Indirect rule - wikipedia Indirect rule A 20th century Yoruba ( Nigerian ) depiction of a British District Officer on tour of indirect rulers Indirect rule is a system of governance used by the British and French to control parts of their colonial empires, particularly in Africa and Asia, through pre-existing indigenous power structures. These dependencies were often called `` protectorates '' or `` trucial states ''. By this system, the day - to - day government and administration of areas both small and large was left in the hands of traditional rulers, who gained prestige and the stability and protection afforded by the Pax Britannica, at the cost of losing control of their external affairs, and often of taxation, communications, and other matters, usually with a small number of European `` advisors '' effectively overseeing the government of large numbers of people spread over extensive areas. Contents 1 British Empire 1.1 In Africa 1.2 In India 2 Practical implementation of indirect rule 3 Interpretations 4 See also 5 References 6 Sources and references 6.1 Period writings British Empire Frederick Lugard, author of The Dual Mandate in British Tropical Africa, was considered the ideological founder of indirect rule in Africa after working as an administrator in Northern Nigeria ( 1899 - 1906 ) Some British colonies were ruled directly by the Colonial Office in London, while others were ruled indirectly through local rulers who are supervised behind the scenes by British advisors. In 1890 Zanzibar became a protectorate ( not a colony ) of Britain. Prime minister Salisbury explained his position : The condition of a protected dependency is more acceptable to the half civilized races, and more suitable for them than direct dominion. It is cheaper, simpler, less wounding to their self - esteem, gives them more career as public officials, and spares of unnecessary contact with white men. The Princely States of India were ruled indirectly. So too was much of the West African holdings. In Africa The ideological underpinnings, as well as the practical application, of indirect rule in Kenya and Nigeria is usually traced to the work of Frederick Lugard, the High Commissioner of the Protectorate of Northern Nigeria from 1899 to 1906. In the lands of the Sokoto Caliphate, conquered by the British Empire at the turn of the century, Lugard instituted a system whereby external, military, and tax control was operated by the British, while most every other aspect of life was left to local pre-British aristocracies who may have sided with the British during or after their conquest. The theory behind this solution to a very practical problem ( a problem referred to as ' The Native Problem ' by Mahmood Mamdani in his work Citizen and Subject ) of domination by a tiny group of foreigners of huge populations is laid out in Lugard 's influential work, The Dual Mandate in British Tropical Africa. In India The largest application of Indirect rule was in British Asia, in hundreds of pre-colonial states, first seen at work under the East India Company 's system of subsidiary alliances in the Indian subcontinent. The areas thus brought into the British sphere of influence became known as the Indian Princely States. Subsequently, the same principle was applied in strategic regions on the sea routes to India, especially in the Persian Gulf protected states. In the British colonies, the laws were typically made by a British Governor and legislative council, but in the protectorates and princely states local rulers retained their traditional administrative authority and ability to legislate, subject to British control of certain areas. Indirect rule was particularly effective in enabling the British to exploit natural resources and raw materials of vast subordinate nations. The establishment of naval and military bases in strategic points around the globe maintained the necessary power to underpin such control. Practical implementation of indirect rule Naaba Koom II, king of the Mossi in French Upper Volta, pictured in 1930. Preservation of precolonial political units was the basis of indirect rule in British and French empires Indirect rule was cheaper and easier for the European powers, and in particular it required fewer administrators, but it did have a number of problems. In many cases, European authorities empowered local traditional leaders, as in the case of the monarchy of Uganda, but if no suitable leader could be found ( in the traditional Western