Borrison/hk-legicost huggingface dataset:
主席，我擔心政府是否真的有意推動一場公平、公正的選舉，還是自己也"落場"製造一些不利的因素。
Why are these facilities left unrepaired after one or two weeks? . Does the Government deliberately do so? . President I am worried whether the Government truly wishes to hold a fair and just election; or whether it wishes to proactively create some unfavourable factors
市民亦擔心會否有人再借助黑勢力來自編、自導、自演，之前已經發生過。
People are also worried whether some people would ask help from triad societies to self - created directed and executed again something which happened before . All Hongkongers know about the 21 July incident and the 31 August incident I just mentioned
市民"心水清"，自會看得出事實。
People with a clear mind would know what it was all about
主席，我想警告政府、所有建制派同事及任何想破壞這場選舉的惡勢力，不要做出這些行為，這是極不智的。
President I wish to warn the Government all pro - establishment Members and triad members who want to ruin this election not to do such things . This will be very unwise
我亦希望在此忠告政府，如果政府想破壞這場選舉，將要負上整個社會的代價，是火上加油，並會帶來憲政上很大的問題，包括之後相應舉行的立法會選舉及行政長官選舉，令問題難以處理。
I also wish to warn the Government here that if it wants to ruin this election it will have to sacrifice the entire community because it will fan up the fire and create a major constitutional problem . This covers also the Legislative Council Election and Chief Executive Election to be held later and this will make the problem even harder to be handled
其實憲政問題亦屬其次，最慘的是把現時社會在躁動邊緣推到北京政府一直不希望香港人提到的革命之上，政府才肯停止。
In fact the constitutional problem comes only the second . The worst thing is that the Government is unwilling to stop until the present social uproars turn into a revolution something the Beijing Government does not want Hongkongers to mention
請政府放下屠刀，回頭是岸。
Would the Government please lay down its butchers knife and repent
主席，我希望建制派同事不要諉過於人，罪魁禍首就是他們，請他們承擔責任。
President I hope Members of the pro - establishment camp do not put the blame on others . They are the culprits
如果政府真的想透過一場公平合理的選舉，讓已經"爆煲"的民意以選舉制度來表達，讓民憤得以宣泄，希望大家共同讓這場選舉可以落實，否則，我很擔心政府，以至整個香港社會都要承擔這場選舉失敗的後果，這肯定是沒有香港市民想看到的。
Would they please take the blame . If the Government truly wishes to let the already boiling public sentiments be expressed through a fair and reasonable election and let public anger be vented through the election system I hope we can jointly let this election be held; otherwise I am afraid that the Government as well as our entire society will have to bear the outcome of a failed election together . This will definitely be something no Hongkonger wishes to see
我在此敦促政府，務必讓這場選舉可以在公平、公正和合理的情況下完成。
Here I urge the Government to ensure that the election can be successfully held in a fair just and reasonable manner
主席，剛才鄺俊宇議員說了很多社會上要解決的問題，例如長者院舍宿位和輪候公屋的問題，基層市民現正在水深火熱之中，希望政府早日派發1萬元。
President just now Mr KWONG Chun - yu said that many social problems are yet to be solved such as the waiting time for residential care homes for the elderly and public housing and the grass roots are in dire straits . Hence he hoped the Government will hand out the 10,000 expeditiously
聽畢他的發言，我以為他會支持這份財政預算案，因為這些都是預算案中有關開支的內容，包 括福利、房屋和派發1萬元的措施，豈料說到最後，民主黨的立場是反對這份預算案。
Judging from his speech I thought he will support this Budget because all these expenditures are covered in the Budget including welfare housing and the 10,000 cash handout . Surprisingly in the end the Democratic Partys position is against this Budget
既然他反對預算案，他之前說那麼多動聽的說話又代表甚麼呢？
If he opposes the Budget what did he make those pleasant remarks for?
不過，我想說說自己對這份預算案的看法。
Nevertheless I would like to talk about my views on the Budget
當然，我們看到司長在這次預算案中建議向每人派發1萬元應急，特首亦提出了第一及第二輪防疫抗疫基金，但這些只能救助部分人，始終有些人未能受惠，而未能受惠的市民便感到遭社會或政府忽視和忽略。
Certainly we can see the Secretarys proposal of a 10,000 handout to each person in the Budget to meet urgent needs and the first and second rounds of the Anti - epidemic Fund AEF proposed by the Chief Executive . However these measures can only help some people . There will always be people who cannot be benefited and thus feel neglected and overlooked by society or the Government
這是最簡單的做法，為何做不到？
This is the simplest way to do it so why can it not be done?
真的令人費解。
It is really puzzling
既然抗疫基金的第一輪措施，有第二輪來補漏拾遺，因此，亦應該有第三輪措施來彌補第二輪的不足。
Since the second round of AEF measures aims at filling the omissions in the first round of AEF there should be a third round of measures to fill the omissions in the second round
一名65歲的在職市民，有糧單，但老闆不替他的MPF供款，於是他無法受惠於抗疫基金。
There was a 65 - year - old employee who has pay slips but his employer has not made Mandatory Provident Fund MPF contributions for him so he cannot benefit from AEF
一名在地 盤當散工的註冊工人，工作時有時無，亦不能受惠。
A registered worker who serves as a casual worker at construction sites from time to time also cannot benefit from it
一名建造業工人，任職管工，但因為他不是註冊員工，於是亦不能受惠。
A construction worker who serves as a foreman also cannot benefit from it because he is not a registered worker
很多自僱人士在過程中連1元資助也沒有，還有一些非註冊的小型補習社同樣未能受惠。
Many self - employed people have not received even 1 of subsidy in the process . So is also the case for some non - registered small tutorial centres
如果我們繼續說下去，還有千萬個例子可以與司長和局長分享，不過，我不再說下去了，因為這些實在是數之不盡。
I can continue to share tens of thousands of examples with the Secretaries . However I will not go on and on because there are really countless cases
政府應該做的是在抗疫基金下或在預算案之外再加碼，幫助這些市民。
The Government should further increase the subsidies under AEF or provide further subsidies in addition to those announced in the Budget in order to help these people
當然，沒有一個方案或預算案是百分之一百完美的，總會有些遺漏，但遺漏不要緊，最重要的是修補。
Certainly no plan or budget is perfect . There will always be some inadequacies but that does not matter . The most important are remedial measures
我在這裏想向司長說，有3點必須緊記：第一，要多聆聽市民和議員的意見。
I would like to tell the Financial Secretary to remember three points first listen more to the opinions of the public and Members
我們當然並非最了不起，我們的想法亦會有遺漏，但我們可以補充他聽不到的聲音。
We are of course not the most remarkable and our views may also be inadequate but we can make up for the voices that he could not hear
如果他的預算案和抗疫基金有遺漏而問題拖延太久，市民便會擔心自己沒有份，亦會覺得自己被忽視，社會的怨氣便由此而生。
If there are inadequacies in the Budget and AEF and the issues are dragged on for too long people will be worried that they are left out and ignored and thus give rise to social grievances
第二，政府千萬不要把支援方案搞得太複雜，過往派發4,000元時已汲取經驗，亦有一點是要戒掉的，就是不要經常覺得市民會欺騙政府的金錢，最重要的是要幫助市民，有沒有人欺騙政府的金錢是次要的考慮，可以幫助市民解決燃眉之急才是最重要的。
Second the Government must not make the support scheme too complicated drawing on experience from the 4,000 handout in the past . Another point is that it should quit thinking that people would swindle public money . The most important thing is to help the people
如果市民欺騙政府的金錢，政府有無數方法可以予以懲處和阻嚇，但不要因為一人或一小撮人鑽空子，便不加思索，把可以幫助市民的計劃擱置。
Whether anyone swindles public money is secondary consideration while helping people meet their pressing needs is the priority . The Government has countless ways to penalize for and deter people from swindling public money but it should not indiscriminately shelve schemes helpful to the people simply because one person or a small group of people exploited the loopholes
第三，政府應該從每次推出"派錢"或紓困措施的不足汲取教訓，這始終是政府最薄弱的一環。
Third the Government should learn from the cash handouts or relief measures introduced in the past which were considered not enough and have always been a weakness of the Government
以往曾派發6,000元及4,000元，這次派發1萬元的時候，為何不可以較之前快捷及準確呢？
It has given out 6,000 and 4,000 before so why can the 10,000 handout not be handled more efficiently and accurately?
