Borrison/hk-legicost huggingface dataset:
任職律政人員的事務律師其實具有豐富的訟辯經驗，專業水平優秀，其實他們有資格申請獲取資深大律師的頭銜。
Solicitors who work as legal officers actually have rich experience in advocacy and are of excellent professional standard . In fact they are qualified for the title of SC . We should look at this matter from this angle
我們應該從這 個角度看這件事，我覺得這才是專業、公道的處理，不要聽取某些人或大律師公會代表的胡言亂語，借助某些說話來貶低事務律師，令人覺得事務律師沒有訟辯能力，我認為這些借故貶低整個事務律師界別的說話真的令人反感，這一點也是有需要澄清的。
I think this is precisely a professional and impartial way of working . We should not listen to the nonsense of some people or representatives of the Bar Association who made certain remarks to belittle solicitors giving people the impression that solicitors are not competent in advocacy . I think such remarks which belittle the entire sector of solicitors on purpose are really offensive
主席，有關垃圾徵費的法案，我在法案委員會開始討論的一刻已明言我會反對。
President regarding this Bill on waste charging I already made it clear at the very beginning of the deliberations of the Bills Committee that I would oppose it
反對的原則有兩點，第一，香港政府的環保政策的施政理念，其實過去只有一道板斧，也就是透過經濟行為改變市民的習慣，從而達到所謂環保的目的。
Firstly insofar as its governing philosophy for green policies is concerned the Hong Kong Government actually knows only one method and that is changing the peoples habits through economic manoeuvres to achieve the objective of environmental protection so to speak
舉例說，在10年前，大約在2009年實施膠袋稅，我相信大家可能未必記得，今時今日大家都知道索取膠袋便要付錢，當年這項政策與今天這項政策所推動的背後邏輯是一樣的，透過加重市民處理垃圾的成本，從而達到整體改變我們處理垃圾行為的目的。
An example is the implementation of the plastic bag levy a decade ago in around 2009 . I think Members may not remember it though we all know nowadays that we need to pay for plastic bags . The logic behind this policy back then is the same as that behind the proposal orchestrated by this policy today and that is increasing the cost borne by the public in waste disposal to achieve the objective of generally changing our behaviours towards waste disposal
因為他們是按數量來說，以當時即10年所處理的膠袋數量是多少噸來計算，甚至每天處理的數量這角度來看，今天看來當然已減少一半，雖然近年說有十噸八噸的回升，很抱歉，我沒有實際的數字，但我印象中大約減少一半，只是這種換算是有局限的，為甚麼？
In other words they made calculation based on the number of tonnes of plastic bags being disposed of back then or a decade ago or even from the angle of the daily disposal quantity . Today the quantity certainly seems to have been reduced by half even though it is said to have rebounded upward by 8 or 10 tonnes in recent years . I am sorry that I do not have the actual figures but I have the impression that it has been reduced by about half just that this approach of calculation has limitations
很多環保人士已經指出，政府當年推動膠袋稅時，其實衍生了很多代替品，這些代替品對於我們的環境傷害更大，甚至更長遠。
Why? . As many environmentalists have already pointed out the promotion of the plastic bag levy by the Government back then actually gave rise to a myriad of substitutes which can do even greater and longer - term harm to our environment
舉例說，環保購物袋好像很環保，但大家不知道的是，原來它所帶來的環境的虛耗可能是同樣尺度。
For example while green shopping bags seem to be very eco - friendly people do not know that they may probably strain the environment to a similar degree
所以，站在第一個原理上，為甚麼我會傾向反對呢？
Therefore according to the first principle why do I tend to oppose it?
這是因為當中的利與弊是有商榷的，視乎以甚麼指標來衡量而已。
It is because the pros and cons are debatable depending on what indicators are used to measure them
第二，這討論其實必然會出現一個問題，便是我今天為何在開始時開宗明義反對的原因。
Secondly this discussion will definitely lead to a problem which also explains why I stated my opposition right at the outset of my speech today
為甚麼10多年來，政府的環保政策都是向小市民開刀，而不正視這並非單純在於消費者、市民是否要負責任，而是我想負更好的責任但我沒有選擇。
Why is it that for more than a decade the Governments policies on environmental protection have always sought to fleece the general public rather than addressing squarely the point that the question lies not purely in whether consumers or the public should take up responsibility because the fact is I want to take up more responsibility but I have no choice
因為由始至終，香港政府在制訂政策的過程或在設計之初，根本便是向小市民開刀，僅此而已。
Because from the very beginning the Hong Kong Government has basically sought to fleece the public in the policy - making process or in the initial design stage and that is all
生產者的責任呢？
What about the responsibility of producers?
供應商的責任呢？
What about the responsibility of suppliers?
連鎖店和大型零售商的責任呢？
What about the responsibility of chain stores and large retailers?
鮮有提及。
There is little mention of it
這政策本身必然有政策討論的矛盾，為何他們每次設計時都向市民開刀？
This policy is bound to be contradictory in policy discussions . Why do they invariably target the public every time they design a policy?
第三是更重要和相對複雜的。
The third reason is more important and relatively complicated
所有人也想環保，大家也知道地球有危機，大家也知道香港的環境有問題，這關乎我們的生活質素。
Everyone wishes to protect the environment . We all know that the earth is in crisis and we all know that there are problems with the environment in Hong Kong and this has a bearing on our quality of life
但是，在推動環保的同時，卻可能與我們其他的價值觀有所衝突，例如生活上的自由。
However the promotion of environmental protection may be at the same time in conflict with our other values such as freedoms in our lives
當我們就垃圾徵費制訂政策的時候，將來不能避免在所謂的垃圾"黑點"、大家的家門前或居所外的走廊會加裝一些攝像鏡頭，對着你的門口拍攝，又例如拍攝原居民村落某個垃圾"黑點"，你丟垃圾就罰你。
When a policy on waste charging is formulated it is inevitable that in the future video cameras will be installed at the so - called refuse dumping blackspots or at places in front of our doorsteps or in the corridors outside our homes pointing right at our doorway and shooting pictures or taking pictures at a certain refuse disposal blackspot in an indigenous village and when you litter you will be punished
代表我們僅餘的生活空間和活動自由被很多視像鏡頭拍攝着。
It means that what little remains of our living space and freedom of movement is being filmed by many video cameras
是一個更環保的社會，但同時可能在每時每刻的衣食住行方面放棄我們的自由。
A greener society but at the same time we may be giving up our freedom in every moment of our lives in all aspects be it food clothing housing and transportation
推動環保不一定是錯，但垃圾徵費在設計上是不能避免會加強對我們日常生活的監控，那便不好意思，我只能反對。
It may not necessarily be wrong to promote environmental protection but the design of waste charging will inevitably strengthen the control on our daily lives . In that case I am sorry to say that I can only oppose it
我用了大概6分鐘說出我的立場和為何我會反對。
I have spent about six minutes explaining my position and reasons for my opposition
這可歸納為幾點：苛徵雜稅，向小市民開刀，其次就是以環保為名，但效果卻變成我們損失了生活上僅有的自由空間。
This can be summarized into several points It is a harsh tax an attempt to fleece the public and a measure proposed in the name of environmental protection but the effect is that we will lose the only free space that we have in our lives
那是否值得推行呢？
Is this measure worth implementing?
在政策的部分，我在法案委員會已多次指出，現時的設計是會衍生一些我們預料不到的政策問題，即所謂的policy implications，是大家沒有想過會出現的。
With respect to the policy as I repeatedly pointed out at the Bills Committee the current design will give rise to some unforeseeable policy problems or the so - called policy implications that we have not expected
第一，在實施的過程中，尤其是私人屋苑，必然會出現一種情況，現在的屋苑可能已有，未來可能會更多，就是增加管理費。
First in the process of implementation especially in private housing estates a situation is set to arise . It may have happened already in housing estates now and there may be more such cases in the future and that is an increase in management fees
你扔垃圾的時候，他們要找人監察你有否使用相關的膠袋，又或屋苑如與政府之間有一定的協議，那便以屋苑的名義去處理。
When you put your rubbish out they will have to find someone to watch over you and see if you have used the designated plastic bags or if there is a certain agreement between the estate and the Government this will be handled by the estate itself
當中處理的成本由誰承擔？
Who will shoulder the costs involved?
當然是業主和住戶。
Certainly it will be the owners and tenants
私人屋苑增加管理費的名目，在未來的香港會否變成社區內其中一個腐敗板塊呢？
Will the reasons for private housing estates to increase the management fees become a ground for corruption in the community of Hong Kong in the future?
你和我也不知道，這也不是環境局的問題，不是由它負責的，但說出來是很荒謬的，是垃圾圍標。
We have no idea and this is not the business of the Environment Bureau nor is this its responsibility . But while it sounds ridiculous there will be bid rigging for waste disposal
屋苑找來一間公司或甚麼子公司，接着它便以圍標方式承接屋苑的垃圾處理問題，然後增加管理費。
An estate may engage a company or some sort of a subsidiary to take over the work of waste disposal in the estate by way of bid - rigging and then it will increase the management fees
以剛才邵家輝議員列舉的例子來說，大家在生活上會有些成本，我也可能會這樣做，就是把垃圾收藏起來，再走到樓下的領展商場棄置。
From the example cited by Mr SHIU Ka - fai just now we know that some costs will be incurred by the public in their living and what I may do is that I will hide my rubbish and then carry it to a shopping arcade of the Link and dump it there
我每月支付四五十元購買指定的膠袋，如可節省這50元，局長，便已足夠吃一盒叉燒飯。
I will have to pay 40 or 50 a month for the designated plastic bags and if I can save this 50 Secretary it will be enough for a box of barbecued pork with rice
所以，我會反對這項政策。
For these reasons I will oppose this policy
我現在向各位提出的待決議題是：《2021年法律執業者條例草案》，予以二讀。
I now put the question to you and that is That the Legal Practitioners Amendment Bill 2021 be read the Second time
《2021年法律執業者條例草案》。
Legal Practitioners Amendment Bill 2021
就着今天這項垃圾收費的法案，在法案委員會我也多次向局方表達，我個人沒有甚麼特別的看法。
Regarding this Bill on waste charging being discussed today I have told the Bureau many times at the Bills Committee that personally I do not have any particular views
環保措施越多，其實可能要用的錢便越多。
The more environmental protection measures there are the more money that we may have to spend
但是，對於某些市民，要額外再增加他的負擔，其實從環保的角度你可能是正確的，但對於他要承擔這些額外的負擔，可能對他來說亦是沉重的。
However for some people if you are going to put an extra burden on them actually you may be right from the perspective of environmental protection but it may also impose a heavy strain on them if they have to bear such an additional burden
所以，當法例通過後，將來對於一些比較貧苦的朋友，你們會否想到特別的政策來推廣呢？
Therefore upon passage of the legislation will you think of any special policies to promote it to the poorer people in the future? . Or whether other political parties and Members engaged in district work ie
或者由其他做地區工作的政黨、議員，即是民主建港協進聯盟、香港工會聯合會的朋友籌集更多資金，送贈垃圾袋給一些有需要的基層朋友，希望可以減低他們的需求。
friends from the Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong and the Hong Kong Federation of Trade Unions can raise more funds to give away free garbage bags to some grass - roots people in need in the hope of reducing their demand for such bags?
但是，正如我剛才所說，我說的是弊處，所以其實很多事情都有利有弊。
Yet as I have said earlier I am talking about the drawbacks . So in fact there are pros and cons with many things
利處當然是，我相信你的計劃推出後，市民掉垃圾的數量一定會減低，剛剛陳振英議員很好，他做了一個很全面的數據資料搜集， 告訴香港市民。
The pros are of course I believe that the waste disposal volume by the public will definitely be reduced upon implementation of the scheme . Just now Mr CHAN Chun - ying has done a very good job in telling the Hong Kong people about the data and information he has collected in a very comprehensive manner
我知道有些朋友一直表示，要多提供誘因，令住戶可以在源頭多做分類，因為我知道局長也有這樣做，例如膠瓶可以有多少毫子等，這些都是誘因，都是一些可以令市民去做的方法。
I know that some friends have been suggesting that more incentives should be provided to encourage households to do more in waste separation at the source . I am aware that the Secretary has also been doing so for example people can exchange a plastic bottle for dozens of cents etc . These are all incentives and ways to make people take action
這個垃圾袋徵費其實也是牽涉到錢的誘因，但它是反過來，你可以少付錢去購買膠袋，如果你把垃圾......
As a matter of fact this charging scheme for garbage bags also involves a financial incentive but it works the other way around
日後這些情況將會越來越多。
There will be more and more such cases in the future
所以，這些問題也是要思考的，因為真正執法時，警察是不會幫忙的，執法也是要靠自己的，對吧？
Thoughts should be given to these issues as well since the Police will not help when it comes to actual law enforcement . You have to enforce the law by yourselves right?
其實，CSA中的豁免，我是更加支持的，又可以幫助到飲食業界或做生意的朋友。
In fact the exemptions in the CSAs have my further support and they can also help friends of the catering sector or the business sector
局長，在此我想特別讚賞你一下，就着這項《條例草案》，如果香港人熟悉立法會今年的情況，也會知道現時在立法會最有爭議的兩項法案，第一就是這項垃圾徵費Bill，另一項便是電子煙、加熱煙的Bill，這兩項法案之前在法案委員會都花了很長時間不斷討論，因為有很多爭議問題。
Secretary here I would like to praise you especially . Speaking of this Bill if Hong Kong people are familiar with the situation of the Legislative Council in this year they will know that the two most controversial bills in the Legislative Council nowadays are First this Bill on waste charging; whereas the other one is the bill on electronic cigarettes and heat - not - burn HNB products . We have spent a lot of time on discussing these two bills at the bills committee since they involve a bunch of controversial issues
最後，希望這項Bill可以盡快通過，之後希望市民慢慢適應、習慣如何使用這些垃圾袋，以及為垃圾分類，為香港和世界的環保出一分力。
In closing I hope this Bill will be passed as expeditiously as possible after which I hope that members of the public can adapt gradually and get accustomed to using these garbage bags and separating waste so as to do their part to help protect the environment in Hong Kong and the world
2016年在堆填區的都市固體廢物人均棄置量達每日1.41公斤，較2015年增加1.4%。
In 2016 the daily disposal of MSW at landfills has reached 1.41 kg per person representing a 1.4 % increase from 2015
而多年來實施多項減廢及回收措施，都市固體廢物棄置率較2011年上升11%。
Despite the waste reduction and recycling measures implemented over the years the disposal rate of MSW has increased by 11 % as compared to that in 2011
如果我們還不行動，垃圾圍城的日子可能不用等到下一代就會發生，處理都市廢物的確是有迫切性。
If we do not take any action the city will be besieged by waste before the next generation comes along . There is indeed an urgency to deal with MSW
以下我想集中兩點回應：第一，當然就是收費問題。
I would like to focus my response on two points first it is about the charge of course
根據《條例草案》，需要收費處置的都市固體廢物，是指除化學廢物、醫療廢物及建築廢物以外的任何廢物。
According to the Bill MSW disposal to be charged includes any waste except chemical waste clinical waste and construction waste
這個原則大致上可取，因為避免向現時已經需要付費處理上述特殊廢物的大小機構作出雙重徵費。
This principle is generally acceptable as it can avoid double - charging to organizations that already have to pay for the disposal of the above mentioned special waste
不過，我擔心當局現時建議的按量收費模式，設計過於複雜。
However I am worried that the quantity - based waste charging mode proposed by the Administration is too complicated . For instance will the standard rates prescribe in the Schedule ie
例如，附表列明收費標準，即指定標籤每個11元，而指定膠袋則按其容量分為9個等級，容量介乎3公升至100公升，會否令人有花多眼亂的感覺呢？
11 for a designated label and nine sizes of designated garbage bags from 3 - litre up to 100 - litre cause confusion to the public?
