EdinburghNLP/nunavut-hansard-plusplus huggingface dataset:
There are many factors related to implementing Inuit beliefs, customs, values and languages.
The Inuit Language Authority is indispensable in these areas as they are continually creating Inuit words for items that don’t have an equivalent Inuktitut word.
The Inuktitut language has been largely completed, with no additional terms, however with the advent of new technology which don’t have Inuit words, they are illustrating their role and expertise.
Furthermore, we now have Inuit elders certified in specific areas of Inuit traditional knowledge and they are allowed to teach these subjects related to teaching Inuit culture and traditional values. Additionally, we have the Tuttarviit body, which is also working on Inuit customs and practices.
Regarding our colleagues’ statements, I concurred with his assessment that the regular members and the Executive together comprise this government and we have to work together. When our colleague made that statement, he spoke the truth regarding this issue.
He said “perhaps if we tried to implement it in this manner, it would be more beneficial.”
That is a strong statement our colleague made, and as a government, we do have to undertake that type of collaboration, and have debates about these issues with the MLAs when they find that this government has to make improvements in order to fully implement Inuit cultural values. We want to hear that type of recommendation from the members.
I would like to thank the Premier for that.
Again, that brings up another question. Can the Premier indicate how often the Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit Katimajiit meets with the cabinet?
The Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit Katimajiit work with the departments as advisors on these issues, but they don’t participate in actual meetings of the cabinet.
Can the Premier indicate if the Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit Katimajiit has the authority to recommend the rejection of a proposal before it goes to cabinet for a decision?
As the cabinet, we meet to review policies that either requires approval or amendment for various departments.
The documents are first vetted to include recommendations on any Inuit traditional values, if any, prior to these documents being reviewed by the cabinet.
Question 562 – 3(3): Search and Rescue in Nunavut (Oshutapik)
I wish my constituents a good afternoon in our community, and eventually I hope to see them in person as opposed to being seen on television.
Earlier this week, the minister informed the Legislative Assembly that his department is “working closely with the RCMP to develop a new policy on search and rescue that clarifies and strengthens the roles of government, communities, and our partners in search and rescue activities.”
Can the minister indicate when he expects this new policy to be finalized?
The departmental officials will undertake this consultation process to discuss and collaborate with our search and rescue societies throughout Nunavut.
However, the consultation process has to be completed first, although I understand the urgency behind wanting the legislation to this effect. I get the urgency; however, we don’t want to present anything that isn’t comprehensive and accurate.
Unfortunately, I can put a time period as to the completion of the legislation.
Since we’re on the same subject, again, earlier this week, the minister informed the Legislative Assembly that his department is “working with Environment Canada to have 1-800 numbers available for communities to call for weather updates.”
When does the minister expect this service to begin?
I thank the member once again for asking that question. Upon completion of the work, we will have a toll-free 1-800 number available.
Once it has been completed, the Minister of Languages and I will have to work together on this file. Once the work has been completed in our official languages, albeit the Inuktitut language version will be modified due to the various dialects in Inuktitut or Inuinnaqtun and once these issues have been identified then we can start the process. I certainly hope it doesn’t take a whole year since our people will be soon starting to spread out on the land based on the warming weather.
We regard this as an urgent implementation requirement and hope to have it completed as soon as possible.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.  Speaker: Thank you, Minister Kusugak.
Again, earlier this week, for my second supplementary, the minister informed the Legislative Assembly that his department has supplied 500 SPOT devices to communities throughout Nunavut.
SPOT devices use GPS technology and the Globalstar satellite system. (interpretation ends) Can the minister indicate how the government determines the number of SPOT devices to provide to each community?
Based on the information provided to me, every community was allocated twenty SPOT devices.
I would like to see those SPOT devices used because when we conduct searches, sometimes it’s difficult to determine where they are.
(interpretation ends) Mr. Speaker, the Canadian Space Agency plans to launch a new generation of RADARSAT satellites later this decade. These are intended to improve satellite coverage of the Arctic. Can the minister indicate if his department’s Emergency Management Organization works with federal authorities to identify areas of improvement with respect to satellite coverage of the Arctic?
Our officials in the department are always working to improve communications, and they work non-stop to try to find solutions to enhance our communications system to improve the satellite connections.
I know it will continue to be spoken to, and whenever we have the chance to inform the House of improving our satellite connections here in Nunavut.
Question 563 – 3(3): Support for Small Business (Ningark)
My constituency consists of two communities that are both decentralized and smaller communities, namely, Repulse Bay and Kugaaruk.
The larger communities have more businesses operating and to see that makes one envious, but it is also good to see that since many businesses provide benefits wherever they may operate.
Additionally within our smaller communities, Mr. Speaker, the lack of job opportunities can be easily seen, with no vacancies and furthermore, most of the employees don’t move to other jobs opening up positions.
