Borrison/hk-legicost huggingface dataset:
我真想問問反對派的政客，今天為了包庇政見相近的人，便甘願顛倒黑白，他日若有更大利益擺在眼前，他們是否也會像鄭松泰一樣公然辱國辱港呢？
I would really like to ask the politicos of the opposition camp as they are willing to confound right with wrong in order to harbour those with similar political views today when they are confronted with greater interests in the future will they act like CHENG Chung - tai and publicly insult the country and Hong Kong?
主席，我由衷希望反對派議員明白，這項譴責議案通過與否，不僅直接關係到鄭松泰的議席，更是關乎立法會的尊嚴。
President I sincerely hope Members of the opposition camp will understand that the passage or otherwise of the motion is not only directly related to the seat of CHENG Chung - tai it is also related to the dignity of the Legislative Council
眾所周知，鄭松泰的行為在電視直播下進行，如果我們不義正詞嚴地對他作出譴責，便極容易對外傳遞錯誤的信息，容易讓人誤以為立法會議員在議會內倒插國旗和區旗也不用負上任何責任、誤以為立法會沒規沒矩、禮崩樂壞。
Everyone knows that the behaviour of CHENG Chung - tai was broadcast live on television . If we do not condemn his behaviour with a strong and forceful sense of righteousness a wrong message will be easily delivered . It will readily make people misunderstand that the act of inverting the national flag and regional flag by Members of the Legislative Council in the Chamber will not incur any liability and that Members can act in defiance of rules in the Legislative Council to the extent that the Council will be rendered in a state of endless eccentricities and irregularities
難道反對派議員樂見這種情形嗎？
Will Members of the opposition camp be glad to see this?
我希望反對派議員不要只問立場，不問是非，而是要是其是，非其非，客觀理性地思考一下，一個公然侮辱自己國家、一個出爾反爾、違背誓言，以及一個知錯不肯認錯，還想設法諉過於人的人，是否值得譴責？
I hope Members of the opposition camp will not focus the matter only on political stands and ignore the rights and wrongs instead the attitude of saying what is right as right and denouncing what is wrong as wrong must be adopted . We must analyse the matter in an objective and rational manner . With regard to a person who publicly insults his country goes back on his words and breaches the oath taken by him; a person who knows he has done something wrong but refuses to admit it and tries every means to put the blame on others does he deserve to be censured?
是否再適合擔任立法會議員？
Is he still suitable to be a Member of the Legislative Council?
畢竟，尊重國旗和區旗、擁護《基本法》、維護立法會尊嚴，這些都不是政治立場的問題，而是大是大非的問題。
After all respecting the national flag and regional flag upholding the Basic Law safeguarding the dignity of the Legislative Council are not matters of political stance rather they are issues involving major principles
至於鄭松泰，我希望他能夠有自我反省和檢討的能力，明白即使此譴責議案被否決，他能夠僥幸留在議會內，也僅僅是得益於反對派盲目包庇，而絕不是公眾對他這種行為的認同。
As for CHENG Chung - tai I hope that he can conduct a self - reflection . He should realize that even if this censure motion is negatived and he is lucky enough to remain in the Council it is only due to Members of the opposition camp blindly shielding him but absolutely not because his behaviour is endorsed by the public
如果他不知悔改，繼續"無知當有趣"，我相信市民終有一天會用選票懲罰他。
If he hardly knows how to repent and continues to act naively as if such behaviour is fun I believe people will eventually use their ballots to punish him
主席，財政司司長在2018-2019年度財政預算案中公布多項寬減措施，與市民分享經濟成果，當中包括寬減2018-2019年度4季差餉，以每個物業每季2,500元為上限。
President in the 2018 - 2019 Budget the Financial Secretary announced a number of concessionary measures to share the fruits of our economic success with the community including waiving rates for the four quarters of 2018 - 2019 subject to a ceiling of 2,500 per quarter for each property
這差餉寬減措施將涵蓋約325萬個住宅和非住宅物業，政府收入將因而減少約178億元。
The rates concession measure will cover about 3.25 million residential and non - residential properties and reduce government revenue by 17.8 billion
