Borrison/hk-legicost huggingface dataset:
就着鄺議員提到的藝術團體，或其他創作、工作室等用途，我想亦應先向相關政策局提出建議，然後我們會檢視在該183間空置校舍中有否任何合適的選擇，再進行跟進工作。
Regarding the use of such sites by arts groups or for other creative or workshop purposes as mentioned by Mr KWONG I think the relevant proposals should first be submitted to the relevant bureau for consideration . Subject to its agreement we will then review whether any of the 183 VSPs may be suitable for the purpose before other follow - up actions are taken
《基本法》第二十五條訂明，香港居民在法律面前一律平等。
Article 25 of the Basic Law stipulates that all Hong Kong residents shall be equal before the law
然而，梁振英作為特首，並不受《防止賄賂條例》第3條和第8條規限，所以在法律面前已享有某些特權。
However LEUNG Chun - ying as the Chief Executive is not subject to section 3 and section 8 of the Prevention of Bribery Ordinance so he already enjoys certain privileges before the law
如果放諸於其他案件，這是很典型的妨礙司法公正的情況。
If this happened in other circumstances this would be a very typical case of perverting the course of justice
如果特首有這種特權，便正正與《基本法》第二十五條有所抵觸。
If the Chief Executive has such a privilege this is undoubtedly in conflict with Article 25 of the Basic Law
這怎可能不影響行政立法關係？
How could this not affect the relationship between the executive and the legislature?
眾所周知，在立法會內，保皇黨佔絕大多數，在專責委員會內，保皇黨亦佔絕大多數。
As we all know the royalist camp commands a majority in the Legislative Council and likewise in the Select Committee
從這個角度來看，梁振英所做最大的壞事，是為整個特區政府樹立了"特區首長在法律面前享有特權"的觀念。
From this point of view the gravest wrongdoing on LEUNG Chun - yings part is that he has as far as the entire SAR Government is concerned established the notion that the head of the SAR is entitled to privileges before the law
試想，如果我們讓香港 社會和國際社會看到，在法律面前並非人人平等，這不是根本地衝擊我們的法治精神嗎？
Just think if we give the Hong Kong community and the international community the impression that not everyone is equal before the law is this not a fundamental challenge to the spirit of the rule of law in our society?
梁振英這次干擾專責委員會的調查過程，反映出其特權是"特"至可作出妨礙司法公正的事，然後不了了之。
LEUNG Chun - yings interference with the process of the Select Committees inquiry this time reflects that he is privileged to the extent of being allowed to pervert the course of justice without being held liable afterwards
雖然專責委員會本身不是一個如法庭般擁有傳召權的機關，但梁振英作為政府首長，理應以法庭的標準來看待自己今次所涉及的事件，從而照顧公眾的觀感。
Although the Select Committee unlike the Court has no power to summon witnesses LEUNG Chun - ying as the head of the Government should having regard to public perception use the Courts standard as the basis for dealing with this incident in which he is involved
如果事件由法庭處理，梁振英會否膽敢以同樣的方法來影響法官或陪審員對他的審判？
If this incident was handled by the Court would LEUNG Chun - ying dare to use the same method to influence the judge or the jury in his trial?
代理主席，作為立法會議員，我們有責任監察政府施政，確保各級政府官員在行事過程中盡忠職守、奉公守法、廉潔奉公，顯示出法律面前人人平等。
Deputy President we as Legislative Council Members are duty - bound to monitor the Governments governance and ensure that government officials of all ranks act conscientiously dutifully in full accordance with the law honestly and with integrity . We have to show that everyone is equal before the law
這是香港賴以成功的基石，但梁振英卻肆意破壞。
This is the cornerstone of Hong Kongs success but LEUNG Chun - ying has damaged it wantonly
他完全無視他的行為會為社會帶來非常壞的觀感：只要位高權重，便可對法律肆無忌憚；"法律面前人人平等"與特首何干？
He has completely disregarded the fact that his act will create a very bad perception in the community as long as one is a high - powered official one can flout the law with impunity; what does everyone being equal before the law have to do with the Chief Executive?
