Theme Parks Segment – Operating Costs and Expenses Our Theme Parks segment operating costs and expenses consist primarily of theme park operations, including repairs and maintenance and related administrative expenses; food, beverage and merchandise costs; labor costs; and sales and marketing costs.
Theme Parks segment operating costs and expenses increased in 2015 and 2014 primarily due to additional costs at our Orlando and Hollywood theme parks associated with newer attractions, such as the Fast Furious?
— Supercharged?
studio tour in Hollywood in 2015 and The Wizarding World of Harry Potter?
— Diagon Alley?
in Orlando in 2014 and increases in food, beverage and merchandise costs associated with the increases in attendance in both years.
Operating costs and expenses also increased in 2015 due to $89 million of operating costs and expenses attributable to Universal Studios Japan and $22 million of transaction costs related to our development of a theme park in China.
NBCUniversal Headquarters, Other and Eliminations Headquarters and Other operating costs and expenses incurred by our NBCUniversal businesses include overhead, personnel costs and costs associated with corporate initiatives.
Operating costs and expenses increased in 2015 and 2014 primarily due to higher employee-related costs, including severance costs in 2014.
Corporate and Other Results of Operations
## Table 0 ##
Corporate and Other – Revenue Other revenue primarily relates to Comcast Spectacor, which owns the Philadelphia Flyers and the Wells Fargo Center arena in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and operates arena management-related businesses.
Other revenue increased in 2015 and 2014 primarily due to increases in revenue from food and other services associated with new contracts entered into by one of our Comcast Spectacor businesses.
The increase in other revenue in 2014 was also due to an increase in revenue associated with newly acquired businesses.
Corporate and Other – Operating Costs and Expenses Corporate and Other operating costs and expenses primarily include overhead, personnel costs, the costs of corporate initiatives and branding, and operating costs and expenses associated with Comcast Spectacor.
Excluding transaction costs associated with the Time Warner Cable merger and related divestiture transactions of $178 million and $237 million in 2015 and 2014, respectively, Corporate and Other operating costs and expenses increased 19% in 2015.
This was primarily due to $56 million of expenses related to a contract settlement, an increase in expenses related to corporate strategic business initiatives and an increase in operating costs and expenses at Comcast Spectacor primarily associated with new contracts entered into by one of its businesses.
Corporate and Other operating costs and expenses increased in 2014 primarily due to $237 million of transaction-related costs associated with the Time Warner Cable merger and related divestiture transactions, as well as an increase in operating costs and expenses associated with new contracts entered into by one of our Comcast Spectacor businesses.
Comparison of the year ended December 31, 2005 to the year ended December 31, 2004 Rental and related revenue.
MOB rental revenue increased 35.4% to $126.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2005.
The increase in MOB rental revenue of $33.2 million primarily relates to the additive effect of our acquisitions in 2005 and 2004, which contributed $26.7 million to rental revenues year over year.
Triple-net lease rental revenues increased 15.2% to $269.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2005.
The increase in triple-net lease rental revenue of $35.7 million primarily relates to the additive effect of our acquisitions in 2005 and 2004, as detailed below:
## Table 1 ##
We also recognized $5.7 million of rental income during the fourth quarter of 2004 resulting from a change in an estimate related to the collectibility of straight-line rental income from ARC.
Additionally, included in triple-net lease rental revenues are facility-level operating revenues for five senior housing properties that were previously leased on a triple-net basis.
Periodically tenants default on their leases, which cause us to take temporary possession of the operations of the facility.
We contract with third-party managers to manage these properties until a replacement tenant can be identified or the property can be sold.
The operating revenues and expenses for these properties are included in triple-net lease rental revenues and operating expenses, respectively.
The increase in reported revenues for these facilities of $3.6 million to $7.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2005, was primarily due to us taking possession of two of these properties in 2005 and increases in overall occupancy of such properties.
Equity income (loss).
