Borrison/hk-legicost huggingface dataset:
由於加固工程涉及鐵路設施的結構，亦牽涉複雜的工序，港鐵公司及後聘請獨立顧問協助審視加固工程的執行細節，一方面確保工程不會影響鐵路安全及服務，同時亦希望減少對周邊市民影響。
As the underpinning works concern the structure of the railway facilities and involve complicated procedures MTRCL commissioned an independent consultant to assist in examining the implementation details of the underpinning works to ensure that the works will not affect railway safety and services and minimize the impact to nearby residents
加固工程已於2017年9月展開，預計可以今年內完成。
The underpinning works commenced in September 2017 and are expected to be completed within this year
港鐵沙中線紅磡站和會展站，以至各個車站出現的問題均有一個共同點，就是在傳媒揭發事件後政府才向公眾通布。
Whether it is the construction works at Hung Hom Station or Exhibition Centre Station under the Shatin to Central Link project or the problems at other railway stations they share one commonality and that is the Government only makes public of the incidents after they are uncovered by the media
元朗站橋躉沉降牽涉很多乘客，因為每天有41萬人次使用西鐵，是他們每天必經之路，但當局拖延5年時間也沒有主動向公眾公布。
With a daily patronage of 410 000 for the West Rail Line the settlement of the viaduct piers of Yuen Long Station will affect many passengers . Commuters simply cannot skip this station . Yet the authorities have delayed informing the public of the settlement until five years later
首先多謝鄺俊宇議員的補充質詢。
First I thank Mr KWONG Chun - yu for the supplementary question
根據現行機制，鐵路安全是我們首要考慮。
Railway safety always comes first under the existing mechanism
元朗站事件其實沒有影響鐵路安全， 橋躉沉降幅度亦在標準基準以內，所以，根據通報機制是無需作出通報的。
Indeed railway safety has not been compromised in the Yuen Long incident . As the settlement levels do not exceed the benchmark levels there is no need to make notification according to the existing reporting mechanism
因應這事件，我們正研究如何加強通報機制以增加透明度，而屋宇署、機電署和港鐵公司現正擬備有關機制。
In response to this incident we are studying ways to strengthen the reporting mechanism to enhance transparency . BD EMSD and MTRCL are jointly working on this
我剛才在主體答覆中提到，我們希望以增加透明度為基準，而日後的通報機制亦會朝這個方向走。
As I have just said in the main reply it is our aim to enhance transparency and we will go in this direction in our effort to improve the reporting mechanism
我想請問局長，這是否反映屋宇署和港鐵公司效率偏低和怠工失責？
I would like to ask the Secretary if this is a reflection of the inefficiency slackness and breaches of responsibilities on the part of BD and MTRCL
首先，我想在這裏再次強調，鐵路安全是我們的首要考慮。
First I would like to reiterate that railway safety is our overriding consideration . There is indeed no question of procrastination
我們沒有拖慢工作，只是在發現橋躉有一定程度沉降後，港鐵公司有所疑慮，故有關工程馬上停止，因為保障港鐵安全營運為我們首要的考慮。
We called for the immediate suspension of the relevant works as soon as we found the settlement level a bit alarming because safeguarding the safe operation of MTRCL is always our top priority
正如我剛才在主體答覆提到，由於鐵路在營運中，我們需要考慮加固工程不會騷擾市民使用鐵路。
As I have mentioned in the main reply since the railway line is in operation we will need to consider how to minimize the disturbances which the underpinning works may cause to passengers
由於要同時考慮方便市民和鐵路安全問題，我們需要較多時間審視有關的補救方案，而且港鐵公司亦邀請了獨立顧問協助審視加固工程的執行細節。
We would thus need more time to study the remedial proposal in the light of convenience to passengers and the railway safety . In this respect MTRCL also commissioned an independent consultant to assist in examining the implementation details of the underpinning works
我們已做好準備工夫，而加固工程已於去年9月展開，預期可於今年內完成。
The underpinning works already commenced last September after making the necessary preparation and scheduled for completion within this year
就未來路向，我們會以增加透明度為依歸，讓大眾明白，我們的工作是以市民的安全為首位，並以鐵路運作的安全為依歸。
In the future we will strive to enhance transparency to assure the public that we accord top priority to the safety of people and that safety of railway operation always comes first
局長沒有回答我，港鐵公司是否曾與發展商商討責任問題，導致開工延誤。
The Secretary has not answered whether the delay of the works is caused by talks between MTRCL and the developer over the question of liability
發展商在西鐵元朗站興建樓宇導致橋躉沉降，所帶來的危險可大可小。
The danger posed by the viaduct pier settlement arising from the residential development on the Yuen Long Station of West Rail Line may be substantial
我想問，如果運輸及房屋局早已知悉事件，為何這麼多年來從未曾向立法會交代？
The Transport and Housing Bureau was aware of the incident years ago but may I ask why it has never reported it to the Legislative Council?
