Borrison/hk-legicost huggingface dataset:
這些政治任務總要插隊，花光立法會的討論時間，所以我請提出今次議案的麥美娟議員及香港工會聯合會想想，如果立法會時常討論這些既對民生沒有好處，又刺中香港人核心權益的法例，而我們又讓政府將這些法例插隊，那我們連討論這"三座大山"的時間也沒有，莫說要解決。
These political missions are always allowed to jump the queue exhausting the discussion time of the Legislative Council . Hence I urge the mover of this motion Ms Alice MAK and the Hong Kong Federation of Trade Unions FTU to think about it . If the Legislative Council has to discuss these bills which are not conducive to peoples livelihood and will sting the core interests of the people of Hong Kong and if we allow the Government to jump the queue in introducing these bills we will not have time to discuss the problems of the three big mountains not to mention identifying solutions to them
關於這"三座大山"，有數位同事剛才也提出了一個很重要的觀點，就是這"三座大山"是政府製造出來的，所以當我們說要解決"三座大山"，基本上是叫政府自我否定。
Regarding the three big mountains several Honourable colleagues have brought forth an important viewpoint just now that is the three big mountains are created by the Government . Hence when we talk about overcoming the three big mountains we are actually asking the Government to overturn its decisions
不過，我們也要思考或追索，政府為何會為香港人堆了這"三座大山"？
Yet we have to think about or track why the Government would have heaped up these three big mountains for the people of Hong Kong?
在殖民時代，在總督身邊的一是政務主任、民官，另一是行政會議內的大商家及銀行家。
During the colonial era Governors were surrounded either by Administrative Officers AO and civil officials or businessmen and bankers in the Executive Council
這情況由殖民政府開始，直到今時今日，仍是核心利益所在。
This situation which started in the time of the colonial government continues today and this is where the core interests lie
為何人大常委會的八三一方案要訂明，即使香港人可以"一人一票"，但仍要控制提名委員會，規定須取得過半數支持才可獲提名參選特首呢？
In the 31 August Decision of the Standing Committee of the National Peoples Congress NPCSC even if the people of Hong Kong may select the Chief Executive by one person one vote the nominating committee is still under control where hopefuls are required to secure the endorsement of more than half of the members for nomination as a Chief Executive election candidate . Why would such a requirement be set?
很簡單，就是要維持可由商界決定特首候選人，屆時他們便自己選擇。
It is straightforward . It is meant to ensure that candidates standing in the Chief Executive Election will be decided by the business sector and by then they can select from among those candidates
由商界決定特首人選最核心的部分，就是要維護自殖民地時代建立的官僚加商界的核心部分。
The crux of allowing the business sector to decide the candidates to be qualified for the Chief Executive Election is to protect the core component of government officials and the business sector established since the colonial era
這已不是純粹視商界為一個遊說群體這麼簡單，因為這核心就是政府本身。
The business sector is not merely regarded as the subject group to be lobbied as this core is the Government per se
這是一個很重要的政治結構，一直推行至今。
This is a very important political structure which has been implemented since then
第二，"三座大山"其實就是關乎兩件事。
Second the three big mountains involves two issues in actuality
第一是退休保障，第二是政府資產私有化。
First it is about retirement protection and second it is about the privatization of Governments assets
背景可追溯至1970年代，由美國帶動的新自由主義，推動全面私有化、外判責任的風潮。
The background can be traced back to the neoliberalism led by the United States in the 1970s spurring a spree of comprehensive privatization and outsourcing of responsibilities
香港的銀行家也是跨國銀行家，商界也是跨國商界，他們自然認為這方法好，所以便引入香港。
Since bankers in Hong Kong came from multinational banks and the business sector was comprised of multinational corporations they would naturally consider the approach desirable and introduced it into Hong Kong
陸頌雄議員質疑這是否因為政府迷信"小政府，大市場"所致，我認為是"是"和"不是"。
Mr LUK Chung - hung queried if this should be attributed to the Governments blind faith in small government and big market . I think the answer is yes and no
其實，他們就是想借美國引起的全球私有化風潮，鞏固自己的利益、強化自己的利益，減少自己的責任。
In fact they wished to take advantage of the worldwide privatization spree sparked by the United States to consolidate and reinforce their interests and minimize their responsibilities
結果，服務做不好，又令"打工仔"失去原有的保障，而政府更被這些私人力量牽着走，要解決問題便更加困難。
