Borrison/hk-legicost huggingface dataset:
便是因為謝偉俊議員提出這項議案，改變了他的思維，即從歪路走向正路。
Because this motion moved by Mr Paul TSE has changed his thinking by putting it back onto the right track
所以，謝偉俊議員這項議案事實上是令一些初入議會的議員，在他們仍然不知道規矩的情況下，現在開始醒覺了，因此這項議案是有用的。
Therefore this motion moved by Mr Paul TSE is actually waking up those Members who are new to the legislature and do not know the rules . For this reason this motion is useful
此外，在他第二段的發言中，他指謝議員抓住他個人的行為，這樣"上綱上線"、採用行政專橫的手段和政治審判的方法來作出政治鬥爭。
Moreover in the second paragraph of his speech he accused Mr TSE of seizing upon his personal behaviour and blowing it out of proportions to wage political struggles by resorting to high - handed executive ploys and political prosecution
鄭議員是熱血公民的成員，熱血公民的始祖是誰？
Dr CHENG is a member of the Civic Passion and who is its founder?
是前議員黃毓民。
It is Mr WONG Yuk - man a former Member
他說我們在議會內必須談鬥爭、抗 爭。
He said that we had to wage struggles and put up resistance in the legislature
所以，如果鄭松泰議員認為謝偉俊議員這項議案是抗爭、鬥爭的話，那麼便請他回去學習一下他的始祖、他的師父在議會內做過甚麼。
Therefore if Dr CHENG Chung - tai thinks that this motion moved by Mr Paul TSE represents a kind of resistance or struggle I ask him to go back and learn about what his forerunner or his master did in the legislature
因此，新的議員在最初進入議會時，應該乖乖地坐在席上看清楚情況、學習一下，在學會真正的規矩後，才去做一些個人認為可以做的事情。
For this reason when new Members initially join the legislature they should behave themselves make observations carefully and do a little learning while sitting squarely in their seats . After they have learnt the true ropes they can then do what they personally think can be done
此外，我們當然反對將國旗及區旗倒轉擺放，這絕對是不尊重，以及有少許侮辱性的動作。
In addition we certainly oppose inverting the national flags and regional flags . This is absolutely disrespectful and a somewhat insulting act
鄭松泰議員身為大學講師，竟然做出這種行為，更甚的是，原來鄭松泰議員是在北京大學修讀碩士和博士畢業的。
Although Dr CHENG Chung - tai is a university lecturer he went so far as to display such behaviour . Worse still as it turns out Dr CHENG Chung - tai actually studied for his postgraduate and doctorate degrees in Peking University and graduated from it
在這個議事廳，"好玩"是必須負上責任的，所有議員均須為其行為負責。
In this Chamber it is necessary to assume responsibility for having fun . All Members must bear the responsibility for their behaviour
事實上，在謝議員提出這項議案後，觀乎鄭松泰議員事後的言論，此舉的確產生了阻嚇作用，亦可以告訴一些新議員，或未成熟的議員也好，他們的行為在議會內是會被監察、被審視的，所以，希望他們不要做一些無謂、不知所謂的動作，而是要真正地坐在這裏，做個有尊嚴的議員，以保護議會的尊嚴。
In fact after Mr TSE had introduced this motion if we look at Dr CHENG Chung - tais comments we will find that such a move has really achieved some deterrent effect and it can also send a message to some new Members or immature Members if you like that their behaviour in the legislature is being monitored and scrutinized so it is hoped that they will not take actions that are pointless and nonsensical . Rather they have to sit here properly and behave like a dignified Member to safeguard the dignity of the legislature
鄭松泰議員是因為謝偉俊議員提出這項譴責議案而改變了他的行為。
It was because Mr Paul TSE had introduced this motion of censure that Dr CHENG Chung - tai changed his behaviour
因此，我們會反對陳志全議員的議案，而支持謝偉俊議員現時的議案。
For this reason we will oppose Mr CHAN Chi - chuens motion but support the present motion moved by Mr Paul TSE
立法會議員受到兩項法律條文保障，第一項是《基本法》第七十七條，該條訂明："香港特別行政區立法會議員在立法會的會議上發言，不受法律追究。
Members of the Legislative Council are protected by two provisions in law . First it is Article 77 of the Basic Law which stipulates that Members of the Legislative Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall be immune from legal action in respect of their statements at meetings of the Council
"另一項是《基本法》第七十八條，該條訂明："香港特別行政區立法會議員在出席會議時和赴會途中不受逮捕。
And the other provision is Article 78 of the Basic Law which stipulates that Members of the Legislative Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall not be subjected to arrest when attending or on their way to a meeting of the Council
