Twenty - seventh amendment to the United States Constitution - wikipedia Twenty - seventh amendment to the United States Constitution This article is part of a series on the Constitution of the United States of America Preamble and Articles of the Constitution Preamble II III IV V VI VII Amendments to the Constitution Bill of Rights II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII XIII XIV XV XVI XVII XVIII XIX XX XXI XXII XXIII XXIV XXV XXVI XXVII Unratified Amendments Congressional Apportionment Titles of Nobility Corwin Child Labor Equal Rights D.C. Voting Rights History Drafting and ratification timeline Convention Signing Federalism Republicanism Full text of the Constitution and Amendments Preamble and Articles I -- VII Amendments I -- X Amendments XI -- XXVII Unratified Amendments United States portal U.S. Government portal Law portal Wikipedia book The Twenty - seventh Amendment ( Amendment XXVII ) to the United States Constitution prohibits any law that increases or decreases the salary of members of Congress from taking effect until the start of the next set of terms of office for Representatives. It is the most recent amendment to be adopted, but one of the first proposed. It was submitted by Congress to the states for ratification on September 25, 1789, along with eleven other proposed amendments. While ten of these twelve proposals were ratified in 1791 to become the Bill of Rights, what would become the Twenty - seventh Amendment and the proposed Congressional Apportionment Amendment did not get ratified by enough states for them to also come into force with the first ten amendments. The proposed congressional pay amendment was largely forgotten until 1982 when Gregory Watson researched it as a student at the University of Texas at Austin and began a new campaign for its ratification. Watson 's role has been widely popularized, since his original paper proposing the idea received a poor grade ( although a current Professor at Texas, Zachary Elkins, engineered a grade change in 2017 in light of Watson 's accomplishments ). The amendment eventually became part of the United States Constitution on May 5, 1992, completing a record - setting ratification period of 202 years, 7 months, and 10 days. Contents 1 Text 2 Historical background 2.1 Proposal by Congress 2.2 Revival of interest 3 Ratification by the states 3.1 Affirmation of ratification 4 Cost - of - living adjustments 5 Prior proposed Twenty - seventh Amendments 6 See also 7 Notes 8 References 8.1 Citations 8.2 Sources 9 External links Text No law, varying the compensation for the services of the Senators and Representatives, shall take effect, until an election of Representatives shall have intervened. The hand - written copy of the proposed Bill of Rights, 1789, cropped to just show the text that was ratified over 202 years later as the Twenty - seventh Amendment Historical background Several states raised the issue of Congressional salaries as they debated whether to ratify the Constitution. The North Carolina ratifying convention proposed several amendments to the Constitution including the following : `` The laws ascertaining the compensation of senators and representatives, for their services, shall be postponed in their operation until after the election of representatives immediately succeeding the passing thereof ; that excepted which shall first be passed on the subject. '' Virginia 's ratifying convention recommended the identical amendment. New York 's declaration of ratification was accompanied by a similar amendment proposal : `` That the Compensation for the Senators and Representatives be ascertained by standing law ; and that no alteration of the existing rate of Compensation shall operate for the Benefit of the Representatives, until after a subsequent Election shall have been had. '' Proposal by Congress This amendment was one of several proposed amendments to the Constitution introduced by Representative James Madison of Virginia in the House of Representatives on June 8, 1789. Madison 's original intent was that it be added to the end of Article I, Section 6, Clause 1 of the Constitution ( `` The Senators and Representatives shall receive a Compensation for their Services, to be ascertained by Law, and paid out of the Treasury of the United States '' ). This, along with Madison 's other proposals were referred to a committee consisting of one representative from each state. After emerging from committee, the full House debated the issue and, on August 24, 1789, passed it and sixteen other articles of amendment. The proposals went next to the Senate, which made 26 substantive alterations. On September 9, 1789, the Senate approved a culled and consolidated package of twelve articles of amendment. On September 21, 1789, a House -- Senate conference committee convened to resolve numerous differences between the House and Senate Bill of Rights proposals. On September 24, 1789, the committee issued its report, which finalized 12 proposed amendments for the House and Senate to consider. The House agreed to the conference report that same day, and the Senate concurred the next day. What would become the Twenty - seventh Amendment was listed second among the twelve proposals sent to the states for their consideration on September 25, 1789. Ten of these, numbers 3 -- 12, were ratified fifteen months later and are known collectively as the Bill of Rights. The remaining proposal, the Congressional Apportionment Amendment, has not been ratified by enough states to make it part of the Constitution. Revival of interest This proposed amendment was largely forgotten until Gregory Watson, an undergraduate student at the University of Texas at Austin, wrote a paper on the subject in 1982 for a political science course. In the paper, Watson argued that the amendment was still `` live '' and could be ratified. Watson received a `` C '' grade on his paper from one of the course 's teaching assistants. Watson appealed the grade to the course instructor, Sharon Waite, who declined to overrule the teaching assistant. Watson responded by starting a new push for ratification with a letter - writing campaign to state legislatures. In 2016, Zachary Elkins, a Professor in the Department of Government became interested in Watson 's story and began to document its origins. He tracked down Sharon Waite, who had left academia in the 1980s to run a citrus farm in the Rio Grande valley. Elkins suggested to Waite that they change Watson 's grade. In 2017, Elkins submitted a grade change form with Waite 's signature and a grade change to `` A + ''. The registrar approved a grade change to `` A '', because the university does not give grades higher than `` A ''. The U.S. Supreme Court, in its decision Coleman v. Miller, 307 U.S. 433 ( 1939 ), had ruled that the validity of state ratifications of a constitutional amendment is political in nature -- and so not a matter properly assigned to the judiciary. It also held that as a political question, it was up to Congress to determine if an amendment with no time limit for ratification was still viable after an extended lapse of time based on `` the political, social and economic conditions which have prevailed during the period since the submission of the amendment ''. When Watson began his campaign in early 1982, he was aware of ratification by six states and he erroneously believed that Virginia 's 1791 approval was the last action taken by the states. He learned in 1983 that Ohio had approved it in 1873 as a means of protest against the Salary Grab Act and learned in 1984 that Wyoming had done the same in 1978, as a protest against a congressional pay raise. Watson did not know, until after the amendment 's adoption, that Kentucky had ratified the amendment in 1792. In April 1983, Maine became the first state to ratify the amendment as a result of Watson 's campaign, followed by Colorado in April 1984. Numerous state legislatures followed suit. Michigan 's ratification on May 7, 1992, provided what was believed to be the 38th state ratification required for the archivist to certify the amendment -- Kentucky 's 1792 ratification having been overlooked. Ratification by the States Ratified amendment, 1789 -- 1792 Ratified amendment, 1873 Ratified amendment, 1978 -- 1991 Ratified amendment, May 1992 Ratified post-enactment, 1992 -- present Ratified twice ( NC : 1789 & 1989 ; KY : 1792 & 1996 ) Have not ratified amendment The Archivist did not certify the amendment until May 18, 1992, with 40 states listed as ratifying the amendment. Kentucky 's then - unknown 1792 ratification would have made it 41 states that had ratified at the time of certification, 3 more than the 38 required for a three - quarters majority. The following states ratified the Twenty - seventh Amendment : Maryland -- December 19, 1789 North Carolina -- December 22, 1789 ( reaffirmed July 4, 1989 ) South Carolina -- January 19, 1790 Delaware -- January 28, 