As a result the services became undesirable and wage earners have lost the protection they originally enjoyed whereas the Government is led by the nose by these private forces making it even more difficult to deal with the problems
說過原因後，我便談談解決"三座大山"的方法。
Having mentioned the causes I would like to talk about the ways to deal with the three big mountains
正如我剛才所說，在香港行政主導，立法會處於弱勢的格局下，現時大家要做的就是"唱衰"那些已被私有化的企業。
As I said earlier Hong Kong upholds the executive led structure . In a framework where the Legislative Council is in an inferior position what we can do now is to bad - mouth those privatized corporations . Take MTRCL as an example
以港鐵公司為例，它真的做得不好，又壞車，又撞車，於是便被人"唱衰"，而領展也被人"唱衰"。
Its performance is really unsatisfactory . Because the cases of train breakdown and the train collision MTRCL is being bad - mouthed . As for Link REIT it is also being bad - mouthed
"唱衰"後，便以民意壓迫政府做點事。
After bad - mouthing these corporations we may pressurize the Government to do something about it with the support of public opinions
我認為這是要做的，因為如果新自由主義是一種意識形態，我們便要令市民接受另一種新想法，是更正確的想法，就是這種外判制度是要抵制的，因其損害市民利益。
I think this is what we should do . If neoliberalism is an ideology we have to make the public accept another new ideology the correct idea that this kind of outsourcing system should be boycotted due to the harms it does to the interests of the public
我們要將這種信息刻進市民內心，過去10年的情況，大家也看得到，我相信我們已經做到這件事。
We have to instill this message in the mind of the public . In the past decade as Members have seen it I believe we have already achieved this goal
然而，從建立這種意識到真正打破這"三座大山"，我相信仍有很大距離。
Yet from the instillation of ideology to the removal of the three big mountains I think we still have a long way to go
當然，工聯會的立場一直也是反對這做法，認為不應這樣壓迫政府，以免引致對立、不和諧。
Certainly FTU always opposes this approach for it considers we should not pressurize the Government lest it will provoke opposition and disharmony
以如英國工黨為例，它於2017年提出國有化的主張，建議將鐵路、水務、能源、郵政國有化，待該黨上台時便會落實。
Take the case of the Labour Party of the United Kingdom as an example . In 2017 it put forth the idea of nationalization proposing the nationalization of railways ie . MTRCL water supply services energy supply services and postal services which would be implemented when the party takes power
結果，5年之內，他們便將英國的鐵路國有化。
As a result in five years they had completed the nationalization of the railways in the United Kingdom
這便是踢走"三座大山"最直接、最清楚的方法，也就是交由人民決定由哪個政府管治，屆時那個政府便可以踢走這些"大山"。
This is the most direct and clear - cut approach to remove the three big mountains . In other words it should be left to the people to decide which administration should take the helm . By then the government may kick out these big mountains
港鐵公司曾經是香港一間具備高質素管理的公司，很多外國的鐵路機構也會找港鐵公司協助營運當地的鐵路。
MTRCL used to be a company the management of which was of high quality in Hong Kong . Many foreign railway organizations such as those in London and Australia would seek assistance from MTRCL in operating their local railways
政府找來夏正民法官主持沙中綫項目紅磡站擴建部分及其鄰近的建造工程調查委員會。
The Government found Mr Michael HARTMANN to chair the Commission of Inquiry into the Construction Works at and near the Hung Hom Station Extension under the SCL Project and the Commission submitted the interim report to the Government last week
調查委員會上星期向政府提交了中期報告。有人質疑這個調查委員會只憑個多月的聆訊，以及一些文書資料便確定紅磡站的結構屬安全。
Some people have questioned the assertion of the Commission that the structure of Hung Hom Station is safe merely on basis of the hearings which lasted a month or so and some written instruments
主席，市民另外的不滿是港鐵年年加票價，今年又加3.3%。
President another point with which members of the public are discontented is the increase in MTR fares year after year . This year there will be an increase of 3.3 %
在現行的可加可減機制下，票價實際上是有加無減。
Under the existing mechanism which provides for both upward and downward adjustments fares have actually kept increasing with no reduction
第一，政府已經擁有港鐵公司四分之三股份，即使回購餘下的四分之一股份，難道要政府管理港鐵公司嗎？
Firstly the Government already holds 75 % of the shares of MTRCL . Even if the remaining 25 % were bought back would the Government be supposed to manage MTRCL itself?
