Borrison/hk-legicost huggingface dataset:
主席，我舉一個例子，他將"梁先生與UGL有否簽訂及/或執行UGL協議"，改成"澳洲傳媒公開的UGL協議文本的完整性及真偽"，嘗試縮窄我們聚焦的部分，即除澳洲傳媒公開的文件外，最好不要調查任何其他文件。
President let me give an example . He has replaced whether or not Mr LEUNG and UGL signed andor executed the UGL Agreement with 澳洲傳媒公開的UGL協議文本的完整性及真偽 in an attempt to narrow the focus of our inquiry with the hope that we will not look into other documents apart from this one made public by the Australian media
主席，正如我剛才所說，我覺得協議中他承諾為這間公司履行一些職責。
LEUNG Chun - ying has all along said that the agreement was a resignation agreement but President he had as indicated by me just now undertaken in the agreement to discharge certain duties for that company
最終專責委員會的結論如何，我們拭目以待，但無論如何，梁振英也無權用這種方式來僭越，蠱惑地嘗試扭轉專責委員會的調查方向。
Let us wait and see the conclusion to be made by the Select Committee but in any case LEUNG Chun - ying has no right to deflect and affect in a tricky way the direction of the inquiry to be carried out by the Select Committee
另外，梁振英除了縮窄調查範圍外，還轉移視線，離題萬丈，我舉一個例子讓公眾知道。
In addition apart from seeking to narrow the scope of inquiry LEUNG Chun - ying has also tried to divert public attention and put forward proposals that are totally irrelevant to the subject matter
他建議加入"《基本法》第四十七條要求行政長官就任時申報財產的原意，以及該款項在《基本法》第四十七條是否屬於須予申報的財產"。
Let me give an example for public information . He proposed to add 《基本法》第四十七條要求行政長官就任時申報財產的原意 以及該款項在《基本法》第四十七條是否屬於須予申報的財產
主席，這很明顯牽涉香港立法會的職權範圍以外的事宜。他的建議不着邊際，他最後想得到的結果是否查無證據或未達共識？
President as his proposal was irrelevant obviously involving matters outside the remit of the Legislative Council of Hong Kong did he actually wish to arrive at the conclusion that no evidence could be collected or no consensus could be reached?
主席，我的結論是，這次梁振英和周浩鼎議員的私通事件，嚴重破壞立法會的尊嚴，是嚴重的瀆職行為。
President my conclusion is that the collusion between LEUNG Chun - ying and Mr Holden CHOW in this incident has undermined the dignity of the Legislative Council and constituted a serious dereliction of duty
主席，這麼嚴重的事，竟然還可以爭辯？
President how can they still argue over such a serious issue?
我再強調一次，如果是警方調查，這叫"斷正"，不應再爭辯，不如接受現實被彈劾。
Let me reiterate they have been caught red - handed in terms of police investigation . LEUNG Chun - ying should stop arguing accept the reality and be impeached
代理主席，特首梁振英被指在出任行政長官期間，涉嫌收受澳洲企業400萬英鎊，可能涉及利益衝突，正接受立法會因此而成立的專責委員會調查。
Deputy President Chief Executive LEUNG Chun - ying is accused of accepting £4 million from the Australian firm UGL during his tenure as the Chief Executive . As it may involve a conflict of interest LEUNG Chun - ying is under inquiry by the Select Committee of the Legislative Council
然而，梁振英作為事件中的主角、專責委員會的受查人，他與時任專責委員會副主席周浩鼎議員合謀，通過周議員修改專責委員會的擬議主要研究範疇，試圖妨礙、歪曲或影響專責委員會的調查方向、內容和結果。
However as the subject of inquiry LEUNG Chun - ying conspired with Mr Holden CHOW then Deputy Chairman of the Select Committee to amend through Mr CHOW the proposed major areas of study of the Select Committee in an attempt to frustrate deflect or affect the direction course and result of the Select Committees inquiry
此舉明顯是瀆職行為，違反了梁振英根據《基本法》作出的宣誓，罔顧行政長官的憲制責任，侵害議會的尊嚴。
Such conduct of LEUNG Chun - ying is obviously in dereliction of duty in violation of the oath he took under the Basic Law and in defiance of his constitutional duty as the Chief Executive and it also harms the dignity of this Council
因此，立法會必須採取果斷行動，委任獨立的調查委員會調查此嚴重瀆職行為，並提交報告，讓立法會決定是否彈劾梁振英。
Hence the Legislative Council must take resolute action and form an independent committee to enquire into this serious dereliction of duty and table a report for the consideration of the Legislative Council whether or not to impeach LEUNG Chun - ying
