Title: ERC721_design_history__categorical_placement_wrt_E
Category: Working_Groups

Author: ravachol70
Date: 2018-10-15T01:08:08.838Z

I was drawn to think of the ERC721 naming debate that William was moderating awhile back. I went to look for the history of the discussion (so as to continue my own design work) but was unable to see any trace of it in the github documentation.
I’m not used to having important and subtle information just disappear like that. I had assumed that transparency was an integral work aesthetic hence me posting my concerns here. Likewise, as I’ve been trying to cobble together an ERC721 research group and, as I will expanding the field study into ERC1410 and other design work, and, finally as this would relate to the grand possibility of employing the finding and integrating into the main-chain economics, I figure that there must be another group out there facing the inevitable challenges of adoption.
Attention: thought leaders.
How can we start to undo the damage of the NFT mentality? I mean, how fascist does it have to sound to those in the outside world?
To wit: an attachment.ravachol-ethereum-research-2016762×248 38.6 KB
It’s worth noting that this hardfork suggestion was put forth in a time of utter chaos, during the aftershock of the DAO attack. I was making the suggestion such that “we”, as a development community, could absorb the questionable use issues by using partial fungibility as a form of self-devaluation. In a sense, this would be akin to a partial burn, a moderator of reflexivity: something simple to compensate for the destructive or redundant situations during nominal network stability/growth.
In the wider sense, any currency should be able to flag itself as being, of the moment, dilutable within a much larger concentration of signals – free to be fungibly questioned, perhaps?

Author: ravachol70
Date: 2018-11-14T04:39:24.703Z

I found the research that I was looking for, so I’d consider 1/2 of the original issue now somewhat resolved – and categorise the problems as being outside the scope, perhaps of this community. I mean: the use of Github is itself a political issue.

Author: ravachol70
Date: 2018-11-14T04:40:22.940Z

github.com/fulldecent/EIPs








Reconsider the word "deed"


patch-2 ← reconsider-deed-name



          opened 08:41AM - 23 Feb 18 UTC




            fulldecent
          



+148
-160






# Discuss / vote on the name for ERC-721

This pull request changes the naming… of #721 / #841 from what it currently is to something else. I will use the consensus achieved here to update and merge this pull request into #841. I hope you will respect the transparency and fairness of this process and also support the final choice. My role in this process is limited to bringing intelligent and hardworking people into this discussion. I will not advocate for ANY of these choices.

## Choices (alphabetical order, a random contract listed for each):

* Asset Registry / asset
* Deed / *thing* --- [ÐWorld](https://dworld.io/) [(ABI)](https://etherscan.io/address/0x752c4e4e90846c5673c3791b9809f71b7d4a638a#readContract)
* Distinguishable Assets Registry / asset --- ??
* Non-fungible Token Standard / token --- [Crypto Kitties](https://www.cryptokitties.co/) [(ABI)](https://etherscan.io/address/0x06012c8cf97bead5deae237070f9587f8e7a266d#code)
* Nungibles
* Title
* Title-deed
* _(If you find a deployed contract I will add it on this list)_
* _(You're free to discuss other choice, but the above space is reserved for contracts that have been deployed or ideas that have been set forth before today)_

## Ground rules:

* Everyone is welcome to discuss
* PLEASE copy/paste into here any talking points you may have made elsewhere, this place is what matters
* Your opinion is valued, if you contribute to the Ethereum ecosystem in some way please introduce yourself and any organization you represent and also any contribution you made to the Ethereum ecosystem
* This discussion ENDS on Sunday 2018-02-25 or sooner if the result is clear
* We may resort to a vote or other mechanism if Monday is getting close -- this will be short notice, so please stay subscribed here