Equity income decreased to a loss of $1.1 million primarily due to our investment in HCP MOP, for which we recorded equity losses of $1.4 million and equity income of $1.5 million for 2005 and 2004, respectively.
During the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, HCP MOP revised its purchase price allocation and attributed more of the purchase price of the properties acquired from MedCap Properties, LLC to below-market lease intangibles and other intangibles from real estate assets.
Lease intangibles generally amortize over a shorter period of time relative to tangible real estate assets.
The decrease in the equity income from our investment in HCP MOP was primarily due to the revisions to the purchase price allocations referred to above.
Additionally, HCP MOP incurred repairs and other related expenses for damages caused by hurricanes Katrina and Rita of $1.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2005.
See Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on HCP MOP.
Investment management fee income.
Management and other fee income decreased by $0.1 million to $3.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2005.
Interest and other income.
Interest and other income decreased 30.0% or $9.8 million to $22.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2005.
The change reflects a reduced level of loans receivable following an $83 million repayment from ARC and a $17 million repayment from Emeritus during the third quarter of 2004.
The decrease in interest and other income was partially offset by gains from the sale of various investments of $4.5 million in 2005.
The gains from these investments were primarily the result of the sale of securities in 2005, which were acquired in conjunction with real estate and or leasing transactions we completed in previous years.
HCP, Inc.  NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) ManorCare, was completed as of January 1 for each of the periods presented below (in thousands, except per share amounts):
## Table 2 ##
(4) Other Real Estate Property Investments $1.7 Billion Senior Housing Portfolio Acquisition During the fourth quarter of 2012, the Company acquired 129 senior housing communities for $1.7 billion, from a joint venture between Emeritus Corporation (‘‘Emeritus’’) and Blackstone Real Estate Partners VI, an affiliate of Blackstone (the ‘‘Blackstone JV’’).
Located in 29 states, the portfolio encompasses 10,077 units representing a diversified care mix of 61% assisted living, 25% independent living, 13% memory care and 1% skilled nursing.
Based on operating performance at closing, the 129 communities consist of 95 that are stabilized and 34 that were in lease-up.
The transaction closed in two stages: (i) 127 senior housing facilities on October 31, 2012 for $1.68 billion representing 9,842 units; and (ii) two senior housing facilities on December 4, 2012 for $24 million representing 235 units.
The Company paid $1.7 billion in cash consideration to acquire: (i) real estate with a fair value of $1.5 billion, (ii) intangible assets with a fair value of $170 million and assumed intangible liabilities with a fair value of $4 million.
As of December 31, 2012, the purchase price allocation is preliminary, and the final purchase price allocation will be determined pending the receipt of information necessary to complete the valuation of certain assets and liabilities, which may result in a change from the initial estimate.
Emeritus operates the communities pursuant to a new triple-net, master lease for the 129 properties (the ‘‘Master Lease’’) guaranteed by Emeritus.
The Master Lease provides aggregate contractual rent in the first year of $103.6 million.
The contractual rent will increase annually by the greater of the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index (‘‘CPI’’) or 3.7% on average over the initial five years, and thereafter by the greater of CPI or 3.0% for the remaining initial lease term.
At the beginning of the sixth lease year, rent on the 34 lease-up properties will increase to the greater of the percentage increase in CPI or fair market, subject to a floor of 103% and a cap of 130% of the prior year’s rent.
From the acquisition dates to December 31, 2012, the Company recognized income of $22 million related to its acquisitions of the 129 senior housing communities.
The leased properties are grouped into three pools that share comparable characteristics and these leased pools have initial terms of 14 to 16 years.
Emeritus has two extension options, which, if exercised, will provide for lease terms of 30 to 35 years.
Concurrent with the acquisition, Emeritus purchased nine communities from the Blackstone JV, for which the Company provided secured debt financing of $52 million with a four-year term.
The loan is secured by the underlying real estate and is prepayable at Emeritus’ option.
