Borrison/hk-legicost huggingface dataset:
我剛才提及的3宗足總被罰款的事件可以說明，香港有需要落實《條例草案》。
The three cases of HKFA being fined I have mentioned just now illustrate that Hong Kong needs to implement the Bill
國歌象徵中國建國的一段艱苦歷程，本身是東北抗日義勇軍的軍歌，鬥爭味道很濃，亦是在戰時所作。
The national anthem signifies Chinas bitter process of nation building . As the military anthem of the Northeast Anti - Japanese Volunteer Army it was composed during wartime and exudes an aura of struggle
有人曾問在和平時期，可否換一首歌詞不太激進的國歌，但我們國家領導人清楚表示，保留東北抗日義勇軍軍歌，因為每個中國人都應記住我們曾經面對的艱苦時間，特別是抗日戰爭時期。
Someone once asked whether during peacetime it could be replaced with another national anthem of which the lyrics were less aggressive but our state leaders clearly indicated that the military anthem of the Northeast Anti - Japanese Volunteer Army should be retained as every Chinese should remember our bitter past particularly the War of Resistance against Japanese Aggression
如果不是抗日成功，我們今天真的是"做奴隸的人們"。
If we had not succeeded in fighting against the Japanese we would really have become people who are slaves today
郭家麒議員剛才問及在座是否有做奴隸的議員，我不知道他有沒有時間回來澄清這個問題。
As Dr KWOK Ka - ki has asked just now whether there are Members present who are slaves I wonder whether he has time to come back to clarify his point
我剛才提到有人曾在去年10月將國旗放進垃圾桶，然後丟進海中，最初裁判官輕判社會服務令，後來在律政司上訴後，改判即時監禁。
As I said just now a person who threw the national flag into a rubbish bin before hurling it into the sea last October was first imposed a light penalty of a community service order by the magistrate and was later sentenced to immediate imprisonment following an appeal filed by the Department of Justice
這體現了《國旗及國徽條例》及即將落實的國歌條例的重要性，希望各位年輕人不要以身試法。
This has reflected the importance of the National Flag and National Emblem Ordinance NFNEO and the soon - to - be - implemented National Anthem Ordinance . I hope young people will refrain from acting in defiance of the law
法例已經制定，如果有人犯法，沒人可以幫他，一定要面對刑責。
Upon the enactment of the legislation lawbreakers will have no one to turn to and must be held criminally liable
主席，他的說法很可笑，我不知道他是否心理不夠強大，所以用反話來侮辱《條例草案》。
Chairman his remarks are absurd . I wonder whether he is not strong enough psychologically and thus needs to insult the Bill with irony
事實上，今時今日，我們中華人民共和國對國 家統一、領土完整，有百分百的信心和實力保護。
In fact in this day and age we in the Peoples Republic of China have full confidence and capability in defending our national unity and territorial integrity
在國土方面，國家一點也不讓步，這已是強國的表現。
When it comes to national territory our country does not budge an inch . This is already the reflection of a superpower
主席，《條例草案》提到要在中小學加強教育和宣傳。
Chairman the Bill states that education and publicity campaigns must be strengthened in primary and secondary schools
我不知道在稍後的答辯環節，教育局局長會否回應，如果局長稍後會作出回應，麻煩他就這部分講解一下，我真的很擔心這方面。
I wonder whether the Secretary for Education will give a reply in the ensuing reply session . If the Secretary will give a reply in a moment I would like to urge him to offer an explanation in this aspect which I am very much concerned about
最後，主席，我知道"港獨"短時間不會消停，接下來的港區國安法將會有適切的交代。
Finally Chairman I know that Hong Kong independence will not cease in a short time and the incoming Hong Kong national security law will properly address the issue
同時，我想跟或明或暗支持"港獨"的"攬炒"議員或社會上的"勇武"說，別以為聽不到國歌，便等於可以搞"港獨"，別以為不理會港區國安法，便可以搞"港獨"，亦不要以為在"一國兩制"下，只談"兩制"不談"一國"，便可以繼續搞"港獨"。
