PART III ITEM 10.
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE Information regarding our Code of Conduct, The Spirit and The Letter, and Code of Ethical Conduct Certificates for our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer are described in Item 1.  Business of this Annual Report.
Information concerning our directors is set forth in the sections entitled "Proposal No.1, Election of Directors - Board Nominees for Directors," and "Corporate Governance - Committees of the Board" in our Definitive Proxy Statement for the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC pursuant to the Exchange Act within 120 days of the end of our fiscal year on December 31, 2018 (Proxy Statement), which sections are incorporated herein by reference.
For information regarding our executive officers, see "Item 1.  Business - Executive Officers of Baker Hughes" in this annual report on Form 10-K.  Additional information regarding compliance by directors and executive officers with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act is set forth under the section entitled "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance" in our Proxy Statement, which section is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 11.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION Information for this item is set forth in the following sections of our Proxy Statement, which sections are incorporated herein by reference: "Compensation Discussion and Analysis," "Director Compensation," "Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation" and "Compensation Committee Report. "
ITEM 12.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS Information concerning security ownership of certain beneficial owners and our management is set forth in the sections entitled "Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners" and “Stock Ownership of Section 16(a) Director and Executive Officers” in our Proxy Statement, which sections are incorporated herein by reference.
We permit our employees, officers and directors to enter into written trading plans complying with Rule 10b5-1 under the Exchange Act.
Rule 10b5-1 provides criteria under which such an individual may establish a prearranged plan to buy or sell a specified number of shares of a company's stock over a set period of time.
Any such plan must be entered into in good faith at a time when the individual is not in possession of material, nonpublic information.
If an individual establishes a plan satisfying the requirements of Rule 10b5-1, such individual's subsequent receipt of material, nonpublic information will not prevent transactions under the plan from being executed.
Certain of our officers have advised us that they have and may enter into stock sales plans for the sale of shares of our Class A common stock which are intended to comply with the requirements of Rule 10b5-1 of the Exchange Act.
In addition, the Company has and may in the future enter into repurchases of our Class A common stock under a plan that complies with Rule 10b5-1 or Rule 10b-18 of the Exchange Act.
Equity Compensation Plan Information The information in the following table is presented as of December 31, 2018 with respect to shares of our Class A common stock that may be issued under our LTI Plan which has been approved by our stockholders (in millions, except per share prices).
## Table 0 ##
Noble Energy, Inc.
Supplemental Oil and Gas Information (Unaudited) 130 Costs Incurred in Oil and Gas Property Acquisition, Exploration and Development Activities (Unaudited) (1) Costs incurred in connection with crude oil and natural gas acquisition, exploration and development are as follows:
## Table 1 ##
(1) Costs incurred include capitalized and expensed items.
(2) Other International includes the North Sea, Ecuador (through November 24, 2010), China, Cameroon, Cyprus, Senegal/Guinea-Bissau, Nicaragua, France and other new ventures.
See Note 3.
Acquisitions and Divestitures.
(3) Proved property acquisition costs include $386 million related to the Marcellus Shale asset acquisition in 2011, $352 million related to the DJ Basin asset acquisition in 2010 and a $6 million downward purchase price adjustment related to the MidContinent acquisition in 2009.
(4) Unproved property acquisition costs include $853 million related to the Marcellus Shale asset acquisition, $40 million related to our position offshore Senegal/Guinea-Bissau (the AGC Profound block), $31 million related to additional acreage in the DJ Basin and $58 million related to other onshore US in 2011; $146 million related to the DJ Basin asset acquisition, $38 million for deepwater Gulf of Mexico lease blocks and the remainder for other onshore US lease acquisitions primarily in Wattenberg in 2010; $56 million for deepwater Gulf of Mexico lease blocks and the remainder primarily for other onshore US lease acquisitions in 2009.
