MetLife, Inc.  Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued) Dividend Restrictions The table below sets forth the dividends permitted to be paid by the respective insurance subsidiary without insurance regulatory approval and the respective dividends paid:
## Table 0 ##
(1) Reflects dividend amounts that may be paid during 2011 without prior regulatory approval.
However, because dividend tests may be based on dividends previously paid over rolling 12-month periods, if paid before a specified date during 2011, some or all of such dividends may require regulatory approval.
(2) All amounts paid, including those requiring regulatory approval.
(3) Reflects dividend amounts that could have been paid during the relevant year without prior regulatory approval.
(4) Includes securities transferred to the Holding Company of $399 million.
(5) Reflects approximate dividends permitted to be paid and the respective dividends paid since the Acquisition Date.
See Note 2.
(6) Includes shares of an affiliate distributed to the Holding Company as an in-kind dividend of $475 million.
In addition to the amounts presented in the table above, for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, cash dividends in the aggregate amount of $0 and $215 million, respectively, were paid to the Holding Company.
Under New York State Insurance Law, MLIC is permitted, without prior insurance regulatory clearance, to pay stockholder dividends to the Holding Company as long as the aggregate amount of all such dividends in any calendar year does not exceed the lesser of: (i) 10% of its surplus to policyholders as of the end of the immediately preceding calendar year; or (ii) its statutory net gain from operations for the immediately preceding calendar year (excluding realized capital gains).
MLIC will be permitted to pay a dividend to the Holding Company in excess of the lesser of such two amounts only if it files notice of its intention to declare such a dividend and the amount thereof with the Superintendent and the Superintendent does not disapprove the dividend within 30 days of its filing.
Under New York State Insurance Law, the Superintendent has broad discretion in determining whether the financial condition of a stock life insurance company would support the payment of such dividends to its shareholders.
Under Delaware State Insurance Law, each of American Life and MTL is permitted, without prior insurance regulatory clearance, to pay a stockholder dividend to the Holding Company as long as the amount of the dividend when aggregated with all other dividends in the preceding 12 months does not exceed the greater of: (i) 10% of its surplus to policyholders as of the end of the immediately preceding calendar year; or (ii) its statutory net gain from operations for the immediately preceding calendar year (excluding realized capital gains).
Each of American Life and MTL will be permitted to pay a dividend to the Holding Company in excess of the greater of such two amounts only if it files notice of the declaration of such a dividend and the amount thereof with the Delaware Commissioner of Insurance (the “Delaware Commissioner”) and the Delaware Commissioner either approves the distribution of the dividend or does not disapprove the distribution within 30 days of its filing.
In addition, any dividend that exceeds earned surplus (defined as unassigned funds) as of the last filed annual statutory statement requires insurance regulatory approval.
Under Delaware State Insurance Law, the Delaware Commissioner has broad discretion in determining whether the financial condition of a stock life insurance company would support the payment of such dividends to its shareholders.
Under Connecticut State Insurance Law, MICC is permitted, without prior insurance regulatory clearance, to pay stockholder dividends to its stockholders as long as the amount of such dividends, when aggregated with all other dividends in the preceding 12 months, does not exceed the greater of: (i) 10% of its surplus to policyholders as of the end of the immediately preceding calendar year; or (ii) its statutory net gain from operations for the immediately preceding calendar year.
MICC will be permitted to pay a dividend in excess of the greater of such two amounts only if it files notice of its declaration of such a dividend and the amount thereof with the Connecticut Commissioner of Insurance (the “Connecticut Commissioner”) and the Connecticut Commissioner does not disapprove the payment within 30 days after notice.
In addition, any dividend that exceeds earned surplus (unassigned funds, reduced by 25% of unrealized appreciation in value or revaluation of assets or unrealized profits on investments) as of the last filed annual statutory statement requires insurance regulatory approval.
Under Connecticut State Insurance Law, the Connecticut Commissioner has broad discretion in determining whether the financial condition of a stock life insurance company would support the payment of such dividends to its shareholders.
Under Rhode Island State Insurance Law, MPC is permitted, without prior insurance regulatory clearance, to pay a stockholder dividend to the Holding Company as long as the aggregate amount of all such dividends in any twelve-month period does not exceed the lesser of: (i) 10% of its surplus to policyholders as of the end of the immediately preceding calendar year; or (ii) net income, not including realized capital gains, for the immediately preceding calendar year, which may include carry forward net income from the second and third preceding calendar years excluding realized capital gains and less dividends paid in the second and immediately preceding calendar years.
MPC will be permitted to pay a dividend to the Holding Company in excess of the lesser of such two amounts only if it files notice of its intention to declare such a dividend and the amount thereof with the Rhode Island Commissioner of Insurance (the “Rhode Island Commissioner”) and the Rhode Island Commissioner does not disapprove the distribution within 30 days of its filing.
Under Rhode Island State Insurance Code, the Rhode Island
(e. g. , Aaa/AAA) amounts and percentages presented herein are based on rating agency designations without adjustment for the revised NAIC methodologies described above.
The following three tables present information about the Company’s fixed maturity securities holdings by NAIC credit quality ratings.
Comparisons between NAIC ratings and rating agency designations are published by the NAIC.
Rating agency designations are based on availability of applicable ratings from rating agencies on the NAIC acceptable rating organizations list, including Moody’s, S&P, Fitch and Realpoint, LLC.
If no rating is available from a rating agency, then an internally developed rating is used.
The following table presents the Company’s total fixed maturity securities by NRSRO designation and the equivalent designations of the NAIC, except for certain structured securities, which are presented using final ratings from the revised NAIC rating methodologies as described above, as well as the percentage, based on estimated fair value, that each designation is comprised of at:
## Table 1 ##
The following tables present the Company’s total fixed maturity securities, based on estimated fair value, by sector classification and by NRSRO designation and the equivalent designations of the NAIC, except for certain structured securities, which are presented as described above, that each designation is comprised of at December 31, 2010 and 2009:
## Table 2 ##
Fixed Maturity Securities — by Sector & Credit Quality Rating at December 31, 2009
## Table 3 ##
Item 7.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations The following discussion and analysis is based primarily on the consolidated financial statements of Welltower Inc.  presented in conformity with U. S.  generally accepted accounting principles (“U.
S.  GAAP”) for the periods presented and should be read together with the notes thereto contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.  Other important factors are identified in “Item 1 — Business” and “Item 1A — Risk Factors” above.
Executive Summary Company Overview Welltower Inc.  (NYSE:WELL), an S&P 500 company headquartered in Toledo, Ohio, is driving the transformation of health care infrastructure.
The Company invests with leading seniors housing operators, postacute providers and health systems to fund the real estate and infrastructure needed to scale innovative care delivery models and improve people’s wellness and overall health care experience.
WelltowerTM, a real estate investment trust (“REIT”), owns interests in properties concentrated in major, high-growth markets in the United States (“U.
S. ”), Canada and the United Kingdom (“U.
K. ”), consisting of seniors housing and post-acute communities and outpatient medical properties.
Our capital programs, when combined with comprehensive planning, development and property management services, make us a single-source solution for acquiring, planning, developing, managing, repositioning and monetizing real estate assets.
The following table summarizes our consolidated portfolio for the year ended December 31, 2017 (dollars in thousands):

<table><tr><td></td><td rowspan="2"> 2011  Permitted w/o   Approval -1</td><td colspan="3"> 2010</td><td colspan="2"> 2009</td></tr><tr><td> Company</td><td> Paid -2</td><td></td><td> Permitted w/o   Approval -3</td><td> Paid -2</td><td> Permitted w/o   Approval -3</td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="6"> (In millions)</td></tr><tr><td>Metropolitan Life Insurance Company</td><td>$1,321</td><td>$631</td><td>-4</td><td>$1,262</td><td>$—</td><td>$552</td></tr><tr><td>American Life Insurance Company -5</td><td>$661</td><td>$—</td><td></td><td>$511</td><td>N/A</td><td>N/A</td></tr><tr><td>MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut</td><td>$517</td><td>$330</td><td></td><td>$659</td><td>$—</td><td>$714</td></tr><tr><td>Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Company</td><td>$—</td><td>$260</td><td></td><td>$—</td><td>$300</td><td>$9</td></tr><tr><td>Metropolitan Tower Life Insurance Company</td><td>$80</td><td>$569</td><td>-6</td><td>$93</td><td>$—</td><td>$88</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td></td><td></td><td colspan="6"> December 31,</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td colspan="3">2010</td><td colspan="3"> 2009</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td> Estimated </td><td></td><td></td><td> Estimated </td><td></td></tr><tr><td> NAIC </td><td></td><td> Amortized </td><td> Fair </td><td>% of</td><td> Amortized </td><td> Fair </td><td> % of </td></tr><tr><td> Rating</td><td> Rating Agency Designation:</td><td> Cost</td><td> Value</td><td>Total</td><td> Cost</td><td> Value</td><td> Total</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td colspan="2"> (In millions)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>1</td><td>Aaa/Aa/A</td><td>$228,875</td><td>$233,540</td><td>71.4%</td><td>$151,391</td><td>$151,136</td><td>66.4%</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>Baa</td><td>65,550</td><td>68,858</td><td>21.0</td><td>55,508</td><td>56,305</td><td>24.