Borrison/hk-legicost huggingface dataset:
不過，我也明白，今時今日，在一個政治鬥爭的情況下，大家劍拔弩張、各不相讓。
However I also understand that we refuse to give way to each other in the midst of a political struggle in these days as the hostility is so intense
不過，我們較不幸，我們人少，你們人多，一定贏。
Nonetheless we are less fortunate . You will surely win because we are the minority and you are the majority
但是，在這情況下，我想大家同事思考一下，今次修改《議事規則》，其實有些是好的《議事規則》。
But in this case I wish Members should think about it . As to the amendments to the Rules of Procedure this time around some of the rules are actually really good ones
既然修改了《議事規則》，例如全體委員會減少法定人數，其實只是叫作"贏了帳面"，實際上沒有贏，無法 達到反"拉布"的目的。
After the Rules of Procedure are amended such as reducing the quorum of a committee of the whole Council we have only achieved the book value gain but not any gain in real terms . As a result we cannot achieve any anti - filibuster objective
再將主席權力放大，被人質疑，亦有同事質疑不好意思，你是代理主席當大主席主持會議時，質疑他有利益衝突，不應主持會議。
The fact that the expansion of the Presidents power is questioned by some colleagues . I am sorry you are just the one who deputizes for the President . Members have questioned if any conflict of interest is present when the President of the Legislative Council is presiding the Council meeting
這些不必要的爭論，其實是否真的幫到整個議會，既有效率，亦有效用去議事，然後做到我記得我昨天說過，我帶着幼稚園K3團體參觀時，小朋友問如何制衡政府，如何立法，以及如何審批公共財政預算案？
They considered that he should not preside the meeting . Have these unnecessary arguments really help the legislature to enhance its efficiency and effectiveness in dealing with its businesses? . Can we achieve what the grade 3 kindergarten students asked me during the Guided Educational Tour yesterday which I can still recall now namely how we exercise checks and balances on the Government how we enact laws and how we approve public expenditure and budgets?
但是，最後，我想看看，說了這麼多具爭議性的事，其實對整件事我說的是"紅書仔"沒有好處，我們是否需要修改呢？
Lastly what I try to see is that after speaking on so many controversial issues actually they will do no good to the entire matter I mean they will do no good to the little red book . Do we really need to amend it?
我希望經過今次事件，大家看看，其實我們是想議會既有效，也有用，以達到我們3個目的，還是怎樣？
After this incident I hope that we should look into ways to make the legislature efficient and effective or our three objectives or something else
我說了15分鐘，交回毛孟靜議員。
I have used up my 15 minutes I am going to pass it back to Ms Claudia MO
本來我打算逐項建議讀出來，最低限度有所記錄，讓大家可以跟隨，不過還是算了，大家自行上網查閱會更清楚，我想把握這個機會討論數個問題。
I originally planned to read out the proposed amendments one by one to at least put them on record for people to follow but I changed my mind . People can read them online which is a better way to do so . I wish to take this opportunity to discuss a few issues
代理主席，廖長江議員的決議案提出的修訂中有一點，我不太聽到其他同事提到，便是關於《議事規則》第404條的部分。
Deputy President I find one of the amendments proposed in Mr Martin LIAOs resolution rarely discussed by other Members . It is about Rule 404 of the Rules of Procedure
現時《議事規則》第404條訂明："在立法會全體委員會會議上，議員可無經預告而動議一項委員會現即休會待續的議案，全體委員會主席須即提 出該議案的待議議題。
The existing Rule 404 of the Rules of Procedure provides that When the Council is in committee a Member may move without notice that further proceedings of the committee be now adjourned . Thereupon the Chairman shall propose the question on that motion
議案如獲通過，委員會即須回復為立法會；議案如被否決，則委員會的程序即須繼續進行。
If the motion is agreed to the Council shall resume; but if the motion is negatived the committee shall continue its proceedings
" 代理主席，這涉及兩個問題。
Deputy President this involves two issues
這是一個原則問題，我認為議員在全體委員會審議階段提出一項現即休會待續的議案，是不可能令立法會不能正常地運作。
This is a matter of principle . I do not think that moving an adjournment motion at the Committee stage can hinder the normal operation of the Legislative Council
我昨天提出一點，便是前主席曾鈺成對於全體委員會無限發言的處理方法，便是最後"剪布"。
I raised a point yesterday . I mentioned that Mr Jasper TSANG our former President chose to cut the filibusters when Members made an unlimited number of speeches in a Committee of the Whole Council
按照他的邏輯，以及接下來終審法院的判決，你也能夠理解這是為了履行《議事規則》和《基本法》賦予他的權力。
We learn from his logic and the subsequent judgment of the Court of Final Appeal that his action can be interpreted as an exercise of his power vested to him by the Rules of Procedure and the Basic Law
但是，在全體委員會內提出一項現即休會待續的議案又怎會產生令立法會無法運作的效果呢？
But how could an adjournment motion moved at the Committee stage make the Legislative Council inoperable?
所以，從根本而言，我認為無論《基本法》或《議事規則》賦予議員的權力，在這個處境下，原則上一定是比主席限制這類議案提出的權力較大的。
So I hold that in this context the powers vested to Members whether under the Basic Law or the Rules of Procedure should in principle be greater than the power vested to the President on restricting the moving of these motions
代理主席，第二點則涉及實際的問題。
Deputy President the second point is a matter of practicality
問題是，這是一個情境的判斷，即是我們現時經常面對一種情況，我們要猜測別人的動機，但《議事規則》是不容許這樣做的。
The problem is that this is judgmental a situation we often run into nowadays in which we have to speculate on another persons motive . But the Rules of Procedure does not allow us to do so
"濫用程序"這4個字未經清楚說明和界定下，主席基本上必須猜測議員提出來的動機。
Without clear elaboration or definition of a proposed adjournment motion the President basically has to speculate on a Members motive of moving the motion to decide if it is an abuse of procedure
我可以在全體委員會階段站起來說，我要提出現即休會待續議案，好像之前"琵琶手"盧偉國議員也說，這是程序而已。
I will still be allowed to rise and propose an adjournment motion when the Council is in Committee . Like what the pipa player Ir Dr LO Wai - kwok said earlier this is just a matter of procedure
如果主席真的要作出判斷，我們真的要開庭審訊，主席要找證人證明朱凱廸提出這議案是立壞心腸，接着進行一、二、三個步驟。
If the President is to make a convincing judgment he may have to bring the matter to court and find witnesses to prove that Mr CHU Hoi - dick moved the motion out of ill intention and then go through other steps
但是，主席是不會有這機會的，所以加入"濫用程序"這4個字的實則效果就是濫權，可以變成無差別的、任意停止議員按照他原有權力提出現即休會待續議案。
But the President will not have the opportunity to do so . Hence an abuse of procedure will become an abuse of power to arbitrarily stop Members from exercising their power to move adjournment motions a power that they are vested with
此外，我想進一步回應廖長江議員減少全體委員會法定人數這項建議。
Moreover I wish to further respond to Mr Martin LIAOs proposal to lower the quorum for a Committee of the Whole Council
我想在此引述前立法會議員吳靄儀剛寫給一個網站的文章，標題是"減低法定人數是否違反《基本法》：比較雙方法律意見"。
Here I wish to quote an article Dr Margaret NG a former Legislative Council Member wrote at a website not long ago . The article is titled 減低法定人數是否違反《基本法》 比較雙方法律意見 In my opinion former Member Dr Margaret NG has raised two very important points
前議員吳靄儀提出兩個我認為很重要的觀點，第一個觀點是她認為"將全體委員會視為立法會的委員會系統的一部分，是毫無實際理據"，因為廖長江議員認為全體委員會跟其他委員會一樣。
First she says Mr Martin LIAO holds that the Committee of the Whole Council is the same as other committees but I hold that there is no solid ground to say that a Committee of the Whole Council is part of the committee system of the Legislative Council
吳靄儀表示，"全體委員會是為立法程序的需要而設，在立法會會議之外無獨立存在，亦無獨立運作。
She adds A Committee of the Whole Council is established to meet the need of the legislative procedure; it does not independently exist or operate outside the meeting of the Legislative Council
《議事規則》的'委員會'部分，並不包括全體委員會；全體委員會只見於'法案的處理程序'，是程序的一部分，只在立法會會議中發揮作用......
