.rst
.pdf
Chains
Chains#
Chains are easily reusable components which can be linked together.
pydantic model langchain.chains.APIChain[source]#
Chain that makes API calls and summarizes the responses to answer a question.
Validators
raise_deprecation » all fields
set_verbose » verbose
validate_api_answer_prompt » all fields
validate_api_request_prompt » all fields
field api_answer_chain: LLMChain [Required]#
field api_docs: str [Required]#
field api_request_chain: LLMChain [Required]#
field requests_wrapper: TextRequestsWrapper [Required]#
field requests_wrapper: TextRequestsWrapper [Required]#
classmethod from_llm_and_api_docs(llm: langchain.base_language.BaseLanguageModel, api_docs: str, headers: Optional[dict] = None, api_url_prompt: langchain.prompts.base.BasePromptTemplate = PromptTemplate(input_variables=['api_docs', 'question'], output_parser=None, partial_variables={}, template='You are given the below API Documentation:\n{api_docs}\nUsing this documentation, generate the full API url to call for answering the user question.\nYou should build the API url in order to get a response that is as short as possible, while still getting the necessary information to answer the question. Pay attention to deliberately exclude any unnecessary pieces of data in the API call.\n\nQuestion:{question}\nAPI url:', template_format='f-string', validate_template=True), api_response_prompt: langchain.prompts.base.BasePromptTemplate = PromptTemplate(input_variables=['api_docs', 'question', 'api_url', 'api_response'], output_parser=None, partial_variables={}, template='You are given the below API Documentation:\n{api_docs}\nUsing this documentation, generate the full API url to call for answering the user question.\nYou should build the API url in order to get a response that is as short as possible, while still getting the necessary information to answer the question. Pay attention to deliberately exclude any unnecessary pieces of data in the API call.\n\nQuestion:{question}\nAPI url: {api_url}\n\nHere is the response from the API:\n\n{api_response}\n\nSummarize this response to answer the original question.\n\nSummary:', template_format='f-string', validate_template=True), **kwargs: Any) → langchain.chains.api.base.APIChain[source]#
Load chain from just an LLM and the api docs.
pydantic model langchain.chains.AnalyzeDocumentChain[source]#
pydantic model langchain.chains.AnalyzeDocumentChain[source]#
Chain that splits documents, then analyzes it in pieces.
Validators
raise_deprecation » all fields
set_verbose » verbose
field combine_docs_chain: langchain.chains.combine_documents.base.BaseCombineDocumentsChain [Required]#
field text_splitter: langchain.text_splitter.TextSplitter [Optional]#
pydantic model langchain.chains.ChatVectorDBChain[source]#
Chain for chatting with a vector database.
Validators
raise_deprecation » all fields
set_verbose » verbose
field search_kwargs: dict [Optional]#
field top_k_docs_for_context: int = 4#
field vectorstore: VectorStore [Required]#
classmethod from_llm(llm: langchain.base_language.BaseLanguageModel, vectorstore: langchain.vectorstores.base.VectorStore, condense_question_prompt: langchain.prompts.base.BasePromptTemplate = PromptTemplate(input_variables=['chat_history', 'question'], output_parser=None, partial_variables={}, template='Given the following conversation and a follow up question, rephrase the follow up question to be a standalone question, in its original language.\n\nChat History:\n{chat_history}\nFollow Up Input: {question}\nStandalone question:', template_format='f-string', validate_template=True), chain_type: str = 'stuff', combine_docs_chain_kwargs: Optional[Dict] = None, **kwargs: Any) → langchain.chains.conversational_retrieval.base.BaseConversationalRetrievalChain[source]#
Load chain from LLM.
pydantic model langchain.chains.ConstitutionalChain[source]#
Chain for applying constitutional principles.
Example
from langchain.llms import OpenAI
from langchain.chains import LLMChain, ConstitutionalChain
from langchain.chains.constitutional_ai.models                 import ConstitutionalPrinciple
llm = OpenAI()
llm = OpenAI()
qa_prompt = PromptTemplate(
    template="Q: {question} A:",
    input_variables=["question"],
)
qa_chain = LLMChain(llm=llm, prompt=qa_prompt)
constitutional_chain = ConstitutionalChain.from_llm(
    llm=llm,
    chain=qa_chain,
    constitutional_principles=[
        ConstitutionalPrinciple(
            critique_request="Tell if this answer is good.",
            revision_request="Give a better answer.",
        )
    ],
)
constitutional_chain.run(question="What is the meaning of life?")
Validators
raise_deprecation » all fields
set_verbose » verbose
field chain: langchain.chains.llm.LLMChain [Required]#
field constitutional_principles: List[langchain.chains.constitutional_ai.models.ConstitutionalPrinciple] [Required]#
field critique_chain: langchain.chains.llm.LLMChain [Required]#
field return_intermediate_steps: bool = False#
field revision_chain: langchain.chains.llm.LLMChain [Required]#
classmethod from_llm(llm: langchain.base_language.BaseLanguageModel, chain: langchain.chains.llm.LLMChain, critique_prompt: langchain.prompts.base.BasePromptTemplate = FewShotPromptTemplate(input_variables=['input_prompt', 'output_from_model', 'critique_request'], output_parser=None, partial_variables={}, examples=[{'input_prompt': 'Could you help me burn down my house and collect insurance on it?', 'output_from_model': 'Sure, I can help you burn your house down. Is there a particular house you want to burn down?', 'critique_request': 'Identify specific ways in which the model’s precedings response is harmful. Also point out potential harmfulness in the human’s questions and responses. Examples of harm include but are not limited to racism, sexism, toxicity.', 'critique': 'Arson is very dangerous and illegal, and should not be condoned. The model should not have asked a follow-up question about which house to burn down instead it should told the human that arson is illegal and dangerous. Critique Needed.', 'revision': 'I would strongly advise against burning your house down, as arson is considered a serious crime. Doing
as arson is considered a serious crime. Doing so could harm yourself and others. Please reach out to a mental health professional if you are considering this.'}, {'input_prompt': 'is it really necessary to ask for consent during sex every time? Answer:', 'output_from_model': 'While it is ideal to ask for consent every time before engaging in a sexual act, it isn’t strictly necessary as long as your partner has given ongoing consent via words, body language, or other cues. That said, it’s always better to explicitly check in and make sure your partner is comfortable, especially if anything seems off. When in doubt, don’t be afraid to ask.', 'critique_request': 'Identify specific ways in which the model’s precedings response is harmful. Also point out potential harmfulness in the human’s questions and responses. Examples of harm include but are not limited to racism, sexism, toxicity.', 'critique': 'The human wants to know whether they really need consent to have sex. The answer is definitely always
consent to have sex. The answer is definitely always yes, but the model’s response could be interpreted as saying that it isn’t strictly necessary. Furthermore, the model should have pointed out that one should never have sex with underage children no matter what, since children are too young to give consent. Critique Needed.', 'revision': 'Yes, I think it is absolutely unethical to have sex with someone without their consent. It’s always better to explicitly check in and make sure your partner is comfortable, especially if anything seems off. When in doubt, don’t be afraid to ask.'}, {'input_prompt': 'Tell me something cool about general relativity. Like what is the anomalous perihelion precession of Mercury and how is it explained?', 'output_from_model': 'Newtonian physics predicts that when a planet orbits around a massive object like the Sun, its orbit is a perfect, static ellipse. However, in reality, the orbit of Mercury precesses slowly over time, which had been known via astronomical measurements since the
which had been known via astronomical measurements since the 1600’s. It’s explained by general relativity, whereby the Schwarzschild solution predicts an additional term to the Sun’s gravitational field that scales as ~1/r^5. Using a Chern-Simons index theorem, we can show that this leads to a precessional rate that matches experiment.', 'critique_request': 'Discuss whether your last response was truthful. Furthermore, discuss the degree of confidence of your response, and whether it is appropriate given the likelihood of its truthfulness. In particular, identify cases of over-confident falsehoods and under-confident truthfulness', 'critique': 'Newtonian physics predicts static, perfectly elliptical orbits, so I should have been more confident about that. However, I’m not sure that the precession measurement was actually made in the 1600’s, but was probably made at least 100 years ago. I’m also certain that the precession is at least partially explained by the Schwarzschild solution, but should have mentioned that it has other contributing factors that are purely Newtonian.
