Borrison/hk-legicost huggingface dataset:
在這憲制架構下，我們必須清楚知道，國家的政黨制度是中國共產黨領導的多黨合作和政治協商制度。
Under this constitutional framework we must be well aware that the political party system of the Peoples Republic of China is a system of multiparty cooperation and political consultation led by the Communist Party of China
香港特別行政區是中華人民共和國不可分離的部分，我們必須尊重《憲法》。
HKSAR is an inalienable part of the Peoples Republic of China . We must respect the Constitution
香港特別行政區按照《基本法》的規定實施"一國兩制"的同時，亦必須尊重內地的制度。
While HKSAR implements one country two systems in accordance with the provisions in the Basic Law HKSAR must also respect the system in the Mainland
我們會繼續按照有關法律的要求，履行相關工作，確保選舉能公平、公開和誠實地進行。
We will continue to perform the relevant duties in accordance with the law and ensure that elections are conducted in a fair open and honest manner
任何有識之士聽到局長的答覆，除哭笑不得外，還會感到憤怒和遺憾。
Upon hearing the reply of the Secretary all learned people will be filled with anger and regret apart from not knowing whether to laugh or cry
我再問一次，究竟呼叫"結束一黨專政"口號是否屬違法和違憲？
I ask him once again . Is chanting the end the one - party dictatorship slogan unlawful and unconstitutional?
香港特別行政區是中華人民共和國的一部分，所以從政人士必須擁護《基本法》和效忠香港特別行政區，同時必須尊重《憲法》和內地的制度，這才合乎政治邏輯和常理。
As HKSAR is part of the Peoples Republic of China all politicians must uphold the Basic Law and pledge allegiance to HKSAR . At the same time they must respect the Constitution and the system in the Mainland . Only by doing so will they be politically logical and reasonable
至於呼叫某些口號是否......
As to whether the chanting of a certain slogan will
議員本身的言行，亦受相關的法例和《議事規則》規範。
The words and deeds of Members are also regulated by the relevant laws and the Rules of Procedure
主席，毛孟靜議員提出的質詢非常清楚、簡單和直接。
President Ms Claudia MO has raised her question in a very clear simple and direct way
在香港呼叫"結束一黨專政"口號是否屬違憲和違法？
Is chanting the end the one - party dictatorship slogan unconstitutional and unlawful in Hong Kong?
所謂"結束一黨專政"，並非旨在結束任何政黨或政權，而是就政治體制改革提出建議。
The so - called end the one - party dictatorship slogan is not intended to end any political party or political regime . Instead it is a proposal on political structural reform
建議修憲不代表違憲，建議修改《基本法》亦不代表違反或不擁護《基本法》。
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution is not tantamount to contravening the Constitution; likewise proposing an amendment to the Basic Law is not tantamount to contravening or declining to uphold the Basic Law
"不尊重"或"不夠尊重"與"違反"在字義上差距甚大。
Disrespectful or not respectful enough is quite different in meaning from contravening
在局長的答覆中，沒有任何"違憲"或"違法"的字眼。
Neither the word unconstitutional nor unlawful has been found in the Secretarys reply
例如參選立法會的人士，必須根據法例要求，示明擁護《基本法》和效忠香港特別行政區。
For example people running in a Legislative Council election must according to the statutory requirements make a declaration to the effect that they will uphold the Basic Law and pledge allegiance to HKSAR
在政治邏輯上，我們必須尊重《憲法》和內地的制度。
Going by this political logic we must respect the Constitution and the system in the Mainland
《憲法》和《基本法》構成香港特別行政區的憲制基礎，《憲法》是根、是母親，是包括《基本法》在內的一切法律根源。
The Constitution and the Basic Law have laid the constitutional foundation of HKSAR . The Constitution is the root the mother and the source of all laws including the Basic Law
