Minersville school District v. Gobitis - wikipedia Minersville school District v. Gobitis Minersville School District v. Gobitis Supreme Court of the United States Argued April 25, 1940 Decided June 3, 1940 Full case name Minersville School District, Board of Education of Minersville School District, et al. v. Walter Gobitis, et al. Citations 310 U.S. 586 ( more ) 60 S. Ct. 1010 ; 84 L. Ed. 1375 ; 1940 U.S. LEXIS 1136 ; 17 Ohio Op. 417 ; 127 A.L.R. 1493 Prior history Judgment for plaintiffs, injunction granted, 24 F. Supp. 271 ( E.D. Pa. 1938 ) ; affirmed, 108 F. 2d 683 ( 3d Cir. 1939 ) ; certiorari granted, 309 U.S. 645 ( 1940 ) Subsequent history None Holding The First Amendment does not require States to excuse public school students from saluting the American flag and reciting the Pledge of Allegiance on religious grounds. Third Circuit reversed. Court membership Chief Justice Charles E. Hughes Associate Justices James C. McReynolds Harlan F. Stone Owen J. Roberts Hugo Black Stanley F. Reed Felix Frankfurter William O. Douglas Frank Murphy Case opinions Majority Frankfurter, joined by Hughes, McReynolds, Roberts, Black, Reed, Douglas, Murphy Dissent Stone Laws applied U.S. Const. amend. I Overruled by West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 ( 1943 ) Minersville School District v. Gobitis, 310 U.S. 586 ( 1940 ), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States involving the religious rights of public school students under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Court ruled that public schools could compel students -- in this case, Jehovah 's Witnesses -- to salute the American Flag and recite the Pledge of Allegiance despite the students ' religious objections to these practices. This decision led to increased persecution of Witnesses in the United States. The Supreme Court overruled this decision a mere three years later, in West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 ( 1943 ). Contents 1 Background 1.1 Jehovah 's Witnesses and compulsory flag pledges 1.2 Facts of the case 1.3 Trial 1.4 Third Circuit 1.5 Oral argument 2 Opinion of the court 2.1 Dissenting opinion 3 Effects of the decision 4 Subsequent history 5 See also 6 Notes 7 Further reading 8 External links Background Jehovah 's Witnesses and compulsory flag pledges Mandatory flag pledges in public schools were motivated by patriotic fervor in wartime America. The first known mandatory flag pledges were instituted in a number of states during the Spanish -- American War. During World War I, many more states instituted mandatory flag pledges with only a few dissents recorded by the American Civil Liberties Union. On Monday, June 3, 1935, Watch Tower Society president J.F. Rutherford, was interviewed at a Witness convention about `` the flag salute by children in school ''. He told the convention audience that to salute an earthly emblem, ascribing salvation to it, was unfaithfulness to God. Rutherford said that he would not do it. '' While the matter was not yet established doctrine or written policy of Jehovah 's Witnesses, at least some Witness families quickly made a personal conscientious decision on the matter. In September in Lynn, Massachusetts, a third - grader and Jehovah 's Witness named Carleton Nichols refused to recite the Pledge of Allegiance and was expelled from school. The Nichols incident received widespread media attention, and other Witness students soon followed suit. Rutherford gave a radio address praising Nichols, and schools around the country began expelling Witness students and firing Witness teachers. Jehovah 's Witnesses published the booklet Loyalty, making the matter an official doctrine of the faith before the end of 1935. Witnesses hired teachers and set up `` Kingdom schools '' to continue their children 's education. The national leadership subsequently decided to make an issue of the forced pledges and asked people to stand up for their right to religious freedom. Facts of the case Walter Gobitas was a recent convert to the Jehovah 's Witnesses. Gobitas was inspired by stories of other Jehovah 