Before revision:  For uncorrelated estimators of bounds --notably if bounds are estimated from distinct subsamples-- and conventional coverage levels, this step can be skipped. The proposed 95\\%DIF < confidence interval then simplifies to the union of a simple 90\\% (!) confidence interval for the partially identified parameter and an equally simple 95\\% confidence interval for a point-identified pseudotrue parameter.
After revision:  However, except for large positive correlation of bound estimators, the practical result will be simple: To achieve 95\\%DIF < confidence interval then simplifies to the union of a simple 90\\% (!) confidence interval for the partially identified parameter and an equally simple 95\\% confidence interval for a point-identified pseudotrue parameter.