Borrison/hk-legicost huggingface dataset:
如果我們明白這一點，而主要元素在這3年來基本上沒有任何改變的時候，朱凱廸議員提出直接進入三讀的建議又似乎有其道理。
If we understand this point and if the Key Attributes basically have not changed over the past three years Mr CHU Hoi - dicks proposal of proceeding to the Third Reading direct seems to be reasonable
當然，在我們訂立一些關鍵性的規則或元素的時候，有否考慮由2014年至今，無論是巴塞爾協定或其他金融機構有否修改、檢討或加強這些主要元素，例如不再是25%或訂定更高的比例，以強化這系統的安全性呢？
Certainly when drawing up the key rules or elements have we considered whether the Basel Accords or other financial institutions have since 2014 revised reviewed or enhanced these key elements such as revising the 25 % threshold or pitching it at an even higher percentage to strengthen the security of this system?
主席，如果我們真的有機會交付內務委員會處理或交由法案委員會討論的話，我看到的好處是在審議法案的時候，我們可以再一次進行查詢，看看對於不同金融機構的處置機制，巴塞爾協定及國際金融機構有否一些新的準則，而我相信這些準則將進一步確立處置機制的有效性。
President if we really have a chance to refer the Bill to the House Committee or for discussion by a Bills Committee the merit is that during the scrutiny of the Bill we can make enquiries once again and look into whether regarding the resolution mechanisms of various financial institutions the Basel Accords and international financial institutions have set out new standards which I believe will further establish the validity of the resolution system
我的意思是，在金融危機出現之前或在今天資產泡沫相當嚴重的情況之下，2014年制訂的主要元素是否已經足以保障金融機構或普通的存戶呢？
What I mean is before the emergence of a financial crisis or when an asset bubble has become very serious now do the Key Attributes formulated in 2014 already suffice for protecting financial institutions or ordinary depositors?
因此，主席，我覺得有需要透過內務委員會交付法案委員會研究，由法案委員會進一步討論這重要的一點。
Therefore President I think it is necessary to refer the Bill to a Bills Committee through the House Committee so that the former can study the Bill and further discuss this salient point
主席，我剛才談到《條例草案》本身的要求，其實《條例草案》是根據巴塞爾委員會在1991年頒布的國際標準，而1991年的標準至現在......
President just now I talked about the requirements of the Bill itself . The Bill was introduced in accordance with the international standards promulgated by BCBS in 1991 and while these standards of 1991 are carried forward to this day
他亦指出，立法會有其慣例、會議常規和規則，要先討論有法律效力的議案，而並非沒有法律效力的議案，例如"一地兩檢"等。
He likewise pointed out that the Legislative Council has its established practices standing orders and rules under which it must discuss legally binding motions as a priority rather than non - legally binding motions such as the one on the co - location arrangement and so on
這是他提出議案的主要論點及精神。
These are his main arguments and spirit in proposing the motion
主席，對朱凱廸議員的論點，大致上及原則上我並無異議。
President generally and also in principle I have no objection to Mr CHU Hoi - dicks arguments
他說應該把握機會，透過此項議案，向行政當局發放清楚的信息，顯示立法會有尊嚴，並非可以隨意玩弄或操控。
He asserted that we should seize the opportunity and make use of this motion to send an unequivocal message to the executive that the Legislative Council has dignity and would not be fooled around or manipulated at will
主席，我覺得向行政當局發放立法會有尊嚴這信息，並非透過簡單的程序就可以達到目的。
President I do not think we can achieve the purpose of sending the message to the executive that the Legislative Council has dignity simply by procedural means
我認為，立法會過去一直也有向行政當局及社會大眾發放這樣的信息，為何今天要特別引用第544條才可以達致這樣的效果呢？
I think that on previous occasions the Legislative Council has sent such a message to the executive society and the general public . Why is it necessary to invoke the specific provision of RoP 544 today in order to achieve the same effect?
我覺得當中存在一點疑問。
I think there is a question mark over this
朱凱廸議員強調不可以讓政府隨意玩弄及操控《議事規則》，但除非政府告訴我們，過去或現在曾經沒有根據《議事規則》行事，又或主席過去主持會議或審批程序或議案時，沒有依據《議事規則》所賦予的權力行事，否則我難以認為政府曾經玩弄及操控權力。
Mr CHU Hoi - dick stressed that we should not allow the Government to fool around with RoP and manipulate it at will . But unless the Government can tell us a previous or current instance of anyone failing to conduct himself in accordance with RoP or a previous occasion of the President not acting in compliance with the powers conferred by RoP in chairing meetings or approving procedural matters or motions I can hardly agree to the assertion that the Government has abused and manipulated its power
會議廳內現有足夠法定人數。
A quorum is present in the Chamber now
梁耀忠議員，我已多次提醒議員應針對如何處理《條例草案》的餘下程序發言。
Mr LEUNG Yiu - chung I have reminded Members many times that their speeches should address the question of how the remaining proceedings of the Bill should be dealt with
梁耀忠議員，請返回辯論的議題。
Mr LEUNG Yiu - chung please come back to the question of the debate
讓我舉一個例子，希望其他議員不要說這個例子已有人引用過，我不能再引用，因為我的觀點與其他議員不同，他們希望盡快通過《條例草案》。
Let me cite an example . I hope other Members will not say that since this example has already been cited I cannot cite it again . I say this because my viewpoint differs from that of other Members in the sense that they hope to see the expeditious passage of the Bill
在1985年6月6日，政府下令海外信託銀行暫停營業，並在當日傍晚發出聲明，指商業罪案調查科已着手調查銀行的經營情況，並於翌日召開立法局特別會議，三讀通過特別法例，而且政府更動用了20億元外匯基金來接管海外信託銀行。
On 6 June 1985 the Government ordered the Overseas Trust Bank OTB to suspend operation and issued a statement in the evening the same day to the effect that the Commercial Crime Bureau had commenced an investigation into OTBs operation and a special meeting would be held at the then Legislative Council the next day to pass a special Bill through three Readings . Besides the Government even acquired OTB with 2 billion from the Exchange Fund
主席，我舉出這例子，並非要說明通過程序的急切性，而是銀行倒閉會對社會帶來甚麼影響。
President I have cited this example to illustrate the social impacts of bank closures rather than the urgency of completing the proceedings
朱凱廸議員說銀行業已有共識，故此可以不經過某些程序，但我認為問題不單關乎銀行業界，也與市民大眾有關，那為何不提供多些機會讓市民大眾表達意見呢？
Mr CHU Hoi - dick asserted that a consensus had been forged in the banking industry so certain procedures could be dispensed with . But I think this matter concerns not only the banking industry but also the general public . So why should we refuse to offer more opportunities for the general public to express their views?
我覺得這方面非常重要。
I think this is very important
所以，我覺得這個問題非常重要，影響將非常深遠，必須多花些時間討論。
So I think this issue is very important and more time must be spent on discussions given the far - reaching consequences
能否解決問題呢？
Can this solve the problems?
