Borrison/hk-legicost huggingface dataset:
不過，真的沒法子，面對的國際制裁、《港區國安法》對於香港司法制度的侵害、不同公司有甚麼看法，就決定了訂立法例後能否仍然吸引投資者在香港進行集資、發行債券，還是即使訂立了法例，投資者會因為信心的問題而選擇在其他地方處理有關集資的安排。
However this is useless . In the face of international sanctions and the damage done to Hong Kongs legal system by the implementation of the National Security Law in HKSAR the views held by different companies will determine whether or not Hong Kong is still attractive to investors who wish to conduct fund - raising activities and to issue bonds in Hong Kong after the legislation is enacted or even with the enactment of the legislation investors will choose to carry out fund - raising activities in other places because of their lack of confidence
就像巨災債券，當有任何能觸發合約條文啟動的事件，投資者將會蒙受損失，但如果事件涉及內地的話，投資者有否信心在香港所進行的仲裁或法院的裁決，第一，能達成裁決？
Just like catastrophe bonds when any predefined trigger event takes place investors will suffer losses . Besides if the event is related to the Mainland will investors have confidence in the arbitration or court rulings in Hong Kong first will a ruling be made?
所以，說到底，在林鄭月娥與中央引入了《港區國安法》之後，究竟香港還是否一個理想的投資地方，令到局長如此辛苦訂立的一項法案仍然有效這方面起了一個很大的疑問。
For that reason in essence after Carrie LAM and the Central Government have introduced the National Security Law in HKSAR will Hong Kong still be an ideal place for them to make investment? . This has posed a big question about the effectiveness of the legislation which has been made by the Secretarys hard work
雖然訂立了相關法例，但同時間又引入了《港區國安法》，再加上一個不能夠令人信任的特區政府，投資者很自然地會在風險胃納方面起了根本的變化，究竟還會否選擇香港作為集團中心？
Even though this piece of legislation is enacted the introduction of the National Security Law in HKSAR at the same time in addition to an untrustworthy HKSAR Government will naturally change investors risk tolerance and appetite . Will they choose Hong Kong as the headquarters for their group of companies?
我不知道有甚麼好的方法，說不定局長可能也未想到有甚麼好的點子可以迎難而上，但從一般商業行為來評估，我認為當一個城市的風險增加了、客觀的環境改變了的時候，自然會影響到投資者的風險胃納。
I cannot come up with any good idea . Perhaps the Secretary cannot come up with any good idea either to forge ahead in the face of difficulties . But judging by common business behaviour I consider that when the risk of a city has increased after the objective environment has changed investors risk tolerance and appetite will certainly be affected
" 所以，香港要自己救，"林鄭"與中央政府引入了《港區國安法》是宣布了"一國兩制"死亡。
For that reason what Hong Kong has to do is to save herself . The introduction of the National Security Law in HKSAR by Carrie LAM and the Central Government is tantamount to a declaration of the demise of one country two systems
雖然"林鄭"政府與一眾港共及中央政府打壓港人，但我們相信追求普世價值、一個自由的空間、一個在法律制度上受到保障的社會是香港人的信念，而信念是刀槍不入的。
Although the Carrie LAM Government the Hong Kong Communist Party and the Central Government are oppressing Hong Kong people we still believe in the pursuit of universal values a free environment and a society protected by a legal system is the belief of Hong Kong people and such a belief is bulletproof
真正的香港人是"硬骨頭"，越被打壓就越不屈服......
Real Hong Kong people are unyielding and dauntless people the harder the oppression the more unyielding they become
我想說的是，無論哪位在9月當選也好，站在人民一方的議員也會運用《基本法》賦予的權力，透過否決財政預算案，迫使政府必須回應"五大訴求"......