Rules concerning a Committee of the Whole Council are not listed under Committees Part M of the Rules of Procedure but only under Procedure on bills Part K which defines the procedures applicable only to Council meetings The critical point is that Article 751 of the Basic Law should not be understood in fragments
關鍵在於《基本法》第七十五條第一款不能'斬件'理解，第七十五條第一款的條文說的是'立法會會議的法定人數'而非'立法會的法定人數'。
Article 751 is talking about the quorum for the meeting of the Legislative Council and not the quorum for the Legislative Council
甚麼是立法會會議，甚麼包括在立法會會議的議程內，一目了然。
It clearly defines the meaning of Legislative Council meeting and the items to be included in the agenda of Legislative Council meeting
"這就是我為何反對廖長江議員降低全體委員會人數的想法。
This is the reason why I oppose Mr Martin LIAOs idea of lowering the quorum of a Committee of the Whole Council
她說："《議事規則》的修改一經通過，接着的立法程序便會按此而行。
Why? . She says Once the resolution on the amendments to the Rules of Procedure is passed any subsequent legislative procedure will be conducted according to the revised Rules of Procedure
若法定人數變為20人的修訂是違憲，假如在某條法案進入全委會階段時有議員要點人數，而人數少於35，那麼通過了的法例是否有效，便大成疑問，因為法律上當時人數未足以構成全委會。
If the amendment to lower the quorum to 20 Members is unconstitutional and if a Member requests a headcount after a bill enters the Committee stage and there are less than 35 Members present it becomes questionable whether the passed bill is legally in effect since legally speaking the Council does not have sufficient Members to constitute a Committee of the Whole Council
" 在這個問題上，我再一次認為主席梁君彥很不負責任。
Once again I think the President Andrew LEUNG has been very irresponsible on this matter . He has actually shirked the responsibility to the whole Legislative Council
其實，他現在是把責任推給整個立法會，他在批准廖長江議員降低全體委員會法定人數的建議的判決中也不敢說清楚，我昨天已指出，他是以一個double negative來表達，換言之，他不確定他一定違反《基本法》，即是他不一定違反《基本法》便可以提出，交由大家決定。
He did not make himself clear in the ruling he made on approving Mr Martin LIAOs proposed amendment to lower the quorum for a Committee of the Whole Council . As I pointed out yesterday he used a double negative to express his statement . In other words he is unsure whether he has violated the Basic Law; that is to say he can propose the amendment as long as he has not definitely violated the Basic Law
為免本會陷入憲政危機，我希望各位同事反對廖長江議員，特別是這個全體委員會的修訂。
To prevent this Council from falling into any constitutional crisis I hope that fellow Members will oppose Mr Martin LIAOs resolution especially concerning the amendments on a Committee of the Whole Council
主席，關於立法會《議事規則》修訂的討論，我認為立法會不同黨派或政見的議員均應以平常心看待。
President with regard to the discussions on the amendments proposed to the Rules of Procedure of the Legislative Council I opine that Members from different political parties or with different political views should look at these amendments with a calm mind
立法會《議事規則》並非一成不變，而是應該與時並進，不斷優化及完善。
The Rules of Procedure of the Legislative Council are not immutable but should be kept abreast of the times and constantly improved and enhanced
如果發現《議事規則》有不合理之處，又或有實在可能影響議會正常運作的地方，為何不能對之作出改善？
If it is considered that some provisions in the Rules of Procedure are unreasonable or some requirements contained therein would possibly affect the normal operations of the Legislative Council why not consider making the necessary improvements?