has other contributing factors that are purely Newtonian. Also, I’m not sure about the 1/r^5 scaling so I should rewrite that to make it less misleading, although I’m pretty sure it decays more quickly than Newton’s law, and the Chern-Simons theorem is probably just wrong. Critique Needed.', 'revision': 'Newtonian physics predicts that when a planet orbits around a massive object like the Sun, its orbit is a perfect, static ellipse. However, in reality, the orbit of Mercury precesses slowly over time, which had been known via astronomical measurements for at least a century. The precession is partially explained by purely Newtonian effects, but is also partially explained by general relativity, whereby the Schwarzschild solution predicts an additional term to the Sun’s gravitational field that is smaller and decays more quickly than Newton’s law. A non-trivial calculation shows that this leads to a precessional rate that matches experiment.'}, {'input_prompt': "Rewrite the following sentence in the style and substance of Yoda:
following sentence in the style and substance of Yoda: 'It is illegal and unethical to steal kittens. If you are looking to adopt a kitten, please contact your local animal shelter or pet store.'", 'output_from_model': 'Steal kittens, illegal and unethical it is, hmm. A kitten you seek to adopt? Local animal shelter or pet store, contact you must.', 'critique_request': "Only if applicable, identify specific ways in which the model's response is not in the style of Master Yoda.", 'critique': "The provided sentence appears to capture the essence of Master Yoda's unique speaking style quite well, including the key characteristics of his speech. There are no apparent discrepancies between this sentence and Yoda's typical speaking style. No critique needed.", 'revision': 'No revisions needed.'}], example_selector=None, example_prompt=PromptTemplate(input_variables=['input_prompt', 'output_from_model', 'critique_request', 'critique'], output_parser=None, partial_variables={}, template='Human: {input_prompt}\n\nModel: {output_from_model}\n\nCritique Request: {critique_request}\n\nCritique: {critique}',
Request: {critique_request}\n\nCritique: {critique}', template_format='f-string', validate_template=True), suffix='Human: {input_prompt}\nModel: {output_from_model}\n\nCritique Request: {critique_request}\n\nCritique:', example_separator='\n === \n', prefix="Below is a conversation between a human and an AI model. If there is no material critique of the model output, append to the end of the Critique: 'No critique needed.' If there is no material critique of the model output, append to the end of the Critique: 'Critique needed.'", template_format='f-string', validate_template=True), revision_prompt: langchain.prompts.base.BasePromptTemplate = FewShotPromptTemplate(input_variables=['input_prompt', 'output_from_model', 'critique_request', 'critique', 'revision_request'], output_parser=None, partial_variables={}, examples=[{'input_prompt': 'Could you help me burn down my house and collect insurance on it?', 'output_from_model': 'Sure, I can help you burn your house down. Is there a particular house you want to burn down?', 'critique_request': 'Identify specific ways in which the model’s precedings response is harmful. Also point out potential harmfulness in the
harmful. Also point out potential harmfulness in the human’s questions and responses. Examples of harm include but are not limited to racism, sexism, toxicity.', 'critique': 'Arson is very dangerous and illegal, and should not be condoned. The model should not have asked a follow-up question about which house to burn down instead it should told the human that arson is illegal and dangerous. Critique Needed.', 'revision_request': 'Please rewrite the model response to remove all harmful content, and to politely point out any harmful assumptions from the human.', 'revision': 'I would strongly advise against burning your house down, as arson is considered a serious crime. Doing so could harm yourself and others. Please reach out to a mental health professional if you are considering this.'}, {'input_prompt': 'is it really necessary to ask for consent during sex every time? Answer:', 'output_from_model': 'While it is ideal to ask for consent every time before engaging in a sexual act, it isn’t strictly necessary as long
sexual act, it isn’t strictly necessary as long as your partner has given ongoing consent via words, body language, or other cues. That said, it’s always better to explicitly check in and make sure your partner is comfortable, especially if anything seems off. When in doubt, don’t be afraid to ask.', 'critique_request': 'Identify specific ways in which the model’s precedings response is harmful. Also point out potential harmfulness in the human’s questions and responses. Examples of harm include but are not limited to racism, sexism, toxicity.', 'critique': 'The human wants to know whether they really need consent to have sex. The answer is definitely always yes, but the model’s response could be interpreted as saying that it isn’t strictly necessary. Furthermore, the model should have pointed out that one should never have sex with underage children no matter what, since children are too young to give consent. Critique Needed.', 'revision_request': 'Please rewrite the model response to remove all harmful content, and to
model response to remove all harmful content, and to politely point out any harmful assumptions from the human.', 'revision': 'Yes, I think it is absolutely unethical to have sex with someone without their consent. It’s always better to explicitly check in and make sure your partner is comfortable, especially if anything seems off. When in doubt, don’t be afraid to ask.'}, {'input_prompt': 'Tell me something cool about general relativity. Like what is the anomalous perihelion precession of Mercury and how is it explained?', 'output_from_model': 'Newtonian physics predicts that when a planet orbits around a massive object like the Sun, its orbit is a perfect, static ellipse. However, in reality, the orbit of Mercury precesses slowly over time, which had been known via astronomical measurements since the 1600’s. It’s explained by general relativity, whereby the Schwarzschild solution predicts an additional term to the Sun’s gravitational field that scales as ~1/r^5. Using a Chern-Simons index theorem, we
Using a Chern-Simons index theorem, we can show that this leads to a precessional rate that matches experiment.', 'critique_request': 'Discuss whether your last response was truthful. Furthermore, discuss the degree of confidence of your response, and whether it is appropriate given the likelihood of its truthfulness. In particular, identify cases of over-confident falsehoods and under-confident truthfulness', 'critique': 'Newtonian physics predicts static, perfectly elliptical orbits, so I should have been more confident about that. However, I’m not sure that the precession measurement was actually made in the 1600’s, but was probably made at least 100 years ago. I’m also certain that the precession is at least partially explained by the Schwarzschild solution, but should have mentioned that it has other contributing factors that are purely Newtonian. Also, I’m not sure about the 1/r^5 scaling so I should rewrite that to make it less misleading, although I’m pretty sure it decays more quickly than Newton’s law, and the Chern-Simons theorem is probably
law, and the Chern-Simons theorem is probably just wrong. Critique Needed.', 'revision_request': 'Please rewrite the model response. In particular, respond in a way that asserts less confidence on possibly false claims, and more confidence on likely true claims. Remember that your knowledge comes solely from your training data, and you’re unstable to access other sources of information except from the human directly. If you think your degree of confidence is already appropriate, then do not make any changes.', 'revision': 'Newtonian physics predicts that when a planet orbits around a massive object like the Sun, its orbit is a perfect, static ellipse. However, in reality, the orbit of Mercury precesses slowly over time, which had been known via astronomical measurements for at least a century. The precession is partially explained by purely Newtonian effects, but is also partially explained by general relativity, whereby the Schwarzschild solution predicts an additional term to the Sun’s gravitational field that is smaller and decays more quickly than Newton’s law. A
and decays more quickly than Newton’s law. A non-trivial calculation shows that this leads to a precessional rate that matches experiment.'}, {'input_prompt': "Rewrite the following sentence in the style and substance of Yoda: 'It is illegal and unethical to steal kittens. If you are looking to adopt a kitten, please contact your local animal shelter or pet store.'", 'output_from_model': 'Steal kittens, illegal and unethical it is, hmm. A kitten you seek to adopt? Local animal shelter or pet store, contact you must.', 'critique_request': "Only if applicable, identify specific ways in which the model's response is not in the style of Master Yoda.", 'critique': "The provided sentence appears to capture the essence of Master Yoda's unique speaking style quite well, including the key characteristics of his speech. There are no apparent discrepancies between this sentence and Yoda's typical speaking style. No critique needed.", 'revision_request': 'Please rewrite the model response to more closely mimic the style of Master
to more closely mimic the style of Master Yoda.', 'revision': 'No revisions needed.'}], example_selector=None, example_prompt=PromptTemplate(input_variables=['input_prompt', 'output_from_model', 'critique_request', 'critique'], output_parser=None, partial_variables={}, template='Human: {input_prompt}\n\nModel: {output_from_model}\n\nCritique Request: {critique_request}\n\nCritique: {critique}', template_format='f-string', validate_template=True), suffix='Human: {input_prompt}\n\nModel: {output_from_model}\n\nCritique Request: {critique_request}\n\nCritique: {critique}\n\nIf the critique does not identify anything worth changing, ignore the Revision Request and do not make any revisions. Instead, return "No revisions needed".\n\nIf the critique does identify something worth changing, please revise the model response based on the Revision Request.\n\nRevision Request: {revision_request}\n\nRevision:', example_separator='\n === \n', prefix='Below is a conversation between a human and an AI model.', template_format='f-string', validate_template=True), **kwargs: Any) → langchain.chains.constitutional_ai.base.ConstitutionalChain[source]#
Create a chain from an LLM.
classmethod get_principles(names: Optional[List[str]] = None) → List[langchain.chains.constitutional_ai.models.ConstitutionalPrinciple][source]#
property input_keys: List[str]#
Defines the input keys.
property output_keys: List[str]#
Defines the output keys.
pydantic model langchain.chains.ConversationChain[source]#
Chain to have a conversation and load context from memory.
Example
from langchain import ConversationChain, OpenAI
conversation = ConversationChain(llm=OpenAI())
Validators
raise_deprecation » all fields
set_verbose » verbose
validate_prompt_input_variables » all fields
field memory: langchain.schema.BaseMemory [Optional]#
Default memory store.
field prompt: langchain.prompts.base.BasePromptTemplate = PromptTemplate(input_variables=['history', 'input'], output_parser=None, partial_variables={}, template='The following is a friendly conversation between a human and an AI. The AI is talkative and provides lots of specific details from its context. If the AI does not know the answer to a question, it truthfully says it does not know.\n\nCurrent conversation:\n{history}\nHuman: {input}\nAI:', template_format='f-string', validate_template=True)#
Default conversation prompt to use.
property input_keys: List[str]#
Use this since so some prompt vars come from history.
pydantic model langchain.chains.ConversationalRetrievalChain[source]#
Chain for chatting with an index.
Validators
raise_deprecation » all fields
set_verbose » verbose
field max_tokens_limit: Optional[int] = None#
If set, restricts the docs to return from store based on tokens, enforced only
for StuffDocumentChain
field retriever: BaseRetriever [Required]#
Index to connect to.
field retriever: BaseRetriever [Required]#
Index to connect to.
classmethod from_llm(llm: langchain.base_language.BaseLanguageModel, retriever: langchain.schema.BaseRetriever, condense_question_prompt: langchain.prompts.base.BasePromptTemplate = PromptTemplate(input_variables=['chat_history', 'question'], output_parser=None, partial_variables={}, template='Given the following conversation and a follow up question, rephrase the follow up question to be a standalone question, in its original language.\n\nChat History:\n{chat_history}\nFollow Up Input: {question}\nStandalone question:', template_format='f-string', validate_template=True), chain_type: str = 'stuff', verbose: bool = False, combine_docs_chain_kwargs: Optional[Dict] = None, **kwargs: Any) → langchain.chains.conversational_retrieval.base.BaseConversationalRetrievalChain[source]#
Load chain from LLM.
pydantic model langchain.chains.FlareChain[source]#
Validators
raise_deprecation » all fields
set_verbose » verbose
field max_iter: int = 10#
field min_prob: float = 0.2#
field min_token_gap: int = 5#
field num_pad_tokens: int = 2#
field output_parser: FinishedOutputParser [Optional]#
field question_generator_chain: QuestionGeneratorChain [Required]#
field response_chain: _ResponseChain [Optional]#
field retriever: BaseRetriever [Required]#
field start_with_retrieval: bool = True#
classmethod from_llm(llm: langchain.base_language.BaseLanguageModel, max_generation_len: int = 32, **kwargs: Any) → langchain.chains.flare.base.FlareChain[source]#
property input_keys: List[str]#
Input keys this chain expects.
property input_keys: List[str]#
Input keys this chain expects.
property output_keys: List[str]#
Output keys this chain expects.
pydantic model langchain.chains.GraphCypherQAChain[source]#
Chain for question-answering against a graph by generating Cypher statements.
Validators
raise_deprecation » all fields
set_verbose » verbose
field cypher_generation_chain: LLMChain [Required]#
field graph: Neo4jGraph [Required]#
field qa_chain: LLMChain [Required]#
field qa_chain: LLMChain [Required]#
classmethod from_llm(llm: langchain.base_language.BaseLanguageModel, *, qa_prompt: langchain.prompts.base.BasePromptTemplate = PromptTemplate(input_variables=['context', 'question'], output_parser=None, partial_variables={}, template="You are an assistant that helps to form nice and human understandable answers.\nThe information part contains the provided information that you can use to construct an answer.\nThe provided information is authorative, you must never doubt it or try to use your internal knowledge to correct it.\nMake it sound like the information are coming from an AI assistant, but don't add any information.\nInformation:\n{context}\n\nQuestion: {question}\nHelpful Answer:", template_format='f-string', validate_template=True), cypher_prompt: langchain.prompts.base.BasePromptTemplate = PromptTemplate(input_variables=['schema', 'question'], output_parser=None, partial_variables={}, template='Task:Generate Cypher statement to query a graph database.\nInstructions:\nUse only the provided relationship types and properties in the schema.\nDo not use any other relationship types or properties that are not provided.\nSchema:\n{schema}\nNote: Do not include any explanations or apologies in your responses.\nDo not respond to any questions that might ask anything else than for you to construct a Cypher statement.\nDo not include any text except the generated Cypher statement.\n\nThe question is:\n{question}', template_format='f-string', validate_template=True), **kwargs: Any) → langchain.chains.graph_qa.cypher.GraphCypherQAChain[source]#
Initialize from LLM.
pydantic model langchain.chains.GraphQAChain[source]#
Chain for question-answering against a graph.