代理主席，這項議案所關乎的具體事實，很多都可能須由專責委員會進一步審視，所以我不在此長篇贅述。
Deputy President as many of the specific facts to which this motion relates may have to be further examined by the Select Committee I will not discuss them at length here
事實上，梁振英在過去5年對香港社會造成的傷害，罄竹難書。
In fact the cases in which LEUNG Chun - ying has harmed Hong Kong society over the past five years are too numerous to mention
我剛才聽到司長開宗明義地說梁振英很好，很努力，為香港人做了很多好事，所以香港人要記着他。
Earlier on I heard the Chief Secretary say in his opening remarks that LEUNG Chun - ying is very good and very hard - working and that he has done a lot of good things for Hong Kong people and so Hong Kong people should remember him
我們要記着他帶給香港社會的撕裂和對立，記着他破壞了香港各種核心價值。
We should remember that he has caused dissension and confrontation in Hong Kong society and he has undermined various core values of Hong Kong
有收入但不繳稅，反映了梁振英的語言"偽術"，他在整個過程中一直都沒有說他曾就這項收入繳稅，只說其他國家的稅局沒有"搞"他。
This is a case of not paying tax on an income received and it reflects LEUNG Chun - yings doublespeak . During the whole process he never said that he had paid tax on this income . He only said that the tax authorities of other countries had not taken any action against him
如果這個概念可以因梁振英位高權重而抹去，即代表香港社會進入了有人可以有法不依的狀態，直接損害本港的核心價值。
If this concept can be erased just because LEUNG Chun - ying is high - powered it means that Hong Kong society has gone into a state where someone is allowed to disobey the law and this will directly damage the core values of Hong Kong
主席，前主席曾鈺成先生於2017年2月27日，在報章寫了一篇名為"領袖風範"的文章，提到好領袖和壞領袖主要有以下分別："第一，好領袖公正待人，壞領袖拉幫結派。
President on 27 February 2017 the former President Mr Jasper TSANG wrote an article in a newspaper entitled Leadership style . He described the major differences between good leaders and bad leaders First good leaders treat people fairly while bad leaders form factions
公平正直地對待團隊的每一個成員，是好領袖的基本要素。
Treating every member of the team fairly and impartially is the basic element of a good leader
作為團隊的領袖，在工作上就要對所有人一視同仁，包括和自己意見不合，或者敢於挑戰自己的主張的人。
As the leader of a team he must treat everyone equally including those who disagree with him or dare to challenge him
壞領袖的表現恰恰相反。
A bad leader behaves in an exactly opposite way
他不能憑自己的實力去贏得團隊的愛戴，便依靠玩弄權術、拉幫結派、扶植親信、打擊異己，以鞏固自己的領袖地位。
As he cannot win the respect and support of his team with his actual strength he plays tricks forms factions fosters confidants and cracks down dissidents to consolidate his position as a leader
對於團隊裡的成員，他不看能力和表現；誰可以給他收納為心腹，他就重用誰。
For members of the team he disregards ability and performance and he puts his confidants in important positions
於是擦鞋文化盛行，阿諛奉承之輩橫行無忌，正直能幹之士難以立足。
Therefore a boot - licking culture prevails; while the yes - men play the bully the upright and capable persons cannot get a foothold
"周浩鼎議員正是梁振英那杯茶。
Mr Holden CHOW is exactly LEUNG Chun - yings cup of tea
"第二，好領袖愛才好士，壞領袖嫉賢妒能。
Second a good leader has a passion for capable persons and intellectuals while a bad leader is jealous of able and virtuous persons
一流的領袖會用一流的人才；二流的領袖會用三流的人才；三流的領袖，用的必然是九流的人才。
First - rate leaders will recruit first - class talents; second - rate leaders will select third - rate people; and third - rate leaders will surely take on ninth - rate people
"憑着我對梁振英與周浩鼎議員的關係的觀察，我認為他的說法非常準確。
Based on my observation of the relationships between LEUNG Chun - ying and Mr Holden CHOW I think his remarks are very accurate
"第三，好領袖承擔責任，壞領袖諉過下屬。
Third a good leader takes up responsibilities while a bad leader lays the blame on subordinates
好領袖的一個重要特質，是功勞歸於團隊，錯誤自己承當。
An important feature of a good leader is that he attributes credit to the team and bears responsibilities for mistakes
壞領袖可剛好相反：有成績時功勞統統歸於自己，出錯誤時責任完全推給下屬。