主席，我認為這項《條例草案》有很多方面值得我們繼續深思。
President I think that many aspects of the Bill warrant further thorough consideration by us
正如我剛才提到"賦權"這個字眼，"賦權金融管理專員制定附屬法例，訂明與認可機構有關的財務風險承擔限度"。
One example is the expression confer a general power I mentioned a moment ago as in confer a general power on the Monetary Authority to make rules prescribing limits on exposures incurred by authorized institutions
代理主席，首先，我感謝剛才多位發言的議員表示期望聽我發言。
First of all Deputy President I wish to thank the many Members who have spoken just now for expressing the hope to hear my speech
其實剛才財經事務及庫務局劉局長發言動議二讀《2017年銀行業條例草案》時，已明確指出這項《條例草案》的目的，是令香港的銀行法例符合最新的國際監管標準，是很清晰明確的。
As a matter of fact during the Second Reading of the Banking Amendment Bill 2017 the Bill earlier the Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury James Henry LAU has pointed out clearly and definitively in his speech that the Bill seeks to bring the banking legislation of Hong Kong up - to - date in accordance with the latest international standards
但是，很遺憾，這項《條例草案》因為時間安排的關係，成為今天"拉布"行動的工具和焦點。
However much to my regret due to scheduling arrangement the Bill becomes the tool and focus of filibustering today
如果把這項《條例草案》交付內務委員會，一般會有議員提出成立法案委員會，以一次或多次會議逐條審議《條例草案》內容。
If the Bill is referred to the House Committee Members generally will propose the establishment of a Bills Committee to scrutinize each clause of the Bill in one or multiple meetings
這類法案的性質較具技術性，在法案委員會上討論的優點是較為聚焦。
Since such Bills are relatively technical in nature putting them through the discussions of a Bills Committee has the merit of making such discussions focused
在法案委員會內完成討論後，無論有沒有修訂，再呈交大會討論，然後辯論和三讀通過，這才是完整的程序。
It would make the whole procedure complete to subject the Bill with or without amendments to discussion in the Bills Committee before presenting it to the whole Council for discussion followed by debates and passage after Third Reading
我相信多位同事也認同，立法會議員其中一項重要職責，就是認真地審議法例。
I believe many Honourable colleagues will agree that it is one of the major responsibilities of Legislative Council Members to scrutinize legislation seriously
如果這項議案獲通過，《條例草案》今天便會突然進入最後全體委員會審議階段，而不經內務委員會和法案委員會，很多同事未必有足夠的準備。
If this motion were passed the Bill would suddenly enter the Committee stage of the whole Council instead of going through the House Committee and a Bills Committee leaving many Honourable colleagues not prepared adequately
其實主席剛才在小休時研究是否批准辯論這項議案時，很多同事也問我究竟這項議案的具體內容是甚麼，這足以證明真的不是理想的做法。
In fact during the break just now when the President was considering whether or not to allow this motion debate to proceed many colleagues asked me about the specifics of the motion . It serves to show that this method is not at all desirable
剛才也有議員跟我說我應感到很高興，並支持朱凱廸議員的議案快些獲通過。
Some Members also said to me just now that I should be very pleased and support the speedy passage of Mr CHU Hoi - dicks motion
但是，其實我並非這樣想，因為正如剛才有議員所說，《條例草案》受國際關注，立法會應採用一貫嚴謹的標準來審議。
This is however not what I thought . For the Bill is a matter of international concern as some Honourable colleagues have pointed out just now and should be scrutinized by the Legislative Council with its consistent standard of stringency
我亦留意到剛才發言的議員，其實絕大部分也不贊同朱議員的議案。
I also noted that most of the Members who have spoken just now in fact do not support Mr CHUs motion
為了不浪費我們議會非常寶貴的時間，我建議無論剛才議員提出 的問題是問我或其他人，無論那些問題是我聽得懂或不管如何用心也聽不懂，大家也可在法案委員會內提出辯論。
To avoid wasting the very valuable time of our Council I suggest that Members should pose their questions whether those questions are directed to me or someone else and whether they are something I can understand or hardly make sense of in a Bills Committee for debate
所以，我不會支持這項議案。
Therefore I do not support this motion
我剛才談到本港作為國際金融中心的地位，國際金融中心除了銀行業外，其他行業同樣重要，但銀行業是百業之母，所以我們加強對銀行業的監管和支援是應該的。
As an international finance centre not only the banking industry is important other industries are also important . Yet the banking industry is the mother of all trades . Hence it is proper to step up our monitoring and support of the banking industry
談到這部分，我們也應該入題，就是朱凱廸議員今次提出的議案，即我們應否將《條例草案》交付內務委 員會以法案委員會來處理。
As we come to this point we should get on to the subject that is the motion moved by Mr CHU Hoi - dick today which is about whether or not the Bill should be referred to the House Committee . This involves a core value of Hong Kong―efficiency
這牽涉到香港的核心價值效率，代理主席，銀行業即金融業，金融業是講求效率的，而我們應否迅速地在今次會議上，一次過完成處理這項《條例草案》的程序，便是效率的問題。
Deputy President the banking industry is indeed the financial industry . The financial industry emphasizes efficiency . Hence whether or not the procedures concerning the Bill should be processed expeditiously in one go at this meeting is a matter of efficiency
談到效率的問題，我們必須細心考慮，究竟是效率重要，還是仔細審理法案，再處理諮詢較為重要......
