Borrison/hk-legicost huggingface dataset:
陳志全議員剛才的發言多次提及我的發言，首先，他提到我提及他們是"以自己之矛攻自己之盾"，其實他誤解了，我是指郭家麒議員的發言經常提及現時的情況是無罪推定，法庭尚未作出判決。
Mr CHAN Chi - chuen repeatedly mentioned what I said in his speech . First he mentioned that I had said that they were using their own spear to attack their own shield . Actually he misunderstood me
主席，我認為，第二，他又提到我的發言純粹為了尊重立法會，這完全曲解了我的意思。
President second he said I rose to speak only to express that we needed to respect the Legislative Council . He completely distorted my meaning
如果議員繼續在座位上說話，會議將無法繼續進行。
If Members continue to do so the Council cannot proceed with its business
主席，我剛才聆聽郭家麒議員發言反對容海恩議員動議的議案，我認為他提出的所有理據，也適用於反對他們昨天支持譴責何君堯議員的議案。
President having just listened to Dr KWOK Ka - kis speech against Ms YUNG Hoi - yans motion I think that all the rationale he put forward also applies to the censure motion against Dr Junius HO which they supported yesterday
他們強調今天發生的所有事情，純粹因為政府做得不好。
They emphasized that everything happening today was merely due to the Governments poor performance
政府做得不好，是大家也已認同的，我們不想再浪費時間談論這些。
It is common consensus that the Government is not doing well . We do not want to waste any more time on such views
我們作為立法會議員，無論屬於哪個派別，內心也不應該有一刻不想與破壞立法會大樓的暴力行徑切割。
No matter which camp we belong to not for a single moment in our hearts should we as Legislative Council Members not want to sever ties with the acts of violence that devastated the Legislative Council Complex
因此，主席，我認為他們今天所提出反對容海恩議員動議譴責議案的理由，來來去去也是那些。
Therefore President in my view the reasons they put forward today against Ms YUNG Hoi - yans censure motion are mostly limited to repetitions
不過，由於他們昨天堅持要提出譴責 何君堯議員議案，所以我也必定要支持容海恩議員動議的這項議案，目的是告訴他們，他們是用自己的矛插向自己陣型的人。
However since they insisted yesterday on proposing a motion to censure Dr Junius HO I must also support Ms YUNG Hoi - yans motion in question with the aim of advising them that they are the ones who use their own spear to attack their own shield
是他要澄清才對，並非我要收回言論。
He is the one who has to clarify instead of asking me to withdraw my remarks
主席，我發言反對由胡志偉議員提出"不得就何君堯議員動議的譴責議案再採取任何行動"的議案。
President I speak to oppose the motion moved by Mr WU Chi - wai that no further action shall be taken on the censure motion moved by Dr Junius HO
其實，我剛才細心聆聽好幾位同事的發言。
In fact I have listened carefully to the speeches of several colleagues just now
我特別同意鄭松泰議員發言的開首部分，就是《議事規則》第49B條不是用來讓立法會內持不同政見的人，為了彼此間可能因發生各種事情而產生的不同意見或紛爭，進行一次又一次的調查。
I agree in particular with what Dr CHENG Chung - tai said in the beginning of his speech ie . Rule 49B of the Rules of Procedure RoP is not meant for people with different political views in this Council to carry out one investigation after another into matters that cause divergent opinions or disputes among Members
對於這一點我是同意的，因為要根據《議事規則》第49B條動議議案很易辦到，只需由1名議員提出、 3名議員和議，如果沒有議員反對，便可通過。
I concur with this point as it is very easy to move a motion under RoP 49B which requires one Member to propose and three Members to second . The motion would be considered passed should there be no objection from Members
根據2009年12月9日本會的投票紀錄我曾參與討論，因此很記得民主黨投了棄權票。
According to the voting results recorded at the Council meeting on 9 December 2009―I remember very clearly as I had participated in the discussion―the Democratic Party had abstained from voting
因為當時民主黨對相關事件持開放態度，同意進行調查。
This was because the Democratic Party adopted an open attitude towards the relevant incident and agreed to conduct an investigation
陸頌雄議員說得對，對於顛倒事實及雙重標準，我們不夠反對派厲害。
