Before revision:  For 32 of 40 loops that challenged prior approaches, at least one of five lowest energy SWA models agrees with the crystallographic conformation with C \alpha RMSD accuracy better than 1.0 \AA . SWA successes include hairpin-like loops , cis-Pro touch turns, loops with lengths of up to 24 residues (well outside the range of previous methods), and five blind tests:
After revision:  For 32 of 40 loops that challenged prior approaches, at least one of five lowest energy SWA models agrees with the crystallographic conformation with C \alpha RMSD accuracy better than 1.0 \AA . SWA successes include hairpin-like loops , cis-Pro touch turns, loops that pass through tunnels of other side-chains, and loops of lengths up to 24 residues (well outside the range of previous methods), and five blind tests: