Commensalism - wikipedia Commensalism An interaction between two organisms living together in more or less intimate association in a relationship in which one benefits and the other is unaffected. Remora are specially adapted to attach themselves to larger fish that provide locomotion and food. Commensalism is a long term biological interaction ( symbiosis ) in which members of one species gain benefits while those of the other species neither benefit nor are harmed. This is in contrast with mutualism, in which both organisms benefit from each other, amensalism, where one is harmed while the other is unaffected, and parasitism, where one benefits while the other is harmed. The commensal ( the species that benefits from the association ) may obtain nutrients, shelter, support, or locomotion from the host species, which is substantially unaffected. The commensal relation is often between a larger host and a smaller commensal ; the host organism is unmodified, whereas the commensal species may show great structural adaptation consonant with its habits, as in the remoras that ride attached to sharks and other fishes. Both remora and pilot fish feed on the leftovers of their hosts ' meals. Numerous birds perch on bodies of large mammal herbivores or feed on the insects turned up by grazing mammals. Contents 1 Etymology 2 Examples of commensal relationships 2.1 Dogs 2.2 Aspergillus and Staphylococcus 3 Arguments 4 Types 4.1 Phoresy 4.2 Inquilinism 4.3 Metabiosis 5 See also 6 References 7 External links Etymology The word `` commensalism '' is derived from the word `` commensal '', meaning `` eating at the same table '' in human social interaction, which in turn comes through French from the Medieval Latin commensalis, meaning `` sharing a table '', from the prefix com -, meaning `` together '', and mensa, meaning `` table '' or `` meal ''. Commensality, at Oxford and Cambridge Universities, refers to professors eating at the same table as students ( as they live in the same `` college '' ). Pierre - Joseph van Beneden introduced the term `` commensalism '' in 1876. Examples of commensal relationships The commensal pathway was traveled by animals that fed on refuse around human habitats or by animals that preyed on other animals drawn to human camps. Those animals established a commensal relationship with humans in which the animals benefited but the humans received little benefit or harm. Those animals that were most capable of taking advantage of the resources associated with human camps would have been the ' tamer ' individuals : less aggressive, with shorter fight or flight distances. Later, these animals developed closer social or economic bonds with humans and lead to a domestic relationship. The leap from a synanthropic population to a domestic one could only have taken place after the animals had progressed from anthropophily to habituation, to commensalism and partnership, at which point the establishment of a reciprocal relationship between animal and human would have laid the foundation for domestication, including captivity and human - controlled breeding. From this perspective, animal domestication is a coevolutionary process in which a population responds to selective pressure while adapting to a novel niche that includes another species with evolving behaviors. Commensal pathway animals include dogs, cats, fowl, and possibly pigs. Dogs The dog was the first domesticated animal, and was domesticated and widely established across Eurasia before the end of the Pleistocene, well before the cultivation of crops or the domestication of other animals. The dog is often hypothesised to be a classic example of a domestic animal that likely traveled a commensal pathway into domestication. Archaeological evidence, such as the Bonn - Oberkassel dog dating to ~ 14,000 BP, supports the hypothesis that dog domestication preceded the emergence of agriculture and began close to the Last Glacial Maximum when hunter - gatherers preyed on megafauna. The wolves more likely drawn to human camps were the less - aggressive, subdominant pack members with lowered flight response, higher stress thresholds, and less wary around humans, and therefore better candidates for domestication. Proto - dogs might have taken advantage of carcasses left on