Question: What happens to a treaty that was designed to terminate under certain conditions when those conditions are actually met?
Answer: automatically terminated

Question: What may we assume the parties to a treaty intended the treaty's obligations to be if the treaty included an expiration date?
Answer: temporarily binding

Question: What might result in a party to a treaty claiming a treaty should be terminated even absent an express provision for its termination?
Answer: a fundamental change in circumstances

Question: A party cannot base its claim of a fundamental change in circumstances if the change was brought about by what?
Answer: its own breach of the treaty

Question: The claim of a fundamental change in circumstances cannot be used to invalidate treaties that established or redrew what?
Answer: political boundaries

Question: The radical transformation of what aspect of the obligations between the parties is a necessary condition for a claim of a fundamental change in circumstances to terminate a treaty?
Answer: the extent of obligations

Question: In order to be considered a fundamental change, a change in circumstances must have been what at the time of the adoption of the treaty?
Answer: unforeseen

Question: The Islamic Prophet Muhammad carried out a siege against what tribe in February 624?
Answer: the Banu Qaynuqa tribe

Question: Muhammad ordered his followers to attack the Banu Qaynuqa Jews for allegedly breaking what treaty?
Answer: the Constitution of Medina

Question: Who's insistence led the Prophet Muhammad to expel the Banu Qaynuqa Jews instead of kill them?
Answer: Abdullah ibn Ubayy

Question: Pinning the clothes of a Muslim woman, which led to her being what, was the action that allegedly violated the Constitution of Medina?
Answer: stripped naked

Question: What chained actions resulted from the alleged violation of the Constitution of Medina by the Banu Qaynuqa Jews?
Answer: revenge killings

Question: What angel, according to Muslim tradition, ordered Muhammad to order a siege on the Banu Qurayza?
Answer: Gabriel

Question: Who claims Muhammad had a treaty with the Banu Qurayza that was torn apart?
Answer: Al-Waqidi

Question: How many members of the Banu Qurayza were beheaded after surrendering to Muhammad and his followers according to Tabari and Ibn Hisham?
Answer: 600-900

Question: According to Sunni Hadith which members of the Banu Qurayza were beheaded after surrendering to Muhammad and his followers?
Answer: all Males and 1 woman

Question: How many Muslims were killed during the invasion of Banu Qurayza?
Answer: Two

Question: When are most of the problems created that might result in an otherwise valid treaty being rejected as a binding international agreement?
Answer: at the formation of the treaty

Question: What treaties between Japan and Korea are examples of treaties that were declared null and void?
Answer: the serial Japan-Korea treaties of 1905, 1907 and 1910

Question: In what treaty were the serial Japan-Korea treaties of 1905, 1907, and 1910 confirmed as "already null and void?"
Answer: the 1965 Treaty on Basic Relations between Japan and the Republic of Korea

Question: Which two states signed a treaty that declared previous treaties between the two from 1905, 1907, and 1910 to be already void?
Answer: Japan and the Republic of Korea

Question: An otherwise valid and agreed upon treaty may be rejected as what for several reasons most of which involve problems created at the formation of a treaty?
Answer: a binding international agreement

Question: A party's consent to a treaty is invalid if it had been given by an agent or body without power to do so under what?
Answer: that state's domestic law

Question: For what does a strong presumption exist internationally that a head of state has acted within in entering into a treaty?
Answer: his proper authority

Question: What is required to invalidate a party's consent due to a reluctance to inquire into the internal affairs and processes of other states?
Answer: a "manifest violation"

Question: A manifest violation is required to invalidate a party's consent to a treaty due to a reluctance internationally to inquire into what aspects of other states?
Answer: the internal affairs and processes

Question: What might a party's consent to a treaty be considered if it has been given by an agent without the power under the state's domestic law to do so?
Answer: invalid

Question: If a state's representative ignored restrictions he is subject to by his sovereign, what might that state's consent to a treaty be considered to be?
Answer: invalid

Question: Who might place restrictions on a representative during negotiation of a treaty?
Answer: his sovereign

Question: What must be true of the ignored restrictions placed on a representative by his sovereign in order for a state's consent to a treaty to be considered invalid?
Answer: the other parties to the treaty were notified of those restrictions prior to his signing

Question: Who must have been notified of the ignored restrictions placed by a sovereign on his representative prior to the signing of a treaty in order for a state's consent to be considered invalid? 
Answer: the other parties

Question: The preamble of what states that treaties are a source of international law?
Answer: The Law of Treaties

Question: Which will prevail in a conflict between international and domestic law?
Answer: international law

Question: What are started to be a source of international law in the preamble in The Law of Treaties?
Answer: treaties

Question: Approval under what law will not make an act or lack thereof legal if condemned under international law?
Answer: internal law

Question: An act or lack thereof cannot be made legal under what law even if made legal under internal law?
Answer: international law

Question: Which articles of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties set out the ways that treaties can be invalidated?
Answer: Articles 46–53

Question: In addition to the circumstances by which a state party joined a treaty, why might a treaty be invalidated?
Answer: the content of the treaty itself

Question: In addition to the content of the treaty itself, why might a treated by invalidated?
Answer: the circumstances by which a state party joined the treaty

Question: A treaty might be considered what if it's considered unenforceable and void under international law?
Answer: invalidated

Question: Which processes simply alter the consent given by parties to a previously valid treaty rather than invalidating the consent completely?
Answer: withdrawal, suspension, or termination

Question: What on behalf of a state cannot invalidate that state's consent to a treaty?
Answer: own conduct

Question: Consent to a treaty will not be invalidated if what should have been evident?
Answer: the truth

Question: What may be invalidated if there was an erroneous understanding of a fact or situation at the time of conclusion of a treaty?
Answer: A state's consent

Question: An erroneous understanding of a fact or situation may only invalidate a state's consent to a treaty if what is also true about the erroneous understanding?
Answer: formed the "essential basis" of the state's consent

Question: What, if it formed the "essential basis" of a state's consent to a treaty, may invalidate that consent?
Answer: an erroneous understanding of a fact or situation

Question: What type of conduct of a party to a treaty can invalidate the consent of another party?
Answer: fraudulent conduct

Question: What type of action, either direct or indirect, of a state's representative by another type of party to a treaty can invalidate a state's consent?
Answer: corruption

Question: Coercion of a representative or a state itself will result in what happening to its consent to a treaty?
Answer: invalidate that consent