CITIZENS FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.  BUSINESS 6 The following table presents selected financial information for our business operating segments, Other and consolidated:
## Table 0 ##
Consumer Banking Segment Consumer Banking serves retail customers and small businesses with annual revenues of up to $25 million with products and services that include deposit products, mortgage and home equity lending, credit cards, business loans, wealth management and investment services.
We also offer our customers auto financing, education lending and unsecured and product financing installment lending products and serve those customers both in-footprint and nationally through our online platform and telephone service centers.
Consumer Banking operates a multi-channel distribution network with a workforce of approximately 6,700 branch colleagues, approximately 1,150 branches, including about 330 in-store locations, and approximately 3,300 ATMs.
Our network includes approximately 1,330 specialists covering lending needs, savings and investments and business banking.
Our online and mobile capabilities offer customers the convenience of paying bills and transferring money between accounts and from person to person, as well as a host of other everyday transactions.
We believe our strong retail deposit market share in our core regions, which have relatively diverse economies and affluent demographics, is a competitive advantage.
As of June 30, 2017, we ranked second by retail deposit market share in the New England region and also ranked in the top five in nine of our ten key MSAs, including Providence, Boston, Pittsburgh, Philadelphia and Cleveland.
(1) The following table sets forth information regarding our competitive position in our principal MSAs:
## Table 1 ##
Source: FDIC, June 2017.
Excludes “non-retail banks” as defined by SNL Financial.
The scope of “non-retail banks” is subject to the discretion of SNL Financial, but typically includes: industrial bank and non-depository trust charters, institutions with more than 20% brokered deposits (of total deposits), institutions with more than 20% credit card loans (of total loans), institutions deemed not to broadly participate in the banking services market and other nonretail competitor banks.
(1) According to SNL Financial.
LEIDOS HOLDINGS, INC.  NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Pro Forma Financial Information (unaudited) The following pro forma financial information presents consolidated results of operations as if the acquisition had occurred on January 31, 2015.
The pro forma financial information was prepared based on historical financial information and has been adjusted to give effect to the events that are directly attributable to the Transactions and factually supportable.
The pro forma results below do not reflect future events that have occurred or may occur after the Transactions, including anticipated synergies or other expected benefits that may be realized from the Transactions.
The pro forma financial information is not intended to reflect the actual results of operations that would have occurred if the acquisition had been completed on January 31, 2015, nor is it intended to be an indication of future operating results.
## Table 2 ##
The unaudited pro forma financial information above excludes acquisition-related costs of $44 million for fiscal 2016 and includes these costs within the 11-month period ended January 1, 2016 as a nonrecurring significant adjustment.
This adjustment was made to account for certain costs incurred as if the Transactions had been completed on January 31, 2015.
Note 3—Divestitures In April 2016, the Company's Civil segment disposed of a business that was primarily focused on providing design, build and heavy construction engineering services.
The Company received cash proceeds of $23 million, resulting in a preliminary pre-tax gain on sale of $3 million.
The major classes of assets and liabilities sold included $73 million of accounts receivable, net; $3 million of non-current assets and $63 million of accounts payable and accrued liabilities.
In addition, the Company recorded a $6 million liability in connection with issuance of a performance guarantee on a contract and guarantee of collection of the accounts receivables transferred.
The Company paid $1 million of selling costs related to the transaction.
The Company recorded the pre-tax gain on sale in "Other (expense) income, net" in the Company's consolidated statements of income.
Plainfield Renewable Energy Holdings LLC Plainfield Renewable Energy Holdings LLC ("Plainfield") is a 37.5 megawatt biomass-fueled power plant in Plainfield, Connecticut (the "plant").
In March 2015, the Company entered into a definitive Membership Interest Purchase Agreement (the "Agreement") to sell 100% of its equity membership interest in Plainfield.
During the quarter ended July 3, 2015, further negotiations occurred related to the sale of Plainfield resulting in an approximate $29 million impairment charge.
The Company adjusted the carrying values of Plainfield's assets to their fair values based on the estimated selling price of the business pursuant to the terms of the Agreement that was amended on July 17, 2015 (Level 1).
The Company recorded these tangible asset impairment charges in "Asset impairment charges" in the Company's consolidated statements of income.
On July 24, 2015, the Company completed the sale of its equity interests in Plainfield for an aggregate consideration of $102 million, subject to certain adjustments, and contingent earn-out payments.
The consideration received at closing consisted of a cash payment of $29 million (the "Closing Payment") and a secured promissory note for $73 million (the "Note").
The sale resulted in an immaterial deferred gain.
In addition to the Closing Payment and the Note, the Company is eligible to receive certain contingent earn-out payments not to exceed $30 million.
The Company will recognize any consideration for the contingent earn-out payments when received.
