Alignment ( Dungeons & Dragons ) - wikipedia Alignment ( Dungeons & Dragons ) In the Dungeons & Dragons ( D&D ) fantasy role - playing game, alignment is a categorization of the ethical and moral perspective of player characters, non-player characters, and creatures. Most versions of the game feature a system in which players make two choices for characters. One is the character 's views on `` law '' vs `` chaos '', the other on `` good '' vs `` evil ''. The two axes allow for nine alignments in combination. These nine alignments can be shown in a grid, as follows : Lawful good Neutral good Chaotic good Lawful neutral ( True ) neutral Chaotic neutral Lawful evil Neutral evil Chaotic evil Contents 1 History 2 Function 3 Axes 3.1 Law vs. chaos 3.2 Good vs. evil 4 Alignments 4.1 Lawful good 4.2 Neutral good 4.3 Chaotic good 4.4 Lawful neutral 4.5 Neutral 4.6 Chaotic neutral 4.7 Lawful evil 4.8 Neutral evil 4.9 Chaotic evil 5 Legacy 6 See also 7 References 8 External links History D&D co-creator Gary Gygax credited the inspiration for the alignment system to the fantasy stories of Michael Moorcock and Poul Anderson. The original version of D&D allowed players to choose among three alignments when creating a character : lawful, implying honor and respect for society 's rules ; chaotic, implying rebelliousness and individualism ; and neutral, seeking a balance between the extremes. The 1977 release of the Dungeons & Dragons Basic Set introduced a second axis of good, implying altruism and respect for life, vs evil, implying selfishness and no respect for life. As with the law - vs - chaos axis, a neutral position exists between the extremes. Characters and creatures could be lawful and evil at the same time ( such as a tyrant ), or chaotic but good ( such as Robin Hood ). Advanced Dungeons & Dragons ( AD&D ), released between 1977 and 1979, continued the two - axis system. The 1981 version of the Basic Set, however, went back to the earlier one - axis alignment system. AD&D 2nd Edition, released in 1988, retained the two - axis system. In that edition, a character who performs too many actions outside their alignment can find their alignment changed, and is penalized by losing experience points, making it harder to reach the next level. D&D 3rd Edition, released in 2000, kept the same alignment system. D&D 4th Edition, released in 2008, reduced the number of alignments to five : lawful good, good, evil, chaotic evil, and unaligned. In that edition, `` good '' replaced neutral good and did not encompass chaotic good ; `` evil '' replaced neutral evil and did not encompass lawful evil ; `` unaligned '' replaced true neutral and did not encompass lawful neutral and chaotic neutral. D&D 5th Edition, released in 2014, returned to the previous schema of nine alignments, and included a tenth alignment of unaligned. Function Richard Bartle 's Designing Virtual Worlds noted that alignment is a way to categorize players ' characters, along with gender, race, character class, and sometimes nationality. Alignment was designed to help define role - playing, a character 's alignment being seen as their outlook on life. A player decides how a character should behave in assigning an alignment, and should then play the character in accordance with that alignment. A character 's alignment can change. If a lawful neutral character consistently performs good acts, when neutral or evil actions were possible, the character 's alignment will shift to lawful good. In games, the Dungeon Master ( referee ) decides when alignment violations occur, as it is subjective. Characters acting as a party should have compatible alignments ; a party with both good and evil characters may turn against itself. Bill Slavicsek and Richard Baker 's Dungeon Master For Dummies noted that a party of good or neutral characters works better as the motivations for adventures are easier, the group dynamics are smoother, and the `` heroic aspects of D&D shine through in ways that just do n't happen when players play evil characters ''. Axes Law vs chaos The law versus chaos axis in D&D predates good versus evil in the game rules. Originally the law / chaos axis was defined as the distinction between `` the belief that everything should follow an order, and that obeying rules is the natural way of life '', as opposed to `` the belief that life is random, and that chance and luck rule the world ''. According to the early rulebook, lawful characters are driven to protect the interest of the group above the interest