EMBO/SourceData huggingface dataset:
Figure 4Immunoblot showing co-immunoprecipitation of Dpb11 with Sgs1. Both DPB11-3xHA and SGS11-647-5xFLAG were expressed at their endogenous loci.
Figure 5Immunoblots showing co-immunoprecipitation between Dpb11 and Sgs1 in the presence of 0.04% MMS in either wildtype, mec1Δ, tel1Δ or mec1Δ tel1Δ cell lines. DPB11-3HA was tagged at its endogenous locus and co-immunoprecipitated with SGS11-647-FLAG tagged and truncated at its endogenous locus.
Figure 6Dilution assay of wild-type or rev3Δ cells expressing BRCT3/4-SGS1 in the presence of 0.0025% MMS.
Figure 7Measurement of BIR efficiency in cells carrying an empty vector or expressing DPB11BRCT3/4 fused to wild-type or mutant versions of SGS1. Mutants include a helicase deficient allele of SGS1 (SGS1hd) or an allele lacking the Top3 Interacting Motif (TIM; SGS1TIM). Error bars represent SEM of at least 3 replicate experiments. P value was calculated with a two-tailed, unpaired t-test. * = p≤0.05; ** = p≤0.01; *** = p ≤0.001. C. Measurement of BIR efficiency in cells carrying an empty vector or expressing DPB11BRCT3/4 fused to either SGS1, TOP3, or RMI1. Error bars represent SEM of at least 3 replicate experiments. P value was calculated with a two-tailed, unpaired t-test. * = p≤0.05; ** = p≤0.01; *** = p ≤0.001. D. Measurement of BIR efficiency in cells carrying an empty vector or DPB11BRCT3/4 fused to either SGS1, hBLM, PIF1, or RRM3. Error bars represent SEM of at least 3 replicate experiments. P value was calculated with a two-tailed, unpaired t-test. * = p≤0.05; ** = p≤0.01; *** = p ≤0.001.
Figure 8Serial dilution assay of sgs1Δ cell lines expressing either SGS1 or sgs1ΔACIDICPATCH.BIR assay in rad9Δ sgs1Δ cell lines expressing either SGS1 or sgs1ΔACIDICPATCH. Error bars represent SEM of 3 independent experiments. Error bars represent SEM of at least 3 replicate experiments. P value was calculated with a two-tailed, unpaired t-test. * = p≤0.05; ** = p≤0.01; *** = p ≤0.001.
Figure 1(B-C) Representative time-lapse images of (B) Tet1-3 triple KD (Tet-TKD), (C) Tet3-KD and control embryos at 3.5 days post fertilization. Scale bar = 100 µm.(D-E) Developmental rates of (D) control (control-MO injected), Tet1-, Tet2- and Tet3-single KD and Tet-TKD embryos and (E) control (control-MO + Tet2 mRNA co-injected), Tet2-KD2 (Tet2 MO2 injected), Tet2-KD2 + GFP mRNA and Tet2-KD2 + Tet2 mRNA embryos until blastocyst stage. Indicated p-values were calculated using log rank (Mantel-Cox) test against (D) control embryos or (E) Tet2-KD2 embryos or as indicated (ns = non-significant, * = p < 0.05, **** = p < 0.0001; numbers of analyzed embryos for each condition are indicated in parenthesis).
Figure 2(A-B) Representative images of (A) 5hmC- and (B) 5mC and 5caC-IF of control (control-MO injected), Tet1+2-DKD and Tet-TKD zygotes at 12 hpf. Paternal and maternal pronuclei are indicated, Pb = polar body; Sp = sperm; Scale bar = 20 μm.(C-E) Quantification of paternal/maternal (C) 5mC-, (D) 5hmC-, and (E) 5caC-signal ratios of 12 hpf derived zygotes normalized against DNA signal. A total of 5-16 zygotes from two to three experiments per condition were analyzed. Significance to control zygotes was calculated using ordinary one-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test (C, E) or Welch ANOVA with Dunnett's T3 multiple comparisons test (D) and significant differences are indicated (* = p < 0.05, ** = < 0.01, *** = p < 0.001, **** = p < 0.0001, data are represented as mean ± SD, with dots representing single zygotes).
