Borrison/hk-legicost huggingface dataset:
以勞聯為例，自2010年起已建議政府設立失業貸款基金，以一筆過短期低息或免息的方式為失業人士提供即時援助，以減輕他們因為失去工作 而出現的財政壓力，同時又不會令政府出現巨額財政承擔。
As in the case of FLU we have been suggesting the Government since 2010 to establish an unemployment loan fund to provide immediate assistance in the form of a short - term low - interest lump sum or interest - free lump sum to those who lost their jobs so as to alleviate their financial hardship and at the same time spare the Government from huge financial burden
但是，這並不表示要取消長期服務金和遣散費。
Nevertheless this does not mean long service and severance payments should be abolished
我們認為，兩者應分開處理。
In our view both issues ought to be dealt with separately
就完善強積金制度，當局在明年4月便會落實俗稱"核心基金"的"預設投資策略"，這將降低強積金的管理費，以及為不擅長投資的工友提供一個平衡的投資選擇。
On refining the MPF System the Default Investment Strategy commonly known as core fund will be implemented in April next year . While lowering the management fees of MPF it will also offer a balanced investment option to those wage earners who are not good at investment
我歡迎這些改變，但這些改變遠遠未能應對社會的需要。
I welcome such changes but they still cannot meet the needs of the community
最明顯的是，強積金未能保障如家庭主婦等非在職人士。
The most obvious case is that MPF fails to protect non - working people such as housewives
我再次要求政府堵塞這個漏洞，擴大保障範圍，為非在職人士開設強積金帳戶，並由政府承擔這些人士的最低供款，令強積金制度更為完善。
I once again ask the Government to plug this loophole by extending the scope of protection to set up MPF accounts for non - working people and make the minimum contributions for them thus further refining the MPF System
主席，我在此重申，強積金對沖機制這項制度漏洞存在已久，必須予以取消。
President I hereby reiterate that the MPF offsetting mechanism a loophole that has existed for a long time should be abolished
特首要兌現競選承諾，政府亦有角色和責任保障僱員權益，應該適當地投放資源解決強積金對沖問題，而非採取拖延策略，模糊焦點。
While the Chief Executive should honour his election pledge the Government has to play a role and bear responsibility in protecting the rights and benefits of employees . It should duly put in resources to solve the MPF offsetting problem and should not employ the delaying tactic to blur the focus
主席，昨天政務司司長林鄭月娥在議事廳引述我的說話："廉署正徹查特首及UGL事件"，並批評我的言論屬揣測性，甚至誤導性。
President yesterday Chief Secretary for Administration Carrie LAM cited my remarks in the Chamber that The Independent Commission Against Corruption ICAC is investigating the Chief Executive and the UGL incident and she criticized that my remark was speculative and even misleading
今天政務司司長說，她根本不知道廉政公署有否調查梁振英涉貪案，試問她怎能批評我的言論是揣測性及誤導性？
Today the Chief Secretary said that she simply did not know if ICAC had investigated the corruption case involving LEUNG Chun - ying . How then could she criticize that my remark was speculative and misleading?
究竟是林卓廷誤導，還是林鄭月娥誤導？
Who has been misleading the public LAM Cheuk - ting or Carrie LAM?
我要告訴各位市民，梁振英確實正被廉署調查，因為我是梁振英涉貪案的投訴人。
I would like to tell members of the public LEUNG Chun - ying is indeed being investigated by ICAC because I am the one who lodged a complaint against him
根據《廉政公署條例》，投訴人最終會獲告知調查結果，但我至今沒有收到廉署通知，表示調查已經結束，相反，廉署高層曾經親自替我錄口供，這豈不表示調查正在進行嗎？
According to the Independent Commission Against Corruption Ordinance the complainant will eventually be informed of the result of investigation but so far I have not been informed by ICAC that the investigation has been completed . On the contrary an ICAC senior officer had taken my statements in person; did that mean that an investigation is in progress?