但是，就鄭松泰議員作出的行為，我覺得上述兩項條文均不適用。
However I think both of the aforementioned provisions are not applicable to the acts of Dr CHENG Chung - tai
所以，陳志全議員說我們不應就這件事進行辯論，而應把時間留作討論民生事項，我要提出兩點回應。
Hence regarding Mr CHAN Chi - chuens remark that this Council should cease the debate on the incident to spend the time on discussions about livelihood issues I would like to raise two points in response
今天，他竟然大仁大義地說要節省時間，討論民生事項。
Yet today he dares take the moral high ground to lecture us on saving time for discussions about livelihood issues
因為大家都想知道，鄭松泰議員是否發自內心地拒絕擁護《基本法》和特區政府。
For we all wish to know whether or not Dr CHENG Chung - tai refuses to uphold the Basic Law and the SAR Government from the bottom of his heart
這件事需要時間調查，不是兒戲之事，也不是政治迫害，而是涉及《基本法》第一百零四條所提及的擁護《基本法》和特區政府，即他宣誓的內容，而他的行為是違反誓言的表現。
It takes time to investigate the incident . This is neither child play nor political persecution . For the incident is about the upholding of the Basic Law and the SAR Government which is included in the content of his oath and whether his conduct manifests a breach of his oath
所以，若這也是政治迫害，那麼香港根本沒有法律可言，只有政治鬥爭。
If this is regarded as political persecution I would say law is no longer a concern in Hong Kong for there are only political struggles
這種說法不禁令人覺得有人為了護短，才提出所謂政治迫害的說法。
Such remark about political persecution will give people the impression that someone is trying to cover up the fault
更離譜的是，在10月19日當天，我們於桌上展示國旗和區旗，是為了向侮辱國家和民族的人表達不滿，同時以示尊重國家和特區政府。
There is yet another really ridiculous point . On 19 October we displayed the national flags and regional flags on our desk to express our dissatisfaction with those people who had insulted the country and the nation and to show respect to our country and the SAR Government
陳志全議員真的需要重新認識一下議會的規則。
Mr CHAN Chi - chuen really needs to study the rules of the legislature all over again
議員桌上的物品屬私人物品，其他人不可拿走或破壞，否則即屬違規。
Items on the desks of Members are personal belongings of Members and other people should not take away or damage those items as it contravenes the rules in doing so
所以，他這種說法完全避開了立法會經常引用的規則。
Hence his argument is circumventing the rules frequently invoked by the Legislative Council
在這次辯論中，陳志全議員提出的議案，一方面是為了護短，另一方面是顯露了其虛偽態度。
In this debate on the motion proposed by Mr CHAN Chi - chuen his attempt to cover up anothers fault and his hypocritical attitude are revealed
關於國旗和區旗，其實作為一位公民，《基本法》亦規定......《國旗及國徽條例》有明確的法律規定，禁止任何人任意破壞國旗，否則便屬違法。
Regarding the national flag and the regional flag as a citizen it is stipulated in the Basic Law that Unequivocal statutory requirements are stipulated in the National Flag and National Emblem Ordinance prohibiting damage of the national flag lest it constitutes an offence
剛才陳志全議員對不起，應該是郭家麒議員表示，美國人怎樣破壞國旗也沒問題，因為有言論自由和行動自由。
Just now Mr CHAN Chi - chuen―sorry it should be Dr KWOK Ka - ki―said that the Americans could do whatever damage to their national flag due to the freedom of speech and the freedom of action
一定有其目的。
There must be a purpose
所以，我覺得這項議案是非常重要和莊重的，亦可以讓鄭松泰議員透過調查委員會表明心跡。
Hence I consider the present motion extremely important and a solemn matter . Dr CHENG Chung - tai may express his mind through the investigation committee
我覺得陳志全議員根據《議事規則》第49B條提出的議案，目的是為鄭松泰議員開脫。
I think Mr CHAN Chi - chuen seeks to absolve Dr CHENG Chung - tai of his blame by proposing the motion under Rule 49B2A of the Rules of Procedure
我認為這做法並不可取，也希望各位包括我自己支持謝偉俊議員的議案，並反對陳志全議員提出的議案。
I think this approach is inappropriate . I hope Members will support Mr Paul TSEs motion but oppose Mr CHAN Chi - chuens motion and I will support the former motion too
議會用甚麼標準判斷呢？
What standards can the Council apply to make a decision?
數位反對派議員剛才提出了有關法院的觀點，我想其中有兩點是一定要弄清楚的。
Several Members of the opposition camp have presented their viewpoints regarding the Court and I think we should be clear about two of them
刑事罪行並不是可以由議會和議員來作出裁決的，究竟執法機構和法院將來會否處 理這宗案件？
The Council and Members are in no position to pass any judgment on a criminal offence . Will the law enforcement agency and the Court handle this case after all?
這件事情並不是我們要處理的，我們應該交由執法機構和法院處理。
This matter is not for us to handle and we should leave it to the law enforcement agency and the Court to do so
正如梁耀忠議員剛才說，現時法院未作出任何判決，謝偉俊議員就已經提出這項議案其實不合程序亦不合法理。
Just as Mr LEUNG Yiu - chung has said the Court has not yet handed down any judgment so it is not in line with procedure or jurisprudence for Mr Paul TSE to move such a motion
所以，他才要求謝偉俊議員撤回議案，大家不要再花時間討論這件事情。
Hence he requested Mr Paul TSE to withdraw the motion so that we can stop spending time discussing this matter
如果我們說的不是違犯刑事罪行，而是行為不檢點或違反誓言，這是《基本法》第七十九條第七項的規定，而不是第六項。
If we are not talking about committing a criminal offence but misbehaviour or breach of oath it is the provision in paragraph 7 not paragraph 6 of Article 79
《基本法》條文已清楚把這兩種情況分開，因此，我希望梁耀忠議員能夠弄清楚《議事規則》和《基本法》的條文。
The Basic Law already makes a clear distinction between the two circumstances . Thus I hope Mr LEUNG Yiu - chung can sort out his understanding of the provisions of the Rules of Procedure and the Basic Law
對於這一點，我認為謝偉俊議員今天提出的譴責議案是符合《基本法》及《議事規則》的條文，並不是好像梁耀忠議員所說般不合程序、不合法理。
In this regard I think that Mr Paul TSEs censure motion is in line with the provisions of the Basic Law and Rules of Procedure unlike the claim made by Mr LEUNG Yiu - chung that it is not in line with procedures and jurisprudence
我希望能夠說清楚這一點。
I wish to make this point clear
我聽到了很多不同的聲音，有議員形容鄭松泰議員的行為是"小學雞"、幼稚，我們何用大費周章，引用有關譴責的《議事規則》條文來處理？
In this connection I have heard various views . Some Members described the behaviour of Dr CHENG Chung - tai as puerile and childish . Why should we spend so much efforts to handle it by invoking the Rules of Procedure in relation to censure?
