Majorities Against Utility : Implications of the Failure of the Miracle of Aggregation

La sagesse collective : principes et mécanismesColloque des 22-23 mai 2008,organisé par l'Institut du Monde Contemporain du Collège de France,sous la direction du Professeur Jon Elster.Intervention de Bryan Caplan,George Mason University,23 mai 2008A surprising conclusion of modern political economy is that democracies with highly ignorant voters can still deliver very good results as long as voters' errors balance each other out. This result is known as the Miracle of Aggregation. This paper begins by reviewing a large body of evidence against this Miracle. Empirically,voters' errors tend to be systematic; they compound rather than cancel.Furthermore,since most citizens vote for the policies they believe are best for society,systematic errors lead voters to support socially suboptimal policies. The paper then considers the case for paternalistically vetoing popular but misguided democratic decisions,presenting several arguments that overruling democratic decisions is much less objectionable than overruling individual decisions. In fact,since democracies routinely adopt paternalistic policies,the opponent of paternalism for individual decisions should embrace paternalism for democratic decisions. The paper concludes byconsidering several different mechanisms for improving upon majority rule.

Disciplines : Philosophie et psychologie,Interaction sociale, communication,Science politique
Mots-clés : comportement collectif,démocratie,rationalité,sagesse,prise de décision,interaction sociale
Type de document : image en mouvement
Type de ressource : lecture
Niveau : licence
Auteurs ou éditeurs : Bryan CAPLAN,C.E.R.I.M.E.S.,COLLEGE DE FRANCE,Marcel LECAUDEY,Loïc QUENTIN