所以，建制派議員批評這項議案的前設並不成立，其實他們沒有正確解讀政務司司長昨天的說法，她說："她沒有獲悉廉署正進行這項調查"。
Pro - establishment Members have criticized that the premise of this motion is not established . In fact they have not correctly interpreted what the Chief Secretary said yesterday . She said that she has not been informed that ICAC is conducting an investigation
各位建制派同事，千萬不要跟車太貼，你們解讀政務司司長的言論時，一定要很小心，否則很容易會跌落梁振英式的語言陷阱。
May I ask pro - establishment colleagues not to make comments hastily; they must be very careful when they interpret the Chief Secretarys remarks; otherwise they would very easily fall into language style typical of LEUNG Chun - yings style
這兩天，建制派議員表達的觀點主要有3點：第一，白韞六誠實可靠，他已充分解釋，今次人事任免是正常的做法；第二，我們要求成立專責委員會的理由沒有證據支持，不可輕率地展開這項調查；第三，這項調查會干預廉署。
In these two days pro - establishment Members has made three main points First Simon PEH is honest and reliable and he has fully explained that the appointment and removal of officials is a normal practice; second the reasons given for setting up a select committee are not substantiated and we should not rashly conduct an investigation; third an investigation will interfere with ICAC
第一，白韞六是否可信？
First is Simon PEH reliable?
其實，香港市民和民主派議員與建制派和政府好像生活在兩個不同的星球，他們完全看不到廉署高層，包括李寶蘭、高迪龍及鄧淑妮突然請辭，他們亦看不到廉署大批人員杯葛廉署的周年晚宴，導致每年舉辦一次的聯歡晚宴也辦不成。
In fact it seems that members of the public and democratic Members live in a planet totally different from that of the pro - establishment camp and the Government . The latter have simply failed to notice the sudden resignation of senior ICAC officials including Rebecca LI Dale KO and TANG Shuk - nei and the boycott of ICACs annual dinner by a large number of ICAC staff leading to its cancellation
廉署人員的行動清楚說明，今次的人事任免絕對不是所謂的正常安排，他們已用腳投下他們的一票。
The actions of ICAC officers clearly indicated that the current appointment and removal of officials is definitely not a so - called normal arrangement and they had cast their votes with their feet
第二，白韞六過去放生了湯顯明案的第一幫兇穆斐文。
Second Simon PEH let off Julie MU the principal accomplice in the Timothy TONG case
穆斐文在立法會政府帳目委員會聆訊中被批評，她領導下的社區關係處嚴重失職，出現分拆帳單問題。
Julie MU was criticized at the hearing of the Public Accounts Committee of the Legislative Council . The Community Relations Department under her leadership was severely derelict of its duties leading to problems such as splitting of entertainment bills
可是，白韞六居然可以輕輕繞過這些問題，最終連一封警告信也沒有發給穆斐文，她後來還在廉署榮休。
However Simon PEH simply ignored these problems and did not even give Julie MU a warning letter and she later retired from ICAC
各位，如果你們認為廉政專員有誠信，他回覆立法會的信件內容可靠，你們難免太天真了。
If Honourable colleagues think that the Commissioner is in good faith and his reply to the Legislative Council is reliable they are too naive
各位，政務司司長沒有回應我提出的其中一個重點，就是梁振英作為特首，為何可以"秘撈"？
Honourable colleagues the Chief Secretary has not responded to one of my key questions that is why is it possible for LEUNG Chun - ying to moonlight as the Chief Executive?
為何他可以在擔任特首期間，收取澳洲企業數以千萬元計的顧問費，推廣他們的生意？
While he is acting as the Chief Executive how come he can receive a consultant fee amounting to several hundred thousand dollars from an Australian enterprise to promote its business?
梁振英聲稱："我在合約內訂明，在沒有任何利益衝突的前提下才提供這些服務；過去UGL從來沒有要求我提供服務，我也從來沒有提供服務，所以沒有利益衝突，也無須向行政會議申報。
LEUNG Chun - ying claimed that I have stipulated in the agreement that such services will only be provided on the premise that there is no conflict of interest; UGL has never asked me to provide services and I have never provided services; thus there is no conflict of interest and there is no need to report to the Executive Council
"如果這樣的理由也能成立，在座所有立法會議員是否可以在10月1日履新前，與大地產商簽訂顧問服務協議，訂 明在沒有利益衝突的情況下提供服務，但無須提供服務，便可每年收取數以千萬元計的顧問服務費用？
If such a case can be justified can all Legislative Council Members present sign consultant service agreements with major property developers before they assumed office on 1 October specifying that services would only be provided if there was no conflict of interest and they could receive an annual consultants fees amounting to several hundred thousand dollars without providing any services?