《議事規則》的修訂，今次並非第一次，我相信亦不會是最後一次。
This is not the first time we propose amendments to the Rules of Procedure and I believe this will also not be the last time for us to do so
我們沒有理由視之為洪水猛獸，更加不應出盡法寶，搗亂議事堂的秩序以圖阻礙會議的進行。
There is no reason why we should take such amendments as some great scourges let alone trying to hinder the progress of the meeting by resorting to every possible means to disrupt the order in the Chamber
代理主席，非建制派議員在這個議題上顯得邏輯混亂，進退失據，令人感到莫名其妙。
Deputy President it seems that when handling the issue Members from the non - establishment camp are confused with logic and it is baffling that they are simply contradicting themselves
例如郭榮鏗議員於11月30日本會會議席上發言時，認為建制派議員修訂《議事規則》，只會種下更多怨恨和仇恨，我當時已發言表示對此感到非常奇怪。
For example when Mr Dennis KWOK spoke at the Council meeting held on 30 November he opined that by proposing amendments to the Rules of Procedure Members of the pro - establishment camp would only create more resentment and hatred . In response I have spoken that day and said that such remarks were really puzzling to me
如果按非建制派議員的邏輯，建制派議員修訂《議事規則》是所謂種下仇恨，那麼非建制派議員為何同時又提出多項修訂《議事規則》的建議呢？
If the logic of non - establishment Members can be established and Members of the pro - establishment camp are really creating hatred by seeking to amend the Rules of Procedure how come non - establishment Members are proposing a number of amendments to the Rules of Procedure at the same time?
他們憑甚麼指責建制派議員？
What makes them so confident that they can criticize Members of the pro - establishment camp like this?
這難度不是持雙重標準嗎？
Is it not an example of the adoption of double standards?
事實上，如今雙方都提出各項修訂建議，正好證明《議事規則》確實有需要作出修訂。
As a matter of fact a number of amendments have now been proposed by both sides and this point alone can prove that there is a genuine need to amend the Rules of Procedure
" 的確，代理主席，破壞容易，建設困難。
Indeed Deputy President it is easier to destroy than to create
但是，我們不應害怕他們層出不窮的招數，《議事規則》如應該修訂，便要作出修訂。
However we should not be afraid of the endless tricks they play and should amend the Rules of Procedure if there is a need to do so
根據《基本法》第七十五條，立法會自行制定《議事規則》，令立法會可履行憲制責任，但不得與《基本法》相抵觸。
Under Article 75 of the Basic Law the Legislative Council shall formulate the Rules of Procedure on its own in order to fulfil its constitutional responsibility but they shall not contravene the Basic Law
立法會《議事規則》絕對具有立法效力，至於非建制派議員就主席所作各項相關裁決的質疑亦沒有道理。
The Rules of Procedure of the Legislative Council absolutely have legislative effect and there is no reason for Members from the non - establishment camp to query the rulings made by the President
對於有12位議員分別就修訂《議事規則》動議合共12項擬議決議案，正如主席多番強調，立法會行之已久的慣例是，修訂《議事規則》的建議必須採用"三部曲"程序進行。
With regard to a total of 12 proposed resolutions moved respectively by 12 Members to amend the Rules of Procedure as pointed out repeatedly by the President it has been an established practice of the Legislative Council to adopt a three - step procedure to process proposed amendments to the Rules of Procedure
具體而言，先由議事規則委員會研究，再向內務委員會報告其建議，之後請立法會主席批准動議相關的擬議決議案，供大會考慮。
Specifically speaking the Committee on Rules of Procedure will first deliberate on the amendments proposed and a report with recommendations will then be submitted to the House Committee which will subsequently seek the approval of the President of the Legislative Council for moving the proposed resolutions accordingly for consideration by the Council
主席作出裁決時只會考慮各項擬議決議案是否經過"三部曲"程序，有否抵觸《基本法》、現行法例或《議事規則》的條文，以及內容有否不準確或不能理解之處。
When making a ruling the President will only consider whether the proposed resolutions have undergone the three - step procedure; whether they contravene the Basic Law the existing legislation or the provisions of the Rules of Procedure; and whether they contain any inaccurate or incomprehensible information
因此，主席裁定12項擬議決議案均可提出，顯然並沒有因為提出議案的議員是建制派還是非建制派而作出偏頗的處理。
Hence when the President ruled that the 12 proposed resolutions could be moved this is obviously not a biased decision made simply on the basis of the identity of their movers that is whether they are Members from the pro - establishment or non - establishment Members
