Table:
revenue class
first nations
inuit
non-indigenous comparison group

non-employer
employer
non-employer
employer
non-employer
employer

percent

goods

no revenue
0.0
0.0
0.0
..
0.0
0.0

more than $0 and less than $30,000
2.6
0.0
0.2
..
4.8
0.0

between $30,000 and $100,000
9.1
0.2
0.6
0.1
13.3
0.3

between $100,000 and $250,000
9.1
0.9
1.7
0.3
17.3
1.6

between $250,000 and $1,000,000
18.5
4.3
0.4
2.8
16.8
6.9

over $1,000,000
60.6
94.6
97.1
96.8
47.8
91.1

all revenue classes
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0

goods

no revenue
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0

more than $0 and less than $30,000
5.5
0.0
1.4
..
3.6
0.0

between $30,000 and $100,000
8.7
0.2
5.8
..
9.1
0.4

between $100,000 and $250,000
16.0
0.9
4.8
..
16.0
2.2

between $250,000 and $1,000,000
30.0
6.4
2.6
x
40.2
17.9

over $1,000,000
39.7
92.5
85.3
x
31.0
79.5

all revenue classes
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0

service

no revenue
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0

more than $0 and less than $30,000
7.8
0.0
4.9
0.0
12.5
0.1

between $30,000 and $100,000
10.3
0.3
8.9
0.1
15.8
0.6

between $100,000 and $250,000
12.6
1.5
10.3
0.5
16.4
2.9

between $250,000 and $1,000,000
18.9
7.9
15.8
5.7
19.2
12.4

over $1,000,000
50.4
90.3
60.0
93.6
36.1
83.9

all revenue classes
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0

Statement: non-employer businesses in the goods (non-resource) and goods (resource) industries which operate in inuit csds break from this trend, as in both cases the share of revenues from the over-$1,000,000 class was higher for non-employer than for employer businesses.
Question: non-employer businesses in the goods (non-resource) and goods (resource) industries which operate in inuit csds break from this trend, which type of employer had higher percent as in both cases the share of revenues from the over-$1,000,000 class, non-employer or employer businesses?
Answer: non-employer