(5) 2011 exploration costs include drilling and completion costs of $74 million in deepwater Gulf of Mexico, $146 million in Israel, $54 million in Equatorial Guinea, $59 million in Cyprus, $36 million in Senegal/Guinea-Bissau and $42 million in the DJ Basin.2010 exploration costs include drilling and completion costs of $62 million in deepwater Gulf of Mexico and $41 million in Israel.2009 exploration costs include drilling and completion costs of $57 million in deepwater Gulf of Mexico, $19 million in Equatorial Guinea and $71 million in Israel.
(6) Worldwide development costs include amounts spent to develop PUDs of approximately $1.4 billion in 2011, $1.1 billion in 2010 and $440 million in 2009.
Equatorial Guinea development costs include non-cash accruals related to estimated construction progress to date on an FSPO to be used in the development of the Aseng field of $66 million in 2011, $266 million in 2010 and $29 million in 2009.
These capitalized costs are included in development costs as the Aseng FPSO is constructed.
US development costs include increases in asset retirement obligations of $115 million in 2011, $15 million in 2010, and $11 million in 2009.
Other international development costs include increases in asset retirement obligations of $13 million in 2011, $2 million in 2010, and $5 million in 2009.
Table of Contents NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION contracts generally require that the contractor use its best efforts to accomplish the scope of the work within some specified time and some stated dollar limitation.
Fixed-price incentive contracts also provide for reimbursement of the contractor’s allowable costs, but are subject to a cost-share limit which affects profitability.
Fixed-price incentive contracts effectively become firm fixed-price contracts once the cost-share limit is reached.
Firm Fixed-Price Contracts – A firm fixed-price contract is a contract in which the specified scope of work is agreed to for a price that is a pre-determined, negotiated amount and not generally subject to adjustment regardless of costs incurred by the contractor.
Time-and-materials contracts are considered firm fixed-price contracts as they specify a fixed hourly rate for each labor hour charged.
The following table summarizes 2008 revenue recognized by contract type and customer:
## Table 2 ##
Contract Fees – Negotiated contract fee structures, for both flexibly priced and fixed-price contracts include, but are not limited to: fixed-fee amounts, cost sharing arrangements to reward or penalize for either under or over cost target performance, positive award fees, and negative penalty arrangements.
Profit margins may vary materially depending on the negotiated contract fee arrangements, percentage-of-completion of the contract, the achievement of performance objectives, and the stage of performance at which the right to receive fees, particularly under incentive and award fee contracts, is finally determined.
Positive Award Fees – Certain contracts contain provisions consisting of award fees based on performance criteria such as: cost, schedule, quality, and technical performance.
Award fees are determined and earned based on an evaluation by the customer of the company’s performance against such negotiated criteria.
Fees that can be reasonably assured and reasonably estimated are recorded over the performance period of the contract.
Award fee contracts are widely used throughout the company’s operating segments.
Examples of significant long-term contracts with substantial negotiated award fee amounts are the KEI, F-35 SDD, Global Hawk Engineering and Manufacturing Development (EMD), LPD, DDG-1000 programs and the majority of satellite contracts.
Compliance and Monitoring – On a regular basis, the company monitors its policies and procedures with respect to its contracts to ensure consistent application under similar terms and conditions as well as compliance with all applicable government regulations.
In addition, costs incurred and allocated to contracts with the U. S.  Government are routinely audited by the Defense Contract Audit Agency.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES, ESTIMATES, AND JUDGMENTS Revenue Recognition Overview – The majority of the company’s business is derived from long-term contracts for the construction of facilities, production of goods, and services provided to the federal government, which are accounted for under the provisions of Accounting Research Bulletin No.45 – Accounting for Long-Term Construction-Type Contracts , American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Statement of Position (SOP) No.81-1 – Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type Contracts , and the AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide, Audits of Federal Government Contractors .
The company classifies contract revenues as product sales or service revenues depending on the predominant attributes of the relevant underlying contracts.
The company also enters into contracts that are not associated with the federal government, such as contracts to provide certain services to non-federal government customers.