因此，港鐵公司是香港的鐵路公司，負責興建、營運和管理對市民而言最重要的交通設施。
Hence MTRCL is a Hong Kong railway company responsible for the construction operation and management of transport facilities crucial to members of the public
我覺得政府必須從港鐵公司內部運作入手，包括管理層表現、承建商管理等方面來加強對港鐵公司的監管，令這座"大山"取得以往的成績，再次成為實行高質素管理的機構。
In my opinion the Government must start with the internal operation of MTRCL including the performance of the Management and management of contractors to enhance the supervision of MTRCL so that this big mountain can regain its laurels and become an organization practising quality management again
另一個真正"嚇死人"的問題是官商勾結，朱凱廸議員的修正案不會用這些字眼，立法會秘書處亦未必容許，但他提到嚴重向商界傾斜，大家便心裏有數。
Another problem which is really scary is the collusion between the Government and the business sector . While such wording is not used in Mr CHU Hoi - dicks amendment and the Legislative Council Secretariat may not necessarily allow it he has mentioned seriously tilted in favour of the business sector and we already have an answer in our mind
剛才"葉劉"說，可以透過立法規管某些事宜，不要經常說自由市場，商界同樣反對修訂《逃犯條例》，政府不也堅持推行？
Just now Regina IP said that certain matters can be regulated by way of legislation and the Government should not keep on resorting to the free market whereas the Government still insists on proceeding with the amendment exercise of the Fugitive Offenders Ordinance FOO despite objection from the business sector
真正影響"林鄭"政府施政的，是政府和特首面對北京的家僕和婢女心態，以北京主人為馬首是瞻、唯命是從，他們想怎樣便怎樣。
What indeed has an influence on the administration of the Carrie LAM Administration is the mentality of being a servant and maid upheld by the Government and the Chief Executive before Beijing . They just follow the lead of their masters in Beijing observe absolute obedience and do everything as told
修訂《逃犯條例》，怎可能把人由一個法治先進的地區例如香港引渡到法治百分之一百落後的地區，即是中國大陸？
With regard to the amendment exercise of FOO how can we surrender a person from an advanced region with the rule of law―such as Hong Kong―to a region which is one hundred per cent backward in the rule of law that is the Mainland China?
領展壟斷的問題已討論多年，每個人都說出屋邨的名稱，指出這樣不對，那樣不妥，但政府說不會回購，因為是自由市場。
Everyone has read out the names of public housing estates pointing out this is wrong and that is inappropriate but the Government has indicated that it will not buy it back as ours is a free market
我還要提一提，政府最了不起的就是動輒說會責成港鐵公司改善，關於文件等問題，政府會一直代香港人追究。
In addition I have to mention that the Government is very good at saying frequently that it will instruct MTRCL to make improvement and that the Government will continue to follow up on behalf of Hong Kong people in respect of the documents and other problems
政府甚至是最大的股東，港鐵公司很明顯出現了一些管理文化的問題，但政府作為最大的股東，沒有參與 嗎？
When it is most obvious that there are some problems in the management culture of MTRCL does the Government being the largest shareholder have no involvement at all and care nothing about it?