Mr LUK Chung - hung was right in saying that we were not as good as the opposition camp in confounding right and wrong and applying double standard
如果反對派要求調查，現在便有兩項事情須予調查，其一是何君堯議員與白衣人握手，另一是林卓廷議員在車站內說粗話。
If the opposition party demands an investigation there are now two things that need to be investigated . One is about Dr Junius HO shaking hands with the white - clad men and the other is about Mr LAM Cheuk - ting speaking foul languages in the MTR station
其實，兩位有關的議員均經由民選產生，因此我們必須尊重市民的選擇。
As a matter of fact the two Members concerned are elected by the people we should therefore respect the choice of the people
本着此心，我們如果有機會加入調查委員會，應盡責行事。
With this in mind if we have the opportunity to join the Investigation Committee we should act with due diligence
無論他們有沒有做過甚麼，我們都把事實及公正的結論交給社會，為我們的立法會取回公信力。
Regardless of whether they had done anything we should present the facts and a fair conclusion to society to help regain the credibility of our Legislative Council
何議員議案第一段指出，林卓廷議員在西環參與名為"光復西環"的非法集會，但林議員當時並不在現場。
The first paragraph of Dr HOs motion states that Mr LAM Cheuk - ting participated in an unlawful assembly known as Liberate Sai Wan in Sai Wan but the fact is that Mr LAM was not on the scene at that time
第二，這項譴責議案如果獲得通過，調查委員會得以成立，會增加秘書處的工作壓力，也涉及公帑的開支。
Second if this censure motion is passed and an investigation committee is established the workload of the Secretariat will be increased and public expenditure will be incurred
如果立法會通過一項譴責議案，而譴責議案的內容歪曲事實、顛倒是非、指鹿為馬，是否表示立法會同事作出判斷時，已喪失分辨是非黑白的能力？
If the Legislative Council passed a censure motion that distorts the facts confuses right and wrong and calls a stag a horse does it mean that Legislative Council Members have lost their ability to tell right from wrong when making their judgments?
所以，我提出這項議案，建議不得就何君堯議員的譴責議案採取進一步行動。
For this reason I move this motion that no further action be taken on the censure motion moved by Dr HO
這會成為立法會非常不好的案例。
This will become a very bad precedent for the Legislative Council
我們要有能力判斷議案的內容是否事實的陳述。
We should be capable of passing judgment on whether a motion states the facts
對於何君堯議員的議案，大家應該從數個角度考慮。
Regarding Dr Junius HOs motion Members should consider it from several perspectives
就"七二一"事件，公眾理解到，當時白衣人早已聲稱，為了保家衞族而要展開反擊。
Regarding the 21 July incident members of the public have learnt that the white - clad people had claimed earlier that they would launch counter - attacks to defend their homes and clans
警方甚至與白衣人握手，即使看到白衣人手握武器，他們亦視而不見。
Some officers even shook hands with the white - clad people and they even turned a blind eye to the weapons carried by the white - clad people
這便是根本的問題。
This is the crux of the problem
第二，如果我們不理事實，然後繼續辯論，最終同意繼續展開譴責林卓廷議員，這舉動不但欠缺事實基礎，亦會浪費公帑。
Second if we disregard the facts continue to engage in the debate and ultimately agree to censure Mr LAM Cheuk - ting we will be taking a move that not only lacks factual foundation but also wastes public money
事實無可迴避的時候，結論亦十分清楚，便是不可能基於林卓廷議員在7月21日的行為，強行將一名履行職責的議員，一名當時保護站內市民免受白衣人攻擊的受害者變成被告。
When avoidance of the facts are not possible the conclusion is very clear that is we cannot based on the behaviour of Mr LAM Cheuk - ting on 21 July forcibly turn a Member performing his duties to protect people inside the station from attacks by the white - clad people from a victim to a defendant
更重要的是，何議員的議案指控林卓廷議員在西環參與"光復西環"的非法集會，但林議員當時不在現場。
