IN THE COURT OF SH. [ENTITY] PRESIDING OFFICER:MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL : (WEST-01):DELHI New [CASE NUMBER] Sh. [ENTITY] S/o Sh. Brij Bhushan Jain R/o 270/10, Joshi Road, Karol Bagh, Delhi-110005 Petitioner VERSUS 1. Sh. [ENTITY]. S/o Sh. [ENTITY] R/o Plot No. 121A, D Block Part-2, Qutaub Vihar Goyla Diary, Delhi-110005 2. Smt. [ENTITY] W/o Sh. Vineet R/o O-45, O Block, New Mahabir Nagar, Delhi 3. [ENTITY] B-18, 1st Floor, Community Centre, Janak Puri, New Delhi-110058 Also At: 3 Middleton Street Post Box No. 9229, Kolkotta-70007 Respondents
Date of Institution : 15.04.2015 (DAR) Date of reserving order/judgment : 29.01.2018 Date of pronouncement : 05.02.2018 A W A R D:
FORM-V COMPLIANCE OF THE PROVISIONS OF THE MODIFIED CLAIMS TRIBUNAL AGREED PROCEDURE
1. Date of the accident 02.10.2014
2. Date of intimation of the accident by the Not provided by the IO Investigation Officer to the Claims Tribunal. (Clause 2)
3. Date of Intimation of the accident by the Date not mentioned Investigating Officer to the Insurance Company. (Clause 2)
4. Date of filing of Report under Section 17.01.2015 173 Cr. P.C. before the Metropolitan Magistrate. (Clause 10)
5. Date of filing of Detailed Accident 15.04.2015 Information Report (DAR) by the Investigating Officer before Claims Tribunal. (Clause 10)
6. Date of service of DAR on the 13.04.2015 Insurance Company. (Clause 11)
7. Date of service of DAR on the claimant 10.04.2015
(s). (Clause 11)
8. Whether DAR was complete in all Yes respects? (Clause 16)
9. If not, whether deficiencies in the DAR
removed later on?
10. Whether the police has verified the Yes documents filed with DAR? (Clause 4)
11. Whether there was any delay or The date of accident is deficiency on the part of the 02.10.2014 Investigating Officer ? If so, whether any action/ direction warranted? The DAR was filed by the IO on 15.04.2015
12. Date of appointment of the Designated Legal offer was not filed Officer by the Insurance Company. by the insurance (Clause 20) company
13. Name, address and contact number of Not mentioned the Designated Officer of the Insurance Company. (Clause 20)
14. Whether the Designated Officer of the Legal offer was not filed Insurance Company submitted his by the insurance report within 30 days of the DAR? company as defence (Clause 22) was taken by the insurance company
15. Whether the Insurance Company No admitted the liability? If so, whether the Designated Officer of the Insurance Company fairly computed the compensation in accordance with law.
(Clause 23)
16. Whether there was any delay or Legal offer was not filed deficiency on the part of the Designated by the insurance Officer of the Insurance Company? If company. so, whether any action/direction warranted?
17. Date of response of the claimant (s) to Legal offer was not filed the offer of the Insurance Company. by the insurance (Clause 24) company
18. Date of the award 05.02.2018
19. Whether the award was passed with Yes the consent of the parties? (Clause 22)
20. Whether the claimant (s) were directed No to open savings bank account (s) near their place of residence? (Clause 18)
21. Date of order by which claimant (s) 15.01.2018 were directed to open savings bank account (s) near his place of residence and produce PAN Card and Adhaar Card and the direction to the bank not issue any cheque book/debit card to the claimant(s) and make an endorsement to this effect on the passbook(s).
(Clause 18)
22. Date on which the claimant(s) produced 29.01.2018 the passbook of their savings bank account near the place of their residence along with the endorsement, PAN Card and Adhaar Card? (Clause
23. Permanent Residential Address of the R/o 270/10, Joshi Road, Claimant(s) (Clause 27) Near Ajmal Khan Park, Karol Bagh, Karol Bagh, Karol Bagh, Central Delhi, Delhi-110005
24. Details of savings bank account(s) of A/c No. 51102073452 of the claimant(s) and the address of the State Bank of Bikaner & bank with [ACT]. (Clause 27) Jaipur, New Delhi, Faiz Road, Karol Bagh, 16/67-68, Faid Road [ACT] No.SBBJ0010332
25. Whether the claimant(s) savings bank Yes account (s) in near his place of residence? (Clause 27)
26. Whether the claimant (s) were Yes examined at the time of passing of the award to ascertain his/their financial condition? (Clause 27)
1. Vide this Judgment-cum-Award, I shall decide the petition under [SECTION] and [SECTION] of [ACT] as amended up to date (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') filed by the petitioner Sh. [ENTITY] for grant of compensation for the injuries suffered by him in the road vehicular accident.