Figure 3(B) MA plots of RNA-seq data from Tet3-KD/control (left) and Tet-TKD/control (right) 2-cell embryos. Significant differentially expressed genes are colored. The amount of up- and downregulated genes is indicated. Differentially expressed genes were determined using DEseq2 (padj<0.05, |log2FC|>0.7).
Figure 4(A) Expression changes of different classes of TEs in Tet3-KD and Tet-TKD. Shown are log2-fold changes of KD embryos compared to control 2-cell embryos of different repetitive elements subdivided in classes of TEs. Indicated p-values were calculated using a paired two-tailed t-test (*** = p < 0.001, **** = p <0.0001, data are represented as medium smoothed violin plots with indicated median and quartiles as dotted lines).(B-C) Expression levels of (B) maternally expressed ERV3-LTRs and (C) 2-cell embryo specific ERV3-LTRs in control, Tet3-KD and Tet-TKD 2-cell embryos (p-values were calculated using DEseq2; * = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01, *** = p < 0.001, **** = p < 0.0001, data are represented as mean ± SD, dots represent single embryos).(E) Expression levels of important candidate factors in control, Tet3-KD and Tet-TKD 2-cell embryos, implicated in the generation of 2C-like cells and as important regulators of EGA (p-values were calculated using DEseq2; * = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01, **** = p < 0.0001, data are represented as mean ± SD, dots represent single embryos).
Figure 5(A) % CpG methylation of 20 kb tiles in 5% bins in control or Tet-TKD 2-cell embryos. All samples from one condition were merged for this visualization.(F) Significant methylation changes of specific TEs subdivided in different classes of TEs (calculated using logistic regression function of Seqmonk, padj < 0.05; data are represented as medium smoothed violin plot with indicated median and quartiles as dotted line).(G) Correlation of significant DNA methylation changes in TEs (calculated with logistic regression function of Seqmonk, padj < 0.05, methylation difference >5%), which are also significant differentially expressed (DEseq2, padj < 0.05, |log2FC|>0.7).(H) Developmental rate of embryos derived from control, Tet2-MO2, Tet2-MO2 + Tet2 full-length mRNA (as shown in Fig. 1E) and Tet2-MO2 + Tet2 truncated mRNA (no catalytical domain) injected oocytes. Indicated p-values were calculated using the log rank (Mantel-Cox) test against Tet2-MO2 KD or as indicated (* = p < 0.05, *** = p < 0.001, **** = p < 0.0001, numbers of analyzed embryos for each condition is indicated in parenthesis).
Figure 1A) Visualisation of the pathology load at 9M of age of TAUwt, TAUtg and APPtg mice at 9M of age. Immunofluorescent staining for X34 (a fluorescent derivative of Congo Red), Iba1 (microglia) and TO-PRO-3 (nuclei) has been pseudocolored. Scale bar = 100μm.
Figure 3B) Log2 fold change (LFC) in TAUtg (x-axis) and APPtg mice (y-axis) after differential expression analysis, assessing the effects of age*genotype interaction. Color code for dots/numbers: grey = genes in hippocampus (n=15824); black = genes in APPtg-Blue (n=4236); green = genes significantly differentially expressed in APPtg mice (n=493); yellow = significantly differentially expressed genes in TAUtg mice (n=9); red = significantly differentially expressed genes in both (n=9).C) Z-score distribution per experimental group for all genes within the APPtg-Blue module. Boxplots: center line, median; box limits, 25th-75th quartiles; whiskers, 1.5x interquartile range. Empirical p-values are Bonferroni adjusted (***pbonf<0.001) and indicate significant shift in z-score distribution
Figure 6A) UMAP clustering of sorted Cd11b+/Cd45+ myeloid cells from mouse hippocampus. ARM: activated response microglia; CAM: CNS-associated macrophages; CPM: cycling and proliferating microglia; HM.1: homeostatic microglia cluster 1; HM.2: homeostatic microglia cluster 2; IRM: interferon-response microglia; MHC.high: high MHC-expressing microglia; Mnc: monocytes; TRM: transitioning microglia.B) Distribution of cells across the different clusters per experimental group (n=2 mice pooled for all experimental groups, except for TAUtg-11M and TAUwt-11M with n=3 mice pooled).C) Distribution of cells per experimental group over the different clusters, expressed in percentages as stated on top of each bar. E.g. of all cells within APPtg-11M, 56.7% of cells are ARM, while 12.5% are HM.1 cells.E) Differential expression of ARM vs HM.1 microglia for APPtg and TAUtg mice separately. Genes with a positive log(fold change) (LFC) are higher expressed in ARMs compared to HM.1 microglia. As can be seen which genes are more highly expressed in ARMs vs HM.1 cells are highly similar among APPtg and TAUtg mice (Spearman correlation r=0.91, p=2.2e-16). LFC > |0.2| with padj<0.05 are considered significant.
