Table of Contents For our creative offerings, both the total number of units licensed and unit average selling prices remained relatively stable during fiscal 2011 as compared to fiscal 2010.
Document Services revenue increased during fiscal 2011 as compared to fiscal 2010.
We attribute this success to strong adoption of our Acrobat X product, which was released in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010.
During fiscal 2011 as compared to fiscal 2010, unit average selling prices for Document Services increased and the number of units licensed remained relatively stable.
Digital Marketing Revenue from Digital Marketing increased $170.0 million, or 23%, during fiscal 2011 as compared to fiscal 2010.
The increase was primarily due to continued customer adoption of our Adobe Marketing Cloud, which includes our WEM offerings resulting from the acquisition of Day, which closed late in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010.
Print and Publishing Revenue from Print and Publishing decreased $7.9 million, or 3%, during fiscal 2011 as compared to fiscal 2010.
The decrease was primarily due to lower Shockwave revenue and the release of ColdFusion 9 at the end of fiscal 2009 for which a comparable release did not occur in the current year.
Also contributing to the decline was a one-time large deal in Adobe Captivate and our Tech Communications products during fiscal 2010 that did not recur in fiscal 2011.
Geographical Information (dollars in millions)
## Table 0 ##
Fiscal 2012 Revenue by Geography Compared to Fiscal 2011 Revenue by Geography Overall revenue for fiscal 2012 increased in the Americas and APAC and declined slightly in EMEA when compared to fiscal 2011.
Revenue in the Americas increased during fiscal 2012 primarily due to revenue increases in Digital Media and Digital Marketing, offset slightly by a decline in Print and Publishing revenue.
Despite the launch of CS6 in May 2012, the current economic conditions in Europe and the weakening of the Euro and British Pound against the U. S.  Dollar caused revenue in EMEA to decline slightly during fiscal 2012 compared with fiscal 2011.
Revenue in APAC increased across all reportable segments during fiscal 2012 as compared with fiscal 2011.
Within each geographical region, the fluctuations in revenue by reportable segment were attributable to the factors noted in the segment information above.
Fiscal 2011 Revenue by Geography Compared to Fiscal 2010 Revenue by Geography Overall revenue for fiscal 2011 increased in each of the geographic regions when compared to fiscal 2010.
Within each geographic region, every reportable segment contributed to the increase in revenue with the exception of Print and Publishing, which experienced decreases in EMEA and APAC.
The increase in revenue during fiscal 2011 as compared to fiscal 2010 in the Americas, EMEA and APAC was attributable to the factors noted in the segment information above.
## Table 1 ##
(a) Includes Demand Side Management, System Benefit Charges and Public Service Law 18A assessments which are collected in revenues.
(b) Includes parent company and consolidation adjustments.
Con Edison’s principal business segments are CECONY’s regulated utility activities, O&R’s regulated utility activities and Con Edison’s competitive energy businesses.
CECONY’s principal business segments are its regulated electric, gas and steam utility activities.
A discussion of the results of operations by principal business segment for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 follows.
For additional business segment financial information, see Note N to the financial statements in Item 8.
Year Ended December 31, 2015 Compared with Year Ended December 31, 2014 The Companies’ results of operations in 2015 compared with 2014 were:
## Table 2 ##
(a) Includes parent company and consolidation adjustments.
(b) Represents the consolidated results of operations of Con Edison and its businesses.
The Bank is a national banking association chartered under the laws of the United States and is subject to comprehensive primary supervision, regulation and examination by the OCC.
As a national bank, the activities of the Bank are limited to those specifically authorized under the National Bank Act and related regulations and interpretations by the OCC.
As a member of the DIF, the Bank is also subject to regulation and examination by the FDIC.
In addition, the Bank is subject to supervision, regulation and examination by the CFPB, which is the primary administrator of most federal consumer financial statutes and the primary consumer financial regulator of banking organizations with $10 billion or more in assets.
Under the system of “functional regulation” established under the BHC Act, the Federal Reserve serves as the primary regulator of our consolidated organization.
The primary regulators of our non-bank subsidiaries directly regulate the activities of those subsidiaries, with the Federal Reserve exercising a supervisory role.
Such “functionally regulated” non-bank subsidiaries include, for example, broker-dealers registered with the SEC and investment advisers registered with the SEC with respect to their investment advisory activities.
