Borrison/hk-legicost huggingface dataset:
"代理主席，如果《人權法案條例》可以在內地口岸區適用，若有政府或執法人員在內地口岸區內無理抓捕、跨境抓捕及拘禁乘客，就可以運用《人權法案條例》賦予的權利，透過香港的法院機制處理，包括提出訴訟。
Deputy Chairman if BORO can remain in force in MPA in the event that any unreasonable capture cross - boundary capture or detention of passengers is made by any government or law enforcement officers in MPA the rights conferred by BORO can be exercised to deal with them through the system of courts in Hong Kong including the institution of legal proceedings
代理主席，香港人權法案第五五條亦指出："任何人受非法逮捕或拘禁者，有權要求執行損害賠償。
Deputy Chairman Article 55 of the Hong Kong Bill of Rights also states that Anyone who has been the victim of unlawful arrest or detention shall have an enforceable right to compensation
"這即是說，即使有香港人不幸面對無理抓捕，也有渠道向內地執法部門和人員追討賠償。
That means in the event that Hong Kong people unfortunately encounter groundless capture there are still channels to seek compensation from Mainland law enforcement agencies and officers
這便是我剛才發言所說作出補救的其中一個方式。
This is one way of providing redress mentioned by me in my speech just now
這正是我所擔心的。
This is precisely my worry
當整個內地口岸區執行所有內地法律時，沒有人知道究竟在內地口岸區內有甚麼設施。
If all Mainland laws are enforced in the entire MPA no one knows what facilities there actually are in MPA
陳帆局長不讓我們在審議法案的過程中前往視察，看看例如是否有大量拘留室內地曾經發生濫用權力的事件，包括秘密關押及施以酷刑讓我們了解及安心，知道這些設施沒有在內 地口岸區內出現，成為硬件設施。
Secretary Frank CHAN did not let us make site visits in the course of scrutinizing the Bill to see if there are for example a large number of detention rooms―incidents of power abuse including secret confinement and torture have happened on the Mainland before―to put our minds at ease with the knowledge that such facilities are not found in MPA and have become its hardware
我們的局長做了甚麼？
What did our Secretary do?
我們的局長在審議法案的過程中多次、一次又一次地拒絕議員進行實地視察的要求，他連這個知情權也剝奪。
The Secretary repeatedly turned down time after time Members request to make site visits in the course of scrutinizing the Bill . He deprived us even of this right to know
因此，將香港人權法案適用於內地口岸區的重要性，在於它的第三條指明："任何人不得施以酷刑，或予以殘忍、不人道或侮辱之處遇或懲罰。
Therefore the importance of making the Hong Kong Bill of Rights applicable to MPA lies in the fact that Article 3 therein specifies that No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment
"若香港乘客不幸地在內地口岸區遇上不人道待遇，也有香港法律作為基礎，在香港的法院制度內，追究內地相關部門或執法人員的責任。
If Hong Kong passengers unfortunately encounter inhuman treatment in MPA the laws of Hong Kong can be used as the basis to ascertain the responsibility of the Mainland agencies or law enforcement officers concerned within Hong Kongs judicial system
這是我支持郭家麒議員修正案的原因。
This is the reason for my support of Dr KWOK Ka - kis amendment
代理主席，國際社會關注到，中國近年經常非法對拘捕者進行"電視認罪"。
Deputy Chairman the international community is concerned about how in recent years the confessions to crime made by illegally arrested people were often broadcast on television in China
曾經發言的議員也多次提及，當中大部分人未經法庭審判，有不少甚至尚未按照中國的檢控方式正式扣捕，而不合作的人就會被秘密審訊。
Members who spoke earlier also pointed out that the great majority of them had not been put on trial and many of them had not even been formally arrested and detained according to the Chinese way of instituting prosecution . Those who refuse to cooperate would be tried secretly
我完全不希望看到將來有香港人，在香港西九龍站內不知名的地方即陳帆局長不讓我們前往視察的地方在電視面前"被認罪"或遭受酷刑而無人能夠知道發生甚麼事。
In the future I absolutely do not wish to see any Hong Kong resident being shown to have made confessions to crime on television or being subjected to torture in some unknown location in Hong Kongs WKS that is in the places that Secretary Frank CHAN did not allow us to visit