Figure 1A, B In-gel kinase assay of OST1 activity in ABA receptor mutants under cold stress. Ten-day-old wild type, ost1-3, pyr1 pyl1,4, pyr1 pyl1,2,4, pyr1 pyl4,5,8 and pyr1 pyl1,4,5,8 mutants were treated at 4°C for 2 h. Total protein extracts were prepared and separated on SDS-PAGE gel containing 0.1 mg/mL GST-∆ABF2 as a substrate, and incubated with 60 μCi of [γ-32P]ATP. Representative pictures are shown in (A) and relative kinase activity is shown in (B). Data information: In (A , Top, gel autoradiograph; bottom, Coomassie Brilliant Blue (CBB) staining of RuBisCO large subunit was used as a loading control. The ratio of band intensity of OST1 to RuBisCO in the wild type with cold treatment for 2 h was set to 1.00. In (B , each bar represents the mean ± SEM of three biological repeats. *P < 0.05 (two-tailed t-test).C, D In-gel kinase assay of OST1 activity in ABI1-OE14 and abi1 abi2 hab1 mutants under cold stress. Representative pictures are shown in (C) and relative kinase activity is shown in (D). Data information: In C), Top, gel autoradiograph; bottom, Coomassie Brilliant Blue (CBB) staining of RuBisCO large subunit was used as a loading control. The ratio of band intensity of OST1 to RuBisCO in the wild type with cold treatment for 2 h was set to 1.00. In D), each bar represents the mean ± SEM of three biological repeats. *P < 0.05 (two-tailed t-test).
Figure 2A Interaction of OST1 and EGR2 in yeast. Yeast cells harboring different vector combinations were grown on SC/−Leu/−Trp medium for 3 d or SC/−Leu/−Trp/−His/−Ade medium for 6 d. OST1-BD/AD and BD/EGR2-AD were used as negative controls.B OST1 interacts with EGR2 in vitro. Purified recombinant MBP-His-EGR2 or MBP-His proteins from E. coli were immunoprecipitated with MBP beads, and then incubated with purified recombinant GST-OST1. Precipitated proteins were detected with anti-His and anti-GST antibodies.C Co-IP assay of OST1 with EGR2 in vivo. 35S:HF-OST1/Super:EGR2-Myc or 35S:HF-OST1/Super:Myc was expressed in N. benthamiana leaves. Total proteins were immunoprecipitated with anti-Myc agarose beads, and the co-immunoprecipitation products were subjected to immunoblot analysis. EGR2-Myc and HF-OST1 were detected with anti-Myc and anti-HA antibodies, respectively.D Bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) assay. Wild-type Arabidopsis protoplasts transformed with OST1-YFPC and EGR2-YFPN proteins were incubated for 18 h. The interaction signal was detected by confocal microcopy. The combinations of OST1-YFPC/GUS-YFPN and GUS-YFPC/EGR2-YFPN were used as negative controls. Scale bars: 100 μm.E EGR2 inhibits OST1 kinase activity in vitro. Proteins were incubated with 1 μCi [γ-32P]ATP in kinase reaction buffer for 30 min at 30°C, and then separated by SDS-PAGE. Top, autoradiograph; bottom, CBB staining.F, G In-gel assay of OST1 activity in 10-d-old wild type, egr1 and egr2 single mutants, and the egr1 egr2 double mutant under cold stress. Data information: the ratio of band intensity of OST1 to RuBisCO in the wild type with cold treatment for 2 h was set to 1.00. In (F representative pictures are shown: Top, autoradiograph; bottom, CBB staining. In (G relative kinase activity is shown. Each bar represents the mean ± SEM of three biological repeats. **P < 0.01 (two-tailed t-test).H, I In-gel assay of OST1 activity in 10-d-old wild-type and EGR2-overexpressing plants under cold stress. Data information the ratio of band intensity of OST1 to RuBisCO in the wild type with cold treatment for 2 h was set to 1.00. In H), representative pictures are shown: Top, autoradiograph; bottom, CBB staining. In I), relative kinase activity is shown. Each bar represents the mean ± SEM of three biological repeats. **P < 0.01 (two-tailed t-test).