2. Brief facts of the case of the petitioner are that on 02.10.2014 at about 7.15 pm, the petitioner along with his friend was going on a scooter from Gurgaon to Pitampura. It has been further stated that then, all of a sudden, the offending RTV bearing No. DL-IVA9194 which was being driven by the respondent No.1 in a rash and negligent manner and at a very high speed, hit the petitioner and his friend. It has been further stated that due to the forceful impact, the petitioner and his friend fell down on the road and the petitioner received serious injuries on his body and his scooter was also got damaged.
3. It has been further stated that the driver of the RTV Mini Bus immediately fled away from the spot of the accident. It has been further stated that the owner of the offending vehicle arrived at the spot of accident and took the injured to the local clinic in Janak Puri and left from there. It has been further stated that when the injured was going back to his home, he started feeling pain and went directly to Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, Rajinder Nagar, New Delhi where he got treatment and discharged on the next day i.e. on 03.10.2014. It has been further stated that thereafter, the injured was taken to Sant Parmanand Hospital for further treatment on 04.10.2014. It has been further stated that the injured remained admitted in the said hospital for 5 days i.e. 04.10.2014 to 08.10.2014 and also operated for Debridement and External Fixator on 05.10.2014. It has been further stated that the injured was against admitted in Sant Parmanand Hospital and remained admitted for 2 days i.e. for 11.11.2014 to 12.11.2014 where he was operated for Skin drafting of left ankle.
4. It has been further stated that the injured had to bear the expenses of Rs.93,522/- on hospital bill, Rs.1195/- on medicines, Rs.16,000/- on physiotherapy, Rs.4,050/- on Post Operative treatment, Rs.20,000/- on tests and investigations, Rs.12,000/- on conveyance and Rs. 10,000/- on miscellaneous expenses.
5. It has been further stated that as a result of the abovesaid accident, FIR No. 817/2014 dated 11.10.2014, PS Vikas Puri, U/[SECTION] of the [ACT] was registered against the respondent No.1.
6. It has been further stated that at the time of accident, the injured was just 26 years of age. It has been further stated that the petitioner was pursuing CA.
7. The petitioner has claimed compensation under various heads and in total the petitioner has claimed the amount of Rs. 3,00,000/- (Rupees Three Lacs Only) along with the interest.
8. It has been further stated that the respondent no.1 being the driver, the respondent No.2 being the owner of the offending vehicle and the respondent no.3 being the Insurer of the offending vehicle are jointly and severally liable to pay the compensation to the petitioner.
9. Separate replied have been filed on record by the respondents No.1 and the respondent no.2 as well but the stand taken by both the respondents is verbatim the same. The respondents No.1 & 2 have stated that the accident in question took place on account of the negligence of the injured himself. It has been further stated that the respondent no.1 was having a valid DL and the offending vehicle was having a valid fitness certificate, registration certificate and a valid permit also. It has been prayed that the claim petition of the petitioner be dismissed.
10. Written statement/reply has been filed by the insurance company stating therein that the offending vehicle bearing No. DL- 1V-A-1994 was insured with it vide policy bearing no. 361801/31/13/6300015099 valid for period from 10.03.2014 to midnight of 09.03.2015 in the name of [ENTITY]. It has been further stated that the DL of the respondent No.1 was blacklisted on the date of the accident as per the verification report. It has been prayed that the present claim petition be dismissed.
11. From the pleadings of the parties, following issues were framed by the Ld. Predecessor of this Tribunal on 01.02.2016:-
1. Whether the injured [ENTITY] suffered injuries in an accident that took place on 02.10.2014 at 7.15 P.M., due to rash and negligent driving of respondent No.1 of the vehicle No. DL-IV-A-9194 (Mini Bus) owned by respondent No.2 and insured with respondent No.3? OPP
2. Whether the injured is entitled for compensation? If so, to what amount and from whom? OPP
3. Relief.
12. In order to establish his claim, the petitioner has examined himself as PW-1 and in his evidence by way of affidavit, he has reiterated and reaffirmed the stand as taken by him in the present claim petition. He has filed on record his affidavit as Ex.