至於其後有22位議員就擬議決議案提出88項修正案，主席亦採取了寬鬆的原則，綜合考慮上述各項因素後批准提出23項議案，當中涉及54項擬議修正案。
As for the 88 amendments proposed by 22 Members subsequently to the proposed resolutions the President has also adopted a lenient approach and after giving comprehensive consideration to various factors mentioned above approved 23 motions involving 54 of these proposed amendments
同時，鑒於12項擬議決議案及其修正案均是根據《基本法》第七十五條修改《議事規則》，屬同一主題，經參考立法會過往處理議員或政府提出決議案的慣例，安排進行合併辯論。
At the same time given that all of the 12 proposed resolutions and their amendments are moved on the same subject under Article 75 of the Basic Law to amend the Rules of Procedure arrangements have been made to debate them together in a joint debate according to the previous practice adopted by this Council to handle resolutions proposed by Members or the Government
由此可見，主席作出的相關裁決既合法亦合理。
It can thus be seen that the rulings made by the President are both legitimate and reasonable
代理主席，非建制派議員提出的《議事規則》修訂建議，有多項其實屬行政問題。
Deputy President in quite a number of amendments proposed to the Rules of procedure by Members from the non - establishment camp the matters involved are actually administrative issues
例如第83AA條的修訂涉及秘書處的設施及資源，第67條的修訂則涉及秘書處的人手配置，均應由行政管理委員會處理，而並非藉修訂《議事規則》處理。
For example the amendments proposed to RoP 83AA are related to the facilities and resources of the Secretariat while those proposed to RoP 67 are about the manpower deployment of the Secretariat and instead of amending the Rules of Procedure such issues should be referred to the Legislative Council Commission
至於第2條的修訂則有關手語的使用，我認為首先要爭取將手語訂為法定語言，那便可以名正言順 地將之納入《議事規則》。
As for the amendments proposed to RoP 2 on the use of sign language I think we should first endeavour to make sign language an official language so that it can be justifiably included in the Rules of Procedure
目前透過行政方法在立法會使用手語，是務實的做法。
It is a pragmatic approach to use sign language in the Legislative Council now through administrative means
代理主席，現時議會長期陷於"拉布"的亂局，最終受害的是全港各階層的市民，因為不論是經濟發展、基礎建設、土地開發及房屋供應，以至許多社會民生問題的解決措施，均大受"拉布"阻延。
Deputy President the Legislative Council is now permanently affected by the chaos created by filibustering and people from all walks of life and different sectors will ultimately be the victims since filibustering has seriously hampered economic development the implementation of infrastructural projects land development and the supply of housing as well as the introduction of measures to tackle numerous social and livelihood problems
公道自在人心，市民看到這些情況，自然心中有數。
As justice naturally exists in the hearts of the people members of the public understand very well what is going on when they are witnessing all these
根據香港中文大學亞太研究所近日公布的調查結果，有53.2%受訪者同意"拉布"阻礙政府施政，拖慢香港的社會發展，只有19.8%受訪者不同意。
According to the survey results published recently by the Hong Kong Institute of Asia - Pacific Studies of the Chinese University of Hong Kong 53.2 % of the respondents agree that filibustering has undermined governance of the Government and slowed down the pace of social development in Hong Kong while only 19.8 % of the respondents disagree
對於是否贊成立法會修改《議事規則》以減少"拉布"，贊成修改的受訪者達到49.4%，不贊成的只佔30.1%。
With regard to the suggestion of preventing filibustering by amending the Rules of Procedure of the Legislative Council 49.4 % of the respondents support such an idea while only 30.1 % of the respondents disagree
同時值得注意的是，有58.6%受訪者表明不贊成非建制派議員早前就有關"一地兩檢"議案進行"拉布"，大幅拋離22.2%的贊成比率。
It is also worth noting that with regard to the actions taken earlier by non - establishment Members to filibuster on the motion relating to the co - location arrangement 58.6 % of the respondents has clearly expressed disagreement significantly surpassing the support rate of 22.2 % among respondents
由此可見，對於非建制派議員種種"拉布"行徑，民意傾向十分清晰。
It can thus be seen that public attitude towards the filibustering acts of non - establishment Members is very clear
主席曾經指出，議員於議事堂發表的言論不一定是事實，但一些最基本的常識及認知又豈能混淆？
The President has once pointed out that what Members say in this Chamber is not necessarily correct but how can we confuse the public about some basic knowledge and information?
