Table:
sample size
distribution
predicted rate

thousands
percent
rate

overall
2,085
100.0
12.3

gender

male
951
45.6
11.4

female
1,134
54.4
13.1

age

25 to 34
393
18.8
6.9

35 to 44
666
31.9
10.5

45 to 54
578
27.7
12.6

55 to 64
262
12.6
15.4

65 and older
186
8.9
24.9

family type

unattached
258
12.4
21.9

attached, no child
404
19.4
10.0

attached, have a child or children
1,286
61.7
10.0

lone parent
138
6.6
21.5

official language at landing

english
1,097
52.6
11.7

french
98
4.7
11.4

both
131
6.3
9.4

none
758
36.4
13.6

education level at landing

secondary or less
940
45.1
13.2

trade, some postsecondary
443
21.3
11.6

university
505
24.2
11.5

postgraduate
196
9.4
11.8

immigrant class

provincial nominee program
29
1.4
10.0

other economic class
985
47.2
11.5

family
713
34.2
13.6

refugee
293
14.0
12.4

other class
65
3.1
11.4

place of birth

northwestern europe
89
4.3
6.1

southeastern europe
280
13.4
8.7

africa
184
8.8
14.3

east asia
174
8.3
18.5

south asia
186
8.9
18.9

southeast asia
63
3.0
10.3

other asia
161
7.7
19.6

china
278
13.3
14.5

india
253
12.1
10.0

philippines
159
7.6
4.6

oceania
6
0.3
6.0

caribbean, central and south america
210
10.1
8.3

oceania, other
11
0.5
8.0

united states
30
1.5
5.9

year since immigration

5 to 10 years
807
38.7
15.8

11 to 15 years
603
28.9
12.0

16 to 20 years
675
32.4
9.5

Statement: the adjusted rates were only 1.1 times higher for those with a secondary school education than for those with a non-university postsecondary education.
Question: what was the multiple relationship between immigrants with a secondary school education and those with a non-university postsecondary education?
Answer: [1.118644]