Epistle of James - wikipedia Epistle of James Not to be confused with Gospel of James. Books of the New Testament Gospels Matthew Mark Luke John Acts Acts of the Apostles Epistles Romans 1 Corinthians 2 Corinthians Galatians Ephesians Philippians Colossians 1 Thessalonians 2 Thessalonians 1 Timothy 2 Timothy Titus Philemon Hebrews James 1 Peter 2 Peter 1 John 2 John 3 John Jude Apocalypse Revelation New Testament manuscripts The Epistle of James ( Ancient Greek : Ἰάκωβος, translit. Iakōbos ), the Book of James, or simply James, is one of the 21 epistles ( didactic letters ) in the New Testament. The author identifies himself as `` James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ, '' who is writing to `` the twelve tribes scattered abroad '' ( James 1 : 1 ). The epistle is traditionally attributed to James the brother of Jesus ( James the Just ), and the audience is generally considered to be Jewish Christians, who were dispersed outside Palestine. Framed within an overall theme of patient perseverance during trials and temptations, James writes to encourage believers to live consistently with what they have learned in Christ. He wants his readers to mature in their faith in Christ by living what they say they believe. He condemns various sins, including pride, hypocrisy, favouritism, and slander. He encourages believers to humbly live by godly rather than worldly wisdom and to pray in all situations. Within the New Testament canon, the Epistle of James is noteworthy because it makes no reference to the death, resurrection, or divine sonship of Jesus. It refers to Jesus twice, as `` the Lord Jesus Christ '' and as `` our glorious Lord Jesus Christ '' ( James 1 : 1, 2 : 1 ). Contents 1 Authorship 2 Dating 3 Genre 4 Structure 5 Historical context 6 Doctrine 6.1 Justification 6.2 Anointing of the Sick 7 Canonicity 8 See also 9 References 10 External links Authorship According to Robert J. Foster, `` there is little consensus as to the genre, structure, dating, and authorship of the book of James. '' There are four `` commonly espoused '' views concerning authorship and dating of the Epistle of James : the letter was written by James before the Pauline Epistles, the letter was written by James after the Pauline Epistles, the letter is pseudonymous, the letter comprises material originally from James but reworked by a later editor. The writer refers to himself only as `` James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ. '' As many as six different men in the Bible are named James. Jesus had two apostles named James : James, the son of Zebedee and James, the son of Alphaeus, but it is unlikely that either of these wrote the letter. According to the Book of Acts, James, the son of Zebedee, was martyred about 44 AD. That would be very early for him to have been the writer. The other apostle James, the son of Alphaeus, is not prominent in the Scriptural record, and very little is known about him. Rather, evidence points to James, the brother of Jesus, to whom Jesus evidently had made a special appearance after his resurrection described in the New Testament. This James was prominent among the disciples. The writer of the letter of James identifies himself as `` a slave of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ '' in much the same way as did Jude, who introduced the Epistle of Jude by calling himself `` a slave of Jesus Christ, but a brother of James '' ( Jas 1 : 1 ; Jude 1 ). Furthermore, the salutation of his letter concludes with the term `` greetings '' ( Greek χαίρειν ), much like the letter on circumcision that was sent to the congregations. In the latter instance it was apparently Jesus 's brother, James, who spoke prominently in the assembly of `` the apostles and the older men '' at Jerusalem. From the middle of the 3rd century, patristic authors cited the Epistle as written by James, the brother of Jesus and a leader of the Jerusalem church. Not numbered among the Twelve Apostles unless he is identified as James the Less, James was nonetheless a very important figure : Paul described him as `` the brother of the Lord '' in Galatians 1 : 19 and as one of the three `` pillars of the Church '' in 2 : 9. Pseudonymous authorship ( 3 above ) implies that the person named `` James '' is respected and doubtless well known. Moreover, this James, brother of Jesus, is honored by the epistle written and distributed after the lifetime of James, the brother of Jesus. John Calvin and others suggested that the author was the Apostle James, son of Alphaeus, who is referred to as James the Less. The Protestant reformer Martin Luther denied it was the work of an apostle and termed it an `` epistle of straw '' as compared to some other books in the New Testament, partly because of the conflict he thought it raised with Paul on the doctrine of justification ( see below ). Dating The first page of James in Minuscule 319, a Greek minuscule manuscript of the New Testament. Many scholars consider the epistle to be written in the late 1st or early 2nd centuries : The author introduces himself merely as `` a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ '' without invoking any special family relationship to Jesus. The cultured Greek language of the Epistle, it is contended, could not have been written by a Jerusalem Jew. Some scholars argue for a primitive version of the letter composed by James and then later polished by another writer. The epistle was only gradually accepted into the canon of the New Testament. Some see parallels between James and 1 Peter, 1 Clement, and the Shepherd of Hermas and take this to reflect the socio - economic situation Christians were dealing with in the late 1st or early 2nd century. It thus could have been written anywhere in the Empire that Christians spoke Greek. There are some scholars who argued for Syria. Other scholars, such as Luke Timothy Johnson, suggest an early dating for the Epistle of James : `` The Letter of James also, according to the majority of scholars who have carefully worked through its text in the past two centuries, is among the earliest of New Testament compositions. It contains no reference to the events in Jesus ' life, but it bears striking testimony to Jesus ' words. Jesus ' sayings are embedded in James ' exhortations in a form that is clearly not dependent on the written Gospels. '' If written by James the brother of Jesus, it would have been written sometime before AD 69 ( or AD 62 ), when he was martyred. Jerusalem would also be the place of writing. The earliest extant manuscripts of James usually date to the mid-to - late 3rd century. Genre James is considered New Testament wisdom literature : `` like Proverbs and Sirach, it consists largely of moral exhortations and precepts of a traditional and eclectic nature. '' The content of James is directly parallel, in many instances, to sayings of Jesus found in the gospels of Luke and Matthew, i.e., those attributed to the hypothetical Q Source. Compare, e.g., `` Do not swear at all, either by heaven... or by the earth... Let your word be ' Yes, Yes ' or ' No, No ' ; anything more than this comes from the evil one '' ( Matthew 5 : 34, 37 ) and ``... do not swear either by heaven or by earth or by any other oath, but let your ' Yes ' be yes and your ' No ' be no, so that you may not fall under condemnation '' ( James 5 : 12 ). According to James Tabor, the epistle of James contains `` no fewer than thirty direct references, echoes, and allusions to the teachings of Jesus found in the Q source. '' Structure Some view the epistle as having no overarching outline : `` James may have simply grouped together small ' thematic essays ' without having more linear, Greco - Roman structures in mind. '' That view is generally supported by those who believe that the epistle may not be a true piece of correspondence between specific parties but an example of wisdom literature, formulated as a letter for circulation. The Catholic Encyclopedia says, `` the subjects treated of in the Epistle are many and various ; moreover, St. James not infrequently, whilst elucidating a certain point, passes abruptly to another, and presently resumes once more his former argument. '' Others view the letter as having only broad topical or thematic structure. They generally organize James under three ( Ralph Martin ) to seven ( Luke Johnson ) general key themes or segments. A third group believes that James was more purposeful in structuring his letter, linking each paragraph theologically and thematically : James, like the gospel writers, can be seen as a purposeful theologian, carefully weaving his smaller units together into larger fabrics of thought and using his overall structure to prioritize his key themes. -- Blomberg and Kamell The third view of the structuring of James is a historical approach that is supported by scholars who are not content with leaving the book as `` New Testament wisdom literature, like a small book of proverbs '' or `` like a loose collection of random pearls dropped in no particular order onto a piece of string. '' A fourth group uses modern discourse analysis or Greco - Roman rhetorical structures to describe the structure of James. The United Bible Societies ' Greek New Testament divides the letter into the following sections : Salutation ( 1 : 1 ) Faith and Wisdom ( 1 : 2 -- 8 ) Poverty and Riches ( 1 : 9 - 11 ) Trial and Temptation ( 1 : 12 -- 18 ) Hearing and Doing the Word ( 1 : 19 -- 27 ) Warning against Partiality ( 2 : 1 -- 13 ) Faith and Works ( 2 : 14 -- 26 ) The Tongue ( 3 : 1 -- 12 ) The Wisdom from Above ( 3 : 13 -- 18 ) Friendship with the World ( 4 : 1 -- 10 ) Judging a Brother ( 4 : 11 -- 12 ) Warning against Boasting ( 4 : 13 -- 17 ) Warning to the Rich ( 5 : 1 -- 6 ) Patience and Prayer ( 5 : 7 -- 20 ) Historical context Understanding the circumstances of James ' writing helps scholars better understand James ' organization of the letter. They view the epistle as having a legitimate purpose for its composition, a response to the suffering of its recipients. A 2013 journal article explores a violent historical background behind the epistle and offers the suggestion that it was indeed written by James, the brother of Jesus, and it was written before AD 62, the year he was killed. The 50s saw the growth of turmoil and violence in Roman Judea, as Jews became more and more frustrated with corruption, injustice and poverty. It continued into the 60s, four years before James was killed. War broke out with Rome and would lead to the destruction of Jerusalem and the scattering of the people. The epistle is renowned for exhortations on fighting poverty and caring for the poor in practical ways ( 1 : 26 -- 27 ; 2 : 1 - 4 ; 2 : 14 - 19 ; 5 : 1 - 6 ), standing up for the oppressed ( 2 : 1 - 4 ; 5 : 1 - 6 ) and not being `` like the world '' in the way one responds to evil in the world ( 1 : 26 - 27 ; 2 : 11 ; 3 : 13 - 18 ; 4 : 1 - 10 ). Worldly wisdom is rejected and people are exhorted to embrace heavenly wisdom, which includes peacemaking and pursuing righteousness and justice ( 3 : 13 - 18 ). This approach sees the epistle as a real letter with a real immediate purpose : to encourage Christian Jews not to revert to violence in their response to injustice and poverty but to stay focused on doing good, staying holy and to embrace the wisdom of heaven, not that of the world. Doctrine Justification Main articles : justification ( theology ), Justification by faith alone, and Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification It contains the following famous passage concerning salvation and justification : What good is it, my brothers, if someone says he has faith but does not have works ? Can that faith save him ? If a brother or sister is poorly clothed and lacking in daily food, and one of you says to them, `` Go in peace, be warmed and filled, '' without giving them the things needed for the body, what good is that ? So also faith by itself, if it does not have works, is dead. But someone will say, `` You have faith and I have works. '' Show me your faith apart from your works, and I will show you my faith by my works. You believe that God is one ; you do well. Even the demons believe -- and shudder ! Do you want to be shown, you foolish person, that faith apart from works is useless ? Was not Abraham our father justified by works when he offered up his son Isaac on the altar ? You see that faith was active along with his works, and faith was completed by his works ; and the Scripture was fulfilled that says, `` Abraham believed God, and it was counted to him as righteousness '' -- and he was called a friend of God. You see that a person is justified by works and not by faith alone. And in the same way was not also Rahab the prostitute justified