Borrison/hk-legicost huggingface dataset:
但是，我不想只針對購買電動車的問題，因為環境局對於推動電動車的使用不止是在稅務上有決定權——雖然這需要與運輸及房屋局討論，但主導角色其實是環境局。
But I do not intend to limit my discussion to the purchase of EVs because the job of the Secretary for the Environment in promoting EVs is more than making just a taxation decision . And I must say that although the Housing and Transport Bureau also has a role to play the policy of promoting EVs is mainly guided by the Environment Bureau
然而，大家反而會看見推動這項政策時的失誤，例如在停車場供應充電裝置方面，事實上充滿問題。
So Members should also look at his other mistakes in his promotion of the policy . The provision of charging facilities in car parks for example is actually marked by many problems
早前已有傳媒報道，有發展商利用提供充電裝置的停車位而無須補地價興建停車場。
As reported by the media earlier some developers who provide parking spaces with charging facilities in the car parks they build are granted land premium exemption for the car parks
所以，正如我剛才所說，主席，環境局局長負責推行這項政策，而執行的可能是發展局。
As I have said Chairman the Secretary for the Environment is responsible for formulating the policy and the Development Bureau is responsible for execution
當然，財政司司長亦可能要負責，為甚麼呢？
Of course I must add that the Financial Secretary also has a role here
因為有一個我不太記得全名，是關於推動使用電動車輛督導委員會，政府於數年前成立了這麼一個組織，該委員會的主席便是財政司司長。
Why? . That is because the Government set up a certain steering committee on promoting the use of EVs some years ago . I cannot quite remember its full name and the Financial Secretary is its chairman
但是，環境局局長絕對應該檢討我剛才所說的事情，不要讓人濫用這個制度。
Anyway the Secretary for the Environment must have a look at the points I have mentioned so as to prevent any abuses of the land premium exemption
我再延伸說說，我們現在說的電動車問題，為何應該由環境局局長主導呢？
Let me carry my point a bit further . Why do we say that the Secretary for the Environment should lead the promotion of EVs?
主席，我開場發言時也提過，雖然推動電動車普及化背後，運輸及房屋局當然有角色，但主導的政策局其實仍然是環境局。
Chairman as I said at the beginning of my speech although the Transport and Housing Bureau also has a role in promoting the popularization of EVs the policy is mainly guided by the Environment Bureau . As we can see the Government set down two objectives for the popularization of EVs some years ago
我們看見的情況是，政府當年為電動車普及化訂下兩個目標，一是希望到2020年，會有三成私家車屬於電動車或混合動力車；二是新落成的建築物有30%的私家車泊車位可提供充電設施，這便是剛才說的政策。
First by the year 2020 30 % of the private cars should be EVs or hybrid vehicles . Second 30 % of the private car parking spaces in newly constructed buildings should provide charging facilities . This is the policy I have been referring to
但是，截至2018年1月，在全港55萬輛私家車中只有1萬輛是電動車，即是佔總數少於2%，即是大幅落後於目標，我也不知如何在2020年達標。
But as at January 2018 only 10 000 of the 550 000 private cars were EVs . This is 2 % of the total meaning that we are falling behind the target . I really do not know how we can attain the target in 2020
其中一項質詢的答覆是這樣的，"現今電動私家車的續航力最少約150公里，以私家車每天的行車里數一般為數十公里，如車主在其居所或辦公地方等場地為其車輛完全充電，應足以應付每天行程，一般不應有太大需要使用公共充電器作補充充電"，那即是說，現時的續航力已經十分充足，所以無須興建那麼多設有充電器的停車位，只要居所有充電設施便可以。
As such an electric private car should be able to sustain a whole days journey after a full charging at its owners home or workplace . The need for electric private cars to top up their batteries by public chargers should be minimal . This means that the existing driving range is already enough and as long as there are sufficient charging facilities in peoples home car parks there is no need to provide so many parking spaces with charging facilities
當局長被問及為何數量只有這麼少時，他回答表示，"電動車輛在政府車隊中所佔比例仍是少數，主要是電池的性能未如理想，包括充電達不到限定用量值及續航距離較短"。
When asked why the number was so small he replied The percentage of EVs in the Government fleet is still low mainly because of the unsatisfactory battery performance including the failure to charge to the rated capacity and the short driving range after charging . Chairman what a reply!
主席，真厲害，對同一項事實的陳述，同一位局長回答兩項不同的質詢時，一方面可以說續航力十分足夠，所以無須興建那麼多充電器，無須要那麼多地方充電；但同一個事實，當被問及為何政府部門中，只有這麼少電動車，他便說因為電動車的續航力不佳。
The same Secretary when talking about the same subject matter in two different written questions could give such different views . In one reply he said that the driving range was sufficient so there was no need to have so many chargers and charging facilities . But when asked why the number of EVs in the government vehicle fleet was so small he said that the driving range of EVs was not good enough
主席，當局長如此回答我們的書面質詢，白紙黑紙這樣寫出來，削減他1個月的薪酬，我認為是應該的，對嗎？
Seeing such black - and - white replies from the Secretary we should really deduct one months salary for him right?
雖說推出"一換一"，已經可以扣稅25萬元，但實情是怎樣的呢？
It is said that it can bring a tax reduction of 250,000 . But is this really true?
運輸署曾經表示，大約有30萬輛車符合資格，但實質上、事實上是否真的有30萬輛汽車呢？
According to the Transport Department about 300 000 vehicles will be eligible . But is this really true in reality?
現時購買一輛電動車，車主本身已經享有97,500元的基本稅 款優惠，"一換一"其實增加了多少呢？
At present anyone who buys an electric vehicle will already be eligible for a basic FRT exemption of up to 975,000 . How much additional exemption can the one - for - one replacement scheme really bring then? . Roughly 150,000
我自然會把車輛"劏"掉，賺取這額外的15萬元多稅項。
In that case I will naturally scrap my old vehicle so as to benefit from the tax exemption of 150,000
所以，第一，是政府錯誤評估究竟有多少車輛符合資格，這個只是帳面上的數字，有些車輛在6年之後，隨時還值三四十萬元，這些車多的是。
Therefore in the very first place the Governments estimation of the number of eligible vehicles is wrong . Its figure is just a simplistic one . Some vehicles are still worth 300,000 or 400,000 six years after purchase
因此，政府錯誤評估有多少人會這樣做，純粹用6年以上來劃線，是不合理的。
There are many such vehicles . The Government has wrongly estimated the number of people who will participate in the scheme . Drawing the line at six years is unreasonable
如果容許車主一時忘記續領車牌，第一，無須要訂得那麼闊，容許24個月之中，有4個月可以沒有行車證，政府可以縮短一些，我亦不會反對的，但我反對些甚麼呢？
I think for this purpose there is actually no need to make it so lenient as to allow for four months of no licence discs within a period of 24 months . The Government may make the period shorter and I will have no objection . But what is it that I oppose then?
如果是這樣，其實只要訂明在24個月之內，無須連續但合共要有20個月領有牌照，甚至訂闊一些也不打緊，23個月領有牌照也沒有問題，但不一定要連續，因為連續這件事有機會"斷纜"，是有機會出現的。
So it is actually better to specify that the vehicle to be scrapped must be licensed for 20 months with or without interruption within 24 months . And it is okay to make it 23 months . But the main thing is to do away with the without any interruption condition
所以，我認為環境局就着電動車的問題，推出有關政策時，有很多地方思考不周，而且推行時有很多盲點。
This is because without interruption may create time gaps that deprive car owners of eligibility . I therefore maintain that the policies on EVs rolled out by the Environment Bureau are not well - thought - out in many ways and there is too much confusion in the course of implementation
主席，過去20多年來，我一直爭取讓投訴警察課獨立於警隊以外，當中的道理其實很簡單。
Chairman over the past 20 odd years I have always been fighting for the independence of CAPO from the Police Force and the reasons behind are actually very simple
"自己人查自己人"的質疑始終揮之不去，這可從多個角度作出闡述。
The problem of peer investigation lingers and this can be elaborated from various different perspectives
首先，政府表示有些地方的警隊亦是由警隊人員調查涉及警隊的投訴個案，我只能說有些地方的警隊規模確實龐大。
First of all the Government argues that some overseas police forces have also adopted the practice of investigating complaints against police officers by their peers in the forces and in this connection I can only say that some overseas places do have a very large police force
所以，同樣是由警隊人員調查警務人員，亦即由熟悉警隊的人調查警務人員濫權個案，但基於有關人員分別屬於完全不同的組織，所以能完全發揮作用，讓人有信心會作出獨立公正的調查。
Therefore although the same practice of investigating police officers by their peers is adopted and cases of alleged abuse of police power are investigated by people familiar with the work of the Police this can still safeguard the effectiveness of the investigation work and instill public confidence in the independence and impartiality of the investigations conducted given that the officers concerned are from completely different entities
我只能說，如有警隊人員認為一定要"自己人查自己人"才能安心，銀幣的另一面就是普羅市民，對於那些重則投訴警務人員傷人、濫權，輕則指責警務人員無禮的市民，他們又如何能夠相信由警務人員"自己人查自己人"，能夠做到完全獨立和公正呢？
I can only say that if some police officers really think that only peer investigation can make them rest assured they should bear in mind that the general public are on the other side of the coin . For those members of the public who have complained against police officers for wounding and abusing powers in serious cases or for being bad mannered in minor cases how can they believe that totally independent and impartial peer investigation can be conducted by police officers?
況且，投訴警務人員的市民很多時均有案在身。
Furthermore complainants against the Police are usually persons who are involved in a court case
換言之，可能有一隊警務人員拘捕了一名疑犯，後來被該名疑犯投訴苦打成招，在這個有直接利益衝突的情況下，如不由完全被視為獨立的另外一些人員進行調查，查明有否苦打成招，我認為只會令市民認為這個制度無法值得相信。
In other words it is possible that a suspect has been arrested by a team of police officers and the suspect has later complained against the police officers for using force to make himher confess . As it may involve a direct conflict of interest if the case is not investigated by another team of officers who are deemed to be completely independent in order to ascertain whether confession was made after the suspect has been tortured I think the public will only regard the system as totally not trustworthy
第二，事隔多月，即使法官下令要求律政司或警務處處長進行調查，很多證據已經失去。
Secondly for a case which occurred some months ago although the Court has ordered that an investigation should be conducted afresh by the Department of Justice or the Commissioner of Police much evidence should have already been lost
主席，我們同時面對一個問題：究竟現時設於投訴警察課之上的獨立監察警方處理投訴委員會，是否已能解決所有信心問題呢？
Chairman there is another problem that we are facing at the same time Whether the establishment of the Independent Police Complaints Council IPCC to monitor and review the investigations undertaken by CAPO an adequate measure to address all credibility issues?
主席，如果沒有一個能令市民相信的制度，這筆錢便是枉花。
Chairman in the absence of a trustworthy system the amount of money in question will only be spent without any return
因此，我仍然會好像把頭撞向牆壁般，繼續試圖透過建議取消這項撥款預算開支來逃出生天。
Hence I will keep ramming my head against the wall and try to find a way out of this dilemma by proposing to cut the estimated expenditure for this purpose
首先，我要申報利益：我曾受惠於經濟貿易辦事處。
First of all I have to declare an interest . I was sort of a beneficiary of the Hong Kong Economic and Trade Office HKETO
其實金發局有甚麼問題？
What are the problems with FSDC?