That is fine as well.
Nonetheless, in our smaller communities, although our residents may be interested in creating a business, they find the process daunting.
Can the minister consider, based on my question here, offering economic development meetings, in English (interpretation ends) economic development workshops?
(Interpretation) Or alternatively host business creation workshop? Has his department provided these types of workshop or has he at least considered this option especially in our smaller communities?
Mr. Speaker, I know that in the past, there have been workshops held in certain communities, but as the department, we do provide funding for EDOs in the smaller communities to help out the community residents who want to get into small business, the small entrepreneurs in these smaller communities.
Mr. Speaker, at this time, I don’t have the information in front of me about upcoming workshops or the recent workshops that may have been held last year or the year before.
I do not have that information, but I will provide to the member once I get it.
As business owners can attest, operating a private business isn’t a simple matter, but a complex maze especially if you want to hire employees in your business.
There is also the associated administrative work, such as income tax deductions, CPP and other deductions based on the legal requirements. These take work, and then there is the financial side of operating a business. You need accounting software to operate a business.
Yes, I understand and thank the minister for his response that he will provide an update down the road about possible workshops in my riding.
These smaller communities really need a leg up in enhancing business opportunities and jobs created by the private sector.
Mr. Speaker, can the minister also provide an update if these types of workshops aren’t available? Can he provide a directive to his regional staff to prioritize smaller communities such as Repulse Bay and Kugaaruk, not to mention all smaller communities for these types of initiatives?
I thank the Member for Akulliq for that question.
Mr. Speaker, in October of last year, this government, through my department, had partnered in with the small business and tourism minister, Maxime Bernier, to provide a service. We all know that permitting and licensing is a burden on small businesses.
So in partnership, with the formation of BizPaL, we use that through interactive licensing, education, and permitting.
Mr. Speaker, at the end of this month, through the Internet process that we call BizPaL, it will be translated into all four official languages so that unilinguals can access that information either on Internet or through their EDOs within the smaller communities.
It will help them access the information required. We know that there’s a lot of paperwork involved in setting up a small business.
So education, right off the bat, is a good tool to use. Knowing what type of business you’re going to be setting up, the required licensing, and permits you would require for certain types of business would be all listed under there so that you do not have to go through a whole series of looking for what type of businesses or licences or permits that you do need to start a small entrepreneurship in these smaller communities.
I have with me here some information from the minister’s office. One that I have is, “Does your business need a financial boost?” The answer would be, “Of course, it does,” in a small community.
Mr. Speaker, other information I have here is “Small Business Development: Let’s Get Started.”
Yes, we want our communities to get started now. Another one I have here is the Nunavut Prospectors Program.
Can the minister tell me, this House, and the people in my community that this information is provided to the local community economic development officers so that small business would be able to access this much needed information to get started?
Yes, I understand the difficulties at times for these small entrepreneurs in these smaller communities in setting up shop and their businesses.
Mr. Speaker, we provide funds to the hamlets to hire an economic development officer whom the community resident can go to for any kind of assistance. There are all sorts of funding, grants, and agencies out there; it’s not just with the Nunavut government. There are a lot with the federal government and we instruct our EDOs to educate and get this information out to the folks who want to start a small business or otherwise, bigger businesses.
Mr. Ningark: Final supplementary. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Will the minister ensure that these programs and services are made available to small communities, remote communities, through the local economic development officers, to Repulse Bay and Kugaaruk?
Absolutely, yes, not just to Kugaaruk and Repulse Bay, but we do work with all of the communities in Nunavut.
Question 564 – 3(3): Cape Dorset Health Centre Replacement (Schell)
Mr. Speaker, the Cape Dorset Health Centre was constructed in 1983.
At 30 years old, it is one of the oldest health centres in Nunavut and has faced some serious issues in recent years.
A replacement health centre project for Cape Dorset was identified in the government’s 2010-15 capital plan with work scheduled to begin in 2013-14.
In October of 2010, during Committee of the Whole deliberations on the 2011-12 capital budget, the Minister of Health and Social Services at the time indicated that the department remains committed to replacing the health centre in Cape Dorset.
We are now in 2013 and the Cape Dorset Replacement Health Centre Project no longer appears on the capital plan.
Can the minister explain why the government has abandoned its commitment to replace Cape Dorset’s health centre?
Mr. Speaker, the government has not abandoned its plan to replace the Cape Dorset Health Centre.
Information provided in the 2010-11 capital plan and again in the 2011-12 capital plan indicated that there four priority health centre replacement projects across Nunavut.
These projects were for the communities of Arctic Bay, Repulse Bay, Taloyoak, and Cape Dorset.