任何煽動及企圖推翻國家《憲法》及其確立制度的行為也屬違憲和違法。
Any act to incite or attempt to overthrow the Countrys Constitution and the systems founded upon the Constitution is both unconstitutional and unlawful
局長及選舉主任必須小心謹慎推行相關工作，以防別有用心的人士進入立法會，將本會變成"播獨"平台，否則後果將會不堪設想。
The Secretary and Returning Officers must cautiously carry out the relevant work in order to prevent anyone with ulterior motives from entering the Legislative Council and turning the Council into a platform for propagating Hong Kong Independence . Otherwise the consequences will be unthinkable
要有效維護"一國兩制"，除了重視及保障本港制度外，同時要尊重國家實行的政治制度。
To effectively safeguard one country two systems it is necessary to attach importance to and safeguard the Hong Kong system . In addition it is also necessary to respect the political system instituted in the Mainland
因此，國家所推行的社會主義制度不會在香港實施。
For this reason the socialist system instituted in the Country will not be implemented in Hong Kong
在"一國兩制"下，我們必須牢牢掌握和緊記，香港屬於"一國"之內。
Under one country two systems we must firmly grasp and bear in mind that Hong Kong is part of one country as prescribed in the Countrys Constitution
因此，特別是對從政人士而言，除擁護《基本法》及效忠香港特別行政區外，亦必須尊重《憲法》及內地制度，並尊重"一國"及珍惜"兩制"。
As a result politicians in particular should uphold the Basic Law and pledge allegiance to HKSAR . They must also respect the Constitution and the system in the Mainland respect one country and cherish two systems
我們透過《基本法》實施"一國兩制"、"港人自港"、"高度自治"。
Under the Basic Law we implement one country two systems Hong Kong people administering Hong Kong and a high degree of autonomy
主席，局長沒有回答，提出修改《憲法》是否等同違憲？
President the Secretary has not answered whether proposing an amendment to the Constitution is unconstitutional
主席，正如我剛才所說，在香港範圍內，根據《基本法》和香港法例，任何人均享有言論自由和表達、示威自由。
President as I said just now within the territory of Hong Kong under the Basic Law and the Hong Kong legislation all people are entitled to the freedom of speech of expression and of demonstration
至於某種言行本身會否構成違法，必須根據法律作出裁斷。
Whether certain speeches or actions are unlawful must be determined in accordance with the law
過去多年，有超過數百萬香港人曾參加六四集會，最多參加者的一年有18萬人參與。
For many years in the past over millions of Hong Kong people have taken part in 4 June rallies with the highest turnout recorded being 180 000 people in one year
李慧琼議員剛才表示，"一黨專政"從來不存在，中國由工人階級領導。
Ms Starry LEE said just now that one - party dictatorship has never existed given that China has been under the rule of the working class
至於一般市民在日常生活當中享有的言論或表達自由，《基本法》中已訂明相關保障，我們亦會根據香港的法例行事。
The freedom of speech or of expression enjoyed by the general public in their daily life has been guaranteed under the Basic Law and we will also act in accordance with the Hong Kong legislation
主席，對於任何有意參選立法會選舉的人士，我們設有一套既定機制，會按照法例的規定來處理他們的申請。
President we have an established mechanism in place to process the application of all people who intend to run in the Legislative Council election in accordance with the law
本會今天討論張超雄議員針對《條例草案》提出的修正案，我感到頗為悲涼。
Today when this Council discusses the amendments proposed by Dr Fernando CHEUNG to the Bill I feel rather sad
正正就是這種思維，令立法會的地位矮化。
It is precisely this way of thinking that belittles the status of the Legislative Council
勞顧會真的代表香港所有"打工仔"嗎？
Does LAB really represent all wage earners in Hong Kong?
