Photosynthetic efficiency - wikipedia Photosynthetic efficiency The photosynthetic efficiency is the fraction of light energy converted into chemical energy during photosynthesis in plants and algae. Photosynthesis can be described by the simplified chemical reaction 6H O + 6CO + energy → C H O + 6O where C H O is glucose ( which is subsequently transformed into other sugars, cellulose, lignin, and so forth ). The value of the photosynthetic efficiency is dependent on how light energy is defined -- it depends on whether we count only the light that is absorbed, and on what kind of light is used ( see Photosynthetically active radiation ). It takes eight ( or perhaps 10 or more ) photons to utilize one molecule of CO. The Gibbs free energy for converting a mole of CO to glucose is 114 kcal, whereas eight moles of photons of wavelength 600 nm contains 381 kcal, giving a nominal efficiency of 30 %. However, photosynthesis can occur with light up to wavelength 720 nm so long as there is also light at wavelengths below 680 nm to keep Photosystem II operating ( see Chlorophyll ). Using longer wavelengths means less light energy is needed for the same number of photons and therefore for the same amount of photosynthesis. For actual sunlight, where only 45 % of the light is in the photosynthetically active wavelength range, the theoretical maximum efficiency of solar energy conversion is approximately 11 %. In actuality, however, plants do not absorb all incoming sunlight ( due to reflection, respiration requirements of photosynthesis and the need for optimal solar radiation levels ) and do not convert all harvested energy into biomass, which results in an overall photosynthetic efficiency of 3 to 6 % of total solar radiation. If photosynthesis is inefficient, excess light energy must be dissipated to avoid damaging the photosynthetic apparatus. Energy can be dissipated as heat ( non-photochemical quenching ), or emitted as chlorophyll fluorescence. Contents 1 Typical efficiencies 1.1 Plants 1.2 Algae and other monocellular organisms 1.2. 1 Worldwide figures 2 Efficiencies of various biofuel crops 3 C3 vs. C4 and CAM plants 4 See also 5 References Typical efficiencies Plants Quoted values sunlight - to - biomass efficiency Plant Efficiency Plants, typical 0.1 % 0.2 -- 2 % Typical crop plants 1 -- 2 % The following is a breakdown of the energetics of the photosynthesis process from Photosynthesis by Hall and Rao : Starting with the solar spectrum falling on a leaf, 47 % lost due to photons outside the 400 -- 700 nm active range ( chlorophyll utilizes photons between 400 and 700 nm, extracting the energy of one 700 nm photon from each one ) 30 % of the in - band photons are lost due to incomplete absorption or photons hitting components other than chloroplasts 24 % of the absorbed photon energy is lost due to degrading short wavelength photons to the 700 nm energy level 68 % of the utilized energy is lost in conversion into d - glucose 35 -- 45 % of the glucose is consumed by the leaf in the processes of dark and photo respiration Stated another way : 100 % sunlight → non-bioavailable photons waste is 47 %, leaving 53 % ( in the 400 -- 700 nm range ) → 30 % of photons are lost due to incomplete absorption, leaving 37 % ( absorbed photon energy ) → 24 % is lost due to wavelength - mismatch degradation to 700 nm energy, leaving 28.2 % ( sunlight energy collected by chlorophyl ) → 32 % efficient conversion of ATP and NADPH to d - glucose, leaving 9 % ( collected as sugar ) → 35 -- 40 % of sugar is recycled / consumed by the leaf in dark and photo - respiration, leaving 5.4 % net leaf efficiency. Many plants lose much of the remaining energy on growing roots. Most crop plants store ~ 0.25 % to 0.5 % of the sunlight in the product ( corn kernels, potato starch, etc. ). Photosynthesis increases linearly with light intensity at low intensity, but at higher intensity this is no longer the case ( see Photosynthesis - irradiance curve ). Above about 10,000 lux or ~ 100 watts / square meter the rate no longer increases. Thus, most plants can only utilize ~ 10 % of full mid-day sunlight intensity. This dramatically reduces average achieved photosynthetic efficiency in fields compared to peak laboratory results. However, real plants ( as opposed to laboratory test samples ) have lots of redundant, randomly oriented leaves. This helps to keep the average illumination of each leaf well below the mid-day peak enabling the plant to achieve a result closer to the expected laboratory test results using limited illumination. Only if the light intensity is above a plant specific value, called the compensation point the plant assimilates more carbon and releases more oxygen by photosynthesis than it consumes by cellular respiration for its own current energy demand. Photosynthesis measurement systems are not designed to directly measure the amount of light absorbed by the leaf. Nevertheless, the light response curves that the class produces do allow comparisons in photosynthetic efficiency between plants. Algae and other monocellular organisms From a 2010 study by the University of Maryland, photosynthesizing Cyanobacteria have been shown to be a significant species in the global carbon cycle, accounting for 20 -- 30 % of Earth 's photosynthetic productivity and convert solar energy into biomass - stored chemical energy at the