prop · H903278 · 2022-07-12 00:00:00 — (19) Directive (EU) 2017/1564 of Parliament and of the Council of on certain permitted uses of certain works and other subject matter protected by copyright and related rights for the benefit of persons who are blind, visually impaired or otherwise print-disabled and amending Directive 2001/29/EC on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society (OJ L 242, 20.9.2017, p. L 130/120 The first subparagraph of this paragraph shall not affect the possible application of Article 14(1) of Directive 2000/31/EC to those service providers for purposes falling outside the scope of this Directive. 4.If no authorisation is granted, online content-sharing service providers shall be liable for unauthorised acts of communication to the public, including making available to the public, of copyright-protected works and other subject matter, unless the service providers demonstrate that they have: (a)made best efforts to obtain an authorisation, and (b)made, in accordance with high industry standards of professional diligence, best efforts to ensure the unavailability of specific works and other subject matter for which the rightholders have provided the service providers with the relevant and necessary information; and in any event (c)acted expeditiously, upon receiving a sufficiently substantiated notice from the rightholders, to disable access to, or to remove from their websites, the notified works or other subject matter, and made best efforts to prevent their future uploads in accordance with point (b). 5.In determining whether the service provider has complied with its obligations under paragraph 4, and in light of the principle of proportionality, the following elements, among others, shall be taken into account: (a)the type, the audience and the size of the service and the type of works or other subject matter uploaded by the users of the service; and (b)the availability of suitable and effective means and their cost for service providers. 6.Member States shall provide that, in respect of new online content-sharing service providers the services of which have been available to the public in the Union for less than three years and which have an annual turnover below million, calculated in accordance with Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC (20), the conditions under the liability regime set out in paragraph 4 are limited to compliance with point (a) of paragraph 4 and to acting expedi tiously, upon receiving a sufficiently substantiated notice, to disable access to the notified works or other subject matter or to remove those works or other subject matter from their websites. Where the average number of monthly unique visitors of such service providers exceeds 5 million, calculated on the basis of the previous calendar year, they shall also demonstrate that they have made best efforts to prevent further uploads of the notified works and other subject matter for which the rightholders have provided relevant and necessary information. 7.The cooperation between online content-sharing service providers and rightholders shall not result in the prevention of the availability of works or other subject matter uploaded by users, which do not infringe copyright and related rights, including where such works or other subject matter are covered by an exception or limitation. Member States shall ensure that users in each are able to rely on any of the following existing exceptions or limitations when uploading and making available content generated by users on online content-sharing services: (a)quotation, criticism, review; (b)use for the purpose of caricature, parody or pastiche. 8.The application of this Article shall not lead to any general monitoring obligation. Member States shall provide that online content-sharing service providers provide rightholders, at their request, with adequate information on the functioning of their practices with regard to the cooperation referred to in paragraph 4 and, where licensing agreements are concluded between service providers and rightholders, information on the use of content covered by the agreements. 9.Member States shall provide that online content-sharing service providers put in place an effective and expeditious complaint and redress mechanism that is available to users of their services in the event of disputes over the disabling of access to, or the removal of, works or other subject matter uploaded by them. (20) Commission Recommendation of 6 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (OJ L 124, 20.5.2003, p. L 130/121 Where rightholders request to have access to their specific works or other subject matter disabled or to have those works or other subject matter removed, they shall duly justify the reasons for their requests. Complaints submitted under the mechanism provided for in the first subparagraph shall be processed without undue delay, and decisions to disable access to or remove uploaded content shall be subject to human review. Member States shall also ensure that out-of-court redress mechanisms are available for the settlement of disputes. Such mechanisms shall enable disputes to be settled impartially and shall not deprive the user of the legal protection afforded by national law, without prejudice to the rights of users to have recourse to efficient judicial remedies. In particular, Member States shall ensure that users have access to a court or another relevant judicial authority to assert the use of an exception or limitation to copyright and related rights. This Directive shall in no way affect legitimate uses, such as uses under exceptions or limitations provided for in Union law, and shall not lead to any identification of individual users nor to the processing of personal data, except in accordance with Directive 2002/58/EC and Regulation (EU) 2016/679. Online content-sharing service providers shall inform their users