代理主席，今次事件發生後，當事人梁振英、周浩鼎議員和建制派議員均眾口一詞，強調事件沒有違法、沒有違規，亦沒有隱瞞，行政長官試圖淡化事件，亦有建制派的議員問我，尚有兩個星期梁振英便要落台，現在彈劾他，還有甚麼作用？
Deputy President after the incident came to light LEUNG Chun - ying Mr Holden CHOW and all pro - establishment Members unanimously stressed that there was no violation of the law or rules and there was no cover - up . The Chief Executive tried to play down the incident . Some pro - establishment Members have asked me what purpose it serves to impeach LEUNG Chun - ying who will step down in two weeks
代理主席，"莫因善小而不為，勿以惡小而為之"。
Deputy President do not fail to commit an act of kindness just because it is insignificant; do not engage in an evil act just because it is trivial
雖然看來這是一宗簡單的文件修改事件，沒有甚麼大不了，但本質上，今次是回歸20年以來最嚴重的公職人員瀆職行為，我們有責任嚴謹處理，立法會更必須對涉事者作出彈劾和譴責，以儆效尤。
Although it seems that the case merely involves an amendment of a paper with no significance it is by nature the most serious dereliction of duty on the part of a public officer in the last two decades after the reunification . We are duty - bound to handle this matter with solemnity and the Legislative Council must impeach and reprove the perpetrators to serve as a warning to others
在今次事件中，梁振英非但涉嫌公職人員行為失當和瀆職，更違反了行政長官必須廉潔奉公、盡忠職守的承諾，同時亦違反《基本法》第四十七條、第六十條及第六十四條所賦予的憲制責任，以及涉嫌藐視立法會，破壞行政立法關係。
In this incident LEUNG Chun - ying is not only suspected of committing the offence of misconduct in public office and dereliction of duty he also violates the pledge that the Chief Executive should be a person of integrity and dedicated to his duty . He has violated his constitutional duty provided under Articles 47 60 and 64 and he is also suspected of contempt of the Legislative Council and disrupting the executive - legislature relationship
先容許我陳述梁振英是否有瀆職和行為不當。
First let me recount if LEUNG Chun - ying has committed the offence of dereliction of duty and misconduct
代理主席，終審法院的案例清晰指出，公職人員行為失當有5個主要元素：一，身為公職人員；二，在執行公職的過程中或在與其公職有關的情況下；三，蓄意作出失當行為，或不作出恰當行為；四，沒有合理解釋或理由；五，其行為偏離公職職責範圍或宗旨屬於嚴重而非微不足道。
Deputy President a case law of the Court of Final Appeal clearly points out the five key elements of the offence of misconduct in public office which include first a public official; second in the course of or in relation to his or her public office; third wilfully misconduct himself or herself by act or omission; fourth without reasonable excuse or justification; and fifth where such misconduct is serious not trivial having regard to the nature and extent of the departure from his or her responsibilities
代理主席，雖然梁振英和周浩鼎議員兩名當事人在東窗事發後承認他們的行為，而梁振英更在事件被揭露後翌日承認修訂文件是由他本人所撰寫，還辯稱只是希望透過周浩鼎議員向專責委員會表達意見，以確保調查更全面。
Deputy President LEUNG Chun - ying and Mr Holden CHOW openly admitted what they did the following day after the incident came to light . LEUNG Chun - ying admitted on 16 May this year the following day after the incident was exposed that he personally amended the paper and he also defended himself by saying that he merely wished to express his views to the Select Committee through Mr Holden CHOW to ensure the comprehensiveness of the enquiry
代理主席，我必須指出，縱使梁振英如此解釋，但如果仔細審視整件事的來龍去脈，仍然有很多疑竇未能解開。
Deputy President despite LEUNG Chun - yings explanation I must point out that if one looks carefully into the ins and outs of the incident there are still many questions unanswered
第一，梁振英要表達意見，為甚麼只透過周浩鼎議員一人轉達？
First if LEUNG Chun - ying wanted to express his views why did he do so through Mr Holden CHOW alone?
為甚麼梁振英不正式致函專責委員會？
Why didnt he formally write to the Select Committee?
事實上，他事後也有這樣做法。為甚麼一開始梁振英不向專責委員會提出修訂研究的範疇？
In fact he did so afterwards but why didnt he propose to the Select Committee to amend the areas of study at the outset?
千萬不要忘記，梁振英已擔任行政長官約5年，這些基本的官場規矩，難道他不知道嗎？
Please do not forget that LEUNG Chun - ying has been in the office of the Chief Executive for five years . Are you telling me that he knows nothing about these basic rules of the official circle?
第二，周浩鼎議員的說法前後矛盾，在4月25日的會議上，周議員一直強調修訂是由他本人作出，但其後卻公開承認是轉達梁振英的意見，為甚麼周浩鼎議員不一開始便表示代梁振英轉達意見？
Second Mr Holden CHOW has been self - contradictory . At the meeting on 25 April he kept insisting that he made the amendments but later he openly admitted that he was relaying LEUNG Chun - yings opinions . Why didnt Mr Holden CHOW say at the outset that he relayed LEUNG Chun - yings opinions on his behalf?
這如果不是隱瞞，會是甚麼？
If it was not a cover - up what is it?
代理主席，就調查工作來說，我們從來都應"大膽假設，小心求證"。
Deputy President in respect of the inquiry work we have always been bold in making hypothesis and cautious in providing proof
如果我們大膽假設梁振英擔心專責委員會的調查結果對他不利，因此蓄意干預專責委員會的工作，並與周議員合謀以達其目的，按這推論，梁振英的干預無疑是涉及利益衝突。
If we boldly assume that LEUNG Chun - ying was worried that the findings the Select Committees inquiry would be unfavourable to him and he thus deliberately interfered with the work of the Select Committee through conspiring with Mr CHOW then we can deduce that LEUNG Chun - yings intervention involves a conflict of interest
如果這假設成立，梁振英在今次事件中的作為，就很大可能屬於上述5個主要元素中的蓄意作出失當行為，而欠缺合理解釋或理由。
If this hypothesis can be established the conduct of LEUNG Chun - ying in this incident will very likely fit in one of the five aforementioned elements which is wilfully misconducting without reasonable excuse or justification
當然，是否屬於公職人員行為失當，最終應該交由執法機構或法官來決定。
Of course whether this can be considered misconduct in public office will ultimately be decided by law enforcement agency or by a judge
但是，梁振英是否廉潔奉公，盡忠職守？抑或是徇私枉法，濫用職權？
However is LEUNG Chun - ying a person of integrity and dedicated to his duty or has he perverted the course of justice and abused his power?
我相信廣大的香港人一定心中有數。
I believe most Hong Kong people have a pretty good idea
代理主席，立法會畢竟不是法庭，行為失當和瀆職是個人的行為，但今次事件，在更廣義的層面，實有其憲制意義，如果立法會不嚴謹地處理，其作為立法機關便是失職，並可以是後患無窮。
Deputy President the Legislative Council is after all not a court and misconduct and dereliction of duty is a personal behaviour . Concerning this incident from a broader perspective it has a constitutional implication . If the Legislative Council does not handle the matter conscientiously and carefully the legislature is in dereliction of duty and endless troubles will arise in the future
梁振英作為特區政府的首長，自上任以來，民望一直低企，施政不得民心，但他一天未下台，一天仍是香港的行政長官，仍有很多憲制責任需要肩負。
As the head of the SAR Government LEUNG Chun - ying has a low popularity rating since his assumption of office and his governance does not get the approval of the public . As long as he remains in office he is still the Chief Executive of Hong Kong and he has to undertake many constitutional duties
在今次事件中，梁振英有何憲制責任？
In this incident what constitutional duties does LEUNG Chun - ying have to undertake?
便是廉潔奉公，盡忠職守，向立法會問責。
He must be a person of integrity dedicated to his duty and be accountable to the Legislative Council
本來接受立法機關的質詢和監督，是行政長官的基本責任之一。
Actually one of the basic duties of the Chief Executive is to answer questions raised by the legislature and accept its monitoring
香港基本法起草委員會主任委員姬鵬飛先生於1990年3月28日向全國人大作出"關於《中華人民共和國香港特別行政區基本法》及 其有關文件的說明"的報告曾經指出："行政機關和立法機關之間的關係應該是既互相制衡又互相配合；為了保持香港的穩定和行政效率，行政長官應有實權，但同時也要受到制約。
Addressing the National Peoples Congress on 28 March 1990 Mr JI Pengfei Chairman of the Basic Law Drafting Committee mentioned in the Explanations on The Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the Peoples Republic of China Draft and Its Related Documents that I quote [t]he executive authorities and the legislature should regulate each other as well as co - ordinate their activities . To maintain Hong Kongs stability and administrative efficiency the Chief Executive must have real power which at the same time should be subject to some restrictions
"《基本法》第六十四條更清楚指出："香港特別行政區政府必須遵守法律，對香港特別行政區立法會負責"。
Article 64 of the Basic Law clearly states The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region must abide by the law and be accountable to the Legislative Council of the Region
代理主席，行政長官如何向立法會問責？
Deputy President how can the Chief Executive be accountable to the Legislative Council?
立法會調查行政長官，而行政長官尊重立法會的調查，不試圖妨礙、影響或干預調查工作，讓立法會的專責委員會能正常履行調查工作，也是向立法會問責的一種方法。在英國，任何行為、言論，如不當地干擾、意圖干擾或很可能不當地干擾議會履行其職能或議員或職員執行職務，即屬藐視國會。在2002年，英國便有一名國會議員因為試圖干預國會對他涉嫌漏報利益的調查工作，被國會判以藐視國會罪，被暫停國會議員資格一個月。
When the Legislative Council conducts an inquiry into the Chief Executive if the Chief Executive respects the inquiry of the Legislative Council takes no action to frustrate affect or interfere with the inquiry work and allows the Select Committee of the Legislative Council to carry out the inquiry in a normal manner he is actually being accountable to the Legislative Council
我現在向各位提出的待議議題是：楊岳橋議員動議的議案，予以通過。
I now propose the question to you and that is That the motion moved by Mr Alvin YEUNG be passed
主席，今天是反對派發動"倒梁"鬥爭的重頭戲。
President the motion moved by the opposition camp today is the most important play in their anti - Mr LEUNG Chun - ying movement
為了"倒梁"，反對派在未有足夠事實根據的情況下，隨意指控梁振英先生嚴重違法及/或瀆職；他們又濫用《基本法》第七十三條，對行政長官提出完全不合乎比例的彈劾議案。
Without the support of sufficient facts Members of the opposition camp willfully charge Mr LEUNG Chun - ying with serious breaches of law andor dereliction of duty . They have also abused Article 73 of the Basic Law when they moved the disproportionately serious impeachment motion against the Chief Executive
這種行為完全罔顧議案一旦獲得通過，對香港社會所造成的震盪和衝擊，亦令立法會最莊嚴的憲制權力，淪為打壓異己的政治鬥爭工具。
What they did has completely disregarded the serious shock and impact which Hong Kong society must endure once the motion is passed . What they did has also turned the most solemn constitutional power of the Legislative Council into a political tool to suppress opposing forces
主席，我感到十分遺憾和憤怒。
President I feel very sorry and frustrated about the whole incident
對於反對派過去5年針對梁振英政府的所作所為，市民看得一清二楚；反對派要癱瘓議會，不讓政府做任何事。
Members of the public can clearly see for themselves what the opposition camp has done over the past five years against LEUNG Chun - yings Government . The opposition camp wants to paralyse the legislature so that nothing can be done by the Government
令立法會禮崩樂壞的始作俑者就是他們。
They are the ones who have brought the Legislative Council in total disarray
香港社會對於今天這類議案一點都不陌生，因為反對派"倒梁"的立場非常清晰。
Hong Kong people are no stranger to motions like this one today because the opposition camp has always made its anti - CY stance clear
反對派經常說"CY好鬥"，但他們也應該好好看看自己，他們鬥完一場又一場，"拉"完一項又一項，豈不是更加好鬥嗎？
The opposition camp often criticizes CY as belligerent but should they not also take a long hard look at themselves? . They stir up trouble one after another; they filibuster time and again to obstruct the proposals of the Government . Are they not the ones who are more belligerent?