Regulatory Capital Requirements Huntington and the Bank are subject to certain risk-based capital and leverage ratio requirements.
The Federal Reserve establishes capital and leverage requirements for Huntington and evaluates its compliance with such requirements.
The OCC establishes similar capital and leverage requirements for the Bank.
In 2013, the Federal Reserve and OCC issued final rules (and the FDIC issued interim final rules that were adopted as final rules in April 2014) to implement the Basel III capital accord, as well as certain requirements of the Dodd-Frank Act.
The final capital rules made a number of significant changes to the regulatory capital ratios applicable to Huntington and the Bank, as well as all other banks and BHCs of their size.
In addition, the capital rules modified the types of capital instruments that may be included in regulatory capital and how certain assets are risk-weighted for purposes of these calculations.
Under the final capital rules, Huntington and the Bank must maintain a minimum CET1 risk-based ratio, a minimum Tier I risk-based capital ratio, a minimum total risk-based capital ratio, and a minimum leverage ratio.
The final capital rules also limit capital distributions and certain discretionary bonuses if a banking organization does not maintain certain capital ratios.
The preamble to the final capital rules states that these quantitative calculations are minimums and that the agencies may determine that a banking organization, based on its size, complexity or risk profile, must maintain a higher level of capital in order to be operate in a safe and sound manner.
In addition, the final capital rules generally provide that trust preferred securities and certain preferred securities no longer count as Tier I capital.
Banking organizations with more than $15 billion in total consolidated assets were required to phase-out of additional Tier 1 capital any non-qualifying capital instruments (such as trust preferred securities and cumulative preferred shares) issued before September 12, 2010.
We have phased out the additional tier 1 capital treatment of our trust preferred securities but are including these instruments in tier 2 capital as allowed by Basel III.
The final capital rules take effect in phases.
Huntington and the Bank were required to be in compliance with certain calculation requirements and begin transitioning to other requirements by January 1, 2015, with full compliance with the modified calculations on January 1, 2019.
The rules concerning capital conservation and countercyclical capital buffers became effective on January 1, 2016.
The following are the minimum Basel III regulatory capital levels that we must satisfy to avoid limitations on capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments during the applicable transition period, from January 1, 2016, until January 1, 2019:
## Table 3 ##
Failure to meet applicable capital guidelines may subject a financial institution to a variety of enforcement remedies available to the federal regulatory authorities.
These include limitations on the ability to pay dividends, the issuance by the regulatory authority of a directive to increase capital, and the termination of deposit insurance by the FDIC.
In addition, the financial institution could be subject to the measures described below under “Prompt Corrective Action” as applicable to under-capitalized institutions.
Contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at December 31, 2005, were as follows:
## Table 4 ##
(a) The 2006 amount includes $2.4 billion for contracts made in the ordinary course of business to purchase pulpwood, logs and wood chips.
The majority of our other purchase obligations are take-or-pay or purchase commitments made in the ordinary course of business related to raw material purchases and energy contracts.
Other significant items include purchase obligations related to contracted services.
TRANSFORMATION PLAN In July 2005, the Company announced a plan to focus its business portfolio on two key global platform businesses: Uncoated Papers (including Distribution) and Packaging.
The plan also focuses on improving shareholder return through mill realignments in those two businesses, additional cost improvements and exploring strategic options for other businesses, including possible sale or spin-off.
In connection with this process, in the third quarter of 2005, the Company completed the sale of its 50.5% interest in Carter Holt Harvey Limited.
Other businesses currently under review include: ?
the Coated and Supercalendered Papers business, including the coated groundwood mill and associated assets in Brazil, ?
the Beverage Packaging business, including the Pine Bluff, Arkansas mill, ?
the Kraft Papers business, including the Roanoke Rapids, North Carolina mill, ?
Arizona Chemical, ?
the Wood Products business, and ?
segments or potentially all of the Company’s 6.5 million acres of U. S.  forestlands.
Consistent with this evaluation process, the Company has distributed bid package information for some of these businesses.
The exact timing of this evaluation process will vary by business; however, it is anticipated that decisions will be made for some of these businesses during 2006.