A bad leader is just the opposite he takes all the credit for achievements but shirks responsibilities to subordinates when mistakes are made
這樣的領袖，一定不得人心"，甚至會令團隊感到可耻。
Such a leader will certainly be unpopular and he will even make the team feel shameful
梁振英語言"偽術"的特色，無須我們多作解釋或闡述，香港有語言"偽術"一詞，其實也是梁振英帶出來的。
Regarding LEUNG Chun - yings hypocritical rhetoric we need not make further explanation or elaboration as the term hypocritical rhetoric is coined in Hong Kong thanks to LEUNG Chun - ying
香港人有梁振英這種特首，是香港的黑暗歲月，香港人真的要以"689"為耻，我相信張建宗司長也應該會有同感，只是無法公開表達。
The years with LEUNG Chun - ying being the Chief Executive is a dark period for Hong Kong; Hong Kong people should really be ashamed of 689 and I believe Chief Secretary Matthew CHEUNG should feel the same but he simply cannot express that sentiment openly
行政長官梁振英早前在最後一次立法會答問會上，眾多民主派議員繼續狙擊UGL事件，問他有否干預立法會調查，他當時強調，自己早已向中央交代，而中央亦清楚表示滿意。
At the last Question and Answer Session of the Legislative Council held earlier many democrats kept putting questions to Chief Executive LEUNG Chun - ying on the UGL incident asking him whether he had interfered with the Legislative Councils inquiry . He stressed that he had already explained to the Central Authorities and the Central Authorities had expressed satisfaction
多少惡事以中央之名而行？
How many evil deeds have been done in the name of the Central Authorities?
不知道梁振英是否以為他擔任政協副主席，便可以假借中央意旨，以為自己向自己交代後，欺騙了自己，便當作已向中央交代？
I do not know if LEUNG Chun - ying thinks that after he became the Vice Chairman of the Chinese Peoples Political Consultative Conference he can act in the name of the Central Authorities and after giving an account to himself and deceiving himself he regards that he has given an account to the Central Authorities
梁振英是否夠膽清楚說明，他究竟是向哪位中央領導人交代，而領導人又有何正式回應，有否"紅頭文件"？
Does LEUNG Chun - ying have the guts to specify which state leaders he had reported to what official response had been given and whether there is any official document?
面對梁振英，確實需要"打爛沙盤問到篤"。
We really need to get to the bottom when we ask LEUNG Chun - ying questions
以梁振英過往的語言"偽術"，再無賴、幼稚及"小學雞"的事情他也說得出來，例如，他 可能會說，中央圖書館、中央飯店、中央車站、中央街等都有"中央"兩個字，便是他口中所說的中央，只是大家沒有問清楚，他真的夠膽那樣無賴。
In consideration of his past hypocritical rhetoric he really could make dishonest childish and puerile comments . For example he may say that the central he speaks of means the Central Library the Central Restaurant the Central Terminal and the Central Street; the problem lies with us not asking specifically . He really dares make such dishonest comments
現時要調查的是梁振英與UGL的利益關係，提出不滿的是香港人，貪污的特首梁振英也要向香港人問責。
We are now going to inquire into the interests involved between LEUNG Chun - ying and UGL . Hong Kong people are dissatisfied and the corrupt Chief Executive LEUNG Chun - ying should be accountable to Hong Kong people
答案只有一個，就是他介意的不是香港人的觀感，可見他的評分是"低處未算低"。
There is only one answer ie . he does not care about the feelings of Hong Kong people; as we can see his rating is getting lower and lower
他關心和介意的是北京對他的看法。
He only cares about Beijings opinion of him
梁振英和周浩鼎議員"打同通"，干預立法會對他的調查固然可耻，但大家細閱他修改後的文件內容，就更能看出梁振英其心可誅。
It is despicable that LEUNG Chun - ying and Mr Holden CHOW colluded to interfere with the Legislative Councils inquiry and if we read the amended document carefully we will realize the ulterior motive of LEUNG Chun - ying
他模糊焦點，為自己堆砌有利說辭，以求蒙混過關。
He blurred the focus of the inquiry and presented arguments favourable to himself in order to muddle through
其中一項修訂建議調查梁振英在簽約"當日是否已當選行政長官"。
One of the amendments proposes the Select Committee should study whether or not LEUNG Chun - ying 當日是否已當選行政長官 of signing of the agreement
根據已披露的文本，梁振英與UGL簽訂協議當日是2011年12月2日，即梁振英宣布參選後的5天，他尚有3個月才當選。