PW1/A; original medical bills as Ex. PW1/A (colly) (running into 6 pages); medicines bills as Ex. PW1/B (colly running into 3 pages); bills for physiotherapy as Ex. PW1/C(colly running into 3 pages); test and investigation document as Ex. PW1/D (colly running into 8 pages) and post operative treatment expenses as Ex. PW1/E (colly running into 5 pages).
13. In the cross examination done by ld. Counsel for the insurance company, PW-1 has stated that the police had not reached at the spot as nobody had called the police. PW-1 has further stated that his father had made the complaint about the accident on the same day and the FIR was registered on the very said date i.e. on the date of accident i.e. on 02.10.2014.
14. PW-1 has further stated that he is a Post Graduate. PW-1 has further stated that apart from the bills submitted on that day towards medical treatment, no other bills of treatment are there. PW-1 has further stated that he has not suffered any disability. PW-1 has further stated that one more person namely [ENTITY] was a pillion rider on his scooty which was owned by his mother Mrs. [ENTITY]. PW-1 has denied the suggestion that some other unknown vehicle was responsible for causing the alleged accident.
15. PW-1 has further stated that the police had recorded his statement after 4 or 5 days of the accident. PW-1 has admitted it to be correct that there was heavy traffic on the road on which the accident took place. PW-1 as further stated that he had himself not seen the registration number of the offending vehicle i.e. RTV Bus. PW-1 has further stated that he does not remember whether the accident site plan has been prepared in his presence or not. PW-1 has further stated that he had been taken to the place of accident by the police officials on the same date of the accident i.e. on 02.10.2014 itself at 12 AM to 1 AM.
16. PW-1 has further stated that he was discharged from Ganga Ram Hospital on the very same day of the accident i.e. on 02.10.2014.
17. In the cross examination done by ld. Counsel for the respondent No.1, PW-1 has stated that he had seen the driver of the offending vehicle first time in Tis Hazari Courts. PW-1 has further stated that he was taken to the hospital by his friend Sh. [ENTITY] and [ENTITY]. PW-1 has further stated that he does not know whether the pillion rider [ENTITY] has received injuries or not.
18. The Insurance company has examined Sh. [ENTITY], MLO, South West Zone 1, Palam/Dwarka (Dwarka Sector
10), Delhi as R3W1 and this witness has brought on record the summoned record pertaining to [CASE NUMBER] which was issued in the name of Sh. [ENTITY] S/o Sh. [ENTITY] R/o RZF- 493, Raj Nagar-II, Palam Colony, New Delhi for the category of LMV-NT, LMV-Comm., LTV-TSR, HTV and MCLY. R3W1 has stated that as per the orders dated 19.09.2014, the said license was in active on 04.10.2014 and vide orders dated 09.12.2015, the said license was revoked. R3W1 has further stated that the said license was valid for RTV Gross Weight 5700kg on 02.10.2014. R3W1 has exhibited the record running into five pages accompanied by his letter bearing his signatures at point A encircled in red as Ex. R3W1/X.
19. R3W1 has further stated that vide orders dated 19.09.2014, the MLO was asked to take action against the said license and the said orders dated 19.09.2014 were passed by the DC office. R3W1 has further stated that however, the said license was suspended on 04.10.2014 and the orders dated 04.10.2014 were revoked on 09.12.2015. R3W1 has again stated that the said license was valid for running RTV Gross Weight 5700 under the category of LMV Comm. on 02.10.2014.
20. This witness has not been cross examined.
21. I have gone through the testimony of the witnesses; entire material available on record. I have also given my thoughtful consideration to the arguments addressed by the Ld. counsels for the parties. The petitioner has also been examined under the [ACT] and I have considered the statement of the petitioner under [ACT] as well.
My findings on various issues are as under :-
22. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner u/[SECTION] & [SECTION] [ACT] and the onus is upon the petitioner to prove the rash and negligent act of the respondent No.1.
