Before revision: She writes that studies of scientific controversies show that credibility of science depend not only on strong scientific consensus, but also on the persuasive power of those who speak for science, especially in the situations of controversy.Sheila Jasanoff, "Cosmopolitan Knowledge: Climate Science and Global Civic Epistemology", in: The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society, 2011, See also Critical thinking Criticism of science Denialism Metascience Scientific skepticism Suppression of dissent References Further references Bechler, Z.
After revision: A Scientific Dissent from DarwinismShe writes that studies of scientific controversies show that credibility of science depend not only on strong scientific consensus, but also on the persuasive power of those who speak for science, especially in the situations of controversy.Sheila Jasanoff, "Cosmopolitan Knowledge: Climate Science and Global Civic Epistemology", in: The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society, 2011, See also Critical thinking Criticism of science Denialism Metascience Scientific skepticism Suppression of dissent References Further references Bechler, Z.