Before revision:  Some designs are found to be inferior because they do not lead to a substantial gain in fairness compared to simpler mechanisms. Changing the standard rule by reversing the shooting order in the sudden death stage improves fairness, while it remains less complicated than the regulation of field hockey shootouts .
After revision:  In the case of stationary scoring probabilities considered here, it remains sufficient to use static rules in order to improve fairness. However, it is worth compensating the second-mover by making it first-mover in the sudden death stage improves fairness, while it remains less complicated than the regulation of field hockey shootouts .