FangyuLei/tatqa huggingface dataset:
Year Ended December 31,
Year Ended December 31,
Year Ended December 31,
Year Ended December 31,
% Change vs.Prior Year
% Change vs.Prior Year
% Change vs.Prior Year
% Change vs.Prior Year
% Change vs.Prior Year
2019
2019
2018
2017
2019
2018
Hardware Revenue (Pre ASC 606 Adoption)
$44,972
$49,914
$43,190
-10%
16%
Cost of hardware
-32,455
-35,947
- 32,205
-10%
12%
Hardware Revenue, net (Post ASC 606 Adoption)
$12,517
$13,967
$ 10,985
-10%
27%
hardware .
hardware sales net decreased $ 1 .
5 million or -10 % in 2019 compared to 2018 .
we adopted the new asc 606 standard as of january 1 2018 and elected to use the modified retrospective method .
historical hardware sales prior to the adoption of asc 606 were recorded on a gross basis as we were the principal in the transaction in accordance with the previous standard asc 605-45 .
under the new standard we are an agent in the transaction as we do not physically control the hardware which we sell .
accordingly starting january 1 2018 we recognize our hardware revenue net of related cost which reduces both hardware revenue and cost of sales as compared to our accounting prior to 2018 .
for comparison purposes only had we implemented asc 606 using the full retrospective method we would have also presented hardware revenue net of cost for prior periods as shown below .
the majority of hardware sales are derived from our americas segment .
sales of hardware are largely dependent upon customer- specific desires which fluctuate .

Question: What is the percentage change in cost of hardware between 2019 and 2018?
Answer: -10%
2019
2018
Net taxable (loss) at effective tax rates
$(2,508)
$(1,567)
Stock compensation expense
119
358
Amortization of debt discount
94
10
Impairment of goodwill
-
519
Other
(223)
(153)
Valuation allowance
2,518
833
Income tax expense
$-
$-
13 .
income taxes .
the company files income tax returns in the u .
s .
federal jurisdiction and the state of california .
with few exceptions the company is no longer subject to u .
s .
federal state and local or non-u .
s .
income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2015 .
deferred income taxes have been provided by temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for tax purposes .
to the extent allowed by gaap the company provides valuation allowances against the deferred tax assets for amounts when the realization is uncertain .
included in the balances at december 31 2019 and 2018 are no tax positions for which the ultimate deductibility is highly certain but for which there is uncertainty about the timing of such deductibility .
because of the impact of deferred tax accounting other than interest and penalties the disallowance of the shorter deductibility period would not affect the annual effective tax rate but would accelerate the payment of cash to the taxing authority to an earlier period .
the company ’ s policy is to recognize interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and penalties in operating expenses .
during the periods ended december 31 2019 and 2018 the company did not recognize interest and penalties .
the income tax provision differs from the amount of income tax determined by applying the u .
s .
federal income tax rate to pretax income from continuing operations for the year ended december 31 2019 and 2018 due to the following : .

Question: What is the percentage change in the valuation allowance from 2018 to 2019?
Answer: 202.28
Named Executive Officer (1)(2) (1)(2) (1)(2)
Target Award Opportunity ($)
Market-based PRSUs award (#)
Stock Options Award (#)
Service-based RSUs Award (#)
Timothy M.Archer
4,000,000
28,935
34,722
17,361
Douglas R.Bettinger
2,750,000
19,892
23,871
11,935
Richard A.Gottscho
3,250,000
23,509
28,209
14,105
Patrick J. Lord
1,100,000
7,957
—
7,957
Vahid Vahedi
1,100,000
7,957
—
7,957
Seshasayee(Sesha) Varadarajan
1,100,000
7,957
—
7,957
figure 29 .
2016 / 2018 ltip award grants .
-1 all of the market-based prsus and one-third of the stock options and service-based rsus granted to mr .
anstice under the 2016 / 2018 ltip that were scheduled to vest in february 2019 were canceled upon his termination of employment with the company as of december 5 2018 .
-2 the number of market-based prsus awarded is reflected at target .
the final number of shares that may have been earned is 0 % to 150 % of target .
in february 2019 the committee determined the payouts for the calendar year 2016 / 2018 ltip awards of market-based prsus .
the number of shares represented by the marketbased prsus earned over the performance period was based on our stock price performance compared to the market price performance of the sox index .
based on the above formula and market-based prsu vesting summary set forth in figures 26 and 27 the company ’ s stock price performance over the three-year performance period was equal to 89 .
93 % and performance of the sox index -based on market price over the same three-year performance period was equal to 84 .
47 % .
lam ’ s stock price outperformed the sox index by 5 .
46 % which resulted in a performance payout of 110 .
93 % to target number of marketbased prsus granted to each neo .
based on such results the committee made the following payouts to each neo for the 2016 / 2018 ltip award of market-based prsus .

