ILLUMINA, INC.  NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) In accordance with SFAS No.142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, the goodwill is not amortized, but will be subject to a periodic assessment for impairment by applying a fair-value-based test.
None of this goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
The Company performs its annual test for impairment of goodwill in May of each year.
The Company is required to perform a periodic assessment between annual tests in certain circumstances.
The Company has performed its annual test of goodwill as of May 1, 2006 and has determined there was no impairment of goodwill during 2006.
The Company allocated $15.8 million of the purchase price to in-process research and development projects.
In-process research and development (IPR&D) represents the valuation of acquired, to-becompleted research projects.
At the acquisition date, CyVera’s ongoing research and development initiatives were primarily involved with the development of its VeraCode technology and the BeadXpress Reader.
These two projects were approximately 50% and 25% complete at the date of acquisition, respectively.
As of December 31, 2006, these two projects were approximately 90% and 80% complete, respectively.
The value assigned to purchased IPR&D was determined by estimating the costs to develop the acquired technology into commercially viable products, estimating the resulting net cash flows from the projects, and discounting the net cash flows to their present value.
The revenue projections used to value the IPR&D were, in some cases, reduced based on the probability of developing a new technology, and considered the relevant market sizes and growth factors, expected trends in technology, and the nature and expected timing of new product introductions by the Company and its competitors.
The resulting net cash flows from such projects are based on the Company’s estimates of cost of sales, operating expenses, and income taxes from such projects.
The rates utilized to discount the net cash flows to their present value were based on estimated cost of capital calculations.
Due to the nature of the forecast and the risks associated with the projected growth and profitability of the developmental projects, discount rates of 30% were considered appropriate for the IPR&D.
The Company believes that these discount rates were commensurate with the projects’stage of development and the uncertainties in the economic estimates described above.
If these projects are not successfully developed, the sales and profitability of the combined company may be adversely affected in future periods.
The Company believes that the foregoing assumptions used in the IPR&D analysis were reasonable at the time of the acquisition.
No assurance can be given, however, that the underlying assumptions used to estimate expected project sales, development costs or profitability, or the events associated with such projects, will transpire as estimated.
At the date of acquisition, the development of these projects had not yet reached technological feasibility, and the research and development in progress had no alternative future uses.
Accordingly, these costs were charged to expense in the second quarter of 2005.
The following unaudited pro forma information shows the results of the Company’s operations for the years ended January 1, 2006 and January 2, 2005 as though the acquisition had occurred as of the beginning of the periods presented (in thousands, except per share data):
## Table 0 ##
Fixed Maturity Securities and Unrealized Gains and Losses by Industry Category The following table sets forth the composition of the portion of our fixed maturity securities portfolio by industry category attributable to the Financial Services Businesses as of the dates indicated and the associated gross unrealized gains and losses.
## Table 1 ##
(1) Investment data has been classified based on Lehman industry categorizations for domestic public holdings and similar classifications by industry for all other holdings.
(2) Includes $24 million of gross unrealized gains and $53 million of gross unrealized losses as of December 31, 2006, compared to $30 million of gross unrealized gains and $51 million of gross unrealized losses as of December 31, 2005 on securities classified as held to maturity, which are not reflected in other comprehensive income.
As a percentage of amortized cost, fixed maturity investments attributable to the Financial Services Businesses as of December 31, 2006, consist primarily of 22% foreign government sector, 17% finance sector, 14% asset-backed securities sector and 13% manufacturing sector compared to 24% foreign government sector, 14% finance sector, 14% manufacturing sector and 12% asset-backed securities sector as of December 31, 2005.
As of December 31, 2006, 98% of the mortgage-backed securities in the Financial Services Businesses were publicly traded agency pass-through securities related to residential mortgage loans.
Collateralized mortgage obligations represented the remaining 2% of mortgage backed securities (and less than 1% of total fixed maturities in the Financial Services Businesses).
The gross unrealized losses related to our fixed maturity portfolio attributable to the Financial Services Businesses were $0.7 billion as of December 31, 2006, compared to $0.6 billion as of December 31, 2005.
The gross unrealized losses as of December 31, 2006 were concentrated primarily in the manufacturing, finance, and utilities sectors and as of December 31, 2005 were concentrated primarily in the manufacturing, mortgage backed and finance sectors.
ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE Our environmental compliance costs include the cost of ongoing monitoring programs, the cost of remediation efforts and other similar costs.
We expense or capitalize environmental costs consistent with our capitalization policy.
We expense costs for an existing condition caused by past operations that do not contribute to future revenues.
We accrue costs for environmental assessment and remediation efforts when we determine that a liability is probable and we can reasonably estimate the cost.
At the early stages of a remediation effort, environmental remediation liabilities are not easily quantified due to the uncertainties of various factors.
The range of an estimated remediation liability is defined and redefined as events in the remediation effort occur.
When we can estimate a range of probable loss, we accrue the most likely amount.
In the event that no amount in the range of probable loss is considered most likely, the minimum loss in the range is accrued.
As of December 31, 2013, the spread between the amount accrued and the maximum loss in the range for all sites for which a range can be reasonably estimated was $3,944,000.
Accrual amounts may be based on technical cost estimations or the professional judgment of experienced environmental managers.
Our Safety, Health and Environmental Affairs Management Committee routinely reviews cost estimates, including key assumptions, for accruing environmental compliance costs; however, a number of factors, including adverse agency rulings and encountering unanticipated conditions as remediation efforts progress, may cause actual results to differ materially from accrued costs.