所以，當內地不尊重香港人這些權利，當內地政府對異見人士作司法迫害、對民間維權活動持續進行監控及打壓時這是香港及國際社會所共知的我覺得我必須基於上述種種理由，支持郭家麒議員提出的修正案，令《人權法案條例》在內地口岸區維持有效，最少可以保障香港人的基本權利和自由，減少他們遭受內地執法部門施加人身傷害的風險。
Therefore since the Mainland does not respect these rights of Hong Kong people in view of the Mainland Governments persecution of dissidents through the judicial process and the continual surveillance and suppression of human rights activists―this is common knowledge in Hong Kong and the international community―I think that based on the foregoing reasons I must support the amendment proposed by Dr KWOK Ka - ki so that BORO will remain in force at MPA . At least this can protect the fundamental rights and freedoms of Hong Kong people and reduce the risk of their being subjected to physical harm caused by the Mainland law enforcement agencies
受害的，是因為工程而遭毀家滅村的菜園村村民。
The victims are Choi Yuen Tsuen dwellers whose home village was razed to make way for XRL construction
即使被人以暴力收地，他們仍堅持不遷不拆，最終過萬名香港人在舊立法會大樓外參加反高鐵、守護菜園村的集會，圍繞舊立法會大樓苦行。
Despite forcible land resumption they still adamantly fought for neither removal and nor demolition . Their resistance culminated in a 10 thousand - strong mass rally against XRL construction and the razing of Choi Yuen Tsuen outside the then Legislative Council Building and some participants even staged a prostrating walk around the building
很多"80後"示威者面對着警察的胡椒噴霧，仍堅守在舊立法會大樓外。
Though battered by police pepper spray many demonstrators born in the 1980s still held their ground outside the Legislative Council Building
在2010年，村民曾以為只要他們團結一心，便可令政府改變初衷，但政府卻不為所動。
At one time in 2010 villagers thought that their solidarity would make the Government change its mind . But the Government simply refused to be swayed
之後，高鐵工程因為政府急於提交撥款申請，前期工程馬虎，出現超支及延誤，而政府卻與港鐵公司聯手隱瞞，直至傳媒在2014年"踢爆"事件後，他們才被迫公開情況，但仍是前言不對後語，以一個又一個謊言來欺騙香港人。
Subsequently the XRL project ran into cost overrun and works delay because the Government submitted the funding request in too much haste and all the necessary advance works were done sloppily . But the Government and MTRCL simply worked in collusion to keep all this from the public . It was not until 2014 when the media uncovered the problems that they were forced to make disclosure
立法會民主派議員要求引用《立法會條例》徹查超支及延誤的原因，但被多位在席的保皇黨議員否決，而由政府成立的三人專家小組，亦迴避責任誰屬的問題。
Pro - democracy Members therefore sought to invoke the Legislative Council Ordinance for the purpose of thoroughly investigating the causes of cost overrun and works delay . But their request was voted down by royalist Members some of whom are present in the Chamber now . As for the three - person Independent Expert Panel set up by the Government it likewise avoided the question of accountability and responsibility
超支及延誤的成因至今仍疑點重重。
Many doubts surrounding the causes of cost overrun and works delay are still unanswered
無論是政府或港鐵公司，無人需要問責，而受害的是香港的納稅人。
In the end neither the Government nor the MTRCL is held accountable but Hong Kong taxpayers must all suffer
在2016年，議員與市民團結一致，嘗試阻止立法會通過就高鐵超支及延誤作出撥款，但政府卻沒有理會程序，透過操控議程，把撥款申請繞過工務小組委員會，插隊提交財務委員會。
In 2016 Members and the public joined hands in an attempt to stop the Legislative Council from approving any funding request concerning the cost overrun and works delay of the XRL project . But the Government simply brushed aside the established procedures and manipulated the agenda bypassing the Public Works Subcommittee and submitting the request to the Finance Committee forthwith
當時的財委會主席陳健波和代理主席，民建聯的陳鑑林，阻止議員提問或提出動議，以配合政府粗暴通過200多億元的超支撥款。
Chairman of the Finance Committee Mr CHAN Kin - por and Deputy Chairman Mr CHAN Kam - lam of the Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong DAB forbade Members to raise any questions or motions in a blatant attempt to help the Government force through the 20 billion funding for cost overrun
前議員陳鑑林當時說自己手執《議事規則》便可以很離譜。
Mr CHAN Kam - lam even said that he could do anything outrageous with the Rules of Procedure in his hand
今晚，還有數小時，由建制派、保皇黨透過制度暴力來把持的立法會，將會通過這項"割地兩檢"的《條例草案》，對《基本法》和"一國兩制"造成自1997年來最大的傷害，亦為反高鐵抗爭帶來最壞的結局。
Just several hours later tonight this Legislative Council dominated by the institutional tyranny of pro - establishment and royalist camps will pass this cession - based co - location bill . This will deal the biggest blow ever to the Basic Law and one country two systems since 1997 and bring the anti - XRL campaign to a most tragic end
2018年，香港人感到失望，部分人甚至感到麻木，好像被專權的政府打壓得毫無還擊之力。
The year 2018 is a year of disappointment to Hong Kong people . Some have even turned apathetic filled with a heavy sense of helplessness before the suppression of the authoritarian government
我想指出為何我要反對三讀這項"割地兩檢"的《條例草案》，那是因為在整個審議的過程中，特區政府根本沒有回應議員的多項質詢，包括政府至今仍未能清楚解釋"割地兩檢"如何符合《基本法》。
I must therefore explain why I oppose the Third Reading of this cession - based co - location bill . All is because the SAR Government has never answered the many questions asked by Members throughout the scrutiny of the Bill . For example till now the Government has not explained why the cession - based co - location arrangement is compatible with the Basic Law
就連議員提出的修正案都被政府、主席認為是違反《合作安排》，因而不被接納，那根本就是為了廢除立法會作為立法機關審議法例的權力。
And the Government and the Chairman even went so far as to reject Members amendments on the grounds of contravening the Co - operation Arrangement . All this is simply intended to strip the Legislative Council of its power to scrutinize legislation as the law - making body
"一地兩檢"的"三步走"程序的最後一步本地立法將會變成香港法治倒退的一步。
The enactment of local legislation the last step of the Three - step Process for implementing the co - location arrangement will signify a regression of the rule of law in Hong Kong
所以，香港人感到憤怒，亦感到失望。
For this reason Hong Kong people are not only angry but also disappointed
其實由《廣深港高鐵條例草案》委員會成立開始，立法會過去一直賴以運作的種種規則，其實已蕩然無存。
Actually ever since the Bills Committee on Guangzhou - Shenzhen - Hong Kong Express Rail Link Co - location Bill started its work all the rules enabling this Council to function have already vanished into thin air
法案委員會主席葉劉淑儀議員草率、粗暴地審議《條例草案》，而為了滿足北京的要求，更不惜把主席的權力用到極致，濫用到極致。
Chairman of the Bills Committee Mrs Regina IP was downright haphazard and high - handed in the scrutiny of the Bill . In order to satisfy Beijings demand she never hesitated to use or even abuse to the fullest extent all the powers she had as the chairman
她不許議員和官員以一問一答的形式進行質詢環節，把審議時間縮短至每人一分鐘，對議員提出的規程問題又不加理會，更阻止議員提問，完成審 議條文後，竟可跳過附表，直接進入審議修正案階段。
She disallowed the usual question - and answer format for members to put questions to government officials . She also shortened the time for scrutiny giving each Member just one minute to speak . She ignored the points of order which Members raised
如果一名議員連《基本法》也能破壞，覺得"割地兩檢"有無數不能解開的謎團，但仍可視而不見，他們又怎會把立法會規則和主席手冊中審議法案的規則看在眼內？
If any Members can flout the Basic Law and ignore the numerous unsolved doubts about the cession - based co - location arrangement how can we expect them to respect the rules of the Legislative Council on the scrutiny of bills as stated in the chairmans handbook?
