Borrison/hk-legicost huggingface dataset:
他又表示完全不介意公開修改內容，但卻指責有專責委員會委員違反閉門會議的保密協定，明言要追究，更"無厘頭"地把矛頭指向會計界的立法會議員梁繼昌，要求他退出專責委員會，意圖轉移公眾視線。
He even said that he did not mind disclosing details of the amendments but accused the Select Committee of breaching the confidentiality undertaking for closed meetings and vowed to pursue responsibility . He even for no reason at all pointed his finger at Legislative Council Member Mr Kenneth LEUNG from the accountancy sector and urged him to withdraw from the Select Committee in an attempt to divert public attention
由此可見，他為了掩飾企圖已經變得語無倫次。
It is well evident that LEUNG Chun - ying has been talking nonsense in order to conceal his intention
明明是自己有錯在先，卻偏要把錯誤加諸別人身上，還要針對專責委員會內唯一一位擁有專業稅務知識的梁繼昌議員。
Obviously he had made a mistake in the first place but he put the blame on others and targeted at Mr Kenneth LEUNG the only person in the Select Committee who possesses professional knowledge in taxation
此舉更令人懷疑他一定是內心有鬼，意圖左右專責委員會的調查方向及結果，他維護自己及掩飾罪行的意圖可謂昭然若揭。
This has aroused further suspicion that he has a guilty conscience thus seeking to influence the direction and result of the Select Committees inquiry . His intention to protect himself and cover up his wrongdoings is therefore clear to all
更離譜的是，他的任期餘下不足1個月，不但沒有做好特首的角色，反而每天翻查梁繼昌議員的Facebook，並撰寫網誌攻擊他，迫使梁議員辭職。
More ridiculous still with a remaining term of less than a month instead of playing a good role as the Chief Executive he looked up the Facebook of Mr Kenneth LEUNG day after day and wrote posts to attack him so as to force him to resign . He launched attacks at others in his transcendent status as the Chief Executive
他以特首的超然身份咄咄逼人，這是廉潔奉公、盡忠職守嗎？
Can he be regarded as a person of integrity and dedicated to his duties?
這種荒謬的理據他不僅每天都在提出，更是大肆地提出。
He has raised such ridiculous justifications day after day brazenly
一個如此不知羞耻的人，還配擔任特區的特首嗎？
Is such a shameless person worthy of being the head of the SAR?
更重要的是，在專責委員會舉行首次會議前，梁繼昌議員已經與主席謝偉俊議員及法律顧問商討是否有需要申報，而主席及法律顧問均表示沒有需要，那試問何時輪到梁振英這個最應該避嫌的受查人出來指指點點？
More important still before the first meeting of the Select Committee was conducted Mr Kenneth LEUNG had discussed with Chairman Mr Paul TSE and the Legal Adviser whether he was required to make declaration and their reply was in the negative . So how come LEUNG Chun - ying has the guts to make comments when he being the subject of inquiry should be the one to avoid arousing suspicion?
究竟梁振英有否弄清楚自己的身份？
Has LEUNG Chun - ying ascertained his own position?
他知否自己在事件中，由始至終都是一個嫌疑犯？
Is he aware that he is a suspect in this matter from the very beginning?