sense of the term ), the Europeans would simply choose local rulers to suit them. This was the case in Kenya and Southern Nigeria, and the new leaders, often called `` warrant chiefs '', were not always supported by the local population. The European ruling classes also often chose local leaders with similar traits to their own, despite these traits not being suited to native leadership. Many were conservative elders, and thus indirect rule fostered a conservative outlook among the indigenous population and marginalised the young intelligentsia. Written laws, which replaced oral laws, were less flexible to the changing social nature, old customs of retribution and justice were removed or banned, and the removal of more violent punishments in some areas led to an increase in crime. Furthermore, leaders empowered by the governments of European powers were often not familiar with their new tasks, such as recruitment and tax. Interpretations From the early 20th century, French and British writers helped establish a dichotomy between British Indirect rule, exemplified by the Indian princely states and by Lord Lugard 's writings on the administration of northern Nigeria, and French colonial direct rule. As with British theorists, French colonial officials like Félix Eboué or Robert Delavignette wrote and argued throughout the first half of the 20th century for a distinct French style of rule that was centralized, uniform, and aimed at assimilating colonial subjects into the French polity. French rule, sometimes labeled Jacobin, was said in these writings to be based on the twin ideologies of the centralized unitary French government of the Metropole, with the French colonial ideology of Assimilation. Colonial Assimilation argued that French law and citizenship was based on universal values that came from the French Revolution. Mirroring French domestic citizenship law, French colonial law allowed for anyone who could prove themselves culturally French ( the `` Évolués '' ) to become equal French citizens. In French West Africa, only parts of the Senegalese `` Four Communes '' ever extended French citizenship outside a few educated African elite. This was contrasted with British Indirect Rule, which never foresaw subject Protectorates becoming legally assimilated into `` the home nations ''. While making more subtle distinctions, this model of direct versus indirect rule was dominant in academia from the 1930s until the 1970s. Academics since the 1970s have problematised the Direct versus Indirect Rule dichotomy, arguing the systems were in practice intermingled in both British and French colonial governance, and that the perception of indirect rule was sometimes promoted to justify quite direct rule structures. Mahmood Mamdani and other academics have discussed extensively how both Direct and Indirect rule were attempts to implement identical goals of foreign rule, but how the `` Indirect '' strategy helped to create ethnic and racial cleavages within ruled societies which persist in hostile communal relations and dysfunctional strategies of government. Mamdani himself famously described indirect rule as `` decentralised despotism ''. Some political scientists have even expanded the debate on how direct versus indirect rule experiences continue to affect contemporary governance into how governments which have never experienced colonialism rule. See also British Empire portal Politics portal Bussa revolt - a 1915 uprising against indirect rule in Northern Nigeria Direct colonial rule Impact of Western European colonialism and colonisation References Jump up ^ The American Historical Association. `` ENGLAND 'S INDIRECT RULE IN ITS AFRICAN COLONIES '' in THROUGH THE LENS OF HISTORY : BIAFRA, NIGERIA, THE WEST AND THE WORLD. AHA teaching guide, historians.org, n.d. Accessed 2012 - 09 - 20 http://www.historians.org/tl/lessonplans/nc/trask/indirect.htm Jump up ^ Andrew Roberts, Salisbury : Victorian Titan ( 1999 ) p 529 Jump up ^ Lakshmi Iyer, `` Direct versus indirect colonial rule in India : Long - term consequences. '' The Review of Economics and Statistics ( 2010 ) 92 # 4 pp : 693 - 713 online Archived 2014 - 09 - 03 at the Wayback Machine... Jump up ^ Adiele Eberechukwu Afigbo, The Warrant Chiefs : indirect rule in southeastern Nigeria, 1891 - 1929 ( London : Longman, 1972 ) Jump up ^ Eric J. Hobsbawm, Terence O. Ranger, ' The Invention of Tradition ' ( 1983 ) Jump up ^ Collins and Burns, pp. 297 - 308 Jump up ^ Robert Louis Delavignette. Freedom