Borrison/hk-legicost huggingface dataset:
我支持有關做法，有不少網民喜歡在網上"惡搞"，以為只是玩玩而已，無需要負責任。
I support this arrangement . A lot of netizens like parodying on the Internet thinking that they are just having fun and do not have to be responsible for their behaviour
現在《條例草案》訂明在網上侮辱國旗和國徽同屬違法，正是提醒大家不要以身試法。
Now that the Bill stipulates that online desecrating acts in relation to the national flag and national emblem is also an offence . It serves precisely as a reminder to all of us that we must not break the law
《條例草案》的目的是將"起底"行為訂為刑事罪行，並授權個人資料私隱專員對"起底"行為進行調查和檢控。
The purpose of the Bill is to criminalize doxxing acts and empower the Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data to carry out criminal investigations and institute prosecution in relation to doxxing acts
目前，私隱專員無權打擊"起底"行為，只可以去信有關的網站平台，要求移除"起底"內容。
At the Commissioner is currently not empowered to combat doxxing acts she can only write to the online platforms concerned to request the removal of doxxing contents
由於不具法律約束力，只有約七成網站平台願意移除這些內容。
As the requests are not legally binding only about 70 % of the online platforms are willing to remove such contents
私隱專員實際上只是一隻"無牙老虎"，有問題都要轉交警方調查，檢控亦要交律政司進行，根本費時失事，無法有效打擊"起底"行為。
The Commissioner is in fact a toothless tiger because she has to refer any problems to the Police for investigation and to the Department of Justice DoJ for prosecution . This approach is indeed costly in terms of both time and effort so it fails to effectively combat doxxing acts
法例修改後，私隱專員便有刑事調査及檢控權，可以親自一手一腳地執法，大大加快打擊工作，做回一隻真正的老虎。
After the legislative amendment the Commissioner will have criminal investigation and prosecution powers to single - handedly enforce the law thus greatly speeding up the crackdown and becoming a real tiger again
代理主席，"起底"是一種懦夫行為，目的是要人噤聲，令受害人蒙受巨大的心理壓力，甚至威脅受害人的人身安全；他們的姓名、住址、電話、身份證、車牌，以至家人和小朋友的資料都被公諸於世。
Deputy President doxxing is a cowardly act aimed at silencing the victims putting them under immense psychological pressure and even threatening their personal safety . Information about their names residential addresses telephone numbers identity cards vehicle licence numbers and even family members and children will be fully made public . Once a persons privacy information is made public they will be pilloried and intimidated by lawless netizens and even have their information stolen to borrow money
任何人一旦個人私隱被公開，會被不法的網民公開批鬥、恐嚇，甚至會被人盜用資料去借錢，小朋友上學時更可能成為欺凌對象，受害人要在惶恐中度日，而且資料一旦上網，根本無法全面移除，可以影響受害者一生。
To cap it all their children may become targets of bullying at school . The victims will have to live in fear . Moreover once the information is uploaded onto the Internet there is no way to remove it completely which may affect the victims for the rest of their lives
在"起底"陰影籠罩下，如果不想私隱被公諸於世，有心發聲的人唯有選擇噤聲。
Under the threat of doxxing those who wish to speak out have no choice but to hold their tongues if they do not want their privacy information to be made public
因此，"起底"絕對是一種反言論自由的行為，是可耻的恐嚇，最後更成為"黑暴"勢力打擊不同政見人士的工具。
Therefore doxxing is definitely an act against freedom of speech . It is a shameful intimidation that has eventually become a tool for black - clad violence perpetrators to combat political dissidents
事實上，自2019年6月至今年6月，個人資料私隱專員公署接獲及主動發現超過5,800宗關於"起底"的個案，有大量是"黑暴"勢力針對執法人員，甚至針對法官和議員的個案，已經達到無法無天的地步。
In fact from June 2019 to June this year the Office of the Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data PCPD received and proactively uncovered over 5 800 doxxing - related cases of which a large number involved black - clad violence perpetrators targeting law enforcement officers and even judges and Legislative Council Members to the extent of lawlessness
私隱公署已將超過1,400多宗個案轉交警方調查，警方共拘捕17人，當中只有2人被定罪。
PCPD had referred over 1 400 cases to the Police for investigation and a total of 17 suspects had been arrested by the Police but only two of the suspects were convicted
此外，由2019年11月至今年4月，私隱公署亦將60宗違反法庭禁制令的"起底"個案轉介予律政司，當中有4人被定罪。
Moreover between November 2019 and April this year PCPD referred 60 doxxing cases on suspicion of breaching the courts injunction orders to DoJ
從數字上看，"起底"個案已經多至不能容忍的地步，但成功檢控卻少之又少。
Among these cases four defendants were convictedJudging from the figures the number of doxxing cases has already grown to an intolerable extent but successful prosecutions are few and far between
另外，在星期一，法庭重判了一名人境事務處職員入獄45個月。這名職員多次登入人境事務處系統，偷取215名官員、法官、警員、議員及藝人的資料，交予一些"起底"頻道發放。
Besides on Monday the court imposed a heavy sentence of 45 - month imprisonment on a staff member of the Immigration Department ImmD who repeatedly logged into ImmDs system to steal the data of 215 government officials judges police officers Legislative Council Members and artistes and provided the data to some doxxing channels for publication
法官怒斥被告猶如施行"網絡恐怖主義"，形容被告行為歹毒；外泄資料將永久流傳，令大批公職人員飽受心理烙印和恐懼。
The judge berated the defendant for her behaviour bordering on cyberterrorism and describing it as vicious because the leaked information would be circulated permanently leaving a large number of public officers to suffer from psychological trauma and fear
不過，必須注意，今次被告得到應有懲罰，是因為被控以公職人員行為失當罪，情節相當嚴重，而不是被控以與"起底"有關的罪名。
However it must be noted that the defendant in this case was duly punished because she was charged with misconduct in public office which is of significant gravity rather than an offence related to doxxing
然而，從今次案件，大家明白到"起底"刑事化是必須做的事情。
Nevertheless it is clear from this case that criminalization of doxxing is crucial
另外，《條例草案》亦規定私隱專員獲授刑事調查權，可申請手令搜查處所及電子器材；若在緊急情況下未有手令，亦可以截停、搜查和拘捕人。
Furthermore the Bill also requires that the Commissioner be empowered with criminal investigation powers to apply for warrants to search premises and electronic devices and to stop search and arrest a person without warrant in urgent circumstances
"起底"罪行將設立兩級制，剛才已有同事詳細解釋了， 我便不再重複。
A two - tier structure will be set up for the offence of doxxing . As some colleagues have already elaborated on this earlier I will not repeat it
我相信兩級制的做法是有必要的，第一級的定罪門檻相對較低，是有效的做法，因為若門檻太高，可能沒有足夠阻嚇力，最後只會形同虛設。
I believe that the adoption of a two - tier structure is necessary . It is an effective approach to set a relatively low conviction threshold for the first tier because if the threshold is too high it may not provide adequate deterrence and will eventually become something existing in name only
此外，當法例通過後，私隱公署計劃成立刑事調查組。
In addition PCPD plans to set up a criminal investigation unit after the legislation is passed
我相信，私隱公署現時有足夠權力，但如果欠缺一些有豐富經驗的人士執法，最後無法成功拘捕疑犯，或者告不入，法例也是形同虛設。
I believe that PCPD has sufficient powers now but if there is a lack of experienced people to enforce the law eventually resulting in failure to arrest suspects or secure convictions the legislation will likewise exist in name only
所以，私隱公署最好直接聘請有經驗的執法人員，相信各位議員都會樂意批出撥款。
Therefore it is highly advisable for PCPD to directly recruit experienced law enforcement officers . I believe that Members will be happy to approve the funding
主席，2019年"黑暴"期間，民間人權陣線發起了多場集會和遊行。
President during the riots in 2019 the Civil Human Rights Front CHRF initiated a number of assemblies and processions
據報，儘管民陣一再宣稱是按"和平、理性、非暴力"的原則舉辦該等活動，但活動期間示威者不時高叫鼓吹暴力抗爭的口號，而活動結束後經常有示威者作出暴力衝擊行為，令不少青少年走上違法歪路。
It has been reported that despite CHRFs repeated claims that it was organizing such activities under the principle that they should be peaceful rational and non - violent the protesters shouted slogans that advocated violent opposition from time to time during such activities and there were often protesters committing acts of violent attacks after such activities had ended leading quite a number of young people astray to break the law
此外，民陣涉嫌洗黑錢、勾結外國勢力和違反《香港國安法》。
Moreover CHRF has been suspected of laundering money colluding with foreign forces and violating the National Security Law for Hong Kong
上月15日民陣宣布解散後，警方發出聲明表示，正跟進民陣涉嫌違反《社團條例》的罪行，並會繼續追究有否任何組織及人士違反《香港國安法》和其他香港法例。
Following CHRFs announcement of its disbandment on the 15th of last month the Police issued a statement indicating that they were following up CHRFs suspected offences of violating the Societies Ordinance and would continue to pursue whether any organization and person had violated the National Security Law for Hong Kong and other Hong Kong laws
就此，政府可否告知本會：一就民陣的涉嫌違法行為，執法部門會如何追究其歷任召集人和幹事及其成員團體的相關法律責任；二執法部門會否加緊依法追究上述鼓吹暴力的組織及人士的責任；及三執法部門會否承諾加快處理與民陣所辦活動相關違法行為的案件，以免有關的嫌疑人潛逃海外，消遙法外？
In this connection will the Government inform this Council 1 regarding CHRFs suspected illegal acts how the law enforcement agencies will pursue the relevant legal liabilities of its former successive convenors and office - bearers as well as its member organizations; 2 whether the law enforcement agencies will step up efforts to pursue in accordance with the law the liabilities of the aforesaid organizations and persons that advocated violence; and 3 whether the law enforcement agencies will undertake to expedite the handling of those cases on the illegal acts relating to the activities organized by CHRF lest the suspects concerned abscond overseas and escape justice?
主席，正如局長所說，所有反中亂港的組織均不能藉着解散而逃避法律責任。
President as pointed out by the Secretary all organizations which oppose China and disrupt Hong Kong will not be allowed to evade from their liabilities just because of their disbandment
香港市民除了關注及早處理它們解散前的所有罪行外，更加擔心它們會化整為零，繼續潛伏運作，又或以其他名義成立新的組織，滲透在各行各業和各階層之中，暗地裏推動各類反華社會運動和政治活動，製造社會矛盾，導致香港市民對中央的不信任。
Apart from their concern about the early handling of all offence cases involving such organizations before their disbandment Hong Kong people are even more worried about the possibility that these organizations would break up into small organizations and continue to operate in a concealed manner or use other names to set up new organizations for infiltration in various trades and industries and different social strata thereby secretly promoting different kinds of anti - China social movements and political activities creating social conflicts and causing Hong Kong peoples distrust towards the Central Authorities
就此，當局會否檢視現行相關法例，包括《公司條例》及《社團條例》，杜絕任何人利用現有法例漏洞，推動一些反中亂港的陰謀？
In this connection will the authorities conduct a review on the relevant legislation currently in force including the Companies Ordinance and the Societies Ordinance with a view to making it impossible for anyone to take advantage of the loopholes in the existing law and hatch plots to oppose China and disrupt Hong Kong?
主席，我絕對相信《香港國安法》能有效打擊反中亂港的集團及人士，特別是針對觸犯分裂國家、顛覆國家政權等罪行的人士。
President I absolutely believe that HKNSL can effectively combat organizations and persons that oppose China and disrupt Hong Kong especially those who commit the offences of secession subversion etc
說到民陣的罪行，委實是罄竹難書，但單以涉嫌收取外部勢力資助這項罪行而論，我反而擔心現行的《香港國安法》能否完全處理到。
CHRF has committed countless offences indeed but with regard to the illegal act of allegedly receiving funds provided by external forces I am conversely concerned that we may not be able to deal with it completely under the existing HKNSL
這亦帶出就《基本法》第二十三條進行立法的必要性，因為只要制定相關法例，便可以令現時維護國家安全的整套法律架構的系統更臻完善。
This has thus highlighted the necessity of legislating for the implementation of Article 23 of the Basic Law because only by enacting the relevant legislation can we achieve further enhancement of the entire system of the existing legal framework for safeguarding national security
局長，我曾聽聞你對媒體表示會在任期之內，就《基本法》第二十三條進行立法工作，那麼你可否告訴我們現時心裏的時間表為何？
Secretary I have heard that you did indicate to the media that you would take forward the legislating for Article 23 of the Basic Law within your term of office and such being the case can you tell us what is the planned timetable you now have in this respect?
這可讓市民心裏有數，認為你可在任期內完成我們及國家要求你處理的保障國家安全的工作。
This will give the public an idea that you can accomplish during your tenure the mission entrusted to you by us and by the country to protect national security
主席，外交部早前發出了"美國干預香港事務、支持反中亂港勢力事實清單"，而我們也知道反對派在2014年受到一些外國勢力的指示，在戴耀廷的推動下進行非法佔中活動，其後再由一個"大台"變成沒有"大台"，煽動學生犯法，並以失敗告終。
President the Ministry of Foreign Affairs has issued earlier a fact sheet that sets out the host of acts of the United States in interfering in Hong Kong affairs and supporting anti - China destabilizing forces and we all know that the opposition camp launched in 2014 under the instruction of some foreign forces the illegal Occupy Central movement initiated by Benny TAI . The movement was subsequently decentralized with the absence of a command centre students were incited to break the law and the whole campaign ultimately ended up in failure
到了2019年，他們又改用另一模式，由一個"大台"即民陣牽頭，但卻將法律責任描繪為每一抗爭者的個人行為，故此所有暴力行為均與民陣無關，對此我們當然必須追究。
These people switched to another mode then in 2019 by making CHRF the organizer that initiated a number of activities but referring the related legal liabilities as personal acts of each individual protestor thus making CHRF have nothing to do with all violent acts . We must of course hold the organization accountable in this respect
《香港國安法》雖然能有效解決過去的問題，為今後的處理奠定基礎，但這並不代表它必定能應對反中亂港勢力將來在手段上的變化。
Although HKNSL can effectively address problems in the past and provide a basis for handling such issues in the future this does not imply that it can definitely cope with the changes in strategy by the forces that oppose China and disrupt Hong Kong in the future
所以，現時網上有很多組織，不是我們剛才所說有真實名稱及已登記的組織，而是化整為零及躲藏在暗角的一些組織，包括某些網上討論區。
There are thus a large number of organizations in online platforms nowadays and instead of following the practice mentioned just now to register themselves with their actual names they have broken up into small organizations and hidden in dark corners including some online discussion fora
特區政府應如何使用這一部分的法律基礎，遏止這種挑動對警方及特區政府仇恨的行為？
How should the SAR Government invoke law in this area to suppress acts of instigating hatred against the Police and the SAR Government?
這才是解決問題的應有方向。
I consider this a proper approach to resolve the problem
實際上，我們發現很多討論區皆屬"掛羊頭賣狗肉"，扭曲言論自由以煽動仇恨。
In fact it has come to our attention that quite a number of online discussion fora are crying up wine but selling vinegar and inciting hatred by distorting the principle of freedom of speech
本人收到不少外籍家庭傭工僱主及準僱主的投訴，指稱有外傭職業介紹所以不良手法經營，例如濫收佣金、巧立名目收取費用、未有按書面服務協議提供服務，以及利用近期外傭短缺教唆外傭"跳工"。
I have received quite a number of complaints from employers and prospective employers of foreign domestic helpers FDHs alleging that some employment agencies for placement of FDHs EAs have engaged in malpractices such as overcharging commissions charging fees under all sorts of pretexts failing to provide services in accordance with written service agreements and abetting FDHs to job - hop to take advantage of the recent shortage of FDHs
主席，就議員的質詢，經諮詢保安局及入境事務處後，我現綜合答覆如下： 一 根據《僱傭條例》，所有在香港經營的職業介紹所，必須事先領有勞工處發出的牌照。
President having consulted the Security Bureau and the Immigration Department ImmD my consolidated reply to the Members question is set out below 1 According to the Employment Ordinance EO all employment agencies EAs operating in Hong Kong must first obtain a licence from the Labour Department LD
如持牌人或其相關人士曾干犯《僱傭條例》或違反《實務守則》，勞工處會拒絕申請。
If it is found that the licensee or hisher associate has committed an offence under EO or breached CoP LD would refuse the application
此外，勞工處已加強巡查職業介紹所，查閱相關紀錄及文件，以確定有關職業介紹所依從各項《僱傭條例》和《職業介紹所規例》的規定及《實務守則》的要求營運。
In addition LD has stepped up the inspections to EAs to scrutinize relevant records and documents to ensure that EAs are operating in compliance with the various requirements in EO EAR and CoP
若發現有可能違規的情況，勞工處職員會檢取相關文件作進一步調查，以防止出現違規經營的情況。
Upon detection of possible irregularities LD officers would seize relevant documents for further investigation with a view to preventing any irregularities in their operation
二 現時《僱傭條例》並無就職業介紹所收取僱主的費用訂定任何規定。
2 There is currently no provision under EO governing the amount of fees collected by EAs from the employers
僱主作為消費者，可自由決定使用市場上哪一間職業介紹所的服務，並與職業介紹所議定收費款額和收費項目。
Employers as consumers are free to choose to engage the services of any EA in the market and negotiate with an EA the amount of fees to be charged and fee items
勞工處一直鼓勵職業介紹所採取公平及透明的手法營運，《實務守則》要求職業介紹所須與僱主訂立書面服務協議，清楚列明服務條款和範圍、收費詳情、付款期限、職業介紹所未能完成所有服務的退款安排、另選外籍家庭傭工所需的費用等，以保障僱主作為消費者的權益。
LD has all along encouraged EAs to adopt an open and transparent approach in conducting their business . To protect the rights of the employers as consumers CoP requires EAs to draw up service agreements SAs with employers to clearly list out the service terms and scope details of the fees to be charged the payment schedule refund arrangements in case of incomplete delivery of EA services fees to be charged for selecting another foreign domestic helper FDH etc
如職業介紹所未能按服務協議提供服務，僱主可向 消費者委員會投訴，亦可作出民事追討。
If an EA is unable to deliver services as per SA the employer may file a complaint with the Consumer Council and may also institute a civil claim against it
此外，如僱主發現職業介紹所行為不當，可向勞工處作出投訴，由勞工處調查跟進。
In addition if an employer has come across any malpractice of an EA heshe may file complaints with LD for investigation and follow up
2018年的《修訂條例》除落實第一部分所述的兩項修訂外，亦將濫收求職者佣金及無牌經營職業介紹所罪行的最高罰則，由罰款5萬元提高至罰款35萬元及監禁3年；將檢控上述兩項罪行的法定時效限制由6個月延長至12個月；以及為處長發出的《實務守則》提供法律基礎。