site by early hunters, assisted in the capture of prey, or provided defense from large competing predators at kills. However, the extent to which proto - domestic wolves could have become dependent on this way of life prior to domestication and without human provisioning is unclear and highly debated. In contrast, cats may have become fully dependent on a commensal lifestyle before being domesticated by preying on other commensal animals, such as rats and mice, without any human provisioning. Debate over the extent to which some wolves were commensal with humans prior to domestication stems from debate over the level of human intentionality in the domestication process, which remains untested. The earliest sign of domestication in dogs was the neotonization of skull morphology and the shortening of snout length that results in tooth crowding, reduction in tooth size, and a reduction in the number of teeth, which has been attributed to the strong selection for reduced aggression. This process may have begun during the initial commensal stage of dog domestication, even before humans began to be active partners in the process. A mitochondrial, microsatellite, and Y - chromosome assessment of two wolf populations in North America combined with satellite telemetry data revealed significant genetic and morphological differences between one population that migrated with and preyed upon caribou and another territorial ecotype population that remained in a boreal coniferous forest. Although these two populations spend a period of the year in the same place, and though there was evidence of gene flow between them, the difference in prey -- habitat specialization has been sufficient to maintain genetic and even coloration divergence. A different study has identified the remains of a population of extinct Pleistocene Beringian wolves with unique mitochondrial signatures. The skull shape, tooth wear, and isotopic signatures suggested these remains were derived from a population of specialist megafauna hunters and scavengers that became extinct while less specialized wolf ecotypes survived. Analogous to the modern wolf ecotype that has evolved to track and prey upon caribou, a Pleistocene wolf population could have begun following mobile hunter - gatherers, thus slowly acquiring genetic and phenotypic differences that would have allowed them to more successfully adapt to the human habitat. Aspergillus and Staphylococcus See also : Aspergillus and Staphylococcus Numerous genera of bacteria and fungi live on and in the human body as part of its natural flora. The fungal genus Aspergillus is capable of living under considerable environmental stress, and thus is capable of colonising the upper gastrointestinal tract where relatively few examples of the body 's gut flora can survive due to highly acidic or alkaline conditions produced by gastric acid and digestive juices. While Aspergillus normally produces no symptoms, in individuals who are immunocompromised or suffering from existing conditions such as tuberculosis, a condition called aspergillosis can occur, in which populations of Aspergillus grow out of control. Staphylococcus aureus, a common bacterial species, is known best for its numerous pathogenic strains that can cause numerous illnesses and conditions. However, many strains of S. aureus are metabiotic commensals, and are present on roughly 20 to 30 % of the human population as part of the skin flora. S. aureus also benefits from the variable ambient conditions created by the body 's mucous membranes, and as such can be found in the oral and nasal cavities, as well as inside the ear canal. Other Staphylococcus species including S. warneri, S. lugdunensis and S. epidermidis, will also engage in commensalism for similar purposes. Arguments Whether the relationship between humans and some types of gut flora is commensal or mutualistic is still unanswered. Some biologists argue that any close interaction between two organisms is unlikely to be completely neutral for either party, and that relationships identified as commensal are likely mutualistic or parasitic in a subtle way that has not been detected. For example, epiphytes are `` nutritional pirates '' that may intercept substantial amounts of nutrients that would otherwise go to