Borrison/hk-legicost huggingface dataset:
由此可見，政府當年一個短視的決定，影響了數以十萬計居民的起居生活和健康。
From this we can see that a short - sighted decision made by the Government years back has taken toll on the daily life and health of hundreds of thousands of tenants
現時領展是上市公司，而非公營機構，政府要監管領展，限制加租，我認為根本是不可能的。
Link REIT is now a listed company not a public body . I think it is actually impossible for the Government to exercise monitoring on Link REIT and impose on it restrictions on rent increase
比較可行的方法是策略性 地回購部分領展物業，由政府以較相宜的租金租給市民急需的社福民生設施，以及盡可能由房委會興建街市和其他民生設施，令小商戶能夠生存，亦讓市民有較相宜的選擇。
A more viable option is to strategically buy back some properties of Link REIT . Then the Government can rent them out for provision of social welfare and livelihood facilities urgently needed by the public at lower rents and where possible markets and other livelihood facilities should be developed by HA to ensure commercial viability for small shop operators and provide less expensive choices for the people
若說因為領展現時市值1,900億元而難以回購，那麼政府作為港鐵的最大股東，擁有大部分股權，以港鐵現時市值2,700多億元計算，回購港鐵只需約690億元，政府回購港鐵，使之成為公營機構，其實是可行的。
If a buyback of Link REIT is said to be difficult given that its market value now stands at 190 billion it is actually feasible for the Government to buy back MTRCL and turn it into a public body as the Government being the biggest shareholder of MTRCL holds a majority stake in the corporation and if we make calculations based on MTRCLs current market value of some 270 billion a buyback will cost only about 69 billion
最近歐洲小國盧森堡宣布明年起所有公共交通工具免費，很有烏托邦的味道。
Recently a small European country Luxembourg has announced that all public transport services will be provided for free beginning next year which is suggestive of a utopian flavour
我並非期望香港政府會這樣做，但百物騰貴，香港位列全球生活費最高的城市之一，政府有責任紓緩市民的交通負擔。
I do not expect the Hong Kong Government to do the same but as prices are exorbitant and Hong Kong is one of the cities with the highest cost of living in the world the Government is duty - bound to alleviate the burden of transport expenses on the public
是否全面收購港鐵需要有政治意志，是服務市民的政治意志。
Whether or not a full buyback of MTRCL is taken forward requires a political will a political will to serve the people
至於強積金，我們早前討論何君堯議員提出的議案時已曾討論，政府最低限度應盡快落實取消強積金對沖機制，令僱員有多點保障。
As for MPF we already discussed it some time ago in our discussion on the motion proposed by Dr Junius HO . The Government should at least abolish the offsetting mechanism of MPF expeditiously in order to provide more protection for the employees
我在立法會曾多次表示，香港是世界上其中一個最富裕的城市，政府坐擁龐大的財政儲備，但市民的福利和保障卻遠遠落後於其他先進經濟體。
As I have said many times in the Legislative Council already Hong Kong is one of the most affluent cities in the world and the Government has amassed a huge fiscal reserve but the welfare and protection for the people are lagging far behind other advanced economies
政府常說不適宜干預市場，自由市場競爭才是對市民最有利。
The Government always considers market intervention inappropriate stressing that only free market competition is most beneficial to the public
但實際上，在金融地產主導之下，只有大財團能賺大錢。
But in fact under the dominance of the financial and real estate sectors only the major consortiums can make handsome profits
如果政府不改變傾向商界，特別是向大財團傾斜的施政心態，恐怕這"三座大山"的問題只會持續下去。
If the Government does not change its position of skewing in favour of the business sector especially the mindset of slanting towards large consortiums in administration I am afraid the problems posed by these three big mountains will only be maintained
議員已獲通知，由於郭偉强議員的修正案獲得通過，梁耀忠議員已撤回他的修正案。