According to the document disclosed LEUNG Chun - ying signed the agreement with UGL on 2 December 2011 ie . five days after LEUNG Chun - ying announced that he would stand for election . He was elected three months later
UGL後來澄清及表示，梁振英確實在2011年簽訂協議。
UGL later clarified and stated that LEUNG Chun - ying actually signed the agreement in 2011
現時根本沒有人質疑協議是在梁振英當選後才簽訂，立法會和市民大眾希望知道的，不是梁振英有否在當選後簽約，而是梁振英有否在當選後收錢。
No one has ever questioned whether LEUNG Chun - ying signed the agreement after he was elected . The Legislative Council and the general public wanted to know whether LEUNG Chun - ying received the payment after he was elected but not whether he signed the agreement after he was elected
根據已披露的資料，UGL給他 400萬英鎊酬金，第二期款項在梁振英當選後，即2013年12月才發放。
According to the information uncovered UGL paid LEUNG Chun - ying £4 million and the second instalment of the payment was made in December 2013 after he was elected
若經調查屬實，梁振英作為行政長官未申報利益，自然是違規行為。
If these facts are verified after investigation LEUNG Chun - ying has certainly breached the law for failing to declare interests in the capacity as the Chief Executive
因此，這項修訂明顯地有意混淆視聽。
Obviously this amendment intends to obscure the facts
第二，加入"調查被澳洲媒體公開的協議文本真偽"。
Second the addition of inquiring into the authenticity of the agreement made public by the Australian media
這項修訂建議專責委員會調查"澳洲媒體公開的UGL協議文本"的真偽，以取代"梁先生與UGL有否簽訂"任何協議。
This amendment proposes that the Select Committee should inquire into the authenticity of 澳洲媒體公開的UGL協議文本 to replace whether or not Mr LEUNG and UGL signed any agreement
如果這項修訂獲得採納會有何結果？
What is the consequence is this amendment is passed?
專責委員會便會在文件的真偽上糾纏不清，反而沒有權限調 查梁振英與UGL有否其他協議。
The Select Committee will become entangled in the authenticity of the document and it will not have the authority to inquire into whether there are other agreements signed between LEUNG Chun - ying and UGL
專責委員會委員尹兆堅議員說過："現時專責委員會的調查權力已少得不能再少，若再進一步收窄，最後一定甚麼都查不到，徒勞無功。
Mr Andrew WAN a member of the Select Committee once said that the Select Committee has minimum inquiry power; if its power is further narrowed its inquiry will eventually be futile
第三，連《基本法》第四十七條的立法原意都要研究？
Third he even proposed to study the legislative intent of Article 47 of the Basic Law
在上月25日，專責委員會的會議上，周浩鼎議員提出，調查範圍應包括研究《基本法》第四十七條，即"行政長官就任時應向香港特別行政區終審法院首席法官申報財產"這項條文的立法原意。
At the meeting of the Select Committee on the 25 of last month Mr Holden CHOW suggested that the scope of the inquiry should include studying the legislative intent of Article 47 of the Basic Law ie . The Chief Executive on assuming office shall declare his or her assets to the Chief Justice of the Court of Final Appeal of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
當時，民主派委員楊岳橋議員、專責委員會主席謝偉俊議員及立法會法律顧問曹志遠先生均認為，這項修訂有問題。
At that time Mr Alvin YEUNG a pro - democracy member; Mr Paul TSE Chairman of the Select Committee; and Mr Timothy CAO the Legal Adviser of the Legislative Council considered that there was something wrong with the amendment
今天終於真相大白，原來這項無理修訂是周浩鼎議員與梁振英"打同通"之作。
Everything is clear today . As it turns out this unreasonable amendment was conspired by Mr Holden CHOW and LEUNG Chun - ying
若非對《基本法》條文有重大爭議，按照字面意思來處理，配合調查結果，便可判斷梁振英在UGL事件中有沒有違反《基本法》，收受UGL利益但未有申報。
If there are no major controversies over the provisions of the Basic Law it will be determined on the literal meaning of the provision and supported by findings of the inquiry whether LEUNG Chun - ying has violated the Basic Law and accepted advantages from UGL without making declaration in the UGL incident
究竟梁振英與周浩鼎議員希望專責委員會如何研究《基本法》第四十七條？
In what way would LEUNG Chun - ying and Mr Holden CHOW want the Select Committee to study Article 47 of the Basic Law?
