Borrison/hk-legicost huggingface dataset:
此外，為何我覺得法律條文的字眼是如此重要呢？
On the other hand why do I consider the wording of legal provisions so important?
看看劉曉波的例子便知道。
We would understand the reason by looking at the case of LIU Xiaobo
大家都知道，在法律制度上，中國政府最常以"搬龍門"來打壓異見人士。
We all know that as far as the legal system is concerned the Chinese Government often suppresses dissidents by moving the goalposts
劉曉波在2008年起草《零八憲章》，因而被中共政府控告他涉嫌煽動顛覆國家政權罪。
LIU Xiaobo drafted Charter 08 in 2008 and was charged for suspicion of inciting subversion of state power
北京法院頒布判詞時說他曾撰寫煽動性文章，並且引述其文章中一段話，內容如下："自從中共掌權以來，中共歷代獨裁者最在乎的是手中的權力，而最不在乎的是人的生命"......
In the judgment handed down by a Beijing court it is said that he has written seditious articles and an excerpt from his articles was cited as follows since the Communist Party of China CPC assumed power the successive dictators of CPC were most concerned about the power in their hands but not the lives of the people
我們很擔心這種所謂"造謠"即是他說是造謠就是造謠，他說是煽動就是煽動，很擔心會變成"欲加之罪，何患無辭"。
We are gravely concerned about this kind of so - called spreading rumour . In other words it is spreading rumour and sedition as long as they say so
因此，我很贊成陳志全議員提出的修正案，應該在《條例草案》中加入國歌作詞人及作曲人的生平及死因等。
Hence I support Mr CHAN Chi - chuens amendment that the biography and cause of death of the composer and the lyricist of the national anthem should be included in the Bill . In fact we have the obligation to tell the next generation that the lyricist of the national anthem TIAN Han was a loyal member of CPC
事實上，我們有責任告訴下一代，國歌的作詞人田漢是一名忠誠的共產黨黨員，但在文化大革命期間，他被扣上資產階級、反動學術權威的帽子，因而被公開批鬥了兩年，受盡折磨屈辱，連他的兒子也公開與他劃清界線，最後他更慘死在形同監獄的病房內，連替他收屍時，也要用假名來處理。
Yet during the Cultural Revolution he was labelled as a capitalistic and counter - revolutionary academic authority . He had been criticized and denounced publicly for two years enduring all kinds of torture and humiliation and even his son denounced him publicly . In the end he died distressingly in a ward comparable to a jail
為何不讓年輕人知道及了解這段歷史呢？
When people collected his corpse a false name was used for him . Why young people are not given to know and understand this history?
況且，田漢所寫的歌詞，第一句是"起來，不願做奴隸的人們"，是鼓勵人民要勇於對抗不公義的事情，受壓迫的時候更加要團結一致，挺身而出去反抗，而不是委曲求全，"義勇軍進行曲"最核心的精神及價值就是反抗。
After all the first verse of the national anthem written by TIAN Han reads Arise ye who refuse to be slaves . It encourages people to be brave to rise against injustice and not to stoop to compromise . Resistance is the core spirit and value of the March of the Volunteers
所以，這一段歷史是非常重要的，因為它本身就是對中共政權最大的諷刺。
Hence this episode in history is extremely important for this is per se the greatest irony of the CPC regime
為了令中小學生了解中國國情，我覺得這是非常有價值及有意義的，值得讓中學生了解更多，所謂鑒古而知今，藉此讓學生看清楚中共政權邪惡的真面目。
To enable primary and secondary students to understand the situation of China I think this is extremely valuable and meaningful and it is worthwhile to let secondary students learn more . As the saying goes the lessons of history teach us about the situation today and students will see clearly the true colours of the evil CPC regime
事實上，《條例草案》附表3本身已列出一些須奏唱國歌的場合，例如宣誓儀式、升國旗儀式及國慶酒會等。
In fact Schedule 3 to the Bill sets out certain occasions on which the national anthem must be played and sung such as an oath - taking ceremony a national flat rising ceremony and the National Day Reception and so on
但是，第52條賦權行政 長官會同行政會議可隨時修改附表3。
Yet clause 52 confers the Chief Executive in Council the power to amend Schedule 3 at any time
我認為這種做法是無限擴大這項權力，不僅非常不恰當，而且非常危險。
I think this approach will expand the power infinitely which is not merely extremely improper but extremely dangerous
首先，現時行政長官會同行政會議並非由民選產生，眾所周知，他們是由中共中央政府欽點，無論是行政長官，以至行政長官有權欽點的行政會議成員，所有過程都是黑箱作業，毫無認受性，亦沒有代表性。
First the Chief Executive in Council is not returned by direct election . It is known to all that they are appointed by the Central Government . Be it the Chief Executive or Members of the Executive Council whom the Chief Executive is authorized to appoint all the procedures are done in the dark lacking a mandate and representativeness
而且我們亦看不到在可見的將來，有普選行政長官的可能性。
Besides we do not see any possibility of universal suffrage of the Chief Executive in future
試問在這種情況下，怎可以再賦權予沒有認受性、沒有公信力的行政長官呢？
Against this background how can the Chief Executive without a mandate and credibility be conferred with such power?