收費方面，以一個標準三人家庭為例，每日丟棄10公升固體廢物，每個膠袋收費1.1元，一個月計30多元，負擔不算很重，而且更會向綜援家庭或受助人提供每月33元或每人10元的津貼。
As far as charges are concerned take a three - member household with 10 - litre daily disposal of MSW as an example it will have to pay 1.1 for a designated garbage bag . The burden is not very heavy . Moreover financial assistance of 33 per month or 10 per person per month will be provided to the householdsrecipients of the Comprehensive Social Security Assistance
但對於低收入家庭，我們又如何幫助他們呢？
But for low - income families how can we help them?
代理主席，我代表民主建港協進聯盟發言，支持政府的法案和修正案。
Deputy President I speak on behalf of the Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong DAB in support of the Bill and the amendments of the Government
代理主席，民建聯一直都支持污者自付，故此我們從來也沒有反對廢物徵費。
Deputy President DAB has always supported the polluter - pays principle so we have never opposed waste charging
因此，我一直認為廢物收費是其中一個可行方法，可以做到源頭減廢、分類回收及循環再造。
Therefore I always think that waste charging is one feasible way to achieve waste reduction at source waste separation for recycling and recycling
當政府提交這項法案時，其實跟所有環保組織及支持環保的市民一樣，我們都是十分期待和振奮，希望可以做得好。
When the Government introduced this Bill in fact like all green groups and members of the public who support environmental protection we were looking forward to and excited about it hoping to do a better job
不過，在《條例草 案》提交時，我最關心的其實是如何執行，而在法案委員會會議初期，我亦感到政府在回答我們的質詢上其實準備不充足，亦非常不成熟和草率。
Actually upon the introduction of the Bill I am most concerned about its implementation . At the earlier meetings of the Bills Committee I felt that the Government was not well - prepared very immature and hasty in answering our questions
代理主席，如果我今時今日並非一名立法會議員，而仍然是一個環保組織的負責人的話，我會義無反顧，甚麼也不用問，一定會舉手舉腳支持《條例草案》。
Deputy President if I were not a Member of the Legislative Council today but still the person in charge of a green group I would raise no objection and give my unswerving support to the Bill without asking any questions
不過，代理主席，我已當了兩屆區議員，現在也當了兩屆立法會議員，我很明白每項法例的細節和執行方法絕對會影響該法例能否成功落實執行，以及很多市民的生活。
Yet Deputy President as I have been a District Council member for two terms and a Member of the Legislative Council for two terms by now I understand full well that the details of each piece of legislation and its implementation approaches will definitely affect the successful implementation of the legislation and the livelihood of many people
好的法案當然是德政，可以惠民，但如果做得不好，在執行細節上考慮得不清楚的話，就會擾民和帶來很大困擾。
If the legislation is good it will surely be a benevolent policy benefiting the people . Yet if the job is not done properly and marred by ill - considered implementation details it will be a nuisance to the people and cause a lot of trouble
因此，當我今天的身份是立法會議員，我當然有責任替市民問清問楚，特別是在執行細節上，一定需要問得很清楚。
Therefore in my current capacity as a Member of the Legislative Council I am definitely obliged to seek clear explanation on behalf of the public particularly on the implementation details for it is necessary to seek thorough answers
我們其實關心甚麼執行細節呢？
Actually what are the implementation details that we are actually concerned about?