我並非指向公眾交代，而是立法會應有權責，以及議員亦應有職責知悉有關情況，為何運輸及房屋局不向立法會交代事件？
I am not discussing public accountability . It is indeed the power and responsibility of the Legislative Council and of the Members to be informed of such an incident . Why the Transport and Housing Bureau has not done so?
多謝鄭松泰議員提出補充質詢。
I thank Dr CHENG Chung - tai for the supplementary question
鐵路本身是安全的，而沉降幅度亦符合基準，嚴格來說，鐵路並沒有出現任何需要我們特別注意的事情。
The railway line is safe and the settlement levels also meet the benchmarks . Strictly speaking as far as railway safety is concerned there is nothing which requires our special attention
因此，鐵路的運作正常，並無出現任何特別需要匯報的情況。
The operation of the railway line is normal and there is no particular area which require reporting
正正因為我們明白我們應可做得更好，屋宇署、機電署及港鐵公司現正草擬一套新的通報機制，以增加透明度為依歸。
We well understand that there should be room for further improvement . Hence BD EMSD and MTRCL are working together to formulate a new reporting mechanism seeking primarily to enhance transparency
最重要的是，當局如何向有關區議會交代，就這一點，希望特區政府關注。
Most importantly the authorities should examine how to improve its accountability to the District Council concerned . I hope the SAR Government could pay special attention to this area
所以，我現在想問，日後會如何公布？
So I would rather ask how the Government will do with the reporting in the future
我們希望有關措施除可以增加透明度外，亦可給予市民信心。
We hope that these measures can enhance transparency and inspire public confidence
主席，我想鐵路是否安全，現在已不是港鐵公司說了算，因為他們的態度如此傲慢，而且以往一段時間"擠牙膏"式的處理問題方法，已經令市民大眾對港鐵公司監管工程，以及政府監管港鐵公司失去信心。
President I think as far as railway safety is concerned it can no longer be determined by MTRCL alone . Its arrogance and its piecemeal approach in response to the problems in a manner like squeezing toothpaste from a tube have made the public lose confidence in MTRCLs monitoring of its projects and in the Governments monitoring of MTRCL
所以，政府未來所制訂的安全通報機制，必須公開透明及設定標準，可以令市民大眾知道在何種情形下，港鐵公司和政府一定會向外公布，保障乘客的安全，這才是最重要的。
Hence the most important thing is that the future safety reporting mechanism should be an open and transparent system . It should set out the criteria to let the public know under what circumstances MTRCL and the Government must make public reporting to ensure the safety of the travelling public
當我們訂立有關通報機制後，會適時向大家公布，以增加透明度。
We will timely release the reporting mechanism once it is ready to enhance transparency
我要強調，我們現時確實有定期檢查鐵路的安全維修，我們並非不把安全放在首位。
I have to emphasize that regular inspection of railway safety and maintenance has really been in place . It is untrue that we do not accord top priority to railway safety
機電署的鐵路保護組亦會以風險為本的準則來檢視鐵路的設施，進行定期的審核及巡查，以及檢視港鐵的營運，以確保鐵路的安全。
To ensure railway safety apart from the risk - based inspection of railway facilities EMSDs railway protection team will also carry out regular audits and surveillance visits and examine the operation of MTRCL
《修訂規則》的目的是更新《證券及期貨規則》，加入過往證券及期貨事務監察委員會因應個別中介人的要求所作出的約40項修改，將相關修改適用於所有中介人，確保《規則》應用的一致性，並為所有中介人提供公平競爭的環境。
The Amendment Rules aim at updating the Securities and Futures Rules to incorporate about 40 modifications that the Securities and Futures Commission SFC has granted over the years in response to requests made by individual intermediaries so as to make the relevant modifications universally applicable for the sake of ensuring consistency in the Rules application and providing a level playing field for all intermediaries
相關修改旨在擴大將被視為專業投資者的個人及法團的類別，以及擴大在確定某個人或法團是否專業投資者時可予考慮的紀錄的種類。