梁振英厚顏無耻早已人盡皆知。
Everyone knows that LEUNG Chun - ying is shameless
事到如今，無論他如何反駁，其做法亦無疑破壞了專責委員會及議會的公信力，並嚴重違反他在就任時根據《基本法》所作的誓言，包括第四十七條、第六十條及第六十四條賦予行政長官的憲制責任，即是有關"行政長官廉潔奉公、盡忠職守，並且必須遵守法律，對香港特別行政區立法會負責"的規定。
No matter how he argues he has undoubtedly undermined the credibility of the Select Committee and this Council and has seriously violated the undertaking he made pursuant to the Basic Law when he sworn into office including the constitutional duty under Articles 47 60 and 64 which requires that the Chief Executive to be a person of integrity dedicated to his or her duties and must abide by the law and be accountable to the Legislative Council of the Region
他以權謀私和濫權瀆職，已經沒有資格繼續擔任特首。
Given that he has abused power for personal gains and is in dereliction of duty he is no longer qualified to be the Chief Executive
因此，我們提出彈劾，要求成立一個獨立的調查委員會，徹底追究其瀆職行為，絕不能夠讓他蒙混過關。
We have therefore activated the impeachment process and demanded the setting up of an independent investigation committee to thoroughly inquire into his dereliction of duty . We absolutely should not let him get off scot - free
有不少人可能會認為，梁振英的任期餘下不足1個月，但彈劾程序卻動輒半年或以上，屆時不論成功與否，梁振英早已下台當其政協副主席，所以彈劾也沒有用。
Many people may think that as LEUNG Chun - ying will only remain in office for less than a month and the impeachment process will probably take at least six months by then disregarding the success or failure of the impeachment LEUNG Chun - ying probably will have already stepped down and become the Vice Chairman of the Chinese Peoples Political Consultative Conference . Hence the impeachment is meaningless
不過，我想強調，彈劾並不是沒有用的，原因是我們不能因為梁振英即將下台便甚麼也不做。
Notwithstanding that I want to stress that the impeachment is not pointless as we cannot just sit back and do nothing simply because he will step down soon
即使他最終可以逃過制度的審判，但我們亦必定要他受到輿論的唾棄。
Even if he can eventually get away from institutional trials we will surely make him spurned by the media
他的厚顏無耻早已人盡皆知，早有前科。
His shamelessness is known to all and there are numerous precedents
因此，我們絕對不能將他私下修改周浩鼎議員提交的文件，當作是無心之失或個別事件。
Therefore we absolutely will not regard his clandestine amendment of the document submitted by Mr Holden CHOW as inadvertent or an individual incident
這顯然是極度嚴重的瀆職事件，是非分明，清清楚楚，不容抵賴。
Rather this is obviously a serious dereliction of duty . The rights and wrongs of this case are obvious and no denial is possible
市民想要的是一名廉潔奉公和承擔責任的特首，而不是一名偷偷摸摸、滿口謊言、滿腹詭計的特首。
Members of the public want their Chief Executive to be a person of integrity who will readily shoulder responsibility but not someone who always acts clandestinely tells lies and makes cunning plans
再者，立法會作為香港唯一擁有廣泛民意授權的機構，儘管現時的結構並不民主，並非全部議員皆由市民廣泛選出，但卻依然是最能反映民意的地方。
Furthermore the Legislative Council is the only institution in Hong Kong with a broad public mandate . Although its current structure is not democratic as not all Members are elected by the general public it is still the place where public views can best be reflected
梁振英在道德上失職，在行政上濫權，視程序公義 為無物，事件被揭發後仍然死不悔改，砌詞狡辯。
LEUNG Chun - ying has neglected his duty morally abused power administratively and disregarded procedural justice . Worse still he remained unrepentant after the case was uncovered and made up all sorts of lame excuses
建制派為梁振英"死撐"，護主的程度是連分辨是非的能力也盡失。
The pro - establishment camps blind support of LEUNG Chun - ying has reached an extent that it has failed to distinguish right from wrong
因此，我們28名背後代表着香港數百萬名市民的民意的非建制議員更應該站出來，要求他為這種行為付出代價。
Therefore we 28 Members of the non - establishment camp who represent the views of millions of Hong Kong people should stand out and urge LEUNG Chun - ying to pay for what he had done
到了這個地步，我們絕對不能夠"放生"他，因為這是我們作為議員監察政府的責任。
Coming to this stage we will surely not let him go because Members are duty - bound to monitor the Government
如果我們沒有這樣做，反而是我們失職。
If we fail to do so it would be dereliction of duty on our part
梁振英干預議會的行為，已經嚴重破壞議會的公信力，如果我們不採取行動，將難以挽回市民對議會的信心，以為今天的議會對於豺狼當道的情況已視若無睹。
LEUNG Chun - yings interference with the Council has seriously undermined its credibility and if we do not take any action it would be difficult to restore public confidence in the legislature and people might think that this Council has turned a blind eye to the fact that the wicked is in power
我們絕對不能讓一個人摧毀整個議會的結構，亦不能讓未來特首或政府官員以為這做法是一種常態，是可以接受的行為，甚至以為做錯事後只要死口不認，便可以蒙混過關。
Surely we cannot allow anyone to destroy the entire legislature; we cannot convey a message to the next Chief Executive or public officers that such actions are normal and therefore acceptable or that they may muddle through by denying any mistakes made
因此，立法會必須啟動彈劾程序，以維護立法會的尊嚴和市民對立法會的信心。
In that case the Legislative Council must activate the impeachment process to uphold the dignity of the Council and restore peoples confidence in this Council
即使梁振英下台，他亦依然要負上應有的責任，不能夠讓事件不了了之。
And even if LEUNG Chun - ying steps down he still needs to be held accountable and we cannot let the case ends up in nothing
第一個論點是彈劾是相當嚴肅的事情，不可以隨便進行，但我不禁要問，究竟政務司司長是否認為，干預立法會並非一件很嚴肅的事情呢？
His first argument is that the power of impeachment is so serious that it should not be casually exercised
主席，政務司司長的第二個論點是，受查者當然可以提出對於調查範圍的意見，我認為這更奇妙。
President the Chief Secretarys second argument is that the subject of inquiry can certainly express his views on the scope of the inquiry . I find this argument even more perplexing
很多人說，受查者可合理要求收窄或擴大調查範圍。
Many people argue that the subject of inquiry can reasonably request to narrow or expand the scope of inquiry
即使退一萬步，受查者可要求擴大或收窄調查範圍，他又可否秘密地向某名委員提出意見呢？
Even if some concessions are made and the subject of inquiry can request to expand or narrow the scope of inquiry can he covertly convey his views to a certain member?
主席，政務司司長有關梁先生在5年內做過一些好事的論點，最多可以應用在首席法官完成調查干預是否屬實後。
President the Chief Secretarys argument concerning the good deeds done by Mr LEUNG can at most be considered after the completion of the investigation by the Chief Justice into the alleged interference
主席，民建聯的李慧琼議員的第一個觀點是，這項彈劾議案其實是"倒梁"而已，反對派無論如何都要"倒梁"。
President the first argument of Ms Starry LEE of the Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong is that this impeachment motion merely aims at toppling LEUNG Chun - ying and the opposition camp aims to topple LEUNG Chun - ying in any event
新特首已選出，不論好醜，也要寄望將來。
Since a new Chief Executive has already been elected we need to look into the future for good or for worse
市民有否逼迫民主派彈劾梁振英？
Have members of the public forced the pro - democracy camp to impeach LEUNG Chun - ying?
周浩鼎議員私通梁振英，嚴重至干預立法會，才需要我們出手。
It is only that the collusion between Mr Holden CHOW and LEUNG Chun - ying is so serious as to interfere with the Legislative Council that we need to take action
民主派議員只希望梁振英快些離職，市民根本提也不想提他，更遑論要我們如此煞有介事地提及他。
Pro - democracy Members only hope that LEUNG Chun - ying will depart from office as soon as possible . Members of the public simply hate to speak of him let alone talk about him in such a serious manner
但是，我認為實際是收窄 了調查範圍，他把調查範圍由原本可研究所有有關離職協議或服務協議的文件，改為只集中研究一份文件。
I believe however that the actual scope of inquiry would be narrowed for he proposed to change the examination of all papers pertaining to the resignation agreement or service agreement to the examination of merely one paper
他們在香港居民中，應該只佔少數。
They are the minority among Hong Kong residents
此外，即使《條例草案》獲得通過，我們的財務機構並不會自動立即與70多個稅務管轄區交換財務資料。
Moreover even if the Bill is passed our financial institutions will not automatically exchange financial information with more than 70 jurisdictions at once