When it comes to efficiency we must consider cautiously whether we should accord priority to efficiency or to the detailed examination of the Bill or the consultation
楊議員，就是否需要仔細審議條文這論點，剛才已有多位議員提及，亦有多位議員在會議上提及具體條文，所以請你集中談論你的論點。
Mr YEUNG regarding the argument on the need to make a detailed examination of the Bill many Members have mentioned it earlier whereas a number of Members have also mentioned the specific provisions at the meeting so please focus on your arguments
代理主席，正正為了避免提及其他議員剛才的論點，所以我並沒有提述具體條文，我說的是原則性的問題，旨在協助大家辯論應否支持朱凱廸議員今次提出的議案。
Deputy President rightly because I wish to avoid arguments already mentioned by other Members earlier I do not mention the specific provisions but talk about matters of principle trying to facilitate Members in debating whether or not the motion moved by Mr CHU Hoi - dick this time around merits support
我相信代理主席定必明察秋毫，看到我這用心良苦的做法。
I trust the Deputy Presidents discerning eyes would have noticed this intention of mine
有關效率和仔細審議條文的精神，剛才已有多位議員提及，請你提出新的論點，否則我會視之為重複發言。
The points about efficiency and the spirit of examining provisions in detail have been mentioned by a number of Members earlier . Please put forth new arguments otherwise you will be regarded as making repetition
主席，我謹動議二讀《2017年銀行業條例草案》。
President I move the Second Reading of the Banking Amendment Bill 2017 the Bill
條例草案的主要目的，是透過實施銀行業有關恢復規劃及財務風險承擔限度的最新國際監管標準，加強銀行體系的應變能力。
The main purpose of the Bill is to strengthen the resilience of our banking system through the implementation of the latest international standards on banking regulation in relation to recovery planning and financial exposure limits
近年的環球金融危機顯示，銀行在應對嚴峻壓力事件方面準備不足。
The global financial crises in recent years have pointed to the inadequacy of financial institutions in preparing for severe stress events
為應對這風險，由20國集團領袖成立的金融穩定理事會在2014年發表了關於恢復規劃的標準。
To address such vulnerability the Financial Stability Board FSB which was established by the G20 leaders issued in 2014 a set of standards relating to recovery planning
按照該標準，監管機構應確保金融機構維持一套恢復計劃。恢復計劃應制訂一系列措施，以讓該機構在受壓時，可以實施該等措施，以重建其財政資源和持續經營能力。
According to these standards supervisory authorities should ensure that financial institutions maintain a recovery plan that sets out a full menu of options to restore financial strength and viability when they come under stress
有關當局亦應有所需權力，以強制金融機構實施恢復措施。
The relevant authorities should also have the requisite powers to mandate the implementation of the recovery measures
目前來說，金融管理專員須倚賴《銀行業條例》賦予的資料蒐集權力，以規定認可機構擬訂恢復計劃。
To date the Monetary Authority MA has relied on the information gathering power under the Banking Ordinance to require authorized institutions AIs to prepare recovery plans
為提升透明度及確定性，我們建議在《銀行業條例》訂立明確條文，賦權金融管理專員規定認可機構制訂並落實相關的恢復規劃要求。
To provide greater transparency and certainty we propose to prescribe explicit provisions in the Ordinance to empower MA to require AIs to maintain and implement the relevant recovery planning requirements
此舉除了可確保符合金融穩定理事會的準則，更重要的是可確保我們銀行體系抵禦嚴峻壓力的能力。
This will ensure compliance with the relevant FSB standards and more importantly the resilience of our banking system to cope with severe stress
恢復計劃以外，《條例草案》亦旨在更新現時有關銀行的財務風險承擔限度。