成立專責委員會的目的是要調查梁振英濫權瀆職，今天梁振英竟然被"踢爆"干預專責委員會的工作，濫權干預對自己濫權的調查。
The purpose of setting up the Select Committee is to inquire into LEUNG Chun - yings abuse of power and dereliction of duty; yet it is uncovered that LEUNG Chun - ying interfered with the work of the Select Committee and he abused power to interfere with the inquiry on his abuse of power
我們絕不能就此放過梁振英。
We definitely should not let LEUNG Chun - ying off the hook
梁振英及周浩鼎議員因UGL調查而鬧得輿論一片沸沸揚揚，顯示二人行事確有不妥當的地方。
LEUNG Chun - yings collusion with Mr Holden CHOW in the UGL inquiry has caused a hubbub in society which reflected that their acts are inappropriate
我相信，建制派同事或民建聯黨友和同事也明白，當中一定有不妥當的地方，不過，為何本來光明正大的事情，他們卻偷偷摸摸、曖曖昧昧，以致有行政干預立法的嫌疑？
I believe that pro - establishment Members and Members of the Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong DAB also understand that something must have gone wrong . The inquiry should be open and above board how come the two had acted clandestinely giving rise to alleged interference of the Executive Authorities with the legislature?
這反映出梁振英根本不相信立法會，行政立法關係真的非常緊張。
This reflects that LEUNG Chun - ying does not trust the Legislative Council and the executive - legislature relationship is very tense
我再說一次，當大家都很關心行政立法關係為何如此緊張時，希望大家弄清楚，矛頭是梁振英，是他令行政立法關係變得緊張和"一鑊粥"。
Let me reiterate when we are all concerned about the tense executive - legislature relationship I hope you will see clearly that LEUNG Chun - ying is the culprit for causing the tense executive - legislature relationship and messing up everything
一如梁振英所說，他是UGL案件的當事人，對於立法會如何調查有發言權。
As pointed out by LEUNG Chun - ying he being the subject of inquiry in the UGL case has a say in how the Legislative Council conducts the inquiry
很多議員都發表了意見，問題是他本來可以直接向專責委員會反映意見，為何要私下找周浩鼎議員，修改其提交的文件？
Many Members have expressed their views but the question is he could have directly reflected his views to the Select Committee why did he contact Mr Holden CHOW in private and amend the document to be submitted by him?
在上周的答問會上，如果我有機會提問，我也想問梁振英：今天建制派議員提出的問題當中，有多少問題被你修訂過？
At the Question and Answer Session held last week if I had the opportunity to ask questions I would also like to ask LEUNG Chun - ying Of the questions asked by pro - establishment Members today how many has been amended by you?
今天的發言有多少篇幅是你自己親手撰寫的？
How many speeches delivered today has been written by you?
