The fair value of the PSU award at the date of grant is amortized to expense over the performance period, which is typically three years after the date of the award, or upon death, disability or reaching the age of 58.
As of December 31, 2017, PMI had $34 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested PSU awards.
This cost is recognized over a weighted-average performance cycle period of two years, or upon death, disability or reaching the age of 58.
During the years ended December 31, 2017, and 2016, there were no PSU awards that vested.
PMI did not grant any PSU awards during 2015.
Note 10.
Earnings per Share:Unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are participating securities and therefore are included in PMI’s earnings per share calculation pursuant to the two-class method.
Basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) were calculated using the following:
## Table 0 ##
For the 2017, 2016 and 2015 computations, there were no antidilutive stock options.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements income (loss).
Refer to Note 14.
Fair Value Measurements and Derivative Instruments for further discussion.
For the years ended December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, we did not record an impairment of goodwill for our reporting units.
Accumulated goodwill impairment losses as of December 31, 2015 were $443.0 million attributable to our Pullmantur reporting unit.
NOTE 4.
INTANGIBLE ASSETS Intangible assets are reported in Other assets in our consolidated balance sheets and consist of the following (in thousands):
## Table 1 ##
As described in Note 3.
Goodwill, the increased challenges facing Pullmantur’s Latin American strategy led to our decision to significantly change Pullmantur’s strategy from growing the brand through vessel transfers to a right-sizing strategy causing us to negatively adjust our cash flow projections for the Pullmantur reporting unit.
As a result, during the third quarter of 2015, we performed an interim impairment evaluation of Pullmantur’s trademarks and trade names using a discounted cash flow model and the relief-from-royalty method to compare the fair value of these indefinite-lived intangible assets to its carrying value.
We used a discount rate comparable to the rate used in valuing the Pullmantur reporting unit in our goodwill impairment test.
Based on our updated cash flow projections, we determined that the fair value of Pullmantur’s trademarks and trade names no longer exceeded their carrying value.
Accordingly, we recognized an impairment charge of approximately $174.3 million to write down trademarks and trade names to their fair value.
The charge reflects the full carrying amount of the trademark and trade names leaving Pullmantur with no intangible assets on its books.
This impairment charge was recognized in earnings during the third quarter of 2015 and is reported within Impairment of Pullmantur related assets within our consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss).
Refer to Note 14.
Fair Value Measurements and Derivative Instruments for further discussion.
For the years ended December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, we did not record an impairment of Pullmantur’s trademark and trade names.
Finite-life intangible assets had a net carrying amount of zero as of December 31, 2015, December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.
NOTE 5.
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT Property and equipment consists of the following (in thousands):
## Table 2 ##
Ships under construction include progress payments for the construction of new ships as well as planning, design, interest and other associated costs.
We capitalized interest costs of $26.5 million, $28.8 million and $17.9 million for the years 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
We review our long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate potential impairment.
In conjunction with performing the two-step goodwill impairment test for the Pullmantur reporting unit, we identified that the estimated fair value of certain long-lived assets, consisting of two ships and three aircraft were less than their carrying values.
As a result of this determination, we evaluated these assets pursuant to our long-lived asset impairment test.
The decision to significantly reduce our exposure to the Latin American market negatively impacted the expected undiscounted cash flows of these vessels and aircraft and resulted in an impairment charge of $113.2 million to write down these assets to their estimated fair values.
This impairment charge was recognized in earnings during the third quarter of 2015 and is reported within Impairment of Pullmantur related assets within our consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss).
Additionally, during 2013, the fair value of Pullmantur’s aircraft were determined to be less than their carrying value which led to a restructuring related impairment charge of $13.5 million.
Furthermore, Pullmantur’s non-core businesses met the accounting criteria to be classified as held for sale during the fourth quarter of 2013 which led to restructuring related impairment charges of $18.2 million to adjust the carrying value of property and equipment held for sale to its fair value, less cost to sell.
These impairment charges were reported within Restructuring and related impairment charges in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss).
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements << 84 >> | 2015 ANNUAL REPORT NOTE 13.
