ChatDOC/OCRFlux-bench-single huggingface dataset:
3.单项金额虽不重大但单项计提
坏账准备的应收账款
合 计	5,292,513.37	100.00	101,027.80	10.49

# 1、 按组合计提坏账准备的其他应收款项

# （1） 采用账龄分析法计提坏账准备的其他应收款项

账 龄	期末数	期初数
账面余额	计提比例(%)	坏账准备	账面余额	计提比例(%)	坏账准备
1 年以内	510,323.34	5.00	25,516.17	750,913.17	5.00	37,545.66
1 至 2 年	68,029.60	10.00	6,802.96	108,884.60	10.00	10,888.46
2 至 3 年	113,490.90	20.00	22,698.18	26,190.90	20.00	5,238.18
3 至 4 年	0.00	50.00	0.00	60,251.00	50.00	30,125.50
4 至 5 年	54,051.00	80.00	43,240.80	0.00	-
5 年以上	16,930.00	100.00	16,930.00	17,230.00	100.00	17,230.00
合 计	762,824.84	--	115,188.11	963,469.67	--	101,027.80

# （2） 采用其他组合方法计提坏账准备的其他应收款项

组合名称	期末数	期初数
账面余额	比例(%)	坏账准备	账面余额	比例(%)	坏账准备
关联方往来：
北京联动新能投资有限公司	2,595,893.57	1,934,902.22
建始恒久风力发电有限公司	3,022,758.44	2266696.82
武汉伦纳新能源开发有限公司	110,192.83	110192.83
巴东聚能风力发电有限公司	5,473.50
武汉联动设计工程有限公司新疆
分公司	7993.39
武汉联动设计股份有限公司江西
分公司	975.1
武汉联动设计股份有限公司北京
工程咨询分公司	8283.34
徐皇冈	53.5
雷振华	6537.63
吴士标	13479.37
刘杰	19150
尧弘	41200
合 计	5,814,738.84	4,329,043.70

# 2、 其他应收款项按款项性质分类情况
unfairly make the insurers liable for the consequences of something which they did not agree to insure.

48. Finally, the FCA asserts that in The B Atlantic [2017] 1 WLR 1303, Christopher Clarke LJ at [26] {J/130/10-11} was “expressly anticipating the disapplication of the but for test in an insurance context where there were concurrent independent causes.”66 This is tenuous at best, for the words quoted by the FCA do not support the assertion, and the case involved interdependent causes (as the passage quoted by the FCA makes clear (“if, as here, both causes need to operate if the loss is to occur”)). In any event, the B Atlantic was appealed to the Supreme Court and no support whatever can be found in the judgment of Lord Mance (with whom the rest of the Court agreed) for any disapplication of the ‘but for’ test where there are concurrent independent causes of loss (see paragraph 54.1 below). Neither Christopher Clarke LJ in the B Atlantic, nor Hamblen J in Orient-Express, nor any other judge in the history of English insurance law, which the parties have no doubt mined to the point of exhaustion, has done so.

49. In all the circumstances, it is fanciful even to suggest that the present is one of those rare and exceptional cases in which the Court could justifiably jettison the ‘but for’ test. This case is not in that territory.

# Concurrent interdependent causes

50. The so-called Wayne Tank principle or Miss Jay Jay rule is not an exception to the application of the ‘but for’ test, because it only applies to concurrent interdependent causes, not to concurrent independent causes.

51. If the loss which is the subject of the claim is caused by concurrent interdependent causes, one of which is covered by the policy and the other is excluded, and the excluded cause is the dominant cause of the loss or a cause of approximately equal

---

66 FCA Skeleton at [240] {I/1/96-97}. The specific dictum of Christopher Clarke LJ on which the FCA relies appears to be: “Or it may be that the event would have happened if either A or B had occurred but, on the facts, both of them can be said to have caused it.” It is hardly a ringing endorsement for the FCA’s plunge into unorthodoxy.
efficacy or potency to the cause which is covered, the insured is not entitled to an indemnity under the policy (the exclusion prevails). But if one of the causes is insured, and the other is simply not covered, then the insured is entitled to an indemnity: see the contrasting decisions of the Court of Appeal in Wayne Tank & Pump v Employers’ Liability Assurance [1973] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 237 {K/64} and JJ Lloyd Instruments v Northern Star Insurance Co (The Miss Jay Jay) [1987] 1 Lloyds Rep 32 {J/36}.

52. Both were cases of interdependent concurrent causes of loss: in the former, Lord Denning MR referred to “two causes which were equal or nearly equal in their efficiency” in bringing about the damage67; and in the latter, Lawton LJ indicated that “one [alleged cause] without the other would not have caused the loss…”68

53. The cases are consistent with contract law generally. See, for example, Heskell v Continental Express Ltd (1950) 83 LLR 438 at 458 {K/53/21}, in which Devlin J (as he then was) held that if a breach of contract was one of two separate causes of the loss which were “both co-operating and both of equal efficacy,” that was sufficient to establish liability.

54. The principlesin Wayne Tank and in The Miss Jay Jay and similar cases only apply where there are two causes (i) each of which is a ‘but for’ cause (i.e. without it, the loss would not have occurred), and therefore (ii) both of which combine to bring about the loss. Point (ii) is merely an expression of point (i).69

---

67 See [1973] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 237, 240 col 2 {K/64/4}.68 See [1987] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 32, 37 col 2 {J/66/6}.69 In this respect, there is a distinction between cases where there are two or more concurrent causes, whether ‘proximate’ or not, and cases where there is a sole cause, albeit one which may give rise to a number of different legal causes of action or insured perils. That is the perfectly orthodox principle expressed by Potter J in Capel-Cure Myers v McCarthy [1995] LRLR 498 {J/73}, which the FCA cites in its skeleton at [232.2] {I/1/94}. There, the judge said, at 503 {J/73/6} col 1: "... loss by a combination of causes must be distinguished from loss by a single cause, which can nevertheless be properly described as amounting to a number of causes of action, one or more of which may be outside the terms of the policy, but one of which is plainly within its terms.”
behaviour would doom such a project. One cannot idealise sociality without taking account of time.62

In other words, the opacity of the problem cannot be redeemed through com-municative rationality, because that solution has no possible foundation in actual communicative situations. It is not just that there is no escape from the distinction between social and psychic systems; it is also the presumption at least that proposals which ignore or bury this problem are doomed to fail. There can, of course, be no proof of this. But why prefer hope to skepticism or circumspection in a world with many possibilities, many of which are ‘sub-optimal’?

# CONCLUSION

One could perhaps describe the race equality agenda as a therapeutic or palliative one at the (national) societal level (and equally this can be regarded as a sub-dimension of a larger pan-European project). The aim is at once to cure or ‘ease’ pathologies and to build a ‘strong’ and healthy societal organism. The assumption is that diversity is to be cherished and that diversity is itself produc-tive. A diverse society is better than a non-diverse, culturally homogenous one. Parekh has some intelligent arguments to support this position (in reality, a more sophisticated position).63 However, who believes this?

I believe it. But I have personal reasons for believing it. That is, in any self-description which I would put into communication, I would offer a selective biography which would explain, if that was demanded, why I ‘personally’ pre-fer to work in a university with students from all over the world (multiethnic, multinational) compared with one where most of the students are from Hertfordshire or Surrey, and most of my colleagues would agree—that is—they would nod assent in an interaction system, although what they really think I do not know. I don’t know if they know. One doesn’t critically test through ‘intro-spection’ whether one believes all the things one assents to in communication. In addition, work is work. Where I live is another matter. What I want or need from where I live is for the most part a quiet environment because I work from home a lot. Certain cultural practices in my immediate environment (neighbours) might not be consistent with that. I may need to make neighbour-related predictions in deciding where to live (along with affordability, space requirements etc). Prejudice is pervasive. Without it ‘personal’ decisions cannot be made.64

---

62 N Luhmann, Theories of Distinction: Redescribing the Descriptions of Modernity (Stanford, Stanford University Press, 2002) 193. 63 B Parekh, Rethinking Multiculturalism: Cultural Diversity and Political Theory (Basingstoke, Palgrave, 2000). 64 TC Schelling, Micromotives and Macrobehaviour (New York, WW Norton, 1978) chapter 4.
Note	2017	2016
RMB’000	RMB’000
Turnover	4	2,005,308	1,400,827
Cost of sales	(1,114,934)	(974,095)
Gross profit	890,374	426,732
Other income	5	453	143
Change in fair value of investment properties	13	–	5,938
Selling and distribution expenses	(53,111)	(67,764)
Administrative expenses	(48,480)	(74,638)
Other expenses	5	(140)	(7,003)
Operating profit	789,096	283,408
Finance income	8,967	1,128
Finance costs	(17,231)	(53,126)
Net finance costs	6(a)	(8,264)	(51,998)
Profit before taxation	780,832	231,410
Income tax	7	(521,320)	(183,366)
Profit for the year	259,512	48,044
Attributable to:
Equity shareholders of the Company	251,181	65,012
Non-controlling interests	8,331	(16,968)
Profit for the year	259,512	48,044

The notes on page 86 to 171 form part of these financial statements.
2017	2016
Note	RMB’000	RMB’000
Earnings per share
Basic and diluted (RMB)	11	0.84	0.25
Profit for the year	259,512	48,044
Other comprehensive income	10
Item that may be reclassified subsequently to
profit or loss
Income from changes in fair value of
available-for-sale financial assets	1,749	–
Item that will not be reclassified subsequently to
profit or loss
Exchange differences on translation of
financial statements of the Company	(15,232)	8,575
Other comprehensive income for the year	(13,483)	8,575
Total comprehensive income for the year	246,029	56,619
Attributable to:
Equity shareholders of the Company	237,698	73,587
Non-controlling interest	8,331	(16,968)
Total comprehensive income for the year	246,029	56,619

The notes on page 86 to 171 form part of these financial statements.
where \( \rho _ { 0 } = 0 . 1 7 \)\( \mathrm { f m ^ { - 3 } } \) is the empirical saturation density of symmetric nuclear matter. We have separated explicitly the kinetic contribution, \( K / A = 3 k _ { F } ^ { 2 } / 2 0 m \), from the potential terms. Coefficients of this parametrization are shown in II.

a	b	α	β
( MeV )	( MeV )
AV18	5.6520	−28.701	1.97	0.83
Paris	5.7215	−28.727	1.97	0.87
N3LO2N	98.155	−122.14	1.13	1.03
\( \mathbf { \delta } \) 3 \( _ { \cdot } \)\( \mathbf { ) } _ { \mathbf { \Phi } ) } \) +N2LO3N	17.767	−36.815	1.50	0.90

TABLE II. Fit coefficients for the energy per neutron, \( B / A \), following Eq. (22).

# IV. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

Within the BHF approach for pure neutron matter at zero temperature, we have in-vestigated di–neutron structures with emphasis placed on the low–density regime. We have calculated self–consistent sp potentials at Fermi momenta up to 2−3 \( \mathrm { f m ^ { - 1 } } \) using the continu-ous choice, restricting the system to a normal (nonsuperfluid) state. We have used AV18 and Paris internucleon potential, in addition to chiral \( \mathrm { N 3 L O } _ { 2 N } \) 2NF as well as \( \mathrm { N 3 L O } _ { 2 N } \mathrm { + N 2 L O } _ { 3 N } \) 3NF. Explicit account for di–neutron bound states is made in the \( { } ^ { 1 } \mathrm { S } _ { 0 } \) channel for the eval-uation of the mass operator during self–consistent searches of the sp potential.

The resulting sp solutions from each of the potentials considered in this work are in fair agreement with those found elsewhere [27, 33, 47–49]. The major conclusion of our work is that di–neutron bound states appear in the BHF approach in the \( { } ^ { 1 } \mathrm { S } _ { 0 } \) channel independently of the Hamiltonian that is used to model neutron interactions. In terms of the Fermi momentum, di–neutrons appear in the regime \( 0 . 0 6 \lesssim k _ { F } \lesssim 1 . 0 5 \)\( \mathrm { f m } ^ { - 1 } \) and are loosely bound, by less than 700 keV. The density dependence of their binding energy is very close for all interactions, which indicates a dominance of many–body correlations in di–neutron formation. In particular, because they appear at low densities, di–neutrons do not seem to be affected by 3NF. More indicative, these bound states form at densities where neutron effective masses become larger than the bare mass. Furthermore, the size of these bound states can get as high as ∼ 100 fm. In contrast to isospin–symmetric nuclear
matter, solutions for the sp spectra do not exhibit coexisting phases [12], mainly due to the fact that \( \mathrm { ^ { 3 } S D _ { 1 } } \) channel is fully suppressed in pure neutron matter. A recent study[50] addressing neutronic and symmetric nuclear matter, considering modern realistic NN interactions, confirms the robustness of theses findings.

The study of nuclear matter, even on its simplest nonrelativistic form, is an exceedingly difficult problem involving various scenarios in density, isospin asymmetry and temperature. On top of that, the emergence of superfluidity, superconductivity and clusterization multiply the physical scenarios under which matter can evolve when confined. The study we have presented is just a first step towards ab initio clusterization studies, going beyond traditional calculations in this context which are based on a variety of phenomenological approximations. In turn, these calculations can provide guidance on clustering in isospin–rich systems.

We can foresee a variety of extension of this work, both at the phenomenological and at the more theoretical level. Within this very same framework, we would like to study the melting of di–neutrons as temperature effects switch on. The extension to isospin asymmetric systems is of relevance for neutron–star matter, but also in the context of nuclear structure and the isospin dependence of clustering correlations. The competition between pairing and bound states in neutron matter is relevant for BEC–BCS studies, and the BHF approach is perfectly suited to provide quantitative guidance on this subject. Finally, it would be interesting to use other many–body techniques to establish firmly the existence of di–neutron bound states in isospin–rich nuclear systems.

# ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

H.F.A. acknowledges partial funding from FONDECYT under grant No 1120396. F.I. thanks funding from CONICYT under contract No. 221320081. This work was supported in part by STFC through Grants ST/I005528/1, ST/J000051/1 and ST/L005816/1. Partial support comes from “NewCompStar”, COST Action MP1304. F.I. thanks the hospitality of colleagues of the University of Surrey, UK, where part of this work took place.

[1] F. Kobayashi and Y. Kanada-En’yo, Phys. Rev. C 88, 034321 (2013).

[2] A. Spyrou, Z. Kohley, T. Baumann, D. Bazin, B. A. Brown, G. Christian, P. A. DeYoung, J. E. Finck, N. Frank, E. Lunderberg, S. Mosby, W. A. Peters, A. Schiller, J. K. Smith, J. Snyder, M. J. Strongman, M. Thoennessen, and A. Volya, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108., 102501 (2012)
# CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION

At 30 June 2020

Notes	As at
30 June
2020	As at
31 December
2019
RMB’000	RMB’000
(Unaudited)	(Audited)
NON-CURRENT ASSETS
Property, lipant and equpment	11	7,802,823	8,077,172
Quarry	12	936,682	964,761
Rihfgt-o-use assets	809,310	819,682
Investment properties	121,067	82,420
Goodwill	554,241	554,241
Other intaniblge assets	4,305	3,571
Interests in joint ventures	60,730	56,491
Interests in associates	722,014	725,122
Restricted bank deposits	3,428	–
Deferred tax assets	97,574	82,222
11,112,174	11,365,682
CURRENT ASSETS
Inventories	13	726,255	674,380
Trade and other receivables	14	2,366,684	3,962,640
Amount due from an associate	10,052	15,959
Amount due from a joint venture	5,005	10,014
Restricted bank deposits	9,854	14,503
Bank balances and cash	9,156,644	7,942,576
12,274,494	12,620,072
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Trade and other payables	15	1,246,115	2,174,123
Amount due to a joint venture	18,102	5,563
Tax payables	152,365	555,414
Borrowings – due within one year	4,591,785	4,770,215
Lease Liabilities	5,639	4,512
Contract Liabilities	16	184,755	185,525
6,198,761	7,695,352
NET CURRENT ASSETS	6,075,733	4,924,720
TOTAL ASSETS LESS CURRENT LIABILITIES	17,187,907	16,290,402
Notes	As at
30 June
2020	As at
31 December
2019
RMB’000	RMB’000
(Unaudited)	(Audited)
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
Borrowings – due after one year	2,295,273	1,444,094
Deferred tax liabilities	58,483	70,555
Lease Liabilities	102,624	96,025
Provision for environmental restoration	41,095	36,734
2,497,475	1,647,408
NET ASSETS	14,690,432	14,642,994
CAPITAL AND RESERVES
Share cailpta	17	140,390	140,390
Share premium and reserves	14,218,399	14,123,411
Equity attributable to owners of the Company	14,358,789	14,263,801
Non-controlling interests	331,634	379,193
TOTAL EQUITY	14,690,432	14,642,994
by a high-energy transient and a fast evolving supernova11. It is also likely that the inner shell of the circumstellar nebula will persist until the explosion and, given the expected low mass of supernova ejecta, will affect the appearance of the supernova remnant ∼ 100 yr after explosion.

The merging of two stars in a binary system is not a rare event. About 10 per cent of the massive main sequence stars are thought to be merger products27, as well as a similar fraction of the known white dwarfs28. The very unusual wind of WS35 strongly supports the idea that stellar mergers can indeed produce highly magnetized stars, which would explain the magnetic stars of the upper main sequence29 and the formation of the magnetic white dwarfs26. Our results also enlighten the ongoing debate on whether a super-Chandrasekhar mass merger of two carbon-oxygen white dwarfs leads to a Type Ia supernova. Here, WS35 appears to provide a counter example, which will likely produce a neutrino-flash and a gamma-ray burst30, followed by a very fast and subluminous Type Ic supernova11.

# Bibliography

1. Hulse, R. A. & Taylor, J. H. Discovery of a pulsar in a binary system. Astrophys. J. 195, L51–L53 (1975).

2. Abbott, B. P. et al. Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016).

3. Abbott, B. P. et al. Gravitational waves and gamma-rays from a binary neutron star merger: GW170817 and GRB 170817A. Astrophys. J. 848, L13 (2017).

4. Iben, I. & Tutukov, A. V. Supernovae of type I as end products of the evolution of binaries with components of moderate initial mass (M not greater than about 9 solar masses). Astron. Astrophys. Supp. 54, 335–372 (1984).

5. Pakmor, R., et al. Violent mergers of nearly equal-mass white dwarf as progenitors of sublu-minous Type Ia supernovae, Astron. Astrophys. 528, A117 (2011).

6. Saio, H. & Nomoto, K. Off-center carbon ignition in rapidly rotating, accreting carbon-oxygen white dwarfs. Astrophys. J. 615, 444–449 (2004).

7. Shen, K. J., Bildsten, L., Kasen, D. & Quataert, E. The long-term evolution of double white dwarf mergers. Astrophys. J. 748, 35 (2012).

8. Schwab, J., Quataert, E. & Kasen, D. The evolution and fate of super-Chandrasekhar mass white dwarf merger remnants. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 463, 3461–3475 (2016).

9. Ji, S. et al. The post-merger magnetized evolution of white dwarf binaries: The double-degenerate channel of sub-Chandrasekhar Type Ia supernovae and the formation of magne-tized white dwarfs. Astrophys. J. 773, 136–149 (2013).
In this prospectus, unless the context otherwise requires, the following expressions have the following meanings.

“2016 Decision”	the Decision of the Standing Committee of the NPC on
Amending the Private Schools Promotion Law (全國人民代
表大會常務委員會關於修改<中華人民共和國民辦教育促進
法>的決定), which was promulgated on November 7, 2016,
and came into force on September 1, 2017
“2021 Imlpementation Rules”	the Imlipementaton Rules for the Law for Promoting Private
Education of the PRC (《中華人民共和國民辦教育促進法
實施條例》), which was promulgated by the State Council
on May 14, 2021 and will take effect from September 1,
2021
“affiliate(s)”	with respect to any specific person, any other person,
directly or indirectly, controlling or controlled by or under
direct or indirect common control with such specified
person
“AliiFppcaton orm(s)”	WHITE alifppcation orm(s), YELLOW aliippcaton form(s)
and GREEN alifppcation orm(s), or where the context so
requires, any one of them, in relation to the Hong Kong
Public Offering
“Articles of Association” or
“Articles”	the amended and restated articles of association of our
Company conditionally adopted on June 23, 2021 and
effective upon the Listing Date and as amended from time to
time, a summary of which is set out in Appendix IV to this
prospectus
“associate(s)”	has the meaning ascribed to it under the Listing Rules
“Board” or “Board of Directors”	the board of Directors
“BPPE”	California Bureau for Private Postsecondary Education, a
unit of the California Department of Consumer Affairs in
charge of regulation of private postsecondary educational
institutions operating in the State of California, the United
States
“Business Cooperation Agreement”	the business cooperation agreement entered into by and
among Lingnan WFOE, the PRC Affiliated Entities and the
Reistered Shareholders dated November 21, 2020g
“Business Day” or “business day”	a day on which banks in Hong Kong are generally open for
business to the public and which is not a Saturday, Sunday
or public holiday in Hong Kong
“BVI”	the British Virilgn Isands
“Caiiptalzation Issue”	the issue of Shares uipon caiptalzation of certain sums
standing to the credit of the share premium account of our
Company as set out in “A. Further Information about Our
Company — 4. Written Resolutions of the Then
Shareholders Passed on June 23, 2021” in Appendix V to
this prospectus
“CCASS”	the Central Clearing and Settlement System established and
operated by HKSCC
“CCASS Clearing Participant”	a person admitted to participate in CCASS as a direct
clearing participant or general clearing participant
“CCASS Custodian Participant”	a person admitted to participate in CCASS as a custodian
participant
“CCASS Investor Participant”	a person admitted to participate in CCASS as an investor
participant who may be an individual orj oint individuals or
a corporation
“CCASS Participant”	a CCASS Clearing Participant, or a CCASS Custodian
Participant or a CCASS Investor Participant
“Chi na” or“PRC”	the Peolbipe’s Relpuc of China excluding for the purpose of
this prospectus, Hong Kong, the Macau Special
Administrative Reion and Taigwan
“China Foreign Education”	China Foreign Education Limited, a limited liability
company incorporated under the laws of the BVI on August
9, 2018 and is wholly owned by Ms. He Huifen, and is one
of our Controlling Shareholders
“Co-manager”	the co-manager as named in the section headed “Directors
and Parties Involved in the Global Offering”
“Companies Act” or “Cayman
Companies Act”	the Companies Act, Cap. 22 (Act 3 of 1961, as combined
and revised) of the Cayman Islands