Borrison/hk-legicost huggingface dataset:
如果我們看《條例草案》的背景，活體器官捐贈可增加器官供應，為正在等候遺體捐贈器官移植的病人提供多一個選擇。
Living donation can increase the supply of organ providing one more option for patients waiting for cadaveric donation
但在某些個案中，等候接受器官移植的病人雖已得到親人同意作活體器官捐贈，但該捐贈人卻因血型或組織類型不相容而不能捐出器官。
There are however cases where patients needing organ transplants have living related donors who are willing but unable to donate because of incompatible blood type or tissue type
配對捐贈是解決這個問題的其中一個方法。
One way to overcome this barrier is paired donation
在配對或匯集捐贈安排下，捐贈人會捐出其器官給予不相識的人，以換取其屬意的受贈人，即《條例草案》所界定的"受益人"，獲得器官捐贈。
Paired or pooled donation arrangement is conducted between living non - related persons in exchange for the donation of an organ to the donors intended recipient that is the beneficiary as defined under the Bill
由於《條例》現時並無對"引誘"作出定義，所以我們建議修訂法例。
Currently the term inducement is not specifically defined under the Ordinance necessitating us to propose a legislative amendment
至於《條例草案》的詳情，《條例草案》的主要修訂是加入新訂的第5DA條，訂明捐贈人不會僅因其同意捐出器官予不相識的人，是由於其選擇的受益人可以透過配對或匯集捐贈安排接受器官移植，而被視為在受引誘的情況下給予同意。
On the details of the Bill the major amendment introduced by the Bill is the addition of a new section 5DA which stipulates that a donor is not to be regarded as having given consent with the offer of inducement only because the donors consent has been given to donate an organ to a stranger in consideration of a proposed transplant into the donors intended beneficiary under a paired or pooled donation arrangement . Paired or pooled donation arrangement involves transplant between living non - related persons
在法案委員會審議《條例草案》的過程中，委員提出了一些關注。
During the scrutiny of the Bill members of the Bills Committee have raised certain concerns
我想在此講解一下委員主要關注的事項和政府的回應。
I would like to spell out these major concerns of the members and the responses subsequently provided by the Government
配對或匯集器官捐贈安排的審批是議員其中一個關注的問題。
The approval of paired or pooled donation arrangements is one of the concerns of the Members
《條例草案》沒有限制進行配對或匯集器官移植的處所。
The Bill makes no restriction on the premises in which the transplant of organ from paired or pooled donation takes place
無論配對或匯集捐贈安排於醫管局或私家醫院進行，都必須預先向人體器官移植委員會提出申請，而委員會只會在信納擬進行的器官移植符合《條例》的規定，包括沒有涉及任何人體器官的商業交易，方會批准有關申請。
Application for prior approval from HOTB is mandatory for paired or pooled donation arrangement no matter whether the transplant is going to take place in HA or private hospital . HOTB will only approve the relevant application when it is satisfied that the proposed organ transplant complies with stipulations under the Ordinance including the fact that the transplant involves no commercial dealing in human organ
根據現時的目標，先導計劃會為期3年。
With reference to the current target the pilot Programme is going to run for three years
醫管局會視乎實際情況安排足夠的人手應付配對器官捐贈安排，並會適時檢討有關機制並研究擴大計劃範圍，包括推行肝臟配對捐贈計劃。
HA will arrange sufficient manpower to tackle paired organ donation in consideration of the actual situation . It will also review the relevant mechanism when appropriate and explore the expansion of the Programme to include a paired liver donation scheme
在《條例草案》獲得通過後，醫管局將展開前期的籌備工作，包括舉辦交流會，向公眾簡報先導計劃的具體運作細節和邀請合資格的捐受者進行驗血配對的程序。
After the passage of the Bill HA will carry out preliminary preparatory work including the organization of sharing session to brief members of the public the specific operation details of the pilot Programme and invite eligible donors and recipients to participate in blood test procedure for pairing
