leases, was $92 million, $80 million, and $72 million in 2002, 2001, and 2000, respectively.
Future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases having remaining terms in excess of one year as of September 28, 2002, are as follows (in millions):
## Table 0 ##
Concentrations in the Available Sources of Supply of Materials and Product Although certain components essential to the Company's business are generally available from multiple sources, other key components (including microprocessors and application-specific integrated circuits, or ("ASICs")) are currently obtained by the Company from single or limited sources.
Some other key components, while currently available to the Company from multiple sources, are at times subject to industrywide availability and pricing pressures.
In addition, the Company uses some components that are not common to the rest of the personal computer industry, and new products introduced by the Company often initially utilize custom components obtained from only one source until the Company has evaluated whether there is a need for and subsequently qualifies additional suppliers.
If the supply of a key single-sourced component to the Company were to be delayed or curtailed or in the event a key manufacturing 80 vendor delays shipments of completed products to the Company, the Company's ability to ship related products in desired quantities and in a timely manner could be adversely affected.
The Company's business and financial performance could also be adversely affected depending on the time required to obtain sufficient quantities from the original source, or to identify and obtain sufficient quantities from an alternative source.
Continued availability of these components may be affected if producers were to decide to concentrate on the production of common components instead of components customized to meet the Company's requirements.
Finally, significant portions of the Company's CPUs, logic boards, and assembled products are now manufactured by outsourcing partners, the majority of which occurs in various parts of Asia.
Although the Company works closely with its outsourcing partners on manufacturing schedules and levels, the Company's operating results could be adversely affected if its outsourcing partners were unable to meet their production obligations.
Contingencies Beginning on September 27, 2001, three shareholder class action lawsuits were filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California against the Company and its Chief Executive Officer.
These lawsuits are substantially identical, and purport to bring suit on behalf of persons who purchased the Company's publicly traded common stock between July 19, 2000, and September 28, 2000.
The complaints allege violations of the 1934 Securities Exchange Act and seek unspecified compensatory damages and other relief.
The Company believes these claims are without merit and intends to defend them vigorously.
The Company filed a motion to dismiss on June 4, 2002, which was heard by the Court on September 13, 2002.
On December 11, 2002, the Court granted the Company's motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action, with leave to plaintiffs to amend their complaint within thirty days.
The Company is subject to certain other legal proceedings and claims that have arisen in the ordinary course of business and have not been fully adjudicated.
In the opinion of management, the Company does not have a potential liability related to any current legal proceedings and claims that would have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, liquidity or results of operations.
However, the results of legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty.
Should the Company fail to prevail in any of these legal matters or should several of these legal matters be resolved against the Company in the same reporting period, the operating results of a particular reporting period could be materially adversely affected.
The parliament of the European Union is working on finalizing the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive (the Directive).
The Directive makes producers of electrical goods, including personal computers, financially responsible for the collection, recycling, and safe disposal of past and future products.
The Directive must now be approved and implemented by individual European Union governments by June 2004, while the producers' financial obligations are scheduled to start June 2005.
The Company's potential liability resulting from the Directive related to past sales of its products and expenses associated with future sales of its product may be substantial.
However, because it is likely that specific laws, regulations, and enforcement policies will vary significantly between individual European member states, it is not currently possible to estimate the Company's existing liability or future expenses resulting from the Directive.
As the European Union and its individual member states clarify specific requirements and policies with respect to the Directive, the Company will continue to assess its potential financial impact.
Similar legislation may be enacted in other geographies, including federal and state legislation in the United States, the cumulative impact of which could be significant.
Net periodic benefit cost for 2011, 2010 and 2009 included the following components
## Table 1 ##
n/a = not applicable Net periodic postretirement health and life expense was determined using the “projected unit credit” actuarial method.
Gains and losses for all benefits except postretirement health care are recognized in accordance with the standard amortization provisions of the applicable accounting guidance.
For the Postretirement Health Care Plans, 50 percent of the unrecognized gain or loss at the beginning of the fiscal year (or at subsequent remeasurement) is recognized on a level basis during the year.
The discount rate and expected return on plan assets impact the net periodic benefit cost recorded for the plans.
With all other assumptions held constant, a 25-basis point decline in the discount rate and expected return on plan assets would result in an increase of approximately $55 million and $27 million for the Qualified Pension Plans.
For the Non-U.
S.  Pension Plans, the Nonqualified and Other Pension Plans, and Postretirement Health and Life Plans, the 25-basis point decline in rates would not have a significant impact.
Assumed health care cost trend rates affect the postretirement benefit obligation and benefit cost reported for the Postretirement Health and Life Plans.
The assumed health care cost trend rate used to measure the expected cost of benefits covered by the Postretirement Health and Life Plans was 8.00 percent for 2012, reducing in steps to 5.00 percent in 2019 and later years.
A onepercentage-point increase in assumed health care cost trend rates would have increased the service and interest costs, and the benefit obligation by $4 million and $59 million in 2011.
A onepercentage-point decrease in assumed health care cost trend rates would have lowered the service and interest costs, and the benefit obligation by $3 million and $52 million in 2011.
enable us to service our customers and consumers.
We believe these efforts will create annualized productivity of $200 million to $250 million.
As a combined productivity and reinvestment program, the Company anticipates generating annualized productivity of $550 million to $650 million, which will be reinvested in brand-building initiatives.
In February 2014, the Company announced that we are expanding our productivity and reinvestment program to drive an incremental $1 billion in productivity by 2016 that will primarily be redirected into increased media investments.
Our incremental productivity goal consists of two relatively equal components.
First, expanded savings through global supply chain optimization, data and information technology system standardization, and resource and cost reallocation, which will be reinvested in global brand-building initiatives, with an emphasis on increased media spending.
Second, we will be increasing the effectiveness of our marketing investments by transforming our marketing and commercial model to redeploy resources into more consumer-facing marketing investments to accelerate growth.
In October 2014, the Company announced that we are further expanding our productivity and reinvestment program and extending it through 2019.
The expansion of the productivity initiatives will focus on four key areas: restructuring the Company’s global supply chain, including manufacturing in North America; implementing zero-based budgeting across the organization; streamlining and simplifying the Company’s operating model; and further driving increased discipline and efficiency in direct marketing investments.
The Company expects that the expanded productivity initiatives will generate an incremental $2 billion in annualized productivity.
This productivity will enable the Company to fund marketing initiatives and innovation required to deliver sustainable net revenue growth and will also support margin expansion and increased returns on invested capital over time.
Refer to Note 18 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
We expect to achieve total annualized productivity of approximately $3.6 billion by 2019 from the initiatives implemented under this program since it began in 2012.
Integration of Our German Bottling and Distribution Operations In 2008, the Company began the integration of 18 German bottling and distribution operations acquired in 2007.
Since the integration commenced, the Company has incurred total pretax expenses of $835 million primarily related to involuntary terminations.
The Company is currently reviewing other restructuring opportunities within the German bottling and distribution operations, which if implemented will result in additional charges in future periods.
However, as of December 31, 2014, the Company had not finalized any additional restructuring plans.
The Company does anticipate incurring additional integration costs related to information technology and other initiatives.
Refer to Note 18 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Operating Income and Operating Margin Information about our operating income contribution by operating segment on a percentage basis is as follows:
## Table 2 ##
Interest on borrowings under the Facility is based on either (a) a Eurodollar Rate formula or (b) the Base Rate formula, each as set forth in the Credit Agreement.
The applicable margin and the commitment fee are based on the pricing grid in the Credit Agreement, which varies based on the Company’s adjusted operating income leverage ratio.
As of June 30, 2016, the Company was paying a commitment fee of 0.225% on any undrawn balance and an applicable margin of 0.50% for a Base Rate borrowing and 1.50% for a Eurodollar Rate borrowing.
As of the date of this filing, the Company has not borrowed any funds under the Facility.
REA Group Unsecured Revolving Loan Facility REA Group entered into a A$480 million unsecured syndicated revolving loan facility agreement in connection with the acquisition of iProperty.
The REA Facility consists of three sub facilities of A$120 million, A$120 million and A$240 million which become due in December 2017, December 2018 and December 2019, respectively.
In February 2016, REA Group drew down the full A$480 million (approximately $340 million as of such date) available under the REA Facility, and the proceeds, less lenders’ fees of $1 million, were used to fund the iProperty acquisition.
Borrowings under the REA Facility bear interest at a floating rate of the Australian BBSY plus a margin in the range of 0.85% and 1.45% depending on REA Group’s net leverage ratio.
As of June 30, 2016, REA Group was paying a margin of between 1.00% and 1.20%.
REA Group paid approximately $4 million in interest for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016 at a weighted average interest rate of 3.2%.
The REA Facility requires REA Group to maintain a net leverage ratio of not more than 3.25 to 1.0 and an interest coverage ratio of not less than 3.0 to 1.0.
As of June 30, 2016, REA Group was in compliance with all of the applicable debt covenants.
Commitments The Company has commitments under certain firm contractual arrangements (“firm commitments”) to make future payments.
These firm commitments secure the future rights to various assets and services to be used in the normal course of operations.
The following table summarizes the Company’s material firm commitments as of June 30, 2016.

<table><tr><td>2003</td><td>$83</td></tr><tr><td>2004</td><td>78</td></tr><tr><td>2005</td><td>66</td></tr><tr><td>2006</td><td>55</td></tr><tr><td>2007</td><td>42</td></tr><tr><td>Later years</td><td>140</td></tr><tr><td>Total minimum lease payments</td><td>$464</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td></td><td colspan="3">Qualified Pension Plans</td><td colspan="3">Non-U.S. Pension Plans</td></tr><tr><td>(Dollars in millions)</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>Components of net periodic benefit cost</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Service cost</td><td>$423</td><td>$397</td><td>$387</td><td>$43</td><td>$32</td><td>$30</td></tr><tr><td>Interest cost</td><td>746</td><td>748</td><td>740</td><td>99</td><td>95</td><td>76</td></tr><tr><td>Expected return on plan assets</td><td>-1,296</td><td>-1,263</td><td>-1,231</td><td>-115</td><td>-97</td><td>-74</td></tr><tr><td>Amortization of prior service cost</td><td>20</td><td>28</td><td>39</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Amortization of net actuarial loss (gain)</td><td>387</td><td>362</td><td>377</td><td>—</td><td>-1</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Recognized gain due to settlements and curtailments</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>-2</td></tr><tr><td>Recognized termination benefit costs</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>36</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Net periodic benefit cost</td><td>$280</td><td>$272</td><td>$348</td><td>$27</td><td>$29</td><td>$30</td></tr><tr><td>Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net cost for years ended December 31</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Discount rate</td><td>5.45%</td><td>5.75%</td><td>6.00%</td><td>5.32%</td><td>5.41%</td><td>5.55%</td></tr><tr><td>Expected return on plan assets</td><td>8.00</td><td>8.00</td><td>8.00</td><td>6.58</td><td>6.60</td><td>6.78</td></tr><tr><td>Rate of compensation increase</td><td>4.00</td><td>4.00</td><td>4.00</td><td>4.85</td><td>4.67</td><td>4.61</td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="3">Nonqualified andOther Pension Plans</td><td colspan="3">Postretirement Healthand Life Plans</td></tr><tr><td>(Dollars in millions)</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>Components of net periodic benefit cost</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Service cost</td><td>$3</td><td>$3</td><td>$4</td><td>$15</td><td>$14</td><td>$16</td></tr><tr><td>Interest cost</td><td>152</td><td>163</td><td>167</td><td>80</td><td>92</td><td>93</td></tr><tr><td>Expected return on plan assets</td><td>-141</td><td>-138</td><td>-148</td><td>-9</td><td>-9</td><td>-8</td></tr><tr><td>Amortization of transition obligation</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>31</td><td>31</td><td>31</td></tr><tr><td>Amortization of prior service cost (credits)</td><td>-8</td><td>-8</td><td>-8</td><td>4</td><td>6</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Amortization of net actuarial loss (gain)</td><td>16</td><td>10</td><td>5</td><td>-17</td><td>-49</td><td>-77</td></tr><tr><td>Recognized loss due to settlements and curtailments</td><td>3</td><td>17</td><td>2</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Net periodic benefit cost</td><td>$25</td><td>$47</td><td>$22</td><td>$104</td><td>$85</td><td>$55</td></tr><tr><td>Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net cost for years ended December 31</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Discount rate</td><td>5.20%</td><td>5.75%</td><td>6.00%</td><td>5.10%</td><td>5.75%</td><td>6.00%</td></tr><tr><td>Expected return on plan assets</td><td>5.25</td><td>5.25</td><td>5.25</td><td>8.00</td><td>8.00</td><td>8.00</td></tr><tr><td>Rate of compensation increase</td><td>4.00</td><td>4.00</td><td>4.00</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td>Year Ended December 31,</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>Eurasia & Africa</td><td>11.2%</td><td>10.6%</td><td>10.0%</td></tr><tr><td>Europe</td><td>29.4</td><td>28.0</td><td>27.5</td></tr><tr><td>Latin America</td><td>23.8</td><td>28.4</td><td>26.7</td></tr><tr><td>North America</td><td>25.2</td><td>23.8</td><td>24.1</td></tr><tr><td>Asia Pacific</td><td>25.2</td><td>24.2</td><td>23.3</td></tr><tr><td>Bottling Investments</td><td>0.1</td><td>1.1</td><td>1.3</td></tr><tr><td>Corporate</td><td>-14.9</td><td>-16.1</td><td>-12.9</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>100.0%</td><td>100.0%</td><td>100.0%</td></tr></table>

Question: What was the average value of Service cost, Interest cost, Amortization of prior service cost in Qualified Pension Plans in 2011? (in millions)
Answer: 396.33333