At the same time I would like to tell Members from the mutual destruction camp who overtly or covertly support Hong Kong independence or valiant protesters in society that they should not mistakenly believe that when they do not hear the national anthem they can champion Hong Kong independence or when they disregard the Hong Kong national security law they can champion Hong Kong independence . Nor should they believe that under one country two systems they can continue to champion Hong Kong independence by only referring to two systems and disregarding one country
港區國安法包含整個香港，任何無知的想法只會令自己身陷牢獄之苦，希望大家三思及警醒。
The Hong Kong national security law covers the entire Hong Kong and any senseless thought will only make one end up behind prison bars . I hope that people will think twice and be alert
我謹此發言，多謝主席。
I so submit . Thank you Chairman
主席，我發言支持《國歌條例草案》，並反對議員提出的21項修正案。
Chairman I rise to speak in support of the National Anthem Bill the Bill and in opposition to the 21 amendments proposed by Honourable Members
主席，我首先想說清楚，《條例草案》的主旨很簡單，就是希望大家尊重國歌、尊重國家，不要做出一些侮辱國歌的行為。
Chairman I wish to make it clear at the very beginning that the main theme of the Bill is very simple and it is the hope that people would respect the national anthem and the country while refraining from engaging in behaviours which will insult the national anthem
至於某些人是否愛國歌，沒有人可以勉強他們，但我們基本上是透過制定《條例草案》，要求大家不要再做一些侮辱國歌的荒誕行為。
As to whether some people would love the national anthem no one can force them to do so but basically we enact the Bill to require people not to engage in any absurd behaviours which will insult the national anthem
事實上，過去我們看到社會上有些人刻意在奏唱國歌的過程中作出一些侮辱行為，包括在奏唱國歌時報以噓聲等，令看到這些行為的 市民真的感到很憤怒；第二，市民亦覺得為何有人作出這些行為後，不會遭受任何懲罰，這樣等於縱容那些人繼續侮辱國歌。
In fact we have witnessed in the past that some people in society deliberately engaged in some insulting behaviours when the national anthem was played and sung including booing the national anthem during that time which made members of the public who saw such behaviours extremely angry indeed . Second members of the public also queried why those people would not be subject to any penalties after showing such behaviours this is tantamount to conniving at those people to continue to insult the national anthem
國歌亦是代表我們國家主權的一個重要象徵，所以我在此再三說明，《條例草案》只是希望大家尊重國歌及尊重國家，不要做一些侮辱國歌的荒誕行為。
The national anthem is also an important symbol representing national sovereignty I thus have to repeat once and again here that the Bill only aims to ensure that people would respect the national anthem and the country and would not engage in some absurd behaviours to insult the national anthem
其實，這也是天經地義的安排。
As a matter of fact this is also a perfectly justified arrangement
但很明顯，我們看到"攬炒派"的議員或人士，不斷無視這個情況，甚至危言聳聽，欺騙市民說如果《條例草案》通過後，哪怕在奏唱國歌時有少許走音，亦會立即被刑事檢控。
But obviously we can see Members or people of the mutual destruction camp keep ignoring this they even resort to scaremongering and deceive the public by claiming that once the Bill is passed they would immediately be subject to criminal prosecution if they are a bit off - key when playing and singing the national anthem
我想反問葉建源議員，在過去接近一年的時間，很多學校在早會時，有人帶領學生集體大喊"光復香港時代革命"，又高呼"香港獨立"的口號。
I wish to ask Mr IP Kin - yuen in the past almost one year some people led students to chant aloud the slogan Liberate Hong Kong the revolution of our times together during the morning assembly of many schools and they also chanted the slogan Hong Kong independence
教育局可能沒有向學校提供足夠指示，結果縱容他們繼續這樣呼喊，難道這些不是擾亂教育工作嗎？
Perhaps the Education Bureau might not have given adequate directions to schools and therefore it ends up in conniving at them to keep chanting those slogans . Are these not disruptions to education?
我想向葉建源議員指出，正正因為我們過去看不到政府當局曾向學校提供明確及適當的指示，以致有人在學校刻意縱容這些惡行，結果誤人子弟，這些才是擾亂教育。
I would like to point out to Mr IP Kin - yuen that it is precisely because we have not seen the Administration provide specific and appropriate directions to schools in the past hence some people deliberately connive at these evil acts in schools and lead young people astray as a result . These are indeed disruptions to education
其實他們只有一個目的，就是要把《條例草案》變成紙老虎，令當局難以執法，令《條例草案》缺乏阻嚇性。
In fact there is only one purpose that is to turn the Bill into a paper tiger making it difficult for the authorities to enforce the law and rendering the Bill lacking in deterrent effect
簡單來說，如果我沒有理解錯誤，該項修正案一旦獲得通過，那麼政府播放國歌宣傳片的日數便會大幅減少至每年不超過36日，我覺得真的很可笑。
To put it simply if I have not got it wrong the number of days that the Government can broadcast the national anthem by a promotional video will be greatly reduced to no more than 36 days per year upon passage of this amendment . I find it really ludicrous since we now hope that by enacting the Bill people will pay respect to the national anthem and will no longer engage in any behaviours which insult the national anthem
我認為這與我們現時訂立《條例草案》，或香港作為國家的一部分，而教育大家認識國家及國家主權這個最基本的要旨，都是背道而馳。
I think this would run counter to the most essential objective for us to enact the Bill or the fact that we should educate people to understand our country and national sovereignty since Hong Kong is a part of our country
香港作為國家的一部分，有權亦有責就《國歌法》訂立本地法律。
Being a part of our country Hong Kong has the right and responsibility to enact local legislation in respect of the National Anthem Law
根據目前的《國歌條例草案》，第52條及第65條是關於附表3的修訂，以及為施行第61c條所作出的訂明，須以"先訂立後審議"的附屬法例程序進行。
Under this National Anthem Bill the Bill clauses 52 and 65 concern the amendment of Schedule 3 and prescription made for the purposes of clause 61c which would be subject to the negative vetting procedure
當然，對於我這兩項修正案，政府表示"先審議後訂立"的程序需時更長，而"先訂立後審議"的程序同樣可以讓立法會有時間審議及在有需要時對附屬法例作出修訂。
Of course regarding these two amendments that I have proposed the Government said that the positive vetting procedure usually takes longer whereas the negative vetting procedure also allow the Legislative Council to scrutinize the subsidiary legislation and to amend it if necessary
政府是以時間過長為理由而反對我的修正案。
The Government opposed my amendments on the ground that the time required would be too long
但是，如果要對附表3所列"須奏唱國歌的場合"作出修訂，這屬於一個茲事體大的動作，而且在時間上究竟有何迫切性呢？
However the amendment to the Occasions on which National Anthem must be Played and Sung as prescribed in Schedule 3 is a matter of great importance and besides what urgency is there in terms of timing?