一如現時器官移植手術的安排，醫管局會將捐贈者及受贈者的身份保密，並且在說明相關程序及手術風險時，解釋有關的法例要求。
Just like the current arrangement for organ transplant operation HA will keep in confidence the identities of donors and recipients on top of providing explanation on the relevant statutory requirements when laying out the procedures and operative risks concerned
醫管局亦會根據《條例》將所有擬作配對捐贈移植手術提交人體器官移植委員會審批。
HA will also seek approval from HOTB on intended paired donation transplant operation in accordance with the Ordinance
剛才有幾位議員發言時，提及到他們對於一些議題的關注或意見，我現在作簡單的回應。
A few Members talked about their concerns or comments of certain issues when delivering their speeches a moment ago . I would like to respond briefly to them now . Dr Elizabeth QUAT brought up for our attention the findings of a survey they conducted
當然推廣工作我們可以做更加多或更加好。
Of course we can always do more promotions and do them better
至於預設默許，剛才有幾位議員包括葛珮帆議員、陳志全議員和郭家麒議員都有提及這方面的意見。
Several Members including Dr Elizabeth QUAT Mr CHAN Chi - chuen and Dr KWOK Ka - ki expressed their views on the opt - out system just now
未來我們應該多做宣傳教育，令到無意見或中立的人士支持，或提高對於器官捐贈的認同。
In future we should do more promotion and education so as to muster support from those who had no opinion or were neutral in their stance or raise their level of recognition over organ donation
我們在1990年代進行的調查，發現約有五成受訪者反對於離世後捐出器官；但我們最近於2016-2017年度進行的調查，結果反映這問題大幅減至約一成。
In the survey conducted in the 1990s about 50 % of the surveyed objected organ donation after ones death . But in our most recent survey conducted in 2016 - 2017 the magnitude of the issue has plummeted to only about 10 %
人手不足或醫生的人手不足，尤其當情況出現在公營體系，是我們非常關心的問題。
Manpower shortage or the shortage of medical doctors and especially those in the public system is an issue of grave concern to us
進行器官移植以團隊的方式提供，所以不僅包括醫生或器官移植聯絡主任，亦有不同專科的同事參與，他們來自內科、深切治療部、麻醉科、外科和化驗室等，整個專業團隊都需要支持這方面的工作。
Organ transplant services are provided through a team approach under which help is enlisted from not only doctors or Organ Donation Coordinators but also from different specialists such as those from medicine intensive care anaesthesia surgery and laboratory . It takes an entire professional team to support our work in this respect
至於肝臟移植團隊，瑪麗醫院於2003年成立全港唯一的肝臟移植中心。
As for the liver transplant team the Queen Mary Hospital set up in 2003 the only liver transplant centre in Hong Kong
這安排除了方便統籌和進行手術外，亦有助負責人員累積經驗。
On top of facilitating coordination and the conduct of operation this arrangement also helps the responsible officers accumulate experience
醫管局會不時檢視服務的規劃和培訓安排，確保服務質素。
HA will review its service planning and training arrangement from time to time to ensure service quality
主席，我懇請議員支持《條例草案》，幫助更多輪候器官移植的病人。
President I implore Members to support the Bill with a view to assisting more patients who are waiting for organ transplant
我現在向各位提出的待決議題是：《2018年人體器官移植條例草案》，予以二讀。
I now put the question to you and that is That the Human Organ Transplant Amendment Bill 2018 be read the Second time
根據現行《規則》，一個個人如擁有不少於800萬元的投資組合，又或一個法團如擁有不少於4,000萬元的總資產，或不少於800萬元的投資組合，均可被視作專業投資者。
According to the existing PI Rules an individual having a portfolio of not less than 8 million or a corporation having total assets of not less than 40 million or a portfolio of not less than 8 million can be regarded as a professional investor
在專業投資者制度下，中介人向專業投資者提供服務時，或可無須遵從《條例》對中介人施加的若干規定。
Under the professional investor regime certain requirements of SFO imposed on intermediaries may be disapplied when intermediaries are serving professional investors
