FangyuLei/tatqa huggingface dataset:
Grant Date
Exercise Date
Expiry Date
Exercise Price $
No. of Options at Beg. of Year
Options Exercised or Lapsed
No. of Options at End of Year
2 Jul 2012
2 Jul 2015
2 Jul 2017
0.92
40,000
(40,000)
-
2 Jul 2013
2 Jul 2016
30 Sept 2018 1
0.92
295,000
(220,000)
75,000
2 Jul 2014
2 Jul 2017
2 Jul 2019
1.30
875,000
(405,000)
470,000
2 Jul 2015
2 Jul 2018
2 Jul 2020
2.67
1,000,000
-
1,000,000
22 Dec 2016
31 Aug 2019
22 Dec 2021
3.59
1,323,730
-
1,323,730
Total
3,533,730
(665,000)
2,868,730
Weighted average exercise price
$1.15
$2.82
movement of options during the year ended 30 june 2018 : .
the weighted average fair value of options granted during the year was nil -2018 : nil as there were none issued during the year .
the weighted average share price for share options exercised during the period was $ 3 .
57 -2018 : $ 3 .
90 .
the weighted average remaining contractual life for share options outstanding at the end of the period was 1 .
68 years -2018 : 2 .
47 years .
the weighted average remaining contractual life for share options outstanding at the end of the period was 1 .
68 years -2018 : 2 .
47 years .

Question: What was the options' exercise date with the greatest number of options exercised or lapsed?
Answer: 2 Jul 2017
Years Ended
Years Ended
Years Ended
2019 vs. 2018
July 27, 2019
July 28, 2018
July 29, 2017
Variance in Dollars
Interest income
$1,308
$1,508
$1,338
$(200)
Interest expense
(859)
(943)
(861)
84
Interest income (expense), net
$449
$565
$477
$(116)
interest and other income -loss net .
interest income -expense net the following table summarizes interest income and interest expense -in millions : .
interest income decreased driven by a decrease in the average balance of cash and available-for-sale debt investments .
the decrease in interest expense was driven by a lower average debt balance partially offset by the impact of higher effective interest rates .

Question: What was the change in Interest expense between 2017 and 2018?
Answer: -82
RESTRUCTURING, ONEROUS
CONTRACTS, STORE EXIT COSTS,
SELF‑INSURED RISKS
AND OTHER
2019
2018
2019
2018
$M
$M
$M
$M
Movement:
Balance at start of period
596
593
679
800
Net provisions recognised/(reversed) (1)
177
161
225
55
Cash payments
(157)
(148)
(162)
(178)
Other
(13)
(10)
(5)
2
Balance at end of period
603
596
737
679
Current
173
177
280
256
Non‑current
430
419
457
423
603
596
737
679
movements in total self ‐ insured risks restructuring onerous contracts store exit costs and other provisions .
-1 the increase in restructuring onerous contracts and store exit costs in 2019 is primarily attributable to the recognition of provisions associated with the big w network review as outlined in note 1 .
4 .
a provision is recognised when the group has a present legal or constructive obligation as a result of a past event it is probable that an outflow of economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation and a reliable estimate can be made as to the amount of the obligation .
the amount recognised is the best estimate of the consideration required to settle the present obligation at the reporting date taking into account the risks and uncertainties surrounding the obligation .
a liability is recognised for benefits accruing to employees in respect of annual leave and long service leave .
liabilities expected to be settled within 12 months are measured at their nominal values using the remuneration rate expected to apply at the time of settlement .
liabilities which are not expected to be settled within 12 months are measured as the present value of the estimated future cash outflows to be made by the group in respect of services provided by employees up to the reporting date .
the provision for self-insured risks primarily represents the estimated liability for workers ’ compensation and public liability claims .
provision for restructuring is recognised when the group has developed a detailed formal plan for the restructuring and has raised a valid expectation in those affected by the restructuring that the restructuring will occur .
an onerous contract is a contract in which the unavoidable costs of meeting the obligations under the contract exceed the economic benefits expected to be received under it .
the unavoidable costs under a contract reflect the least net cost of exiting from the contract which is the lower of the cost of fulfilling it and any compensation or penalties arising from failure to fulfil it .