in their terms and conditions that they can use works and other subject matter under exceptions or limitations to copyright and related rights provided for in Union law. 10.As of 6 2019 the Commission, in cooperation with the Member States, shall organise stakeholder dialogues to discuss best practices for cooperation between online content-sharing service providers and rightholders. The Commission shall, in consultation with online content-sharing service providers, rightholders, users' organisations and other relevant stakeholders, and taking into account the results of the stakeholder dialogues, issue guidance on the application of this Article, in particular regarding the cooperation referred to in paragraph 4. When discussing best practices, special account shall be taken, among other things, of the need to balance fundamental rights and of the use of exceptions and limitations. For the purpose of the stakeholder dialogues, users' organisations shall have access to adequate information from online content-sharing service providers on the functioning of their practices with regard to paragraph 4. Fair remuneration in exploitation contracts of authors and performers Principle of appropriate and proportionate remuneration 1.Member States shall ensure that where authors and performers license or transfer their exclusive rights for the exploitation of their works or other subject matter, they are entitled to receive appropriate and proportionate remuneration. 2.In the implementation in national law of the principle set out in paragraph 1, Member States shall be free to use different mechanisms and take into account the principle of contractual freedom and a fair balance of rights and interests. 1.Member States shall ensure that authors and performers receive on a regular basis, at least once a year, and taking into account the specificities of each sector, up to date, relevant and comprehensive information on the exploitation of their works and performances from the parties to whom they have licensed or transferred their rights, or their successors in title, in particular as regards modes of exploitation, all revenues generated and remuneration due. 2.Member States shall ensure that, where the rights referred to in paragraph 1 have subsequently been licensed, authors and performers or their representatives shall, at their request, receive from sub-licensees additional information, in the event that their first contractual counterpart does not hold all the information that would be necessary for the purposes of paragraph 1. Where that additional information is requested, the first contractual counterpart of authors and performers shall provide information on the identity of those sub-licensees. L 130/122 Member States may provide that any request to sub-licensees pursuant to the first subparagraph is made directly or indirectly through the contractual counterpart of the author or the performer. 3.The obligation set out in paragraph 1 shall be proportionate and effective in ensuring a high level of transparency in every sector. Member States may provide that in duly justified cases where the administrative burden resulting from the obligation set out in paragraph 1 would become disproportionate in the light of the revenues generated by the exploitation of the work or performance, the obligation is limited to the types and level of information that can reasonably be expected in such cases. 4.Member States may decide that the obligation set out in paragraph 1 of this Article does not apply when the contribution of the author or performer is not significant having regard to the overall work or performance, unless the author or performer demonstrates that he or she requires the information for the exercise of his or her rights under Article 20(1) and requests the information for that purpose. 5.Member States may provide that, for agreements subject to or based on collective bargaining agreements, the transparency rules of the relevant collective bargaining agreement are applicable, on condition that those rules meet the criteria provided for in paragraphs 1 to 4. 6.Where Article 18 of Directive 2014/26/EU is applicable, the obligation laid down in paragraph 1 of this Article shall not apply in respect of agreements concluded by entities defined in Article 3(a) and (b) of that Directive or by other entities subject to the national rules implementing that Directive. 1.Member States shall ensure that, in the absence of an applicable collective bargaining agreement providing for a mechanism comparable to that set out in this Article, authors and performers or their representatives are entitled to claim additional, appropriate and fair remuneration from the party with whom they entered into a contract for the exploitation of their rights, or from the successors in title of such party, when the remuneration originally agreed turns out to be disproportionately low compared to all the subsequent relevant revenues derived from the exploitation of the works or performances. 2.Paragraph 1 of this Article shall not apply to agreements concluded by entities defined in Article 3(a) and (b) of Directive 2014/26/EU or by other entities that are already subject to the national rules implementing that Directive. Alternative dispute resolution procedure Member States shall provide that disputes concerning the transparency obligation under Article 19 and the contract adjustment mechanism under Article 20 may be submitted to a voluntary, alternative dispute resolution procedure. Member States shall ensure that representative organisations of authors and performers may initiate such procedures at the specific request of one or more authors or performers. 1.Member States shall ensure that where an author or a performer has licensed or transferred his or her rights in a work or other protected subject matter on an exclusive basis, the author or performer may revoke in whole or in part the licence or the transfer of rights where there is a lack of exploitation of that work or other protected subject matter. 