然而，我們必須強調，即使客戶為專業投資者，中介人仍須遵守"認識你的客戶"及合適性等規定，當中包括要考慮客戶的投資目標、投資期、投資知識與經驗、風險承受能力及財政狀況等，以評估所推介產品的特點及風險是否適合該客戶。
Nonetheless it must be emphasized that even if a client is a professional investor an intermediary is still required to comply with certain requirements such as completing know - your - client procedures suitability assessment etc . The clients investment objectives investment horizon investment knowledge and experience risk tolerance and financial situation are among the factors that an intermediary has to take into account in assessing whether the characteristics and risk exposures of a recommended product are suitable for a client
再者，廢除《修訂規則》並不會改變現有的資產額水平。
The Amendment Rules will not change any of the safeguards for investors
對於有議員提到為何不可以在現階段立即修訂資產額水平，證券及期貨事務監察委員會認為，任何對現有制度的改變，包括將現有資產額水平提高或修改，均會對投資者及業界的運作帶來相當影響。
I will give a consolidated response to their views . Some Members have questioned why the monetary thresholds could not be amended right away at this stage . According to the Securities and Futures Commission any alterations to the existing regime including raising or amending the existing monetary thresholds will have considerable impact on investors and the operation of the industry
我們今次提交立法會審議的《2018年證券及期貨規則》，旨在把證監會過去根據《證券及期貨條例》第134條就個別中介人批出的修 改進行標準化，以及把這些修改納入《證券及期貨規則》。
The Amendment Rules that we have tabled for the Legislative Councils scrutiny is to standardize the modifications granted by SFC to individual intermediaries under section 134 of the Securities and Futures Ordinance over the years by incorporating such modifications into the Securities and Futures Rules
因此，證監會於去年進行的公眾諮詢及隨後於今年5月所發表的諮詢總結，正是針對把此等修改進行標準化的建議。
Actually the public consultation conducted last year and the consultation conclusions released this May both by SFC were on the standardization proposal only
就此，我們需要在經過全面考慮，以及適當諮詢與深入研究後，才有基礎就有關資產額水平提出意見。
We will need to go through a process of detailed consideration due consultation and in - depth study for the formulation of the proposed monetary thresholds
有見議員對資產額水平的關注，正如大家已聽到，政府已在6月29日向小組委員會主席作出回覆，交代證監會已承諾將會於2019年開展專業投資者制度下的資產額水平的檢討。
As Members have heard just now according to the Governments reply dated 29 June to Chairman of the Subcommittee on the Amendment Rules in response to members concern SFC has pledged to commence a review of the monetary thresholds under the professional investor PI regime in 2019
而這個檢討及諮詢的過程均會非常透明，證監會不會拖延。
The review and consultation work will be conducted in high transparency . There is no question of procrastination by SFC
我們也明白到有意見認為不應單單用資產額水平作為確定專業投資者身份的標準，剛才亦有議員提到，例如投資經驗及投資者的學歷或資格，亦應被納入專業投資者制度內。
We know that some Members have questioned the adoption of the monetary thresholds as the only criterion for determining the qualification of an individual or corporation as a PI . There have also been suggestions that investment experience as well as the experience or qualification of investors should also be incorporated into the PI regime
在2019年的檢討中，證監會將一如既往，歡迎市場及公眾就建議提出意見，並會全面考慮收到的意見。
In its 2019 review SFC will continue to welcome views from the market and the public and to take full account of the views received
另外，有議員提到對於控股公司的股東的保障，根據《修訂規則》，某控股公司可以因其全資擁有的專業投資者子公司而成為專業投資者。
Some Members think there is a need to protect shareholders of holding companies . Under the Amendment Rules a holding company will become a PI as a result of the PI status of its wholly - owned subsidiary