為了實施上述的差餉寬減措施，政府於今年3月把《2018年差餉令》提交立法會，按先訂立後審議的程序處理，《命令》在今年4月1日生效。
In order to implement the aforesaid rates concession measure the Government tabled the Rating Exemption Order 2018 the Order in the Legislative Council in March this year for negative vetting . The Order took effect on 1 April this year
立法會成立小組委員會審議《命令》，我特別感謝小組委員會主席黃定光議員及其他委員的努力，令審議工作得以早日完成。
The Legislative Council formed a Subcommittee to scrutinize the Order . I would like to particularly thank Mr WONG Ting - kwong Chairman of the Subcommittee and other members for their efforts which facilitated the early completion of the scrutiny work
我明白小組委員會就差餉寬減的安排提出了不同的意見，我剛才亦聽到議員對有關議題的各種看法。
I understand that the Subcommittee has raised different views on the rates concession arrangement and I have just listened to Members various points of view on the subject concerned
我希望在此回應大家較為關注的3個事項。
I would like to hereby respond to three matters that are of concern to Members
鑒於差餉物業估價署每季發出的徵收差餉通知書超過220萬份，估價署會分批印製和寄出通知書。
Given that the number of demand notes for rates payment issued by the Rating and Valuation Department RVD exceeds 2.2 million each quarter RVD will print and send the demand notes by batches
一般而言，估價署在每季繳款月前一個月的月底左右開始寄出通知書，讓繳納人在繳款月結束前有充裕時間繳款。
In general RVD starts sending out the demand notes around the end of the month preceding the payment month of each quarter so that payers will have ample time to settle the payment before the end of the payment month
估價署今年3月28日起發出4月至6月季度的徵收差餉通知書，"最後繳款日期"定於4月30日。
RVD started issuing on 28 March this year the demand notes for rates payment for the quarter of April to June and the Last Day for Payment was set on 30 April
另一方面，《差餉條例》第362條訂明，行政長官會同行政會議可發出命令，宣布任何類別或其部分的物業單位，或香港任何部分，獲豁免繳交全部或部分差餉。
On the other hand section 362 of the Rating Ordinance provides that the Chief Executive in Council may by order declare any class of tenements or parts thereof or any part of Hong Kong to be exempted from the payment of rates wholly or in part
為落實2018-2019年度財政預算案的寬減差餉建議，行政長官會同行政會議已作出《命令》。
In order to implement the rates concession proposed in the 2018 - 2019 Budget the Chief Executive in Council already made the Order
事實上，以往多年推行的差餉寬減措施亦一直沿用類似安排，而將《命令》交予立法會審議的時間表亦大致相若。
In fact similar arrangements were made for the rates concession measures introduced in the past years and a broadly similar timetable has also been formulated for tabling the Order in the Legislative Council for scrutiny
第二個議員關注事項，是差餉寬減是否向大財團傾斜。
The second matter of concern to Members is whether the rates concession tilts towards consortiums
雖然我們預計在2018-2019年度可獲最高差餉寬減額的首10位差餉繳納人，有關的差餉寬減額為2億多元，涉及4萬多個主要為非住宅的物業，但我們已多次向小組委員會強調，這些物業的租約當中，有超過八成訂明租金是不包含差餉的。
We anticipate that for the top 10 ratepayers who will receive the largest amounts of rates concession in 2018 - 2019 the total rates concession amounts to some 200 million involving some 40 000 properties which are mainly non - residential but we have emphasized time and again to the Subcommittee that over 80 % of the tenancy agreements of such properties are rates exclusive
此外，現時為差餉寬減設定上限的做法，已能達致累退的政策效果，即租值越高的物業受惠於差餉寬減的幅度越低。
In addition the practice of setting a ceiling for rates concession can achieve a regressive effect of the policy that is the higher the rateable value of a property the smaller the magnitude of benefit arising from the rates concession
另外，我希望議員留意差餉寬減措施涵蓋的325萬個物業中，包括了796,000個出租公屋住宅單位。
Furthermore I hope Members will note that the 3.25 million properties covered by the rates concession measure include 796 000 public rental housing units