可是，當我們提出引用《立法會條例》調查港鐵公司，又不見得大家會贊成。
Yet when we propose to conduct an inquiry into MTRCL by invoking the Legislative Council Ordinance it is unlikely that all Members will agree
強積金對沖機制更加如是。
This is even more so with the MPF offsetting mechanism
當時的議案內容如下："鑒於近日政府的公共資產私有化計劃，例如領匯上市、香港機場管理局私有化及兩鐵合併等，均引起公眾關注，而有關計劃涉及推行私有化是否對整體社會有利、會否影響民生及加劇貧富懸殊等問題，本會要求政府應審慎行事，暫時擱置有關的私有化計劃"。
The content of the motion of that time reads That as the Governments recent public asset privatization plans such as the listing of The Link Real Estate Investment Trust the privatization of the Airport Authority Hong Kong and the proposed merger of the two railway corporations have aroused public concerns and such plans involve issues of whether the implementation of privatization is beneficial to the community as a whole and whether it will affect peoples livelihood and widen the disparity between the rich and the poor etc this Council demands that the Government should act prudently and suspend the privatization plans concerned
這項議案由前議員陳偉業提出，香港工會聯合會當時表示支持要求擱置私有化，而民主派兩大政黨的議員有人反對，亦有人棄權。
That motion was proposed by former Member Albert CHAN . At that time the Federation of Hong Kong Trade Unions FTU expressed support for the demand for the suspension of privatization . As for the two major political parties in the pro - democracy camp some Members opposed it and some abstained
在2005年時，公民黨尚未成立，但之後加入該黨的議員，當時也是投了棄權票的，這便是歷史。
In 2005 the Civic Party was not yet found . Yet Members joining the Civic Party subsequently abstained at the time . This is the history
如今回顧，這"三座大山"之所以能夠出現和屹立不倒，關鍵在於其背後有一座更大的靠山，這座更大的靠山就是特區政府及佔據議會大多數的建制派。
In retrospect the key to the emergence of the three big mountains and their immovable status lies in their being backed by a bigger mountain . This bigger mountain is the SAR Government and the majority pro - establishment camp in the legislature
正正就是由政府和大多數建制派所育成。
Link REIT is nurtured by the Government and the majority pro - establishment camp
當年，政府為托高樓價，堅決不讓房屋署興建居屋，及後房署以財赤為由，出售仍有盈利的公屋商場。
Back then the Government shored up property prices and insisted on not allowing the Housing Department HD to construct Home Ownership Scheme flats . Subsequently HD sold shopping arcades in public housing estates which were still generating profits on the grounds of a fiscal deficit
當時除了陳偉業、梁國雄、鄭經翰和工聯會外，大部分政黨，特別是民建聯這些大黨均支持政府出售公屋商場。
At that time apart from Albert CHAN LEUNG Kwok - hung Albert CHENG and FTU most of the major political parties in particular like DAB supported the Government in selling the shopping arcades in public housing estates
可是，政府在大多數建制派的護航下，堅決不在領展股價仍處於相對低位時亡羊補牢，回購領展。
Regrettably with the protection provided by the majority pro - establishment camp the Government insisted on not making any remedy by buying back Link REIT when its stock price was still on the low side
最終，領展股價越來越高，這座"大山"越來越大，當局便越來越多藉口，告訴我們當局無能為力，因為領展已經變得屹立不倒。
Eventually the stock price of Link REIT increases continuously and the big mountain grows increasingly bigger . The authorities thereby are given more and more excuses to tell us that the authorities can do nothing about it for Link REIT has already developed into an immovable mountain . Today Ms Alice MAK has proposed a motion debate on this issue
麥美娟議員今天提出這項議案辯論，以及之前有建制派議員曾提出私人條例草案，要求限制領展的租金升幅，雖然法律草擬專員不反對該項私人條例草案，但大家也知道，法律草擬專員只着重法律格式和用字，我估計特區政府最後也會以干預自由經濟、衍生政府開支等理由，阻止議員提出私人條例草案。
Some time ago a Member from the pro - establishment camp proposed a private bill requesting the capping of rent increases imposed by Link REIT . Though the Law Draftsman does not oppose the private bill we all know that the Law Draftsmans focus will merely be on the format and wording of the private bill . I guess the SAR Government will obstruct the Member from proposing the private bill on the grounds that the bill will cause intervention in free economy and incur government expenditure and so on
大家回想一下，是誰在沒有必要的情況下，把港鐵由法定機構變為上市公司；是誰投票支持修改法例讓港鐵上市；是誰推動兩鐵合併；是誰支持《兩鐵合併條例草案》。
Who allowed MTRCL to turn into a listed company from a statutory organization when the situation did not call for such a change? . Who voted for the legislative amendment to allow MTRCL to be listed? . Who promoted the merger of the two railway companies?
其實，我們過往並非沒有建議政府如何妥善處理港鐵的問題，人民力量曾多次要求政府盡快回購港鐵，但政府卻充耳不聞，這正正顯示政府就是扶植和保護港鐵這隻異形、這座"大山"的其中一個勢力。
In fact in the past we did propose to the Government how the problems of MTRCL should be addressed properly . The People Power has made repeated requests urging the Government to buy back MTRCL as soon as possible yet the Government has simply turned a deaf ear to all of these . It is evident that the Government is one of the forces nurturing and protecting this alien this big mountain
說到底，如果我們想移動這數座"大山"，也莫說要剷除了，我們要令政府和建制派付出代價。
After all if we want to move these few mountains not to mention levelling them we must make the Government and the pro - establishment camp pay the price
這項議案既提供平台讓同事進行辯論，更別出心裁地提出"1+3"的選項，以免出現各大皆空的情況，令政府可以"側 側膊"輕視今天所討論的議題。
Not only does this motion provide a platform for Honourable colleagues to engage in a debate; an ingenious 13 option is also offered to pre - empt the situation of the motion and all the amendments failing to win any support in which case the Government can shirk its responsibility and attach little importance to the subject matter under discussion today
最重要的是，領展、港鐵票價及強積金對沖等問題確實困擾所有香港人，因此政府有責任處理及提出可行的解決辦法。
The most important point is that the issues related to Link REIT the fares of MTRCL and the offsetting mechanism under MPF are really troubling all Hong Kong people so the Government has the responsibility to deal with them and propose feasible solutions
可是，坦白說，領展是一間上市公司，偏偏政府一無所有，對管理層的決定完全可用"束手無策"這4個字來形容。
In contrast frankly speaking Link REIT is a listed company and the Government controls nothing whatsoever in it so in respect of the decisions made by the Link Management it can be said that it is totally at its wits end
不過，代理主席，我經常強調，辦法總比困難多，如果難以處理，是否代表政府便不用處理、不發聲或甚麼也不做？
However Deputy President I often stress that there are always more solutions than problems . If something is a hard nut to crack does it mean the Government does not have to deal with it or say and do anything?
代理主席，我認為領展的問題在於壟斷，其實是區域性的壟斷，例如在天水圍和東涌，整個社區只有領展的街市是主要購物地點，別無他選。
Deputy President I believe the problem with Link REIT lies in its monopolization . In fact it is monopolization in the local communities . For example in Tin Shui Wai and Tung Chung the major shopping spots throughout these communities are the markets under Link REIT and there are no other choices
政府告訴我，稍後會在天水圍、東涌等地興建街市，但確實不知道要等到何時。
The Government told us that later on markets would be built in such places as Tin Shui Wai and Tung Chung but there is no knowing how long the wait will be
大家想想，這對市民有甚麼影響？
Just consider this What is the implication of this to the public?
