Equity Equity at December 31, 2014 was $6.6 billion, a decrease of $1.6 billion from December 31, 2013.
The decrease resulted primarily due to share repurchases of $2.3 billion, $273 million of dividends to shareholders, and an increase in Accumulated other comprehensive loss of $760 million, partially offset by Net income of $1.4 billion.
The $760 million increase in Accumulated other comprehensive loss from December 31, 2013, primarily reflects the following: ?
negative net foreign currency translation adjustments of $504 million, which are attributable to the strengthening of the U. S.  dollar against certain foreign currencies, ?
an increase of $260 million in net post-retirement benefit obligations, ?
net derivative gains of $5 million, and ?
net investment losses of $1 million.
REVIEW BY SEGMENT General We serve clients through the following segments: ?
Risk Solutions acts as an advisor and insurance and reinsurance broker, helping clients manage their risks, via consultation, as well as negotiation and placement of insurance risk with insurance carriers through our global distribution network.  ?
HR Solutions partners with organizations to solve their most complex benefits, talent and related financial challenges, and improve business performance by designing, implementing, communicating and administering a wide range of human capital, retirement, investment management, health care, compensation and talent management strategies.
Risk Solutions
## Table 0 ##
The demand for property and casualty insurance generally rises as the overall level of economic activity increases and generally falls as such activity decreases, affecting both the commissions and fees generated by our brokerage business.
The economic activity that impacts property and casualty insurance is described as exposure units, and is most closely correlated with employment levels, corporate revenue and asset values.
During 2014, pricing was flat on average globally, and we would still consider this to be a "soft market. "
In a soft market, premium rates flatten or decrease, along with commission revenues, due to increased competition for market share among insurance carriers or increased underwriting capacity.
Changes in premiums have a direct and potentially material impact on the insurance brokerage industry, as commission revenues are generally based on a percentage of the premiums paid by insureds.
Additionally, continuing through 2014, we faced difficult conditions as a result of continued weakness in the global economy, the repricing of credit risk and the deterioration of the financial markets.
Weak economic conditions in many markets around the globe have reduced our customers' demand for our retail brokerage and reinsurance brokerage products, which have had a negative impact on our operational results.
Risk Solutions generated approximately 65% of our consolidated total revenues in 2014.
Revenues are generated primarily through fees paid by clients, commissions and fees paid by insurance and reinsurance companies, and investment income on funds held on behalf of clients.
Our revenues vary from quarter to quarter throughout the year as a result of the timing of our clients' policy renewals, the net effect of new and lost business, the timing of services provided to our clients, and the income we earn on investments, which is heavily influenced by short-term interest rates.
We operate in a highly competitive industry and compete with many retail insurance brokerage and agency firms, as well as with individual brokers, agents, and direct writers of insurance coverage.
Specifically, we address the highly specialized
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) Fiscal years ended May 30, 2010, May 31, 2009, and May 25, 2008 Columnar Amounts in Millions Except Per Share Amounts Other indebtedness included $83 million and $89 million of debt of consolidated variable interest entities at May 30, 2010 and May 31, 2009, respectively.
The liabilities recognized as a result of consolidating the Lamb Weston BSW entity do not represent additional claims on our general assets.
The creditors of Lamb Weston BSW have claims only on the assets of the specific variable interest entity to which they extend credit.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009, we issued $500 million of senior notes maturing in 2014 and $500 million of senior notes maturing in 2019.
During fiscal 2009, we retired $357.3 million of 6.75% senior long-term debt due September 2011, $27.6 million of 7.125% senior long-term debt due October 2026, $290.8 million of 6.7% senior long-term debt due August 2027, $17.9 million of 7% senior long-term debt due October 2028, $252.0 million of 7.875% senior long-term debt due September 2010, and $4.1 million of 9.75% senior subordinated long-term debt due March 2021, prior to the maturity of the long-term debt, resulting in net charges of $49.2 million.
As discussed in Note 3, in September 2008, we entered into a potato processing venture, Lamb Weston BSW.
We have determined that the venture is a variable interest entity and that we are the primary beneficiary of the entity.
Accordingly, we consolidate the financial statements of the venture.