's Witnesses who challenged the system and suffered for it, and decided to make a stand himself and instructed his children not to pledge allegiance when at school. Minersville, Pennsylvania was predominantly Roman Catholic and there was significant animosity towards the Jehovah 's Witnesses. Tensions were already high before this case arose and many viewed this as one way to get back at the Witnesses. As a result, his children were subjected to teasing, taunting, and attacks from the other kids. For Lillian, this meant giving up her status as class president and losing most of her friends. `` When I 'd come to school, '' she said, `` they would throw a hail of pebbles and yell things like, ' Here comes Jehovah ! ' Billy 's fifth grade teacher attempted to physically force his arm out of his pocket to make the requisite salute. A local Catholic church started a boycott of the family store and its business dropped off. Because of their eventual expulsion, their father had to pay for them to enroll in a private school, resulting in even more economic hardship. At first the school board was in a quandary because the law did not provide penalties for those who refused to pledge. Finally, though, the school board got permission to punish the Gobitas children and expelled them, without appeal. Trial The case was argued in Philadelphia on 15 February 1938. During the trial, school superintendent Roudabush displayed contempt for the beliefs of the children, stating that he felt they had been `` indoctrinated '' and that the existence of even a few dissenters would be `` demoralizing, '' leading to widespread disregard for the flag and American values. Four months later District Judge Albert B. Maris found that the board 's requirement that the children salute the flag was an unconstitutional violation of their free exercise of religious beliefs. Third Circuit Within two weeks, the school board unanimously agreed to appeal the decision. Oral arguments in the appeal were made before the Third Circuit of the U.S. Court of Appeals on 9 November 1938. One year later, the three - judge court unanimously affirmed the district court decision. Despite its two defeats in the lower courts, the school board decided to take its case to the Supreme Court, authorizing its attorney to file a petition for a writ of certiorari, which the Court granted on 4 March 1940. Oral argument The Court heard oral arguments on 25 April. Joseph Rutherford, president of the Watch Tower Society, and himself a lawyer, took over the defense, assisted by the new head of the religious group 's Legal Department, Hayden Covington. The ACLU and the Committee on the Bill of Rights of the American Bar Association filed amicus curiae briefs. Opinion of the Court The Court 's decision was nearly unanimous ; only Justice Harlan F. Stone dissented. In an 8 - to - 1 decision, the Court upheld the mandatory flag salute, declining to make itself `` the school board for the country. '' Justice Felix Frankfurter wrote the majority decision ; in doing so, he relied primarily on the `` secular regulation '' rule, which weighs the secular purpose of a nonreligious government regulation against the religious practice it makes illegal or otherwise burdens the exercise of religion. He identified the Pennsylvania flag - salute requirement as an intrinsically secular policy enacted to encourage patriotism among school children. Frankfurter wrote that the school district 's interest in creating national unity was enough to allow them to require students to salute the flag. According to Frankfurter, the nation needed loyalty and the unity of all the people. Since saluting the flag was a primary means of achieving this legitimate goal, an issue of national importance was at stake. The Court held that the state 's interest in `` national cohesion '' was `` inferior to none in the hierarchy of legal values ''. National unity is the basis of national security. To deny the legislature the right to select appropriate means for its attainment presents a totally different order of problem from that of the