林鄭司長亦表示，其實梁振英已向她轉授任命副廉政專員的權力，但我提出的重點是，梁振英作為被調查人士，根本不應參與這些人事任命。
Chief Secretary Carrie LAM has also said that LEUNG Chun - ying had actually delegated to her the power to appoint the Deputy Commissioner but my main point is that LEUNG Chun - ying being under investigation should not take part in the appointment of staff
據梁振英及白韞六所說，白韞六事前已通知梁振英他的決定，只是梁振英沒有作出評論。
As mentioned by LEUNG Chun - ying and Simon PEH Simon PEH had notified LEUNG Chun - ying of his decision in advance but LEUNG Chun - ying had no comments
梁振英沒有評論，是否代表他沒有參與決策？
Though LEUNG Chun - ying made no comment does that mean that he had not been involved in making the decision?
道理很簡單，任何大機構的"第二把交椅"如果對"第一把交椅"說，他會把"第三把交椅"降職，但"第一把交椅"不作聲，最終"第三把交椅"真的被降職，大家認為"第一把交椅"有沒有參與這項決定？
The reason is very simple . If the second highest ranking person in any large organization told the highest ranking person that he would demote the third highest ranking person; the highest ranking person made no comments and finally the third highest ranking person was demoted would you think that the highest ranking person had not been involved in making the decision?
很明顯，梁振英有參與這項決定，他默許這項決定，讓白韞六將李寶蘭降職。
Obviously LEUNG Chun - ying had participated in making the decision and he tacitly agreed to the decision for Simon PEH to demote Rebecca LI
立法會進行這項調查，是否干預廉署？
Is an investigation to be conducted by the Legislative Council interfering with ICAC?
立法會有責任監管政府，廉署也在我們的監管範圍以內。
The Legislative Council has the responsibility to monitor the Government and ICAC is within the scope of monitoring
也有議員說，我們要制衡廉署的運作，但如果廉署運作正常，我們為何要調查？
Some Members have said that we have to exercise checks and balances over the operation of ICAC . But if ICAC is operating regularly why do we have to investigate?
正如我剛才所說，現時廉署的運作出現很大問題，只是建制派議員好像身處火星一樣，完全看不到這個問題，跟一般市民的理解完全脫節。
As I have just said there are serious problems with the operation of ICAC . However it seems that pro - establishment Members are living in Mars and they have completely failed to notice the problem and they are totally out of touch with the general public
其實，何謂"正常"？
In fact what is meant by normal?
最不正常的是，立法會內有大量建制派議員經常把不正常的情況說成是正常，這便是最不正常的情況。
A large number of pro - establishment Members in the Legislative Council often refer to abnormal situations as normal and that is the most abnormal situation
姚思榮議員說，李寶蘭沒有投訴，沒有原告，又何來被告？
According to Mr YIU Si - wing Rebecca LI has not lodged a complaint how can there be a defendant when there is no plaintiff?
我想告訴姚議員，有一類受害者是無法發聲的，我們是否不應該替無法發聲的受害者發聲？
I would like to tell Mr YIU there is a kind of victim who cannot make their voices heard . Should we not speak up for such victims?