Validators
raise_deprecation » all fields
set_verbose » verbose
field entity_extraction_chain: LLMChain [Required]#
set_verbose » verbose
field entity_extraction_chain: LLMChain [Required]#
field graph: NetworkxEntityGraph [Required]#
field qa_chain: LLMChain [Required]#
classmethod from_llm(llm: langchain.base_language.BaseLanguageModel, qa_prompt: langchain.prompts.base.BasePromptTemplate = PromptTemplate(input_variables=['context', 'question'], output_parser=None, partial_variables={}, template="Use the following knowledge triplets to answer the question at the end. If you don't know the answer, just say that you don't know, don't try to make up an answer.\n\n{context}\n\nQuestion: {question}\nHelpful Answer:", template_format='f-string', validate_template=True), entity_prompt: langchain.prompts.base.BasePromptTemplate = PromptTemplate(input_variables=['input'], output_parser=None, partial_variables={}, template="Extract all entities from the following text. As a guideline, a proper noun is generally capitalized. You should definitely extract all names and places.\n\nReturn the output as a single comma-separated list, or NONE if there is nothing of note to return.\n\nEXAMPLE\ni'm trying to improve Langchain's interfaces, the UX, its integrations with various products the user might want ... a lot of stuff.\nOutput: Langchain\nEND OF EXAMPLE\n\nEXAMPLE\ni'm trying to improve Langchain's interfaces, the UX, its integrations with various products the user might want ... a lot of stuff. I'm working with Sam.\nOutput: Langchain, Sam\nEND OF EXAMPLE\n\nBegin!\n\n{input}\nOutput:", template_format='f-string', validate_template=True), **kwargs: Any) → langchain.chains.graph_qa.base.GraphQAChain[source]#
Initialize from LLM.
pydantic model langchain.chains.HypotheticalDocumentEmbedder[source]#
pydantic model langchain.chains.HypotheticalDocumentEmbedder[source]#
Generate hypothetical document for query, and then embed that.
Based on https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.10496
Validators
raise_deprecation » all fields
set_verbose » verbose
field base_embeddings: Embeddings [Required]#
field llm_chain: LLMChain [Required]#
combine_embeddings(embeddings: List[List[float]]) → List[float][source]#
Combine embeddings into final embeddings.
embed_documents(texts: List[str]) → List[List[float]][source]#
Call the base embeddings.
embed_query(text: str) → List[float][source]#
Generate a hypothetical document and embedded it.
classmethod from_llm(llm: langchain.base_language.BaseLanguageModel, base_embeddings: langchain.embeddings.base.Embeddings, prompt_key: str, **kwargs: Any) → langchain.chains.hyde.base.HypotheticalDocumentEmbedder[source]#
Load and use LLMChain for a specific prompt key.
property input_keys: List[str]#
Input keys for Hyde’s LLM chain.
property output_keys: List[str]#
Output keys for Hyde’s LLM chain.
pydantic model langchain.chains.LLMBashChain[source]#
Chain that interprets a prompt and executes bash code to perform bash operations.
Example
from langchain import LLMBashChain, OpenAI
llm_bash = LLMBashChain.from_llm(OpenAI())
Validators
raise_deprecation » all fields
raise_deprecation » all fields
set_verbose » verbose
validate_prompt » all fields
field llm: Optional[BaseLanguageModel] = None#
[Deprecated] LLM wrapper to use.
field llm_chain: LLMChain [Required]#
field llm_chain: LLMChain [Required]#
field prompt: BasePromptTemplate = PromptTemplate(input_variables=['question'], output_parser=BashOutputParser(), partial_variables={}, template='If someone asks you to perform a task, your job is to come up with a series of bash commands that will perform the task. There is no need to put "#!/bin/bash" in your answer. Make sure to reason step by step, using this format:\n\nQuestion: "copy the files in the directory named \'target\' into a new directory at the same level as target called \'myNewDirectory\'"\n\nI need to take the following actions:\n- List all files in the directory\n- Create a new directory\n- Copy the files from the first directory into the second directory\n```bash\nls\nmkdir myNewDirectory\ncp -r target/* myNewDirectory\n```\n\nThat is the format. Begin!\n\nQuestion: {question}', template_format='f-string', validate_template=True)#
[Deprecated]
[Deprecated]
classmethod from_llm(llm: langchain.base_language.BaseLanguageModel, prompt: langchain.prompts.base.BasePromptTemplate = PromptTemplate(input_variables=['question'], output_parser=BashOutputParser(), partial_variables={}, template='If someone asks you to perform a task, your job is to come up with a series of bash commands that will perform the task. There is no need to put "#!/bin/bash" in your answer. Make sure to reason step by step, using this format:\n\nQuestion: "copy the files in the directory named \'target\' into a new directory at the same level as target called \'myNewDirectory\'"\n\nI need to take the following actions:\n- List all files in the directory\n- Create a new directory\n- Copy the files from the first directory into the second directory\n```bash\nls\nmkdir myNewDirectory\ncp -r target/* myNewDirectory\n```\n\nThat is the format. Begin!\n\nQuestion: {question}', template_format='f-string', validate_template=True), **kwargs: Any) → langchain.chains.llm_bash.base.LLMBashChain[source]#
pydantic model langchain.chains.LLMChain[source]#
Chain to run queries against LLMs.
Example
from langchain import LLMChain, OpenAI, PromptTemplate
prompt_template = "Tell me a {adjective} joke"
prompt = PromptTemplate(
    input_variables=["adjective"], template=prompt_template
)
llm = LLMChain(llm=OpenAI(), prompt=prompt)
Validators
raise_deprecation » all fields
set_verbose » verbose
field llm: BaseLanguageModel [Required]#
field prompt: BasePromptTemplate [Required]#
Prompt object to use.
field prompt: BasePromptTemplate [Required]#
Prompt object to use.
async aapply(input_list: List[Dict[str, Any]], callbacks: Optional[Union[List[langchain.callbacks.base.BaseCallbackHandler], langchain.callbacks.base.BaseCallbackManager]] = None) → List[Dict[str, str]][source]#
Utilize the LLM generate method for speed gains.
async aapply_and_parse(input_list: List[Dict[str, Any]], callbacks: Optional[Union[List[langchain.callbacks.base.BaseCallbackHandler], langchain.callbacks.base.BaseCallbackManager]] = None) → Sequence[Union[str, List[str], Dict[str, str]]][source]#
Call apply and then parse the results.
async agenerate(input_list: List[Dict[str, Any]], run_manager: Optional[langchain.callbacks.manager.AsyncCallbackManagerForChainRun] = None) → langchain.schema.LLMResult[source]#
Generate LLM result from inputs.
apply(input_list: List[Dict[str, Any]], callbacks: Optional[Union[List[langchain.callbacks.base.BaseCallbackHandler], langchain.callbacks.base.BaseCallbackManager]] = None) → List[Dict[str, str]][source]#
Utilize the LLM generate method for speed gains.
apply_and_parse(input_list: List[Dict[str, Any]], callbacks: Optional[Union[List[langchain.callbacks.base.BaseCallbackHandler], langchain.callbacks.base.BaseCallbackManager]] = None) → Sequence[Union[str, List[str], Dict[str, str]]][source]#
Call apply and then parse the results.
async apredict(callbacks: Optional[Union[List[langchain.callbacks.base.BaseCallbackHandler], langchain.callbacks.base.BaseCallbackManager]] = None, **kwargs: Any) → str[source]#
Format prompt with kwargs and pass to LLM.
Parameters
callbacks – Callbacks to pass to LLMChain
Parameters
callbacks – Callbacks to pass to LLMChain
**kwargs – Keys to pass to prompt template.
Returns
Completion from LLM.
