Trophic level - wikipedia Trophic level First trophic level. The plants in this image, and the algae and phytoplankton in the lake, are primary producers. They take nutrients from the soil or the water, and manufacture their own food by photosynthesis, using energy from the sun. The trophic level of an organism is the position it occupies in a food chain. A food chain is a succession of organisms that eat other organisms and may, in turn, be eaten themselves. The trophic level of an organism is the number of steps it is from the start of the chain. A food chain starts at trophic level 1 with primary producers such as plants, can move to herbivores at level 2, predators at level 3 and typically finish with carnivores or apex predators at level 4 or 5. The path along the chain can form either a one - way flow or a food `` web ''. Ecological communities with higher biodiversity form more complex trophic paths. The word trophic derives from the Greek τροφή ( trophē ) referring to food or nourishment. Contents 1 History 2 Overview 3 Biomass transfer efficiency 4 Evolution 5 Fractional trophic levels 6 Mean trophic level 7 FiB index 8 Tritrophic and other interactions 9 Examples 10 See also 11 References 12 External links History The concept of trophic level was developed by Raymond Lindeman ( 1942 ), based on the terminology of August Thienemann ( 1926 ) : `` producers '', `` consumers '' and `` reducers '' ( modified to `` decomposers '' by Lindeman ). Overview Consumer categories based on material eaten ( plant : green shades are live, brown shades are dead ; animal : red shades are live, purple shades are dead ; or particulate : grey shades ) and feeding strategy ( gatherer : lighter shade of each color ; miner : darker shade of each color ) The three basic ways in which organisms get food are as producers, consumers and decomposers. Producers ( autotrophs ) are typically plants or algae. Plants and algae do not usually eat other organisms, but pull nutrients from the soil or the ocean and manufacture their own food using photosynthesis. For this reason, they are called primary producers. In this way, it is energy from the sun that usually powers the base of the food chain. An exception occurs in deep - sea hydrothermal ecosystems, where there is no sunlight. Here primary producers manufacture food through a process called chemosynthesis. Consumers ( heterotrophs ) are species that can not manufacture their own food and need to consume other organisms. Animals that eat primary producers ( like plants ) are called herbivores. Animals that eat other animals are called carnivores, and animals that eat both plant and other animals are called omnivores. Decomposers ( detritivores ) break down dead plant and animal material and wastes and release it again as energy and nutrients into the ecosystem for recycling. Decomposers, such as bacteria and fungi ( mushrooms ), feed on waste and dead matter, converting it into inorganic chemicals that can be recycled as mineral nutrients for plants to use again. Trophic levels can be represented by numbers, starting at level 1 with plants. Further trophic levels are numbered subsequently according to how far the organism is along the food chain. Level 1 : Plants and algae make their own food and are called producers. Level 2 : Herbivores eat plants and are called primary consumers. Level 3 : Carnivores that eat herbivores are called secondary consumers. Level 4 : Carnivores that eat other carnivores are called tertiary consumers. Level 5 : Apex predators that have no predators are at the top of the food chain. Second trophic level Rabbits eat plants at the first trophic level, so they are primary consumers. Third trophic level Foxes eat rabbits at the second trophic level, so they are secondary consumers. Fourth trophic level Golden eagles eat foxes at the third trophic level, so they are tertiary consumers. Decomposers The fungi on this tree feed on dead matter, converting it back to nutrients that primary producers can use. In real world ecosystems, there is more than one food chain for most organisms, since most organisms eat more than one kind of food or are eaten by more than one type of predator. A diagram that sets out the intricate network of intersecting and overlapping food chains for an ecosystem is called its food web. Decomposers are often left off food webs, but if included, they mark the end of a food chain. Thus food