這些公屋單位的租戶，接近全數將不需要在2018-2019年度繳交差餉。
Almost all the tenants of such public rental housing units need not pay any rates in 2018 - 2019
另一方面，擁有自住物業的市民和自置物業的小商戶亦可受惠於有關措施，可見差餉寬減的受惠層面非常廣闊。
On the other hand owners of self - occupied properties and small business operators with self - owned premises can also benefit from the measure . We can thus see the extensive coverage of the rates concession
事實上，在2018-2019年度預計約178億元的差餉寬減總額中，涉及住宅物業單位的佔約149億元，而涉及非住宅物業單位的只佔約29億元。
In fact of the expected total amount of rates concession of some 17.8 billion in 2018 - 2019 some 14.9 billion involve residential properties and only some 2.9 billion involve non - residential properties
由此證明，差餉寬減措施並非向大財團傾斜。
This proves that the rates concession measure does not tilt towards consortiums
第三個議員關注事項，是應否對未來的差餉寬減安排作出改變。
The third matter of concern to Members is whether changes should be made to rates concession arrangement if any in the future
為達致更公平地分配差餉寬減額和令有需要的市民受惠，議員提出了不同的建議，包括限制每名差餉繳納人可獲得差餉寬減的應課差餉物業數目、將差餉寬減措施局限於租戶及自住物業的業主、只向住宅物業的差餉繳納人提供差餉寬減，或規定差餉繳納人須向估價署提出申請，才可享有差餉寬減等。
In order to achieve a more equitable distribution of rates concession and benefit needy people Members have raised various proposals including limiting the number of rateable properties per ratepayer eligible for rates concession confining the rates concession measure to tenants and owners of self - occupied properties providing rates concession to ratepayers of residential properties only or requiring the ratepayers to apply to RVD for claiming rates concession
我感謝議員提出的提議和關注，但這些建議與現行的差餉徵收安排有很大出入。
I would like to thank Members for their proposals and concerns but such proposals differ considerably from the existing rates collection arrangement
正如政府多次向小組委員會解釋，根據《差餉條例》，差餉的估價及徵收是以物業單位為基礎。
As the Government has explained to the Subcommittee time and again pursuant to the Rating Ordinance the valuation and collection of rates are based on tenements
差餉繳納人可以是相關應課差餉物業的業主、佔用人或業主或佔用人的代理人。
A ratepayer can be the owner occupier or agent of the owner or occupier of the rateable property concerned
現時估價署只收集有關差餉繳納人姓名及通訊地址的資料，以發出季度徵收差餉通知書，並沒有收集差餉繳納人的身份證號碼、商業登記證號碼或物業業主的資料。
At present for the purpose of issuing quarterly demand notes for rates payment RVD collects information on the names and mailing addresses of the ratepayers but not their Hong Kong Identity Card numbers the Business Registration numbers or information of the owners of the tenements
若改變現行差餉寬減的做法，我們或須根本性地改變徵收差餉的安排，這可能涉及修訂法例和全面地更改估價署的電腦系統及資料庫，有關資料亦須不斷更新以反映最新的業權狀況。
Any changes to the current rates concession approach may imply the need for making a fundamental change to the rates collection arrangement . This may involve amendments to be made to the law and complete replacement of RVDs computer systems and databases with new ones . Moreover all the relevant information will need to be constantly updated to reflect the latest ownership status
如何處理聯名物業及以公司名義持有物業亦可能備受爭議和十分困難。
The way of handling jointly - owned properties or properties held via a holding company may also be contentious and problematic
此外，新限制或會令部分租用物業單位而根據租約須負責繳交差餉的人士，無法受惠於差餉寬減措施。
In addition the new restriction may exclude those tenants who are required to pay rates by the terms of a tenancy agreement from benefiting from the rates concession measure
我們明白部分議員和市民對差餉寬減安排的關注，因此已承諾向立法會提交文件，詳述政府就改變現行差餉寬減機制不同方案所作的分析和涉及的影響。
We understand the concerns of some Members and members of the public over the rates concession arrangement . We have therefore undertaken to provide a paper to the Legislative Council detailing the Governments analysis of options to change the current rates concession mechanism and the implications thereof
由於有關事宜複雜，我們會盡量在今年年底前完成有關分析。
Given the complexity of the issues we will endeavour to complete the analysis by the end of this year
主席，2018-2019年度的差餉寬減能惠及社會上不同階層的市民，涵蓋層面十分廣闊，可有效地與市民分享經濟成果。
President the rates concession in 2018 - 2019 will benefit people from various social strata thanks to its extensive coverage and effectively share the fruits of our economic success with the community
我感謝議員就差餉寬減安排所表達的不同意見，我們在分析不同方案時會加以考慮。
I would like to thank Members for their different views on the rates concession arrangement and we will consider their views when analysing different proposals
代理主席，今天我們要討論鄭松泰議員行為不檢的議案，並決定是否按《議事規則》第49B條，對他作出譴責。
Deputy President today we discuss the motion on the misbehaviour of Dr CHENG Chung - tai and decide whether we should censure Dr CHENG according to Rule 49B1A of the Rules of Procedure
整件事的起源是在前年10月19日的立法會會議上，鄭松泰議員趁大部分議員不在席時，走到部分議員的座位，把他們擺放在桌上的中國國旗和香港區旗故意倒插。
The entire incident originated from the Legislative Council meeting on 19 October 2016 . During the absence of the majority of Members Dr CHENG Chung - tai went over to the seats of some Members and deliberately inverted the national flags of China and the regional flags of Hong Kong placed on their desks
當蔣麗芸議員發現並把國旗和區旗重新擺放後，鄭松泰議員再次走到其他議員的座位，把國旗和區旗倒插。
After Dr CHIANG Lai - wan found out what happened and rearranged the national flags and the regional flags Dr CHENG once again went over to the seats of other Members and inverted the national flags and the regional flags
事實上，鄭議員其後也因此被法庭裁定侮辱國旗和區旗罪名成立，判處罰款。
As a matter of fact Dr CHENG was subsequently convicted by the Court of desecrating the national flag and regional flag and fined
或許有人認為既然鄭議員已受到法律制裁，立法會便無須多此一舉，提出今天的譴責議案。
Some people may hold that since Dr CHENG had already been subjected to legal sanctions there is no need for the Legislative Council to make this superfluous effort of moving todays censure motion
然而，我們看回鄭議員在就任議員之初，曾按《基本法》第一百零四條及《宣誓及聲明條例》作出擁護《基本法》，以及效忠中華人民共和國香港特別行政區立法會的誓言。
However we can look back at the time when Dr CHENG assumed office he had taken an oath under Article 104 of the Basic Law and the Oaths and Declarations Ordinance to uphold the Basic Law and swear allegiance to the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region HKSAR of the Peoples Republic of China
由於當天所展示的國旗和區旗均代表着擁護《基本法》和效忠中華人民共和國香港特別行政區的莊嚴意義和承諾，鄭議員的行為不但違反其曾作出的誓言，亦干犯《基本法》第七十九條第七項所指的行為不檢，更是不承認、不尊重國家和特區的行為，破壞國旗和區旗的尊嚴，其實較玷污國旗和區旗更為嚴重，理應受到譴責。
As the national flags and regional flags displayed on that day represent the solemn pledge and significance of upholding the Basic Law and swearing allegiance to HKSAR of the Peoples Republic of China Dr CHENGs conduct was not only in breach of the oath taken by him but also constituted misbehaviour under Article 797 of the Basic Law . The severity of this act of denying and disrespecting the country and HKSAR tarnishing the dignity of the national flag and regional flag was in fact of a more serious degree than that of defiling the national flag and regional flag . It is justifiable that such conduct should be censured
我亦想指出，鄭議員參選立法會議員，成為政府體制內的一分子，便應履行立法會議員應有的責任，知道立法會有立法會的規矩，亦有議員應遵守的《議事規則》，絕不應在議事廳內故意侮辱國旗和區旗，亦不應把立法會就職的莊嚴誓言當作沒有說過。
I would also like to point out that upon assumption of office as a Legislative Council Member Dr CHENG has become a member of the government structure . Hence he has the obligation to discharge the responsibilities of a Legislative Council Member accept the fact that there are rules of the Legislative Council as well as the Rules of Procedure by which Members should abide . He should absolutely not deliberately desecrate the national flag and regional flag in the Chamber