Question: What was the number of shares represented by the Marketbased PRSUs earned over the performance period based on?
Answer: our stock price performance compared to the market price performance of the SOX index
2019
2018
2018
A$ Million
A$ Million
Variance %
Operating revenue
231.3
230.8
0.2%
EBITDA1
53.0
59.3
(10.6%)
NPAT
21.5
28.9
(25.6%)
NPATA1
31.2
38.0
(17.9%)
Basic earnings per share (EPS) (cents)
10.9
14.8
(26.4%)
Basic EPSa1 (cents)
15.8
19.4
(18.6%)
review of operations .
the group ’ s operating performance for the fiscal year compared to last year is as follows : .
1 .
the directors believe the information additional to ifrs measures included in the report is relevant and useful in measuring the financial performance of the group .
these include : ebitda npata and epsa .
these measures have been defined in the chairperson and chief executive officer ’ s joint report on page 2 .
in 2019 the business continued to deliver strong results after the record 2018 year .
revenues and ebitda were in line with guidance .
further details on the group ’ s results are outlined in the chairperson and chief executive officer ’ s joint report on page 2 .
on 1 june 2019 hansen acquired the sigma systems business -sigma and one month of these results are included in the fy19 result .
also included in the results are the transaction and other restructuring costs related to the acquisition which we have identified as separately disclosed items in our results .
this acquisition has also resulted in the re-balancing of the group ’ s market portfolio which post the acquisition of enoro in fy18 was initially weighted towards the utilities sector .
with sigma ’ s revenues concentrated in the communications sector the group ’ s revenue portfolio is now re-balanced to ensure greater diversification across multiple industries regions and clients .
the group has generated operating cash flows of $ 39 .
7 million which has been used to retire external debt and fund dividends of $ 12 .
6 million during the financial year .
with the introduction of a higher level of debt in june 2019 to fund the sigma acquisition the group has for the first time used the strength of the group ’ s balance sheet to fund 100 % of an acquisition .
with the group ’ s strong cash generation hansen is well placed to service and retire the debt over the coming years .

Question: What was the average difference between basic EPS and basic EPSa for both FYs?
Answer: 4.75
For the Years Ended December 31,
For the Years Ended December 31,
For the Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
Cost of revenues—product sales: Software royalties, amortization, and intellectual property licenses
$19
$13
$10
Cost of revenues—subscription, licensing, and other revenues: Game Operations and Distribution Costs
1
2
1
Cost of revenues—subscription, licensing, and other revenues: Software royalties, amortization, and intellectual property licenses
1
3
3
Product development
53
61
57
Sales and marketing
10
15
15
General and administrative
82
115
92
Share-based compensation expense before income taxes
166
209
178
Income tax benefit
(29)
(46)
(34)
Total share-based compensation expense, net of income tax benefit
$137
$163
$144
share-based compensation expense .
the following table sets forth the total share-based compensation expense included in our consolidated statements of operations -amounts in millions : .

