Parabola - wikipedia Parabola For other uses, see Parabola ( disambiguation ). In mathematics, a parabola is a plane curve, which is mirror - symmetrical, and is approximately U-shaped when oriented as shown in the diagram below ( it remains a parabola if is differently oriented ). It fits any of several superficially different mathematical descriptions, which can all be proved to define exactly the same curves. Part of a parabola ( blue ), with various features ( other colours ). The complete parabola has no endpoints. In this orientation, it extends infinitely to the left, right, and upward. One description of a parabola involves a point ( the focus ) and a line ( the directrix ). The focus does not lie on the directrix. The parabola is the locus of points in that plane that are equidistant from both the directrix and the focus. Another description of a parabola is as a conic section, created from the intersection of a right circular conical surface and a plane which is parallel to another plane which is tangential to the conical surface. A third description is algebraic. A parabola is a graph of a quadratic function, y = x, for example. The line perpendicular to the directrix and passing through the focus ( that is, the line that splits the parabola through the middle ) is called the `` axis of symmetry ''. The point on the parabola that intersects the axis of symmetry is called the `` vertex '', and is the point where the parabola is most sharply curved. The distance between the vertex and the focus, measured along the axis of symmetry, is the `` focal length ''. The `` latus rectum '' is the chord of the parabola which is parallel to the directrix and passes through the focus. Parabolas can open up, down, left, right, or in some other arbitrary direction. Any parabola can be repositioned and rescaled to fit exactly on any other parabola -- that is, all parabolas are geometrically similar. Parabolas have the property that, if they are made of material that reflects light, then light which travels parallel to the axis of symmetry of a parabola and strikes its concave side is reflected to its focus, regardless of where on the parabola the reflection occurs. Conversely, light that originates from a point source at the focus is reflected into a parallel ( `` collimated '' ) beam, leaving the parabola parallel to the axis of symmetry. The same effects occur with sound and other forms of energy. This reflective property is the basis of many practical uses of parabolas. The parabola has many important applications, from a parabolic antenna or parabolic microphone to automobile headlight reflectors to the design of ballistic missiles. They are frequently used in physics, engineering, and many other areas. The parabola is a member of the family of conic sections. Contents 1 History 2 Definition of a parabola as locus of points 3 Parabola in a cartesian coordinate system 3.1 Axis of symmetry parallel to the y - axis 3.2 General case 4 Parabola as graph of a function 5 Any parabola is similar to the unit parabola y = x2 6 Parabola as a special conic section 7 Parabola in polar coordinates 8 Conic section and quadratic form 8.1 Diagram, description, and definitions 8.2 Derivation of quadratic equation 8.3 Focal length 8.4 Position of the focus 8.5 Alternative proof with Dandelin spheres 9 Proof of the reflective property 9.1 Construction and definitions 9.2 Deductions 9.3 Other consequences 9.3. 1 Tangent bisection property 9.3. 2 Intersection of a tangent and perpendicular from focus 9.3. 3 Reflection of light striking the convex side 9.4 Alternative proofs 10 Properties of a parabola related to Pascal 's theorem 10.1 4 - points - property of a parabola 10.2 3 - points - 1 - tangent - property of a parabola 10.3 2 - points - 2 - tangents - property of a parabola 10.4 Axis - direction of a parabola 11 Steiner generation of a parabola and a dual parabola 11.1 Parabola 11.2 Dual parabola 12 Inscribed angles for parabolas y = ax2 + bx + c and the 3 - point - form 13 Pole - polar relation of a parabola 14 Tangent properties 14.1 Two tangent properties related to the latus rectum 14.2 Orthoptic property 14.3 Lambert 's theorem 15 Facts related to chords 15.1 Focal length calculated from parameters of a chord 15.2 Area enclosed between a parabola and a chord 15.3 Corollary concerning midpoints and endpoints of chords 16 Length of an arc of a parabola 17 A geometrical construction to find the area of a parabolic sector 18 Focal length and radius of curvature at the vertex 19 Parabola as the affine image of the unit parabola y = x2 20 Parabola as quadratic Bézier curve 21 Parabola and numerical integration 22 Parabolas as plane sections of quadrics 23 Mathematical generalizations 24 Parabolas in the physical world 24.1 Gallery 25 See also 26 Footnotes 27 Citations 28 Further reading 29 External links History Parabolic compass designed by Leonardo da Vinci The earliest known work on conic sections was by Menaechmus in the fourth century BC. He discovered a way to solve the problem of doubling the cube using parabolas. ( The solution, however, does not meet the requirements of compass - and - straightedge construction. ) The area enclosed by a parabola and a line segment, the so - called `` parabola segment '', was computed by Archimedes via the method of exhaustion in the third century BC, in his The Quadrature of the Parabola. The name `` parabola '' is due to Apollonius who discovered many properties of conic sections. It means `` application '', referring to `` application of areas '' concept, that has a connection with this curve, as Apollonius had proved. The focus -- directrix property of the parabola and other conics is due to Pappus. Galileo showed that the path of a projectile follows a parabola, a consequence of uniform acceleration due to gravity. The idea that a parabolic reflector could produce an image was already well known before the invention of the reflecting telescope. Designs were proposed in the early to mid seventeenth century by many mathematicians including René Descartes, Marin Mersenne, and James Gregory. When Isaac Newton built the first reflecting telescope in 1668, he skipped using a parabolic mirror because of the difficulty of fabrication, opting for a spherical mirror. Parabolic mirrors are used in most modern reflecting telescopes and in satellite dishes and radar receivers. Definition of a parabola as locus of points A parabola can be defined geometrically as a set of points ( locus of points ) in the Euclidean plane : A parabola is a set of points, such that for any point P ( displaystyle P ) of the set the distance P F ( displaystyle PF ) to a fixed point F ( displaystyle F ), the focus, is equal to the distance P l ( displaystyle Pl ) to a fixed line l ( displaystyle l ), the directrix : ( P : P F = P l ) ( displaystyle ( P : PF = Pl ) ) The midpoint V ( displaystyle V ) of the perpendicular from the focus F ( displaystyle F ) onto the directrix l ( displaystyle l ) is called vertex and the line F V ( displaystyle FV ) the axis of symmetry of the parabola. Parabola in a Cartesian coordinate system Axis of symmetry parallel to the y - axis Parabola : Definition, p : semi latus rectum parabola : axis parallel to y - axis parabola : general case If one introduces cartesian coordinates, such that F = ( 0, f ), f > 0, ( displaystyle F = ( 0, f ) , f > 0, ) and the directrix has the equation y = − f ( displaystyle y = - f ) one gets for a point P = ( x, y ) ( displaystyle P = ( x, y ) ) from P F 2 = P l 2 ( displaystyle PF ^ ( 2 ) = Pl ^ ( 2 ) ) the equation x 2 + ( y − f ) 2 = ( y + f ) 2 ( displaystyle x ^ ( 2 ) + ( y-f ) ^ ( 2 ) = ( y + f ) ^ ( 2 ) ). Solving for y ( displaystyle y ) yields y = 1 4 f x 2 ( displaystyle y = ( \frac ( 1 ) ( 4f ) ) x ^ ( 2 ) ). The parabola is U-shaped ( opening to the top ). The length of the horizontal chord through the focus ( s. picture ) is called latus rectum, one half of it semi latus rectum and designated by p ( displaystyle p ). From the picture one gets p = 2 f ( displaystyle p = 2f ). Latus rectum is similar defined for an ellipse and hyperbola resp. For any case p ( displaystyle p ) is the radius of the osculating circle at the vertex. For a parabola p ( displaystyle p ) is the distance of the focus from the directrix, too. Using parameter p ( displaystyle p ), the equation of the parabola can be rewritten as x 2 = 2 p y ( displaystyle x ^ ( 2 ) = 2py ). More general, if the Vertex is V = ( v 1, v 2 ) ( displaystyle V = ( v_ ( 1 ), v_ ( 2 ) ) ), the focus F = ( v 1, v 2 + f ) ( displaystyle F = ( v_ ( 1 ), v_ ( 2 ) + f ) ) and the directrix y = v 2 − f ( displaystyle y = v_ ( 2 ) - f ) one gets the equation y = 1 4 f ( x − v 1 ) 2 + v 2 = 1 4 f x 2 − v 1 2 f x + v 1 2 4 f + v 2 ( displaystyle y = ( \frac ( 1 ) ( 4f ) ) ( x-v_ ( 1 ) ) ^ ( 2 ) + v_ ( 2 ) = ( \frac ( 1 ) ( 4f ) ) x ^ ( 2 ) - ( \frac ( v_ ( 1 ) ) ( 2f ) ) x+ ( \frac ( v_ ( 1 ) ^ ( 2 ) ) ( 4f ) ) + v_ ( 2 ) ). Remark : In the case of f < 0 ( displaystyle f < 0 ) the parabola has a downwards opening. The presumption axis parallel to the y - axis allows to consider a parabola as the graph of a polynomial of degree 2 and vice versa : The graph of an arbitrary polynomial of degree 2 is a parabola ( see next section ). If one changes x ( displaystyle x ) and y ( displaystyle y ), one gets equations y 2 = 2 p x ( displaystyle y ^ ( 2 ) = 2px ) of parabolas, which are open to the left ( if p < 0 ( displaystyle p < 0 ) ) or right ( if p > 0 ( displaystyle p > 0 ) ). General