Borrison/hk-legicost huggingface dataset:
主席，我剛才說過，《基本法》是香港的憲制文件，是整個法律制度中的最高規範，所以"一地兩檢"違反《基本法》，不可視作等閒地處理，我相信律政司司長也不會鼓勵我們不尊重《基本法》。
President I said earlier that Basic Law is the constitutional document of Hong Kong and the highest standard of the legal system at large . Therefore the fact that the co - location arrangement is in violation of the Basic Law cannot be treated lightly . I believe the Secretary for Justice would not encourage us to show disrespect to the Basic Law
其實，政府近日的確花了很多公帑在電視上賣廣告，說高鐵"快靚正"，方便大家營商和旅遊，諸如此類。
Indeed the Government has recently spent a lot of public funds on television advertisements to promote the speedy quality and efficient XRL which facilitates business and travelling and so on
我相信有些市民真的有此想法。
I believe some people really have such thoughts
然而，民意是否真的絕大多數認為，即使"一地兩檢"違反《基本法》，但為了節省時間，我們就應閉上眼當《基本法》不存在？
However is it true that the majority public really hold the view that even the co - location arrangement violates the Basic Law we should keep our eyes shut and ignore the Basic Law just for the sake of saving time?
民主黨都想了解市民是否覺得，"一地兩檢"安排違反我剛才提到的《基本法》第十八條、 第十九條和第二十二條。
The Democratic Party also wishes to find out if people consider the co - location arrangement a violation of Articles 18 19 and 22 of the Basic Law that I have just mentioned
在我們最近一次的民意調查，回答"非常同意"，認為"一地兩檢"方案違反《基本法》的受訪者有22.8%；有19.1%同意政府"一地兩檢"方案違反《基本法》；不同意這說法的有19.9%；而非常不同意的有19.6%......
In an recent opinion survey conducted by us 22.8 % of the respondents answered strongly agree to the question that the co - location arrangement violates the Basic Law; 19.1 % of them agreed that the co - location arrangement violates the Basic Law; those disagreeing accounted for 19.9 % ; and those holding strong disagreement accounted for 19.6 %
我只希望議員發言合理，盡量不說到辯論的內容。
I just hope that Members speak reasonably and try not to discuss contents that should be included in the debate
他們既然要中止辯論，沒理由連民意調查的內容都一一交代。
As they wish to adjourn the debate there is no reason for them to give an account of the opinion survey
主席，我已遵照你的吩咐，我現正說明我為何支持中止待續。
President I have done what you told me and now I am explaining why I support the adjournment
論點一是違反《基本法》，我並沒有進入違反《基本法》那3條條文的辯論。
The first argument is it violates the Basic Law . I did not engage in a debate on the provisions of those three Articles of the Basic Law being violated
我現正向大家解釋，民意有很大分歧。
I am now explaining to all Honourable colleagues that public opinion is hugely split
如果這件事引起嚴重的分歧和爭議，我認為提出中止待續絕對合理，好讓我們化解憲法層次上的問題。
If the incident has caused serious divergence and controversies I consider it absolutely reasonable to propose an adjournment so that we can resolve issues on the constitutional level
所以我其實沒有離題，可能只是梁美芬議員的理解能力有問題。
Therefore I have not strayed from the subject; perhaps it was Dr Priscilla LEUNG who has a problem with comprehension
我再說第三個論點，為何支持中止待續。
I will present the third argument to explain why I support the adjournment
所以，既然連大律師公會也覺得政府給議員的資料太單薄，沒甚麼可以討論，我們又如何繼續辯論？
Therefore even HKBA considers the information the Government has provided for Members lacking in substance not contributing to any meaningful discussion then how do we continue the debate?
議員的時間也很寶貴，如果我們今天不中止辯論，就得辯論一些虛無縹緲、抽象的事情，連大律師公會都覺得難以討論。
Time is valuable to Members too . If we do not adjourn the debate today we will have to debate some illusory and abstract matters which even HKBA found difficult to discuss
所以，我們自然要求中止待續。
Hence we certainly need to request an adjournment
中止待續的意思不等於永遠不回立法會討論，何時回來討論？
This adjournment does not mean the debate will forever be removed from the Legislative Council . When will the debate resume?
就是待陳帆局長、律政司司長和保安局局長就"一地兩檢"的詳細安排給我們一份文件，讓我們知道他們將如何與國內的單位商討。
It is until Secretary Frank CHAN the Secretary for Justice and the Secretary for Security provide us with a document detailing the co - location arrangement so that we are informed of how they will discuss with the Mainland authorities . Currently we do not have such details
你可以說這是空穴來風，自己嚇自己，但我們真的有無數疑問。
You may dismiss it as a groundless rumour and we are just scaring ourselves but we do have countless questions
因為細節沒有披露。
Because the details are not disclosed
如此一來，我們的辯論就難以針對一個精準的焦點；大家滿腹疑慮之下辯論，即使每人發言15分鐘，也可能只是子彈橫飛，沒有意思。
In this way our debate cannot focus on an accurate point . In a debate where everyone is so misgivings - ridden each Member though given 15 minutes to speak may well be firing bullets aimlessly at no target
所以，我認為現時要求中止待續，非常合理。
Therefore I consider it very reasonable to request an adjournment now
我再說第四個論點。
I will present the fourth argument
為何現時要中止待續？
Why does the debate need to be adjourned now?
第一步是由港方與內地商議具體細節安排；第二步是全國人民代表大會常務委員會批准相關合作方案；然後第三步才返回立法機關立法。
Step one is that Hong Kong and the Mainland will discuss specific details of the arrangement; step two involves the Standing Committee of the National Peoples Congress NPCSC approving the cooperation arrangement; and step three is that it will then come back to the legislature for local legislation
這個做法會產生甚麼問題？
What problem will arise from such a process?
一個非常嚴重的問題。
A gravely serious problem
所以，第三步令香港立法機關淪為橡皮圖章。
Hence step three reduces the legislature of Hong Kong to a rubber stamp
因此，就"三步走"的安排，議員其實大有意見，因為我們必須捍衞香港特別行政區立法機關的立法權。
Therefore Members indeed have strong views about the Three - step Process because we must defend the legislative power of the legislature of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
如果現在不中止討論，讓我們先弄清楚香港立法機關是否從此會淪為橡皮圖章；而人大是否僭越了香港立法機關的立法權，作了決定，米已成炊，才交回立法會討論呢；屆時即使我們提出成立法案委員會審議，"一地兩檢"安排也離不開人大常委會"第二步"所作的決定。
The discussion should be adjourned now so that we can ascertain whether the legislature of Hong Kong will be reduced to a rubber stamp from now on and whether NPCSC will have usurped the lawmaking power of the legislature of Hong Kong and made an irrevocable decision that cannot be undone before the debate will resume at the Legislative Council . At that time even we propose to set up a Bills Committee for scrutiny the co - location arrangement cannot deviate from the decision made in step two by NPCSC
所以，我們今天提出中止待續議案，是有四大理由的。
Therefore we have proposed the adjournment motion today for four reasons
我希望大家認真考慮，尤其有些議員還未仔細看清楚文件，以為"一地兩檢"沒有違反《基本法》，沒有違反"一國兩制"。
I hope Honourable colleagues will give them serious consideration especially those who have not yet carefully read the documents and assume that the co - location arrangement does not violate the Basic Law and one country two systems
作為九龍西的民選立法會議員，我當然明白剛才梁美芬議員所說，大家都希望高鐵工程盡快完成，避免交通嚴重擠塞。
As an elected Member of the West Kowloon Constituency I can certainly appreciate the remark made by Dr Priscilla LEUNG just now that the speedy completion of XRL is much and widely anticipated so that serious traffic congestion can be avoided
所以，雖然高鐵計劃落實的快慢為市民所關注，但"三步走"方案存在更大、更高層次的違憲問題及"一國兩制"問題，既容許 國內的公安、國家安全部人員進入西九龍的地底執法，我們又自動放棄了司法管轄權。
As a result though the speed of implementation of the XRL project is a matter of public concern the Three - step Process gives rise to even greater and higher - level questions of violation of the constitution and one country two systems for it allows entry of Mainland public security and personnel of the Ministry of State Security into the underground area of the West Kowloon Station to enforce laws while we automatically give up our judicial jurisdiction
雖然律政司司長可能會說，他們只能在劃定範圍內，而非全香港這樣做。
The Secretary for Justice might say they can do so only in designated areas not Hong Kong in its entirety
但事實上，"一地兩檢"的確改變了"香港的領土範圍"，亦削弱了香港特區應有的司法管轄權。
Yet the co - location arrangement will have in essence changed the territory of Hong Kong while undermining the legitimate judicial jurisdiction of HKSAR
鑒於這些如此關鍵、如此重大的問題尚未解決，"一地兩檢"又沒有具體詳細的方案，"三步走"又僭越打垮香港立法機關的立法權力，我認為我們支持毛孟靜議員的中止待續議案，是合憲、合情、合理及合法的決定。
In the light of these critical and crucial problems that are pending solution the absence of a specific and detailed proposal for the co - location arrangement and the infringement on―usurpation of―the legislative power of the legislature of Hong Kong by the Three - step Process I consider our support for Ms Claudia MOs adjournment motion constitutional reasonable rational and lawful
代理主席，我發言支持毛孟靜議員提出的中止待續議案，換言之，我們要中止辯論政府提出的這項有關"一地兩檢"安排的無約束力議案。
Deputy President I speak in support of the adjournment motion moved by Ms Claudia MO . In other words we wish to adjourn the debate on the non - legally binding government motion on the co - location arrangement
首先，我認為"一地兩檢"安排議案所提到的方案違反《基本法》，而一項違反《基 本法》的議案絕對不應該在本會提出。
First I think the co - location arrangement mentioned in the government motion contravenes the Basic Law and a motion which contravenes the Basic Law must not be moved in this Council
第二，我認為政府在提供有關該議案的資料時不盡不實。
Second I think the information provided by the Government concerning this motion is incomplete and untruthful
第三，我認為政府現時披露的資料並不足以讓我們全面討論"一地兩檢"方案。
Third I think the information disclosed by the Government is inadequate thus preventing us from conducting a comprehensive discussion on the co - location arrangement
我接下來會解釋我的立場。
I am now going to explain my position
就着第一點，我認為政府提出在西九龍站實施"一地兩檢"的方案違反《基本法》，這一點已獲得不少法律界人士認同，他們更對此表示極度憂慮。
With regard to the first point I think that the co - location arrangement at West Kowloon Station contravenes the Basic Law and my views are shared by quite a number of members of the legal sector who have also expressed grave concern about this
法政匯思是一個我非常尊重、敢言的法律界組織，該組織在其陳述書中很清楚指出，政府提出的"一地兩檢"方案明顯並直接違反《基本法》第十七條、第十八條、第二十二條及第二十九條，我選擇就其中3條作出闡釋。
The Progressive Lawyers Group is an outspoken civic group of the legal profession which I very much respect and it points out very clearly in its submission that the co - location arrangement formulated by the Government obviously and directly contravenes Article 17 Article 18 Article 22 and Article 29 of the Basic Law . I will elaborate further on how three of these Articles are contravened
《基本法》第十八條訂明，香港原有法律繼續生效，而全國性法律皆不能在香港實施，但列於附件三者除外。
Article 18 of the Basic Law stipulates that the laws previously in force in Hong Kong shall remain in force and that national laws shall not be applied in HKSAR except for those listed in Annex III to the Basic Law
《基本法》第二十二條訂明，中央人民政府所屬各部門、各省、直轄市均不得干預特區根據《基本法》自行管理的事務，以及中央政府在特區設立的一切機構及其人員必須遵守特區的法律，這是很清楚的規定。
Article 22 of the Basic Law stipulates that no department of the Central Peoples Government and no province or municipality directly under the Central Government may interfere in the affairs which HKSAR administers on its own in accordance with the Basic Law and that all offices set up in HKSAR by the Central Government and the personnel of these offices shall abide by the laws of HKSAR . The relevant requirements are as crystal clear
《中華人民共和國憲法》規定，全國人大是國家的最高權力機關，即使是國家行政機關也須由全國人大設立，並向全國人大負責，接受監管，而《基本法》更業經全國人大通過。
As specified in the Constitution of the Peoples Republic of China the National Peoples Congress NPC is the highest organ of state power and all administrative organs of the state are set up by NPC . These administrative organs shall be held accountable to NPC and subject to its supervision and the Basic Law has also been adopted by NPC
所以，《基本法》不單是香港的憲法，更是中央政府行政機關亦須遵守的全國性法律。
Therefore the Basic Law is not only the constitution of Hong Kong but also a national law that all administrative organs of the Central Government shall abide by
即使是中央政府的行政機關，也不能干預香港特別行政區根據《基本法》自行管理的事務。
No administrative organ of the Central Government may interfere in the affairs which HKSAR administers on its own in accordance with the Basic Law
可是，特區政府現在竟然提出這樣的一個方案，要在香港某一地帶即西九龍站劃出一個地方，以便在該處作出違反《基本法》的安排。
Yet the HKSAR Government has now worked out an option like this so as to designate an area in a place within Hong Kong that is West Kowloon Station for implementing an arrangement which contravenes the Basic Law
第二，我剛才已提出，政府就整件事情向公眾披露的有關西九龍站"一地兩檢"方案的資料，一直均是不盡不實。
Secondly as mentioned just now the information disclosed to the public by the Government concerning the co - location arrangement to be implemented at West Kowloon Station has all along been incomplete and untruthful
《眾新聞》剛剛作出了相當詳盡的報道，比對在這10年間，政府就"一地兩檢"安排所披露的公開資料是如何的前言不對後語。
In a rather detailed news report published lately in Hong Kong Citizen News a comparison is made on the information disclosed by the Government in the past 10 years on the implementation of a co - location arrangement to prove how the Government has contradicted itself in this regard
有否內地部門參與？
Has any Mainland department been involved?
小組是在何時決定實施"一地兩檢"安排？
When did the task force decide to implement a co - location arrangement for XRL?
當局以往曾在提交立法會的文件表示，任何具體落實"一地兩檢"安排的方案，一定需要得到社會上同意。當局一定會向社會交代，亦會讓社會有充分機會表達意見，但為何現在卻是零諮詢呢？
As the Government has indicated in a paper previously submitted to the Legislative Council that it must secure the consent of the community for any concrete proposal on the implementation of a co - location arrangement and that it would keep the public informed of the relevant proposal and allow ample opportunity for members of the public to express their views why does the Government propose the arrangement now without consultation?
主席，我剛才正說到第二點，政府提供資訊不盡不實。
President I am talking about the second point and am explaining the reasons why I consider the information provided by the Government incomplete and untruthful
正如《眾新聞》指出，在2016年2月24日，國務院港澳事務辦公室已把西九龍站的內地口岸設置布局方案，正式轉交特區政府。
As pointed out in a news report published in Hong Kong Citizen News the Hong Kong and Macao Affairs Office of the State Council officially passed the layout scheme of the Mainland Port Area to be set up at West Kowloon Station to the HKSAR Government on 24 February 2016
這個方案甚至早已提交政府，至2016年6月27日，當時的運輸及房屋局副局長邱誠武仍表示仍在和內地商討有關方案，"在訂出任何具體計劃之前，不宜披露任何詳情"。
Although a concrete proposal had actually been passed to the Government already YAU Shing - mu the then Under Secretary for Transport and Housing told us on 27 June 2016 that they were still discussing the options of implementing a co - location arrangement with the Mainland authorities and it was inappropriate to disclose any details before any concrete plan was drawn up
政府由2008年甚至更早之前，已開始與內地展開雙方會談，商討這件事，很多組織架構已建立了，卻 一直不說；具體方案有了，也不透露。
The Government has been discussing the issue with the Mainland authorities since 2008 or even earlier and in the process a lot of plans and schemes have been drawn up and a concrete proposal has even been formulated but the Government has mentioned nothing about that
然後至今年2017年7月25日才向公眾披露，做法是否不夠老實？
It was not until 25 July this year that the arrangement was finally made public so would it be fair to say that the Government was not being very honest in this respect?
據報，該會的相關委員會也認為，全國人民代表大會常務委員會未必可以授權特區政府自行放棄《基本法》的任何條文。
But according to the relevant media reports the said Committee of the Bar Association is also of the view that it may not be possible for the Standing Committee of NPC to authorize the HKSAR Government to give up of its own accord the rights to exercise certain articles of the Basic Law
他們亦高度懷疑，如果把西九龍站內的內地口岸區視作香港以外的範圍，是否不違反《基本法》第八、十八、十九及二十二條？
They also remain highly sceptical of the legality of the co - location arrangement under Article 8 Article 18 Article 19 and Article 22 of the Basic Law if the Mainland Port Area to be set up at West Kowloon Station is deemed as an area outside the territory of HKSAR
就違反《基本法》的顧慮，過去政府披露的資料不盡不實，大律師公會於是在今年10月19日發表聲明，"促請政府及時向公眾提供'一地兩檢'安排下'三步走'建議的詳情，致使公眾能就相關法律及憲制議題進行恰當、有建設及理性的討論"。
Given the public concern about non - compliance with the requirements of the Basic Law and as the information previously disclosed by the Government is incomplete and untruthful the Bar Association issued a statement on 19 October this year to urge the Government to keep the general public timeously informed of the details of the Three - step Process to facilitate a proper constructive and rational discussion on the legal and constitutional issues involved
但是，政府有否透露過詳情？
However has the Government provided us with such details?
今年10月19日大律師公會已促請政府提供更多資料，因為根本沒有足夠資訊供大家討論。
The Bar Association urged the Government on 19 October this year to provide more information about its proposal because we do not have enough information to discuss the relevant arrangement
現在有人質疑，即使以經濟效益或成本效益的角度看，方案也很差劣，政府又不解釋清楚，只是匆匆要求議會立即通過這項議案，甚至連通過議案也等不了，"三步走"要變成"偷步走"。
There are also queries that the proposed arrangement is far from desirable if we look at the economic efficiency it generates or its cost - effectiveness and a clear explanation is again not available from the Government which has only made an urgent request for the immediate passage of its motion by this Council . It cannot even wait for the passage of the motion and it is considering turning the Three - step Process into a queue - jumping process
有冇搞錯？
Is it not ridiculous?
這樣的一個特區政府，連同我們幫政府忙的議員，都只想盡快通過議案便算了事。
The only purpose of this Government of ours together with Members who take side with the Government is to facilitate the passage of the Governments motion as soon as possible
《基本法》維護香港人的基本權益，不能被這個特區政府及建制派肆意破壞。
The basic rights and benefits enjoyed by Hong Kong people are protected under the Basic Law and these should not be recklessly undermined by the HKSAR Government and the pro - establishment camp
政府扭盡六壬，無論如何一定要愚弄公眾。
The Government has been racking its brain to fool the public by all means
政府已經操控一切，香港已經進入威權時代。
With everything under the control of the Government Hong Kong has been ushered into an era of authoritarianism
今早，林鄭月娥便彷如山寨王發惡般走出來說道："立法會這樣做，我不排除將'三步走'"甚麼"三步走""的過程一次過做完。
This morning Carrie LAM came out if she was an overlord and said angrily to this effect Should the Legislative Council behave in this manner I would not rule out completing the Three - step Process―what does she mean by the Three - step Process―in one go
香港不單已進入威權時代，更已進入極權時代。
Not only has Hong Kong been ushered into an era of authoritarianism but it has also entered an era of totalitarianism
玩弄立法會，玩弄《基本法》，其實等於破壞"一國兩制"。
To manipulate the Legislative Council and the Basic Law is actually tantamount to damaging one country two systems
他們違反了《基本法》。
They have violated the Basic Law
原來有人向你點頭，不是你向我點頭。
I now know that someone was nodding to you and you were not nodding to me