propriety of subordinating the possible ugliness of littered streets to the free expression opinion through handbills. Weighing the circumstances in this case, he argued that the social need for conformity with the requirement was greater than the individual liberty claims of the Jehovah 's Witnesses. He emphasized that Conscientious scruples have not, in the course of the long struggle for religious toleration, relieved the individual from obedience to a general law not aimed at the promotion or restriction of religious beliefs Frankfurter further wrote that the recitation of a pledge advanced the cause of patriotism in the United States. He said the country 's foundation as a free society depends upon building sentimental ties. The flag, the Court found, was an important symbol of national unity and could be a part of legislative initiatives designed `` to promote in the minds of children who attend the common schools an attachment to the institutions of their country. '' Dissenting opinion Harlan Stone, the lone dissenter from the majority 's decision, wrote : The guarantees of civil liberty are but guarantees of freedom of the human mind and spirit and of reasonable freedom and opportunity to express them... The very essence of the liberty which they guarantee is the freedom of the individual from compulsion as to what he shall think and what he shall say... Effects of the decision On June 9, a mob of 2,500 burned the Kingdom Hall in Kennebunkport, Maine. On June 16, Litchfield, Illinois police jailed all of that town 's sixty Witnesses, ostensibly protecting them from their neighbors. On June 18, townspeople in Rawlins, Wyoming brutally beat five Witnesses ; on June 22, the people of Parco, Wyoming tarred and feathered another. The American Civil Liberties Union reported to the Justice Department that nearly 1,500 Witnesses were physically attacked in more than 300 communities nationwide. One Southern sheriff told a reporter why Witnesses were being run out of town : `` They 're traitors ; the Supreme Court says so. Ai n't you heard ? '' First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt appealed publicly for calm, while newspaper editorials and the American legal community condemned the Gobitis decision as a blow to liberty. On June 8, 1942, Supreme Court Justices Black, Douglas and Murphy stated in their opinion on Jones v. City of Opelika that, although they had concurred with the majority in the Gobitis case, they now believed that that case had been wrongly decided. Subsequent History Partly because of the violent reaction to its decision, including the lynching of Jehovah Witnesses, the ruling did not stand for long. Frank Murphy in particular regretted his decision, and instructed his clerk to look out for an opportunity to revisit the issue. The elevation of Harlan Fiske Stone to Chief Justice, and the appointment of two new members to the Supreme Court, were also factors in the Court 's reversal of policy. On 14 June 1943 ( Flag Day ), the court handed down West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette. In addition to Murphy, Justices Black and Douglas also reversed their opinions, resulting in a 6 - 3 vote. The majority opinion written by Robert Jackson echoed Justice Stone 's dissent when he wrote, `` If there is any fixed star in our constitutional constellation, it is that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion or other matters of opinion ''. The active persecution of Jehovah 's Witnesses abated somewhat, although thousands were arrested during World War II for seeking religious exemption from military service. They were accused of being unpatriotic, and even of being Nazi sympathizers. See also Knocking, a documentary on Jehovah 's Witnesses that features Lillian and William Gobitis List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 310 Letter, Billy Gobitas to Minersville, Pennsylvania, school directors, explaining why the young Jehovah 's Witness refused to salute the American flag, 5 November 1935. http://lcweb2.