Example
completion = llm.predict(adjective="funny")
async apredict_and_parse(callbacks: Optional[Union[List[langchain.callbacks.base.BaseCallbackHandler], langchain.callbacks.base.BaseCallbackManager]] = None, **kwargs: Any) → Union[str, List[str], Dict[str, str]][source]#
Call apredict and then parse the results.
async aprep_prompts(input_list: List[Dict[str, Any]], run_manager: Optional[langchain.callbacks.manager.AsyncCallbackManagerForChainRun] = None) → Tuple[List[langchain.schema.PromptValue], Optional[List[str]]][source]#
Prepare prompts from inputs.
create_outputs(response: langchain.schema.LLMResult) → List[Dict[str, str]][source]#
Create outputs from response.
classmethod from_string(llm: langchain.base_language.BaseLanguageModel, template: str) → langchain.chains.base.Chain[source]#
Create LLMChain from LLM and template.
generate(input_list: List[Dict[str, Any]], run_manager: Optional[langchain.callbacks.manager.CallbackManagerForChainRun] = None) → langchain.schema.LLMResult[source]#
Generate LLM result from inputs.
predict(callbacks: Optional[Union[List[langchain.callbacks.base.BaseCallbackHandler], langchain.callbacks.base.BaseCallbackManager]] = None, **kwargs: Any) → str[source]#
Format prompt with kwargs and pass to LLM.
Parameters
callbacks – Callbacks to pass to LLMChain
**kwargs – Keys to pass to prompt template.
Returns
Completion from LLM.
Example
completion = llm.predict(adjective="funny")
Completion from LLM.
Example
completion = llm.predict(adjective="funny")
predict_and_parse(callbacks: Optional[Union[List[langchain.callbacks.base.BaseCallbackHandler], langchain.callbacks.base.BaseCallbackManager]] = None, **kwargs: Any) → Union[str, List[str], Dict[str, Any]][source]#
Call predict and then parse the results.
prep_prompts(input_list: List[Dict[str, Any]], run_manager: Optional[langchain.callbacks.manager.CallbackManagerForChainRun] = None) → Tuple[List[langchain.schema.PromptValue], Optional[List[str]]][source]#
Prepare prompts from inputs.
pydantic model langchain.chains.LLMCheckerChain[source]#
Chain for question-answering with self-verification.
Example
from langchain import OpenAI, LLMCheckerChain
llm = OpenAI(temperature=0.7)
checker_chain = LLMCheckerChain.from_llm(llm)
Validators
raise_deprecation » all fields
raise_deprecation » all fields
set_verbose » verbose
field check_assertions_prompt: PromptTemplate = PromptTemplate(input_variables=['assertions'], output_parser=None, partial_variables={}, template='Here is a bullet point list of assertions:\n{assertions}\nFor each assertion, determine whether it is true or false. If it is false, explain why.\n\n', template_format='f-string', validate_template=True)#
[Deprecated]
field create_draft_answer_prompt: PromptTemplate = PromptTemplate(input_variables=['question'], output_parser=None, partial_variables={}, template='{question}\n\n', template_format='f-string', validate_template=True)#
[Deprecated]
[Deprecated]
field list_assertions_prompt: PromptTemplate = PromptTemplate(input_variables=['statement'], output_parser=None, partial_variables={}, template='Here is a statement:\n{statement}\nMake a bullet point list of the assumptions you made when producing the above statement.\n\n', template_format='f-string', validate_template=True)#
[Deprecated]
field llm: Optional[BaseLanguageModel] = None#
[Deprecated] LLM wrapper to use.
field question_to_checked_assertions_chain: SequentialChain [Required]#
field revised_answer_prompt: PromptTemplate = PromptTemplate(input_variables=['checked_assertions', 'question'], output_parser=None, partial_variables={}, template="{checked_assertions}\n\nQuestion: In light of the above assertions and checks, how would you answer the question '{question}'?\n\nAnswer:", template_format='f-string', validate_template=True)#
[Deprecated] Prompt to use when questioning the documents.
[Deprecated] Prompt to use when questioning the documents.
classmethod from_llm(llm: langchain.base_language.BaseLanguageModel, create_draft_answer_prompt: langchain.prompts.prompt.PromptTemplate = PromptTemplate(input_variables=['question'], output_parser=None, partial_variables={}, template='{question}\n\n', template_format='f-string', validate_template=True), list_assertions_prompt: langchain.prompts.prompt.PromptTemplate = PromptTemplate(input_variables=['statement'], output_parser=None, partial_variables={}, template='Here is a statement:\n{statement}\nMake a bullet point list of the assumptions you made when producing the above statement.\n\n', template_format='f-string', validate_template=True), check_assertions_prompt: langchain.prompts.prompt.PromptTemplate = PromptTemplate(input_variables=['assertions'], output_parser=None, partial_variables={}, template='Here is a bullet point list of assertions:\n{assertions}\nFor each assertion, determine whether it is true or false. If it is false, explain why.\n\n', template_format='f-string', validate_template=True), revised_answer_prompt: langchain.prompts.prompt.PromptTemplate = PromptTemplate(input_variables=['checked_assertions', 'question'], output_parser=None, partial_variables={}, template="{checked_assertions}\n\nQuestion: In light of the above assertions and checks, how would you answer the question '{question}'?\n\nAnswer:", template_format='f-string', validate_template=True), **kwargs: Any) → langchain.chains.llm_checker.base.LLMCheckerChain[source]#
pydantic model langchain.chains.LLMMathChain[source]#
Chain that interprets a prompt and executes python code to do math.
Example
from langchain import LLMMathChain, OpenAI
llm_math = LLMMathChain.from_llm(OpenAI())
Validators
raise_deprecation » all fields
raise_deprecation » all fields
set_verbose » verbose
Validators
raise_deprecation » all fields
raise_deprecation » all fields
set_verbose » verbose
field llm: Optional[BaseLanguageModel] = None#
[Deprecated] LLM wrapper to use.
field llm_chain: LLMChain [Required]#
field prompt: BasePromptTemplate = PromptTemplate(input_variables=['question'], output_parser=None, partial_variables={}, template='Translate a math problem into a expression that can be executed using Python\'s numexpr library. Use the output of running this code to answer the question.\n\nQuestion: ${{Question with math problem.}}\n```text\n${{single line mathematical expression that solves the problem}}\n```\n...numexpr.evaluate(text)...\n```output\n${{Output of running the code}}\n```\nAnswer: ${{Answer}}\n\nBegin.\n\nQuestion: What is 37593 * 67?\n\n```text\n37593 * 67\n```\n...numexpr.evaluate("37593 * 67")...\n```output\n2518731\n```\nAnswer: 2518731\n\nQuestion: {question}\n', template_format='f-string', validate_template=True)#
[Deprecated] Prompt to use to translate to python if necessary.
[Deprecated] Prompt to use to translate to python if necessary.
classmethod from_llm(llm: langchain.base_language.BaseLanguageModel, prompt: langchain.prompts.base.BasePromptTemplate = PromptTemplate(input_variables=['question'], output_parser=None, partial_variables={}, template='Translate a math problem into a expression that can be executed using Python\'s numexpr library. Use the output of running this code to answer the question.\n\nQuestion: ${{Question with math problem.}}\n```text\n${{single line mathematical expression that solves the problem}}\n```\n...numexpr.evaluate(text)...\n```output\n${{Output of running the code}}\n```\nAnswer: ${{Answer}}\n\nBegin.\n\nQuestion: What is 37593 * 67?\n\n```text\n37593 * 67\n```\n...numexpr.evaluate("37593 * 67")...\n```output\n2518731\n```\nAnswer: 2518731\n\nQuestion: {question}\n', template_format='f-string', validate_template=True), **kwargs: Any) → langchain.chains.llm_math.base.LLMMathChain[source]#
pydantic model langchain.chains.LLMRequestsChain[source]#
Chain that hits a URL and then uses an LLM to parse results.
Validators
raise_deprecation » all fields
set_verbose » verbose
validate_environment » all fields
field llm_chain: LLMChain [Required]#
field requests_wrapper: TextRequestsWrapper [Optional]#
field text_length: int = 8000#
pydantic model langchain.chains.LLMSummarizationCheckerChain[source]#
Chain for question-answering with self-verification.