勞顧會只是諮詢機構，立法會才具有立法的法定權力。
LAB is only an advisory body while the Legislative Council has the statutory power to enact legislation
在勞顧會的架構下，資方並不代表全部中小企，勞方亦不代表所有工會，更不代表全體工人。
Under the LAB structure employers do not represent all small and medium enterprises and employees do not represent all trade unions or all workers
剛才出現一個比較有趣的畫面：鍾國斌議員表示，可以與陸頌雄議員分享講稿。
There was a rather interesting scene just now Mr CHUNG Kwok - pan said that he could share his script with Mr LUK Chung - hung
區諾軒議員，你已發言5分鐘，請你返回《2017年僱傭條例草案》二讀辯論的議題。
Mr AU Nok - hin you have spoken for five minutes please return to the subject of the Second Reading debate on the Employment Amendment Bill 2017
張超雄議員修正案的內容，其實梁耀忠議員早在港英政府晚期已經提出。
Regarding the contents of Dr Fernando CHEUNGs amendments Mr LEUNG Yiu - chung had in fact raised such points in the later days of the British Administration in Hong Kong
我希望花少許時間讀出。
I would like to spend a little time reading out the relevant contents
前者會包括基本償金、補償性償金及特別償金"；及第三，"政府當局的條例草案就頒發復職令或重新聘用令規定須獲得僱主及遭解僱的僱員雙方同意，但議員條例草案僅規定須獲得該名僱員的同意"。
The former would comprise a basic award a compensatory award and a special award; and third unlike the Administrations Bill which would require the mutual consent of the employer and the dismissed employee for the grant of a reinstatement or re - engagement order his Bill would only require the consent of the employee
換言之，梁耀忠議員在21年前提出的改革建議，時至今日仍未能實現，而要透過修正案的形式再次提交立法會討論，這是否香港荒謬之處？
In other words the reform proposal made by Mr LEUNG Yiu - chung 21 years ago has not yet been realized and it will be tabled at the Legislative Council again in the form of an amendment . Is this an absurdity of Hong Kong?
工人不應無故遭受解僱，當中包括"不合法解僱"及"不合理解僱"兩種情況。
Workers should not be dismissed without cause including unlawful dismissal and unreasonable dismissal
《僱傭條例》第32K條訂明解僱的正當理由，包括：僱員的行為、僱員在履行其職務時的能力或資格、裁員或其他真確的業務運作需要，法例規定及其他重要原因。
Section 32K of the Employment Ordinance stipulates that valid reasons for dismissal include the conduct of the employee; the capability or qualifications of the employee for performing hisher duties; redundancy or other genuine operational requirements of the business of the employer; stipulation of the law or any other reason of substance
這明顯涉及公義問題。政府有責任確保員工復職的權利，令公義得以伸張。
The Government has the responsibility to ensure that employees have the rights of reinstatement so that justice can be done
回顧立法會以往的討論，2003年11月20日人力事務委員會就"有關《僱傭條例》復職及再次聘用條文的建議修訂"展開討論。
Looking back at the previous discussions in the Legislative Council the Panel on Manpower commenced discussions on the Proposed amendments to reinstatement and re - engagement provisions under the Employment Ordinance on 20 November 2003
我手上的會議文件，載列勞工處在1999年檢討《僱傭條例》的結果。
The meeting paper I have in hand set out the result of the review of the Employment Ordinance by the Labour Department LD in 1999
當局作出以下建議："修訂復職及再次聘用的條文，訂明遇有被裁定遭不合理及不合法解僱的僱員提出復職/再次聘用的申索，勞資審裁處如認為適當而合理切實可行，可作出復職/再次聘用的命令。
The Administrations recommendation was as follows the reinstatement and re - engagement provisions be amended to the effect that where an employee who has been found to be unreasonably and unlawfully dismissed makes a claim for reinstatementre - engagement the Labour Tribunal may make an order of reinstatementre - engagement if it considers it appropriate and reasonably practicable
這將免除須取得僱主同意的要求。
This would remove the need to secure the consent of the employer
各有關法例賦權區域法院可命令答辯人聘用、重新聘用或擢升申索人"。
The Court is empowered under the respective legislation to order among other things the respondent to employ re - employ or promote the claimant
換言之，勞工處在1999年即19年前已經完成檢討，更得出以下結論：政府應一視同仁，令《僱傭條例》與其他3項歧視條例一致，令區域法院可以透過《僱傭條例》援引強制復職的命令。
In other words LD completed the review 19 years ago in 1999 and it came to the following conclusion The Government should treat all employees equally and make the Employment Ordinance consistent with three other ordinances on discrimination so that the District Court can invoke the orders for reinstatement under the Employment Ordinance
其實，僱員可根據歧視條例，向平等機會委員會作出申訴，要求金錢賠償或復職。
In fact employees may lodge complaints with the Equal Opportunities Commission EOC under the ordinances on discrimination and ask for monetary compensation or reinstatement
無論如何，完善復職令安排還有很長的路要走。
In any case there is still a long way to go to perfect the arrangements for making an order for reinstatement
最理想的情況，當然是《僱傭條例》得以完善，令勞審處及勞工處在處理職場不平等情況時有法可依，無需事事轉介到平機會，變相令個案難以跟進。
It is definitely most desirable to perfect the Employment Ordinance so that the Labour Tribunal and LD can act in accordance with the law when dealing with inequality in the workplace and there is no need to refer matters to EOC making it difficult to follow up on cases
張超雄議員的修正案，只是呼應前人爭取的訴求，我一定會支持。
Dr Fernando CHEUNGs amendments just echo the demands of the predecessors and I will certainly support them
對於種種勞工權益，包括被臨時立法會廢除的"集體談判權"，以及被工聯會縮減至3天的男士侍產假，我認為立法會日後應伸張正義，繼續完善有關安排。
As for various labour rights including the right to collective bargaining which was abolished by the Provisional Legislative Council and paternity leave which was reduced to three days by FTU I think the Legislative Council should uphold justice and continue to improve the relevant arrangements in the future
我留意到，主席批准張超雄議員提出的3項修正案，內容與《條例草案》原定於1月底恢復二讀時，他提出的修正案大致相同。
I notice that the contents of the three amendments that the President allowed Dr Fernando CHEUNG to propose are largely the same as those he intended to propose when the Bill was scheduled to resume its Second Reading at the end of January
經法院或勞資審裁處的判決，確認他並非由於個人錯失而被免職，享有重返職場的權利。
A dismissed employee has the right to reinstatement upon ruling by the court or Labour Tribunal that he was not dismissed due to personal faults
《條例草案》主要新增4項安排，分別是：引入強制復職令；僱主若不遵從法庭命令，須向僱員支付額外款項；若僱主既不遵從命令，又不支付相關款項，將會負上刑事責任；以及將強制復職令涵蓋僱主繼承人或相聯公司。
The Bill has mainly provided for four new arrangements the introduction of the compulsory order for reinstatement; a further sum to be paid to the employee if the employer fails to comply with the court order; the employer will be held criminally liable if he neither complies with the court order nor pays the sum concerned to the employee; and the employers successor or associated company is covered by the compulsory order
香港教育專業人員協會是全港最大的教師工會，我作為其代表，在上屆立法會亦有參與《2016年條例草案》的審議工作。
The Hong Kong Professional Teachers Union is the largest trade union for teachers in Hong Kong . Being its representative I also took part in scrutinizing the 2016 Bill in the last Legislative Council
當局在上個立法會會期再度提交《條例草案》，並就我們在上屆立法會提出的意見作出修訂，包括訂定若僱主不履行法庭的強制復職令，須向僱員支付額外款項的安排，由原定"有關僱員月薪的3倍，上限為5萬元，以較低者為準"，提升至72,500元。
When the Government reintroduced the Bill in the last legislative session it has taken on board our views expressed in the Legislative Council of the last term and made some amendments which include providing for the payment of a further sum to the employee in the event that the employer fails to comply with the compulsory reinstatement order made by the court with the amount payable increased from the original three times the average monthly wages of the employee subject to a maximum of 50,000 whichever is lesser to 72,500
雖然如此，作為工會代表，我對於這項款項仍然有意見。
Despite the increase as the representative of my trade union I still take issue with the sum
我亦留意到張超雄議員就《條例草案》提出修正案，建議將額外款項提升至月薪6倍，並不設上限，以增加對違法僱主的阻嚇力。
Also I notice that Dr Fernando CHEUNG proposed amendments to the Bill to increase the further sum to six times the employees average monthly wages with the ceiling removed so as to enhance the deterrent effect on law - breaking employers
主席，每當我們談及改善勞工權益和福利時，市民可能認為主要只關乎基層工友的保障，例如早前海麗邨清潔工人爭取遣散費等。
President whenever we talk about improving labour rights and welfare people may think that the protection is mainly for grass - roots workers only as in the earlier incident of cleansing workers of Hoi Lai Estate fighting for severance payments
可是，政府作為全港最大僱主，對勞工的想象不能過於狹隘。
However being the largest employer in Hong Kong the Government cannot adopt a narrow perspective in respect of labour affairs
現時有關額外款項的上限，正正體現出政府對勞工的保障只是片面想象。
The present ceiling of the further sum precisely reflects that the Government has taken a one - sided approach to the labour protection issue
主席，不論在上屆或今屆立法會法案委員會審議期間，委員均對額外款項過低表示關注。
President during the scrutiny of the Bills Committee of the last or current Legislative Council members have expressed concern about the amount of further sum being too low
即使這項《條例草案》所訂的款項有所提升，但對於一些專業職位而言，其實仍然未能對他們提供有效保障。
To certain professional posts the sum despite being increased in the Bill actually fails to protect them effectively
正如當局向法案委員會提供的資料顯示，在2012年至2016年期間，勞工處曾處理25宗僱員就不合理及不合法解僱而要求復職及再次聘用的個案，當中接近一半個案涉及的僱員月薪超過24,000元。
As indicated in the information provided by the Government to the Bills Committee of the 25 cases of unreasonable and unlawful dismissal handled by the Labour Department between 2012 to 2016 in which the employees requested reinstatement and re - engagement employees involved in almost half ie . 12 of these cases received monthly wages of over 24,000
以教師為例，官立及資助學校的文憑教師起薪點是總薪級表第14點，即27,485元；若按月薪3倍計算，額外款項將較現時高出接近10,000元。
Take teachers as an example . The entry point for certificated masters in government and aided schools is Point 14 of the Master Pay Scale ie . 27,485; if calculated on the basis of three times the monthly wages the amount of further sum will be nearly 10,000 higher than the present amount
可惜，他們若被僱主違法解僱又不獲強制復職，只能獲得72,500元的賠償。
Sadly if they were unlawfully dismissed by their employers and not compulsorily reinstated they could only be compensated with 72,500
當局提出72,500元，理據就是上屆立法會議員提出修正案，建議額外款項為100,000元。
The rationale for the authorities proposal of 72,500 was that Members of the last Legislative Council proposed amendments to set the further sum at 100,000
於是勞顧會就像街市議價般，一邊提出100,000元，另一邊政府提出50,000元，中間取個平衡便大約是72,500元。
Hence just like bargaining in the market while the legislators proposing 100,000 on one side and the Government proposing 50,000 on the other LAB then struck the balance that is at around 72,500
首先，議員提出的數額並非憑空想象、開天殺價。
First of all the amount proposed by Members was not a fancy to ask for a sky - high amount
《條例草案》第二個安排，就是法庭頒下強制復職令時，如認為有關情況屬公正和恰當，可指明僱主須向該名僱員支付在解僱日期至復職日期之間包含年資計算的報酬。
The second arrangement in the Bill is that on the making of a compulsory reinstatement order if the court considers just and appropriate in the circumstances it may specify the employer to pay the employee his remuneration for the period between the date of dismissal and the date of reinstatement calculated inclusive of the years of service
作為工會代表，我支持有關安排，讓僱員不會因不合理解僱而影響生計。
As a trade union representative I support this arrangement as the employees living should not be affected by unreasonable dismissal
不過，我希望當局留意，現時的安排對於教師的保障尚有漏洞。
However I wish to draw the authorities attention that there are still loopholes in the present arrangement in protecting teachers
主席，一般僱員向強制性公積金供款，但任職資助學校的常額教師向公積金供款。
President common employees contribute to mandatory provident funds but teachers working in aided schools contribute to provident funds
公積金對於供款的年資有嚴格的規限。
Provident funds have strict restrictions regarding the years of contribution
若教師遭解僱後，未能即時入職其他資助學校成為常額教師，除非他獲教育局批准保留公積金戶口，否則有關帳戶會被取消；若3年內未能領取公積金戶口裏的累算權益，更會被政府充公。
If a teacher fails to secure employment as a regular teacher in other aided schools immediately after dismissal his provident fund account will be cancelled unless approval for retention is given by the Education Bureau; if he fails to collect the accrued benefits in his provident fund account within three years such benefits will even be forfeited by the Government
有關教師即使他日再次入職成為常額教師，其公積金供款年資要重新計算，這對教師的退休保障有相當大的影響。
Even if the teacher concerned becomes a regular teacher again later the year of his provident fund contribution has to be calculated anew . This affects his retirement protection rather significantly
主席，我明白今天審議的《條例草案》屬於勞工及福利局的範疇，但也希望局長可以提醒教育局，在《條例草案》通過後盡快補漏拾遺，修訂《津貼學校公積金規則》及《補助學校公積金規則》，令教師到法庭入稟要求復職或再次聘用時，他的公積金帳戶可獲暫時保留至訴訟完結或復職後為止，讓教師得到充分保障。
President I understand that the Bill under scrutiny today is under the scope of the Labour and Welfare Bureau yet I still hope the Secretary may remind the Education Bureau to plug the gap by amending the Grant Schools Provident Fund Rules and the Subsidized Schools Provident Funds Rules as soon as possible upon passage of the Bill such that when teachers apply to the court for reinstatement or re - engagement they may have their provident fund accounts retained temporarily until the close of the proceedings or the employees reinstatement thereby protecting teachers adequately
主席，我支持立法會通過這項《條例草案》，讓全港僱員都可以受到復職權的保障，減低僱主無理解僱的機會。
President I support the passage of the Bill by the Council so that all employees in Hong Kong can be protected under the right to reinstatement whereby the chance of unreasonable dismissal by employers is reduced
要知道每 名"打工仔"背後也有一個家庭需要肩負，一旦失去工作便會對整個家庭的生計造成重大影響。
We should understand that there is a family burden behind every wage earner . Once he lost his job the living of his whole family will be significantly affected
當然，如能加快處理有關訴訟，亦可避免一些僱主以審訊需時為由而聘請其他人，令原有僱員在復職上出現波折。
Certainly if the proceedings can be processed more expeditiously it may also prevent the employer from engaging a replacement for the reason of prolonged trial thus causing obstacles to the reinstatement of the employee
教師被校方不合理解僱，除了該名教師要面對生計問題外，無論該名教師被另一位教師替代或能成功復職，均會對學生的學習和其他進度造成一定的影響。
In the event that a teacher is unreasonably dismissed by the school apart from the teacher having to face livelihood problems students learning and other progress will certainly be impacted regardless of whether the teacher concerned is replaced or successfully reinstated
即使該名老師最後成功復職，但由於校方在訴訟審理期間已另聘教師取代其職位，他便因而要到同一辦學團體的另一間學校工作，在熟習工作和磨合方面都需要時間。
Even if the teacher concerned is finally reinstated he will have to work in other school under the same school sponsoring body because a replacement has been engaged to take up his work during the course of proceedings . He will thus need time to familiarize with his work and integrate in the workplace
因此，我希望法庭在處理復職申訴時，能以讓僱員返回原有職位為優先考慮，除了在合理的時間內完成審訊，作出復職命令時亦應與僱傭雙方訂定合適時間安排，讓僱員盡快返回原職。
Therefore I hope the court will accord priority to reinstating the employee to his original post in processing reinstatement claims . Apart from completing the trial within a reasonable period of time the court should when making an order for reinstatement also ask the employer and employee to make adequate time arrangement so that the employee may return to his original post as soon as possible . Let me take schools as the example again