證監會明白有意見認為，該控股公司的股東應獲得適當保障，例如當控股公司成為專業投資者時，股東是應該要獲得知會的。
SFC understands the view that shareholders should be duly protected and properly informed if and when a holding company becomes a PI
有見及此，證監會在今年5月的諮詢總結中，已提醒法團董事或股東應檢討其企業管治架構，以確保當法團根據《修訂規則》而符合資格成為專業投資者時，其股東已就所帶來的影響獲適當知會，並得悉對其的影響。
In view of this SFC has committed in the consultation conclusions of May this year to remind directors and shareholders of a corporation to review the corporate governance structure . This is to ensure that shareholders of a corporation are properly informed and are aware of the implications when the corporation becomes a PI pursuant to the Amendment Rules
當《修訂規則》於本周五生效時，證監會將發出新聞稿以提醒公眾，並會在這方面提供更多的投資者教育。
SFC will also issue a press release to remind the public of the same when the Amendment Rules become effective this Friday and will provide more investor education in this regard
另外，有見及議員的意見，證監會已進一步檢討有關情況。
SFC has further reviewed the situation in response to Members views
除剛才所述的措施外，證監會亦計劃於本周五，即《修訂規則》生效時，發出通函，要求中介人在提供服務前，需得到控股法團的授權人員的確認，以確保該控股法團的股東已獲得知會該法團已因全資擁有另一專業投資者子法團而成為專業投資者。
Apart from the measures mentioned above SFC will also issue a circular when the Amendment Rules become effective on Friday . Prior to providing services intermediaries will be required to obtain confirmation from authorized persons of a holding corporation that the corporation has informed the shareholders of its corporate PI status by virtue of the PI status of its wholly - owned subsidiary
主席，我們今次提交立法會審議的《修訂規則》，旨在標準化證監會過去根據《條例》第134條就個別中介人批出的修改，把這些修改納入《規則》中，以確保應用《規則》時的一致性，為市場提供一 個公平競爭及更加透明的環境。
President the Amendment Rules that we have tabled for the Legislative Councils scrutiny is to standardize the modifications granted by SFC to individual intermediaries under section 134 of the Ordinance over the years by incorporated such modifications into the PI Rules . The purpose is to ensure consistency in the application of the PI Rules and provide a level playing field for and increase transparency of the market
我們敦請議員反對這兩項決議案，支持《修訂規則》，讓《修訂規則》能盡早落實。
I implore Members to oppose the two resolutions and support the Amendment Rules to enable its expeditious implementation
梁議員，聽完法律政策專員剛才的發言，我感到政府真是輕描淡寫，淡化自己的怠慢、隱藏自己的疏忽，對今次一再拖延修例完全沒有半點歉意，我稍後會一一列舉政府哪裏出錯、哪裏怠慢。
Mr LEUNG the speech delivered by the Solicitor General just now gives me an impression that the Government does not show the slightest apology for its delay in proposing the amendment as it seeks to play down the delay and conceal its negligence . Later in my speech I will point out its faults as well as its delay one by one
首先，我希望解釋一下，為何我提出修訂《致命意外條例》第43條，將親屬喪亡之痛的法定賠償款額由15萬元增加至22萬元。
First I wish to explain why I propose to raise the statutory sum of damages for bereavement under section 43 of the Fatal Accidents Ordinance from 150,000 to 220,000
今年年初，大埔公路發生雙層巴士翻側事故，造成19人死亡。
At the beginning of this year 19 people were killed in a double - decker bus crash on Tai Po Road
於是，我在今年3月提出擬議決議案，修訂有關賠償金額。
Hence I moved a proposed resolution this March to amend the sum of compensation
我提出的擬議決議案是修訂《致命意外條例》第43條。
My proposed resolution seeks to amend section 43 of the Ordinance
根據現行條例，倘若某人死亡是由於錯誤作為、疏忽或過失引致，死者的受養人便可向原須對死者承擔賠償責任的人提出親屬喪亡之痛的申索，以彌補他們喪失摯愛親人不能再與他們相處的傷痛。
The existing provision stipulates that if death is caused to any person by any wrongful act neglect or default a claim for damages for bereavement may be brought by dependants of the deceased against the person who would have been liable in damages to the deceased to compensate for the grief of the loss of their beloved and inability to live with himher anymore