Figure 4N-myristoylation of EGR2 and EGR2G2A in N. benthamiana leaves. Protein extracts prepared from N. benthamiana leaves expressing EGR2-Myc or EGR2G2A-Myc were immunoprecipated by anti-Myc agarose beads. Precipitated proteins were detected by anti-Myc and anti-myristic acid antibodies.D Immunoblot analysis showing that the total level of myristoylated proteins in wild type plants. Total proteins were prepared from two-week-old wild type seedlings treated with or without 80 μM myristic acid alkyne at 22°C for 72 h and then subjected to click-reaction with the biotin azide. The reaction was protected from light at room temperature for 3 h. The products were detected by anti-streptavidin-HRP antibody.E N-myristoylation of EGR2 in plants. Total proteins were prepared from two-week-old EGR2-Myc seedlings The products were immunoprecipated by anti-Myc agarose beads and detected by anti-streptavidin-HRP antibody. EGR2-Myc detected by anti-Myc antibody was used as a loading control.F Immunoblot assay of myristoylated EGR2 under cold stress. Total proteins were prepared form EGR2-Myc plants treated with 4°C for the indicated period, and immunoprecipated by anti-Myc agarose beads. Precipitated proteins were detected by anti-Myc and anti-myristic acid antibodies. The ratio of band intensity detected by anti-myristic acid antibody to anti-Myc antibody without cold treatment was set to 1.00. Representative pictures are shown (left) and quantitative analysis is shown (right). Each bar represents the mean ± SEM of three biological repeats. **P < 0.01 (two-tailed t-test).G Expression of EGR2 in egr2-3 EGR2:EGR2G2A-Myc complementation transgenic plants. Total RNAs were extracted from 2-week-old seedlings and subjected to RT-PCR analysis. EF1α was used as a loading control.Freezing tolerance assays of the egr2-3 mutant and EGR2:EGR2G2A-Myc transgenic plants in egr2-3 mutant. Two-week-old seedlings grown on MS medium containing 0.8% agar at 22°C were treated at −5°C for 0-1.5 h (NA) or −8°C for 0-1.5 h (CA). Representative photographs (-5oC, 0.5 h; -8oC, 0.5 h) are shown in (H)Freezing tolerance assays of the egr2-3 mutant and EGR2:EGR2G2A-Myc transgenic plants in egr2-3 mutant. Two-week-old seedlings grown on MS medium containing 0.8% agar at 22°C were treated at −5°C for 0-1.5 h (NA) or −8°C for 0-1.5 h (CA). survival rate is shown in (I). Data shown in (I) are mean values ± SEM of three biological replicates, each of which has three technical replicates. Asterisks indicate significant differences compared with wild type for the same treatment (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, two-tailed t-test); n. s., not significant.