More importantly Dr HOs motion accuses Mr LAM Cheuk - ting of participating in an unlawful assembly known as Liberate Sai Wan in Sai Wan but the fact is that Mr LAM was not on the scene at that time
我謹此陳辭，請各位支持我提出的議案。
With such remarks I urge Members to support my motion
在我提出待決議題之前，我想提醒各位，根據《議事規則》第49B條，胡志偉議員的議案如獲得通過，本會便不得就該項譴 責議案再採取任何行動。
Before I put the question to you I would like to remind Members that in accordance with Rule 49B2A of the Rules of Procedure if Mr WU Chi - wais motion is passed the Council shall take no further action on the censure motion
如胡志偉議員的議案被否決，譴責議案所述的事宜須交付調查委員會處理。
If Mr WU Chi - wais motion is negatived the matter stated in the censure motion should be referred to an investigation committee
"七二一"元朗恐襲案，是大量白衣人在港鐵元朗站及元朗街頭無差別攻擊途人所致。
In the 21 July Yuen Long terrorist attack large numbers of white - clad gangsters perpetrated an indiscriminate attack on civilians at Yuen Long MTR Station and the streets of Yuen Long
他亦向涉嫌發動是次襲擊的人士豎起拇指，以示支持及鼓勵其暴力行徑，並說出'支持你'及'你們是我的英雄'等支持和鼓勵的說話。
He had also given a thumbs up to those people suspected of launching the assault to show his support and encouragement for their violent acts and made such supportive and encouraging remarks as I support you and You are my heroes
" 現時，元兇仍然逍遙法外，警察對襲擊市民的案件放軟手腳，竟然是涉嫌發動襲擊市民的黑手譴責想保護市民的人。
At present the assailants are still at large and the Police have been slack on this case of assault on civilians . It is hard to believe that the suspected mastermind of this attack on civilians can censure the person who protected people
"七二一"元朗恐襲案為何會發生呢？
What was the cause of the 21 July Yuen Long terrorist attack?
市民為何會被毒打呢？
Why were civilians beaten up?
如果沒有白衣人，沒有警察視而不見，沒有嫌疑元兇何君堯議員，恐襲案便不會發生。
Without those white - clad gangsters without the Police which turned a blind eye to it and without this suspected culprit called Dr Junius HO this terrorist attack would not have taken place
單看議案措辭，又或一如陳百祥般，抱着對市民被打"是我看不到"、對何君堯議員和白衣人的關係"是我不知道"的態度，那麼大家或會以為林卓廷議員是"七二一"慘案的主催者。
If people look at his motion wording alone if people look at the assault on civilians with Natalis CHANs mindset of I cannot see anything and I do not know the relationship between Dr Junius HO and the white - clad gangsters then they may really think that Mr LAM Cheuk - ting is the culprit of the 21 July tragedy
何君堯議員在這項議案的造假能力與趙高可謂不相伯仲，與淘寶的假貨可以相提並論。
This motion shows that the ability of Dr Junius HO to make things up is honestly on par with that of ZHAO Gao and its contents are comparable to those counterfeits on Taobao
無怪乎中國政法大學要頒發榮譽博士學位予何君堯議員，以一個"中國製造"的博士銜頭加以表揚。
No wonder the China University of Political Science and Law had to award a honourary doctorate degree to Dr Junius HO and commend him with a Made in China doctorate title
為何我會覺得何君堯議員的議案製造曼德拉效應呢？
Why do I think that Dr Junius HOs motion seeks to create a Mandela effect?
因為議案試圖重塑群眾記憶，將沒有的說成是有，將不存在的事實變成群眾記憶的一部分。
It is because his motion attempts to reshape peoples memory by mentioning something that did not happen as real and inculcating non - existent events into peoples memory
何議員議案的第一點已經與事實不符，但何議員卻經常有意說成真有其事。
Point one in Dr HOs motion is already in contradiction with the facts . But more often than not Dr HO has deliberately talked about it as real
其實，林卓廷議員當晚根本沒有參加"光復西環"的集會，亦不曾在西環出現。
Actually Mr LAM Cheuk - ting was not a participant of the Liberate Sai Wan rally that evening and he was never present in Sai Wan
既然如此，他又如何做到議案所述的挑戰"一國兩制"及違反《基本法》呢？
In that case how could he possibly challenge one country two systems and violate the Basic Law as stated in the motion?
議案所述的第二及三點亦屬無稽之談。
Points two and three in the motion are likewise untrue
當中的指控是將林卓廷議員描述為挑起"七二一"恐襲的禍首。
The allegations therein portray Mr LAM Cheuk - ting as the culprit of the 21 July terrorist attack
更恐怖的是，何君堯議員指是林卓廷議員帶領黑衣人、黑衣暴徒於元朗站襲擊白衣居民，將"七二一"的事實完全反轉。
What is more dreadful is Dr Junius HOs accusation that Mr LAM Cheuk - ting was the leader of those black - clad people or black - clad rioters in their attack on white - clad residents at Yuen Long Station
早於元朗恐襲前數天，網上已有大量信息流傳元朗的鄉民會聚集，不會放過在7月21日當天進入元朗的示威人士。
He has completely defied the facts of the 21 July incident . As early as several days before the Yuen Long terrorist attack lots of rumours were already circulated online alleging that Yuen Long villagers and residents would get together and they would not let go of those protesters who came to Yuen Long on the very day of 21 July
如果市民曾收看有線電視、Now TV，以至林卓廷議員的Facebook直播，便會知道早於當日晚上9時49分，元朗站外已有市民遇襲，及至晚上10時40分便開始有白衣人闖入商場追打市民。
Anyone who has viewed the Facebook live stream footages of i - Cable Now TV and also Mr LAM Cheuk - ting will know that a number of people were already assaulted outside Yuen Long Station as early as 9col49 pm that day and white - clad gangsters forced their way into a shopping mall at 10col40 pm and began to chase after people and beat them up
此外，電視片段亦顯示，大量白衣人在元朗站大堂的行人電梯見人就打，而他們衝入車廂毆打市民的鏡頭更是歷歷在目。
Besides as also captured by television footages large numbers of white - clad gangsters battered whoever came into their sight at the escalators in the Yuen Long Station concourse and the scene of their intrusion into train compartments and subsequent assaults on the passengers on board has even remained vivid in peoples mind
附表所記錄的白衣人行為簡直可以用"白衣觀音"來形容，他們不止面慈，而且手善，如果不留意整件事的始末，反而會認為白衣人是拯救市民於水深火熱之中的"救世主"。
Those white - clad gangsters as recorded in the Schedule can simply be likened to the Chinese Goddess of Mercy in a white gown in the sense that not only did they look compassionate but their deeds were also merciful . If people are not aware of the events of the whole incident they may instead regard those white - clad people as saviours who came to the rescue of those in dire danger
從Now TV及有線電視等有公信力的電視台所播放的直播畫面可見，白衣人將市民打得"口腫面腫"、血流處處，甚至有市民在車廂內央求白衣人停手，但仍然被拳打腳踢。
From the live footages captured by those television broadcasters of credibility such as Now TV and i - Cable we can notice that those white - clad gangsters beat up people aggressively and inflicted multiple bleeding injuries on them . Some passengers on board the train begged those white - clad gangsters to stop their attack but they nonetheless ended up receiving punches and kicks all the same
當白衣人無差別襲擊市民時，警方是完全隱形的。
Throughout this indiscriminate attack perpetrated by white - clad gangsters on civilians the Police remained completely invisible
既然何議員的議案企圖虛構林卓廷議員帶隊進入元朗，所以白衣人才會起來保衞家園的假象，那麼議會絕對沒有理由支持一項沒有事實根據的議案，藉此對林卓廷議員作出政治攻擊。
Dr HOs motion attempts to conjure up the illusion that Mr LAM Cheuk - ting was the one who led a group of people to Yuen Long and that was why those white - clad people came forward to defend their homes . That being the case this Council absolutely has no reason to support this motion as it is stripped of any factual basis and intended to discredit Mr LAM Cheuk - ting politically
因此，我謹此提出議案，動議"不得就何君堯議員動議的譴責議案再採取任何行動"。
For this reason I hereby propose a motion and move that no further action shall be taken on the censure motion moved by Dr Junius HO
我想確認一點，我們現在在議會內，非議會用語只是不可以說，但可以寫，對嗎？
I wish to seek confirmation of one point . Now in the Council is it that we are only forbidden to utter unparliamentary words but we can write them right?