by works when she received the messengers and sent them out by another way ? For as the body apart from the spirit is dead, so also faith apart from works is dead. That passage has been cited in Christian theological debates, especially regarding the doctrine of justification. Gaius Marius Victorinus ( 4th century ) associated James 's teaching on works with the heretical Symmachian sect, followers of Symmachus the Ebionite, and openly questioned whether James ' teachings were heretical. This passage has also been contrasted with the teachings of Paul the Apostle on justification. Some scholars even believe that the passage is a response to Paul. One issue in the debate is the meaning of the Greek word δικαιόω ( dikaiόō ) ' render righteous or such as he ought to be ', with some among the participants taking the view that James is responding to a misunderstanding of Paul. Roman Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy have historically argued that the passage disproves the doctrine of justification by faith alone ( or sola fide ), The early and many modern Protestants resolve the apparent conflict between James and Paul regarding faith and works in alternate ways from the Catholics and Orthodox : Paul was dealing with one kind of error while James was dealing with a different error. The errorists Paul was dealing with were people who said that works of the law were needed to be added to faith in order to help earn God 's favor. Paul countered this error by pointing out that salvation was by faith alone apart from deeds of the law ( Galatians 2 : 16 ; Romans 3 : 21 - 22 ). Paul also taught that saving faith is not dead but alive, showing thanks to God in deeds of love ( Galatians 5 : 6 ( '... since in Christ Jesus it is not being circumcised or being uncircumcised that can effect anything - only faith working through love. ' ) ). James was dealing with errorists who said that if they had faith they did n't need to show love by a life of faith ( James 2 : 14 - 17 ). James countered this error by teaching that faith is alive, showing itself to be so by deeds of love ( James 2 : 18, 26 ). James and Paul both teach that salvation is by faith alone and also that faith is never alone but shows itself to be alive by deeds of love that express a believer 's thanks to God for the free gift of salvation by faith in Jesus. Anointing of the sick The epistle is also the chief biblical text for the Anointing of the Sick. James wrote : Is anyone among you sick ? Let him call for the elders of the church, and let them pray over him, anointing him with oil in the name of the Lord. And the prayer of faith will save the one who is sick, and the Lord will raise him up. And if he has committed sins, he will be forgiven. G.A. Wells suggested that the passage was evidence of late authorship of the epistle, on the grounds that the healing of the sick being done through an official body of presbyters ( elders ) indicated a considerable development of ecclesiastical organisation `` whereas in Paul 's day to heal and work miracles pertained to believers indiscriminately ( I Corinthians, XII : 9 ). '' Canonicity See also : Antilegomena and Biblical canon The Epistle was first explicitly referred to and quoted by Origen of Alexandria, and possibly a bit earlier by Irenaeus of Lyons as well as Clement of Alexandria in a lost work according to Eusebius, although it was not mentioned by Tertullian, who was writing at the end of the Second Century. It is also absent from the Muratorian fragment, the earliest known list of New Testament books. The Epistle of James was included among the twenty - seven New Testament books first listed by Athanasius of Alexandria in his Thirty - Ninth Festal Epistle ( AD 367 ) and was confirmed as a canonical epistle of the New Testament by a series of councils in the Fourth Century. Today, virtually all denominations of Christianity consider this book to be a canonical epistle of the New Testament. In the first centuries of the Church the authenticity of the Epistle was doubted by some, including Theodore, Bishop of Mopsuestia in Cilicia. Because of the silence of several of the western churches regarding it, Eusebius classes it among the Antilegomena or contested writings ( Historia