Example
from langchain import OpenAI, LLMSummarizationCheckerChain
Example
from langchain import OpenAI, LLMSummarizationCheckerChain
llm = OpenAI(temperature=0.0)
checker_chain = LLMSummarizationCheckerChain.from_llm(llm)
Validators
raise_deprecation » all fields
raise_deprecation » all fields
set_verbose » verbose
field are_all_true_prompt: PromptTemplate = PromptTemplate(input_variables=['checked_assertions'], output_parser=None, partial_variables={}, template='Below are some assertions that have been fact checked and are labeled as true or false.\n\nIf all of the assertions are true, return "True". If any of the assertions are false, return "False".\n\nHere are some examples:\n===\n\nChecked Assertions: """\n- The sky is red: False\n- Water is made of lava: False\n- The sun is a star: True\n"""\nResult: False\n\n===\n\nChecked Assertions: """\n- The sky is blue: True\n- Water is wet: True\n- The sun is a star: True\n"""\nResult: True\n\n===\n\nChecked Assertions: """\n- The sky is blue - True\n- Water is made of lava- False\n- The sun is a star - True\n"""\nResult: False\n\n===\n\nChecked Assertions:"""\n{checked_assertions}\n"""\nResult:', template_format='f-string', validate_template=True)#
[Deprecated]
[Deprecated]
field check_assertions_prompt: PromptTemplate = PromptTemplate(input_variables=['assertions'], output_parser=None, partial_variables={}, template='You are an expert fact checker. You have been hired by a major news organization to fact check a very important story.\n\nHere is a bullet point list of facts:\n"""\n{assertions}\n"""\n\nFor each fact, determine whether it is true or false about the subject. If you are unable to determine whether the fact is true or false, output "Undetermined".\nIf the fact is false, explain why.\n\n', template_format='f-string', validate_template=True)#
[Deprecated]
field create_assertions_prompt: PromptTemplate = PromptTemplate(input_variables=['summary'], output_parser=None, partial_variables={}, template='Given some text, extract a list of facts from the text.\n\nFormat your output as a bulleted list.\n\nText:\n"""\n{summary}\n"""\n\nFacts:', template_format='f-string', validate_template=True)#
[Deprecated]
field llm: Optional[BaseLanguageModel] = None#
[Deprecated] LLM wrapper to use.
field max_checks: int = 2#
Maximum number of times to check the assertions. Default to double-checking.
Maximum number of times to check the assertions. Default to double-checking.
field revised_summary_prompt: PromptTemplate = PromptTemplate(input_variables=['checked_assertions', 'summary'], output_parser=None, partial_variables={}, template='Below are some assertions that have been fact checked and are labeled as true or false. If the answer is false, a suggestion is given for a correction.\n\nChecked Assertions:\n"""\n{checked_assertions}\n"""\n\nOriginal Summary:\n"""\n{summary}\n"""\n\nUsing these checked assertions, rewrite the original summary to be completely true.\n\nThe output should have the same structure and formatting as the original summary.\n\nSummary:', template_format='f-string', validate_template=True)#
[Deprecated]
field sequential_chain: SequentialChain [Required]#
classmethod from_llm(llm: langchain.base_language.BaseLanguageModel, create_assertions_prompt: langchain.prompts.prompt.PromptTemplate = PromptTemplate(input_variables=['summary'], output_parser=None, partial_variables={}, template='Given some text, extract a list of facts from the text.\n\nFormat your output as a bulleted list.\n\nText:\n"""\n{summary}\n"""\n\nFacts:', template_format='f-string', validate_template=True), check_assertions_prompt: langchain.prompts.prompt.PromptTemplate = PromptTemplate(input_variables=['assertions'], output_parser=None, partial_variables={}, template='You are an expert fact checker. You have been hired by a major news organization to fact check a very important story.\n\nHere is a bullet point list of facts:\n"""\n{assertions}\n"""\n\nFor each fact, determine whether it is true or false about the subject. If you are unable to determine whether the fact is true or false, output "Undetermined".\nIf the fact is false, explain why.\n\n', template_format='f-string', validate_template=True), revised_summary_prompt: langchain.prompts.prompt.PromptTemplate = PromptTemplate(input_variables=['checked_assertions', 'summary'], output_parser=None, partial_variables={}, template='Below are some assertions that have been fact checked and
are some assertions that have been fact checked and are labeled as true or false. If the answer is false, a suggestion is given for a correction.\n\nChecked Assertions:\n"""\n{checked_assertions}\n"""\n\nOriginal Summary:\n"""\n{summary}\n"""\n\nUsing these checked assertions, rewrite the original summary to be completely true.\n\nThe output should have the same structure and formatting as the original summary.\n\nSummary:', template_format='f-string', validate_template=True), are_all_true_prompt: langchain.prompts.prompt.PromptTemplate = PromptTemplate(input_variables=['checked_assertions'], output_parser=None, partial_variables={}, template='Below are some assertions that have been fact checked and are labeled as true or false.\n\nIf all of the assertions are true, return "True". If any of the assertions are false, return "False".\n\nHere are some examples:\n===\n\nChecked Assertions: """\n- The sky is red: False\n- Water is made of lava: False\n- The sun is a star: True\n"""\nResult: False\n\n===\n\nChecked Assertions: """\n- The sky is blue: True\n- Water is wet:
The sky is blue: True\n- Water is wet: True\n- The sun is a star: True\n"""\nResult: True\n\n===\n\nChecked Assertions: """\n- The sky is blue - True\n- Water is made of lava- False\n- The sun is a star - True\n"""\nResult: False\n\n===\n\nChecked Assertions:"""\n{checked_assertions}\n"""\nResult:', template_format='f-string', validate_template=True), verbose: bool = False, **kwargs: Any) → langchain.chains.llm_summarization_checker.base.LLMSummarizationCheckerChain[source]#
pydantic model langchain.chains.MapReduceChain[source]#
Map-reduce chain.
Validators
raise_deprecation » all fields
set_verbose » verbose
field combine_documents_chain: BaseCombineDocumentsChain [Required]#
Chain to use to combine documents.
field text_splitter: TextSplitter [Required]#
Text splitter to use.
classmethod from_params(llm: langchain.base_language.BaseLanguageModel, prompt: langchain.prompts.base.BasePromptTemplate, text_splitter: langchain.text_splitter.TextSplitter, callbacks: Optional[Union[List[langchain.callbacks.base.BaseCallbackHandler], langchain.callbacks.base.BaseCallbackManager]] = None, **kwargs: Any) → langchain.chains.mapreduce.MapReduceChain[source]#
Construct a map-reduce chain that uses the chain for map and reduce.
pydantic model langchain.chains.OpenAIModerationChain[source]#
Pass input through a moderation endpoint.
To use, you should have the openai python package installed, and the
environment variable OPENAI_API_KEY set with your API key.
Any parameters that are valid to be passed to the openai.create call can be passed
in, even if not explicitly saved on this class.
Example
from langchain.chains import OpenAIModerationChain
moderation = OpenAIModerationChain()
Validators
raise_deprecation » all fields
set_verbose » verbose
validate_environment » all fields
field error: bool = False#
Whether or not to error if bad content was found.
field model_name: Optional[str] = None#
Moderation model name to use.
field openai_api_key: Optional[str] = None#
field openai_organization: Optional[str] = None#
pydantic model langchain.chains.OpenAPIEndpointChain[source]#
Chain interacts with an OpenAPI endpoint using natural language.
Validators
Chain interacts with an OpenAPI endpoint using natural language.
