FangyuLei/tatqa huggingface dataset:
Years ended December31
Years ended December31
Years ended December31
(In millions of dollars, except tax rates)
2019
2018
Statutory income tax rate
26.7%
26.7%
Income before income tax expense
2,755
2,817
Computed income tax expense
736
752
Increase (decrease) in income tax expense resulting from:
Non-deductible stock-based compensation
–
5
Non-deductible portion of equity losses
7
1
Income tax adjustment, legislative tax change
(23)
-
Non-taxable portion of capital gains
(2)
(9)
Other items
(6)
9
Total income tax expense
712
758
Effective income tax rate
25.8%
26.9%
Cash income taxes paid
400
370
income tax expense .
below is a summary of the difference between income tax expense computed by applying the statutory income tax rate to income before income tax expense and the actual income tax expense for the year .
our effective income tax rate this year was 25 .
8 % compared to 26 .
9 % for 2018 .
the effective income tax rate for 2019 was lower than the statutory tax rate primarily as a result of a reduction to the alberta corporate income tax rate over a four-year period .
cash income taxes paid increased this year primarily as a result of the timing of installment payments .

Question: What was the average Computed income tax expense?
Answer: 744
July 27, 2019
July 28, 2018
Notional Amount
Fair Value
Notional Amount
Fair Value
Forward contracts:
Purchased
$2,239
$14
$1,850
$(2)
Sold
$1,441
$(14)
$845
$2
foreign currency exchange risk .
our foreign exchange forward contracts outstanding at fiscal year-end are summarized in u .
s .
dollar equivalents as follows -in millions : .
at july 27 2019 and july 28 2018 we had no option contracts outstanding .
we conduct business globally in numerous currencies .
the direct effect of foreign currency fluctuations on revenue has not been material because our revenue is primarily denominated in u .
s .
dollars .
however if the u .
s .
dollar strengthens relative to other currencies such strengthening could have an indirect effect on our revenue to the extent it raises the cost of our products to non-u .
s .
customers and thereby reduces demand .
a weaker u .
s .
dollar could have the opposite effect .
however the precise indirect effect of currency fluctuations is difficult to measure or predict because our revenue is influenced by many factors in addition to the impact of such currency fluctuations .
approximately 70 % of our operating expenses are u .
s .
-dollar denominated .
in fiscal 2019 foreign currency fluctuations net of hedging decreased our combined r & d sales and marketing and g & a expenses by approximately $ 233 million or 1 .
3 % as compared with fiscal 2018 .
in fiscal 2018 foreign currency fluctuations net of hedging increased our combined r & d sales and marketing and g & a expenses by approximately $ 93 million or 0 .
5 % as compared with fiscal 2017 .
to reduce variability in operating expenses and service cost of sales caused by non-u .
s .
-dollar denominated operating expenses and costs we may hedge certain forecasted foreign currency transactions with currency options and forward contracts .
these hedging programs are not designed to provide foreign currency protection over long time horizons .
in designing a specific hedging approach we consider several factors including offsetting exposures significance of exposures costs associated with entering into a particular hedge instrument and potential effectiveness of the hedge .
the gains and losses on foreign exchange contracts mitigate the effect of currency movements on our operating expenses and service cost of sales .
we also enter into foreign exchange forward and option contracts to reduce the short-term effects of foreign currency fluctuations on receivables and payables that are denominated in currencies other than the functional currencies of the entities .
the market risks associated with these foreign currency receivables investments and payables relate primarily to variances from our forecasted foreign currency transactions and balances .
we do not enter into foreign exchange forward or option contracts for speculative purposes .

Question: What was the percentage change in the notional amount of sold forward contracts between 2018 and 2019?
Answer: 70.53
€ million
Note no.
30/9/2018
30/9/2018 adjusted1
30/9/2019
Current assets
7,703
8,329
7,761
Inventories
26
2,108
1,905
1,946
Trade receivables
27
571
496
482
Financial assets
1
1
4
Other financial and other non-financial assets
24
913
796
881
Entitlements to income tax refunds
206
202
190
Cash and cash equivalents
29
1,298
906
500
Assets held for sale
30,43
2,605
4,024
3,758
current assets of continuing operations decreased by € 569 million compared to the previous year ' s figures to € 7 .
8 billion -30 / 9 / 2018 : € 8 .
3 billion .
cash and cash equivalents in particular contributed to this development with a decrease of € 407 million to € 0 .
5 billion -30 / 9 / 2018 : € 0 .
9 billion .
1 adjusted for effects of the discontinued business segment .
for more information about the development of current assets see the notes to the consolidated financial statements in the numbers listed in the table .

