Review petition - wikipedia Review petition In India, a binding decision of the Supreme Court / High Court can be reviewed in Review Petition. The parties aggrieved on any order of the Supreme Court on any apparent error can file a review petition. Taking into consideration the principle of stare decisis, courts generally do not unsettle a decision, without a strong case. This provision regarding review is an exemption to the legal principle of stare decisis. Article 137 of the Constitution provides that subject to provisions of any law and rule made under Article 145 the Supreme Court of India has the power to review any judgement pronounced ( or order made ) by it. Under Supreme Court Rules, 1966 such a petition needs to be filed within 30 days from the date of judgement or order. It is also recommended that the petition should be circulated without oral arguments to the same bench of judges that delivered the judgement ( or order ) sought to be reviewed. Furthermore, even after dismissal of a review petition, the SC may consider a curative petition in order to prevent abuse of its process and to cure gross miscarriage of justice. While a civil review petition can be moved in accordance with Order XLVII, Rule 1 ( 1 ) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 a criminal review petition can be moved only on the ground of an error apparent on the face of the record. ( Source : CPC, 1908 and CRPC, 1973 ) Contents 1 Prominent cases 1.1 2G spectrum scam 1.2 Vodafone - Hutchison Tax Case 1.3 Mayawati Disproportionate Assets case 2 See also 3 References Prominent cases This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. ( March 2012 ) 2G spectrum scam Main article : 2G spectrum scam On 2 March 2012, Govt of India filed a review petition in Supreme Court seeking partial review of the court 's 2 February 2012 order which had quashed 122 licenses. The Govt questioned Supreme Court 's authority over ruling against the first - come first - served policy but stayed away from challenging the cancellation of 122 licences issued during the tenure of A Raja as Telecom Minister. On the same day Sistema, majority shareholder in MTS India, too filed a review petition in Supreme Court. The Supreme Court on 4 April 2012 accepted Government 's review petition on limited grounds and dismissed all other 10 review petitions. = = = NEET Case = = = Main article : National Eligibility cum Entrance Test On 18 July 2013, a 3 - judge division bench of the SC by a 2 : 1 majority verdict had quashed National Eligibility Cum Entrance Test for admission to MBBS / BDS courses. The government of India subsequently filed a review petition. The Supreme Court agreed to hear the review petition on 23 October 2013.It recalled the 18 July order on 11 April 2016 and allowed the government to conduct NEET for admission to MBBS / BDS courses.It decided to hear afresh on the validity of NEET. Subsequently, a 5 - judge constitution bench overruled the earlier order and upheld the constitutional validity of National Eligibility cum Entrance Test for admission to MBBS / BDS courses throughout the nation. Vodafone - Hutchison tax case Further information : Vodafone Tax Case On 17 February 2012, Govt of India moved the Supreme Court seeking a review of its verdict holding that the Indian Income Tax Department does not have jurisdiction to impose Rs. 11,000 crore as tax on the overseas deal between Vodafone and Hutchison. On 20 March 2012, SC dismissed the review petition during an in - chamber proceeding saying the petition has no merit. Mayawati disproportionate assets case Further information : Mayawati # Disproportionate assets case On 4 October 2012, based on a review petition filed by a person named Kamlesh Verma, the Supreme Court decided to review its earlier verdict in open court in a Disproportionate assets case against Mayawati. The case dates back to 2003 when CBI filed a case against Mayawati for owning assets disproportionate to her known sources of income. Mayawati described the CBI investigation against her as illegal. The assets case was finally quashed on 6 July 2012 -- nine years later -- by the Supreme Court ; the court found that the case was unwarranted. The CBI decided not to file an appeal. See also Curative petition References Jump up ^ When review petition can be filed in high court and supreme court ^ Jump up to : `` Supreme Court of India Manual of Office Procedure '' ( PDF ). Supreme Court of India. Retrieved March 3, 2012. Jump up ^ `` JURISDICTION OF THE SUPREME COURT ''. Supreme Court of India. Retrieved March 3, 2012. Jump up ^ `` Economic Times ''. Economic Times. 3 March 2012. Jump up ^ `` 2G verdict : Auction ca n't be only way to allot natural assets, government says ''. Times of India. 3 March 2012. Jump up ^ `` 2G licences cancellation : Sistema files review petition in Supreme Court ''. Economic Times. Archived from the original on May 22, 2012. Jump up ^ `` 2G spectrum scam : Supreme Court dismisses all but one review petition Close ''. Economic Times. 4 April 2012. Jump up ^ `` Govt seeks review of Vodafone tax verdict ''. Feb 18, 2012. Retrieved March 19, 2012. Jump up ^ `` Centre seeks review of Vodafone verdict ''. Feb 18, 2012. Retrieved March 19, 2012. Jump up ^ `` Govt seeks review of Vodafone tax case verdict ''. Feb 17, 2012. Retrieved March 19, 2012. Jump up ^ `` Second slap : SC junks govt 's Vodafone review petition ''. First Post. Mar 20, 2012. Retrieved March 20, 2012. Jump up ^ `` SC dismisses govt 's review petition on Vodafone tax verdict ''. Indian Express. Mar 20, 2012. Retrieved March 20, 2012. Jump up ^ `` SC order on REVIEW PETITION ( CRL. ) NO ( s ). 453 OF 2012 ''. SUPREMECOURTOFINDIA. Retrieved 4 October 2012. Jump up ^ `` SC agrees to hear review of quashing of Mayawati DA case ''. DNA. 4 October 2012. Retrieved 4 October 2012. Jump up ^ `` SC to hear review of quashing of Mayawati 's assets case ''. Rediff.com. 4 October 2012. Retrieved 4 October 2012. Jump up ^ Hasan, Masoodul ( 21 April 2010 ). `` CBI probe in DA case illegal : Mayawati ''. Hindustan Times. Retrieved 17 June 2012. Jump up ^ Supreme Court quashes FIR in Mayawati assets case ( July 6, 2012 ). The Hindu. Chennai, India http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article3609174.ece. Retrieved 4 October 2012. Missing or empty title = ( help ) Jump up ^ `` Assets case : Relief for Mayawati as CBI admits defeat ''. The Indian Express. 1 August 2012. Retrieved 1 August 2012. Retrieved from `` https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Review_petition&oldid=799886130 '' Categories : Law in India Hidden categories : Pages with citations lacking titles Pages with citations having bare URLs Wikipedia articles needing factual verification from March 2016 Articles to be expanded from March 2012 All articles to be expanded Articles using small message boxes Talk Contents About Wikipedia Add links This page was last edited on 10 September 2017, at 11 : 57. About Wikipedia

Question: under which article supreme court has the power to review its own judgement
Answer: Review Petition