Rate equation - wikipedia Rate equation The rate law or rate equation for a chemical reaction is an equation that links the reaction rate with the concentrations or pressures of the reactants and constant parameters ( normally rate coefficients and partial reaction orders ). For many reactions the rate is given by a power law such as r = k ( A ) x ( B ) y ( displaystyle r ; = ; k ( mathrm ( A ) ) ^ ( x ) ( mathrm ( B ) ) ^ ( y ) ) where ( A ) and ( B ) express the concentration of the species A and B, respectively ( usually in moles per liter ( molarity, M ) ). The exponents x and y are the partial reaction orders and must be determined experimentally ; they are not in general equal to the stoichiometric coefficients. The constant k is the reaction rate constant or rate coefficient of the reaction. The value of this coefficient k may depend on conditions such as temperature, ionic strength, surface area of an adsorbent, or light irradiation. For elementary reactions, which consist of a single step, the order equals the molecularity as predicted by collision theory. For example, a bimolecular elementary reaction A + B → products will be second order overall and first order in each reactant, with rate equation r = k ( A ) ( B ) ( displaystyle r ; = ; k ( mathrm ( A ) ) ( mathrm ( B ) ) ). For multistep reactions, the order of each step equals the molecularity, but this is not generally true for the overall rate. The rate equation of a reaction with an assumed multi-step mechanism can often be derived theoretically using quasi-steady state assumptions from the underlying elementary reactions, and compared with the experimental rate equation as a test of the assumed mechanism. The equation may involve a fractional order, and may depend on the concentration of an intermediate species. The rate equation is a differential equation and can be integrated to obtain an integrated rate equation that links concentrations of reactants or products with time. Contents 1 Zero order reactions 2 First order reactions 2.1 Further properties of first order reaction kinetics 3 Second order reactions 3.1 Pseudo-first order 4 Summary for reaction orders 0, 1, 2, and n 5 Equilibrium reactions or opposed reactions 5.1 Simple example 5.2 Generalization of simple example 6 Consecutive reactions 7 Parallel or competitive reactions 8 Stoichiometric reaction networks 9 General dynamics of unimolecular conversion 10 See also 11 References Zero order reactions A zero order reaction has a rate that is independent of the concentration of the reactant ( s ). Increasing the concentration of the reacting species will not speed up the rate of the reaction i.e. the amount of substance reacted is proportional to the time. Zero order reactions are typically found when a material that is required for the reaction to proceed, such as a surface or a catalyst, is saturated by the reactants. The rate law for a zero order reaction is r = k ( displaystyle \r = k ) where r is the reaction rate and k is the reaction rate coefficient, with the same units of concentration divided by time. If, and only if, this zeroth order reaction 1 ) occurs in a closed system, 2 ) there is no net build - up of intermediates, and 3 ) there are no other reactions occurring, it can be shown by solving a mass balance equation for the system that : r = − d ( A ) d t = k ( displaystyle r = - ( \frac ( d ( ( ce ( A ) ) ) ) ( dt ) ) = k ) If this differential equation is integrated it gives an equation often called the integrated zero order rate law. ( A ) t = − k t + ( A ) 0 ( displaystyle ( ( ce ( A ) ) ) _ ( t ) = - kt+ ( ce ( ( A ) 0 ) ) ) where ( A ) t ( displaystyle ( ( ce ( A ) ) ) _ ( t ) ) represents the concentration of the chemical of interest at a particular time, and ( A ) 0 ( displaystyle ( ce ( ( A ) 0 ) ) ) represents the initial concentration. A reaction is zero order if concentration data are plotted versus time and the result is a straight line. A plot of ( A ) t ( displaystyle ( ( ce ( A ) ) ) _ ( t ) ) vs. time t gives a straight line with a slope of − k ( displaystyle - k ). The half - life of a reaction describes the time needed for half of the reactant to be depleted ( same as the half - life involved in nuclear decay, which is a first order reaction ). For a zero order reaction the half - life is given by t 1 2 = ( A ) 0 2 k ( displaystyle t_ ( \frac ( 1 ) ( 2 ) ) = ( \frac ( ( ce ( ( A ) 0 ) ) ) ( 2k ) ) ) Example of a zero order reaction Reversed Haber process : 2 NH 3 ( g ) ⟶ 3 H 2 ( g ) + N 2 ( g ) ( displaystyle ( ce ( 2NH3 ( g ) - > ( 3H2 ( g ) ) + ( N2 ( g ) ) ) ) ) The order of a reaction can not be deduced from the chemical equation of the reaction. First order reactions See also : Order of reaction A first order reaction depends on the concentration of only one reactant ( a unimolecular reaction ). Other reactants can be present, but