Figure 7Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of selected (A) HSPC transcriptional regulators expression in bone marrow HSPCs (n=4 mice per genotype). Data information: The statistical significance of difference was assessed using Two-tailed Student's unpaired t-test analysis for comparison of control and PKCδ cKO HSPCs. All data are presented as mean± SEM., *p<0.05, **p<0.001.Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of selected (B) cell cycle and apoptosis regulators expression in bone marrow HSPCs (n=4 mice per genotype). Data information: The statistical significance of difference was assessed using Two-tailed Student's unpaired t-test analysis for comparison of control and PKCδ cKO HSPCs. All data are presented as mean± SEM., *p<0.05, **p<0.001.Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of selected (C) known HSPC metabolic regulators expression in bone marrow HSPCs (n=4 mice per genotype). Data information: The statistical significance of difference was assessed using Two-tailed Student's unpaired t-test analysis for comparison of control and PKCδ cKO HSPCs. All data are presented as mean± SEM., *p<0.05, **p<0.001.Intracellular flow cytometry analysis of Cyclin D1 protein (D) Data shown in bar graphs are mean fluorescence intensity of indicated protein expression in PKCδ cKO HSPCs subsets relative to WT controls (n=4-6 mice per genotype per target). Data information: The statistical significance of difference was assessed using Two-tailed Student's unpaired t-test analysis for comparison of control and PKCδ cKO HSPCs. All data are presented as mean± SEM., *p<0.05, **p<0.001.Intracellular flow cytometry analysis of pro-survival regulators Mcl1, Blc2, and Bim protein (E) Data shown in bar graphs are mean fluorescence intensity of indicated protein expression in PKCδ cKO HSPCs subsets relative to WT controls (n=4-6 mice per genotype per target). Data information: The statistical significance of difference was assessed using Two-tailed Student's unpaired t-test analysis for comparison of control and PKCδ cKO HSPCs. All data are presented as mean± SEM., *p<0.05, **p<0.001.representative FACS histograms and bar graphs show relative levels of pAKT (Ser473) relative to WT controls (F) Data shown in bar graphs are mean fluorescence intensity of indicated protein expression in PKCδ cKO HSPCs subsets relative to WT controls (n=4-6 mice per genotype per target). Data information: The statistical significance of difference was assessed using Two-tailed Student's unpaired t-test analysis for comparison of control and PKCδ cKO HSPCs. All data are presented as mean± SEM., *p<0.05, **p<0.001.representative FACS histograms and bar graphs show relative levels of pFoxO3a (Ser253) (G) Data shown in bar graphs are mean fluorescence intensity of indicated protein expression in PKCδ cKO HSPCs subsets relative to WT controls (n=4-6 mice per genotype per target). Data information: The statistical significance of difference was assessed using Two-tailed Student's unpaired t-test analysis for comparison of control and PKCδ cKO HSPCs. All data are presented as mean± SEM., *p<0.05, **p<0.001.representative FACS histograms and bar graphs show relative levels of Total cMyc protein (H) Data shown in bar graphs are mean fluorescence intensity of indicated protein expression in PKCδ cKO HSPCs subsets relative to WT controls (n=4-6 mice per genotype per target). Data information: The statistical significance of difference was assessed using Two-tailed Student's unpaired t-test analysis for comparison of control and PKCδ cKO HSPCs. All data are presented as mean± SEM., *p<0.05, **p<0.001.; representative FACS histograms and bar graphs show relative levels of pRb (Ser807/811) (I) Data shown in bar graphs are mean fluorescence intensity of indicated protein expression in PKCδ cKO HSPCs subsets relative to WT controls (n=4-6 mice per genotype per target). Data information: The statistical significance of difference was assessed using Two-tailed Student's unpaired t-test analysis for comparison of control and PKCδ cKO HSPCs. All data are presented as mean± SEM., *p<0.05, **p<0.001.representative FACS histograms and bar graphs show total PPARγ protein levels relative to WT controls (J) Data shown in bar graphs are mean fluorescence intensity of indicated protein expression in PKCδ cKO HSPCs subsets relative to WT controls (n=4-6 mice per genotype per target). Data information: The statistical significance of difference was assessed using Two-tailed Student's unpaired t-test analysis for comparison of control and PKCδ cKO HSPCs. All data are presented as mean± SEM., *p<0.05, **p<0.001.Relative expression levels of total PPARδ protein in HSPCs (K) Data shown in bar graphs are mean fluorescence intensity of indicated protein expression in PKCδ cKO HSPCs subsets relative to WT controls (n=4-6 mice per genotype per target). Data information: The statistical significance of difference was assessed using Two-tailed Student's unpaired t-test analysis for comparison of control and PKCδ cKO HSPCs. All data are presented as mean± SEM., *p<0.05, **p<0.001.Activation of pmTOR (Ser2448) (L) Data shown in bar graphs are mean fluorescence intensity of indicated protein expression in PKCδ cKO HSPCs subsets relative to WT controls (n=4-6 mice per genotype per target). Data information: The statistical significance of difference was assessed using Two-tailed Student's unpaired t-test analysis for comparison of control and PKCδ cKO HSPCs. All data are presented as mean± SEM., *p<0.05, **p<0.001.Activation of pS6 (Ser235/236) and (Ser240/244) (M). Data shown in bar graphs are mean fluorescence intensity of indicated protein expression in PKCδ cKO HSPCs subsets relative to WT controls (n=4-6 mice per genotype per target). Data information: The statistical significance of difference was assessed using Two-tailed Student's unpaired t-test analysis for comparison of control and PKCδ cKO HSPCs. All data are presented as mean± SEM., *p<0.05, **p<0.001.