到了提交立法會會議的審議階段，我和其他民主派議員為了令"割地兩檢"的《條例草案》，對"一國兩制"和《基本法》的損害減至最低我多次強調那是嘗試力挽狂瀾提出不同的修正案，希望可藉着這些修正案，改善《合作安排》中的不足之處。
When it came to the committee stage I myself and other pro - democracy Members wanted to minimize the harm done by this cession - based co - location arrangement to one country two systems and the Basic Law so we put forward various amendments in the hope of rectifying the inadequacies of the Co - operation Arrangement or salvaging the situation as I have repeatedly stressed
但是，將"裁決不容質疑"掛在唇邊的主席閣下，你為了所謂的死線，便任意把我們提出的75項修正案，裁減至24項，更引入限制辯論時數，把整個審議的限時設定為36小時，然後再任意劃線。
But you the Honourable President whose lips are dripping with the words of the Presidents rulings shall be final only ruled in 24 of the 75 amendments we proposed in order to meet the so - called deadline . You also introduced a time limit for debate capping the total hours of the whole scrutiny process at 36
全體委員會的主席最初明明說有22小時的審議時間，最後卻連10小時也沒有，突然劃線，說劃就劃，說改就改。
Initially the Chairman of the Committee of the whole Council clearly stated that we would have 22 hours for scrutiny but then we were given less than 10 hours . Our scrutiny was ended entirely abruptly and at will
全體委員會階段明明容許我們無限次發言......
We are allowed to speak for unlimited times during the committee stage
主席，你不能濫用你以主席身份可以行使的權力，在席上說謊。
Chairman you must not abuse the power you may exercise in your capacity as the Chairman to lie in the meeting
你指控議員沒有好好利用時間發言，其實有11位議員在二 讀階段按掣輪候發言，今天也有18位議員在CSA階段按掣輪候發言，但部分議員甚至連首次發言的機會也沒有。
You accused Members of failing to make good use of their time to speak . In fact during the Second Reading stage 11 Members pressed the button to wait for their turn to speak . Today 18 Members had pressed the button to wait for their turn to speak during the Committee stage but some of them were not given the opportunity to speak for even the first time
議員如對安排有疑問，應於會議前向秘書處提出；再者，本會現已進入本星期第二天的辯論環節，如果你在會議進行期間察覺有問題，可即時向秘書處了解。
If Members have any questions about the arrangements they should raise them with the Secretariat before the meeting . Furthermore now this Council has already entered the debate session of the second day of the meeting this week . If you notice any problem during the meeting you may immediately consult the Secretariat
我剛才亦已兩度向朱凱廸議員提出同樣要求。
Just now I made the same request on Mr CHU Hoi - dick twice already
代理主席，很簡單，我現在手上有秘書處發給我們的通知，表示"就立法會主席今天與議員會面後，指示本人向全體議員提供隨附有關上述安排的資料"。
Deputy Chairman it is very simple . Now I have on hand a circular issued to us by the Secretariat which said to this effect After meeting with Members today the President of the Legislative Council has directed me to provide all Members with the attached information on the said arrangements
范國威議員，你是否想發言？
Mr Gary FAN do you wish to speak?
你如要評論我主持會議的作風，請另覓場合，現在請你坐下。
If you wish to comment on my style of presiding over the meeting please do it on another occasion . Now will you please sit down
我相信委員都希望繼續按照《議事規則》進行會議。
I believe Members wish to proceed with the meeting in accordance with RoP
代理主席，你主持會議，跟梁君彥議員一樣，都是只會重複提述《議事規則》，但卻沒有清楚解釋或具體地回應議員的問題。
Deputy Chairman you and Mr Andrew LEUNG share the same style of chairing repeatedly making reference to the Rules of Procedure RoP without giving clear or definite responses to Members queries
其實，在今次《廣深港高鐵條例草案》整個審議過程中，不同的主席或政府作出的回應均未能解決問題，只讓問題繼續下去。
In the whole process of the deliberation of the Guangzhou - Shenzhen - Hong Kong Express Rail Link Co - location Bill the Bill neither the relevant chairmen and President nor the Government have sought to address the problems associated with the Bills . Instead they let the problems continue to exist
議會的審議工作，在香港人眼中展示出來的是一個水平低 下或根本是轉移視線的過程。
In the eyes of Hong Kong people this is a reflection of the second - rate deliberation work of the Legislative Council with every attempt to distract the publics attention
建制派議員批評我們民主派議員提出多項修正案是混淆視聽、偷換概念及無理取鬧。
It is okay for pro - establishment Members to express their personal views and criticize democratic Members for proposing vexatious amendments in order to substitute concepts and confuse the public
他們可以提出主觀的意見，當然可以駁斥我們和進行辯論，但請具體針對地回應和作出辯論，然後投下反對票，這才是議員應有的責任。
It is just fine for them to refute our claims and carry out a debate before voting against our amendments . This is what we as Members should do . But those refutations and debates ought to be to the point
空泛的批評和負面的攻擊，並不理想。我甚至懷疑部分議員根本沒有清楚閱讀每一項修正案。
Giving vague criticism and staging negative attack are undesirable just making me doubt if some Members have ever studied all the amendments
代理主席，我提出在《條例草案》加入截止生效日期，訂明該條例在廣深港高速鐵路香港段終止運作的日期起期滿失效。再者，在西九龍站內地口岸區的租用安排完結時，特區政府應即時收回內地口岸區的管轄權，以免特區政府在《條例草案》生效後永久失去內地口岸區的管轄權，變成永久割讓。
Deputy Chairman I propose to include an expiry date in the Bill stipulating that the Ordinance expires on the day of the termination of operation of the Hong Kong Section of the Express Rail Link XRL and that the SAR Government recovers its jurisdiction over the West Kowloon Station WKS Mainland Port Area MPA immediately after the expiry of the WKS MPA lease . The inclusion of an expiry date is to prevent the eternal loss of Hong Kongs jurisdiction over MPA following the commencement of the Ordinance leading to the ceding of Hong Kong land permanently
我很清楚指出，當政府以深圳灣口岸推銷現行高鐵"一地兩檢"方案時，便應參考深圳灣口岸"一地兩檢"的條例。
I have made it very clear that if the Government uses the Shenzhen Bay Port SBP as an example to promote the current co - location arrangement at WKS it should also make reference to the co - location legislation for SBP
他們作出的批評可否更具針對性，解釋得更清楚呢？
I wonder if pro - establishment Members could make their criticisms up to point and explain their arguments with clarity
代理主席，不要像梁君彥議員主持會議般，他所說的便代表一切，他的裁決是無上的，不會更改的，也不用解釋理據。
Deputy Chairman please do not adopt Mr Andrew LEUNGs style of chairing . To him what he says are representative of the Council and what he rules are unchallengeable and unalterable without any need for explanations or justifications
我在發言中曾特別提到郭家麒議員有關《香港人權法案條例》適用於內地口岸區的修正案，完全是體現《合作安排》所指"不減損香港特別行政區居民依法享有的權利和自由"。
In my previous speech I have highlighted the amendment proposed by Dr KWOK Ka - ki which calls for the application of the Hong Kong Bill of Rights Ordinance to MPA . This is a full realization of the principle laid down in the Co - operation Arrangement that the establishment of MPA does not undermine the rights and freedoms enjoyed by the residents of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region in accordance with law
修正案的目的，就是透過香港已有的法律，將《公民權利和政治權利國際公約》的精神在內地口岸區繼續實現。
His amendment seeks to allow the spirit of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights to continue to display at MPA through the application of the existing Hong Kong law to MPA
為何認為有問題？
Why do you think there are problems with the amendment?
《基本法》第三十九條訂明"《公民權利和政治權利國際公約》......適用於香港的有關規定繼續有效"。因此，我們只想確保《基本法》內有關繼續履行國際公約條文的規定，在內地口岸區維持生效，避免在國際法上出現一些灰色地帶和可能出現的爭議，減少香港市民喪失人權自由的風險，亦是向國際社會作出交代。
It is stipulated in Article 39 of the Basic Law that The provisions of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights as applied to Hong Kong shall remain in force The amendment only intends to ensure that the Basic Laws provision on the continuous implementation of the international covenants will remain in force at MPA thus avoiding any possible grey area and disputes over the implementation of international law reducing the risk of Hong Kong people being deprived of human rights and freedoms and enabling us to be accountable to the international community
這是很嚴肅、很謹慎的修正，為何建制派、保皇黨會說這樣的修訂是為玩而玩？
The amendment is proposed with seriousness and due consideration . Why do the pro - establishment camp and the royalists consider this amendment as fussing for the sake of fussing?
陳志全議員提出有關修正案，就是要在《條例草案》確認《合作安排》第六條的內容，並清楚列明罰則。
Mr CHAN Chi - chuens amendment seeks to affirm the content of Article 6 of the Co - operation Arrangement in the Bill and to provide for the penalty
因此，怎可以批評陳志全議員提出的修正案違反《合作安排》，是瑣屑無聊？
In this respect how can we criticize the amendments of Mr CHAN Chi - chuen for its frivolousness and its breach of the Co - operation Arrangement?
這完全是為補充《條例草案》的不足。
The amendments only seek to make up for the deficiencies of the Bill
但是，各位建制派議員，保皇黨卻提出反對。
But the pro - establishment Members and royalists still say no to them
反對衍生出來的客觀效果是甚麼？
Then what will be the objective consequences brought about by the opposition?
是否等於大家默許內地執法人員，可以藉不同理由闖入非內地口岸區範圍或香港境內，而無須面對任何懲罰？
Does the opposition imply that we will give tacit consent to Mainland enforcement officers to enter non - MPA or the Hong Kong territory by various excuses without facing any penalty?
是否默許大陸的強力部門可以跨境抓捕，如入無人之境呢？
Does this imply that we will give tacit consent to powerful agencies in the Mainland to make cross - boundary arrests in Hong Kong as if there was no boundary between the two places?
如果不幸遇到這些情況，被無理對待的香港人將會面對甚麼困境呢？
What Hong Kong people can do if this sort of unfortunate incident befalls them and they are unreasonably treated?
我們是否應在《條例草案》中清楚訂明，如何向這些侵犯香港人人權的內地執法人員追究責任呢？
It is necessary for us to explicitly stipulate in the Bill how we can hold Mainland enforcement officers accountable for their violation of human rights of Hong Kong people
這些是香港人實在存有的憂慮。
Hong Kong people really feel the worries
銅鑼灣書店事件、香港記者在內地合法採訪被阻撓和暴力對待的事件，就是令我們作為代議士，認為應該在今次審議《條例草案》時提出修正案的重要依據。
The incident on a bookstore in Causeway Bay as well as the violent obstruction of the lawful news coverage of Hong Kong reporters in the Mainland are the major reasons prompting us as elected representatives in the Legislative Council to propose these amendments during our deliberation of the Bill
他們指這些修正案製造恐慌，是陰謀論；他們選擇對活生生已發生及客觀存在的殘酷事實視而不見，自欺欺人。
They think the amendments are proposed on the basis of conspiracy theories seeking to create panic . They choose to ignore the cruel reality which objectively exists before us as they try to deceive themselves and others
這並不是負責任的說法。
This is an irresponsible remark
政府提供的高鐵總經濟效益也只是推算了50年，甚至當被問及高鐵通車早期究竟會虧損多少時，政府也不能提供財務推算。
Even the Government can only provide the projected economic benefits of XRL for as long as 50 years . Neither can it project the loss to be incurred by the express rail link during its initial operation when asked about such a figure
這樣，如果高鐵首天便虧損，而"一地兩檢"則是永久性，是否等於特區政府變相容許高鐵永久出現虧損，不會有終結的一天，而無事可為呢？
In case XRL records loss in its very first day of operation does the eternal arrangement of the co - location clearance imply that the Government has to allow XRL to suffer loss forever and can nothing with this?
所以，設下截止生效日期，其實只是預留一個"止蝕"制度，避免高鐵成為港鐵公司、特區政府和香港納稅人的無限財政黑洞。
In this respect the inclusion of an expiry date in the Bill is basically to put in place a stop - loss mechanism in advance preventing XRL to become a financial black hole digging into the pockets of the MTR Corporation Limited the SAR Government and the Hong Kong taxpayers as well
主席，我與其他議員提出的修正案，也只是因應我們的憂慮及已出現的客觀事實，嘗試透過修正案作出修補，以把最壞的情況及會帶來的負面影響盡量減少。
Chairman the objective facts make us worried . The amendments proposed by other Members and me represent our very attempt to remedy the worst scenario and minimize the negative impact to be brought about by the co - location arrangement
我的修正案提出把有關條文寫入《條例草案》，是要確保香港人不會無限期承擔不可預見的財政風險。
The proposal to incorporate the relevant provisions into the Bill seeks to ensure that Hong Kong people would not have to bear unforeseeable financial risk forever
很多建制派議員提到人大的《決定》就是基礎，我們要接受中國的憲制秩序，但他們口中所說的究竟是甚麼秩序呢？
Many pro - establishment Members have said the NPCSCs Decision forms the basis of the Bill calling on us to accept the constitutional order of the Mainland . But what is the order they actually refer to?
其他民主派議員多次提到，當有異見者被司法迫害、被利用法律以外的手段打壓，並對民間組織作嚴密監控，甚至人身迫害時，我們便需要有機制處理這種濫權及執法人員違規的情況。
As other democratic Members have repeatedly said when we see dissidents are subject to judicial persecutions as well as suppression other than legal means while civil organizations are under close surveillance or even personal persecutions there is an increasing need for us to put in place a mechanism to combat this sort of abuse of power and rule - breaking by enforcement officers
所以，修正案就是想盡量減少所謂強力部門的秩序在香港出現，是要減低其出現的可能性。
Hence the amendments aim to minimize the appearance or reduce the possibility of the appearance of the so - called forceful agencies order in Hong Kong
主席，若按照你昨天所說，《議事規則》實質是加強了你的權力，是在《基本法》給予你的權力之上再加大，這便會令香港人聯想到特區政府、中央政府、建制派和內地執法人員會否也使用這種思維，並在日後付諸實行，使其權力更加不受制約呢？
Chairman you said yesterday that RoP in effect reinforced your power further strengthening the power conferred on you by the Basic Law . What you have said will make Hong Kong people wonder if the SAR Government the Central Government the pro - establishment camp and the Mainland enforcement officers all share this mindset and whether they will put this thought into action one day and exercise their unlimited powers
人大《決定》和《合作安排》規範了西九龍站內地口岸區，那麼，日後是否變相會加強內地執法人員跨境抓捕的權力呢？
Does the designation of MPA at WKS through the NPCSCs Decision and the Co - operation Arrangement in effect strengthen the power of Mainland enforcement officers to make cross - boundary arrests?
這種所謂的中國憲制秩序根本就是一種倒退，是對香港的法治精神和我們珍而重之的人權造成傷害。
This Mainlands constitutional order is essentially a regression compromising the spirit of rule of law and human rights that we treasure so dearly
所以，我們應該透過修正案進行約束、監察、追究和施以罰則，全部也要寫得清清楚楚。
Hence we have to explicitly build up a mechanism of checking monitoring pursuing and penalizing in the Bill through proposing amendments to it
我請政府和建制派議員清楚看看我們提出修正案的理據，以及背後考慮的邏輯，而非把立法會，把我們作為代議士對政府的監察權，對審議法案可以履行的職責葬送和放棄，這便是我們的應有之義。
I call on the Government and pro - establishment Members to look into the justifications of and the logic behind our amendments . As elected representatives in the Legislative Council it is incumbent upon us to monitor the Government and scrutinize various bills . These are the duties and responsibilities that we should not duck or abdicate
主席，首先，我必須恭賀你，經歷過《廣深港高鐵條例草案》的審議，你將會在歷史留名。
President first of all I must congratulate you for your name will certainly be left in history after the scrutiny of the Guangzhou - Shenzhen - Hong Kong Express Rail Link Co - location Bill the Bill