Item 2: Properties Information concerning Applied's properties at October 25, 2015 is set forth below:
## Table 0 ##
Because of the interrelation of Applied's operations, properties within a country may be shared by the segments operating within that country.
The Company's headquarters offices are in Santa Clara, California.
Products in Silicon Systems are manufactured in Austin, Texas; Gloucester, Massachusetts; Rehovot, Israel; and Singapore.
Remanufactured equipment products in the Applied Global Services segment are produced primarily in Austin, Texas.
Products in the Display segment are manufactured in Tainan, Taiwan and Santa Clara, California.
Products in the Energy and Environmental Solutions segment are primarily manufactured in Alzenau, Germany and Treviso, Italy.
Applied also owns and leases offices, plants and warehouse locations in many locations throughout the world, including in Europe, Japan, North America (principally the United States), Israel, China, India, Korea, Southeast Asia and Taiwan.
These facilities are principally used for manufacturing; research, development and engineering; and marketing, sales and customer support.
Applied also owns a total of approximately 139 acres of buildable land in Texas, California, Israel and Italy that could accommodate additional building space.
Applied considers the properties that it owns or leases as adequate to meet its current and future requirements.
Applied regularly assesses the size, capability and location of its global infrastructure and periodically makes adjustments based on these assessments.
Performance Graph The performance graph below shows the five-year cumulative total stockholder return on Applied common stock during the period from October 31, 2010 through October 25, 2015.
This is compared with the cumulative total return of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index and the RDG Semiconductor Composite Index over the same period.
The comparison assumes $100 was invested on October 31, 2010 in Applied common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends, if any.
Dollar amounts in the graph are rounded to the nearest whole dollar.
The performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance.
COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN* Among Applied Materials, Inc. , the S&P 500 Index and the RDG Semiconductor Composite Index
## Table 1 ##
Dividends During each of fiscal 2015 and 2014, Applied's Board of Directors declared four quarterly cash dividends of $0.10 per share.
During fiscal 2013, Applied’s Board of Directors declared three quarterly cash dividends of $0.10 per share and one quarterly cash dividend of $0.09 per share.
Dividends paid during fiscal 2015, 2014 and 2013 amounted to $487 million, $485 million and $456 million, respectively.
Applied currently anticipates that cash dividends will continue to be paid on a quarterly basis, although the declaration of any future cash dividend is at the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend on Applied’s financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, business conditions and other factors, as well as a determination by the Board of Directors that cash dividends are in the best interests of Applied’s stockholders.
New orders and net sales for fiscal 2015 increased compared to fiscal 2014 mainly due to higher demand for semiconductor spares and services, and 200mm equipment systems.
Operating income, operating margin, non-GAAP adjusted operating income, and non-GAAP adjusted operating margin increased in fiscal 2015 compared fiscal 2014, reflecting the increase in net sales, which was partially offset by unfavorable product mix and the absence of a recovery of a regional customs duty assessment charge recorded in fiscal 2014.
New orders and net sales for fiscal 2014 increased compared to fiscal 2013 mainly due to increased demand for semiconductor spares and services, as well as 200mm equipment systems and equipment upgrades.
Operating income and non-GAAP adjusted operating income increased in fiscal 2014 compared to the prior year, reflecting the increase in net sales as well as the recovery of a regional customs duty assessment charge recorded in fiscal 2013.
Display Segment The Display segment encompasses products for manufacturing liquid crystal displays (LCDs), organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs), and other display technologies for TVs, personal computers (PCs), tablets, smart phones, and other consumer-oriented devices.
The segment is focused on expanding its presence through technologically-differentiated equipment for manufacturing large-scale TVs; new markets such as low temperature polysilicon (LTPS), metal oxide, and touch panel sectors; and development of products that enable cost reductions through productivity and uniformity.
Display industry growth depends primarily on consumer demand for increasingly larger and more advanced LCD TVs and high resolution displays for next generation mobile devices.
The market environment for Applied's Display segment in fiscal 2015 has been characterized by continued demand for manufacturing equipment for TV and high-end mobile devices, although this sector remains susceptible to highly cyclical conditions.
Uneven order and revenue patterns in the Display segment can cause significant fluctuations quarter-over-quarter, as well as year-over year.
Certain significant measures for each fiscal year were as follows:
## Table 2 ##
Reconciliations of non-GAAP adjusted measures are presented under "Non-GAAP Adjusted Results" below.
for an aggregate cost of approximately $318.4 million.
During fiscal 2002, we reissued 4,621,793 million shares of treasury stock in connection with employee stock plans.
