Before revision:  We map papers representing 95\% of citations on CRISPR / Cas from these institutions grouped by the stage that each represents in the translational research process (as a biological phenomenon, as a research tool, and development and applications of these technologies), and use a novel technique to analyse the relationships between the structures of the co-funding networks, the phase of research, and funding sources. The co-funding subnetworks were similar in that US government research funding played the decisive role in early stage research. Research at Broad/Harvard/MIT is also strongly supported by URLanizations in later stages of the translational research process, clustered around certain topics.
After revision:  We map papers representing 95\% of citations on CRISPR / Cas from these institutions grouped by the stage that each represents in the translational research process (as a biological phenomenon, as a research tool, and development and applications of these technologies), and use a novel technique to analyse the relationships between the structures of the co-funding CRISPR/Cas technology development as opposed to basic biological research. This is particularly true for the Broad/Harvard/MIT is also strongly supported by URLanizations in later stages of the translational research process, clustered around certain topics.