Members have already been informed that as Mr KWOK Wai - keungs amendment has been passed Mr LEUNG Yiu - chung has withdrawn his amendment
可是，問題在於政府。
Yet the problems lie with the Government
其實，領展的寫法不是"發展"的"展"，而是"剪斷"的"剪"，因其剪斷了整個社區的人情味和關係網，所以應寫作"領剪"。
In fact the acronym of Link REIT in Chinese should not use the character 展 meaning development but should be written as 剪 meaning to cut off . Link REIT should be written as 領剪 instead for it has cut off the warmth and relationship in the community as a whole
我不知司長及兩位局長有否前度女友，我是沒有的，因為我的初戀女友就是我的太太。
I wonder if the Chief Secretary for Administration and the two Directors of Bureaux have an ex - girlfriend . I do not and my wife is my first love
我們且看看甲級寫字樓的同期租金指數。
Let us look at the rental indices for Grade A offices of the same period
在2006年，香港甲級寫字樓的租金指數是121.6，今年是348，升幅是186%，"領剪"租金的升幅足足較甲級寫字樓的指數高出100%。
The rental index for Grade A office in Hong Kong in 2016 was 121.6 which has increased to 348 this year presenting an increase of 186 % . The rental increase imposed by Link REIT exceeds the increase of Grade A office rental by as much as 100 %
大家想想，在"領剪"商場經營的小商戶所繳交的租金，較本港甲級寫字樓、跨國企業支付的租金還要高出100%，這簡直與"劏房"的租金升幅有過之而無不及。
Come to think about this . The rent paid by small tenants operating in the shopping arcades under Link REIT Cut is higher than the rent of Grade A offices and paid by multinational corporations by 100 % . Such a rate of increase is definitely more rampant than the rent increase for subdivided units
我們可能會說領展已經很差劣，但拆售出來的新業主更差。
We may say that Link REIT is bad yet the new owner of the divested property is even worse
對於商場內的社福設施，政府規定每平方呎的租金是5.5元，但新業主竟然設法鑽法律空子，大幅增加管理費至與租金水平相若，變相加租1倍。
Regarding the welfare facilities in the shopping centre the rent is capped at 5.5 by the Government yet the new owner dares to exploit the loopholes in law by hook or by crook by imposing a drastic increase in management fee . Since the management fee was raised to a level comparable to the rent the rent was de facto doubled
幸好，當年的局長即現任司長暫時把問題處理，以致沒有再加管理費。
Fortunately the Secretary at the time that is the incumbent Chief Secretary for Administration solved the problem and the management fee was not increased further
然而，這些新業主確實違反了市場規律。
Yet these new owners have definitely violated the rule of the market
有文具鋪因加租而被趕走，鋪位已丟空1年多；銀行也因為加租丟空了1年多；有五金鋪也快將被加租；水果店亦丟空了1年多。
A stationery shop was forced to close down as a result of the rent increase yet the shop space has been left vacant for more than year . For the bank the shop space has been left vacant for one year or so as a result of rent increase . A hardware store will soon face a rent increase
可是，如果不引入競爭，這種劣勢只會持續，小市民面對的困難只會更嚴重。
Yet if no competition is introduced the unfavourable position will continue and it will aggravate the difficulties faced by the average citizen
因此，我的修正案的第一項，是希望政府加緊興建更多公營街市及公眾停車場，尤其是在新的公營房屋項目中。
In the first item in my amendment I urge the Government to construct more public markets and public car parks particularly in new public housing projects
我希望陳帆局長可以處理此事。
I hope Secretary Frank CHAN will deal with this
第二，我們希望修訂《房屋條例》。
Second we look forward to an amendment of the Housing Ordinance
麥美娟議員也提出了一項私人條例草案，希望處理這個問題。
Ms Alice MAK has also proposed a private bill to address this problem
主席，我相信很多聆聽發言的市民或朋友也跟我一樣是香港中文大學的校友。
President I believe many citizens or friends now listening to our speeches like me are alumni of The Chinese University of Hong Kong CUHK
在2009年，領展停車場的使用率是71%，當時每月租金是1,000元。
In 2009 the utilization rate of Link REIT car parks was 71 % and the monthly rent was 1,000 back then
時至今日，每月租金平均大概是2,492元，上升逾1倍。
The average monthly rent has more than doubled to about 2,492 nowadays
領展的資產亦不斷增加，2009年租金收入大概為9億元，10年後則差不多有二三十億元。
The assets held by Link REIT have also increased continuously with its rental income soaring from about 900 million in 2009 to almost 2 billion to 3 billion after a decade
過去數年，我們多次向政府提出，真的要供應車位，但政府卻說不用，他們打算透過車位供應來控制車輛的增長，結果讓領展得益。
Over the past few years we have repeatedly proposed to the Government that it is really necessary to supply parking spaces . Yet the Government dismissed it saying that they intended to control the growth in the number of vehicles through containing the supply of parking spaces and therefore let Link REIT reap the gains
由於車位供應不足，市民自然渴求車位，令租值越來越高，現時領展一個車位的售價是 50多萬元。
Given the shortage of parking spaces members of the public naturally have a keen demand for parking spaces thereby leading to the ever - increasing rental value . The price of a parking space held by Link REIT is some 500,000 at present
可想而知，升值、租金貴、不斷加租的源頭，是因為政府沒有供應車位。
One can realize that the appreciation exorbitant rents and constant rent hikes all originate from the failure of the Government to supply parking spaces
如果私人機構有土地，政府可否由他們興建，然後豁免他們補地價甚至無須繳交地租。
If the private sector has land can the Government let them construct it and then waive the land premium or even exempt them from paying Government rent?
我希望政府會鼓勵大家在領展物業周邊的項目，增加車位供應，令供求得以平衡。
I hope that the Government will incentivize property developers to increase the supply of parking spaces in developments located in the vicinity of Link REIT properties with a view to achieving balance in supply and demand
事實上，政府近年終於願意引入智能停車場，我覺得很好，但進展非常緩慢。
In fact the Government has finally presented the willingness to introduce smart car parks in recent years . I find it very good but the progress is extremely slow
正如鄭泳舜議員所說，興建智能停車場需時五六年，如果能讓市場、社會和私人機構協助興建，我相信速度會更快。
As Mr Vincent CHENG said it takes five to six years to construct a smart car park . I believe the progress can be speeded up by allowing the market society and private sector to assist in construction
有鑒於此，要解決領展這座"大山"是"不為也，非不能也"。
In view of this whether this big mountain Link REIT can be overcome is a question of unwillingness not inability
談到港鐵公司，我必須強調，港鐵公司其實是公共品牌，其七成資產是公有的，即由市民擁有。
Speaking of MTRCL I must emphasize that MTRCL is actually a public brand since 70 % of its assets are publicly owned that is owned by the public
形象低落對港鐵公司是傷害，對市民也是傷害，故此港鐵公司形象低落，是對社會不利的。
The poor image of MTRCL not only hurts itself but also the public . Therefore the poor image of MTRCL is detrimental to society
每次加價的時候，大家都覺得服務越來越差，但票價卻經常增加，是會有這種感覺的。
Whenever a fare rise is mooted everyone would feel that the service quality is deteriorating but fare rises are frequent . People would have such a perception
我認為這種做法既拖累了港鐵公司的形象，亦苦了市民的錢包。
I think this practice has taken toll on the image of MTRCL while hurting the wallet of the public
第二，長遠來說，應該在票價調整機制中加入盈利指數，與盈利掛鈎，如果盈利達到某個指數，便會在方程式中扣減。
Second in the long run a profitability index should be added to FAM to peg it to profit under which the profit will be deducted from the formula upon reaching a particular index
主席，在談論香港鐵路有限公司這座"大山"前，我想先跟大家分享一個最近在"打工仔"界廣泛流傳的黑色笑話、黑色幽默。
President before commenting on this big mountain called the MTR Corporation Limited MTRCL I wish to share with Members a dark joke or some black humour making its rounds among wage earners widely of late
再說說有關港鐵的問題，它真的與市民的期望有很大落差。
Further on the issues related to MTRCL it really has fallen far short of public expectations
除了剛才說的笑話外，最近亦很流行港鐵式的荒謬邏輯循環線。
Apart from the joke told by me just now of late an absurd MTR - style loop of logic is also gaining popularity
這其實對港鐵來說只是小意思而已，不過可能也會有一點影響。
In fact it does not mean much to MTRCL but there may still be some impact
其實，在談論港鐵的問題前，一定要知道港鐵的本質為何。
In fact before talking about the problems with MTRCL we have to understand the nature of MTRCL
港鐵的本質其實是一間"國企"。
Its nature is actually one of a national enterprise
在這種歷史沿革之中，政府其實是不能撇清對港鐵的責任的，甚至港鐵在與九鐵合併前，"MTR"亦是由政府全資擁有的。
In the course of this historical evolution the Government actually could not alienate itself entirely from its responsibilities for MTRCL and before the merger of MTRCL with KCRC MTRCL was also wholly owned by the Government
因此，我們建議政府委任多一些獨立非執行董事，以及加強官方和有相關背景的代表，以加強政府在港鐵內的角色和發揮監察作用。
In view of this we propose that the Government appoint more independent non - executive directors and increase the number of representatives with official backgrounds or related backgrounds so as to strengthen the role of the Government in MTRCL and bring its monitoring function into play
另一方面是票價機制的問題。
Another issue is the fare adjustment mechanism
我剛才提到現在的"可加可減"機制變為"只加不減"，而且是"自動波"地加價，間接加劇通脹，令市民和"打工仔"百上加斤。
As I said just now the existing mechanism that allows fares to go upwards and downwards has become one that virtually only allows fares to go upwards . Moreover increases are made automatically so inflation is exacerbated indirectly thus resulting in an ever heavier burden on the public and wage earners
因此，我們要求港鐵重新檢討票價檢討機制，在方程式內加入營利增長這一項因素，而最重要的是由政府把關我又談論政府的角色了為何要提及政府把關？
For this reason we demand that MTRCL review its fare adjustment mechanism and incorporate the factor of profit growth into the formula and most importantly the Government has to keep the gate―I am talking about the role of the Government again . Why is it necessary to talk about the Government keeping the gate?
其實港鐵現時的維修團隊面對的情況就像"10個煲，只有7個蓋"般肯定9個蓋也沒有維修人員經常須跨區、跨部門"撲火"，在發生事故時須動員全部人員，根本沒有足夠人手處理突發事故，而且年資長的同事即中間年紀不算太大，但有一定經驗的那一層流失量很大，現時要不便是依靠一群已工作十多二十年、很資深的員工，要不 便是靠新入職的同事，為何欠缺了中層的員工？
In fact the situation faced by the repairs and maintenance team of MTRCL at present is like having 10 pots but only seven lids―there are surely fewer than nine lids―so the repairs and maintenance staff often have to cross districts and departments to put out fires and when incidents happen all staff members have to be mobilized as there is insufficient manpower to deal with contingencies . Moreover the wastage of senior workers―that is the workers in the middle tier who are considered that old but who have a certain degree of experience―is very serious . At present it is necessary to rely either on a group of senior staff members who have worked for one or two decades or newly - recruited workers
其實維修是十分強調經驗的。
In fact experience is crucial to repairs and maintenance
第一，有經驗可以做得快。
First with experience jobs can be done quickly
再加上鐵路線擴展，我們工會亦收到很多意見，指未有同步增加相關的人手。
In addition with the expansion of the railway network our labour unions have also received a lot of views saying that the relevant manpower has not been increased accordingly
況且，鐵路系統已漸漸步入"機械老，容易壞"的情況，以致意外頻生，也增加了維修人手的壓力。
Moreover the railway system has gradually entered the situation of old machines prone to breakdowns so the pressure on repairs and maintenance staff has increased
故此，我們十分反對港鐵減少維修人手，以節省金錢，以及搞外判，這是不可取的。
For this reason we strongly oppose the reduction of manpower by MTRCL to save money and arrange for outsourcing as doing so is not advisable
如此核心的業務，怎可以假手於人、搞外判呢？
Since this is such a core business how possibly can it be left to the charge of other people and how can it be outsourced?