each will be zero order. The rate law for a reaction that is first order with respect to a reactant A is − d ( A ) d t = r = k ( A ) ( displaystyle ( \frac ( - d ( ( ce ( A ) ) ) ) ( dt ) ) = r = k ( ( ce ( A ) ) ) ) k is the first order rate constant, which has units of 1 / s or s. The integrated first order rate law is ln ⁡ ( A ) = − k t + ln ⁡ ( A ) 0 ( displaystyle ln ( ce ( ( A ) ) ) = - kt+ ln ( ce ( ( A ) 0 ) ) ) A plot of ln ⁡ ( A ) ( displaystyle ln ( ce ( ( A ) ) ) ) vs. time t gives a straight line with a slope of − k ( displaystyle - k ). The half - life of a first order reaction is independent of the starting concentration and is given by t 1 2 = ln ⁡ ( 2 ) k ( displaystyle t_ ( \frac ( 1 ) ( 2 ) ) = ( \frac ( ln ( ( 2 ) ) ) ( k ) ) ). Examples of reactions that are first order with respect to the reactant : H 2 O 2 ( l ) ⟶ H 2 O ( l ) + 1 2 O 2 ( g ) ( displaystyle ( ce ( H2O2 ( l ) - > ( H2O ( l ) ) + 1 / 2O2 ( g ) ) ) ) SO 2 Cl 2 ( l ) ⟶ SO 2 ( g ) + Cl 2 ( g ) ( displaystyle ( ce ( SO2Cl2 ( l ) - > ( SO2 ( g ) ) + Cl2 ( g ) ) ) ) 2 N 2 O 5 ( g ) ⟶ 4 NO 2 ( g ) + O 2 ( g ) ( displaystyle ( ce ( 2N2O5 ( g ) - > ( 4NO2 ( g ) ) + O2 ( g ) ) ) ) Further properties of first order reaction kinetics The integrated first order rate law ln ⁡ ( A ) = − k t + ln ⁡ ( A ) 0 ( displaystyle ln ( ce ( ( A ) ) ) = - kt+ ln ( ce ( ( A ) 0 ) ) ) is usually written in the form of the exponential decay equation A = A 0 e − k t ( displaystyle A = A_ ( 0 ) e ^ ( - kt ) ) A different ( but equivalent ) way of considering first order kinetics is as follows : The exponential decay equation can be rewritten as : A = A 0 ( e − k Δ t p ) n ( displaystyle A = A_ ( 0 ) left ( e ^ ( - k Delta t_ ( p ) ) \right ) ^ ( n ) ) where Δ t p ( displaystyle Delta t_ ( p ) ) corresponds to a specific time period and n ( displaystyle n ) is an integer corresponding to the number of time periods. At the end of each time period, the fraction of the reactant population remaining relative to the amount present at the start of the time period, f R P ( displaystyle f_ ( RP ) ), will be : A n A n − 1 = f R P = e − k Δ t p ( displaystyle ( \frac ( A_ ( n ) ) ( A_ ( n - 1 ) ) ) = f_ ( RP ) = e ^ ( - k Delta t_ ( p ) ) ) Such that after n ( displaystyle n ) time periods, the fraction of the original reactant population will be : A A 0 ≡ A n A 0 = ( e − k Δ t p ) n = ( f R P ) n = ( 1 − f B P ) n ( displaystyle ( \frac ( A ) ( A_ ( 0 ) ) ) equiv ( \frac ( A_ ( n ) ) ( A_ ( 0 ) ) ) = left ( e ^ ( - k Delta t_ ( p ) ) \right ) ^ ( n ) = left ( f_ ( RP ) \right ) ^ ( n ) = left ( 1 - f_ ( BP ) \right ) ^ ( n ) ) where : f B P ( displaystyle f_ ( BP ) ) corresponds to the fraction of the reactant population that will break down in each time period. This equation indicates that the fraction of the total amount of reactant population that will break down in each time period is independent of the initial amount present. When the chosen time period corresponds to Δ t p = ln ⁡ ( 2 ) k ( displaystyle Delta t_ ( p ) = ( \frac ( ln left ( 2 \right ) ) ( k ) ) ), the fraction of the population that will break down in each time period will be exactly 1⁄2 the amount present at the start of the time period ( i.e. the time period corresponds to the half - life of the first order reaction ). The average rate of the reaction for the n time period is given by : r a v g, n = − Δ A Δ t p = A n − 1 − A n Δ t p ( displaystyle r_ ( avg, n ) = - ( \frac ( Delta A ) ( Delta t_ ( p ) ) ) = ( \frac ( A_ ( n - 1 ) - A_ ( n ) ) ( Delta t_ ( p ) ) ) ) Therefore, the amount remaining at the end of each time period will be related to the average rate of that time period and the reactant population at the start of the time period by : A n = A n − 1 − r a v g, n Δ t p ( displaystyle A_ ( n ) = A_ ( n - 1 ) - r_ ( avg, n ) Delta t_ ( p ) ) Since the fraction of the reactant population that will break down in each time period can be expressed as : f B P = 1 − A n A n − 1 ( displaystyle f_ ( BP ) = 1 - ( \frac ( A_ ( n ) ) ( A_ ( n - 1 ) ) ) ) The amount of reactant that will break down in each time period can be related to the average rate over that time period by : f B P = r a v g, n Δ t p A n − 1 ( displaystyle f_ ( BP ) = ( \frac ( r_ ( avg, n ) Delta t_ ( p ) ) ( A_ ( n - 1 ) ) ) ) Such that the amount that remains at the end of each time period will be related to the amount present at the start of the time period according to : A n = A n − 1 ( 1 − r a v g, n Δ t p A n − 1 ) ( displaystyle A_ ( n ) = A_ ( n - 1 ) left ( 1 - ( \frac ( r_ ( avg, n ) Delta t_ ( p ) ) ( A_ ( n - 1 ) ) ) \right ) ) This equation is a recursion allowing for the calculation of the amount present after any number of time periods, without need of the rate constant, provided that the average rate for each time period is known. Second order reactions A second order reaction depends on the concentrations of one second order reactant, or two first order reactants. The reaction rate is given by r = k ( A ) 2 ( displaystyle \r = k ( ( ce ( A ) ) ) ^ ( 2 ) ) or by r = k ( A ) ( B ) ( displaystyle r = k ( ( ce ( A ) ) ) ( ( ce ( B ) ) ) ) For a reaction of type 2 A ⟶ P ( displaystyle ( ce ( 2A - > P ) ) ) ( where P ( displaystyle ( ce ( P ) ) ) is the product or products ), the rate is defined as r = − 1 2 d ( A ) d t = d ( P ) d t ( displaystyle r =- ( \frac ( 1 ) ( 2 ) ) ( \frac ( d ( ( ce ( A ) ) ) ) ( dt ) ) = ( \frac ( d ( ( ce ( P ) ) ) ) ( dt ) ) ). The derivative of ( P ) ( displaystyle ( ce ( ( P ) ) ) ) with respect to time is equal to minus one half of the derivative of ( A ) ( displaystyle ( ce ( ( A ) ) ) ) with respect to time, because for each P ( displaystyle ( ce ( P ) ) ) that is formed, two A ( displaystyle ( ce ( A ) ) ) react. Thus the speed with which A ( displaystyle ( ce ( A ) ) ) disappears is twice the speed with which P ( displaystyle ( ce ( P ) ) ) appears. In terms of the concentration of the reactant A ( displaystyle ( ce ( A ) ) ), the rate of a reaction 2 A ⟶ P ( displaystyle ( ce ( 2A - > P ) ) ) which is second - order in A is then : − d ( A ) d t = 2 r = 2 k ( A ) 2 ( displaystyle - ( \frac ( d ( ( ce ( A ) ) ) ) ( dt ) ) = 2r = 2k ( ( ce ( A ) ) ) ^ ( 2 ) ) For this case, the integrated second order rate law is 1 ( A ) = 1 ( A ) 0 + 2 kt ( displaystyle ( ce ( ( \frac ( 1 ) ( ( A ) ) ) = ( \frac ( 1 ) ( ( A ) 0 ) ) + 2kt ) ) ) If a reaction of type A + B → P is first - order in both reactants A and B, the rate is r = − d ( A ) d t = − d ( B ) d t = k ( A ) ( B ) ( displaystyle r =- ( \frac ( d ( ( ce ( A ) ) ) ) ( dt ) ) = - ( \frac ( d ( ( ce ( B ) ) ) ) ( dt ) ) = k ( A ) ( B ) ). In this case the integrated rate law is ( A ) ( B ) = ( A ) 0 ( B ) 0 e ( ( A ) 0 − ( B ) 0 ) kt ( displaystyle ( ce ( ( \frac ( ( A ) ) ( ( B ) ) ) = ( \frac ( ( A ) 0 ) ( ( B ) 0 ) ) ( mathit ( e ) ) ^ ( ( ( A ) 0 - ( B ) 0 ) ( mathit ( kt ) ) ) ) ) ), provided that the two initial concentrations ( A ) and ( B ) are not equal. For the special case of equal concentrations ( A ) = ( B ) ( displaystyle ( ce ( ( A ) = ( B ) ) ) ), the rate r = − d ( A ) d t = k ( A ) 2 ( displaystyle r = - ( \frac ( d ( ( ce ( A ) ) ) ) ( dt ) ) = k ( A ) ^ ( 2 ) ), and the integrated second order rate law is 1 ( A ) = 1 ( A ) 0 + kt ( displaystyle ( ce ( ( \frac ( 1 ) ( ( A ) ) ) = ( \frac ( 1 ) ( ( A ) 0 ) ) + ( mathit ( kt ) ) ) ) ) The half - life equation for a second order reaction dependent on one second order reactant is t 1 2 = 1 k ( A ) 0 ( displaystyle t_ ( \frac ( 1 ) ( 2 ) ) = ( \frac ( 1 ) ( k ( ce ( ( A ) 0 ) ) ) ) ). For such a reaction, the half - life progressively doubles as the concentration of the reactant falls to half its initial value. Another way to present the above rate laws is to take the log of both sides : ln ⁡ r = ln ⁡ k + 2 ln ⁡ ( A ) ( displaystyle ln ( ) r = ln ( ) k + 2 ln ( ( ce ( A ) ) ) ) Examples of a Second order reaction 2 NO 2 ( g ) ⟶ 2 NO ( g ) + O 2 ( g ) ( displaystyle ( ce ( 2NO2 ( g ) - > ( 2NO ( g ) ) + O2 ( g ) ) ) ) Pseudo-first order Measuring a second order reaction rate with reactants A and B can be problematic : The concentrations of the two reactants must be followed simultaneously, which is more difficult ; or measure one of them and calculate the other as a difference, which is less precise. A common solution for that problem is the pseudo-first order approximation. If the concentration of one reactant remains relatively constant, for example because it is supplied in great excess, its concentration can be absorbed in the expressed rate constant, obtaining the pseudo first order reaction constant. The rate then depends on the concentration only of the other reactant. If, for example, ( B ) remains constant, then : r = k ( A ) ( B ) = k ′ ( A ) ( displaystyle r = k ( ce ( ( A ) ( B ) ) ) = k ' ( ( ce ( A ) ) ) ) where k ′ = k ( B ) 0 ( displaystyle k ' = k ( ce ( ( B ) 0 ) ) ) ( k ' or k with units s ), which is identical to the first -- order equation above. One way to obtain a pseudo-first order reaction is to use a large excess of one reactant ( ( B ) ≫ ( A ) in the previous example ) so that, as the reaction progresses, only a small amount of the other reactant ( B ) is consumed, and its concentration can be considered to stay constant. By collecting k ′ ( displaystyle k ' ) for many reactions with different concentrations of ( B ) ( but always in excess ), a plot of k ' versus ( B ) gives k ( the regular second order rate constant ) as the slope. Example The hydrolysis of esters by dilute mineral acids follows pseudo-first order kinetics where the concentration of water is present in large excess. CH COOCH + H O → CH COOH + CH OH Summary for reaction orders 0, 1, 2, and n Elementary reaction steps with order 3 ( called ternary reactions ) are rare and unlikely to occur. However, overall reactions composed of several elementary steps can, of course, be of any ( including non-integer ) order. Zero order First order Second order nth order Rate Law − d ( A ) / d t = k ( displaystyle - ( d ( ( ce ( A ) ) ) ) / ( dt ) = k ) − d ( A ) / d t = k ( A ) ( displaystyle - ( d ( ( ce ( A ) ) ) ) / ( dt ) = k ( ( ce ( A ) ) ) ) − d ( A ) / d t = k ( A ) 2 ( displaystyle - ( d ( ( ce ( A ) ) ) ) / ( dt ) = k ( ( ce ( A ) ) ) ^ ( 2 ) ) − d ( A ) / d t = k ( A ) n ( displaystyle - ( d ( ( ce ( A ) ) ) ) / ( dt ) = k ( ( ce ( A ) ) ) ^ ( n ) ) Integrated Rate Law ( A ) = ( A ) 0 − k t ( displaystyle ( ce ( ( A ) = ( A ) 0 ) ) - kt ) ( A ) = ( A ) 0 e − k t ( displaystyle ( ce ( ( A ) = ( A ) 0 ) ) e ^ ( - kt ) ) 1 ( A ) = 1 ( A ) 0 + k t ( displaystyle ( \frac ( 1 ) ( ( ce ( ( A ) ) ) ) ) = ( \frac ( 1 ) ( ( ce ( ( A ) 0 ) ) ) ) + kt ) 1 ( A ) n − 1 = 1 ( A ) 0 n − 1 + ( n − 1 ) k t ( displaystyle ( \frac ( 1 ) ( ( ( ce ( A ) ) ) ^ ( n - 1 ) ) ) = ( \frac ( 1 ) ( ( ce ( ( A ) 0 ) ) ^ ( n - 1 ) ) ) + ( n - 1 ) kt ) ( Except first order ) Units of Rate Constant ( k ) M s ( displaystyle ( \rm ( \frac ( M ) ( s ) ) ) ) 1 s ( displaystyle ( \rm ( \frac ( 1 ) ( s ) ) ) ) 1 M ⋅ s ( displaystyle ( \rm ( \frac ( 1 ) ( M cdot s ) ) ) ) 1 M n − 1 ⋅ s ( displaystyle ( \frac ( 1 ) ( ( \rm ( M ) ) ^ ( n - 1 ) cdot ( \rm ( s ) ) ) ) ) Linear Plot to determine k ( A ) vs. t ln ⁡ ( ( A ) ) ( displaystyle ( ce ( ln ( ( A ) ) ) ) ) vs. t 1 ( A ) ( displaystyle ( ce ( ( \frac ( 1 ) ( ( A ) ) ) ) ) ) vs. t 1 ( A ) n − 1 ( displaystyle ( ce ( \frac ( 1 ) ( ( A ) ^ ( ( mathit ( n ) ) - 1 ) ) ) ) ) vs. t ( Except first order ) Half - life t 1 2 = ( A ) 0 2 k ( displaystyle t_ ( \frac ( 1 ) ( 2 ) ) = ( \frac ( ( ce ( ( A ) 0 ) ) ) ( 2k ) ) ) t 1 2 = ln ⁡ ( 2 ) k ( displaystyle t_ ( \frac ( 1 ) ( 2 ) ) = ( \frac ( ln ( 2 ) ) ( k ) ) ) t 1 2 = 1 k ( A ) 0 ( displaystyle t_ ( \frac ( 1 ) ( 2 ) ) = ( \frac ( 1 ) ( k ( ce ( ( A ) 0 ) ) ) ) ) t 1 2 = lim x → n 2 x − 1 − 1 ( x − 1 ) k ( A ) 0 x − 1 ( displaystyle t_ ( \frac ( 1 ) ( 2 ) ) = lim _ ( x \to n ) ( \frac ( 2 ^ ( x-1 ) - 1 ) ( ( x-1 ) k ( ce ( ( A ) 0 ) ) ^ ( x-1 ) ) ) ) ( limit only necessary in first order ) Where M stands for concentration in molarity ( mol L ), t for time, and k for the reaction rate constant. The half - life of a first order reaction is often expressed as t = 0.693 / k ( as ln2 = 0.693 ). Equilibrium reactions or opposed reactions A pair of forward and reverse reactions may define an equilibrium process. For example, A and B react into X and Y and vice versa ( s, t, u, and v are the stoichiometric coefficients ) : s A + t B ↽ − − ⇀ u X + v Y ( displaystyle ( ce ( ( ( mathit ( s ) ) A ) + ( mathit ( t ) ) B < = > ( ( mathit ( u ) ) X ) + ( ( mathit ( v ) ) Y ) ) ) ) The reaction rate expression for the above reactions ( assuming each one is elementary ) can be expressed as : r = k 1 ( A ) s ( B ) t − k 2 ( X ) u ( Y ) v ( displaystyle r = ( k_ ( 1 ) ( ( ce ( A ) ) ) ^ ( s ) ( ( ce ( B ) ) ) ^ ( t ) ) - ( k_ ( 2 ) ( ( ce ( X ) ) ) ^ ( u ) ( ( ce ( Y ) ) ) ^ ( v ) ) , ) where : k is the rate coefficient for the reaction that consumes A and B ; k is the rate coefficient for the backwards reaction, which consumes X and Y and produces A and B. The constants k and k are related to the equilibrium coefficient for the reaction ( K ) by the following relationship ( set r = 0 in balance ) : k 1 ( A ) s ( B ) t = k 2 ( X ) u ( Y ) v ( displaystyle ( k_ ( 1 ) ( ( ce ( A ) ) ) ^ ( s ) ( ( ce ( B ) ) ) ^ ( t ) = k_ ( 2 ) ( ( ce ( X ) ) ) ^ ( u ) ( ( ce ( Y ) ) ) ^ ( v ) ) , ) K = ( X ) u ( Y ) v ( A ) s ( B ) t = k 1 k 2 ( displaystyle K = ( \frac ( ( ( ce ( X ) ) ) ^ ( u ) ( ( ce ( Y ) ) ) ^ ( v ) ) ( ( ( ce ( A ) ) ) ^ ( s ) ( ( ce ( B ) ) ) ^ ( t ) ) ) = ( \frac ( k_ ( 1 ) ) ( k_ ( 2 ) ) ) ) Concentration of A ( A = 0.25 mole / l ) and B versus time reaching equilibrium k = 2 min and k = 1 min Simple example In a simple equilibrium between two species : A ↽ − − ⇀ B ( displaystyle ( ce ( A < = > B ) ) ) Where the reactions starts with an initial concentration of A, ( A ) 0 ( displaystyle ( ce ( ( A ) 0 ) ) ), with an initial concentration of 0 for B at time t = 0. Then the constant K at equilibrium is expressed as : K = d e f k f k b = ( B ) e ( A ) e ( displaystyle K ( stackrel ( mathrm ( def ) ) ( = ) ) ( \frac ( k_ ( f ) ) ( k_ ( b ) ) ) = ( \frac ( left ( ( ce ( B ) ) \right ) _ ( e ) ) ( left ( ( ce ( A ) ) \right ) _ ( e ) ) ) ) Where ( A ) e ( displaystyle ( ( ce ( A ) ) ) _ ( e ) ) and ( B ) e ( displaystyle ( ( ce ( B ) ) ) _ ( e ) ) are the concentrations of A and B at equilibrium, respectively. The concentration of A at time t, ( A ) t ( displaystyle ( ( ce ( A ) ) ) _ ( t ) ), is related to the concentration of B at time t, ( B ) t ( displaystyle ( ( ce ( B ) ) ) _ ( t ) ), by the equilibrium reaction equation : ( A ) t = ( A ) 0 − ( B ) t ( displaystyle ( ce ( ( A ) _ ( mathit ( t ) ) = ( A ) 0 - ( B ) _ ( mathit ( t ) ) ) ) ) Note that the term ( B ) 0 ( displaystyle ( ce ( ( B ) 0 ) ) ) is not present because, in this simple example, the initial concentration of B is 0. This applies even when time t is at infinity ; i.e., equilibrium has been reached : ( A ) e = ( A ) 0 − ( B ) e ( displaystyle ( ce ( ( A ) _ ( mathit ( e ) ) = ( A ) 0 - ( B ) _ ( mathit ( e ) ) ) ) ) then it follows, by the definition of K, that ( B ) e = x = k f k f + k b ( A ) 0 ( displaystyle ( ( ce ( B ) ) ) _ ( e ) = x = ( \frac ( k_ ( f ) ) ( k_ ( f ) + k_ ( b ) ) ) ( ce ( ( A ) 0 ) ) ) and, therefore, ( A ) e = ( A ) 0 − x = k b k f + k b ( A ) 0 ( displaystyle ( ( ce ( A ) ) ) _ ( e ) = ( ce ( ( A ) 0 ) ) - x = ( \frac ( k_ ( b ) ) ( k_ ( f ) + k_ ( b ) ) ) ( ce ( ( A ) 0 ) ) ) These equations allow us to uncouple the system of differential equations, and allow us to solve for the concentration of A alone. The reaction equation, given previously as : r = k 1 ( A ) s ( B ) t − k 2 ( X ) u ( Y ) v ( displaystyle r = ( k_ ( 1 ) ( ( ce ( A ) ) ) ^ ( s ) ( ( ce ( B ) ) ) ^ ( t ) ) - ( k_ ( 2 ) ( ( ce ( X ) ) ) ^ ( u ) ( ( ce ( Y ) ) ) ^ ( v ) ) , ) − d ( A ) d t = k f ( A ) t − k b ( B ) t ( displaystyle - ( \frac ( d ( ( ce ( A ) ) ) ) ( dt ) ) = ( k_ ( f ) ( ( ce ( A ) ) ) _ ( t ) ) - ( k_ ( b ) ( ( ce ( B ) ) ) _ ( t ) ) , ) The derivative is negative because this is the rate of the reaction going from A to B, and therefore the concentration of A is decreasing. To simplify annotation, let x be ( A ) t ( displaystyle ( ( ce ( A ) ) ) _ ( t ) ), the concentration of A at time t. Let x e ( displaystyle x_ ( e ) ) be the concentration of A at equilibrium. Then : − d ( A ) d t = k f ( A ) t − k b ( B ) t − d x d t = k f x − k b ( B ) t = k f x − k b ( ( A ) 0 − x ) = ( k f + k b ) x − k b ( A ) 0 ( displaystyle ( \begin ( aligned ) - ( \frac ( d ( ( ce ( A ) ) ) ) ( dt ) ) & = ( k_ ( f ) ( ( ce ( A ) ) ) _ ( t ) ) - ( k_ ( b ) ( ( ce ( B ) ) ) _ ( t ) ) - ( \frac ( dx ) ( dt ) ) & = ( k_ ( f ) x ) - ( k_ ( b ) ( ( ce ( B ) ) ) _ ( t ) ) & = ( k_ ( f ) x ) - ( k_ ( b ) ( ( ce ( ( A ) 0 ) ) - x ) ) & = ( ( k_ ( f ) + k_ ( b ) ) x ) - ( k_ ( b ) ( ce ( ( A ) 0 ) ) ) end ( aligned ) ) ) Since : k f + k b = k b ( A ) 0 x e ( displaystyle k_ ( f ) + k_ ( b ) = ( k_ ( b ) ( \frac ( ( ce ( ( A ) 0 ) ) ) ( x_ ( e ) ) ) ) ) The reaction rate becomes : d x d t = k b ( A ) 0 x e ( x e − x ) ( displaystyle ( \frac ( dx ) ( dt ) ) = ( \frac ( k_ ( b ) ( ce ( ( A ) 0 ) ) ) ( x_ ( e ) ) ) ( x_ ( e ) - x ) ) which results in : ln ⁡ ( ( A ) 0 − ( A ) e ( A ) t − ( A ) e ) = ( k f + k b ) t ( displaystyle ln left ( ( \frac ( ( ce ( ( A ) 0 ) ) - ( ( ce ( A ) ) ) _ ( e ) ) ( ( ( ce ( A ) ) ) _ ( t ) - ( ( ce ( A ) ) ) _ ( e ) ) ) \right ) = ( k_ ( f ) + k_ ( b ) ) t ) A plot of the negative natural logarithm of the concentration of A in time minus the concentration at equilibrium versus time t gives a straight line with slope k + k. By measurement of A and B the values of K and the two reaction rate constants will be known. Generalization of simple example If the concentration at the time t = 0 is different from above, the simplifications above are invalid, and a system of differential equations must be solved. However, this system can also be solved exactly to yield the following generalized expressions : ( A ) = ( A ) 0 1 k f + k b ( k b + k f e − ( k f + k b ) t ) + ( B ) 0 k b k f + k b ( 1 − e − ( k f + k b ) t ) ( displaystyle left ( ( ce ( A ) ) \right ) = ( ce ( ( A ) 0 ) ) ( \frac ( 1 ) ( k_ ( f ) + k_ ( b ) ) ) left ( k_ ( b ) + k_ ( f ) e ^ ( - left ( k_ ( f ) + k_ ( b ) \right ) t ) \right ) + ( ce ( ( B ) 0 ) ) ( \frac ( k_ ( b ) ) ( k_ ( f ) + k_ ( b ) ) ) left ( 1 - e ^ ( - left ( k_ ( f ) + k_ ( b ) \right ) t ) \right ) ) ( B ) = ( A ) 0 k f k f + k b ( 1 − e − ( k f + k b ) t ) + ( B ) 0 1 k f + k b ( k f + k b e − ( k f + k b ) t ) ( displaystyle left ( ( ce ( B ) ) \right ) = ( ce ( ( A ) 0 ) ) ( \frac ( k_ ( f ) ) ( k_ ( f ) + k_ ( b ) ) ) left ( 1 - e ^ ( - left ( k_ ( f ) + k_ ( b ) \right ) t ) \right ) + ( ce ( ( B ) 0 ) ) ( \frac ( 1 ) ( k_ ( f ) + k_ ( b ) ) ) left ( k_ ( f ) + k_ ( b ) e ^ ( - left ( k_ ( f ) + k_ ( b ) \right ) t ) \right ) ) When the equilibrium constant is close to unity and the reaction rates very fast for instance in conformational analysis of molecules, other methods are required for the determination of rate constants for instance by complete lineshape analysis in NMR spectroscopy. Consecutive reactions If the rate constants for the following reaction are k 1 ( displaystyle k_ ( 1 ) ) and k 2 ( displaystyle k_ ( 2 ) ) ; A ⟶ B ⟶ C ( displaystyle ( ce ( A - > B - > C ) ) ), then the rate equation is : For reactant A : d ( A ) d t = − k 1 ( A ) ( displaystyle ( \frac ( d ( ( ce ( A ) ) ) ) ( dt ) ) = - k_ ( 1 ) ( ( ce ( A ) ) ) ) For reactant B : d ( B ) d t = k 1 ( A ) − k 2 ( B ) ( displaystyle ( \frac ( d ( ( ce ( B ) ) ) ) ( dt ) ) = k_ ( 1 ) ( ( ce ( A ) ) ) - k_ ( 2 ) ( ( ce ( B ) ) ) ) For product C : d ( C ) d t = k 2 ( B ) ( displaystyle ( \frac ( d ( ( ce ( C ) ) ) ) ( dt ) ) = k_ ( 2 ) ( ( ce ( B ) ) ) ) With the individual concentrations scaled by the total population of reactants to become probabilities, linear systems of differential equations such as these can be formulated as a master equation. The differential equations can be solved analytically and the integrated rate equations are ( A ) = ( A ) 0 e − k 1 t ( displaystyle ( ( ce ( A ) ) ) = ( ce ( ( A ) 0 ) ) e ^ ( - k_ ( 1 ) t ) ) ( B ) = ( ( A ) 0 k 1 k 2 − k 1 ( e − k 1 t − e − k 2 t ) + ( B ) 0 e − k 2 t k 1 ≠ k 2 ( A ) 0 k 1 t e − k 1 t + ( B ) 0 e − k 1 t otherwise ( displaystyle left ( ( ce ( B ) ) \right ) = ( \begin ( cases ) ( ce ( ( A ) 0 ) ) ( \frac ( k_ ( 1 ) ) ( k_ ( 2 ) - k_ ( 1 ) ) ) left ( e ^ ( - k_ ( 1 ) t ) - e ^ ( - k_ ( 2 ) t ) \right ) + ( ce ( ( B ) 0 ) ) e ^ ( - k_ ( 2 ) t ) &k_ ( 1 ) \neq k_ ( 2 ) ( ce ( ( A ) 0 ) ) k_ ( 1 ) te ^ ( - k_ ( 1 ) t ) + ( ce ( ( B ) 0 ) ) e ^ ( - k_ ( 1 ) t ) & ( \text ( otherwise ) ) end ( cases ) ) ) ( C ) = ( ( A ) 0 ( 1 + k 1 e − k 2 t − k 2 e − k 1 t k 2 − k 1 ) + ( B ) 0 ( 1 − e − k 2 t ) + ( C ) 0 k 1 ≠ k 2 ( A ) 0 ( 1 − e − k 1 t − k 1 t e − k 1 t ) + ( B ) 0 ( 1 − e − k 1 t ) + ( C ) 0 otherwise ( displaystyle left ( ( ce ( C ) ) \right ) = ( \begin ( cases ) ( ce ( ( A ) 0 ) ) left ( 1 + ( \frac ( k_ ( 1 ) e ^ ( - k_ ( 2 ) t ) - k_ ( 2 ) e ^ ( - k_ ( 1 ) t ) ) ( k_ ( 2 ) - k_ ( 1 ) ) ) \right ) + ( ce ( ( B ) 0 ) ) left ( 1 - e ^ ( - k_ ( 2 ) t ) \right ) + ( ce ( ( C ) 0 ) ) &k_ ( 1 ) \neq k_ ( 2 ) ( ce ( ( A ) 0 ) ) left ( 1 - e ^ ( - k_ ( 1 ) t ) - k_ ( 1 ) te ^ ( - k_ ( 1 ) t ) \right ) + ( ce ( ( B ) 0 ) ) left ( 1 - e ^ ( - k_ ( 1 ) t ) \right ) + ( ce ( ( C ) 0 ) ) & ( \text ( otherwise ) ) end ( cases ) ) ) The steady state approximation leads to very similar results in an easier way. Parallel or competitive reactions Time course of two first order, competitive reactions with differing rate constants. When a substance reacts simultaneously to give two different products, a parallel or competitive reaction is said to take place. Two first order reactions A ⟶ B ( displaystyle ( ce ( A - > B ) ) ) and A ⟶ C ( displaystyle ( ce ( A - > C ) ) ), with constants k 1 ( displaystyle k_ ( 1 ) ) and k 2 ( displaystyle k_ ( 2 ) ) and rate equations − d ( A ) d t = ( k 1 + k 2 ) ( A ) ( displaystyle - ( \frac ( d ( ( ce ( A ) ) ) ) ( dt ) ) = ( k_ ( 1 ) + k_ ( 2 ) ) ( ( ce ( A ) ) ) ) ; d ( B ) d t = k 1 ( A ) ( displaystyle ( \frac ( d ( ( ( ce ( B ) ) ) ) ) ( dt ) ) = k_ ( 1 ) ( ( ( ce ( A ) ) ) ) ) and d ( C ) d t = k 2 ( A ) ( displaystyle ( \frac ( d ( ( ce ( C ) ) ) ) ( dt ) ) = k_ ( 2 ) ( ( ce ( A ) ) ) ) The integrated rate equations are then ( A ) = ( A ) 0 e − ( k 1 + k 2 ) t ( displaystyle ( ( ce ( A ) ) ) = ( ce ( ( A ) 0 ) ) e ^ ( - ( k_ ( 1 ) + k_ ( 2 ) ) t ) ) ; ( B ) = k 1 k 1 + k 2 ( A ) 0 ( 1 − e − ( k 1 + k 2 ) t ) ( displaystyle ( ( ce ( B ) ) ) = ( \frac ( k_ ( 1 ) ) ( k_ ( 1 ) + k_ ( 2 ) ) ) ( ce ( ( A ) 0 ) ) ( 1 - e ^ ( - ( k_ ( 1 ) + k_ ( 2 ) ) t ) ) ) and ( C ) = k 2 k 1 + k 2 ( A ) 0 ( 1 − e − ( k 1 + k 2 ) t ) ( displaystyle ( ( ce ( C ) ) ) = ( \frac ( k_ ( 2 ) ) ( k_ ( 1 ) + k_ ( 2 ) ) ) ( ce ( ( A ) 0 ) ) ( 1 - e ^ ( - ( k_ ( 1 ) + k_ ( 2 ) ) t ) ) ). One important relationship in this case is ( B ) ( C ) = k 1 k 2 ( displaystyle ( \frac ( ( ce ( ( B ) ) ) ) ( ( ce ( ( C ) ) ) ) ) = ( \frac ( k_ ( 1 ) ) ( k_ ( 2 ) ) ) ) One first order and one second order reaction This can be the case when studying a bimolecular reaction and a simultaneous hydrolysis ( which can be treated as pseudo order one ) takes place : the hydrolysis complicates the study of the reaction kinetics, because some reactant is being `` spent '' in a parallel reaction. For example, A reacts with R to give our product C, but meanwhile the hydrolysis reaction takes away an amount of A to give B, a byproduct : A + H 2 O ⟶ B ( displaystyle ( ce ( ( A ) + H2O - > B ) ) ) and A + R ⟶ C ( displaystyle ( ce ( ( A ) + R - > C ) ) ). The rate equations are : d ( B ) d t = k 1 ( A ) ( H 2 O ) = k 1 ′ ( A ) ( displaystyle ( \frac ( d ( ( ce ( B ) ) ) ) ( dt ) ) = k_ ( 1 ) ( ce ( ( A ) ( H2O ) ) ) = k_ ( 1 ) ' ( ( ce ( A ) ) ) ) and d ( C ) d t = k 2 ( A ) ( R ) ( displaystyle ( \frac ( d ( ( ce ( C ) ) ) ) ( dt ) ) = k_ ( 2 ) ( ce ( ( A ) ( R ) ) ) ). Where k 1 ′ ( displaystyle k_ ( 1 ) ' ) is the pseudo first order constant. The integrated rate equation for the main product ( C ) is ( C ) = ( R ) 0 ( 1 − e − k 2 k 1 ′ ( A ) 0 ( 1 − e − k 1 ′ t ) ) ( displaystyle ( ce ( ( C ) = ( R ) 0 ) ) left ( 1 - e ^ ( - ( \frac ( k_ ( 2 ) ) ( k_ ( 1 ) ' ) ) ( ce ( ( A ) 0 ) ) ( 1 - e ^ ( - k_ ( 1 ) 't ) ) ) \right ) ), which is equivalent to ln ⁡ ( R ) 0 ( R ) 0 − ( C ) = k 2 ( A ) 0 k 1 ′ ( 1 − e − k 1 ′ t ) ( displaystyle ln ( \frac ( ( ce ( ( R ) 0 ) ) ) ( ( ce ( ( R ) 0 - ( C ) ) ) ) ) = ( \frac ( k_ ( 2 ) ( ce ( ( A ) 0 ) ) ) ( k_ ( 1 ) ' ) ) ( 1 - e ^ ( - k_ ( 1 ) 't ) ) ). Concentration of B is related to that of C through ( B ) = − k 1 ′ k 2 l n ( 1 − ( C ) ( R ) 0 ) ( displaystyle ( ( ce ( B ) ) ) = - ( \frac ( k_ ( 1 ) ' ) ( k_ ( 2 ) ) ) ln left ( 1 - ( \frac ( ce ( ( C ) ) ) ( ( R ) 0 ) ) \right ) ) The integrated equations were analytically obtained but during the process it was assumed that ( A ) 0 − ( C ) ≈ ( A ) 0 ( displaystyle ( ce ( ( ( A ) 0 ) - ( C ) approx ( A ) 0 ) ) ) therefeore, previous equation for ( C ) can only be used for low concentrations of ( C ) compared to ( A ) Stoichiometric reaction networks The most general description of a chemical reaction network considers a number N ( displaystyle N ) of distinct chemical species reacting via R ( displaystyle R ) reactions. The chemical equation of the j ( displaystyle j ) - th reaction can then be written in the generic form s 1 j X 1 + s 2 j X 2... + s N j X N → k j r 1 j X 1 + r 2 j X 2 +... + r N j X N, ( displaystyle s_ ( 1j ) ( ce ( X ) ) _ ( 1 ) + s_ ( 2j ) ( ce ( X ) ) _ ( 2 ) ldots + s_ ( Nj ) ( ce ( X ) ) _ ( N ) ( ce ( - > ( k_ ( j ) ) ) ) \r_ ( 1j ) ( ce ( X ) ) _ ( 1 ) + \r_ ( 2j ) ( ce ( X ) ) _ ( 2 ) + ldots + r_ ( Nj ) ( ce ( X ) ) _ ( N ), ) which is often written in the equivalent form ∑ i = 1 N s i j X i → k j ∑ i = 1 N r i j X i. ( displaystyle sum _ ( i = 1 ) ^ ( N ) s_ ( ij ) ( ce ( X ) ) _ ( i ) ( ce ( - > ( k_ ( j ) ) ) ) sum _ ( i = 1 ) ^ ( N ) \r_ ( ij ) ( ce ( X ) ) _ ( i ). ) Here j ( displaystyle j ) is the reaction index running from 1 to R ( displaystyle R ), X i ( displaystyle ( ce ( X ) ) _ ( i ) ) denotes the i ( displaystyle i ) - th chemical species, k j ( displaystyle k_ ( j ) ) is the rate constant of the j ( displaystyle j ) - th reaction and s i j ( displaystyle s_ ( ij ) ) and r i j ( displaystyle r_ ( ij ) ) are the stoichiometric coefficients of reactants and products, respectively. The rate of such reaction can be inferred by the law of mass action f j ( ( X → ) ) = k j ∏ z = 1 N ( X z ) s z j ( displaystyle f_ ( j ) ( ( ( \vec ( ce ( X ) ) ) ) ) = k_ ( j ) prod _ ( z = 1 ) ^ ( N ) ( ( ce ( X ) ) _ ( z ) ) ^ ( s_ ( zj ) ) ) which denotes the flux of molecules per unit time and unit volume. Here ( X → ) = ( ( X 1 ), ( X 2 ), ⋅ ⋅ ⋅, ( X N ) ) ( displaystyle ( ce ( ( ( \vec ( X ) ) ) = ( ( X1 ), ( X2 ),..., ( X_ ( mathit ( N ) ) ) ) ) ) ) is the vector of concentrations. Note that this definition includes the elementary reactions : zero order reactions for which s z j = 0 ( displaystyle s_ ( zj ) = 0 ) for all z ( displaystyle z ), first order reactions for which s z j = 1 ( displaystyle s_ ( zj ) = 1 ) for a single z ( displaystyle z ), second order reactions for which s z j = 1 ( displaystyle s_ ( zj ) = 1 ) for exactly two z ( displaystyle z ), i.e., a bimolecular reaction, or s z j = 2 ( displaystyle s_ ( zj ) = 2 ) for a single z ( displaystyle z ), i.e., a dimerization reaction. Each of which are discussed in detail below. One can define the stoichiometric matrix S i j = r i j − s i j, ( displaystyle S_ ( ij ) = r_ ( ij ) - s_ ( ij ), ) denoting the net extent of molecules of i ( displaystyle i ) in reaction j ( displaystyle j ). The reaction rate equations can then be written in the general form d ( X i ) d t = ∑ j = 1 R S i j f j ( ( X → ) ). ( displaystyle ( \frac ( d ( ( ce ( X ) ) _ ( i ) ) ) ( dt ) ) = sum _ ( j = 1 ) ^ ( R ) S_ ( ij ) f_ ( j ) ( ( ( \vec ( ce ( X ) ) ) ) ). ) Note that this is the product of the stoichiometric matrix and the vector of reaction rate functions. Particular simple solutions exist in equilibrium, d ( X i ) d t = 0 ( displaystyle ( \frac ( d ( ( ce ( X ) ) _ ( i ) ) ) ( dt ) ) = 0 ), for systems composed of merely reversible reactions. In this case the rate of the forward and backward reactions are equal, a principle called detailed balance. Note that detailed balance is a property of the stoichiometric matrix S i j ( displaystyle S_ ( ij ) ) alone and does not depend on the particular form of the rate functions f j ( displaystyle f_ ( j ) ). All other cases where detailed balance is violated are commonly studied by flux balance analysis which has been developed to understand metabolic pathways. General dynamics of unimolecular conversion For a general unimolecular reaction involving interconversion of N ( displaystyle N ) different species, whose concentrations at time t ( displaystyle t ) are denoted by X 1 ( t ) ( displaystyle X_ ( 1 ) ( t ) ) through X N ( t ) ( displaystyle X_ ( N ) ( t ) ), an analytic form for the time - evolution of the species can be found. Let the rate constant of