Question: What was the cost of revenues from product sales in 2019?
Answer: $19
2018
2019
As per January 1:
Issued shares
62,297,394
56,297,394
Treasury shares
6,157,241
6,978,496
Outstanding shares
56,140,153
49,318,898
Changes during the year:
Cancellation of treasury shares
6,000,000
5,000,000
Share buybacks
7,242,734
950,902
Treasury shares used for share based performance programs
421,479
498,224
As per December 31:
Issued shares
56,297,394
51,297,394
Treasury shares
6,978,496
2,431,174
Outstanding shares
49,318,898
48,866,220
share information .
on december 31 2019 the total number of issued common shares of asmi amounted to 51297394 compared to 56297394 at year-end 2018 .
the decrease was the result of the cancellation of 5 million treasury shares that was approved by the annual general meeting of shareholders -agm on may 20 2019 and became effective on july 23 2019 .
on december 31 2019 we had 48866220 outstanding common shares excluding 2431174 treasury shares .
this compared to 49318898 outstanding common shares and 6978496 treasury shares at year-end 2018 .
besides the cancellation of 5 million treasury shares in july 2019 the change in the number of treasury shares in 2019 was the result of approximately 951000 repurchased shares and approximately 498000 treasury shares that were used as part of share based payments .
on december 31 2019 48583340 of the outstanding common shares were registered with our transfer agent in the netherlands abn amro bank nv ; and 282880 were registered with our transfer agent in the united states citibank na new york .
on february 25 2020 asmi announced that it will propose to the agm 2020 the cancellation of 1 .
5 million treasury shares as the number of 2 .
4 million treasury shares held at that date was more than sufficient to cover our outstanding options and restricted / performance shares .

Question: At which point of time was the Outstanding shares the greatest?
Answer: January 1 2018
Employee and Director Options
For the Years Ended December 31,
For the Years Ended December 31,
For the Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
Expected life (in years)
7.85
7.64
7.01
Volatility
30.00%
32.37%
35.00%
Risk free interest rate
1.90%
3.10%
2.14%
Dividend yield
0.76%
0.61%
0.50%
Weighted-average grant date fair value
$17.12
$21.03
$21.11
Stock price volatility range:
Low
30.00%
31.72%
28.19%
High
38.17%
36.73%
35.00%
fair value valuation assumptions .
valuation of stock options .
the fair value of stock options granted are principally estimated using a binomial-lattice model .
the inputs in our binomial-lattice model include expected stock price volatility risk-free interest rate dividend yield contractual term and vesting schedule as well as measures of employees ’ cancellations exercise and post-vesting termination behavior .
statistical methods are used to estimate employee termination rates .
the following table presents the weighted-average assumptions weighted average grant date fair value and the range of expected stock price volatilities : .
expected life the expected life of employee stock options is a derived output of the binomial-lattice model and represents the weighted-average period the stock options are expected to remain outstanding .
a binomial-lattice model assumes that employees will exercise their options when the stock price equals or exceeds an exercise multiple .
the exercise multiple is based on historical employee exercise behaviors .
volatility to estimate volatility for the binomial-lattice model we consider the implied volatility of exchange-traded options on our stock to estimate short-term volatility the historical volatility of our common shares during the option ’ s contractual term to estimate long-term volatility and a statistical model to estimate the transition from short-term volatility to long-term volatility .
risk-free interest rate as is the case for volatility the risk-free interest rate is assumed to change during the option ’ s contractual term .
the riskfree interest rate which is based on u .
s .
treasury yield curves reflects the expected movement in the interest rate from one time period to the next - “ forward rate ” .
dividend yield the expected dividend yield assumption is based on our historical and expected future amount of dividend payouts .
share-based compensation expense recognized is based on awards ultimately expected to vest and therefore has been reduced for estimated forfeitures .
forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant based on historical experience and revised if necessary in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates .

Question: How was the fair value of stock options granted estimated by?
Answer: using a binomial-lattice model.
(In millions)
(In millions)
(In millions)
(In millions)
Year Ended June 30,
2019
2018
2017
Beginning unrecognized tax benefits
$ 11,961
$ 11,737
$ 10,164
Decreases related to settlements
(316)
(193)
(4)
Increases for tax positions related to the current year
2,106
1,445
1,277
Increases for tax positions related to prior years
508
151
397
Decreases for tax positions related to prior years
(1,113)
(1,176)
(49)
Decreases due to lapsed statutes of limitations
0
(3)
(48)
Ending unrecognized tax benefits
$  13,146
$  11,961
$  11,737
uncertain tax positions .
as of june 30 2019 2018 and 2017 we had accrued interest expense related to uncertain tax positions of $ 3 .
4 billion $ 3 .
0 billion and $ 2 .
3 billion respectively net of income tax benefits .
the provision for -benefit from income taxes for fiscal years 2019 2018 and 2017 included interest expense related to uncertain tax positions of $ 515 million $ 688 million and $ 399 million respectively net of income tax benefits .
the aggregate changes in the gross unrecognized tax benefits related to uncertain tax positions were as follows : .
we settled a portion of the internal revenue service - “ irs ” audit for tax years 2004 to 2006 in fiscal year 2011 .
in february 2012 the irs withdrew its 2011 revenue agents report related to unresolved issues for tax years 2004 to 2006 and reopened the audit phase of the examination .
we also settled a portion of the irs audit for tax years 2007 to 2009 in fiscal year 2016 and a portion of the irs audit for tax years 2010 to 2013 in fiscal year 2018 .
we remain under audit for tax years 2004 to 2013 .
we expect the irs to begin an examination of tax years 2014 to 2017 within the next 12 months .
as of june 30 2019 the primary unresolved issues for the irs audits relate to transfer pricing which could have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements when the matters are resolved .
we believe our allowances for income tax contingencies are adequate .
we have not received a proposed assessment for the unresolved issues and do not expect a final resolution of these issues in the next 12 months .
based on the information currently available we do not anticipate a significant increase or decrease to our tax contingencies for these issues within the next 12 months .
we are subject to income tax in many jurisdictions outside the u .
s .
our operations in certain jurisdictions remain subject to examination for tax years 1996 to 2018 some of which are currently under audit by local tax authorities .
the resolution of each of these audits is not expected to be material to our consolidated financial statements .