由於廉署人員受官方保密法規限，他們很難發聲，但我們在議事廳內絕對可以替他們發聲。
It is very difficult for the ICAC officers to speak up as they are subject to official confidentiality requirements but we can definitely speak up for them in this Chamber
我們不單要替廉署人員發聲，也要替香港市民發聲，因為這是香港非常重要的核心價值，也是廉潔的支柱。
We have to speak up not only for the ICAC officials but also for Hong Kong people because this is a very important core value of Hong Kong and it is also the pillar of ICACs probity
張國鈞議員點名批評我曾經在廉署工作，不應該如此馬虎地要求立法會展開調查。
Mr CHEUNG Kwok - kwan criticized me saying that since I had once worked in ICAC I should not casually ask the Legislative Council to conduct an investigation
我想告訴張議員，他有所不知，要廉署展開調查的門檻遠低於立法會現有的標準，只要是涉及貪污的指控或是可追查的案件，不用提供大量證據便可以舉報，廉署便會展開調查，廉署的口號是："有貪必報，你做得到"。
Let me tell Mr CHEUNG as he may not be aware the threshold for ICAC to launch an investigation is much lower than that of the existing threshold of the Legislative Council; so long as the allegations involve corruption or the cases are pursuable reports can be made without the need to provide substantial evidence and ICAC will launch investigations . ICACs slogan Be Smart Report Corruption encourages people to report corruption
可惜的是，雖然我們提出那麼多合理質疑及事實資料，建制派卻置若罔聞，視若無睹。
Unfortunately though we have raised so many reasonable queries and provided factual information the pro - establishment camp has turned a deaf ear and a blind eye
劉國勳議員說，丘樹春先生已經解釋他辭職的流程，而我在報章上也表示同意，並指出與我的理解吻合。
Mr LAU Kwok - fan said that Mr Ricky YAU had explained the sequence of events related to his resignation and I expressed consent in the press saying that it was consistent with my understanding
他把我的同意理解為我認為整件事沒有問題。
Mr LAU interpreted my understanding as claiming that there was nothing wrong with the whole incident
我覺得劉議員的理解能力有所欠缺，因為我同意丘樹春的辭職流程這個事實，並不代表我也同意廉署終止李寶蘭署任安排及其後的人事"大地震"作出的所有解釋。
I think Mr LAUs comprehension power is weak . While I agree with the facts concerning Mr YAUs resignations this does not mean that I also accept given the explanation given by ICAC for cancelling the acting appointment of Rebecca LI and the subsequent radical staffing shake - up
我想問在座各位和香港市民，數年來，香港的廉潔聲譽江河日下，原因何在？
I would like to ask Honourable colleagues and Hong Kong people why has Hong Kongs clean reputation been declining these few years?
請她撫心自問，如果不是政府表現那麼差勁，香港的廉潔聲譽怎會走到今天的局面？
I hope she would be honest with herself Will Hong Kongs clean reputation be declining if the Governments performance has not been so poor?
在3任特首包括董建華、曾蔭權和梁振英當中，兩人涉貪，兩人受查，這是香港的悲哀。
Of the three Chief Executives including TUNG Chee - hwa Donald TSANG and LEUNG Chun - ying two were involved in corruption and two were being investigated . This is a tragedy for Hong Kong
所以，廉署不應再受特首一個人監管和掌控，現時局面非常尷尬：廉署查特首，特首監管廉署。
Therefore ICAC should no longer be subject to the Chief Executives monitoring and control . The present situation is very embarrassing ICAC is investigating the Chief Executive while the Chief Executive is monitoring ICAC
我認為未來應由一個由法官組成的獨立委員會監管廉署的運作。
I believe that the operation of ICAC should in future be monitored by an independent committee made up of Judges
林鄭月娥回應郭榮鏗議員時說，是否修改《防止賄賂條例》涉及特首監管的問題，也牽涉憲制問題。
In response to Mr Dennis KWOK Carrie LAM said that whether the Prevention of Bribery Ordinance should be amended involved monitoring the Chief Executive and also constitutional issues
這句說話聽了4年多，問題究竟有多複雜？
We have heard this remark for more than four years . How complicated are the issues?
是否梁振英其身不正，有很多問題，以致他不敢把自己納入《防止賄賂條例》的監管？
Has LEUNG Chun - yings improper conduct given rise to many problems and thus he dares not subject himself to monitoring under the Prevention of Bribery Ordinance?
我希望政務司司長回答我們一個問題：為何一名受調查人可以默許正在調查他的廉署最高層人員降職，最後迫使她離職？
This constitutes a serious misconduct and even an illegal act . I would like to ask the Chief Secretary to answer one question Why could a person under investigation tacitly agree to the demotion of the most senior ICAC officer investigating him finally forcing her to leave office?
我現在向各位提出的待決議題是：林卓廷議員動議的議案，予以通過。
I now put the question to you and that is That the motion moved by Mr LAM Cheuk - ting be passed
主席，強制性公積金的對沖機制蠶食僱員的遣散費和長期服務金，令他們一生付出的血汗得不到應有的回報。
President the Mandatory Provident Fund MPF offsetting mechanism has nibbled away the severance payments and long - service payments of employees robbing them of their well - deserved rewards for a whole life of hard toil
有一些基層的僱員更因為對沖機制，令他們的強積金戶口的款項剩餘無幾。這不僅是立法會內的共識，同樣是社會上大家普遍認同的現象。
Little remains in the MPF accounts of some grass - roots employees thanks to the offsetting mechanism―it is not just a consensus inside the Legislative Council but also a commonly recognized phenomenon in society
不過，今天有些代表商界的同事的發言，也不無道理。
However some Honourable colleagues from the business sector have delivered well - grounded speeches
他們表示取消強積金的對沖機制，會對一些企業造成負擔，特別是中小型企業，因為這些企業大部分沒有撥備額外資金，以應付取消對沖機制後要付出的費用。
They stated that the abolition of the MPF offsetting mechanism will encumber some companies especially small and medium enterprises SMEs because most of them do not reserve extra funds to meet the payments incurred by the abolition of the offsetting mechanism
我認為取消強積金對沖機制對大財團來說不會造成很大的影響，因為他們實力強大，資金充裕。
I think abolishing the MPF offsetting mechanism will not exert too much of an impact on big corporations as they hoards tremendous strengths and abundant capital
我擔心的是在香港營運的中小企。
My concern lies in the SMEs operating in Hong Kong
如果取消對沖機制的過程處理得不好，對中小企造成非常大的財政壓力，隨時可能令中小企倒閉，屆時不僅對僱主，甚至對僱員也會有影響，變成雙輸，這是我最不想看到的情況。
The process of abolishing the offsetting mechanism if not carefully handled will constitute enormous financial pressure on SMEs easily leading to business closures . It will then affect not only employers but also employees resulting in a lose - lose outcome the last thing I wish to see
如果不想出現這情況，政府需要妥善處理取消強積金對沖機制的安排，以紓緩過程中可能出現的影響。
To pre - empt this scenario the Government needs to make careful arrangements in respect of handling the abolition of the MPF offsetting mechanism so as to ameliorate the effects thus caused in the course
我留意到吳永嘉議員剛才的發言，其實非常能夠代表商界和僱主的立場。
I have taken note of the speech made just now by Mr Jimmy NG which can adequately illustrate the positions of the business sector and employers
他主要的理據是，如果取消對沖機制，僱主變相要支付雙重的遣散費和長期服務金。
His main argument is that abolishing the offsetting mechanism will mean de facto double severance payments and long - service payments borne by employers
他亦指出一個很現實的問題，就是當公司將要倒閉，可能已經資不抵債，如果取消強積金對沖機制，對僱主更是雪上加霜。
He has also pointed out a realistic issue that is if the company is about to close down possibly already insolvent the abolition of the MPF offsetting mechanism will add hardship to the employers demise
最後，吳議員也提到，勞方的退休保障不應該只由資方承擔，正如我剛才所說，政府和局長在當中要擔當一定的角色。
Lastly Mr NG mentioned that retirement protection for employees should not be the sole responsibility of employers . As I have just said the Government and the Secretary have a certain role to play
雖然我並非完全認同吳永嘉議員的觀點，但我認為他的發言非常精闢，他將取消強積金對沖機制的難處，為我們很簡單地歸納起來。
I do not entirely subscribe to Mr Jimmy NGs viewpoints but I find his speech most insightful . He has given a simple summary of the difficulties in abolishing the MPF offsetting mechanism
他的發言指出，取消對沖機制是牽一髮動全身，並非好像泛民議員所說那般簡單。
He pointed out in his speech that abolishing the offsetting mechanism is a small move that is going to cause a sea change across the board not as simple as suggested by the pan - democrats
但是，難歸難，不能因為問題困難，我們便裹足不前。
Difficult though it is we cannot halt our progress because of the predicament presented before us
