Borrison/hk-legicost huggingface dataset:
正如我剛才所說，我和公眾均感覺到它只不過是一個高級"梁粉俱樂部"或"密室俱樂部"，做事沒有透明度，不知它做些甚麼；甚至它進行的民調，它亦說明不會公開，而我們亦沒有見到其成效。
As I mentioned just now the public and I feel that it is merely a high - class LEUNGs fan club or backroom club which works with no transparency . We have no idea what it does . It has even stated clearly that it will not disclose the opinion surveys conducted by it and we have not seen any of its results
過去5年，它可曾為政府出謀獻計？
In the past five years did it ever give the Government any good advice on strategies and plans?
為何處處碰壁，處處"踩地雷"呢？
Why did it always run up against the wall and always get on the peoples nerves?
可想而知，其實我剛才所說的並非無的放矢。
It thus shows that what I said just now is actually not groundless
很明顯，中策組的工作既不透明，亦沒甚麼成效。
Obviously the work of CPU is neither transparent nor effective
自梁振英上任後，截至2016年5月，中策組一共進行了207項民意調查，單是民意調查便花了2,000萬元。
Since LEUNG Chun - ying assumed office as at May 2016 CPU has conducted a total of 207 opinion surveys . It has expended 20 million on opinion surveys alone
最近政府又再進行民調，這不是很鮮活的例子嗎？
Recently the Government has conducted an opinion survey again . Is this not a vivid example?
主席，根本整個中策組的工作架床疊屋，重複又重複，對政府沒甚助益。
Chairman the work of the entire CPU is in fact duplicated and repetitive . It is not of much help to the Government
我翻閱我提及這數年的研究報告，發現有一個名字很值得告訴大家知道，便是一國兩制研究中心。
Browsing through the research reports of these several years mentioned by me I found a name worth mentioning the One Country Two Systems Research Institute
原來在2014年至2015年，該中心就輿論與時事民情，具體名稱是"傳媒時事輿情研究"，獲取了772,800元。
It turns out that from 2014 to 2015 this institute received 772,800 for its study on public opinion current affairs and public sentiments . The exact name was Study on Trend of Discussions on Social and Political Issues in the Mass Media
主席，這些資料給予我一種感覺，這好像是圈養計劃似的，這些與政府或北京有親密關係的組織，基本上每年從我們納稅人的口袋定期出糧，產生出如此虛無的時事焦點議題研究。
Chairman these pieces of information make me feel that it is like a captive breeding scheme . Basically these organizations which are closely connected with the Government or Beijing are regularly paid with our taxpayers money every year generating such intangible studies on current affairs and topical issues
老實說，主席，這些研究如果認認真真地做，我亦不太反對，因為外間確實有許多真正的政治顧問能提供意見。
Frankly Chairman I will not have too much objection if these studies are conducted seriously since there are indeed many genuine political advisers outside who can offer advice
但他們每年須領取七十多八十萬元，而最近這兩年還固定領取811,440元，一毫子也不缺少，主席，這給我的感覺很明顯，它是一種變相的定期出糧圈養計劃。
But they are to be paid 700,000 to 800,000 every year . In the last two years they received a fixed amount of 811,440 not a penny less . Chairman this gives me an obvious feeling that it is tantamount to a captive breeding scheme where payments are received on a regular basis
鑒於中策組現時這種格局和組合，而當中這一群所謂顧問其實都是親政府陣營或"梁粉俱樂部"的成員，縱使她真有決心改弦易轍，要換掉所有人，也絕非易事。
She has said it herself . Given the existing structure and composition of CPU in which this bunch of so - called members are actually members of the pro - Government camp or LEUNGs fan club it is by no means easy to replace all these people even if she is really determined to carry out an overhaul
在現時的政治氣氛下，政府找人擔任局長或加入其班子亦甚困難，而中策組屬政府班子以外的顧問，我相信亦不會容易找到人選。
In the present political atmosphere it is also difficult for the Government to find someone to serve as Secretaries of Departments or join its governing team . Members of CPU are advisers outside the Governments team . I believe it will not be easy to find suitable candidates either
在這情況下，我看不到她有任何機會可以做到甚麼。
In this circumstance I cannot see that she has any opportunity of achieving anything
更可笑的是，候任行政長官自己亦只將中策組視為在不同政策局及不同持份者之間的協調者；說得白一點，是多餘的。
What is more ridiculous is that the Chief Executive - elect herself also merely regards CPU as a coordinator among different Policy Bureaux and stakeholders . To put it more bluntly it is redundant
她之前不是曾表示自己作為政務司司長的時候，擁有自己的辦事處和團隊，若有經濟項目，便會自行諮詢經濟顧問？
Did she not say that when she served as the Chief Secretary for Administration she had her own office and team and would consult the Economist herself if there was any economic project?
其實有甚麼緣故要架床疊屋？
In fact what is the reason for duplicating the efforts?
主席，我在我的開場白提到，花費接近1億2,000萬元聘請這些人擔任所謂政府顧問，但很明顯，他們的組成及性質在回歸後已逐漸變質，到今天只變為一個"密室俱樂部"。
Chairman as mentioned in my opening remarks nearly 120 million is spent on hiring these people as so - called advisers to the Government but obviously their composition and nature have gradually changed since the reunification . Today they have merely turned out to be a backroom club . In my view such spending of money does not worth its while at all
如果她的鴻圖大計不成功，我們便須每年繼續支付1億2,000萬元予這一群低水準的政治打手。
If her ambitious plan falls through we will have to continue to pay 120 million to this bunch of political henchmen of a low standard every year
因此，主席，我建議取消這項撥款。
Hence Chairman I propose withdrawing such funding
我在這一節發言提出削減行政長官的薪酬，我針對的是梁振英作為特首在過去5年為香港社會帶來的撕裂和矛盾。
In this session I will speak on the proposal for cutting the remuneration of the Chief Executive . My focus will be on the dissension and conflicts LEUNG Chun - ying brought to Hong Kong society in the past five years in his capacity as the Chief Executive
可能在他的眼中，這些社會撕裂和矛盾均是他作為特首的應有之義，所有對他的批評只不過是反對派斷章取義，強加在他身上，針對他的為人，針對他的施政，針對他的言論。
Perhaps he considers it the duty of the Chief Executive to bring forth these dissension and conflicts to society and that all the criticisms against him are imposed on him by the opposition camp out of context directing at his personality his governance and remarks . Come to think about this . Things must have gone rotten before worms are bred
可是，大家試想一下，物必先腐而後蟲生，如果梁振英在上任時可以信守承諾，兌現建立"香港營"，拋開語言"偽術"，真心誠意為香港社會的未來謀福祉，我相信很多批評自會遠他而去。
Had LEUNG Chun - ying honoured his promise of building a Hong Kong camp when he assumed office had he given up his practice of equivocation and striven sincerely for the future well - being of Hong Kong society I trusted many of those criticisms would have gone . Come think about this
在選舉期間，梁振英批評他的對手唐英年的僭建問題不可接受，批評唐英年的行為損害了作為特首應有的個人最高誠信。
During the election LEUNG Chun - ying criticized his opponent Henry TANGs unauthorized building works incident unacceptable claiming such conduct had failed the highest personal integrity expected of the Chief Executive
當他被人發現有僭建問題時，他是用甚麼方法來解說的呢？
When he was revealed to have unauthorized building works how did he explain his case?
他有否撫心自問，反躬自省，反省自己呢？
Had he reflected on his mistake wholeheartedly? . Had he engaged himself in self - reflection?
他當日那種批評，正正是香港社會要表達的，就是不接受特首毫無誠信，不接受特首以語言"偽術"來治理香港。
The criticism he made back then is exactly what Hong Kong society wanted to express . We cannot accept a Chief Executive who lacks credibility and governs Hong Kong with hypocritical rhetoric
他一起步便犯了最重要、最重要的錯誤，便是告訴香港社會他是一名語言"偽術"的特首，這是他活該的。
He committed the most serious and crucial mistake right at the beginning that is telling Hong Kong society that he was a Chief Executive of double - talk . Serve him right
這個問題在社會上引起軒然大波，因為牽涉到整個國民教育的內容。
The issue which involved the content of national education had stirred up a hornets nest in society
大家看到這套國民教育並非大家想象般要令香港市民、年青一代，認清作為中國國民應要掌握的全部相關歷史資訊，而是選擇性地隱惡揚善，對現政權共產政權歌功頌德，對其他惡行則避重就輕。
The public perceived that the set of national education to be introduced did not aim at facilitating Hong Kong citizens and the younger generation in grasping all the historic information a Chinese citizen should know as they expected but was a selective approach of promoting good deeds and covering up the bad ones seeking to heap praises on the ruling regime and the Communist Party of China and gloss over their wicked deeds
此事正正反映梁振英心底的價值觀，就是他根本不相信香港社會具有能夠成為"一國兩制"下的香港的應有獨特性。
The incident has accurately reflected the values held by LEUNG Chun - ying at heart that he does not trust Hong Kong society possesses the uniqueness to be the Hong Kong under one country two systems
如果香港事事要以國內省市作為跟從的依據，那香港便無須執行"一國兩制"，香港便會變成一個國內的城市。
If every issue of Hong Kong is to be handled with reference to provinces and cities of the Mainland there is no need to implement one country two systems in Hong Kong and Hong Kong will become one of the cities of the Mainland
如果香港只是一個國內的城市，究竟我們有甚麼價值呢？
If Hong Kong is only one of the cities of the Mainland what is our value?
我們是否要採取梁振英這次探訪大灣區的訪問團所表達的態度，便是要盡快融入大灣區的經濟發展，爭取機遇，成為大灣區成員的一部分，成為大灣區其中一個城市呢？
In his visit to the Guangdong - Hong Kong - Macao Bay Area the delegation led by LEUNG Chun - ying expressed that Hong Kong should integrate into the bay area in economic development expeditiously striving for opportunities to become a member and a city of the bay area . Should we adopt this attitude?
如果要採取這種態度，就正好摧毀香港的核心價值。
If we adopt this attitude we will rightly destroy the core values of Hong Kong
因為香港的核心價值在於我們與國內城市不同之處，在於我們有文明社會應該有的對人權、法治和自由的追求，與國際社會接軌的一套普世價值。
For the core values of Hong Kong lie in our difference from cities in the Mainland that we aspire for human rights the rule of law and freedom which a civil society should have and that we have a set of universal values compatible with the international community
可是，在梁振英的管治下，這些全被視為不重要的事情。
However under the governance of LEUNG Chun - ying all of these are considered unimportant
在他眼中，所謂的法治只是整人的工具，他把法治視為可以肆意運用的政治檢控工具；將人權視為大家無休止、無限制地挑戰特區政府的言論，又或如他所說，他亦應享有言論自由，忘記他作為特首必須謹言慎行，以公眾利益作為他發言的依據。
In his eyes the so - called rule of law is merely a means of oppression and he regards the rule of law a tool for political prosecution which he can exploit wantonly . To him human rights equals to remarks posing endless and boundless challenges to the SAR Government or as he said he also enjoys freedom of expression . He has simply forgotten that as the Chief Executive he must be cautious with this words and deeds and his remarks should always be based on the interest of the public
作為政治領袖，作為特首，他的責任是甚麼呢？
What is his obligation as a political leader as the Chief Executive?
便是找出方法，令整個社會在這些矛盾對立的討論過程中找到出路，但他沒有這樣做，他的做法是繼續火上加油。
He is supposed to identify a solution to enable society as a whole to find a way out in the course of discussions over these conflicts and oppositions . Yet he has not done so . He simply added fuel to the fire
即使某項問題是整個社會明明已有共同方向，例如特首念茲在茲所說的，就是房 屋問題是香港施政的重中之重，但他選擇了與社會對立的方法。
Even for an issue which society as a whole has a common direction such as the housing issue which the Chief Executive keeps mentioning as the most important task in the governance of Hong Kong he has chosen to go against the will of society
他一直說香港社會應讓土地供應趕上需求，要多建房屋，讓市民大眾安居樂業，但當我們指出10年建屋計劃已累積缺口，在公營房屋包括出租公屋、居屋、資助出售的房屋等各種不同類型，總的目標和方向均指向要為香港市民提供可負擔的房屋。
He always says that Hong Kong society should ensure land supply to meet the demand and construct additional flats to enable the public to live in peace and work with contentment . We have pointed out that there is an accumulated shortfall under the Ten - year Housing Programme in various types of public housing including public rental housing Home Ownership Scheme flats and subsidized sale flats so the overall objective and direction should be focused on providing affordable housing for the public
可是，從特首到發展局，以至是運輸及房屋局也一直表示這方向不可行，指出當局必須繼續提供土地資源興建私人樓房，透過增加私人樓房供應來遏止樓價升幅。
Yet the Chief Executive and the Development Bureau as well as the Transport and Housing Bureau keep saying that the direction is impracticable for the authorities must continue providing land resource for private housing to increase private housing supply in order to curb the rise in property prices
香港只是彈丸之地，當局要將土地分配以應付全球的游資或熱錢需求，試問怎能應對得來呢？
Hong Kong is a small place . If the authorities are to allocate land resource to cope with the idle fund or hot money coming from all parts of the world how can it make it?
從這個角度而言，他在處理房屋問題上沒有對症下藥，結果一直被批評官商勾結，為熱錢、為內地富豪的資金"鋪橋搭路"，在香港找出路。
From this angle he has failed to prescribe the right remedy to address the housing problem . As a result he has to face criticisms of colluding with the business sector and paving the way for hot money and capital of the rich and powerful from the Mainland for channelling funds . This is an apt reflection of the overall policy vision of LEUNG Chun - ying
這正正反映梁振英的整個施政理念，除了是目中只有自己外，完全欠缺政策理念和邏輯，他亦欠缺觀察力，無法看見香港社會最應走的方向。
He is self - centred . He lacks any policy vision and logic . He lacks the ability of observation failing to perceive the best direction in which society of Hong Kong should head
過去5年，我們面對梁振英一直為自己連任鋪路，在他鋪路的過程中，他認為既然得不到社會信任，便要弄出很多事情來挑起社會的對立和撕裂。
In the past five years we have been LEUNG Chun - ying striving to pave the way for his reappointment . In the course of paving this way he considered that if he could not gain the trust of society he would stir up all kinds of issues to provoke opposition and dissension in society
他將香港社會一直追求的政治制度改變，貶視為向中央、向梁振英奪權的過程。
He has degraded the pursuit of changes in the constitutional system by the community of Hong Kong to a process of seizing the power of the Central Authorities and LEUNG Chun - ying
他將香港社會重視的核心價值，視為不值一哂的事情......
He regards the core values treasured by society of Hong Kong as something meaningless A phone rang Sorry
因此，我認為梁振英在餘下的3個月任期，完全沒有資格領取任何俸祿酬金。
Therefore in my view LEUNG Chun - ying is totally not qualified to receive any remuneration in his remaining term of three months
一方面，固然是因為他的施政完全沒有照顧香港社會的核心價值，公眾利益。
On the one hand it is definitely because his policies have given no regard to the core values of society of Hong Kong and public interest
另一方面，他只是將香港視為大灣區或珠三角地區的其中一個城市。
On the other hand he only regards Hong Kong as one of the cities in the Greater Bay Area or the Pearl River Delta Region
他可有想過香港的國際經驗，以及與國際接軌的這種普世價值，正正是中國內地最需要面對和學習的。
Has it ever come to his mind that Hong Kongs experience in and its universal values being compatible with the international arena are aspects which Mainland China badly needs to address and learn
他所想的只是如何能盡快建立中港接軌的平台，盡快令香港進入內地的生活圈。
He is only thinking about establishing a Hong Kong - China integration platform expeditiously so that Hong Kong may assimilate into life on the Mainland
為甚麼不是以香港的核心價值、香港與國際接軌的經驗來影響國內省市，朝一個更文明、更進步的社會前進呢？
Why do we not influence Mainland provinces and cities with the core values of Hong Kong and our experience of integration with the international community so that they will be geared towards a more civilized and developed society?
這正好反映梁振英心底的態度。
This aptly reflects the attitude of LEUNG Chun - ying at heart
在特首選舉期間，梁振英不能競選連任，但卻可以升官發財，出任全國政協副主席。
During the election of the Chief Executive LEUNG Chun - ying could not stand for re - election yet he was offered a higher position a Vice - chairman of the National Committee of the Chinese Peoples Political Consultative Conference
我一直批評此舉開了一個非常壞的先河，因為"一國兩制"一向的說法是"港人治港"，從來沒有一個說法是，"一國兩制"可以接受中國內地的領導出任香港特區的平衡領導人。
I have condemned the appointment for setting an extremely bad precedent . Hong Kong people ruling Hong Kong is always mentioned under one country two systems and it has never been mentioned that a leader of Mainland China may assume the office of the SAR leader in parallel under one country two systems
可是，梁振英連這個如此簡單和基本、一個維護"一國兩制"的根本也未有考 慮。
However LEUNG Chun - ying has failed to give regard to this simple and fundamental premise in upholding one country two systems
他只顧沾沾自喜，想着自己現在有多威風，既是中國國家領導人之一，又是在香港指指點點的特區政府首長。
He is overwhelmed by complacency savouring how prestigious he is to be one of the State leaders of China and the head of the SAR Government to manipulate things in Hong Kong
即使中國領導人提出，特首應尋找方法解開香港社會的困局和撕裂，尋找方法去團結社會，但他仍是反其道而行。
Even though leaders of China have mentioned that the Chief Executive should identify ways to resolve the deadlock and dissension in society of Hong Kong and unite society he has acted in the opposite
不管大家是否喜歡新一屆政府，社會還是提出應採取一些行動來改善互雙對立的局面，例如開放公民廣場、取消TSA等。
Whether or not the public like the new government the community considers it necessary to take some steps to ease the deadlock of confrontation such as the opening up of the Civic Square and the abolition of the TSA and so on
這些也是善意的行為，可以逐步將社會的矛盾有序地化解，打開這個缺口。
These are actions of good will which may resolve the conflicts in society in an orderly manner and create opportunities
可是，梁振英真厲害，他表示這些事情他不會接納，不會考慮。
How terrific LEUNG Chun - ying is . He said he would neither accept nor consider any of these
我們的特區政府和梁振英可否多些尊重香港市民、香港社會的意願呢？
Will the SAR Government and LEUNG Chun - ying please show more respect to the wishes of the people and the community of Hong Kong?
如果有些行為和事情是不會影響政府的，為甚麼不做呢？
If certain actions or issues will not affect the Government why does he not simply do them?
為甚麼事事也要選擇一種對抗和撕裂的態度呢？
Why would he choose to adopt an attitude of confrontation and provoke dissension in every issue?
難道這就是一個合格的行政長官嗎？
Is this how a qualified Chief Executive should behave?
主席，我會就修正案編號124，即總目142，關於中央政策組的全年預算運作開支發言。
Chairman I will speak on Amendment No . 124 relating to head 142 on the estimated annual operating expenditure of the Central Policy Unit CPU
我不知道局長的回應是否曲線表達了政府的立場，我認識局長一段長時間，他是很聰明的人，如果連他也想不到方法為中央政策組抵擋"兩拳"，它也相當"抵打"。
I do not know if the Secretarys response is an indirect indication of the Governments position . I have known the Secretary for a long time . He is a very smart person
我在上一次發言時已經說過，中央政策組在過去，尤其是過去5年，在協助政府的工作上表現欠佳，這個也不是主觀的看法。
As I already said when I spoke last time CPU has performed very poorly in its work of assisting the Government especially over the past five years . This is not a subjective opinion
主席，第一，它事實上交不出成績，很多調查研究都以屬內部資料為由來辯解或開脫。
Chairman firstly its inability to deliver any results is a fact . In many cases internal use is quoted as an excuse or justification for not disclosing the information of researches and studies
但是，有關"人馬"是甚麼人呢？
But what kind of people are working for CPU?
大家都知道，無論是首席顧問或是屬於全職的顧問，都是"梁粉俱樂部"的人或一直是親建制陣營的打手。
We all know that the Head of CPU and all the full - time CPU Members are from the social club of LEUNGs fans or are hired guns of the pro - establishment camp
它進行這麼多研究，掌握民情，本應做到一點工夫，但它卻做不到，最後連累政府的施政。
It has conducted many researches to grasp public sentiments so they should have been able to deliver some results . But it has failed to do so thus adversely affecting the Governments work in the end
我對於諮詢委員會已經很不滿，更何況是達到政府智囊團級數的中央政策組，看到它也淪為這種貨色，實在很可笑。
I do not even like all those advisory committees so how can I possibly approve of CPU which is supposed to be a government - level think tank? . Seeing its degeneration into such a state I really cannot help jeering at it
主席，我覺得很奇怪，因為我知道以局長的才智，他也是候任政府的熱門班子成員，也有報章這樣報道。
Chairman considering his intelligence and ability I was very surprised to hear his response . He is one of the likely members in the team of the next Government as already pointed out in some newspapers reports
整體成本或研究員的規模是否都是一樣，不會有任何變化呢？
Are the overall costs or the research personnel establishment always the same without any changes?
這一點很奇怪，給我的感覺很不好，好像一個定期支薪的機制。
This is very weird . I do not feel comfortable . All is just like a regular payroll
主席，我希望政府聽到我們的意見。
Chairman I hope the Government can hear our voice
他每天最主要的工作是， 第一，網絡攝影師，我不知道他有多專業，是否用很專業的相機拍照，但我在新聞片段中只見他拿着手提電話，以不同的角度替特首"高炒"、"低炒"地拍照，可能有此需要。
I do not know how professional he is or whether he uses any professional cameras at all . The only thing I can see from all those news clips is he is always taking high - angle and low - angle photographs of the Chief Executive with a mobile phone . Maybe he really sees such a need
在選舉期間，有很多選民找我投訴，還有就着近日再次被人炒得熱烘烘的"種票"問題投訴。
There were DQ cases involving electors and DQ cases are not unique to Members . Registered letters were sent to members of the public and if any persons do not reply to these registered letters it was assumed that they did not want to become an elector . During election periods many electors approached me to lodge complaints some of which were about vote - rigging an issue that has once again stirred up quite a row lately
但在發言之前，我首先要感謝主席，他就今次財政預算案會議的編排可說非常恰當，亦符合議事規程。
Before I speak I would like to thank the Chairman for the meeting arrangements he has made for this Budget which are very appropriate and perfectly in compliance with the Rules of Procedure
結果，主席把這些修正案剪裁成100多項，這亦符合公眾期望。
But the President has trimmed these amendments into some 100 in number . This aligns with public expectation
此外，鄭松泰議員亦大力批評警隊，並提出"七警案"作為主要的理據。
Besides Dr CHENG Chung - tai has also criticized the Police Force very severely citing the seven cops as the major evidence
所以，我認為他們批評的理據薄弱，只是為批評而批評，為"拉布"而"拉布"。
Therefore I think that the justifications for their amendments are lame . They only criticize for the sake of criticizing . They only filibuster for the sake of filibustering
我奉勸立法會反對派同事，請高抬貴手，點到即止，不要讓"拉布"對預算案造成太大衝擊。
I must advise opposition Members to be sensible and not to go too far . Do not let the filibuster cause any heavy impact on the Budget
主席，我現就總目21，關於削減新聞統籌專員約1個月薪酬開支預算的修正案發言。
Chairman I am going to speak on the amendment moved to head 21 which seeks to deduct the estimated expenditure of about one months remuneration for the Information Coordinator
為何我要削減馮煒光1個月薪酬呢？
Why do I seek to deduct Andrew FUNGs remuneration for one month?