金發局的宗旨，是進行策略研究，向政府提供建議，推動市場發展和培養人才，以加強香港在國際金融市場上的競爭力。
The aims of FSDC are to conduct strategic studies provide advice to the Government foster market development and nurture talent with a view to enhancing Hong Kongs competitiveness in the international financial market
金發局自於2013年1月成立以來，已經過一段頗長的日子，但該局是否真的在推動本港的金融業發展？
Established in January 2013 FSDC has operated for quite a long time . But has it really engaged in fostering the development of the Hong Kong financial industry?
主席，我不知道你對於金發局的想法為何，但我注意到一點：在梁振英成立金發局後，該局發表有關發展香港作為房地產信託基金集資中心的研究報告，最終竟促成證券及期貨事務監察委員會放寬守則，致使領展作為資產管理公司，卻可以參與土地投資。
Chairman I do not know what do you think about FSDC? . I note that FSDC was set up by C Y LEUNG and that it was FSDCs release of the research report on developing Hong Kong as a capital formation centre for REITs which eventually led to the Securities and Futures Commissions SFC relaxation of its code on REITs . The relaxed code thus allows Link Real Estate Investment Trust Link REIT an asset management company to participate in property development
我發現多位在席的議員均在今年的預算案辯論中提出許多對領展的關注。他們希望各個政府部門能透過不同措施對領展進行監管，包括管制地契、興建更多街市等，其實有些議員正是藉修正案作出有關建議。
In the course of the Budget debate this year I observe that a number of Members have voiced various concerns about Link REIT and expressed hopes that Government departments could put Link REIT under supervision through various measures including by means of lease control and the building of more markets
這樣便不行了，立法會甚少討論金發局營運方式變更的問題，但原來政府當局也沒有先例可循，沒法憑以往經驗印證這種變更能有助政府推展目標。
The transformation of the operation of FSDC has never been sufficiently discussed in the Legislative Council . Worse still with no precedent at all the Government is unable to draw from experience to prove that such a change can help it achieve its objectives
如此的話，試問又如何能說服立法會，金發局變成獨立擔保公司可以進一步推動金融發展呢？
How can the Legislative Council be convinced that the incorporation of FSDC as a company limited by guarantee can boost the development of the financial sector?
究竟政府部門最終會聽取那一方的意見呢？代理主席，我所看到的，是政府聽取了有關發展房地產信託基金的建議，最後導致領展不斷拆售物業。
In the end which party Government departments would listen to Deputy Chairman what I can see is the Government has taken on board the proposal to develop REITs paving the way for Link REITs unceasingly divestment of its properties
正因為金發局所發表的報告，最終導致證監會放寬條例，而零售業界在領展的"魔爪"下不斷被剝削。
It is the FSDC report and SFCs subsequent relaxation of the code that causes the retail sector to suffer from the evil claws and under the continuous expolitation of Link REIT
金發局在批準就房地產信託基金作出報告時，參與其中的人包括了當時的領展總裁王國龍先生。
Mr George HONGCHOY Chief Executive Officer of Link REIT has participated in the approval of the preparation of the report on REITs
主席，請容許我在開始發言之前，就我上一次發言做補漏拾遺，因為財政預算案也很愛做補漏拾遺。
Chairman before I speak allow me to fill some gaps in my previous speech since the Government is also fond of doing so with its Budget . I mentioned the Beijing International Horticultural Exhibition in my previous speech . In fact I brought up the subject to respond to Secretary LAU Kong - wahs enquiry on this subject
但是，如果大家稍為清楚香港的金融制度，便會知道香港金融管理局的外匯基金實際上已有類似的功能。
However if Members know something about the financial system of Hong Kong they should know that the exchange fund of the Hong Kong Monetary Authority has been performing a similar function