我記得在緊接其後的會議，即當年10月26日的大會上，我鄰座的鄭議員，手執我手上這本《議事規則》，走到主席台前抗議。
I remember that at the meeting following this incident that is at the Council meeting of 26 October 2016 Dr CHENG who sat next to me dashed to protest in front of the Presidents pedestal holding the Rules of Procedure the one I have in hand now
他被主席警告後，仍然不聽勸諭，最後被主席以行為不檢為理由，把他逐出會議廳。
He was warned by the President but he still failed to heed his advice . Eventually he was ordered by the President to leave the Chamber because of his grossly disorderly conduct
不過，鄭議員再次沒有依從主席的命令，反而衝開勸諭他離開的保安人員，走到我身後投擲這本重量接近1公斤的《議事規則》，而那本《議事規則》便從我頭上這裏飛到那裏，發出轟然巨響，不單令我受驚，多 位同事也同樣受驚。
However Dr CHENG had again failed to comply with the Presidents order instead he pushed aside the security personnel who advised him to leave . He ran to the back of my seat and threw a copy of the Rules of Procedure which weighs about 1 kg . The copy of the Rules of Procedure was thrown from this side of my head to that side causing an extremely loud sound which had not only scared me but also scared many colleagues
然後，他縱身跳過位於會議廳後方高1米多的圍欄，從我這個位置返回座位。
And then he jumped over the fence of more than 1 m tall at the back of the Chamber before returning to his seat from this position of where my seat is
這種行為一方面肆意破壞社會秩序，另一方面亦構成巨大危險。
Such behaviour on the one hand brazenly disrupts the order of society and on the other causes serious hazards
代理主席，我要強調一點，鄭議員一方面要做立法會議員，另一方面卻在議會內作出這些故意、重複、幼稚、無聊的侮辱國家和特區象徵、破壞議會秩序的行為，這是一種不分輕重、超越作為議員應有底線的舉措。
Deputy President I have to emphasize one point . On the one hand Dr CHENG wants to be a Legislative Council Member but on the other he has engaged in these deliberate repeated childish frivolous acts of desecrating the symbol of the country and HKSAR and disrupting the order of the Council . These acts have failed to differentiate the insignificant from the significant and crossed the bottom line by which Legislative Council Members should abide
這些行為亦對其他參與會議的議員和立法會的工作人員造成很大的滋擾和危害，更反映鄭議員根本無視《議事規則》。
His acts have also caused great nuisances and hazards to other Members and staff of the Council reflecting that Dr CHENG has basically disregarded the Rules of Procedure
在這數件事發生後，他仍表現得毫無悔意和歉意。
After these incidents he still shows no signs of remorse and offers no apology
故此，我支持今天的譴責議案，對鄭議員作出懲處，維護議會的尊嚴，遏止這種歪風，避免類似情況再度發生。
Therefore I support todays censure motion to take punitive action against Dr CHENG defend the dignity of the Council arrest such undesirable trends and prevent similar incidents from recurring
主席，謝偉俊議員根據《議事規則》第49B條動議譴責鄭松泰議員。
President Mr Paul TSE has moved a motion to censure Dr CHENG Chung - tai under Rule 49B1A of the Rules of Procedure
簡單而言，我們不認同鄭議員的行為，但他所犯的過錯已遭受法庭判決及處分；要再透過譴責議案來取消他的議員資格，便成了法庭懲處外的欲加之罪。
Simply put we do not endorse Dr CHENGs behaviour but as the Court has passed a verdict and imposed punishment on his offence if we attempt to disqualify him from his office through a censure motion we are virtually seeking to trump up a charge against him other than the sentence handed down by the Court
這其實是赤裸裸打壓政治異己的行為，公民黨認為不能接受。
This is actually a blatant attempt to suppress a political dissident which the Civic Party finds unacceptable
主席，在1年半前謝偉俊議員提出這項譴責議案時，我代表公民黨在議事堂內明確表示反對。
President when Mr Paul TSE moved this censure motion one and a half years ago I specifically expressed opposition on behalf of the Civic Party . I gave three reasons at that time
建制派強行成立了全由自己人參與的調查委員會，花了過去1年多的時間，堆砌出這份厚達300頁、洋洋萬字的調查報告，就是為了"煮死"一個他們認為分裂國家的政治異見者。