The interest rate on the loan was initially 6.1% and will gradually increase during its four year term to 6.8%.
Tenant Lease Expirations The following table shows tenant lease expirations, including those related to DFLs, for the next 10 years and thereafter at our leased properties, assuming that none of the tenants exercise any of their renewal options (dollars and square feet in thousands).
See ‘‘Tenant Purchase Options’’ section of Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on leases subject to purchase options.
## Table 3 ##
(1) Includes month-to-month leases.
(2) Excludes 68 RIDEA facilities, leased to consolidated subsidiaries, with annualized NOI of $117 million.
(3) The most recent month’s (or subsequent month’s if acquired in the most recent month) base rent including additional rent floors and cash income from DFLs annualized for 12 months.
Base rent does not include tenant recoveries, additional rents in excess of floors and non-cash revenue adjustments (i. e. , straight-line rents, amortization of market lease intangibles, DFL interest accretion and deferred revenues).
We specifically incorporate by reference into this section the information set forth in Schedule III: Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation, included in this report.
ITEM 3.
Legal Proceedings We are involved from time-to-time in legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of our business, including, but not limited to, commercial disputes, environmental matters, and litigation in connection with transactions including acquisitions and divestitures.
We believe that such existing legal proceedings will not have a material adverse impact on our financial position or our results of operations.
We record a liability when a loss is considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated.
See ‘‘Legal Proceedings’’ section of Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding legal proceedings, which information is incorporated by reference in this Item 3.
ITEM 4.
Mine Safety Disclosures None.

<table><tr><td>Year ended December 31 (in millions)</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>% Change 2014 to 2015</td><td>% Change 2013 to 2014</td></tr><tr><td>Revenue</td><td>$766</td><td>$709</td><td>$600</td><td>8.0%</td><td>18.1%</td></tr><tr><td>Operating costs and expenses</td><td>1,664</td><td>1,487</td><td>1,089</td><td>11.9</td><td>36.5</td></tr><tr><td>Operating loss before depreciation and amortization</td><td>$-898</td><td>$-778</td><td>$-489</td><td>-15.5%</td><td>-59.1%</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td> </td><td colspan="3"> Triple-net lease rental revenue resulting from acquisitions— for the year ended December 31,</td></tr><tr><td> Property Type</td><td> 2005</td><td> 2004</td><td> Change</td></tr><tr><td> </td><td colspan="3"> (in thousands)</td></tr><tr><td>Senior housing</td><td>$44,980</td><td>$14,183</td><td>$30,797</td></tr><tr><td>Other healthcare</td><td>6,091</td><td>5,566</td><td>525</td></tr><tr><td> Total</td><td>$51,071</td><td>$19,749</td><td>$31,322</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td> </td><td colspan="2"> Year Ended December 31,</td></tr><tr><td> </td><td> 2011</td><td> 2010</td></tr><tr><td>Revenues</td><td>$1,807,355</td><td>$1,690,899</td></tr><tr><td>Net income</td><td>659,514</td><td>745,119</td></tr><tr><td>Net income applicable to HCP, Inc.