他們發言時全都欠着身，涎着臉，雖然不用陪着笑，但卻總是振振有詞或念念有詞地讀出講稿，同意"三步走"方案。
Although they did not need to put up a smiling face to please they all smiled subserviently with cap in hand when reading from their scripts in a most justified manner saying they approve of the Three - step Process proposal which is set to be put into implementation in Hong Kong
他說道："任何具體落實一地兩檢的安排，一定需要得到社會上同意。
He said The community must give consent before any co - location arrangement can be implemented in concrete terms
他就是上任運輸及房屋局局長張炳良。
He was the former Secretary for Transport and Housing Anthony CHEUNG
此舉便可以真正體現前局長張炳良當年所說的話。
Doing so can truly manifest the remarks made by the former Secretary Anthony CHEUNG at that time
他們喜歡引述中共的報告。
They also like to quote the reports of the Communist Party of China CPC
中國共產黨"十九大報告"中有句話："有事好商量，眾人的事情由眾人商量，是人民民主的真諦。
A line in the report of the 19 National Congress of the CPC reads Dialogue is good for society . People should engage in dialogues to discuss their own business . This is the true essence of democracy
香港可獲賦予其他權力，本來是正面的事，但如果變成自閹、自殘、自廢武功便完全不適合......
It is originally a positive thing for Hong Kong to be conferred other powers but it is not at all appropriate for Hong Kong to castrate or harm itself or even curtail its own power
如果讓他得逞，香港將會非常危險，政府往後便可以動輒引用《基本法》第二十條，由北京政府授權香港政府如此這般，因為這是"其他權力"的一部分，總之他說可以便可以。
If he is allowed to do so Hong Kong will be in serious peril . In other words the Government may from now on arbitrarily invoke Article 20 of the Basic Law whereby the Beijing Government may authorize the Hong Kong Government to do this and that as it is part of other powers . In a word the Secretary for Justice can do anything he wants
香港人真的要醒來。
The people of Hong Kong must wake up
大家試想想，如果這樣也可以，香港的法治便真的蕩然無存，總之北京的一套下達香港，不管律政司司長是誰，他也可以公開表示："是的，我們有權這樣做，就是這樣了"。
If it can be done this way the rule of law will become non - existent in Hong Kong . Anyway so long as Beijing issues an order to Hong Kong no matter who the Secretary for Justice is he can say publicly Yes we have the power to do so period
不過，代價是否太大呢？
However is the price too big to pay?
此外，連方便快捷也是謊言。
Furthermore the convenience and speediness is also a lie
我們這邊會有多位同事向政府娓娓數算所謂的"方便快捷"是如何不知所謂。
Many colleagues on our side will explain in detail to the Government why the so - called convenience and speediness makes no sense at all
"割地兩檢"肯定是一個黑洞，無論如何漂白，仍然是漆黑一片的黑洞。
Ceding Hong Kong land for co - location is definitely a black hole . It is still totally dark no matter how the co - location arrangement is bleached
假貨無論如何仿真，仍然是假貨。
We cannot turn something that is fake into authentic no matter how hard we try
"他回應不會無緣無故再出現同類情況。
In response the Secretary for Justice said that similar situations would not happen for no reason
他們竟然指是中文出錯，是中文翻譯有誤，意思應是"洗手間"而非"宿舍"。
They can somehow put the blame on the Chinese translation saying the translation should be 洗手間 instead of 宿舍
原來，他們是以英文為原文的。
It turns out that the English version is regarded as the original
讓我再次討論黨的"十九大報告"，當中有一句是讚揚年青人的，便是"青年一代有理想、有本領、有擔當"。
Let me come back to the discussion of the report of the 19 National Congress of the CPC . A line in the report is devoted to praising young people . It reads Young people have ambitions abilities and commitments
年青一代是有擔當的，而香港有太多問題尚未解決。
The young generation is willing to make commitment but there are too many unresolved problems in Hong Kong
代理主席，我根據《議事規則》第401條，動議"現即將辯論中止待續"的議案。
Deputy President under RoP 401 I move that the debate be now adjourned
我有的是時間，我當然會說，用不着你擔心......