因為這個"F字"肯定是非議會用語，你現在的裁決等於不可以說但可以寫，這是絕對有影響的，例如過去的甚麼"臭甚麼出臭草"，那些全部我往後都不說，但我寫出來，你也要接納。
As this F - word is certainly an unparliamentary word your current ruling is tantamount to forbidding it to be uttered but allowing it to be written which definitely has repercussions . Take for example something like foul grass grows out of a foul thingy said in the past . In future if I refrain from saying all those words but write them out then you will have no choice but to accept them
何君堯議員的指控是非常嚴重的。
The allegations made by Dr Junius HO are very serious
他指控林卓廷議員行為不檢，單是議案的第一句，已經令我摸不着頭腦，林議員如何行為不檢？
He accuses Mr LAM Cheuk - ting of misbehaviour . Just the first sentence of the motion alone is perplexing
主席，我先說議案詳情的第一點。
President let me start with the first point of the details of the motion
何君堯議員指"2019年7月21日傍晚，林卓廷議員直接或間接地涉及或參與由一批暴徒組織的名為'光復西環'的非法集會"。
Dr Junius HO stated that In the evening of 21 July 2019 Mr LAM Cheuk - ting directly or indirectly involved or participated in an unlawful assembly known as Liberate Sai Wan organized by mob
究竟林卓廷議員當晚有沒有去過中西區？
After all did Mr LAM Cheuk - ting go to the Central and Western District that night?
有甚麼證據顯示他直接或間接地涉及或參與何議員所說的"光復西環"的非法集會？
Is there any evidence to show that Mr LAM Cheuk - ting has directly or indirectly involved or participated in what Dr HO called the Liberate Sai Wan unlawful assembly?
回顧以往的案例，例如某議員倒插國旗或其他行為，大家對事情有否發生並無爭議，只是對應否那樣做有不同看法。
Looking back at past cases such as a Member inverting the national flag or taking other actions no one would dispute whether the act had taken place we only had different views towards the action itself
如果提出一些並非基於事實的指控，就是很惡毒的誣衊。
Making allegations without factual basis is vicious slander
他這個動機已經錯誤，他沒有任何證據而提出"直接或間接地涉及"的指控，用自己想象出來的事去誣衊一位議員，本身已是非常不公道。
His motive is bad . He has no proof to support his allegation of directly or indirectly involved using his own imagination to slander a Legislative Council Member . This is extremely unjust by nature
所以，當我聽到多位建制派議員竟然支持何君堯議員，我便明白為何民建聯和工聯會在今次區議會選舉一敗塗地，新民黨亦然，原因是他們所做的事根本顛倒黑白是非。
Therefore when I learnt that many Legislative Council Members of the pro - establishment camp turned out to support Dr Junius HO I understood why the Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong DAB and the Federation of Trade Unions FTU suffered crushing defeat in this District Council Election as did the New Peoples Party . It is because what they are doing is actually confounding right and wrong
現時公眾最質疑的，就是何君堯議員的所作所為。
The public is now most skeptical of what Dr Junius HO has done
《基本法》第一百零四條是有關擁護《基本法》，效忠香港特別行政區。
Article 104 of the Basic Law is about upholding the Basic Law and pledging allegiance to the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region SAR
我看不到我的同僚如何違反《基本法》，如何不效忠香港特別行政區？
I fail to see how my colleague has violated the Basic Law and how he has failed to be loyal to the Hong Kong SAR
只有一些傻的議員才會站在他那邊支持他，而他們亦不會有好下場，因為公眾的眼睛非常雪亮。
Only silly Members would stand by his side to support him and they will not end well because the public have discerning eyes
他說我是立法會議員，問我可否致電報警。
He asked me being a Legislative Council Member to call the Police
當時我對他說，如果他已經報警，我相信警察會處理。
At that time I told him if he had called the Police I believed the Police would deal with the situation
主席，多謝你的提示。
President thank you for your reminder
我知道，你不要干擾我，我很快就會說完。
I know . Please do not interrupt me . I will finish soon
我當然支持胡志偉議員的議案。
Of course I support the motion of Mr WU Chi - wai
我剛才已經批評何君堯議員的指控沒有事實根據，並且顛倒黑白是非，不知所謂。
Just now I criticized that Dr Junius HOs allegations are unfounded; it confounds right and wrong and is totally nonsensical
當時我覺得他十分勇敢，因為我也感到害怕。
I thought he was very brave because I was kind of scared
市民做錯了甚麼？
What had the public done wrong?
元朗區新界西的議員在哪裏？
Where were the District Council members of Yuen Long and New Territories West?
他在該區有眾多鄉親父老，他不趕往現場，反而新界東的林卓廷議員前往了解市民遭遇甚麼災禍。
Though he has the support of many village elders in Yuen Long he did not rush to the scene . It was Mr LAM Cheuk - ting of New Territories East who was present at the scene to see what hazards the public was facing
事件就發生在"七二一"之前，而襲擊林卓廷議員和元朗站內市民的，就是白衣人。
This incident happened before the 21 July incident and white - clad people were the ones who assaulted Mr LAM Cheuk - ting and the public inside Yuen Long Station
何議員是否膽敢在上帝面前發誓，他沒有勾結這群白衣人襲擊香港人？
Does Dr HO dare to swear before God that he had not colluded with this group of white - clad people to attack Hong Kong people?
如果何議員還有一點良心，請自問做了甚麼錯事、壞事，招惹白衣人襲擊香港市民。
If Dr HO still has a little conscience please ask yourself what improper and bad things you have done to provoke white - clad people to attack Hongkongers
所有當天在現場被打的市民，也一定選擇站在林卓廷議員那一方，他們全都是受害者。
All those who were assaulted at the scene would definitely stand on the side of Mr LAM Cheuk - ting . All of them had been victimized
主席，如果我們容許如此極不公義的議案，竟然可以在立法會進行調查，我相信立法會便不得不被改稱為"垃圾會"。
That is really ridiculous . President if we allow such an extremely unjust motion to be investigated in the Legislative Council I believe the Legislative Council will have to be renamed as the Garbage Council . Well what goes around comes around
然而，所有的事情也會有報應，第一次的報應已經發生在區議會選舉結果上。
The outcome of the District Council Election has exemplified the first retribution
如果保皇黨不自我檢討，繼續包庇、縱容黑社會和白衣人，勾結警方一起對付小市民，報應將會繼續再發生。
If the pro - Government camp does not review themselves; if it continues to harbour and condone triads and white - clad people and colludes with the Police to act against the ordinary citizens retribution will continue to come
因此，我希望議會的同事用良心投下一票，支持胡志偉議員的議案。
Therefore I hope that colleagues in this Council will vote with conscience in support of Mr WU Chi - wais motion
在張超雄議員早前提出同樣質疑時，我已作出解釋，或許黃碧雲議員沒有聽到。
When Dr Fernando CHEUNG raised the same question earlier I had already given my explanation . Perhaps Dr Helena WONG has not heard it
我發言反對陳志全議員動議的議案，不就我所動議的譴責議案再採取任何行動。
I speak in opposition to the motion moved by Mr CHAN Chi - chuen that no further action shall be taken on the censure motion moved by me
我亦聽到不同議員的發言，關乎我的議案內有關鄭松泰議員行為不檢的措辭。
I have heard what different Members said about the wording of censuring Dr CHENG Chung - tai for misbehaviour in my motion
其實，我的議案或措辭是非常直接及清晰的，便是直接指出鄭松泰議員的行為不檢，所以我要動議這項譴責議案。
In fact my motion or its wording is very direct and clear . It directly points out Dr CHENG Chung - tais misbehaviour and because of this I have to move this censure motion
我現在解釋何謂行為不檢？
I now explain what is meant by misbehaviour
當然，如果泛民議員或反對派議員認為他沒有行為不檢，大可透過調查來證實他沒有行為不檢。
Of course if Members from the pan - democratic camp or opposition camp think that he has not misbehaved we can have his misbehaviour or otherwise verified through an investigation
如果他沒有看過直播，他又怎可以用事實的陳述來作反駁理據呢？
If he has not watched the video clips of Dr CHENGs live streams how can he make a counter argument with factual statements?