Question: How many years between 2017 and 2019 had Increases for tax positions related to prior years that were greater than 100million?
Answer: 3
2019
2018
£m
£m
Performance Share Plan
5.1
4.7
Employee Share Ownership Plan
1.1
1.0
Total expense recognised in Income Statement
6.2
5.7
share-based payments .
disclosures of the share-based payments offered to employees are set out below .
more detail on each scheme is given in the annual report on remuneration 2019 on pages 102 to 132 .
the charge to the income statement in respect of share-based payments is made up as follows : .

Question: In which year was the amount for Employee Share Ownership Plan value larger?
Answer: 2019
Year Ended 
Year Ended 
Year Ended 
June 30, 2019
June 30,2018
June 30, 2017
Research and development  
21.1%
18.7%
15.4%
Sales and marketing  
28.7%
27.2%
26.8%
General and administrative  
5.6%
5.2%
6.2%
Acquisition and integration costs, net of bargain purchase gain  
0.3%
5.5%
2.2%
Restructuring charges, net of reversals  
0.5%
0.8%
1.5%
Amortization of intangibles  
0.6%
0.9%
1.4%
Total operating expenses
56.8%
58.3%
53.5%
Operating (loss) income  
(1.5)%
(3.9)%
1.0%
operating expenses .
the following table highlights our operating expenses and operating loss as a percentage of net revenues : .

Question: Which years did General and administrative as a percentage of net revenues exceed 6%?
Answer: 2017
Balance at Beginning of Period
Charged to Costs and Expenses
Write-offs
Balance at End of Period
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts:
Fiscal Year 2019
$—
$—
$5
$—
Fiscal Year 2018
$—
$—
$—
$—
Fiscal Year 2017
$—
$—
$—
$—
Allowance for Deferred Tax Assets:
Fiscal Year 2019
$54,913
$3,227
$—
$58,140
Fiscal Year 2018
$55,931
$—
$(1,018)
$54,913
Fiscal Year 2017
$79,150
$—
$(23,219)
$55,931
item 15 .
exhibits and financial statement schedules .
-a 1 .
financial statements .
reference is made to item 8 for a list of all financial statements and schedules filed as a part of this report .
2 .
financial statement schedules .
quicklogic corporation .
valuation and qualifying accounts .
-in thousands .
all other schedules not listed above have been omitted because the information required to be set forth therein is not applicable or is shown in the financial statements or notes hereto .