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>Ba</td><td>15,335</td><td>15,294</td><td>4.7</td><td>13,184</td><td>12,003</td><td>5.3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>B</td><td>8,752</td><td>8,316</td><td>2.5</td><td>7,474</td><td>6,461</td><td>2.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>Caa and lower</td><td>1,343</td><td>1,146</td><td>0.4</td><td>1,809</td><td>1,425</td><td>0.6</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>In or near default</td><td>153</td><td>130</td><td>—</td><td>343</td><td>312</td><td>0.1</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Total fixed maturity securities</td><td>$320,008</td><td>$327,284</td><td>100.0%</td><td>$229,709</td><td>$227,642</td><td>100.0%</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td></td><td colspan="7"> Fixed Maturity Securities — by Sector & Credit Quality Rating at December 31, 2010</td></tr><tr><td> NAIC Rating</td><td>1</td><td>2</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td>5</td><td> 6</td><td> Total </td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>Caa and</td><td> In or Near </td><td> Estimated </td></tr><tr><td> Rating Agency Designation:</td><td>Aaa/Aa/A</td><td>Baa</td><td>Ba</td><td>B</td><td>Lower</td><td> Default</td><td> Fair Value</td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="7"> (In millions)</td></tr><tr><td>U.S. corporate securities</td><td>$46,754</td><td>$34,326</td><td>$7,635</td><td>$3,460</td><td>$353</td><td>$40</td><td>$92,568</td></tr><tr><td>Foreign corporate securities</td><td>39,652</td><td>24,414</td><td>2,476</td><td>1,454</td><td>173</td><td>9</td><td>68,178</td></tr><tr><td>RMBS -1</td><td>38,984</td><td>1,109</td><td>2,271</td><td>1,993</td><td>331</td><td>45</td><td>44,733</td></tr><tr><td>Foreign government securities</td><td>32,957</td><td>7,184</td><td>2,179</td><td>1,080</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>43,400</td></tr><tr><td>U.S. Treasury, agency and government guaranteed securities</td><td>33,304</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>33,304</td></tr><tr><td>CMBS -1</td><td>19,385</td><td>665</td><td>363</td><td>205</td><td>56</td><td>1</td><td>20,675</td></tr><tr><td>ABS -1</td><td>13,136</td><td>435</td><td>338</td><td>120</td><td>226</td><td>35</td><td>14,290</td></tr><tr><td>State and political subdivision securities</td><td>9,368</td><td>722</td><td>32</td><td>—</td><td>7</td><td>—</td><td>10,129</td></tr><tr><td>Other fixed maturity securities</td><td>—</td><td>3</td><td>—</td><td>4</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>Total fixed maturity securities</td><td>$233,540</td><td>$68,858</td><td>$15,294</td><td>$8,316</td><td>$1,146</td><td>$130</td><td>$327,284</td></tr><tr><td>Percentage of total</td><td>71.4%</td><td>21.0%</td><td>4.7%</td><td>2.5%</td><td>0.4%</td><td>—%</td><td>100.0%</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td></td><td colspan="7"> Fixed Maturity Securities — by Sector & Credit Quality Rating at December 31, 2009</td></tr><tr><td> NAIC Rating</td><td>1</td><td>2</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td>5</td><td>6</td><td> Total </td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>Caa and</td><td>In or Near</td><td> Estimated </td></tr><tr><td> Rating Agency Designation:</td><td>Aaa/Aa/A</td><td>Baa</td><td>Ba</td><td>B</td><td>Lower</td><td>Default</td><td> Fair Value</td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="7"> (In millions)</td></tr><tr><td>U.S. corporate securities</td><td>$31,848</td><td>$30,266</td><td>$6,319</td><td>$2,965</td><td>$616</td><td>$173</td><td>$72,187</td></tr><tr><td>Foreign corporate securities</td><td>16,678</td><td>17,393</td><td>2,067</td><td>1,530</td><td>281</td><td>81</td><td>38,030</td></tr><tr><td>RMBS -1</td><td>38,464</td><td>1,563</td><td>2,260</td><td>1,391</td><td>339</td><td>3</td><td>44,020</td></tr><tr><td>Foreign government securities</td><td>5,786</td><td>4,841</td><td>890</td><td>415</td><td>—</td><td>15</td><td>11,947</td></tr><tr><td>U.S. Treasury, agency and government guaranteed securities</td><td>25,447</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>25,447</td></tr><tr><td>CMBS</td><td>15,000</td><td>434</td><td>152</td><td>22</td><td>14</td><td>—</td><td>15,622</td></tr><tr><td>ABS</td><td>11,573</td><td>1,033</td><td>275</td><td>124</td><td>117</td><td>40</td><td>13,162</td></tr><tr><td>State and political subdivision securities</td><td>6,337</td><td>765</td><td>40</td><td>8</td><td>58</td><td>—</td><td>7,208</td></tr><tr><td>Other fixed maturity securities</td><td>3</td><td>10</td><td>—</td><td>6</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>19</td></tr><tr><td>Total fixed maturity securities</td><td>$151,136</td><td>$56,305</td><td>$12,003</td><td>$6,461</td><td>$1,425</td><td>$312</td><td>$227,642</td></tr><tr><td>Percentage of total</td><td>66.4%</td><td>24.7%</td><td>5.3%</td><td>2.9%</td><td>0.6%</td><td>0.1%</td><td>100.0%</td></tr></table>

Question: What was the sum of Fair Value without those Fair Value smaller than 60000 in 2010? (in million)