Table:
direct productivity effect
total structural adjustment

1990s
2000s
difference
1990s
2000s
difference

percentage points

business sector
1.80
0.94
-0.86
-0.18
0.23
0.41

industry

agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting
0.10
0.09
-0.01
0.06
0.05
-0.01

mining and oil and gas extraction
0.15
-0.31
-0.46
-0.05
0.31
0.37

utilities
0.06
0.00
-0.06
-0.05
0.00
0.04

construction
-0.03
0.00
0.03
0.01
-0.06
-0.07

manufacturing
0.76
0.29
-0.47
-0.04
-0.05
-0.01

wholesale trade
0.15
0.22
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00

retail trade
0.13
0.15
0.02
0.02
0.00
-0.03

transport and warehousing
0.09
0.06
-0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00

information and cultural industries
0.05
0.09
0.04
0.04
-0.01
-0.05

finance, insurance, real estate and renting and leasing
0.41
0.18
-0.23
-0.01
0.04
0.06

professional, scientific and technical services
0.02
0.08
0.07
-0.02
-0.01
0.01

administrative and support, waste management and remediation services
-0.01
0.01
0.02
-0.05
-0.04
0.01

arts, entertainment and recreation
-0.02
0.00
0.02
-0.02
0.00
0.02

accommodation and food services
-0.03
0.02
0.05
-0.03
0.01
0.04

other private services
-0.04
0.06
0.10
-0.04
-0.01
0.03

Statement: the direct productivity growth effect falls from 0.76 percentage points in the 1990s to 0.29 percentage points in the 2000s in manufacturing sector.
Question: what is the direct productivity growth effect falls from 1990s to 2000s in manufacturing sector?
Answer: [0.76, 0.29]