況且，過往建制派的行政長官候選人，最常見的態度就是"擦鞋"，日後選舉特首時，他們為了得到中共中央官員的支持，隨時可以大放厥詞，順口開河，說要改變奏唱國歌的場合，藉此討人歡心。
Moreover in the past candidates of the Chief Executive election from the pro - establishment camp would often engage in apple polishing . In the Chief Executive election in future they may talk a lot of nonsense and make a lot of commitments casually saying that the occasions on which the national anthem must be played and sung can be amended in order to win support of the officials of CPCs central authorities
這樣便會變成濫權的行為，怎可以容許他們這樣做呢？
Such practices will constitute abuse of power . How can we allow them to do so?
因此，我支持陳志全議員這項修正案。
Hence I support this amendment proposed by Mr CHAN Chi - chuen
我認為這種做法是本末倒置，要培養一個真正愛國的人，應該讓他發自內心去做，而不是透過立法和施加刑罰來限制他，這樣做只會培訓出一群盲目服從權威的機器。
I consider that this approach is putting the cart before the horse . To nurture genuine patriots people should be allowed to follow their hearts rather than having their behaviours restricted by way of legislation and penalty as this will merely produce a batch of machines which blindly obey authority
有鑒於此，我認為，如果希望人民真正尊重國歌，這個政權以至這個國家應該做好自己的本分，令人民、市民大眾能夠發自內心地尊重它。
In view of this I think if they really want people to genuinely respect the national anthem the regime as well as the State should do their part properly so that the people and the general public will respect it wholeheartedly
主席，我發言是支持4位議員提出的21項修正案。
Chairman with these remarks I support the 21 amendments proposed by four Members
主席，首先要談談今天的辯論時間。
Chairman I would like to first talk about the debating time today
有部分同事，例如陳志全議員說主席打壓議員今天的討論時間。
Some of my colleagues such as Mr CHAN Chi - chuen said that the Chairman has restrained Members discussion time today
這正是反對派過去在本會乃至香港社會經常作的"賊喊捉賊"的把戲，以為香港人完全沒記性。
This is exactly a show of a thief crying stop thief constantly put up by the opposition in this Council and even Hong Kong society . They consider Hong Kong people forgetful
"老兄"，我真的不敢忘記，也不想記起一件事，即上星期許智峯議員投擲"臭彈"或"毒氣彈"，散發濃烈氣味。
Buddy I honestly dare not forget and do not want to recollect one incident namely the hurling by Mr HUI Chi - fung last week of a stink bomb or poisonous gas bomb that emitted a strong smell
主席，我以前說過，我做過學生護士，屎尿絕對嚇不到我，但主席，你對那股臭味應該印象深刻。
Chairman as I said previously I used to be a student nurse and faeces and urine can by no means deter me . However Chairman you must vividly remember that stench
別有用心的人投擲物品，釋放臭氣、毒氣，當中所含一氧化碳和硫化氫的濃度不低，而消防員也說高濃度可致人死亡。
A person with an ulterior motive threw an object that emitted a foul smell and poisonous gases . Its concentration of carbon monoxide and hydrogen sulphide was not low and even firefighters said that a high concentration could be lethal
《國歌條例草案》的立法一波三折，特別是在本立法年度，郭榮鏗議員由去年10月起，已經在內務委員會上大玩選主席的"拉布"遊戲，所有反對派或"攬炒派"配合，共開了17次會議，花了7個月也未能選出內會主席。