Pro - establishment Members forcibly established an investigation committee comprising of their peers . The committee has spent more than one year to pad out this investigation report with some 300 pages and over ten thousand words solely for the purpose of killing a political dissident whom they believe is a secessionist
我本着好奇的心態翻閱這份報告，看看他們如何努力堆砌理據打壓異己，結果發現其內容不但牽強，而且自相矛盾。
Out of curiosity I have read the report to see how they strove to string reasons together to suppress a dissident . I found that the contents are not only far - fetching but also self - contradictory
主席，就從是否應該提出這項議案說起。
President I will start by talking about whether this motion should be moved
調查委員會在報告中一直強調並非取代法庭的角色，而譴責議案的原委是要處理法庭不能處理的政治問題。
The investigation committee stresses time and again in its report that it does not intend to take over the role of a court and the censure motion aims at addressing a political issue that cannot be addressed by the court
今次鄭松泰議員所涉及的情況，因為已經過司法程序，經歷過法庭的審判，因此應比照《基本法》第七十九條第六項："在香港特別行政區區內或區外被判犯有刑事罪行，判處監禁一個月以上，並經立法會出席會議的議員三分之二通過解除其職務"。
In the case of the incident concerning Dr CHENG Chung - tai he has already undergone judicial proceedings and court trials so we should refer to Article 796 of the Basic Law which stipulates that when he or she is convicted and sentenced to imprisonment for one month or more for a criminal offence committed within or outside the Region and is relieved of his or her duties by a motion passed by two - thirds of the members of the Legislative Council present
鄭議員侮辱國旗案在法院判決的結果是鄭議員有罪，但案情不至於嚴重至入獄，最終是罰款了事。
The Court convicted Dr CHENG of desecrating the national flag but the conviction was not serious enough for imprisonment and a fine was imposed instead
因此，很明顯這並不符合第七十九條第六項的條件，不能即時取消鄭議員的資格。
As such this obviously does not meet the conditions set out in Article 796 and Dr CHENG shall not be disqualified from his office immediately
主席，老實說，在法律上我們沒有說不能同一事件使用兩條罪名來控告，但必須精準、謹慎及符合法律精神。
Frankly speaking President there is no law prohibiting making two charges on the same incident but the charge must be precise cautious and in compliance with the rule of law
差不多所有立法會同事也必然知道，連今次的調查報告也承認，立法會從來並沒有為行為不檢或違反誓言下定義，因為下定義並不容易；過去的議事規則委員會亦因此建議，由當時的立法會決定何種行為會被視為行為不檢或違反誓言。
As is known to almost all my colleagues in the Legislative Council and even this investigation report also admits that the Legislative Council has never provided any definition for misbehaviour or breach of oath for it is not easy to do so . The Committee on Rules of Procedure therefore advised previously that the then prevailing Council should decide what constituted misbehaviour or breach of oath
主席，從這標準出發，調查委員會報告中所提出的理據明顯未夠充分，而且可說是非常牽強。
President if this standard is adopted the reasons set out in the investigation committee are obviously not ample or we may even say they are very far - fetched
舉例而言，其中一項指控鄭議員行為不檢的理據是沒有理會"蔣麗芸議員及立法會主席的勸喻及警告，仍繼續有關行為"。
For example one reason for accusing Dr CHENG of misbehaviour is that he continued to do so despite repeated advice and warnings by Dr CHIANG and the President
報告中大量引述了當時主席及蔣麗芸議員在事件中給鄭議員的勸諭，從而指鄭議員一再違反這些勸諭，認為這是行為不檢。
In the report many pieces of advice then given by the President and Dr CHIANG Lai - wan to Dr CHENG in the incident are quoted and Dr CHENG is thus accused of misbehaviour for repeatedly acting against such advice
這裏我並非有意為鄭議員的部分行為作出任何辯護乃至辯論。
I am not seeking to defend Dr CHENG for some of his behaviours or debate his behaviours
鄭議員"擅自離席及騷擾其他議員的展示物品"並非恰當行為，但這是否構成他可以被"DQ"的理由？
Dr CHENG leaving his seat at will and disturbing other Members displaying objects is not a proper behaviour but does this constitute a reason for his disqualification?