除了這項《條例草案》外，另一項《2017年稅務條例草案》的部分內容，亦是因應國際監管機構的要求，對《稅務條例》作出一些修訂。
In addition to this Bill the Inland Revenue Amendment No . 2 Bill 2017 also makes amendments to the Inland Revenue Ordinance in response to the requirements of the international regulatory authorities
由於香港的稅務制度是以地域來源徵稅，我們在符合國際責任之餘，從外國或其他司法管轄區得到的財務資料有限， 對於是否需要向這些外國司法管轄區索取財務資料所知亦有限。
Since Hong Kong adopts the Territorial Source Principle of Taxation in fulfilling international responsibilities the financial information we have to get from foreign countries or other jurisdictions is limited and we also have limited knowledge on whether we need to obtain financial information from these foreign jurisdictions
我們為了遵守這些國際責任，付出的時間、人力資源及其他資源非常多。
We have devoted a lot of time human resources and other resources to comply with these international responsibilities
我重申，香港作為國際金融中心及國際社會一分子，必須付出這些最低代價。
Let me reiterate as an international financial centre and a member of the international community Hong Kong must pay this minimum price
我亦希望政府當局不要以為，香港一定要站在金融改革、稅務改革的國際最前線。
I also hope that the Administration will not have the idea that Hong Kong must stand at the forefront in the world in respect of financial reform and tax reform
我們只需要與時並進、符合一個最低標準便已經足夠，並不需要超英趕美，也不需要做先鋒。
We only need to keep abreast of the times and meet the lowest standard; we do not have to surpass the United Kingdom and catch up with the United States or become forerunners
其實，很多議員同事亦曾在不同場合，包括在法案委員會提出這點，希望政府當局留意。
Actually many Honourable colleagues have also raised this point on different occasions such as at meetings of the Bills Committee I hope that the Administration will pay heed to this point
另一方面，我們可否不遵守這些國際責任或國際標準？
On the other hand can we refuse to comply with these international responsibilities or international standards?
我可以告訴各位市民，這樣做不太可能。
I can tell members of the public that this is very unlikely
我可以很肯定地告訴國際社會，香港並非避稅天堂，我們得以維持低稅率，是因為我們的財政狀況穩健，收入十分穩定。
I can tell the international community positively that Hong Kong is not a tax haven . Hong Kong is able to maintain a low tax regime because its financial position is robust and its revenue has been very stable
我們有一些實際稅收，亦有一套透明及嚴謹的法律來打擊避稅，包括跨國避稅。
There are actual tax revenues and we have transparent and strict laws to combat tax avoidance including cross - border tax avoidance
避稅天堂是一個污名，香港絕對不是避稅天堂。
A tax haven is a blemish and Hong Kong is definitely not a tax haven
不過，如果我們不努力遵守最低的國際要求，很可能會再次成為一些妒忌香港財政穩健的國家的攻擊目標。
But if we do not make efforts to comply with the minimum international requirements it is very likely that we may once again become the target of attack by some countries which are jealous of our robust financial position
香港另一次處於這危機是2015年，這個所謂"避稅天堂"的黑名單更是耐人尋味。
The other crisis of Hong Kong happened in 2015 . The so - called tax haven blacklist is even more intriguing
2015年7月，有些歐盟國家不是大國竟然說香港應與開曼群島、英屬處女群島等，並列為傳統的避稅天堂。
In July 2015 some European Union EU countries―not big countries―unexpectedly said that Hong Kong should be listed as a traditional tax haven just like the Cayman Islands the British Virgin Islands etc
幸好，就該兩次事件，中央政府在2009年極力與其他國家斡旋，使香港幸免於被列入灰色名單，而在2015年，我知道香港的財經事務及庫務局做了很多工作，令歐盟各國最終將香港剔除於所謂"黑名單"之外。
Fortunately on these two occasions the Central Government made all - out efforts to negotiate with other countries in 2009 so that Hong Kong was spared from being on the grey list . In 2015 I knew that the Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau had made a lot of efforts and eventually the EU countries excluded Hong Kong from the so - called blacklist
如果香港被列為避稅天堂或被列入稅務黑名單，對香港有何不良影響？
If Hong Kong is classified as a tax haven or included in the taxation blacklist how will it be adversely affected?