case If the focus is F = ( f 1, f 2 ) ( displaystyle F = ( f_ ( 1 ), f_ ( 2 ) ) ) and the directrix a x + b y + c = 0 ( displaystyle ax + by + c = 0 ) one gets the equation ( a x + b y + c ) 2 a 2 + b 2 = ( x − f 1 ) 2 + ( y − f 2 ) 2 ( displaystyle ( \frac ( left ( ax + by + c \right ) ^ ( 2 ) ) ( a ^ ( 2 ) + b ^ ( 2 ) ) ) = left ( x-f_ ( 1 ) \right ) ^ ( 2 ) + left ( y - f_ ( 2 ) \right ) ^ ( 2 ) ) ( The left side of the equation uses the Hesse normal form of a line to calculate the distance P l ( displaystyle Pl ). ) For a parametric equation of a parabola in general position see § Parabola as the affine image of the unit parabola y = x2, below. The implicit equation of a parabola is defined by an irreducible polynomial of degree two a x 2 + b x y + c y 2 + d x + e y + f = 0, ( displaystyle ax ^ ( 2 ) + bxy + cy ^ ( 2 ) + dx + ey + f = 0, ) such that b 2 − 4 a c = 0, ( displaystyle b ^ ( 2 ) - 4ac = 0, ) or, equivalently, such that a x 2 + b x y + c y 2 ( displaystyle ax ^ ( 2 ) + bxy + cy ^ ( 2 ) ) is the square of a linear polynomial. Parabola as graph of a function parabolas y = a x 2 ( displaystyle y = ax ^ ( 2 ) ) The previous section shows : any parabola with the origin as vertex and the y - axis as axis of symmetry can be considered as the graph of a function f ( x ) = a x 2 with a ≠ 0 ( displaystyle f ( x ) = ax ^ ( 2 ) ( \text ( with ) ) a \neq 0 ). For a > 0 ( displaystyle a > 0 ) the parabolas are opening to the top and for a < 0 ( displaystyle a < 0 ) opening to the bottom ( see picture ). From the section above one gets : The focus is ( 0, 1 4 a ) ( displaystyle left ( 0, ( \frac ( 1 ) ( 4a ) ) \right ) ), the focal length 1 4 a ( displaystyle ( \frac ( 1 ) ( 4a ) ) ), the semi latus rectum is p = 1 2 a ( displaystyle p = ( \frac ( 1 ) ( 2a ) ) ), the directrix has the equation y = − 1 4 a ( displaystyle y = - ( \frac ( 1 ) ( 4a ) ) ) and the tangent at point ( x 0, a x 0 2 ) ( displaystyle left ( x_ ( 0 ), ax_ ( 0 ) ^ ( 2 ) \right ) ) has the equation y = 2 a x 0 x − a x 0 2 ( displaystyle y = 2ax_ ( 0 ) x-ax_ ( 0 ) ^ ( 2 ) ). For a = 1 ( displaystyle a = 1 ) the parabola is the unit parabola with equation y = x 2 ( displaystyle y = x ^ ( 2 ) ). Its focus is ( 0, 1 4 ) ( displaystyle left ( 0, ( \tfrac ( 1 ) ( 4 ) ) \right ) ), the semi latus rectum p = 1 2 ( displaystyle p = ( \tfrac ( 1 ) ( 2 ) ) ) and the directrix has the equation y = − 1 4 ( displaystyle y = - ( \tfrac ( 1 ) ( 4 ) ) ). The general function of degree 2 is f ( x ) = a x 2 + b x + c with a, b, c ∈ R, a ≠ 0 ( displaystyle f ( x ) = ax ^ ( 2 ) + bx + c ( \text ( with ) ) a, b, c in mathbb ( R ), a \neq 0 ). Completing the square yields f ( x ) = a ( x + b 2 a ) 2 + 4 a c − b 2 4 a ( displaystyle f ( x ) = a left ( x+ ( \frac ( b ) ( 2a ) ) \right ) ^ ( 2 ) + ( \frac ( 4ac - b ^ ( 2 ) ) ( 4a ) ) ), which is the equation of a parabola with the axis x = − b 2 a ( displaystyle x = - ( \frac ( b ) ( 2a ) ) ) ( parallel to the y - axis ), the focal length 1 4 a ( displaystyle ( \frac ( 1 ) ( 4a ) ) ), the semi latus rectum p = 1 2 a ( displaystyle p = ( \frac ( 1 ) ( 2a ) ) ), the vertex V = ( − b 2 a, 4 a c − b 2 4 a ) ( displaystyle V = left ( - ( \frac ( b ) ( 2a ) ), ( \frac ( 4ac - b ^ ( 2 ) ) ( 4a ) ) \right ) ), the focus F = ( − b 2 a, 4 a c − b 2 + 1 4 a ) ( displaystyle F = left ( - ( \frac ( b ) ( 2a ) ), ( \frac ( 4ac - b ^ ( 2 ) + 1 ) ( 4a ) ) \right ) ), the directrix y = 4 a c − b 2 − 1 4 a ( displaystyle y = ( \frac ( 4ac - b ^ ( 2 ) - 1 ) ( 4a ) ) ). Any parabola is similar to the unit parabola y = x2 When the parabola y = 2 x 2 ( displaystyle color ( blue ) ( y = 2x ^ ( 2 ) ) ) is uniformly scaled by factor 2, the result is the parabola y = x 2 ( displaystyle color ( red ) ( y = x ^ ( 2 ) ) ) Any parabola P ( displaystyle ( mathcal ( P ) ) ) has a vertex V = ( v 1, v 2 ) ( displaystyle V = ( v_ ( 1 ), v_ ( 2 ) ) ) and can be transformed by the translation ( x, y ) → ( x − v 1, y − v 2 ) ( displaystyle ( x, y ) \rightarrow ( x-v_ ( 1 ), y - v_ ( 2 ) ) ) and a suitable rotation around the origin such that the transformed parabola has the origin as vertex and the y - axis as axis of symmetry. A translation and a rotation preserve any length and any angle. Hence the parabola P ( displaystyle ( mathcal ( P ) ) ) is similar to a parabola with an equation y = a x 2 ( displaystyle y = ax ^ ( 2 ) ). Additionally such a parabola can be transformed by the uniform scaling ( x, y ) → ( a x, a y ) ( displaystyle ( x, y ) \rightarrow ( ax, ay ) ) into the unit parabola with equation y = x 2 ( displaystyle y = x ^ ( 2 ) ). A uniform scaling preserves angles, hence is a similarity, too. Remarks : This property, that all parabolas are similar to each other, is special for parabolas and is not true for ellipses or hyperbolas. There exist other simple affine transformations, which map the parabola y = a x 2 ( displaystyle y = ax ^ ( 2 ) ) onto the unit parabola. For example ( x, y ) → ( x, y a ) ( displaystyle ( x, y ) \rightarrow left ( x, ( \tfrac ( y ) ( a ) ) \right ) ). But this mapping is not a similarity. Parabola as a special conic section pencil of conics with a common vertex The pencil of conic sections with the x-axis as axis of symmetry, one vertex at the origin ( 0, 0 ) and the same semi latus rectum p ( displaystyle p ) can be represented by the equation y 2 = 2 p x + ( e 2 − 1 ) x 2, e ≥ 0 ( displaystyle y ^ ( 2 ) = 2px+ ( e ^ ( 2 ) - 1 ) x ^ ( 2 ) qquad, e geq 0 ), with e ( displaystyle e ) the eccentricity. For e = 0 ( displaystyle e = 0 ) the conic is a circle ( osculating circle of the pencil ), for 0 < e < 1 ( displaystyle 0 < e < 1 ) an ellipse, for e = 1 ( displaystyle e = 1 ) the parabola with equation y 2 = 2 p x ( displaystyle y ^ ( 2 ) = 2px ) and for e > 1 ( displaystyle e > 1 ) a hyperbola ( see picture ). Parabola in polar coordinates pencil of conics with a common focus If p > 0, the parabola with equation y 2 = 2 p x ( displaystyle y ^ ( 2 ) = 2px ) ( opening to the right ) has the polar coordinate representation : r = 2 p cos ⁡ φ sin 2 ⁡ φ with φ ∈ ( − π 2, π 2 ) ∖ ( 0 ). ( displaystyle r = 2p ( \frac ( cos \varphi ) ( sin ^ ( 2 ) \varphi ) ) ( \text ( with ) ) \varphi in left ( - ( \tfrac ( pi ) ( 2 ) ), ( \tfrac ( pi ) ( 2 ) ) \right ) setminus ( 0 ). ) ( r 2 = x 2 + y 2, x = r cos ⁡ φ ( displaystyle r ^ ( 2 ) = x ^ ( 2 ) + y ^ ( 2 ), \x = r cos \varphi ). ) Its vertex is V = ( 0, 0 ) ( displaystyle V = ( 0, 0 ) ) and its focus is F = ( p 2, 0 ) ( displaystyle F = left ( ( \tfrac ( p ) ( 2 ) ), 0 \right ) ). If one shifts the origin into the focus, i.e., F = ( 0, 0 ) ( displaystyle F = ( 0, 0 ) ), one gets the equation r = p 1 − cos ⁡ φ with φ ≠ 2 π k. ( displaystyle r = ( \frac ( p ) ( 1 - cos \varphi ) ) ( \text ( with ) ) \varphi \neq 2 pi k. ) Remark 1 : Inverting this polar form shows : a parabola is the inverse of a cardioid. Remark 2 : The second polar form is a special case of a pencil of conics with focus F = ( 0, 0 ) ( displaystyle F = ( 0, 0 ) ) ( s. picture ) : r = p 1 − e cos ⁡ φ ( displaystyle r = ( \frac ( p ) ( 1 - e cos \varphi ) ) ), ( e ( displaystyle e ) : eccentricity ). Conic section and quadratic form Diagram, description, and definitions Cone with cross-sections ( To enlarge, click on diagram. To shrink, go to previous page. ) The diagram represents a cone with its axis vertical. The point A is its apex. An inclined cross-section of the cone, shown in pink, is inclined from the vertical by the same angle, θ, as the side of the cone. According to the definition of a parabola as a conic section, the boundary of this pink cross-section, EPD, is a parabola. A horizontal cross-section of the cone passes through the vertex, P, of the parabola. This cross-section is circular, but appears elliptical when viewed obliquely, as is shown in the diagram. Its centre is V, and PK is a diameter. We will call its radius r. Another horizontal, circular cross-section of the cone is farther from the apex, A, than the one just described. It has a chord DE, which joins the points where the parabola intersects the circle. Another chord, BC, is the perpendicular bisector of DE, and is consequently a diameter of the circle. These two chords and the parabola 's axis of symmetry, PM, all intersect at the point M. All the labelled points, except D and E, are coplanar. They are in the plane of symmetry of the whole figure. This includes the point F, which is not mentioned above. It is defined and discussed below, in the paragraph `` Position of the focus ''. Let us call the length of DM and of EM x, and the length of PM y. Derivation of quadratic equation The lengths of BM and CM are : B M  ̄ = 2 y sin ⁡ θ ( displaystyle ( overline ( mathrm ( BM ) ) ) = 2y sin ( \theta ) ) ( triangle BPM is isosceles. ) C M  ̄ = 2 r ( displaystyle ( overline ( mathrm ( CM ) ) ) = 2r ) ( PMCK is a parallelogram. ) Using the intersecting chords theorem on the chords BC and DE, we get : B M  ̄ ⋅ C M  ̄ = D M  ̄ ⋅ E M  ̄ ( displaystyle ( overline ( mathrm ( BM ) ) ) cdot ( overline ( mathrm ( CM ) ) ) = ( overline ( mathrm ( DM ) ) ) cdot ( overline ( mathrm ( EM ) ) ) ) Substituting : 4 r y sin ⁡ θ = x 2 ( displaystyle 4ry sin ( \theta ) = x ^ ( 2 ) ) Rearranging : y = x 2 4 r sin ⁡ θ ( displaystyle y = ( \frac ( x ^ ( 2 ) ) ( 4r sin ( \theta ) ) ) ) For any given cone and parabola, r and θ are constants, but x and y are variables which depend on the arbitrary height at which the horizontal cross-section BECD is made. This last equation shows the relationship between these variables. They can