這樣會直接影響對市民的服務，亦侵害員工的權益。
This will directly impact on the services provided to the public and infringe on staff members rights
長遠來說，港鐵不能再做獨市生意，在未來，香港仍會有鐵路發展，有重鐵的項目和地區上的環保運輸等。
In the long run MTRCL can no longer monopolize the market . In the future there will still be other railway development projects in Hong Kong such as the heavy rail project and environmentally - friendly modes of transport in local districts
對於這些項目，政府不要再閉上眼便判給港鐵，應在全球層面招標，看看有否更好的鐵路公司或交通服務提供者，能夠提供新的服務給市民。
Insofar as these projects are concerned the Government cannot just award them to MTRCL without looking rather it should invite tenders worldwide to see if there are any better railway companies or transport service providers that can provide new services to the public
最後，我們認為在融資方面，亦須檢討現時的服務經營權模式，讓港鐵自行負上全部責任。
Lastly we believe that in respect of financing it is also necessary to review the present concession approach and make MTRCL assume all responsibility on its own
使用傳統的擁有權模式是否最好呢？
Is the adoption of the conventional ownership approach the best option?
綜合地回應"三座大山"的問題，我認為過去政府太過迷信"小政府，大市場"，導致公共服務過度市場化，政府未有承擔起應負的責任。
As an overall response to the issue of the three big mountains I believe that in the past the Government had too much faith in small government big market thus resulting in the excessive marketization of public services and the failure of the Government to assume its due share of responsibilities
如果要撥亂反正，真的須視乎政府的決心及魄力，是否足以負起這些應有的責任，處理好這些為市民提供服務的機構。
If we want to set things right again it really depends on whether or not the resolve and vision of the Government are adequate for it to assume its due responsibilities and properly deal with these organizations providing services to the public
我現在向各位提出的待議議題是：何啟明議員經修改的修正案，予以通過。
I now propose the question to you and that is That Mr HO Kai - mings revised amendment be passed
對市民來說，港鐵公司有3個問題：第一，是鐵路工程的施工問題； 第二，是列車日常經營出現事故；第三，是票價不斷上漲。
Insofar as members of the public are concerned MTRCL has three problems first the problem with the execution of railway works; second occurrence of train incidents in the day - to - day operation; and third continuous increases in fares
港鐵公司已經營多年，無論軟件和硬件均已老化，而且繁忙時間約2分鐘一班車，班次的頻密程度令整個系統的負擔沉重。
After years of operation both the software and hardware of MTRCL have become aged . Moreover during the peak hours the train frequency stands at about two minutes . Such a high frequency has imposed a heavy burden on the entire system
所以，港鐵公司不斷提升系統和更新硬件，但又不可以圍封整個車站維修，只能在晚上逐一修理。
For this reason MTRCL keeps upgrading the system and renewing the hardware but it cannot enclose the whole stations for maintenance . It can only undertake the repairs one by one at night
大家也看到前線人員十分努力，而且事故是難以避免的。
We have seen the hard work of the frontline staff . Moreover it is hard to avoid incidents
所以，社會一方面要責成港鐵公司要做好修改更新工作，但同時又要鼓勵市民多些包容體諒，而政府則要反省以鐵路為主的交通政策有否必須改善之處。
Therefore on the one hand society has to ensure that MTRCL will carry out the rectification and updating work properly but at the same time members of the public should be encouraged to be more tolerant and understanding while the Government has to reflect on the need to identify room for improvement in the transport policy of using railway as the backbone
施工的問題顯然是有關方面監督不足，港鐵公司的新任行政總裁和主席是時候大刀闊斧地進行改革。
The problem with the execution of works obviously shows a lack of supervision by the relevant parties . It is time for the new Chief Executive Officer and the Chairman of MTRCL to carry out a drastic reform