While the exact use of any proceeds from potential future sales is dependent upon various factors affecting future cash flows, such as the amount of any proceeds received and changes in market conditions, input costs and capital spending, the Company remains committed to using its free cash flow in 2006 to pay down debt, to return value to shareholders, and for selective high-return investments.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States requires International Paper to establish accounting policies and to make estimates that affect both the amounts and timing of the recording of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses.
Some of these estimates require judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain.
Accounting policies whose application may have a significant effect on the reported results of operations and financial position of International Paper, and that can require judgments by management that affect their application, include SFAS No.5, “Accounting for Contingencies,” SFAS No.144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” SFAS No.142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” SFAS No.87, “Employers’ Accounting for Pensions,” SFAS No.106, “Employers’ Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions,” as amended by SFAS Nos.132 and 132R, “Employers’ Disclosures About Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits,” and SFAS No.109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.
” The following is a discussion of the impact of these accounting policies on International Paper: Contingent Liabilities.
Accruals for contingent liabilities, including legal and environmental matters, are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred or an asset impaired and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated.
Liabilities accrued for legal matters require judgments regarding projected outcomes and range of loss based on historical experience and recommendations of legal counsel.
Additionally, as discussed in Note 10 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, reserves for projected future claims settlements relating to exterior siding and roofing products previously manufactured by Masonite require judgments regarding projections of future claims rates and amounts.
International Paper utilizes an independent third party consultant to assist in developing these estimates.
Liabilities for environmental matters require evaluations of relevant environmental regulations and estimates of future remediation alternatives and costs.
International Paper determines these estimates after a detailed evaluation of each site.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Goodwill.
An impairment of a long-lived asset exists when the asset’s carrying amount exceeds its fair value, and is recorded when the carrying amount is not recoverable through future operations.
A goodwill impairment exists when the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its fair value.
Assessments of possible impairments of long-lived assets and goodwill are made when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the asset

<table><tr><td></td><td>Fiscal2012</td><td>Fiscal2011</td><td>Fiscal2010</td><td>% Change2012-2011</td><td>% Change2011-2010</td></tr><tr><td>Americas</td><td>$2,196.4</td><td>$2,044.6</td><td>$1,835.3</td><td>7%</td><td>11%</td></tr><tr><td>Percentage of total revenue</td><td>50%</td><td>49%</td><td>48%</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>EMEA</td><td>1,294.6</td><td>1,317.4</td><td>1,191.9</td><td>-2%</td><td>11%</td></tr><tr><td>Percentage of total revenue</td><td>29%</td><td>31%</td><td>32%</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>APAC</td><td>912.7</td><td>854.3</td><td>772.8</td><td>7%</td><td>11%</td></tr><tr><td>Percentage of total revenue</td><td>21%</td><td>20%</td><td>20%</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total revenue</td><td>$4,403.7</td><td>$4,216.3</td><td>$3,800.0</td><td>4%</td><td>11%</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td>(Millions of Dollars)</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>CECONY</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Operations</td><td>$1,464</td><td>$1,384</td><td>$1,313</td></tr><tr><td>Pensions and other postretirement benefits</td><td>364</td><td>467</td><td>485</td></tr><tr><td>Health care and other benefits</td><td>159</td><td>149</td><td>133</td></tr><tr><td>Regulatory fees and assessments (a)</td><td>550</td><td>519</td><td>505</td></tr><tr><td>Other</td><td>344</td><td>354</td><td>299</td></tr><tr><td>Total