而不是像郭家麒議員，批評或針對我或其他議員的專業操守，或說因為我是律師，根本就不知道這些是否未審先判等。
That will be unlike Dr KWOK Ka - ki who merely criticized or picked on me or other Members about our professional ethics or said that I am a lawyer but I basically do not know whether we are making a judgment before trial
現在是泛民或反對派議員說不需要進行任何調查，不需要成立任何調查委員會，便說他沒有犯事，他沒有行為不檢，而只是很小事。
At present it is the Members from the pan - democratic camp or the opposition camp who say that it is unnecessary to conduct any investigation or to set up any investigation committee . They simply say that he has not violated the law and has not misbehaved and that it was only a very minor case
我現在就是在說明7月1日動亂的源頭，就是說鄭松泰議員的行為不檢。
I am now explaining the origin of the turmoil on 1 July and which was Dr CHENG Chung - tais misbehaviour
所以，請反對派議員如果針對其他議員所作的陳述，便真的要針對事實陳述，不要誣衊及"生安白造"。
Therefore when Members from the opposition camp are making comments on other Members they really have to make comments with factual basis instead of vilifying or slandering
我們只是希望針對鄭松泰議員今次的行為不檢，基於7月1日立法會被破壞一事，討論一位議員應該負上甚麼責任的問題。
In respect of Dr CHENG Chung - tais misbehaviour and the havoc wrought on the Legislative Council Complex on 1 July we only wish to discuss what responsibility a certain Member should take
不過，我亦正是擔心他的做法會否令人有這種感覺，我很希望他不是有這樣的意思。
However I am worried that what he did would give people such an impression and I wish that this was not what he meant
這也正正是我現在提出這項議案的原因，就是希望嘗試從鄭松泰議員今次的行為不檢，了解究竟他的行徑是否成為對議會施行暴力的源頭？究竟是否有議員默許衝擊立法會的行為？究竟他的行徑是否等同支持示威者，壯大了他們的膽子，讓他們有膽量去衝擊立法會？
This is exactly my reason for moving this motion as I wish to understand from Dr CHENG Chung - tais misbehaviour in the present incident whether his behaviour was the source of violence to the Legislative Council whether the Member was giving tacit consent to the acts of storming the Legislative Council Complex and whether his behaviour was tantamount to supporting and emboldening the protesters so that they had the nerve to storm the Complex
立法會一直都是法治其中一個根基，我們是否可以容許他人這樣做，而致令香港立法會蒙羞？
All along the Legislative Council has been one of the bases for the rule of law . Can we allow such behaviours of a person to put the Legislative Council of Hong Kong to shame?
香港市民是否接受這樣的暴力、有這樣的議員默許他人衝擊立法會，或牽頭令立法會內充斥暴力？
Do Hong Kong people accept this kind of violence or accept such a Member who has given tacit consent to other people to storm the Legislative Council Complex or has taken the lead to fill the Complex with violence?
當然，陳志全議員一開始便針對紅色警示，問它究竟代表甚麼？
Of course Mr CHAN Chi - chuen queried about the Red alert at the beginning of the debate and asked what it represented
我向他解釋，紅色警示即表示在立法會大樓內的人士必須立即撤離，這就是要先撤離的警示。
I have explained to him that when the Red alert is issued all people should leave the Legislative Council Complex immediately . It is a warning telling us that first of all we have to leave the building
鄭若驊過去幾個月的表現的確引起公眾懷疑，她除了在任內未經申報提供仲裁服務，還可能在未經申報的情況下，為其他持份者提供服務，致使她犯了這麼多嚴重錯判，甚至導致她率領的團隊推出極度差劣的"送中條例"，激起全港多次百萬人上街遊行反對。
Teresa CHENGs performance in the past few months did arouse public suspicions . In addition to providing arbitration services during her tenure without making declaration she might have provided services to other stakeholders without declaring interest . As a result she has made many serious misjudgments and even pushed her team to introduce the highly despicable China extradition bill thereby provoking millions of Hong Kong people to take to the streets for many times
在過去半年，鄭若驊在"反送中"運動中失去蹤影，以及她急於引用《緊急情況規例條例》推出《禁止蒙面規例》。
In the past six months Teresa CHENG disappeared in the Anti - extradition to China movement and she hastily introduced the Prohibition on Face Covering Regulation by invoking the Emergency Regulations Ordinance