Question: When is provision for restructuring recognised?
Answer: Provision for restructuring is recognised when the Group has developed a detailed formal plan for the restructuring and has raised a valid expectation in those affected by the restructuring that the restructuring will occur.
June 1, 2019
June 2, 2018
Land and improvements
$93,046
$90,757
Buildings and improvements
370,451
360,030
Machinery and equipment
496,166
478,997
Construction-in-progress
52,551
9,307
1,012,214
939,091
Less: accumulated depreciation
555,920
513,707
$456,294
$425,384
6 .
property plant and equipment .
property plant and equipment consisted of the following -in thousands : .
depreciation expense was $ 51 .
7 million $ 51 .
1 million and $ 48 .
8 million in fiscal years 2019 2018 and 2017 respectively .
the company maintains insurance for both property damage and business interruption relating to catastrophic events such as fires .
insurance recoveries received for property damage and business interruption in excess of the net book value of damaged assets clean-up and demolition costs and post-event costs are recognized as income in the period received or committed when all contingencies associated with the recoveries are resolved .
gains on insurance recoveries related to business interruption are recorded within “ cost of sales ” and any gains or losses related to property damage are recorded within “ other income -expense .
” insurance recoveries related to business interruption are classified as operating cash flows and recoveries related to property damage are classified as investing cash flows in the statement of cash flows .
insurance claims incurred or finalized during the fiscal years ended 2019 2018 and 2017 did not have a material affect on the company ' s consolidated financial statements .

Question: What are recoveries related to property damage are classified as?
Answer: investing cash flows
Year Ending March 31,
Capital Leases
Facility Leases
Data Centers
2020
$ 918
$ 10,649
$ 21,216
2021
1,102
15,186
17,427
2022
326
14,111
13,010
2023
—
13,825
2,774
2024
—
13,686
356
Thereafter  
—
59,502
—
Total minimum lease payments 
$ 2,346
$ 126,959
$ 54,783
Less: Amount representing interest  
(121)
Present value of capital lease obligations  
2,225
Less: Current portion  
(844)
Long-term portion of capital lease obligations 
$1,381
12 .
commitments and contingencies .
the company leases its facilities under non-cancelable operating leases and build-to-suit leases with various expiration dates through march 2029 .
rent expense related to the company ’ s office facilities was $ 5 .
3 million $ 4 .
8 million and $ 3 .
2 million for the years ended march 31 2019 2018 and 2017 respectively .
the company has also entered into various capital lease agreements for computer equipment with non-cancelable terms through january 2022 and has non-cancelable commitments related to its data centers .
future minimum payments for our capital leases facility operating leases -including lexington ma – u .
s .
build-to-suit lease and data center operating leases as of march 31 2019 are as follows : .
certain amounts included in the table above relating to data center operating leases for the company ’ s servers include usage-based charges in addition to base rent .
future lease payments in the table above do not include amounts due to the company for future minimum sublease rental income of $ 0 .
6 million under non-cancelable subleases through 2020 .
the company has outstanding letters of credit of $ 3 .
9 million and $ 3 .
8 million related to certain operating leases as of march 31 2019 and 2018 respectively .

Question: How much was the outstanding letters of credit related to certain operating leases as of March 31, 2018?
Answer: $3.8 million
Fiscal Year Ended August 31,
Fiscal Year Ended August 31,
Fiscal Year Ended August 31,
2019
2018
2017
Expected dividend yield
0.6%
0.6%
0.8%
Risk-free interest rate
2.3%
1.4%
0.5%
Expected volatility(1)
28.6%
23.0%
33.0%
Expected life
0.5 years
0.5 years
0.5 years
employee stock purchase plan .
the maximum aggregate number of shares that are available for issuance under the 2011 employee stock purchase plan -the “ espp ” is 12000000 .
employees are eligible to participate in the espp after 90 days of employment with the company .
the espp permits eligible employees to purchase common stock through payroll deductions which may not exceed 10 % of an employee ’ s compensation as defined in the espp at a price equal to 85 % of the fair value of the common stock at the beginning or end of the offering period whichever is lower .
the espp is intended to qualify under section 423 of the internal revenue code .
as of august 31 2019 3397019 shares remained available for issue under the 2011 espp .
the fair value of shares issued under the espp was estimated on the commencement date of each offering period using the black-scholes option pricing model .
the following weighted-average assumptions were used in the model for each respective period : .
-1 the expected volatility was estimated using the historical volatility derived from the company ’ s common stock .

