Borrison/hk-legicost huggingface dataset:
我聽到梁繼昌議員發言，指出如果按新加坡的計算方式得出數字，其實大家便會差不多，政府是否因此而推算出這個可競爭百分比或推算出這條方程式呢？
I heard Mr Kenneth LEUNG say in his speech that if we followed Singapores computation method the outcome would be something like the percentage mentioned above . Is it why the Government has come to project that the above mentioned percentage is a competitive one or is it why it has come up with the formula?
其實，我之前曾經想到一個理由，就是當局 想令飛機租賃公司的利潤上升。
Actually I previously thought that the reason might be the Governments intention of boosting the profits of aircraft leasing companies
例如在我例子中的公司，它今個財政年度的應課稅利潤為4億7,300萬美元，所得稅費用為5,500萬美元。
In the case of the company I have talked about the profits chargeable to tax in this fiscal year are US473 million and the cost of corporate income tax is US55 million
如果按照政府最新的稅務優惠，假設該公司將業務轉移到香港，它的應課稅利潤就是8億5,100萬美元乘以20%，即是1億7,000萬美元，應課稅利潤由4億7,300萬美元下跌至1億7,000萬美元，再加上8.25%的利得稅率，其稅務費用就會由5,500萬美元跌至1,400萬美元。
Under the Governments proposed tax concessions if this company transfers its business to Hong Kong the profits chargeable to tax will be 20 % of US851 million or US170 million . The profits chargeable to tax will drop from US473 million to US170 million . With the profits tax concessions of 8.25 % the tax it has to pay will drop from US55 million to US14 million
對於這個稅務優惠，如果理論上方程式是如此計算時，相信一些原本在內地設立的飛機租賃公司就會排隊來香港，以香港的稅率交稅了。
Theoretically the computation of the tax concession under this formula will induce many aircraft leasing companies set up in the Mainland to queue up for entry into Hong Kong so that they can pay profits taxes according to Hong Kongs tax rate
我認為一個政策的推出，最重要的便是公平，不應該偏幫任何一方。
In my opinion the most important thing about the introduction of a policy is fairness and there should be no partiality . Let us take a look at the profits tax policy for enterprises in general
我們看看一般企業的利得稅政策，在現時的折舊免稅額下，工業建築物及構築物的免稅額只限於建築成本的20%及每年4%，商業建築物的免稅額為建築成本的4%，機械工業裝置初期免稅額為資產成本的60%，而之後的折舊免稅額則為資本成本的10%至30%。
Under the existing depreciation allowance policy the initial allowance for industrial buildings and structures is 20 % on the cost of construction and the annual allowance thereafter is 4 % on the cost of construction . For commercial buildings and structures there is just an annual allowance of 4 % on the cost of construction . The initial allowance on machinery and plants is 60 % on their cost of the asset and the depreciation allowance thereafter is 10 % to 30 % of the capital cost
由此可見，貢獻香港多年的本地財團以至中小企，其享有的折舊扣稅都不及飛機租賃公司20%的安排，對於本地財團和中小企是否公平呢？
We can see that all the local consortiums or small and medium enterprises SMEs which have been making contributions to Hong Kong over the years are not entitled to tax depreciation allowances as good as the 20 % enjoyed by aircraft leasing companies . Is it fair to local consortiums and SMEs?
所以，如果真想對它們公平，政府是否應向它們提供更多稅務優惠，使它們與外國或其他行業有競爭呢？
For that reason if we are to treat them fairly should the Government provide them with more tax concessions so as to enable them to compete with foreign countries or other businesses?