The road to the enactment of the National Anthem Bill the Bill has been full of twists and turns . In the current legislative session in particular Mr Dennis KWOK had since last October blatantly played the filibuster game in the election of the Chairman of the House Committee . With the support of all Members of the opposition or the mutual destruction camp 17 meetings in total had been held over some seven months and the Chairman of the House Committee had yet to be elected
其實，很多"攬炒"局面都是"攬炒派"一手造成，甚至現時港區國安法也是"攬炒派"成功爭取。
In fact many cases involving mutual destruction can be directly attributed to the mutual destruction camp . The mutual destruction camp has even succeeded in striving for the national security law in Hong Kong
如果他們沒有搞"港獨"、甚至引入恐怖主義，國家也無須出手。
If they had not championed Hong Kong independence or resorted to even terrorism the Central Authorities would not have intervened
就《條例草案》而言，有人認為，數年前香港有人刻意侮辱國歌，令國家認為有立法的需要。
Regarding the Bill there are views that the intentional insult of the national anthem by some people in Hong Kong several years ago prompted the Central Authorities to consider the need to enact legislation
雖然中國14億人中極少人會侮辱國歌，內地民眾比較認識國家的歷史和民族悲痛，十分尊重國歌，但香港有一小撮人經常侮辱國歌。
Although very few among the 1.4 billion people of China would insult the national anthem and people on the Mainland very much respect the national anthem given their good understanding of the history of the country and national grief a small fraction of people in Hong Kong constantly insult the national anthem
我是球迷，十分支持香港隊參賽，但有時真的很無奈，有部分球迷在球場上令香港隊蒙羞。
As a football fan I very much support the Hong Kong team in football matches . However I feel really helpless in a football stadium when certain fans disgrace the Hong Kong team
當香港隊出賽，奏起中華人民共和國國歌時，有些人"噓"國歌或背向球場。
When the Hong Kong team plays a match and the national anthem of the Peoples Republic of China is played some people would boo the national anthem or turn their back on the football pitch
在國際場合發生這種事，令香港人以至中國人蒙羞，亦傷害中國人的感情。
The occurrence of such an incident in an international event not only disgraces Hong Kong people and Chinese people at large but also hurts the feelings of Chinese people
所以，國家可能因此特別照顧香港的需要，制定國歌法。
For this reason the Central Authorities had perhaps enacted the national anthem law having particular regard to the needs of Hong Kong
反對派在辯論中顧左右而言他，立場曖昧，論述混亂，可能因為他們曾宣誓效忠中華人民共和國香港特別行政區，不敢否定國歌的合法性和意義。
In the debate opposition Members are equivocal their stances are ambiguous and their arguments are confusing . Perhaps it is because they have sworn allegiance to the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the Peoples Republic of China and dare not deny the legitimacy and significance of the national anthem
是否有錢，便可以侮辱國歌，"惡搞"國歌，不用理會14億人民的感受，污衊抗日先烈，污衊國家追求自由、解放、平等的理想？
Is it that if people are rich they can insult the national anthem spoof the national anthem disregard the feelings of 1.4 billion people vilify martyrs to the cause of resisting Japanese aggression and vilify our countrys pursuit of the ideals of freedom liberation and equality?
