Table:
random effects meta-analysis
random effects meta-regression

number of cycles
pooled estimate
95% confidence intervals
q
p-value
i2
tau-squared
β
95% confidence intervals
p-value

from
to
from
to

presence of a mde in the past 12 months

employed
9
5.40
4.70
6.00
200.50
<0.001
96.00
0.0001
-0.09
-0.21
0.04
0.15

unemployed
9
11.70
10.40
13.00
18.05
0.02
55.70
0.0002
0.02
-0.30
0.34
0.90

not participating in the labour force
9
9.80
8.50
11.20
110.30
<0.001
92.70
0.0004
0.14
-0.20
0.48
0.38

number of weeks feeling depressive symptoms, among participants with a mde

employed
6
7.61
7.24
8.00
18.00
<0.01
72.30
0.0027
0.01
-0.01
0.02
0.22

unemployed
6
9.58
8.33
10.38
1.00
0.96
0.00
0.0000
0.01
-0.02
0.03
0.56

not participating in the labour force
6
11.36
9.97
12.55
19.10
<0.01
73.90
0.0106
0.02
0.001
0.04
0.05

self-reported anxiety disorder

employed
7
4.60
3.70
5.40
190.40
<0.001
96.80
0.0001
0.26
0.08
0.45
0.01

unemployed
7
8.00
6.40
9.50
25.20
<0.001
76.20
0.0003
0.34
-0.10
0.78
0.10

not participating in the labour force
7
10.80
8.80
12.70
118.00
<0.001
94.90
0.0007
0.55
0.15
0.95
0.02

presence of a mde in the past 12 months and self-reported anxiety disorder

employed
7
1.20
1.00
1.40
41.50
<0.001
85.60
0.0000
0.05
-0.01
0.12
0.09

unemployed
7
3.00
2.50
3.50
7.20
0.31
16.20
0.0000
0.06
-0.12
0.24
0.40

not participating in the labour force
7
4.10
3.20
5.00
66.10
<0.001
90.90
0.0001
0.23
-0.05
0.50
0.09

Statement: average annual mde prevalence was 11.7% among unemployed participants.
Question: how many the average annual mde prevalence was among unemployed participants?
Answer: [11.7]