Honeypot ( computing ) - wikipedia Honeypot ( computing ) This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. ( June 2014 ) In computer terminology, a honeypot is a computer security mechanism set to detect, deflect, or, in some manner, counteract attempts at unauthorized use of information systems. Generally, a honeypot consists of data ( for example, in a network site ) that appears to be a legitimate part of the site, but is actually isolated and monitored, and that seems to contain information or a resource of value to attackers, who are then blocked. This is similar to police sting operations, colloquially known as `` baiting, '' a suspect. Honeypot diagram to help understand the topic Contents 1 Types 1.1 Deception technology 1.2 Malware honeypots 1.3 Spam versions 1.4 Email trap 1.5 Database honeypot 2 Detection 3 Honey nets 4 Metaphor 5 See also 6 References and notes 7 Further reading 8 External links Types Honeypots can be classified based on their deployment ( use / action ) and based on their level of involvement. Based on deployment, honeypots may be classified as production honeypots research honeypots Production honeypots are easy to use, capture only limited information, and are used primarily by corporations. Production honeypots are placed inside the production network with other production servers by an organization to improve their overall state of security. Normally, production honeypots are low - interaction honeypots, which are easier to deploy. They give less information about the attacks or attackers than research honeypots. Research honeypots are run to gather information about the motives and tactics of the black hat community targeting different networks. These honeypots do not add direct value to a specific organization ; instead, they are used to research the threats that organizations face and to learn how to better protect against those threats. Research honeypots are complex to deploy and maintain, capture extensive information, and are used primarily by research, military, or government organizations. Based on design criteria, honeypots can be classified as : pure honeypots high - interaction honeypots low - interaction honeypots Pure honeypots are full - fledged production systems. The activities of the attacker are monitored by using a bug tap that has been installed on the honeypot 's link to the network. No other software needs to be installed. Even though a pure honeypot is useful, stealthiness of the defense mechanisms can be ensured by a more controlled mechanism. High - interaction honeypots imitate the activities of the production systems that host a variety of services and, therefore, an attacker may be allowed a lot of services to waste his time. By employing virtual machines, multiple honeypots can be hosted on a single physical machine. Therefore, even if the honeypot is compromised, it can be restored more quickly. In general, high - interaction honeypots provide more security by being difficult to detect, but they are expensive to maintain. If virtual machines are not available, one physical computer must be maintained for each honeypot, which can be exorbitantly expensive. Example : Honeynet. Low - interaction honeypots simulate only the services frequently requested by attackers. Since they consume relatively few resources, multiple virtual machines can easily be hosted on one physical system, the virtual systems have a short response time, and less code is required, reducing the complexity of the virtual system 's security. Example : Honeyd. Deception technology Recently, a new market segment called deception technology has emerged using basic honeypot technology with the addition of advanced automation for scale. Deception technology addresses the automated deployment of honeypot resources over a large commercial enterprise or government institution. Malware honeypots Malware honeypots are used to detect malware by exploiting the known replication and attack vectors of malware. Replication vectors such as USB flash drives can easily be verified for evidence of modifications, either through manual means or utilizing special - purpose honeypots that emulate drives. Malware increasingly is used to search for and steal cryptocurrencies, which provides opportunities for services such as Bitcoin Vigil to create and monitor honeypots by using small amount of money to provide early warning alerts of malware infection. Spam versions Spammers abuse vulnerable resources such as open mail relays and open proxies. Some system administrators have created honeypot programs that masquerade as these abusable resources to discover spammer activity. There are several capabilities such honeypots provide to these administrators and the existence of such fake abusable systems makes abuse more difficult or risky. Honeypots can be a powerful countermeasure to abuse from those who rely on very high volume abuse ( e.g., spammers ). These honeypots can reveal the abuser 's IP address