metadata

languages:
  - en
licenses:
  - unknown
multilinguality:
  - monolingual
size_categories:
  - 10K<n<100K

Dataset Card for CLUTRR

Dataset Description

Dataset Summary

CLUTRR (Compositional Language Understanding and Text-based Relational Reasoning), a diagnostic benchmark suite, is first introduced in (https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.06177) to test the systematic generalization and inductive reasoning capabilities of NLU systems.

The CLUTRR benchmark allows us to test a model’s ability for systematic generalization by testing on stories that contain unseen combinations of logical rules, and test for the various forms of model robustness by adding different kinds of superfluous noise facts to the stories.

Dataset Task

CLUTRR contains a large set of semi-synthetic stories involving hypothetical families. The task is to infer the relationship between two family members, whose relationship is not explicitly mentioned in the given story.

Dataset Structure

We show detailed information for all 17 configurations of the dataset.

configurations:

id: a unique series of characters and numbers that identify each instance
story: one semi-synthetic story involving hypothetical families
query: the target query/relation which contains two names, where the goal is to classify the relation that holds between these two entities
text_query:
target: correct relation for the query
(the following kin-ship relations are used: son, father, husband, brother, grandson, grandfather, son-in-law, father-in-law, brother-in-law, uncle, nephew, daughter, mother, wife, sister, granddaughter, grandmother, daughter-in-law, mother-in-law, sister-in-law, aunt, niece.)
text_target:
clean_story:
proof_state: the logical rule of the kinship generation
f_comb: the kinships of the query followed by the logical rule
task_name: the task of the sub-dataset in a form of "task_[num1].[num2]"
The first number [num1] indicates the status of noise facts added in the story: 1- no noise facts; 2- Irrelevant facts*; 3- Supporting facts*; 4- Disconnected facts*.
The second number [num2] directly indicates the length of clauses for the task target.
for example:
task_1.2 -- task requiring clauses of length 2 without adding noise facts
task_2.3 -- task requiring clauses of length 3 with Irrelevant noise facts added in the story
story_edges: all the edges in the kinship graph
edge_types: similar to the f_comb, another form of the query's kinships followed by the logical rule
query_edge: the corresponding edge of the target query in the kinship graph
genders: genders of names appeared in the story
syn_story:
node_mapping:
task_split: train,test

*Further explanation of Irrelevant facts, Supporting facts and Disconnected facts can be found in the 3.5 Robust Reasoning section in https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.06177

Data Instances

An example of 'train'in Task 1.2 looks as follows.

{
  "id": b2b9752f-d7fa-46a9-83ae-d474184c35b6,
  "story": "[Lillian] and her daughter [April] went to visit [Lillian]'s mother [Ashley] last Sunday.",
  "query": ('April', 'Ashley'),
  "text_query": ,
  "target": "grandmother",
  "text_target": ['[Ashley] has a granddaughter called [April] who is her favourite.'],
  "clean_story": [Lillian] and her daughter [April] went to visit [Lillian]'s mother [Ashley] last Sunday.,
  "proof_state": [{('April', 'grandmother', 'Ashley'): [('April', 'mother', 'Lillian'), ('Lillian', 'mother', 'Ashley')]}],
  "f_comb": "mother-mother",
  "task_name": "task_1.2",
  "story_edges": [(0, 1), (1, 2)],
  "edge_types": ['mother', 'mother'],
  "query_edge": (0, 2),
  "genders": "April:female,Lillian:female,Ashley:female";
  "syn_story": ,
  "node_mapping": {7: 0, 2: 1, 1: 2},
  "task_split": trian
}

Data Splits

task_split	train	test
task_1.2	15227	114
task_1.3	15050	621
task_1.4	5024	621
task_1.5	0	359
task_1.6	0	212
task_1.7	0	299
task_1.8	0	285
task_1.9	0	243
task_1.10	0	241
task_2.2	5107	38
task_2.3	5047	408
task_3.2	5104	38
task_3.3	4995	407
task_4.2	5096	38
task_4.3	5004	407

Datasets:

CLUTRR
/

v1