CECONY</td><td>2,881</td><td>2,873</td><td>2,735</td></tr><tr><td>O&R</td><td>333</td><td>318</td><td>302</td></tr><tr><td>Competitive energy businesses</td><td>134</td><td>108</td><td>105</td></tr><tr><td>Other (b)</td><td>-4</td><td>-5</td><td>-5</td></tr><tr><td>Total other operations and maintenance expenses</td><td>$3,344</td><td>$3,294</td><td>$3,137</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td></td><td colspan="2">CECONY</td><td colspan="2">O&R</td><td colspan="2">Competitive EnergyBusinesses</td><td colspan="2">Other (a)</td><td colspan="2">Con Edison (b)</td></tr><tr><td>(Millions of Dollars)</td><td>Increases(Decreases)Amount</td><td>Increases(Decreases)Percent</td><td>Increases(Decreases)Amount</td><td>Increases(Decreases)Percent</td><td>Increases(Decreases)Amount</td><td>Increases(Decreases)Percent</td><td>Increases(Decreases)Amount</td><td>Increases(Decreases)Percent</td><td>Increases(Decreases)Amount</td><td>Increases(Decreases)Percent</td></tr><tr><td>Operating revenues</td><td>$-458</td><td>-4.2%</td><td>$-47</td><td>-5.3%</td><td>$139</td><td>11.2%</td><td>$1</td><td>33.3%</td><td>$-365</td><td>-2.8%</td></tr><tr><td>Purchased power</td><td>-372</td><td>-17.8</td><td>-28</td><td>-11.8</td><td>-44</td><td>-4.0</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>-444</td><td>-13.0</td></tr><tr><td>Fuel</td><td>-37</td><td>-13.0</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>-37</td><td>-13.0</td></tr><tr><td>Gas purchased for resale</td><td>-272</td><td>-44.7</td><td>-37</td><td>-42.0</td><td>-9</td><td>-7.8</td><td>2</td><td>Large</td><td>-316</td><td>-39.0</td></tr><tr><td>Other operations and maintenance</td><td>8</td><td>0.3</td><td>15</td><td>4.7</td><td>26</td><td>24.1</td><td>1</td><td>20.0</td><td>50</td><td>1.5</td></tr><tr><td>Depreciation and amortization</td><td>49</td><td>4.9</td><td>7</td><td>11.5</td><td>3</td><td>15.8</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>59</td><td>5.5</td></tr><tr><td>Taxes, other than income taxes</td><td>58</td><td>3.2</td><td>2</td><td>3.3</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>60</td><td>3.2</td></tr><tr><td>Gain on sale of solar electric production projects</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>-45</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>-45</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Operating income (loss)</td><td>108</td><td>5.0</td><td>-6</td><td>-4.7</td><td>118</td><td>Large</td><td>-2</td><td>-66.7</td><td>218</td><td>9.9</td></tr><tr><td>Other income less deductions</td><td>-16</td><td>Large</td><td>-7</td><td>Large</td><td>6</td><td>21.4</td><td>-1</td><td>—</td><td>-18</td><td>-42.9</td></tr><tr><td>Net interest expense</td><td>47</td><td>8.8</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>19</td><td>Large</td><td>-4</td><td>-14.8</td><td>62</td><td>10.5</td></tr><tr><td>Income before income tax expense</td><td>45</td><td>2.8</td><td>-13</td><td>-13.7</td><td>105</td><td>Large</td><td>1</td><td>4.2</td><td>138</td><td>8.3</td></tr><tr><td>Income tax expense</td><td>19</td><td>3.4</td><td>-5</td><td>-14.3</td><td>29</td><td>Large</td><td>-6</td><td>-40.0</td><td>37</td><td>6.5</td></tr><tr><td>Net income</td><td>$26</td><td>2.5%</td><td>$-8</td><td>-13.3%</td><td>$76</td><td>Large</td><td>$7</td><td>77.8%</td><td>$101</td><td>9.2%</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td></td><td colspan="4">Minimum Basel III Regulatory Capital Levels</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>January 1,2016</td><td>January 1,2017</td><td>January 1,2018</td><td>January 1,2019</td></tr><tr><td>Common equity tier 1 risk-based capital ratio</td><td>5.125%</td><td>5.75%</td><td>6.375%</td><td>7.0%</td></tr><tr><td>Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio</td><td>6.625%</td><td>7.25%</td><td>7.875%</td><td>8.5%</td></tr><tr><td>Total risk-based capital ratio</td><td>8.625%</td><td>9.25%</td><td>9.875%</td><td>10.5%</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td><i>In millions</i></td><td>2006</td><td>2007</td><td>2008</td><td>2009</td><td>2010</td><td>Thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>Total debt</td><td>$1,181</td><td>$570</td><td>$308</td><td>$2,330</td><td>$1,534</td><td>$6,281</td></tr><tr><td>Lease obligations</td><td>172</td><td>144</td><td>119</td><td>76</td><td>63</td><td>138</td></tr><tr><td>Purchase obligations (a)</td><td>3,264</td><td>393</td><td>280</td><td>240</td><td>204</td><td>1,238</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>$4,617</td><td>$1,107</td><td>$707</td><td>$2,646</td><td>$1,801</td><td>$7,657</td></tr></table>

Question: Is the total amount of all elements in 2015 greater than that in 2014?