其實，會有很大影響，包括會令聲譽受損，從而直接影響其他各國對香港的投資。
In fact the impacts will be considerable including loss of credibility which will directly affect the investment by other countries in Hong Kong
這對香港的投資活動影響非常大。
This will have significant impacts on Hong Kongs investment activities
我剛才提到，《條例草案》獲得通過，並不代表我們會與73個國家自動交換稅務資料。
As I have just said the passage of the Bill does not mean that we will automatically exchange tax information with 73 countries
在現有制度下，我們仍然要與這些司法管轄區逐一談判，並簽署雙邊的全面性避免雙重徵稅協定或稅務資料交換協議。
Under the existing system we still have to negotiate with each jurisdiction individually and sign bilateral CDTAs or TIEAs
經合組織或歐盟對香港亦有一個最低要求，即明年香港一定要與最少某個數目的司法管轄區進行自動稅務資料交換。
OECD or EU has imposed a minimum requirement on Hong Kong that is Hong Kong must at least carry out automatic exchange of tax information with a certain number of jurisdictions next year
由於時間所限，稅務局或財經事務及庫務局的資源，究竟可否做到這事？
Due to the time constraint can IRD or the Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau meet the requirement with its existing resources?
其實，我認為不大可能。
I actually think that is not quite possible
如果香港成為該協議的成員，這100多個司法管轄區便自動成為香港的協議國。
If Hong Kong becomes a member of the Convention over 100 jurisdictions will automatically become our partners
當然，我們還需要啟動機制，才可以與這些司法管轄區作自動稅務交換。
Of course we still need to activate the mechanism before we can automatically exchange tax information with these jurisdictions
但是，我們可以節省大量時間、人力和資源，無須與這些司法管轄區逐一商討及簽署稅務資料交換協議。
However a lot time manpower and resources can be saved and we need not negotiate with each jurisdiction and sign TIEA
因為香港作為國際金融中心，必須符合這些國際組織的要求，責任實在非常重大。
As Hong Kong is an international financial centre it must meet the requirements of these international organizations and the responsibilities are indeed great
代理主席，我謹此陳辭，希望在席議員支持《條例草案》恢復二讀及三讀。
With these remarks Deputy President I hope the Members present will support the resumption of Second Reading debate on the Bill and the Third Reading of the Bill
主席，我自願作出申報，我與梁振英先生涉及一宗私人民事訴訟。
President I declare on my own initiative that Mr LEUNG Chun - ying and I are involved in a private civil action
然而，我必須講清楚，這宗民事訴訟對今天討論的議案並無關係，我更要澄清本議案的數個謬誤。
However I have to make it clear that this civil action has nothing to do with the motion under discussion today . Furthermore I have to clarify a few fallacies concerning this motion
動議議案是《基本法》第七十三條第九項訂明的第二個步驟。
Initiating a motion is the second step stipulated by Article 739 of the Basic Law
第一個步驟，是全體議員的四分之一聯合動議；因此，我們絕對沒有濫用這個程序。
The first step requires one fourth of all Members to jointly initiate the motion . Hence we absolutely have not abused this procedure
《基本法》第七十三條第九項訂明非常嚴謹及繁複的程序，即使本議案獲得通過但我相信可能性是絕無僅有也須委托獨立調查委員會調查。
Article 739 of the Basic Law has set out very stringent and complex procedures . Even if this motion is passed―which I believe will be highly unlikely―an independent investigation committee has to be mandated for the investigation
有關獨立調查委員會的主席可由終審法院首席法官出任，負責調查議案所涉及的事宜，以擬定公平、公開、公正的報告。
The Chief Justice of the Court of Final Appeal may be appointed as the chairman of the independent investigation committee which is responsible for investigating all related matters with a view to compiling a fair transparent and just report
基於這份報告，立法會議員亦需再進行表決，如獲三分之二議員通過才可提出彈劾議案。
Members will then have to vote again on that report . The motion of impeachment can only be initiated with the approval of two thirds of Members
2017年5月15日，即不足1個月前，專責委員會舉行了1次閉門會議。
On 15 May 2017 that is less than a month ago the Select Committee held a closed - door meeting
但是，最終很多傳媒卻披露，特首梁振英先生秘密地、粗暴地改動了專責委員會的研究範疇。