死者家屬可以根據法例提出索償，再由法庭判決是否有人須為錯誤而承擔疏忽或過失的責任。
Pursuant to the Ordinance relatives of the deceased may bring an action for damages to court for it to decide if anyone should be made liable for such a wrongful act neglect or default
這項親屬喪亡之痛是法律改革委員會在1995年提交報告建議訂立的。
The bereavement legislation was first proposed by the Law Reform Commission in its report in 1995
關於賠償款額，當時已表明是一個頗為任意的決定，而委員會當時建議根據英國的定額賠償方式，將金額定為4萬元，同時建議制訂機制，日後在無須訂立新法例的情況下，也可以不時檢討和調整。
The Commission made it clear that time that fixing the amount of the award for bereavement was an arbitrary decision . It proposed to follow the British approach of awarding a fixed sum initially at 40,000 . It also suggested that a mechanism be devised to enable this figure to be adjusted and reviewed from time to time without the need for new legislation
香港是一個文明的社會，有責任對失去至親的人作出最大的幫助和慰問。
Hong Kong is a civilized society . The Government should as far as possible give the greatest help and consolation to people who have lost their beloved ones
我們也知道，失去至親的傷痛，不能用金錢量度，並且難以計算。
As we all know the loss of the beloved can neither be qualified nor calculated in terms of money
所以我在計算修訂金額時，也參考上一次，即1997年由當時何俊仁議員提出的方式，用當初的基數，再按甲類消費物價指數來計算，由1997年至2017年的累積通脹為43.7%，得出215,550元，並調整至整數22萬元。
Hence we make reference to the methodology adopted by Mr Albert HO in the last adjustment of the bereavement sum in 1997 . Using the initial sum as the base we calculate the adjustment rate by tracking the changes in the Consumer Price Index A CPIA . On the basis of the 43.7 % cumulative inflation rate over the period from 1997 to 2017 the adjusted sum should be 215,550 rounding up to 220,000
根據過往的法庭案例，親屬喪亡之痛的申索雖然只佔申索金額一個很小的部分，但往往已足夠為親屬支付殮葬費和律師費，對親屬而言，有一定程度的實質幫助。
If we look at previous court cases we will find that claims for bereavement damages only make up a small portion of the total amounts of claims . Yet the sum is generally sufficient for relatives to pay for burial expenses and lawyers fees and is really helpful
雖然22萬元不算多，但相信可為死者家屬經濟上帶來少許援助。
The sum of 220,000 is not significant but it can still provide some financial assistance to relatives of the deceased
《致命意外條例》已足足21年未有修訂賠償款額，我認為現時有迫切的需要作出檢討和修訂。
The amount of compensation under the Ordinance has not been adjusted for 21 years . I think it is high time to have it reviewed and adjusted
因為盡快完成修訂，便可讓死者親屬申索時得到一個較高的金額，為他們帶來一些幫助。
The faster we finish the amendment the faster we can award a higher sum of compensation to relatives of the deceased and give them some more help
我在3月已經準備為提出今次的決議案召開記者會，發新聞稿，並致函相關機構，包括律政司、香港大律師公會、香港律師會、相關的功能界別議員，包括保險界和法律界的議員，以及本會的司法及法律事務委員會，請他們提出意見。
In as early as March I planned to hold a press conference and issue press releases in preparation for the moving of this resolution . To seek the views of relevant organizations I wrote to the Department of Justice DoJ the Hong Kong Bar Association The Law Society of Hong Kong Members from the insurance and legal functional constituencies as well as the Panel on Administration of Justice and Legal Services AJLS of this Council
我又在3月26日的司法及法律事務委員會會議上，詢問各位委員是否有需要在事務委員會上進行討論，因為過往兩次檢討，均不曾在事務委員會進行討論。
In the AJLS Panel meeting on 26 March I also consulted members of the need to discuss the proposed amendment despite the fact that similar amendments were not discussed in the AJLS Panel during the previous two adjustments