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/r?ammem/mcc:@field(DOCID+@lit(mcc/016 ) ) Notes Jump up ^ `` United States of America '', 1975 Yearbook of Jehovah 's Witnesses, © 1975 Watch Tower, page 168 Jump up ^ The Gobitas family seems to have made such a personal conscientious decision in the weeks between the convention and the beginning of the new school year ( typically about September 1 in the United States ). According to her later written account, then - eleven - year - old Lillian Gobitas and her ten - year - old brother were impressed by Rutherford 's answer, and they `` talked about it with our parents and looked up Exodus 20 : 4 - 6, 1 John 5 : 21, and Matthew 22 : 21. Mom and Dad never pressured us or made us feel guilty. When school opened in September, we were very much aware of what we ought to do. '' - See Lillian Gobitas memoir `` The Courage to Put God First '', Awake !, July 22, 1993, © 1993 Watch Tower, page 13 Jump up ^ Nichols name was misspelled in some reports, and in the early case Carlton B. Nicholls v. Mayor and School Committee of Lynn ( Massachusetts ), wherein Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruled that no allowance need be made for religious belief by mandatory school flag salutes. See `` ' Defending and Legally Establishing the Good News ' '', Jehovah 's Witnesses -- Proclaimers of God 's Kingdom, © 1993 Watch Tower, page 684 - 685 Jump up ^ `` United States of America '', 1975 Yearbook of Jehovah 's Witnesses, © 1975 Watch Tower, page 168, `` ( In addition to Nichols, at least one other Witness student, ) Barbara Meredith, took the same stand at her school in Sudbury, Massachusetts, the same day. '' But her situation did not reach the press, as she had a teacher who was tolerant and did not make an issue out of it. '' Jump up ^ Anecdotally, Rutherford 's radio address further solidified the resolution of Witnesses and their children to pointedly refuse to salute the flag. Lillian Gobitas writes that for the first few weeks of school in September 1935 she had silently mouthed, but not actually uttered, the pledge ; she changed her view, she writes, when on... `` October 6, Brother Rutherford made a coast - to - coast radio broadcast entitled `` Saluting a Flag. '' He explained that we respect the flag but that going through rituals before an image or emblem was actually idolatry. Our relationship with Jehovah would strictly forbid this. `` On October 22, Bill ( Gobitas, her brother ), just ten years old, came home from school all smiles. `` I stopped saluting the flag ! '' he said triumphantly. `` The teacher tried to put up my arm, but I held on to my pocket. '' `` The next morning, heart pounding, I went to my teacher before class so that I would n't weaken. `` Miss Shofstal, '' I stammered, `` I ca n't salute the flag anymore. The Bible says at Exodus chapter 20 that we ca n't have any other gods before Jehovah God. '' To my surprise she just hugged me and said what a dear girl I was. Well, when the flag ceremony time came, I did not join in the salute. '' - `` The Courage to Put God First '', Awake !, July 22, 1993, © 1993 Watch Tower, page 13 Jump up ^ Those who heeded this call and challenged the practice of pledging the flag were accused of working with or being duped by German sympathizers. Ironically, Jehovah 's Witnesses in Germany under Hitler rule were sentenced to concentration camps for the same reason, namely the denial to salute national symbols. A further irony lay in the fact that, at the time, many flag pledges were performed not with the right hand over the heart as they are today, but instead with an outstretched right hand, a gesture which has now become associated with the `` Sieg Heil '' salute of the Nazis. Jump up ^ The name was misspelled `` Gobitis '' in the Court 's decision, but was in fact `` Gobitas. '' Peters, Shawn Francis Judging Jehovah 's Witnesses : Religious Persecution and the Dawn of the Rights Revolution, pg. 13 ( University of Kansas Press : 2000 ) Jump up ^ Panchyk, Richard ( 2007 ). `` sidebar : Interview with Lillian Gobitas Klouse ''. Our Supreme Court : A History with 14 Activities. Chicago Review Press, Inc. p. 77. Jump up ^ Gobitis v, Minersville School District, 24 F. Supp. 271 ( E.D. Pa. 1938 ) Jump up ^ Minersville School District v. Gobitis, 108 F. 2d 685 ( 3d Cir. 1939 ) Jump up ^ Minersville School District v. Gobitis, 309 U.S. 645 ( 1940 ) ^ Jump up to : Manwaring, Render Unto Caesar Jump up ^ `` Minersville School District v. Gobitis, 310 U.S. 586 ''. The Oyez Project ( U.S. Supreme Court media ). 