However eventually a number of media disclosed that Chief Executive Mr LEUNG Chun - ying had amended the areas of study of the Select Committee in a clandestine manner
我們在5月15日才發現如此嚴重的違規事件，雖然現時距現屆政府和行政長官離任只有3個多星期，但基於議員在《基本法》下須對香港市民問責，我們必須嚴正提出這項議案，不能因為只餘下3個多星期便坐視不理。
It was not until 15 May that we discovered such a serious breach . Although only three weeks are left before the expiry of the tenure of the incumbent Government and of the Chief Executive we must solemnly initiate this motion because Members are accountable to the Hong Kong people under the Basic Law . We cannot turn a blind eye simply because only the current - term Government will remain in office for just three weeks or so
至於我要澄清的第三個謬誤，很遺憾，政務司司長剛才發言時表示，梁振英先生在任內做了很多事情，可以作為抗辯理由。
As to the third fallacy which I have to clarify very regrettably the Chief Secretary for Administration mentioned in his speech just now the many things done by Mr LEUNG Chun - ying during his tenure which can serve as a ground of defence
當一名地區甚至國家領導人犯下嚴重錯誤時，即使他任內可能做過惠民的事情，仍須對犯下的嚴重錯誤接受問責。
When the leader of a region or even a country has made a serious mistake even if he has done a lot to benefit the people when he is in office he still has to be held accountable for the serious mistake made
在很多民主體制或司法管轄區內也有很多例子，我們也不能例外。
There are many such examples in democratic regimes or jurisdictions and the case of Hong Kong should be of no exception
而周浩鼎議員亦會繼續充當梁振英的喉舌，把其意見當作是自己的意見，連專責委員會的最終報告，也任由梁振英先生改動，這是相當恐怖的事情。
And Mr Holden CHOW would continue to act like the mouthpiece of LEUNG Chun - ying taking LEUNGs views as if they were his own . Mr LEUNG Chun - ying would even make amendments to the final report of the Select Committee at will which would be a rather frightening move
梁先生如要就研究範疇發表意見，可循以下3個途徑：第一，公開表達意見；第二，去信專責委員會主席；第三，向全體委員發出公開信。
If Mr LEUNG really wants to express his views on the areas of study he can do so through the following three channels first express his views publicly; second send a letter to the Chairman of the Select Committee; and third send a public letter to all committee members
然而，周浩鼎議員當時可作出數個選擇：第一，拒絕梁振英先生的好意；第二，向專責委員會主席及全體委員報告此事。
However Mr Holden CHOW should have had a few options then first turn down the good intention of Mr LEUNG Chun - ying; and second report the matter to the Chairman and all members of the Select Committee . Take my personal experience as an example
以我個人經驗為例，我在政府帳目委員會不時會接獲被調查對象或被調查對象的相關人士，發給我的書面陳述，但我一定會第一時間把這 書面陳述、電郵或我接獲的其他物品，直接提交相關委員會主席和秘書處，請他們向所有委員交代，這才是最正常、最恰當的做法。
When I was a member of the Public Accounts Committee PAC I would from time to time receive written statements from subjects of investigation or their related persons . I would immediately pass these written statements emails or other articles that I had received on to the PAC Chairman and the Legislative Council Secretariat . I would then ask them to bring this to the attention of all members
梁先生作為特區首長，亦有眾多機會，每日在不同場合向公眾表達他對此事的意見。
As the head of the SAR Mr LEUNG has numerous opportunities to express his views publicly on this incident on various occasions every day
可是，梁振英先生卻選擇以秘密的方式，不遵從規矩行事。
Nevertheless Mr LEUNG Chun - ying had opted for a clandestine way instead of following the established rules
主席，我謹此發言，支持議案。
With these remarks President I support the motion
四年前，第一次被彈劾，今天已是第二次，28名議員根據《基本法》第七十三條第九項提出議案。
Four years ago he was impeached the first time . Today is the second time . Twenty - eight Members have jointly initiated this impeachment motion in accordance with Article 739 of the Basic Law
四年前，是因為其大宅的僭建，我相信大家仍記得，他覺得處理僭建後便沒有僭建，不知道今次他是否亦覺得發出聲明，問題處理後已不再是問題？