Question: What was the amount of cash and cash equivalents in FY2019?
Answer: 500
DRAM
NAND
(percentage change in average selling prices)
2019 from 2018
(30)%
(44)%
2018 from 2017
37%
(8)%
2017 from 2016
19%
(7)%
2016 from 2015
(35)%
(19)%
2015 from 2014
(11)%
(15)%
volatility in average selling prices for our semiconductor memory and storage products may adversely affect our business .
we have experienced significant volatility in our average selling prices including dramatic declines as noted in the table below and may continue to experience such volatility in the future .
in some prior periods average selling prices for our products have been below our manufacturing costs and we may experience such circumstances in the future .
average selling prices for our products that decline faster than our costs could have a material adverse effect on our business results of operations or financial condition .

Question: What is the ratio of percentage change in average selling prices of DRAM in '2017 from 2016' to '2018 from 2017'?
Answer: 0.51
2019
2019
2019
2018
In thousands
$
%
$
%
Drinkable Kefir other than ProBugs
$ 71,822
77%
$ 78,523
76%
Cheese
11,459
12%
11,486
11%
Cream and other
4,228
4%
5,276
5%
ProBugs Kefir
2,780
3%
2,795
3%
Other dairy
1,756
2%
3,836
4%
Frozen Kefir (a)
1,617
2%
1,434
1%
Net Sales
$ 93,662
100%
$ 103,350
100%
our product categories are : .
drinkable kefir sold in a variety of organic and non-organic sizes flavors and types including low fat non-fat whole milk protein and biokefir -a 3 .
5 oz .
kefir with additional probiotic cultures .
european-style soft cheeses including farmer cheese in resealable cups .
cream and other which consists primarily of cream a byproduct of making our kefir .
probugs a line of kefir products designed for children .
other dairy which includes cupped kefir and icelandic skyr a line of strained kefir and yogurt products in resealable cups .
frozen kefir available in soft serve and pint-size containers .
lifeway has determined that it has one reportable segment based on how our chief operating decision maker manages the business and in a manner consistent with the internal reporting provided to the chief operating decision maker .
the chief operating decision maker who is responsible for allocating resources and assessing our performance has been identified collectively as the chief financial officer the chief operating officer the chief executive officer and chairperson of the board of directors .
substantially all of our consolidated revenues relate to the sale of cultured dairy products that we produce using the same processes and materials and are sold to consumers through a common network of distributors and retailers in the united states .
net sales of products by category were as follows for the years ended december 31 : .
-a includes lifeway kefir shop sales .
significant customers – sales are predominately to companies in the retail food industry located within the united states .
two major customers accounted for approximately 22 % and 21 % of net sales for the years ended december 31 2019 and 2018 respectively .
two major customers accounted for approximately 17 % of accounts receivable as of december 31 2019 and 2018 .
our ten largest customers as a group accounted for approximately 57 % and 59 % of net sales for the years ended december 31 2019 and 2018 respectively .

Question: What is net sales from cream and other in 2018 and 2019 respectively?
Answer: 5,276 4,228
December 31,
December 31,
2018
2019
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
285,907
497,874
Accounts receivable
173,450
199,535
Financial liabilities:
Accounts payable
80,640
119,712
note 17 .
financial instruments and financial risk management .
financial instruments .
financial instruments include : .
the carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents accounts receivable and accounts payable equal their fair values because of the short-term nature of these instruments .

Question: What is the change in accounts payable from 2018 to 2019?
Answer: 39072
(in thousands)
2019
2018
2017
Domestic
$(51,396)
(27,494)
57,493
Foreign
(83,450)
15,951
28,742
(Loss) income before (benefit from) income taxes
$(134,846)
$(11,543)
$86,235
16 .
income taxes .
the components of -loss income before -benefit from income taxes are : .

