Before revision: The Gilomen & Lee (2015) meta-analysis indicated a moderate effect size of tapping on psychological distress (utilizing Hedge ’ s g as compared to the standard Cohen ’ s h), although they opined that the results could be due to factors common to other therapeutic approaches, and not necessarily due to tapping.
After revision: The Gilomen & Lee (2015) meta-analysis indicated a moderate effect size of tapping on psychological distress (utilizing Hedge ' s g as compared to the standard Cohen ' s h), although they opined that the results could be due to factors common to other therapeutic approaches, and not necessarily due to tapping.