When we reissue treasury shares, if the proceeds from the sale are more than the average price we paid to acquire the shares we record an increase in additional paid-in capital.
Conversely, if the proceeds from the sale are less than the average price we paid to acquire the shares, we record a decrease in additional paid-in capital to the extent of increases previously recorded for similar transactions and a decrease in retained earnings for any remaining amount.
Repurchases through July 31, 2002 have had no significant impact on our net income or loss per share.
Intuit intends to continue using its cash and cash equivalents to fund these repurchases.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan In October 1996, Intuit adopted an Employee Stock Purchase Plan under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code.
A total of 3,800,000 shares of common stock are reserved for issuance under the plan.
The plan allows eligible employees to purchase Intuit’s stock at 85% of the lower of the fair market value at the beginning of each 12-month offering period or at the end of the applicable six-month purchase period.
During fiscal 2000, 2001 and 2002 employees purchased 355,281, 469,873 and 583,990 shares, respectively.
At July 31, 2002, there were 1,261,479 shares available for issuance under this plan.
Stock-Based Compensation We follow APB Opinion No.25, ‘‘Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,’’ in accounting for stock-based compensation.
Accordingly, we are not required to record compensation expense when stock options are granted to employees, as long as the exercise price is not less than the fair market value of the stock when the option is granted, and we are not required to record compensation expense in connection with the Employee Stock Purchase Plan as long as the purchase price is not less than 85% of the lower of the fair market value at the beginning of each 12-month offering period or at the end of each applicable six-month purchase period.
In October 1995, the FASB issued SFAS 123, ‘‘Accounting for Stock Based Compensation.
’’ Although SFAS 123 allows us to continue to follow the present APB 25 guidelines, we are required to disclose pro forma net income (loss) and net income (loss) per share as if we had adopted SFAS 123.
The pro forma impact of applying SFAS 123 in fiscal 2000, 2001 and 2002 will not necessarily be representative of the pro forma impact in future years.
We have elected to use the Black-Scholes model to estimate the fair value of options granted.
This valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable.
This model requires the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility.
Because our employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect this estimate, we believe the Black-Scholes model does not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of our employee stock options.
Inputs used for the valuation model are as follows:

<table><tr><td>(Square feet in thousands)</td><td>United States</td><td>Other Countries</td><td>Total</td></tr><tr><td>Owned</td><td>3,748</td><td>1,624</td><td>5,372</td></tr><tr><td>Leased</td><td>556</td><td>1,107</td><td>1,663</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>4,304</td><td>2,731</td><td>7,035</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td></td><td>10/31/2010</td><td>10/30/2011</td><td>10/28/2012</td><td>10/27/2013</td><td>10/26/2014</td><td>10/25/2015</td></tr><tr><td>Applied Materials</td><td>100.00</td><td>104.54</td><td>90.88</td><td>155.43</td><td>188.13</td><td>150.26</td></tr><tr><td>S&P 500 Index</td><td>100.00</td><td>108.09</td><td>124.52</td><td>158.36</td><td>185.71</td><td>195.37</td></tr><tr><td>RDG Semiconductor Composite Index</td><td>100.00</td><td>110.04</td><td>104.07</td><td>136.15</td><td>172.41</td><td>170.40</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td colspan="4">Change</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td colspan="2">2015 over 2014</td><td colspan="2">2014 over 2013</td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="7">(In millions, except percentages and ratios)</td></tr><tr><td>New orders</td><td>$717</td><td>$845</td><td>$703</td><td>$-128</td><td>-15%</td><td>$142</td><td>20%</td></tr><tr><td>Net sales</td><td>780</td><td>615</td><td>538</td><td>165</td><td>27%</td><td>77</td><td>14%</td></tr><tr><td>Book to bill ratio</td><td>0.9</td><td>1.4</td><td>1.3</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Operating income</td><td>156</td><td>129</td><td>74</td><td>27</td><td>21%</td><td>55</td><td>74%</td></tr><tr><td>Operating margin</td><td>20.0%</td><td>21.0%</td><td>13.8%</td><td></td><td>-1.0 points</td><td></td><td>7.2 points</td></tr><tr><td>Non-GAAP Adjusted Results</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Non-GAAP adjusted operating income</td><td>158</td><td>131</td><td>$80</td><td>27</td><td>21%</td><td>51</td><td>64%</td></tr><tr><td>Non-GAAP adjusted operating margin</td><td>20.3%</td><td>21.3%</td><td>14.9%</td><td></td><td>-1.0 points</td><td></td><td>6.4 points</td></tr></table>

Question: based on the table , how much more square feet is owned outside the united states?