and provide bulk spam capture ( which enables operators to determine spammers ' URLs and response mechanisms ). For open relay honeypots, it is possible to determine the e-mail addresses ( `` dropboxes '' ) spammers use as targets for their test messages, which are the tool they use to detect open relays. It is then simple to deceive the spammer : transmit any illicit relay e-mail received addressed to that dropbox e-mail address. That tells the spammer the honeypot is a genuine abusable open relay, and they often respond by sending large quantities of relay spam to that honeypot, which stops it. The apparent source may be another abused system -- spammers and other abusers may use a chain of abused systems to make detection of the original starting point of the abuse traffic difficult. This in itself is indicative of the power of honeypots as anti-spam tools. In the early days of anti-spam honeypots, spammers, with little concern for hiding their location, felt safe testing for vulnerabilities and sending spam directly from their own systems. Honeypots made the abuse riskier and more difficult. Spam still flows through open relays, but the volume is much smaller than in 2001 to 2002. While most spam originates in the U.S., spammers hop through open relays across political boundaries to mask their origin. Honeypot operators may use intercepted relay tests to recognize and thwart attempts to relay spam through their honeypots. `` Thwart '' may mean `` accept the relay spam but decline to deliver it. '' Honeypot operators may discover other details concerning the spam and the spammer by examining the captured spam messages. Open relay honeypots include Jackpot, written in Java by Jack Cleaver ; smtpot.py, written in Python by Karl A. Krueger ; and spamhole ( honeypot ) spamhole, written in C. The Bubblegum Proxypot is an open source honeypot ( or `` proxypot '' ). E-mail trap This section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. ( June 2013 ) Main article : Spamtrap An email address that is used for any other purpose than to receive spam can also be considered a spam honeypot. Compared with the term `` spamtrap '', the term `` honeypot '' might be more suitable for systems and techniques that are used to detect or counterattacks and probes. With a spamtrap, spam arrives at its destination `` legitimately '' -- exactly as non-spam email would arrive. An amalgam of these techniques is Project Honey Pot, a distributed, open source project that uses honeypot pages installed on websites around the world. These honeypot pages disseminate uniquely tagged spamtrap email addresses and spammers can then be tracked -- the corresponding spam mail is subsequently sent to these spamtrap e-mail addresses. Database honeypot Databases often get attacked by intruders using SQL injection. As such activities are not recognized by basic firewalls, companies often use database firewalls for protection. Some of the available SQL database firewalls provide / support honeypot architectures so that the intruder runs against a trap database while the web application remains functional. Detection Just as honeypots are weapons against spammers, honeypot detection systems are spammer - employed counter-weapons. As detection systems would likely use unique characteristics of specific honeypots to identify them, a great deal of honeypots in use makes the set of unique characteristics larger and more daunting to those seeking to detect and thereby identify them. This is an unusual circumstance in software : a situation in which `` versionitis '' ( a large number of versions of the same software, all differing slightly from each other ) can be beneficial. There 's also an advantage in having some easy - to - detect honeypots deployed. Fred Cohen, the inventor of the Deception Toolkit, even argues that every system running his honeypot should have a deception port that adversaries can use to detect the honeypot. Cohen believes that this might deter adversaries. Honey nets `` A ' honey net ' is a network of high interaction honeypots that simulates a production network and configured such that all activity is monitored, recorded and in a degree, discreetly regulated. '' - Lance Spitzner, Honeynet Project Two or more honeypots on a network form a honey net. Typically, a honey net is used for monitoring a larger and / or more diverse network in which one honeypot may not be sufficient. Honey nets and honeypots are usually implemented as parts of larger network intrusion detection systems. A honey farm is a centralized collection of honeypots and analysis tools. The concept of the honey net first began in 1999 when Lance Spitzner, founder of the Honeynet Project, published the paper `` To Build a Honeypot ''. Metaphor The metaphor of a bear being attracted to and stealing honey is common in many traditions, including Germanic and Slavic. A common Germanic kenning for the bear was `` honey eater ''. The tradition of bears stealing honey has been passed down through stories and folklore, especially the well known Winnie the Pooh. See also Canary trap Client honeypot HoneyMonkey Honeytoken Network telescope Operation Trust Tarpit References and notes Jump up ^ Cole, Eric ; Northcutt, Stephen. `` Honeypots : A Security Manager 's Guide to Honeypots ''. Jump up ^ Lance Spitzner ( 2002 ). Honeypots tracking hackers. Addison - Wesley. pp. 68 -- 70. ISBN 0 - 321 - 10895 - 7. Jump up ^ Katakoglu, Onur ( 2017 - 04 - 03 ). `` Attacks Landscape in the Dark Side of the Web '' ( PDF ). acm.org. Retrieved 2017 - 08 - 09. Jump up ^ `` Deception related technology -- its not just a `` nice to have '', its a new strategy of defense -- Lawrence Pingree ``. 28 September 2016. Jump up ^ Litke, Pat. `` Cryptocurrency - Stealing Malware Landscape ''. Secureworks.com. SecureWorks. Retrieved 9 March 2016. Jump up ^ `` Bitcoin Vigil : Detecting Malware Through Bitcoin ''. cryptocoins news. May 5, 2014. Jump up ^ Edwards, M. `` Antispam Honeypots Give Spammers Headaches ''. Windows IT Pro. Retrieved 11 March 2015. Jump up ^ `` Sophos reveals latest spam relaying countries ''. Help Net Security. Help Net Security. 24 July 2006. Retrieved 14 June 2013. Jump up ^ `` Honeypot Software, Honeypot Products, Deception Software ''. Intrusion Detection, Honeypots and Incident Handling Resources. Honeypots.net. 2013. Retrieved 14 June 2013. Jump up ^ dustintrammell ( 27 February 2013 ). `` spamhole -- The Fake Open SMTP Relay Beta ''. SourceForge. Dice Holdings, Inc. Retrieved 14 June 2013. Jump up ^ Ec - Council ( 5 July 2009 ). Certified Ethical Hacker : Securing Network Infrastructure in Certified Ethical Hacking. Cengage Learning. pp. 3 --. ISBN 978 - 1 - 4354 - 8365 - 1. Retrieved 14 June 2013. Jump up ^ `` Secure Your Database Using Honeypot Architecture ''. www.dbcoretech.com. August 13, 2010. Archived from the original on March 8, 2012. Jump up ^ `` Deception Toolkit ''. All.net. All.net. 2013. Retrieved 14 June 2013. Jump up ^ `` cisco router Customer support ''. Clarkconnect.com. Retrieved 2015 - 07 - 31. Jump up ^ `` Know Your Enemy : GenII Honey Nets Easier to deploy, harder to detect, safer to maintain ''. Honeynet Project. Honeynet Project. 12 May 2005. Retrieved 14 June 2013. Jump up ^ `` The word for `` bear '' ``. Pitt.edu. Retrieved 12 Sep 2014. Further reading Lance Spitzner ( 2002 ). Honeypots tracking hackers. Addison - Wesley. ISBN 0 - 321 - 10895 - 7. Sean Bodmer, CISSP, CEH, Dr Max Kilger, PhD, DrPH ( c ) Gregory Carpenter, CISM, Jade Jones, Esq., JD ( 2012 ). Reverse Deception : Organized Cyber Threat Counter-Exploitation. McGraw - Hill Education. ISBN 978 - 0 - 07 - 177249 - 5. CS1 maint : Multiple names : authors list ( link ) External links The Ultimate Fake Access Point - AP less clear - text WPA2 passphrase hacking Distributed Open Proxy Honeypots Project : WASC SANS Institute : What is a Honey Pot ? SANS Institute : Fundamental Honeypotting Project Honeypot A curated list of honeypots, tools and components focused on open source projects Malware topics Infectious malware Computer virus Comparison of computer viruses Computer worm List of computer worms Timeline of computer viruses and worms Concealment Trojan horse Rootkit Backdoor Zombie computer Man - in - the - middle Man - in - the - browser Man - in - the - mobile Clickjacking Malware for profit Privacy - invasive software Adware Spyware Botnet Keystroke logging Form grabbing Web threats Fraudulent dialer Malbot Scareware Rogue security software Ransomware Crimeware By operating system Linux malware Palm OS viruses Mobile malware Macro virus Classic Mac OS viruses MacOS malware iOS malware Android malware Protection Anti-keylogger Antivirus software Browser security Internet security Mobile security Network security Defensive computing Firewall Intrusion detection system Data loss prevention software Countermeasures Computer and network surveillance Operation : Bot Roast Honeypot Retrieved from `` https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Honeypot_(computing)&oldid=812962364 '' Categories : Computer network security Spamming Hidden categories : Articles needing additional references from June 2014 All articles needing additional references Articles needing additional references from June 2013 CS1 maint : Multiple names : authors list Talk Contents About Wikipedia Čeština Deutsch Español Euskara فارسی Français 한국어 Italiano עברית Nederlands 日本 語 Polski Português Русский Slovenščina Suomi ไทย Türkçe Українська 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 30 November 2017, at 22 : 35. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution - ShareAlike License ; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia ® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. About Wikipedia

Question: what is a honey pot in network security
Answer: a computer security mechanism set to detect, deflect, or, in some manner, counteract attempts at unauthorized use of information systems