Before revision:  Furthermore, we show that the embeddings capture meaningful "axes" that encompass all disciplines in the knowledge domains, such as an axis from "soft" to "hard" sciences or from "social" to "biological" sciences, which allow us to quantitatively ground a periodical on a given spectrum. Using this new capacity, we test the hypothesis of the hierarchy of the sciences, showing that, in most disciplines such as Social Sciences and Life Sciences, most widely cited papers tend to appear in "harder" periodicals. Our framework may offer novel quantification methods in science of science, which may in turn facilitate the study of how knowledge is created URLanized.
After revision:  Furthermore, we show that the embeddings capture meaningful "axes" that encompass all disciplines in the knowledge domains, such as an axis from "soft" to "hard" sciences or from "social" to "biological" sciences, which allow us to quantitatively ground a periodical on a given dimension. By offering novel quantification in science of science, which may in turn facilitate the study of how knowledge is created URLanized.