然而，我亦聽到一些議員及社會裏的聲音，清楚告訴我，他們不能接受鄭松泰議員今次的行為舉止，認為這牽涉到侮辱國旗、國家的行為。
However I have also heard the voices of some Members and in society which clearly tell me they cannot accept the behaviour and conduct of Dr CHENG Chung - tai as they consider it tantamount to insults to the national flag and the country
我們聽到就同一種行為都有很多不同的解讀，大家用的標準可能不同。
We have come across different interpretations of the same kind of behaviour with perhaps different standards applied by different people
在將來的調查委員會公布調查結果之後，立法會的同事就應該作出裁決，究竟這位議員的行為是否構成《基本法》第七十九條所述的行為不檢。
After the investigation committee has announced the results of investigation in the future honourable colleagues of the Legislative Council should then make a judgment to determine if such a Members behaviour constitutes misbehaviour as stated in Article 79 of the Basic Law
反對派的議員剛才說，如果我們較法院更早作出裁決，是否於理不合？
Members of the opposition camp have just queried whether it would be unreasonable of us to make a judgment before the Court does so
當然，這個標準一定不能夠太寬鬆。
Certainly such standards cannot be too lax
所以，我們看到《基本法》、《議事規則》的條文都指出，如果我們要通過任何有關行為不檢的譴責議案， 需要獲得出席議員的三分之二通過，所以，條文已有非常嚴謹的標準，社會也把這個責任交給各位議會同事，我們應該對自己在議會裏的行為負責。
Therefore as we can see in the provisions of the Basic Law and the Rules of Procedure that for any censure motion against misbehavior to be passed a vote of two thirds of the members present is required . Accordingly the provisions have prescribed very stringent standards . Society also assigns such a duty to all Honourable colleagues in the Council
在今天的辯論中，我聽到很多同事口口聲聲說，議員代表選舉中支持他們的選民，正如鄭松泰議員得到5萬多名選民的支持，所以議會不應該對他作出任何譴責，或裁定他的行為不檢。
We ought to bear the responsibility for our actions in the Council . In the debate today I have heard the repeated claims by many Honourable colleagues that Members represent voters who lent them support in the election just as Dr CHENG Chung - tai has won the support of over 50 000 voters the Council should not impose any censure on him or rule that his conduct is misbehaviour
但是，我想告訴大家，即使我們是民選議員，在議會裏雖然受到《立法會條例》的保障，但我們在議會裏所有的行為和討論，也應該受到自我約束。
However I would like to say that even for Members returned by popular elections and protected by the Legislative Council Ordinance our behaviour and discussions inside the Council should be subject to self - restraint
這是《議事規則》的規矩，並且由主席裁斷我們有否做出一些違反《議事規則》的行為。
Such are the rules in the Rules of Procedure and it is up to the President to rule if we have committed acts in breach of the Rules of Procedure
否則，議會根本不能成為一個讓我們暢所欲言、大家有規有矩地討論和議事論事的地方。
Otherwise the Council can never become a venue where we can freely speak our mind hold discussions and exchange views in an orderly manner
莫說是得到數萬張選票的議員，我剛才舉例提到的南韓總統，她當年得到的選票肯定不止5萬多票，但她也要遭受彈劾，甚至是下台，因為由人民選出的代表的行為需要受到約束。
Let alone Members who have received tens of thousands of votes the South Korean President whom I have just mentioned certainly received more than 50 000 votes in the year she was elected . But even she has to face impeachment and is asked to step down because the behaviour of representatives elected by people are subject to restraint
根據現行的《議事規則》，我們要處理一如今次鄭松泰議員的行為爭議，有兩個方法，也可以說，只有兩個方法。
According to the existing Rules of Procedure for us to handle a dispute over Dr CHENG Chung - tais behaviour this time there are two methods or there can only be two methods
第一，根據現有條文，在我們的機制之下，當作甚麼事情也沒有發生，不了了之。
First according to the existing provisions under the current mechanism we can pretend nothing has happened and sit on it
即使鄭議員並沒有對他的行為表示任何歉意，或作出任何回應，也不了了之，這是第一個處理方法。
Even if Dr CHENG has not shown any sense of guilt or made any response we can sit on the incident . This is the first method
如果我們不是使用這種處理方法，我們還可以做甚麼呢？
If we do not adopt such a method what else can we do?