我再以學校為例，不論學校以任何原因解僱教師，都需要在短期內填補有關職位，不能出現有學生但沒老師授課的情況。
Regardless of the reason for the school to dismiss a teacher it has to fill the post within a short period of time for lessons cannot be conducted without a teacher
因此，法庭在作出復職的命令時可考慮各行業的實際運作，讓僱員可以順利復職。
Therefore the court may consider the actual operation of different professions in making reinstatement orders so that the employees can be reinstated successfully
我認為有關修訂務實，而且已考慮僱主的需要，因此支持有關修正案。
In my view the amendment is practical and has also considered the employers needs . I thus support the amendment
主席，總結而言，勞工界等待強制復職權的落實已接近20年，進度十分不理想。
President in conclusion the labour sector has waited for the implementation of the right to reinstatement for almost 20 years and the progress has been very undesirable
我們現在終等到了，但亦發現僱傭保障政策有缺漏，例如我前述的額外款項不能保障專業職級，又或復職令只包含不合法解僱，但如果僱員因為政治取向和性傾向被解僱，或在放取產假前後被解僱等，則這些不合理解僱均不受強制復職令所保障。
Now we finally have the right to reinstatement yet we find that there are inadequacies and omissions in employment protection policies . For instance as I mentioned earlier the further sum fails to protect employees in professional ranks and the reinstatement order only covers unlawful dismissals . If an employee is dismissed for his political or sexual orientation or in the period before or after taking maternity leave such unreasonable dismissals are not under the protection of the compulsory reinstatement order
所以，《條例草案》現時在不合理解僱方面的保障仍然存有很大的漏洞，只是比較上能處理不合法解僱的問題。
Therefore the Bill still has a very big loophole regarding the protection against unreasonable dismissal just that it is only relatively capable of dealing with unlawful dismissal
我希望政府不要認為今天通過了《條例草案》便功德圓滿，而最少應在法例實施1年後全面檢視成效，確保這項政策及相關法例能保障僱員免遭僱主不合理及不合法解僱。
I hope that the Government will not consider the passage of the Bill today a success; rather it should comprehensively review the effectiveness of the legislation one year after its implementation so as to ensure that this policy and the relevant legislation can protect employees from being unreasonably and unlawfully dismissed by employers
當然，張超雄議員有他的考慮，但我想善意提醒一下。
Of course Dr Fernando CHEUNG has his considerations but I would like to give a kind reminder
我支持政府就強制復職令提出的《條例草案》。
I support the Bill introduced by the Government on the compulsory order for reinstatement
我希望政府在條例生效後，能夠定期進行檢視。
I hope that the Government will regularly examine these matters after the Ordinance has taken effect
正如法案委員會主席黃定光議員剛才所說，《條例草案》的宗旨是實施2018-2019年度財政預算案中有關稅務寬免的若干建議，以及就其他事宜提出相關修訂。
As pointed out by Mr WONG Ting - kwong Chairman of the Bills Committee just now the Bill aims to implement various proposals concerning tax concessions in the 2018 - 2019 Budget and introduce amendments concerning other matters
法案委員會只召開一次會議便完成審議《條例草案》的條文。
The Bills Committee completed the scrutiny of all clauses of the Bill by convening only one meeting
首先，關於擴闊薪俸稅的邊際稅階和調低邊際稅率，經修訂後的邊際稅率分別是2%、6%、10%、14%及17%，稅階由45,000元增加至50,000元。
First regarding the widening of marginal bands and lowering of marginal rates for salaries tax the revised marginal rates will be 2 % 6 % 10 % 14 % and 17 % respectively and the tax bands will be widened from 45,000 to 50,000 each
政府坐擁1,480多億元的盈餘，不能不把多收的稅款用作：第一，資源再分配；第二，退給納稅人。
Sitting on a surplus of some 148 billion the Government should use the excessive taxes collected for the purposes of first reallocating resources; second reimbursing taxpayers
所以，一次性寬減稅款是無可厚非的。
For this reason a one - off reduction of tax gives little cause for criticism