The reporting part is probably the most important step in a radiological exam because the radiologist's expertise comes into play. Radiologists in training learn the pecularities of reporting during their training. For novel domains in medical imaging, such cardiac MRI (eg in patients of with ischemic heart disease), experience is often limited. Moreover, reporting of these exams differs from 'traditional' radiological exams, since it necessitates (extensive) image analysis (eg, contouring of endo-and epicardial myocardial contours), interpretation of dynamic sequences (myocardial contractility, myocardial perfusion), and multisequence imaging (e.g. imaging of acute myocardial infarct patients). All the information needs to be interpreted together, to achieve an idea about the status of the heart. In some patients these studies are (or need to be) performed during stress conditions to evaluate the impact on stress on myocardial perfusion and function. To streamline the interpretation of MRI study results with other information obtained with other modalities (eg echocardiography, nuclear medicine), standardized reporting is required, otherwise the referring clinician risks to get lost in the abundance of information. In this lecture, the focus is how to practically approach and report a cardiac MRI exam in ischemic heart disease patients starting from several clinical cases. Imaging plays now a major role at every step in the management of lymphomas: initial staging, response assessment, follow-up and investigation of suspected relapse. Beyond conventional cross-sectional imaging, molecular imaging has changed dramatically the management of routinely FDG-avid lymphomas in the past decade. Recommendations for the use of PET-CT have been published in 2007 for standardisation of the technique, optimal timing and a better understanding of false positives and negatives, providing uniform endpoints for clinical trials. Depending on the type and course of lymphoma, and on protocol inclusion, CT, PET of both will be done at any step in the course of the disease. This exhaustive workup better assesses therapeutic response but raises new questions. Occult lesions or new events are early detected, prompting image-guided biopsy for histological confirmation. The aim of this presentation is to consolidate knowledge of the imaging workup in lymphoma and illustrate how imaging strongly influences patients' management. Proper imaging strategies are of paramount importance for selecting patients for interventional radiological treatment in the setting of abdominal trauma. Contrastenhanced CT should be performed whenever possible in the severely injured trauma patient as it accurately grades injury to parenchymal abdominal organs, identifies active bleeding or the presence of other vascular injuries that require treatment and also assesses the presence of concomitant injuries such as pelvic fracture with bleeding. Angiography and embolisation is performed to treat ongoing bleeding or to prevent delayed bleeding from false aneurysms or traumatically dissected vessels, thus rendering non-operative management safer. Depending on the location and the nature of the vascular abnormalities coils and /or gelfoam are the most commonly used embolisation materials. The most frequently involved organs / vessels amenable to embolisation are the spleen, the liver, the internal iliac arteries due to pelvic fracture and the kidneys. Rarely a covered stent can be used to treat the vascular injury while maintaining patency of the treated vessel.