國家在發展的過程中，的確曾經走上歪路，遇上挫折，亦有人做錯事，但偏偏國家近幾十年發展得很好，在扶貧工作上盡量做到社會公平公義。
In the course of development our country indeed used to take the wrong path and suffer setbacks and there were people who committed mistakes . Contrary to expectations however our country has been faring quite well over the recent decades and in the area of poverty alleviation social equality and justice are upheld to a large extent
有人透過破壞國歌，宣揚不正當的思想。
Some people are promoting their illegitimate thoughts by way of spoofing the national anthem and hence there is indeed a need to introduce proper penalties
他們甚至舉出一些很無稽的例子，即奏唱國歌時，有人不小心睡着了應該怎辦。
They have even raised a very absurd query as to what will happen to someone who accidentally falls asleep when the national anthem is being played and sung
這當然沒問題，因為該人不是故意的，定罪要視乎動機和客觀證據，香港法庭有獨立審訊，亦有舉證標準。
Certainly nothing will happen to him as he is not intentional in doing so and conviction must be based on proof of motive and objective evidence . The courts in Hong Kong exercise judicial power independently and the standard of proof is also upheld
正如他們以睡覺作為例子，我也想送他們一句：裝睡的人叫不醒，跟盲反的人講道理沒有用。
In the light of their example of a person falling asleep I would like to tell them You cannot wake a person who is pretending to be asleep and there is no use reasoning with the blind opposition
所以，我今天會反對全部21項修正案。
As such I will oppose all the 21 amendments today
我們希望能夠全面、完整地落實《條例草案》，一方面透過教育、宣傳令公眾理解，另一方面透過合適的罰則和清晰的定義，確立國歌的尊嚴，凝聚全國人民，包括香港人對國家、民族、先烈的尊重，以及我們對國家的認同。
We hope that the Bill can be implemented in its entirely . On the one hand we must promote the publics understanding through education and publicity campaigns . On the other hand we must through suitable penalties and clear definitions affirm the dignity of the national anthem foster the respect for our country our nation and our martyrs as well as a sense of national identity among everyone in our country including Hong Kong people
他們把自己的子女都送走了，但香港人的子女卻要留在香港接受國民教育和國歌教育。
They have sent their children abroad while the children of Hong Kong people have to stay in Hong Kong to receive national education and national anthem education
我經常也說，愛國是一件由心而發的事情，想國家好，便要保持批判思考；想國家越來越進步，想國家越來越自由，想國家越來越堅強，便要發聲。
As I have always said patriotism should come from peoples hearts . We have to maintain critical thinking if we want the country to improve . We have to voice out if we want the country to progress and to become freer and stronger
想這個地方越來越好，人民的意志是很重要的，自由不應該被打壓。
The will of the people is crucial for the betterment of a place . Freedom should not be suppressed
我們在審議《條例草案》時感到相當擔心，《條例草案》究竟會否變成箝制自由的警號呢？
In scrutinizing the Bill we are worried that it will become a warning for the suppression of freedom
"爭你們個人的自由，便是為國家爭自由；爭你們個人的權利，便是為國家爭權利，因為自由平等的國家不是一群奴才建造得起來的"，這是胡適先生所說的，多年後仍然沒有變。
Mr HU Shi said To fight for your individual freedom is to fight for the freedom of your nation; to fight for your individual rights is to fight for the rights of your nation for a free and equal society cannot be built by a group of servile subjects . It still rings true after so many years
我們想這個地方好，便應該有提供意見的自由，而無須擔心會被以言入罪，也不用擔心自己會不小心越過了紅線。
We should have the freedom to express our opinions for the betterment of this place without having to worry about being convicted for expression of opinions or crossing the red line inadvertently
主席，世界上普遍只有兩類國家，一類是當權者權力最大、最優先的國家，而另一類則是人民權力最優先的國家，究竟要先顧及人民抑或先顧及當權者呢？
Chairman generally speaking there are two types of countries in the world those which put the power of the authority first and those which put the power of the people first . Should the people or the authority come first?
想要有效率是很簡單的，以當權者優先，所有事情也無須討論，直接通過。
We can achieve efficiency simply by putting the authority first and passing everything direct without any discussion
可是，我們擁有普世價值，我們渴望人民可以得到自由，這便是進步，也是勢不可擋的民主潮流。
However we uphold universal values and aspire to freedom for the people . This is a step forward and the unstoppable tide of democracy
可是，今天我們面對《條例草案》和港區國安法，令我們非常擔心香港是否在開倒車。
However in the face of the Bill today and the Hong Kong national security law we are very worried that Hong Kong is backpedalling
為何政府要透過刑罰令大家畏懼？
Why must the Government frighten people with penalties?
