Trinitarian formula - wikipedia Trinitarian formula Pronunciation of the trinitarian formula in Latin : `` In nomine Patris et Filii et Spiritus Sancti '', `` amen ''. The `` Shield of the Trinity '' or `` Scutum Fidei '' diagram of traditional Western Christian symbolism. The trinitarian formula is the phrase `` in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit '' ( original Greek εἰς τὸ ὄνομα τοῦ Πατρὸς καὶ τοῦ Υἱοῦ καὶ τοῦ Ἁγίου Πνεύματος, eis to onoma tou Patros kai tou Huiou kai tou Hagiou Pneumatos, or in Latin in nomine Patris et Filii et Spiritus Sancti ), or words to that form and effect referring to the three persons of the Christian Trinity. It is often followed by an `` Amen ''. Contents 1 Biblical origin 2 Use in baptism 3 Other uses 4 Views of textual criticism 5 See also 6 References Biblical origin These words are quoted from a command of the risen Jesus in the Great Commission : `` Go, therefore, and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit '' ( Matthew 28 : 19 ) ; a small minority of other translations read, `` into the name ''. Use in baptism According to the doctrines of Roman Catholicism, Eastern Orthodoxy, Anglicanism and most forms of Protestantism, a baptism is not valid if the Trinitarian formula is not used in the administration of that sacrament. Consequently, they may not recognize religious communities that baptize without this formula -- e.g. Unitarians, Branhamists, Frankists, Jehovah 's Witnesses, and Oneness Pentecostals, all of whom deny the Trinity -- as Christian religions. This is also the case with baptisms within The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter - day Saints ( LDS church ). Although LDS members baptize with the same Trinitarian formula, they reject the Nicene Trinitarian conception and regard the three Persons of the Trinity as being distinct personages united not in substance, but in dominion and purpose. Other faiths ( Frankists, Oneness Pentecostals and Branhamists in particular ) use the formula `` In the name of Jesus Christ '' ( based on Acts 2 : 38 ) for baptism, and in turn re-baptize converts who were first baptized under the Trinitarian formula, sometimes claiming that such persons would not have been previously aware that `` Jesus is the Lord ''. Likewise, converts to Trinitarian denominations from Mormonism and other nontrinitarian denominations have to be baptized in the name of the ( Nicene ) Trinity. Other uses Together with baptism, the Trinitarian formula is used in other prayers, rites, liturgies, and sacraments. One of its most common uses apart from baptism is when Roman Catholics, Eastern and Oriental Orthodox, Anglicans, Lutherans, Methodists, and others make the sign of the cross while reciting the formula. Views of textual Criticism Some scholars of the Greek New Testament and of the historical Jesus, both liberal and conservative, regard the trinitarian formula as an early Christian elaboration. Biblical scholars from the controversial Jesus Seminar, a group of textual critics ( including figures like Robert W. Funk, John Dominic Crossan, Marcus Borg, Bruce D. Chilton, and John S. Kloppenborg ), have said that the whole of Matthew chapter 28 is the result of later editorial work on the Gospels and was never uttered by Jesus or his immediate disciples. Luke Timothy Johnson, a frequent critic of the methodologies of the Jesus Seminar, says in his book The Writings of the New Testament : An Interpretation that his research affirms a view of Matthew 28 : 19 as apocryphal. While denying that Jesus spoke the formula, these scholars acknowledge that the verse does represent Trinitarian ideas in the early Christian church. Most Christians belong to denominations that recognize church history as at least partially inspired by the Holy Spirit, so they tend to see the formula as valid even if not spoken by Jesus himself. However, the formula does not necessarily endorse the specific Nicene Trinitarian doctrine adopted at the 4th - century Council of Nicea and elaborated upon by later councils, and does not necessarily show that 1st - century Christians believed in the mysterious unity, equality, or co-eternity of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. Other scholars have challenged the work of the Jesus Seminar, arguing that those working on the project began with a conclusion and worked to justify it through their research and exegesis. See also Christianity portal Sign of the cross References Jump up ^ `` English Standard Version ( ESV ) Footnote on Matthew 28 : 19. ''. Retrieved 9 January 2014. Jump up ^ Encyclopedia of Mormonism, Godhead, http://eom.byu.edu/index.php/Godhead Jump up ^ They apply the Seminar 's presuppositional test, `` Beware of finding a Jesus entirely congenial to you '', especially to the Jesus Seminar themselves, `` who a priori have determined the nature of the ' historical Jesus ' by adopting biased presuppositions, thereby producing a ' Jesus ' wholly ' congenial ' to themselves '' ( The Jesus Crisis : The Inroads of Historical Criticism Into Evangelical..., by Robert L. Thomas, F. David Farnell ) ; cf. A Look at the Jesus Seminar, by Brad Bromling, The Jesus Seminar and Radical Higher Criticism by Glenn Giles, etc. ) Theology : Outline Conceptions of God Theism Forms Deism Dystheism Henotheism Hermeticism Kathenotheism Nontheism Monolatrism Monotheism Mysticism Panentheism Pandeism Pantheism Polydeism Polytheism Spiritualism Theopanism Concepts Deity Divinity Gender of God and gods Male deity Goddess Numen Singular god theologies By faith Abrahamic religions Judaism Christianity Islam the Bahá'í Faith Buddhism Hinduism Jainism Sikhism Zoroastrianism Concepts Absolute Brahman Emanationism Logos Supreme Being God as the Devil Sustainer Time Trinitarianism Athanasian Creed Comma Johanneum Consubstantiality Homoousian Homoiousian Hypostasis Perichoresis Shield of the Trinity Trinitarian formula Trinity Trinity of the Church Fathers Trinitarian Universalism Eschatology Afterlife Apocalypticism Buddhist Christian Heaven Hindu Islamic Jewish Taoist Zoroastrian Feminist Buddhism Christianity Hinduism Islam Judaism Mormonism Goddesses Other concepts The All Aristotelian view Attributes of God in Christianity / in Islam Binitarianism Demiurge Divine simplicity Divine presence Egotheism Exotheology Holocaust Godhead in Christianity Latter Day Saints Great Architect of the Universe Great Spirit Apophatic theology Olelbis Open theism Personal god Phenomenological definition Philo 's view Process Tian Unmoved mover Names of God in Christianity Hinduism Islam Jainism Judaism By Faith Christian History Outline Biblical canon Glossary Christology Cosmology Ecclesiology Ethics Hamartiology Messianism Nestorianism Philosophy Practical Sophiology Soteriology Hindu Ayyavazhi theology Krishnology Islamic Oneness of God Prophets Holy Scriptures Angels Predestination Last Judgment Jewish Abrahamic prophecy Aggadah Denominations Kabbalah Philosophy Retrieved from `` https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Trinitarian_formula&oldid=798551003 '' Categories : Baptism Trinitarianism Biblical phrases Christian terminology Hidden categories : Articles containing Ancient Greek - language text Articles containing Latin - language text All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from January 2012 Talk Contents About Wikipedia Wikisource Dansk Español Latina Русский Tagalog ไทย Edit links This page was last edited on 2 September 2017, at 15 : 02. About Wikipedia

Question: in nomine veritas in nomine filii et patris in nomine veritas et sanctus translate
Answer: in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit