Borrison/hk-legicost huggingface dataset:
據媒體報道，政府從新世界提交城市規劃委員會的文件中，已發現部分從未公開、獲政府採納的人口和就業數據被顧問公司挪用，因而要求對方澄清，該顧問公司亦隨之抽起相關資料。
As reported by the media the Government noticed from the documents submitted by NWD to the Town Planning Board TPB the illegal use of certain data on population and employment adopted by the Government but has never been released by the consultancy . The Government thus sought clarification from the company and the consultancy withdrew the relevant information immediately
據相關顧問公司回覆，問題源於職員疏忽，使用了受限制的資料。
According to the reply of the consultancy in question the use of restricted information was due to the negligence of staff members
由此可見，挪用資料事件是由政府主動揭發、查詢及跟進，政府採取主動處理問題的態度有目共睹，我相信社會自有公論。
It is evident that the Government has been proactive in discovering inquiring and following up the incident involving the illegal use of information . The Governments proactive attitude in handling the case is obvious to all . I trust that society will pass a fair judgment on this
事件揭發後，發展局也明確指出，相關顧問公司參與由土木工程拓展署批出的元朗橫洲基建工程項目顧問合約時，確實沒有遵照合約條款，在參與相關私人發展項目前向政府提出申請並獲得批准，也沒有嚴格執行該公司為免內部資料被不適當地運用而制訂的防火牆措施。
Upon the exposure of the incident the Development Bureau pointed out unequivocally that the consultant under the consultancy agreement on Wang Chau infrastructural works with the Civil Engineering Development Department failed to comply with the terms of agreement in obtaining prior approval for undertaking the relevant private development project and did not follow strictly the firewall measures formulated for preventing improper use of internal information of the company
我看到發展局非常關注這次事件，並按照規定暫停這間公司投標所有顧問合約，為期3個月。
I note that the Development Bureau is deeply concerned about the incident and the consultancy was suspended from submitting tenders for any consultancy agreement for three months according to the requirements
當然，我也認為懲罰太輕，但我想表達一個信息，便是政府在事件上的態度很明確：有錯必會處理，而且秉公辦事。
Certainly I also consider the punishment too lenient . Yet I would like to strike home the message that the Government has adopted a definite attitude in the incident Improper practices must be dealt with to uphold justice
主席，發展局在2016年12月曾聲言，除民事索償外，也會諮詢法律意見，考慮提出刑事檢控。
President in December 2016 the Development Bureau claimed that in addition to making civil claims it would seek legal advice and consider initiating prosecution
我認為這可見政府在處理事件上的另一態度，就是如果可以，必會跟進到底。
In my view this reflects another attitude of the Government in handling the incident that it would follow up the incident as far as practicable
至於最後為何無法提出起訴，我相信政府已清楚向公眾說明，就是徵詢法律意見後認為證據不足，無法起訴。
Why was prosecution not initiated eventually? . I think the Government has already made it clear to the public that prosecution could not be initiated due to insufficient evidence as per legal advice
政府應該向公眾公開相關法律意見，以示當局毫無保留跟進此事的清晰態度。
The Government should make open the relevant legal advice to prove its unreserved attitude in following up this incident
此外，還有一個最重要的重點，便是城規會否決了新世界的申請，把橫洲永寧村以東的綠化地改劃住宅用途。
There is another key point which is the most important one that is TPB had rejected the application of NWD to rezone the green - belt zone to the east of Wing Ning Tsuen in Wang Chau as a residential zone
我看未必，因為立法會需要很多時間討論不同政策，接下來還有很多議案有待處理。
I think it is not necessarily so for the Legislative Council needs a lot of time to discuss various policies and there are many motions pending
所以，主席，我希望這些議案均能盡快獲得處理，讓其他關乎民生經濟的議案得以提交立法會審議。
Hence President I hope these motions can be processed as soon as possible so that other motions concerning peoples livelihood can be submitted to the Legislative Council for examination
主席，我也要藉此機會表達一個十分中肯的意見。
President I would like to take this opportunity to state an objective opinion
就整件事而言，我認為政府可以做好一點；正如我經常強調，沒有最好，只有更好。
Regarding the incident as a whole I think the Government can do better . As I often emphasize there is no the best only better
在這件事上，我認為政府必須承擔其錯誤，顧問公司的懲罰也太輕，大多數公眾均表示不滿。
Insofar as the incident is concerned I think the Government must bear the blame . Besides the punishment for the consultancy is too lenient and the majority public considers this unsatisfactory
不過，我想指出，媒體在2016年年底也報道，還有3間顧問公司挪用規劃署內部人口和就業預測資料，協助私人發展項目，這說明了甚麼呢？
However I have to point out that according to the report made by the media in the end of 2016 another three consultant companies were involved in the illegal use of internal information of the Planning Department on projected population and employment for private development projects . What does it mean?
我要強調，政府的確監管不力，我十分希望政府官員能汲取今次經驗進行檢討。
I have to stress that the Government is slack in regulation . I earnestly hope that government officials will learn from this experience and conduct a review
我不知道當局有否檢討，但我認為當局必須檢討現行機制是否合理，以杜絕同類事件重演。
I do not know if the Government has conducted a review yet I think the authorities must examine whether or not the existing mechanism is reasonable in preventing the recurrence of similar incidents
我們想知道答案的問題，不僅這數項，還包括港珠澳大橋香港口岸的泊車位的安排。
What we wish to know is not merely the answers of these few questions but also the parking arrangement for the Hong Kong Boundary Crossing Facilities HKBCF
大家過去如有留意立法會會議，便知我曾多次在不同場合向局方反映，並採取不同方式向局方表達，泊車位數量不足的問題。
If Members have paid attention to the previous Council meetings they would know that I have conveyed to the Bureaux on various occasions and expressed my concern to them through various means about the problem of inadequate parking spaces
現時只有650個泊車位，並不足以應付未來大量本地私家車於香港口岸停泊，以轉乘跨境車通過港珠澳大橋。
At present there are only 650 parking spaces which will not be sufficient for the large number of local private cars parking at HKBCF for interchange to transport services which cross the boundary via HZMB
主席，我發言支持陳淑莊議員根據《基本法》第七十三條第五項及第七十三條第十項提出的議案，要求政務司司長及民政事務局常任秘書長出示包括她剛才提述的文件，我不再詳述。
President I speak in support of the motion moved by Ms Tanya CHAN under Articles 735 and 7310 to summon the Chief Secretary for Administration and the Permanent Secretary for Home Affairs to produce the documents just read out by her and I am not going to give the details here
主席，香港現時的情況可謂"低處未算低"，"爛透仍未算最爛"。
President it can be said that the situation of Hong Kong has kept worsening and the worst has yet to come
有多少人同意？
How many people had given their consent?
時任政務司司長在否決採用正常程序時的說法很有趣，她說政府以往接收大熊貓時也沒有諮詢公眾。
The justification given by the then Chief Secretary for Administration for not following the normal procedure was very interesting . She said the Government had not consulted the public on the reception of pandas in the past
主席，她不單沒有因此事而影響了在特區政府的晉升的機會，還升官發財。
President not only was her promotion prospect in the SAR Government not adversely affected she even got promoted and made a fortune
主席，這是很好的示範，就是不需要理會民意，也不需要諮詢......
President this is a very good demonstration of not having to pay heed to public opinion and not having to conduct consultation
主席，這些都是重要的，因為大家都想做好這件事。
President all these are important information and we all want to do a good job
我當然不希望政府內上至林鄭月娥下至低層的公務員......現在連律政司司長也可以為所欲為，說了便算。
I certainly do not want to see that all civil servants from Carrie LAM on the top to the lowest echelon and now even the Secretary for Justice is doing whatever she likes and has the final say
我們索取這些文件是要告訴大家，當中涉及甚麼內容；為何這樣做會違反程序公義，以及有必要在事件曝光後，迫使政府作出交代。
We seek to obtain the documents to tell the public of the details; of the reasons why procedural justice has been violated and the reasons why we have to press the Government to give an account after the incident came to light
如果這些文件也無法還原當時的真相，香港市民將會繼續被蒙在鼓裏，只好繼續相信官員所說這是為大家好，而且有千真萬確的需要。
If those documents still fail to recover the truth back then the people of Hong Kong will continue to be kept in the dark and have to believe in the words of government officials that the project is implemented for our well - being and there is a genuine need to do so
主席想必也知道，香港市民一直相信問責政府會交代，最低限度也會提供文件，這已是最低限度的要求，而議員透過《甚本法》第七十三條第五項及第七十三條十項動議議案，就是要容許立法會在取得議員的同意後，要求政府公開資料。
The President may also be aware that Hong Kong people have always believed that the Government will be accountable or at least it will produce the relevant documents which are the minimum requirements . The Members motion moved under Articles 735 and 7310 of the Basic Law would allow the Legislative Council to request after obtaining Members consent the Government to disclose information
即使在30年後，政府依然可以毀屍滅跡，把這些政府認為見不得光的協議或書信繼續藏在地毯下。
In that case the Government can eliminate all information even after 30 years and sweep all agreements and correspondence that have to be kept secret under the carpet
主席，今天只有少數建制派議員發言。
President only a few Members from the pro - establishment camp have spoken today
我固然認為如果他們尊重自己的職務及立法會的憲制地位，便應該支持這項議案。
Of course in my opinion if they respect their duties and the constitutional status of the Legislative Council they should support this motion
主席，我們的要求並不多，而且那些資料也不涉及私隱。
President we have not asked for too much and the information requested does not have any privacy implication
如果各位議員也認為這樣做能夠敲醒這個一天比一天差勁的政府，令它知道將來不可以再亂來、說了便算和跟大陸一樣奉行長官意志，那我們別無選擇，只好表決贊成這項議案，令那些原本不讓市民知悉的文件曝露於陽光下，令市民和立法會可以監察政府。
If Members including those from the pro - establishment camp also agree that this can be a wake - up call to the worsening Government reminding the Government that it can no longer ignore the rules act arbitrarily and follow the Mainland practice of domination of the authority then we have no choice but to vote in favour of this motion so that all documents that were previously kept from the public can be exposed under the sun thereby enabling the general public and the Legislative Council to monitor the Government
其實，這明顯已經違反了公眾利益。
Indeed apparently it was already a violation of public interest
在2016年，沒有人不知道時任特首的梁振英與新 世界鄭氏家族的關係非比尋常。
In 2016 everyone knew the then Chief Executive LEUNG Chun - ying had a most extraordinary relationship with the CHENGs of NWD
我十分記得，梁振英在2012年勝出行政長官選舉時，當晚新世界的鄭家純先生和其他人便為他"站台"，現在還歷歷在目。
I remember vividly that when LEUNG Chun - ying won the Chief Executive Election in 2012 on the very same night Mr Henry CHENG of NWD and others stood with him on the stage in the rally to show support
更詭異的是，涉及的不是其他房屋發展計劃，偏偏是橫洲的發展計劃，而特首也十分奇怪，我想局長稍後也須清楚解釋甚麼時候會見到一名主要官員會與一個署級機關當時是房屋署插手一些他本身不應該插手的事情？
What is even more bizarre is that it involved not other housing development projects but the development project at Wang Chau . And the Chief Executive acted very oddly . I believe the Secretary has to explain later on when a principal official in conjunction with a department―the Housing Department at the time―would intervene in some matters that he should not intervene in
我個人在隨後的房屋事務委員會會議席上，也不只一次地要求政府交出事件當中最關鍵的文件。
In the subsequent meetings of the Panel on Housing more than once had I personally requested the Government to produce the most critical documents of the incident
但是，政府每次的回應也是：由於這些文件是敏感資料，涉及相關的利益，因此不能提供。
However every time the Government gave the same response such documents were sensitive information involving the interests of the relevant parties and therefore could not be provided
有甚麼敏感資料？
Who else? . What sensitive information could there be?