我看不到當中有何迫切性，因為最重要的那些場合已經在附表3列明。
I do not see any urgency because the most important occasions are already set out in Schedule 3
因此，我認為"先審議後訂立"並無不妥，因為立法機關畢竟較行政機關更具民意認受性，亦更加貼近民情，所以應該先行審議，然後才對附表3作出修訂。
Therefore I think there is nothing wrong to adopt the positive vetting procedure because after all the legislature has greater credibility and keeps tabs on public sentiments more closely than the Executive Authorities . Such being the case deliberations should be conducted before any amendment is made to Schedule 3
事實上，由立法會把關亦有另一個好處，大家試想想，如果經"先訂立後審議"的程序訂立的附屬法例在立法會上遭到反對，即使已經作出修改，但我們卻表示反對，屆時便會令政府尷尬，亦會令中央感到尷尬，因為即使先訂立後才審議，我們仍有權力否決這些"先訂立 後審議"的附屬法例。
In fact there is another advantage for the Legislative Council to take up the gate - keeping role . Think about this If the subsidiary legislation enacted through the negative vetting procedure would meet opposition in the Legislative Council or in other words even if the amendments are made and if we oppose them it would then be embarrassing for the Government and it would be embarrassing for the Central Authorities too . It is because even if the negative vetting procedure are adopted we still have the power to veto the subsidiary legislation enacted through the negative vetting procedure
《條例草案》第76條訂明任何人若干犯與侮辱國歌相關的罪行，一經定罪，可處第5級罰款，即5萬港元，以及監禁3年。
Clause 76 of the Bill provides that a person who commits an offence relating to insulting the national anthem is liable on conviction to a fine at level 5 ie . 50,000 and to imprisonment for three years
然而，我認為條文對侮辱國歌的定義寫得相當模糊和寬鬆，容易令市民誤墮法網。
But in my view the provisions on the definition of insulting the national anthem are very vague and loose thus making it easy for members of the public to contravene the law inadvertently
《國歌法》的第十五條與《條例草案》第7條分別提到，任何人如公開及故意篡改國歌歌詞或曲譜，或以歪曲或貶損的方式奏唱國歌，或以其他方式侮辱國歌均屬犯法，以及任何人如公開及故意以任何方式侮辱國歌，即屬犯罪。
Article 15 of the National Anthem Law and clause 7 of the Bill respectively provide that a person commits an offence if the person publicly and intentionally alters the lyrics or score of the national anthem or plays and sings the national anthem in a distorted or disrespectful way or insults the national anthem in any other manner or publicly and intentionally insults the national anthem in any way
法政匯思在其發出的"國歌法聯合聲明"中提到，"以其他方式侮辱國歌"的詮釋，其實是可以無限延伸到《國歌法》中其他本來不屬於刑事的罪行。
In its Joint Statement on Local Legislation for the National Anthem Lawthe Progressive Lawyers Group said that the scope of insulting the national anthem in any other manner can be open to boundless interpretation to encompass other non - criminal acts in the National Anthem Law
這是有絕大可能發生的，因而令人憂慮《條例草案》日後或會被用作打壓言論自由的工具。
This is absolutely likely to happen and has aroused concerns that the Bill may be used as a tool to suppress the freedom of speech in future
當一位執法者或警員主觀地認為某作為或不作為屬侮辱國歌行為，例如某人可能在奏唱國歌時睡着了，沒有醒過來，如果這屬於侮辱國歌的行為，便可能會通知律政司檢控他。
When a law enforcement officer or a policeman subjectively thinks that a certain act or omission is insulting the national anthem say when a person falls asleep and does not wake up while the national anthem is played and sung and if such a behaviour is considered to be insulting the national anthem this may be brought to the attention of the Department of Justice which may then institute prosecution against this person
此外，英國和澳洲等地的有關法規並不是主體法例，亦不是附屬法例，只不過是一種協議，即大家須共同遵守的約章或規則，當中是沒有罰則的。
Moreover in countries such as Britain and Australia their laws or regulations in this respect are neither main legislation nor subsidiary legislation but only protocols or in other words they are only charters or rules for compliance by the citizens and they do not provide for any penalty
我翻閱了立法會文件CB2995/18-19的附件，當中列出其他國家對侮辱國歌的行為所施加的刑罰，但這些國家的刑罰水平，一般來說也遠低於現時《條例草案》所訂明的5萬元罰款及監禁3年。
I have read the Annex to LC Paper No . CB299518 - 1901 which listed out the penalties for behaviours insulting the national anthem in other countries but the levels of penalty in these countries are generally far lower than the 50,000 fine and three years imprisonment as provided for in the Bill
有人說國家十分強大，當然要尊重國歌，但為何還要對國民施加3年的監禁刑罰呢？
Some people said that our country is strong and powerful and we certainly have to respect the national anthem . But why should it still be necessary to impose on the people an imprisonment for three years?
究竟是否想以一種恐嚇的方式來令大家遵從呢？
Is that actually meant to be a kind of intimidation to make the people abide by the law?