Figure 5A In vitro pull-down assay showing the interaction of NMT1 and EGR2. Recombinant GST-NMT1 was incubated with immunoprecipated MBP-His-EGR2 or MBP-His at 4°C for 2 h. Anti-GST and anti-MBP were used to detect NMT1, EGR2 and MBP-His, respectively.Co-localization of NMT1 and EGR2 in N. benthamiana leaves. Scale bar: 50 μmC, D Effect of cold stress on the interaction of EGR2 and NMT1 determined by co-IP assay. Arabidopsis protoplasts expressing HF/NMT1-Myc and HF-EGR2/NMT1-Myc were treated with or without 4°C for 2 h. Total proteins were immunoprecipated by anti-HA agarose beads. Anti-Myc and anti-HA were used to detect NMT1-Myc and HF-EGR2, respectively. In (C), relative band intensity is shown below the co-IP blot. In (D), each bar represents the mean ± SEM of three biological experiments (**P < 0.01, two-tailed t-test).E In vitro pull-down assay showing decreased interaction intensity of EGR2 (4°C) and NMT1 compared with that of EGR2 (22°C) and NMT1. Total proteins prepared from two-week-old EGR2-Myc plants grown at 4°C for 0 h and 6 h were immunoprecipated by anti-Myc agarose beads and incubated with GST-NMT1 in pull down buffer for 2 h at 4°C. Anti-Myc and anti-GST antibodies were used to detect EGR2 and NMT1 proteins. Relative band intensity is shown below the output blot.F Expression of NMT1 in NMT1-Myc overexpression plants. EF1α was used as a loading control.Freezing phenotype (G) of NMT1-Myc overexpression transgenic plants. Two-week-old Super:NMT1-Myc plants were treated at −5°C (NA) or −8°C for 0.5 h (CA).survival rate (H) of NMT1-Myc overexpression transgenic plants. Two-week-old Super:NMT1-Myc plants were treated at −5°C (NA) or −8°C for 0.5 h (CA). In (H), each bar represents the mean ± SEM of three biological experiments, and asterisks indicate significant differences compared with the wild type for the same treatment (*P < 0.05, two tailed t-test).OST1 kinase activity in NMT1-Myc overexpression plants under cold stress. Top, autoradiograph; bottom, CBB staining. Representative pictures are shown in (I) In (I): the ratio of band intensity of OST1 to RuBisCO in wild type with cold treatment for 2 h was set to 1.00.OST1 kinase activity in NMT1-Myc overexpression plants under cold stress. the relative kinase activity is shown in (J). In (J): each bar represents the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments (**P < 0.01, two tailed t-test).
Figure 6A, B Pull-down assay. Total proteins prepared from EGR2-Myc or EGR2G2A-Myc transgenic plants was immunoprecipated with anti-Myc agarose beads, and then incubated with GST-OST1. Anti-Myc and anti-GST antibody were used to detect GST-OST1 and EGE2-Myc. Representative pictures are shown in (A). Relative interaction is shown in (B). Data information: In (A Relative band intensities are shown. In (B each bar represents the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments (**P < 0.01, two-tailed t-test).C LCI of EGR2 and EGR2G2A with OST1 in N. benthamiana leaves. EGR2-cLuc/OST1-nLuc and EGR2G2A-cLuc/OST1-nLuc were expressed in N. benthamiana leaves for 48 h. EGR2-cLuc/nLuc, EGR2G2A-cLuc/nLuc, and cLuc/OST1-nLuc were used as negative controls. Scale bar: 2 cm.D, E Co-IP assay. EGR2-Myc/HF-OST1, EGR2G2A-Myc/HF-OST1, HF/EGR2-Myc and HF/EGR2G2A-Myc were expressed in N. benthamiana leaves. Total proteins were immunoprecipated by anti-HA agarose beads. Anti-HA and anti-Myc antibodies were used to detect HF-OST1, EGR2-Myc and EGR2G2A-Myc, respectively. Representative pictures are shown in (D), and relative interaction is shown in (E). Data information: In : Relative band intensities are shown. In each bar represents the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments (**P < 0.01, two-tailed t-test).F, G Effect of EGR2G2A on the interaction of OST1 and EGR2 in Arabidopsis protoplasts expressing HF-OST1/EGR2-GFP/EGR2-Myc, HF-OST1/EGR2-GFP/EGR2G2A-Myc, or HF-OST1/EGR2-GFP. Total proteins were immunoprecipated by anti-HA agarose beads. Anti-Myc, anti-GFP, and anti-HA antibodies were used to detect EGR2-Myc, EGR2-GFP, and HF-OST1, respectively. Representative pictures are shown in (F), and relative interaction is shown in (G). Data information In Relative band intensities are shown. In each bar represents the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments (**P < 0.01, two-tailed t-test).H, I Effect of cold stress on the interaction of OST1 and EGR2. Arabidopsis protoplasts expressing EGR2-Myc/HF-OST1 and EGR2-Myc/HF were treated at 4°C for 0 and 2 h. Total proteins were immunoprecipated by anti-HA agarose beads. The co-immunoprecipitated products were detected by anti-HA and anti-Myc antibodies, respectively. Representative pictures are shown in (H), and relative interaction is shown in (I). Data information: In H) Relative band intensities are shown. In I): each bar represents the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments (**P < 0.01, two-tailed t-test).