chains start with primary producers and end with decay and decomposers. Since decomposers recycle nutrients, leaving them so they can be reused by primary producers, they are sometimes regarded as occupying their own trophic level. Biomass transfer efficiency An energy pyramid illustrates how much energy is needed as it flows upward to support the next trophic level. This diagram is not to scale, because only about 10 % of the energy transferred between each trophic level is converted to biomass. In general, each trophic level relates to the one below it by absorbing some of the energy it consumes, and in this way can be regarded as resting on, or supported by, the next lower trophic level. Food chains can be diagrammed to illustrate the amount of energy that moves from one feeding level to the next in a food chain. This is called an energy pyramid. The energy transferred between levels can also be thought of as approximating to a transfer in biomass, so energy pyramids can also be viewed as biomass pyramids, picturing the amount of biomass that results at higher levels from biomass consumed at lower levels. The efficiency with which energy or biomass is transferred from one trophic level to the next is called the ecological efficiency. Consumers at each level convert on average only about 10 % of the chemical energy in their food to their own organic tissue ( the ten - percent law ). For this reason, food chains rarely extend for more than 5 or 6 levels. At the lowest trophic level ( the bottom of the food chain ), plants convert about 1 % of the sunlight they receive into chemical energy. It follows from this that the total energy originally present in the incident sunlight that is finally embodied in a tertiary consumer is about 0.001 % Evolution Both the number of trophic levels and the complexity of relationships between them evolve as life diversifies through time, the exception being intermittent mass extinction events. Fractional trophic levels Killer whales ( orca ) are apex predators but they are divided into separate populations hunting specific preys varying from tuna, small sharks, and seals. Food webs largely define ecosystems, and the trophic levels define the position of organisms within the webs. But these trophic levels are not always simple integers, because organisms often feed at more than one trophic level. For example, some carnivores also eat plants, and some plants are carnivores. A large carnivore may eat both smaller carnivores and herbivores ; the bobcat eats rabbits, but the mountain lion eats both bobcats and rabbits. Animals can also eat each other ; the bullfrog eats crayfish and crayfish eat young bullfrogs. The feeding habits of a juvenile animal, and, as a consequence, its trophic level, can change as it grows up. The fisheries scientist Daniel Pauly sets the values of trophic levels to one in plants and detritus, two in herbivores and detritivores ( primary consumers ), three in secondary consumers, and so on. The definition of the trophic level, TL, for any consumer species is : T L i = 1 + ∑ j ( T L j ⋅ D C i j ) ( displaystyle TL_ ( i ) = 1 + sum _ ( j ) ( TL_ ( j ) cdot DC_ ( ij ) ) ! ) where T L j ( displaystyle TL_ ( j ) ) is the fractional trophic level of the prey j, and D C i j ( displaystyle DC_ ( ij ) ) represents the fraction of j in the diet of i. In the case of marine ecosystems, the trophic level of most fish and other marine consumers takes value between 2.0 and 5.0. The upper value, 5.0, is unusual, even for large fish, though it occurs in apex predators of marine mammals, such as polar bears and killer whales. In addition to observational studies of animal behavior, and quantification of animal stomach contents, trophic level can be quantified through stable isotope analysis of animal tissues such as muscle, skin, hair, bone collagen. This is because there is a consistent increase in the nitrogen isotopic composition at each trophic level caused by fractionations that occur with the synthesis of biomolecules ; the magnitude of this increase in nitrogen isotopic composition is approximately 3 -- 4 ‰. Mean trophic level The mean trophic level of the world fisheries catch has steadily declined because many high trophic level fish, such as this tuna, have been overfished In fisheries, the mean trophic level for the fisheries catch across an entire area or ecosystem is calculated for year y as : T L y = ∑ i ( T L i ⋅ Y i y ) ∑ i Y i y ( displaystyle TL_ ( y ) = ( \frac ( sum _ ( i ) ( TL_ ( i ) cdot Y_ ( iy ) ) ) ( sum _ ( i ) Y_ ( iy ) ) ) ) where Y i y ( displaystyle Y_ ( iy ) ) is the catch of the species or group i in year y, and T L i ( displaystyle TL_ ( i ) ) is the trophic level for species i as defined above. Fish at higher trophic levels usually have a higher economic value, which can result in overfishing at the higher trophic levels. Earlier reports found precipitous declines in mean trophic level of fisheries catch, in a process known as fishing down the food web. However, more recent work finds no relation between economic value and trophic level ; and that mean trophic levels in catches, surveys and stock assessments have not in fact declined, suggesting that fishing down the food web is not a global phenomenon. However Pauly et al. note that trophic levels peaked at 3.4 in 1970 in the northwest and west - central Atlantic, followed by a subsequent decline to 2.9 in 1994. They report a shift away from long - lived, piscivorous, high - trophic - level bottom fishes, such as cod and haddock, to short - lived, planktivorous, low - trophic - level invertebrates ( e.g., shrimps ) and small, pelagic fish ( e.g., herrings ). This shift from high - trophic - level fishes to low - trophic - level invertebrates and fishes is a response to changes in the relative abundance of the preferred catch. They argue this is part of the global fishery collapse. FiB index Since biomass transfer efficiencies are only about 10 %, it follows that the rate of biological production is much greater at lower trophic levels than it is at higher levels. Fisheries catches, at least to begin with, will tend to increase as the trophic level declines. At this point the fisheries will target species lower in the food web. In 2000, this led Pauly and others to construct a `` Fisheries in Balance '' index, usually called the FiB index. The FiB index is defined, for any year y, by F i B y = log ⁡ Y y / ( T E ) T L y Y 0 / ( T E ) T L 0 ( displaystyle FiB_ ( y ) = log ( \frac ( Y_ ( y ) / ( TE ) ^ ( TL_ ( y ) ) ) ( Y_ ( 0 ) / ( TE ) ^ ( TL_ ( 0 ) ) ) ) ) where Y y ( displaystyle Y_ ( y ) ) is the catch at year y, T L y ( displaystyle ( TL ) _ ( y ) ) is the mean trophic level of the catch at year y, Y 0 ( displaystyle Y_ ( 0 ) ) is the catch, T L 0 ( displaystyle ( TL ) _ ( 0 ) ) the mean trophic level of the catch at the start of the series being analyzed, and T E ( displaystyle TE ) is the transfer efficiency of biomass or energy between trophic levels. The FiB index is stable ( zero ) over periods of time when changes in trophic levels are matched by appropriate changes in the catch in the opposite direction. The index increases if catches increase for any reason, e.g. higher fish biomass, or geographic expansion. Such decreases explain the `` backward - bending '' plots of trophic level versus catch originally observed by Pauly and others in 1998. Tritrophic and other interactions One aspect of trophic levels is called tritrophic interaction. Ecologists often restrict their research to two trophic levels as a way of simplifying the analysis ; however, this can be misleading if tritrophic interactions ( such as plant -- herbivore -- predator ) are not easily understood by simply adding pairwise interactions ( plant -- herbivore plus herbivore -- predator, for example ). Significant interactions can occur between the first trophic level ( plant ) and the third trophic level ( a predator ) in determining herbivore population growth, for example. Simple genetic changes may yield morphological variants in plants that then differ in their resistance to herbivores because of the effects of the plant architecture on enemies of the herbivore. Plants can also develop defenses against herbivores such as chemical defenses. Examples Depending on the nature of the species the precise trophic level of the species may be somewhat ambiguous and its precise value may vary depending on the source. Virtually all plants as well as phytoplankton and similar organisms are classified at level 1.0. Many worms would be typically classified at level 2.1 ; a typical insect 2.2 ; a jellyfish 3.0 ; a typical bird 3.6. A 2013 study published in the National Academy of Sciences estimates the average trophic level of human beings at 2.21, similar to pigs or anchovy. This is only an average, and plainly both modern and ancient