正如我在上星期恢復二讀辯論時提出，尊重是雙方的，是要互相尊重的，國家尊重國民，國民便會尊重國家。
As I pointed out during the resumed Second Reading debate last Tuesday respect is two - way and it has to be mutual . When the state respects the people the people will respect the state
說到底，尊重應該是互相尊重，應該是發自內心。
In the final analysis respect should be reciprocal and it should come from the heart
所以，主席，我的修正案旨在刪除入獄的刑責，因為罰款5萬元已經是很高的罰則，外國也只是罰款數百元或千多元而已。
Therefore Chairman my amendment seeks to delete the penalty of imprisonment because a fine of 50,000 is already a very heavy penalty whereas in overseas countries the fine is only a few hundred dollars or some 1,000
我希望議會的同事支持我的3項修正案。
I hope that colleagues in this Council will support my three amendments
多謝，李慧琼議員。
Thank you Ms Starry LEE
修正案可分為數部分。
The amendments can be divided into several parts
第一部分涉及奏唱國歌的場合。
The first part involves the occasions on which the national anthem must be played and sung
這樣可能會出現一種情況，就是特首指定了很多的場合是市民大眾沒想過要唱國歌的，包括公司場合、社團場合或學校場合。
This may give rise to the scenario where the Chief Executive has specified many occasions which the public have never expected that the national anthem must be played and sung including occasions involving offices societies or schools
其實，特首是擁有這權力的。
In fact the Chief Executive has such power
因此，將觸犯涉及國歌、國旗、國徽、區旗、區徽等法例的罰則整體減輕，又有何問題呢？
Hence what is wrong with reducing the overall penalty for breaches of laws on national anthem national flag national emblem regional flag and regional emblem? . We differ with them in one major principle . They consider severe punishment should be imposed
這種嚴刑峻法的思維，基本上反映在所有建制派同事的發言當中。
This thinking of imposing severe punishment is generally reflected in the speeches of all colleagues from the pro - establishment camp
我想特別回應郭偉强議員，因為根據我的記憶，我是首次在立法會聽到"敬酒不喝喝罰酒"這7個字。
I would like to respond to Mr KWOK Wai - keung in particular for as far as I remember this is the first time I heard of the phrase refusing a toast only to be forced to drink a forfeit at the Legislative Council
當然，這7個字沒有甚麼大不了，大家經常都會說，但如果把它套用在北京、中國共產黨及香港人的關係上，我認為這便反映出中共或其支持者，究竟有否打算重回以民為本、尊重香港人及尊重"一國兩制"的管治。
Of course there is no big deal about this phrase for it is a common saying . Nonetheless if this is applied to the relationship between Beijing and CPC and the people of Hong Kong I think this can reflect whether or not CPC and its supporters intend to return to people - based governance and governance respecting the people of Hong Kong and one country two systems
"敬酒不喝喝罰酒"的意思，如果說得較粗暴或不禮貌一點，即是指"我要強姦你，如果你反抗，我只會用更粗暴的方法強姦你"。
What does it mean to refuse a toast only to be forced to drink a forfeit? . To put it in a more vulgar or impolite way it is to say I have to rape you and if you refuse I will use a more violent way to rape you
他們又經常提到14億人，我記得有幾位同事都說我們傷害了14億人的感情，又說不論港區國安法或《國歌法》都是大勢所趨。
Also they often mention the population of 1.4 billion . I recall a number of colleagues saying that we have hurt the feelings of the 1.4 billion people and that the Hong Kong national security law and the National Anthem Law are inevitable
就此，我們最直接的回應是，如果中共真的會交給14億人決定，不論是《國歌法》應否加入附件三，或者是否一定要強迫香港人執行港區國安法，請交給14億人決定吧，但他們聽到後又會不作聲，只能啞口無言，因為大家都知道，事實就是中國共產黨說了算。