不過我們也要看看制度是否出了問題，令政府改變這件事情所涉及的制度，釜底抽薪，改變這種含混不清、利益交錯......
Still we need to check if there is a problem with the system so as to make the Government change the system underlying this incident with a view to taking away the fuel from the fire and changing such an obscure situation where different interests intertwine
這即是說，我們見到顧問公司"吃兩家茶禮"，做了一些違反公眾利益的事情，但政府卻仍然與它簽訂合約，房屋署不訂定，委員會不給簽訂，便由另一個部門與它簽訂好了。
In other words we observed that a consultancy got the best of both worlds and committed violations of public interest but the Government still signed a contract with it―if the Housing Department did not sign it and neither did the committee then another department would do so
其實大家也知道前任發展局局長也是顧問公司出身的，但當然不是這一間，不過，大家"行頭行尾"，在狹小的香港裏，主要的工程也是由這數間不是A字頭便是M字頭的工程顧問公司包攬。
However in this small territory of Hong Kong within the same trade major projects are undertaken by a few works consultants with names either beginning with A or M
很多時候，政府會做一些很過分的事情，例如在進行一些"大白象"工程或市民不想看到的工程時，它便會找這數間工程顧問公司協助進行前期研究。
Often the Government will go so out of the line to for example engage these few works consultants to assist the preliminary studies of some white elephant projects or projects not wanted by the public
大家可能以為，做前期研究便只是前期研究，與之後的工程無關，原來不是的，轉過頭來，那份最大的合約、那塊肥豬肉也是會給它們的。
People may think that preliminary studies only concern the preliminary stages and are not related to the works to be conducted subsequently . It is not true . Shortly afterwards the biggest contract―the big piece of fat pork―is reserved for them
誰也知道，在重重疊疊的利益關係下，當然是老闆想要甚麼，它們便寫甚麼，明知老闆想進行"大白象"工程，當然便會寫得貼貼服服，指這項"大白象"工程是最好的，所有的評估也表示不會有問題；交通不會有問題、環境也不會有問題，全部也通過，當然它們所得的回報也會很大。
Everyone knows in the relationship with overlapping interests they will of course write the report in accordance with whatever the boss wants . Knowing full well that the boss wants to carry out white elephant projects they of course will gladly be obliged to point out that the white elephant project is the best and all assessments will be fine the traffic assessment will be fine the environmental impact assessment will be fine―all of them will pass . They will certainly earn rich rewards
我們要獲取證據和文件的唯一目的，便是要把當中涉及的內容公諸於世，使政府在將來須決定一些明顯有利益衝突的合約時，會有合理和合乎水平的契約和管制，最低限度確保類似這次橫洲和奧雅納的事件不會再發生。
The sole purpose of obtaining evidence and documents is to make the contents therein public so that the Government when determining contracts with an obvious conflict of interest in future will put in place reasonable and up to standard agreements and control to at least ensure that incidents similar to the one involving Wang Chau and Arup will not happen again
主席，我無法信服現時的機制已經能夠解決問題，更無法相信現行的所謂懲罰有用。
President I am not convinced that the existing mechanism can solve the problems . Nor can I believe in the effectiveness of the existing so - called punishment
可是，事件經過10個月後，到了2017年8月，發展局卻說沒有足夠理據支持局方採取其他行動。
Nonetheless 10 months had passed after the incident and in August 2017 the Development Bureau said there were insufficient justifications to take other actions
那麼，我們便很想看看，究竟在甚麼情況下，政府是不會作出檢控的？
Then we would want to know under what circumstances will the Government not bring prosecution?
其實，大家也知道政府本身有偏私，這種情況在前任政府的時期是相當明顯的。
Let us see who will fall first . As a matter of fact we all know that the Government practises favouritism fairly evidently in the last - term Government
我謹此陳辭，支持朱凱廸議員的議案。
With these remarks I support Mr CHU Hoi - dicks motion
代理主席，局長剛才指出朱凱廸議員議案的背景資料，我不再詳細介紹。
Deputy President with regard to Mr CHU Hoi - dicks motion the Secretary for Transport and Housing has just mentioned some background information so I will not give a lengthy introduction
作為發展地段之一的鳳池村，是原居民及非原居民的聚居地。
Fung Chi Tsuen one of the sites for development is inhabited by indigenous and non - indigenous residents
事有湊巧，原居民居住的南部不屬於收地範圍，而非原居民居住的北部則納入範圍，明顯予人"同村不同命"的感覺，出現了不平等對待。
It happened that the villages southern part inhabited by indigenous residents is not earmarked for land resumption but the northern part with non - indigenous residents is . This creates the impression that people in the same village have different fates as they are treated unequally
然而，局長發言時卻含糊其辭，未有清楚交代。
However the Secretary made ambiguous remarks in his speech and failed to give a clear account
政府表示，就橫洲房屋發展計劃成立由梁振英出任主席的跨部門工作小組，於2013年曾兩度與地區領袖"摸底"會面。
According to the Government an interdepartmental task force on the Wang Chau Housing Development Plan chaired by LEUNG Chun - ying met with local leaders twice in 2013 for soft lobbying
房屋署的文件指出，地區領袖普遍反對橫洲第2及3期發展，又指倘若政府不檢視棕地政策，第2及3期的發展將難以推行。
According to documents from the Housing Department these local leaders generally opposed Wang Chau Development Phases 2 and 3 and claimed that Phases 2 and 3 could hardly be implemented if the Government did not review its policy on brownfield sites
然而，其後不久，香港特別行政區行政長官辦公室作出回應，指梁振英從未與政府以外的人士就橫洲發展商討，但未排除官員曾向鄉事及地區人士"摸底"。
But shortly after the Office of the Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region responded stating that LEUNG Chun - ying had never discussed Wang Chau development with anyone other than government officials but did not rule out that government officials had engaged in soft lobbying with the rural and local representatives
這種做法予人前言不對後語之感，當局有否隱瞞一些事實？
This kind of practice gives people an impression that the Governments contradictory remarks intended to cover up certain facts
梁振英在記者會上承認出任橫洲及皇后山發展的跨部門工作小組主席，統籌橫洲及皇后山的土地發展。
LEUNG Chun - ying admitted at the press conference that he chaired an interdepartmental task force to coordinate land development at Wang Chau and Queens Hill Task Force
請政府作出解釋及交代。
I request an explanation from the Government
第二，為何一個普通公屋發展計劃，要由特首親自督導？
Second why would an ordinary public housing development project be personally steered by the Chief Executive?
當中存在甚麼關鍵性考慮，促使他作出如此關鍵性的決定？
What were the crucial factors for consideration that had prompted the Chief Executive to make such a crucial decision?
工作小組實際上是否想繞過由曾俊華當時主理土地供應的工作？
Did the Task Force actually intended to bypass the work on land supply being handled by John TSANG at that time?
此外，當有記者問及決策過程，梁振英慣常使用卸責伎倆，聲稱自己只負責高層次、方向性的決定，有關具體細節及細則的問題則交由時任財政司司長曾俊華轄下的督導委員會負責。
In addition when a reporter asked about the decision - making process LEUNG Chun - ying resorted to his usual tactic of shirking responsibility saying that he only made high - level and directional decisions while issues concerning specific and minor details were handled by the Steering Committee under the then Financial Secretary John TSANG
更吊詭的是，當時財政司司長辦公室的發言人在記者會當晚發表回應，指財政司司長是工作小組成員之一，但未曾出席工作小組會議；而督導委員會得悉地區人士對橫洲房屋發展計劃有不同意見，但沒有決定把橫洲房屋發展計劃以分期形式進行。
More intrigue still in the evening after the press conference was held a spokesperson for the Financial Secretarys Office made a response pointing out that the Financial Secretary though being a member of the Task Force had never attended its meetings and while the Steering Committee was aware of the different opinions of members of local communities regarding the Wang Chau Housing Development Plan it had not decided to develop the project in phases
一天之內，政府三大巨頭分別"割席"，互相推搪責任。
In a single day the top three government officials cut ties with one another as each of them tried to shirk responsibility
時任運輸及房屋局局長張炳良承認，房屋署曾4次與地區人士進行"摸底"會議，與會者包括：元朗區議會前主席、民建聯立法會議員梁志祥、屏山鄉鄉事委員會主席曾樹和及元朗區議員鄧慶業等5人。
Anthony CHEUNG the then Secretary for Transport and Housing admitted that Housing Department staff had held four soft lobbying sessions with local representatives and the five participants included LEUNG Che - cheung former chairman of the Yuen Long District Council and currently a Member belonging to the Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong; TSANG Shu - wo chairman of the Ping Shan Rural Committee; and TANG Hing - ip a member of the Yuen Long District Council
但是，由於他們一致反對興建17,000個單位，因此後來改為第1期先發展4,000個單位。
As they unanimously opposed to constructing 17 000 units the Government subsequently changed its plan to proceed with Phase 1 first and construct 4 000 units
一項涉及重大公眾利益的房屋工程，竟然因為數次非正式、非公開的"摸底"會議而被擱置，當中究竟發生甚麼事？
Surprisingly a housing project involving significant public interest had been shelved after a couple of informal closed - door soft lobbying sessions . What had actually happened?
政府至今仍然含糊其辭、拒絕交代，令人覺得這件事件匪夷所思。
Until now the Government still makes ambiguous remarks and refuses to explain the whole incident is thus incomprehensible
張炳良當時聲稱，這4次涉及重大公眾利益的關鍵"摸底"會議，全部沒有正式會議紀錄，亦沒有任何文字紀錄。
Anthony CHEUNG claimed at that time that there were no formal minutes of meeting or any written record of these four important soft lobbying sessions which involved significant public interest
雖然如此，政府表示，有關遊說會面的資料，是以職員內部電郵或工作文件中所匯報或提及的會面內容為基礎整理而成。
This notwithstanding the Government said that the information on the lobbying sessions was compiled based on the interview notes as reported or mentioned in the internal emails or work documents of staff
既然如此，政府至少備有會面的零碎文字紀錄資料；這跟張炳良"沒有任何文字紀錄"的說法，又是否吻合？
In that case the Government should at least have some piecemeal written records of the meetings . Is this consistent with Anthony CHEUNGs statement of not having any written record?
更重要的是，究竟這是否政府部門的處事常態？
More important still is this the usual practice of government departments?