Question: What is the average loss from domestic and foreign sources in 2019?
Answer: 67423
(In millions)
(In millions)
(In millions)
(In millions)
Year Ended June 30,
2019
2018
2017
Revenue
Productivity and Business Processes
$ 41,160
$ 35,865
$ 29,870
Intelligent Cloud
38,985
32,219
27,407
More Personal Computing
45,698
42,276
39,294
Total
$  125,843
$   110,360
$   96,571
Operating Income (Loss)
Productivity and Business Processes
$ 16,219
$ 12,924
$ 11,389
Intelligent Cloud
13,920
11,524
9,127
More Personal Computing
12,820
10,610
8,815
Corporate and Other
0
0
(306)
Total
$ 42,959
$ 35,058
$ 29,025
revenue and costs are generally directly attributed to our segments .
however due to the integrated structure of our business certain revenue recognized and costs incurred by one segment may benefit other segments .
revenue from certain contracts is allocated among the segments based on the relative value of the underlying products and services which can include allocation based on actual prices charged prices when sold separately or estimated costs plus a profit margin .
cost of revenue is allocated in certain cases based on a relative revenue methodology .
operating expenses that are allocated primarily include those relating to marketing of products and services from which multiple segments benefit and are generally allocated based on relative gross margin .
in addition certain costs incurred at a corporate level that are identifiable and that benefit our segments are allocated to them .
these allocated costs include costs of : legal including settlements and fines ; information technology ; human resources ; finance ; excise taxes ; field selling ; shared facilities services ; and customer service and support .
each allocation is measured differently based on the specific facts and circumstances of the costs being allocated .
certain corporate-level activity is not allocated to our segments including restructuring expenses .
segment revenue and operating income were as follows during the periods presented : .
corporate and other operating loss comprised restructuring expenses .

Question: How many items are there for operating income (loss)?
Answer: 4
(In millions)
(In millions)
(In millions)
(In millions)
Year Ended June 30,
2019
2018
2017
Interest and dividends income
$    2,762
$    2,214
$   1,387
Interest expense
(2,686)
(2,733)
(2,222)
Net recognized gains on investments
648
2,399
2,583
Net gains (losses) on derivatives
144
(187)
(510)
Net losses on foreign currency remeasurements
(82)
(218)
(111)
Other, net
(57)
(59)
(251)
Total
$  729
$ 1,416
$  876
other income -expense net .
the components of other income -expense net were as follows : .
we use derivative instruments to : manage risks related to foreign currencies equity prices interest rates and credit ; enhance investment returns ; and facilitate portfolio diversification .
gains and losses from changes in fair values of derivatives that are not designated as hedging instruments are primarily recognized in other income -expense net .
fiscal year 2019 compared with fiscal year 2018 interest and dividends income increased primarily due to higher yields on fixed-income securities .
interest expense decreased primarily driven by a decrease in outstanding long-term debt due to debt maturities offset in part by higher finance lease expense .
net recognized gains on investments decreased primarily due to lower gains on sales of equity investments .
net gains on derivatives includes gains on foreign exchange and interest rate derivatives in the current period as compared to losses in the prior period .
fiscal year 2018 compared with fiscal year 2017 dividends and interest income increased primarily due to higher average portfolio balances and yields on fixed-income securities .
interest expense increased primarily due to higher average outstanding long-term debt and higher finance lease expense .
net recognized gains on investments decreased primarily due to higher losses on sales of fixed-income securities offset in part by higher gains on sales of equity securities .
net losses on derivatives decreased primarily due to lower losses on equity foreign exchange and commodity derivatives offset in part by losses on interest rate derivatives in the current period as compared to gains in the prior period .