be interpreted as Cartesian coordinates of the points D and E, in a system in the pink plane with P as its origin. Since x is squared in the equation, the fact that D and E are on opposite sides of the y - axis is unimportant. If the horizontal cross-section moves up or down, toward or away from the apex of the cone, D and E move along the parabola, always maintaining the relationship between x and y shown in the equation. The parabolic curve is therefore the locus of points where the equation is satisfied, which makes it a Cartesian graph of the quadratic function in the equation. This discussion started from the definition of a parabola as a conic section, but it has now led to a description as a graph of a quadratic function. This shows that these two descriptions are equivalent. They both define curves of exactly the same shape. Focal length It is proved in a preceding section that if a parabola has its vertex at the origin, and if it opens in the positive y direction, then its equation is y = x / 4f, where f is its focal length. Comparing this with the last equation above shows that the focal length of the parabola in the cone is r sin θ. Position of the focus In the diagram above, the point V is the foot of the perpendicular from the vertex of the parabola to the axis of the cone. The point F is the foot of the perpendicular from the point V to the plane of the parabola. By symmetry, F is on the axis of symmetry of the parabola. Angle VPF is complementary to θ, and angle PVF is complementary to angle VPF, therefore angle PVF is θ. Since the length of PV is r, the distance of F from the vertex of the parabola is r sin θ. It is shown above that this distance equals the focal length of the parabola, which is the distance from the vertex to the focus. The focus and the point F are therefore equally distant from the vertex, along the same line, which implies that they are the same point. Therefore, the point F, defined above, is the focus of the parabola. Alternative proof with Dandelin spheres An alternative proof can be done using Dandelin spheres. It works without calculation and uses elementary geometric considerations, only. ( see German article on Parabel ) Proof of the reflective property Reflective property of a parabola The reflective property states that, if a parabola can reflect light, then light which enters it travelling parallel to the axis of symmetry is reflected to the focus. This is derived from the wave nature of light in the paragraph `` description of final diagram '', which describes a diagram just above it, at the end of this article. This derivation is valid, but may not be satisfying to readers who would prefer a mathematical approach. In the following proof, the fact that every point on the parabola is equidistant from the focus and from the directrix is taken as axiomatic. Consider the parabola y = x. Since all parabolas are similar, this simple case represents all others. The right - hand side of the diagram shows part of this parabola. Construction and definitions The point E is an arbitrary point on the parabola, with coordinates ( x, x ). The focus is F, the vertex is A ( the origin ), and the line FA ( the y - axis ) is the axis of symmetry. The line EC is parallel to the axis of symmetry, and intersects the x-axis at D. The point C is located on the directrix ( which is not shown, to minimize clutter ). The point B is the midpoint of the line segment FC. Deductions Measured along the axis of symmetry, the vertex, A, is equidistant from the focus, F, and from the directrix. According to the Intercept theorem, since C is on the directrix, the y - coordinates of F and C are equal in absolute value and opposite in sign. B is the midpoint of FC, so its y - coordinate is zero, so it lies on the x-axis. Its x-coordinate is half that of E, D, and C, i.e., x / 2. The slope of the line BE is the quotient of the lengths of ED and BD, which is x / x / 2, which comes to 2x. But 2x is also the slope ( first derivative ) of the parabola at E. Therefore, the line BE is the tangent to the parabola at E. The distances EF and EC are equal because E is on the parabola, F is the focus and C is on the directrix. Therefore, since B is the midpoint of FC, triangles △ FEB and △ CEB are congruent ( three sides ), which implies that the angles marked α are congruent. ( The angle above E is vertically opposite angle ∠ BEC. ) This means that a ray of light which enters the parabola and arrives at E travelling parallel to the axis of symmetry will be reflected by the line BE so it travels along the line EF, as shown in red in the diagram ( assuming that the lines can somehow reflect light ). Since BE is the tangent to the parabola at E, the same reflection will be done by an infinitesimal arc of the parabola at E. Therefore, light that enters the parabola and arrives at E travelling parallel to the axis of symmetry of the parabola is reflected by the parabola toward its focus. The point E has no special characteristics. This conclusion about reflected light applies to all points on the parabola, as is shown on the left side of the diagram. This is the reflective property. Other consequences There are other theorems that can be deduced simply from the above argument. Tangent bisection property The above proof, and the accompanying diagram, show that the tangent BE bisects the angle ∠ FEC. In other words, the tangent to the parabola at any point bisects the angle between the lines joining the point to the focus, and perpendicularly to the directrix. Intersection of a tangent and perpendicular from focus Perpendicular from focus to tangent Since triangles △ FBE and △ CBE are congruent, FB is perpendicular to the tangent BE. Since B is on the x-axis, which is the tangent to the parabola at its vertex, it follows that the point of intersection between any tangent to a parabola and the perpendicular from the focus to that tangent lies on the line that is tangential to the parabola at its vertex. See animated diagram. and pedal curve. Reflection of light striking the convex side If light travels along the line CE, it moves parallel to the axis of symmetry and strikes the convex side of the parabola at E. It is clear from the above diagram that this light will be reflected directly away from the focus, along an extension of the segment FE. Alternative proofs Parabola and tangent The above proofs of the reflective and tangent bisection properties use a line of calculus. For readers who are not comfortable with calculus, the following alternative is presented. In this diagram, F is the focus of the parabola, and T and U lie on its directrix. P is an arbitrary point on the parabola. PT is perpendicular to the directrix, and the line MP bisects angle ∠ FPT. Q is another point on the parabola, with QU perpendicular to the directrix. We know that FP = PT and FQ = QU. Clearly, QT > QU, so QT > FQ. All points on the bisector MP are equidistant from F and T, but Q is closer to F than to T. This means that Q is to the left of MP, i.e., on the same side of it as the focus. The same would be true if Q were located anywhere else on the parabola ( except at the point P ), so the entire parabola, except the point P, is on the focus side of MP. Therefore, MP is the tangent to the parabola at P. Since it bisects the angle ∠ FPT, this proves the tangent bisection property. The logic of the last paragraph can be applied to modify the above proof of the reflective property. It effectively proves the line BE to be the tangent to the parabola at E if the angles α are equal. The reflective property follows as shown previously. Properties of a parabola related to Pascal 's theorem A parabola can be considered as the affine part of a non degenerated projective conic with a point Y ∞ ( displaystyle Y_ ( infty ) ) on the line of infinity g ∞ ( displaystyle g_ ( infty ) ), which is the tangent at Y ∞ ( displaystyle Y_ ( infty ) ). The 5 -, 4 - and 3 - point degenerations of Pascal 's theorem are properties of a conic dealing with at least one tangent. If one considers this tangent as line of infinity and its point of contact as the point of infinity of the y - axis, one gets three statements for a parabola. The following properties of a parabola deal only with terms connect, intersect, parallel, which are invariants of similarities. So, it is sufficient to prove any property for the unit parabola with equation y = x 2 ( displaystyle y = x ^ ( 2 ) ). 4 - points - property of a parabola 4 - points - property of a parabola Any parabola can be described in a suitable coordinate system by an equation y = a x 2 ( displaystyle y = ax ^ ( 2 ) ). Let P 1 = ( x 1, y 1 ), P 2 = ( x 2, y 2 ), P 3 = ( x 3, y 3 ), P 4 = ( x 4, y 4 ) ( displaystyle P_ ( 1 ) = ( x_ ( 1 ), y_ ( 1 ) ), , P_ ( 2 ) = ( x_ ( 2 ), y_ ( 2 ) ), , P_ ( 3 ) = ( x_ ( 3 ), y_ ( 3 ) ), , P_ ( 4 ) = ( x_ ( 4 ), y_ ( 4 ) ) ) be four points of the parabola y = a x 2 ( displaystyle y = ax ^ ( 2 ) ) and Q 2 ( displaystyle Q_ ( 2 ) ) the intersection of the secant line P 1 P 4 ( displaystyle P_ ( 1 ) P_ ( 4 ) ) with the line x = x 2, ( displaystyle x = x_ ( 2 ), ) and let Q 1 ( displaystyle Q_ ( 1 ) ) be the intersection of the secant line P 2 P 3 ( displaystyle P_ ( 2 ) P_ ( 3 ) ) with the line x = x 1 ( displaystyle x = x_ ( 1 ) ) ( see picture ). Then the secant line P 3 P 4 ( displaystyle P_ ( 3 ) P_ ( 4 ) ) is parallel to line Q 1 Q 2 ( displaystyle Q_ ( 1 ) Q_ ( 2 ) ). ( The lines x = x 1 ( displaystyle x = x_ ( 1 ) ) and x = x 2 ( displaystyle x = x_ ( 2 ) ) are parallel to the axis of the parabola. ) Proof : straightforward calculation for the unit parabola y = x 2 ( displaystyle y = x ^ ( 2 ) ). Application : The 4 - points - property of a parabola can be used for the construction of point P 4 ( displaystyle P_ ( 4 ) ), while P 1, P 2, P 3 ( displaystyle P_ ( 1 ), P_ ( 2 ), P_ ( 3 ) ) and Q 2 ( displaystyle Q_ ( 2 ) ) are given. Remark : the 4 - points - property of a parabola is an affine version of the 5 - point - degeneration of Pascal 's theorem. 