以往的經驗有否成為政府現時派發1萬元的參考？政府今次建立的系統和資料庫，在下次有需要再推出紓困措施時，可否作為參考及基礎呢？
Can the system and database established this time be used as a reference and a basis when relief measures are necessary next time?
如果政府能夠謹記這3點，我相信日後再推出紓困措施，甚至要編製恆常的預算案時，一定能夠做得較現時更進步及更好。
If the Government can keep these three points in mind I believe it will certainly do a better job in implementing relief measures or even drawing up regular Budgets in the future
最多人挑剔預算案的另一點，應該是泛民同事口中的警隊開支問題。
Another item most criticized in the Budget according to colleagues from the pan - democratic camp is probably the expenditure of the Police
警方已在多個場合指出為何警隊的開支會大幅增加，最主要的原因是過去8個月以來的"黑暴"，他們需要大量警力維持治安。
The Police have pointed out on many occasions the reasons for the substantial increase in their expenditure . The main reason is that a large number of police officers is needed to maintain public order due to the black riots in the past eight months
暴徒惹事犯法，警員執法作出拘捕，這是天經地義的事，是體現法治，美化"黑暴"並不能掩飾真相。
It is a matter of justice and a manifestation of the rule of law for police officers to enforce and law and arrest rioters who broke the law . Glorifying black - clad rioters cannot conceal the truth
過去8個月，我們每天也看到"黑暴"阻礙市民上班和上學，每晚也有示威活動，堵路、縱火、放置炸彈、"私了"、破壞公物和港鐵設施、佔領校園，這些全都需要警方執法。
In the past eight months we could see black - clad rioters preventing people from going to work and school every day as well as demonstrations every evening . Road blockages arsons placing of bombs vigilante attacks and vandalism of public properties and MTR facilities and occupation of campus all called for law enforcement actions by the Police
既然要動用警方的人力物力執法，開支當然會增加，所以2019-2020年度的預算開支才會增加。
Since Police manpower and resources are needed to enforce the law their expenditure will surely raise thus the budget increase in 2019 - 2020
但是，有一點是要看清楚的，當中大部分是超時工作津貼，如果警員可以選擇，我相信沒有人想得到這津貼，他們寧願社會安定和諧，可以回復正常的維持治安工作。
However we have to see clearly that a majority of the increase is for overtime work allowance . If given a choice I believe no police officer would want this allowance . They would prefer a stable and harmonious society so that they can resume their normal duty of maintaining law and order
沒有人想得到這些加班津貼，而這些津貼亦無法補償過去一段時間他們面對的壓力，以及其家人被"起底"和欺凌的苦況。
Nobody wanted the overtime work allowance which can barely compensate for the pressure they faced in the past period of time and the doxxing and bullying their families had to suffer
泛民同事提出的另一點，是警方今年購買很多裝備。
Another point raised by colleagues from the pan - democratic camp is that the Police have purchased a lot of equipment this year
購買或更新裝備有甚麼問題呢？
What is wrong with purchasing or updating equipment?
購買了裝備，不一定要使用，但當警方要作出一些行動而沒有適當裝備，可能議員同事又會反過來予以批評。
It may not be necessary to use the equipment purchased . However if the Police do not have the right equipment to carry out certain operations Honourable colleagues may turn around and criticize them
以往警員可能只穿着防暴裝備，但現時的"黑暴"原來會向警員投擲鏹水彈，向他們射箭，又會用鎅刀割頸，相應的防護措施是不應該購買的嗎？
In the past police officers might wear anti - riot gears only . But now black - clad rioters would throw acid bombs on them shoot arrows at them and even slit their necks with a cutter . Should relevant protective gears not be purchased?