領展更乾脆地每年瘋狂調升租金，不論是商戶或停車場，領展也如狼似虎般，不斷地咬，完全不放鬆。
Furthermore each year Link REIT takes the simple and easy step of imposing outrageous increases in rent and be it commercial tenants or car parks Link REIT keeps biting like a wolf or tiger without let - up
此外，代理主席，我經常認為，政府現時說急市民所急，特首亦表示將會在甚麼地方興建街市、在甚麼地方做甚麼事情，現在還要推行帆哥提出的智能停車場，公道地說，由現在開始討論到落實，沒有3年、5年也不可能成事，所以在某程度上，我認為政府應該下決心 加快實行所有能打破領展壟斷的辦法，全速地加快程序，盡快落實這些急市民所急的措施。
In addition Deputy President I often think that although the Government says now that it will address the communitys pressing problems and the Chief Executive also said that markets would be built in certain locations and that certain things would be done in certain places and now it is even said that the smart car parks proposed by Secretary Frank CHAN will be built it would be fair to say that from discussion to actual implementation it will take three to five years . Therefore to some extent I believe the Government should summon its resolve and expedite the implementation of all measures that can break the monopolization by Link REIT speed up the processes at full steam and implement the measures aimed at addressing the communitys pressing concerns as soon as possible
代理主席，雖然政府興建街市的主動性強，但我認為這始終需要時間，民主建港協進聯盟一直也建議當局考慮在各區設立墟市，主動向居民提供多一個選擇，特別是在領展壟斷的地方。
Deputy President although the Government by building markets is mounting a powerful offensive I think that ultimately this will take time and the Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong has all along proposed that the authorities consider setting up bazaars in various districts to provide another choice to residents particularly in areas monopolized by Link REIT
代理主席，最後我希望政府能夠像我一樣着緊一點。
As really the last point Deputy President I hope the Government can have a greater sense of urgency like I do
我告訴大家，我真的十分着緊領展的問題，我們不可以再不理會了，我希望政府能夠切實委任專責部門，不論是以"狗仔隊"或名正言順的方式也好，他們必須嚴肅處理，讓這個問題 得以解決，並做好物業監管工作，以保障香港人，特別是市民應有的權益。
Let me tell Members that I really care a lot about the problems related to Link REIT . We can no longer ignore them . I hope the Government can assign the task to a dedicated department and be it by way of some covert operation or some open and formal approach they must deal with this problem seriously so that it can be solved and a good job of property monitoring can be done to protect Hong Kong people in particular the due rights of the public
議員如此踴躍發言，目的只有一個，便是希望政府能認真正視這三大問題。
In speaking so enthusiastically Members have only one purpose . They hope the Government can squarely address these three major issues in a serious manner
答案是沒可能的，因為3個街市只會對一個小區的當區市民的福祉有幫助，對領展卻毫無影響，因為它擁有太多街市和泊車位，況且現在我們並非純粹討論街市或空置問題。
The answer is that it is impossible because the three markets will only be conducive to the well - being of residents in the respective local communities . There will be little impact on Link REIT because it owns too many markets and parking spaces . What is more now we are not simply discussing the problem of markets or vacancies
為何會出現圍封問題呢？
Why would the problem of enclosures emerge?
