Before revision:  We describe when and how the absence of a decision of a neighboring agent communicates social information, and how an agent must marginalize over all unobserved decisions. We also show how decision thresholds and network connectivity affect group evidence accumulation, and describe the dynamics of decision making in social cliques. Our model provides a bridge between the abstractions used in the economics literature and the evidence accumulator models used widely in neuroscience and psychology.
After revision:  We describe when and how the absence of a decision can lead to a sequence of belief updates akin to those in the literature on common knowledge. Information obtained from observing repeated non-decisions is independent of realization, unless the private information of agents is redundant. On the other hand, in larger networks a single decision can trigger a cascade of agreements and disagreements that depend on the private information agents have gathered. Our approach provides a bridge between the abstractions used in the economics literature and the evidence accumulator models used widely in neuroscience and psychology.