我表示，如果委員不反對，我便會在立法會上提出擬議決議案，當時沒有委員表示反對或要求討論，包括律政司也沒有提出。
I also told members my intention to move the proposed resolution in the Council if they did not raise any opposition . Neither members nor DoJ spoke against the resolution or requested to discuss it
所以，我在提出決議案之前，已經通知和諮詢政府和各個持份者。
Hence I already notified and also consulted the Government and all other stakeholders of my intention to move the resolution
在同一天，我向立法會提出議案預告，以在5月9日的立法會大會提出擬議決議案。
On the same day I gave a notice for the moving of the proposed resolution at the Legislative Council meeting on 9 May
但是，令人失望的是，當我提出擬議決議案後，政府立刻遊說我不要提出，而交由政府提出。
However to my disappointment as soon as I gave the notice for the moving of the resolution I was approached by the Government as it tried to lobby me to withdraw my motion in favour of the motion to be moved by the Government . I definitely would not do so
我當然不同意，政府已拖延了21年，如果要做，我相信早已做了，如果我撤回議案，不知道政府又會拖到何時。
The adjustment has been delayed for 21 years . If the Government really intended to increase the payment it should have done so years earlier . If I withdraw the resolution I really do not know how long the proposed adjustment will drag on
其後，政府運用牽強的行政手段，阻撓我提出今次的擬議決議案。
The Government then made use of an unconvincing excuse to obstruct my moving of the proposed resolution through administrative means
我接獲律政司給予秘書的建議，指我今次提出的擬議決議案，有增加政府開支的效果，導致動用公帑開支，所以認為我的擬議決議案應被裁定為"不可提出"。
In its letter addressed to the Secretariat to give comments on my proposed resolution DoJ said my proposal would increase the Government expenditure and have a charging effect and should thus be ruled inadmissible
雖然政府反對我今次提出的擬議決議案，認為會增加開支，但卻從未能提供官方數字，說明該條例所招致公帑開支的確實數字。
Despite its citation of the charging effect to oppose my resolution the Government could not tell us officially the exact amount of Government expenditure to be incurred by the legislative amendment
而且，這項決議案的內容並無直接提出增加公帑開支，有關修訂只會造成間接性、非連續性及非常輕微的開支。
This resolution does not seek to directly increase Government expenditure and the amendment will only lead to indirect non - recurrent and negligible Government spending
除政府作出阻撓外，最經典的是梁議員。
Apart from the Governments obstruction the most classic example comes from Mr LEUNG
所以，我說最經典的便是你濫權，要"等埋律政司"，把我提出的擬議決議案擱下整整兩個月零6天才處理，其間究竟發生了甚麼事？
Hence I think the most classic example is that you have abused your power to wait for DoJ by putting aside my proposed resolution and not dealing with it until two months and six days later . Actually what have happened during this period of time?
所以，我認為這完全是梁君彥議員利用自己的權力來配合行政機關，把這項擬議決議案一再拖延。
I think this is a full display of how Mr Andrew LEUNG has made use of his power to put the proposed resolution on hold in cooperation with the executive authorities
連簡單的民生議題也要拖延數月。
and even to put this simple livelihood issue on hold for several months
然而，由1991年起，律政司沒有再就此議案提出修訂。
However no resolution has been proposed by DoJ to amend the sum since 1991 due to various reasons
不作調整的原因有很多，律政司剛提及政府曾經在2000年作檢討，但因為消費物價指數下跌及其他因素，所以沒有理據調高款額。
As DoJ has just mentioned the Government conducted a review of the bereavement sum in 2000 but reached the view that there was no basis for increasing the sum at that stage considering inter alia the drop in the consumer price index
然而，我們參考律政司5月提交司法及法律事務委員會文件的附件，當中載列按1997年至2018年甲類消費物價指數變動計算的賠償款額。
Let us have a look at the calculation of the compensation amount according to changes in CPIA from 1997 to 2018 as set out in Annex of the DoJ paper submitted to the AJLS Panel in May