1940. Retrieved 2007 - 10 - 25. Jump up ^ `` The Courage to Put God First ''. Awake ! : 15. 1993 - 07 - 22. Jump up ^ Shawn Francis Peters Judging Jehovah 's Witnesses : Religious Persecution and the Dawn of Rights Revolution ( Lawrence, Kansas : University Press of Kansas, 2000 ) 84 Jump up ^ http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=CASE&court=US&vol=316&page=584 Jump up ^ Shawn Francis Peters in his book Judging Jehovah 's Witnesses : Religious Persecution And the Dawn of the Rights Revolution Jump up ^ University of Michigan Law Quadrangle Notes on Frank Murphy. Archived 2010 - 08 - 06 at WebCite Jump up ^ Leming, Robert S. ERIC Clearinghouse for Social Studies / Social Science Education Bloomington IN. Teaching about Landmark Dissents in United States Supreme Court Cases. ERIC Digest. Jump up ^ Konkoly, Toni. Law, Power & Personality, The Supreme Court, Famous Dissents : Minersville School District v. Gobitis. Public Broadcasting Service. Jump up ^ Sittser, Gerald Lawson ( 1 June 1997 ). A Cautious Patriotism : The American Churches & the Second World War. Univ of North Carolina Press. p. 186. ISBN 978 - 0 - 8078 - 2333 - 0. Retrieved 21 May 2012. Further reading Tushnet, Mark, ed. ( 2008 ) I Dissent : Great Opposing Opinions in Landmark Supreme Court Cases, Malaysia : Beacon Press, pp. 256, ISBN 978 - 0 - 8070 - 0036 - 6. External links Wikisource has original text related to this article : Minersville School District v. Gobitis Full text of decision at findlaw.com Billy Gobitas ' letter to Minersville, Pennsylvania, school directors, explaining why the young Jehovah 's Witness refused to salute the American flag, 5 November 1935. ( image ) Lillian Gobitas Klose, Schoolgirl at Center of Historic 1940 Supreme Court Case, Dies at 90 United States First Amendment case law Establishment Clause Public funding Everson v. Board of Education ( 1947 ) McCollum v. Board of Education ( 1948 ) Walz v. Tax Commission of the City of New York ( 1970 ) Lemon v. Kurtzman ( 1971 ) Marsh v. Chambers ( 1983 ) Mueller v. Allen ( 1983 ) Aguilar v. Felton ( 1985 ) Board of Education of Kiryas Joel Village School District v. Grumet ( 1994 ) Agostini v. Felton ( 1997 ) Mitchell v. Helms ( 2000 ) Zelman v. Simmons - Harris ( 2002 ) Locke v. Davey ( 2004 ) Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v. Winn ( 2011 ) Public displays Stone v. Graham ( 1980 ) Lynch v. Donnelly ( 1984 ) Board of Trustees of Scarsdale v. McCreary ( 1985 ) County of Allegheny v. ACLU ( 1989 ) McCreary County v. ACLU of Kentucky ( 2005 ) Van Orden v. Perry ( 2005 ) Pleasant Grove City v. Summum ( 2009 ) School prayer Zorach v. Clauson ( 1952 ) Engel v. Vitale ( 1962 ) Abington School District v. Schempp ( 1963 ) Stone v. Graham ( 1980 ) Wallace v. Jaffree ( 1985 ) Lee v. Weisman ( 1992 ) Santa Fe Independent School District v. Doe ( 2000 ) Elk Grove Unified School District v. Newdow ( 2004 ) Creationism Epperson v. Arkansas ( 1968 ) Edwards v. Aguillard ( 1987 ) Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District ( M.D. Pa. 2005 ) Legislature prayer Marsh v. Chambers ( 1983 ) Town of Greece v. Galloway ( 2014 ) Lund v. Rowan County ( 4th Cir., 2017 ) Bormuth v. County of Jackson ( 6th Cir., 2017 ) Other McGowan v. Maryland ( 1961 ) McDaniel v. Paty ( 1978 ) Estate of Thornton v. Caldor, Inc. ( 1985 ) Texas Monthly, Inc. v. Bullock ( 1989 ) Hosanna - Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & School v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ( 2012 ) Free Exercise Clause Reynolds v. United States ( 1879 ) Davis v. Beason ( 1890 ) Schneider v. New Jersey ( 1939 ) Cantwell v. Connecticut ( 1940 ) Minersville