3 - points - 1 - tangent - property of a parabola 3 - points - 1 - tangent - property Let be P 0 = ( x 0, y 0 ), P 1 = ( x 1, y 1 ), P 2 = ( x 2, y 2 ) ( displaystyle P_ ( 0 ) = ( x_ ( 0 ), y_ ( 0 ) ), P_ ( 1 ) = ( x_ ( 1 ), y_ ( 1 ) ), P_ ( 2 ) = ( x_ ( 2 ), y_ ( 2 ) ) ) three points of the parabola with equation y = a x 2 ( displaystyle y = ax ^ ( 2 ) ) and Q 2 ( displaystyle Q_ ( 2 ) ) the intersection of the secant line P 0 P 1 ( displaystyle P_ ( 0 ) P_ ( 1 ) ) with the line x = x 2 ( displaystyle x = x_ ( 2 ) ) and Q 1 ( displaystyle Q_ ( 1 ) ) the intersection of the secant line P 0 P 2 ( displaystyle P_ ( 0 ) P_ ( 2 ) ) with the line x = x 1 ( displaystyle x = x_ ( 1 ) ) ( s. picture ), then the tangent at point P 0 ( displaystyle P_ ( 0 ) ) is parallel to the line Q 1 Q 2 ( displaystyle Q_ ( 1 ) Q_ ( 2 ) ). ( The lines x = x 1 ( displaystyle x = x_ ( 1 ) ) and x = x 2 ( displaystyle x = x_ ( 2 ) ) are parallel to the axis of the parabola. ) Proof : can be performed for the unit parabola y = x 2 ( displaystyle y = x ^ ( 2 ) ). A short calculation shows : line Q 1 Q 2 ( displaystyle Q_ ( 1 ) Q_ ( 2 ) ) has slope 2 x 0 ( displaystyle 2x_ ( 0 ) ) which is the slope of the tangent at point P 0 ( displaystyle P_ ( 0 ) ). Application : The 3 - points - 1 - tangent - property of a parabola can be used for the construction of the tangent at point P 0 ( displaystyle P_ ( 0 ) ), while P 1, P 2, P 0 ( displaystyle P_ ( 1 ), P_ ( 2 ), P_ ( 0 ) ) are given. Remark : The 3 - points - 1 - tangent - property of a parabola is an affine version of the 4 - point - degeneration of Pascal 's theorem. 2 - points - 2 - tangents - property of a parabola 2 - points - 2 - tangents - property Let P 1 = ( x 1, y 1 ), P 2 = ( x 2, y 2 ) ( displaystyle P_ ( 1 ) = ( x_ ( 1 ), y_ ( 1 ) ), P_ ( 2 ) = ( x_ ( 2 ), y_ ( 2 ) ) ) be two points of the parabola with equation y = a x 2 ( displaystyle y = ax ^ ( 2 ) ) and Q 2 ( displaystyle Q_ ( 2 ) ) the intersection of the tangent at point P 1 ( displaystyle P_ ( 1 ) ) with the line x = x 2 ( displaystyle x = x_ ( 2 ) ) and Q 1 ( displaystyle Q_ ( 1 ) ) the intersection of the tangent at point P 2 ( displaystyle P_ ( 2 ) ) with the line x = x 1 ( displaystyle x = x_ ( 1 ) ) ( s. picture ) then the secant P 1 P 2 ( displaystyle P_ ( 1 ) P_ ( 2 ) ) is parallel to the line Q 1 Q 2 ( displaystyle Q_ ( 1 ) Q_ ( 2 ) ). ( The x = x 1 ( displaystyle x = x_ ( 1 ) ) and x = x 2 ( displaystyle x = x_ ( 2 ) ) are parallel to the axis of the parabola. ) Proof : straight forward calculation for the unit parabola y = x 2 ( displaystyle y = x ^ ( 2 ) ). Application : The 2 - points - 2 - tangents - property can be used for the construction of the tangent of a parabola at point P 2 ( displaystyle P_ ( 2 ) ) while P 1, P 2 ( displaystyle P_ ( 1 ), P_ ( 2 ) ) and the tangent at P 1 ( displaystyle P_ ( 1 ) ) are given. Remark 1 : The 2 - points - 2 - tangents - property of a parabola is an affine version of the 3 - point - degeneration of Pascal 's theorem. Remark 2 : The 2 - points - 2 - tangents - property should not be confused with the following property of a parabola, which deals with 2 points and 2 tangents, too, but is not related to Pascal 's theorem ! Axis - direction of a parabola construction of the axis - direction The statements above presume the knowledge of the axis - direction of the parabola, in order to construct the points Q 1, Q 2 ( displaystyle Q_ ( 1 ), Q_ ( 2 ) ). The following property determines the points Q 1, Q 2 ( displaystyle Q_ ( 1 ), Q_ ( 2 ) ) by 2 given points and their tangents, only, and the result is : the line Q 1 Q 2 ( displaystyle Q_ ( 1 ) Q_ ( 2 ) ) is parallel to the axis of the parabola. Let be P 1 = ( x 1, y 1 ), P 2 = ( x 2, y 2 ) ( displaystyle P_ ( 1 ) = ( x_ ( 1 ), y_ ( 1 ) ), , P_ ( 2 ) = ( x_ ( 2 ), y_ ( 2 ) ) ) two points of the parabola y = a x 2 ( displaystyle y = ax ^ ( 2 ) ) and t 1, t 2 ( displaystyle t_ ( 1 ), , t_ ( 2 ) ) their tangents, and Q 1 ( displaystyle Q_ ( 1 ) ) the intersection of the tangents t 1, t 2 ( displaystyle t_ ( 1 ), , t_ ( 2 ) ), Q 2 ( displaystyle Q_ ( 2 ) ) the intersection of the parallel line to t 1 ( displaystyle t_ ( 1 ) ) through P 2 ( displaystyle P_ ( 2 ) ) with the parallel line to t 2 ( displaystyle t_ ( 2 ) ) through P 1 ( displaystyle P_ ( 1 ) ) ( s. picture ) then the line Q 1 Q 2 ( displaystyle Q_ ( 1 ) Q_ ( 2 ) ) is parallel to the axis of the parabola and has the equation x = x 1 + x 2 2. ( displaystyle x = ( \tfrac ( x_ ( 1 ) + x_ ( 2 ) ) ( 2 ) ). ) Proof : can be done ( like the properties above ) for the unit parabola y = x 2 ( displaystyle y = x ^ ( 2 ) ). Application : This property can be used to determine the direction of the axis of a parabola, if 2 points and their tangents are given. An alternative way is to determine the midpoints of two parallel chords, see section on parallel chords. Remark : This property is an affine version of the theorem of two perspective triangles of a non degenerate conic. Steiner generation of a parabola and a dual parabola Parabola Steiner generation of a parabola Steiner established the following procedure for the construction of a non-degenerate conic ( see Steiner conic ) : Given two pencils B ( U ), B ( V ) ( displaystyle B ( U ), B ( V ) ) of lines at two points U, V ( displaystyle U, V ) ( all lines containing U ( displaystyle U ) and V ( displaystyle V ) respectively ) and a projective but not perspective mapping π ( displaystyle pi ) of B ( U ) ( displaystyle B ( U ) ) onto B ( V ) ( displaystyle B ( V ) ). Then the intersection points of corresponding lines form a non-degenerate projective conic section. This procedure can be used for a simple construction of points on the parabola y = a x 2 ( displaystyle y = ax ^ ( 2 ) ) : Consider the pencil at the vertex S ( 0, 0 ) ( displaystyle S ( 0, 0 ) ) and the set of lines Π y ( displaystyle Pi _ ( y ) ), which are parallel to the y - axis. Let P = ( x 0, y 0 ) ( displaystyle P = ( x_ ( 0 ), y_ ( 0 ) ) ) be a point on the parabola and A = ( 0, y 0 ) ( displaystyle A = ( 0, y_ ( 0 ) ) ), B = ( x 0, 0 ) ( displaystyle B = ( x_ ( 0 ), 0 ) ). The line segment B P  ̄ ( displaystyle ( overline ( BP ) ) ) is divided into n equally spaced segments and this division is projected ( in the direction B A ( displaystyle BA ) ) onto the line segment A P  ̄ ( displaystyle ( overline ( AP ) ) ) ( see figure ). This projection gives rise to a projective mapping π ( displaystyle pi ) from pencil S ( displaystyle S ) onto the pencil Π y ( displaystyle Pi _ ( y ) ). The intersection of the line S B i ( displaystyle SB_ ( i ) ) and the i - th parallel to the y - axis is a point on the parabola. Proof : straightforward calculation. Remark : Steiner 's generation is also available for ellipses and hyperbolas. Dual parabola dual parabola and Bezier curve of degree 2 ( right : curve point and division points Q 0, Q 1 ( displaystyle Q_ ( 0 ), Q_ ( 1 ) ) for parameter t = 0.4 ( displaystyle t = 0.4 ) ) A dual parabola consists of the set of tangents of an ordinary parabola. The Steiner generation of a conic can be applied to the generation of a dual conic by changing the meanings of points and lines : Let be given two point sets on two lines u, v ( displaystyle u, , v ) and a projective but not perspective mapping π ( displaystyle pi ) between these point sets, then the connecting lines of corresponding points form a non degenerate dual conic. In order to generate elements of a dual parabola, one starts with three points P 0, P 1, P 2 ( displaystyle P_ ( 0 ), P_ ( 1 ), P_ ( 2 ) ) not on a line, divides the line sections P 0 P 1  ̄ ( displaystyle ( overline ( P_ ( 0 ) P_ ( 1 ) ) ) ) and P 1 P 2  ̄ ( displaystyle ( overline ( P_ ( 1 ) P_ ( 2 ) ) ) ) each into n ( displaystyle n ) equally spaced line segments and adds numbers as shown in the picture. Then the lines P 0 P 1, P 1 P 2, ( 1, 1 ), ( 2, 2 ),... ( displaystyle P_ ( 0 ) P_ ( 1 ), P_ ( 1 ) P_ ( 2 ), ; ( 1, 1 ), ( 2, 2 ), dotsc ) are tangents of a parabola, hence elements of a dual parabola. The parabola is a Bezier curve of degree 2 with the control points P 0, P 1, P 2 ( displaystyle P_ ( 0 ), P_ ( 1 ), P_ ( 2 ) ). The proof is a consequence of the de Casteljau algorithm for a Bezier curve of degree 2. Inscribed angles for parabolas y = ax2 + bx + c and the 3 - point - form inscribed angles of a parabola A parabola with equation y = a x 2 + b x + c, a ≠ 0 ( displaystyle y = ax ^ ( 2 ) + bx + c, a \neq 0 ) is uniquely determined by three points ( x 1, y 1 ), ( x 2, y 2 ), ( x 3, y 3 ) ( displaystyle ( x_ ( 1 ), y_ ( 1 ) ), ( x_ ( 2 ), y_ ( 2 ) ), ( x_ ( 3 ), y_ ( 3 ) ) ) with different x-coordinates. The usual procedure to determine the coefficients a, b, c ( displaystyle a, b, c ) is to insert the point coordinates into the equation. The result is a linear system of 3 equations, which can be solved by the Gauss algorithm. An alternative way uses the inscribed angle theorem for parabolas : In order to measure an angle between two lines with equations y = m 1 x + d 1, y = m 2 x + d 2 ( displaystyle y = m_ ( 1 ) x + d_ ( 1 ), y = m_ ( 2 ) x + d_ ( 2 ) ) in this context one uses the difference m 1 − m 2. ( displaystyle m_ ( 1 ) - m_ ( 2 ) . ) Analogous to the inscribed angle theorem for circles one gets the Inscribed angle theorem for parabolas :, : For four points P i = ( x i, y i ), i = 1, 2, 3, 4, x i ≠ x k, i ≠ k ( displaystyle P_ ( i ) = ( x_ ( i ), y_ ( i ) ), i = 1, 2, 3, 4, \x_ ( i ) \neq x_ ( k ), i \neq k ) ( s. picture ) the following statement is true : The four points are on a parabola with equation y = a x 2 + b x + c ( displaystyle y = ax ^ ( 2 ) + bx + c ) if and only if the angles at P 3 ( displaystyle P_ ( 3 ) ) and P 4 ( displaystyle P_ ( 4 ) ) are equal in the sense of the measurement above. That means if y 4 − y 1 x 4 − x 1 − y 4 − y 2 x 4 − x 2 = y 3 − y 1 x 3 − x 1 − y 3 − y 2 x 3 − x 2. ( displaystyle ( \frac ( y_ ( 4 ) - y_ ( 1 ) ) ( x_ ( 4 ) - x_ ( 1 ) ) ) - ( \frac ( y_ ( 4 ) - y_ ( 2 ) ) ( x_ ( 4 ) - x_ ( 2 ) ) ) = ( \frac ( y_ ( 3 ) - y_ ( 1 ) ) ( x_ ( 3 ) - x_ ( 1 ) ) ) - ( \frac ( y_ ( 3 ) - y_ ( 2 ) ) ( x_ ( 3 ) - x_ ( 2 ) ) ). ) ( Proof : straight forward calculation. If the points are on a parabola, one can assume the parabola 's equation is y = a x 2 ( displaystyle y = ax ^ ( 2 ) ). ) A consequence of the inscribed angle theorem for parabolas is the 3 - point - form of a parabola 's equation : The equation of the parabola determined by 3 points P i = ( x i, y i ), i = 1, 2, 3, x i ≠ x k, i ≠ k ( displaystyle P_ ( i ) = ( x_ ( i ), y_ ( i ) ), i = 1, 2, 3, \x_ ( i ) \neq x_ ( k ), i \neq k ) is the solution of the equation y − y 1 x − x 1 − y − y 2 x − x 2 = y 3 − y 1 x 3 − x 1 − y 3 − y 2 x 3 − x 2 ( displaystyle ( \frac ( ( color ( red ) y ) - y_ ( 1 ) ) ( ( color ( green ) x ) - x_ ( 1 ) ) ) - ( \frac ( ( color ( red ) y ) - y_ ( 2 ) ) ( ( color ( green ) x ) - x_ ( 2 ) ) ) = ( \frac ( y_ ( 3 ) - y_ ( 1 ) ) ( x_ ( 3 ) - x_ ( 1 ) ) ) - ( \frac ( y_ ( 3 ) - y_ ( 2 ) ) ( x_ ( 3 ) - x_ ( 2 ) ) ) ) for y ( displaystyle ( color ( red ) y ) ). Pole - polar relation of a parabola parabola : pol - polar - relation In a suitable coordinatesystem any parabola can be described by an equation y = a x 2 ( displaystyle y = ax ^ ( 2 ) ). The equation of the tangent at a point P 0 = ( x 0, y 0 ), y 0 = a x 0 2 ( displaystyle P_ ( 0 ) = ( x_ ( 0 ), y_ ( 0 ) ), y_ ( 0 ) = ax_ ( 0 ) ^ ( 2 ) ) is y = 2 a x 0 ( x − x 0 ) + y 0 = 2 a x 0 x − a x 0 2 = 2 a x 0 x − y 0 ( displaystyle y = 2ax_ ( 0 ) ( x-x_ ( 0 ) ) + y_ ( 0 ) = 2ax_ ( 0 ) x-ax_ ( 0 ) ^ ( 2 ) = 2ax_ ( 0 ) x-y_ ( 0 ) ). One gets the function ( x 0, y 0 ) → y = 2 a x 0 x − y 0 ( displaystyle ( x_ ( 0 ), y_ ( 0 ) ) \rightarrow y = 2ax_ ( 0 ) x-y_ ( 0 ) ) on the set of points of the parabola onto the set of tangents. Obviously this function can be extended onto the set of all points of R 2 ( displaystyle mathbb ( R ) ^ ( 2 ) ) to a bijection between the points of R 2 ( displaystyle mathbb ( R ) ^ ( 2 ) ) and the lines with equations y = m x + d, m, d ∈ R ( displaystyle y = mx + d, m, d in mathbb ( R ) ). The inverse mapping is line y = m x + d → ( displaystyle y = mx + d \rightarrow ) point ( m 2 a, − d ) ( displaystyle ( ( \tfrac ( m ) ( 2a ) ), - d ) ). This relation is called the pole - polar relation of the parabola, where the point is the pole and the corresponding line its polar. By calculation one checks the following properties of the pole - polar relation of the parabola : For a point ( pole ) on the parabola the polar is the tangent at this point ( s. picture : P 1, p 1 ( displaystyle P_ ( 1 ), p_ ( 1 ) ) ). For a pole P ( displaystyle P ) outside the parabola the intersection points of its polar with the parabola are the touching points of the two tangents passing P ( displaystyle P ) ( s. picture : P 2, p 2 ( displaystyle P_ ( 2 ), p_ ( 2 ) ) ). For a point within the parabola the polar has no point with the parabola in common. ( s. picture : P 3, p 3 ( displaystyle P_ ( 3 ), p_ ( 3 ) ) and P 4, p 4 ( displaystyle P_ ( 4 ), p_ ( 4 ) ) ). The intersection point of two polar lines ( for example : p 3, p 4 ( displaystyle p_ ( 3 ), p_ ( 4 ) ) ) is the pole of the connecting line of their poles ( in example : P 3, P 4 ( displaystyle P_ ( 3 ), P_ ( 4 ) ) ). focus and directrix of the parabola are a pole - polar pair. Remark : Pole - polar relations exist for ellipses and hyperbolas, too. Tangent properties Two tangent properties related to the latus rectum Let the line of symmetry intersect the parabola at point Q, and denote the focus as point F and its distance from point Q as f. Let the perpendicular to the line of symmetry, through the focus, intersect the parabola at a point T. Then ( 1 ) the distance from F to T is 2f, and ( 2 ) a tangent to the parabola at point T intersects the line of symmetry at a 45 ° angle. Orthoptic property Perpendicular tangents intersect on the directrix Main article : Orthoptic ( geometry ) If two tangents to a parabola are perpendicular to each other, then they intersect on the directrix. Conversely, two tangents which intersect on the directrix are perpendicular. Proof Without loss of generality, consider the parabola y = ax, a ≠ 0. Suppose that two tangents contact this parabola at the points ( p, ap ) and ( q, aq ). Their slopes are 2ap and 2aq respectively. Thus the equation of the first tangent is of the form y = 2apx + C, where C is a constant. In order to make the line pass through ( p, ap ), the value of C must be − ap, so the equation of this tangent is y = 2apx − ap. Likewise, the equation of the other tangent is y = 2aqx − aq. At the intersection point of the two tangents, 2apx − ap = 2aqx − aq. Thus 2x ( p − q ) = p − q. Factoring the difference of squares, cancelling, and dividing by 2 gives x = p + q / 2. Substituting this into one of the equations of the tangents gives an expression for the y - coordinate of the intersection point : y = 2ap ( p + q / 2 ) − ap. Simplifying this gives y = apq. We now use the fact that these tangents are perpendicular. The product of the slopes of perpendicular lines is − 1, assuming that both of the slopes are finite. The slopes of our tangents are 2ap and 2aq, so ( 2ap ) ( 2aq ) = − 1, so pq = − 1 / 4a. Thus the y - coordinate of the intersection point of the tangents is given by y = − 1 / 4a. This is also the equation of the directrix of this parabola, so the two perpendicular tangents intersect on the directrix. Lambert 's theorem Let three tangents to a parabola form a triangle. Then Lambert 's theorem states that the focus of the parabola lies on the circumcircle of the triangle. Tsukerman 's converse to Lambert 's theorem states that, given three lines that bound a triangle, if two of the lines are tangent to a parabola whose focus lies on the circumcircle of the triangle, then the third line is also tangent to the parabola. Facts related to chords Focal length calculated from parameters of a chord Suppose a chord crosses a parabola perpendicular to its axis of symmetry. Let the length of the chord between the points where it intersects the parabola be c and the distance from the vertex of the parabola to the chord, measured along the axis of symmetry, be d. The focal length, f, of the parabola is given by : f = c 2 16 d ( displaystyle f = ( \frac ( c ^ ( 2 ) ) ( 16d ) ) ) Proof Suppose a system of Cartesian coordinates is used such that the vertex of the parabola is at the origin, and the axis of symmetry is the y - axis. The parabola opens upward. It is shown elsewhere in this article that the equation of the parabola is 4fy = x, where f is the focal length. At the positive x end of the chord, x = c / 2 and y = d. Since this point is on the parabola, these coordinates must satisfy the equation above. Therefore, by substitution, 4fd = ( c / 2 ) 2. From this, f = c / 16d. Area enclosed between a parabola and a chord Parabola ( magenta ) and line ( lower light blue ) including a chord ( blue ). The area enclosed between them is in pink. The chord itself ends at the points where the line intersects the parabola. The area enclosed between a parabola and a chord ( see diagram ) is two - thirds of the area of a parallelogram which surrounds it. One side of the parallelogram is the chord, and the opposite side is a tangent to the parabola. The slope of the other parallel sides is irrelevant to the area. Often, as here, they are drawn parallel with the parabola 's axis of symmetry, but this is arbitrary. A theorem equivalent to this one, but different in details, was derived by Archimedes in the 3rd Century BCE. He used the areas of triangles, rather than that of the parallelogram. See the article `` The Quadrature of the Parabola ''. If the chord has length b, and is perpendicular to the parabola 's axis of symmetry, and if the perpendicular distance from the parabola 's vertex to the chord is h, the parallelogram is a rectangle, with sides of b and h. The area, A, of the parabolic segment enclosed by the parabola and the chord is therefore : A = 2 3 b h ( displaystyle A = ( \frac ( 2 ) ( 3 ) ) bh ) This formula can be compared with the area of a triangle : 1 / 2bh. In general, the enclosed area can be calculated as follows. First, locate the point on the parabola where its slope equals that of the chord. This can be done with calculus, or by using a line that is parallel with the axis of symmetry of the parabola and passes through the midpoint of the chord. The required point is where this line intersects the parabola. Then, using the formula given in the article `` Distance from a point to a line '', calculate the perpendicular distance from this point to the chord. Multiply this by the length of the chord to get the area of the parallelogram, then by 2 / 3 to get the required enclosed area. midpoints of parallel chords Corollary Concerning midpoints and endpoints of chords A corollary of the above discussion is that if a parabola has several parallel chords, their midpoints all lie on a line which is parallel to the axis of symmetry. If tangents to the parabola are drawn through the endpoints of any of these chords, the two tangents intersect on this same line parallel to the axis of symmetry ( see Axis - direction of a parabola ). Length of an arc of a parabola If a point X is located on a parabola which has focal length f, and if p is the perpendicular distance from X to the axis of symmetry of the parabola, then the lengths of arcs of the parabola which terminate at X can be calculated from f and p as follows, assuming they are all expressed in the same units. h = p 2 q = f 2 + h 2 s = h q f + f ln ⁡ ( h + q f ) ( displaystyle ( \begin ( aligned ) h& = ( \frac ( p ) ( 2 ) ) q& = ( sqrt ( f ^ ( 2 ) + h ^ ( 2 ) ) ) s& = ( \frac ( hq ) ( f ) ) + f ln left ( ( \frac ( h + q ) ( f ) ) \right ) end ( aligned ) ) ) This quantity, s, is the length of the arc between X and the vertex of the parabola. The length of the arc between X and the symmetrically opposite point on the other side of the parabola is 2s. The perpendicular distance, p, can be given a positive or negative sign to indicate on which side of the axis of symmetry X is situated. Reversing the sign of p reverses the signs of h and s without changing their absolute values. If these quantities are signed, the length of the arc between any two points on the parabola is always shown by the difference between their values of s. The calculation can be simplified by using the properties of logarithms : s 1 − s 2 = h 1 q 1 − h 2 q 2 f + f ln ⁡ h 1 + q 1 h 2 + q 2 ( displaystyle s_ ( 1 ) - s_ ( 2 ) = ( \frac ( h_ ( 1 ) q_ ( 1 ) - h_ ( 2 ) q_ ( 2 ) ) ( f ) ) + f ln ( \frac ( h_ ( 1 ) + q_ ( 1 ) ) ( h_ ( 2 ) + q_ ( 2 ) ) ) ) This can be useful, for example, in calculating the size of the material needed to make a parabolic reflector or parabolic trough. This calculation can be used for a parabola in any orientation. It is not restricted to the situation where the axis of symmetry is parallel to the y - axis. A geometrical construction to find the area of a parabolic Sector S is the Focus and V is the Principal Vertex of the parabola VG. Draw VX perpendicular to SV. Take any point B on VG and drop a perpendicular BQ from B to VX. Draw perpendicular ST intersecting BQ, extended if necessary, at T. At B draw the perpendicular BJ, intersecting VX at J. For the parabola, the segment VBV, the area enclosed by the chord VB and the arc VB, is equal to ∆ VBQ / 3, also B Q = V Q 2 4 S V ( displaystyle BQ = ( \frac ( VQ ^ ( 2 ) ) ( 4SV ) ) ) The Area of the Parabolic Sector SVB = ∆ SVB + ∆ VBQ / 3 = S V ⋅ V Q 2 + V Q ⋅ B Q 6 ( displaystyle = ( \frac ( SV cdot VQ ) ( 2 ) ) + ( \frac ( VQ cdot BQ ) ( 6 ) ) ) Since triangles TSB and QBJ are similar : V J = V Q − J Q = V Q − B Q ⋅ T B S T = V Q − B Q ⋅ ( S V − B Q ) V Q = 3 V Q 4 + V Q ⋅ B Q 4 S V ( displaystyle VJ = VQ - JQ = VQ - ( \frac ( BQ cdot TB ) ( ST ) ) = VQ - ( \frac ( BQ cdot ( SV - BQ ) ) ( VQ ) ) = ( \frac ( 3VQ ) ( 4 ) ) + ( \frac ( VQ cdot BQ ) ( 4SV ) ) ) Therefore, the Area of the Parabolic Sector S V B = 2 S V ⋅ V J 3 ( displaystyle SVB = ( \frac ( 2SV cdot VJ ) ( 3 ) ) ), and can be found from the length of VJ, as found above. It should be noted that a circle through S, V and B also passes through J. Conversely, if a point, B on the parabola VG is to be found so that the Area of the Sector SVB is equal to a specified value, determine the point J on VX, and construct a circle through S, V and J. Since SJ is the diameter, the centre of the circle is at its mid-point, and it lies on the perpendicular bisector of SV, a distance of one half VJ from SV. The point required, B is where this circle intersects the parabola. If a body traces the path of the parabola due to an inverse square force directed towards S, the area SVB increases at a constant rate as point B moves forward. It follows that J moves at constant speed along VX as B moves along the parabola. If the speed of the body at the vertex, where it is moving perpendicularly to SV is v, then the speed of J is equal to 3v / 4. The construction can be extended simply to include the case where neither radius coincides with the axis, SV as follows. Let A be a fixed point on VG between V and B, and point H be the intersection on VX with the perpendicular to SA at A. From the above, the Area of the Parabolic Sector S A B = 2 S V ⋅ ( V J − V H ) 3 = 2 S V ⋅ H J 3 ( displaystyle SAB = ( \frac ( 2SV cdot ( VJ - VH ) ) ( 3 ) ) = ( \frac ( 2SV cdot HJ ) ( 3 ) ) ) Conversely, if it is required to find the point B for a particular area SAB, find point J from HJ and point B as before. By Book 1 Proposition 16, Corollary 6 of the Principia, the speed of a body moving along a parabola with a force directed towards the focus is inversely as the square root of the radius. If the speed at A is v, then at the vertex, V it is S A S V v ( displaystyle ( sqrt ( \frac ( SA ) ( SV ) ) ) v ), and point J moves at a constant speed of 3 v 4 S A S V ( displaystyle ( \frac ( 3v ) ( 4 ) ) ( sqrt ( \frac ( SA ) ( SV ) ) ) ) The above construction was devised by Isaac Newton and can be found in Book 1 of the Principia as Proposition 30. Focal length and radius of curvature at the vertex The focal length of a parabola is half of its radius of curvature at its vertex. Proof Image is inverted. AB is x-axis. C is origin. O is centre. A is ( x, y ). OA = OC = R. PA = x. CP = y. OP = ( R − y ). Other points and lines are irrelevant for this purpose. The radius of curvature at the vertex is twice the focal length. The measurements shown on the above diagram are in units of the latus rectum, which is four times the focal length. Consider a point ( x, y ) on a circle of radius R and with centre at the point ( 0, R ). The circle passes through the origin. If the point is near the origin, the Pythagorean theorem shows that : x 2 + ( R − y ) 2 = R 2 ∴ x 2 + R 2 − 2 R y + y 2 = R 2 ∴ x 2 + y 2 = 2 R y ( displaystyle ( \begin ( aligned ) x ^ ( 2 ) + ( R-y ) ^ ( 2 ) & = R ^ ( 2 ) \therefore x ^ ( 2 ) + R ^ ( 2 ) - 2Ry + y ^ ( 2 ) & = R ^ ( 2 ) \therefore x ^ ( 2 ) + y ^ ( 2 ) & = 2Ry end ( aligned ) ) ) But if ( x, y ) is extremely close to the origin, since the x-axis is a tangent to the circle, y is very small compared with x, so y is negligible compared with the other terms. Therefore, extremely close to the origin : x 2 = 2 R y ( displaystyle x ^ ( 2 ) = 2Ry ) ( Equation 1 ) Compare this with the parabola : x 2 = 4 f y ( displaystyle x ^ ( 2 ) = 4fy ) ( Equation 2 ) which has its vertex at the origin, opens upward, and has focal length f. ( See preceding sections of this article. ) Equations 1 and 2 are equivalent if R = 2f. Therefore, this is the condition for the circle and parabola to coincide at and extremely close to the origin. The radius of curvature at the origin, which is the vertex of the parabola, is twice the focal length. Corollary A concave mirror which is a small segment of a sphere behaves approximately like a parabolic mirror, focusing parallel light to a point which is midway between the centre and the surface of the sphere. Parabola as the affine image of the unit parabola y = x2 parabola as an affine image of the unit parabola Another definition of a parabola uses affine transformations : Any parabola is the affine image of the unit parabola with equation y = x 2 ( displaystyle y = x ^ ( 2 ) ). An affine transformation of the Euclidean plane has the form x → → f → 0 + A x → ( displaystyle ( \vec ( x ) ) \to ( \vec ( f ) ) _ ( 0 ) + A ( \vec ( x ) ) ), where A ( displaystyle A ) is a regular matrix ( determinant is not 0 ) and f → 0 ( displaystyle ( \vec ( f ) ) _ ( 0 ) ) is an arbitrary vector. If f → 1, f → 2 ( displaystyle ( \vec ( f ) ) _ ( 1 ), ( \vec ( f ) ) _ ( 2 ) ) are the column vectors of the matrix A ( displaystyle A ), the unit parabola ( t, t 2 ), t ∈ R, ( displaystyle ( t, t ^ ( 2 ) ), t in mathbb ( R ), ) is mapped onto the parabola x → = p → ( t ) = f → 0 + f → 1 t + f → 2 t 2 ( displaystyle ( \vec ( x ) ) = ( \vec ( p ) ) ( t ) = ( \vec ( f ) ) _ ( 0 ) + ( \vec ( f ) ) _ ( 1 ) t+ ( \vec ( f ) ) _ ( 2 ) t ^ ( 2 ) ) f → 0 ( displaystyle ( \vec ( f ) ) _ ( 0 ) ) is a point of the parabola and f → 1 ( displaystyle ( \vec ( f ) ) _ ( 1 ) ) is a tangent vector at point f → 0 ( displaystyle ( \vec ( f ) ) _ ( 0 ) ). f → 2 ( displaystyle ( \vec ( f ) ) _ ( 2 ) ) is parallel to the axis of the parabola ( axis of symmetry through the vertex ). In general the two vectors f → 1, f → 2 ( displaystyle ( \vec ( f ) ) _ ( 1 ), ( \vec ( f ) ) _ ( 2 ) ) are not perpendicular and f → 0 ( displaystyle ( \vec ( f ) ) _ ( 0 ) ) is not the vertex, unless the affine transformation is a similarity. The tangent vector at the point p → ( t ) ( displaystyle ( \vec ( p ) ) ( t ) ) is p → ′ ( t ) = f → 1 + 2 t f → 2 ( displaystyle ( \vec ( p ) ) ' ( t ) = ( \vec ( f ) ) _ ( 1 ) + 2t ( \vec ( f ) ) _ ( 2 ) ). At the vertex the tangent vector is orthogonal to f → 2 ( displaystyle ( \vec ( f ) ) _ ( 2 ) ). Hence the parameter t 0 ( displaystyle t_ ( 0 ) ) of the vertex is the solution of the equation p → ′ ( t ) ⋅ f → 2 = f → 1 ⋅ f → 2 + 2 t f → 2 2 = 0 ( displaystyle ( \vec ( p ) ) ' ( t ) cdot ( \vec ( f ) ) _ ( 2 ) = ( \vec ( f ) ) _ ( 1 ) cdot ( \vec ( f ) ) _ ( 2 ) + 2t ( \vec ( f ) ) _ ( 2 ) ^ ( , 2 ) = 0 ), which is t 0 = − f → 1 ⋅ f → 2 2 f → 2 2 ( displaystyle t_ ( 0 ) = - ( \tfrac ( ( \vec ( f ) ) _ ( 1 ) cdot ( \vec ( f ) ) _ ( 2 ) ) ( 2 ( \vec ( f ) ) _ ( 2 ) ^ ( , 2 ) ) ) ) and p → ( t 0 ) = f → 0 − f → 1 ⋅ f → 2 2 f → 2 2 f → 1 + ( f → 1 ⋅ f → 2 ) 2 4 ( f → 2 2 ) 2 f → 2 ( displaystyle ( \vec ( p ) ) ( t_ ( 0 ) ) = ( \vec ( f ) ) _ ( 0 ) - ( \tfrac ( ( \vec ( f ) ) _ ( 1 ) cdot ( \vec ( f ) ) _ ( 2 ) ) ( 2 ( \vec ( f ) ) _ ( 2 ) ^ ( , 2 ) ) ) ( \vec ( f ) ) _ ( 1 ) + ( \tfrac ( ( ( \vec ( f ) ) _ ( 1 ) cdot ( \vec ( f ) ) _ ( 2 ) ) ^ ( 2 ) ) ( 4 ( ( \vec ( f ) ) _ ( 2 ) ^ ( , 2 ) ) ^ ( 2 ) ) ) ( \vec ( f ) ) _ ( 2 ) ) is the vertex. The focal length can be determined by a suitable parameter transformation ( which does not change the geometric shape of the parabola ). The focal length is f = f → 1 2 ⋅ f → 2 2 − ( f → 1 ⋅ f → 2 ) 2 4 f → 2 3 ( displaystyle f = ( \tfrac ( ( \vec ( f ) ) _ ( 1 ) ^ ( 2 ) cdot ( \vec ( f ) ) _ ( 2 ) ^ ( 2 ) - ( ( \vec ( f ) ) _ ( 1 ) cdot ( \vec ( f ) ) _ ( 2 ) ) ^ ( 2 ) ) ( 4 ( \vec ( f ) ) _ ( 2 ) ^ ( , 3 ) ) ) ). Hence F : f → 0 − f → 1 ⋅ f → 2 2 f → 2 2 f → 1 + f → 1 2 ⋅ f → 2 2 4 ( f → 2 2 ) 2 f → 2 ( displaystyle F :( \vec ( f ) ) _ ( 0 ) - ( \tfrac ( ( \vec ( f ) ) _ ( 1 ) cdot ( \vec ( f ) ) _ ( 2 ) ) ( 2 ( \vec ( f ) ) _ ( 2 ) ^ ( , 2 ) ) ) ( \vec ( f ) ) _ ( 1 ) + ( \tfrac ( ( \vec ( f ) ) _ ( 1 ) ^ ( 2 ) cdot ( \vec ( f ) ) _ ( 2 ) ^ ( 2 ) ) ( 4 ( ( \vec ( f ) ) _ ( 2 ) ^ ( , 2 ) ) ^ ( 2 ) ) ) ( \vec ( f ) ) _ ( 2 ) ) is the focus of the parabola. Remark : The advantage of this definition is, one gets a simple parametric representation of an arbitrary parabola, even in the space, if the vectors f → 0, f → 1, f → 2 ( displaystyle ( \vec ( f ) ) _ ( 0 ), ( \vec ( f ) ) _ ( 1 ), ( \vec ( f ) ) _ ( 2 ) ) are vectors of the Euclidean space. Parabola as quadratic Bezier curve quadratic Bézier curve and its control points A quadratic Bézier curve is a curve c → ( t ) ( displaystyle ( \vec ( c ) ) ( t ) ) defined by three points P 0 : p → 0 ( displaystyle P_ ( 0 ) : ( \vec ( p ) ) _ ( 0 ) ), P 1 : p → 1 ( displaystyle P_ ( 1 ) : ( \vec ( p ) ) _ ( 1 ) ) and P 2 : p → 2 ( displaystyle P_ ( 2 ) : ( \vec ( p ) ) _ ( 2 ) ), its control points : c → ( t ) = ∑ i = 0 2 ( 2 i ) t i ( 1 − t ) 2 − i p → i = ( 1 − t ) 2 p → 0 + 2 t ( 1 − t ) p → 1 + t 2 p → 2 = ( p → 0 − 2 p → 1 + p → 2 ) t 2 + ( − 2 p → 0 + 2 p → 1 ) t + p → 0, t ∈ ( 0, 1 ) ( displaystyle ( \begin ( aligned ) ( \vec ( c ) ) ( t ) & =sum _ ( i = 0 ) ^ ( 2 ) ( \binom ( 2 ) ( i ) ) t ^ ( i ) ( 1 - t ) ^ ( 2 - i ) ( \vec ( p ) ) _ ( i ) & =( 1 - t ) ^ ( 2 ) ( \vec ( p ) ) _ ( 0 ) + 2t ( 1 - t ) ( \vec ( p ) ) _ ( 1 ) + t ^ ( 2 ) ( \vec ( p ) ) _ ( 2 ) & =( ( \vec ( p ) ) _ ( 0 ) - 2 ( \vec ( p ) ) _ ( 1 ) + ( \vec ( p ) ) _ ( 2 ) ) t ^ ( 2 ) + ( - 2 ( \vec ( p ) ) _ ( 0 ) + 2 ( \vec ( p ) ) _ ( 1 ) ) t+ ( \vec ( p ) ) _ ( 0 ) ( \text (, ) ) t in ( 0, 1 ) end ( aligned ) ) ) This curve is an arc of a parabola ( s. section : parabola as affine image of the unit parabola ). Simpson 's rule : the graph of a function is replaced by an arc of a parabola Parabola and numerical integration For numerical integration one replaces the graph of a function by arcs of parabolas and integrates the parabola arcs. A parabola is determined by three points. The formula for one arc is ∫ a b f ( x ) d x ≈ b − a 6 ⋅ ( f ( a ) + 4 f ( a + b 2 ) + f ( b ) ) ( displaystyle int _ ( a ) ^ ( b ) f ( x ) , dx approx ( \frac ( b-a ) ( 6 ) ) cdot left ( f ( a ) + 4f left ( ( \frac ( a + b ) ( 2 ) ) \right ) + f ( b ) \right ) ). The method is called Simpson 's rule. Parabolas as plane sections of quadrics The following quadrics contain parabolas as plane sections : Elliptical Cone Parabolic cylinder Elliptical paraboloid Hyperbolic paraboloid Hyperboloid of one sheet Hyperboloid of two sheets Elliptic cone Parabolic cylinder Elliptic paraboloid Hyperbolic paraboloid Hyperboloid of one sheet Hyperboloid of two sheets Mathematical generalizations If one replaces the real numbers by an arbitrary field, many geometric properties of the parabola y = x 2 ( displaystyle y = x ^ ( 2 ) ) are still valid : 1 ) a line intersects in at most two points. 2 ) At any point ( x 0, x 0 2 ) ( displaystyle ( x_ ( 0 ), x_ ( 0 ) ^ ( 2 ) ) ) the line y = 2 x 0 x − x 0 2 ( displaystyle y = 2x_ ( 0 ) x-x_ ( 0 ) ^ ( 2 ) ) is the tangent... Essentially new phenomena arise, if the field has characteristic 2 ( i.e., 1 + 1 = 0 ( displaystyle 1 + 1 = 0 ) ) : the tangents are all parallel. In algebraic geometry, the parabola is generalized by the rational normal curves, which have coordinates ( x, x, x,..., x ) ; the standard parabola is the case n = 2, and the case n = 3 is known as the twisted cubic. A further generalization is given by the Veronese variety, when there is more than one input variable. In the theory of quadratic forms, the parabola is the graph of the quadratic form x ( or other scalings ), while the elliptic paraboloid is the graph of the positive - definite quadratic form x + y ( or scalings ) and the hyperbolic paraboloid is the graph of the indefinite quadratic form x − y. Generalizations to more variables yield further such objects. The curves y = x for other values of p are traditionally referred to as the higher parabolas, and were originally treated implicitly, in the form x = ky for p and q both positive integers, in which form they are seen to be algebraic curves. These correspond to the explicit formula y = x for a positive fractional power of x. Negative fractional powers correspond to the implicit equation x y = k, and are traditionally referred to as higher hyperbolas. Analytically, x can also be raised to an irrational power ( for positive values of x ) ; the analytic properties are analogous to when x is raised to rational powers, but the resulting curve is no longer algebraic, and can not be analyzed via algebraic geometry. Parabolas in the physical world In nature, approximations of parabolas and paraboloids are found in many diverse situations. The best - known instance of the parabola in the history of physics is the trajectory of a particle or body in motion under the influence of a uniform gravitational field without air resistance ( for instance, a ball flying through the air, neglecting air friction ). The parabolic trajectory of projectiles was discovered experimentally by Galileo in the early 17th century, who performed experiments with balls rolling on inclined planes. He also later proved this mathematically in his book Dialogue Concerning Two New Sciences. For objects extended in space, such as a diver jumping from a diving board, the object itself follows a complex motion as it rotates, but the center of mass of the object nevertheless forms a parabola. As in all cases in the physical world, the trajectory is always an approximation of a parabola. The presence of air resistance, for example, always distorts the shape, although at low speeds, the shape is a good approximation of a parabola. At higher speeds, such as in ballistics, the shape is highly distorted and does n't resemble a parabola. Another hypothetical situation in which parabolas might arise, according to the theories of physics described in the 17th and 18th centuries by Sir Isaac Newton, is in two - body orbits ; for example the path of a small planetoid or other object under the influence of the gravitation of the Sun. Parabolic orbits do not occur in nature ; simple orbits most commonly resemble hyperbolas or ellipses. The parabolic orbit is the degenerate intermediate case between those two types of ideal orbit. An object following a parabolic orbit would travel at the exact escape velocity of the object it orbits ; objects in elliptical or hyperbolic orbits travel at less or greater than escape velocity, respectively. Long - period comets travel close to the Sun 's escape velocity while they are moving through the inner solar system, so their paths are near parabolic. Approximations of parabolas are also found in the shape of the main cables on a simple suspension bridge. The curve of the chains of a suspension bridge is always an intermediate curve between a parabola and a catenary, but in practice the curve is generally nearer to a parabola, and in calculations the second degree parabola is used. Under the influence of a uniform load ( such as a horizontal suspended deck ), the otherwise catenary - shaped cable is deformed toward a parabola. Unlike an inelastic chain, a freely hanging spring of zero unstressed length takes the shape of a parabola. Suspension - bridge cables are, ideally, purely in tension, without having to carry other, e.g., bending, forces. Similarly, the structures of parabolic arches are purely in compression. Paraboloids arise in several physical situations as well. The best - known instance is the parabolic reflector, which is a mirror or similar reflective device that concentrates light or other forms of electromagnetic radiation to a common focal point, or conversely, collimates light from a point source at the focus into a parallel beam. The principle of the parabolic reflector may have been discovered in the 3rd century BC by the geometer Archimedes, who, according to a dubious legend, constructed parabolic mirrors to defend Syracuse against the Roman fleet, by concentrating the sun 's rays to set fire to the decks of the Roman ships. The principle was applied