ecclesiae, 3.25 ; 2.23 ). Jerome gives a similar appraisal but adds that with time it had been universally admitted. Gaius Marius Victorinus, in his commentary on the Epistle to the Galatians, openly questioned whether the teachings of James were heretical. Its late recognition in the Church, especially in the West, may be explained by the fact that it was written for or by Jewish Christians, and therefore not widely circulated among the Gentile Churches. There is some indication that a few groups distrusted the book because of its doctrine. In Reformation times a few theologians, most notably Martin Luther in his early career, argued that this epistle should not be part of the canonical New Testament. Martin Luther 's description of the Epistle of James changes. In some cases, Luther argues that it was not written by an apostle ; but in other cases, he describes James as the work of an apostle. He even cites it as authoritative teaching from God and describes James as `` a good book, because it sets up no doctrines of men but vigorously promulgates the law of God. '' Lutherans hold that the Epistle is rightly part of the New Testament, citing its authority in the Book of Concord, however it remains part of the Lutheran antilegomena. See also Wikiquote has quotations related to : Epistle of James Abrogation of Old Covenant laws Protevangelium of James Pauline Christianity Textual variants in the Epistle of James References Jump up ^ Davids, Peter H ( 1982 ). I Howard Marshall and W Ward Gasque, ed. New International Greek Testament Commentary : The Epistle of James ( Repr. ed. ). Grand Rapids, Mich. : Eerdmans. ISBN 0802823882. Jump up ^ Evans, Craig A ( 2005 ). Craig A Evans, ed. Bible Knowledge Background Commentary : John, Hebrews - Revelation. Colorado Springs, Colo. : Victor. ISBN 0781442281. ^ Jump up to : Camerlynck, Achille ( 1910 ). `` Epistle of St James ''. The Catholic Encyclopedia. Retrieved 16 May 2012. Jump up ^ Robert J. Foster ( 23 September 2014 ). The Significance of Exemplars for the Interpretation of the Letter of James. Mohr Siebeck. p. 8. ISBN 978 - 3 - 16 - 153263 - 4. Jump up ^ Dan G. McCartney ( 1 November 2009 ). James. Baker Academic. pp. 14 --. ISBN 978 - 0 - 8010 - 2676 - 8. ^ Jump up to : McCartney, Dan G ( 2009 ). Robert W Yarbrough and Robert H Stein, ed. Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament : James. Grand Rapids : Baker Academic. ISBN 0801026768. Jump up ^ See Acts 12 : 1 -- 2 Jump up ^ See Matthew 13 : 55 ; Acts 21 : 15 -- 25 ; 1 Corinthians 15 : 7 ; and Galatians 1 : 19, 2 : 9 Jump up ^ Moo, Douglas J ( 2000 ). DA Carson, ed. The Letter of James. Grand Rapids : Wm B Eerdmans Publishing co. ISBN 0802837301. Jump up ^ Cf. James 1 : 1 and Acts 15 : 23. Jump up ^ Adam Clarke, 1821, commentary on 5 : 13, 22, 23. Jump up ^ Bechtel, Florentine. `` The Brethren of the Lord ''. Catholic Encyclopedia. Retrieved 16 May 2012. His identity with James the Less ( Mark 15 : 40 ) and the Apostle James, the son of Alpheus ( Matthew 10 : 3 ; Mark 3 : 18 ), although contested by many Protestant critics, may also be considered as certain. Jump up ^ Shillington, V. George ( 2015 ). James and Paul : The Politics of Identity at the Turn of the Ages. Minneapolis : Fortress Press. pp. 65 -- 96. ISBN 978 - 1 - 4514 - 8213 - 3. Jump up ^ `` History of the Christian Church, book 7, chapter 4 ''. Jump up ^ `` Epistle of James ''. Early Christian Writings. Retrieved 16 May 2012. ^ Jump up to : John Barton and John Muddiman, ed. ( 2001 ). The Oxford Bible Commentary. Oxford : Oxford University Press. p. 1256. ISBN 0198755007. Jump up ^ Johnson, Luke Timothy ( 1996 ). The Real Jesus. HarperOne. p. 121. ISBN 0060641665. Jump up ^ `` Epistle of James Theopedia ''. www.theopedia.com. Retrieved 2017 - 03 - 28. Jump up ^ Laws, Sophie ( 1993 ). The HarperCollins Study Bible. San Francisco : HarperCollins Publishers. p. 2052. ISBN 0060655267. Jump up ^ Tabor, James D. ( 2012 ). Paul and Jesus : How the Apostle Transformed Christianity. New York : Simon & Schuster. p. 41. ISBN 978 - 1 - 4391 - 2332 - 4. ^ Jump up to : Blomberg, Craig ( 2008 ). James. Grand Rapids : Zondervan. p. 23. ISBN 9780310244028. Jump up ^ Martin, Ralph ( 1988 ). James. Waco, TX : WBC. p. xcviii - civ. Jump up ^ Johnson, Luke ( 2000 ). The Letter of James. Grand Rapids : Pillar. pp. 11 -- 16. Jump up ^ Some numerous writers and commentators assume so, like William Barclay, The Daily Study Bible, rev. ed., 17 vols. ( Philadelphia : The Westminster Press, 1976 ), Vol 14, The Letters of James and Peter, p. 28. Jump up ^ Taylor, Mark ( 2006 ). A Linguistic Investigation into the Discource Structure of James. London : T&T Clark. ISBN 9780310244028. Jump up ^ `` Faith versus Works ''. Jump up ^ Eberhard Nestle, ed. ( 2011 ). Greek New Testament With Revised Concise Greek - English Dictionary ( 4th Revised ed. ). Hendrickson Publishers. ISBN 1598567209. Jump up ^ Jim Reiher, `` Violent Language -- a clue to the Historical Occasion of James. '' Evangelical Quarterly. Vol. LXXXV No. 3. July 2013 Jump up ^ On the death of James, see Josephus Antiquities, 20.9. 1 and Eusebius II. 23.1 - 18. Jump up ^ Numerous studies argue for a letter - structure to James. See, for example, Euan Fry, `` Commentaries on James, I and 2 Peter, and Jude, '' The Bible Translator, 41 ( July 1990 ) : 330, and F.O. Francis, `` The Form and Function of the Opening and Closing Paragraphs of James and I John, '' ZNW 61 ( 1970 ) : 110 - 126. Jump up ^ James 2 : 14 - 26, English Standard Version. Jump up ^ McKnight, Scot ( 2011 ). The Letter of James. The New International Commentary on the New Testament. Grand Rapids, Michigan : William B. Erdmans. pp. 259 -- 263. ISBN 978 - 0 - 8028 - 2627 - 5. Jump up ^ `` Dikaioo ''. Greek Lexicon. Retrieved 16 May 2012. Jump up ^ Martin, D. 2009. New Testament History & Literature : 18. Arguing with Paul. Yale University. Jump up ^ `` The Theological Virtues : 1815 ''. Catechism of the Catholic Church. The gift of faith remains in one who has not sinned against it. But ' faith apart from works is dead ' : ( Jas 2 : 26 ) when it is deprived of hope and love, faith does not fully unite the believer to Christ and does not make him a living member of his Body. Jump up ^ Schaff, Philip ( 1877 ). `` The Synod of Jerusalem and the Confession of Dositheus, A.D. 1672 : Article XIII ''. Creeds of Christendom. Harper & Brothers. Man is justified, not by faith alone, but also by works. Jump up ^ Calvin, John. `` James 2 : 20 -- 26 ''. Commentaries on the Catholic Epistles. When, therefore, the Sophists set up James against Paul, they go astray through the ambiguous meaning of a term. Jump up ^ `` Faith and Works ''. WELS Topical Q&A. Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod. Archived from the original on 20 December 2013. Retrieved 30 September 2015. Jump up ^ James 5 : 14 -- 15 ^ Jump up to : Wells, George Albert ( 1971 ). The Jesus of Early Christians. London : Pemberton. p. 152. ISBN 0301710147. Jump up ^ Davis, Glenn ( 2010 ). `` Irenaeus of Lyons ''. The Development of the Canon of the New Testament. Retrieved 16 May 2012. Jump up ^ Griggs, C Wilfred ( 1991 ). Early Egyptian Christianity ( 2nd ed. ). Leiden : Brill Academic Publisher. p. 173. ISBN 9004094075. Jump up ^ 1958 -, Cooper, Stephen Andrew,. Marius Victorinus ' `` Commentary on Galatians '' : introduction, translation, and notes. Oxford University Press. pp. 265 -- 266. ISBN 0198270275. OCLC 878694940. ^ Jump up to : The Lutheran Study Bible, Concordia Publishing House, 2009, p2132 Jump up ^ Schaff, Philip. History of the Reformation. The most important example of dogmatic influence in Luther 's version is the famous interpolation of the word alone in Rom. 3 : 28 ( allein durch den Glauben ), by which he intended to emphasize his solifidian doctrine of justification, on the plea that the German idiom required the insertion for the sake of clearness. 