是絕對應該購買的。
They should absolutely be purchased
現時不論媒體、警察體育遊樂會、警務處處長甚至招聘警員的部門，也收到白色粉末甚至郵包炸彈恐嚇，在這方面，是否需要添置相關裝備以作出應對呢？
The media the Police Sports and Recreation Club the Commissioner of Police and even the department recruiting police officers have received white powder or even threatened by parcel bombs . Should relevant gears be purchased in response to the situation?
如果我們繼續......美化罪行，確實會影響我們的下一代。
If we continue to glorify crimes our next generation will indeed be affected
提到自編自導自演，當然要說"林子健釘書機事件"，沒有可能說其他，這是常識，難道譚文豪議員沒有常識嗎？
Speaking of scripting directing and performing by oneself we certainly have to mention the stapler incident alleged by Howard LAM but not anything else . This is common sense does Mr Jeremy TAM have no common sense at all?
另外，譚議員一站起來便向何俊賢議員"抽水"，將非洲豬瘟和"武漢肺炎"兩者相提並論。
In addition when Mr TAM rose to speak he immediately piggybacked on Mr Steven HO by mentioning African swine fever in the same breath with Wuhan pneumonia
譚議員是否想拖低立法會的形象，彷彿我們連世衞的資料都跟不上呢？
Does Mr TAM want to tarnish the image of the Legislative Council as if we even fail to catch up with the information released by WHO?
這就是反對派和"攬炒派"的基本論調和邏輯。
This is virtually the basic tone and logic of the opposition camp and the mutual destruction camp
主席，預算案是在2月26日公布，坦白說，當時還未有很多禁令，大家對於疫情都採取觀望態度。
President the Budget was delivered on 26 February . Frankly speaking there were not too many prohibition orders back then and people took a wait - and - see attitude towards the epidemic
第二，就是剛剛通過的1,375億元防疫抗疫基金第二輪撥款。
The next point is the second - round funding of AEF of 137.5 billion that has recently been passed
我們當然明白，無論是建制派的同事以至"攬炒派"均認為這1,375億元仍然有不足之處。
We certainly understand that both Honourable colleagues of the pro - establishment camp and even the mutual destruction camp consider this sum of 137.5 billion still insufficient
但問題是，雖然仍有不足，為何最後有議員會支持，有議員會堅決反對？
But the question is though it is insufficient why would some Members support it whilst some Members strongly oppose it in the end?
主席，道理其實很簡單，這1,375億元的確不是人人有份，但為何我認為一定要通過呢？
President the reason is actually very simple . It is true that not everyone can benefit from this 137.5 billion but why do I think it must be passed?
因為防疫抗疫基金第二輪措施的方向很清晰，就是要"保就業"。
Because the direction of the second - round AEF measures is very clear it is to safeguard employment
"保就業"的概念是甚麼？
What is the concept of safeguarding employment?
現在"攬炒派"的做法卻是，總之他們不喜歡、看不順眼、稍有瑕疵的，他們便會全盤否定，因而反對、否決這1,375億元的防疫抗疫基金撥款。
Nonetheless what the mutual destruction camp is doing now in short is to reject totally anything that they dislike or not pleasing to the eye or anything with even the slightest flaws . Thus they have objected and voted against the 137.5 billion AEF funding
其實大家都明白，擔任議員多年，大家都理解到，由於建制派同事會支持，所以需要幫助的街坊、需要幫助的市民，最終都會得到這筆錢，所以"攬炒派"才會肆無忌憚地玩弄這些伎倆。
In fact having served as Members for many years all of us understand that given the support of Honourable colleagues of the pro - establishment camp people in the neighborhood who need help and members of the public in need will eventually get this sum of money . The mutual destruction camp hence plays these tricks unscrupulously
不過，我想說的是，如果日後由"攬炒派"主導立法會的話，屆時市民是否還有機會得到這些援助呢？
However what I want to say is if the mutual destruction camp dominates the Legislative Council in the future will members of the public still have the chance to receive such assistance by then?