Aside from recovery plans the Bill also seeks to update the limitations on financial exposures incurred by banks
根據《銀行業條例》，認可機構須遵從訂明的財務風險承擔限度，以避免其風險過度集中於某些範疇。
Under the Ordinance AIs are subjected to the prescribed limitations on the financial exposures that they may incur which seek to prevent their exposures from becoming overly concentrated in certain aspects
現時，這些限度是按照巴塞爾銀行監管委員會在1991年頒布的國際標準制訂。
The current exposure limitations follow the standards promulgated by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision BCBS in 1991
隨着巴塞爾委員會在2014年4月就計量及管控大額風險承擔公布新的監管框架，香港有責任按照最新國際標準，更新監管制度。
Following the BCBSs release of a new supervisory framework for measuring and controlling large exposures in April 2014 it is incumbent upon Hong Kong to bring our regulatory regime up to date in accordance with the latest international standards
要落實新的財務風險承擔框架，我們建議修訂《銀行業條例》，刪除過時的條文和訂立替代規則。
To implement the new large exposures framework we have proposed amendments to the Ordinance to remove obsolete provisions and institute replacement rules
鑒於新框架的技術性質，並考慮到替代規則須因應國際標準變更不時作出修訂，我們建議廢除主體法例 的相關條文，改為賦權金融管理專員制定附屬法例，訂明這些風險承擔限度。
In view of the technical nature of the new framework and that replacement rules need to be updated from time to time to reflect changes in international standards we propose to repeal the relevant provisions in the main legislation and instead empower MA to formulate subsidiary legislation to prescribe such limits on exposures
這個安排與我們現時落實巴塞爾委員會的資本、披露和流動性標準時所採用的方式一致。
Such approach is in line with that adopted in the past for implementing the BCBS capital disclosure and liquidity standards
主席，我們已在2017年3月16日向立法會財經事務委員會簡介上述立法建議。我們亦已就立法建議諮詢了銀行業界。兩者均對建議表示支持。
President we briefed the Panel on Financial Affairs of the Legislative Council on 16 March 2017 and consulted the banking industry on the proposed legislation to which both the Panel and the industry have expressed support
我希望立法會可以盡快通過《條例草案》，以便我們可以依時落實這些銀行業國際監管標準，提升香港作為國際金融中心，以及巴塞爾委員會和金融穩定理事會等組織成員的公信力。
I hope the Legislative Council can pass the Bill expeditiously so as to facilitate the timely implementation of the latest international standards on banking regulation and add to the credibility of Hong Kong both as an international financial centre and a responsible member of bodies including BCBS and FSB
第一，因為正如主席早前回覆很多民主派議員要求就《議事規則》提出修訂的信函清楚說出，要尊重議會的傳統和慣例。
First as clearly stated in the Presidents reply to many pro - democracy Members request for amending the Rules of Procedures the tradition and practices of the Council should be respected
過去而言，立法會就類似的條例草案也慣常交付立法會內務委員會及相關的法案委員會，讓議員和官員就草擬的法例詳細討論，以及聽取社會各界，包括相關的持份者及專家的意見，最後再提交立法會辯論。
In the past similar Bills were routinely referred to the House Committee and relevant Bills Committees of the Legislative Council so that Members and public officers could conduct detailed discussions on the draft legislation and views could be solicited from all sectors of the community including relevant stakeholders and experts before being tabled before the Legislative Council for debate
當然，如果政府擬修訂條例草案，可以主動提出，而議員對於條例草案有意見，亦有機會提出有關的修正案，並且遊說其他議員支持和接納。