當然，有些議員表示，我們動輒提出譴責，會否過於嚴苛呢？
Of course some Members may wonder if it would be too harsh for us to move a censure motion so readily
但沒有辦法，現時根據《議事規則》，可以使用的方法只有這兩項。
Yet there is no other way . Currently there are only these two methods at our disposal under the Rules of Procedure
但是，在現有機制之下，我們的確別無選擇。
Nonetheless under the existing mechanism we really do not have other choices
此外，陳志全議員提及，其實鄭松泰議員並不是在侮辱國旗、區旗，他只是在侮辱放置這些國旗、區旗的議員，即是我們這些民主建港協進聯盟的成員。
Moreover Mr CHAN Chi - chuen mentioned that indeed Dr CHENG Chung - tai was not insulting the national and regional flags; he was insulting those Members who had placed those national flags and regional flags ie . us members of the Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong DAB
我不知道陳志全議員說的這些辯護理由，鄭 松泰議員將來會否使用作為辯護，但我相信只有透過成立調查委員會，我們才能夠調查清楚，究竟陳志全議員所說的這些辯護理由，是否成立，而當天鄭松泰議員是否把這些國旗、區旗視為棄置物，以及是否正如陳志全議員所說的，打算侮辱我們這些民建聯議員？
I do not know if such defence put up by Mr CHAN Chi - chuen will be used by Dr CHENG Chung - tai in the future but I believe only through forming an investigation committee can we conduct a thorough investigation into whether the defence presented by Mr CHAN Chi - chuen is valid; whether Dr CHENG Chung - tai considered those national and regional flags discarded articles; and whether he intended to insult us Members from DAB just as Mr CHAN Chi - chuen suggested
所以，我認為成立調查委員會，可以還鄭松泰議員一個公道，也可以令這件事水落石出，讓議會裏的全體議員，可以就謝偉俊議員提出的譴責議案，作出客觀和公正的決定。
Therefore I believe the setting up of an investigation committee can do justice to Dr CHENG Chung - tai as well as clearing up the doubts surrounding this incident such that all Members in the Council can make an impartial and fair decision on the censure motion moved by Mr Paul TSE . For this reason President I oppose the motion moved by Mr CHAN Chi - chuen under Rule 49B2A of the Rules of Procedure that no further action shall be taken on the censure motion moved by Mr Paul TSE
主席，香港迪士尼樂園度假區自2005年開業以來，已營運超過10年，是本港旅遊基建的重要一環，對本地及海外訪客來說，已經成為其中一個最多人到訪的旅遊熱點，亦有助鞏固香港作為國際首選旅遊目的地的地位。
President the Hong Kong Disneyland Resort HKDL has been in operation for over 10 years since its opening in 2005 . It is a major component of the tourism infrastructure in Hong Kong and one of the most popular tourist attractions for both local and overseas visitors . It also helps consolidate our position as an international premier tourist destination
我們一直有透過香港旅遊發展局向到訪香港的旅客做分析調查，發現到訪樂園的旅客中，有大約50%來香港的主要目的是要到訪樂園，可見樂園的吸引力及實力。
Our on - going analysis of the Hong Kong Tourism Boards survey with inbound visitors revealed that around 50 % of HKDLs visitors cited visiting HKDL as their main purpose of coming to Hong Kong . This demonstrates the attractiveness and strength of HKDL
樂園營運首10年合共接待了超過5,800萬訪客人次，這些訪客在港的額外消費約為1,360億元，為本港經濟帶來的增加值達749億元，相當於本地生產總值的0.38%。
In its first 10 years of operation HKDL has received over 58 million guests . Their additional spending in Hong Kong was around 136 billion which generated 74.9 billion of total value - added for Hong Kongs economy equivalent to 0.38 % of Hong Kongs Gross Domestic Product
樂園同期亦為香港整體創造195,700個職位，為市民製造大量就業機會。
HKDL has also created a total of 195 700 jobs for Hong Kongs economy over the same period providing considerable job opportunities to the general public
政府致力追求本港旅遊業均衡、健康和長遠發展。
The Government is committed to pursuing a balanced healthy and long - term development of our tourism industry
我們亦已指出香港不應只着重旅客人數的增長，應邁向服務多元化和高增值方向。
We have also stated that Hong Kong should not merely focus on the growth in tourist number but should also move towards diversified and high value - added services
由於樂園已有穩固的基礎，以及為了令樂園能在區內競爭日趨激烈的環境下，繼續發揮其實力，吸引世界各地高增值旅客來港和推動旅遊業發展，我們認為現時是合適的時機，在未來數年推出一系列新的遊樂設施。