主席，議會應成為據理力爭的地方。
President the legislature should be a place where one argues strongly on good grounds
在席的同事當中可能也有人試過被主席勒令離開會議廳，大家也會有不同的反應。
When some of the Members present were ordered by the President to leave the Chamber they might have different reactions
如果因為沒有遵從主席的指令便要被"DQ"，那麼主席，立法會有多少議員同事要被"DQ"？
If a Member who fails to comply with the order of the President should be disqualified how many Members in the Legislative Council should be disqualified President?
主席，威權社會有3項特質：第一，有一個行政霸道的政府，處處以效率及發展的名義來踢走一切批評政府施政的異己；第二，有一個以國族為中心的政府，處處以國家之名，欺壓百姓；以及第三，有一個偏幫政府的議會，所有事情均包裝成為多數人的民意，在議會內以大欺小，在議會內行使多數票的暴政。
First it has an executive - hegemonic government that is bent on in the name of efficiency and development kicking out all dissidents who criticize the government for its policy implementation . Second it has a nation - centred government that is bent on bullying and suppressing the masses in the name of the state . Third it has a legislature that favours the government by package all things into the views of the majority and in the legislature the big political party plays a bullying role and exercises tyranny of the majority
今天的立法會是否去到這地步？
Should the Legislative Council today be relegated to such a state?
建制派是否要"有風駛盡𢃇，有權用到盡"？
Should the pro - establishment camp leverage all its resources and exercise its power to the fullest?
他們是否不放過任何一個機會，以各種名義打壓反對派？
Is it true that pro - establishment Members will miss no opportunity to suppress the opposition under various pretexts?
主席，我不希望今天的香港立法會會悲哀至此。
President I hope that the Legislative Council of Hong Kong today will not be relegated to such a pathetic state
我再次重申，我代表公民黨反對今次的議案。
Let me reiterate that I oppose this motion on behalf of the Civic Party
主席，我動議 《2017年僱傭條例草案》 予以三讀並通過。
President I move that the Employment Amendment Bill 2017 be read the Third time and do pass
我現在向各位提出的待議議題是：《2017年僱傭條例草案》予以三讀並通過。
I now propose the question to you and that is That the Employment Amendment Bill 2017 be read the Third time and do pass
勞工及福利局局長及張超雄議員已分別作出預告，動議講稿附錄他們的修正案，以修正第7條。
The Secretary for Labour and Welfare and Dr Fernando CHEUNG have respectively given notice to move their amendments to amend clause 7 as set out in the Appendix to the Script
各位委員現在可以就原條文及修正案進行合併辯論。
Members may now proceed to a joint debate on the original clause and the amendments
我會先請局長發言及動議他的修正案，然後請張超雄議員發言，但他在現階段不可動議修正案。
I will first call upon the Secretary to speak and move his amendment . Then I will call upon Dr Fernando CHEUNG to speak but he may not move his amendment at this stage
本會現在成為全體委員會，審議《2017年僱傭條例草案》。
Council now becomes committee of the whole Council to consider the Employment Amendment No . 2 Bill 2017
根據《僱員補償條例》動議的擬議決議案。
Proposed resolution under the Employees Compensation Ordinance