EMBO/SourceData huggingface dataset:
Figure 8A. Mean protein concentration in the CSF of Mpdz+/+ and Mpdz-/- P14-P21 mice (mean ± SD, n=2÷3).B. Volcano plot showing that the protein contents in sera of P15-P21 Mpdz+/+ and Mpdz-/- mice are similar to each other.C. A volcano plot showing that 23 proteins are at least two-fold significantly more abundant in the CSF of P15-21 Mpdz-/- mice (red circles, protein names are indicated) whereas only two proteins were more abundant in the CSF of Mpdz+/+ mice (green circles). The CSF composition was analyzed in 3 Mpdz-/- and 3 Mpdz+/+ mice.D. Images of 10 μm-thick sections from lateral ventricle CP villi of Mpdz+/+ and Mpdz-/- mice, immunolabeled for Nkcc1. The areas in the marked squares are magnified below. Scale bars, top, 50 μm, bottom 20 μm.E. Immunoblots of LDLR and Mpdz, with β-actin as loading control. The MPDZ immunoblot shows the efficiency of the shRNA-mediated knockdown. Bands from three immunoblots were quantified by normalization to β-actin bands (mean ± SD).
Figure 1(A) Immunoblots of mitochondrial fractions from siRNA‐transfected HEK293T cells±CCCP.(B) Immunoblots against indicated proteases in siRNA‐transfected cells.(C) Quantification of full‐length PINK1 (n=4) and knockdown efficiency (n=2) compared with non‐targeting (NT) siRNA from experiments performed as in B. *P0.05; **P0.01; ***P0.001. CCCP, carbonyl cyanide m‐chlorophenyl hydrazone; MPP, mitochondrial processing peptidase; PARL, presenilin‐associated rhomboid‐like protease; PINK1, phosphatase and tensin homologue‐induced kinase 1; siRNA, short interfering RNA.
Figure 2(A) Live confocal micrographs of siRNA‐transfected HEK293T cells±CCCP stained with MitoTracker (MTR) Green and Deep Red (DR); Scale bar, 5 μm.(B) MTR DR/Green ratio from images as in A. N=3; *P0.05 compared with NT siRNA.(C) Mitochondrial interconnectivity from images as in A, N=3.(D) Oxygen consumption in state 3 respiration in mitochondrial fractions from siRNA‐transfected cells. Antimycin A with NT siRNA was used as a control. A.U., arbitrary unit; CCCP, carbonyl cyanide m‐chlorophenyl hydrazone; MPP, mitochondrial processing peptidase; NT, non‐targeting; PARL, presenilin‐associated rhomboid‐like protease; siRNA, short interfering RNA.
Figure 3(A) Immunoblots of mitochondrial (M) and cytosolic (C) fractions from siRNA‐transfected HEK293T cells±CCCP for 3.5 h, ±MG132 for the final hour.(B) Quantification of 52‐kDa PINK1 from A (with MG132), n=3; *P0.05; **P0.001 compared with NT siRNA.(C) Mitochondria from siRNA‐transfected cells treated with 10 μM CCCP or dimethylsulphoxide were incubated with or without respiration substrate (Resp. mix) for 30 min at 37°C.al hour.
Figure 4(A) Mitochondria from CCCP‐treated or siRNA‐transfected HEK293T cells were incubated with increasing concentrations of proteinase K (PK).(B) Mitochondria from CCCP‐treated or MPPβ knockdown cells were incubated ±0.1 M Na2CO3 before supernatant (S) and pellet (P) were separated by centrifugation. CCCP, carbonyl cyanide m‐chlorophenyl hydrazone; MPP, mitochondrial processing peptidase; NT, non‐targeting; PARL, presenilin‐associated rhomboid‐like protease; PINK1, phosphatase and tensin homologue‐induced kinase 1; siRNA, short interfering RNA; WB, western blot.
Figure 5(A) Live confocal micrographs of siRNA‐, GFP‐Parkin‐ and OCT‐DsRed‐transfected HEK293T cells ±CCCP; Scale bars, 20 μm (low magnification) and 5 μm (high magnification).(B) Percentage of transfected cells displaying a punctate mitochondrial pattern of GFP‐Parkin distribution, n=3; *P0.05; **P0.01 compared with NT siRNA.(C) Immunoblots of endogenous Parkin in mitochondrial fractions from siRNA‐transfected cells ±CCCP.(D) Mitochondrial mass measured by flow cytometry of MTR Green fluorescence in siRNA‐transfected cells treated ±CCCP for 24 h, n=3. A.U., arbitrary unit; CCCP, carbonyl cyanide m‐chlorophenyl hydrazone; GFP, green fluorescent protein; MPP, mitochondrial processing peptidase; MTR, MitoTracker; NT, non‐targeting; PARL, presenilin‐associated rhomboid‐like protease; PINK1, phosphatase and tensin homologue‐induced kinase 1; siRNA, short interfering RNA.
Figure 1(a) Transverse slice of live E10.5 Venus::HES5 homozygous knock-in mouse showing the ventral HES5 domain in spinal cord ex vivo (left panel); Draq5 live nuclear stain with nuclear segmentation overlay (right panel); scale bar 30 μm.
Figure 2(a) 20x snapshot of an ex-vivo slice culture of E10.5 spinal cord from Venus::HES5 heterozygous knock-in mouse, transverse section; delineated region (blue) correspond to data shown in (b-c). D- dorsal, V- ventral. (b) Spatial profile of Venus::HES5 intensity averaged over 2.5hrs with 0 distance representing the ventral end of kymograph; black line represents the trend in Venus::HES5 data across the domain produced using an polynomial order 6 (see Materials and Methods). (c) Detrended spatial profile of Venus::HES5 corresponding to data shown in (b).
Figure 4(a) Start:Finish Venus::HES5 intensity ratio in E10.5 Venus::HES5 heterozygous spinal cord slices treated with control (DMSO) and Notch inhibitor DBZ (2 μM) observed over 16h; bars indicate mean and standard deviation of DMS0 (n=3 experiments) and DBZ (n=4 experiments); 2-tailed t-test ****p=0.0001.
Figure 7(a) Transverse cryosection of E10.5 Venus::HES5 spinal cord. Venus::HES5 endogenous signal, OLIG2 - motorneuron progenitor marker, NGN2 - early marker of neuronal commitment; scale bar 20 μm. (b) Relative nuclear intensities of Venus::HES5 and NGN2 in motorneuron and interneuron progenitors; bars show mean and SD of at least 494 cells per domain from 5 slices in 2 experiments; Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn's multiple comparison test adjusted p-values **p=0.0032, ***p<0.001.
Figure 8(a) Detrended spatial profile of NGN2::mScarlet-I intensity from transverse slice of E10.5 spinal cord from heterozygous knock-in mouse in ventral-dorsal direction;red indicates motorneuron (MN) domain, blue interneuron domain (IN).
Figure 1A Combined IF and DNA FISH analysis of RAD54 (IF) and telomeres (FISH) in ALT and non-ALT cell lines. White arrows indicate RAD54 foci that colocalize with telomeres. Scale bars = 10 µm B Quantification of data in A. A cell was counted positive if it contained 1 or more colocalization event between RAD54 and the telomere. At least 100 cells were counted per cell line per repeat. For SaOS2, NOS, SJSA1, HeLa LT n = 3. For Cal72, U2OS, HuO9 n = 4. Values shown are mean±sd Combined IF and DNA FISH analysis of RAD54 (IF), PML (IF) and telomeres (FISH) in ALT cell lines SaOS2 and HuO9. Scale bars = 10 µmWestern blot showing expression of TRF1-FOK1-mCherry fusion protein following doxycycline induction, both WT and D450A (nuclease dead). Cells were treated with 40 ng/mL doxycycline for 16 hrs and then 1µM Shield-1 and 1µM 4-OHT for 4 hrsCombined IF and DNA FISH for RAD54 (IF) and telomeres (FISH) in U2OS-TRF1-FOK1-WT or U2OS-TRF1-FOK1-D450A (nuclease dead) cells. Cells were treated as in E immediately prior to staining. Scale bars = 10 µm Quantification of data from F. RAD54 foci were detected using particle analysis in Fiji. At least a total of 300 cells were counted from 3 repeated experiments. Values shown are mean±sem. Values were compared using Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn's multiple comparison test. Quantification of data from F. RAD54 foci were detected using particle analysis in Fiji. Cells were counted as positive if they counted 8 or more RAD54 foci that colocalized with telomeres. Values shown are mean±sem of n=3 biological replicates. Values were compared using standard two-way ANOVA followed by Sidak's multiple comparison test.
Figure 2Combined IF and DNA FISH for RAD51 (IF) and telomeres (FISH) in SaOS2 or HuO9 cells. Cells were transfected with 20nM siRAD54#2 for 48 hours immediately prior to staining. Scale bars = 10 µm Quantification of A. A cell was counted as positive it is contained at least 1 colocalization event between RAD51 and telomeres. At least 100 cells were counted per condition per repeat, n=3. Values shown are mean±sd. Data were compared using standard two-way ANOVA followed by Sidak's multiple comparison test.ChIP for telomeric DNA associated with RAD51. DNA dot blot probed with DIG labeled telomere probe or Alu probe. HuO9 cells were transfected with 20nM siRAD54 #2, or 15µg myc-TRF2 for 72 hours prior to immunoprecipitation with RAD51 antibody (Mock, siRAD54 conditions) or myc antibody (myc-TRF2 positive control). Quantification of (CCCTAA)4 dot blot performed in C. IP values were normalized to loading (IP/input) and then normalized to mock control. Values shown are mean±sd of n=3 biological replicates. Values were compared using two-tailed unpaired student's t-test.Western blot of samples used for ChIP in C-D.Combined IF and DNA FISH for GFP (IF) and telomeres (FISH) in SaOS2 and HuO9 cells. Cells were forward transfected with Polη-GFP, and then after 24 hours transfected with 20nM siRAD54#2. Cells were stained for GFP and telomeres 48 hours after siRNA transfection. Scale bars = 10 µm Quantification of data in F. GFP negative cells were excluded from analysis. Cells were considered positive if they showed 1 or more colocalization events between GFP (Polη) and telomeres. At least 50 GFP positive cells were counted per condition per repeat, n=3. Values shown are mean±sd. Values were compared using standard two-way ANOVA followed by Sidak's multiple comparison test.
Figure 3Representative images of combined EdU staining (Click-it) and DNA FISH for telomeres. HuO9 or SaOS2 cells were transfected with 20nM siRAD54#2 (representative images for siRAD54#1 not shown) for 48 hours followed by a 1.5 hr pulse of EdU. Pan-nuclear EdU stain represents S-phase cells. White arrows indicate non-S-phase cells containing EdU colocalizing with telomeres. Scale bars = 10 µm Quantification of data shown in A. HuO9 or SaOS2 cells were mock transfected or transfected with 20nM siRAD54#1 or 20nM siRAD54#2 for 48 hours followed by a 1.5 hr pulse of EdU. Cells with pan-nuclear EdU signal or greater than 8 EdU foci were excluded from analysis as S-phase cells. Non-S-phase cells were considered positive if they contained at least one EdU foci colocalizing with telomeres. Data were normalized to mock condition for each repeat. At least 100 non-S-phase cells were counted per condition per repeat, n=3. Values shown are mean±sd. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's multiple comparison test.Representative DNA dot blot from C-circle assay on HuO9 cells, either mock transfected or transfected with 20nM siRAD54#2 for 48 hours. Quantification of C-circle assay in C. Signal was quantified with densitometry, background (- Φ29) was subtracted and signal was normalized to mock. N=5 biological replicates values shown are mean±sd. Conditions were analyzed using unpaired two-tailed student's t-test.Representative images of combined IF and DNA FISH for PML (IF) and telomeres (FISH). HuO9 or SaOS2 cells were mock transfected or transfected with 20nM siRAD54#2 for 48 hours. White arrows indicate large colocalization events. Blue arrows indicate small colocalization events. Scale bars = 10 µm Quantification HuO9 or SaOS2 cells were mock transfected or transfected with 20nM siRAD54#1 or 20nM siRAD54#2 for 48 hours. Cells were considered positive if they contained 1 large or 3 small colocalization events. At least 100 cells were counted per condition per repeat, n=3. Values shown are mean±sd. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's multiple comparison test.Representative images of combined EdU staining (Click-it) and DNA FISH for telomeric DNA. HuO9 cells were forward transfected with 2µg empty vector (EV), RAD54-WT, RAD54-K189R, or S49E construct. After 24 hours, cells were transfected with 20 nM siRAD54#2 for 48 hours followed by a 1.5 hr pulse of EdU. White arrows indicate non-S-phase cells containing EdU colocalizing with telomeres. Scale bars = 10 µm Quantification of data shown in G. Non-S-phase cells were considered positive if they contained at least one EdU foci colocalizing with telomeres. Data were normalized to EV-Mock condition for each repeat. At least 100 non-S-phase cells were counted per condition per repeat, n=4 for EV, WT, S49E, n=3 for K189R. Values shown are mean±sd. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA followed by Sidak's multiple comparison test.
Figure 1(A) Immunostaining of API in the vacuole of SEY6210 (wild-type) cell showing a dispersed pattern.(B-D) Immunostaining of TVY1 (pep4) cells showing API in the Cvt complex. The arrow points to a Cvt complex. Higher magnification images are shown in C and D.E) Freeze-substitution fixation image of Cvt complex in TVY1 cell.(F) Freeze-substitution fixation image of a Cvt complex in strain SEY6210 transformed with a 2μ plasmid encoding API grown in SD medium.(G) Immunostaining of strain SEY6210 containing a 2μ APE1 plasmid grown in SD medium. N, Nucleus; V, vacuole.
Figure 2(A and B) Immunostaining image showing Cvt vesicles (marked with arrows in A) in the cytosol. Arrowhead and double arrowheads show the inner and outer membrane of Cvt vesicle, respectively.(C) Freeze-substitution fixation image of Cvt vesicles (marked with arrows).(D) Immunostaining of Cvt vesicle (marked with arrows) in the cytosol and Cvt body (marked with double arrows) in the vacuole.(E and F) Freeze-substitution fixation image of Cvt bodies in the vacuole (marked with arrows). A Cvt vesicle is marked with an arrowhead.(G and H) Freeze-substitution fixation image of Cvt vesicle contacting and fusing to a vacuole. V, Vacuole; VM, vacuolar membrane.
Figure 3Cvt complexes in TVY1 (pep4) cells under nitrogen starvation conditions. Logarithmically growing cells in YEPD were transferred to nitrogen starvation medium (SD[-N]) at 30°C for 30 min (A and B) or 60 min (C and D) and prepared for electron microscopy as described in Fig. 1. (A) Freeze-substitution fixation image showing a Cvt complex in an autophagosome (marked by an arrow) in the cytosol. (B) Freeze-substitution fixation image showing a Cvt complex in an autophagic body in the vacuole. (C) Immunostaining of a Cvt complex in an autophagic body in the vacuole. (D) Immunostaining of Cvt vesicles (marked with arrows) in the vacuole. AB, Autophagic body; AP, autophagosome; V, vacuole.