現在香港要抗疫，究竟我們要做甚麼呢？
It is now time for Hong Kong to fight against the epidemic what should we do indeed?
要繼續"攬炒"，還是讓政府做些他們認為可以做到的工作呢？
Should we pursue mutual destruction or to allow the Government to do the work considered to be within their capabilities?
我想問，打算投反對票的同事，投票後還有何顏面見自己的支持者或市民大眾？
May I ask Honourable colleagues who intend to cast a negative vote will they still have the face to meet their supporters or the general public after casting such a vote?
一般市民可能亦會受到影響，因為如果他們想求醫，而醫管局能夠挽留人才，這樣他們便可安心一點，至少醫院內都是有醫德而且願意幫助病人的醫護人員。
Members of the ordinary public are also at stake because if HA is able to retain talents people who want to seek medical treatment can feel somewhat at ease for at least the health care personnel in the hospitals are upholding a high standard of medical ethics and willing to help the patients
不過，由於議會要監督政府施政，所以議員通常會提出一些原本計劃內沒有的項目，例如指出哪些部分要多做一些，這是我們身為議員的職能和職責，是正確的。
However as the legislature has to monitor policy administration by the Government Members would usually propose some items that are not included in the original programmes . For instance we may point out which parts require more efforts . This is our functions and duties as Members it is right to do so
但問題是，是否因為某人認為有不足或感到不滿，所以最後便要投反對票？
But the question is should one cast a negative vote in the end simply because he thinks there are deficiencies or he is dissatisfied?
反對票的意義是否用來表達自己的不滿？
Is a negative vote meant to be used to express ones dissatisfaction?
大家要思考一下，如果反對票太多，意味着整項議案不會獲得通過，政府部門便無錢可用，連基本運作都不行。
We must give it some thoughts . If there are too many negative votes it implies that the motion will not be passed . Government departments will have no money to spend hence even the basic operations cannot be maintained
當然，大家希望政府做到"加零一"是正常的，世界上所有人民都希望政府可以做到"加零一"，但事實上，有哪個政府可以做到"加零一"？
Of course it is normal for everyone to expect outstanding performance from the Government . All people in the world wish that their Government can do so . But in fact which government is able to deliver outstanding perform?
因此，我們要靠日常與政府接觸、磨合和溝通來反映民意，之後再要求政府多做一點，而不是像"攬炒派"現在奉行"你死我亡"的態度，總之有不滿便要全盤否定政府的一切。
Therefore we must rely on maintaining contact running in and communication with the Government on a routine basis in order to reflect public opinion and then urge the Government to make more efforts instead of following the attitude of one shall stand and one shall fall adopted by the mutual destruction camp . In short they will completely reject everything about the Government when they are dissatisfied
這是一門學問，也是一個懸念，沒有人知道答案，究竟重寫又重寫，要多久才能成事？
This is a kind of knowledge which is also anyones guess as no one knows the answer . How long will it take to get the job done when the measures have to be rewritten again and again?
"，其實我一聽到這題目便很生氣，因為整句說話聽起來平平無奇，但實際上是在"洗腦"。
In fact I was very angry after hearing this topic because the whole question sounds quite plain and ordinary but it is actually brainwashing . People brush their teeth wash their face have a meal take a bath go to work or go to school after getting up every day
大家每天起床、刷牙、洗臉、吃飯、洗澡、上班、上課，內務委員會停擺一時三刻，固然不會影響市民的日常生活，有些人可 能不關心政事，繼續每天如常生活，但立法會停擺對民生是否真的零影響呢？
The daily life of the public will not be affected when the House Committee comes to a standstill for a short period of time . Some people may not care about politics and they continue to live their normal life every day . But does a standstill of the Legislative Council really have zero impact on peoples livelihood?