The purpose of the relevant amendments is to expand the types of individuals and corporations that are to be regarded as professional investors and the records which may be considered in ascertaining whether an individual or corporation is a professional investor
小組委員會與政府當局及證監會舉行了3次會議，就以下事宜進行討論： a 確定個人或法團是否符合資格成為專業投資者的準則； b 控股公司及他們的附屬公司在何等情況下符合專業投資者的資格； c 專業投資者及非專業投資者的投資產品選擇；及 d 針對專業投資者及非專業投資者的保障措施。
The Subcommittee has held three meetings with the Administration and SFC to discuss the following issues a ascertaining the criteria for an individual or a corporation to qualify as a professional investor; b the circumstances under which holding companies and their subsidiaries qualify as professional investors; c the choice of investment products available to professional and non - professional investors; and d protective measures tailored to professional investors and non - professional investors
鑒於近年物業價格急升，部分委員關注到，現行《規則》下就專業投資者總值限額的規定，即個人專業投資者的800萬元投資組合門檻，以及法團專業投資者的800萬元投資組合或4,000萬元總資產水平過低，會令不少缺乏投資經驗及對較複雜的投資產品沒有認識的一般投資者被納入成為專業投資者，增加他們的投資風險。
In view of the escalating property prices in recent years some members have noted the monetary thresholds for qualifying as professional investor under the prevailing PI Rules that is an individual having a portfolio of not less than 8 million or a corporation having a portfolio of not less than 8 million or total assets of not less than 40 million are too low . A number of less than sophisticated investors who lack investment experience or knowledge in more complicated investment products are hence counted as professional investors and made to face greater investment risks
委員認為有關總值限額已設定超過10年，政府及證監會應盡快檢討並調高有關限額，以確保水平能跟上市場變化。
Members hold that the monetary thresholds have been in place for over 10 years the Government and SFC should expeditiously review and revise them upwards to ensure the levels can keep up with market changes
有委員則建議證監會加強投資者教育，以加深公眾對成為專業投資者後可享有的權利及需要承擔的風險的認識。
A member suggests SFC step up investor education to deepen the publics understanding of the rights and risks of becoming a professional investor
此外，有委員認為在釐定個人專業投資者資格方面，應同時考慮其投資經驗及對不同投資產品的認識，使有深厚知識及豐富投資經驗的投資者，即使其投資組合未達到800萬元，亦可獲得專業投資者的資格。
Furthermore some members hold that ones investment experience and knowledge in different investment products should be taken into account when determining the qualification of individual professional investor such that people with in - depth knowledge and rich investment experience can be qualified as professional investors despite their not meeting the monetary threshold of 8 million
亦有委員建議證監會加強對投資產品的批核工作，包括按投資產品的風險水平作出評級，以及就有關產品是否適合不同的投資者提供意見，藉以提高對投資者的保障。
Some members have suggested SFC strengthen its work on approving investment products including rating investment products based on their risk levels and advising on the suitability of products for various investors in a bid to boost investor protection
證監會指出，總值限額的測試是一個簡單易明的方法，以評估某個人或法團是否符合專業投資者的資格。
SFC has indicated that monetary threshold is an easy - to - understand method for evaluating whether an individual or corporation qualifies as a professional investor
中介人仍須透過執行"認識你的客戶"程序，以確定其客戶的專業投資者資格。
Yet intermediaries have to conduct the know - your - client procedures to ensure the professional investor qualification of their clients
中介人在向專業投資者提供服務時，亦應進行盡職審查及須遵從合適性規定，運用其專業判斷能力，顧及客戶的相關情況，如客戶的投資目標、投資期、投資知識與經驗、風險承受能力及財政狀況等，以評估他們推介的產品是否適合該客戶。
When providing service for professional investors intermediaries should carry out due diligence and comply with the suitability requirement . They should also exercise professional judgment to assess whether the products they recommend are suitable for their clients after taking into account the clients relevant circumstances such as their investment objectives investment horizon investment knowledge and experience risk tolerance and financial situation
就委員對檢討《規則》下的總值限額水平，以及保障專業投資者及非專業投資者的措施的意見，政府當局及證監會表示會積極研究，但由於任何對現有制度的改變均會對投資者及行業運作造成影響，必須先經過全面考慮及適當諮詢才可提出。
With regard to members comments on reviewing the levels of monetary threshold under the PI Rules and on the protective measures for professional investors and non - professional investors the Administration and SFC have advised that they will actively study the issues . However as any alterations to the existing regime will have considerable impact on investors and the operation of the industry they must be considered in a holistic manner and raised after a due consultation process
考慮到《修訂規則》旨在標準化證監會過去就個別中介人批出的修改，政府當局及證監會認為應先實施修訂建議。
As the Amendment Rules aim to standardize the modifications granted previously by SFC to individual intermediaries the Administration and SFC hold that the relevant amendment proposals should be realized first
鑒於在小組委員會審議期間，政府當局及證監會未能就檢討專業投資者制度下的總值限額一事作出清晰承諾及提供時間表，涂謹申議員表示他會動議擬議決議案，以廢除《修訂規則》。
In view of the lack of a clear commitment from the Administration and SFC to conduct a review on the monetary thresholds adopted under the professional investor regime and provide a timetable Mr James TO has indicated that he will give notice to move a motion to repeal the Amendment Rules
政府當局其後於2018年6月29日致函小組委員會，表示證監會將於2019年就專業投資者制度下的總值限額水平展開檢討。
The Administration wrote to the Subcommittee subsequently on 29 June 2018 advising that SFC would review the levels of monetary threshold under the professional investor regime in 2019
有關函件已於同日發給所有委員及其他議員參閱。
The relevant correspondence was then circulated to all members and other Members on the same day for their information
就《修訂規則》中建議，如一家控股公司全資擁有另一家已達到4,000萬元資產總值限額的子公司，該控股公司亦會符合資格成為專業投資者的規定，有委員關注到，由於控股公司股東未必知悉公司會根據《修訂規則》成為專業投資者，有關建議會為控股公司的股東帶來風險。
It is suggested in the Amendment Rules that if a holding company wholly owns a subsidiary which has met the total asset level of 40 million the holding company itself will also qualify as a professional investor . With regard to this a member has expressed concern that as shareholders of the holding company may not know that the company would become a professional investor under the Amendment Rules the suggestion might bring risk to shareholders of the holding company
此外，委員亦詢問控股公司的股東可以如何得悉該公司符合資格成為專業投資者，以及中介人如何確認控股公司的股東已知悉該公司成為專業投資者。
Furthermore members have also asked how the shareholders of the holding company can know if the company has qualified as a professional investor and how intermediaries can confirm that these shareholders have been informed of the companys status as professional investor
證監會解釋，由於控股公司對其全資擁有的附屬公司的資產或投資組合擁有控制權，一家控股公司如全資擁有另一家已達到相關總值限額的法團，該控股公司應被視為已達到相關總值限額，而符合資格成為專業投資者。
SFC has explained that as a holding company has control over the assets or portfolios held by a wholly - owned subsidiary a holding company which wholly owns another corporation meeting the relevant monetary threshold should also be regarded as having met the relevant monetary threshold to qualify as a professional investor
