The liabilities recognized as a result of consolidating these entities do not represent additional claims on the general assets of the Company.
The creditors of these entities have claims only on the assets of the specific variable interest entities to which they have advanced credit.
OBLIGATIONS AND COMMITMENTS As part of its ongoing operations, the Company enters into arrangements that obligate the Company to make future payments under contracts such as debt agreements, lease agreements, and unconditional purchase obligations (i. e. , obligations to transfer funds in the future for fixed or minimum quantities of goods or services at fixed or minimum prices, such as “take-or-pay” contracts).
The unconditional purchase obligation arrangements are entered into by the Company in its normal course of business in order to ensure adequate levels of sourced product are available to the Company.
Capital lease and debt obligations, which totaled $3.5 billion at May 25, 2008, are currently recognized as liabilities in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet.
Operating lease obligations and unconditional purchase obligations, which totaled $1.7 billion at May 25, 2008, are not recognized as liabilities in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
A summary of the Company’s contractual obligations at the end of fiscal 2008 was as follows (including obligations of discontinued operations):
## Table 0 ##
The purchase obligations noted in the table above do not reflect approximately $374 million of open purchase orders, some of which are not legally binding.
These purchase orders are settlable in the ordinary course of business in less than one year.
The Company is also contractually obligated to pay interest on its long-term debt obligations.
The weighted average interest rate of the long-term debt obligations outstanding as of May 25, 2008 was approximately 7.2%.
The Company consolidates the assets and liabilities of certain entities from which it leases corporate aircraft.
These entities have been determined to be variable interest entities and the Company has been determined to be the primary beneficiary of these entities.
The amounts reflected in contractual obligations of long-term debt, in the table above, include $54 million of liabilities of these variable interest entities to the creditors of such entities.
The long-term debt recognized as a result of consolidating these entities does not represent additional claims on the general assets of the Company.
The creditors of these entities have claims only on the assets of the specific variable interest entities.
As of May 25, 2008, the Company was obligated to make rental payments of $67 million to the variable interest entities, of which $7 million is due in less than one year, $13 million is due in one to three years, and $47 million is due in three to five years.
Such amounts are not reflected in the table, above.
As part of its ongoing operations, the Company also enters into arrangements that obligate the Company to make future cash payments only upon the occurrence of a future event (e. g. , guarantee debt or lease payments of a third party should the third party be unable to perform).
In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, the following commercial commitments are not recognized as liabilities in the Company’s
The following table presents the carrying values of intangible assets included in our consolidated balance sheet (in millions):
## Table 1 ##
* Accounts for less than 1 percent of the Company’s total assets.1 The total percentage does not add due to rounding.
When facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of definite-lived intangible assets may not be recoverable, management assesses the recoverability of the carrying value by preparing estimates of sales volume and the resulting gross profit and cash flows.
These estimated future cash flows are consistent with those we use in our internal planning.
If the sum of the expected future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) is less than the carrying amount of the asset (or asset group), we recognize an impairment loss.
The impairment loss recognized is the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value.
We use a variety of methodologies to determine the fair value of these assets, including discounted cash flow models, which are consistent with the assumptions we believe hypothetical marketplace participants would use.
We test intangible assets determined to have indefinite useful lives, including trademarks, franchise rights and goodwill, for impairment annually, or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate that assets might be impaired.
Our Company performs these annual impairment reviews as of the first day of our third fiscal quarter.
We use a variety of methodologies in conducting impairment assessments of indefinite-lived intangible assets, including, but not limited to, discounted cash flow models, which are based on the assumptions we believe hypothetical marketplace participants would use.
For indefinite-lived intangible assets, other than goodwill, if the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, an impairment charge is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.
The Company has the option to perform a qualitative assessment of indefinite-lived intangible assets, other than goodwill, prior to completing the impairment test described above.
The Company must assess whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of the intangible asset is less than its carrying amount.
If the Company concludes that this is the case, it must perform the testing described above.
Otherwise, the Company does not need to perform any further assessment.
During 2013, the Company performed qualitative assessments on less than 10 percent of our indefinite-lived intangible assets balance.
We perform impairment tests of goodwill at our reporting unit level, which is one level below our operating segments.
Our operating segments are primarily based on geographic responsibility, which is consistent with the way management runs our business.
Our operating segments are subdivided into smaller geographic regions or territories that we sometimes refer to as ‘‘business units.
’’ These business units are also our reporting units.
The Bottling Investments operating segment includes all Company-owned or consolidated bottling operations, regardless of geographic location, except for bottling operations managed by CCR, which are included in our North America operating segment.
Generally, each Company-owned or consolidated bottling operation within our Bottling Investments operating segment is its own reporting unit.
Goodwill is assigned to the reporting unit or units that benefit from the synergies arising from each business combination.
The goodwill impairment test consists of a two-step process, if necessary.
The first step is to compare the fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying value, including goodwill.
We typically use discounted cash flow models to determine the fair value of a reporting unit.
The assumptions used in these models are consistent with those we believe hypothetical marketplace participants would use.
If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, the second step of the impairment test must be performed in order to determine the amount of impairment loss, if any.
The second step compares the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill.
If the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, an impairment charge is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.
The loss recognized cannot exceed the carrying amount of goodwill.
The Company has the option to perform a qualitative assessment of goodwill prior to completing the two-step process described above to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, including goodwill and other intangible assets.
If the Company concludes that this is the case, it must perform the two-step process.