human eating habits are complex and vary greatly. For example, a traditional Eskimo living on a diet consisting primarily of seals would have a trophic level of nearly 5. See also Cascade effect Energy flow ( ecology ) Mesopredator release hypothesis Trophic cascade Trophic state index -- applied to lakes Trophic dynamics -- Food web References Jump up ^ `` Definition of TROPHIC ''. www.merriam-webster.com. Retrieved 2017 - 04 - 16. Jump up ^ Lindeman, R.L. ( 1942 ). The trophic - dynamic aspect of ecology. Ecology 23 : 399 -- 418. link. Jump up ^ Thienemann, A. 1926. Der Nahrungskreislauf im Wasser. Verh. deutsch. Zool. Ges., 31 : 29 - 79, link. ( Also at : Zool. Anz. Suppl., 2 : 29 - 79. ) Jump up ^ Science of Earth Systems. Cengage Learning. 2002. ISBN 978 - 0 - 7668 - 3391 - 3. Jump up ^ The Ecology of Deep - sea Hydrothermal Vents. Princeton University Press. 2000. ISBN 978 - 0 - 691 - 04929 - 8. ^ Jump up to : Lisowski M, Miaoulis I, Cyr M, Jones LC, Padilla MJ, Wellnitz TR ( 2004 ) Prentice Hall Science Explorer : Environmental Science, Pearson Prentice Hall. ISBN 978 - 0 - 13 - 115090 - 4 ^ Jump up to : American Heritage Science Dictionary, 2005. Houghton Mifflin Company. ^ Jump up to : Pauly, D. ; Palomares, M.L. ( 2005 ). `` Fishing down marine food webs : it is far more pervasive than we thought '' ( PDF ). Bulletin of Marine Science. 76 ( 2 ) : 197 -- 211. Archived from the original ( PDF ) on 2013 - 05 - 14. Jump up ^ Sahney, S. & Benton, M.J. ( 2008 ). `` Recovery from the most profound mass extinction of all time '' ( PDF ). Proceedings of the Royal Society B : Biological Sciences. 275 ( 1636 ) : 759 -- 65. doi : 10.1098 / rspb. 2007.1370. PMC 2596898. PMID 18198148. Jump up ^ Odum WE and Heald EJ ( 1975 ) `` The detritus - based food web of an estuarine mangrove community ''. Pages 265 -- 286 in L.E. Cronin, ed. Estuarine research. Vol. 1. Academic Press, New York. Jump up ^ Pimm, SL ; Lawton, JH ( 1978 ). `` On feeding on more than one trophic level ''. Nature. 275 ( 5680 ) : 542 -- 544. doi : 10.1038 / 275542a0. Jump up ^ Cortés, E ( 1999 ). `` Standardized diet compositions and trophic levels of sharks ''. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 56 ( 5 ) : 707 -- 717. doi : 10.1006 / jmsc. 1999.0489. ^ Jump up to : Pauly, D ; Trites, A ; Capuli, E ; Christensen, V ( 1998 ). `` Diet composition and trophic levels of marine mammals ''. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 55 ( 3 ) : 467 -- 481. doi : 10.1006 / jmsc. 1997.0280. Jump up ^ Szpak, Paul ; Orchard, Trevor J. ; McKechnie, Iain ; Gröcke, Darren R. ( 2012 ). `` Historical Ecology of Late Holocene Sea Otters ( Enhydra lutris ) from Northern British Columbia : Isotopic and Zooarchaeological Perspectives ''. Journal of Archaeological Science. 39 ( 5 ) : 1553 -- 1571. doi : 10.1016 / j. jas. 2011.12. 006. Jump up ^ Gorlova, E.N. ; Krylovich, O.A. ; Tiunov, A.V. ; Khasanov, B.F. ; Vasyukov, D.D. ; Savinetsky, A.B. ( March 2015 ). `` Stable - Isotope Analysis as a Method of Taxonomical Identification of Archaeozoological Material ''. Archaeology, Ethnology and Anthropology of Eurasia. 43 ( 1 ) : 110 -- 121. doi : 10.1016 / j. aeae. 2015.07. 013. Jump up ^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment ( 2005 ) Ecosystems and Human Well - being : Synthesis Island Press. pp. 32 -- 33. Jump up ^ Sethi, SA ; Branch, TA ; Watson, R ( 2010 ). `` Global fishery development patterns are driven by profit but not trophic level ''. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 107 ( 27 ) : 12163 -- 12167. doi : 10.1073 / pnas. 1003236107. PMC 2901455. PMID 20566867. Jump up ^ Branch, TA ; Watson, Reg ; Fulton, Elizabeth A. ; Jennings, Simon ; McGilliard, Carey R. ; Pablico, Grace T. ; Ricard, Daniel ; Tracey, Sean R. ( 2010 ). `` Trophic fingerprint of marine fisheries '' ( PDF ). Nature. 468 ( 7322 ) : 431 -- 435. doi : 10.1038 / nature09528. PMID 21085178. Archived from the original ( PDF ) on 2014 - 02 - 09. ^ Jump up to : Pauly, D ; Christensen v, V ; Dalsgaard, J ; Froese, R ; Torres Jr, FC Jr ( 1998 ). `` Fishing down marine food webs ''. Science. 279 ( 5352 ) : 860 -- 863. doi : 10.1126 / science. 279.5352. 860. PMID 9452385. Jump up ^ Pauly, D ; Christensen, V ; Walters, C ( 2000 ). `` Ecopath, Ecosim and Ecospace as tools for evaluating ecosystem impact of fisheries ''. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 57 ( 3 ) : 697 -- 706. doi : 10.1006 / jmsc. 2000.0726. Jump up ^ Kareiva, Peter ; Sahakian, Robert ( 1990 ). `` Letters to Nature : Tritrophic effects of a simple architectural mutation in pea plants ''. Nature. 35 ( 6274 ) : 433 -- 434. doi : 10.1038 / 345433a0. Jump up ^ PW Price ; CE Bouton ; P Gross ; BA McPheron ; JN Thompson ; Weis, and A.E. ( 1980 - 01 - 01 ). `` Interactions Among Three Trophic Levels : Influence of Plants on Interactions Between Insect Herbivores and Natural Enemies ''. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 11 ( 1 ) : 41 -- 65. doi : 10.1146 / annurev. es. 11.110180. 000353. Jump up ^ Biodiversity and Morphology : Table 3.5 in Fish on line, Version 3, August 2014. FishBase Jump up ^ Yirka, Bob ( December 3, 2013 ). `` Eating up the world 's food web and the human trophic level ''. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 110 : 20617 -- 20620. doi : 10.1073 / pnas. 1305827110. PMC 3870703. Lay summary -- Phys.org. Jump up ^ Campbell, Bernard Grant ( 1995 - 01 - 01 ). Human Ecology : The Story of Our Place in Nature from Prehistory to the Present. p. 12. ISBN 9780202366609. External links Trophic levels BBC. Last updated March 2004. Ecology : Modelling ecosystems : Trophic components General Abiotic component Abiotic stress Behaviour Biogeochemical cycle Biomass Biotic component Biotic stress Carrying capacity Competition Ecosystem Ecosystem ecology Ecosystem model Keystone species List of feeding behaviours Metabolic theory of ecology Productivity Resource Producers Autotrophs Chemosynthesis Chemotrophs Foundation species Mixotrophs Myco - heterotrophy Mycotroph Organotrophs Photoheterotrophs Photosynthesis Photosynthetic efficiency Phototrophs Primary nutritional groups Primary production Consumers Apex predator Bacterivore Carnivores Chemoorganotroph Foraging Generalist and specialist species Intraguild predation Herbivores Heterotroph Heterotrophic nutrition Insectivore Mesopredators Mesopredator release hypothesis Omnivores Optimal foraging theory Planktivore Predation Prey switching Decomposers Chemoorganoheterotrophy Decomposition Detritivores Detritus Microorganisms Archaea Bacteriophage Environmental microbiology Lithoautotroph Lithotrophy Microbial cooperation Microbial ecology Microbial food web Microbial intelligence Microbial loop Microbial mat Microbial metabolism Phage ecology Food webs Biomagnification Ecological efficiency Ecological pyramid Energy flow Food chain Trophic level Example webs Cold seeps Hydrothermal vents Intertidal Kelp forests Lakes North Pacific Subtropical Gyre Rivers San Francisco Estuary Soil Tide pool Processes Ascendency Bioaccumulation Cascade effect Climax community Competitive exclusion principle Consumer - resource systems Copiotrophs Dominance Ecological network Ecological succession Energy quality Energy Systems Language f - ratio Feed conversion ratio Feeding frenzy Mesotrophic soil Nutrient cycle Oligotroph Paradox of the plankton Trophic cascade Trophic mutualism Trophic state index Defense, counter Animal coloration Antipredator adaptations Camouflage Deimatic behaviour Herbivore adaptations to plant defense Mimicry Plant defense against herbivory Predator avoidance in schooling fish Ecology : Modelling ecosystems : Other components Population ecology Abundance Allee effect Depensation Ecological yield Effective population size Intraspecific competition Logistic function Malthusian growth model Maximum sustainable yield Overpopulation in wild animals Overexploitation Population cycle Population dynamics Population modeling Population size Predator -- prey ( Lotka -- Volterra ) equations Recruitment Resilience Small population size Stability Species Biodiversity Density - dependent inhibition Ecological effects of biodiversity Ecological extinction Endemic species Flagship species Gradient analysis Indicator species Introduced species Invasive species Latitudinal gradients in species diversity Minimum viable population Neutral theory Occupancy -- abundance relationship Population viability analysis Priority effect Rapoport 's rule Relative abundance distribution Relative species abundance Species diversity Species homogeneity Species richness Species distribution Species - area curve Umbrella species Species interaction Antibiosis Biological interaction Commensalism Community ecology Ecological facilitation Interspecific competition Mutualism Parasitism Storage effect Symbiosis Spatial ecology