Before revision:  Interestingly, intervals also provided insight into respondents' reasoning about different types of uncertainties, suggesting a tendency to underestimate lack of available information relative to observable variability when making a stimulus judgement .
After revision:  Interestingly, intervals also provided insight into respondents' reasoning about the different aforementioned types of intervals - we replicate a tendency towards overconfidence for those representing epistemic uncertainty (i.e., disjunctive sets), but find intervals representing inherent range (i.e., conjunctive sets) to be well-calibrated .