Question: Why did interest and dividends income increase from $1,387 million in 2017 to $2,214 million in 2018?
Answer: Dividends and interest income increased primarily due to higher average portfolio balances and yields on fixed-income securities.
Balance at December 31, 2017
Adjustments Due to ASC 606
Balance at January 1, 2018
Contract assets
$3,790
$(584)
$3,206
Contract liabilities
7,288
821
8,109
Accumulated deficit
(56,365)
(1,405)
(57,770)
3 .
revenue from contracts with customers .
revenues and related costs on construction contracts are recognized as the performance obligations are satisfied over time in accordance with asc 606 revenue from contracts with customers .
under asc 606 revenue and associated profit will be recognized as the customer obtains control of the goods and services promised in the contract -i .
e .
performance obligations .
the cost of uninstalled materials or equipment will generally be excluded from the company ’ s recognition of profit unless specifically produced or manufactured for a project because such costs are not considered to be a measure of progress .
in adopting asc 606 the company had the following significant changes in accounting principles : .
-i timing of revenue recognition for uninstalled materials - the company previously recognized the majority of its revenue from the installation or construction of commercial & public works projects using the percentage-of-completion method of accounting whereby revenue is recognized as the company progresses on the contract .
the percentage-of-completion for each project was determined on an actual cost-to-estimated final cost basis .
under asc 606 revenue and associated profit is recognized as the customer obtains control of the goods and services promised in the contract -i .
e .
performance obligations .
the cost of uninstalled materials or equipment is generally excluded from the company ’ s recognition of profit unless specifically produced or manufactured for a project because such costs are not considered to be a measure of progress .
-ii completed contracts - the company previously recognized the majority of its revenue from the installation of residential projects using the completed contract method of accounting whereby revenue the company recognized when the project is completed .
under asc 606 revenue is recognized as the customer obtains control of the goods and services promised in the contract -i .
e .
performance obligations .
revenue recognition for other sales arrangements such as the sales of materials will remain materially consistent with prior treatment .
the adoption of the new revenue recognition standard resulted in a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings of approximately $ 1405 as of january 1 2018 .
the details of this adjustment are summarized below .

Question: What is the percentage change in the contract assets after adjustments due to ASC606?
Answer: -15.41
Name
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)
Stock Awards ($) (1)
Option Awards ($)
All Other Compensation ($) (2)
Total ($)
Robert D. Rosenthal
95,000
40,000
-
25,900
160,900
Chad M. Lindbloom
95,00
40,000
-
13,800
148,800
Paul S. Pearlman
65,000
40,000
-
850
105,850
Lawrence Reinhold
65,000
40,000
-
850
105,850
non-management director compensation in fiscal 2019 .
the non-management directors received the following compensation during fiscal 2019 : .
-1 this column represents the fair value of the stock award on the grant date determined in accordance with the provisions of asc 718 .
as per sec rules relating to executive compensation disclosure the amounts shown exclude the impact of forfeitures related to service based vesting conditions .
for additional information regarding assumptions made in calculating the amount reflected in this column please refer to note 10 to our audited consolidated financial statements included in our annual report on form 10-k for fiscal 2019 .
-2 dividend equivalent payments on unvested restricted stock .

Question: What is the total compensation received by Robert D. Rosenthal and Chad M. Lindbloom during fiscal 2019?
Answer: 309700
2019
2018
Domestic
(1,698,689)
(2,468,805)
Foreign
(52,222)
(88,726)
Loss before income taxes
(1,750,911)
(2,557,531)
note 11 – income taxes .
the components of loss before income taxes are as follows : .

Question: What is the company's percentage change in foreign loss between 2018 and 2019?
Answer: -41.14
Year-ended 31 March 2019
Year-ended 31 March 2018 Restated See note 2
$M
$M
Revenue
710.6
639.0
Net deferral of revenue (see note 23)
49.7
129.6
Billings
760.3
768.6
Currency revaluation
25.9
18.7
Constant currency billings
786.2
787.3
billings .
billings represent the value of products and services invoiced to customers after receiving a purchase order from the customer and delivering products and services to them or for which there is no right to a refund .
billings do not equate to statutory revenue .