23. During the course of arguments, Ld. Counsel for the insurance company has vehemently argued that the offending vehicle has been planted by the police. It has been further argued that the accident in question did not take place with the alleged offending vehicle.
24. First of all, it has to be seen that the petitioner in the claim petition has categorically stated that after causing the accident, the respondent no.1 i.e. the Driver of the offending vehicle had fled from the spot. It has been further stated by the petitioner that the owner of the offending vehicle came at the spot and he was taken to a doctor by the owner.
25. The abovesaid assertions of the petitioner have not been denied by the respondents No.1 & 2 in their respective replies.
26. It is true that the petitioner in his cross examination has stated that he had not seen the number of the offending vehicle himself but the petitioner has examined himself as PW-1 who has corroborated his stand as contained in the claim petition in his cross examination. Whereas on the other hand, neither the respondents No.1 & 2 nor the respondent No.3 has led any evidence on the negligent aspect of the matter. As such, to my mind, the respondent No.3 has utterly failed to proved on record that the offending vehicle has been planted by the police officials.
27. In the present case, as per the case of the petitioner, FIR No. 817/2014 dated 11.10.2014, PS Vikas Puri, U/[SECTION] of the [ACT] was registered against the respondent No.1.
28. In [PRECEDENT], in [PRECEDENT], in [PRECEDENT], it has been held that the negligence has to be decided on the touchstone of preponderance of probabilities and a holistic view is to be taken. It has been further held that the proceedings under the [ACT] are not akin to the proceedings in a Civil Suit and hence, strict rules of evidence are not applicable.
29. In the light of the abovesaid discussion, to my mind, the petitioner has been able to prove issue No.1 in his favour and accordingly, the issue No.1 is decided in favour of the petitioner.
Issue No. (ii)
30. LOSS OF EARNING CAPACITY For the purposes of assessing the loss of earning capacity, the income of the Petitioner/injured needs to be assessed along with the functional disability suffered by him due to the injuries sustained in the accident.
(a) Criteria for determining the income of the Petitioner In the claim petition, the petitioner has claimed that he is student and pursuing CA. In the cross examination, the petitioner has stated that he is a Post Graduate. But nothing has been placed on record by the petitioner to show that he is pursuing CA or that he is a post graduate.
In these circumstances, to my mind, the income of the petitioner has to be assessed on the basis of the Minimum Wages of an unskilled worker on the date of the accident.
The date of accident is 02.10.2014. In the facts and circumstances, notional income of the Petitioner is considered on the basis of minimum wages of an unskilled worker as notified by Government of NCT of Delhi for the relevant period i.e. @ Rs. 8,632/- per month for the purposes of assessment of compensation.
(b) Loss of Income on account of accident The petitioner has filed on record the test and investigation documents as Ex. PW1/D and post operative treatment expenses as Ex. PW1/E. Ex. PW1/D(colly) also includes the discharge summary of Sant Parmanand Hospital which suggests that the petitioner was admitted in the said hospital on 04.10.2014 and discharged on 08.10.2014. Thereafter, the petitioner was treated in the said hospital on 11.10.2014. The petitioner was lastly treated by Dr. [ENTITY] on 15.11.2014.
As such, to my mind, it can be safely concluded that the petitioner was not able to do his job/work for a period of two months. As such, the amount of Rs. 17,264/- ( Rs.8,632 x 2) is granted to the petitioner on account of loss of income due to the accident in question.
(c) Pain, Suffering & Mental Agony Keeping in view the nature of the injuries sustained by the petitioner, he is awarded a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) towards pain and suffering and mental agony.
(d) Medicines and Medical Treatment The petitioner has placed on record his original medical bills as Ex. PW1/A; medicines bills as Ex. PW1/B; bills for physiotherapy as Ex. PW1/C and post operative treatment expenses as Ex. PW1/E. The total bills are comes to Rs. 1,19,689/- after rounding off Rs.1,19,689.02 (Rs.570 + Rs.62,513+ 30,089+ Rs. 150 + Rs.200 + Rs.16,000 + Rs.270 + Rs.48+ Rs.799.02+ Rs.24+ Rs.96+ Rs.30 + Rs.700+ Rs.700+ Rs.700+ Rs.700+ Rs.700 + Rs.700 + Rs.700+Rs.1500 + Rs.2500/-).