All of these projects have remained on the ladder capital plans, with the exception of the one for Cape Dorset.
Can the minister explain why the Cape Dorset project was singled out to be dropped from the capital plan?
Mr. Speaker, as all Members of this House are aware, we have to get into more detailed planning on all of our infrastructure demands across Nunavut, including health centres.
There’s more detailed planning going into all of these infrastructure projects and bringing them forward on the capital plan so that we have a better idea of what the costs are when we do submit it to the standing committees and this House for approval.
As the minister is aware, the Cape Dorset Health Centre building is facing some serious issues due to aging, especially with respect to code upgrades, ventilation problems, overcrowding of programs, and also from previous fuel leaks in the crawlspace.
Can the minister indicate what kind of structural or mechanical evaluations and assessments have been conducted on the Cape Dorset Health Centre in recent years?
I thank Mr. Schell for the concern for his constituents and the community of Cape Dorset.
Mr. Speaker, the Department of Health and Social Services and the Department of Community and Government Services are well aware of the issues concerning the existing Cape Dorset Health Centre.
So we’re well aware of the concerns and that’s why we remain committed to a new health centre in Cape Dorset.
I’m confident that the minister’s review of the evaluations and assessments of the Cape Dorset Health Centre will clearly demonstrate the need for a new health centre in the community.
Will the minister commit to putting this project back on the capital plan at the earliest opportunity and, if not, why not?
I will assure Mr. Schell that the functional review of a new health centre for Cape Dorset will continue to be a priority for my department.
Question 565 – 3(3): Article 24 of NLCA Binding on QEC (Curley)
Mr. Curley (interpretation): Yes, a good afternoon greeting to the people of Rankin Inlet.
The question I want to ask, Mr. Speaker, is directed to the department responsible for the implementation of the land claim, that is (interpretation ends) Implementation.
(interpretation) I want to refer back to the statement made earlier in the day as I was proud to hear the particular announcement that twenty years have passed since the Nunavut Land Claims Agreement Act was enacted by Canada.
Also, yesterday when I was commenting and asking questions related to this issue during Committee of the Whole, I asked the Minister of Justice about this legislation, in other words (interpretation ends) a legal question.
(interpretation) Further, the government responded to this question about Article 24, when I asked the minister: does his department, the Department of Justice provide legal advice? I asked whether legal advice had been provided as to whether Article 24 was binding and applicable to the Qulliq Energy Corporation.
The deputy minister responded in this manner. He said that the advice provided by the department was that Article 24 had to be adhered to. (interpretation ends) Binding on all departments…
(interpretation) Now I want to raise this question to the Premier, who is also the minister responsible for implementing the land claim.
Do you agree with or believe the response I received about legal advice being binding on this government regarding Article 24?
Speaker: Thank you, Mr. Curley. Minister of Executive and Intergovernmental Affairs, Madam Premier.
Hon. Eva Aariak (interpretation): Thank you, Mr. Speaker. The members’ comments I believe are related to yesterday’s discussions during the Department of Justice review.
After careful review of the issue discussed yesterday, I hope to be able to respond.
(interpretation ends) So I will take it as notice. (interpretation) I apologize, Mr. Speaker. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Question 566 – 3(3): Environmental Protection in the High Arctic (Elliott)
My questions are for the Minister of Environment. Welcome home and congratulations on success in Bangkok.
Mr. Speaker, for a number of years, the Department of Environment has been studying the feasibility of establishing a new territorial park on Axel Heiberg Island which would be known as Napaaqtulik.
For the benefit of the residents of Grise Fiord who are following our proceedings today, can the minister update the House on the status of this initiative?
Speaker: Thank you, Mr. Elliott. Minister responsible for the Department of Environment, Minister Arreak.
Hon. James Arreak (interpretation): Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I also thank the Quttiktuq MLA for his questions.
Yes, the work is ongoing towards the establishment of territorial parks here in Nunavut, and the priority has been on non-decentralized communities such as Clyde River, Sanikiluaq and the area the member referred to as Napaaqtulik, which I imagine is the local name.
At this current time, the work towards this goal is still ongoing and further, hold on. Indeed the communities in the High Arctic, specifically Resolute Bay and Grise Fiord have been consulted and discussions are underway to work towards the territorial park that may be called Napaaqtulik upon completion of this process.
Speaker: Thank you, Minister Arreak. Your first supplementary, Mr. Elliott.
Mr. Elliott: Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Can the minister indicate how his department is consulting with Grise Fiord’s municipality, hunters and trappers organization, and the Community Lands and Resource Committee concerning matters related to environmental protection and initiatives in the High Arctic, including park development?
Hon. James Arreak (interpretation): Thank you, Mr. Speaker. There have been a number of meetings held with the communities, including consultations ever since the initiative was started. The agreement was reached, based on the previous MLA during the GNWT days, to name the future park: Napaaqtulik.