當然，我們無法證實究竟未來變成擔保獨立公司後，是否真的會出現這個問題，我們只能放遠眼光來觀察。
Of course we have no way to prove whether FSDC will have this problem after it is incorporated as a company limited by guarantee . We can only keep this issue in view for a longer time
主席，我在這次希望就修正案編號66發言，修正案旨在議決為削減分目000而將總目190的撥款削減，即修訂2018-2019年度"教資會、研究資助局及質素保證局的會議開支"預算開支。
Chairman I wish to talk about Committee Stage Amendment CSA No . 66 this time . The CSA seeks to deduct the funding for head 190 in respect of subhead 000
正如我跟多位朋友說過，我自己也是從事大專教學工作。
I may have mentioned to a few friends that I teach in tertiary institutions
坦白說，真正的院校自主，不單要大學避受政治勢力的干預，更要大學不受商業邏輯的影響，為大學提供真正院校自主的土壤，這是大學教育資助委員會的責任，也是政府的責任。
Honestly in order for tertiary institutions to have true autonomy they should be immune from political interferences or be free from the influence of business logics . It is the responsibility of UGC and also that of the Government to provide the soil that truly fosters autonomy in universities
大學是社會的前緣，其研究應能為社會帶來進步，並能介入社會正在面對的問題，而不是將目光放在虛無縹緲的國際化上。
Universities are the forefront of society . University researches should improve the condition of society and intervene in problems facing society; they should not focus on the unrealistic idea of internationalization
另一方面，大學是為我們社會培訓未來人才的地方，提供有質素的大學教育，令每位同學也獲得全面發展，這是每所大學、每個學系的責任。
On the other hand universities are the place where we train future talents for society and where we provide quality tertiary education for the all - round development of students . This is the responsibility of universities and their different faculties
教育不應在大學內被邊緣化，成為大學運作的配菜。
Education should not be marginalized in universities nor should it become something minor to the university operation
這些全也是社會對大學的期望，也是每一個市民、每一個大學生，甚至每一個家長的期望。
These are what society expects universities to fulfil and also what every citizen university student and parent expects universities to fulfil
如要確保大學能做到我前面所說的種種，便不應設立一個無限的競爭邏輯，無須好像商業機構般運作及掙扎求存。
In order to warrant that universities can meet the aforesaid expectations they should not foster a logic that encourages endless competition . Universities do not need to operate or survive like a commercial enterprise
但是，主席，我們看到教資會的運作邏輯，偏偏與社會的期望相反，它重研究，輕教學，亦以很多商業邏輯運作來搞教育，令我們的大學教育逐漸變質。
But Chairman we notice that the administrative logic of UGC is quite the opposite of what society expects . It stresses research and disparages teaching; it develop education with many business logics which has led to the gradual deterioration of university education
教資會有否盡其責任呢？
Has UGC duly discharged its responsibilities?
每3年1次的學額回撥計劃，不單令學系無法進行長遠發展和規劃，更加劇不同學系之間的資源爭奪。
The triennial competitive allocation has prevented university faculties from making long - term development and planning and also intensified resources competition among them
那些不是主流，但對科研非常重要的學系便慘遭殺系。
Faculties that are less popular but instrumental to the scientific research are closed
政府一直希望推動年青人有多元出路，有不同的學術專長，但事實上，對少數學科卻坐視不理，不予尊重，讓主流學科不斷坐大，令香港無法做到多元教育，甚至部分學科無法繼續生存。
The Government has been promoting the idea of multiple pathways for and different specialties among young people . But in reality it does not attach importance to or respect minor school subjects . As a result major subjects become increasingly dominant thus making it impossible for Hong Kong to achieve diversified education and for some subjects to continue to survive