Four years ago the subject of impeachment was related to the unauthorized building works UBWs at his residence . I believe Members can still recall that LEUNG considered that UBWs no longer existed once they had been dealt with . In this incident I wonder does he still think that after he has made a statement to fix the problem there is no more problem
今次梁振英公然干預本會調查，雖然在功能界別的保駕護航及分組點票之下，這項議案不會獲得通過，但監察政府絕對是立法會議員應有的責任，即使其任期不足1個月，我們仍然要啟動彈劾程序，提醒政府，無論是之後的林鄭月娥，又或是再之後的人，都不可像梁振英那樣。
This time LEUNG Chun - ying blatantly interfered with the inquiry of this Council . Although with the shielding of Members of functional constituencies and under the separate voting system this motion will not be passed the Legislative Council is duty - bound to monitor the Government . Even though LEUNG will step down in less than a month we still have to initiate the impeachment procedure to remind the Government that neither Carrie LAM nor her successor can follow the example of LEUNG Chun - ying
今天有一篇新聞，指林超英先生表示開始懷念曾蔭權。
There is a press article today that Mr LAM Chao - ying said he began to miss Donald TSANG
不知道 在"林鄭"的管治之下，我們會否懷念"689"。
I wonder if we would miss 689 under the rule of Carrie LAM
雖然香港法院多次指出，香港實行三權分立，但這數年來，多位高官、香港人大代表，甚至特首本人更反覆說行政長官地位超然。
Although the court in Hong Kong has repeatedly stated that separation of the three powers is implemented in Hong Kong over the past few years many senior officials and Hong Kong Deputies to the National Peoples Congress and even the Chief Executive himself have said time and again that the Chief Executive has a transcendent status
梁振英在2012年 以"偷呃拐騙"的方法奪取特首一職，5年來令香港社會不斷撕裂，成為"港獨之父"，令到香港"雞毛鴨血"。
In 2012 LEUNG Chun - ying won the Chief Executive Election by fraud and in the next five years he has incessantly created rifts in Hong Kong society . He is practically the Father of Hong Kong independence and has stirred up all kinds of troubles in Hong Kong
我剛才聽到李慧琼議員說民主派打壓梁振英，她真的太抬舉民主派。
Just now Ms Starry LEE said the democrats oppressed LEUNG Chun - ying . She really thinks too highly of the democratic camp
梁振英每天都在打壓異己，利用整個律政部門去逐一DQ所有議員。
LEUNG Chun - ying oppresses his opponents every day using the Department of Justice to disqualify one Member after another
在雨傘運動後，他用盡方法對一些議員及學者秋後算帳，用公帑將一個個他看不順眼的"眼中釘"交給法庭審理。
After the Umbrella Movement he has exploited every means to take reprisals against certain Members and scholars and used public money to bring all people he hates to court and put them on trial
我們何德何能可以打壓梁振英？
How are we capable of oppressing LEUNG Chun - ying?
接着，他以僭建來擊倒唐英年，當然唐英年沒有才幹是一回事，但相對梁振英，唐英年尚算是一名正人君子，我相信沒有人比梁振英更差劣。
Later he used the issue of unauthorized building works UBWs to attack Henry TANG . While it is a fact that Henry TANG is incompetent but when compared with LEUNG Chun - ying he can still be considered a person of integrity . I believe no one is worse than LEUNG Chun - ying
梁振英的UGL事件，以及他與民建聯周浩鼎議員私通，導致我們今天要彈劾他，其實彈劾來得很晚。
LEUNG Chun - yings UGL incident and his collusion with Mr Holden CHOW of DAB are the reasons why we have to impeach him . The impeachment has come rather late
主席，5,000萬元是真金白銀，為何特首不根據行政會議守則申報？
President 50 million is real cash . Why didnt the Chief Executive make declaration in accordance with the Executive Councils guidelines?
主席，由於本會專責委員會正在調查梁振英先生收受UGL公司400萬英鎊一事，因此議員今天不能作出過分評論，干涉專責委員會的工作。
President as the Select Committee of this Council is inquiring into the matter about Mr LEUNG Chun - ying receiving £4 million from UGL Members cannot comment too much on that incident lest it will interfere with the inquiry work of the Select Committee
所以，郭家麒議員所談論的事已超越了本會今天討論的議案的範圍。
Hence the issue discussed by Dr KWOK Ka - ki has exceeded the scope of todays motion