Competition ( Biology ) - wikipedia Competition ( Biology ) Sea anemones compete for the territory in tide pools Competition is an interaction between organisms or species in which both the organisms or species are harmed. Limited supply of at least one resource ( such as food, water, and territory ) used by both can be a factor. Competition both within and between species is an important topic in ecology, especially community ecology. Competition is one of many interacting biotic and abiotic factors that affect community structure. Competition among members of the same species is known as intraspecific competition, while competition between individuals of different species is known as interspecific competition. Competition is not always straightforward, and can occur in both a direct and indirect fashion. According to the competitive exclusion principle, species less suited to compete for resources should either adapt or die out, although competitive exclusion is rarely found in natural ecosystems. According to evolutionary theory, this competition within and between species for resources is important in natural selection. However, competition may play less of a role than expansion among larger clades ; this is termed the ' Room to Roam ' hypothesis. Contents 1 By mechanism 1.1 Interference 1.2 Exploitative 1.3 Apparent 2 By size asymmetry 3 By taxonomic relationship 3.1 Intraspecific 3.2 Interspecific 4 Evolutionary strategies 5 Competitive exclusion principle 6 Character displacement 7 See also 8 References 9 External links By mechanism Competition occurs by various mechanisms, which can generally be divided into direct and indirect. These apply equally to intraspecific and interspecific competition. Biologists typically recognize two types of competition : interference and exploitative competition. During interference competition, organisms interact directly by fighting for scarce resources. For example, large aphids defend feeding sites on cottonwood leaves by ejecting smaller aphids from better sites. In contrast, during exploitative competition, organisms interact indirectly by consuming scarce resources. For example, plants consume nitrogen by absorbing it into their roots, making nitrogen unavailable to nearby plants. Plants that produce many roots typically reduce soil nitrogen to very low levels, eventually killing neighboring plants. Male - male competition in red deer during rut is an example of interference competition within a species. Interference Interference competition occurs directly between individuals via aggression etc. when the individuals interfere with foraging, survival, reproduction of others, or by directly preventing their physical establishment in a portion of the habitat. An example of this can be seen between the ant Novomessor cockerelli and red harvester ants, where the former interferes with the ability of the latter to forage by plugging the entrances to their colonies with small rocks. Exploitative Exploitation competition occurs indirectly through a common limiting resource which acts as an intermediate. For example, use of resources depletes the amount available to others, or they compete for space. Apparent Apparent competition occurs indirectly between two species which are both preyed upon by the same predator. For example, species A and species B are both prey of predator C. The increase of species A may cause the decrease of species B, because the increase of As may aid in the survival of predator Cs, which will increase the number of predator Cs, which in turn will hunt more of species B. By size asymmetry Main article : size - asymmetric competition Competition varies from complete symmetric ( all individuals receive the same amount of resources, irrespective of their size ) to perfectly size symmetric ( all individuals exploit the same amount of resource per unit biomass ) to absolutely size - asymmetric ( the largest individuals exploit all the available resource ). The degree of size asymmetry has major effects on the structure and diversity of ecological communities, e.g. in plant communities size - asymmetric competition for light has stronger effects on diversity compared with competition for soil resources. By taxonomic relationship See also : Female intrasexual competition Competition can occur between individuals of the same species, called intraspecific competition, or between different species, called interspecific competition. Studies show that intraspecific competition can regulate population dynamics ( changes in population size over time ). This occurs because individuals become crowded as a population grows. Since individuals within a population require the same resources, crowding causes resources to become more limited. Some individuals ( typically small juveniles ) eventually do not acquire enough resources and die or do not reproduce. This reduces population size and slows population growth. Species also interact with other species that require the same resources. Consequently, interspecific competition can alter the sizes of many species ' populations at the same time. Experiments demonstrate that when species compete for a limited resource, one species eventually drives