Watchdog journalism - wikipedia Watchdog journalism Watchdog journalism informs the public about goings - on in institutions and society, especially in circumstances where a significant portion of the public would demand changes in response. This might involve : Fact - checking statements of public officials. Interviewing public figures and challenging them with problems or concerns. Beat reporting to gather information from meetings that members of the public might not otherwise attend, and to observe `` on the ground '' in broader society Investigative journalism, which involves information - gathering on a single story for a long period of time Like a literal guard dog that barks when it notices an intruder, a `` watchdog '' role involves alerting others when a problem is detected. Common subjects are the government decision - making process, illegal activity, immorality, consumer protection issues, and environmental degradation. Watchdog journalism can be located in a variety of news media, such as radio, television, Internet, and print media where it may be seen as `` a unique strength of newspapers '', and additional new media and concepts such as weblogs and citizen journalism. Watchdog journalists also are called `` watchmen '', `` agents of social control '', or `` moral guardians ''. Contents 1 Role 1.1 `` Detached watchdog '' 2 In practice 3 Criticism 4 See also 5 Notes 6 References 7 External links Role The role of a watchdog journalist can be that of a protector or guardian. The role of a watchdog journalist as a guardian is to supply the citizens with information they must have `` to prevent the abuse of power '', and to `` warn citizens about those that are doing them harm ''. In order to conduct their role as a watchdog, journalists need to have a certain distance from the powers and challenge them, as opposed to `` propagandist '' journalists, who are loyal to the ruling powers and elites. Because of the power distance and its overseeing function, watchdog journalism often officiates as the fourth estate, or is used in the context of that term. The array of topics for watchdog journalism is wide and includes `` personal scandals, financial wrongdoing, political corruption, enrichment in public office, and other types of wrongdoing ''. In order to expose wrongdoings the watchdog aims at `` finding hidden evidence ''. The aforementioned aspects are necessary for the role of the watchdog journalist to help `` maintain order '' and `` warn against disorder ''. `` Detached watchdog '' `` Detached watchdog '' journalism ( `` dedicated to objectivity, neutrality, fairness, and impartiality '' ) is one of the four identified journalism cultures in a study conducted by communication researchers Thomas Hanitzsch, Epp Lauk, and others, between 2007 and 2011. The study comparatively surveyed 2100 active journalists worldwide. It exists next to the idea of a journalist as a populist disseminator, critical change agent or opportunist facilitator. The goal of the study was to create a better understanding of journalism culture and journalistic views. The study detected four global professional milieus of journalists : the populist disseminator, detached watchdog, critical change agent, and the opportunist facilitator. The detached watchdog is an absolutely `` detached observer ''. In addition to the watchdog functions described earlier, the detached watchdog is not interventionist, but uninvolved. In order to achieve that status he has to be objective, neutral, and impartial. Still, because of his watchdog function, he articulates his `` skeptical and critical attitude towards the government and business elites ''. The detached watchdog milieu is accredited as the most prototypical of western journalism. Countries where this milieu predominated at the time of the study were Germany, Austria, United States, Switzerland, and Australia. In practice Watchdog journalism can lead to the successful resignation of power holders. A well - known example is the reporting of Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein on the Watergate scandal for The Washington Post and the subsequent resignation of U.S. president Richard Nixon in 1974. Another more recent example took place in the Philippines, where president Joseph Estrada was arrested and resigned in 2001. The daily newspaper, Pinoy Times, covered the case of Estrada till `` the ouster of Estrada ''. In a country that guarantees freedom of the press, watchdog journalism can be `` a highly effective mechanism of external control on corruption ''. Yet, the mechanisms of watchdog journalism can also work in countries that abridge freedom of the press. A journalist in authoritarian contexts might not be able to cover all topics, but can still find an important journalistic niche. For example, in China where free press is still not established or guaranteed `` the notion of the press as watchdogs of power is embedded in the self - definition of journalists ''. Here it makes a difference at whom the critique is directed. Journalists are able to criticize power abuse by individuals even when criticism pointed at major state policies is frowned upon and not feasible for established journalists. In free societies `` the idea of the media as the eyes and ears '' of the public is widely accepted. Criticism The concept of watchdog journalism is not free of criticism. The whole field of watchdog journalism has decreased over time and parts of journalism and in 2005 observers affirmed that the current period was `` not a time of rich watchdog reporting in any media ''. This comes with the framework and the problem that many journalists tend `` towards reflecting the status quo, rather than radically challenging it ''. This decrease, however, can not lead to the presumption that there are not enough critical topics to write or report about. In fact, the opposite is the case, and there is enough material to work with. While watchdog journalism in the U.S. helped to force Nixon out of office in 1974, the situation presented itself differently in 2003. During the Iraq war part of the established media turned out to take more of a `` pro-war attitude '', without adequately fulfilling their function of a critical watchdog. Many professionals in the media `` appeared to feel that it was not their role to challenge the administration ''. Critics direct the blame in part to the general public itself, however, since their interest in watchdog journalism is `` inconstant and fleeting at times ''. They also see the role of watchdog journalism as `` driven by its own interests rather than by a desire to protect the public interest ''. See also Muckraking Whistleblowing Investigative journalism Fake News Notes Jump up ^ Ward 2005 Jump up ^ Hanitzsch 2007, p. 373 Jump up ^ Berger 2000, 84 Jump up ^ Marder, 1998, p. 20 Jump up ^ Coronel, 2008, p. 3 Jump up ^ Hanitzsch, 2007, p 373 Jump up ^ Pasti 2005, p. 95 Jump up ^ Hanitzsch 2007, p 373 ^ Jump up to : Berger 2000, p. 84 ^ Jump up to : Coronel 2008, p. 2 Jump up ^ Overholser & Jamieson 2005, p. 170 Jump up ^ Gans 1979, p. 295 Jump up ^ Hanitzsch 2011, p. 481 Jump up ^ Worlds of Journalism, Pilot Study. http://www.worldsofjournalism.org/pilot.htm Jump up ^ Hanitzsch, T. ( 2011a ). Populist disseminators, detached watchdogs, critical change agents and opportunist facilitators : Professional milieus, the journalistic field and autonomy in 18 countries. International Communication Gazette, 73 ( 6 ). Jump up ^ http://www.worldsofjournalism.org/index.htm ^ Jump up to : Hanitzsch 2011, p. 485 Jump up ^ Hanitzsch 2011, p. 481 Jump up ^ Hanitzsch 2011, p. 486 Jump up ^ `` The Worlds of Journalism Study ''. The Worlds of Journalism Study. Retrieved 10 April 2018. Jump up ^ Mojares 2006, p. 8 Jump up ^ Brunetti & Weder 2003, p. 1804 Jump up ^ Coronel 2008, p. 1 Jump up ^ Yuezhi 2000, p. 589 Jump up ^ Overholser & Jamieson 2005, p. 178 Jump up ^ Overholser & Jamieson 2005, p. 179 ^ Jump up to : Kull / Ramsay / Lewis 2003, p. 593 Jump up ^ Coronel 2008, p. 13 Jump up ^ Kohut 2001, p. 52 References Berger, G. ( 2000 ) : Grave New World ? Democratic Journalism Enters the Global Twenty - first Century, Journalism Studies, 1 : 1, 81 - 99, Rhodes University, South Africa. Brunetti, Weder ( 2003 ) : Journal of Public Economics 87 ( 2003 ) 1801 -- 1824, Mainz. Collins English Dictionary ( 2009 ) : Watchdog, HarperCollins Publishers New York. Coronel, S.S. ( 2008 ) : The Media as Watchdog, Harvard. Gans, H.J. ( 1979 ). Deciding what 's news : A study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek, and Time. New York : Pantheon Books. Hanitzsch, Thomas ( 2007 ) : Deconstructing journalism culture : Towards a universal theory Communication theory 17 ( 4 ), 367 - 385. Hanitzsch, T ( 2011 ) : Populist disseminators, detached watchdogs, critical change agents, and opportunist facilitators : Professional milieus, the journalistic field and autonomy in 18 countries, International Communication Gazette 73 ( 6 ), 477 -- 494. Kohut, A. ( 2001 ) : Public Support for the Watchdog Is Fading. Colombia Journalism Review, New York. Marder, M. ( 1999 ) : Journalism - This Is Watchdog Journalism. In Nieman reports ( 53 ) Cambridge, Massachusetts Marder, M. ( 1998 ) : Watchdog Journalism - Arrogance Wins ? In Nieman reports ( 52 ) Cambridge, Massachusetts Mojares, R.B. ( 2006 ) : Biography Eugenia Duran Apostol, Ramon Magsaysay Awards Foundation. Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard ( 2012 ) : Investigative Journalism : Being a Watchdog, Getting Paid, Cambridge. http://www.nieman.harvard.edu/reports/professor.aspx?id=100016 Overholser, G. & Jamieson, K.H. ( 2005 ) : The press, Oxford University Press 2005. Pasti, S. ( 2005 ) : Two generations of contemporary Russian journalists. European Journal of Communication, 20 ( 1 ), 89 -- 115. Ward, B ( 2005 ) : Watchdog Culture : Why You Need it, How You Can Build it. In Poynter.org St. Petersburg, FL. http://www.poynter.org/how-tos/leadership-management/what-great-bosses-know/67742/watchdog-culture-why-you-need-it-how-you-can-build-it/ worldsofjournalism.org http://www.worldsofjournalism.org/pilot.htm Yuezhi, Z. ( 2000 ) : Watchdogs on Party Leashes ? Contexts and implications of investigative journalism in post-Deng China, Journalism Studies, 1 : 4, 577 - 597. External links Nieman Watchdog : Questions the Press Should Ask -- Official site ( Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard University ). News Media Watchdog Journalism Roles Journalist Reporter Editor Columnist Copy editor Meteorologist News presenter Photographer Political commentator Blogger Profession News News writing style Ethics Objectivity Values Attribution Defamation Editorial independence Journalism school Areas Arts Business Data - driven Entertainment Environment Fashion Global Medicine Politics Science Sports Technical Trade Traffic Video games Weather World Genres Advocacy Analytic Blogging Broadcast Churnalism Citizen Civic Collaborative Community Data Database Embedded Gonzo Immersion Interpretive Investigative Literary Muckraking Narrative New Journalism Non-profit journalism Online Opinion Peace Photojournalism Presstitute Scientific Visual Watchdog Social impact Fake news Fourth Estate Freedom of the press Infotainment Media bias Public relations Yellow journalism News media Newspapers Magazines TV and radio Internet News agencies Alternative media List of journalism articles Retrieved from `` https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Watchdog_journalism&oldid=837127159 '' Categories : Watchdog journalism Journalism genres Talk Contents About Wikipedia فارسی Tagalog Edit links This page was last edited on 18 April 2018, at 21 : 54. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution - ShareAlike License ; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia ® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. About Wikipedia

Question: the watchdog role of the press helps to
Answer: informs the public about goings-on in institutions and society, especially in circumstances where a significant portion of the public would demand changes in response