of the individual and would strive to be honest and to obey just and fair laws. Chaotic creatures and individuals embraced the individual above the group and viewed laws and honesty as unimportant. At that time, the rulebook specified that `` chaotic behavior is usually the same as behavior that could be called ' evil ' ''. Neutral creatures and characters believe in the importance of both groups and individuals, and felt that law and chaos are both important. They believe in maintaining the balance between law and chaos and were motivated by self - interest. The third edition D&D rules define `` law '' and `` chaos '' as follows : Law implies honor, trustworthiness, obedience to authority, and reliability. On the downside, lawfulness can include closed - mindedness, reactionary adherence to tradition, judgmentalness, and a lack of adaptability. Those who consciously promote lawfulness say that only lawful behavior creates a society in which people can depend on each other and make the right decisions in full confidence that others will act as they should. Chaos implies freedom, adaptability, and flexibility. On the downside, chaos can include recklessness, resentment toward legitimate authority, arbitrary actions, and irresponsibility. Those who promote chaotic behavior say that only unfettered personal freedom allows people to express themselves fully and lets society benefit from the potential that its individuals have within them. Someone who is neutral with respect to law and chaos has a normal respect for authority and feels neither a compulsion to follow rules nor a compulsion to rebel. They are honest but can be tempted into lying or deceiving others if it suits him / her. Good vs evil The conflict of good versus evil is a common motif in D&D and other fantasy fiction. Although player characters can adventure for personal gain rather than from altruistic motives, it is generally assumed that the player characters will be opposed to evil and will tend to fight evil creatures. The third edition D&D rules define `` good '' and `` evil '' as follows : Good implies altruism, respect for life, and a concern for the dignity of sentient beings. Good characters make personal sacrifices to help others. Evil implies harming, oppressing, and killing others. Some evil creatures simply have no compassion for others and kill without qualms if doing so is convenient or if it can be set up. Others actively pursue evil, killing for sport or out of duty to some malevolent deity or master. People who are neutral with respect to good and evil have compunctions against killing the innocent but lack the commitment to make sacrifices to protect or help others. Neutral people are committed to others by personal relationships. Within the game, Paladins, altruistic heroes, and creatures such as angels are considered good. Villains and violent criminals are considered evil, as are inherently evil creatures such as demons and most undead. Animals are considered neutral even when they attack innocents, because they act on natural instinct and lack the intelligence to make moral decisions ; in the fifth edition, this is expressed by labeling such beasts as `` unaligned ''. Alignments Lawful good A lawful good character typically acts with compassion and always with honor and a sense of duty. Such characters include righteous knights, paladins, and most dwarves. Lawful good creatures include the noble golden dragons. Neutral good A neutral good character typically acts altruistically, without regard for or against lawful precepts such as rules or tradition. A neutral good character has no problems with cooperating with lawful officials, but does not feel beholden to them. In the event that doing the right thing requires the bending or breaking of rules, they do not suffer the same inner conflict that a lawful good character would. Chaotic good A chaotic good character does what is necessary to bring about change for the better, disdains bureaucratic organizations that get in the way of social improvement, and places a high value on personal freedom, not only for oneself, but for others as well. Chaotic good characters usually intend to do the right thing, but their methods are generally disorganized and often out of sync with the rest of society. Lawful neutral A lawful neutral character typically believes strongly in lawful concepts such as honor, order, rules, and tradition, and often follows a personal code. Examples of lawful neutral characters include a soldier who always