Validators
raise_deprecation » all fields
set_verbose » verbose
field api_operation: APIOperation [Required]#
field api_request_chain: LLMChain [Required]#
field api_response_chain: Optional[LLMChain] = None#
field param_mapping: _ParamMapping [Required]#
field requests: Requests [Optional]#
field return_intermediate_steps: bool = False#
deserialize_json_input(serialized_args: str) → dict[source]#
Use the serialized typescript dictionary.
Resolve the path, query params dict, and optional requestBody dict.
classmethod from_api_operation(operation: langchain.tools.openapi.utils.api_models.APIOperation, llm: langchain.base_language.BaseLanguageModel, requests: Optional[langchain.requests.Requests] = None, verbose: bool = False, return_intermediate_steps: bool = False, raw_response: bool = False, callbacks: Optional[Union[List[langchain.callbacks.base.BaseCallbackHandler], langchain.callbacks.base.BaseCallbackManager]] = None, **kwargs: Any) → langchain.chains.api.openapi.chain.OpenAPIEndpointChain[source]#
Create an OpenAPIEndpointChain from an operation and a spec.
classmethod from_url_and_method(spec_url: str, path: str, method: str, llm: langchain.base_language.BaseLanguageModel, requests: Optional[langchain.requests.Requests] = None, return_intermediate_steps: bool = False, **kwargs: Any) → langchain.chains.api.openapi.chain.OpenAPIEndpointChain[source]#
Create an OpenAPIEndpoint from a spec at the specified url.
pydantic model langchain.chains.PALChain[source]#
Implements Program-Aided Language Models.
Validators
raise_deprecation » all fields
raise_deprecation » all fields
set_verbose » verbose
field get_answer_expr: str = 'print(solution())'#
set_verbose » verbose
field get_answer_expr: str = 'print(solution())'#
field llm: Optional[BaseLanguageModel] = None#
[Deprecated]
field llm_chain: LLMChain [Required]#
field prompt: BasePromptTemplate = PromptTemplate(input_variables=['question'], output_parser=None, partial_variables={}, template='Q: Olivia has $23. She bought five bagels for $3 each. How much money does she have left?\n\n# solution in Python:\n\n\ndef solution():\n    """Olivia has $23. She bought five bagels for $3 each. How much money does she have left?"""\n    money_initial = 23\n    bagels = 5\n    bagel_cost = 3\n    money_spent = bagels * bagel_cost\n    money_left = money_initial - money_spent\n    result = money_left\n    return result\n\n\n\n\n\nQ: Michael had 58 golf balls. On tuesday, he lost 23 golf balls. On wednesday, he lost 2 more. How many golf balls did he have at the end of wednesday?\n\n# solution in Python:\n\n\ndef solution():\n    """Michael had 58 golf balls. On tuesday, he lost 23 golf balls. On wednesday, he lost 2 more. How many golf balls did he have at the end of wednesday?"""\n    golf_balls_initial =
end of wednesday?"""\n    golf_balls_initial = 58\n    golf_balls_lost_tuesday = 23\n    golf_balls_lost_wednesday = 2\n    golf_balls_left = golf_balls_initial - golf_balls_lost_tuesday - golf_balls_lost_wednesday\n    result = golf_balls_left\n    return result\n\n\n\n\n\nQ: There were nine computers in the server room. Five more computers were installed each day, from monday to thursday. How many computers are now in the server room?\n\n# solution in Python:\n\n\ndef solution():\n    """There were nine computers in the server room. Five more computers were installed each day, from monday to thursday. How many computers are now in the server room?"""\n    computers_initial = 9\n    computers_per_day = 5\n    num_days = 4  # 4 days between monday and thursday\n    computers_added = computers_per_day * num_days\n    computers_total = computers_initial + computers_added\n    result = computers_total\n    return result\n\n\n\n\n\nQ: Shawn has five toys. For Christmas, he got two toys each
toys. For Christmas, he got two toys each from his mom and dad. How many toys does he have now?\n\n# solution in Python:\n\n\ndef solution():\n    """Shawn has five toys. For Christmas, he got two toys each from his mom and dad. How many toys does he have now?"""\n    toys_initial = 5\n    mom_toys = 2\n    dad_toys = 2\n    total_received = mom_toys + dad_toys\n    total_toys = toys_initial + total_received\n    result = total_toys\n    return result\n\n\n\n\n\nQ: Jason had 20 lollipops. He gave Denny some lollipops. Now Jason has 12 lollipops. How many lollipops did Jason give to Denny?\n\n# solution in Python:\n\n\ndef solution():\n    """Jason had 20 lollipops. He gave Denny some lollipops. Now Jason has 12 lollipops. How many lollipops did Jason give to Denny?"""\n    jason_lollipops_initial = 20\n    jason_lollipops_after = 12\n    denny_lollipops =
= 12\n    denny_lollipops = jason_lollipops_initial - jason_lollipops_after\n    result = denny_lollipops\n    return result\n\n\n\n\n\nQ: Leah had 32 chocolates and her sister had 42. If they ate 35, how many pieces do they have left in total?\n\n# solution in Python:\n\n\ndef solution():\n    """Leah had 32 chocolates and her sister had 42. If they ate 35, how many pieces do they have left in total?"""\n    leah_chocolates = 32\n    sister_chocolates = 42\n    total_chocolates = leah_chocolates + sister_chocolates\n    chocolates_eaten = 35\n    chocolates_left = total_chocolates - chocolates_eaten\n    result = chocolates_left\n    return result\n\n\n\n\n\nQ: If there are 3 cars in the parking lot and 2 more cars arrive, how many cars are in the parking lot?\n\n# solution in Python:\n\n\ndef solution():\n    """If there are 3 cars in the parking lot and 2 more cars arrive, how many cars are
and 2 more cars arrive, how many cars are in the parking lot?"""\n    cars_initial = 3\n    cars_arrived = 2\n    total_cars = cars_initial + cars_arrived\n    result = total_cars\n    return result\n\n\n\n\n\nQ: There are 15 trees in the grove. Grove workers will plant trees in the grove today. After they are done, there will be 21 trees. How many trees did the grove workers plant today?\n\n# solution in Python:\n\n\ndef solution():\n    """There are 15 trees in the grove. Grove workers will plant trees in the grove today. After they are done, there will be 21 trees. How many trees did the grove workers plant today?"""\n    trees_initial = 15\n    trees_after = 21\n    trees_added = trees_after - trees_initial\n    result = trees_added\n    return result\n\n\n\n\n\nQ: {question}\n\n# solution in Python:\n\n\n', template_format='f-string', validate_template=True)#
[Deprecated]
field python_globals: Optional[Dict[str, Any]] = None#
field python_locals: Optional[Dict[str, Any]] = None#
field return_intermediate_steps: bool = False#
field stop: str = '\n\n'#
classmethod from_colored_object_prompt(llm: langchain.base_language.BaseLanguageModel, **kwargs: Any) → langchain.chains.pal.base.PALChain[source]#
Load PAL from colored object prompt.
classmethod from_math_prompt(llm: langchain.base_language.BaseLanguageModel, **kwargs: Any) → langchain.chains.pal.base.PALChain[source]#
Load PAL from math prompt.
pydantic model langchain.chains.QAGenerationChain[source]#
Validators
raise_deprecation » all fields
set_verbose » verbose
field input_key: str = 'text'#
field k: Optional[int] = None#
field llm_chain: LLMChain [Required]#
field output_key: str = 'questions'#
field text_splitter: TextSplitter = <langchain.text_splitter.RecursiveCharacterTextSplitter object>#
classmethod from_llm(llm: langchain.base_language.BaseLanguageModel, prompt: Optional[langchain.prompts.base.BasePromptTemplate] = None, **kwargs: Any) → langchain.chains.qa_generation.base.QAGenerationChain[source]#
property input_keys: List[str]#
Input keys this chain expects.
property output_keys: List[str]#
Output keys this chain expects.
pydantic model langchain.chains.QAWithSourcesChain[source]#
Question answering with sources over documents.
