GHSA-v38x-c887-992f Flowise: Airtable_Agent Code Injection Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
ZDI-CAN-29412: FlowiseAI Flowise Airtable_Agent Code Injection Remote Code Execution VulnerabilityTrend Micro's Zero Day Initiative has identified a vulnerability affecting the following products:
Flowise - Flowise-- VULNERABILITY DETAILS ------------------------Version tested:   3.0.13Installer file:   hxxps://github.com/FlowiseAI/FlowisePlatform tested:  Ubuntu 25.10AnalysisFlowiseAI Flowise Airtable Agent pythonCode Prompt Injection Remote Code Execution VulnerabilityThis vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of FlowiseAI Flowise. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability.The specific flaw exists within the run method of the Airtable_Agents class. The issue results from the lack of proper sandboxing when evaluating an LLM generated python script. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the user running the server.Product informationFlowiseAI Flowise version 3.0.13 (https://github.com/FlowiseAI/Flowise)Setup Instructionsnpm install -g flowise@3.0.13
npx flowise startRoot Cause AnalysisFlowiseAI Flowise is an open source low-code tool for developers to build customized large language model (LLM) applications and AI agents. It supports integration with various LLMs, data sources, and tools in order to facilitate rapid development and deployment of AI solutions. Flowise offers a web interface with a drag-and-drop editor, as well as an API, through an Express web server accessible over HTTP on port 3000/TCP.One such feature of Flowise is the ability to create chatflows. Chatflows use a drag and drop editor that allow a developer to place nodes which control how an interaction with a LLM will occur. One such node is the Airtable Agent node that represents an Agent used to answer queries on a provided Airtable table.When a user makes a query against a chatflow using the Airtable Agent node, the run method of the Airtable_Agents class will be called. This method will first request the contents of the Airtable table passed to the node and convert it to a base64 string. It will then set up a pyodide environment and create a python script to be executed in this environment. This python script will use pandas to extract the column names and their types from the Airtable table. The method will then create a system prompt for an LLM using this data as follows:Where {dict} is the extracted column names and {question} is the initial prompt provided by the user.This system prompt will be sent to an LLM in order for it to generate a python script based on the user's prompt, and the LLM generated response will be stored in a variable name pythonCode. The method will then evaluate the pythonCode variable in a pyodide environment.While the LLM-generated Python script is evaluated in a non-sandboxed environment, there is a list of forbidden patterns that are checked for before the script is executed on the server. The function validatePythonCodeForDataFrame() enumerates through a list, named FORBIDDEN_PATTERNS, which contains pairs of regex pattern and reasons. Each regex pattern is run against the Python script, and if the pattern is found in the script, the script is invalidated and is not run, responding to the request with a reason for rejection.The input validation can be bypassed, which can still lead to running arbitrary OS commands on the server. An example of this is the pattern `/\bimport\s+(?!pandas|numpy\b)/g`, which intends to search for lines of code which import a module other than pandas or numpy. This can be bypassed by importing along with pandas or numpy. For example, consider the following lines of code:pandas is imported, but so is the os module, with pandas as its alias. OS commands can then be invoked with `pandas.system()`.Using prompt injection techniques, an unauthenticated attacker with the ability to send prompts to a chatflow using the Airtable Agent node may convince an LLM to respond with a malicious python script that executes attacker controlled commands on the flowise server.An attacker can use this vulnerability to execute arbitrary python code, which can lead to arbitrary system commands being executed on the target server.It is also possible for an authenticated attacker to exploit this vulnerability by specifying an attacker controlled server in a chatflow. This server would respond to prompts with an attacker controlled python script instead of an LLM generated response, which would then be evaluated on the server.It is also possible for an authenticated attacker to exploit this vulnerability by specifying an attacker controlled Airtable table in a chatflow. This airtable table would contain columns whose name contain prompt injections, that are later passed to an LLM to use when generating a python script.comments documenting the issue have been added to the following code snippet. Added comments are prepended with "!!!".From packages/components/nodes/agents/AirtableAgent/core.tsFrom packages/components/nodes/agents/AirtableAgent/AirtableAgent.tsProof of ConceptA proof of concept for this vulnerability is provided in ./poc.py. It expects the following syntax:Where USER is a username of a user on the server, PASSWORD is the user's password, HOST is the ip address of the vulnerable flowise server, R_HOST is the ip address of a malicious server started by this poc, R_PORT is the port a malicious server started by this poc is listening on (default: 5000), L_PORT is the port a malicious server started by this poc should listening on (default: 5000), PORT is the port the vulnerable flowise server is listening on (default: 3000), CMD is the command to execute on the flowise server (default: xcalc), CHAT_ID is the chatflow id of a chatflow using the Airflow Agent node, AIRTABLE_TOKEN is an api key for an Airtable account, BASE_ID is the base id to find an airflow table in, and TABLE_ID is the airflow table to use.This poc has three modes of operation controlled by the method argument. The method argument may have any of the values "server" OR "chatflow" OR "prompt_injection".method = "server"By default the poc will start a malicious server listening on the port specified by the <L_PORT> value. This server will respond to requests made to the "/api/chat" endpoint with a JSON object containing an LLM response that contains a malicious python script. This python script will execute a command specified by the <CMD> value.method = "chatflow"By default, the poc will first establish an authenticated session on the server using the <USER> and <PASSWORD> arguments. It will then send a POST request to the "/api/v1/chatflow" endpoint with a JSON body containing a crafted chatflow using an Airflow Agent node and a ChatOllama node configured with a server specified by the <R_HOST> and <R_PORT> arguments. The Airflow Agent node will be configured using the <AIRTABLE_TOKEN>, <BASE_ID>, and <TABLE_ID> arguments. The default values of these arguments will be valid for 14 days from 2026-02-22. The poc will then send a POST request to the "/api/v1/internal-prediction/" endpoint in order to trigger a prediction using the chatflow.It is intended that the server specified in the chatflow is a server started using the server method of this poc. When making a prediction against this chatflow, flowise will send a request to the specified server in order to generate an LLM response. The response recieved by flowise will be evaluated as a python script. Upon successful exploitation, The <CMD> argument passed to the server method of this poc will be executed on the vulnerable flowise server.method = "prompt_injection"By default, the poc will send a POST request to the "/api/v1/prediction/*chat_id*" endpoint, where *chat_id* is a vulnerable chatflow id specified by the <CHAT_ID> parameter. The JSON body of this request will contain a question member whose value will be a prompt containing a prompt injection. Upon successful exploitation, The <CMD> argument will be executed on the vulnerable flowise server.Due to the nature of LLM responses, it may take multiple attempts to be successful or require a different prompt injection technique depending on the model used.Testing EnvironmentThe provided proof of concept was tested using FlowiseAI Flowise version 3.0.13 runing on a Ubuntu 25.10 VM. The prompt injection method was tested using the Llama3.2 model running in Ollama.How This Differs from CVE-2026-41138CVE-2026-41138 introduced sanitization for the Pyodide code ran by the Airtable Agent. This advisory demonstrates a bypass of that sanitization, which we addressed separately by disallowing imports outright.
CVSS v4.0 score: 9.2
CVSS v3.1 score: 9.8