我會讓這8位議員發言完畢後才宣布休會。
I will allow these eight Members to speak and adjourn the meeting after they have spoken
主席，關於今次的財政預算案，最大亮點當然是所謂派發1萬元的安排。
President the highlight of the Budget this time is certainly the 10,000 handout
對於派發1萬元，我們除要求派發1萬元外，也要求加快派、簡單派，因為這1萬元對全港很多市民來說，也是一項補漏的安排。
In this connection we ask that the 10,000 be given out more quickly and simply because it is an arrangement to fill the omissions for many Hong Kong people
在第二輪防疫抗疫基金的安排上，雖然有部分能夠應付市民的急切需要，但的確仍有遺漏和不足。
Although some measures in the second round of the Anti - epidemic Fund AEF could meet the pressing needs of the public there were indeed some omissions and inadequacies
我舉一個例子，很多65歲以上、沒有供強制性公積金或正在失業的人士，目前仍然無法受惠，對於政府今次推出第二輪防疫抗疫基金，以及要求這些朋友申請綜援的說法，我認為是非常不理想的。
For example many people over 65 without making any Mandatory Provident Fund MPF contributions and the unemployed are still unable to benefit . I find it most undesirable that these people are told to apply for the Comprehensive Social Security Assistance CSSA despite the Governments introduction of the second round of AEF
環顧海外其他國家，例如日本，政府也曾向失業的自由工作者或自僱人士提供每天 4,100日元的補助金，或最多10萬日元的免息貸款產品以作支援。
Let us take a look at other countries . For example in Japan the Government has provided a daily subsidy of ¥4,100 or an interest - free loan up to ¥10,000 to support jobless freelancers or self - employed people
這些是我們看到海外國家支援自由工作者或自僱人士的一些安排。
These are some arrangements to support freelancers or self - employed people that we can see in overseas countries
在香港的就業人口之中，有相當部分屬於65歲以上而沒有MPF的人士，我們看到當中很多從事基層的行業，例如清潔、保安等，這些是十分明顯的例子。
A considerable portion of the employed population in Hong Kong are people aged above 65 who do not have an MPF account . We can see that many of them are engaged in elementary - level jobs such as cleaning and security to name but a few obvious examples
我們建議政府在所謂"保就業"的安排上，除了以MPF供款紀錄為根據外，也應接納其他文件，例如糧單、僱傭合約、工時紀錄，或某些法定聲明，作為申請工資補貼所需的工作證明文件，希望達到保就業的目標。
We suggest that insofar as employment support is concerned the Government accepts other documents other than MPF contribution records such as pay slips employment contracts working hours records or certain statutory declarations as proof of work in applying for wage subsidies in order to achieve the objective of safeguarding employment
因此，我們一直要求特區政府應就失業援助推出政策，包括特別推出失業援助金。
Hence we have been urging the Government to devise policies in regard to unemployment relief including an unemployment allowance
我認為在第二輪防疫抗疫基金通過後，政府仍然需要持續跟進和處理這方面的事情。
In my opinion the Government should continue to follow up and handle matters in this regard after the passage of the second round of AEF
主席，在全球化的經濟環境下，我們過去看到供應鏈在全世界也有一個鋪排，但經歷今次疫情後，全球有不少評論指出，將來供應鏈的布局有機會進行重組。
President in the past we could see the layout of global supply chains against the background of economic globalization . However as pointed out by many commentators around the world the layout of supply chains will probably be restructured in the future after this epidemic
中國外交部前副部長何亞非曾經指出，適當調校和重組供應鏈要考慮的問題，包括供應鏈的上下游會否有替代的方案，他亦認為中國作為全球製造業的龍頭，這是一個需要認真研究和考慮的問題。
HE Ya - fei Vice - Minister of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of China has also spoke on the factors to be considered in properly adjusting and restructuring the supply chains including whether there are upstream and downstream alternatives for the supply chains . He also reckoned that China as a global leader in manufacturing needs to examine and consider this question seriously
香港中文大學經濟學教授劉遵義亦曾表示，現時所有供應鏈也應尋找一個可靠的第二來源。