the populations of other species extinct. These experiments suggest that competing species can not coexist ( they can not live together in the same area ) because the best competitor will exclude all other competing species. Intraspecific Main article : Intraspecific competition Intraspecific competition occurs when members of the same species compete for the same resources in an ecosystem. Interspecific Main article : Interspecific competition Interspecific competition may occur when individuals of two separate species share a limiting resource in the same area. If the resource can not support both populations, then lowered fecundity, growth, or survival may result in at least one species. Interspecific competition has the potential to alter populations, communities and the evolution of interacting species. An example among animals could be the case of cheetahs and lions ; since both species feed on similar prey, they are negatively impacted by the presence of the other because they will have less food, however they still persist together, despite the prediction that under competition one will displace the other. In fact, lions sometimes steal prey items killed by cheetahs. Potential competitors can also kill each other, in so - called ' intraguild predation '. For example, in southern California coyotes often kill and eat gray foxes and bobcats, all three carnivores sharing the same stable prey ( small mammals ). An example among protozoa involves Paramecium aurelia and Paramecium caudatum. Russian ecologist, Georgy Gause, studied the competition between the two species of Paramecium that occurred as a result of their coexistence. Through his studies, Gause proposed the Competitive exclusion principle, observing the competition that occurred when their different ecological niches overlapped. Competition has been observed between individuals, populations and species, but there is little evidence that competition has been the driving force in the evolution of large groups. For example, mammals lived beside reptiles for many millions of years of time but were unable to gain a competitive edge until dinosaurs were devastated by the Cretaceous -- Paleogene extinction event. Evolutionary strategies Main articles : r / K selection theory and Verhulst equation In evolutionary contexts, competition is related to the concept of r / K selection theory, which relates to the selection of traits which promote success in particular environments. The theory originates from work on island biogeography by the ecologists Robert MacArthur and E.O. Wilson. In r / K selection theory, selective pressures are hypothesised to drive evolution in one of two stereotyped directions : r - or K - selection. These terms, r and K, are derived from standard ecological algebra, as illustrated in the simple Verhulst equation of population dynamics : d N d t = r N ( 1 − N K ) ( displaystyle ( \frac ( dN ) ( dt ) ) = rN left ( 1 - ( \frac ( N ) ( K ) ) \right ) qquad ! ) where r is the growth rate of the population ( N ), and K is the carrying capacity of its local environmental setting. Typically, r - selected species exploit empty niches, and produce many offspring, each of whom has a relatively low probability of surviving to adulthood. In contrast, K - selected species are strong competitors in crowded niches, and invest more heavily in much fewer offspring, each with a relatively high probability of surviving to adulthood. Competitive exclusion principle 1 : a smaller ( yellow ) species of bird forages across whole tree. 2 : a larger ( red ) species competes for resources. 3 : red dominates in middle for the more abundant resources. Yellow adapts to new niche, avoiding competition. Main article : Competitive exclusion principle To explain how species coexist, in 1934 Georgii Gause proposed the competitive exclusion principle which is also called the Gause principle : species can not coexist if they have the same ecological niche. The word `` niche '' refers to a species ' requirements for survival and reproduction. These requirements include both resources ( like food ) and proper habitat conditions ( like temperature or pH ). Gause reasoned that if two species had identical niches ( required identical resources and habitats ) they would attempt to live in exactly the same area and would compete for exactly the same resources. If this happened, the species that was the best competitor would always exclude its competitors from that area. Therefore, species must at least have slightly different niches in order to coexist. Character displacement Medium ground finch ( Geospiza fortis ) on Santa Cruz Island in the Galapagos Main article : Character displacement Competition can cause species to evolve differences in traits. This occurs because the individuals of a species with traits similar to competing species always experience strong interspecific competition. These individuals have less reproduction and survival than individuals with traits that differ from their competitors. Consequently, they will not contribute many offspring to future generations. For example, Darwin 's finches can be found alone or together on the Galapagos Islands. Both species ' populations