Biogeography Cross-boundary subsidy Ecocline Ecotone Ecotype Disturbance Edge effects Foster 's rule Habitat fragmentation Ideal free distribution Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis Island biogeography Landscape ecology Landscape epidemiology Landscape limnology Metapopulation Patch dynamics r / K selection theory Resource selection function Source -- sink dynamics Niche Ecological niche Ecological trap Ecosystem engineer Environmental niche modelling Guild Habitat Marine habitats Limiting similarity Niche apportionment models Niche construction Niche differentiation Other networks Assembly rules Bateman 's principle Bioluminescence Ecological collapse Ecological debt Ecological deficit Ecological energetics Ecological indicator Ecological threshold Ecosystem diversity Emergence Extinction debt Kleiber 's law Liebig 's law of the minimum Marginal value theorem Thorson 's rule Xerosere Other Allometry Alternative stable state Balance of nature Biological data visualization Ecocline Ecological economics Ecological footprint Ecological forecasting Ecological humanities Ecological stoichiometry Ecopath Ecosystem based fisheries Endolith Evolutionary ecology Functional ecology Industrial ecology Macroecology Microecosystem Natural environment Regime shift Systems ecology Urban ecology Theoretical ecology List of ecology topics Aquatic ecosystem topics Aquatic ecosystems -- general and freshwater components General Acoustic ecology Adaptation Agent - based models Algal bloom Anoxic waters Aquatic animals ( Insects Mammals ) Aquatic plants Aquatic science Benthos Biodiversity research Bioluminescence Biomass Biomonitoring Cascade effect Colored dissolved organic matter Camouflage and mimicry Dead zone Ecohydrology Ecosystems Eutrophication Fisheries science Food chain Food web GIS and aquatic science Hydrobiology Hypoxia Isotope analysis Microbial ecology Microbial food web Microbial loop Nekton Neuston Particle Pelagic zone Photic zone Phytoplankton Plankton Pleuston Predation Productivity Ramsar Convention Respiration Schooling Sediment trap Siltation Spawning Substrate Thermal pollution Toxicology Trophic level Water column Zooplankton More... Freshwater Biology Biomes Ecosystems freshwater lake river Fish Hyporheic zone Limnology Lake stratification Macrophyte Pond Fish pond Rheotaxis Stream bed Stream pool Trophic state index Upland and lowland Water garden Wetland brackish marsh freshwater marsh swamp bog fen Environmental quality More... Ecoregions Freshwater ( List ) Marine ( List ) The Everglades Maharashtra The North Pacific Subtropical Gyre The San Francisco Estuary Aquatic ecosystems -- marine components Marine Marine biology Marine chemistry Deep scattering layer Diel vertical migration Ecosystems large marine marine ) f - ratio Iron fertilization Marine snow Ocean nourishment Oceanic physical - biological process Ocean turbidity Photophore Thorson 's rule Upwelling Whale fall More... Marine life Bacteriophages Census Fish coastal coral reef deep sea demersal pelagic Deep sea communities Deep sea creature Deep - water coral Invertebrates Larvae Mammals Marine life Microorganisms Paradox of the plankton Reptiles Seabirds Seashore wildlife Vertebrates Wild fisheries Marine habitats Bay mud Coastal biogeomorphology Cold seeps Coral reefs Davidson Seamount Estuaries Intertidal ecology Intertidal wetlands Kelp forests Hydrothermal vents Lagoons Mangroves Marine biomes Marine habitats Mudflats Rocky shores Salt marshes Salt pannes and pools Seagrass meadows Sponge grounds Sponge reefs Tide pools Issues Ecological values of mangroves Fisheries and climate change HERMIONE Marine conservation Marine conservation activism Marine pollution Marine Protected Area Retrieved from `` https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Trophic_level&oldid=853988724 '' Categories : Fisheries Ecology Talk Contents About Wikipedia Català Dansk Deutsch Eesti Español Français Galego 한국어 Italiano עברית Norsk Polski Português Simple English Slovenščina Suomi Svenska Українська Tiếng Việt 中文 11 more Edit links This page was last edited on 8 August 2018, at 06 : 05 ( UTC ). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution - ShareAlike License ; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia ® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. About Wikipedia

Question: predators of herbivores belong to which trophic level
Answer: Level 3