例如多位非建制派議員於發言中詭辯，在大會以20人站立方式提交呈請書，只佔很短時間而不屬"拉布"。
For example a number of non - establishment Members have employed sophistry in their speech and argued that it would only take a very short time for presenting a petition in a Council meeting and requesting its referral to a select committee by 20 Members who rise in their places and this should not be regarded as filibustering
但是，眾所周知，提交呈請書之後成立相關專責委員會所虛耗的時間、人力、公帑非常龐大，因此不容濫用呈請書。
However as we all know considerable time manpower and public financial resources will be required to set up a select committee after a petition has been presented and we should therefore guard against possible abusive use of the arrangements for the presentation of petitions
這個議會非常妖獸。
This Council is kind of immoral
今天早上，聽到因為謝偉俊議員的一件褻衣，究竟是內褲、三角褲，還是泳褲，也可以談好幾分鐘。
This morning I heard the meeting spend a good few minutes discussing a piece of undergarment worn by Mr Paul TSE debating whether it was a pair of underpants briefs or swimming briefs
而我當時看到你眉花眼笑，十分興奮，沉淪的程度真是難以想象。
I also saw you grinning from ear to ear beaming in excitement at that time . Such kind of debasement is hardly imaginable
當然，這個議會充斥很多西環"契仔"、"契女"，當然亦有"契弟"，是一定有的。
Of course this Council is swarmed with Western District godsons and goddaughters and of course god brothers for sure
結果，現在我們的議會落入了憲制危機，真的是憲制危機。
As a result this Council of ours is now confronting with a constitutional crisis a genuine constitutional crisis
說到底，現況就好像黑社會一般，誰有權處理規矩的，就是最有實力的社團。
After all the current situation is actually like that of a triad society whosoever empowered to handle the rules is the most powerful gang
何謂最有實力？
And what exactly is the most powerful?
就是最有錢的人。
The wealthiest
這種威權根本就是獨裁。
This kind of authority is nothing but dictatorial
一天到晚也有人說，"拉布"妨礙民生、阻礙撥款，例如廖長江議員說：民生項目真的被"拉"得很慘等。
Meanwhile people keep on saying filibuster is a hindrance to livelihood development as it impedes funding allocation . Mr Martin LIAO for instance has said that livelihood issues are indeed affected by filibuster badly
在這個議會，我以前很介意一個人，但現在有一點懷念他。
I used to dislike a certain person in this Council but now I kind of miss him
而我最不能理解的一個項目，就是港珠澳大橋。
The project which makes the least sense to me is the Hong Kong - Zhuhai - Macao Bridge
167億元，等於10億罐午餐肉。
16.7 billion or one billion cans of luncheon meat
由納稅人支付，這12億罐午餐肉的價錢。
Taxpayers are to shoulder the sum which amounts to 1.2 billion cans of luncheon meat
但他讓人看到，他是公正、公平的。
But he gave the impression that he was fair and impartial
我們只有數屆立法會主席，大家說：哪位主席是公平、公正的，會有市民看到，人民的眼睛是雪亮的，他豈能堵世人悠悠之口？
So far we only have a few Legislative Council Presidents and people can tell which are fair and impartial they can observe with their eyes . People are sharp - eyed and how can they be prevented from passing on their judgment?
