2005 Texas Proposition 2
County breakdown

2005 Texas Proposition 2

Section Title: County breakdown
Table Section Text: None

County	Yes	Votes	No	Votes	Voter turnout

Floyd	95.4%	1,134	4.6%	55	27.12%

Martin	95.4%	644	4.6%	31	23.45%

Ochiltree	95.1%	1,372	4.9%	71	29.34%

Parmer	95.1%	1,141	4.9%	59	24.47%

Hansford	95.1%	904	4.9%	47	29.70%

Childress	94.6%	902	5.4%	51	25.52%

Motley	94.5%	327	5.5%	19	38.06%

Hartley	94.3%	810	5.7%	49	29.97%

Dallam	94.3%	615	5.7%	37	20.31%

Lipscomb	94.1%	602	6.9%	38	33.49%

Wheeler	93.9%	1,057	7.1%	69	29.18%

Gaines	93.8%	1,663	6.2%	109	25.43%

Briscoe	93.8%	471	7.2%	31	39.93%

Hardin	93.7%	5,121	6.3%	342	16.60%

Panola	93.6%	3,429	6.4%	234	23.60%

Cass	93.5%	4,488	6.5%	343	26.41%

Jasper	93.5%	3,690	6.5%	258	19.12%

Newton	93.5%	1,552	6.5%	108	17.95%

Collingsworth	93.5%	563	6.5%	39	26.01%

Yoakum	93.4%	919	6.6%	65	22.91%

Lynn	93.3%	758	6.7%	54	19.66%

Hutchinson	93.2%	3,714	6.8%	272	24.92%

Moore	93.2%	2,271	6.8%	166	25.22%

Deaf Smith	93.2%	1,664	6.8%	121	18.64%

Sherman	93.2%	449	6.8%	33	34.35%

King	93.2%	109	6.8%	8	54.16%

Armstrong	93.1%	462	6.9%	32	33.11%

Stonewall	92.9%	340	7.1%	26	30.75%

Shelby	92.8%	2,942	7.2%	229	21.85%

Tyler	92.8%	2,332	7.2%	181	18.72%

Callahan	92.8%	1,782	7.2%	138	21.46%

Shackelford	92.8%	506	7.2%	39	21.86%

Red River	92.6%	1,520	7.4%	122	20.04%

Oldham	92.6%	375	7.4%	30	28.06%

Scurry	92.5%	1,955	7.5%	159	19.64%

Roberts	92.5%	236	7.5%	19	36.63%

Rusk	92.4%	6,269	7.6%	519	22.35%

Baylor	92.4%	580	7.6%	48	22.21%

Orange	92.3%	5,699	7.7%	476	11.80%

Hale	92.3%	3,568	7.7%	299	18.90%

Eastland	92.3%	2,386	7.7%	199	25.19%

Lavaca	92.2%	2,527	7.8%	215	19.93%

Terry	92.2%	1,381	7.8%	117	20.02%

Ward	92.2%	1,282	7.8%	109	21.69%

Carson	92.2%	1,278	7.8%	108	29.61%

Brown	92.1%	5,413	7.9%	466	24.27%

Bailey	92.1%	812	7.9%	70	21.25%

Knox	92.1%	563	7.9%	48	24.15%

Andrews	92.0%	1,617	8.0%	140	21.89%

Coleman	92.0%	1,224	8.0%	107	21.23%

San Saba	92.0%	977	8.0%	85	29.13%

Haskell	92.0%	913	8.0%	79	24.42%

Hockley	91.9%	2,663	8.1%	235	21.15%

Archer	91.9%	1,522	8.1%	134	26.00%

Madison	91.9%	1,314	8.1%	113	21.11%

Sterling	91.9%	193	8.1%	17	24.41%

Swisher	91.8%	991	8.2%	89	23.64%

Lamar	91.7%	6,134	8.3%	554	23.02%

Dawson	91.7%	1,482	8.3%	135	19.12%

Hemphill	91.7%	593	8.3%	54	28.59%

Sutton	91.7%	409	8.3%	37	17.26%

Van Verde	91.6%	7,189	8.4%	663	24.88%

Upshur	91.6%	5,194	8.4%	477	23.85%

Clay	91.6%	1,942	8.4%	177	27.65%