政府聲稱"摸底"只是正常接觸，不代表勾結。
The Government claims that soft lobbying is a kind of normal contact and does not imply collusion
行政會議成員羅范椒芬亦表示，在 政策推行之前，以非正式會面聽取意見，是多年來行之有效的做法，不涉及任何檯底交易。
Fanny LAW a member of the Executive Council also pointed out that before rolling out a policy listening to views through informal meetings has been an effective practice for years and it does not involve any deals under the table
不過，在整個橫洲規劃的過程中，政府完全沒有與當地村民接觸，更加沒有諮詢公眾，只是找權勢人士進行非正式諮詢。
However throughout the planning process for Wang Chau development the Government has never contacted the local villagers nor consulted the public; it has only carried out informal consultation with those in power
政府以為向鄉委會主席"摸底"，便等同諮詢村民，以權貴的片面之詞，作為政策的方向。
The Government thought that soft lobbying a rural committee chairman was tantamount to consulting the villagers; it adopted the partial views of the bigwigs to set the policy direction
政府最後終於公開2014年年中完成的橫洲公共房屋發展及工業邨擴展規劃及工程研究報告。
Eventually the Government released the Report of the Planning and Engineering Study for the Public Housing Development and Yuen Long Industrial Estate Extension at Wang Chau which was completed in mid - 2014
這份長達3,000頁的報告，當中不少內容涉及財政費用等資料。
The Study Report 3 000 pages in length contains a lot of information involving financial costs
不過，財政費用、第三者資料、土地擁有權人士的資料，均被視為敏感而完全刪去或遮蓋。
However information on financial costs third party particulars land ownership were all considered as sensitive and were deleted or redacted
當中涉及99個持有元朗工業邨擴展範圍及橫洲公屋用地的業權人資料、當中實質佔有多少公頃面積的土地等內容，均未有詳細公開，公眾因而無法得知這些關鍵性資料。
Information on the particulars of 99 owners of land within the sites for Yuen Long Industrial Estate extension and public housing development at Wang Chau and the exact hectares of land actually held by these owners were not disclosed in detail thus the public could not get hold of these crucial data
此外，研究報告指棕地持有者對橫洲發展持反對態度，成為發展的重大阻力。
In addition the Study Report pointed out that the objection of owners of brownfield sites to the Wang Chau project posed a major obstacle to the development
另一個令人感到奇怪的問題是，2016年已有多間傳媒揭發，曾參與"摸底"會議、大力反對棕地發展的地區人士曾樹和，以超低呎價租用橫洲棕地內被霸佔的部分官地，經營面積約17公頃的停車場，估計他年賺8,000萬元。
Another puzzling issue is that in 2016 a number of the media exposed that TSANG Shu - wo a local stakeholder who had participated in the soft lobbying sessions and had strongly opposed the development of brownfield sites had rented at an extremely low price per square foot part of the illegally occupied Government land in a brownfield site at Wang Chau to run a car park covering an area of about 17 hectares . It is estimated that his profit amounts to 80 million per annum
代理主席，我絕對不會以"明日黃花"為由來反對這項議案。
Deputy President I oppose this motion but definitely not for the reason that the incident is a thing of the past
朱凱廸議員根據《基本法》第七十三條第五項及第七十三條第十項動議的第一項議案，我表示反對。
I oppose the first motion moved by Mr CHU Hoi - dick under Articles 735 and 7310 of the Basic Law . The reason for my opposition is very simple
反對的原因非常簡單，我們可以翻查立法會就橫洲公共房屋發展計劃發表的研究報告，其中附錄一載有整個橫洲發展過程的時序表。
Members can read the information note on the public housing development plan at Wang Chau prepared by the Legislative Council and check the chronology of the major events in Appendix I and then they will understand why I oppose this motion
他進入議會後，所做的第一件事是在發展事務委員會要求討論這件事，結果發展事務委員會便討論橫洲發展計劃。
After he entered the Council the first thing he did was to ask the Panel on Development to discuss this incident . Consequently the Panel on Development discussed the Wang Chau development project
正如局長剛才所說，政府在事情發生後，除了向地區人士進行諮詢外，在2014年的區議會也曾進行諮詢。
As the Secretary said a while ago after the incident the Government consulted the District Council in 2014 apart from consulting local representatives
在尚未解決交通問題前，便計劃在橫洲興建17,000多個公屋單位，預計會有5萬多人遷入。
Despite the fact that the transport problem remained unsolved the Government planned to build more than 17 000 public housing units at Wang Chau and expected that 50 000 people would move in
當時傳媒訪問我，我簡單直接地表示，希望政府先搞好交通配套才發展橫洲計劃，否則便應暫停。
During an interview with the media at that time I pointed out directly that the Government should first improve the supporting transport facilities before implementing the housing development plan at Wang Chau otherwise the plan should be suspended
這個策略能否成功？
Will this strategy work?
我認為要視乎政府的考慮。
I think it depends on the Governments consideration