Before revision: () modern reanalysis of the dataDaniel Kennefick, "Not Only Because of Theory: Dyson, Eddington and the Competing Myths of the 1919 Eclipse Expedition," Proceedings of the 7th Conference on the History of General Relativity, Tenerife, 2005; available online from ArXivPhillip Ball, "Arthur Eddington Was Innocent," Nature, 7 September 2007, (available online 2007) suggests that Eddington's analysis of the data was accurate.
After revision: () modern reanalysis of the dataDaniel Kennefick, "Not Only Because of Theory: Dyson, Eddington and the Competing Myths of the 1919 Eclipse Expedition," Proceedings of the 7th Conference on the History of General Relativity, Tenerife, 2005; available online from ArXiv Phillip Ball, "Arthur Eddington Was Innocent," Nature, 7 September 2007, (available online 2007) suggests that Eddington's analysis of the data was accurate.