rate of ~ 450 TW. Worldwide figures According to the cyanobacteria study above, this means the total photosynthetic productivity of earth is between ~ 1500 -- 2250 TW, or 4.73 -- 7.10 x 10 J ( 47,300 -- 71,000 exajoules ) per year. Using this source 's figure of 178,000 TW of solar energy hitting the Earth 's surface, the total photosynthetic efficiency of the planet is 0.84 % to 1.26 % ( see also Earth 's energy budget ). Efficiencies of various biofuel crops Popular choices for plant biofuels include : oil palm, soybean, castor oil, sunflower oil, safflower oil, corn ethanol, and sugar cane ethanol. An analysis of a proposed Hawaiian oil palm plantation claimed to yield 600 gallons of biodiesel per acre per year. That comes to 2835 watts per acre or 0.7 W / m. Typical insolation in Hawaii is around 5.5 kWh / ( m day ) or 230 W / m. For this particular oil palm plantation, if it delivered the claimed 600 gallons of biodiesel per acre per year, would be converting 0.3 % of the incident solar energy to chemical fuel. Total photosynthetic efficiency would include more than just the biodiesel oil, so this 0.3 % number is something of a lower bound. Contrast this with a typical photovoltaic installation, which would produce an average of roughly 22 W / m ( roughly 10 % of the average insolation ), throughout the year. Furthermore, the photovoltaic panels would produce electricity, which is a high - quality form of energy, whereas converting the biodiesel into mechanical energy entails the loss of a large portion of the energy. On the other hand, a liquid fuel is much more convenient for a vehicle than electricity, which has to be stored in heavy, expensive batteries. Most crop plants store ~ 0.25 % to 0.5 % of the sunlight in the product ( corn kernels, potato starch, etc. ), sugar cane is exceptional in several ways to yield peak storage efficiencies of ~ 8 %. Ethanol fuel in Brazil has a calculation that results in : `` Per hectare per year, the biomass produced corresponds to 0.27 TJ. This is equivalent to 0.86 W / m. Assuming an average insolation of 225 W / m, the photosynthetic efficiency of sugar cane is 0.38 %. '' Sucrose accounts for little more than 30 % of the chemical energy stored in the mature plant ; 35 % is in the leaves and stem tips, which are left in the fields during harvest, and 35 % are in the fibrous material ( bagasse ) left over from pressing. C3 vs. C4 and CAM plants C3 plants use the Calvin cycle to fix carbon. C4 plants use a modified Calvin cycle in which they separate Ribulose - 1, 5 - bisphosphate carboxylase oxygenase ( RuBisCO ) from atmospheric oxygen, fixing carbon in their mesophyll cells and using oxaloacetate and malate to ferry the fixed carbon to RuBisCO and the rest of the Calvin cycle enzymes isolated in the bundle - sheath cells. The intermediate compounds both contain four carbon atoms, which gives C4. In Crassulacean acid metabolism ( CAM ), time isolates functioning RuBisCo ( and the other Calvin cycle enzymes ) from high oxygen concentrations produced by photosynthesis, in that O is evolved during the day, and allowed to dissipate then, while at night atmospheric CO is taken up and stored as malic or other acids. During the day, CAM plants close stomata and use stored acids as carbon sources for sugar, etc. production. The C3 pathway requires 18 ATP for the synthesis of one molecule of glucose while the C4 pathway requires 20 ATP. Despite this reduced ATP efficiency, C4 is an evolutionary advancement, adapted to areas of high levels of light, where the reduced ATP efficiency is more than offset by the use of increased light. The ability to thrive despite restricted water availability maximizes the ability to use available light. The simpler C3 cycle which operates in most plants is adapted to wetter darker environments, such as many northern latitudes.. Corn, sugar cane, and sorghum are C4 plants. These plants are economically important in part because of their relatively high photosynthetic efficiencies compared to many other crops. Pineapple is a CAM plant. See also Energy conversion efficiency FLEX ( satellite ) Phototroph Photosynthetically active radiation References ^ Jump up to : Renewable biological systems for unsustainable energy production. FAO Agricultural Services Bulletins ( 1997 ). Jump up ^ Lubert Stryer ( 1981 ). Biochemistry ( 2nd ed. ). p. 448. ISBN 0 - 7167 - 1226 - 1. ^ Jump up to : Govindjee, What is photosynthesis ? Jump up ^ The Green Solar Collector ; converting sunlight into algal biomass Wageningen University project ( 2005 -- 2008 ) ^ Jump up to : David Oakley Hall ; K.K. Rao ; Institute of Biology ( 1999 ). Photosynthesis. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978 - 0 - 521 - 64497 - 6. Retrieved 3 November 2011. ^ Jump up to : Pisciotta JM, Zou Y, Baskakov IV ( 2010 ). `` Light - Dependent Electrogenic Activity of Cyanobacteria ''. PLoS ONE. 5 ( 5 ) : e10821. doi : 10.1371 / journal. pone. 0010821. PMC 2876029. PMID 20520829. Jump up ^ Biodiesel Fuel. Ag.ndsu.edu... Retrieved on 2011 - 11 - 03. Jump up ^ PVWATTS : Hawaii. Rredc.nrel.gov. Retrieved on 2011 - 11 - 03. Jump up ^ NREL : In My Backyard ( IMBY ) Home Page. Nrel.gov ( 2010 - 12 - 23 ). Retrieved on 2011 - 11 - 03. Ecology : Modelling ecosystems : Trophic components General Abiotic component Abiotic stress Behaviour Biogeochemical cycle Biomass Biotic component Biotic stress Carrying capacity Competition Ecosystem Ecosystem ecology Ecosystem model Keystone species List of feeding behaviours Metabolic theory of ecology Productivity Resource Producers Autotrophs Chemosynthesis Chemotrophs Foundation species Mixotrophs Myco - heterotrophy Mycotroph Organotrophs Photoheterotrophs Photosynthesis Photosynthetic efficiency Phototrophs Primary nutritional groups Primary production Consumers Apex predator Bacterivore Carnivores Chemoorganotroph Foraging Generalist and specialist species Intraguild predation Herbivores Heterotroph Heterotrophic nutrition Insectivore Mesopredators Mesopredator release hypothesis Omnivores Optimal foraging theory Predation Prey switching Decomposers Chemoorganoheterotrophy Decomposition Detritivores Detritus Microorganisms Archaea Bacteriophage Environmental microbiology Lithoautotroph Lithotrophy Microbial cooperation Microbial ecology Microbial food web Microbial intelligence Microbial loop Microbial mat Microbial metabolism Phage ecology Food webs Biomagnification Ecological efficiency Ecological pyramid Energy flow Food chain Trophic level Example webs Cold seeps Hydrothermal vents Intertidal Kelp forests Lakes North Pacific Subtropical Gyre Rivers San Francisco Estuary Soil Tide pool Processes Ascendency Bioaccumulation Cascade effect Climax community Competitive exclusion principle Consumer - resource systems Copiotrophs Dominance Ecological network Ecological succession Energy quality Energy Systems Language f - ratio Feed conversion ratio Feeding frenzy Mesotrophic soil Nutrient cycle Oligotroph Paradox of the plankton Trophic cascade Trophic mutualism Trophic state index Defense / counter Animal coloration Antipredator adaptations Camouflage Deimatic behaviour Herbivore adaptations to plant defense Mimicry Plant defense against herbivory Predator avoidance in schooling fish Ecology : Modelling ecosystems : Other components Population ecology Abundance Allee effect Depensation Ecological yield Effective population size Intraspecific competition Logistic function Malthusian growth model Maximum sustainable yield Overpopulation in wild animals Overexploitation Population cycle Population dynamics Population modeling Population size Predator -- prey ( Lotka -- Volterra ) equations Recruitment Resilience Small population size Stability Species Biodiversity Density - dependent inhibition Ecological effects of biodiversity Ecological extinction Endemic species Flagship species Gradient analysis Indicator species Introduced species Invasive species Latitudinal gradients in species diversity Minimum viable population Neutral theory Occupancy -- abundance relationship Population viability analysis Priority effect Rapoport 's rule Relative abundance distribution Relative species abundance Species diversity Species homogeneity Species richness Species distribution Species - area curve Umbrella species Species interaction Antibiosis Biological interaction Commensalism Community ecology Ecological facilitation Interspecific competition Mutualism Storage effect Spatial ecology Biogeography Cross-boundary subsidy Ecocline Ecotone Ecotype Disturbance Edge effects Foster 's rule Habitat fragmentation Ideal free distribution Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis Island biogeography Landscape ecology Landscape epidemiology Landscape limnology Metapopulation Patch dynamics r / K selection theory Resource selection function Source -- sink dynamics Niche Ecological niche Ecological trap Ecosystem engineer Environmental niche modelling Guild Habitat Marine habitats Limiting similarity Niche apportionment models Niche construction Niche differentiation Other networks Assembly rules Bateman 's principle Bioluminescence Ecological collapse Ecological debt Ecological deficit Ecological energetics Ecological indicator Ecological threshold Ecosystem diversity Emergence Extinction debt Kleiber 's law Liebig 's law of the minimum Marginal value theorem Thorson 's rule Xerosere Other Allometry Alternative stable state Balance of nature Biological data visualization Ecocline Ecological economics Ecological footprint Ecological forecasting Ecological humanities Ecological stoichiometry Ecopath Ecosystem based fisheries Endolith Evolutionary ecology Functional ecology Industrial ecology Macroecology Microecosystem Natural environment Regime shift Systems ecology Urban ecology Theoretical ecology List of ecology topics Retrieved from `` https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Photosynthetic_efficiency&oldid=816892760 '' Categories : Ecological metrics Photosynthesis Hidden categories : All articles that may contain original research Articles that may contain original research from November 2010 All articles lacking reliable references Articles lacking reliable references from June 2015 All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from November 2010 Talk Contents About Wikipedia Català Русский Українська Edit links This page was last edited on 24 December 2017, at 12 : 54. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution - ShareAlike License ; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia ® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. About Wikipedia

Question: what percentage of sunlight is captured by plants to convert it into food energy
Answer: 3 to 6%; 45%; 3 to 6%; 3 to 6%