The use of needles in the practice of anesthesiology and the effect of a needleless intravenous administration system
Anesthesia personnel are at risk for occupationally acquired blood-borne infections transmitted through needlestick injuries. To formulate strategies for the prevention of needlestick injuries, it is necessary to identify the types of needles used by anesthesia personnel and the devices associated with injuries. The introduction of a needleless intravenous (IV) administration system provided an opportunity to assess its effect on needle usage in the practice of anesthesiology. The contents of needle disposal containers placed in the preoperative holding area and five operating rooms before (control) and after the introduction of a needleless administration system (study) were categorized by needle type. The information on needles used by anesthesia personnel was compared with that on needles purchased for the entire hospital. During the control period, most of the needles used were 18-23- gauge hollow needles (51.6%), IV catheter stylets (23%), and 25-26-gauge small-bore hollow needles (17.1%). There was no difference in the total number of needles collected after the introduction of the needleless administration system, but there was an increase in capped 18-23-gauge hollow needles. Anesthesia personnel used a relatively greater number of small-bore hollow needles (25-26 gauge), IV catheters, and spinal and epidural needles, but fewer hollow needles (18-23 gauge) than were purchased for hospital-wide use. Small-bore hollow needles (25-26 gauge) were responsible for 31.6% of the 19 needlestick injuries reported by anesthesia personnel to the Employee Health Service. These data indicate that the practice of anesthesia is associated with a specific pattern of needle usage and that strategies for reducing needlestick injuries in anesthesia personnel should be directed toward finding alternatives to small-bore hollow needles and IV catheter stylet needles.