What I want to say is no matter who is elected in September Members standing with the people will make use of the power conferred by the Basic Law . They will vote down the budget to force the Government to respond to the Five demands
現代醫學一日千里，我希望《條例草案》獲通過後，這些先進療法製品的科研發展和應用都得到規範。
Modern medicine progresses rapidly . Upon passage of the Bill I hope that the scientific research and application of ATPs will be regulated
我希望大家留意，雖然這些新產品和治療方法是未來的新趨勢，但它們涉及抽取人體本身的組織， 然後再以注射方式注入身體。
I hope Members will take note that these new products and therapies are the future prevailing trend but they involve drawing human tissues and infusing them back into the human body
一個現在開始較多人推廣的療法是CAR-T療法，用於治療淋巴癌。
CAR T - Cell therapies which have become increasingly popular are used for curing lymphoma
它的原理是，從病人身上抽取無法辨認癌細胞的T細胞，植入一些特別基因，再將這些經改造的T細胞注射入病人身體，作為一個消滅癌細胞的方法。
They involve drawing a patients T cells which cannot identify cancer cells for genetic modification and then infusing the modified T cells back into the patient to eliminate the cancer cells in the patients body
當然，現在已經有這個技術，但費用非常昂貴。
This medical technology is now available but of course it is very expensive
我希望政府注意的是，當我們支持一些先進療法，並加以規管後，我們需要處理一個問題，就是將來甚麼人能夠享用這些先進療法呢？
I wish to draw the Governments attention to the fact that after we express our support to these ATPs and put them under regulation we will need to deal with the next problem; and that is who can use these ATPs?
所以，我希望政府日後研究如何將這些技術普及，令不同階層的人都有機會接受這些治療，我覺得這是非常重要的。
I thus hope that the Government will explore how to make these medical technologies available to people of all social strata . I think that this is very important
甚麼人能夠獲授權發牌和監管這些製品呢？
Who can become the authorized persons for licensing and monitoring ATPs?
我希望《條例草案》獲通過後，政府日後在培訓有關人員方面多加努力。
I hope that upon passage of the Bill the Government will put in extra effort on training the persons concerned
主席，我發言支持《條例草案》。
President I speak in support of the Bill
《2019年藥劑業及毒藥條例草案》。
Pharmacy and Poisons Amendment Bill 2019
我現在向各位提出的待議議題是：《2020年保險業條例草案》予以三讀並通過。
I now propose the question to you and that is That the Insurance Amendment Bill 2020 be read the Third time and do pass
我現在向各位提出的待議議題是：《2020年保險業條例草案》予以三讀並通過。
I now propose the question to you and that is That the Insurance Amendment No . 2 Bill 2020 be read the Third time and do pass
主席，我發言反對《2019年強制性公積金計劃條例草案》三讀。
President I am speaking in opposition to the Third Reading of the Mandatory Provident Fund Schemes Amendment Bill 2019 the Bill
我不會用盡15分鐘的發言時間，在以下的時間，我會很簡單地闡述我反對《條例草案》的理由。
I will not use up my 15 minutes of speaking time . In the following I will briefly explain my reasons against the Bill
今次的《條例草案》，說來說去，一句話便能總結，便是設立"積金易"的中央平台。
The essence of this Bill can be boiled down to one theme and that is the setting up of the centralized eMPF platform
雖然政府表示中央平台是以非牟利的方式營運，而修訂後的法例亦會禁止受託人向註冊計劃的成員收取任何與註冊年費有關的費用，但我深信這次法例的修訂根本不能有效解決強制性公積金計劃收費高、回報低的"老問題"。
Even though the Government says that the centralized platform will be operated in a non - profit making manner and the amended Ordinance will also prohibit any trustee from charging any fee in relation to the annual registration fee from members of registered schemes I deeply believe that this amendment to the Ordinance can basically not resolve the old problem of high administrative fees and low return of Mandatory Provident Fund MPF schemes
此外，一些不懂 得投資的市民，特別是基層市民，在《強制性公積金計劃條例》下更被迫加入這個投資市場，"人人皆股，人人皆炒"，政府要他們面對投資風險，更將他們的血汗金錢交予基金公司，將他們的退休保障與股票市場掛鈎。
Besides some people who do not know how to invest especially the grass roots are even forced to join this investment market under the Mandatory Provident Fund Schemes Ordinance such that everyone becomes an equity investor and speculator . The Government forces them to face investment risks and to surrender their hard - earned money to fund companies thereby linking their retirement protection to the performance of the equity market
主席，設立"積金易"平台，有人說這是資訊透明的做法。
President some people say that the setting up of this eMPF platform can enhance information transparency
不過，我身邊有很多知識分子，他們受過高等教育，但也不懂得管理自己的強積金戶口、不懂得投資管理，更遑論是基層的"打工仔"。
I know many intellectuals who have received higher education but they know nothing about how to manage their own MPF accounts or investment management not to mention those grass - roots employees
這些"打工仔"根本沒有時間，亦沒有充足的資訊和知識來作出投資管理，但強積金計劃便是強迫這群人將血汗錢放入這個他們完全不懂得的股票市場裏，並且自行承擔風險，強迫他們投資。
These employees basically do not have time sufficient information and knowledge to manage their investments . However MPF schemes force this group of people to put their hard - earned money into this equity market which they know nothing at all and to shoulder their own risks . These people are forced to invest
建立甚麼"積金易"的平台對他們有何好處？
Will the establishment of the eMPF platform bring any advantages to them?
他們可能連一般的瀏覽互聯網也有困難，平時繳交費用也要到郵局和便利店排隊進行。
They may even have difficulties browsing the Internet in general and will queue up at post offices or convenient stores to make payments
強積金計劃本來便與他們脫節，現在還多開設"積金易"平台，多一個平台，便多一種管理收費，這對於那些不懂得投資的人而言根本沒有任何益處。
MPF schemes has fundamentally gone out of tune with them . After the establishment of this eMPF platform there will be one more kind of management fee for this additional platform . This is simply not beneficial at all to these people who know nothing about investment
基層"打工仔"不懂得管理他們的強積金，而對沖機制更進一步削減了他們的退休保障，強積金戶口內的累算權益已所餘無幾，在他們多轉換一兩次工作下，更可能連甚麼也沒有。
Grass - roots employees do not know how to manage their MPF accounts . With the off - setting mechanism further eroding their retirement protection the amount of accrued benefits in their MPF accounts is getting less
但基金公司、強制性公積金計劃管理局，以至管理"積金易"這中央平台的非牟利機構管理人卻可以"賺到盤滿缽滿"。
On the contrary fund companies the Mandatory Provident Fund Schemes Authority MPFA and even the non - profit making managing organization of the centralized eMPF platform can make a lot of money
強積金計劃推行多年，依靠的是私營機構、市場運作，而政府一直聲稱強積金計劃是退休保障的其中一根支柱，但我不禁要問，其實計劃在保障誰？
Over these years the implementation of MPF schemes has been depending on private organizations and market operation . And all along the Government has been claiming that MPF schemes form one of pillars of retirement protection . But I cannot help asking who are actually protected by these schemes
修訂法例好像是進一步保障基金公司、積金局管理人多於一般市民。
It seems that the amendment to the Ordinance seeks to further protect fund companies MPFA and the managing organization rather than the general public
退休保障市場化、個人化，現在強積金計劃又多設一個平台，將之變為中央電子平台。
With retirement protection being market driven and personalized an additional platform which turns out to be a centralized electronic platform is now set up for MPF schemes
所謂的正面結果，其實只是市民可以按個人喜好選擇受託人，市場競爭亦令各個受託人有動機壓縮成本，提升他們的表現，以爭取消費者的供款，這是市場競爭的假設。
The so - called positive result is merely that people can choose trustees in accordance with their personal preferences while various trustees due to market competitiveness will have the incentive to compress their costs and enhance their performance in order to strive for a larger share of the contributions of consumers . This is an assumption in market competition and under this assumption the public can benefit
在這假設下，市民可以受惠，但現實告訴我們，香港的強積金制度根本不是這樣。
Nevertheless reality tells me that the MPF system in Hong Kong does not work this way
修例只會令積金局袋袋平安，繼續扮演自己管理和監管的角色，但對於是否真正能夠降低強積金計劃的行政費，卻沒有任何保證。
Following the amendment to the Ordinance MPFA will only continue to pocket a lot of money by playing its management and monitoring roles . But concerning whether the administrative fee of MPF schemes can really be reduced there is no guarantee at all
事實上，很多受託人和強積金管理公司也設有網上平台，方便僱主和僱員管理其強積金，但最後大部分人仍然以紙張交易。
In fact many trustees and MPF management companies also have their respective online platforms to facilitate the management of MPF accounts by employers and employees . Nonetheless most of these people still resort to paper transactions at the end
政府憑甚麼認為"積金易"平台，可以令僱主和僱員改為使用網上平台呢？
On what basis does the Government think that eMPF platform can make employers and employees switch to the online platform?
如果"積金易"能令僱主轉用網上平台，是否代表要投入更多金錢製造誘因和宣傳推廣，之後便可以繼續合理化強積金計劃管理費高昂的情況呢？
If eMPF platform can make employers switch to the online platform does it mean that more money has to be spent in creating incentives and in propaganda and promotion and thus the exorbitant management fee of MPF schemes can continue to be justified afterwards?
推行私營公積金制度的初衷，是要透過私人市場達到百花齊放、百家爭鳴的狀況，以滿足不同市民的供款投資，準備未來退休的不同需要。
The initial intention of launching a private provident fund system was to achieve diversification and enhance competition through a private market with a view to satisfying the investment needs of different people with their contributions and making preparation for their different retirement needs in the future
私營公積金制度要求個別服務提供者，就其自身能力自行建立各自的行政平台，市場競爭也可令服務提供者壓縮成本，但現在的情況是怎樣呢？
A private provident fund system requires individual service providers to set up their respective administrative platforms according to their own capacities while market competition can also help compress the costs of service providers . But what is the current situation?
現時香港認可的基金信託機構有14間，核准成分基金有417種，這不是政府當初推行私營公積金制度所希望看到的市場光景嗎？
At present there are 14 recognized fund trustees and 417 approved constituent funds in Hong Kong . Is it not the market picture that the Government would like to see when rolling out the private provident fund system in the first place?
管理費應該會因為市場競爭而減少，但結果卻沒有發生。
The management fee should have been reduced due to market competition but this has not happened yet
今次政府還要修訂《強制性公積金計劃條例》，容許積金局多設立一個全資附屬公司來推出中央平台，要市民給予政府多一次機會。
This time through amending the Mandatory Provident Fund Schemes Ordinance the Government also allows MPFA to additionally set up a wholly owned subsidiary for launching the centralized platform seemingly asking the public to give the Government one more chance
政府沒有承擔削減管理費、沒證沒據，尤如一個無底深潭，這是甚麼道理？
The Government has not promised to reduce the management fee but without any proof or evidence for the undertaking this is just like a bottomless pit . What kind of rationale is it?
請問香港政府要再欺騙市民多久呢？
How long will the Hong Kong Government deceive the public?
其實，政府要我說多少次才會明白，市場絕非萬能，市場不可能解決所有問題，市場不一定是最具效率的。
In fact how many times do I need to tell the Government so that it can understand that the market is not a panacea the market cannot resolve all problems and the market is not necessarily the most efficient tool
就現在的強制性供款制度，政府有法例要求僱主、僱員供款，這便早早已經脫離市場的原則；而在20年後的今天，政府最終也要介入，仍然要由政府的法定機構執行管理和協調，白白浪費了20年。
As regards the current mandatory contribution system the Government has required mandatory contributions from employers and employees with the relevant law this move has long deviated from the market principles . Today after the implementation for 20 years the Government eventually needs to intervene and the management and coordination work still needs to be carried out by a statutory institution of the Government
二十年來，有多少市民在市場中成為受害者，受到封閉的市場剝削，賺取了他們的血汗錢、影響他們的退休保障......
A period of 20 years has been wasted . During these 20 years how many people have fallen victims to the market have been exploited by a closed market which exploits their hard - earned money and affects their retirement protection
最後，政府最需要做的，不是建立一個電子交易平台，不是要積金局多扮演協調統籌的角色，成立非牟利公司。
Lastly what the Government needs to do most is not to set up an electronic transaction platform require MPFA to play the role of a coordinator or set up a non - profit company
政府最需要做的，是大刀闊斧回應市民多年來的訴求，為所有市民提供多支柱、全面而足夠的退休保障。
What the Government needs to do most is to respond decisively to public aspirations over the years by providing multi - pillared comprehensive and sufficient retirement protection to all citizens
政府早該取消強積金計劃，以中央公積金計劃協助分擔市民的投資風險，甚至以全民退休保障計劃代替強積金計劃，令所有市民，包括不懂得投資的"打工仔"、不懂得操作網上交易的僱主，以至沒有受薪工作的照顧者，全部也能夠真正老有所養。
The Government should have long replaced MPF schemes with a centralized provident fund scheme to help shoulder the investment risks of the public or even replaced MPF schemes with the universal retirement protection scheme so that all people including those employees who do not know how to invest those employers who do not know how to operate online transactions and also those carers who do not have paid jobs can really be provided with a sense of security in their old age
局長，我肯定民主派無論誰人進入這個議會，他們都會繼續爭取全民退休保障計劃。
Secretary I am sure that whoever from the democratic camp will be elected to this Council will continue to fight for the universal retirement protection scheme
我沒有保留我原修正案前部分的修正，因為對於"香港需要妥善的長遠規劃，以確保可持續發展"，相信立法會同事不會有異議。
I do not retain the first part of my original amendment because I think no Honourable colleagues would dispute that Hong Kong needs proper long - term planning to ensure sustainable development
我亦沒有保留與較早時已修正的議案相同的內容，但我保留了原修正案中最核心的建議，即是政府當局應"優化長遠綜合城市規劃、落實全面及平衡的產業政策、增加工商業用地和基建配套"；"檢討及優化公眾諮詢制度，並改善及簡化規劃程序和執行機制"。
Likewise I do not retain the parts in my original amendment which are more or less the same as the earlier amendment that has been passed . But I have retained the core proposals of my original amendment that is the Administration should enhance long - term integrated town planning implement a comprehensive and balanced industrial policy increase the provision of sites and infrastructure support for industrial and commercial industries as well as review and enhance the public consultation system and improve and streamline the planning procedures and implementation mechanism
我在剛才的主體發言中已經解釋這些建議背後的理據，亦相信這些建議有助於對今天的議題作進一步思考。
I have already explained the rationale for these proposals in my main speech delivered earlier . I consider that these proposals would offer useful insights for Members to consider todays motion further
我提出這項經修改的修正案，懇請各位議員支持。
I implore Members to support the revised amendment I moved
我現在向各位提出的待議議題是：盧偉國議員就經麥美娟議員修正的陳恒鑌議員議案動議的修正案，予以通過。
I now propose the question to you and that is That Ir Dr LO Wai - kwoks amendment to Mr CHAN Han - pans motion as amended by Ms Alice MAK be passed
代理主席，多謝陳恒鑌議員提出這項議案，讓我們討論《香港規劃標準與準則》如何優化我們的社區設施和生活環境。
Deputy President I would like to thank Mr CHAN Han - pan for moving this motion allowing us to discuss how the Hong Kong Planning Standards and Guidelines HKPSG can optimize our community facilities and living environment
其實，議會其中一項很重要的工作是改善市民的生活和社區設施，這項工作涉及3方面，包括政策、土地及財政來源。
Actually a very important task of this Council is to improve peoples lives and community facilities and this task involves three aspects that is policies land and financial sources
如何令這些設施用得其所？
How can these facilities be put to effective use?
需要訂立標準及界定在甚麼情況下應該設立甚麼設施。
It is necessary to set standards and define the conditions for the provision of facilities
所以，《規劃標準》的理念相當好，提供一個清晰的指標，說明甚麼應該做及何謂城市規劃。
In this regard HKPSG contains good ideas and provides clear indicators of what should be done and what town planning is
當我們接觸其他部門的時候，它們又說應該要求發展局提供土地。
When we approach other departments they told us to request the Development Bureau for the provision of land
由於部門之間經常互相"三角短傳"、互相推諉，令改善社區設施的工作變得相當困難，街市是一個很好的例子，由於多位同事已發表意見，我不想重複。
As the departments are frequently shifting responsibilities onto one another it is very difficult to improve community facilities . A very good example is markets . As many Honourable colleagues have expressed their views I do not want to repeat them
很多人覺得《規劃標準》已變成一紙空文，究竟有多大約束力是值得我們思考的問題。
Many people think that HKPSG is a mere scrap of paper and it is worth considering what binding force this document has
將來政府要拿出更大誠意來對待《規劃標準》。
The Government should show greater sincerity in dealing with HKPSG in the future
我想舉出兩三個例子。
I would like to cite two or three examples
第一個例子有關公共診所。
The first example is about public clinics
我自己很熟悉和10多年來服務的天水圍有30萬人口，根據《規劃標準》，每10萬人便應有1間公立普通科診所，雖然經過多年爭取，天水圍現在只有兩間公立普通科診所，另外1間仍然遙遙無期。
I am very familiar with Tin Shui Wai as I have been serving the district with a population of 300 000 for more than 10 years . According to HKPSG there should be one public general clinic for every 100 000 persons . Despite years of striving there are only two public general clinics in Tin Shui Wai and another clinic will not be available in the foreseeable future
我們恐怕情況會越來越差，醫療是一大問題。
We are afraid that the situation may worsen . Healthcare is really a very serious issue
第二個例子有關社區設施。
The second example is about community facilities
我多年來擔任區議員，知道無論任何年齡的居民都需要搞活動。
I have been a District Council member for many years and I know that residents of all ages need to engage in activities
社區中心及社區會堂是很重要的公共空間，是凝聚居民、聯絡感情或議員舉辦居民大會或會議的重要場所。
Community centres and community halls are very important public spaces for the residents social gathering liaison or for District Council members to convene resident forums or meetings
例如，屯門區50萬人口有10間社區會堂；黃大仙46萬人口有7間；但九龍城40萬人口卻只有兩間；油尖旺30萬人口也是只有兩間。
For example there are 10 community halls in Tuen Mun with a population of 500 000; seven in Wong Tai Sin with a population of 460 000 but there are only two in Kowloon City with a population of 400 000 as well as in Yau Tsim Mong with a population of 300 000
在沒有指標的情況下，《規劃標準》很多時候形同虛設，這些社區設施或公共服務完全沒有標準，即使有標準，當局有時也無法遵照標準。
In the absence of indicators HKPSG often exist in name only . There are no standards for these community facilities or public services; even if there are standards the authorities sometimes fail to comply
所以，我們十分支持陳恒鑌議員提出的議案及麥美娟議員的修正案。
Hence we strongly support Mr CHAN Han - pans motion and Ms Alice MAKs amendment
希望當局能夠更新《規劃標準》，從而改善社區設施及市民的生活。
I hope the authorities can update HKPSG so as to improve community facilities and the publics living
代理主席，我同意有需要更新《香港規劃標準與準則》，加入符合現時社會需要的標準和元素。
Deputy President I agree that there is a need to update the Hong Kong Planning Standards and Guidelines HKPSG by including in it standards and elements that meet the needs of todays society
我一直都認為，社區規劃必須全面，除了增加住宅房屋外，也應確保社區有足夠的零售設施供應。
I always believe that community planning must be comprehensive . Apart from increasing residential housing we should also ensure a sufficient supply of retail facilities for the community
公眾街市是我最關心的其中一項社區設施。
Public markets are one of the community facilities which are of prime concern to me
其實，我在本議事堂已就公眾街市的問題，提出過很多建議，2008年也曾動議"制訂公眾及公屋街市新政策"的議案。
Actually in this Chamber I had put forward many proposals on matters relating to public markets . In particular I moved a motion on Formulating new policies on public and public housing estate markets in 2008
當局表面上參考了我的建議，於2009年修訂《規劃標準》時，不再死板地以每1萬人設45個檔位的計算公式來規劃街市，但卻含糊地指"日後應按個別情況考慮是否闢建新公眾街市，以確保妥善運用公共資源"。
On the face of it the authorities did take into account my proposals in that when they revised HKPSG in 2009 they no longer required the planning of markets to follow the rigid formula of 45 stalls for 10 000 people . But then again they stipulated vaguely that the future provision of new public markets should be considered on a case - by - case basis to ensure the efficient use of public resources
我感到可惜的是，當局沒有將我當時提出，配合市場講求的商業組合規劃，以及"準確深入剖析街市所屬地區的需要，以市場角度決定街市大小、售賣貨品種類、檔位位置及配套措施"等元素，加入在《規劃標準》之內。
I find it regrettable that the authorities did not incorporate into HKPSG certain elements proposed by me back then such as the proposals that planning should be in line with the trade mix desired by the market and that the needs of the districts to which the markets belong should be analysed accurately and in depth and the sizes types of commodities on offer layout of stalls and ancillary measures of individual markets should be determined from a market perspective
這不但可紓緩香港泊車位緊張的狀況，更可提高公眾街市的競爭力，一舉兩得。
In doing so it will not only alleviate the tight supply of parking spaces in Hong Kong but also enhance the competitiveness of public markets thus killing two birds with one stone
許久以前，政府定下了一個既定做法，若房屋署在某區興建了一個公屋街市，市政局就不會在同區興建另一公眾街市。
A long time ago the Government made it an established practice that if the Housing Department had built a public housing estate market in a particular district the Urban Council would not build another public market in the same district . But things are different now
但是，今時不同往日，既然領展已搞到亂七八糟，當局不應再停留於舊時的既定模式，而應積極考慮在同區興建多一個有停車場的街市，以打破壟斷的局面。
In view of the mess created by Link REIT the authorities should no longer stick to that approach established in the past but should actively consider building one more market with a car park in each of the districts concerned so as to put an end to the monopolistic situation
事實上，大家都看到，公眾街市的購買力並不遜色，跑馬地和九龍城的公眾街市就是很好的例子。
In fact as we can see the purchasing power of shoppers in public markets is not insignificant . The public markets in Happy Valley and Kowloon City are good examples
只要做好環境和配套，並增加條款，規定不可租予連鎖企業，便可為小販商帶來新的商機，為市場帶來良性競爭。
As long as public markets are properly managed in terms of their environment and ancillary facilities with the additional requirement that their stalls may not be let to chain enterprises it is possible to bring new business opportunities for small traders and introduce healthy market competition
代理主席，另一個我關注的範疇是醫療設施的供應，這與一位同事所提出的建議有關。
Deputy President another area of concern to me is the supply of medical facilities which is related to a proposal put forward by an Honourable colleague
我當然同意，香港有很大的需要增加醫療設施。
I certainly agree that there is a great need for more medical facilities in Hong Kong
因此，對於陳淑莊議員建議在各區的適當地點增建醫療及保健設施，以符合《規劃標準》所訂每1,000人設有5.5張病床的規定，我不會反對。
Therefore I will not oppose Ms Tanya CHANs proposal for building more medical and health facilities at appropriate locations in various districts to meet the HKPSG requirement of providing 5.5 beds per 1 000 persons