胡志偉議員和陳志全議員也提出了修正案，內容普遍是圍繞《條例草案》中"警務處處長發現或知悉有關罪行的日期之後1年屆滿時"及"犯該罪行的日期之後2年屆滿時"，即發現有關罪行後的追溯期大約有多長。
The amendments proposed by Mr WU Chi - wai and Mr CHAN Chi - chuen mainly concern the phrases the end of the period of 1 year after the date on which the offence is discovered by or comes to the notice of the Commissioner of Police and the end of the period of 2 years after the date on which the offence is committed that is the length of the retrospective period upon the discovery of the offence
主席，如果我們有一個穩妥的機制，整個社會的氣氛不是那麼繃緊，在推行某些法例時或許便不會引起那麼大的動盪。
How will the Bill be enforced in the future? . Chairman if we have a robust system in place and the social atmosphere is not as tense the introduction of legislation will probably not cause such upheavals
可是，《條例草案》在這一刻為了要快和有效率，條文中明明有很多模糊之處，我們不能不理。
However the Bill has to be passed right now for the sake of speed and efficiency even though there are many ambiguities in the provisions from the date to the overly heavy penalties which we cannot ignore
作為立法會議員，我們看的就是刑罰是否過重，可否從輕發落？
As a Member of the Legislative Council we have to examine if the penalties are too heavy and whether they can be made more lenient
有很多同事提及田漢，屆時能否提及他呢？
Many Honourable colleagues referred to TIAN Han . Will he be mentioned?
同學問國歌的填詞人是誰？
If students ask who wrote the lyrics of the national anthem they will be told it was TIAN Han
那麼田漢最後有何遭遇或他是否很愛國？
Then what has happened to TIAN Han? . Was he very patriotic?
當然，我也要說說，田漢當時被視作資產階級反動學術權威而被批鬥。
Of course I have to tell everyone here that TIAN Han was denounced as a bourgeois reactionary academic authority at the time
一時一樣，今天說自由，屆時照史實教授後，有情況發生又沒有保障。
The answers change with time . Even though teachers are said to have freedom today they are not protected if they have taught the facts according to history and then something happens
其實，《條例草案》及同時出現的港區國安法，是令香港人人心不穩的原因。
As a matter of fact the Bill and the Hong Kong national security law introduced at the same time are the causes of the restlessness among Hong Kong people
天可憐見，香港人對這項法例，想提供意見都不能。
Heaven help us all for Hong Kong people cannot even express opinions on this law
今天已經是2020年，我們還要卑微、可憐到要求政府不要立法來收緊我們的自由。
It is already 2020 but we still have to be so pathetic as to ask the Government to stop enacting legislation to restrict our freedoms
不需要這樣的，可否反過來令人民由衷地、由心而發地去愛國呢？
No there is no need to do so . Can we instead make people patriotic from the bottom of their heart?
可能數年後市民會慨嘆，這些法例原來只 是開始，陸續落實後香港的改變才慢慢出現，最後發覺要去扭轉局面，已經為時已晚。
Perhaps in a few years people will lament that these pieces of legislation were merely a start and Hong Kong has changed slowly upon their implementation . It will be too late when they want to turn things around eventually
但是，有一天法例影響到你，甚至惹上官非，屆時才想就太遲了。
However it will be too late to think about this if the legislation affects them one day or if they are caught by the law
其實，在人類的歷史中，任何城市和國家的人民只會越來越自由，民主是每人手上都有一票，不怕以言入罪，可以自由地說出心裏的想法。
As a matter of fact in the history of mankind people in any city and country will only enjoy more and more freedom . Democracy means everyone has a vote and does not have to worry about being persecuted for his opinion . Everyone may express their views freely
其實，作為民選議員，我們在這個議事廳尚且有《立法會條例》保護，能夠在這裏說出我們認為的市民心聲。
In fact as elected Members we can still voice out here what we think are public opinions as we are protected by the Legislative Council Ordinance in this chamber
其實大家可以想象到無限個有機會進入犯法紅線的情況當然不夠港區國安法多，但今天不是討論港區國安法這令我不禁思考，為何我們要不斷增加這個城市的紅線，令可能很多不太相關的市民終日惶恐？
We can actually imagine countless possible scenarios that people may cross the red line and violate the law―not as many as the Hong Kong national security law of course but we are not discussing the Hong Kong national security law today―I cannot help but wonder why do we have to draw more and more red lines in this city and make people live in fear day in and day out?
