Task: Consequences
Come up with an original and creative consequence for the following scenario:
What would be the result if none of us needed food in order to live?

Response: Dieting would not exist
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: more traveling
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 38

Response: there would be no more food service jobs
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: grocery store specialties would be obsolete
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: loose all food
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: no dinner parties
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: no starvation
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: No bathrooms
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: use our hands
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 38

Response: no food commercials
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: no more killing of animals for food
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: No need to cook
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 10

Response: would animals be involved? - if so, greater animal populations
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: No hospital food services (more jobs lost)
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 38

Response: Employers will also save money because they will not be required to pay for a lunch break
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 38

Response: no cooking meals
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 10

Response: could stay more focused during the da
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: No one is ever starved
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: get more done during meal times
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: Less pollution and garbage
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: no need for stomachs or digestive system
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: wouldn't need a toilet
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: We would be over run with animals
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: different family time
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: animals would take over
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 38

Response: more animals on earth
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: Less family time at meals
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: More recrational activity options
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: world wold have more animals
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: No starvation problem
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: More time doing other things like studying
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: Dieting wouldn't exist
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: a rise in the prices for non food items
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 38

Response: we would have more animals
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: wouldn't need intestines
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: money could be spent on other things
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: Less energy needed
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: Malnutrition no longer a health concern
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: No need for diets
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: No grocery stores
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: Animal populations would probably increase
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: Land used for farming could be given rest and used to plant trees
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: No one would take care of our land and it would look gross
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 38

Response: Redirect disposable income to consuming other goods and services
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: less time to sit down with family
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: no family get togethers
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: possibly no farm animals
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: no trash of bad food
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: Save electric
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 38

Response: no death from hunger
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: No more restaurants - resulting unemployment
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: Home design will change as no more need for a kitchen
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: Body shape will change and will negatively impact the fitness industry
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 38

Response: No dates at meals
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: No meetings over lunch
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: Arcade rooms instead of breakrooms
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 50

Response: an abundance of animals because they aren't being killed for food
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: no government
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 50

Response: People would make less money
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: Less deaths due to starving and malnourishment
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: friendships could suffer (as a result of not getting together over dinner)
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: More land development
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: No one in the world would be starving
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: no more diets
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: no eating
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 10

Response: Companies would lose lots of money
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: No farmer's wages
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: higher population of animals
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: world hunger would be no more
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: Over abundance of animals such as cattle and chicken
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: Have a different social event to do with friends
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: people wouldn't die from starvation
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: an extra room for activities in the house
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: Reduction in happiness
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 38

Response: Technology advances with the more time we have not worrying about food
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 38

Response: People would almost have to kill other people to prevent overpopulation--if sex was happening, which confuses me on why these creatures who don't need food would copulate
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 50

Response: No need to do dishes
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: No more need for chiefs
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: No death by starvation
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: No celiac disease
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: no waste would be getting drop into the land
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: our bodies would be able to sustain itself and not shut down if food wasn't consumed
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 38

Response: Not learn to cook
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 10

Response: No animals would be slaughtered for food
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: People would probably have less energy
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: No waiters/waitresses
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: No need for refrigeration, leading to lower demand for energy
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 38

Response: exercise only for personal fitness, not weight loss
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: more work time - no lunch break
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: Trucking companies severely impacted due to no food shipments, or those related to food production
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 38

Response: nobody would be strong
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: no more hungry children
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: more land to live on
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: no civilization going hungry
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: People would need to find new ways to socialize
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: there would be less sick and hungry people in the world.
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: Poverty would be reduced.
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: tons and tons of land available for other uses
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: Grocery stores would close
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: A lot less wars
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 38

Response: no one would suffer from not eating
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: get more things done
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: No date night dinners
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: Environment wouldn't be as rich with nutrients
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 38

Response: no need for cooking channels
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: No intestines
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: less family time around the dinner table
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: No need for restaurants, grocery stores, etc.
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: Mass suicide of individuals in the food service industry
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 50

Response: No one would starve
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: Grocery stores would no longer be needed.
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: No use for the digestive track.
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: more work done
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: no dinner lunch or breakfast time
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 10

Response: More animals on the planet
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: Lots of additional space and people available for other uses
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: wildlife would flourish because farming would not be depleting the land and water
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: seasons of the year would not have an impact on growing seasons
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 38

Response: less fights
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: No more plants to be grown
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: no more cooking shows
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: Farmers would go broke
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: Greenhouse gases would be greatly reduced
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: less health problems from unhealthy food
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: farmers would be out of a job as well as many other corporations
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: do not cook
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 10

Response: don't go out to eat
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: No one would suffer from hunger.
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: Starvation wouldn't be a problem.
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: Supermarkets, restaurants, farms would not be necessary
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: Everything would be cleaner and not polluted
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: We would not have breakfast, dinner, or lunch.
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 10

Response: There would be a lot more land to build on
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: people would be in each others business
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 38

Response: we would live forever and be happy without having to worry about resources
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 38

Response: what to do on a date?
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: death due to starvation would cease
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: natural cultivation for our benefit would cease
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: productivity would increase
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: farm land could be used for other purposes;
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: More land would be available for deveopment
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: grocers would go out of business.
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: We'd never have a hunger problem in the world.
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: so many animals do not die
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: less cows
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: We would no longer celebrate holidays the same way.
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: We would not need to kill animals
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: we would not torture animals in farms.
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: There would be no sewage treatment plants
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 38

Response: We would have more open land to use
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: animals would not be slaughtered
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: loss of income for farmers,
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: There would be no farming, so nomads never would have settled. We mostly would stay in tribes and kill eachother.
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 50

Response: There would be no sickness from food.
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: shipping less food would save greenhouse emissions
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: we could deal with climate change better
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: we could rededicate farmland to other usages
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: Less global warming effects
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: hthere woud be no need for domestic animals for consumption.
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: Population would increase
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: There would be less global warming from factories
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: Eating would be a hobby, presumably for the rich alone like skydiving
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 38

Response: people will concentrate more on work
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: Overpopulation would skyrocket, resulting in less quality of life.
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: people would fight less.
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 38

Response: DOCTORS WOULD HAVE LESS PATIENTS
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 38

Response: Jobs would be list due to no grocery stores
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: cows would go extint
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: There would be no cooking TV.
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: Farmers wouldn't be able to make money anymore
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: More time to work
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: increase of wildlife
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: world hunger would be nonexistent
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22