1790 Vermont -- November 3, 1791 Virginia -- December 15, 1791 Kentucky -- June 27, 1792 ( reaffirmed March 21, 1996 ) Ohio -- May 6, 1873 Wyoming -- March 6, 1978 Maine -- April 27, 1983 Colorado -- April 22, 1984 South Dakota -- February 21, 1985 New Hampshire -- March 7, 1985 ( after rejection -- January 26, 1790 ) Arizona -- April 3, 1985 Tennessee -- May 28, 1985 Oklahoma -- July 1, 1985 New Mexico -- February 14, 1986 Indiana -- February 24, 1986 Utah -- February 25, 1986 Arkansas -- March 13, 1987 Montana -- March 17, 1987 Connecticut -- May 13, 1987 Wisconsin -- July 15, 1987 Georgia -- February 2, 1988 West Virginia -- March 10, 1988 Louisiana -- July 7, 1988 Iowa -- February 9, 1989 Idaho -- March 23, 1989 Nevada -- April 26, 1989 Alaska -- May 6, 1989 Oregon -- May 19, 1989 Minnesota -- May 22, 1989 Texas -- May 25, 1989 Kansas -- April 5, 1990 Florida -- May 31, 1990 North Dakota -- March 25, 1991 Alabama -- May 5, 1992 Missouri -- May 5, 1992 Michigan -- May 7, 1992 On May 18, 1992, the Archivist of the United States, Don W. Wilson, certified that the amendment 's ratification had been completed. Michigan 's May 7, 1992, ratification was believed to be the 38th state, but it later came to light that the Kentucky General Assembly had ratified the amendment during that state 's initial month of statehood, making Missouri the state to finalize the amendment 's addition to the Constitution. The amendment was later ratified by : 40. New Jersey -- May 7, 1992 ( After rejection -- November 20, 1789 ) 41. Illinois -- May 12, 1992 42. California -- June 26, 1992 43. Rhode Island -- June 10, 1993 ( After rejection -- June 7, 1790 ) 44. Hawaii -- April 29, 1994 45. Washington -- April 6, 1995 46. Nebraska -- April 1, 2016 Four states have not ratified the Twenty - seventh Amendment : Massachusetts, Mississippi, New York, and Pennsylvania. Affirmation of ratification In certifying that the amendment had been duly ratified, the Archivist of the United States had acted under statutory authority granted to his office by the Congress under Title 1, section 106b of the United States Code, which states : Whenever official notice is received at the National Archives and Records Administration that any amendment proposed to the Constitution of the United States has been adopted, according to the provisions of the Constitution, the Archivist of the United States shall forthwith cause the amendment to be published, with his certificate, specifying the States by which the same may have been adopted, and that the same has become valid, to all intents and purposes, as a part of the Constitution of the United States. The response in Congress was sharp. Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia scolded Wilson for certifying the amendment without congressional approval. Although Byrd supported Congressional acceptance of the amendment, he contended that Wilson had deviated from `` historic tradition '' by not waiting for Congress to consider the validity of the ratification, given the extremely long lapse of time since the amendment had been proposed. Speaker of the House Tom Foley and others called for a legal challenge to the amendment 's unusual ratification. On May 20, 1992, under the authority recognized in Coleman, and in keeping with the precedent first established regarding the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment, each house of the 102nd Congress passed its own version of a concurrent resolution agreeing that the amendment was validly ratified, despite the unorthodox period of more than 202 years for the completion of the task. The Senate 's approval of the resolution was unanimous ( 99 to 0 ) and the House vote was 414 to 3. Twenty - seventh Amendment 's certification, National Archives Cost - of - living adjustments Congressional cost - of - living adjustments ( COLA ) have been upheld against legal challenges based on this amendment. In Boehner v. Anderson, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled that the Twenty - seventh Amendment does not affect annual COLAs. In Schaffer v. Clinton, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit ruled that receiving such a COLA does not grant members of the Congress standing in federal court to challenge that COLA ; the Supreme Court did not hear either case and so has never ruled on this amendment 's effect on COLAs. Prior proposed Twenty - seventh amendments Before the adoption of the Twenty - seventh Amendment, Congress had