CHANGES IN ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) The following table presents the changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) by component for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands):
## Table 3 ##
The following table presents reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands):

<table><tr><td></td><td>For the Years Ended December 31,</td></tr><tr><td>(in millions)</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>Net earnings attributable to PMI</td><td>$6,035</td><td>$6,967</td><td>$6,873</td></tr><tr><td>Less distributed and undistributed earnings attributable to share-based payment awards</td><td>14</td><td>19</td><td>24</td></tr><tr><td>Net earnings for basic and diluted EPS</td><td>$6,021</td><td>$6,948</td><td>$6,849</td></tr><tr><td>Weighted-average shares for basic EPS</td><td>1,552</td><td>1,551</td><td>1,549</td></tr><tr><td>Plus contingently issuable performance stock units (PSUs)</td><td>1</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Weighted-average shares for diluted EPS</td><td>1,553</td><td>1,551</td><td>1,549</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td></td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>Indefinite-life intangible asset—Pullmantur trademarks and trade names</td><td>$188,038</td><td>$214,112</td></tr><tr><td>Impairment charge</td><td>-174,285</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Foreign currency translation adjustment</td><td>-13,753</td><td>-26,074</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>$—</td><td>$188,038</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td></td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>Ships</td><td>$22,102,025</td><td>$21,620,336</td></tr><tr><td>Ship improvements</td><td>2,019,294</td><td>1,904,524</td></tr><tr><td>Ships under construction</td><td>734,998</td><td>561,779</td></tr><tr><td>Land, buildings and improvements, including leasehold improvements and port facilities</td><td>337,109</td><td>303,394</td></tr><tr><td>Computer hardware and software, transportation equipment and other</td><td>1,025,264</td><td>889,579</td></tr><tr><td>Total property and equipment</td><td>26,218,690</td><td>25,279,612</td></tr><tr><td>Less—accumulated depreciation and amortization</td><td>-7,440,912</td><td>-7,085,985</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>$18,777,778</td><td>$18,193,627</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td></td><td>Changes related to cash flow derivative hedges</td><td>Changes in definedbenefit plans</td><td>Foreign currency translation adjustments</td><td>Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)</td></tr><tr><td>Accumulated comprehensive loss at January 1, 2013</td><td>$-84,505</td><td>$-34,823</td><td>$-15,188</td><td>$-134,516</td></tr><tr><td>Other comprehensive income before reclassifications</td><td>188,073</td><td>8,240</td><td>1,529</td><td>197,842</td></tr><tr><td>Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)</td><td>-60,244</td><td>2,589</td><td>—</td><td>-57,655</td></tr><tr><td>Net current-period other comprehensive income</td><td>127,829</td><td>10,829</td><td>1,529</td><td>140,187</td></tr><tr><td>Accumulated comprehensive income (loss) at January 1, 2014</td><td>43,324</td><td>-23,994</td><td>-13,659</td><td>5,671</td></tr><tr><td>Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications</td><td>-919,094</td><td>-8,937</td><td>-28,099</td><td>-956,130</td></tr><tr><td>Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)</td><td>49,744</td><td>1,724</td><td>1,997</td><td>53,465</td></tr><tr><td>Net current-period other comprehensive loss</td><td>-869,350</td><td>-7,213</td><td>-26,102</td><td>-902,665</td></tr><tr><td>Accumulated comprehensive loss at January 1, 2015</td><td>-826,026</td><td>-31,207</td><td>-39,761</td><td>-896,994</td></tr><tr><td>Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications</td><td>-697,671</td><td>3,053</td><td>-25,952</td><td>-720,570</td></tr><tr><td>Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)</td><td>291,624</td><td>1,707</td><td>-4,200</td><td>289,131</td></tr><tr><td>Net current-period other comprehensive (loss) income</td><td>-406,047</td><td>4,760</td><td>-30,152</td><td>-431,439</td></tr><tr><td>Accumulated comprehensive loss at December 31, 2015</td><td>$-1,232,073</td><td>$-26,447</td><td>$-69,913</td><td>$-1,328,433</td></tr></table>

Question: What was the average of the Net current-period other comprehensive income in the years where Other comprehensive income before reclassifications for Changes related to cash flow derivative hedges is positive?
Answer: 46729.0