我也為建制派同事感到難過和委屈。
I also feel sorry and aggrieved for pro - establishment colleagues
其實，有關文件是公開的，過往也有類似的調查，例如涉及前立法會議員甘乃威的個案，在擬定有關調查範圍時，也會向當事人諮詢意見，只是在諮詢前會先徵得委員會同意。
In fact the relevant documents are open to the public . There were similar inquires in the past . For example in the case relating to KAM Nai - wai a former Legislative Council Member in drawing up the scope of inquiry the parties concerned had also been consulted after seeking the consent of the committee
有人或會認為，梁振英有意透過修改文件，引導專責委員會的調查朝有利於自己的方向走。
It might be argued that LEUNG Chun - ying intended to guide the inquiry of the Select Committee in a direction in his favour by amending the document
梁振英作出大大小小的修改共47項，都與調查範圍有關。
LEUNG Chun - ying made a total of 47 amendments to the scope of inquiry
雖然周浩鼎議員狡辯指梁振英的修改糅合了自己的意見，但事到如今，作為臥底的周浩鼎議員已是百詞莫辯。
Although Mr Holden CHOW argued speciously that his views have been incorporated into LEUNG Chun - yings amendments he as an undercover cannot explain away his deed
民建聯黨友未能為他積極護航，工聯會理事吳秋北更批評他無能和怠惰，愚不可及。
Members from DAB cannot actively protect him and Stanley NG Chairman of the Hong Kong Federation of Trade Unions even criticized that he was incompetent insolent and very foolish
周浩鼎議員，我確實想看看你稍後如何發言，看看你如何能夠再"頂"下去，如何能夠厚顏地向香港人解釋此事。
Mr Holden CHOW I really want to see how you will express your views later how you can continue to hold on and barefacedly offer an explanation to Hong Kong people
民主派的支持者自然早已看出你愚不可及，但看來你連保皇黨的支持者也得失了。
Naturally supporters of the democratic camp have noticed for a long time that you are a fool but it seems that you have even offended the supporters of the royalist camp
梁振英和周浩鼎議員的政治成績表已經滿江紅。
The political report cards of LEUNG Chun - ying and Mr Holden CHOW are nothing but failure
父親節快到了，我有一個溫馨提示，你們都為人父親，其實你們可以藉此機會作父親的模範。
Fathers Day is coming and I have a gentle reminder for both of them as fathers you can actually take this opportunity to set a good example for your children
在整件事情上，大家都把焦點放在梁振英和周浩鼎議員的錯失上，但我也想提出一點：造成這個局面的其中一個原因，是立法會現時的運作。
On this matter all of us have focused on the mistakes made by LEUNG Chun - ying and Mr Holden CHOW but I would also like to point out that the current operation of the Legislative Council is one of the causes of this situation
當保皇黨心中不再有公平，一切對人不對事時，這正是摧毀議會的原因。
When the royalists do not care about fairness and are only concerned about people rather than facts this Council is ruined
我手上有一本書名為《獨裁者的進化》，我今天支持這項彈劾議案，是不想讓這個獨裁者繼續進一步進化。
I am holding a book called Evolution of a Dictator; I support this impeachment motion today because I do not wish to see the further evolution of this dictator
主席，我剛才在樓上聽政務司司長張建宗讀出今天預備的發言稿，我不知道那是否出自張司長的手筆，但我相信很大機會不是。
President just now when Chief Secretary for Administration Matthew CHEUNG read out his scripted speech for todays meeting I was upstairs listening . I wonder whether the speech was prepared by Chief Secretary Matthew CHEUNG himself but I believe it is highly unlikely
因此，我們28名泛民同事聯署彈劾是名正言順的。
For this reason it is perfectly justified for us 28 pan - democratic Members to jointly initiate an impeachment motion
主席，如果不是因為立法會秘書處的專業，發現電腦文件上有梁振英修改的痕跡，周浩鼎議員這名立法會的"二五仔"便會一直在專責委員會做梁振英的喉舌，做"無間道"。
President had it not been for the professionalism of the Legislative Council Secretariat which detected in the computer file the traces of amendments left by LEUNG Chun - ying Mr Holden CHOW a double - crosser in the Legislative Council would have continued to serve as LEUNG Chun - yings mouthpiece or undercover agent . Apart from being tipped off by Mr Holden CHOW LEUNG Chun - ying could also revise Mr Holden CHOWs speeches
主席，整件事不嚴重嗎？
President is the issue not serious?
我相信這是回歸20年以來，最誇張、最離譜的其中一件政治黑幕事件。
I think this must be one of the most outrageous and ridiculous political scandals over the 20 years following the reunification
梁振英試圖將專責委員會的調查方向扭轉，達致自己的目的。
LEUNG Chun - ying endeavoured to change the direction of the inquiry undertaken by the Select Committee so as to serve his own ends
我們身為議員，盡責追究一些不公平、不合理、不合法的行為，這樣做難道有錯嗎？
As Members are we in the wrong if we discharge our duties to look into unfair unreasonable and illegal deeds?