I surely will talk about it and dont you worry about me Right!
是這個了，又是 2016年，剛才提到張炳良的那番說話是在去年1月說的，這一句也是在2016年1月說的，我非常懷疑是袁國強說的......
It was again 2016 . Those remarks of Anthony CHEUNG that I mentioned earlier were made in January last year whereas this remark was made in January 2016 and I very much suspect that it was made by Rimsky YUEN Some people are going away right?
除了剛才說的問題，包括2008年香港政府成立專責小組監察"一地兩檢"這回事。
Apart from the problems mentioned just now other problems include the one with the task force set up by the Hong Kong Government in 2008 to oversee issues relating to the co - location arrangement
這是要回答的，張炳良承諾市民一定有充足的機會充分表達意見。
All these questions require answers and Anthony CHEUNG once undertook that members of the public would definitely be given ample opportunities to fully express their views
另一點是，內地的官方文件寫得很清楚，國務院港澳事務辦公室在2014年年底之後已經"拍板"在香港的高鐵站實施"一地兩檢"。為何到了去年年中，官員仍集體嘮嘮叨叨說未有具體方案、未能披露？這是第三個問題。
Another point is that as clearly stated in an official paper issued by the Mainland authorities some time after the end of 2014 the Hong Kong and Macao Affairs Office of the State Council already endorsed implementation of the co - location arrangement at the XRL station in Hong Kong
"三步走"、與內地訂立協議，就這樣做吧。
Just proceed to reach an agreement with the Mainland under the Three - step Process
由於有這一班"嘍囉"，立法幾乎是一定通過的。
With this group of lackeys here it is almost certain that the legislation will be passed
這是令人十分驚嚇的，當年訂立《基本法》的時候，曾經有人不只是有人，是很多人也擔心這樣的寫法很曖昧，不知想怎樣，究竟這樣做是好還是壞呢？
This is most frightening . During the drafting of the Basic Law back then some people―not only some people but many people―were concerned that the wording was too ambiguous to understand wondering if it would bode good or bad
相比北京，香港最大的困難是一個"信"字。
The greatest difficulty encountered by Hong Kong in the face of Beijing lies in the word trust
主席，我贊同毛孟靜議員提出的中止待續議案。
President I agree to the motion moved by Ms Claudia MO on adjournment of the debate
政府在立法會提出議案，本來是想取得民意支持，但沒有公開諮詢，又如何顯示真正有民意支持呢？
The original intention of the motion moved by the Government is to gain popular support but without public consultation how can the Government show that it has really gained popular support?
政府有錢、有人，而且有權，硬要推行"一地兩檢"本來應該"一帆風順"，卻選錯了"帆"，我指的是陳帆。
The Government has money manpower and powers . The implementation of the co - location arrangement should be smooth sailing 一帆風順 had it not chosen the wrong FAN 帆 . I am referring to Frank CHAN Fan
當別人問他為何取消福田站"一地兩檢"時，他卻說即使選擇了終生伴侶，也不等於要放棄其他選擇，因而被報章取笑為愛情哲學家。
When he was asked why the co - location arrangement at Futian Station was abandoned he said that even if a lifelong partner had been chosen it did not mean that other options had to be abandoned as well . That is why he was teased and called by newspapers a philosopher of love
主席，我認為這種"偷步走"行為反映了事實即使本會今天討論議案或完成辯論，政府會聆聽多少聲音和意見呢？
In my opinion her proposal for jumping the gun reflects the truth―how many voices and views will the Government heed even if the motion is discussed or the debate is concluded today?
如果在2014年已經作出決定，為何立法會一直被蒙在鼓裏呢？
If the decision was made in 2014 why has the Legislative Council been kept in the dark all along?