Task: Consequences
Come up with an original and creative consequence for the following scenario:
What would be the result if society no longer used money, and instead traded goods and services?

Response: Banks would be unnecessary.
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 10

Response: More human interaction
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 23

Response: finding the value of that good or service
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 10

Response: not being able to have a good or service to purchase something
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 23

Response: The balance of wealth would drastically change
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 23

Response: Current cash and coins would be irrelevant.
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 10

Response: economy could potentially be destroyed or improved
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 10

Response: money would lose its value
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 10

Response: Less people living off the system
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 39

Response: goods and services would be the new form of money
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 10

Response: society would change
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 10

Response: Banks would go out of business.
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 10

Response: People may become more creative, making art to trade.
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 31

Response: People might grow their own food and specialize in a type of food to trade.
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 31

Response: People would probably talk more to set up trades
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 23

Response: no more banks
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 10

Response: work less because everything is trading
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 23

Response: Wallets would be next to useless.
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 31

Response: People would have to actually interact with each other
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 23

Response: billionaires might not be as evil
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 39

Response: we would not need banks
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 10

Response: People (especially couples) would stop fighting so much about financial issues
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 50

Response: Banks could go out of business
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 10

Response: They might not be value for the other person that wants to trade.
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 10

Response: value of objects would differ.
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 10

Response: it seems like there would be no value to anything/how could one measure value
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 10

Response: All countries would have the same 'currency.'
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 23

Response: There could be discrepancy over the value of certain objects.
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 10

Response: Save time on creating money
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 31

Response: Many people would not know what to do with theirselves if they have not mastered an area of work.
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 31

Response: Trade agreements
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 10

Response: Banks would not be necessary.
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 10

Response: Not everyone might have a good or service worthy of trading
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 23

Response: People would interact more
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 23

Response: things people take for granted would become valuable
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 31

Response: The distance between the rich and the poor would grow.
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 31

Response: what is considered good may be different to people
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 10

Response: It could be difficult to decide what's equal and what goods and services are worth.
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 10

Response: more cooperation
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 23

Response: less pollution throughout the air
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 23

Response: whole lotta babies
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 50

Response: we would build better relationships with people by trading goods or services
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 23

Response: More connections can be made with other individuals
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 23

Response: Banks would no longer be needed
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 10

Response: Electricity/water/AC/heating would probably be harder to trade for, as they require constant "payment" to keep the utility on.
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 39

Response: There might be more violence as some people value things differently when trading.
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 23

Response: Trading and storing goods would be a huge pain in the ass (storage space, perishables, etc.)
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 39

Response: But travelling would be much harder because you have to bring goods to trade for anything you want.
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 50

Response: Banks would become obsolete - No need for them
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 10

Response: I think people wouldn't have that many jobs anymore due to there not being money
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 23

Response: children in schools wouldn't need to learn how to count money
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 50

Response: less hassle of carrying a purse or wallet
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 31

Response: value of everything is ambiguous
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 10

Response: No fair equal prices.
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 10

Response: Public works projects would be difficult to perform without financing of any kind.
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 50

Response: people would benefit more from each other
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 23

Response: people would interact more with each other
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 23

Response: More value would place on items and services
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 10

Response: The work force scene would be very different since you're no longer working for money.
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 10

Response: There would be a greater sense of community
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 23

Response: There would be no clear measure or value or wealth
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 10

Response: People would value goods more than money, which is valuable only when someone places value on it.
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 10

Response: Services would be more specific to the individual - one person would master one service that they could use to trade, instead of everyone being somewhat decent at every service.
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 39

Response: people would have different ideas on how much things were worth,
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 10

Response: money would become less valuable.
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 10

Response: People would only pursue things that were interesting or important to them instead of something to get by
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 31

Response: Someone would still create a system on how it would work though.
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 23

Response: more prostitution
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 50

Response: We might not even have a use for banks anymore.
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 10

Response: People wouldn't see money are worth much.
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 10

Response: Bank would not exist.
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 10

Response: Services would be more valued such as child care, domestic workers, etc.
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 39

Response: Banks would shut down
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 10

Response: some sciences would not be funded
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 50

Response: people would choose to have more kids to do more labor for their families
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 50

Response: the expiration dates on perishable items would become more important
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 50

Response: Less structure
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 23

Response: Banks would become obsolete
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 10

Response: Values of certain goods and services would increase
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 23

Response: Agricultural societies and mining countries would hold most of the power.
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 50

Response: more engagement in the community
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 23

Response: more face to face involvement
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 23

Response: Disagreements on what is equal would start.
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 10