School District v. Gobitis ( 1940 ) Murdock v. Pennsylvania ( 1943 ) United States v. Ballard ( 1944 ) Braunfeld v. Brown ( 1961 ) Torcaso v. Watkins ( 1961 ) Sherbert v. Verner ( 1963 ) Presbyterian Church v. Hull Church ( 1969 ) Wisconsin v. Yoder ( 1972 ) Harris v. McRae ( 1980 ) Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division ( 1981 ) United States v. Lee ( 1982 ) Bob Jones University v. United States ( 1983 ) Bowen v. Roy ( 1986 ) Goldman v. Weinberger ( 1986 ) Employment Division v. Smith ( 1990 ) Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah ( 1993 ) City of Boerne v. Flores ( 1997 ) Watchtower Society v. Village of Stratton ( 2002 ) Cutter v. Wilkinson ( 2005 ) Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. Comer ( 2017 ) Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission ( under consideration ) National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra ( under consideration ) Freedom of speech ( portal ) Sedition and imminent danger Alien and Sedition Acts ( 1798 ) Masses Publishing Co. v. Patten ( S.D.N.Y. 1917 ) Schenck v. United States ( 1919 ) Abrams v. United States ( 1919 ) Gitlow v. New York ( 1925 ) Whitney v. California ( 1927 ) Dennis v. United States ( 1951 ) Communist Party v. Subversive Activities Control Board ( 1955, 1961 ) Yates v. United States ( 1957 ) Bond v. Floyd ( 1966 ) Brandenburg v. Ohio ( 1969 ) Hess v. Indiana ( 1973 ) False speech Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. ( 1974 ) United States v. Alvarez ( 2012 ) Fighting words and the heckler 's veto Cantwell v. Connecticut ( 1940 ) Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire ( 1942 ) Terminiello v. Chicago ( 1949 ) Feiner v. New York ( 1951 ) Gregory v. Chicago ( 1969 ) National Socialist Party of America v. Village of Skokie ( 1977 ) R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul ( 1992 ) Snyder v. Phelps ( 2011 ) Elonis v. United States ( 2015 ) Freedom of assembly and public forums Hague v. CIO ( 1939 ) Schneider v. New Jersey ( 1939 ) Thornhill v. Alabama ( 1940 ) Martin v. City of Struthers ( 1943 ) Marsh v. Alabama ( 1946 ) Niemotko v. Maryland ( 1951 ) Edwards v. South Carolina ( 1963 ) Cox v. Louisiana ( 1965 ) Brown v. Louisiana ( 1966 ) Adderley v. Florida ( 1966 ) Carroll v. Town of Princess Anne ( 1968 ) Coates v. Cincinnati ( 1971 ) Organization for a Better Austin v. Keefe ( 1971 ) Lloyd Corp. v. Tanner ( 1972 ) Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins ( 1980 ) Widmar v. Vincent ( 1981 ) Hill v. Colorado ( 2000 ) McCullen v. Coakley ( 2014 ) Packingham v. North Carolina ( 2017 ) Symbolic speech Stromberg v. California ( 1931 ) United States v. O'Brien ( 1968 ) Cohen v. California ( 1971 ) Smith v. Goguen ( 1974 ) Texas v. Johnson ( 1989 ) United States v. Eichman ( 1990 ) Virginia v. Black ( 2003 ) Compelled speech Minersville School District v. Gobitis ( 1940 ) West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette ( 1943 ) Wooley v. Maynard ( 1977 ) Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System v. Southworth ( 2000 ) Davenport v. Washington Education Association ( 2007 ) Knox v. Service Employees International Union, Local 1000 ( 2012 ) Agency for International Development v. Alliance for Open Society International, Inc. ( 2013 ) Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission ( under consideration ) National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra ( under consideration ) Loyalty oaths American Communications Association v. Douds ( 1950 ) Garner v. Board of Public Works ( 1951 ) Speiser v. Randall ( 1958 ) Keyishian v. Board of Regents ( 1967 ) Communist Party of Indiana v. Whitcomb ( 1974 ) School speech Minersville School District v. Gobitis ( 1940 ) West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette ( 1943 ) Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District ( 1969 ) Island Trees School District v. Pico ( 1982 ) Bethel School District v. Fraser ( 1986 ) Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier ( 1988 ) Rosenberger v. University of Virginia ( 1995 ) Morse