During the second quarter of fiscal 2009, Lamb Weston BSWentered into a term loan agreement with a bank under which it borrowed $20.0 million of senior debt at an annual interest rate of 4.34% due September 2018.
During the third quarter of fiscal 2009, Lamb Weston BSW restructured and repaid this debt and entered into a term loan agreement with a bank under which it borrowed $40.0 million of variable (30-day LIBOR+1.85%) interest rate debt due in June 2018.
In the first quarter of fiscal 2010, we established a line of credit with Lamb Weston BSW, under which we will lend up to $1.5 million to Lamb Weston BSW, due on August 24, 2010.
Borrowings under the line of credit, which are subordinate to Lamb Weston BSW’s borrowings from a syndicate of banks, bear interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 3%.
Our most restrictive debt agreements (the revolving credit facility and certain privately placed long-term debt) require that our consolidated funded debt not exceed 65% of our consolidated capital base, and that our fixed charges coverage ratio be greater than 1.75 to 1.0.
At May 30, 2010, we were in compliance with our debt covenants.
Net interest expense consists of:
## Table 1 ##
Interest paid from continuing and discontinued operations was $244.3 million, $261.2 million, and $275.2 million in fiscal 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively.
Our net interest expense was reduced by $1.2 million due to the impact of the interest rate swap contracts entered into in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010.
The interest rate swaps effectively changed our interest rates on the senior long-term debt instruments maturing in fiscal 2012 and 2015 from fixed to variable.
For further discussion on these derivative instruments, see Note 19.
Our net interest expense was increased by $0.7 million and reduced by $1.2 million in fiscal 2010 and 2008, respectively, due to the net impact of previously closed interest rate swap agreements.
As part of the Watts Brothers purchase in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, we assumed $83.8 million of debt, of which we immediately repaid $64.3 million after the acquisition.
## Table 2 ##
## Table 3 ##
Note: We have not declared any cash dividends on common stock for the periods shown.
(1) In 2011, we acquired the majority of the real estate investment management business of Netherlands-based ING Group N. V.  (ING).
The acquisitions included substantially all of ING’s Real Estate Investment Management (REIM) operations in Europe and Asia as well as substantially all of Clarion Real Estate Securities (CRES), its U. S. -based global real estate listed securities business (collectively referred to as ING REIM) along with certain CRES co-investments from ING and additional interests in other funds managed by ING REIM Europe and ING REIM Asia.
On July 1, 2011, we completed the acquisition of CRES for $332.8 million and CRES co-investments from ING for an aggregate amount of $58.6 million.
On October 3, 2011, we completed the acquisition of ING REIM Asia for $45.3 million and three ING REIM Asia co-investments from ING for an aggregate amount of $13.9 million.
On October 31, 2011, we completed the acquisition of ING REIM Europe for $441.5 million and one co-investment from ING for $7.4 million.
During the year ended December 31, 2012, we also funded nine additional co-investments for an aggregate amount of $34.5 million related to ING REIM Europe.
The results for the year ended December 31, 2011 include the operations of CRES, ING REIM Asia and ING REIM Europe from July 1, 2011, October 3, 2011 and October 31, 2011, respectively, the dates each respective business was acquired.
(2) EPS represents earnings per share.
See Earnings Per Share information in Note 17 of our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements set forth in Item 8 of this Annual Report.
(3) Includes EBITDA related to discontinued operations of $7.9 million, $5.6 million, $14.1 million and $16.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
EBITDA represents earnings before net interest expense, write-off of financing costs, income taxes, depreciation and amortization.
Our management believes EBITDA is useful in evaluating our operating performance compared to that of other companies in our industry because the calculation of EBITDA generally eliminates the effects of financing and income taxes and the accounting effects of capital spending and acquisitions, which would include impairment charges of goodwill and intangibles created from acquisitions.
Such items may vary for different companies for reasons unrelated to overall operating performance.
As a result, our management uses EBITDA as a measure to evaluate the operating performance of our various business segments and for other discretionary purposes, including as a significant component when measuring our operating performance under our employee incentive programs.
Additionally, we believe EBITDA is useful to investors to assist them in getting a more complete picture of our results of operations.