With the solid foundation of HKDL we consider that it is the right opportunity to roll out a series of new attractions in the next few years so as to enable HKDL to continue to play to its strength in attracting high value - added visitors from all over the world to Hong Kong and fostering tourism development amidst intensifying competition in the region
在上月公布的樂園擴建及發展計劃下，樂園在2018年至2023年期間差不多每年都有新設施推出，包括以大受歡迎的迪士尼品牌"魔雪奇緣"和"漫威英雄"為主題的新園區。
Under the expansion and development plan of HKDL announced last month new attractions will be launched almost every year from 2018 to 2023 including new themed areas featuring Disneys popular properties namely Frozen and Marvel Super Heroes
計劃一方面能提升樂園的吸引力和競爭力，同時亦是我們發展旅遊業的其中一個策略，目的是吸引更多高消費、過夜及不同市場的旅客到港，令旅遊相關行業受惠，並創造就業。
Apart from enhancing HKDLs attractiveness and competitiveness the plan is also an integral part of our tourism development strategy which aims to attract more high spending overnight visitors from different source markets to Hong Kong and thereby benefiting the tourism - related industries and creating job opportunities
我們預期擴建及發展計劃在未來40年可為香港帶來額外385億元至416億元的經濟淨值。
We expect that the expansion and development plan would generate additional net economic benefits of 38.5 billion to 41.6 billion over a 40 - year operation period
計劃的建築期內預計可創造大約3,500個職位，完成擴建後樂園亦可額外提供600個職位。
The plan is also expected to create around 3 500 jobs during the construction stage and another 600 jobs at HKDL upon completion
因計劃所帶來的額外訪客及消費會為香港整體帶來約5,000個職位，並逐步增加至約8,000個職位。
Moreover the additional visitors and their spending arising from the expansion and development plan would bring about 5 000 jobs to Hong Kongs economy which would progressively increase to around 8 000 jobs
就質詢的3個部分，現答覆如下： 一及二 為盡快推出樂園擴建及發展計劃下的娛樂項目和設施，及時為本港旅遊業發展加強動力，以及由於是次計劃的規模較大，雙方股東認為按照現時"香港國際主題樂園有限公司"的持股比率攤分擴建及發展計劃所需的109億元作股本注資是恰當的做法，即是根據現時政府53%及華特迪士尼公司47%的持股比率。
My reply to the three parts of the question is as follows 1 and 2 In order to enable the launch of the entertainment offerings and attractions under the expansion and development plan as soon as possible and to add impetus to Hong Kongs tourism development in a timely manner and given the relatively large scale of the plan both shareholders of the Hongkong International Theme Parks Limited HKITP consider it appropriate to share the project cost of 10.9 billion according to the existing shareholding ratio ie . 53 % by the Government and 47 % by The Walt Disney Company TWDC as equity injection
我們曾經考慮以借貸方式支付擴建及發展計劃所需的款額。
We have considered the option of raising debt to fund the expansion and development plan
然而，減低合營公司的債務及利息開支是雙方股東的共同願景，事實上自2009年我們已逐漸大幅降低合營公司的負債，因此我們認為以股本注資的方式支付擴建及發展計劃所需的款額，將會更有利於合營公司的長遠財務表現。
However it is the common vision of both shareholders to reduce debt and interest expenses of HKITP and we have indeed since 2009 deleveraged HKITP considerably . Therefore we consider that funding the expansion and development plan through equity injection will be more conducive to the long - term financial performance of HKITP
事實上，合營公司在本財政年度的最高負債已達23億元。
In fact the liability of HKITP will reach up to 2.3 billion in the current fiscal year
根據我們的評估，在沒有擔保的情況下，合營公司現時最多只能借得約40億元，根本不能在市場借得整筆109億元的款額。
According to our assessment HKITP can at most secure loan amount of about 4 billion without any guarantee under the current circumstances and would not be able to borrow the entire sum of 10.9 billion in the market
擴建及發展計劃下的新項目自2018年起陸續落成後，能有助樂園充分發揮其國際特色，進一步開拓本地、東南亞及 內地市場，刺激入場及消費意欲，同時延長訪客在樂園的逗留時間。
The progressive launch of new offerings under the expansion and development plan from 2018 onwards will help HKDL give full play to its international features and further open up the local Southeast Asia and Mainland markets and thereby stimulating visitation and consumption desire as well as lengthening visitors stay in HKDL
我們預計在2025年，樂園的每年入場人次可達900萬至930萬。