actually have more individuals with intermediate - sized beaks when they live on islands without the other species present. However, when both species are present on the same island, competition is intense between individuals that have intermediate - sized beaks of both species because they all require intermediate sized seeds. Consequently, individuals with small and large beaks have greater survival and reproduction on these islands than individuals with intermediate - sized beaks. Different finch species can coexist if they have traits -- for instance, beak size -- that allow them to specialize on particular resources. When Geospiza fortis and Geospiza fuliginosa are present on the same island, G. fuliginosa tends to evolve a small beak and G. fortis a large beak. The observation that competing species ' traits are more different when they live in the same area than when competing species live in different areas is called character displacement. For the two finch species, beak size was displaced : Beaks became smaller in one species and larger in the other species. Studies of character displacement are important because they provide evidence that competition is important in determining ecological and evolutionary patterns in nature. See also Biological interaction Character displacement Community Minimum viable population Scramble competition Resource ( biology ) Resource partitioning References Jump up ^ Begon, M. ; Harper, J.L. ; Townsend, C.R. ( 1996 ) Ecology : Individuals, populations and communities Blackwell Science. ^ Jump up to : Sahney, S. ; Benton, M.J. ; Ferry, P.A. ( 2010 ). `` Links between global taxonomic diversity, ecological diversity and the expansion of vertebrates on land ''. Biology Letters. 6 ( 4 ) : 544 -- 547. doi : 10.1098 / rsbl. 2009.1024. PMC 2936204. PMID 20106856. Jump up ^ Jardine, P.E. ; Janis, C.M. ; Sahney, S. ; Benton, M.J. ( 2012 ), `` Grit not grass : Concordant patterns of early origin of hypsodonty in Great Plains ungulates Glires '', Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 365 - 366 : 1 -- 10, doi : 10.1016 / j. palaeo. 2012.09. 001 Jump up ^ Barton, Kasey E. ; Sanders, Nathan J. ; Gordon, Deborah M. ( 2002 ). `` The Effects of Proximity and Colony Age on Interspecific Interference Competition between the Desert Ants Pogonomyrmex barbatus and Aphaenogaster cockerelli ''. American Midland Naturalist. 148 ( 2 ) : 376 -- 382. doi : 10.1674 / 0003 - 0031 ( 2002 ) 148 ( 0376 : TEOPAC ) 2.0.CO ; 2. Jump up ^ Tilman, D. ( 1982 ) Resource competition and community structure. Princeton university press. Jump up ^ Holt, Robert D. ( 1977 ). `` Predation, apparent competition, and the structure of prey communities ''. Theoretical Population Biology. 12 ( 2 ) : 197 -- 229. doi : 10.1016 / 0040 - 5809 ( 77 ) 90042 - 9. PMID 929457. Jump up ^ Van Nouhuys, S. ; Hanski, I. ( 2000 ). `` Apparent competition between parasitoids mediated by a shared hyperparasitoid ''. Ecology Letters. 3 ( 2 ) : 82 -- 84. doi : 10.1046 / j. 1461 - 0248.2000. 00123. x. Jump up ^ Townsend, Colin R. ; Begon, Michael ( 2008 ). Essentials of Ecology. pp. 103 -- 105. ISBN 978 - 1 - 4051 - 5658 - 5. CS1 maint : Multiple names : authors list ( link ) Jump up ^. Fedriani, J.M., T.K. Fuller, R.M. Sauvajot and E.C. York. 2000. Competition and intraguild predation among three sympatric carnivores. Oecologia, 125 : 258 - 270. Jump up ^ Gause, G.F. ( 1934 ). The struggle for existence. Baltimore, MD : Williams & Wilkins. Jump up ^ MacArthur, R. and Wilson, E.O. ( 1967 ). The Theory of Island Biogeography, Princeton University Press ( 2001 reprint ), ISBN 0 - 691 - 08836 - 5. Jump up ^ Pianka, E.R. ( 1970 ). On r and K selection. American Naturalist ' 104 ', 592 - 597. ^ Jump up to : Verhulst, P.F. ( 1838 ). Notice sur la loi que la population pursuit dans son accroissement. Corresp. Math. Phys. ' 10 ', 113 - 121. Jump up ^ Hardin, Garrett ( 1960 ). `` The competitive exclusion principle '' ( PDF ). Science. 131 ( 3409 ) : 1292 -- 1297. doi : 10.1126 / science. 131.3409. 1292. PMID 14399717. Jump up ^ Pocheville, Arnaud ( 2015 ). `` The Ecological Niche : History and Recent Controversies ''. In Heams, Thomas ; Huneman, Philippe ; Lecointre, Guillaume ; et al. Handbook of Evolutionary Thinking in the Sciences. Dordrecht : Springer. pp. 547 -- 586. ISBN 978 - 94 - 017 - 9014 - 7. Jump up ^ Brown, W.L., and E.O. Wilson. 1956. `` Character displacement ''. Systematic Zoology 5 : 49 -- 65. External links http://www.encyclopedia.com/topic/Competition_%28Biology%29.aspx The Biological Basis for the ' Thrill of Victory ' hide Inter-species biological interactions in ecology Amensalism Commensalism Competition Deception in animals Inquilinism Mimicry Mutualism Neutralism Synnecrosis Predation Carnivore Herbivore Intraguild Parasitism Parasitoidism Cheating Symbiosis Cleaning symbiosis Ecology : Modelling ecosystems : Trophic components General Abiotic component Abiotic stress Behaviour Biogeochemical cycle Biomass Biotic component Biotic stress Carrying capacity Competition Ecosystem Ecosystem ecology Ecosystem model Keystone species List of feeding behaviours Metabolic theory of ecology Productivity Resource Producers Autotrophs Chemosynthesis