Hall	91.6%	490	8.4%	45	24.28%

Bowie	91.5%	8,651	8.5%	800	17.04%

Gary	91.5%	4,099	8.5%	379	30.75%

Live Oak	91.5%	1,033	8.5%	96	15.25%

Kimble	91.5%	668	8.5%	62	25.68%

Liberty	91.4%	5,477	8.6%	517	13.63%

Houston	91.3%	2,717	8.7%	258	19.77%

Mills	91.3%	805	8.7%	77	26.97%

Cottle	91.3%	230	8.7%	22	19.00%

Jack	91.2%	1,075	8.8%	104	24.10%

Castro	91.2%	938	8.8%	91	22.59%

Mitcheell	91.2%	834	8.8%	80	17.61%

Morris	91.1%	1,755	8.9%	172	22.12%

Crane	91.1%	501	8.9%	49	21.91%

Harrison	91.0%	6,717	9.0%	662	17.68%

Wood	91.0%	6,231	9.0%	620	28.66%

Rains	91.0%	1,421	9.0%	141	24.44%

Donely	91.0%	689	9.0%	68	29.43%

Coke	91.0%	506	9.0%	50	22.32%

Hopkins	90.9%	3,947	9.1%	397	21.11%

Leon	90.9%	2,318	9.1%	233	22.99%

Cherokee	90.8%	5,329	9.2%	541	20.99%

Stephens	90.8%	193	9.2%	17	21.18%

Titus	90.7%	2,919	9.3%	298	21.34%

Hardeman	90.7%	545	9.3%	56	20.29%

Cochran	90.7%	441	9.3%	45	24.27%

Upton	90.7%	388	9.3%	40	21.24%

Anderson	90.6%	6,137	9.4%	640	23.92%

Montague	90.6%	2,655	9.4%	274	22.83%

Jackson	90.6%	1,946	9.4%	203	23.05%

Jones	90.6%	1,927	9.4%	201	20.87%

Concho	90.6%	367	9.4%	38	21.64%

Delta	90.5%	766	9.5%	80	24.93%

Borden	90.5%	162	9.5%	17	39.51%

Freestone	90.4%	2,365	9.6%	251	23.31%

McCulloch	90.4%	1,088	9.6%	115	22.33%

Winkler	90.3%	805	9.7%	86	23.27%

Howard	90.2%	2,946	9.8%	320	18.60%

Gregg	89.9%	13,213	10.1%	1,946	19.97%

Angelina	89.9%	8,210	10.1%	918	20.00%

Runnels	89.9%	1,319	10.1%	148	21.35%

Midland	89.8%	13,364	10.2%	1,515	20.99%

Cooke	89.8%	5,632	10.2%	640	26.59%

Wharton	89.8%	4,412	10.2%	503	20.04%

Camp	89.8%	1,414	10.2%	161	21.70%

Throckmorton	89.8%	440	10.2%	50	39.70%

Smith	89.7%	22,357	10.3%	2,559	21.63%

Navarro	89.7%	5,276	10.3%	604	21.46%

Franklin	89.7%	1,468	10.3%	169	26.09%

Trinity	89.5%	1,673	10.5%	197	16.95%

Karnes	89.5%	1,099	10.5%	129	14.89%

Schleicher	89.5%	377	10.5%	44	22.75%

Lamb	89.4%	2,360	10.6%	279	28.29%

Young	89.3%	3,228	10.7%	387	32.49%

San Jacinto	89.3%	2,624	10.7%	316	18.95%

Comanche	89.3%	1,845	10.7%	220	22.64%

Edwards	89.3%	299	10.7%	36	22.36%

Bee	89.1%	1,732	10.9%	212	12.25%

Regan	89.1%	353	10.9%	43	21.07%

Jim Hogg	89.1%	180	10.9%	22	5.36%

Randall	89.0%	17,202	11.0%	2,130	26.14%

Chambers	89.0%	3,149	11.0%	390	17.43%

Kaufman	88.9%	7,535	11.1%	939	16.53%

Fannin	88.9%	3,775	11.1%	469	22.37%

Colorado	88.9%	2,302	11.1%	287	19.91%

Sabine	88.9%	1,372	11.1%	172	21.79%

DeWitt	88.8%	2,281	11.2%	288	21.60%

Fisher	88.8%	659	11.2%	83	26.04%