464 But he thereby brought Paul into direct verbal conflict with James, who says ( James 2 : 24 ), `` by works a man is justified, and not only by faith '' ( `` nicht durch den Glauben allein '' ). It is well known that Luther deemed it impossible to harmonize the two apostles in this article, and characterized the Epistle of James as an `` epistle of straw, '' because it had no evangelical character ( `` keine evangelische Art '' ). Jump up ^ Stonehouse, Ned B ( 1957 ). Paul Before the Areopagus. pp. 186 -- 197. Jump up ^ Die deutsche Bibel 41 : 578 - 90 Jump up ^ Luther 's Large Catechism, IV 122 - 24 Jump up ^ Luther 's Works ( American Edition ) 35 : 395 Jump up ^ `` Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod - Christian Cyclopedia ''. External links Bible : James public domain audiobook at LibriVox Various versions Epistle of James General Epistle Preceded by Hebrews New Testament Books of the Bible Succeeded by First Peter Epistle of James Bible James 1 5 Bible portal Persons Abraham Elijah James Jesus Christ Job Rahab Terms / phrases Elder Faith Temptation Tongue Sources Greek Text Latin Vulgate Wycliffe Version King James Version American Standard Version World English Version ← Epistle to the Hebrews ( chapter 13 ) First Epistle of Peter ( chapter 1 ) → Books of the Bible Principal divisions Hebrew Bible / Old Testament Protocanon Genesis Exodus Leviticus Numbers Deuteronomy Joshua Judges Ruth 1 -- 2 Samuel 1 -- 2 Kings 1 -- 2 Chronicles Ezra Nehemiah Esther Job Psalms Proverbs Ecclesiastes Song Isaiah Jeremiah Lamentations Ezekiel Daniel Hosea Joel Amos Obadiah Jonah Micah Nahum Habakkuk Zephaniah Haggai Zechariah Malachi Deuterocanon and Apocrypha Catholic Orthodox Tobit Judith Additions to Esther 1 Maccabees 2 Maccabees Wisdom Sirach Baruch / Letter of Jeremiah Additions to Daniel Susanna Song of the Three Children Bel and the Dragon Orthodox only 1 Esdras 2 Esdras Prayer of Manasseh Psalm 151 3 Maccabees 4 Maccabees Odes Tewahedo Orthodox Enoch Jubilees 1, 2, and 3 Meqabyan Paralipomena of Baruch Broader canon Syriac Letter of Baruch Psalms 152 -- 155 New Testament Matthew Mark Luke John Acts Romans 1 Corinthians 2 Corinthians Galatians Ephesians Philippians Colossians 1 Thessalonians 2 Thessalonians 1 Timothy 2 Timothy Titus Philemon Hebrews James 1 Peter 2 Peter 1 John 2 John 3 John Jude Revelation Subdivisions Chapters and verses Pentateuch Wisdom Major prophets / Minor prophets Gospels Synoptic Epistles Pauline Johannine Pastoral Catholic Apocalyptic literature Development Old Testament canon New Testament canon Antilegomena Jewish canon Christian canon Manuscripts Dead Sea Scrolls Samaritan Pentateuch Septuagint Targum Diatessaron Muratorian fragment Peshitta Vetus Latina Masoretic Text New Testament manuscript categories New Testament papyri New Testament uncials See also Biblical canon Luther 's canon Authorship English Bible translations Other books referenced in the Bible Pseudepigrapha list New Testament apocrypha Studies Synod of Hippo Textual criticism Portal WikiProject Book BNF : cb120083397 ( data ) GND : 4028448 - 7 SELIBR : 269835 SUDOC : 174112815 VIAF : 182251478 Retrieved from `` https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Epistle_of_James&oldid=841490395 '' Categories : Epistle of James Canonical epistles New Testament books Luther 's Antilegomena Hidden categories : Use dmy dates from October 2015 Articles containing Ancient Greek - language text All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from October 2016 Articles with unsourced statements from May 2014 Articles with LibriVox links Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with SELIBR identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Talk Contents About Wikipedia Wikiquote Wikisource Afrikaans ܐܪܡܝܐ Bân - lâm - gú Беларуская Беларуская ( тарашкевіца ) ‎ Boarisch Brezhoneg Català Čeština Cymraeg Dansk Deutsch Eesti Ελληνικά Español Esperanto Euskara فارسی Français Frysk Furlan Gaeilge गोंयची कोंकणी / Gõychi Konknni 客家 語 / Hak - kâ - ngî 한국어 Հայերեն Hrvatski Bahasa Indonesia IsiZulu Italiano עברית Basa Jawa ქართული Kinyarwanda Kiswahili Latina Latviešu Lietuvių Lumbaart Magyar Македонски Malagasy മലയാളം Mìng - dĕ̤ng - ngṳ̄ Nederlands 日本 語 Norsk Polski Português Română Runa Simi Русский Gagana Samoa Simple English Slovenčina Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska Tagalog தமிழ் ไทย Українська اردو ئۇيغۇرچە / Uyghurche Tiếng Việt Winaray Yorùbá 粵語 Zeêuws 中文 63 more Edit links This page was last edited on 16 May 2018, at 05 : 12 ( UTC ). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution - ShareAlike License ; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia ® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. About Wikipedia

Question: who wrote the book of james in bible
Answer: James the brother of Jesus (James the Just)