International Botanical Congress
History
Prior to the first International Botanical Congress, local congresses concerned with natural sciences generally had grown to be very large, and a more specialized but also international meeting was considered desirable.

International Botanical Congress

Section Title: History
Table Section Text: Prior to the first International Botanical Congress, local congresses concerned with natural sciences generally had grown to be very large, and a more specialized but also international meeting was considered desirable.

Year	City	Country	Code	Major actions concerning nomenclature

I	1900	Paris	France	Decisions on nomenclature deferred.

II	1905	Vienna	Austria	Yes	First binding Rules of Nomenclature; French became the official language of the meeting; requirement for Latin plant descriptions from 1908 onwards (not enforced); end of the Kew Rule.

III	1910	Brussels	Belgium	Yes	Separate starting dates for nomenclature of fungi established.

IV	1926	Ithaca	United States	Decisions on nomenclature deferred.

V	1930	Cambridge	United Kingdom	Yes	The type method incorporated; Latin requirement deferred until 1932; "absolute homonym rule" accepted, or "once a later homonym always illegitimate (unless conserved)", which altered the status of many names, including many that had previously been conserved.

VI	1935	Amsterdam	Netherlands	English became the official language of the Congress, replacing French. No formal Code was published.

VII	1950	Stockholm	Sweden	Yes	Adoption of the first International Code of Nomenclature for Cultivated Plants; arbitrary dates defined for some foundational works; decision to hold future congresses every five years (except four years for the next one).

VIII	1954	Paris	France	Yes	Two additional principles added, II and III, dealing with types and with priority. Proposals to conserve or reject specific names were rejected, but a committee was established to find ways to improve the stability of names.

IX	1959	Montreal	Canada	Yes	Presentation of a completely reworked list of conserved and rejected names necessitated by changes made at the 1930 congress, but the list for species was not accepted.

X	1964	Edinburgh	United Kingdom	Yes	No major changes to the code.

XI	1969	Seattle	United States	Yes	Established the International Association of Bryologists.

XII	1975	Leningrad	Soviet Union	Yes	Official versions of the code in English, French, and German (the English version to take precedence in case of discrepancy); rejection of species names allowed in a few special cases; organ-genera for fossil plants are eliminated, replaced by form-genera.

XIII	1981	Sydney	Australia	Yes	Official versions of the code in English, French, and German (the English version to take precedence in case of discrepancy); conservation procedure (and rejection) extended to species names "of major economic importance"; fungi starting date restored to 1753 with sanctioned name status established; the types of genera and higher categories become the types of species (i.e., the taxa themselves are no longer types, only specimens or illustrations).

XIV	1987	Berlin	Germany	Yes	Official version of the code only in (British) English; later translations in French, German, and Japanese; conservation extended to species names that represent the type of a conserved generic name.

XV	1993	Tokyo	Japan	Yes	Moves towards registration of plant names; extensive re-arrangement of the nomenclature code; official version of the code only in (British) English; later translations in Chinese, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Russian, and Slovak; conservation extended to all species names; rejection permitted for any name that would cause a disadvantageous nomenclatural change; epitype concept introduced.

XVI	1999	St. Louis	United States	Yes	Refinement of type requirements; illustrations as types mostly forbidden from 1958; morphotaxa for fossils. Proposals defeated included the BioCode and registration of plant names.

XVII	2005	Vienna	Austria	Yes	Morphotaxa and regular taxa for fossils; illustrations as types mostly forbidden from 2007; glossary added to the code of nomenclature.

XVIII	2011	Melbourne	Australia	Yes	Electronic publication permitted; registration of fungal names; English or Latin descriptions (or diagnoses) from 2012; the concepts of anamorph and teleomorph (for fungi) and morphotaxa (for fossils) eliminated.

XIX	2017	Shenzhen	China

Sentence(s)

The numbering system for the International Botanical Congress starts from the year 1900; the XVIII IBC was held in Melbourne, Australia in 2011 and the XIX IBC was held in Shenzhen, China in 2017.

final_sentence: The numbering system for the International Botanical Congress starts from the year 1900; the XVIII IBC was held in Melbourne, Australia in 2011 and the XIX IBC was held in Shenzhen, China in 2017.