the host plant. Large numbers of epiphytes can also cause tree limbs to break or shade the host plant and reduce its rate of photosynthesis. Similarly, phoretic mites may hinder their host by making flight more difficult, which may affect its aerial hunting ability or cause it to expend extra energy while carrying these passengers. Types Phoretic mites on a fly ( Pseudolynchia canariensis ) Like all ecological interactions, commensalisms vary in strength and duration from intimate, long - lived symbioses to brief, weak interactions through intermediaries. Phoresy Phoresy is one animal attached to another exclusively for transport, mainly arthropods, examples of which are mites on insects ( such as beetles, flies or bees ), pseudoscorpions on mammals or beetles, and millipedes on birds. Phoresy can be either obligate or facultative ( induced by environmental conditions ). Inquilinism Inquilinism : Tillandsia bourgaei growing on an oak tree in Mexico Inquilinism is the use of a second organism for permanent housing. Examples are epiphytic plants ( such as many orchids ) that grow on trees, or birds that live in holes in trees. Metabiosis Metabiosis is a more indirect dependency, in which one organism creates or prepares a suitable environment for a second. Examples include maggots, which feast and develop on corpses, and hermit crabs, which use gastropod shells to protect their bodies. See also Mutualism -- where both organisms experience mutual benefit in the relationship Parasitism -- where one organism benefits at the expense of another organism. Parabiosis -- where both organisms occupy the same dwelling, but do not interfere with each other Symbiosis -- long - term interactions between different biological species, which can be mutualistic, commensal or parasitic References Jump up ^ Wilson, Edward O. ( 1975 ). `` Ch. 17 - Social Symbiosis ''. Sociobiology : The New Synthesis. Harvard University Press. p. 354. ISBN 0 - 674 - 00089 - 7. Jump up ^ Mikula, Peter ; Hadrava, Jiří ; Albrecht, Tomáš ; Tryjanowski, Piotr ( 19 March 2018 ). `` Large - scale assessment of commensalistic -- mutualistic associations between African birds and herbivorous mammals using internet photos ''. PeerJ. 6 : e4520. doi : 10.7717 / peerj. 4520. PMC 5863707. PMID 29576981. Jump up ^ Harper, Douglas. `` commensalism ''. Online Etymology Dictionary. Jump up ^ van Beneden, Pierre - Joseph ( 1876 ). Animal parasites and messmates. London, Henry S. King. link. ^ Jump up to : Zeder MA ( 2012 ). `` The domestication of animals ''. Journal of Anthropological Research. 68 : 161 -- 190. doi : 10.3998 / jar. 0521004.0068. 201. ^ Jump up to : Larson, G ( 2014 ). `` The Evolution of Animal Domestication '' ( PDF ). Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. 45 : 115 -- 36. doi : 10.1146 / annurev - ecolsys - 110512 - 135813. Jump up ^ Larson G ( 2012 ). `` Rethinking dog domestication by integrating genetics, archeology, and biogeography '' ( PDF ). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 109 : 8878 -- 83. Bibcode : 2012PNAS... 109.8878 L. doi : 10.1073 / pnas. 1203005109. PMC 3384140. PMID 22615366. Jump up ^ Janssens, L. ( 2018 ). `` A new look at an old dog : Bonn - Oberkassel reconsidered ''. Journal of Archaeological Science. 92 : 126 -- 138. doi : 10.1016 / j. jas. 2018.01. 004. Jump up ^ Vila, C. ( 1997 ). `` Multiple and ancient origins of the domestic dog ''. Science. 276 ( 5319 ) : 1687 -- 9. doi : 10.1126 / science. 276.5319. 1687. PMID 9180076. ^ Jump up to : Thalmann, O. ( 2013 ). `` Complete mitochondrial genomes of ancient canids suggest a European origin of domestic dogs ''. Science. 342 : 871 -- 874. Bibcode : 2013Sci... 342... 871T. doi : 10.1126 / science. 1243650. PMID 24233726. Jump up ^ Larson G, Fuller DQ ( 2014 ). `` The evolution of animal domestication ''. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. 45 : 217 -- 295. doi : 10.1146 / annurev - ecolsys - 110512 - 135813. Jump up ^ Hulme - Beaman A, Dobney K, Cucchi T, Searle JB ( 2016 ). `` An ecological and evolutionary framework for commensalism in anthropogenic environments ''. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 31 : 633 -- 645. doi : 10.1016 / j. tree. 2016.05. 