Venue: ICLR 2023 TinyPapers

Reviews:

final_score: rating: Great Start (GS): a submission which meets some of the reviewing criteria but has room for improvement
review_content: summary_of_contributions: The paper discusses potential use cases for a chat bot like ChatGPT to be used by speech-language pathologists (SLPs). Several potential uses are enumerated, and both the benefits and limitations are explored
strengths_and_weaknesses: Strengths:

-	The paper clearly indicates that there is potentially immense value for SLPs to use chatbots such as ChatGPT.

Weaknesses:

-	The paper reads more like a research proposal than a research paper.

-	The contributions from the paper are not clear. Most of the body of the paper is a literature review, and it is not clear what additional content was provided by the authors.

-	Much of contributions appear to be found in the appendix. For example, while there is a brief discussion about the limitations of ChatGPT, much of the more substantive critique can be found in the appendix.

-	Most of the ChatGPT prompts focus on asking ChatGPT about the field itself rather than a demonstration of the various proposed uses in the paper. It is not clear why ChatGPT’s perception of its implications is relevant to the discussion.

suggested_changes: -	Clearly indicate the contributions from the paper.

-	Exploring ChatGPT’s own perception of its implications focuses on its use for information recall as opposed to specific clinical tasks. Greater focus on demonstrating ChatGPT in a clinical setting, presumably a simulated one, would significantly enhance the paper.

-	For Tables 1-3, the inconsistencies and errors are not obvious to non-SLPs. More clarity would be necessary for a lay person.
review_title: null

Decision: Invite to revise