Benign biliary stenoses may be due to postoperative injury (laparoscopic cholecystectomy, gastric/hepatic resection and bilio-enteric anastomosis), post-liver transplantation, post traumatic (blunt or penetrating trauma), inflammation associated with lithiasis, congenital (usually in paediatric population), parasitic and post radiation. Internal biliary fistulas occur due to acute inflammation with obstruction that leads to adhesions, erosion of the bile duct or gallbladder wall and eventual erosion with formation of a fistula. The most common causes of benign fistulas are cholelithiasis, peptic ulcerartion and Crohn's disease of the duodenum. Diagnosis of benign biliary strictures is usually performed with Ultrasound, Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography or Endocopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), whereas biliary fistulas are difficult to diagnose with non invasive methods and the diagnosis is usually made either with Percutaneous Transhepatic Cholagiography, ERCP or even intraoperatively. Percutaneous approach is an established method of treatment of benign stenosis, particularly when they are a result of bilio-digestive anastomosis, either with the use of multiple and prolonged balloon dilatations, or with the use of plastic or metallic (bare or covered) stents. Biliary fistulas can be percutaneously treated by correcting the reason keeping the fistula active (patent). A biliary stricture or stone may be such a reason and can be dilated or removed, respectively, either through the existing fistula or through a new transhepatic access. Embolisation of the fistula tract or use of a metallic stent can be also discussed. In case of portalbiliary fistula, embolisation of the portal branches or positioning of a covered stent might be the solution. Bile tract complications occur in 10-35% of liver transplants, with major incidence in partial LT. The incidence is highest in the first few month after LT and 80% are diagnosed within 6 months. Type of surgical anastomosis, cold and warm ischaemic liver injury and pre-existing biliary diseases are all factors influencing the frequency, type and severity of complications which include biliary strictures, bile leakage, stone formation and bilomas. Screening sonography (38% sensitivity) may be misleading due to false-negative results. Therefore, systematic PTC at 6 month after LT is recommended in order to disclose biliary complications at early stage. Main indications for percutaneous approach include 1. Early anastomotic strictures unaccessible to endoscopy (segmental graft or hepaticojejunostomy anastomosis The screen-film system has been the primary tool in radiology for over a century and the radiation dose was a minor consideration during the early days. The technology evolution for digital radiography provided a lot of advantages, like a better workflow, a high image quality and when properly used can decrease the dose per exam. It is mandatory for radiographer follow the whole process of transition from screen-film to digital system and has thorough knowledge of new installed technology. Internationally, medical radiation accounts for the majority of radiation exposure to the public. With the increasing international focus on radiation protection in clinical practice, there has never been a more appropriate time to promote education in this area amongst the radiography community. With the advent of new technologies and changes in working role, the radiographer's role is ever developing. Because radiographers are directly involved with the technology and patients on a daily basis, their role in quality assurance (QA) and radiation protection is pivotal. This presentation will focus on the current role of the radiographer in QA and radiation protection from a European perspective and will explore the increasing role of QA in the clinical department. The importance of appropriate education and training and the types of education currently available for radiographers will be discussed alongside current literature and guidelines available in this field. The experience of an online radiation safety course and its impact on the role of the radiographer will be reviewed. The future of the radiographer's role in this field and deficiencies in current practice will be examined and conclusions will be drawn. Meta-analyses of studies (mostly nonconsecutive patient series) showed that breast MRI detects otherwise occult ipsilateral and contralateral disease in 11% and 4% of women who had the test, respectively. The ongoing controversy regarding preoperative breast MRI and the balance between potential advantages (reduction in re-operation rate for positive margins and ipsi-/contralateral recurrence) and drawbacks (overdiagnosis/overtreatment) persists given limited evidence. Association of increasing use of preoperative MRI and increased rate of mastectomies has been suggested. Two recent randomized controlled trials did not show advantages from preoperative MRI but have been criticized due to various limitations. Thus, EuroAIM in cooperation with EUSOBI, designed an observational multicenter study which will analyses individual women data: "Preoperative breast MRI multicenter international prospective analysis (MIPA) study". Two concurrent consecutive cohorts of newly diagnosed breast cancer patients defined by receiving/not receiving preoperative breast MRI will be compared matched for age/breast density. Analytical adjustment will be performed for relevant covariates. All involved centers will be high-volume breast imaging/care facilities. We plan to enroll about 2,600 women from 18 to 80 years of age with newly diagnosed breast cancer: 1,300 for the MRI group and 1,300 for the no-MRI group. Rate and type of changed surgical planning in the MRI group will be assessed. Primary outcomes will be rate of primary upfront mastectomy and re-excision rate for positive margins. Secondary outcome will be ipsilateral recurrence rate, contralateral cancer rate, and distant metastasis occurrence during 5-year follow-up. Recent results show that CTC is an accurate test to detect colonic polyps and masses. Although the CMS has declined reimbursement for screening CTC in the United States in 2009, CTC is being used increasingly in the radiologic community. Indications for CTC include examination of elderly and symptomatic patients as well as examination of asymptomatic adults who select CTC as their screening option for colorectal cancer. In the light of a lack of reimbursement certain steps have to be taken to set up a successful CTC service. In many countries, ionizing radiation cannot be used for screening examinations other than mammography. Therefore, radiologists have to be well familiar with radiation exposure considerations in CTC. Also, specialists have to know about indications, contraindications, and pitfalls that have to be followed for succesful CTC. Furthermore, training strategies for CTC interpretation will be discussed; in the beginning, expert double reading is recommended. In this presentation it will be outlined which steps have to be undertaken to set up a succesful CTC program. Learning Objectives: