Cash Flows from Financing Activities Our cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities were as follows (in millions):
## Table 0 ##
Debt Financing Our Company maintains debt levels we consider prudent based on our cash flows, interest coverage ratio and percentage of debt to capital.
We use debt financing to lower our overall cost of capital, which increases our return on shareowners’ equity.
This exposes us to adverse changes in interest rates.
Our interest expense may also be affected by our credit ratings.
As of December 31, 2013, our long-term debt was rated ‘‘AA-’’ by Standard & Poor’s, ‘‘Aa3’’ by Moody’s and ‘‘A+’’ by Fitch.
Our commercial paper program was rated ‘‘A-1+’’ by Standard & Poor’s, ‘‘P-1’’ by Moody’s and ‘‘F-1’’ by Fitch.
In assessing our credit strength, all three agencies consider our capital structure (including the amount and maturity dates of our debt) and financial policies as well as the aggregated balance sheet and other financial information of the Company.
In addition, some rating agencies also consider the financial information of certain bottlers, including New CCE, Coca-Cola Amatil Limited, Coca-Cola Bottling Co.  Consolidated, Coca-Cola FEMSA and Coca-Cola Hellenic.
While the Company has no legal obligation for the debt of these bottlers, the rating agencies believe the strategic importance of the bottlers to the Company’s business model provides the Company with an incentive to keep these bottlers viable.
It is our expectation that the credit rating agencies will continue using this methodology.
If our credit ratings were to be downgraded as a result of changes in our capital structure, our major bottlers’ financial performance, changes in the credit rating agencies’ methodology in assessing our credit strength, or for any other reason, our cost of borrowing could increase.
Additionally, if certain bottlers’ credit ratings were to decline, the Company’s equity income could be reduced as a result of the potential increase in interest expense for those bottlers.
In February 2014, Fitch affirmed the Company’s A+ long-term debt rating and F-1 commercial paper rating, but revised its rating outlook from stable to negative.
The Company does not believe that a downgrade would have a material adverse effect on our cost of borrowing.
We monitor our financial ratios and, as indicated above, the rating agencies consider these ratios in assessing our credit ratings.
Each rating agency employs a different aggregation methodology and has different thresholds for the various financial ratios.
These thresholds are not necessarily permanent, nor are they always fully disclosed to our Company.
Our global presence and strong capital position give us access to key financial markets around the world, enabling us to raise funds at a low effective cost.
This posture, coupled with active management of our mix of short-term and long-term debt and our mix of fixed-rate and variable-rate debt, results in a lower overall cost of borrowing.
Our debt management policies, in conjunction with our share repurchase programs and investment activity, can result in current liabilities exceeding current assets.
Issuances and payments of debt included both short-term and long-term financing activities.
On December 31, 2013, we had $6,410 million in lines of credit available for general corporate purposes.
These backup lines of credit expire at various times from 2014 through 2018.
There were no borrowings under these backup lines of credit during 2013.
These credit facilities are subject to normal banking terms and conditions.
In 2013, the Company had issuances of debt of $43,425 million, which included $35,944 million of issuances of commercial paper and short-term debt with maturities greater than 90 days.
The Company’s total issuances of debt also included long-term debt issuances of $7,481 million, net of related discounts and issuance costs.
Net Loan Charge-Offs (Recoveries) as a Percentage of Average Total Loans
## Table 1 ##
The following table presents, by class of loan, the allocation of the allowance for loan losses on originated loans and the percent of loans in each class to total loans:
## Table 2 ##
The allocation of the allowance for loan losses on originated loans at December 31, 2013 reflects management’s assessment of credit risk and probable loss within each portfolio.
This assessment is based on a variety of internal and external factors including, but not limited to, the likelihood and severity of loss, portfolio growth and related risk characteristics, and current economic conditions.
With respect to the originated portfolio, an allocation of a portion of the allowance to one loan segment does not preclude its availability to absorb losses in another loan segment.
Management believes that the level of the allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2013 is appropriate to cover probable losses.
Non-Performing Assets A loan is generally considered “non-performing” when it is placed on non-accrual status.
A loan is generally placed on non-accrual status when it becomes 90 days past due as to interest or principal payments.
Past due status is based on the contractual payment terms of the loan.
A loan may be placed on non-accrual status before it reaches 90 days past due if such loan has been identified as presenting uncertainty with respect to the collectability of interest and principal.
A loan past due 90 days or more may remain on accruing status if such loan is both well secured and in the process of collection.
All previously accrued but unpaid interest on non-accrual loans is reversed from interest income in the period in which the accrual of interest is discontinued.
Interest payments received on non-accrual loans (including impaired loans) are generally applied as a reduction of principal if future collections are doubtful, although such interest payments may be recognized as income.
A loan remains on non-accrual status until the factors that indicated doubtful collectability no longer exist or until a loan is determined to be uncollectible and is charged off against the allowance for loan losses.
There were no loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest at December 31, 2013 or 2012.
Qorvo, Inc.  and Subsidiaries Annual Report on Form 10-K 2017 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net (loss) income per share (in thousands, except per share data)

<table><tr><td>Year Ended December 31,</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>Issuances of debt</td><td>$43,425</td><td>$42,791</td><td>$27,495</td></tr><tr><td>Payments of debt</td><td>-38,714</td><td>-38,573</td><td>-22,530</td></tr><tr><td>Issuances of stock</td><td>1,328</td><td>1,489</td><td>1,569</td></tr><tr><td>Purchases of stock for treasury</td><td>-4,832</td><td>-4,559</td><td>-4,513</td></tr><tr><td>Dividends</td><td>-4,969</td><td>-4,595</td><td>-4,300</td></tr><tr><td>Other financing activities</td><td>17</td><td>100</td><td>45</td></tr><tr><td>Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities</td><td>$-3,745</td><td>$-3,347</td><td>$-2,234</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td>Years ended December 31</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>Commercial Banking:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Commercial real estate</td><td>0.16%</td><td>0.24%</td><td>0.30%</td><td>0.48%</td><td>0.20%</td></tr><tr><td>Commercial and industrial</td><td>0.26</td><td>0.18</td><td>0.26</td><td>0.47</td><td>0.31</td></tr><tr><td>Equipment financing</td><td>0.08</td><td>0.19</td><td>0.44</td><td>0.44</td><td>0.70</td></tr><tr><td>Retail:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Residential mortgage</td><td>0.15</td><td>0.17</td><td>0.21</td><td>0.15</td><td>0.19</td></tr><tr><td>Home equity</td><td>0.31</td><td>0.26</td><td>0.17</td><td>0.17</td><td>0.17</td></tr><tr><td>Other consumer</td><td>1.29</td><td>0.93</td><td>0.93</td><td>1.57</td><td>1.90</td></tr><tr><td>Total portfolio</td><td>0.19%</td><td>0.21%</td><td>0.28%</td><td>0.40%</td><td>0.29%</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td></td><td colspan="2">2013</td><td colspan="2">2012</td><td colspan="2">2011</td><td colspan="2">2010</td><td colspan="2">2009</td></tr><tr><td>As of December 31(dollars in millions)</td><td>Amount</td><td>Percent of Loan Portfolio</td><td>Amount</td><td>Percent of Loan Portfolio</td><td>Amount</td><td>Percent of Loan Portfolio</td><td>Amount</td><td>Percent of Loan Portfolio</td><td>Amount</td><td>Percentof LoanPortfolio</td></tr><tr><td>Commercial Banking:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Commercial real estate</td><td>$65.0</td><td>36.6%</td><td>$60.0</td><td>33.6%</td><td>$70.5</td><td>35.2%</td><td>$82.0</td><td>42.2%</td><td>$91.0</td><td>38.3%</td></tr><tr><td>Commercial and industrial</td><td>72.5</td><td>25.8</td><td>75.5</td><td>27.8</td><td>69.4</td><td>26.2</td><td>53.2</td><td>17.9</td><td>52.8</td><td>19.9</td></tr><tr><td>Equipment financing</td><td>21.0</td><td>10.6</td><td>22.0</td><td>10.8</td><td>20.5</td><td>9.9</td><td>26.3</td><td>12.1</td><td>21.8</td><td>8.8</td></tr><tr><td>Retail:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Residential mortgage</td><td>10.0</td><td>18.1</td><td>12.0</td><td>17.9</td><td>8.8</td><td>17.8</td><td>5.8</td><td>15.3</td><td>4.0</td><td>17.1</td></tr><tr><td>Home equity</td><td>8.0</td><td>8.6</td><td>6.7</td><td>9.4</td><td>4.3</td><td>10.1</td><td>2.7</td><td>11.4</td><td>1.8</td><td>14.1</td></tr><tr><td>Other consumer</td><td>1.0</td><td>0.3</td><td>1.3</td><td>0.5</td><td>2.0</td><td>0.8</td><td>2.5</td><td>1.1</td><td>1.1</td><td>1.8</td></tr><tr><td>Total originated allowance for loan losses</td><td>$177.5</td><td>100.0%</td><td>$177.5</td><td>100.0%</td><td>$175.5</td><td>100.0%</td><td>$172.5</td><td>100.0%</td><td>$172.5</td><td>100.0%</td></tr></table>

Question: What's the sum of the Equipment financing for Commercial Banking in the years where Equipment financing for Amoun is positive?
Answer: 1.85