Question: What was the maximum aggregate number of shares that are available for issuance under the 2011 Employee Stock Purchase Plan?
Answer: 12,000,000
December 31, 2019
September 30, 2019
June 30, 2019
March 31, 2019
December 31, 2018
ACI On Premise
$1,977
$1,925
$1,880
$1,861
$1,875
ACI On Demand
3,855
3,756
3,813
2,290
2,299
Total
$5,832
$5,681
$5,693
$4,151
$4,174
December 31, 2019
September 30, 2019
June 30, 2019
March 31, 2019
December 31, 2018
Committed
$2,168
$2,003
$2,105
$1,734
$1,832
Renewal
3,664
3,678
3,588
2,417
2,342
Total
$5,832
$5,681
$5,693
$4,151
$4,174
the following table sets forth our 60-month backlog estimate by reportable segment as of december 31 2019 ; september 30 2019 ; june 30 2019 ; march 31 2019 ; and december 31 2018 -in millions .
the 60-month backlog estimate includes approximately $ 1 .
5 billion as a result of the acquisition of speedpay which occurred on may 9 2019 .
dollar amounts reflect foreign currency exchange rates as of each period end .
this is a non-gaap financial measure being presented to provide comparability across accounting periods .
we believe this measure provides useful information to investors and others in understanding and evaluating our financial performance .
estimates of future financial results require substantial judgment and are based on several assumptions as described above .
these assumptions may turn out to be inaccurate or wrong for reasons outside of management ’ s control .
for example our customers may attempt to renegotiate or terminate their contracts for many reasons including mergers changes in their financial condition or general changes in economic conditions in the customer ’ s industry or geographic location .
we may also experience delays in the development or delivery of products or services specified in customer contracts which may cause the actual renewal rates and amounts to differ from historical experiences .
changes in foreign currency exchange rates may also impact the amount of revenue recognized in future periods .
accordingly there can be no assurance that amounts included in backlog estimates will generate the specified revenues or that the actual revenues will be generated within the corresponding 60-month period .
additionally because certain components of committed backlog and all of renewal backlog estimates are operating metrics the estimates are not required to be subject to the same level of internal review or controls as contracted but not recognized committed backlog .

Question: What was the committed backlog in December 31, 2019?
Answer: $2,168
Fiscal Years
Fiscal Years
Fiscal Years
2019
2018
% Change
Telecom
$180,938
$ 222,940
(18.8)%
Data Center
114,132
162,098
(29.6)%
Industrial & Defense
204,638
185,360
10.4 %
Total
$499,708
$ 570,398
(12.4)%
Telecom
36.2%
39.1%
Data Center
22.8%
28.4%
Industrial & Defense
41.0%
32.5%
 Total
100.0%
100.0%
comparison of fiscal year ended september 27 2019 to fiscal year ended september 28 2018 .
revenue .
in fiscal year 2019 our revenue decreased by $ 70 .
7 million or 12 .
4 % to $ 499 .
7 million from $ 570 .
4 million for fiscal year 2018 .
revenue from our primary markets the percentage of change between the years and revenue by primary markets expressed as a percentage of total revenue were -in thousands except percentages : .
in fiscal year 2019 our telecom market revenue decreased by $ 42 .
0 million or 18 .
8 % compared to fiscal year 2018 .
the decrease was primarily due to the full year effect of our may 2018 sale of the japan-based long-range optical subassembly business -the " lr4 business " lower sales of carrier-based optical semiconductor products to our asia customer base as well as lower sales of products targeting fiber to the home applications .
in fiscal year 2019 our data center market revenue decreased by $ 48 .
0 million or 29 .
6 % compared to fiscal year 2018 .
the decrease was primarily due to lower revenue related to sales of legacy optical products and lasers partially offset by the recognition of $ 7 .
0 million of licensing revenue during the fiscal year ended september 27 2019 .
in fiscal year 2019 our i & d market revenues increased by $ 19 .
3 million or 10 .
4 % compared to fiscal year 2018 .
the increase was related to higher revenue from sales across the product portfolio .