Figure 7Freezing phenotype (A) of wild type, ost1-3, egr2-3, and ost1 egr2 mutants. Two-week-old seedlings grown on MS medium were treated at −5°C (NA) or −8°C for 0.5 h (CA).survival rate and ion leakage (B) of wild type, ost1-3, egr2-3, and ost1 egr2 mutants. Two-week-old seedlings grown on MS medium were treated at −5°C (NA) or −8°C for 0.5 h (CA). Data information: each bar represents the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments, each of which has three technical repeats. Asterisks indicate significant differences compared to the wild type with the same treatment (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, two-tailed t-test).C Expression of CBFs in wild type, ost1-3, egr2-3, and ost1 egr2-3 plants under cold stress. Two-week-old seedlings grown at 22°C were treated at 4°C for 0 h and 3 h. Data information: each bar represents the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments, each of which has three technical repeats. Asterisks indicate significant differences compared to the wild type with the same treatment (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, two-tailed t-test).
Figure 1(C) 293T cells were transfected with empty vector (EV), a vector encoding FLAG-tagged full length CYLD (wt), or constructs encoding FLAG-tagged CYLD fragments 1-581 (F1) lacking the C-terminus, or 581-956 (F2) lacking the N-terminus, as indicated, followed by FLAG-IP. The blot was probed with antibodies recognizing SPATA2, FLAG and tubulin. Endogenous SPATA2 was co-immunoprecipitated to comparable levels by CYLD and the C-terminal CYLD protein fragment, containing the USP domain.(D) CYLD-/- MEF were infected with retrovirus encoding FLAG-CYLD as indicated and CYLD was purified by FLAG-IP. The blot was probed with antibodies recognizing CYLD, SPATA2 and actin.(E) 293T cells were transfected with empty vector (EV), a vector encoding FLAG-tagged full length SPATA2 or a construct encoding the FLAG-tagged N-terminal part of SPATA2 (NT), as indicated, followed by FLAG-IP. The blot was probed with antibodies recognizing CYLD, SPATA2 and tubulin. M, marker lane.
Figure 2(A) 293T cells were transfected with a vector encoding V5-tagged full length SPATA2, along with empty vector (EV) a vector encoding FLAG-tagged HOIP wild-type (wt) or a vector encoding a FLAG-tagged PUB domain mutant of HOIP (N102A). After FLAG-IP, the blot was probed with antibodies recognizing HOIP, CYLD, V5 and actin.(B) 293T cells were transfected with empty vector or a vector encoding FLAG-tagged HOIP along with either V5-tagged SPATA2 (wt) or a V5-tagged PIM mutant (PIMmut) of SPATA2. After V5-IP, the blot was probed with antibodies recognizing FLAG, CYLD, V5 and tubulin.(C) 293T cells were transfected with a vector encoding FLAG-tagged HOIP and increasing amounts of V5-tagged SPATA2. After FLAG-IP, the blot was sequentially probed with antibodies recognizing OTULIN, HOIP, V5 and tubulin.(D) 293T cells were transfected with empty vector, FLAG-SPATA2 or FLAG-HOIP. After FLAG-IP, the blot was probed with antibodies recognizing OTULIN, CYLD, FLAG and actin.(E) 293T cells were transfected with empty vector, V5-tagged SPATA2 (wt) or a V5-tagged PUB domain mutant PUBmut of SPATA2. After V5-IP, the blot was probed with antibodies recognizing CYLD, FLAG, V5 and tubulin.(F) A549 cells were treated with FLAG-TNF (2µg/ml) for the indicated time. The purified TNF-RSC was sequentially probed with antibodies recognizing SPATA2, CYLD, RIPK1, TRADD, SHARPIN, TNF and tubulin as indicated.
Figure 3(A) A549 cells were infected to express a CRISPR/Cas9 system targeting luciferase (as control, indicated wt) or the spata2 gene (ko). Mixed cell cultures were treated with FLAG-huTNF (2µg/ml) for the indicated time. The purified TNF-RSC was sequentially probed with antibodies recognizing SPATA2, CYLD, HOIP, SHARPIN, TRADD, TNF and tubulin as indicated.(B) MEF were infected to express a CRISPR/Cas9 system targeting luciferase (wt) or the spata2 gene (ko). Single clones were generated, which were treated with FLAG-TNF (2µg/ml) for the indicated time. The purified TNF-RSC was sequentially probed with antibodies recognizing M1-linked ubiquitin, CYLD, RIPK1, and tubulin as indicated.