Before revision:  including manual-based and NAS-based, as well as CNN-based and Transformer-based ones . Particularly, with single-model and single-scale testing, our HTC Dual-Swin-B achieves 58.6\% box AP and 51.1\% mask AP on COCO test-dev, which is significantly better than the state-of-the-art result (i.e., 57.7\% box AP and 50.2\% mask AP) achieved by a stronger baseline HTC++ with a larger backbone Swin-L.
After revision:  including manual-based and NAS-based, as well as CNN-based and Transformer-based ones . Particularly, with single-model and single-scale testing, our HTC Dual-Swin-B achieves 58.6\% box AP and 51.1\% mask AP on COCO test-dev, which is significantly better than the state-of-the-art result (i.e., 57.7\% box AP and 50.2\% mask AP) achieved by HTC++ with a larger backbone Swin-L.