Question: What is the average Telecom for fiscal year 2018 and 2019?
Answer: 201939
OPENING
NON‑CASH
NET CASH
CLOSING
BALANCE
MOVEMENTS
MOVEMENTS
BALANCE
2019
$M
$M
$M
$M
Current, unsecured
Short-term money market loans
16
2
21
39
Bank loans
88
5
142
235
Securities
500
–
(500)
–
Total current borrowings
604
7
(337)
274
Non‑current, unsecured
Bank loans
540
36
102
678
Securities
1,668
110
400
2,178
Unamortised borrowing costs
(9)
5
–
(4)
Finance leases
–
6
(3)
3
Total non‑current borrowings
2,199
157
499
2,855
Total
2,803
164
162
3,129
this section provides a summary of the capital management activity of the group during the period including the group ’ s borrowings .
the group manages its liquidity requirements with a range of short-term money market loans bank loans and flexible debt instruments with varying maturities .
the group manages its capital structure with the objective of enhancing long-term shareholder value through funding its business at an optimised weighted average cost of capital .
the group returns capital to shareholders when consistent with its long-term capital structure objectives and where it will enhance shareholder value .
in may 2019 the group returned $ 1 .
7 billion of capital to shareholders through an off-market share buy-back .
this resulted in the purchase of 58 .
7 million shares which were subsequently cancelled .
the share buy-back complements dividends of $ 1 .
4 billion paid to shareholders this reporting period through the 2018 final and special dividends and the 2019 interim dividend with a total of $ 3 .
1 billion returned to shareholders excluding franking credits .
the group remains committed to solid investment grade credit ratings and a number of actions can be undertaken to support the credit profile including the sale of non-core assets further working capital initiatives and adjusting growth capital expenditure and the property leasing profile .
the group ’ s credit ratings -1 are bbb -stable outlook according to s & p and baa2 -stable outlook according to moody ’ s .
in march 2019 the $ 500 million domestic medium term notes matured .
it was refinanced in april 2019 with $ 400 million of medium term notes issued to meet the group ’ s new green bond framework -green bonds .
the green bonds have been issued for a five-year tenor maturing in april 2024 .
in november 2019 $ 320 million of undrawn syndicated bank loan facilities are due to mature .
the group intends to refinance this facility at maturity .
-1 these credit ratings have been issued by a credit rating agency which holds an australian financial services licence with an authorisation to issue credit ratings to wholesale clients only and are for the benefit of the group ’ s debt providers .

Question: What percentage constitution does bank loans hold in total non-current borrowings in the closing balance?
Answer: 23.75
USDm
2019
2018
Maturity analysis - contractual undiscounted cash flow
Less than one year
7.5
5.2
One to five years
27.6
25.6
More than five years
0.1
-
Total undiscounted lease liabilities as of 31 December
35.2
30.8
Lease liabilities included under "Borrowings" as of 31 December
30.6
25.3
Non-current
10.2
3.2
Current
20.4
22.1
lease liabilities regarding right-of-use assets are included on the balance sheet under “ borrowings ” .
extension and termination options are included in several leases in order to optimize operational flexibility in terms of managing contracts .
the lease term determined by torm is the noncancellable period of a lease together with any extension / termination options if these are / are not reasonably certain to be exercised .

Question: What was the percentage change in non-current lease liabilities?
Answer: 218.75
December 31, 2019
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
Multi-Asset Fund
$ —
$4,825
$ —
$ 4,825
Diversified Growth Fund
—
4,855
—
4,855
Index-Linked Gilts
—
1,934
—
1,934
Corporate Bonds
—
2,090
—
2,090
Insurance Contracts
—
—
1,045
1,045
Cash
154
—
—
154
Total
$154
$13,704
$1,045
$14,903
December 31, 2018
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
Multi-Asset Fund
$ —
$4,570
$—
$4,570
Diversified Growth Fund
—
4,650
—
4,650
Index-Linked Gilts
—
2,044
—
2,044
Corporate Bonds
—
2,044
—
2,044
Insurance Contracts
—
—
72
72
Cash
53
—
—
53
Total
$53
$13,308
$72
$13,433
advanced energy industries inc .
notes to consolidated financial statements – -continued -in thousands except per share amounts .
the fair value of the company ’ s qualified pension plan assets by category for the years ended december 31 are as follows : .
at december 31 2019 our plan ’ s assets of $ 14 .
9 million were invested in five separate funds including a multiasset fund -32 .
4 % a diversified growth fund -32 .
6 % an index-linked gilt -13 .
0 % corporate bonds -14 .
0 % and insurance contracts -7 % .
the asset and growth funds aim to generate an ‘ equity-like ’ return over an economic cycle with significantly reduced volatility relative to equity markets and have scope to use a diverse range of asset classes including equities bonds cash and alternatives e .
g .
property infrastructure high yield bonds floating rate debt private equity hedge funds and currency .
the bond fund and gilt fund are invested in index-linked gilts and corporate bonds .
these investments are intended to provide a degree of protection against changes in the value of our plan ’ s liabilities related to changes in long-term expectations for interest rates and inflation expectations .

Question: How many assets was in the Level 2 Corporate Bonds for 2018?
Answer: 2,044
Year ended December 31
Year ended December 31
Year ended December 31
Year ended December 31
Year ended December 31
(EUR million)
2018
2018
2019
2019
United States
175.9
21.5%
339.5
26.4%
Europe
165.6
20.2%
126.2
9.8%
Asia
476.6
58.3%
818.2
63.7%
818.1
100.0%
1,283.9
100.0%
revenue .
the sales cycle from quotation to shipment for our front-end equipment generally takes several months depending on capacity utilization and the urgency of the order .
usually acceptance is within four months after shipment .
the sales cycle is longer for equipment that is installed at the customer ’ s site for evaluation prior to sale .
the typical trial period ranges from six months to two years after installation .
our revenues are concentrated in asia the united states and europe .
the following table shows the geographic distribution of our revenue for 2018 and 2019 : .

Question: What is the average revenue for United States in 2018 and 2019?
Answer: 257.7
Reported change
Other activity (including M&A)
Foreign exchange
Organic* change
%
pps
pps
%
Revenue – Europe
(1.9)
4.1
0.8
3.0
Service revenue
Germany
2.6
–
–
2.6
Italy
1.0
0.2
–
1.2
UK
(8.1)
0.1
4.5
(3.5)
Spain
1.8
0.3
–
2.1
Other Europe
(19.6)
22.9
(0.4)
2.9
Europe
(3.9)
4.0
0.8
0.9
Adjusted EBITDA
Germany
10.9
(0.1)
(0.1)
10.7
Italy
4.5
0.1
–
4.6
UK
45.4
(1.2)
7. 6
51.8
Spain
4.4
0.6
–
5.0
Other Europe
(18.8)
26.8
(0.3)
7.7
Europe
7.3
5.1
0.6
13.0
Europe adjusted operating profit
53.2
34.8
(1.7)
86.3
european revenue decreased by 1 .
9 % .
foreign exchange movements contributed a 0 .
8 percentage point negative impact and the deconsolidation of vodafone netherlands contributed a 4 .
1 percentage point negative impact offset by 3 .
0 % organic growth .
service revenue increased by 0 .
9 % * or 0 .
6 % * excluding a legal settlement in germany in q4 driven by strong fixed customer growth and the benefit of the group ’ s “ more-for-more ” mobile propositions in several markets which offset increased regulatory headwinds following the implementation of the eu ’ s “ roam like at home ” policy in june and the impact of the introduction of handset financing in the uk .
excluding regulation and uk handset financing as well as a legal settlement in germany in q4 service revenue growth was 2 .
0 % * -q3 : 1 .
9 % * q4 : 1 .
7 % * .
adjusted ebitda increased 7 .
3 % including a 5 .
1 percentage point negative impact from the deconsolidation of vodafone netherlands and a 0 .
6 percentage point negative impact from foreign exchange movements .
on an organic basis adjusted ebitda increased 13 .
0 % * supported by the benefit of the introduction of handset financing in the uk regulatory settlements in the uk and a legal settlement in germany .
excluding these items as well as the net impact of roaming adjusted ebitda grew by 7 .
9 * reflecting operating leverage and tight cost control through our “ fit for growth ” programme .
adjusted ebit increased by 86 .
3 % * reflecting strong adjusted ebitda growth and stable depreciation and amortisation expenses .

Question: How many percent of organic change in Europe adjusted operating profit is the organic change in Italy EBITDA?
Answer: 5.33
Year ended December 31,
Year ended December 31,
Year ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
Expected term (in years)
0.5
0.5
0.5
Expected volatility
47%
42%
34%
Risk-free interest rate
2.01%
2.31%
1.20%
Expected dividend yield
0%
0%
0%
Offering grant date fair value of ESPP rights
$33.66
$18.07
$9.52
the espp provides for annual increases in the number of shares available for issuance under the espp on the first day of each fiscal year beginning in fiscal 2014 equal to the least of : -i 1 % of the outstanding shares of all classes of common stock on the last day of the immediately preceding year ; -ii 1250000 shares ; or -iii such other amount as may be determined by the board of directors .
during the year ended december 31 2019 a total of 810459 shares of class a common stock were added to the espp plan in connection with the annual increase provision .
at december 31 2019 a total of 3918712 shares were available for issuance under the espp .
the weighted-average assumptions used to value espp rights under the black-scholes-merton option-pricing model and the resulting offering grant date fair value of espp rights granted in the periods presented were as follows : .
as of december 31 2019 and 2018 there was approximately $ 2 .
3 million and $ 1 .
5 million of unrecognized share-based compensation expense net of estimated forfeitures related to espp which will be recognized on a straight-line basis over the remaining weighted-average vesting periods of approximately 0 .
4 years respectively .

Question: What are the respective expected volatility of ESPP rights for the year ended December 31, 2018 and 2017?
Answer: 42% 34%