</td><td>643,911</td><td>731,433</td></tr><tr><td>Basic earnings per common share</td><td>$1.53</td><td>$1.86</td></tr><tr><td>Diluted earnings per common share</td><td>1.52</td><td>1.85</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td></td><td colspan="12">Expiration Year</td></tr><tr><td>Segment</td><td>Total</td><td>2015-1</td><td>2016</td><td>2017</td><td>2018</td><td>2019</td><td>2020</td><td>2021</td><td>2022</td><td>2023</td><td>2024</td><td>Thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>Senior housing-2:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Properties</td><td>397</td><td>1</td><td>14</td><td>8</td><td>25</td><td>5</td><td>24</td><td>9</td><td>2</td><td>8</td><td>26</td><td>275</td></tr><tr><td>Base rent-3</td><td>$495,555</td><td>$220</td><td>$17,139</td><td>$10,759</td><td>$48,887</td><td>$8,893</td><td>$39,965</td><td>$12,147</td><td>$2,129</td><td>$23,553</td><td>$30,111</td><td>$301,752</td></tr><tr><td>% of segment base rent</td><td>100</td><td>—</td><td>3</td><td>2</td><td>10</td><td>2</td><td>8</td><td>2</td><td>—</td><td>5</td><td>6</td><td>62</td></tr><tr><td>Post-acute/skilled nursing:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Properties</td><td>301</td><td>—</td><td>1</td><td>—</td><td>2</td><td>21</td><td>6</td><td>—</td><td>4</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>267</td></tr><tr><td>Base rent-3</td><td>$489,547</td><td>$—</td><td>$340</td><td>$—</td><td>$1,168</td><td>$18,633</td><td>$6,934</td><td>$—</td><td>$3,274</td><td>$—</td><td>$—</td><td>$459,198</td></tr><tr><td>% of segment base rent</td><td>100</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>4</td><td>1</td><td>—</td><td>1</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>94</td></tr><tr><td>Life science:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Square feet</td><td>6,971</td><td>280</td><td>375</td><td>911</td><td>835</td><td>509</td><td>1,056</td><td>643</td><td>455</td><td>769</td><td>471</td><td>667</td></tr><tr><td>Base rent-3</td><td>$261,376</td><td>$9,076</td><td>$10,165</td><td>$31,876</td><td>$35,758</td><td>$15,519</td><td>$48,264</td><td>$34,638</td><td>$15,919</td><td>$34,173</td><td>$7,553</td><td>$18,435</td></tr><tr><td>% of segment base rent</td><td>100</td><td>4</td><td>4</td><td>12</td><td>14</td><td>6</td><td>18</td><td>13</td><td>6</td><td>13</td><td>3</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>Medical office:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Square feet</td><td>13,814</td><td>2,242</td><td>1,681</td><td>2,190</td><td>1,831</td><td>1,621</td><td>1,304</td><td>707</td><td>628</td><td>413</td><td>417</td><td>780</td></tr><tr><td>Base rent-3</td><td>$316,302</td><td>$52,546</td><td>$37,273</td><td>$51,006</td><td>$40,421</td><td>$37,281</td><td>$28,892</td><td>$16,658</td><td>$14,507</td><td>$7,374</td><td>$10,952</td><td>$19,392</td></tr><tr><td>% of segment base rent</td><td>100</td><td>17</td><td>12</td><td>16</td><td>13</td><td>12</td><td>9</td><td>5</td><td>5</td><td>2</td><td>3</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>Hospital:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Properties</td><td>16</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>3</td><td>—</td><td>5</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>2</td><td>—</td><td>1</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>Base rent-3</td><td>$74,903</td><td>$—</td><td>$—</td><td>$12,667</td><td>$—</td><td>$7,332</td><td>$7,700</td><td>$1,282</td><td>$11,523</td><td>$—</td><td>$13,304</td><td>$21,095</td></tr><tr><td>% of segment base rent</td><td>100</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>17</td><td>—</td><td>10</td><td>10</td><td>2</td><td>15</td><td>—</td><td>18</td><td>28</td></tr><tr><td>Total:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Base rent-3</td><td>$1,637,683</td><td>$61,842</td><td>$64,917</td><td>$106,308</td><td>$126,234</td><td>$87,658</td><td>$131,755</td><td>$64,725</td><td>$47,352</td><td>$65,100</td><td>$61,920</td><td>$819,872</td></tr><tr><td>% of total base rent</td><td>100</td><td>4</td><td>4</td><td>6</td><td>8</td><td>5</td><td>8</td><td>4</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td>4</td><td>50</td></tr></table>

Question: What is the percentage of all Properties that are positive to the total amount, in 2016?
Answer: 0.02941