無限的競爭邏輯，帶來的是無盡的管理主義問題。
The logic of infinite competition has led to the serious problem of managerialism
在如此強烈競爭和搶排名的邏輯下，大學制度變得越來越官僚。
The intense competition and rank fighting have made the university system increasingly bureaucratic
以往，我們看到很多中小學老師面對行政工作過多，影響教育質素的問題；今天，這些影響教育邏輯的行政工作，正影響着我們的大專教育。
In the past heavy administrative work that primary and secondary school teachers had to handle impacted negatively on education quality; today such administrative work that undermines education logics are affecting our tertiary education
大學校方把同學和老師化成數字，以成本效益計算大學盈利，至於教育理想和理念，卻全部掃在兩旁。
The university administration regards students and teachers as a number and assesses the profitability of the university using cost - effectiveness completely ignoring its education vision and philosophy
我們近來更看到不同的大學學系，以財政理由不斷解僱已任教10年、甚至20年最具教學經驗的老師。
We notice that different university faculties dismissed experienced lecturers who had taught for 10 or even 20 years in the name of financial reasons but the fundamental reason is the so - called cost - effectiveness
歸根究底，就是為了所謂的成本效益，以工資更低、更沒保障、更不穩定的流浪講師取代穩定的教師體系。
They replace a stable teaching system with a low - paid unstable system made up of wandering lecturers who are not given any protection
主席，大學不是沒有金錢，教資會亦並不是沒有金錢，我們的政府更不是沒有金錢，但為何多個學系好像"發窮惡"般，要掙扎求存，人人也陷入財困邊緣呢？
Chairman universities are not running out of money; UGC is not running out of money either; and the Government is of course not running out of money . But then why have so many university faculties acted like being plagued by poverty and had to fight for survival? . Why do they all seem to have run into financial difficulties?
這正正是管理主義及盲目競爭邏輯之下的產物，這也是教資會的現況。
This is the product of managerialism and blind competition . This is also the present situation of UGC . Chairman perhaps Members do not understand what wandering lecturers are
主席，可能大家未必知道流浪講師是甚麼一回事，其實有時候我也有一個黑色笑話，很多人說我有一個花名叫"金教練"，問我屬甚麼隊伍，我說我是流浪隊，因為我就是流浪講師之一。
I have a sad joke . Many people nickname me Coach KIM . When asked which soccer team I am attached to I always say the Rangers because I am a wandering lecturer
我又要在此跟大家說，我曾經有一份兼職講師的合約，源自將一個全職講師分為3份不是把人分為3份，而是把那份工作分為3份，聘請3科兼職，這便是大專院校的現況。
I have to tell Members this example again . One of my past part - time lecturer contract comes from one - third of the work of a full - time lecturer I do not mean dividing a person into three parts but dividing the teaching post into three parts and then three part - time lecturers are employed to teach the three subjects . This is the present situation of tertiary institutions
講師工作零碎化，令講師的工作極不穩定。
The work of a lecturer is highly insecure because universities are dividing their work into small parts
這個學期我可能在一間大學任教，到下學期便不獲續約，可能要到另一間大學任教，很多老師更同時要在兩三間學校授課才能維持生活。
I may be teaching in this university in this semester and then in another university in the following semester because my contract is not renewed . Many lecturers have to teach at a few universities at the same time to make a living . Take me as an example
為何大專院校和教資會那麼富有，但在教學上卻要讓講師面對如此貧乏的境況呢？
Tertiary institutions and UGC are so rich but when it comes to education why do they have to impoverish lecturers to such an extent?