Chemotrophs Foundation species Mixotrophs Myco - heterotrophy Mycotroph Organotrophs Photoheterotrophs Photosynthesis Photosynthetic efficiency Phototrophs Primary nutritional groups Primary production Consumers Apex predator Bacterivore Carnivores Chemoorganotroph Foraging Generalist and specialist species Intraguild predation Herbivores Heterotroph Heterotrophic nutrition Insectivore Mesopredators Mesopredator release hypothesis Omnivores Optimal foraging theory Predation Prey switching Decomposers Chemoorganoheterotrophy Decomposition Detritivores Detritus Microorganisms Archaea Bacteriophage Environmental microbiology Lithoautotroph Lithotrophy Microbial cooperation Microbial ecology Microbial food web Microbial intelligence Microbial loop Microbial mat Microbial metabolism Phage ecology Food webs Biomagnification Ecological efficiency Ecological pyramid Energy flow Food chain Trophic level Example webs Cold seeps Hydrothermal vents Intertidal Kelp forests Lakes North Pacific Subtropical Gyre Rivers San Francisco Estuary Soil Tide pool Processes Ascendency Bioaccumulation Cascade effect Climax community Competitive exclusion principle Consumer - resource systems Copiotrophs Dominance Ecological network Ecological succession Energy quality Energy Systems Language f - ratio Feed conversion ratio Feeding frenzy Mesotrophic soil Nutrient cycle Oligotroph Paradox of the plankton Trophic cascade Trophic mutualism Trophic state index Defense, counter Animal coloration Antipredator adaptations Camouflage Deimatic behaviour Herbivore adaptations to plant defense Mimicry Plant defense against herbivory Predator avoidance in schooling fish Ecology : Modelling ecosystems : Other components Population ecology Abundance Allee effect Depensation Ecological yield Effective population size Intraspecific competition Logistic function Malthusian growth model Maximum sustainable yield Overpopulation in wild animals Overexploitation Population cycle Population dynamics Population modeling Population size Predator -- prey ( Lotka -- Volterra ) equations Recruitment Resilience Small population size Stability Species Biodiversity Density - dependent inhibition Ecological effects of biodiversity Ecological extinction Endemic species Flagship species Gradient analysis Indicator species Introduced species Invasive species Latitudinal gradients in species diversity Minimum viable population Neutral theory Occupancy -- abundance relationship Population viability analysis Priority effect Rapoport 's rule Relative abundance distribution Relative species abundance Species diversity Species homogeneity Species richness Species distribution Species - area curve Umbrella species Species interaction Antibiosis Biological interaction Commensalism Community ecology Ecological facilitation Interspecific competition Mutualism Parasitism Storage effect Symbiosis Spatial ecology Biogeography Cross-boundary subsidy Ecocline Ecotone Ecotype Disturbance Edge effects Foster 's rule Habitat fragmentation Ideal free distribution Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis Island biogeography Landscape ecology Landscape epidemiology Landscape limnology Metapopulation Patch dynamics r / K selection theory Resource selection function Source -- sink dynamics Niche Ecological niche Ecological trap Ecosystem engineer Environmental niche modelling Guild Habitat Marine habitats Limiting similarity Niche apportionment models Niche construction Niche differentiation Other networks Assembly rules Bateman 's principle Bioluminescence Ecological collapse Ecological debt Ecological deficit Ecological energetics Ecological indicator Ecological threshold Ecosystem diversity Emergence Extinction debt Kleiber 's law Liebig 's law of the minimum Marginal value theorem Thorson 's rule Xerosere Other Allometry Alternative stable state Balance of nature Biological data visualization Ecocline Ecological economics Ecological footprint Ecological forecasting Ecological humanities Ecological stoichiometry Ecopath Ecosystem based fisheries Endolith Evolutionary ecology Functional ecology Industrial ecology Macroecology Microecosystem Natural environment Regime shift Systems ecology Urban ecology Theoretical ecology List of ecology topics Retrieved from `` https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Competition_(biology)&oldid=839904554 '' Categories : Competition Biological interactions Ethology Hidden categories : CS1 maint : Multiple names : authors list All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from January 2017 Talk Contents About Wikipedia Afrikaans Català Čeština Deutsch Eesti Español Esperanto Euskara Français Galego 한국어 עברית Magyar Nederlands 日本 語 Norsk Polski Português Русский Simple English Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски தமிழ் Українська Tiếng Việt 17 more Edit links This page was last edited on 6 May 2018, at 13 : 26 ( UTC ). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution - ShareAlike License ; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia ® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. About Wikipedia

Question: what possible outcome(s) can result from intense competition between two species
Answer: adapt