
139%
90%
138%
Market share, 31 March 2019 (2)
51.1%
45.2%
28.0%
56.6%
Market share, 31 March 2018 (2)
48.5%
44.8%
25.7%
52.1%
Market position (2)
#1
#1
#2
#1
Mobile customers (‘000)
- Aggregate
168,642
41,491
384,078
83,490
- Proportionate
59,025
9,676
144,770
39,307
Growth in mobile customers (3) (%)
-13%
3.6%
-2.9%
32%
notes : -1 mobile penetration rate market share and market position pertained to india market only .
-2 based on number of mobile customers .
-3 compared against 31 march 2018 and based on aggregate mobile customers .

Question: Which associate has the worst market position?
Answer: Airtel
Consolidated
2019
2018
US$’000
US$’000
Trade payables
3,492
2,016
Deferred consideration
888
643
Other payables
11,898
9,488
16,278
12,147
note 12 .
current liabilities - trade and other payables .
accounting policy for trade and other payables these amounts represent liabilities for goods and services provided to the group prior to the end of the financial year and which are unpaid .
due to their short-term nature they are measured at amortised cost and are not discounted .
the amounts are unsecured and are usually paid within 30 days of recognition .
deferred consideration the payable represents the obligation to pay consideration following the acquisition of a business or assets and is deferred based on passage of time .
it is measured at the present value of the estimated liability .

Question: What are the components of the liabilities?
Answer: Trade payables Deferred consideration Other payables
Restructuring Liability Employee Separation and other
Restructuring Liability Consulting Costs
Balance as of October 1, 2017
$ 1.0
$  —
Accrued costs
4.2
0.8
Cash payments
(4.6)
(0.5)
Balance as of September 30, 2018
$  0.6
$  0.3
Accrued costs
7.5
7.9
Cash payments
(6.1)
(7.4)
Balance as of September 30, 2019
$  2.0
$  0.8
the following table presents a rollforward of our restructuring liability as of september 30 2019 which is included within accrued compensation and other current liabilities within our consolidated balance sheet -in millions : .
certain restructuring costs are based upon estimates .
actual amounts paid may ultimately differ from these estimates .
if additional costs are incurred or recognized amounts exceed costs such changes in estimates will be recognized when incurred .

Question: Which elements of restructuring liability are considered in the table?
Answer: Employee Separation and other Consulting Costs