成為一個好的國家，人民便會由心而發地尊重它。
If the country becomes a better country people will respect it sincerely
本會會隨即表決修正案並處理全體委員會的餘下程序，然後便會進入三讀程序。
We will immediately put the amendments to vote and deal with the remaining procedures of the committee of the whole Council . After that we will proceed to the Third Reading procedures
有意發言的委員，尤其是尚未發言的委員，請盡早按下"要求發言"按鈕。
Members who wish to speak especially those who have not yet spoken please press the Request to speak button as early as possible
另一方面，根據《條例草案》，當局已就不當使用國歌的行為及相關刑罰作出清晰指引，包括第6條訂明"不當使用國歌的罪行"，包括把國歌、國歌歌詞或國歌曲譜用於商標或商業廣告、私人喪事活動，以及行政長官會同行政會議藉憲報公告訂明的場合、場所或目的。
On a different note pursuant to the Bill the authorities have set out clear guidelines on the misuse of the national anthem and the related penalty . Among them clause 6 provides for the Offence of misuse of national anthem including using the national anthem or the lyrics or score of the national anthem in a trade mark or commercial advertisement at a private funeral event or on an occasion at a place or for a purpose prescribed by the Chief Executive in Council by notice published in the Gazette
同時，國歌不得用作公眾場所的背景音樂。
At the same time the national anthem must not be used as background music in a public place
此外，《條例草案》亦訂明，侮辱國歌的行為，一經定罪，可處第5級罰款及監禁3年。
Moreover the Bill also provides that behaviour that insults the national anthem is liable on conviction to a fine at level 5 ie 50,000 and to imprisonment for three years
至於涉及不當使用國歌的罪行，例如以國歌作為商標或商業廣告，最高可判處第5級罰款，其他情況則最高可處第2級罰款，即2萬元。
The offence of misuse of the national anthem such as using the national anthem in a trade mark or commercial advertisement is liable to a maximum fine at level 5 and in other circumstances to a maximum fine at level 2 which is 20,000
自由黨認為有關條文清晰可辨，沒有任何懸念。
The Liberal Party considers the clauses clear and definite without any doubt
所以，我不同意所有修正案。
For this reason I disagree to all amendments
事實上，海外有不少國家均制定國歌法，例如馬來西亞、 菲律賓、新加坡、印度、日本、美國等。
In fact many foreign countries have enacted national anthem laws such as Malaysia the Philippines Singapore India Japan and the United States
雖然中央和港府已多次作出嚴厲譴責，但有關情況卻沒有減少。
Despite the many severe condemnations coming from the Central Authorities and the Hong Kong Government those situations have not mitigated
因此，社會有必要針對這種具侮辱成分的不文明舉動制定法例，列明刑事責任，阻止有關行為繼續蔓延。
Therefore it is necessary for society to enact laws and criminalize such uncivilized insulting behaviour so as to stop such behaviour from spreading
我們不願再看到社會繼續撕裂，亦不能容忍個別政黨議員及公眾人士繼續包庇暴徒及"港獨"分子侮辱國旗和國歌。
We do not wish to see the continued dissension in society and cannot tolerate Members of individual political parties and members of the public to continue to condone insults to the national flag and national anthem by rioters and Hong Kong independence advocates
自由黨必須強調，今次立法不單是屬於香港制度憲法的權利，亦符合"一國兩制"的原則。
The Liberal Party must stress that the legislative exercise is not only a constitutional right under the systems in Hong Kong but also consistent with the principle of one country two systems
此舉一如在香港實施國旗法及國徽法，即與訂立《國旗及國徽條例》的做法一致，當中並無差異。
Such a move is no different from applying the Law on the National Flag and the Law on the National Emblem in Hong Kong which is line with the enactment of the National Flag and National Emblem Ordinance . There is no dissimilarity