follows orders, a judge or enforcer that adheres mercilessly to the letter of the law, and a disciplined monk. Neutral A neutral character ( also called `` true neutral '' ) is neutral on both axes and tends not to feel strongly towards any alignment, or actively seeks their balance. Druids frequently follow this dedication to balance and, under Advanced Dungeons & Dragons rules, were required to be this alignment. In an example given in the 2nd Edition Player 's Handbook, a typical druid might fight against a band of marauding gnolls, only to switch sides to save the gnolls ' clan from being totally exterminated. Most animals are originally considered true neutral, because they lack the capacity for moral judgment, guided by instinct rather than conscious decision. The 4th edition introduced an additional alignment called `` unaligned '' for creatures not sapient enough to make decisions based on alignment, even that of neutrality, which is also used in 5th edition. Chaotic neutral A chaotic neutral character is an individualist who follows their own heart and generally shirks rules and traditions. Although chaotic neutral characters promote the ideals of freedom, it is their own freedom that comes first ; good and evil come second to their need to be free. Lawful evil A lawful evil character sees a well - ordered system as being easier to exploit and shows a combination of desirable and undesirable traits. Examples of this alignment include tyrants, devils, and undiscriminating mercenary types who have a strict code of conduct. Neutral evil A neutral evil character is typically selfish and has no qualms about turning on allies - of - the - moment, and usually makes allies primarily to further their own goals. A neutral evil character has no compunctions about harming others to get what they want, but neither will they go out of their way to cause carnage or mayhem when they see no direct benefit for themselves. Another valid interpretation of neutral evil holds up evil as an ideal, doing evil for evil 's sake and trying to spread its influence. Examples of the first type are an assassin who has little regard for formal laws but does not needlessly kill, a henchman who plots behind their superior 's back, or a mercenary who switches sides if made a better offer. An example of the second type would be a masked killer who strikes only for the sake of causing fear and distrust in the community. Chaotic evil A chaotic evil character tends to have no respect for rules, other people 's lives, or anything but their own desires, which are typically selfish and cruel. They set a high value on personal freedom, but do not have much regard for the lives or freedom of other people. Chaotic evil characters do not work well in groups because they resent being given orders and do not usually behave themselves unless there is no alternative. Legacy This section needs expansion with : examples of use of the alignment system in other contexts. You can help by adding to it. ( June 2016 ) The D&D alignment system is occasionally referenced as a system of moral classification in other contexts. Salon television critic Heather Havrilesky, while reviewing the HBO television series True Blood, analyzed the program 's characters in terms of D&D alignments and identified protagonist Sookie Stackhouse as chaotic good, her vampire boyfriend Bill Compton as lawful neutral, Eric Northman as lawful evil, and Lafayette Reynolds as chaotic neutral. In `` Hostiles and Calamities '', the 11th episode of season 7 of The Walking Dead television series, the character Eugene Porter makes a reference to the D&D alignment system when describing himself as ``... not good. I 'm not lawful, neutral, or chaotic. '' See also Alignment ( role - playing games ) Book of Exalted Deeds Book of Vile Darkness References Jump up ^ Livingstone, Ian ( 1982 ). Dicing with Dragons : An Introduction to Role - playing Games ( 2nd ed. ). London : Routledge & Kegan Paul. p. 79. ISBN 0710094663. Jump up ^ Fine, Gary Alan ( 2002 ). Shared Fantasy : Role Playing Games as Social Worlds ( Paperback ed. ). Chicago : University of Chicago Press. p. 17. ISBN 0226249441. Retrieved February 6, 2017. Jump up ^ Calisuri and Corvar ( May 30, 2000 ). `` Gary Gygax - Creator of Dungeons & Dragons ''. TheOneRing.net. Retrieved March 5, 2015. Jump up ^ Knode, Mordicai ; Callahan, Tim ( June 17, 2013 ). `` Advanced Readings in D&D : Poul Anderson ''. Tor.com. Retrieved February 19, 2017. Jump up ^ Pulsipher, Lewis ( Oct -- Nov 1991 ). `` An Introduction to Dungeons & Dragons, Part V ''. White Dwarf. Games Workshop ( 27 ) : 14. Jump up ^ Gygax, Gary ( 1978 ). Advanced Dungeons & Dragons, Players Handbook. Lake Geneva, Wisconsin : TSR Hobbies. p. 33. ISBN 9780935696011. ^ Jump up to : Gygax, Gary ; Arneson, Dave ; Moldvay, Tom ( 1981 ). Dungeons & Dragons : Basic Rulebook ( 4th ed. ). Lake Geneva, Wisconsin : TSR Hobbies. p. 11. ISBN 0935696482. ^ Jump up to : Cook, David `` Zed '' ( 1989 ). Advanced Dungeons & Dragons, 2nd Edition, Player 's Handbook ( 2nd ed. ). Lake Geneva, Wisconsin : TSR. pp. 46 -- 49. ISBN 0880387165. ^ Jump up to : Cook, Monte ; Tweet, Jonathan ; Williams, Skip ( 2003 ). Dungeons & Dragons : Player 's Handbook ( Special ed. ). Renton, Washington : Wizards of the Coast. ISBN 9780786928866. Jump up ^ Heinsoo, Rob ; Collins, Andy ; Wyatt, James ( 2008 ). Player 's Handbook ( 4th ed. ). Renton, Washington : Wizards of the Coast. pp. 19 -- 20. ISBN 0786948671. Jump up ^ Cogburn, Jon ; Silcox, Mark ( 2012 ). Dungeons and Dragons and Philosophy : Raiding the Temple of Wisdom. Chicago : Open Court Publishing. pp. 30 -- 32, 35. ISBN 9780812697964. Since neutral alignments are traditionally labeled `` true '' versions of the other axis ( so `` true good '' equals `` neutral good '' ), the new system can be shown as above. The change represents a staggering metaphysical and psychological shift. Lawful Neutral, Lawful Evil, Chaotic Good, and Chaotic Neutral have been removed as archetypes for all of the denizens in the Dungeons and Dragons universe... So you ca n't fail to be Good if you 're Lawful... So again it 's impossible to see how you could be Evil and be Lawful in the new sense... Being Chaotic is so undermining of our ability to act rationally that a Chaotic person will not possess the ability to be Good... But then, the people in the middle are those who will neither. So true Neutrals will neither law nor chaos, neither good nor evil. ^ Jump up to : Mearls, Mike ; Crawford, Jeremy ( 2014 ). Dungeons & Dragons Monster Manual ( 9th ed. ). Renton, Washington : Wizards of the Coast. ISBN 0786965614. ^ Jump up to : Bartle, Richard A. ( 2004 ). Designing Virtual Worlds. Indianapolis, Indiana : New Riders. pp. 257 -- 260. ISBN 0131018167. ^ Jump up to : Slavicsek, Bill ; Baker, Richard ( 2006 ). Dungeon Master For Dummies. Hoboken, New Jersey : Wiley. p. 43. ISBN 9780471783305. Retrieved February 6, 2017. Jump up ^ Studio 260 ( May 12, 2016 ). `` The Chart That Explains Everyone ''. WNYC. Retrieved June 22, 2016. Jump up ^ Havrilesky, Heather ( June 14, 2009 ). `` I Like to Watch ''. Salon. Retrieved March 5, 2015. Jump up ^ Handlen, Zack ( February 26, 2017 ). `` The Walking Dead digs into Eugene 's psyche, which is fine if you 're into that ''. The A.V. Club. Retrieved February 27, 2017. External links Alignment test - Wizards of the Coast D20 System Reference Document alignment description Dungeons & Dragons Basics General Controversies Editions Gen Con Popular culture Film series Related products Retro - clones RPGA Sources and influences Gameplay Adventures Alignment Dungeon Master Game mechanics Magic Magic item major artifacts Miniatures Psionics Creators Gary Gygax Dave Arneson Keith Baker Richard Baker Ed Greenwood Jeff Grubb Tracy Hickman Robert J. Kuntz Mike Mearls Frank Mentzer Chris Perkins Jim Ward Margaret Weis Companies TSR Wizards of the Coast Grenadier Models Judges Guild Paizo Ral Partha Strategic Simulations Licenses Game System License Open Game License System Reference Document Geography and cosmology Campaign settings Al - Qadim Birthright Blackmoor Council of Wyrms Dark Sun Dragonlance Eberron Forgotten Realms Ghostwalk Greyhawk Kara - Tur Mystara Planescape Ravenloft Spelljammer Worlds Abeir - Toril Eberron Krynn Mystara Oerth Underdark Planes of existence Prime Material Plane Inner Plane Outer Plane Far Realm Player characters Races Dragonborn Dwarf Eladrin Elf Gnome Halfling Half - elf Half - orc Human Tiefling Classes Barbarian Bard Cleric Druid Fighter Monk Paladin Ranger Sorcerer Rogue Warlock Wizard List of alternative classes Character lists Dragonlance Forgotten Realms Greyhawk Ravenloft Notable characters Drizzt Do'Urden Elminster Iggwilv Raistlin Majere Mordenkainen Lord Soth Strahd von Zarovich Beasts and other beings Creatures and monsters Creature types Aberration Celestials Constructs Deathless Draconic creatures Dragons Chromatic dragon Metallic dragon Elementals Fey Fiends Giants Humanoids Lycanthropes Monstrous humanoids Oozes Outsiders Undead Notable Beholder Drow ( dark elf ) Githyanki Illithid ( mind flayer ) Lich Lists by edition Original Classic AD&D 1st edition AD&D 2nd edition D&D 3rd edition D&D v3. 