在票價問題方面，由2010年至今，港鐵公司已按"可加可減"機制調升票價9次，累積升幅33.5%，難怪市民感到氣憤。
On the problem of fares since 2010 MTRCL has already raised the fares nine times in accordance with the Fare Adjustment Mechanism FAM which allows both upward and downward adjustments . The accumulated increase is 33.5 % . No wonder members of the public feel infuriated
事實上，政府必須考慮修改"可加可減"機制。
In fact the Government must consider revising FAM . This mechanism was introduced back then during Hong Kongs economic downturn
我要強調，取消對沖機制的同時，也要考慮商界的意見，因為政府當年是以對沖機制來換取商界支持強積金制度，現在要取消對沖機制，也應該對商界有所交代，而且勞資雙方關係是相輔相成，不應該對立，萬大事也應該開誠布公地商討妥當。
I wish to emphasize that in abolishing the offsetting mechanism it is also necessary to consider the views of the business sector because back then the Government had traded such a mechanism for the support of the business sector for the MPF System . Now that the offsetting mechanism is to be abolished it should give an account to the business sector . Moreover in the employer - employee relationship the two parties should complement each other
同時，新方案也要顧及中小微企的承受能力。
They should not be confrontational . Everything should be discussed and settled in a frank and open manner . Meanwhile the new proposal should also take the affordability of micro small and medium enterprises into account
最後一座"大山"是領展，其實領展正好示範了由政府或商界經營的分別，政府經營的效率低，但可以顧及社區的需要；而商界經營則效率高，但往往以賺取最大利益為目標，社區需要只是次要。
The last big mountain is Link REIT . In fact Link REIT has precisely demonstrated the difference between operation by the Government and that by the business sector . Operation by the Government suffers low efficiency but it can cater for the needs of the community whereas operation by the business sector enjoys high efficiency but very often its goal is to make the greatest profit with community needs being accorded a lower priority
目前，領展以利潤最大的方式經營，自然不受社區歡迎。
It is only natural that Link REIT currently operating for maximization of its profits is not welcomed by the community
有建議提出回購領展，甚至建議政府修改法例，規管領展商場和街市租金的增幅。
There is the suggestion of buying back Link REIT . It is even suggested that the Government should amend the law to regulate the rate of rental increase in shopping malls and markets under Link REIT
所以，政府現在於社區增建公共街市或議員建議舉辦墟市，均是有效和務實的方法，不過市民需要等候較長的時間才能享受另類的服務。
Hence the current construction of more public markets in the community by the Government and setting up of bazaars as proposed by Members are effective and pragmatic approaches . Nevertheless members of the public will have to wait longer to enjoy alternative services
我認為另一座"大山"是醫療的問題，現在公營醫療系統的醫生、護士及病床不足，而私營醫療病床亦不足，還有部分醫生濫收費用。
In my opinion another big mountain is the problem of health care . At present there is a shortage of doctors nurses and hospital beds in the public health care system . Private hospital beds are not sufficient either and some doctors even charge excessive fees
可惜，政府受到醫生霸權的箝制，現在想引入海外醫生以解燃眉之急，但卻多次碰壁。
Regrettably the Government has been constrained by doctors hegemony . Now it wishes to introduce overseas doctors to resolve the pressing need but it has been rebuffed repeatedly
香港醫務委員會昨天討論4項豁免海外醫生實習的方案，竟然在投暗票的情況下全部被否決，難怪醫委會主席批評有委員"說一套，做一套"。
Yesterday the Medical Council of Hong Kong MCHK discussed four proposals for exempting overseas doctors from internship but surprisingly all of them were vetoed in a secret ballot . No wonder the Chairman of MCHK criticized some members of not walking the talk