我們關心的是如何能真正執行得到。
Our concern is how it can be implemented in practice
我們早前就很關心衞生和環境的問題，這些都是我們在地區工作上經常面對很大的問題，所以我們在法案委員會不斷追問，一直在追政府。
Some time ago we had been very concerned about health and environmental issues which are the major problems we often face in our work at the district level and that is why we have been pressing the Government for answers to these issues at the Bills Committee
大家也知道，政府過去多年也有推動所謂減廢的工作，但減廢目標其實一直未能達到。
As we all know in the past years the Government had promoted the so - called waste reduction work yet the target of waste reduction had never been achieved
現時的回收率只有29%，人均垃圾生產量，現在每天達1.47公斤，所以對於政府早前表示會推出《香港資源循環藍圖2035》，我當然支持。
At present the recovery rate is only 29 % and the per capita waste disposal rate per day is 1.47 kg . As such I will definitely support the Governments proposal to launch the Waste Blueprint for Hong Kong 2035 put forth earlier
當中提及全民減廢、資源循環及零廢堆填，這些都是我特別關心的，因為將軍澳堆填區及其他堆填區的問題一直困擾很多市民。
It has mentioned waste reduction resource circulation and zero landfill . I am particularly concerned about these issues for many people have been troubled by problems arising from the landfills in Tseung Kwan O and other landfills
我們當然不希望再擴展堆填區，或所有廢物不管甚麼也全部送去堆填區。
Certainly we do not wish to see any further extension of landfills or all waste going to landfills regardless of what it is
因此，當政府提出推行廢物徵費時，我們沒有理由反對，但問題在於如何執行，如何在執行上不擾民，並確保所有政府部門也協調。
Therefore when the Government proposes to implement waste charging we have no reason to oppose it . Yet the problem lies in implementation that is how the implementation would not cause nuisance to the public and to ensure that all government departments would coordinate their efforts
我早前已舉出多個例子，政府在2005年推出建築廢物處置收費計劃，鼓勵建築廢物生產者減少產生廢物，並把廢物分類、再用和循環再造。
I have cited a number of examples earlier . In 2005 the Government introduced the Construction Waste Disposal Charging Scheme to encourage construction waste producers to reduce sort and recycle construction waste
不過，我們看到的是，有一些廢物是可以回收的，但很多建築廢物均被非法棄置，在各區出現很多衞生黑點，無論是路邊、天台或鄉郊，也有這些建築廢物黑點。
Yet we see that some waste can be recycled and a lot of construction waste is illegally disposed of . There are many hygiene blackspots in various districts be it at the roadside on rooftops or in the countryside
我經常也提到我跟進的大水坑廢物收集站，那是超過10年的衞生黑點。
I often mention the case of the waste collection point at Tai Shui Hang which I have been following up a hygiene blackspot for more than 10 years
我投訴了10年現在已不止10年，是12年，代理主席我投訴了12年，但12年都仍是黑點，其間也試過很多方法。
I have been complaining for 10 years―it has been more than 10 years and should be 12 years by now Deputy President―I have been complaining for 12 years but it has remained a blackspot for 12 years . In the meantime I have tried many ways to deal with the issue
當我在法案委員會提出時，因為我在那裏提出，所以局方立即回應，會一併找跨部門安裝CCTV。
When I brought the case up at the Bills Committee and because I brought it up at the meeting the Bureau responded immediately by making inter - departmental arrangement for the installation of CCTV
不過，環境保護署安裝了CCTV後，原來食物環境衞生署卻不可以分享使用，而食環署表示，如果他們要安裝，則須經區議會，又要 再申請。
However after the CCTV was installed by the Environmental Protection Department EPD the Food and Environmental Hygiene Department FEHD was not allowed to share its use . FEHD said that if they were to install CCTV they would have to submit another application through the District Council
由此可見，處理這些非法棄置的情況是跨部門的工作，既牽涉環保、衞生，又牽涉街道管理，權責則歸屬不同部門，所以執法出現大混亂，弄來弄去也處理不好。
It is evident that the handling of illegal disposal requires inter - departmental effort . Since it involves environmental protection hygiene and street management issues where the relevant powers and responsibilities are vested in different departments there is great confusion in law enforcement and the problems cannot be properly addressed
藉着局長今天在席，我想告訴他，大水坑那個黑點，今天仍然有問題，仍然未能完全解決。
As the Secretary is here today I would like to tell him that the blackspot in Tai Shui Hang is still a problem today and has not been completely solved
當我們知道有那麼多衞生黑點，也知道香港有超過5,000棟"三無大廈"，由於那些大廈欠缺統籌角色協助推行和落實政策，當局如何處理呢？
As we know that there are so many hygiene blackspots and that there are over 5 000 three - nil buildings in Hong Kong which do not have anyone to play a coordinating role to facilitate the promotion and implementation of policies how will the authorities deal with this?
屆時推行廢物徵費後，會否所有天井、後梯......我們上次巡視"劏房"時，也看到後樓梯堆滿廢物，屆時又會怎樣呢？
Upon the implementation of waste charging will all light wells and rear staircases When we inspected subdivided flats last time we saw those rear staircases filled with waste . What will happen by then?
這是我們相當憂慮和擔心的。
We are quite worried and concerned about this
再者，代理主席，我這幾年一直跟進地區的環境衞生和老鼠為患的問題。
Moreover Deputy President I have been following up the environmental hygiene and rat infestation problems in the districts in recent years
我們亦指出，現在鼠患問題真是十分嚴重，經常有居民投訴老鼠入屋、老鼠比貓還要大，周圍越來越多老鼠，這問題根本至今仍未能解決。
We have also pointed out that the rat infestation problem is really very serious at present . There are often complaints from residents that rats enter their flats that rats are bigger than cats and that there are more and more rats around . The problem has not been solved yet
現在非法棄置垃圾以建築廢料為主，我們十分擔心，在實施廢物徵費後，會否連有大量食物的家居廢物也被非法棄置，會否產生更多衞生和老鼠問題，令問題更加嚴重？
At present illegal disposals mainly involve construction waste . Yet we worry that after the implementation of waste charging domestic waste with a large amount of food content may be illegally disposed of and may create additional hygiene and rat infestation problems thus aggravating the existing problems?
政府也提出了很多善用科技、改善問題的方法，包括在捉老鼠、處理衞生黑點或非法棄置方面。
The Government has put forth many proposals to make good use of technology and alleviate the problem including catching rats dealing with hygiene blackspots or illegal waste disposal
當然，今天問題尚未解決，但我看到政府在這方面已下了工夫和努力。
Of course the problem has not yet been solved today but I can see that the Government has made efforts and worked hard in this regard
究竟在鄉郊、舊樓等地方如何執法呢？
How should we enforce the law in the countryside and old buildings?
未來會否善用更多科技呢？
Will technology be applied more extensively in the future?
我認為我們仍要繼續督促政府，要求政府做好這方面。
I think we should continue to urge and request the Government to do a good job in this regard
再者，我之前曾詢問物管公司、清潔公司等，他們也表示政府未有向他們講解未來會如何執法，以及在指引和培訓上如何做好，我們是有這方面的要求的。
Moreover I have previously asked property management companies and cleaning companies about this and they said that the Government has not explained to them how law enforcement will be carried out in the future and how guidelines and training will be properly provided to let them know the requirements
有很多市民問我，民建聯是否不支持這項法例，我們是否"拉布"，我想告訴大家，我是其中一位十分、十分希望這項法例盡快通過的議員，我怎會"拉布"呢？
Many members of the public have asked me if DAB does not support this legislation and whether we are filibustering . I have to tell them I am one of those who are keen to have the legislation passed expeditiously . How will I filibuster then?
我的目的是想這項法例做得好、落實得好，而並非不要這項法例。
My aim is to see that the legislation is carried out and implemented properly but not to forego the legislation