to telescopes in the 17th century. Today, paraboloid reflectors can be commonly observed throughout much of the world in microwave and satellite - dish receiving and transmitting antennas. In parabolic microphones, a parabolic reflector is used to focus sound onto a microphone, giving it highly directional performance. Paraboloids are also observed in the surface of a liquid confined to a container and rotated around the central axis. In this case, the centrifugal force causes the liquid to climb the walls of the container, forming a parabolic surface. This is the principle behind the liquid mirror telescope. Aircraft used to create a weightless state for purposes of experimentation, such as NASA 's `` Vomit Comet '', follow a vertically parabolic trajectory for brief periods in order to trace the course of an object in free fall, which produces the same effect as zero gravity for most purposes. In the United States, vertical curves in roads are usually parabolic by design. Gallery Click on any image to enlarge it. A bouncing ball captured with a stroboscopic flash at 25 images per second. Note that the ball becomes significantly non-spherical after each bounce, especially after the first. That, along with spin and air resistance, causes the curve swept out to deviate slightly from the expected perfect parabola. Parabolic trajectories of water in a fountain. The path ( in red ) of Comet Kohoutek as it passed through the inner solar system, showing its nearly parabolic shape. The blue orbit is the Earth 's The supporting cables of suspension bridges follow a curve which is intermediate between a parabola and a catenary. The Rainbow Bridge across the Niagara River, connecting Canada ( left ) to the United States ( right ). The parabolic arch is in compression, and carries the weight of the road. Parabolic arches used in architecture Parabolic shape formed by a liquid surface under rotation. Two liquids of different densities completely fill a narrow space between two sheets of transparent plastic. The gap between the sheets is closed at the bottom, sides and top. The whole assembly is rotating around a vertical axis passing through the centre. ( See Rotating furnace ) Solar cooker with parabolic reflector Parabolic antenna Parabolic microphone with optically transparent plastic reflector, used to overhear referee conversations at an American college football game. Array of parabolic troughs to collect solar energy Edison 's searchlight, mounted on a cart. The light had a parabolic reflector. Physicist Stephen Hawking in an aircraft flying a parabolic trajectory to simulate zero - gravity See also Catenary Degenerate conic Ellipse Hyperbola Liquid mirror telescope, paraboloids produced by rotation Parabolic dome Parabolic partial differential equation Parabolic reflector Paraboloid Quadratic equation Quadratic function Universal parabolic constant Footnotes ^ The tangential plane just touches the conical surface along a line which passes through the apex of the cone ^ In the diagram, the axis is not exactly vertical. This is the result of a technical problem that occurs when a 3 - dimensional model is converted into a 2 - dimensional image. Readers should imagine the cone rotated slightly clockwise, so the axis, AV, is vertical. ^ As stated above in the lead, the focal length of a parabola is the distance between its vertex and focus. ^ The point V is the centre of the smaller circular cross-section of the cone. The point F is in the ( pink ) plane of the parabola, and the line VF is perpendicular to the plane of the parabola. ^ Archimedes proved that the area of the enclosed parabolic segment was 4 / 3 as large as that of a triangle that he inscribed within the enclosed segment. It can easily be shown that the parallelogram has twice the area of the triangle, so Archimedes ' proof also proves the theorem with the parallelogram. ^ This method can be easily proved correct by calculus. It was also known and used by Archimedes, although he lived nearly 2000 years before calculus was invented. ^ A proof of this sentence can be inferred from the proof of the orthoptic property, above. It is shown there that the tangents to the parabola y = x at ( p, p ) and ( q, q ) intersect at a point whose x-coordinate is the mean of p and q. Thus if there is a chord between these two points, the intersection point of the tangents has the same x-coordinate as the midpoint of the chord. ^ In this calculation, the square root, q, must be positive. The quantity ln a is the natural logarithm of a, i.e., its logarithm to base e. ^ However, this parabolic shape, as Newton recognized, is only an approximation of the actual elliptical shape of the trajectory, and is obtained by assuming that the gravitational force is constant ( not pointing toward the center of the earth ) in the area of interest. Often, this difference is negligible, and leads to a simpler formula for tracking motion. Citations ^ `` Can You Really Derive Conic Formulae from a Cone ? - Deriving the Symptom of the Parabola - Mathematical Association of America ''. Retrieved 30 September 2016. ^ Wilson, Ray N. ( 2004 ). Reflecting Telescope Optics : Basic design theory and its historical development ( 2 ed. ). Springer. p. 3. ISBN 3 - 540 - 40106 - 7. Extract of page 3 ^ Stargazer, p. 115. ^ Stargazer, pp. 123 and 132 ^ Fitzpatrick, Richard ( July 14, 2007 ). `` Spherical Mirrors ''. Electromagnetism and Optics, lectures. University of Texas at Austin. Paraxial Optics. Retrieved October 5, 2011. ^ Tsukerman, Emmanuel ( 2013 ). `` On Polygons Admitting a Simson Line as Discrete Analogs of Parabolas '' ( PDF ). Forum Geometricorum. 13 : 197 -- 208. ^ Planar Circle Geometries, an Introduction to Moebius -, Laguerre - and Minkowski - planes, p. 36 ^ E. Hartmann : Lecture Note ' Planar Circle Geometries ', an Introduction to Möbius -, Laguerre - and Minkowski Planes, p. 72 ^ W. Benz, Vorlesungen über Geomerie der Algebren, Springer ( 1973 ) ^ Downs, J.W. ( 2003 ). Practical Conic Sections. Dover Publishing. ^ Sondow, Jonathan ( 2013 ). `` The parbelos, a parabolic analog of the arbelos ''. American Mathematical Monthly. 120 : 929 -- 935. arXiv : 1210.2279. doi : 10.4169 / amer. math. monthly. 120.10. 929. ^ Tsukerman, Emmanuel ( 2014 ). `` Solution of Sondow 's problem : a synthetic proof of the tangency property of the parbelos ''. American Mathematical Monthly. 121 : 438 -- 443. arXiv : 1210.5580. doi : 10.4169 / amer. math. monthly. 121.05. 438. ^ `` Sovrn Container ''. Mathwarehouse.com. Retrieved 2016 - 09 - 30. ^ `` Parabola ''. Mysite.du.edu. Retrieved 2016 - 09 - 30. ^ Dialogue Concerning Two New Sciences ( 1638 ) ( The Motion of Projectiles : Theorem 1 ) ^ Troyano, Leonardo Fernández ( 2003 ). Bridge engineering : a global perspective. Thomas Telford. p. 536. ISBN 0 - 7277 - 3215 - 3. ^ Drewry, Charles Stewart ( 1832 ). A memoir of suspension bridges. Oxford University. p. 159. ^ Middleton, W.E. Knowles ( December 1961 ). `` Archimedes, Kircher, Buffon, and the Burning - Mirrors ''. Isis. Published by : The University of Chicago Press on behalf of The History of Science Society. 52 ( 4 ) : 533 -- 543. JSTOR 228646. doi : 10.1086 / 349498. Further reading Lockwood, E.H. ( 1961 ). A Book of Curves. Cambridge University Press. External links Wikimedia Commons has media related to Parabolas. Wikisource has the text of the 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica article Parabola. Hazewinkel, Michiel, ed. ( 2001 ) ( 1994 ), `` Parabola '', Encyclopedia of Mathematics, Springer Science + Business Media B.V. / Kluwer Academic Publishers, ISBN 978 - 1 - 55608 - 010 - 4 Weisstein, Eric W. `` Parabola ''. MathWorld. Interactive parabola - drag focus, see axis of symmetry, directrix, standard and vertex forms Archimedes Triangle and Squaring of Parabola at cut - the - knot Two Tangents to Parabola at cut - the - knot Parabola As Envelope of Straight Lines at cut - the - knot Parabolic Mirror at cut - the - knot Three Parabola Tangents at cut - the - knot Focal Properties of Parabola at cut - the - knot Parabola As Envelope II at cut - the - knot The similarity of parabola at Dynamic Geometry Sketches, interactive dynamic geometry sketch. Retrieved from `` https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Parabola&oldid=802019292 '' Categories : Conic sections Curves Parabolas Hidden categories : Pages with missing ISBNs Talk Contents About Wikipedia Afrikaans አማርኛ Azərbaycanca বাংলা Беларуская Беларуская ( тарашкевіца ) ‎ Български Bosanski Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Eesti Ελληνικά Español Esperanto Euskara فارسی Føroyskt Français Gaeilge Gàidhlig Galego 한국어 Hawaiʻi Հայերեն हिन्दी Hrvatski Ido Bahasa Indonesia Íslenska Italiano עברית ქართული Қазақша Latina Latviešu Lietuvių Magyar മലയാളം Bahasa Melayu Mìng - dĕ̤ng - ngṳ̄ Nederlands 日本 語 Norsk Norsk nynorsk Occitan Oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ភាសា ខ្មែរ Piemontèis Polski Português Română Русский Scots Sicilianu Simple English Slovenčina Slovenščina کوردی Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska தமிழ் ไทย Türkçe Українська Tiếng Việt 文言 ייִדיש 粵語 Zazaki 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 23 September 2017, at 13 : 11. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution - ShareAlike License ; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia ® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. About Wikipedia

Question: what is the exact same distance from a parabola
Answer: focal length