Yes, the organizations the member referred to have been consulted, and negotiations have begun towards attaining that goal, and further meetings have been scheduled for this month, March. Once the meetings have concluded, if there is a report outlining any progress made to date, it would be include these details contained in a report.
As the minister is aware, the Municipality of Grise Fiord, the hunters and trappers organization, and the Community Lands and Resources Committee have made submissions to the Nunavut Impact Review Board concerning Canada Coal’s plans to develop coal mining in the High Arctic. The submissions have expressed concerns regarding the need to protect the unique environment of the petrified forests and fossil deposits on Axel Heiberg Island and Ellesmere Island.
Can the minister indicate when the Department of Environment will make a formal submission to NIRB concerning Canada Coal’s application related to its exploration and exploratory drilling activities in the High Arctic?
Our department is working with these communities, as they are intensely interested in protecting both that area as well as the island. That particular area is said to have abundant wildlife, based on hunters who have gone there, including migratory birds and their nesting sites.
The coal exploration company, Canada Coal wants to conduct more drilling this summer and their current drilling program has been approved, however, if they were to progress to the next step, it would entail numerous environmental baseline studies as well as a NIRB hearing and the communities would have to be consulted on the project.
At this time, this project doesn’t enjoy the support of these communities and thereby, based on that, the Department of Environment wouldn’t be able to offer their support unilaterally.
Peary caribou live on Axel Heiberg Island and other areas of the High Arctic. A 2011 report issued by the Department of Environment indicated that “the estimated abundance of Peary caribou inhabiting the Axel Heiberg Island Group in 2007 was 2,291.”
According to the Nunavut Wild Species 2000 report, the status of Peary caribou is “sensitive.”
Can the minister indicate what actions his department is taking to ensure that mining activities in the High Arctic do not negatively impact the Peary caribou?
The Department of Environment is in continual contact with NIRB, with discussions held on various projects, especially when proposals for development are submitted and especially non-renewable resource development.
Furthermore, the department is involved in drafting up recommendations, including terms and conditions. If NIRB did approve the project proposal to develop the coal deposits in that area, there would be stringent terms and conditions imposed on the company to protect the environment.
We are working with NIRB at this point, and we will ensure that we keep the communities informed of any further developments.
Question 567 – 3(3): Standardized Inuit Language Terminology for Names of Departments (Tapardjuk)
Mr. Tapardjuk (interpretation): Thank you, Mr. Speaker. And further, I was getting anxious to start raising questions to my newly arrived Annuraaqatik, and for that I am quite pleased.
Be forewarned as we will be picking on him for a bit.
(the rest is a prepared question) Mr. Speaker, I would like to direct my question to the Minister of Languages.
Mr. Speaker, I am very pleased that Nunavut’s very own Official Languages Act will soon be in force.
Working in tandem with the Inuit Language Protection Act, these two pieces of legislation will ensure the provision of government services in the Inuit language.
However, we must take the steps to ensure that the government services are appropriately identified before we can access them.
To start with, it is critically important that standardized terms for each of our government departments be established.
Can the minister update this House on what steps have been taken to ensure that consistent and standardized Inuit language terminology is used for each and every government department?
Hon. James Arreak (interpretation): Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I also thank my Annuraaqatik for welcoming me with that question.
Yes, as per my previous statements when bringing forth the legislation, and based on his questions, the Department of Culture and Heritage will work with all departments on the need to incorporate Inuktitut in the working environment, as well as to instill Inuktitut as a working language.
We will be the lead department responsible for the operations of the Inuit Language Authority, as the Department of Culture and Heritage has this mandate.
Also, the hamlets will also have a separate section to work with.
However, with respect to the operations, at least for the government departments will continue to be a work-in-progress and a priority for the Department of Culture and Heritage.
I will give you an example.
The government has created a new department.
In English, it is referred to as the Department of Family Services.
However, in Inuktitut, it has already been referred to as Ilagiinut Pijitsirautauvaktut, Ilagiinut Pijitsiraqtikkut, and Ilagiinut Pijirautilirijikkut.
I understand that we can all have slightly different ways of saying the same thing. However, a formal entity should have a formal title. Can the minister confirm whether or not a standardized Inuit language term has been assigned to identify the government’s new department?
We have the Inuit Language Authority and they have not been working on the Inuktitut wording for that new department yet.
To date, they will be working on the standardization of that new Department of Family Services.
I am questioning the minister because on July 1, 2012 press release it was called one thing and then in the Minister of Finance’s budget address was called something else.
I fully recognize that the Inuit Language Authority, the Inuit Uqausinginnik Taiguusiliuqtiit, has the mandate to standardize terminology across Nunavut.