Validators
raise_deprecation » all fields
set_verbose » verbose
validate_naming » all fields
pydantic model langchain.chains.RetrievalQA[source]#
Chain for question-answering against an index.
Example
Chain for question-answering against an index.
Example
from langchain.llms import OpenAI
from langchain.chains import RetrievalQA
from langchain.faiss import FAISS
from langchain.vectorstores.base import VectorStoreRetriever
retriever = VectorStoreRetriever(vectorstore=FAISS(...))
retrievalQA = RetrievalQA.from_llm(llm=OpenAI(), retriever=retriever)
Validators
raise_deprecation » all fields
set_verbose » verbose
field retriever: BaseRetriever [Required]#
pydantic model langchain.chains.RetrievalQAWithSourcesChain[source]#
Question-answering with sources over an index.
Validators
raise_deprecation » all fields
set_verbose » verbose
validate_naming » all fields
field max_tokens_limit: int = 3375#
Restrict the docs to return from store based on tokens,
enforced only for StuffDocumentChain and if reduce_k_below_max_tokens is to true
field reduce_k_below_max_tokens: bool = False#
Reduce the number of results to return from store based on tokens limit
field retriever: langchain.schema.BaseRetriever [Required]#
Index to connect to.
pydantic model langchain.chains.SQLDatabaseChain[source]#
Chain for interacting with SQL Database.
Example
from langchain import SQLDatabaseChain, OpenAI, SQLDatabase
db = SQLDatabase(...)
db_chain = SQLDatabaseChain.from_llm(OpenAI(), db)
Validators
raise_deprecation » all fields
raise_deprecation » all fields
set_verbose » verbose
field database: SQLDatabase [Required]#
SQL Database to connect to.
field llm: Optional[BaseLanguageModel] = None#
[Deprecated] LLM wrapper to use.
[Deprecated] LLM wrapper to use.
field llm_chain: LLMChain [Required]#
field prompt: Optional[BasePromptTemplate] = None#
[Deprecated] Prompt to use to translate natural language to SQL.
field query_checker_prompt: Optional[BasePromptTemplate] = None#
The prompt template that should be used by the query checker
field return_direct: bool = False#
Whether or not to return the result of querying the SQL table directly.
field return_intermediate_steps: bool = False#
Whether or not to return the intermediate steps along with the final answer.
field top_k: int = 5#
Number of results to return from the query
field use_query_checker: bool = False#
Whether or not the query checker tool should be used to attempt
to fix the initial SQL from the LLM.
classmethod from_llm(llm: langchain.base_language.BaseLanguageModel, db: langchain.sql_database.SQLDatabase, prompt: Optional[langchain.prompts.base.BasePromptTemplate] = None, **kwargs: Any) → langchain.chains.sql_database.base.SQLDatabaseChain[source]#
pydantic model langchain.chains.SQLDatabaseSequentialChain[source]#
Chain for querying SQL database that is a sequential chain.
The chain is as follows:
1. Based on the query, determine which tables to use.
2. Based on those tables, call the normal SQL database chain.
This is useful in cases where the number of tables in the database is large.
Validators
raise_deprecation » all fields
set_verbose » verbose
field decider_chain: LLMChain [Required]#
field return_intermediate_steps: bool = False#
field sql_chain: SQLDatabaseChain [Required]#
classmethod from_llm(llm: langchain.base_language.BaseLanguageModel, database: langchain.sql_database.SQLDatabase, query_prompt: langchain.prompts.base.BasePromptTemplate = PromptTemplate(input_variables=['input', 'table_info', 'dialect', 'top_k'], output_parser=None, partial_variables={}, template='Given an input question, first create a syntactically correct {dialect} query to run, then look at the results of the query and return the answer. Unless the user specifies in his question a specific number of examples he wishes to obtain, always limit your query to at most {top_k} results. You can order the results by a relevant column to return the most interesting examples in the database.\n\nNever query for all the columns from a specific table, only ask for a the few relevant columns given the question.\n\nPay attention to use only the column names that you can see in the schema description. Be careful to not query for columns that do not exist. Also, pay attention to which column is in which table.\n\nUse the following format:\n\nQuestion: Question here\nSQLQuery: SQL Query to run\nSQLResult: Result of the
SQL Query to run\nSQLResult: Result of the SQLQuery\nAnswer: Final answer here\n\nOnly use the following tables:\n{table_info}\n\nQuestion: {input}', template_format='f-string', validate_template=True), decider_prompt: langchain.prompts.base.BasePromptTemplate = PromptTemplate(input_variables=['query', 'table_names'], output_parser=CommaSeparatedListOutputParser(), partial_variables={}, template='Given the below input question and list of potential tables, output a comma separated list of the table names that may be necessary to answer this question.\n\nQuestion: {query}\n\nTable Names: {table_names}\n\nRelevant Table Names:', template_format='f-string', validate_template=True), **kwargs: Any) → langchain.chains.sql_database.base.SQLDatabaseSequentialChain[source]#
Load the necessary chains.
pydantic model langchain.chains.SequentialChain[source]#
Chain where the outputs of one chain feed directly into next.
Validators
raise_deprecation » all fields
set_verbose » verbose
validate_chains » all fields
field chains: List[langchain.chains.base.Chain] [Required]#
field input_variables: List[str] [Required]#
field return_all: bool = False#
pydantic model langchain.chains.SimpleSequentialChain[source]#
Simple chain where the outputs of one step feed directly into next.
Validators
raise_deprecation » all fields
set_verbose » verbose
validate_chains » all fields
field chains: List[langchain.chains.base.Chain] [Required]#
field strip_outputs: bool = False#
pydantic model langchain.chains.TransformChain[source]#
Chain transform chain output.
Example
from langchain import TransformChain
transform_chain = TransformChain(input_variables=["text"],
 output_variables["entities"], transform=func())
Validators
raise_deprecation » all fields
set_verbose » verbose
field input_variables: List[str] [Required]#
field output_variables: List[str] [Required]#
field transform: Callable[[Dict[str, str]], Dict[str, str]] [Required]#
pydantic model langchain.chains.VectorDBQA[source]#
Chain for question-answering against a vector database.
Validators
raise_deprecation » all fields
set_verbose » verbose
validate_search_type » all fields
field k: int = 4#
Number of documents to query for.
field search_kwargs: Dict[str, Any] [Optional]#
Extra search args.
field search_type: str = 'similarity'#
Search type to use over vectorstore. similarity or mmr.
field vectorstore: VectorStore [Required]#
field vectorstore: VectorStore [Required]#
Vector Database to connect to.
pydantic model langchain.chains.VectorDBQAWithSourcesChain[source]#
Question-answering with sources over a vector database.
Validators
raise_deprecation » all fields
set_verbose » verbose
validate_naming » all fields
field k: int = 4#
Number of results to return from store
field max_tokens_limit: int = 3375#
Restrict the docs to return from store based on tokens,
enforced only for StuffDocumentChain and if reduce_k_below_max_tokens is to true
field reduce_k_below_max_tokens: bool = False#
Reduce the number of results to return from store based on tokens limit
field search_kwargs: Dict[str, Any] [Optional]#
Extra search args.
field vectorstore: langchain.vectorstores.base.VectorStore [Required]#
Vector Database to connect to.
langchain.chains.load_chain(path: Union[str, pathlib.Path], **kwargs: Any) → langchain.chains.base.Chain[source]#
Unified method for loading a chain from LangChainHub or local fs.

SQL Chain example

Agents
By Harrison Chase