Figure 4Transport of Cvt complex in SEY6210 (wild-type) harboring 2μ plasmid encoding API under growing and nitrogen starvation conditions. Vegetative cells grown in SD medium were observed (A-E). For starvation, logarithmically growing cells in SD were transferred to SD(-N) for 25 min (F-H) or 1 h (I-K) in the presence of 1 mM PMSF. Samples were prepared for electron microscopy as described in Fig. 1. (A) Freeze-substitution fixation image of Cvt vesicle (marked with an arrow). (B) Immunostaining of a Cvt vesicle (marked with an arrow). (C and D) Higher magnification image of Cvt vesicle. Arrowhead and double arrowheads show the inner and outer membrane of a Cvt vesicle, respectively. (E) Freeze-substitution fixation image of a membrane sac enclosing small portion of a large Cvt complex (marked with an arrow). (F) Freeze-substitution image of the wrapping of a Cvt complex by the isolation membrane (marked with an arrow). (G) Freeze-substitution image of a Cvt vesicle (marked with an arrow) fusing to a vacuole. (H) Freeze-substitution image of autophagic body containing a Cvt complex. (I) Immunostaining image depicting the wrapping of a Cvt complex. The arrow marks the enwrapping membrane. (J) Immunostaining of an autophagosome containing a Cvt complex. (K) Immunostaining of an autophagic body containing a Cvt complex in the vacuole. V, vacuole.
Figure 5Mutant analysis allows for differentiation between vacuolar delivery by Cvt vesicles and autophagosomes. (A) SEY6210 (wild-type), cvt3, and cvt7 yeast were grown in SD to 1 OD600 U/ml and transferred to SD (-N). Aliquots were collected after 0 h (+) and 4 h (−) incubation and subjected to immunoblotting. The positions of precursor (pro) and mature (m) API are indicated. (B) cvt3 and cvt7 cells were pulse labeled for 10 min. After addition of cold cysteine and methionine, the cells were harvested, washed, and resuspended in either SD or SD(-N) and chased for the indicated times. API was recovered by immunoprecipitation, resolved on SDS polyacrylamide gels, and quantified using a phosphorimager (STORM; Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA).
Figure 6Analysis of the Cvt complex in the cvt3 mutant under vegetative and starvation conditions. Vegetative cells were grown in SD medium at 30°C to log phase. For starvation, logarithmically growing cells in SD medium were transferred to SD(-N) for 5 h. Samples were prepared for electron microscopy as described in Fig. 1. (A) Immunostaining image depicting Cvt complex in the cytosol. Cvt vesicles are not detected in this strain. (B) Freeze-substitution fixation image showing Cvt complex in autophagosome (marked with an arrow) under starvation conditions, indicating that autophagy can still proceed. AP, Autophagosome; N, nucleus; V, vacuole.
Figure 1Representative images of combined IF for H3K27me3 or H2AK119ub (green) with RNA FISH for Xist (red) in Xist-TetOP lines (for clone 1 of each mutant type) upon D2 in DOX conditions; Blue - DAPI staining; Scale bar: 10 µm.Graph represents the mean % + S.E.M. of Xist-coated X chromosomes enriched for H3K27me3 or H2AK119ub in the different Xist-TetOP mutants (for clone 1 of each mutant type) from 2-to-4 independent experiments; A minimum of 50 Xist-coated X chromosomes were counted per experiment; Only p-values corresponding to significant differences from unpaired Student's t-test comparing mutants to Xist FL are indicated as * (p-value < 0.05).
Figure 2Top 20 protein hits from the ChIRP-MS of Xist FL; The ranking was based on fold-enrichment of Xist FL DOX versus Xist FL noDOX; Weakly annotated protein isoforms with an Annotation score in UniprotKB < 3 (out of 5) were excluded; Fold-enrichment for Xist ΔB+C is also displayed for comparison; Light green boxes correspond to proteins as Xist interactors [13]; protein in red (RNF2/RING1B) represents a protein not found in the Xist ΔB+C interactome; Protein in light brown (TRIM71) is less enriched in Xist ΔB+C than in Xist FL.Scatter plot displaying the differences in peptide counts between Xist FL and Xist ΔB+C for the 74 out of 81 Xist-interactors with a minimum of fold-change of 2.5 in Xist FL or Xist ΔB+C; Shown is the log2 fold change of peptide counts of each mutant in DOX conditions compared with the Xist FL in noDOX conditions; proteins retrieved by both Xist FL and Xist ΔB+C ChIRPs with a proposed role in XCI such as SPEN, RBM15, WTAP, YTHDC1 and hnRNPU are indicated; light brown dots mark proteins more represented in Xist FL than in Xist ΔB+C ChIRPs, while red dots display proteins which are only retrieved by Xist FL ChIRP.