Lawrence LAU Professor of Economics of the Chinese University of Hong Kong has also stated that all supply chains should seek a reliable second source now
因應今次經歷的疫情，所謂供應鏈的重組，也會來得比較迫切。
The restructuring of supply chains has become more urgent due to the epidemic
因此，我希望特區政府繼續在這方面下工夫。
I believe this is an opportunity for Hong Kong in the future so I hope the Government will make further efforts in this regard
我們注意到"攬炒"香港會令香港人失去守法的意識，甚至他們提出的違法達義也是完全扭曲了法治的概念，律政司作為檢控機關，絕對有需要認真和嚴肅地處理相關的檢控。
We have noticed that mutual destruction of Hong Kong will undermine the law - abiding awareness of Hong Kong people . Moreover the idea of achieving justice by violating the law proposed by them is a complete distortion of the concept of the rule of law . It is absolutely necessary for the Department of Justice as the prosecution authority to handle relevant prosecutions in a serious and solemn manner
在過去超過8個月的黑色暴亂中，警方拘捕了超過7,000人，至今有超過1,000人被檢控。
During the black riots over the past eight months the Police have arrested more than 7 000 people . Over 1 000 people have been prosecuted so far
不過，大家要知道，有些檢控尚未完成，同樣地，有些被捕人士的相關檢控仍在處理中，即是律政司未來仍需要更多人手和時間處理這些檢控。
We should understand that some prosecutions are still under progress . The prosecutions against some arrested individuals are still being processed . The Department of Justice will thus require more manpower and time to handle these prosecutions
我們亦提出律政司在檢控人手和工作安排上也必須有所調整，以盡快處理這些檢控。
Hence we believe that the Department of Justice should make adjustments to its prosecution manpower and work arrangements in order to handle these prosecutions expeditiously
正如我們一直所說，為應對這些黑色暴亂，法庭必須盡快審理和處理，涉及暴亂的暴徒必須承擔法律後果，這樣才有阻嚇性。
As we have always said in order to create a deterrent effect against black riots the Court must try the cases as soon as possible and the rioters concerned must bear the legal consequences
如果一直拖延檢控或不處理，將會導致暴亂繼續延續下去。
Delayed prosecutions and lack of actions will cause riots to persist
主席，如果在律政司轄下的檢控團隊，即堪稱專業的團隊中，竟然有成員一方面提倡法治，另一方面卻出版書籍教人如何"走法律罅"而不被檢控，其實在宣揚違法達義，試問香港社會如何告訴他人我們可以堅守法治呢？
President how can Hong Kong show its commitment to the rule of law when a member of the so - called professional prosecution team under the Department of Justice advocated the rule of law on the one hand while on the other published a book which teaches people how to circumvent the law to avoid prosecution and in effect promotes achieving justice by violating the law?
因此，我希望律政司司長可以告訴公眾會如何應對檢控人員違反法治觀念、宣揚違法達義的行為，他們究竟會如何處理和作出處分，因為這是我們守護法治很重要的一點。
Therefore I hope the Secretary for Justice can tell the public its ways to tackle prosecutors whose acts violate the rule of law and promote achieving justice by violating the law? . How will these prosecutors be dealt with and penalized? . This is an important aspect in upholding the rule of law
主席，我亦在這裏指出，在這份預算案的整個辯論過程中，我們看到"攬炒派"不斷針對警隊的開支。
President I also wish to point out here that the mutual destruction camp kept targeting the expenditure of the Police in the entire Budget debate
我剛才聽譚文豪議員的發言，竟然說警隊的開支等於收保護費這是完全沒有邏輯，只是強行抹黑警隊，他們主要是針對警隊，然後用抹黑的手法說一些完全不合正常邏輯的說話。
Just now I heard Mr Jeremy TAM say that the expenditure of the Police is equivalent to charging protection fees . It is completely illogical and a blatant smearing of the Police . They target the Police and make completely illogical statements by using smearing tactics
主席，當然，我們看到沒有邏輯的事情非常多，"攬炒派"的想法正是這樣。
President of course there are a lot of illogical things which are exactly what the mutual destruction camp wants