Accordingly, the petitioner is entitled for Rs.1,19,689/- under this head.
(e) Conveyance, Attendant Charges & Special Diet Keeping in view the duration of the treatment of the petitioner and nature of the injuries sustained by the petitioner, a sum of Rs. 10,000/- is awarded to the petitioner on account of conveyance, attendant charges and special diet collectively.
31. As discussed above, the overall compensation is tabulated as under:-
Loss of Income on Account of accident Rs. 17,264/-
Pain and Suffering Rs.10,000/- Medicines & Medical Treatment Rs. 1,19,689/- Conveyance, Attendant Charges Rs. 10,000/- and Special Diet Total Rs. 1,56,953/-
(Rupees One Lakh Fifty Six Thousand Nine Hundred and Fifty Three Only)
32. On the said amount, interest @ 9% per annum is also awarded from the date of filing of DAR i.e. from 15.04.2015. The amount of interim award, if any, shall however be deducted from the above amount, if the same has already been paid to the Petitioner.
APPORTIONMENT OF LIABILITY
33. The insurance company in the written statement has taken the defence that the [CASE NUMBER] of respondent No.1 was black listed as per the verification report.
34. The insurance company has examined Sh. [ENTITY], MLO, South West Zone, Palam/Dwarka (Dwarka, Sector-
10) Delhi as R3W1 who specifically stated that the [CASE NUMBER] of Sh. [ENTITY] was valid for running RTV Gross Weight 5700 under the category of LMV Comm on 02.10.2014. R3W1 is a witness examined by none other but by the respondent no.3 itself.
As such, to my mind, the insurance company has utterly failed to prove that the DL of the respondent No.1 was blacklisted on the date of the accident.
R E L I E F:
35. I hereby pass an award of Rs. 1,56,953/- (Rupees One Lakh Fifty Six Thousand Nine Hundred and Fifty Three Only) as compensation with interest at the rate of 9% per annum including interim award, if any from the date of filing the DAR/claim petition i.e. w.e.f. 15.04.2015 in favour of the petitioner and against the respondents.
The court has examined the petitioner on 29.01.2018 under [ACT] and his statement has also been considered by this Tribunal.
36. This Tribunal is in receipt of the letter dated 08.11.2017 from Delhi State Legal Services Authority, which is annexed with the latest [ACT] as approved by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi. The Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in Para no. 28 of new [ACT] has held as under:-
"Para no. 28 The Claims Tribunal shall, depending upon the financial status and financial need of the claimant (s), release such amount as may be considered necessary and direct the remaining amount to be kept in fixed deposits in phased manner (for example, if a sum of Rs.5,50,000/- has been awarded to the claimant, Rs.50,000/- may be released immediately and the remaining amount of Rs. 5,00,000/- may be kept in 10 fixed deposits of Rs.50,000/- each for a periods of six months, one year, one and half years, two years and so on till five years or one year, two years, three years and so on till ten years). The Claims Tribunal may also consider imposing following conditions with respect to the fixed deposits:-
(i) The interest on the fixed deposits be paid monthly to the Claimant(s).
(ii) The monthly interest be credited automatically in the saving account of the claimant (s).
(iii) Original fixed deposit receipts be retained by the bank in safe custody. However, a passbook of the FDRs be given to the claimant
(s) along with the photocopy of the FDR. At the time of maturity, the fixed deposit amount shall be automatically credited in the savings bank account of the Claimant(s).
(iv) No cheque book be issued to the claimant (s) without permission of the Court. However, a photo identity card be issued to the claimant (s) and the withdrawal be permitted upon production of the identity card.
(v) No loan, advance or withdrawal be allowed on the fixed deposits without permission of the Court.
(vi) The Bank shall not permit any joint name (s) to be added in the savings bank account or fixed deposit accounts of the victim.
(vii) Half yearly statement of account be filed by the Bank in the Tribunal".
Keeping in view the entirety of the facts and circumstances involved in the present case and the abovesaid guidelines laid down by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi, the Insurance company is directed to deposit the amount of Rs. 1,56,953/- (Rupees One Lakh Fifty Six Thousand Nine Hundred and Fifty Three Only) as stated herein above with SBI, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, out of which the amount of Rs. 16,953/- shall be released to the petitioner keeping in view the submissions of the Ld. Counsel for the petitioners and that of the respondents as well and in the entirety of the facts.