在2018年3月26日，於司法及法律事務委員會的會議上，你曾詢問委員是否需要討論你的立法建議。
In the AJLS Panel meeting on 26 March 2018 you consulted members on the need to discuss your legislative proposal
當時該事務委員會的主席已表示同意討論你的有關建議，並會與政府當局商討時間安排。
The then Panel Chairman agreed to discuss your proposal and made the relevant meeting arrangement with the Administration
其後，政府當局建議該事務委員會於5月28日的會議上討論相關議題。
Subsequently the Administration proposed to discuss the topic on the Panel meeting of 28 May
在本年4月6日，我已書面向你指出，鑒於司法及法律事務委員會已決定於5月28日討論有關的立法建議，因此按照既定機制，我決定待該事務委員會及之後成立的小組委員會完成有關討論後，才考慮你的擬議決議案可否在立法會會議上提出。
On 6 April I wrote to inform you that as the AJLS Panel would discuss the legislative proposal on 28 May according to the established mechanism I would consider the admissibility of your proposed resolution after the Panel and the Subcommittee to be set up under the Panel finished their discussions
有關的函件已上載立法會網站，供公眾查閱。
The letter has been uploaded onto the Legislative Council website for public inspection
我要求完成我的演辭。
I request to finish my speech
我無意再與主席"玩泥漿摔角"，我請你不要再打斷我的發言，並尊重《議事規則》的規定。
I am not going to slide into a mud wrestling with the President . Can I ask you to respect RoP and not to interrupt me anymore? . Many Members have tried to find out the differences between the moving of the respective resolutions under the Fatal Accidents Ordinance by me and by the Department of Justice DoJ today
但是，最令我失望、最令我不耻的是，律政司對於我提出這項擬議決議案極有敵意，更嘗試說服我不要提出這項決議案，而讓政府提出。
However it is most disappointing and appalling to find that DoJ has looked at my proposed resolution with deep hostility . It has even attempted to persuade me to drop the plan in favour of the resolution to be moved by the Government
他還指我提出與政府一模一樣的擬議決議案，但諷刺的是，政府是在我之後才提出一項無論在計算方式、金額和行文用字均一樣的擬議決議案。
He has also said the resolution proposed by me is essentially identical to the Governments version . This is absurd . It is actually the Government which put forward a resolution which is identical to mine in terms of the methodology amount and drafting
我重申，我不怕政府抄襲，也不怕政府搶功勞，我只是怕政府慢。
I have to reiterate that I am not afraid of the Government copying from me nor do I mind it overshadowing me in this legislative exercise . My only fear is that the Government is slow in taking forward the amendment
所以，我在此要重現由3月開始發生的程序。
I hereby give an account of the chronology of the incident since March
但我問政府盡快的意思是何時？
I asked the Government to give me an exact timing instead
你有你的邏輯，你不要打斷，但對我來說，這是一種濫權，是一種等待律政司的做事手法。
You have your own logic but you should not interrupt me . To me this is an abuse of power and a means to wait for DoJ
這也不要緊，我只希望公眾理解，我今天仍然堅持提出這項擬議決議案，是要作政治表態，告訴香港市民政府今次真的"漏招"，是怠慢了，我實際上是替政府"補底"，因為我不知道律政司會否隨時基於甚麼原因撤回擬議決議案。
Never mind I just want to make the public understand why I insist on proposing this resolution . This is sort of political gesture to tell Hong Kong people that there are really negligence and delay on the part of the Government . My proposed resolution is actually a fallback as I am really not sure whether DoJ could withdraw its resolution at any time due to whatever reasons
我今次發言及提出擬議決議案，是有雙重意義的。
In this respect my speech and my proposed resolution are of dual significance
最後，我想提出一點，亦有很多議員提到，就是今次的修訂由15萬元增加至22萬元，當中只增加7萬元，在修訂生效後也只是22萬元。
Before I stop I wish to raise one more point . As many Members have mentioned this amendment seeks to increase the bereavement sum by only 70,000 from 150,000 to 220,000 . The bereavement sum is a mere 220,000 after the amendment comes into effect