In this connection our direct response is that if CPC really allows the 1.4 billion people to decide whether or not the National Anthem Law should be included in Annex III and whether or not the people of Hong Kong should be forced to implement the Hong Kong national security law please let the 1.4 billion people make the decision . Yet when they hear this they keep silent . They are struck dumb
至於另外一些修正案，包括陳志全議員希望納入作曲人及作詞人的生平和死因、要求納入關於廣播服務的規定，以及楊岳橋議員在其修正案中提出加入一句條文，訂明《條例草案》中的條文"只受香港法例管限並只按照香港法例解釋"。
For we all know that in reality CPCs decision is final . As for other amendments they include Mr CHAN Chi - chuens amendments seeking to include the biography and cause of death of the lyricist and composer of the national anthem and provisions on broadcasting services as well as Mr Alvin YEUNGs amendment seeking to include a phrase stipulating that provisions in the Bill should be governed by and interpreted in accordance with solely the laws of Hong Kong
最後，我想回應陸頌雄議員的發言，陸頌雄議員剛才也提到一個官式說法，就是中共過去多年曾經走過歪路、遇到挫折、也有人犯錯，但關鍵在於國體的重要部分不能被侵犯，所以便要訂立《國歌法》。
Finally I would like to respond to the remarks of Mr LUK Chung - hung . Just now Mr LUK Chung - hung has toed the official line saying that CPC may have gone astray experienced failure and made mistakes over past years yet the key is that the crucial part of the State system should not be infringed upon which warrants the enactment of the National Anthem Law
我想請大家看看中共的歷史，明天便是6月4日，香港人看到《條例草案》及港區國安法時，為何會從根本上反對呢？
I invite Members to look at the history of CPC . It will be 4 June tomorrow . Why would the people of Hong Kong oppose the Bill and the Hong Kong national security law fundamentally at the sight of them?
一個殺人政權本身已經沒有資格再統治這個地方，但它竟惡劣到在殺人後，還要在之後的30年間不斷以錯誤和謊言來掩飾其暴行，試問這怎會不使大部分香港人只要他們有清醒的記憶和良知都認為共產黨現時還想強迫我們接受港區國安法和《國歌法》，從而對它頂禮膜拜，它會否感到嘔心呢？
A ruling authority that killed people is not qualified for ruling this place . Worse still in the 30 years after the killing it keeps resorting to wrongdoings and lies to cover up its violent acts . How would not a majority of the people of Hong Kong―provided that their memory and conscience remain sober―consider that CPC is now forcing us to accept the Hong Kong national security law and the National Anthem Law so that we will bow in worship before it?
其實，歸根究底，這就是中共對香港有否自知之明的問題，它是否知道自己是一個怎樣的政權呢？
Do they find this disgusting? . After all it concerns whether or not CPC knows its position in Hong Kong . Does it know what kind of ruling authority it is?
如果它想強迫我們，我們亦沒有辦法，但請不要在強迫我們的同時，還要假裝有道理，假裝有很多市民接受，這與香港人的想法完全相反。
If it wants to force these things on us we can do nothing about it . Yet when they are forcing these things on us they should not pretend that their actions are justified and accepted by many people . This is the exact opposite of the aspiration of the people of Hong Kong
因此，我會支持所有修正案。
Hence I will support all the amendments
主席，請你指出《議事規則》哪一項條文訂明主席的裁決是不容辯論的。
Chairman please advise which rule under the Rules of Procedure stipulates that the Presidents ruling is not subject to debate
梁議員，根據《議事規則》第44條，主席所作決定為最終決定，但《議事規則》沒有說不容辯論。
Mr LEUNG pursuant to Rule 44 of the Rules of Procedure RoP the Presidents decision shall be final but there is no mention in RoP that no debate may arise on it
你有你的決定，我們有我們的看法。
You have your decision and we have our views
我們不可以有獨立思考嗎？
Are we not allowed to think independently?
我們不可以在議會裏提出辯論嗎？
Are we not allowed to propose a debate in this legislature?
《議事規則》完全沒有這樣說。
RoP make no mention of such things
《議事規則》沒有說議員不可以提出異議，即使對主席的裁決也一樣。
RoP make no mention that a Member shall raise no objection and this is true even in the case of the Presidents ruling
所以，我的其他修正案將罰則全部刪除，而這項修正案刪除這款，以保持一致。
For this reason my other amendments seek to delete all penalties and this amendment seeks to delete this subclause for the sake of consistency
這樣一來，這項修正案的效果適得其反，變成如果這款被刪除，觸犯有關罪行，便未必需要按照香港法律進行調查及予以檢控。
In this way this amendment will only achieve the opposite effect . In other words if this subclause is deleted offences concerned may not be investigated and persons may not be prosecuted according to the laws of Hong Kong
弁言有3點，"1中華人民共和國國歌是中華人民共和國的象徵和標誌"，這沒有問題。
1 The national anthem of the Peoples Republic of China is a symbol and sign of the Peoples Republic of China which is fine
"2一切個人和組織都應當尊重國歌，維護國歌的尊嚴，並在適宜的場合奏唱國歌"，這也沒有問題。
2 All individuals and organizations should respect the national anthem preserve the dignity of the national anthem and play and sing the national anthem on appropriate occasions which is also fine
"3現須制定條例維護國歌的尊嚴，規範國歌的奏唱、播放和使用，增強公民的國家觀念，以及弘揚愛國精神"。
3 An Ordinance is to be enacted to preserve the dignity of the national anthem to regulate the playing and singing the broadcast and the use of the national anthem to enhance citizen awareness of the Peoples Republic of China and to promote patriotism
我就此提出修正案，刪去"弘揚愛國精神"，這沒有抵觸宗旨，但修正案不獲批准提出。
In this regard I have proposed an amendment to delete and to promote patriotism . This is not in contradiction to the legislative intent but my amendment has been ruled inadmissible
一個國家能否藉訂立惡法贏取全世界尊重呢？
Can a country win the respect of the world by enacting a piece of draconian legislation?
對我來說，一定不能。
As far as I am concerned the answer is certainly no
請委員注意，根據《議事規則》第561條，在全體委員會審議階段只可討論法案條文及修正案的細節，不得討論其原則，希望委員留意。
Will Members please note that pursuant to Rule 561 of the Rules of Procedure Members shall not discuss the principles of the clauses of the bill and amendments thereto but only their details at the Committee stage
主席，無論國歌、國旗或國徽，都是一個國家的標誌和象徵，任何一位公民都必須予以尊重。
Chairman the national anthem the national flag and the national emblem are all the symbol and sign of a country which should be respected by each and every citizen
《中華人民共和國國歌法》作為全國性法律，已經列入《基本法》附件三，香港有憲制責任就條文進行本地立法。
The Law of the Peoples Republic of China on the National Anthem being a national law has been added to Annex III of the Basic Law . Hong Kong has a constitutional duty to enact local legislation in respect of the provisions
因此，我支持就《國歌法》進行本地立法，並且反對各項修正案。
Therefore I support the enactment of local legislation in respect of the National Anthem Law and oppose all the amendments
主席，《國歌條例草案》的弁言納入了《國歌法》第一、三及五條的內容，述明相關背景及立法原則，以助大家了 解就《國歌法》進行本地立法的背景。
Chairman the Preamble of the National Anthem Bill the Bill sets out the relevant background and legislative principles by adapting Articles 1 3 and 5 of the National Anthem Law to provide a context for people to understand the background of enacting local legislation in respect of the National Anthem Law
就尊重國歌立法並非罕見的事情，世界各地都有相關法律，規範國民的行為，例如美國的國歌法是包括在國旗法之中，列明奏唱國歌時要面對國旗或者播放音樂的方向，保持肅立和脫下帽子，右手亦要按着心口位置。
It is not uncommon to enact legislation to ensure respect for the national anthem . There are relevant laws around the world that regulate the behaviour of the citizens . For instance the national anthem law in the United States is included in the National Flag Act which stipulates that all persons should face the national flag or face toward the music stand solemnly and remove their headdress with their right hand over the heart when the national anthem is played and sung
美國總統特朗普曾經在公開活動奏響國歌時手舞足蹈，假裝指揮，此舉引起民眾批評，說他不尊重國歌。
President of the United States Donald TRUMP once danced with joy pretending that he was the conductor when the national anthem was played on a public occasion . His act was criticized by the public who alleged that he did not respect the national anthem