The rest of the amount of Rs. 1,40,000/- shall be kept in 3 FDR's for an amount of Rs. 50,000/-, Rs.50,000/- and Rs.40,000/- for a period of six month, one year and one and a half year with cumulative interest in the name of the petitioner The abovesaid conditions as laid down in [ACT] shall be adhered to by SBI, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in respect to the FDR's.
37. Since the offending vehicle, was admittedly insured with the respondent No.3, the respondent No.3 is hereby directed to deposit the award amount in favour of the petitioner with SBI, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi within a period of 30 days from the date of passing of this award together with the interest as stated herein above under the intimation to this court and under intimation to the petitioner. In case of any delay, it shall be liable to pay interest at the rate of 12% per annum for the period of delay.
A separate file be prepared for compliance report by the Nazir and put up the same on 15.03.2018.
A copy of this award be given to the insurance company as well as to the petitioner free of cost.
A copy of this award be sent to the concerned Ld. Metropolitan Magistrate as well as DSLSA as per the provisions of the [ACT].
File be consigned to Record Room.
Announced in the open court On 05th of February, 2018 ( [ENTITY] ) P.O.MACT (WEST-01) Delhi (05.02.2018) FORM-IVB
SUMMARY OF THE COMPUTATION OF AWARD AMOUNT IN INJURY CASE
1. Date of accident : 02.10.2014
2. Name of the injured : Sh. [ENTITY]
3. Age of the injured : 26 years
4. Occupation of the injured : Student and pursing CA
5. Income of the injured : Rs. 8632/- per month
6. Nature of injury : Grievous
7. Medical treatment taken : The petitioner was by the injured hospitalized 04.10.2014 to 08.10.2014 and w.e.f. 11.11.2014 to 12.11.2014
8. Period of Hospitalization : w.e.f 04.10.2014 to 08.10.2014 and w.e.f.
11.11.2014 to 12.11.2014
9. Whether any permanent disability ?
If yes, give details : N.A. 10. Computation of Compensation S. No. Heads Awarded by the Tribunal 11. Pecuniary Loss (i) Expenditure on treatment Rs. 1,19,689/- (ii) Expenditure on Rs.10,000/- (including attendant charges conveyance and special diet) (iii) Expenditure on special diet As above (iv) Cost of nursing/attendant As above- (v) Loss of earning capacity NIL (vi) Loss of Income Rs. 17,264/- (vii) Any other loss which may N.A require any special treatment or aid to the injured for the rest of his life 12. Non-Pecunicary Loss: (i) Compensation for mental NIL and physical shock (ii) Pain and suffering Rs.10,000/- (iii) Loss of amenities of life NIL (iv) Disfiguration N.A. (v) Loss of marriage N.A. prospects (vi) Loss of earning, N.A. inconvenience, hardships, disappointment, frustration, mental stress, dejectment and unhappiness in future life etc.
13. Disability resulting in loss of earning capacity:
(I) Percentage of disability N.A. assessed and nature of disability as permanent or temporary (ii) Loss of amenities or loss N/A of expectation of life span on account of disability (iii) Percentage of loss of N.A. earning capacity in relation to disability (iv) Loss of future income - NIL (Income x% Earning Capacity x Multiplier) 14. TOTAL COMPENSATION Rs. 1,56,953/- 15. INTEREST AWARDED 9% per annum 16. Interest amount up to the Rs.39630.62(2 years 9 months and 20 date of award days) 17. Total amount including Rs.1,96,583.62 interest 18. Award amount released Rs.16,953/- 19. Award amount kept in Rs. 1,40,000/- FDRs 20. Mode of disbursement of Mentioned in the award the award amount to the claimant (s). (Clause 29) 21. Next date for compliance 15.03.2018 of the award. (Clause 31) ( [ENTITY] ) P.O. MACT (WEST-01) Delhi 05.02.2018 05.02.2018 Present None Award is passed separately. File be consigned to Record Room.
A separate file be prepared for compliance report by the Nazir and put up the same on 15.03.2018 A copy of this award be sent to the concerned Ld. Metropolitan Magistrate as well as DSLSA as per the provisions of the [ACT].
( [ENTITY] ) P.O. MACT (WEST-01) Delhi 05.02.2018