For additional information regarding environmental compliance costs see Note 8.
CLAIMS AND LITIGATION INCLUDING SELF-INSURANCE We are involved with claims and litigation, including items covered under our self-insurance program.
We are self-insured for losses related to workers' compensation up to $2,000,000 per occurrence and automotive and general/product liability up to $3,000,000 per occurrence.
We have excess coverage on a per occurrence basis beyond these retention levels.
Under our self-insurance program, we aggregate certain claims and litigation costs that are reasonably predictable based on our historical loss experience and accrue losses, including future legal defense costs, based on actuarial studies.
Certain claims and litigation costs, due to their unique nature, are not included in our actuarial studies.
We use both internal and outside legal counsel to assess the probability of loss, and establish an accrual when the claims and litigation represent a probable loss and the cost can be reasonably estimated.
For matters not included in our actuarial studies, legal defense costs are accrued when incurred.
The following table outlines our self-insurance program at December 31:
## Table 2 ##
Estimated payments (undiscounted) under our self-insurance program for the five years subsequent to December 31, 2013 are as follows:

<table><tr><td></td><td>Year Ended January 1, 2006</td><td>Year Ended January 2, 2005</td></tr><tr><td>Revenue</td><td>$73,501</td><td>$50,583</td></tr><tr><td>Net loss</td><td>-6,234</td><td>-9,965</td></tr><tr><td>Net loss per share, basic and diluted</td><td>-0.15</td><td>-0.27</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td></td><td colspan="4"> December 31, 2006</td><td colspan="4"> December 31, 2005</td></tr><tr><td> Industry-1</td><td> Amortized Cost</td><td> Gross Unrealized Gains-2</td><td> Gross Unrealized Losses-2</td><td> Fair value</td><td> Amortized Cost</td><td> Gross Unrealized Gains-2</td><td> Gross Unrealized Losses-2</td><td> Fair Value</td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="8"> (in millions)</td></tr><tr><td>Corporate Securities:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Finance</td><td>$19,189</td><td>$324</td><td>$102</td><td>$19,411</td><td>$15,014</td><td>$337</td><td>$86</td><td>$15,265</td></tr><tr><td>Manufacturing</td><td>14,133</td><td>577</td><td>139</td><td>14,571</td><td>14,491</td><td>736</td><td>163</td><td>15,064</td></tr><tr><td>Utilities</td><td>9,313</td><td>454</td><td>74</td><td>9,693</td><td>8,400</td><td>523</td><td>60</td><td>8,863</td></tr><tr><td>Services</td><td>7,398</td><td>297</td><td>71</td><td>7,624</td><td>7,121</td><td>356</td><td>64</td><td>7,413</td></tr><tr><td>Energy</td><td>3,550</td><td>189</td><td>45</td><td>3,694</td><td>3,406</td><td>272</td><td>15</td><td>3,663</td></tr><tr><td>Retail and Wholesale</td><td>2,605</td><td>78</td><td>20</td><td>2,663</td><td>2,619</td><td>95</td><td>21</td><td>2,693</td></tr><tr><td>Transportation</td><td>2,483</td><td>128</td><td>20</td><td>2,591</td><td>2,352</td><td>158</td><td>10</td><td>2,500</td></tr><tr><td>Other</td><td>563</td><td>11</td><td>15</td><td>559</td><td>1,028</td><td>32</td><td>5</td><td>1,055</td></tr><tr><td>Total Corporate Securities</td><td>59,234</td><td>2,058</td><td>486</td><td>60,806</td><td>54,431</td><td>2,509</td><td>424</td><td>56,516</td></tr><tr><td>Foreign Government</td><td>25,164</td><td>685</td><td>70</td><td>25,779</td><td>24,694</td><td>929</td><td>48</td><td>25,575</td></tr><tr><td>Asset-Backed Securities</td><td>16,196</td><td>156</td><td>29</td><td>16,323</td><td>12,516</td><td>164</td><td>35</td><td>12,645</td></tr><tr><td>Mortgage Backed</td><td>8,523</td><td>77</td><td>53</td><td>8,547</td><td>9,376</td><td>97</td><td>97</td><td>9,376</td></tr><tr><td>U.S. Government</td><td>2,812</td><td>324</td><td>14</td><td>3,122</td><td>3,343</td><td>411</td><td>7</td><td>3,747</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>$111,929</td><td>$3,300</td><td>$652</td><td>$114,577</td><td>$104,360</td><td>$4,110</td><td>$611</td><td>$107,859</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td>dollars in thousands</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>Self-insurance Program</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Self-insured liabilities (undiscounted)</td><td>$ 50,538</td><td>$ 48,019</td></tr><tr><td>Insured liabilities (undiscounted)</td><td>17,497</td><td>15,054</td></tr><tr><td>Discount rate</td><td>0.98%</td><td>0.51%</td></tr><tr><td>Amounts Recognized in Consolidated</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Balance Sheets</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Investments and long-term receivables</td><td>$ 16,917</td><td>$ 14,822</td></tr><tr><td>Other accrued liabilities</td><td>-16,657</td><td>-17,260</td></tr><tr><td>Other noncurrent liabilities</td><td>-49,148</td><td>-44,902</td></tr><tr><td>Net liabilities (discounted)</td><td>$ -48,888</td><td>$ -47,340</td></tr></table>

Question: what was the percentage change in net loss between 2005 and 2006?
Answer: 0.37441