The company accounts for those contracts in accordance with the SEC’s Staff Accounting Bulletin No.104, Revenue Recognition , and other relevant revenue recognition accounting literature.

<table><tr><td>Equity Compensation PlanCategory</td><td>Number ofSecurities to beIssued UponExercise ofOutstandingOptions, Warrantsand Rights</td><td>Weighted AverageExercise Price ofOutstandingOptions, Warrantsand Rights</td><td>Number of SecuritiesRemaining Availablefor Future IssuanceUnder EquityCompensation Plans(excluding securitiesreflected in the firstcolumn)</td></tr><tr><td>Stockholder-approved plans</td><td>2.7</td><td>$36.11</td><td>46.2</td></tr><tr><td>Nonstockholder-approved plans</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Subtotal (except for weighted average exercise price)</td><td>2.7</td><td>36.11</td><td>46.2</td></tr><tr><td>Employee Stock Purchase Plan</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>15.0</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>2.7</td><td>$36.11</td><td>61.2</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td></td><td>United States</td><td>EquatorialGuinea</td><td>Israel</td><td>OtherInt'l-2</td><td>Total</td></tr><tr><td>(millions)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Year Ended December 31, 2011</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Property Acquisition Costs</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Proved-3</td><td>$392</td><td>$-</td><td>$-</td><td>$-</td><td>$392</td></tr><tr><td>Unproved-4</td><td>942</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>40</td><td>982</td></tr><tr><td>Total Acquisition Costs</td><td>1,334</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>40</td><td>1,374</td></tr><tr><td>Exploration Costs-5</td><td>241</td><td>54</td><td>146</td><td>152</td><td>593</td></tr><tr><td>Development Costs-6</td><td>1,511</td><td>499</td><td>485</td><td>37</td><td>2,532</td></tr><tr><td>Total Consolidated Operations</td><td>$3,086</td><td>$553</td><td>$631</td><td>$229</td><td>$4,499</td></tr><tr><td>Year Ended December 31, 2010</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Property Acquisition Costs</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Proved-3</td><td>$352</td><td>$-</td><td>$-</td><td>$-</td><td>$352</td></tr><tr><td>Unproved-4</td><td>304</td><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>305</td></tr><tr><td>Total Acquisition Costs</td><td>656</td><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>657</td></tr><tr><td>Exploration Costs-5</td><td>306</td><td>6</td><td>52</td><td>54</td><td>418</td></tr><tr><td>Development Costs-6</td><td>964</td><td>596</td><td>236</td><td>75</td><td>1,871</td></tr><tr><td>Total Consolidated Operations</td><td>$1,926</td><td>$603</td><td>$288</td><td>$129</td><td>$2,946</td></tr><tr><td>Year Ended December 31, 2009</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Property Acquisition Costs</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Proved-3</td><td>$-5</td><td>$-</td><td>$-</td><td>$-</td><td>$-5</td></tr><tr><td>Unproved-4</td><td>89</td><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2</td><td>92</td></tr><tr><td>Total Acquisition Costs</td><td>84</td><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2</td><td>87</td></tr><tr><td>Exploration Costs-5</td><td>189</td><td>30</td><td>81</td><td>13</td><td>313</td></tr><tr><td>Development Costs-6</td><td>711</td><td>100</td><td>33</td><td>129</td><td>973</td></tr><tr><td>Total Consolidated Operations</td><td>$984</td><td>$131</td><td>$114</td><td>$144</td><td>$1,373</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td><i>($ in millions)</i></td><td>U.S. Government</td><td>Other Customers</td><td>Total</td><td>Percent of Total</td></tr><tr><td>Flexibly priced</td><td>$22,534</td><td>$184</td><td>$22,718</td><td>67%</td></tr><tr><td>Firm fixed-price</td><td>8,358</td><td>2,811</td><td>11,169</td><td>33%</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>$30,892</td><td>$2,995</td><td>$33,887</td><td>100%</td></tr></table>

Question: If Proved-3 for Total develops with the same growth rate in 2011, what will it reach in 2012? (in million)