證監會會提醒法團董事或股東應檢討其企業管治架構，以確保當法團根據《修訂規則》而符合資格成為專業投資者時，其股東會知道可能對他們帶來的影響。
SFC reminds directors and shareholders of a corporation to review the corporate governance structure to ensure that the shareholders of a corporation are properly informed and aware of the implications when the corporation becomes a professional investor pursuant to the Amendment Rules
證監會亦會發出新聞稿，提醒公眾有關修改。此外，證監會會發出通函，要求中介人在向法團專業投資者提供服務前，須得到控股公司的授權人員確認，該控股公司的股東已獲知會法團已成為專業投資者。
SFC will additionally issue a circular which requires intermediaries to obtain confirmation from the authorized persons of the holding company of a corporate professional investor that the shareholders of that holding company have been informed of its corporate professional investor status prior to providing services to the holding company
代理主席，以下是我個人對《修訂規則》的意見。
Deputy President below is my personal opinion on the Amendment Rules
今次的修訂究竟所為何事？
Then what is the purpose of raising the amendments in question?
簡單而言是這樣，今天我們只是正式將之明文化，標準化，寫清楚，提供一些確定性，謹此而已。
What we are doing today is just documentation standardization and clarification for providing some degree of certainty
代理主席，事實上，關於個人投資者800萬元的門檻，大家很容易明白，是指現金或個人投資組合，當然我們也有疑問，保險是否計算在內，因為市面上有很多保險單也有投資成分。
Deputy President about the 8 million threshold for individual investors in fact we can easily understand it as cash or personal investment portfolio . Of course we also doubt if the amount includes insurance as many insurance policies in the market contain certain investment elements
不過，政府已經回答我們，保險並不包括在內，物業也是不包括在內的，所以這個要說清楚。
However the Government has told us that insurance is not counted towards the monetary threshold nor is property included . This indeed has to be clarified
當然我也聽到涂謹申議員給予很多寶貴意見，他這方面的意見與蔣麗芸議員的意見相信是一樣的，特別是關於專業投資者和非專業投資者的保障措施。
Of course I have listened to a lot of valuable comments made by Mr James TO . His opinions probably agree with those of Dr CHIANG Lai - wan and especially the views on the protection measures for professional investors and non - professional investors
我也在會議上明確指出，證監會應該多採取主動， 加強對於各種投資產品的審批，特別是要保障非專業投資者。
I have also pointed out clearly in the meetings that SFC should be more proactive in strengthening the approval of various investment products and it is particularly important to protect non - professional investors
我相信這是政府回應蔣麗芸議員、涂謹申議員或其他委員的要求，我相信這個檢討也是大家希望見到的。
I believe this is the Governments response to the demand made by Dr CHIANG Lai - wan Mr James TO or some other members and the review is probably welcomed by all of us
至於涂謹申議員的兩項修正案，包括廢除這項《修訂規則》和將其生效日期延遲兩年，我有以下看法：坦白說，正如我所說，即使今天沒有《修訂規則》，其實過去的做法會繼續進行，不過這次修訂可以將做法明文化、標準化，而標準化有其好處。
As for the two amendments raised by Mr James TO including the repeal of the Amendment Rules and the deferral of their effective date for two years I have the following views frankly as I have said the previous practices will continue to be adopted if the Amendment Rules are not moved today . But the amendment this time facilitates documentation and standardization which is desirable
我主要想指出，最近的市場確實較為波動，不是一直上升，特朗普又展開中美貿易戰。
Basically I want to point out that the market has been quite unstable recently it is not rising continually all along . Donald TRUMP has meanwhile launched the Sino - US trade war
所以，我請大家注意這方面的影響。