Glasscock	88.8%	223	11.2%	28	34.95%

Ellis County	88.7%	13,632	11.3%	1,730	20.00%

Jim Wells	88.7%	1,677	11.3%	214	7.31%

Wise	88.6%	5,896	11.4%	762	20.21%

Somervell	88.6%	1,158	11.4%	149	23.59%

Crosby	88.4%	1,107	11.6%	145	29.25%

Ector County	88.3%	10,465	11.7%	1,382	17.66%

Hill	88.2%	3,911	11.8%	523	20.36%

Nolan	88.2%	1,859	11.8%	249	22.70%

Pecos	88.2%	983	11.8%	132	14.47%

Johnson	88.1%	13,920	11.9%	1,879	20.68%

Limestone	88.1%	2,294	11.9%	311	18.75%

Austin	88.0%	3,401	12.0%	462	22.89%

Burleson	87.9%	1,815	12.1%	249	19.05%

Goliad	87.9%	718	12.1%	99	15.11%

Crockett	87.9%	392	12.1%	54	16.13%

Henderson	87.8%	9,310	12.2%	1,293	21.69%

Parker	87.7%	11,905	12.3%	1,669	21.00%

Polk	87.7%	4,367	12.3%	612	13.71%

Hudspeth	87.7%	206	12.3%	29	14.90%

Lee	87.6%	2,001	12.4%	284	25.43%

Reeves	87.6%	567	12.4%	80	9.26%

Grayson	87.5%	13,641	12.5%	1,946	21.53%

Matagorda	87.5%	3,957	12.5%	566	21.80%

Fayette	87.5%	3,504	12.5%	502	26.97%

Frio	87.5%	752	12.5%	107	8.86%

Wilson	87.3%	3,275	12.7%	478	15.95%

Medina	87.3%	3,121	12.7%	453	14.72%

Falls	87.3%	1,595	12.7%	231	19.29%

San Augustine	87.3%	897	12.7%	130	15.10%

Dickens	87.3%	672	12.7%	98	51.56%

Wichita	87.2%	13,373	12.8%	1,967	20.12%

Taylor	87.2%	12,138	12.8%	1,787	17.85%

Gonzales	87.2%	1,703	12.8%	249	16.52%

Hamilton	87.1%	1,186	12.9%	176	25.05%

Calhoun	87.0%	1,872	13.0%	279	16.99%

Hunt	86.9%	8,490	13.1%	1,279	20.21%

Wilbarger	86.9%	3,207	13.1%	484	43.59%

Robertson	86.9%	1,772	13.1%	266	17.69%

Uvalde	86.8%	2,290	13.2%	347	16.49%

Refugio	86.7%	740	13.3%	114	15.50%

Coryell	86.5%	3,691	13.5%	575	11.77%

Real	86.5%	637	13.5%	99	30.15%

Kent	86.5%	173	13.5%	27	27.73%

Montgomery	86.4%	31,600	13.6%	4,956	17.12%

Earth	86.4%	3,766	13.6%	592	22.44%

Washington	86.4%	3,722	13.6%	585	21.26%

Jefferson	86.3%	12,631	13.7%	2,003	9.36%

Victoria County	86.3%	9,148	13.7%	1,449	20.07%

Palo Pinto	86.0%	2,663	14.0%	435	18.46%

Marion	85.9%	1,046	14.1%	171	15.73%

Hood	85.8%	6,675	14.2%	1,104	24.45%

Bosque	85.8%	2,166	14.2%	359	21.44%

McMullen	85.8%	145	14.2%	24	24.42%

Lampasas	85.5%	2,159	14.5%	366	21.54%

Waller	85.3%	3,330	14.7%	573	15.59%

San Patricio	84.9%	3,525	15.1%	628	8.77%

Atascosa	84.7%	2,565	15.3%	463	12.50%

Irion	84.7%	272	15.3%	49	25.94%

Potter	84.5%	8,309	15.5%	1,523	17.70%

Kerr	84.4%	6,518	15.6%	1,205	23.96%

Terrell	84.3%	145	15.7%	27	22.78%

Kinney	84.2%	416	15.8%	78	21.06%

Grimes	84.1%	2,423	15.9%	459	22.28%

