Before revision: P-values are being computed for increasingly complicated statistics but lacking evaluations on their quality. Meanwhile, accurate p-values enable significance comparison across batches of hypothesis tests and consequently unified false discover rate (FDR) control. This article discusses two related questions in this setting. First, we propose statistical tests to evaluate the quality of p-value  and the cross-batch comparability of any other statistic.
After revision: Bayesian networks can represent directed gene regulations and therefore are favored over co-expression networks. However, hardly any Bayesian network study concerns the false discovery control (FDC) of network edges, leading to low accuracies due to systematic biases from inconsistent false discovery levels in the same study. We design four empirical tests to examine the FDC of Bayesian networks from three p-value and the cross-batch comparability of any other statistic.