We expect that the annual attendance of HKDL in 2025 will reach 9 million to 9.3 million
三 樂園是香港的一項重要和策略性的旅遊基建投資，其發展需要配合政府推動旅遊業和整體經濟發展的政策。
3 HKDL is an important and strategic tourism infrastructure investment of Hong Kong and its development has to tie in with the Governments policy to promote tourism industry and overall economic development
基於樂園現時的財務狀況，以及它對推動香港旅遊業及整體經濟發展的策略性作用，政府現時沒有計劃考慮出售樂園股份或引入第三方投資者。
Given the current financial positions of HKDL and its strategic role in promoting our tourism industry as well as the overall economic development the Government has no plan to sell our shares in HKITP or introduce third party investors at present
事實上，政府可根據合營公司雙方股東的協議，商討出售股份予第三方投資者。
In fact the Government may following agreement reached between both shareholders of the joint venture negotiate the sale of our shares to third party investors
若日後樂園的財務狀況合適及在符合香港整體經濟利益的前提下，政府會因時制宜，就此作出考慮。
We will consider this option in the future as and when HKDLs financial positions are suitable and it is in the overall economic interests of Hong Kong
樂園是本港重要的旅遊設施，政府作為樂園的主要股東會繼續監察樂園的發展和業務表現。
HKDL is an important tourism facility of Hong Kong . As the majority shareholder of HKDL the Government will continue to monitor the development and business performance of HKDL
我們樂見華特迪士尼公司對香港市場及旅遊業前景投下信心，繼續就樂園的擴建和發展作出重大投資。
We are pleased that TWDC has casted a vote of confidence in the prospects of the Hong Kong market and our tourism industry and continues to make substantial investment in the expansion and development plan of HKDL
我們希望社會各界和立法會議員支持樂園的擴建及發展計劃，以期為樂園業務注入增長動力，進一步推動香港旅遊業向服務多元化和高增值方向發展。
We hope that different sectors of the community as well as Members of this Council will support the expansion and development plan with a view to bringing growth momentum to HKDLs business and fostering further development of our tourism industry towards diversified and high value - added services
雖然政府表示要控制樂園短期及中期的債務負擔，但樂園設施的使用周期一般只有4至5年。
Although the Government has indicated its intention to control the short - and medium - term debt burden of HKDL the facilities of HKDL usually have a life cycle of only four to five years
換句話說，樂園大概每5至7年便有需要進行擴建，而在不影響樂園債務負擔的情況下，政府將會被迫不斷向迪士尼注資。
In other words HKDL will probably need expansion every five to seven years and in order not to affect HKDLs debt burden the Government will be forced to inject funds into Disneyland continuously
我想問政府會否評估及考慮這個情況，確保樂園運用公共資源時，符合公眾利益原則。
I would like to ask the Government whether it will assess and consider this situation to ensure that HKDL adheres to the principle of public interest in using public resources
政府亦應把握每次注資的時機，與迪士尼談判經營條款，確保公帑運用得宜。
The Government should also grasp the opportunity of each capital injection to negotiate with TWDC the terms of operation so as to ensure proper use of public money
主席，我剛才在主體答覆裏已提及迪士尼在營運首10年為香港帶來的經濟效益，這方面是非常清楚的。
President just now I have mentioned in the main reply the economic benefits HKDL has brought to Hong Kong in its first 10 years of operation . That is very clear
但是，就今次的注資方案來說，正如我剛才在主體答覆也提到，預期擴建及發展計劃帶來實質財務內部收益率會超過5%，而且對周邊整體經濟帶來的效益尚未計算在內。
However as far as this capital injection plan is concerned as I have mentioned in my main reply just now it is expected that the expansion and development plan will have a financial internal rate of return of over 5 % in real terms without taking into account the peripheral benefits that it will bring to the overall economy
主席，世界各地也有迪士尼，例如東京及巴黎，但都不需政府動用公帑，也能運作良好，為何唯獨香港迪士尼要如此依賴政府呢？
President there are Disneylands all over the world such as the ones in Tokyo and Paris . They all work well without government funding so why is that only the one in Hong Kong is so dependent on the Government?
究竟香港人要為迪士尼投入多少錢呢？
How much money actually do Hong Kong people have to inject into Disneyland?