Question: What is the total balance at the beginning of the period in fiscal year 2018 and 2019?
Answer: 110844
Positive (Negative) Impact to Net Income
December 31,
December 31,
2018
2017
(Dollars in millions)
(Dollars in millions)
Increase in revenue
$74
49
Decrease in cost of sales
22
15
Increase in loss on sale of business included in selling, general and administrative expense
—
(102)
Increase in depreciation expense (one-time)
—
(44)
Increase in depreciation expense (ongoing)
(69)
(47)
Increase in interest expense
(55)
(39)
Decrease in income tax expense
7
65
Decrease in net income
$(21)
(103)
the failed-sale-leaseback accounting treatment had the following effects on our consolidated results of operations for the years ended december 31 2018 and 2017 : .
after factoring in the costs to sell the data centers and colocation business excluding the impact from the failed-sale-leaseback accounting treatment the sale resulted in a $ 20 million gain as a result of the aggregate value of the proceeds we received exceeding the carrying value of the assets sold and liabilities assumed .
based on the fair market values of the failed-sale-leaseback assets the failed-sale-leaseback accounting treatment resulted in a loss of $ 102 million as a result of the requirement to treat a certain amount of the pre-tax cash proceeds from the sale of the assets as though it were the result of a financing obligation .
the combined net loss of $ 82 million was included in selling general and administrative expenses in our consolidated statement of operations for the year ended december 31 2017 .
effective november 3 2016 which is the date we entered into the agreement to sell a portion of our data centers and colocation business we ceased recording depreciation of the property plant and equipment to be sold and amortization of the business ’ s intangible assets in accordance with applicable accounting rules .
otherwise we estimate that we would have recorded additional depreciation and amortization expense of $ 67 million from january 1 2017 through may 1 2017 .
upon adopting asu 2016-02 accounting for the failed sale leaseback is no longer applicable based on our facts and circumstances and the real estate assets and corresponding financing obligation were derecognized from our consolidated financial statements .
please see “ leases ” -asu 2016-02 in note 1 — background and summary of significant accounting policies for additional information on the impact the new lease standard will have on the accounting for the failed-sale-leaseback .

Question: What is the change in the increase in revenue in 2018 from 2017?
Answer: 25
(in thousands, except per share amounts and employee data)
(in thousands, except per share amounts and employee data)
(in thousands, except per share amounts and employee data)
Fiscal Years
Fiscal Years
Fiscal Years
2019(1)
2019(1)
2018
2017
2016(3)
2015
Operations:
Revenue:
$11,171,297
$9,030,008
$7,301,505
$5,854,430
$4,795,511
Gross profit
$9,498,577
$7,835,009
$6,291,014
$5,034,522
$4,051,194
Income before income taxes
$3,204,741
$2,793,876
$2,137,641
$1,435,138
$873,781
Net income
$2,951,458
$2,590,774
$1,693,954
$1,168,782
$629,551
Net income per share:
Basic
$6.07
$5.28
$3.43
$2.35
$1.26
Diluted
$6.00
$5.20
$3.38
$2.32
$1.24
Shares used to compute basic net income                                        per share
486,291
490,564
493,632
498,345
498,764
Shares used to compute diluted net income per share
491,572
497,843
501,123
504,299
507,164
Financial position:
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments
$4,176,976
$3,228,962
$5,819,774
$4,761,300
$3,988,084
Working capital(2)
$(1,696,013)
$555,913
$3,720,356
$3,028,139
$2,608,336
Total assets
$20,762,400
$18,768,682
$14,535,556
$12,697,246
$11,714,500
Debt, current
$3,149,343
$—
$—
$—
$—
Debt, non-current
$988,924
$4,124,800
$1,881,421
$1,892,200
$1,895,259
Stockholders’ equity
$10,530,155
$9,362,114
$8,459,869
$7,424,835
$7,001,580
Additional data:
Worldwide employees
22,634
21,357
17,973
15,706
13,893
item 6 .
selected financial data .
the following selected consolidated financial data is derived from our consolidated financial statements .
as our historical operating results are not necessarily indicative of future operating results this data should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and with item 7 management ’ s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations .
-1 on december 1 2018 the beginning of our fiscal year 2019 we adopted the requirements of the financial accounting standards board ’ s accounting standards update no .
2014-09 revenue from contracts with customers topic 606 utilizing the modified retrospective method of transition .
prior period information has not been restated and continues to be reported under the accounting standard in effect for those periods .
-2 as of november 29 2019 working capital was in a deficit primarily due to the reclassification of our $ 2 .
25 billion term loan due april 30 2020 and $ 900 million 4 .
75 % senior notes due february 1 2020 to current liabilities .
we intend to refinance our term loan and 2020 notes on or before the due dates .
-3 our fiscal year is a 52- or 53-week year that ends on the friday closest to november 30 .
fiscal 2016 was a 53-week fiscal year compared with the other periods presented which were 52-week fiscal years .

Question: What was the gross profit margin in 2018?
Answer: 86.77