Table:
privately sponsored refugees
government-assisted refugees
economic class principal applicants
family class

men
women
men
women
men
women
men
women

percentage

age at landing

25-34
90
68
81
57
88
83
91
68

35-44
84
60
73
50
85
83
88
69

45-54
69
33
56
31
77
74
80
51

presence of children 7 years since landing

no
88
70
77
58
86
86
89
76

yes
85
52
74
47
85
80
89
58

marital status at landing

single
86
58
78
53
87
83
88
69

married
86
61
74
52
85
82
89
65

divorced, widowed, separated
84
49
70
44
84
79
89
67

knowledge of official language at landing

no
86
56
75
49
82
78
88
63

yes
87
67
75
55
86
83
90
66

world area of last permanent residence

south, central america and the caribbean
86
78
81
67
90
86
90
70

europe and north america
88
72
69
50
90
86
88
70

africa
92
72
82
59
82
80
86
58

middle east and central asia
79
52
58
32
81
80
79
42

east, south, southeast asia and oceania
73
43
67
37
85
80
90
66

highest education qualification at landing

secondary or less
86
58
74
49
82
77
89
65

non-university certification
87
61
76
53
86
80
90
66

university degree
88
65
77
55
85
83
88
65

participation in canadian postsecondary education by year 7

no
84
57
73
45
82
76
89
61

yes
94
72
83
79
90
88
91
79

number

total
2,340
2,260
4,680
4,860
94,145
31,565
25,080
44,080

Statement: the smallest difference in employment incidence between those with and without training is seen amongst family class men, for whom participation in training is associated with only a 2% increase in the predicted probability of employment.
Question: what class of men has the smallest difference in the employment rate between the trained and the untrained, and what percentage is the difference?
Answer: [2]