Figure 3Plots showing H3K27me3 and H2AK119ub accumulation over the X chromosome in Xist FL and Xist ΔB+C with upon DOX induction at day 2 (D2) of differentiation; Each dot represents a single 10Kb window and its enrichment relative to noDOX condition; Black line is a loess regression on all windows; Xist locus is represented by a blue long line, active genes by green lines.Violin plots quantifying H3K27me3 and H2AK119ub enrichment over intergenic regions, active promoters and active gene bodies in the X chromosome in Xist FL and Xist ΔB+C cell lines at D2 upon DOX induction; Shown is the log2 fold change of DOX vs noDOX conditions; violin plots represent the distribution of the values, the horizontal band is the median, the lower and upper hinges correspond to the 25th and 75th percentiles; n = indicates the number of regions/genes analyzed; p-values were calculated using paired Wilcoxon test, comparing Xist FL and Xist ΔB+C cell lines.Average plots showing the mean enrichment of H3K27me3 (top) and H2AK119ub (bottom) over all X-linked initially active transcriptional start sites (TSS); Shown is the mean of normalized log2 enrichment of DOX vs noDOX in both Xist FL and Xist ΔB+C cell lines.Genome browser plots showing H3K27me3 (top) and H2AK119ub (bottom) enrichments in a region encompassing the inactive Atp1b4 and the initially active Lamp2 genes within the XqA3.3 region and the initially active Rlim/Rnf12 gene at the XqD region; Region around the promoter of Rlim/Rnf12 is highlighted in yellow.
Figure 3Boxplots showing differences of the APTT time (left) and ME1-enriched protein expressions (right) between mild (n=13) and severe (n=18) COVID-19 patients. Differences between groups were estimated using Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test. * p <0.05, ** p <0.01, *** p <0.001. The horizontal box lines in the boxplots represent the first quartile, the median, and the third quartile. Whiskers denote the range of points within the first quartile − 1.5× the interquartile range and the third quartile + 1.5× the interquartile range.Boxplots showing differences of IL-6 level, IL-10 level (left) and ME15-enriched protein expressions (right) between mild (n=13) and severe (n=18) COVID-19 patients. Differences between groups were estimated using Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test. * p <0.05, ** p <0.01, *** p <0.001. The horizontal box lines in the boxplots represent the first quartile, the median, and the third quartile. Whiskers denote the range of points within the first quartile − 1.5× the interquartile range and the third quartile + 1.5× the interquartile range.
Figure 4Rose plots indicating the number of all detected and differently expressed tissues-enhanced proteins in mild (left) and severe patients (right) compared with healthy controls. Tissues labeled in orange represented tissues with the largest proportions (100% of all detected tissue-enhanced proteins) of altered tissues-enhanced proteins.Boxplots indicating the expression level of known brain dysfunctional biomarkers in control (n=12), mild (n=13) and severe (n=18) patients. Differences between groups were estimated using Kruskal-Wallis test. The horizontal box lines in the boxplots represent the first quartile, the median, and the third quartile. Whiskers denote the range of points within the first quartile − 1.5× the interquartile range and the third quartile + 1.5× the interquartile range.
Figure 5Boxplot showing the selected cell type specific proteins among control (n=12), mild (n=13) and severe (n=18) COVID-19 patients. Differences between groups were estimated using Kruskal-Wallis test. The horizontal box lines in the boxplots represent the first quartile, the median, and the third quartile. Whiskers denote the range of points within the first quartile − 1.5× the interquartile range and the third quartile + 1.5× the interquartile range.
Figure 6Heatmap of IFNG, GZMB and PRF1 gene expression in COVID-19 patients. Average expression values were centered and scaled. Red indicates a higher expression and blue indicates a lower expression.Heatmap of the expression of genes enriched in IL-17 signaling pathway between healthy control and COVID-19 patients. Average expression values were centered and scaled. Red indicates a higher expression and blue indicates a lower expression.