v. Frederick ( 2007 ) Obscenity Rosen v. United States ( 1896 ) United States v. One Book Called Ulysses ( S.D.N.Y. 1933 ) Roth v. United States ( 1957 ) One, Inc. v. Olesen ( 1958 ) Smith v. California ( 1959 ) Marcus v. Search Warrant ( 1961 ) MANual Enterprises v. Day ( 1962 ) Jacobellis v. Ohio ( 1964 ) Quantity of Books v. Kansas ( 1964 ) Freedman v. Maryland ( 1965 ) Ginzburg v. United States ( 1966 ) Memoirs v. Massachusetts ( 1966 ) Redrup v. New York ( 1967 ) Ginsberg v. New York ( 1968 ) Stanley v. Georgia ( 1969 ) Cohen v. California ( 1971 ) United States v. Thirty - seven Photographs ( 1971 ) Kois v. Wisconsin ( 1972 ) Miller v. California ( 1973 ) Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton ( 1973 ) United States v. 12 200 - ft. Reels of Film ( 1973 ) Jenkins v. Georgia ( 1974 ) Erznoznik v. City of Jacksonville ( 1975 ) Young v. American Mini Theatres ( 1976 ) New York v. Ferber ( 1982 ) American Booksellers v. Hudnut ( 7th Cir., 1985 ) Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc. ( 1986 ) People v. Freeman ( Cal. 1988 ) Osborne v. Ohio ( 1990 ) United States v. X-Citement Video ( 1994 ) Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union ( 1997 ) United States v. Playboy Entertainment Group ( 2000 ) Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition ( 2002 ) Ashcroft v. American Civil Liberties Union ( 2002 ) Nitke v. Gonzales ( S.D.N.Y., 2005 ) United States v. Williams ( 2008 ) FCC v. Fox Televisions Stations - 2 cases ( 2009 and 2012 ) American Booksellers Foundation for Free Expression v. Strickland ( 6th Cir., 2009 ) United States v. Kilbride ( 9th Cir., 2009 ) United States v. Stevens ( 2010 ) Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association ( 2011 ) Public employees Pickering v. Board of Education ( 1968 ) Perry v. Sindermann ( 1972 ) Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth ( 1972 ) Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle ( 1977 ) Givhan v. Western Line Consolidated School District ( 1979 ) Connick v. Myers ( 1983 ) Rankin v. McPherson ( 1987 ) Waters v. Churchill ( 1994 ) Garcetti v. Ceballos ( 2006 ) Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri ( 2011 ) Heffernan v. City of Paterson ( 2016 ) Hatch Act and similar laws Ex parte Curtis ( 1882 ) United Public Workers v. Mitchell ( 1947 ) United States Civil Service Commission v. National Association of Letter Carriers ( 1973 ) Broadrick v. Oklahoma ( 1973 ) Licensing and restriction of speech Mutual Film Corporation v. Industrial Commission of Ohio ( 1915 ) Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson ( 1952 ) Freedman v. Maryland ( 1965 ) Virginia State Pharmacy Board v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council ( 1976 ) Hoffman Estates v. The Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc. ( 1982 ) Walker v. Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans ( 2015 ) Matal v. Tam ( 2017 ) Commercial speech Valentine v. Chrestensen ( 1942 ) Rowan v. U.S. Post Office Dept. ( 1970 ) Pittsburgh Press Co. v. Pittsburgh Commission on Human Relations ( 1973 ) Bigelow v. Commonwealth of Virginia ( 1974 ) Virginia State Pharmacy Board v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council ( 1976 ) Bates v. State Bar of Arizona ( 1977 ) Linmark Associates, Inc. v. Willingboro ( 1977 ) Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service Commission ( 1980 ) Consol. Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n ( 1980 ) Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Public Utilities Commission of California ( 1986 ) Posadas de Puerto Rico Associates v. Tourism Company of Puerto Rico ( 1986 ) San Francisco Arts & Athletics, Inc. v. United States Olympic Committee ( 1987 ) 44 Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode Island ( 1996 ) Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc. ( 2011 ) Campaign finance and political speech Buckley v. Valeo ( 1976 ) First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti ( 1978 ) Citizens Against Rent Control v. City of Berkeley ( 1981 ) Brown v. Socialist Workers ' 74 Campaign Committee ( 1982 ) Regan v. Taxation with Representation of Washington ( 1983 ) FEC v. Massachusetts Citizens for Life ( 1986 ) Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce ( 1990 ) McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission ( 1995 ) Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee v. FEC ( 1996 ) Nixon v. Shrink Missouri Government PAC ( 2000 ) Republican Party of Minnesota v. White ( 2002 ) McConnell v. FEC ( 2003 ) Randall v. Sorrell ( 2006 ) FEC v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc. ( 2007 ) Davis v. FEC ( 2008 ) Citizens United v. FEC ( 2010 ) McComish v. Bennett ( 2011 ) American Tradition Partnership v. Bullock ( 2012 ) McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission ( 2014 ) Williams - Yulee v. The Florida Bar ( 2015 ) Freedom of the press Prior restraints and censorship Near v. Minnesota ( 1931 ) Lovell v. City of Griffin ( 1938 ) Hannegan v. Esquire, Inc. ( 1946 ) New York Times Co. v. United States ( 1971 ) Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Tornillo ( 1974 ) Nebraska Press Ass'n v. Stuart ( 1976 ) Landmark Communications, Inc. v. Virginia ( 1978 ) Loewen v. Turnipseed ( N.D. Miss., 1980 ) Tory v. Cochran ( 2005 ) Privacy Time, Inc. v. Hill ( 1967 ) Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn ( 1975 ) Florida Star v. B.J.F. ( 1989 ) Taxation and privileges Grosjean v. American Press Co. ( 1936 ) Branzburg v. Hayes ( 1972 ) Minneapolis Star Tribune Co. v. Commissioner ( 1983 ) Defamation Beauharnais v. Illinois ( 1952 ) New York Times Co. v. Sullivan ( 1964 ) Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts ( 1967 ) Greenbelt Cooperative Publishing Ass'n, Inc. v. Bresler ( 1970 ) Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. ( 1974 ) Time, Inc. v. Firestone ( 1976 ) Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc. ( 1984 ) Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. Greenmoss Builders, Inc. ( 1985 ) McDonald v. Smith ( 1985 ) Hustler Magazine v. Falwell ( 1988 ) Harte - Hanks Communications, Inc. v. Connaughton ( 1989 ) Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co. ( 1990 ) Obsidian Finance Group, LLC v. Cox ( 9th Cir., 2014 ) Broadcast media Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. FCC ( 1969 ) FCC v. Pacifica Foundation ( 1978 ) Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. FCC ( 1994 ) Bartnicki v. Vopper ( 2001 ) Copyrighted materials Zacchini v. Scripps - Howard Broadcasting Co. ( 1977 ) Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises ( 1985 ) Freedom of association Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrath ( 1951 ) Watkins v. United States ( 1957 ) NAACP v. Alabama ( 1958 ) Baggett v. Bullitt ( 1964 ) In re Primus ( 1978 ) Roberts v. United States Jaycees ( 1984 ) Hurley v. Irish - American Gay, Lesbian, & Bisexual Group of Boston ( 1995 ) Boy Scouts of America v. Dale ( 2000 ) Retrieved from `` https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Minersville_School_District_v._Gobitis&oldid=831750098 '' Categories : United States Supreme Court cases United States education case law United States Free Speech Clause case law Jehovah 's Witnesses litigation in the United States 1940 in United States case law Flag controversies in the United States Pledge of Allegiance 1940 in education 1940 in religion Overruled United States Supreme Court decisions United States Supreme Court cases of the Hughes Court Christianity and law in the 20th century Hidden categories : Webarchive template webcite links All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from September 2014 Talk Contents About Wikipedia Français Српски / srpski Edit links This page was last edited on 22 March 2018, at 01 : 27. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution - ShareAlike License ; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia ® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. About Wikipedia

Question: what function according to the supreme court did the flag salute serve
Answer: to encourage patriotism among school children.