and Authority in French West Africa. originally published as Les vrais chefs de l'empire : 1939. Oxford University : 1946. Jump up ^ Georges Hardy, Histoire sociale de la colonisation française. ( Paris, 1953 ) Jump up ^ Raymond F. Betts, Assimilation and Association in French Colonial Theory, 1890 - 1914 ( New York, 1961 ) Jump up ^ Martin D. Lewis, `` One Hundred Million Frenchmen : The Assimilationist Theory in French Colonial Policy, '' Comparative Studies in Society and History IV ( January 1962 ), 129 - 153. Jump up ^ Erik Bleich, ' The legacies of history ? Colonization and immigrant integration in Britain and France. Theory and Society, Volume 34, Number 2, April 2005. Jump up ^ Michael Crowder ' in Senegal : A Study in French Assimilation Policy ( London : Oxford University Press, 1962 ) Jump up ^ Mamadou Diouf, ' The French Colonial Policy of Assimilation and the Civility of the Originaires of the Four Communes ( Senegal ) : A Nineteenth Century Globalization Project ' in Development and Change, Volume 29, Number 4, October 1998, pp. 671 -- 696 ( 26 ) Jump up ^ M.M. Knight, ' French Colonial Policy -- the Decline of `` Association '' ' in The Journal of Modern History, Vol. 5, No. 2 ( Jun., 1933 ), pp. 208 -- 224 Jump up ^ Michael Lambert, ' From Citizenship to Negritude : Making a difference in elite ideologies of colonized Francophone West Africa ' in Comparative Studies in Society and History, Vol. 35, No. 2. ( Apr., 1993 ), pp. 239 -- 262 Jump up ^ G. Wesley Johnson, Jr., The Emergence of Black Politics in Senegal : The Struggle for Power in the Four Communes, 1900 -- 1920 ( 1972 ) Jump up ^ James F. Searing, ' Senegal : Colonial Period : Four Communes : Dakar, Saint - Louis, Gorée, and Rufisque ', in Kevin Shillington ( editor ), Encyclopedia of African History ( New York, 2005 ) : 3 Volumes, 3, 1334 -- 35 Jump up ^ Ralph J. Bunche, ' French and British Imperialism in West Africa ' in The Journal of Negro History, Vol. 21, No. 1. ( Jan., 1936 ), pp. 31 -- 46 Jump up ^ Michael Crowder, ' Indirect Rule : French and British Style ' in Africa : Journal of the International African Institute, Vol. 34, No. 3. ( Jul., 1964 ), pp. 197 -- 205 Jump up ^ Alec G. Hargreaves, ed. Memory, Empire, and Postcolonialism : Legacies of French Colonialism ( Lanham : Lexington Books, 2005 ; ISBN 9780739108215 ) Jump up ^ Ann Laura Stoler ( 1989 ), ' Rethinking Colonial Categories : European Communities and the Boundaries of Rule ' in Comparative Studies in Society and History, 31, pp 134 - 161 doi : 10.1017 / S0010417500015693 Jump up ^ Jonathan Derrick, ' The ' Native Clerk ' in Colonial West Africa ' in African Affairs, Vol. 82, No. 326. ( Jan., 1983 ), pp. 61 -- 74. Jump up ^ Emily Lynn Osborn ( 2003 ). ' CIRCLE OF IRON ' : AFRICAN COLONIAL EMPLOYEES AND THE INTERPRETATION OF COLONIAL RULE IN FRENCH WEST AFRICA. The Journal of African History, 44, pp 29 - 50 doi : 10.1017 / S0021853702008307 Jump up ^ Anthony I. Nwabughuogu. The Role of Propaganda in the Development of Indirect Rule in Nigeria, 1890 - 1929. The International Journal of African Historical Studies Vol. 14, No. 1 ( 1981 ), pp. 65 - 92 Jump up ^ Paul Rich. The Origins of Apartheid Ideology : The Case of Ernest Stubbs and Transvaal Native Administration, c. 1902 - 1932. African Affairs, Vol. 79, No. 315. ( Apr., 1980 ), pp. 171 -- 194. Jump up ^ Lakshmi Iyer ( 2010 ). Direct versus Indirect Colonial Rule in India : Long - Term Consequences. The Review of Economics and Statistics. November 2010, Vol. 92, No. 4, Pages 693 - 713 Jump up ^ Mahmood Mamdani. Indirect Rule, Civil Society, and Ethnicity : The African Dilemma. Social Justice Vol. 23, No. 1 / 2 ( 63 - 64 ), The World Today ( Spring - Summer 1996 ), pp. 145 - 150 Jump up ^ Mahmood Mamdani. Historicizing power and responses to power : indirect rule and its reform. Social Research Vol. 66, No. 3, PROSPECTS FOR DEMOCRACY ( FALL 1999 ), pp. 859 - 886 Jump up ^ Mahmood Mamdani, Citizen and Subject : Contemporary Africa and the Legacy of Late Colonialism ( 1996 ), p. 37. Jump up ^ John Gerring, Daniel Ziblatt, Johan Van Gorp and Julián Arévalo ( 2011 ). An Institutional Theory of Direct and Indirect Rule. World Politics, 63, pp 377 - 433 doi : 10.1017 / S0043887111000104 This article includes a list of references, but its sources remain unclear because it has insufficient inline citations. Please help to improve this article by introducing more precise citations. ( September 2012 ) Sources and references Michael