Of course if the Government intends to amend the Bills it can take the initiative to propose amendments and if Members hold different views on the Bills they also have the opportunity to propose relevant amendments and lobby for the support and approval of other Members
所以，這個傳統和慣例應該要尊重和遵守。
Therefore such a tradition and practices should be respected and adhered to
主席，就這次朱凱廸議員提出的議案，我集中說兩點來反對：第一，是急切性的問題；第二，是重要性的問題。
President as regards the motion proposed by Mr CHU Hoi - dick I will focus my opposing views on two points the first one is about urgency; the second one is about importance
正如剛才有若干同事提及，立法會過去曾經引用《議事規則》第544條，不經內務委員會和法案委員會的機制，直接由立法會三讀通過法案。
As a number of Members have mentioned earlier in past terms of the Legislative Council RoP 544 was invoked so that a Bill was read the Third time and passed direct without engaging the mechanism of the House Committee and the Bills Committee
但是，歷史告訴我們，也是非常緊急和有迫切性才會這樣做。
However history tells us that it only happened because of extreme emergencies and urgency
主席，立法會前秘書長吳文華小姐撰寫的《香港特別行政區立法會歷史、規則及行事方式參考手冊》第7.80段提到："如有急切需要通過法例，政府可提交法案，在一次立法會會議上完成三讀程序。
President paragraph 7.80 of A Companion to the history rules and practices of the Legislative Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region penned by former Secretary General of the Legislative Council Ms Pauline NG reads Where there is an urgent need for the passage of legislation the Government may introduce bills that may have their 3 - reading process completed in one Council meeting
在此情況下，在負責有關法案的官員在二讀辯論發言後，任何議員可根據《議事規則》第544條，無經預告而動議不將法案交付內務委員會處理。
In this case after the public officer in charge of the bill has spoken at the second reading debate any Member may move without notice for the bill not to be referred to the House Committee under Rule 544 of the Rules of Procedure
如該議案獲得通過，立法會將立即在同一會議上就法案進行二讀辯論，而如法案二讀的議案獲得通過，便直接進入全體委員會審 議階段，隨之進行三讀。
If this motion is passed the Council will immediately proceed to debating the motion on the second reading of the bill and if passed will then proceed direct to committee stage and then third reading at the same meeting
有關例子包括《1982年人民入境條例草案》及《1985年海外信託銀行條例草案》。
Examples are the Immigration Amendment Bill 1982 and the Overseas Trust Bank Acquisition Bill 1985
而我們看看當年兩項法例的通過，確實有急切性。
Let us look at the two items of legislation thereby passed back then which were certainly urgent
第一項是《1982年人民入境條例草案》，關於當時越南船民來香港後面對很嚴峻的情況。
The first one is the Immigration Amendment Bill 1982 which was about the harsh conditions faced by Vietnamese boat people after arriving in Hong Kong
主席，多謝你的提醒，我盡量避免如《議事規則》所訂，"冗贅煩厭地重提本身或其他議員的論點"，多謝主席的提醒。
President thank you for your reminder . I will try to avoid irrelevance or tedious repetition of his own or other Members arguments as stipulated in RoP . Thank you President for your reminder
主席，我繼續說下去。
President I shall continue
第二，正如主席多次提醒我們，《議事規則》第451條是有關"冗贅煩厭地重複本身或其他議員的論點"。
Second as President you have repeatedly reminded us RoP 451 is pertinent to irrelevance and tedious repetition of his own or other Members arguments
我只是第一次說，我相信......
It was the first time I mentioned it . I believe
其實，我正正想說下去，你讓我說下去好嗎，主席？
Indeed I just want to continue . Can you let me continue speaking President?