2.Specific provisions for the revocation mechanism provided for in paragraph 1 may be provided for in national law, taking into account the following: (a)the specificities of the different sectors and the different types of works and performances; and (b)where a work or other subject matter contains the contribution of more than one author or performer, the relative importance of the individual contributions, and the legitimate interests of all authors and performers affected by the application of the revocation mechanism by an individual author or performer. L 130/123 Member States may exclude works or other subject matter from the application of the revocation mechanism if such works or other subject matter usually contain contributions of a plurality of authors or performers. Member States may provide that the revocation mechanism can only apply within a specific time frame, where such restriction is duly justified by the specificities of the sector or of the type of work or other subject matter concerned. Member States may provide that authors or performers can choose to terminate the exclusivity of the contract instead of revoking the licence or transfer of the rights. Member States shall provide that the revocation provided for in paragraph 1 may only be exercised after a reasonable time following the conclusion of the licence or the transfer of the rights. The author or performer shall notify the person to whom the rights have been licensed or transferred and set an appropriate deadline by which the exploitation of the licensed or transferred rights is to take place. After the expiry of that deadline, the author or performer may choose to terminate the exclusivity of the contract instead of revoking the licence or the transfer of the rights. 4.Paragraph 1 shall not apply if the lack of exploitation is predominantly due to circumstances that the author or the performer can reasonably be expected to remedy. 5.Member States may provide that any contractual provision derogating from the revocation mechanism provided for in paragraph 1 is enforceable only if it is based on a collective bargaining agreement. 1.Member States shall ensure that any contractual provision that prevents compliance with Articles 19, 20 and 21 shall be unenforceable in relation to authors and performers. 2.Members States shall provide that Articles 18 to 22 of this Directive do not apply to authors of a computer program within the meaning of Article 2 of Directive 2009/24/EC. Amendments to Directives 96/9/EC and 2001/29/EC 1.Directive 96/9/EC is amended as follows: (a)In Article 6(2), point (b) is replaced by the following: ‘(b) where there is use for the sole purpose of illustration for teaching or scientific research, as long as the source is indicated and to the extent justified by the non-commercial purpose to be achieved, without prejudice to the exceptions and limitations provided for in Directive (EU) 2019/790 of Parliament and of the Council (*); (*)Directive (EU) 2019/790 of Parliament and of the Council of on copyright and related rights in the Digital Single Market and amending Directives 96/9/EC and 2001/29/EC (OJ L 130, , p. 92).’. (b)In Article 9, point (b) is replaced by the following: ‘(b) in the case of extraction for the purposes of illustration for teaching or scientific research, as long as the source is indicated and to the extent justified by the non-commercial purpose to be achieved, without prejudice to the exceptions and limitations provided for in Directive (EU) 2019/790;’. L 130/124 2.Directive 2001/29/EC is amended as follows: (a)In Article 5(2), point (c) is replaced by the following: ‘(c) in respect of specific acts of reproduction made by publicly accessible libraries, educational or museums, or by archives, which are not for direct or indirect economic or commercial advantage, without prejudice to the exceptions and limitations provided for in Directive (EU) 2019/790 of Parliament and of the Council (*); (*)Directive (EU) 2019/790 of Parliament and of the Council of on copyright and related rights in the Digital Single Market and amending Directives 96/9/EC and 2001/29/EC (OJ L 130, , p. 92).’. (b)In Article 5(3), point (a) is replaced by the following: ‘(a) use for the sole purpose of illustration for teaching or scientific research, as long as the source, including the author's name, is indicated, unless this turns out to be impossible and to the extent justified by the non-commercial purpose to be achieved, without prejudice to the exceptions and limitations provided for in Directive (EU) 2019/790;’. (c)In Article 12(4), the following points are added: ‘(e) to examine the impact of the transposition of Directive (EU) 2019/790 on the functioning of the internal market and to highlight any transposition difficulties; (f)to facilitate the exchange of information on relevant developments in legislation and case law as well as on the practical application of the measures taken by Member States to implement Directive (EU) 2019/790; (g)to discuss any other questions arising from the application of Directive (EU) 2019/790.’. Relationship with exceptions and limitations provided for in other directives Member States may adopt or maintain in force broader provisions, compatible with the exceptions and limitations provided for in Directives 96/9/EC and 2001/29/EC, for uses or fields covered by the exceptions or limitations provided for in this Directive. 1.This Directive shall apply in respect of all works and other subject matter that are protected by national law in the field of copyright on or after 7 2021. 