conversion from species X i ( displaystyle X_ ( i ) ) to species X j ( displaystyle X_ ( j ) ) be denoted as k i j ( displaystyle k_ ( ij ) ), and construct a rate - constant matrix K ( displaystyle K ) whose entries are the k i j ( displaystyle k_ ( ij ) ). Also, let X ( t ) = ( X 1 ( t ), X 2 ( t ),..., X N ( t ) ) T ( displaystyle X ( t ) = ( X_ ( 1 ) ( t ), X_ ( 2 ) ( t ),..., X_ ( N ) ( t ) ) ^ ( T ) ) be the vector of concentrations as a function of time. Let J = ( 1, 1, 1,..., 1 ) T ( displaystyle J = ( 1, 1, 1,..., 1 ) ^ ( T ) ) be the vector of ones. Let I ( displaystyle I ) be the N ( displaystyle N ) × N ( displaystyle N ) identity matrix. Let D i a g ( displaystyle Diag ) be the function that takes a vector and constructs a diagonal matrix whose on - diagonal entries are those of the vector. Let L − 1 ( displaystyle displaystyle ( mathcal ( L ) ) ^ ( - 1 ) ) be the inverse Laplace transform from s ( displaystyle s ) to t ( displaystyle t ). Then the time - evolved state X ( t ) ( displaystyle X ( t ) ) is given by X ( t ) = L − 1 ( ( s I + D i a g ( K J ) − K T ) − 1 X ( 0 ) ) ( displaystyle X ( t ) = displaystyle ( mathcal ( L ) ) ^ ( - 1 ) ( ( sI + Diag ( KJ ) - K ^ ( T ) ) ^ ( - 1 ) X ( 0 ) ) ), thus providing the relation between the initial conditions of the system and its state at time t ( displaystyle t ). See also Michaelis -- Menten kinetics Petersen matrix Reaction - diffusion equation Reactions on surfaces : rate equations for reactions where at least one of the reactants adsorbs onto a surface Reaction progress kinetic analysis Reaction rate Reaction rate constant Steady state approximation References Jump up ^ IUPAC Gold Book definition of rate law. See also : According to IUPAC Compendium of Chemical Terminology. Jump up ^ Walsh R, Martin E, Darvesh S. A method to describe enzyme - catalyzed reactions by combining steady state and time course enzyme kinetic parameters... Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010 Jan ; 1800 : 1 -- 5 Jump up ^ IUPAC, Compendium of Chemical Terminology, 2nd ed. ( the `` Gold Book '' ) ( 1997 ). Online corrected version : ( 2006 -- ) `` Rate of reaction ''. ^ Jump up to : NDRL Radiation Chemistry Data Center. See also : Christos Capellos and Bennon H. Bielski `` Kinetic systems : mathematical description of chemical kinetics in solution '' 1972, Wiley - Interscience ( New York ). Jump up ^ For a worked out example see : Determination of the Rotational Barrier for Kinetically Stable Conformational Isomers via NMR and 2D TLC An Introductory Organic Chemistry Experiment Gregory T. Rushton, William G. Burns, Judi M. Lavin, Yong S. Chong, Perry Pellechia, and Ken D. Shimizu J. Chem. Educ. 2007, 84, 1499. Abstract Jump up ^ José A. Manso et al. `` A Kinetic Approach to the Alkylating Potential of Carcinogenic Lactones '' Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2005, 18, ( 7 ) 1161 -- 1166 Jump up ^ Heinrich, R. and Schuster, S. ( 1996 ) The regulation of cellular systems. Chapman & Hall, New York. Jump up ^ Chen, L. and Wang, R. and Li, C. and Aihara, K. ( 2010 ) Modeling biomolecular networks in cells : structures and dynamics. Springer. Jump up ^ Szallasi, Z. and Stelling, J. and Periwal, V. ( 2006 ) System modeling in cell biology : from concepts to nuts and bolts. MIT Press Cambridge. Jump up ^ Iglesias, P.A. and Ingalls, B.P. ( 2010 ) Control theory and systems biology. MIT Press Cambridge. Basic reaction mechanisms Nucleophilic substitutions Unimolecular nucleophilic substitution ( S 1 ) Bimolecular nucleophilic substitution ( S 2 ) Nucleophilic aromatic substitution ( S Ar ) Nucleophilic internal substitution ( S i ) Nucleophilic acyl substitution Elimination reactions Unimolecular elimination ( E1 ) E1cB - elimination reaction Bimolecular elimination ( E2 ) Addition reactions Electrophilic addition Nucleophilic addition Free - radical addition Cycloaddition Related topics Elementary reaction Molecularity Stereochemistry Catalysis Collision theory Solvent effects Arrow pushing Chemical kinetics Rate equation Rate - determining step Retrieved from `` https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rate_equation&oldid=819919588 '' Categories : Chemical reactions Chemical kinetics Chemical reaction engineering Talk Contents About Wikipedia Català Čeština Cymraeg Deutsch Ελληνικά Español فارسی Italiano עברית Magyar Македонски 日本 語 Polski Português Română Simple English Српски / srpski தமிழ் Türkçe 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 12 January 2018, at 01 : 20. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution - ShareAlike License ; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia ® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. About Wikipedia

Question: rate constant of first order reaction depends on
Answer: concentration of only one reactant (a unimolecular reaction)