如果政府容許業主改裝，請提出理據。
If the Government allows such conversion by the property owner please tell us the justifications
我手邊其實並無太多這類契約，因為這些始終是政府文件，我們想索取也頗困難。
I actually do not have too many deeds of this kind on hand because after all these are government documents to which we can hardly have access
其實議員也希望能索取領展轄下所有街市的契約，逐一研究，我們真的很希望能這樣做。
In fact Members wish to have access to the deeds for all the markets under Link REIT and study them one by one . We really hope we can do so . Back to my constituency
說回我所屬地區，以寶林邨為例，我相信每個屋邨的契約也差不多，很多時也是傾斜的，例如泊車位只供地契列明人士，包括住戶、佔用人及真實訪客使用。
I believe the deed of every housing estate is more or less the same . Very often it is tilted . For example parking spaces are exclusively for persons specified in the land lease including residents occupiers and bona fide guests
問題是，現時很多屋邨內的固定車位均轉為浮動車位，究竟由誰來確定哪些是真實訪客呢？
The question is given that the fixed parking spaces in many housing estates have now been converted into floating parking spaces who will ascertain who are bona fide guests?
如果沒有，這情況是否違反了地契內的要求？
If not has this situation contravened the lease requirements?
政府真的有責任處理。
The Government does have the responsibility to deal with the matter
我想問他們有否聽過香港市民經常掛在口邊的一項指數，名為香港的悲情指數，真的非常desperate，非常絕望。
I wish to ask if they have heard of an index frequently cited by members of the public in Hong Kong which is called the desperation index of Hong Kong . It is really desperate
我們看到領展的股價上升，又看到港鐵公司雖然連年犯錯，連年出事，但其股價卻完全沒有動搖。
We see a rise in the share price of Link REIT and that the share price of MTRCL though plagued by blunders and troubles year after year remains totally immune
此外，我們亦曾視察屯門的友愛商場。
Furthermore we have also visited Yau Oi Commercial Centre in Tuen Mun
還有興民商場，簡直是經典中的經典，被轉售予佛山順聯集團。
Hing Man Commercial Centre is yet another case which is a classic among classics . It was resold to the Sunlink Group of Foshan
官商合謀，瓜分香港，說甚麼也沒用，在座的學者又在白說些甚麼呢？
The Government and the business sector act in collusion to carve up Hong Kong . It is pointless to say anything . What nonsense are the scholars here talking about?
六十多歲的黃婆婆找不到工作，與甚麼有關呢？
Why is Mrs WONG in her sixties unable to find a job?
代理主席，麥美娟議員今天提出"要求政府解決民生'三座大山'"的議案，當然是想提醒政府加緊處理大家關注的重大議題。
Deputy President the motion on Requesting the Government to overcome the three big mountains in peoples livelihood proposed by Ms Alice MAK today certainly seeks to remind the Government of stepping up its efforts in addressing major issues of public concern
事實上，特區政府面對的施政難題，又豈止這"三座大山"。
In fact the difficulties in governance encountered by the Government are surely not confined to these three big mountains
單是住屋問題，已經是一座"超級大山"。
Merely the housing problem is a super big mountain
今天這項議題，重點放在政府的角色。
The motion today focuses on the role of the Government
我認為政府的確虧欠了公屋居民，應該還公屋居民一個真正屬於他們、能夠照顧他們日常起居飲食的商場環境。
I think the Government does owe public housing residents and should return them shopping malls that truly belong to the residents and cater to their daily needs
最近更出現通車40年以來首宗列車相撞的嚴重事故，連"安全系數"這個金漆招牌也打破了。
The recent serious train collision first of its kind for 40 years has also blemished its shinning reputation in terms of safety
我認為港鐵公司一再"甩轆"，除了令市民信心盡失外，也正好反映這間機構已患上頑疾，不能夠單靠換血解決問題，而是要解決官僚主義制度，改革殖民地時代留下來的舊體制，加強港鐵管理層對社會的承擔及對市民所負的責任，並提高企業管治水平，來一場徹底的重大改革，不是主席說OK就OK，而是要以民為本，要市民覺得滿意才OK。
I think the repeated blunders by MTRCL not only have wiped out public confidence but also shown that the organization is suffering from a serious illness that cannot be treated with staff replacement alone . Instead bureaucracy has to be addressed and the old system from the colonial era has to be reformed in order to strengthen MTRCL Managements social commitment and public responsibility as well as enhance its corporate governance . A comprehensive major reform is in order