Therefore I would like to ask all of us to pay attention to the impact in this respect
我發言支持政府提出的《修訂規則》，不支持涂謹申議員提出的兩項議案，原因剛才我亦清楚表明。
I speak in support of the Amendment Rules put forth by the Government and in opposition of the two amendments raised by Mr James TO for the reasons stated above
投資組合超過800萬元，或者資產總值不少於4,000萬元這個門檻沒有改變。
The thresholds of having a portfolio of over 8 million or total assets of not less than 40 million will remain unchanged
最主要改變的是對公司的規定，例如以前當公司的唯一經營業務是投資，它才可以成為專業投資者，而現在《規則》改動後，只要公司其中一個主要業務是投資，便可以成為專業投資者。
The major change lies in the requirement for corporations . For instance under the existing rules a corporation will qualify as a professional investor only if its sole business is investment . But with the present amendments to the PI Rules a corporation will qualify as a professional investor as long as one of its principal businesses is investment
當然，公司也要符合其他有關投資金額的門檻。
Of course corporations must also meet the other thresholds in relation to investment amounts
我就有一個最基本的質疑，就是按《規則》，我們叫某些人做專業投資者，其實對他們來說，這是否一種burden，是一種額外風險？
As for me I have just one fundamental question . When we regard certain people as professional investors under the Rules are we in fact giving them a kind of burden or plunging them into more risks?
周浩鼎議員剛才也解釋過，當某人成為專業投資者，中介人便可以向他主要銷售一些證券及期貨事務監察委員會不用認可的投資產品，包括一些複雜的衍生產品，一些並未獲認可的債券等。
Mr Holden CHOW has just explained that if a person is qualified as a professional investor an intermediary selling investment products to him may just concentrate on products that require no authorization from the Securities and Futures Commission SFC . Such products include complex derivative products and unauthorized debentures etc
如果你以投資金額、資產總值來衡量一個人能否承受這些風險，其實完全不科學。
In fact it is not at all scientific to assess a persons risk tolerance on the basis of his investment amount or aggregate asset value
當然，證監會發出這個《規則》之餘，亦發出了其他指引，要求中介人必須考慮投資者的投資經驗、學識水平，以及承受風險的能力，才售賣一些高風險產品。
We of course do know that apart from issuing the PI Rules SFC has also published other guidelines requiring intermediaries to consider the investment experience education level and risk tolerance of an investor before selling any high - risk products to him
當然，客觀來說，如果我的客人是一位專業投資者，很可能我的第一個感覺就是：我可以售賣一些高風險產品給這客人。
Actually to be fair if my client is a professional investor I am very likely to think at the very beginning that I can sell some high - risk products to him
代理主席，我不知道你數年前有沒有看過一齣電影"奪命金"，此電影由盧海鵬和蘇杏璇主演。
Deputy President I do not know if you have ever seen the movie Life Without Principle which was screened several years ago and starred by LO Hoi - pang and SOH Hang - suen
電影中，蘇杏璇是一位受害者，其中一幕是中介機構跟她做盡職審查，過程中有錄音，銀行中介人亦有詢問她的投資經驗。
SOH Hang - suen plays a victim in the movie and in one scene an intermediary is doing the due diligence procedure with her . The whole process is tape - recorded and the intermediary which is a bank also asks her questions about her previous investment experience
當然，這並非唯一的方法，因為很多時候，中介人不會有太多時間做這麼詳細的風險分析，亦沒有機構可以就市場上所有未被證監會認可的產品，做這樣的風險評估，所以，這只是其中一個方法。
Obviously we should not rely solely on this approach because very often intermediaries do not have much time to conduct detailed risk assessments and also no institutions can possibly assess the risks of all market investment products requiring no authorization from SFC . So this tactic should just be one of the solutions
我們要加強的是投資者教育。
We must still step up investor education in the meantime
"專業投資者"並非一項權利，只是一個標籤，即這群人可以承受高一點的風險。
You know being a professional investor does not give a person any exclusive right as such and the status is in a way just an indication that such investors can withstand higher risks
所以，投資者不要沾沾自喜， 以為自己屬專業投資者便代表很有本事，這"專業投資者"資格只不過讓人有機會投資一些高風險，甚至可能會跌破底價的投資產品。
So people who are qualified as professional investors must not be complacent thinking that they are very capable . The status will only give people opportunities to invest in some investment products which are of high risks or may plummet below the initial prices
就"專業投資者"資格方面，我認為證監會必須教育一般投資者，這不是一個專業資格，它只不過告訴你，有些人可能會向你銷售一些很高風險的產品，你最終可能賠本，甚至連本金也取不回。
I think SFC must make publicity efforts to tell investors in general that the status as a professional investor is itself not a professional qualification as such and that it just serves to let the person concerned know that some people may sell some high - risk products to him . In the end the person may have his fingers burnt or lose his principal even
至於檢討這《規則》的工作，證監會雖然承諾於2019年進行檢討，但檢討的方向、檢討的範疇，資料仍然欠奉。
Speaking of the issue of reviewing the PI Rules I must say that though SFC has undertaken to do so in 2019 it has not yet given us any information about the direction and scope of the review
對於涂謹申議員的兩項修訂，雖然我原則上、實際上都覺得可以考慮，但我決定就這項決議案投棄權票。
Some investors may even lose all their pensions . I certainly think that the underlying principle and practicability of the two amendments proposed by Mr James TO are both worthy of consideration but I have nonetheless decided to abstain from voting on them for reasons of one question
因為實際上，如果現在沒有這個改動是否好事呢？
Can the situation be any better if there is no such modification?
我覺得未必是好事。
I do not think so
實際上，現在還沒有一個折衷辦法，所以，我唯有對這項決議案投棄權票。
But there is not yet any compromise solution . So I have no alternative but to abstain from voting on this resolution
主席，食物及衞生局於今年5月向立法會提交《2018年人體器官移植條例草案》，建議修訂《人體器官移植條例》，容許以配對或匯集形式進行的器官捐贈安排在香港進行。
President the Food and Health Bureau introduced to the Legislative Council the Human Organ Transplant Amendment Bill 2018 the Bill in May this year proposing amendments to the Human Organ Transplant Ordinance to allow the conduct of paired or pooled donation arrangements in Hong Kong
當局早前已就有關的建議諮詢醫療專業人員和病人組織、立法會衞生事務委員會和人體器官移植委員會，各方均表示支持建議。
With regard to the proposal the authorities have earlier consulted health care professionals patient groups the Legislative Council Panel on Health Services and the Human Organ Transplant Board HOTB and in return have received support from all these parties
我在此特別感謝提供意見及支持建議的團體和人士。
Here I would like to express my gratitude to all the delegations and individuals that have provided comments and support for the proposal
負責審議《條例草案》的法案委員會共舉行了兩次會議，討論《條例草案》的條文及醫院管理局就腎臟配對捐贈先導計劃的實際操作安排。
The Bills Committee on Human Organ Transplant Amendment Bill 2018 has altogether held two meetings to discuss provisions of the Bill and the actual operational arrangement to be carried out by the Hospital Authority HA regarding the pilot Paired Kidney Donation Programme
所有法案委員會的委員對修訂都表示支持。
All members of the Bills Committee have expressed support for the proposal
我非常感謝法案委員會主席陳沛然議員及其他委員的努力，令審議工作順利完成。
I am deeply grateful to Dr Pierre CHAN Chairman of the Bills Committee and other members for their efforts which enabled the smooth completion of the scrutiny . Let us take a look at the background of the Bill