2017 Tour of Flanders
Categorised climbs and cobbles

No.
Name
Distance from
Distance from
Surface
Length (metres)
Gradient (%)
Gradient (%)
No.
Name
Start (km)
Finish (km)
Surface
Length (metres)
(ave.)
(max.)
–
Lippenhovestraat
85.2
175.6
cobbles
1300
—
—
–
Paddestraat
86.6
174.2
cobbles
1500
—
—
1
Oude Kwaremont
116.3
144.5
cobbles
2200
4%
11.6%
2
Kortekeer
126.8
134.0
asphalt
1000
6.4%
17.1%
3
Eikenberg
134.5
126.3
cobbles
1200
5.2%
10%
4
Wolvenberg
137.6
123.2
asphalt
645
7.9%
17.3%
–
Holleweg
137.7
123.1
cobbles
1500
—
—
–
Haaghoek
143.4
117.4
cobbles
2000
—
—
5
Leberg
146.4
114.4
asphalt
950
4.2%
13.8%
6
Berendries
150.5
110.3
asphalt
940
7%
12.3%
7
Tenbosse
155.5
105.3
asphalt
450
6.9%
8.7%
8
Muur van Geraardsbergen
165.8
95.0
cobbles
1075
9.3%
19.8%
9
La Houppe
184.5
76.3
cobbles
2800
3.3%
10%
10
Kanarieberg
190.3
70.5
asphalt
1000
7.7%
14%
11
Oude Kwaremont
206.2
54.6
cobbles
2200
4%
11.6%
12
Paterberg
209.6
51.2
cobbles
360
12.9%
20.3%
13
Koppenberg
216.2
44.6
cobbles
600
11.6%
22%
–
Mariaborrestraat
220.3
40.5
cobbles
2000
—
—
14
Steenbeekdries
221.6
39.2
asphalt
700
5.3%
6.7%
15
Taaienberg
224.1
36.7
cobbles
530
6.6%
15.8%
16
Kruisberg
234.3
26.5
asphalt
2500
5%
9%
17
Oude Kwaremont
244.1
16.7
cobbles
2200
4%
11.6%
18
Paterberg
247.6
13.2
cobbles
360
12.9%
20.3%

Question: How did Oude Kwaremont and Paterberg do at the 2017 Tour of Flanders?
Answer: The second pairing of Oude Kwaremont and Paterberg represented the end game of the race with a 13.2 kilometre finish.