Before revision:  We prove that for all reasonable values of the parameters and the problem, the expected runtime of the (\mu,\lambda)  EA is, apart from lower order terms, at least as large as the expected runtime of its elitist counterpart, the (\mu+\lambda)~EA (for which we conduct the first runtime analysis  to allow this comparison).
After revision:  We prove that for all reasonable values of the parameters and the problem, the expected runtime of the (\mu,\lambda) EA is, apart from lower order terms, at least as large as the expected runtime of its elitist counterpart, the (\mu+\lambda)~EA (for which we conduct the first runtime analysis on jump functions to allow this comparison).