這些數字很清楚，目的就是為了狙擊梁振英，為了打擊特首政府的管治威信，為了拖政府施政的後腿，反對派真是無所不用其極，令原本莊嚴的議事堂淪為政治鬥爭工具。
Members of the opposition camp are going after LEUNG Chun - ying . They will spare no effort to discredit the governance of the Chief Executives Government and hold his administration back . As a result they have turned this solemn Council into a platform for political wrangling
首先要有四分之一議員聯署提出議案，經立法會大會分組點票通過進行調查；再由終審法院首席法官組成獨立調查委員會調查事件。
First of all a motion has to be initiated jointly by one fourth of all the Members of the Legislative Council . If the motion for investigation is passed by the Council under the separate voting system an independent investigation committee will be formed by the Chief Justice of the Court of Final Appeal to carry out the investigation
如果指控有足夠證據，亦要獲立法會全體三分之二議員支持才可以通過，最後並報請中央決定解除特首職務。
If the committee considers the evidence sufficient to substantiate the charges the Council may pass a motion of impeachment by a two - thirds majority of all its Members and report it to the Central Peoples Government for decision of the Chief Executives removal
根據《基本法》，要啟動彈劾程序必須符合兩類指控，一是"嚴重違法"，一是"瀆職"。
According to the Basic Law the impeachment procedures can only be activated if the charges against the Chief Executive fall under the following two categories serious breach of law and dereliction of duty
梁先生的行為是否真的如今天提出議案的議員所說，已經構成"嚴重違法"、"瀆職"？
Is it true that the acts of Mr LEUNG have already constituted serious breach of law or dereliction of duty as claimed by Members who initiate the motion?
又或是否已有足夠的疑點或資料，顯示情況確實如此呢？
Is there sufficient doubt or information to show that this is indeed the situation?
關於UGL事件，梁先生已經多次回應社會及立法會的提問，而澳洲的UGL亦曾多次發出書面聲明。
As far as the UGL incident is concerned Mr LEUNG had already answered the questions raised in society and by the Legislative Council on numerous occasions
有不少學者認為，該份協議只是一般商業協議，亦看不到澳洲、英國的監管機構，以至UGL的股東，曾就着事件提出任何實質質疑。
Several written statements had also been issued by the Australian company UGL . Many scholars consider that the relevant agreement is just a general commercial agreement . They also note that so far no substantial query has been raised by the regulators in Australia and the United Kingdom or the shareholders of UGL on this incident
主席，你應該記得，上屆立法會已經多次討論此事，亦先後兩次否決引用《條例》進行調查。
President you should recall that the matter had already been discussed by the last Legislative Council on a number of occasions while two motions to investigate the incident by invoking the Ordinance had also been vetoed
但是，反對派仍然死纏不休，繼續翻炒又翻炒。
But instead of giving up the opposition camp just kept repeating their questions again and again
新一屆立法會成立後，反對派便透過呈請書的方式，在無需經由立法會表決的情況下，成立專責委員會。
After the new Legislative Council is formed the opposition camp managed to establish a select committee through the presentation of a petition which does not require any voting by the Council
難怪早前有市民在街上截停我，對我說："成立UGL專責委員會，調查當然不是重點，最重要的是通過所謂'調查'，對梁特首發動新一波政治打擊"。
No wonder some members of the public who stopped me earlier in the street said to me that the purpose to set up a select committee on UGL is certainly not for investigations sake but to launch a new round of political attacks against Chief Executive LEUNG Chun - ying through the so - called investigation
對於在現今政治、社會和議會的情況下，對於在只問顏色的政治戰場下進行這種調查，民建聯確實十分不願意，亦十分審慎，就是要避免令這些調查成為打擊政敵的工具。
Given the present state of our politics our society and the legislature the Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong DAB is indeed most reluctant to conduct such kind of investigation in a political battlefield where colour is all that matters . We are also extremely cautious to avoid such kind of investigation being exploited as a tool of suppression against political opponents