梁振英身為特首，是香港最有權的人，反而說我們打壓他，會否有些倒果為因，混淆視聽呢？
As the Chief Executive LEUNG Chun - ying is the most powerful person in Hong Kong . How can one say we oppress him? . Is this taking effect for cause and leading the public astray?
事實上，現在是誰犯法、違規呢？
In fact who has broken the law and rules?
誰人撕裂社會，誰人在今次事件上私通議會"二五仔"？
Who has caused social dissension? . Who has conspired with the double - crosser in the legislature in this incident?
誰人嘗試混淆視聽呢？
Who have sought to make grossly misleading remarks?
主席，彈劾梁振英，是因為他做錯事。
President we have decided to impeach LEUNG Chun - ying for he has erred
我認為民建聯這種混淆視聽的邏輯真是十分離譜。
I think the misleading logic of DAB is preposterous
他們一再嘗試誤導公眾，說我們未審先判，說我們認為梁振英有問題。
In their attempts to mislead the public they accuse us of passing a judgment before trial and finding fault with LEUNG Chun - ying
我們認為有問題，便是對梁振英不公平，未審先判。
If we consider that there are problems we are being unfair to LEUNG Chun - ying and we pass a judgment before trial
主席，這個邏輯真是可笑，我們認為有問題，提出質疑，我們也不知道最後的調查結果為何，但建制派同事說梁振英一定沒有問題，這不是另類的未審先判嗎？
President this logic is ridiculous . We raise queries to support our claim that there are problems and we do not know the findings of the inquiry but pro - establishment Members insist that LEUNG Chun - ying should take no blame arent they passing a judgment before trial?
我覺得這真是很可笑，他們一再使用這個理由，合理化自己的說法。
That is hilarious and they have time and again used this reason to justify their remarks
她鼓勵周浩鼎議員，說今次周浩鼎議員沒有甚麼不妥主席，她是小罵大幫忙她說唯一的不妥是他做得不夠妥當，意思是當小偷應"乾手淨腳"些，不應留下指模被人發現。
She encouraged Mr Holden CHOW saying that he had done nothing particularly wrong this time around―President she criticized him lightly for the sake of doing him a great favour―she said that the only mistake that he made was that he did not act properly implying that he should have been a more adroit thief leaving behind no fingerprints to be detected by others
我看不到建制派有一點點道理，辯論了一整天，也只是提出這些論調。
I fail to see any reason on the part of pro - establishment Members who have only kept making such arguments in this day - long debate
我覺得這是很嚴重的失職，我不明白為甚麼今天還有建制派同事，嘗試為他保駕護航。
Given such a serious dereliction of duty I fail to understand why pro - establishment Members are still trying to shield him today
梁振英詞窮理屈，不斷表示已經報請中央政府，中央政府也沒有調查他。
LEUNG Chun - ying failing to provide justifiable reasons has kept reiterating that he had reported the case to the Central Government and the Central Government has not conducted any investigation
正如之前有同事建議，我們可以放長雙眼，看看他會不會被人"雙規"，我相信天有眼。
As advised by certain Members earlier we should wait and see whether he will be detained and interrogated one day . I believe that justice will prevail
我覺得這很離譜。
That is absurd
剛才何君堯議 員很緊張，表達了他的意見，我不知道他是不是護航，但最少他表達了自己的意見。
Dr Junius HO has just now acted anxiously when expressing his views . I do not know whether he was seeking to shield the persons concerned but he has expressed his views at the very least
梁振英如果如此害怕專責委員會今次的調查，我覺得他露出了一點狐狸尾巴。
If LEUNG Chun - ying is so scared of the inquiry to be carried out by the Select Committee he has actually revealed his foxs tail
他這次借助私通周浩鼎議員這個議會的臥底或"二五仔"，嘗試在有關調查範圍的文件中，刪除一些對梁振英不利的表述，加入一些對梁振英有利的表述。
By colluding with Mr Holden CHOW an undercover agent or a double - crosser in the legislature LEUNG Chun - ying tried to delete statements unfavourable to him and add statements favourable to him in the paper on the scope of inquiry