如果推出優惠，相信大部分香港公司也會選擇它，就是由於這個優惠獲得的稅務寬免，我認為一定會多於現時的折舊扣稅優惠，但梁繼昌議員剛才又說其實不是的，並指它們在計算後應該會使用舊方法，但我手上便沒有一個可以比較的模式作分析。
If new concessions are introduced I believe most Hong Kong companies will opt the new arrangement because the tax concessions will give them greater tax depreciation allowances than the existing ones . However just now Mr Kenneth LEUNG said this would not be the case and he pointed out that enterprises would opt the old way after doing some computations . Nevertheless I do not have a model for comparison at hand
政府一方面不想利得稅大減，而致令本地公司不能享有很高的稅務優惠，另一方面，又想吸引飛租賃公司在香港經營而提供我們認為頗大的稅務優惠，這樣是否雙重標準呢？
On the one hand the Government does not want to cut the profits tax drastically and local companies cannot enjoy greater tax concession as a result . But on the other hand it wants to attract aircraft leasing business to Hong Kong so it proposes to provide them with tax concessions that are very substantial in our opinion . Is this a double standard?
令我更為憂慮的是，正如我較早前稍微提到，今次為了吸引飛機租賃公司而為他們設計的利潤20%的應課稅款額，這會否成為先例？
There is one thing that worries me even more . In order to attract aircraft leasing business to Hong Kong the Government has set the assessable amount at 20 % of the profits . But as I have mentioned briefly will this become a precedent?
如果日後飛機租賃業務在香港成為頗有勢力的既得利益者，他們會否繼續逼迫政府將應課稅利潤調低呢？
In case aircraft leasing operators turn into a strong force having a vested interest in Hong Kong in the future will they keep forcing the Government to lower the profits tax?
如果日後有一些新興產業向政府敲門，是否可以以這例子與政府談判，表示政府既然向飛機租賃公司提供優惠，以他們的利益裏扣除開支後，再乘以20%為 基準，為甚麼不可以提供我們類似的優惠？
If some emerging businesses and industries approach the Government can they use this case as a precedent to bargain with the Government? . Seeing that the Government has offered aircraft leasing business a tax concession of setting the taxable amount at 20 % of the profits after deducting expenses will they say that the Government should provide them with similar concessions?
所以，政府未能說出這"甜招"是如何運算出來，因此，我表示我難以支持......
But the Government is unable to show us the computations leading to this sweetener so I must say it is difficult for me to give my support
提出這樣的提述，是否我們今天通過《條例草案》後，便要立即再行修改，以期修正剛通過的條例呢？
If the Government had not brought up this issue and we really pass the original Bill today are we supposed to amend the enacted legislation right now immediately?
問題是，我們很想知道，當局為甚麼在最後才知悉有關事宜，並且採納經合組織的意見？
The question is we want to know why the Administration found out the matter so late and decided to adopt OECDs view
經合組織與當局有否恆常溝通？
Has the Administration been keeping regular communications with OECD?
未來兩方是否更要多作溝通？
Should the two sides enhance their future communications?
如果有相關的稅務的條例，是否應該循例把副本交送給他們，詢問他們的意見？
If any relevant legislation is to be proposed in future should a copy be sent to OECD beforehand for consultation purpose?
我希望政府可以解釋一下，多謝主席。
I hope the Government will explain this . Thank you Chairman
主席，對於今天的辯論題目"飛機租賃"，若以簡單邏輯理解，就是為飛機作"包租公"：由財團購買飛機，然後出租予航空公司。
President using simple common sense to explain todays debate topic of aircraft leasing I would say it simply means the renting out of aircraft . A consortium purchases some aircraft and rent them out to airlines
飛機租賃這門生意於航空業務而言，算是一種新鮮概念。
Aircraft leasing is quite a new concept in aviation business
事實上，這也是一門在積極發展中的行業。在實際操作上，現時的營運方式有兩種，分別為飛機融資租賃及飛機經營租賃。
In fact aircraft leasing is a trade which has been actively developing . In actual operation there are two forms of leasing namely finance lease and operating lease
前者是在飛機租賃期屆滿後，航空公司便擁有飛機購買權，本質上就像由航空公司以分期付款方式購買飛機般，這是現時較普遍的做法。
In the case of a finance lease the lessee will obtain ownership of the aircraft upon a successful offer to buy the aircraft at the end of the lease term . It is in essence like buying an aircraft on hire purchase and is more popular among aircraft lessors
另一種是經營租賃，即飛機擁有權一直屬於出租人，經營成本相對較輕。
The other form is operating lease where the ownership of the aircraft belongs to the lessor all along and the operating cost will be relatively lower
正因如此，便產生了飛機租賃這門生意。
This therefore leads to the emergence of aircraft leasing business
主席，根據澳洲某間投資管理公司估計，隨着近年旅客人數和貨運航空交通的需求不斷增長，商用飛機的租賃比率已由1980年的1.7%大幅增至2011年的36.5%，預計2020年更有望突破50%。
President according to the estimation done by an investment management company in Australia as the number of tourists and demand for air cargo traffic have been increasing in recent years the lease ratio of commercial aircraft has increased significantly from 1.7 % in 1980 to 36.5 % in 2011 and is expected to exceed 50 % in 2020
而業界更預期在2013年至2032年間，全球交付的35,000架新商用飛機當中，亞太區和北美洲分別佔40.5%和20.8%，可見市場的確非常龐大。
The industry itself expects that the Asia - Pacific region and North America will account for 40.5 % and 20.8 % respectively of the 35 000 new commercial aircraft delivered worldwide between 2013 and 2032 and this helps illustrate the huge market for commercial aircraft
根據國際航空運輸協會統計，2004年至2011年航空租賃年均投資回報率約為9%，相比於航空公司4%的回報率和機場6%的回報率，這門生意的回報真的相當可觀。
According to the statistics compiled by the International Air Transport Association the rate of annual average return on investment for aviation leasing during the period between 2004 and 2011 was about 9 % which is so much higher as compared with the 4 % of airlines and 6 % of airports
然而，主席，這個行業是否完全零風險？
However President is this industry totally risk - free?
當然不是。尤其當飛機訂單數量快速增長，"包租公"也要承擔相應風險。
Surely not not least because renters must bear the corresponding risks when aircraft orders grow rapidly
假如出現泡沫，究竟應如何處理，才可避免因出現財務困境而拖垮整個金融體系？
If a market bubble comes into being what should we do to prevent the financial difficulties of individual companies from causing the collapse of the entire financial system?
而有關這一點，我希望局長在回應時能夠解釋一下，究竟香港能否提供類似《公約》所列舉的相關安全網。
Concerning this I hope the when responding to Members enquiries Secretary can explain whether Hong Kong can provide a safety net similar to those set out in the Convention
至於香港現時的實際情況，主席，今年的施政報告提到，政府希望能就此進行研究。
As for the present situation in Hong Kong President it is mentioned in this years policy address that the Government hopes to conduct a study in this regard
而實際上，我們均注意到，政府已在2013年踏出一小步，那便是成立航空融資專題小組，但至今我們仍未看到任何實質的支持。
Actually we notice that the Government has already taken a small step forward in 2013 that is the setting up of the Aerospace Finance Task Force but no substantive support has been provided so far
當然，憑藉香港的法治環境、多種服務行業及一個完善的金融體系，我們可提供"一條龍"服務，這是我們所擁有的優勢。
With our rule of law a wide variety of services industries and a sound financial system we can provide one - stop services . This is exactly our advantage
現時，我們最缺少的是與飛機工程相關的專業人士，希望藉這次訂立條例，能吸引更多人投身相關行業，而當局亦會培訓更多相關人才。
In addition professionals in Hong Kong can provide assistance when necessary . At present our greatest shortage is in aircraft engineering professionals . We hope that after this legislative enactment more people will join the relevant industries and the authorities will step up the training of more talents
當然，主席，香港並不是完全佔有優勢，就稅率而言，我們稍遜於其他地方。
Of course President Hong Kong does not enjoy absolute advantage . Our tax rates are not as attractive as those in other places
雖然，我們現時16.5%的企業利得稅劃一稅率較許多其他地區為低，但租賃公司是按總租賃收入而非實際利潤徵稅，如此的話，本港就飛機租賃利潤所徵收企業稅的稅率較愛爾蘭的12.5%及新加坡的5%至10%為高。
The corporate profits tax in Hong Kong is set at a flat rate of 16.5 % which is lower than those in many other jurisdictions . But aircraft leasing companies are assessed on their income from gross lease payments instead of actual profits . As a result the corporate profits tax rate for aircraft leasing profits in Hong Kong is higher than both the 12.5 % in Ireland and the 5 % - 10 % in Singapore
究竟我們在未來日子應如何吸引投資者來港建立飛機租賃業務呢？
In that case how can we induce investors to set up aircraft leasing business in Hong Kong in the future?
主席，我不想在這裏把推動香港航空融資聚焦小組所作分析的內容逐一讀出。
President I am not going to read out item - by - item the contents of the analysis conducted by the Focus Group on Promoting Aerospace Financing in Hong Kong here
客觀地說，小組的分析顯示出對未來這方面的展望甚是美好：期望在未來20年，我們可以逐漸從其他競爭對手手上取得18%的份額。
The Focus Groups analysis is very optimistic about our prospects in this area hopefully Hong Kong can gradually capture up to about 18 % of aircraft leasing business in the global aircraft leasing market in the coming 20 years
當然，沒有人知道我們可否做到，亦沒法可從水晶球預視得到。
Certainly no one knows whether we can really make this happen nor is there a crystal ball to help predict if this will happen
不過，我相信透過這次公民黨支持相關條例，能夠邁開第一步，但在我們給予支持的同時，亦希望政府能夠老實回答：我們邀請別人來做生意，那究竟我們是否能提供安全網，以堅定投資者的信心？
Yet I trust that the support rendered to the Bill by the Civic Party today will mark a first step towards positive outcomes . While giving our support to the Bill we do hope that the Government can give an honest answer to this question when we invite foreign entrepreneurs to do business in Hong Kong can we put in place a safety net to reassure investors?
香港除了稅率及完善的制度外，我們還有何優勢可以吸引其他外資呢？
What else do we have apart from the low tax rates and a sound system that can help Hong Kong attract foreign investments?
主席，我動議二讀《私營醫療機構條例草案》，以推行新的私營醫療機構規管制度。
President I move the Second Reading of the Private Healthcare Facilities Bill the Bill to effect the new regulatory regime for private health care facilities PHFs
在香港，私營醫療機構涵蓋各類提供醫療診斷和治療的私人處所。
In Hong Kong PHFs comprise a wide range of privately - owned facilities providing medical diagnosis and treatment
但是，現有法例下的規管範圍狹窄，規管架構亦不合時宜。
However the current scope of regulation is limited to a narrow set of premises and the existing regulatory frameworks for PHFs are out - dated
況且，過去數年，私營醫療機構發生多宗醫療事故，引起公眾對它們服務質素的關注。
Moreover over the past few years a number of medical incidents have taken place at PHFs thus arousing public concern about on the service quality of PHFs
因此，為配合私營醫療服務不斷轉變的需要和情況，政府已就私營醫療機構的規管作出了全面檢討，並於2014年12月舉行為期3個月的公眾諮詢。
For that reason with a view to better regulating private health care services amid the evolving need and landscape of health care services the Government conducted a comprehensive review on the regulation of PHFs and a three - month public consultation on the proposal was rolled out in December 2014
我們在諮詢文件中所載的建議獲得社會廣泛支持，而諮詢報告亦已於2016年4月發表。
The community expressed broad support for the proposals set out in the consultation papers and the consultation report was published in April 2016
根據公眾諮詢的結果及社會各界的意見，我們擬備了一項以處所為本的新法案，以取代現行的《醫院、護養院及留產院註冊條例》及《診療所條例》。
According to the consultation outcomes and the views from various sectors we have drawn up a new piece of premises - based legislation to replace the existing Hospitals Nursing Homes and Maternity Homes Registration Ordinance Cap . 165 and the Medical Clinics Ordinance Cap
在新制度下，有4類私營醫療機構將受到規管，分別是醫院、日間醫療中心、診所，以及衞生服務機構。
343 . Under the new regime four types of PHFs are subject to regulation namely hospitals day procedure centres clinics and health services establishments
其中，就診所而言，我們認為由個別或少數醫生營辦的診所可以獲得豁免；營辦合資格小型執業診所的人士亦可以向衞生署署長要求發出豁免書。
As far as clinics are concerned we consider that those clinics which involve only solo or small group practice should be exempted under the new regime . Any person operating a small practice clinic may ask the Director of Health DoH for granting the exemption
至於須持牌的私營醫療機構方面，我們建議明確訂明對這些機構的持牌人和醫務行政總監的要求，以及他們的權限和責任。
As regards licensed PHFs we propose that the requirements authorities and responsibilities of the licensee and the chief medical executive should be set out explicitly
簡單而言，私營醫療機構的持牌人須為該機構的運作負上全部責任，並須委任一名醫務行政總監掌管私營醫療機構的日常管理。
In short the licensee of a PHF is wholly responsible for the operation of the facility and the licensee must appoint a chief medical executive to take charge of the day - to - day administration of the PHF
在新制度下，受規管的私營醫療機構須遵從多項要求。
Under the new regulatory regime PHFs subject to regulation should meet a number of requirements
其中，我們在《條例草案》中訂明，私營醫療機構的持牌人須實施有關收費透明度的措施，包括提供收費項目及服務的價目資料，供公眾人士知悉。
In particular it is stipulated in the Bill that the licensee of a PHF should implement measures to enhance price transparency . Hence he must make available to the public the prices of any chargeable items and services provided in the PHF
此外，醫院的持牌人亦須就衞生署署長指明的某些治療及程序，設立服務費用預算制度和公布過往費用及收費的統計數據。
Furthermore the licensee of a hospital will also be required to put in place a budget estimate system and to publish historical statistics on fees and charges in respect of the treatments and procedures specified by DoH
除此之外，我們亦建議訂立兩層的投訴管理制度，以處理在新制度下對受規管的私營醫療機構所作出的投訴。
Moreover we propose to establish a two - tier complaints management system to handle complaints against the PHFs to be regulated under the new regime
第一層設於服務提供者層面，私營醫療機構的持牌人須設立處理投訴程序，以接受、管理和回應針對該機構的投訴。
The first - tier will be at the service delivery level where the licensee of a PHF must put in place a complaints handling procedure for receiving managing and responding to complaints that are received against the facility
第二層則為一個獨立的私營醫療機構投訴委 員會，以集中處理在服務提供者層面未能解決的投訴。
An independent committee on complaints against PHFs will be established at the second - tier which will look into complaints unresolved at service delivery level by the PHFs concerned
《條例草案》內列明該投訴委員會的組成、職能和調查權力。
The Bill will set out the formation functions and investigation powers of the complaints committee
此外，《條例草案》會賦權衞生署署長發出、修改或撤銷實務守則。
The Bill will also empower DoH to issue revise or revoke the codes of practice
在新制度下，不同類型的私營醫療機構各有一套規管標準，由衞生署署長以實務守則的形式頒布。
Under the new regulatory regime different types of PHFs will each be subject to a set of regulatory standards which will be promulgated in the form of codes of practice by DoH
籌備工作方面，衞生署和香港醫學專科學院已成立日間醫療機構標準項目督導委員會，為日間醫療中心訂定規管標準和就診所的規管標準提出建議。
As to the preparation work a Project Steering Committee on Standards for Ambulatory Facilities was set up by the Department of Health and the Hong Kong Academy of Medicine to draw up regulatory standards for day procedure centres and to give advice on the regulatory standards for clinics
另一方面，本港現時有多家院舍根據第165章註冊為護養院。
Besides there are a number of institutions registered as nursing homes under Cap . 165
這些院舍提供各種服務，當中大部分為長者提供護理服務。
These institutions are currently providing a diverse range of services and the majority of them provide care for elderly persons
經檢討後，我們認為這類長者護養院基本上屬於安老院舍，並非醫療機構，故不應受新制度規管。
After reviewing these facilities we consider that they are basically nursing homes for elderly persons and should not be regulated as such under the new regulatory regime
上述修訂的唯一目的是在第459章下引入護養院。
The amendments are made for the sole purpose of introducing nursing homes under Cap . 459
對於受第165章規管的護養院而言，現行的規管要求大部分會保留並移至第459章。
The existing regulatory requirements for nursing homes under the Cap . 165 regulatory regime will be largely preserved and moved to Cap . 459
至於目前適用於受第459章規管的3類安老院的現行規管要求水平，將會維持不變。
The existing level of regulatory requirements for the three existing types of residential care homes under Cap
除了以上的建議外，《條例草案》的其他主要內容包括訂明規管措施和罪行，以處理違反法例及發牌規定的行為，以及訂立過渡安排，確保順利過渡至新規管制度，讓營辦人和醫療/牙醫專業有充足的準備時間。
459 will remain unchanged . Besides the above proposals the major contents of the Bill include the stipulation of regulatory measures and offences to tackle with breaches of the law and licensing requirements and to provide for transitional arrangements to ensure a smooth transition to the new regulatory regime so that operators and the medical and dental professions will be fully prepared before implementation of the revamped regime
我們建議，新規管制度將分階段落實，首先規管屬風險較高類型的私營醫療機構。
We propose that the regulatory regime will be commenced in phases with the regulatory regime of riskier types of PHFs put in force earlier
我們已於2017年2月28日出席立法會衞生事務委員會的會議，介紹我們的立法建議。
We already presented our legislative proposals in the meeting of the Legislative Councils Panel on Health Services held on 28 February 2017
委員普遍支持我們的立法建議。主席，我懇請各位議員能夠支持《條例草案》，讓我們可以早日引入新規管制度，加強保障病人安全和消費者權益，並促進本地醫療系統持續發展。
President I implore Members to support the Bill so that we can introduce the new regulatory regime at an early day which aims to better safeguard the safety of patients and rights and interests of consumers as well as to promote the sustainable development of local health care system
我現在向各位提出的待議議題是：《私營醫療機構條例草案》，予以二讀。
I now propose the question to you and that is That the Private Healthcare Facilities Bill be read the Second time
主席，我動議二讀《2017年應課稅品條例草案》，以規管在業務過程中向未滿18歲的人士售賣和供應令人醺醉的酒類，以保障未成年人的健康和福祉。
President I move the Second Reading of the Dutiable Commodities Amendment Bill 2017 the Bill to prohibit the sale and supply of intoxicating liquor to persons under the age of 18 years for protecting the health and well - being of minors
自從2000年開始實施現有的酒牌制度起，香港已有相關措施限制18歲以下人士接觸酒類飲品。
Since the implementation of the current liquor licensing system in 2000 relevant measures have been put in place in Hong Kong to restrict persons under 18 years of age to access liquor drinks . Under the Dutiable Commodities Liquor Regulations Cap
根據《應課稅品規例》，酒牌持有人不可以准許18歲以下人士在領有酒牌處所內飲用令人醺醉的酒類。
109B liquor licensees shall not allow any person under 18 years of age to drink any intoxicating liquor on any licensed premises
但是，香港現時並沒有法例禁止在領有酒牌的處所內，或在未領有酒牌的處所如商鋪、便利店和超級市場內，向未成年人售賣或供應令人醺醉的酒類。
However there is no law in Hong Kong which prohibits the sale or supply of intoxicating liquor to minors in licensed premises or unlicensed premises such as stores convenience stores and supermarkets
多年以來，零售業界都以自願方式，避免售賣有關酒類予未成年人。
Over the years the retail industry has been avoiding to sell the relevant liquor to minors on a voluntary basis
但是，這項自願性措施的成效令人關注。
However there are concerns over the effectiveness of this voluntary measure
社會上有持份者曾進行買酒測試，結果發現青少年在不同類型的零售商店，例如超級市場、高級超市和便利店，購買啤酒等酒類產品時，並沒有遇到困難。
Some stakeholders in the community have conducted experiments on liquor purchase and found out that youngsters had no difficulties purchasing beers and other liquors in different retail stores such as supermarkets premium supermarkets and convenience stores
此外，衞生署曾在2013年委託香港大學進行調查。
Furthermore the Department of Health commissioned the University of Hong Kong for a study in 2013
結果顯示，香港有43.5%的小四至小六學生和62.4%的中學生曾經飲酒。
The findings showed that 43.5 % of Primary Four to Six students and 62.4 % of secondary school students had taken liquor drinks
曾經飲酒的未成年人雖然主要從父母獲得酒類飲品，但當中也有9.9%的小學生及27.4%的中學生飲用自行購買的酒類飲品。
Minors with liquor experience mainly obtained liquor drinks from their parents . But there were also 9.9 % of primary school students and 27.4 % of secondary school students who purchased liquor drinks on their own
另一方面，香港現時亦未有法例禁止透過遙距途徑，例如互聯網、電話或郵遞，向未成年人售賣或供應令人醺醉的酒類。
Meanwhile no existing law in Hong Kong prohibits the sale or supply of intoxicating liquor to minors through remote means such as on the Internet over the telephone or by mail
為進一步限制未成年人接觸酒類飲品及堵塞現行法例的漏洞，食物及衞生局建議提交《條例草案》，以修訂《應課稅品條例》及其附屬法例。
To further restrict minors access to liquor drinks and plug the loopholes in existing legislation the Food and Health Bureau proposes the Bill to amend the Dutiable Commodities Ordinance Cap
《條例草案》有以下主要建議： a 限制以銷售機售賣令人醺醉的酒類； b 禁止在業務過程中，向未成年人售賣或供應令人醺醉的酒類； c 規定在當面分發的售賣或供應酒類的地方，展示一個載有訂明通知的告示，表明禁止向未成年人售賣或供應令人醺醉的酒類；及 d 規定在遙距分發中加入訂明通知，以及收取買方或收受方的年齡聲明。
109 and its auxiliary legislation . The major proposals in the Bill are as follows a to restrict the sale of intoxicating liquor from vending machines; b to prohibit the sale or supply of intoxicating liquor to minors in the course of business; c to impose an requirement to display a sign containing a prescribed notice to declare the prohibition of sale or supply of intoxicating liquor to minors at the place of sale or supply of liquor in face - to - face distribution; and d to impose requirements to include a prescribed notice and to receive a declaration of age from the purchaser or recipient for remote distribution
我們在今年1月至2月期間舉行了簡介會，向有關持份者闡述規管建議的內容。
We have conducted briefing sessions from January to February this year to expound the regulatory proposals to the stakeholders concerned
我們也邀請了持份者就建議提交書面意見。
We have also invited the stakeholders for written submission of views
在接獲的意見書中，大部分支持立法的建議，部分酒商要求政府就罰則和適應期等事項與業界再溝通。
Among the submissions received the majority supports the legislative proposals and some liquor vendors have asked the Government for further communication with the industry on such issues as penalty and adaptation period
其後，我們在今年5月9日向酒牌局介紹有關建議，於5月22日為業界舉行了第二次簡介會，並於5月24日為方便營商諮詢委員會轄下的批發及零售業工作小組、食物及相關服務業工作小組和營商聯絡小組工作小組的成員，舉行簡介會。
Subsequently we made a presentation on the relevant proposals to the Liquor Licensing Board on 9 May this year the second briefing session for the industry on 22 May and another briefing session to members of the Wholesale and Retail Task Force the Food Business and Related Services Task Force as well as the Task Force on Business Liaison Groups under the Business Facilitation Advisory Committee on 24 May
絕大部分業界代表支持立法的建議，但關注當中細節及執法詳情。
The overwhelming majority of industry representatives supports the legislative proposals but expresses concern over the particulars involved and the enforcement details
我們在今年4月25日就擬議的法例修訂，徵詢立法會衞生事務委員會的意見，大部分委員均支持立法的原意。
On 25 April this year we consulted the Legislative Council Panel on Health Services with regard to the proposed legislative amendments and gained support of the legislative intent from the majority of members
主席，我懇請各位議員支持《條例草案》，讓我們可進一步保護未成年人免受酒精相關危害的影響。
President I earnestly call for Members support to the Bill so that we can further protect minors from the impact of liquor - related harm
我現在向各位提出的待議議題是：《2017年應課稅品條例草案》，予以二讀。
I now propose the question to you and that is That the Dutiable Commodities Amendment Bill 2017 be read the Second time