立法會成立專責委員會，梁先生自然成為狙擊目標。
With the establishment of the Select Committee by the Legislative Council Mr LEUNG naturally becomes a target of attack
不過，我必須指出，無論意見由誰人提出，專責委員會的調查 範圍最終須由專責委員會本身通過。
However I must point out that the scope of inquiry would ultimately be endorsed by the Select Committee no matter whose views are raised
再者，如果我們仔細審視梁先生提出的修改要求，他其實是把調查範圍擴大了。
Besides if we carefully examine the amendments suggested by Mr LEUNG he has actually expanded the scope of inquiry
所以，實際效果並不是減低對他本身的調查，而是讓專責委員會、議會和社會得到更多資料，更全面地作出判斷。
Hence the actual effect is not limiting the scope of inquiry on him . Instead he has made it possible for the Select Committee the Council and the public to obtain additional information about the case so that a comprehensive judgment can be made
故此，就整件事來看，單憑這一點便指特首妨礙、扭曲或影響專責委員會調查的說法，我認為難以成立。
Therefore considering the matter as a whole I think it is difficult to say conclusively that the Chief Executive has frustrated deflected or affected the investigation of the Select Committee on the basis of this point alone
主席，我想強調，無論反對派議員對梁特首如何不滿，亦不應剝奪當事人提出意見的權利。
President I would like to stress that no matter how opposition Members are dissatisfied with Chief Executive LEUNG Chun - ying they should not deprive the right of the subject of inquiry to express views
因此，若說梁先生向專責委員會提出意見就等於介入委員會，實在是無限上綱上線。
Therefore I think it is much ado about nothing if they say that Mr LEUNG has interfered with the affairs of the select committee by expressing his views thereto
反對派議員單憑特首通過委員在專責委員會提出意見，便認定他已犯上嚴重錯失，並且動用最嚴重的彈劾議案，可見他們只是借題發揮，志在政治攻擊，並濫用《基本法》賦予立法會最莊嚴的憲制權力，將之變成針對個人的政治鬥爭工具。
Opposition Members have based on the incident that the Chief Executive had expressed views to the Select Committee through one of its members concluded that he had made serious mistakes and thus initiated the most serious impeachment motion . Evidently they have used the incident as a pretext to attack the Chief Executive politically . By doing so they have abused the most solemn constitutional power conferred to the Legislative Council by the Basic Law and turned it into a tool of political struggle against an individual
反對派為求一己政治利益，不惜將立法會的尊嚴完全置諸不顧，這做法實在令人遺憾。
It is most regrettable that the opposition camp has completely disregarded the dignity of the Legislative Council for the sake of its own political gains
為了狙擊梁振英，周浩鼎議員成了棋子，反對派當然想連消帶打，打擊周浩鼎議員之餘，亦想打擊民建聯。
Mr Holden CHOW has become a pawn in their struggle against Mr LEUNG Chun - ying . Surely the opposition camp also wants to kill two birds with one stone by discrediting DAB through their attack on Mr CHOW
主席，我認為周浩鼎議員在這事上有做得不妥當之處，但他已為此致歉，並承擔了責任，退出專責委員會；他既已為此付上政治代價，事情本應告一段落。
President I think Mr Holden CHOW had not handled the matter properly but he had already apologized and accepted responsibility by withdrawing from the Select Committee . He had paid a price for it politically and the matter should have ended
可惜，事與願違，有人把這件事當作是"執到寶"，死咬不放，如鯊魚一樣，看見獵物便不斷撕咬，定要咬到人流血不止。
But regrettably some Members have taken the incident as a golden opportunity and would not let go . They chase after the prey like bloodthirsty sharks and will only stop when the prey died from bleeding
主席，事情發展至今，於我而言，確實是上了沉重的一課。
President given the development of the incident so far I have also learnt a hard lesson personally
