Before revision:  We observe that the models under consideration fail to perform well on sentences with no agreement attractor when trained solely on natural sentences with at least one attractor. Even in the presence of this biased training set, implicit hierarchical bias in the architecture (as in the Ordered Neurons LSTM) is not enough to capture syntax-sensitive dependencies. These results suggest that current RNNs do not capture the underlying hierarchical rules of natural language , but rather use shallower heuristics for their predictions .
After revision:  We observe that the models under consideration fail to perform well on sentences with no agreement attractor when trained solely on sentences with attractors. We analyze how these selectively trained RNNs compare to the baseline (training on a natural distribution of agreement attractors) along the dimensions of number agreement accuracy, representational similarity, and performance across different syntactic constructions. Our findings suggest that RNNs trained on our hard agreement instances still do not capture the underlying hierarchical rules of natural language , but rather use shallower heuristics for their predictions .