我們這群流浪講師承擔起大學大量教育工作，但卻被這個制度壓迫在最底層。
We the wandering lecturers take up a large part of the teaching in universities but we are pressed to the very bottom by this system
我今天不是想說待遇問題，畢竟這是財政預算案的辯論，我希望說的是教學質素問題。
I am not going to talk about our remunerations today . After all this is a debate on the Budget . I wish to talk about the teaching quality
當學生無法在學校很容易地找到老師，教學質素一定會受到 影響，如果沒有充足的教育資源，亦會令教學質素受到影響，這正正是大學教育在這數年的趨勢。
The teaching quality will definitely be affected if students cannot easily find their teachers in the school campus . Insufficient education resources will also affect the teaching quality . This has been the trend of university education over the past few years
主席，香港仍然有很多年輕人對學術抱有信念和有研究抱負，他們很希望貢獻香港的學術界。
Chairman there are still many young people in Hong Kong who believe in and aspire to academic researches and they earnestly wish to contribute to the Hong Kong academia . But many of them are reduced to wandering lecturers under this highly pressurized and competitive system . Their contracts are renewed annually or even biannually
但是，在如此高壓和高度競爭的制度下，很多人只能成為流浪講師，每年甚至半年才能獲續約一次，在高等教育界中掙扎求存，這正是大學為了盲目追逐排名，重研究、輕教學的結果，亦是教資會多年來訂立的政策，大家競爭撥款，這是駭人的制度造成的現況。
They strive to survive in the tertiary education sector . This is the outcome created by universities that blindly pursue rankings and researches but disregard teaching; and this is also the present situation shaped by the UGC policies over the years where universities are only keen on resources seeking . This is the present situation created by this appalling system
我今天討論這項修正案，是關於削減"教資會、研究資助局及質素保證局的會議開支"，我希望主席或在席議員不要誤以為削減了它們便沒有撥款，其實我不是這個意思。
My discussion today is about the CSA on deducting the meeting expenses of the UGC Research Grants Council and Quality Assurance Council . I hope the Chairman or Members here will not mistake that these institutions will not have any funding after the deduction . This is not my purpose either
如果政府和教資會真的對香港的大專教育有抱負，要確保香港的大學質素，對得住家長和香港市民，絕對沒有理由繼續對這些情況坐視不理。
If the Government and UGC truly have a vision of tertiary education in Hong Kong and want to ensure the quality of our universities and act responsibly to parents and Hong Kong citizens they absolutely should not continue to turn a blind eye to the situation
改革整個撥款制度，讓大專院校重新重視教學，不把教育邊緣化，這絕對是教資會需要完成的責任。
To reform the whole funding system to put teaching back into the focus of tertiary institutions and not to marginalize education are responsibilities that UGC should discharge
主席，香港的教育壓力問題嚴重，其中一個重要的源頭便是資助大學學位不足的問題。
Chairman having education in Hong Kong is under immense pressure . One of the major sources of pressure is insufficient subsidized university places
很多同學前赴後繼，努力讀書，便是為了入讀八大。
Many students study very hard just to get a place in the eight major universities
我不認同學生的出路要如此單一，但這絕對不代表他們接受大學教育時要面對教育零散化。
I do not think that should be the only pathway for students . But it does not mean that when they receive university education they should be having such fragmentary education
在"流浪講師"，重研究、輕教育的今天，政府對香港的大專教育無須負上所有責任，但我認為政府起碼要負上一些責任。
Nowadays universities employ wandering lecturers and regards researches more important than education . The Government may not have to take full responsibility of the tertiary education in Hong Kong but it should at least take some responsibility . Perhaps Chief Executive Carrie LAM is watching this meeting broadcast when I speak
可能在我發表這番言論時，特首林鄭月娥正在收看我們的發言，我亦相信她應該有收看我們的發言，否則她不會在行政長官答問會時，忽然提起留意到涂謹申議員的某言論，令我覺得她很厲害，連議員的發言也有收看，我很希望她正在收看。
And I believe she is doing so; otherwise she would not be able to mention something Mr James TO said in her Question and Answer Session . She is incredible . She can manage to watch the broadcast of Members speeches and I hope she is watching now
對於特首當天的對答回應，我認為我們說的院校自主不是她當時說的院校自主，院校自主當然重要，但令院校變成人本而不是駭人的地方，有教學質素而不是扭曲的地方更為重要。
Regarding the Chief Executives exchanges with a Member on that day I think the institutional autonomy that we talk about is not the institutional autonomy she said at that time . It is certainly important for tertiary institutions to have autonomy but it is even more important that tertiary institutions are developed into a people - oriented and not an appalling place and also a place with education quality and not a place of distortion