Task: Consequences
Come up with an original and creative consequence for the following scenario:
What would be the result if none of us needed food in order to live?

Response: no work for grocers
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: more time for exercise
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: medical demands would be lessened
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 38

Response: no cooking in general
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 10

Response: no hunger
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: more animals
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: no nutrients
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: no time spent cooking
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 10

Response: humans more productive
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: Possibly less deforestation
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: more land for buildings
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: no need for bathrooms
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: save money on water and detergent
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: no worries about diet
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: More efficient
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: personalilties would lack
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 38

Response: No diets/ diet fads
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: no pollution
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: no need to use the restroom
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: no messy kitchens
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: faster sex
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 50

Response: we would no longer need toilets
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: wouldn't need teeth at all
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 38

Response: You don't go hungry
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: World hunger would end
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: no super market
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: stress out
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 38

Response: World hunger would no long exist
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: no meal times
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 10

Response: Reduced poverty
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: no toilets
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: No starving children
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: less commercials on tv
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: less pollution from packaging
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: ingenieurs would be need...
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 38

Response: no more starvation
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: food chain would be completely messed up
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 38

Response: less fitness culture
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: no more hunger in the world
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: More accidents
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 38

Response: Eating would solely be for pleasure
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: More work getting done
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: no hungry people
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: children could focus on schoolwork
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: more opportunities for the next "genius" to arise out of a situation where he might not have, because of lack of resources and rampant disease caused by malnourishment and inadequate education
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 50

Response: no holiday feasts
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: No more illnesses due to vitamin and mineral deficiencies
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: fewer livestock animals
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: Would we eat just for pleasure or sign of wealth?
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 38

Response: no more hungry families
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: less amazing reality tv shows based on food competitions
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: less pollution from tractors and semis driving food everywhere
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: No more tooth decay
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 38

Response: wouldn't need a digestive system
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: No food network
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: Wine and beer would no longer be paired with dinner and may influence choices
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 38

Response: get more work done
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: no tummy aches when hungry
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: no use for vegetation
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: don't need to take care of farm animals
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: there would be more equality in the world
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 38

Response: dates would change (no longer go to restaurant)
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: less energy
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: Less death
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: history would be completely different
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 38

Response: A strange body without a digestive system
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: More value in material objects
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 38

Response: The greatest chance of survival would come from fighting off things trying to eat you
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 50

Response: What sexually drives a person would be different, since it usually has to do with what kind of people are best able to provide food
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 50

Response: less cavities
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 38

Response: less family gatherings
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: People will be less grumpy when hungry
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: People wouldn't need to diet
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: No Food Network
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: Less need for bathrooms
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: No more hunger
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: No food on Thanksgiving!!!
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: No more binge eating when you are sad (what do we do instead?)
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 38

Response: Climate change drastically reduced & would start to heal
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: No waiters/ waitresses
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: Could utilize space from restaurants and grocery stores for other places
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: reduce other greenhouse emissions
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: No need more animals that provide us with food
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: Save space in house
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: Spend less time at work
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: No more cooking shows or Food Network
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: No need for culinary arts
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: No need for animals on farms
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: not as much family interactions (no family dinners)
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: we would all turn into vampires because vampires don't eat food

Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 50

Response: no more starving children
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: the digestive tract-obsolete
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: people telepathically communicate
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 50

Response: no family dinners/gatherings
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: we wouldn't have to worry about calories
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: no need for certain animals e.g. cows, chickens, turkeys
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: No bowl movements(no food in your system)
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 38

Response: no deaths from hunger
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: no need for alot of factory jobs
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 38

Response: The mood Hangry (cranky b/c hungry) wouldn't affect relationships
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 38

Response: fewer social settings
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: No kitchen=more space
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: no poverty
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: No more starvation.
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: Never hungry
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: have more time to exercise
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: A lot of people would be put out of work (waiters, food workers)
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: No more food network.
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: House styles change because you would no longer need a kitchen
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: More crowds
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: no need to learn to cook
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 10

Response: People would need other reasons to take a break during the work day
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 38

Response: More animals would be alive.
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: no killing of animals for food
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: Lots of lost jobs in the food industry
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: environment would be better
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: less caretaking of environment
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: People would find different ways to celebrate holidays
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: No need to have animals around for food.
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: companies could produce non-food products to help society
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 38

Response: we could do more work
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: people could be more equal
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 38

Response: land otherwise used as farm or ranch land might developed into housing or businesses.
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: there would be more plants and animals on earth
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: no more need for grocery stores
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: No need to for diets
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: We wouldn't need to grow vegetables or grains
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: Thanksgiving would probably go away
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: deminished food supply
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: special night vision glasses would be needed
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 50

Response: don't have to worry about allergic reactions
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: farmers would be out of jobs
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: People will use farm land for work or give it back to nature
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: no getting sick
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: many buildings would need to be repurposed
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: more equality between people and societies
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 38

Response: No farms, more forests
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: There would no longer be family dinners
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: Bathrooms will no longer exist
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: grocery stores would only sell household goods
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: no food chain pyramid
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 38

Response: fewer social occasions, i.e. dinner, lunch.
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: an overgrowth of food
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: Animals would not be killed any more.
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: No more bathroom time
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: There would be no need for diets.
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: There would not be any malnutrition.
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: Richard Simmons would be obsolete
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 38

Response: don't have to go to the bathroom,
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: more room for houses and businesses to be built
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: loss of food production and restaurant jobs
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: more animals on the earth
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: Fewer truckers
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 38

Response: we would have a that in common with robots
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 50

Response: farms would be converted to homes or parks.
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: No Need for Toilets
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 30

Response: MEDICATION COMPANIES WOULDN'T NEED AS MANY DRUGS
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 38

Response: Farming would lose money
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: Everyone would be the optimal weight as bodies adjusted to become the most efficient they can be
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: increased stds.
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 50

Response: equality between people
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 38

Response: We wouldn't cook
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 10

Response: We wouldn't have crop fields.
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22

Response: crops would be irrelevant
Human originality rating (0-100 scale): 22