因為《條例草案》其實是非常重要的。
Because the Bill is indeed very important
正如剛才代表銀行界的陳振英議員發言指出，其實《條例草案》相當技術性，亦非常重要。
Just as Mr CHAN Chun - ying who represents the banking sector said in his speech the Bill is fairly technical and very important
主席，政府提供給我們的資料當中提到《條例草案》的作用，就是"賦權金融管理專員規定認可機構維持、修訂或實施恢復計劃。該計劃包括一系列認可機構在受壓時可實施的恢復措施，以穩定及重建其財政資源和持續經營能力；以及更改認可機構財務風險承擔的限度，並賦權專員藉制定附屬法例，訂明該等限度"。
President the purpose of the Bill as stated in the information the Government provided for us is to empower the Monetary Authority MA to require an authorized institution AI to maintain revise or implement a recovery plan which should set out the measures that the institution can take to stabilize and restore its financial resources and viability in the event that it comes under severe stress; and change the limitations on financial exposures incurred by AIs and to empower MA to make rules for such limitations
這個問題其實不單影響個別銀行的生存及聲譽，更影響到香港整個金融業界的穩定。
The issue affects not only the survival and reputation of individual banks but also the stability of the entire financial sector in Hong Kong
而主席，你也知道，鑒於現時全球化的趨勢，很多金融集團出現問題時，其實都不是個別公司的事情，其影響是全球性的。
And President as you must know in the light of globalization the problems of many financial groups are not just the matters of some individual companies; their impact is global
正如大家也知道，如果《條例草案》寫得不好，日後對銀行的監管有任何疏忽，導致金融不穩，亦會影響本港作為全球金融中心地位的重要形象。
As Honourable colleagues all understand if the Bill is poorly drafted resulting in any negligence in the regulation of banks and thus instability in the financial market the crucial image of Hong Kong as a global financial centre will be tarnished
正如剛才有些同事所說，香港其中一根經濟支柱是金融業，我們絕對不容許金融業的聲譽受到影響，令我們國際金融中心的形象受損。
As some Honourable colleagues have said the financial sector is one of the economic pillars of Hong Kong . We absolutely do not allow the reputation of the financial sector to be affected nor the image of Hong Kong as an international financial centre to be tarnished
另一方面，訂立有關法例，亦是香港履行對於國際金融體系穩定的重要責任。
Meanwhile the enactment of relevant legislation is an act of Hong Kong to fulfil its duty vis - à - vis the stability of the international financial system
香港作為國際社會的重要一員，有無可推卸的責任，去履行一些國際的義務。
Hong Kong as a key member of the international community is duty - bound to discharge some international responsibilities
主席，就朱凱廸議員今次根據《議事規則》第544條提出的議案，嘗試將這項如此重要的《條例草案》不交付內務委員會及法案委員會處理，便由立法會通過，我認為是相當不理想的做法。
President I hold that it is rather undesirable for Mr CHU Hoi - dick to propose a motion under RoP 544 in an attempt to allow such an important Bill to be passed by the Legislative Council without it being referred to the House Committee and the Bills Committee
我亦覺得不應該開一個壞先例，讓一些無迫切性亦非常重要的法例倉卒通過。
I also consider that a bad precedent should not be set for the hasty passage of some non - urgent and very important Bills
這樣最終受損的，可能不單是銀行業界，也是本港市民，而國際社會的金融穩定和秩序亦會受到影響。
It follows that eventually the harm will befall not only the banking industry but also the people of Hong Kong; and the financial stability and order of the international community will also be affected
所以，朱凱廸議員，抱歉，我不能夠支持你的議案。
Therefore Mr CHU Hoi - dick sorry I cannot support your motion
主席，有研究指出，會議展覽業具有三高的特性，即高成長潛力、高附加價值及高創新效益。
President a study has pointed out that the convention and exhibition CE industry is characterized by three highs namely high growth potential high added - values and highly beneficial innovations
會展業既能提升會展設施所在城市的國際形象，又可吸引商務旅客到訪，從而帶動高增值旅遊業的發展。
Not only can CE industry improve the international image of the city where CE facilities are located it can also attract business visitors thereby driving the development of high value - added tourism
在2015-2016年度，會展及獎勵旅遊的訪港過夜旅客人次為172萬，他們的人均消費超過8,400港元，較一般訪港旅客高出百分之十六。
In 2015 - 2016 overnight CE and incentives arrivals in Hong Kong reached 1.72 million and their per - capita spending exceeded HK8,400 which is 16 % higher than that of inbound visitors in Hong Kong in general
另一方面，有不少亞洲城市近年已把會展業定為重點發展產業。
On the other hand in recent years quite a number of Asian cities have identified the CE industry as a key industry for development