Prosecution will be initiated where there is sufficient evidence to substantiate that an EA has violated the law . Apart from implementing the two amendments mentioned in Part 1 above EAO 2018 has also increased the maximum penalties for the offences of overcharging of commissions from jobseekers and unlicensed operation from a fine of 50,000 to a fine of 350,000 and imprisonment for three years; extended the statutory time limit for prosecution of the above two offences from 6 to 12 months; and provided a legal basis for CoP issued by the Commissioner
《修訂條例》為勞工處打擊職業介紹所的違規行為提供更堅實的基礎。
EAO 2018 provides an even more solid foundation for LD to combat irregularities of EAs
就外傭"跳工"的情況，勞工處一直與入境處保持緊密溝通。
In respect of job - hopping of FDHs LD has maintained close communication with ImmD
入境處會詳細審查申請人的情況，包括提早終止僱傭合約的次數及原因，以考慮外傭有否濫用提早終止合約轉換僱主的安排。
ImmD would thoroughly scrutinize the details of the applicants including the number of and the reasons for premature termination of contract in order to consider whether an FDH has abused the arrangements for premature termination of contract to change employer
入境處及勞工處並採取聯合行動，查察懷疑鼓勵或教唆外傭"跳工"的職業介紹所。
ImmD and LD also mount joint operations to inspect EAs suspected of encouraging or inducing FDHs to job - hop
如發現職業介紹所沒有遵從《實務守則》，處長可撤銷、拒絕發出或續發其牌照，或發出警告以敦促其糾正。
If it is found that an EA has failed to comply with CoP the Commissioner may revoke or refuse to issue or renew its licence or issue warnings to urge it to rectify the irregularities detected
由2019年至2021年，勞工處撤銷或拒絕發出/續發職業介紹所牌照的個案分別有13宗、7宗及6宗，理由包括持牌人因濫收求職者佣金或無牌經營而被定罪，以及持牌人沒有遵從《實務守則》等。
From 2019 to 2021 up to August LD revoked or refused to issue or renew the licences of 13 7 and 6 EAs respectively on the grounds that the licensees had been convicted of overcharging of commission from jobseekers or unlicensed operation or had failed to comply with CoP etc
勞工處一直監察職業介紹所的運作及遵從《僱傭條例》和《職業介紹所規例》的情況，並會不時檢討現行法例規管業界的成效。
LD has all along monitored the operation of EAs and their compliance with EO and EAR and would review the effectiveness of the existing legislation in regulating the industry from time to time
主席，其實現在"僱主"變了"苦主"。
President actually employers have now become victims
面對外傭"跳工"的問題，他們真的很無奈，而且，有一種"肉隨砧板上"的感覺。
They are really helpless and feel as if they are being held over a barrel in the face of the problem of job - hopping among FDHs
雖然有一份服務協議，但僱主仍十分擔心，如外傭單方面違反合約，他們除了向勞工處，以及正如局長所說向消費者委員會投訴之外，真的沒有甚麼可以做現在還要輪候那麼長的時間對於一些照顧者，或者家中有小朋友、有長者的家庭來說，其實真的十分無奈。
Despite the presence of an SA employers are still filled with worries . Except lodging a complaint with LD and―just as what the Secretary mentioned―the Consumer Council there is really nothing much they can do in case of a unilateral breach of contract by their FDHs―worse still the waiting time is very long right now―and this is really a helpless situation for carers families with children and elders
所以，局方會否考慮加強勞工處現時的職能，包括......雖然我們知道現時僱主可以向消費者委員會投訴，或者可就介紹所行為不當向勞工處投訴，又或者如果發現外傭有問題，可交由入境處處理，但其實對於一個沒有了外傭的家庭而言，他們的壓力其實相當大，勞工處會否加強其現時的工作，以提供一站式服務，讓僱主無需百上加斤，壓力更大？
In light of this will the Bureau consider enhancing the existing functions of LD including Though we know that employers can now lodge their complaints with the Consumer Council or with LD regarding the malpractices of EAs or have ImmD handle their cases if their FDHs are found to be questionable they are already heavily burdened when their families cease to have FDHs . Will LD strengthen its existing work to provide one - stop services which can free employers from their heavy burden and stress?