5 D&D 4th edition D&D 5th edition List of monsters Deities and powers Human and demihuman Human Dwarven deities Elven deities ( Seldarine ) Gnome deities Halfling deities Monster Archdevils Demon lords Dragon deities Fey deities ( Seelie Court ) Giant deities Goblinoid deities Orc deities Lists by setting Dragonlance deities Forgotten Realms deities Greyhawk deities Publications Core rulebooks Player 's Handbook Dungeon Master 's Guide Monster Manual Classic boxed sets Dungeons & Dragons ( Original ) Basic Expert Companion Master Immortals Rules Cyclopedia Supplements Arms and Equipment Guide Battlesystem Book of Exalted Deeds Book of Vile Darkness Deities & Demigods Draconomicon Dungeon Master Option : High - Level Campaigns Fiend Folio Forgotten Realms Campaign Setting Libris Mortis Manual of the Planes Player 's Option : Combat & Tactics Player 's Option : Skills & Powers Player 's Option : Spells & Magic Psionics Handbook AD&D 2nd edition D&D 3rd edition D&D v3. 5 Expanded and Complete Unearthed Arcana Wrath of the Immortals Periodicals Dragon Dungeon Imagine Living Greyhawk Journal Polyhedron Notable modules List of Eberron modules and sourcebooks Against the Giants Dead Gods Desert of Desolation Dragonlance Expedition to the Barrier Peaks The Gates of Firestorm Peak The Isle of Dread The Keep on the Borderlands The Lost Caverns of Tsojcanth Queen of the Spiders Ravenloft Red Hand of Doom The Ruins of Undermountain The Temple of Elemental Evil Tomb of Horrors White Plume Mountain Video games Early games ( 1975 -- 1983 ) D&D Computer Labyrinth Game D&D Computer Fantasy Game AD&D : Cloudy Mountain AD&D : Treasure of Tarmin Baldur 's Gate series Bhaalspawn Saga Baldur 's Gate Tales of the Sword Coast Enhanced Edition Siege of Dragonspear Baldur 's Gate II : Shadows of Amn Throne of Bhaal Enhanced Edition Dark Alliance Baldur 's Gate : Dark Alliance Baldur 's Gate : Dark Alliance II Icewind Dale series Icewind Dale Heart of Winter Icewind Dale : Enhanced Edition Icewind Dale II Neverwinter Nights series Neverwinter Nights Shadows of Undrentide Hordes of the Underdark Kingmaker Darkness over Daggerford Neverwinter Nights 2 Mask of the Betrayer Storm of Zehir Mysteries of Westgate Pool of Radiance series Pool of Radiance Curse of the Azure Bonds Secret of the Silver Blades Pools of Darkness Ruins of Myth Drannor Savage Frontier series Gateway to the Savage Frontier Neverwinter Nights Treasures of the Savage Frontier Other games by campaign setting Dark Sun Dark Sun : Shattered Lands Dark Sun : Wake of the Ravager Dark Sun Online : Crimson Sands Dragonlance Heroes of the Lance Dragons of Flame War of the Lance DragonStrike Shadow Sorcerer Champions of Krynn Death Knights of Krynn The Dark Queen of Krynn Eberron D&D : Dragonshard D&D Online : Stormreach Forgotten Realms Hillsfar Eye of the Beholder Eye of the Beholder II : The Legend of Darkmoon Eye of the Beholder III : Assault on Myth Drannor Dungeon Hack Unlimited Adventures Menzoberranzan Blood & Magic Descent to Undermountain Demon Stone Daggerdale Neverwinter Lords of Waterdeep Sword Coast Legends Mystara Order of the Griffon Warriors of the Eternal Sun Fantasy Empires Tower of Doom Shadow over Mystara Collection Chronicles of Mystara Ravenloft Ravenloft : Strahd 's Possession Ravenloft : Stone Prophet Iron & Blood : Warriors of Ravenloft Various settings Spelljammer : Pirates of Realmspace D&D : Stronghold AD&D : Slayer DeathKeep Al - Qadim : The Genie 's Curse Birthright : The Gorgon 's Alliance Planescape : Torment D&D : Heroes The Temple of Elemental Evil D&D : Tactics Retrieved from `` https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alignment_(Dungeons_%26_Dragons)&oldid=852078040 '' Categories : Dungeons & Dragons Role - playing game terminology Hidden categories : Use mdy dates from February 2017 Articles to be expanded from June 2016 All articles to be expanded Talk Contents About Wikipedia Esperanto Français 日本 語 Русский Українська Tiếng Việt 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 26 July 2018, at 13 : 39 ( UTC ). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution - ShareAlike License ; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia ® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. About Wikipedia

Question: what are the alignments in dungeons and dragons
Answer: Lawful good