越是困難，香港政府和局長就越要動腦筋，越要鼓起勇氣面對。
The more difficult it is the harder the Hong Kong Government and the Secretary should think and the more courage they have to muster to address the issue
自從強積金計劃實施以來，對沖機制其實就好像一根刺，一直刺着我們，令很多"打工仔"感到很不舒服。
Since the implementation of the MPF scheme the offsetting mechanism has been a thorn constantly irritating us causing great discomfort to many workers
解決的辦法很簡單，就是拔出這根刺，當然，過程中可能要經歷一些陣痛。我們不應因為害怕這一下的陣痛，而放棄取消對沖機制。
The remedy is simple just pluck it out . Of course a pang of pain may ensue in the process but we should not give up abolishing the offsetting mechanism just for fear of such pain
主席，蔣麗芸議員剛才提到，民建聯在今年年初邀請了多位專家和學者一起探討取消對沖機制的問題。
President Dr CHIANG Lai - wan mentioned just now that earlier this year the Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong DAB had invited a number of experts and scholars to engage in a discussion on abolition of the offsetting mechanism
關於這次會談的內容，蔣議員剛才已經很清楚地詳述，我不在此重複，但我要重申一個重點，便是 政府在這方面要有所承擔，這不僅是民建聯和商界的意見，同樣是很多專家和學者的意見。
Dr CHAING has given a detailed account of the meeting so I would not make any repetition here . Yet I would like to reiterate an important point that is the Government has to make a commitment in this regard . It is not a view presented by only DAB and the business sector but one shared by many experts and scholars
主席，關於吳永嘉議員、張宇人議員及其他商界議員所關注的問題，蔣麗芸議員剛才已經有效地回應，並且表達了民建聯的建議。
President regarding the issue of concern to Mr Jimmy NG Mr Tommy CHEUNG and other Members representing the business sector Dr CHIANG Lai - wan has given an effective response and DABs suggestions
只要政府願意作出承擔，釋除商界，特別是中小企的憂慮，我相信取消對沖機制是可以討論的。
The Government only needs to make a commitment to dispel the misgivings of the business sector especially SMEs; then in my view the abolition of the offsetting mechanism is open for discussion
一個是"大荷包"、"大水塘"，另一個是"打工仔"的"小荷包"，根本無法比較。
One is a deep pocket and a massive pool of wealth whereas the other is a flat wallet of the humble workers―the two are simply incomparable
如果政府每年花20億元，可以令廣大的市民和"打工仔"得到更多的保障，令香港人快樂一些，令市民認為政府能處理事情，我認為這20億元是值得撥用。
This 2 billion will be well spent if by earmarking such an amount yearly the Government can afford more protection to the general public and workers thus making people happier and having more trust in the abilities of the Government
如果政府不做，政府是不為也，非不能也。
The Governments failure to do so is a result of unwillingness not inability
所以，希望日後議事堂真的好像今天般，議員正經地議事，不要搞這麼"拉布"、搞這麼抗爭，市民想看見的議會就是今天這樣。
For this reason I hope the Chamber is going to look like today where Members engage in serious discussions not filibusters and opposition . People will hope to see a Chamber like it is today
如果視之為劇本的話，是3分現象7分想象。
If we view the whole thing as writing a drama script 30 % of its contents are adapted from various phenomena while the remaining 70 % are the scriptwriters imagination
首先，廉署有人事調動，有人因為不滿 而辭職，事件被渲染成為受到干預，繼而拉扯上行政長官與UGL事件。
First of all some personnel reshuffles have to be made within ICAC as a staff member has resigned to express her dissatisfaction but the incident is played up to suggest that ICAC has been subject to intervention dragging the Chief Executive and the UGL incident into the mire
雖然我的黨友張國鈞議員剛才說這是一個好的劇本，但我認為這劇本結構鬆散，劇情和轉折點均難以令觀眾信服，只能說是牽強附會的爛劇，加上類似的劇情在過去數年已經多次在立法會上演，市民一看便知道劇情如何，所以毫無新意。
Although my fellow party member Mr CHEUNG Kwok - kwan commented just now that it is a good drama script I consider the script loosely written . It can only be described as a rotten drama with far - fetched story lines and turning points which are not convincing to the viewing public at all . Moreover similar dramas have been put on the stage of this Council many times in the past few years and there is nothing new to the general public since they all know the story lines very well