其實，以他質素之低，本應該要求他退回所有薪酬，削減1個月薪酬只是象徵式追討而已。
In fact judging from his poor performance I should have asked him to return all the remuneration he has received and the deduction of one months remuneration is a merely symbolic gesture
第一，身為新聞統籌專員，他完全漠視民情，無法建立特首和市民之間的溝通。
First of all as the Information Coordinator he has completely ignored public sentiments and failed to enhance communication between the Chief Executive and the general public
他的公關策略質素奇低，引致"關公災難"更多於表現其真正的公關技巧，而他不但無法為本身質素很差的特首塗脂抹粉，反而令他更為社會大眾所討厭。
His public relations strategy is appallingly poor and instead of having any genuine public relations skills he has been causing public relations disasters . Not only has he failed to do whitewashing for the very lousy Chief Executive he has also rendered his boss even more hateful to the public
歷任特首的民望或高或低，例如彭定康的民望一直保持平穩，第一屆特首"董伯伯"由民望高企至慢慢回軟，但他的民望再低也不及"689"上任時的情況。
As we can see from this chart the several former Chief Executives had different levels of popularity rating . For example the popularity rating of Chris PATTEN was all the time stable while that of the first Chief Executive Uncle TUNG was high initially and dropped over time . However TUNGs popularity rating even at its lowest was never as low as that of 689 when he assumed office
這個特首的起步點已經很差，身為他的新聞統籌專員確實是比較為難，可接任這崗位的人可說是"藝高人膽大"，可惜他無疑是膽大，但技藝卻極低。
This Chief Executive indeed had a very poor start in popularity rating so the task of his Information Coordinator is honestly quite a difficult one . The one capable of doing this task must be a person with a lot of guts and skills . Regrettably Andrew FUNG undoubtedly has a lot of guts but he has very poor skills
只要看看他一開始是多麼惹人討厭，便知道新聞統籌專員確實難為。
Once we realize how annoying he was when he first assumed office we will understand the difficulty faced by the Information Coordinator
他尚未上任已牽涉一連串誠信問題，例如西九文化區設計比賽的漏報利益風波，還未上任已出現誠信問題。
LEUNG Chun - ying got entangled in a series of integrity issues before he took office such as the failure to make a declaration of interest in the West Kowloon Cultural District design competition and his integrity was already open to question even before he took up the post
剛上任又鬧出麥齊光和曾景文的涉貪案，整個團隊烏煙瘴氣。
His entire governing was riddled with scandals as soon as he assumed office one example being the suspected corruption case involving MAK Chai - kwong and TSANG King - man
還有陳茂波涉及經營"劏房"和避稅，令我們不知應稱呼他為"劏房波"還是"醉駕波"，因為他之後又涉及酒後駕駛。
Besides Paul CHAN was involved in the operation of subdivided units and tax evasion . We really do not know how we should call him Subdivided - units Paul or Drink - driving Paul because he was later involved in a drink - driving incident
這種種爭議，的確令身為新聞統籌專員者十分為難。
All these controversies have indeed made things very difficult for the Information Coordinator
且讓我們看看新聞統籌專員的職責是甚麼。
Let us now take a look at the duties and responsibilities of the Information Coordinator
原來美國的白宮新聞秘書長在奧巴馬年代收取的年薪是173,922美元，亦即大約135萬港元，只是馮煒光年薪的三分之一。
How does his remuneration compare with that of a real White House spokesman? . In the United States the remuneration for the White House Press Secretary in the OBAMA era was US173,922 or about HK1.35 million that is only one third of the annual salary for Andrew FUNG
然而，大家其實也知道連5歲、10歲以至8歲的孩子也對他嗤之以鼻。
However we all know that even children aged 10 8 or even 5 would sneer at him
當市民大表氣憤時，馮煒光又如何回應呢？
How has Andrew FUNG responded to peoples anger?
他說那些"嬲"可能沒有代表性，把數十萬個"嬲"說成是少數人營造出來的假象。
He argues that all these Angrys may not mean anything at all and simply dismisses the several hundred thousand Angrys as a false picture fabricated by a handful of people