事實上，這種關係到全港市民福祉的事情，他們也能反對，可見醫生霸權是多麼厲害。
Actually that they could oppose such matters having a bearing on the well - being of all the people of Hong Kong is thus evident how awful the doctors hegemony is
我相信香港市民十分期待政府出手，一定要移除醫生霸權這座"大山"。
I believe the people of Hong Kong keenly expect the Government to do something to remove this big mountain of doctors hegemony
最後，我認為另一座巨大的"山"是居住問題，所以我們應該盡快推出"明日大嶼"計劃，目標是學習新加坡"人人有樓住"，真正解決市民所需。
Lastly I hold that another huge mountain is the housing problem . For this reason we should expeditiously launch the Lantau Tomorrow programme . The aim is to provide housing for everyone like Singapore does thus genuinely meeting the peoples need
即使要等10年，只要能真正解決居住問題，讓市民不用受苦，也是值得的。
Even if we have to wait for 10 years it is still worthwhile so long as it can truly resolve the housing problem and end the peoples suffering
我相信真理越辯越明，廣大市民越來越明白，要走新加坡的路線，填海造地是解決居住問題的最有效方法。
I believe the more the truth is debated the clearer it becomes . The community at large has come to understand the need to adopt the practice of Singapore . Reclamation for creation of land is the most effective way to resolve the housing problem
但就今天的議案那邊的同事已全部離席竟然有議員指"明日大嶼"計劃是倒錢落海，我不禁心想：為何當市民看到希望時，這些議員要令希望熄滅，還利用這個藉口來阻擋造地建樓，是否要令市民繼續受苦？
However regarding the motion today―all the Honourable colleagues on that side have left―to my surprise some Members alleged that the Lantau Tomorrow programme is tantamount to dumping money into the sea . I could not help wondering in my mind Just when the people see a glimpse of hope why do these Members wish to shatter their hope and use such an excuse to obstruct the creation of land and construction of housing? . Do they wish to make members of the public continue to suffer?
有時想想真令我感到歎息，市民投票時是否要小心選擇較好的人選，選擇真正明白市民需要的人，而不要因為政治需要，令市民得不到應得的東西。
Pondering over this question sometimes I really find it lamentable . When members of the public vote would it not be better for them to carefully select candidates who truly appreciate the peoples needs rather than those who would prevent the public from getting what they deserve owing to political needs?
大家仍記得"林鄭"的金句，而這"三座大山"是她在當選前告訴我們的。
We still remember the famous lines of Carrie LAM and these three big mountains were what she told us before she was elected . Chief Executive Carrie LAM has a number of famous lines
特首"林鄭"有 很多金句，她另一句金句是說她很安樂，因為天堂已留位給她。
Another famous line of hers is that she has peace of mind knowing that she is guaranteed a place in heaven
我首先指出我並非教徒，但我想引用一段聖經，經文是彌迦書第三章1至4節，講述彌迦對以色列的長官說："你們要聽！
Let me first make it clear that I am not a believer but I would like to quote a passage from the Bible namely verses 1 to 4 of chapter 3 of Micah about what Micah said to the rulers of Israel Hear!
你們不當知道公平嗎？
Is it not for you to know justice?
你們惡善好惡，從人身上剝皮，從人骨頭上剔肉；吃我民的肉，剝他們的皮"。
You who hate the good and love the evil who tear the skin from off my people and their flesh from off their bones; who eat the flesh of my people and flay their skin from off them
我不知道"林鄭"及那些高官信徒有否讀聖經，今天的香港就是如此，"吃人的肉，剝人的皮"，天堂會留位給他們這些"狗官"嗎？
I do not know whether Carrie LAM and those senior officials who are believers have read the Bible . That is what happens in Hong Kong nowadays . Will those dog officials who eat the flesh and flay the skin of the people be guaranteed a spot in heaven?