如果真的拍成電影，我相信會是票房毒藥。
If the drama is really adapted into a movie it will definitely have a very poor box office receipt
這份劇本如果發展下去，便是從立法會引用《條例》成立專責委員會，以調查廉署人事的問題開始。
If the story is allowed to develop further a new chapter will start with the appointment of a select committee by this Council under the Ordinance to inquire into the personnel reshuffle within ICAC
但這與市民的根本價值相違背，因為市民也會認為，廉署的人事調任是一件普通事件，加上署任是否一定會真除呢？
However this is contrary to the basic value cherished by Hong Kong people because in their opinion personnel reshuffles within ICAC are actually very ordinary . Besides does an acting appointment necessarily lead to substantive promotion?
如果所有的署任均會真除，往後便沒有人敢擔當署任，政府甚或要取消署任安排，直接讓員工擔任該職位，對嗎？
If all acting appointments should be arranged with a view to substantive promotion no one should accept an acting appointment in the future or the Government should simply abolish the acting arrangement since suitable candidates should be allowed to take up positions at a higher rank directly am I right?
最重要的是，廉署的內部事件根本不應該被外界力量干預，這核心價值其實已經深入民心。
Most importantly the internal affairs of ICAC should definitely be free from any outside intervention and this is in fact the core value widely upheld by Hong Kong people
最重要的是，事件如果被一些連宣誓也未能完成的議員來調查，簡直會是票房毒藥，匪夷所思。
The most important thing is that if Members who have not even taken the Oath of this Council are allowed to inquire into the matter things would become so ridiculous that a huge uproar would be aroused among Hong Kong people
如果真的進行調查，我相信一定會引起公憤，連戲院內的椅子也會被人拆下。
Public indignation would surely be provoked if an inquiry is really conducted into the matter and the agitated masses would even cause damage to cinemas showing such a rotten movie
這就是故事的結論，觀眾也看慣，所以一定會打瞌睡，可以說沒有任何新意。
This would be the conclusion of the whole story and viewers have already got used to the boring and uncreative plots
而且在多個劇本當中，UGL事件更已聽了很多次。
Moreover the UGL incident has also appeared in a number of these scripts
這件事名為"黃金握手"，在商場上經常出現。
The incident is taken as a golden handshake which is a very common practice in the business sector
正如司長所說，她沒有接獲任何關於這宗案件要進行調查的消息。
As the Chief Secretary has said she has never received any news about the conduct of an investigation into the incident
這位作為編劇的前廉署僱員，理應明白需要提供一些證據來求取別人支持，但他並沒有這樣做，一切都是"齋吹"。
The scriptwriter who is a former employee of ICAC should understand very well that he has to produce some evidence in order to solicit support from the public but he has done nothing other than making empty accusations
"齋吹"又如何能說服人呢？
How can members of the public be convinced by empty accusations?
不過，這位編劇過去都習慣這樣做，以吸引眼球。
Yet this is what the scriptwriter has done repeatedly in the past to attract attention
例如在今年選舉時，他高調召開記者招待會，指自己接獲廉署的內部消息，指廉署放過了某宗涉及其政敵的案件，不再跟進。
For example during the Legislative Council Election this year he convened a press meeting in a high - profile manner claiming that he had received some inside information of ICAC which suggested that ICAC had stopped following up a case involving a political opponent of him
他認為該宗案件被廉署放過，指控十分嚴重，但當記者問他有否證據時，他也只是"齋噏"。
He made a very serious allegation against ICAC of letting off the person involved in the case but when asked by reporters if he could produce any evidence to prove it no actual evidence could be presented