之前有民主派同事問他，這本書並沒有訂明"不容辯論"這4個字，他又假裝沒有這一回事，聽不到、不回答。
A colleague from the pro - democracy camp has earlier asked why his decision cannot be subject to any debate as such a word is not found in this book . He acted as though the question had not been raised he pretended not to have listened to the question and provided no answer
他現在一直在賣港，完全是陷香港人於不義。
He is betraying Hong Kong and thoroughly imperilling Hong Kong people all the time
他一定要在聖誕節前全部通過這些"擦鞋"修訂，以向北京交代。
He must get all these apple - polishing amendments passed before Christmas so as to be accountable to Beijing
大家看到，整個議會由一些認受性低的人來主理，其實是貶低我們的議會，是一個完全不能夠令人信服的議會。
As we can see this Council has been led by people with poor legitimacy . This will actually belittle the Legislative Council making it a totally unconvincing Council to the public
所以，這項修訂其實很合理，我甚至覺得大會主席都應該......由直選產生。
Hence this amendment is justifiable . I even think that the President of the Legislative Council should also be elected from the geographical constituency
這說法真是厲害，我們佔少數，現在很明顯挨打，卻變成"少數獨裁"。
We are obviously the underdog here . But they now use the term dictatorship of the minority to describe us
民主派議員佔直選議席大多數，但在這個議會，我們變成少數。
Pro - democracy camp Members occupy most directly elected seats in this legislature but we are instead the minority
現時所有最重要的委員，包括財務委員會、工務小組委員會、人事編制小組委員會及內務委員會，全部都是你們的人。
At present the most important Panels committees and subcommittees including the Finance Committee the Public Works Sub - committee the Establishment Sub - committee and the House Committee are all controlled by your people
這個議會的權力已經完全不平衡，沒有平等參與。
There is a total power imbalance in the legislature . There is no equal participation at all
這個議會在無法真正完全平等地代表人民的聲音下，現在還要進一步收緊《議事規則》，限制議員的發言權、縮短表決的程序、簡化三讀的程序、收緊呈請的程序，然後還指控我們是"少數獨裁"，要將議會回復暢順，才可以得到平衡。
The public are already unable to have any equal representation of their voices in this legislature but now you people still want to tighten the Rules of Procedure limit Members right to speak shorten the voting procedures simplify the proceedings of three readings and tighten the pre - requisites for presenting a petition . And besides all this you people even accuse us of dictatorship of the minority saying that your intention is to restore smooth operation and balance in the legislature
我非常同意朱凱廸議員所說，其實現時這場球賽，我們已經比你們少踢很多人，然後還要"DQ"，再踢走一些人。
I fully agree with Mr CHU Hoi - dick who says that it is now all like a soccer match in which our team already has fewer players than yours . But then you still want to disqualify and expel some more players of ours
現在隊長是你們的人、球證是你們的人，足總、足協全部都是你們的人。
The captain the referee and the staff of the football association are all your people
然後，你說不可以，要將龍門再搬遠一點，有本事便射球吧，射不到是你們的問題。
But you are still not satisfied and want to move the goal further back daring us to shoot and saying that we can only blame ourselves if we cannot make a score
坦白一點吧，建制派，何必欺騙市民呢？
You pro - establishment Members must honestly ask yourselves why you should still say such things to cheat the public
其實，你們已經大權在握。
Actually you people already have all the power in your hands
不過，雖說是大權在握，但其實你們是否真的能夠制衡政府呢？
Nevertheless despite all the power in your hands can you people really check and monitor the Government?