proposed two amendments to the Constitution with each intended to be the Twenty - seventh Amendment. Either proposed amendment could have become a twenty - seventh amendment if it had been ratified by three - fourths of the states : Equal Rights Amendment -- would have barred sex - based distinctions in any federal, state, or local law. District of Columbia Voting Rights Amendment -- would have required the District of Columbia be treated the same as a state regarding congressional representation, presidential elections, and how the Constitution is amended. See also List of amendments to the United States Constitution List of proposed amendments to the United States Constitution United States Bill of Rights Notes Jump up ^ Alabama and Missouri both ratified the amendment on May 5, 1992, with the Archivist of the United States then recording Alabama as the 36th and Missouri the 37th state to ratify the amendment. References Citations Jump up ^ Berke, Richard ( May 8, 1992 ). `` 1789 Amendment Is Ratified But Now the Debate Begins ''. The New York Times. Retrieved March 24, 2016. ^ Jump up to : Largey, Matt ( March 13, 2017 ). `` He Got a Bad Grade. So, He Got the Constitution Amended. Now He 's Getting the Credit He Deserves ''. KUT. Retrieved March 14, 2017. ^ Jump up to : The U.S. Constitution and Constitutional Law. Britannica Educational Publishing. 2012. pp. 105 -- 108. ISBN 9781615307555. Jump up ^ `` Calculate Duration Between Two Dates -- Results ''. timeanddate.com. Jump up ^ `` The Bill of Rights : A Transcription ''. Archives.gov. Retrieved 4 November 2016. ^ Jump up to : Bernstein, Richard B. ( 1992 ). `` The Sleeper Wakes : The History and Legacy of the Twenty - Seventh Amendment ''. Fordham Law Review. 61 ( 3 ) : 497 -- 557. Retrieved June 9, 2013. Jump up ^ Gordon Lloyd. `` Madison 's Speech Proposing Amendments to the Constitution, June 8, 1789 ''. TeachingAmericanHistory.org. Ashland, Ohio : The Ashbrook Center at Ashland University. Retrieved November 1, 2015. Jump up ^ Labunski, Richard E. ( 2006 ). James Madison and the struggle for the Bill of Rights. Oxford University Press. pp. 235 -- 237. ISBN 978 - 0 - 19 - 518105 - 0. Jump up ^ Schwartz, Bernard ( 2002 ). The Great Rights of Mankind : A History of the American Bill of Rights ( First Rowman & Littlefield ed. ). Lanham, Maryland : Rowman & Littlefield. p. 186. ISBN 9780945612285. Retrieved June 29, 2014. Jump up ^ Frantzich, Stephen E. ( 2008 ). Citizen Democracy : Political Activists in a Cynical Age ( 3rd ed. ). New York : Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 12 -- 14. ISBN 9780742564459. Jump up ^ `` 27 : Congressional pay raises ''. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. November 27, 2002. Retrieved July 9, 2013. ^ Jump up to : Dean, John W. ( September 27, 2002 ). `` The Telling Tale of the Twenty - Seventh Amendment ''. FindLaw. Retrieved July 9, 2013. Jump up ^ Herman, Ken ( March 13, 2017 ). `` Herman : 35 years later, A+ for Austinite who got Constitution amended ? ''. mystatesman. Retrieved 2017 - 03 - 15. Jump up ^ Bomboy, Scott ( 7 May 2016 ). `` How a C - grade college term paper led to a constitutional amendment ''. National Constitution Center. Retrieved 2016 - 09 - 08. Jump up ^ Rowley, Sean ( 2 September 2014 ). `` 27th amendment aimed at congressional pay ''. Tahlequah Daily Press. Retrieved 2016 - 09 - 08. Jump up ^ webmasters, NC General Assembly. `` North Carolina General Assembly - House Bill 1052 Information / History ( 1989 - 1990 Session ) ''. www.ncleg.net. ^ Jump up to : Chapter XII, June Session 1792. The Statute Law of Kentucky : With Notes, Prælections, and Observations on the Public Acts... Frankfort : William Hunter. 1809. pp. 76 -- 77. ^ Jump up to : James J. Kilpatrick, ed. ( 1961 ). The Constitution of the United States and Amendments Thereto. Virginia Commission on Constitutional Government. p. 64. Jump up ^ Congressional Record of the 102nd Congress, Volume 138 -- Part 9, May 19, 1992, p. 11656. ^ Jump up to : Michaelis, Laura ( May 23, 1992 ). `` Both Chambers Rush to Accept 27th Amendment on Salaries ''. Congressional Quarterly. p. 1423. Jump up ^ Kyvig, David E. ( 1996 ). Explicit and Authentic Acts : Amending the U.S. Constitution, 1776 -- 1995. Lawrence : University Press of Kansas. pp. 467, 546n17. ISBN 9780700607921. ^ Jump up to : `` The Organic Laws of the United States of America ''. Retrieved 5 December 2010. Jump up ^ Young, JoAnne ( 1 April 2016 ). `` It took awhile, but