Crowder. Indirect Rule : French and British Style. Africa : Journal of the International African Institute, Vol. 34, No. 3. ( Jul., 1964 ), pp. 197 -- 205. Paul Rich. The Origins of Apartheid Ideology : The Case of Ernest Stubbs and Transvaal Native Administration, c. 1902 - 1932. African Affairs, Vol. 79, No. 315. ( Apr., 1980 ), pp. 171 -- 194. Omipidan Teslim Indirect Rule in Nigeria OldNaija H.F. Morris. A History of the Adoption of Codes of Criminal Law and Procedure in British Colonial Africa, 1876 - 1935. Journal of African Law, Vol. 18, No. 1, Criminal Law and Criminology. ( Spring, 1974 ), pp. 6 -- 23. Jonathan Derrick. The ' Native Clerk ' in Colonial West Africa. African Affairs, Vol. 82, No. 326. ( Jan., 1983 ), pp. 61 -- 74. Diana Wylie. Confrontation over Kenya : The Colonial Office and Its Critics 1918 - 1940. The Journal of African History, Vol. 18, No. 3. ( 1977 ), pp. 427 -- 447. P.A. Brunt. Empires : Reflections on British and Roman Imperialism. Comparative Studies in Society and History, Vol. 7, No. 3. ( Apr., 1965 ), pp. 267 -- 288. R.O. Collins and J.M. Burns. A History of Sub-Saharan Africa, Cambridge, 2007. Harrington, Jack ( 2010 ), Sir John Malcolm and the Creation of British India, Chs. 4 & 5., New York : Palgrave Macmillan., ISBN 978 - 0 - 230 - 10885 - 1 Period writings Harold Nicolson. The Colonial Problem. International Affairs ( Royal Institute of International Affairs 1931 - 1939 ), Vol. 17, No. 1. ( Jan. - Feb., 1938 ), pp. 32 -- 50. W.E. Rappard. The Practical Working of the Mandates System. Journal of the British Institute of International Affairs, Vol. 4, No. 5. ( Sep., 1925 ), pp. 205 -- 226. Jan Smuts. Native Policy in Africa. Journal of the Royal African Society, Vol. 29, No. 115. ( Apr., 1930 ), pp. 248 -- 268. Ralph J. Bunche. French and British Imperialism in West Africa. The Journal of Negro History, Vol. 21, No. 1. ( Jan., 1936 ), pp. 31 -- 46. Empires Ancient ( Colonies ) Akkadian Egyptian Assyrian Babylonian Carthaginian Chinese Qin Han Three Kingdoms Jin North and South Hellenistic Macedonian Seleucid Hittite Indian Nanda Maurya Satavahana Shunga Gupta Harsha Iranian Elamite Median Achaemenid Parthian Sasanian Kushan Mongol Xianbei Xiongnu Roman Western Eastern Teotihuacan Post-classical Arab Rashidun Umayyad Abbasid Fatimid Córdoba Aragonese Angevin Aztec Benin Bornu Bruneian Bulgarian First Second Byzantine Nicaea Trebizond Chinese Sui Tang Song Yuan Ethiopian Zagwe Solomonic Georgian Hunnic Inca Indian Chola Gurjara - Pratihara Pala Eastern Ganga dynasty Delhi Vijayanagara Iranian Samanid Kanem Khmer Latin Majapahit Malaccan Mali Mongol Yuan Golden Horde Chagatai Khanate Ilkhanate Moroccan Idrisid Almoravid Almohad Marinid North Sea Oyo Holy - Roman Carolingian Serbian Somali Ajuran Ifatite Adalite Mogadishan Warsangali Songhai Srivijaya Tibetan Turko - Persian Ghaznavid Great Seljuk Khwarezmian Timurid Vietnamese Ly Tran Le Wagadou Modern Ashanti Austrian Austro - Hungarian Brazilian Central African Chinese Ming Qing China Manchukuo Ethiopian Haitian French First Second German First / Old Reich Second Reich Third Reich Indian Maratha Sikh Mughal British Raj Iranian Safavid Afsharid Qajar Japanese Johor Korean Mexican First Second Moroccan Saadi Alaouite Russian Somali Gobroon Majeerteen Hobyo Soviet Swedish Tongan Turkish Ottoman Karaman Ramazan Vietnamese Tay Son Nguyen Vietnam Colonies American Belgian British English Danish Dutch French German Italian Japanese Omani Polish -- Lithuanian Couronian Portuguese Sovereign Military Order of Malta Spanish Swedish Lists Empires largest ancient great powers medieval great powers modern great powers Retrieved from `` https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Indirect_rule&oldid=859936492 '' Categories : Governance of the British Empire History of European colonialism French colonels Hidden categories : Webarchive template wayback links All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from March 2014 Articles lacking in - text citations from September 2012 All articles lacking in - text citations Talk Contents About Wikipedia Deutsch Français 한국어 Polski Edit links This page was last edited on 17 September 2018, at 08 : 07 ( UTC ). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution - ShareAlike License ; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia ® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. About Wikipedia

Question: who practiced indirect rule with their african colonies
Answer: the British Empire