Nacogdoches	83.4%	5,634	16.6%	1,118	21.59%

Walker	85.3%	5,012	16.6%	998	21.39%

Val Verde	83.4%	2,290	16.6%	347	10.73%

Bell	83.1%	16,891	16.9%	3,437	14.06%

Gillespie	82.9%	4,132	17.1%	852	30.89%

Menard	82.9%	266	17.1%	55	17.69%

Rockwall	82.8%	8,349	17.2%	1,738	26.51%

Brazoria	82.7%	27,582	17.3%	5,789	21.36%

Willacy	82.7%	671	17.3%	140	7.38%

Fort Bend	82.6%	35,695	17.4%	7,542	17.07%

Lubbock	82.6%	25,594	17.4%	5,380	20.12%

Tom Green	82.6%	11,418	17.4%	2,400	21.94%

La Salle	82.6%	303	17.4%	64	8.52%

Mason	82.5%	692	17.5%	147	29.18%

Llano	82.2%	3,722	27.8%	806	33.52%

Zapata	82.2%	444	17.8%	96	7.92%

Milam	82.0%	2,767	18.0%	606	23.69%

Culberson	82.0%	132	18%	29	8.85%

Hidalgo	81.9%	15,497	18.1%	3,436	7.49%

Foard	81.9%	154	18.1%	34	19.20%

Burnet	81.5%	5,277	18.5%	1,195	25.81%

Kendall	81.4%	4,044	18.6%	923	23.91%

Bandera	81.3%	2,485	18.7%	573	22.45%

Comal	81.1%	10,826	18.9%	2,515	20.47%

Starr	81.0%	665	19.0%	156	3.05%

McLennan	80.9%	18,819	19.1%	4,445	17.90%

Guadalupe	80.7%	9,844	19.3%	2,358	18.95%

Kleberg	80.6%	1,364	19.4%	329	9.32%

Zavala	80.6%	408	19.4%	98	6.58%

Dimmit	80.3%	435	19.7%	107	7.20%

Brooks	79.3%	352	20.7%	92	7.21%

Duval	77.8%	833	22.2%	238	11.22%

Maverick	77.7%	665	22.3%	191	3.42%

Tarrant	76.8%	128,456	23.2%	38,831	18.97%

Texas	76.25%	1,723,782	23.74%	536,913	17.97%

Aransas	76.0%	2,117	24.0%	668	17.89%

Webb	75.9%	4,619	24.1%	1,463	6.30%

Jeff Davis	75.8%	294	24.2%	94	22.82%

Caldwell	75.6%	2,676	24.4%	862	16.85%

Kenedy	75.4%	46	24.6%	15	19.00%

Blanco	75.2%	1,387	24.8%	458	28.60%

Denton	75.1%	39,650	24.9%	13,166	16.89%

Nueces	74.7%	17,375	25.3%	5,888	12.19%

Galveston	74.6%	18,331	25.4%	6,241	13.56%

Collin	74.5%	44,765	25.5%	15,359	16.60%

Brazos	73.4%	12,618	26.6%	4,571	20.28%

Harris	72.5%	236,071	27.5%	89,652	17.50%

Cameron	72.4%	11,831	27.6%	4,501	10.21%

Loving	71.4%	20	28.6%	8	25.45%

Bastrop	71.1%	5,974	28.9%	2,432	22.57%

Williamson	69.9%	33,677	30.1%	14,508	24.58%

Bexar	69.2%	100,308	30.8%	44,578	16.67%

El Paso	68.1%	19,870	31.9%	9,313	8.02%

Presidio	67.2%	195	32.8%	95	5.30%

Dallas	66.5%	144,559	33.5%	72,973	18.79%

Brewster	64.4%	774	35.6%	427	20.16%

Hays	58.1%	9,253	41.9%	6,665	20.25%

Travis	40.1%	54,246	59.9%	81,170	25.18%

Sentence(s)

Harris voted 72.5 percent for Texas Proposition 2 with 17.5 percent voter turn out.

final_sentence: Harris voted 72.5 percent for Texas Proposition 2 with 17.5 percent voter turn out.