001. CS1 maint : Multiple names : authors list ( link ) Jump up ^ Morey, Darcy F. 1992. Size, shape, and development in the evolution of the domestic dog. Journal of Archaeological Science 19 : 181 -- 204 ^ Jump up to : Lyudmila N. Trut ( 1999 ). `` Early Canid Domestication : The Farm - Fox Experiment '' ( PDF ). American Scientist. Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Society. 87 ( March -- April ) : 160 -- 169. Bibcode : 1999AmSci... 87... T. doi : 10.1511 / 1999.20. 813. Retrieved June 25, 2011. Jump up ^ Turnbull, Priscilla F., and Charles A. Reed. 1974. The fauna from the terminal Pleistocene of Palegawra Cave. Fieldiana : Anthropology 63 : 81 -- 146 Jump up ^ Musiani M, Leonard JA, Cluff H, Gates CC, Mariani S, et al. ( 2007 ). `` Differentiation of tundra / taiga and boreal coniferous forest wolves : genetics, coat colour and association with migratory caribou ''. Mol. Ecol. 16 : 4149 -- 70. doi : 10.1111 / j. 1365 - 294x. 2007.03458. x. PMID 17725575. Jump up ^ Leonard, J.A. ( 2007 ). `` Megafaunal extinctions and the disappearance of a specialized wolf ecomorph '' ( PDF ). Current Biology. 17 ( 13 ) : 1146 -- 50. doi : 10.1016 / j. cub. 2007.05. 072. PMID 17583509. Jump up ^ Wolpert, Stuart ( November 14, 2013 ). `` Dogs likely originated in Europe more than 18,000 years ago, UCLA biologists report ''. UCLA News Room. Retrieved December 10, 2014. Statement by Wayne, R.K. Jump up ^ Kluytmans J, van Belkum A, Verbrugh H ( July 1997 ). `` Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus : epidemiology, underlying mechanisms, and associated risks ''. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 10 ( 3 ) : 505 -- 20. PMC 172932. PMID 9227864. Jump up ^ Benzing, D.H. ( 1980 ) Biology of the Bromeliads. Eureka, California : Mad River Press. Jump up ^ Durden, Lance A. ( June 1991 ). `` Pseudoscorpions Associated With Mammals in Papua New Guinea ''. Biotropica. 23 ( 2 ) : 204 -- 6. doi : 10.2307 / 2388309. JSTOR 2388309. Jump up ^ Tajovský, Karel ; Mock, Andrej ; Krumpál, Miroslav ( 2001 ). `` Millipedes ( Diplopoda ) in birdsˈ nests ''. European Journal of Soil Biology. 37 ( 4 ) : 321 -- 3. doi : 10.1016 / S1164 - 5563 ( 01 ) 01108 - 6. Jump up ^ C. Michael Hogan. 2011. Commensalism. Topic Ed. M. Mcginley. Ed - in - chief C.J. Cleveland. Encyclopedia of Earth. National Council for Science and the Environment. Washington DC External links Media related to Commensalism at Wikimedia Commons `` Commensalism ''. Encyclopædia Britannica. Inter-species biological interactions in ecology Amensalism Commensalism Competition Deception in animals Inquilinism Mimicry Mutualism Neutralism Synnecrosis Parasitism Predation Carnivore Intraguild Symbiosis Cleaning symbiosis Ecology : Modelling ecosystems : Trophic components General Abiotic component Abiotic stress Behaviour Biogeochemical cycle Biomass Biotic component Biotic stress Carrying capacity Competition Ecosystem Ecosystem ecology Ecosystem model Keystone species List of feeding behaviours Metabolic theory of ecology Productivity Resource Producers Autotrophs Chemosynthesis Chemotrophs Foundation species Mixotrophs Myco - heterotrophy Mycotroph Organotrophs Photoheterotrophs Photosynthesis Photosynthetic efficiency Phototrophs Primary nutritional groups Primary production Consumers Apex predator Bacterivore Carnivores Chemoorganotroph Foraging Generalist and specialist species Intraguild predation Herbivores Heterotroph Heterotrophic nutrition Insectivore Mesopredators Mesopredator release hypothesis Omnivores Optimal foraging theory Planktivore Predation Prey switching Decomposers Chemoorganoheterotrophy Decomposition Detritivores Detritus Microorganisms Archaea Bacteriophage Environmental microbiology Lithoautotroph Lithotrophy Microbial cooperation Microbial ecology Microbial food web Microbial intelligence Microbial loop Microbial mat Microbial metabolism Phage ecology Food webs Biomagnification Ecological efficiency Ecological pyramid Energy flow Food chain Trophic level Example webs Cold seeps Hydrothermal vents Intertidal Kelp forests Lakes North Pacific Subtropical Gyre Rivers San Francisco Estuary Soil Tide pool Processes Ascendency Bioaccumulation Cascade effect Climax community Competitive exclusion principle Consumer - resource systems Copiotrophs Dominance Ecological network Ecological succession Energy quality