基於上述種種理據，自由黨支持香港特區政府提交《條例草案》及落實《國歌法》，並反對所有修正案。
For the various aforementioned reasons the Liberal Party supports the HKSAR Government in tabling the Bill and applying the National Anthem Law and opposes all amendments
就《條例草案》的辯論安排，委員可參閱講稿附錄。
Members may refer to the Appendix to the Script for the debate arrangement for the Bill
會議廳內法定人數不足。
There is a lack of quorum in the Chamber
主席，我很早便已指出，以立法來規定香港人尊重國歌其實是弱勢的表現。
Chairman as I have pointed out very early on it is actually a show of weakness to oblige Hong Kong people to respect the national anthem by means of legislation
正因如此，我支持多位民主派議員提出的所有修正案。
For this reason I support all the amendments proposed by pro - democracy Members
大家不妨看看《國歌條例草案》的"前世今生"。
Let us take a look at the past and present lives of the National Anthem Bill the Bill
一個偉大的國家、強國，如果得到市民認同，大家不用強迫自然便會唱國歌，對嗎？
If a great and powerful country is recognized by its people everyone will sing the national anthem voluntarily right?
誰想做奴隸的人們？
Who wants to be a slave?
我們現在看到的情況是用《條例草案》強迫香港人尊重國歌。
The present situation is that Hong Kong people are forced to respect the national anthem by the Bill
誰人出賣了偉大的祖國？
Who has betrayed the great Motherland?
對"一國兩制"不信任的多於62%，而信任的只有30%多，即是說香港大部分人均不相信"一國兩制"和中央政府，誰是罪魁禍首？
More than 62 % of people have no confidence in one country two systems while only some 30 % of people have confidence in it . That means the majority of Hong Kong people do not have confidence in one country two systems and the Central Government . Who is the culprit of this situation?
其實好端端的，如果去年年初......
Actually at the beginning of last year when everything was fine
不是，主席，我正在說現在的情景沒有最壞，只有更壞。所以，我們希望用這些修正案撥亂反正，令我剛才說這些極糟糕的情況不要發生。
No Chairman I am saying that the current situation can only get worse so we hope these amendments can rectify the mistakes and avoid the terrible situations mentioned just now
所有修正案也是以良好的意願提出，大家想想，如果"777林鄭"或將來的行政長官可以任意修改附表3，隨意要人唱國歌，要字正腔圓，不知道"大媽"怎樣唱，因為她們的廣東話不正宗......
All these amendments were proposed with good intentions . Come to think of it if 777 Carrie LAM or any future Chief Executives may amend Schedule 3 arbitrarily and require everyone to sing the national anthem articulately how will the Mainland Aunties be able to do so as they speak Cantonese with an accent no the national anthem is in Putonghua so actually we will be the ones in trouble because we may be jailed for singing it in poor Putonghua
不是，國歌是普通話的，屆時是我們出事，因為如果我們普通話唱得不好，可能又要入獄，要快些學習普通話，否則隨時入獄3年。
We have to learn Putonghua fast or else we will probably be jailed for three years
不用害怕，可以學澳門特首說普通話的，原來澳門特首的普通話水平領導人也接受。
Do not worry . We may learn Putonghua from the Chief Executive of Macao whose Putonghua level is still acceptable to the leaders
尊重不是發自內心嗎？
Does respect not come from the bottom of peoples heart?
好像文革時的紅太陽、毛主席那樣，會否好一點呢？
Will it be better to follow the red sun and chairman MAO during the Cultural Revolution?
但現在要用嚴刑，難看又醜怪，是示弱的表現。
The introduction of heavy penalties is indeed awful and ugly as well as a show of weakness
我再說一次，是示弱，不是強。
Let me repeat it is a show of weakness not strength