Otherwise, the Company will forego the two-step process and does not need to perform any further testing.
U. S.  Insurance.
The following table presents the underwriting results and ratios for the U. S.  Insurance segment for the periods indicated.
## Table 2 ##
(Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding. )
Premiums.
Gross written premiums increased by 2.2% to $885.6 million for 2007 from $866.3 million for 2006.
The increase is primarily the result of a new program we assumed late in 2007 for approximately $76 million of gross written premium.
Absent this new program, gross written premiums would have decreased due to the further decline in our workers’ compensation and contractors liability writings in response to increased competition.
Net written premiums decreased by 1.2% to $744.3 million for 2007 compared to $753.3 million for 2006 as our retention level fell slightly.
Net premiums earned decreased 3.4% to $735.9 million for 2007 from $761.7 million for 2006.
The change in net premiums earned relative to net written premiums is the result of timing; premiums are earned ratably over the coverage period whereas written premiums are reflected at the initiation of the coverage period.
Gross written premiums decreased by 7.1% to $866.3 million for 2006 from $932.5 million for 2005.
The decrease was primarily the result of declines in our workers’ compensation and contractors liability writings in response to increased competition, partially offset by some growth from new programs.
Net written premiums decreased 7.6% to $753.3 million for 2006 compared to $815.3 million for 2005, primarily due to the decrease in gross written premiums.
Net premiums earned decreased 7.5% to $761.7 million for 2006 from $823.0 million for 2005, in line with the decrease in net written premiums.

<table><tr><td>($ in millions)</td><td>Payments Due by Period</td></tr><tr><td>Contractual Obligations</td><td>Total</td><td>Less than 1 Year</td><td>1-3 Years</td><td>3-5 Years</td><td>After 5  Years</td></tr><tr><td>Long-Term Debt</td><td>$3,531.4</td><td>$15.4</td><td>$521.6</td><td>$751.8</td><td>$2,242.6</td></tr><tr><td>Lease Obligations</td><td>514.9</td><td>89.2</td><td>148.1</td><td>106.9</td><td>170.7</td></tr><tr><td>Purchase Obligations</td><td>1,199.6</td><td>1,078.6</td><td>104.0</td><td>16.3</td><td>0.7</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>$5,245.9</td><td>$1,183.2</td><td>$773.7</td><td>$875.0</td><td>$2,414.0</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td>December 31, 2013</td><td>CarryingValue</td><td>Percentageof TotalAssets<sup>1</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Goodwill</td><td>$12,312</td><td>14%</td></tr><tr><td>Bottlers' franchise rights with indefinite lives</td><td>7,415</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>Trademarks with indefinite lives</td><td>6,744</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>Definite-lived intangible assets, net</td><td>969</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>Other intangible assets not subject to amortization</td><td>171</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>$27,611</td><td>31%</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td></td><td colspan="3">Years Ended December 31,</td><td colspan="2">2007/2006</td><td colspan="2">2006/2005</td></tr><tr><td>(Dollars in millions)</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>Variance</td><td>% Change</td><td>Variance</td><td>% Change</td></tr><tr><td>Gross written premiums</td><td>$ 885.6</td><td>$ 866.3</td><td>$ 932.5</td><td>$ 19.3</td><td>2.2%</td><td>$ -66.2</td><td>-7.1%</td></tr><tr><td>Net written premiums</td><td>744.3</td><td>753.3</td><td>815.3</td><td>-9.0</td><td>-1.2%</td><td>-62.0</td><td>-7.6%</td></tr><tr><td>Premiums earned</td><td>$ 735.9</td><td>$ 761.7</td><td>$ 823.0</td><td>$ -25.8</td><td>-3.4%</td><td>$ -61.3</td><td>-7.4%</td></tr><tr><td>Incurred losses and LAE</td><td>556.4</td><td>519.9</td><td>530.8</td><td>36.5</td><td>7.0%</td><td>-10.9</td><td>-2.0%</td></tr><tr><td>Commission and brokerage</td><td>136.2</td><td>123.1</td><td>132.6</td><td>13.1</td><td>10.6%</td><td>-9.5</td><td>-7.2%</td></tr><tr><td>Other underwriting expenses</td><td>58.2</td><td>48.9</td><td>51.9</td><td>9.3</td><td>19.0%</td><td>-3.0</td><td>-5.8%</td></tr><tr><td>Underwriting (loss) gain</td><td>$ -14.9</td><td>$ 69.8</td><td>$ 107.7</td><td>$ -84.7</td><td>-121.3%</td><td>$ -37.9</td><td>-35.2%</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>Point Chg</td><td></td><td>Point Chg</td></tr><tr><td>Loss ratio</td><td>75.6%</td><td>68.3%</td><td>64.5%</td><td></td><td>7.3</td><td></td><td>3.8</td></tr><tr><td>Commission and brokerage ratio</td><td>18.5%</td><td>16.1%</td><td>16.1%</td><td></td><td>2.4</td><td></td><td>0.0</td></tr><tr><td>Other underwriting expense ratio</td><td>7.9%</td><td>6.4%</td><td>6.3%</td><td></td><td>1.5</td><td></td><td>0.1</td></tr><tr><td>Combined ratio</td><td>102.0%</td><td>90.8%</td><td>86.9%</td><td></td><td>11.2</td><td></td><td>3.9</td></tr><tr><td colspan="2">(Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></table>

Question: How many Years Ended December 31, exceed the average of Years Ended December 31, in 2007 for Amount?