In conjunction with the sale of the plant, the Company paid $2 million of the purchase price contingent consideration
We intend to use excess cash on hand, cash from operating activities and proceeds from the asset divestitures to repay debt.
We believe that our excess cash, cash from operating activities and proceeds from our revolving credit facilities provide us with sufficient financial resources to meet our anticipated capital requirements and obligations as they come due.
Despite the current economic conditions, we believe that we will be able to raise additional debt or equity financing, if necessary.
Credit Rating We have received investment grade credit ratings.
As of December 31, 2008, our senior debt was rated BBB, Baa3, and BBB- by Standard & Poor’s Rating Services, Inc. , Moody’s Investors Service, Inc.  and Fitch, Inc. , respectively.
Fuel Hedges We use derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges to manage our exposure to changes in diesel fuel prices and other commodity prices.
We have entered into multiple option agreements related to forecasted diesel fuel purchases and other commodity prices.
Under SFAS No.133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS 133), the options qualified for, and were designated as, effective hedges of changes in the prices of forecasted diesel fuel purchases (fuel hedges).
We have the following fuel hedges outstanding at December 31, 2008:
## Table 3 ##
If the national U. S.  on-highway average price for a gallon of diesel fuel (average price) as published by the Department of Energy exceeds the contract price per gallon, we receive the difference between the average price and the contract price (multiplied by the notional gallons) from the counter-party.
If the national U. S.  on-highway average price for a gallon of diesel fuel is less than the contract price per gallon, we pay the difference to the counter-party.
The fair values of our fuel hedges are obtained from third-party counter-parties and are determined using standard option valuation models with assumptions about commodity prices being based on those observed in underlying markets (Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy).
The aggregated fair values of the outstanding fuel hedges at December 31, 2008 and 2007 were $11.7 million and $11.4 million, respectively, and have been recorded in other current liabilities and other current assets in our consolidated balance sheets, respectively.
In accordance with SFAS 133, the effective portions of the changes in fair values as of December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, net of tax, of $7.1 million and $6.9 million, respectively, have been recorded in stockholders’ equity as components of accumulated other comprehensive income.
The ineffective portions of the changes in fair values as of December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 were immaterial and have been recorded in other income (expense), net in our consolidated statements of income.
Realized gains of $5.9 million and realized losses of $1.6 million and $1.3 million related to these fuel hedges are included in cost of operations in our consolidated statements of income for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Commodity Hedges We use derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges to manage our exposure to changes in prices of certain commodities.
We have entered into multiple agreements related to certain forecasted
Note 10—Income Taxes We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code commencing with the year that ended December 31, 1999.
We intend to continue to operate in such a manner as to enable us to qualify as a REIT.
Our actual qualification and taxation as a REIT depends upon our ability to meet, on a continuing basis, distribution levels, stock ownership, and the various qualification tests.
During the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, our tax treatment of distributions was as follows: We made no income tax payments for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002.
As a former C corporation for federal income tax purposes, we potentially remain subject to corporate level taxes for any asset dispositions for the period January 1, 1999 through December 31, 2008 (“built-in gains tax”).
The amount of income potentially subject to this special corporate level tax is generally equal to (a) the excess of the fair value of the asset as of December 31, 1998 over
## Table 4 ##
No net provision for income taxes has been recorded in the Consolidated Financial Statements for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 due to our belief that we qualified as a REIT and the distribution of more than 100% of our 2004 and 2003 taxable income as a dividend.
In the third quarter of 2002, we filed our 2001 federal tax return on which we elected to apply certain 2002 dividend payments in excess of our 2002 taxable net income.
As a result, we recorded a $2.2 million tax benefit for 2002.