"浩鼎"，你作為議員新丁，經驗不足，有做得不妥當之處便要承認，也要認真反省自己有甚麼地方做得不對。
Holden you are inexperienced as a newbie in Council . That is why you should admit and seriously reflect on your shortcomings
但是，你不要因此而氣餒，也不要中了那些"想你死"的敵人的詭計，我們也不會讓你成為繼CY之後新一輪政治打擊的對象。
And most importantly do not be discouraged or fall into the death trap set by your enemies . We will not let you become another target of political attacks after CY
所以，我們堅決反對這一波和下一波的政治追擊。
That is why we will staunchly fight against this round and the next round of political attacks
事情已經很清楚，我也透過這件事看得更清楚。
The picture has become clear and I can also see things more clearly through this incident
我看到很多很恐怖、很猙獰的面孔，很多雙重標準，很多只問顏色的言論。
As I can see there are many ugly and horrible faces who adopt double standards and whose remarks are only based on political colours
有人明明看到梁繼昌議員作為UGL專責委員會成員的角色衝突，一個是被告，另一個是原告，而且，同是UGL事件，他們卻當作看不見，還 堅持梁繼昌議員應留在專責委員會，不讓他退出，要他"死撐"。
Some Members are very well aware that Mr Kenneth LEUNG has a conflict of interests for being a member of the Select Committee . He is the defendant and the other party is the plaintiff in a case which is also related to UGL . But Members of the opposition camp have turned a blind eye to this situation and even insisted that Mr Kenneth LEUNG should stay in the Select Committee
我亦要在此補充，彈劾權是《基本法》賦予立法會最莊嚴的權力，一旦行使該權力，必定對香港社會造成極大的衝擊和震盪。
Once again I must say that the impeachment power is the most solemn power conferred to the Legislative Council by the Basic Law . Such a power if exercised will definitely create serious impact and shock in the society of Hong Kong
所以，在2013年，前立法會議員譚耀宗作為當時議事規則委員會主席在本會發言時指出，自回歸以來，議事規則委員會與行政當局曾多番商議彈劾機制的具體運作程序，但雙方仍未達成共識，當中未有共識的問題包括：究竟行政長官涉及甚麼行為，才構成"嚴重違法"及"瀆職"？
That is why when former Member Mr TAM Yiu - chung spoke in Council as Chairman of the Committee on Rules of Procedure CRoP in 2013 he pointed out that since the reunification CRoP and the Administration had conducted many discussions on the specific procedures of the modus operandi of the impeachment mechanism but no consensus had been reached . There were concerns over issues such as what conducts of the Chief Executive constituted serious breach of law and dereliction of duty
由終審法院首席法官組成的獨立調查委員會如何運作？
How should the independent investigation committee formed by the Chief Justice of the Court of Final Appeal carry out the investigation?
調查委員會的權力究竟有多大？
What was the scope of power of the investigation committee?
正如過往一樣，反對派議員在提出這次彈劾議案之前，也明知道這些背景，但他們未有要求議事規則委員會就彈劾機制的運作程序和安排，展開相關討論。
In this case as in past cases opposition Members are aware of such a background when they initiate the impeachment motion . But they have never requested CRoP to discuss the specific arrangements of the modus operandi of the impeachment mechanism
如果連哪些行為屬於"嚴重違法"及"瀆職"還未弄清楚，便隨便提出彈劾議案，正正違反了我們經常掛在嘴邊的"程序公義"。
It will be against the principle of procedural justice which we always emphasize if the impeachment motion is hastily initiated even before we have a clear idea of what conducts constituted serious breach of law and dereliction of duty
所以，反對派這種行為正好顯示出他們根本心知肚明，提出的指控遠遠未符合《基本法》第七十三條的有關規定，所以他們這次展開彈劾的目的很清楚，純粹只是另一場政治炒作，以打擊梁振英和特區政府的管治威信。
Hence it is well evident that opposition Members also understand that the nature of those charges against Mr LEUNG Chun - ying can hardly meet the requirements of Article 73 of the Basic Law and they activate the impeachment mechanism merely for the objective of launching another political struggle to undermine the prestige of governance of Mr LEUNG Chun - ying and the SAR Government