Energy Systems Language f - ratio Feed conversion ratio Feeding frenzy Mesotrophic soil Nutrient cycle Oligotroph Paradox of the plankton Trophic cascade Trophic mutualism Trophic state index Defense, counter Animal coloration Antipredator adaptations Camouflage Deimatic behaviour Herbivore adaptations to plant defense Mimicry Plant defense against herbivory Predator avoidance in schooling fish Ecology : Modelling ecosystems : Other components Population ecology Abundance Allee effect Depensation Ecological yield Effective population size Intraspecific competition Logistic function Malthusian growth model Maximum sustainable yield Overpopulation in wild animals Overexploitation Population cycle Population dynamics Population modeling Population size Predator -- prey ( Lotka -- Volterra ) equations Recruitment Resilience Small population size Stability Species Biodiversity Density - dependent inhibition Ecological effects of biodiversity Ecological extinction Endemic species Flagship species Gradient analysis Indicator species Introduced species Invasive species Latitudinal gradients in species diversity Minimum viable population Neutral theory Occupancy -- abundance relationship Population viability analysis Priority effect Rapoport 's rule Relative abundance distribution Relative species abundance Species diversity Species homogeneity Species richness Species distribution Species - area curve Umbrella species Species interaction Antibiosis Biological interaction Commensalism Community ecology Ecological facilitation Interspecific competition Mutualism Parasitism Storage effect Symbiosis Spatial ecology Biogeography Cross-boundary subsidy Ecocline Ecotone Ecotype Disturbance Edge effects Foster 's rule Habitat fragmentation Ideal free distribution Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis Island biogeography Landscape ecology Landscape epidemiology Landscape limnology Metapopulation Patch dynamics r / K selection theory Resource selection function Source -- sink dynamics Niche Ecological niche Ecological trap Ecosystem engineer Environmental niche modelling Guild Habitat Marine habitats Limiting similarity Niche apportionment models Niche construction Niche differentiation Other networks Assembly rules Bateman 's principle Bioluminescence Ecological collapse Ecological debt Ecological deficit Ecological energetics Ecological indicator Ecological threshold Ecosystem diversity Emergence Extinction debt Kleiber 's law Liebig 's law of the minimum Marginal value theorem Thorson 's rule Xerosere Other Allometry Alternative stable state Balance of nature Biological data visualization Ecocline Ecological economics Ecological footprint Ecological forecasting Ecological humanities Ecological stoichiometry Ecopath Ecosystem based fisheries Endolith Evolutionary ecology Functional ecology Industrial ecology Macroecology Microecosystem Natural environment Regime shift Systems ecology Urban ecology Theoretical ecology List of ecology topics Retrieved from `` https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commensalism&oldid=863426826 '' Categories : Biological interactions Symbiosis Hidden categories : CS1 maint : Multiple names : authors list Wikipedia articles needing page number citations from September 2014 Articles with short description Talk Contents About Wikipedia Azərbaycanca Беларуская Беларуская ( тарашкевіца ) ‎ Български Bosanski Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Eesti Español Esperanto Euskara فارسی Français Gaeilge Galego 한국어 हिन्दी Hrvatski Íslenska Italiano עברית ქართული Қазақша Kreyòl ayisyen Kurdî Кыргызча Latina Lietuvių Magyar Македонски മലയാളം მარგალური Bahasa Melayu Nederlands 日本 語 Norsk Norsk nynorsk Oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча Polski Português Română Русский Scots Simple English Slovenščina Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi தமிழ் Türkçe Українська Tiếng Việt 中文 47 more Edit links This page was last edited on 10 October 2018, at 18 : 04 ( UTC ). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution - ShareAlike License ; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia ® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. About Wikipedia

Question: one organism benefits at the expense of another
Answer: Commensalism