However, EBITDA is not a recognized measurement under GAAP and when analyzing our operating performance, readers should use EBITDA in addition to, and not as an alternative for, net income as determined in accordance with GAAP.
Because not all companies use identical calculations, our presentation of EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies.
Furthermore, EBITDA is not intended to be a measure of free cash flow for our management’s discretionary use, as it does not consider certain cash requirements such as tax and debt service payments.
The amounts shown for EBITDA also differ from the amounts calculated under similarly titled definitions in our debt instruments, which are further adjusted to reflect certain other cash and non-cash charges and are used to determine compliance with financial covenants and our ability to engage in certain activities, such as incurring additional debt and making certain restricted payments.
The following table presents our consolidated revenues by major solutions and services and by segment, as a percentage of total revenues:

<table><tr><td>Years ended December 31(millions, except percentage data)</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>Revenue</td><td>$7,834</td><td>$7,789</td><td>$7,632</td></tr><tr><td>Operating income</td><td>1,648</td><td>1,540</td><td>1,493</td></tr><tr><td>Operating margin</td><td>21.0%</td><td>19.8%</td><td>19.6%</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td></td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>Long-term debt</td><td>$257.7</td><td>$261.9</td><td>$255.4</td></tr><tr><td>Short-term debt</td><td>0.1</td><td>5.4</td><td>14.7</td></tr><tr><td>Interest income</td><td>-85.2</td><td>-78.2</td><td>-9.1</td></tr><tr><td>Interest capitalized</td><td>-12.2</td><td>-3.1</td><td>-8.1</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>$160.4</td><td>$186.0</td><td>$252.9</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td></td><td colspan="5">Year Ended December 31,</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011 -1</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="5">(Dollars in thousands, except share data)</td></tr><tr><td>Weighted average shares:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Basic</td><td>330,620,206</td><td>328,110,004</td><td>322,315,576</td><td>318,454,191</td><td>313,873,439</td></tr><tr><td>Diluted</td><td>334,171,509</td><td>331,762,854</td><td>327,044,145</td><td>323,723,755</td><td>319,016,887</td></tr><tr><td> STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS DATA:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$661,780</td><td>$745,108</td><td>$291,081</td><td>$361,219</td><td>$616,587</td></tr><tr><td>Net cash used in investing activities</td><td>-151,556</td><td>-464,994</td><td>-197,671</td><td>-480,255</td><td>-62,503</td></tr><tr><td>Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities</td><td>-232,069</td><td>-866,281</td><td>-100,689</td><td>711,325</td><td>-784,222</td></tr><tr><td> OTHER DATA:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>EBITDA -3</td><td>$1,142,252</td><td>$982,883</td><td>$861,621</td><td>$693,261</td><td>$647,467</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td></td><td colspan="5"> As of December 31,</td></tr><tr><td></td><td> 2014</td><td> 2013</td><td> 2012</td><td> 2011</td><td> 2010</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td colspan="4"> (Dollars in thousands)</td></tr><tr><td> BALANCE SHEET DATA:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$740,884</td><td>$491,912</td><td>$1,089,297</td><td>$1,093,182</td><td>$506,574</td></tr><tr><td>Total assets</td><td>7,647,105</td><td>6,998,414</td><td>7,809,542</td><td>7,219,143</td><td>5,121,568</td></tr><tr><td>Long-term debt, including current portion</td><td>1,875,209</td><td>1,840,680</td><td>2,427,605</td><td>2,472,686</td><td>1,428,322</td></tr><tr><td>Notes payable on real estate -4</td><td>42,843</td><td>130,472</td><td>326,012</td><td>372,912</td><td>627,528</td></tr><tr><td>Total liabilities</td><td>5,345,707</td><td>5,062,408</td><td>6,127,730</td><td>5,801,980</td><td>4,055,773</td></tr><tr><td>Total CBRE Group, Inc. stockholders’ equity</td><td>2,259,830</td><td>1,895,785</td><td>1,539,211</td><td>1,151,481</td><td>908,215</td></tr></table>

Question: What is the average value of Long-term debt and Cash and cash equivalents for BALANCE SHEET DATA in 2010? (in thousand)
Answer: 253415.85