Question: What do Billings represent?
Answer: the value of products and services invoiced to customers after receiving a purchase order from the customer and delivering products and services to them, or for which there is no right to a refund. Billings do not equate to statutory revenue.
Year Ended December 31,
Year Ended December 31,
Year Ended December 31,
Year Ended December 31,
Year Ended December 31,
(In thousands)
2019
2018
2017
2019 % Change from 2018
2018 % Change from 2017
Revenue
$161,216
$140,326
$69,879
14.9%
100.8%
Gross profit
$104,896
$100,708
$43,817
4.2%
129.8%
Gross margin %
65.1%
71.8%
62.7%
Income from operations
$43,996
$43,641
$23,816
0.8%
83.2%
Operating margin %
27.3%
31.1%
34.1%
veradigm .
our veradigm segment derives its revenue from the provision of data-driven clinical insights with actionable tools for clinical workflow research analytics and media .
its solutions targeted at key healthcare stakeholders help improve the quality efficiency and value of healthcare delivery – from biopharma to health plans healthcare providers and patients and health technology partners among others .
year ended december 31 2019 compared with the year ended december 31 2018 .
veradigm revenue increased during the year ended december 31 2019 compared with the prior year comparable period due to an increase in organic sales .
gross profit and income from operations increased for during the year ended december 31 2019 due to an increase in organic sales and cost reductions partially offset with headcount growth and hosting migration costs .
the acquisition of practice fusion during the first quarter of 2018 also contributed to the increases .
gross margin and operating margin decreased during the year ended december 31 2019 compared with the prior year comparable period primarily due to -i an increase in hosting migration costs -ii costs associated with recent acquisitions -iii headcount growth and -iv partially offset with other cost reductions .
year ended december 31 2018 compared with the year ended december 31 2017 .
veradigm revenue gross profit gross margin and income from operations increased during the year ended december 31 2018 compared with the prior year comparable period primarily due to the acquisition of practice fusion during the first quarter of 2018 .
operating margin decreased during 2018 primarily due to higher personnel costs related to incremental resources from the practice fusion acquisition and to support anticipated new hosting client golives .

Question: What is the change in Revenue between 2019 and 2017?
Answer: 91337
2019
2018
Cash flows provided by operating activities
$115.3
$66.8
Payments for property, plant and equipment
(90.6)
(62.8)
Free cash flow
24.7
4.0
free cash flow .
we define free cash flow - " fcf " a non-gaap financial measure as cash flow provided by operations less capital expenditures .
fcf was $ 24 .
7 million for fiscal 2019 compared to $ 4 .
0 million for fiscal 2018 an increase of $ 20 .
7 million .
non-gaap financial measures including fcf are used for internal management assessments because such measures provide additional insight to investors into ongoing financial performance .
in particular we provide fcf because we believe it offers insight into the metrics that are driving management decisions .
we view fcf as an important financial metric as it demonstrates our ability to generate cash and can allow us to pursue opportunities that enhance shareholder value .
fcf is a non-gaap financial measure that should be considered in addition to not as a substitute for measures of our financial performance prepared in accordance with gaap .
a reconciliation of fcf to our financial statements that were prepared using gaap follows -in millions : .

Question: How was Free Cash Flow defined by the company?
Answer: as cash flow provided by operations less capital expenditures
Fiscal Year Ended
Fiscal Year Ended
Fiscal Year Ended
Fiscal Year Ended
December 28, 2019
December 29, 2018
$ Change
% Change
(Dollars in thousands)
(Dollars in thousands)
(Dollars in thousands)
(Dollars in thousands)
Selling, general and administrative
$106,335
$99,254
$7,081
7.1 %
% of revenues
18.0 %
18.7 %
Fiscal Year Ended
December 29, 2018
December 30, 2017
$ Change
% Change
(Dollars in thousands)
Selling, general and administrative
$99,254
$95,489
$3,765
3.9 %
% of revenues
18.7 %
17.4 %
selling general and administrative .
the increase in selling general and administrative in fiscal 2019 compared to fiscal 2018 was primarily due to higher variable costs on increased sales volumes primarily related to increases in headcount costs and employee incentive compensation as well as additional costs from the frt acquisition offset partially by a decrease in the amortization of intangible assets .

Question: What is the average Selling, general and administrative for the Fiscal Year Ended December 29, 2018 to December 30, 2017?
Answer: 97371.5