2.This Directive shall apply without prejudice to any acts concluded and rights acquired before 7 2021. Agreements for the licence or transfer of rights of authors and performers shall be subject to the transparency obligation set out in Article 19 as from 7 2022. Protection of personal data The processing of personal data carried out within the framework of this Directive shall be carried out in compliance with Directive 2002/58/EC and Regulation (EU) 2016/679. L 130/125 1.Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by 7 2021. They shall immediately inform the Commission thereof. When Member States adopt those provisions, they shall contain a reference to this Directive or be accompanied by such a reference on the occasion of their official publication. The methods of making such reference shall be laid down by Member States. 2.Member States shall communicate to the Commission the text of the main provisions of national law which they adopt in the field covered by this Directive. 1.No sooner than 7 2026, the Commission shall carry out a review of this Directive and present a report on the main findings to Parliament, the Council and Economic and . The Commission shall, by 7 2024, assess the impact of the specific liability regime set out in Article 17 applicable to online content-sharing service providers that have an annual turnover of less than million and the services of which have been available to the public in the Union for less than three years under Article 17(6) and, if appropriate, take action in accordance with the conclusions of its assessment. 2.Member States shall provide the Commission with the necessary information for the preparation of the report referred to in paragraph 1. This Directive shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the . This Directive is addressed to the Member States. Done at , . COM(2021) 288 final MEDDELANDE FRÅN KOMMISSIONEN TILL OCH Vägledning om artikel 17 i direktivet 2019/790 om upphovsrätt på den digitala inre Enligt artikel 17.10 i direktivet om upphovsrätt på den digitala inre marknaden (direktiv (EU) 2019/790, direktivet om den digitala inre marknaden1) ska kommissionen utfärda en vägledning för tillämpningen av artikel 17, särskilt när det gäller samarbetet mellan onlineleverantörer av delningstjänster för innehåll och rättsinnehavare. Vägledningen tar hänsyn till resultaten av de dialoger med berörda parter som anordnats i samarbete med medlemsstaterna för att diskutera bästa praxis för samarbete mellan onlineleverantörer av delningstjänster för innehåll och rättsinnehavare. Efter en öppen inbjudan till intresseanmälan anordnade kommissionen sex dialogmöten med berörda parter mellan . Mellan och genomfördes ett riktat skriftligt samråd för att slutföra dialogen med berörda parter. Syftet med vägledningen är att stödja ett korrekt och konsekvent införlivande av artikel 17 bland medlemsstaterna. Särskild tonvikt läggs på behovet av att uppnå en avvägning mellan de grundläggande rättigheterna och tillämpningen av undantag och inskränkningar, i enlighet med artikel 17.10. Vägledningen kan också vara till hjälp för marknadsaktörerna när de följer nationell lagstiftning som genomför artikel 17. Även om det här dokumentet inte är rättsligt bindande har det formellt antagits som ett meddelande från kommissionen och uppfyller det mandat som tilldelats kommissionen av unionens lagstiftare enligt artikel 17.10. Domen från Europeiska unionens domstol i mål C- 401/192 kommer att få följdverkningar för medlemsstaternas genomförande av artikel 17 och vägledningen. Vägledningen kan behöva ses över efter domen. II.ARTIKEL 17 – ETT SÄRSKILT SYSTEM FÖR TILLSTÅND OCH ANSVAR FÖR UPPHOVSRÄTT I artikel 17 föreskrivs ett särskilt system för tillstånd och ansvar för upphovsrätt och närstående rättigheter (upphovsrätt). Det gäller för vissa leverantörer av informationssamhällets tjänster som definieras som onlineleverantörer av delningstjänster för innehåll enligt artikel 2.6 i direktivet. Enligt den tidigare tillämpliga rättsliga ramen3, var det oklart vilket upphovsrättsligt ansvar dessa tjänsteleverantörer hade för sina användares handlingar. Artikel 17 ger rättssäkerhet i fråga om huruvida onlineleverantörer av delningstjänster för innehåll agerar på ett upphovsrättsligt relevant sätt i förhållande till sina användares handlingar, liksom rättssäkerhet för användarna. 1Direktivet om den digitala inre marknaden riktar sig till medlemsstater som har skyldighet att införliva det . 2Polen/rådet och parlamentet. 3Artikel 3 i direktiv /29/EG och artikel 14 i direktiv /31/EG. Artikel 17 syftar till att främja utvecklingen av licensmarknaden mellan rättsinnehavare och onlineleverantörer av delningstjänster för innehåll. Därmed skapar artikel 17 en rättslig grund för rättsinnehavare att tillåta användning av sina verk när de laddas upp av användare på onlineleverantörernas delningstjänster för innehåll. Detta ökar rättsinnehavarnas möjligheter till licensiering och betald ersättning. Genom direktivet införs också skyddsåtgärder för användare som laddar upp sitt innehåll som kan omfatta innehåll från tredje part, som skyddas av upphovsrätt och rättigheter relaterade till upphovsrätt. I artikel 17.1 och 17.2 föreskrivs att onlineleverantörer av delningstjänster för innehåll utför en upphovsrättsligt relevant handling i form av överföring till allmänheten när de ger tillgång till upphovsrättsskyddat innehåll som laddats upp av användarna. Därför måste de få tillstånd från de berörda rättsinnehavarna. I detta fall föreskrivs i artikel 17.3 att när tjänsteleverantörerna vidtar en åtgärd som innebär en överföring till allmänheten enligt dessa bestämmelser ska den ansvarsbegränsning som fastställs i artikel 14.1 i direktiv /31/EG4 inte tillämpas. Artikel 17 är en speciallag eller en lex specialis till artikel 3 i direktiv /29/EG och artikel 14 i direktiv /31/EG. Den inrättar inte någon ny rättighet i unionens upphovsrättslagstiftning. I stället leder det till en fullständig och specifik reglering av hur överföring till allmänheten ska ske under de begränsade omständigheter som omfattas av bestämmelsen i detta direktiv.