主席，我相信有關"跳工"的信息，可能需要加強。
President I believe that messages about job - hopping may need to be reinforced
當然，如剛才主體答覆提及，勞工處的工作實際上在過往兩三年已經大幅加強。特別因為這疫情，導致剛才提到的一些問題突顯出來。
Of course as mentioned in my main reply earlier LD has significantly strengthened its work over the past two to three years particularly because some problems mentioned just now have become more prominent due to this pandemic
其中一個很重要的信息，是要讓外傭或中介組織、介紹所知道，如果有外傭"跳工"的話，只要我們接獲有關投訴，甚或無須接獲投訴，只要我們留意到有外傭中斷其合約，而沒有一個合理的理由，例如僱主離開香港，或其他合理的理由，他/她便需要在短時間內離開香港。
One of the key messages which FDHs and EAs have to know is that any FDH who job - hops will be required to leave Hong Kong within a short time once we receive relevant complaints or we without receiving any complaint notice an absence of any valid reason for hisher premature termination of contract say hisher employers moving away from Hong Kong or any other reasonable cause
所以，外傭以為可以"跳工"，尋找新僱主的情況，在我們最近加緊打擊"跳工"之下，應該會越來越少。
So there should be dwindling cases of FDHs trying to find new employers by job - hopping with our stepped - up efforts in combating job - hopping recently
主席，當局在主體答覆第三部分表示，勞工處已經加強打擊涉嫌教唆外傭"跳工"的職業介紹所，包括仔細監察職業介紹所的營商手法。
President the authorities have stated in part 3 of the main reply that LD has already strengthened its efforts in combating suspected inducement of FDH job - hopping by EAs including closely monitoring the business practice of EAs
我想請當局簡單說一說，他們是用甚麼手段來監察這些中介呢？
May I ask the authorities to talk briefly about the means by which they monitor these EAs?
是否好像香港金融管理局一樣，派神秘顧客巡查零售銀行，即派員假扮顧客光顧這些職業介紹所？
Do they send officers to pretend to be customers to visit these EAs just like the Hong Kong Monetary Authority deploying mystery customers to inspect retail banks?
還是當局有其他手段或措施呢？
Or do the authorities have other means or measures?
主席，由於這類職業介紹所有千多間，所以從監管的角度，我們一般都是採用風險為本的處理方法。
President as there are some 1 000 - odd EAs of this kind we generally adopt a risk - based approach from the regulatory perspective
當然，最簡單的風險為本的方法，就是一接獲投訴，便立即跟進。
Definitely the simplest risk - based approach is taking prompt follow - up action upon receipt of a complaint
所以，如果任何香港僱主面對有關情況，應盡快告訴我們，我們會跟進。
So employers in Hong Kong should let us know as soon as possible if they face the situation in question and we will then follow up their cases
如果問題出自中介公司，勞工處自然會索取資料和調查，如果證明有關公司有任何違規的行為，更可直接用剛才在主體答覆所說的方法處理。
If it is the problem of the EAs concerned LD will of course ask for information and conduct investigation . In case of any substantiated irregularities involving an EA LD may handle it directly in the way as stated in the main reply earlier
這項工作相當重要，因為如果多一宗不合法的營商手法案件傳出去，便會有人仿效，所以越快打擊不合法和不合理的情況越重要。
This is a fairly important task as the more cases of unlawful business practice are exposed the more the people will imitate . For this reason it becomes increasingly important to take quicker actions against cases of unlawful and unreasonable practices
主席，其實我差不多天天都接獲不同外傭僱主的投訴，很多外傭僱主都覺得，現時的法例對外傭僱主毫無保障，尤其在現時外傭短缺的情況下，他們更加覺得自己"肉隨砧板上"，被人"撳住嚟搶"。
President actually I receive complaints from different FDH employers almost every day . Many of them consider that the existing legislation offers no protection to them at all especially at present when there is a shortage of FDHs . They simply feel as if they are being held over a barrel or being robbed
另外，我們也繼續收到一些有關外傭借貸問題的投訴。
Moreover we also keep receiving some complaints about the problem of FDHs borrowing money
這個問題亦困擾很多僱主。
This is also a problem besetting many employers
我剛在今天收到一位胡太的投訴，她告訴我們，她之前的外傭借貸，令她經常收到騷擾電話、追債電話，被人上門追債。
Today I just got a complaint from a Mrs WU . She told us that she always received harassment calls or debt collection calls and got knocks on her door from people chasing up debt repayment because her previous FDH had borrowed money
她已經辭退該外傭，但情況仍然繼續，而這個問題仍在困擾這些僱主。
While she has already sacked that FDH the situation still persists . This problem remains a headache for employers like her
我現在向各位提出的待議議題是：《2021年個人資料條例草案》予以三讀並通過。
I now propose the question to you and that is That the Personal Data Privacy Amendment Bill 2021 be read the Third time and do pass