add Nebraska 's name to the list ''. Lincoln Journal - Star. Retrieved 2016 - 08 - 02. Jump up ^ 30 F. 3d 156 ( D.C. Cir. 1994 ) Jump up ^ 240 F. 3d 878 ( 10th Cir. 2001 ) Sources The Constitution of the United States of America : Analysis and Interpretation. ( Senate Document No. 103 -- 6 ). ( Johnny H. Killian and George A. Costello, Eds. ), Washington, D.C. : United States Government Publishing Office. External links Wikimedia Commons has media related to Twenty - seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution. Wikisource has original text related to this article : Coleman v. Miller National Archives : Bill of Rights including Twenty - seventh Amendment Library of Congress Bill of Rights Primary Documents links page Congressional resolutions recognizing ratification : S. Con. Res. 120 H. Con. Res. 320 Certification of the 27th Amendment at National Archives Online Public Access The Unlikely Story of the 27th Amendment, interview of Gregory Watson by the Dallas County Community College District on YouTube Washington Post Constitutional podcast about the ratification of the 27th Amendment ( with transcript ) United States Constitution Articles Preamble II III IV V VI VII Amendments Ratified Bill of Rights 5 6 7 8 9 10 Others 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Pending Congressional Apportionment Titles of Nobility Corwin Amendment Child Labor Repealed Eighteenth Amendment Unsuccessful Equal Rights District of Columbia Voting Rights List of Amendments Bill of Rights ( Amendments 1 -- 10 ) Reconstruction Amendments ( Amendments 13 -- 15 ) Amendment proposals in Congress Convention to propose amendments State ratifying conventions Formation History Articles of Confederation Mount Vernon Conference Annapolis Convention Philadelphia Convention Virginia Plan New Jersey Plan Connecticut Compromise Three - Fifths Compromise Committee of Detail Signing Independence Hall Syng inkstand The Federalist Papers Anti-Federalist Papers Massachusetts Compromise Virginia Ratifying Convention Hillsborough Convention Rhode Island ratification Drafting and ratification timeline Clauses Appointments Appropriations Assistance of Counsel Bills of credit Case or Controversy Citizenship Commerce Compact Compulsory Process Confrontation Contract Copyright and Patent Double Jeopardy Due Process Equal Protection Establishment Exceptions Excessive Bail Ex post facto Extradition Free Exercise Free Speech Fugitive Slave Full Faith and Credit General Welfare Guarantee Impeachment Import - Export Ineligibility Militia Natural - born citizen Necessary and Proper New States No Religious Test Oath or Affirmation Origination Petition Postal Presentment Privileges and Immunities Privileges or Immunities Recess appointment Recommendation Self - Incrimination Speech or Debate Speedy Trial State of the Union Supremacy Suspension Take Care Takings Taxing and Spending Territorial Title of Nobility Treaty Trial by Jury Vesting Vicinage War Powers List of clauses Interpretation Concurrent powers Congressional enforcement Constitutional law Criminal procedure Criminal sentencing Dormant Commerce Clause Enumerated powers Equal footing Executive privilege Incorporation of the Bill of Rights Judicial review Nondelegation doctrine Preemption Saxbe fix Separation of church and state Separation of powers Taxation power Unitary executive theory Display and legacy National Archives Charters of Freedom Rotunda Independence Mall Constitution Day Constitution Gardens National Constitution Center Scene at the Signing of the Constitution ( painting ) A More Perfect Union ( film ) Worldwide influence US Government Portal Law Portal Wikipedia book Retrieved from `` https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Twenty-seventh_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution&oldid=826840699 '' Categories : 1992 in American politics 1992 in American law 1st United States Congress Amendments to the United States Constitution History of the United States ( 1980 -- 91 ) Legislative branch of the United States government 1789 in American law 1789 in American politics Talk Contents About Wikipedia Ænglisc Беларуская Català Deutsch Español فارسی Français 한국어 עברית Nederlands 日本 語 Polski Русский Simple English Suomi Українська Tiếng Việt 中文 9 more Edit links This page was last edited on 21 February 2018, at 08 : 24. About Wikipedia

Question: when was the last amendment passed and what was the topic
Answer: Twenty-seventh Amendment