Before revision:  Thus, the highlighted areas can be interpreted as the 'positive evidence' used by the network for deciding whether an individual has AD. We find that this LRP-evidence indeed fulfills those expectations that one would have towards AD evidence: (1) it is very specific for individuals ("Why does this person have AD?") with high inter-patient variability, (2) there is very little evidence for AD in healthy controls and (3) areas that exhibit a lot of evidence correlate well with what is known from literature.
After revision:  In particular, we show that (1) it is very specific for individuals ("Why does this person have AD?") with high inter-patient variability, (2) there is very little evidence for AD in healthy controls and (3) areas that exhibit a lot of evidence correlate well with what is known from literature.