The 2002 benefit for income taxes consists of the following (in thousands):

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td colspan="8">For the Year Ended December 31,</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4">2017</td><td colspan="4">2016</td></tr><tr><td>(in millions)</td><td>Consumer Banking</td><td>Commercial Banking</td><td>Other<sup></sup></td><td>Consolidated</td><td>Consumer Banking</td><td>Commercial Banking</td><td>Other</td><td>Consolidated</td></tr><tr><td>Net interest income</td><td>$2,651</td><td>$1,411</td><td>$111</td><td>$4,173</td><td>$2,443</td><td>$1,288</td><td>$27</td><td>$3,758</td></tr><tr><td>Noninterest income</td><td>905</td><td>538</td><td>91</td><td>1,534</td><td>883</td><td>466</td><td>148</td><td>1,497</td></tr><tr><td>Total revenue</td><td>3,556</td><td>1,949</td><td>202</td><td>5,707</td><td>3,326</td><td>1,754</td><td>175</td><td>5,255</td></tr><tr><td>Noninterest expense</td><td>2,593</td><td>772</td><td>109</td><td>3,474</td><td>2,547</td><td>741</td><td>64</td><td>3,352</td></tr><tr><td>Net income</td><td>$452</td><td>$774</td><td>$426</td><td>$1,652</td><td>$345</td><td>$631</td><td>$69</td><td>$1,045</td></tr><tr><td>Total average loans and leases and loans held for sale</td><td>$58,371</td><td>$48,655</td><td>$2,946</td><td>$109,972</td><td>$55,052</td><td>$45,903</td><td>$2,999</td><td>$103,954</td></tr><tr><td>Total average deposits</td><td>$74,873</td><td>$30,005</td><td>$6,996</td><td>$111,874</td><td>$72,003</td><td>$26,811</td><td>$6,633</td><td>$105,447</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td>(dollars in millions)</td><td></td><td rowspan="2">Total Deposits</td><td rowspan="2">Total Deposit Rank</td><td rowspan="2">Deposit Market Share</td></tr><tr><td>MSA</td><td>Total Branches</td></tr><tr><td>Boston, MA</td><td>203</td><td>$35,939</td><td>2</td><td>16.1%</td></tr><tr><td>Philadelphia, PA</td><td>179</td><td>$17,548</td><td>5</td><td>4.8%</td></tr><tr><td>Providence, RI</td><td>96</td><td>$12,264</td><td>1</td><td>30.2%</td></tr><tr><td>Pittsburgh, PA</td><td>120</td><td>$9,483</td><td>3</td><td>7.3%</td></tr><tr><td>Cleveland, OH</td><td>52</td><td>$9,018</td><td>4</td><td>13.5%</td></tr><tr><td>Detroit, MI</td><td>88</td><td>$5,335</td><td>8</td><td>4.1%</td></tr><tr><td>Manchester, NH</td><td>21</td><td>$4,390</td><td>1</td><td>38.6%</td></tr><tr><td>Albany, NY</td><td>23</td><td>$3,357</td><td>2</td><td>11.4%</td></tr><tr><td>Buffalo, NY</td><td>41</td><td>$1,836</td><td>5</td><td>4.5%</td></tr><tr><td>Rochester, NY</td><td>32</td><td>$1,638</td><td>5</td><td>8.7%</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td>(unaudited)</td><td>12 Months Ended December 30,2016</td><td>11 Months Ended January 1,2016</td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="2">(in millions, except for per share amounts)</td></tr><tr><td>Revenues</td><td>$10,443</td><td>$9,868</td></tr><tr><td>Income from continuing operations</td><td>340</td><td>336</td></tr><tr><td>Income from continuing operations attributable to Leidos common stockholders</td><td>335</td><td>331</td></tr><tr><td>Earnings per share:</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Basic</td><td>$2.23</td><td>$2.21</td></tr><tr><td>Diluted</td><td>$2.20</td><td>$2.19</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>Notional Amount</td><td>Contract Price</td></tr><tr><td>Inception Date</td><td>Commencement Date</td><td>Termination Date</td><td>(in Gallons per Month)</td><td>per Gallon</td></tr><tr><td>September 22, 2008</td><td>January 1, 2009</td><td>December 31, 2011</td><td>150,000</td><td>$4.1600-4.1700</td></tr><tr><td>March 17, 2008</td><td>January 5, 2009</td><td>December 31, 2012</td><td>50,000</td><td>3.7200</td></tr><tr><td>March 17, 2008</td><td>January 5, 2009</td><td>December 31, 2012</td><td>50,000</td><td>3.7400</td></tr><tr><td>November 5, 2007</td><td>January 5, 2009</td><td>December 30, 2013</td><td>60,000</td><td>3.2815</td></tr><tr><td>January 26, 2007</td><td>January 5, 2009</td><td>December 28, 2009</td><td>500,000</td><td>2.8270</td></tr><tr><td>January 26, 2007</td><td>January 4, 2010</td><td>December 27, 2010</td><td>500,000</td><td>2.8100</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td></td><td>2004</td><td> 2003 </td><td> 2002 </td></tr><tr><td>Tax treatment of distributions:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Ordinary income</td><td>$1.1164</td><td>$0.8025</td><td>$0.9500</td></tr><tr><td>Long-term capital gain</td><td>0.1241</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Unrecaptured section 1250 gain</td><td>0.0020</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Distribution reported for 1099-DIV purposes</td><td>1.2425</td><td>0.8025</td><td>0.9500</td></tr><tr><td>Add: Dividend declared in current year and taxable in following year</td><td>0.3250</td><td>0.2675</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Less: Dividend declared in prior year and taxable in current year</td><td>-0.2675</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Distributions declared per common share outstanding</td><td>$1.3000</td><td>$1.0700</td><td>$0.9500</td></tr></table>

Question: In which year the sum of revenue for Consumer Banking has the highest value?