Borrison/hk-legicost huggingface dataset:
當局和內地政府及中華電力有限公司等參與大亞灣核電廠建設的持份者不斷組織香港市民參觀大亞灣核電廠考察一日遊，作出大量詳細、具體的說明，解釋大亞灣核電廠的安全性， 以及對香港未來發展的好處，藉此消除香港社會大眾對大亞灣核電廠的擔憂，最終令到大亞灣核電廠順利上馬。
The Hong Kong and Mainland authorities as well as the stakeholders participating in the construction of DBNPS such as China Light and Power Company Limited had kept organizing day trips for Hong Kong people to visit the site at DBNPS . During these visits lots of detailed and specific information were given to demonstrate the safety of DBNPS and its benefits to the future development of Hong Kong thus alleviating the concerns of the general public of Hong Kong . As a result DBNPS was smoothly launched
民建聯早前進行了一項調查，有26.6%受訪者表示不會主動接種疫苗，當中有47.7%因為擔心疫苗有副作用，16.6%擔心疫苗會有危險。
In a survey conducted by the Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong 26.6 % of the respondents indicated they would not take the initiative to receive vaccination . Among them 47.7 % were worried about the side effects of the vaccines and 16.6 % were worried about the risks involved
醫學院因而認為，政府有必要盡早部署，就市民最關心、最關切的問題進行權威的說明，釋除市民的疑慮。
The Faculty of Medicine therefore opined that the Government should make preparations to provide as early as possible authoritative explanations on issues that were most concerned by the public so as to dispel their doubts
專家組最近已向政府建議批准使用多種疫苗，我希望能夠盡快進行。
The expert group has recently recommended the Government to approve a number of vaccines and I hope the relevant work can be done as soon as possible
事實上，至今還有很多行業仍然在"吊鹽水"，可以說很快就"斷氣"，他們卻沒有獲得資助。
In fact many industries are still struggling; they are on a drip and will soon collapse but they have not received any subsidy
他當天宣傳這些信息尚算"小兒科"，其實大家想想，假信息是可以造成很大很大禍害的，當年納粹德國的國會縱火案，最後弄致怎樣？
The information he disseminated at that time was relatively minor . Actually we can imagine the great harm caused by fake information as shown in the arson attack on the Nazi German parliament . What was its consequence?
剛才鄭松泰議員承認曾誤信其支持者當年發給他的一幅"砌圖"，說高鐵西九龍站的玻璃被颱風全打破。
Just now Dr CHENG Chung - tai admitted that he was once misled into believing the authenticity of an edited photo sent by one of his supporters . The photo showed that all glass panels at the West Kowloon Station of the High Speed Rail had been broken in the typhoon
主席，我覺得大家不要玩文字遊戲了，甚麼叫做"獨立檢視會"？
President I think they should stop this wordplay . What is this independent review panel?
代理主席，我的發言是支持陳志全議員、劉小麗議員的修正案編號116及117。
Deputy Chairman I speak in support of Amendment Nos . 116 and 117 proposed by Mr CHAN Chi - chuen and Dr LAU Siu - lai respectively
然而，昨天竟然揭露了另一件......真的是"反高潮"，大家忽然很震驚，故事一轉就揭發為何鄧女士要遭受這些不必要的痛苦？
Yet the story turned into an anti - climax yesterday when we were suddenly shocked by discovering the reasons for Madam TANGs unnecessary suffering
大家都不明白，然後基督教聯合醫院的行政總監出來鞠躬道歉，說4月6日翻查病歷紀錄，發現聯合醫院兩位腎科醫生向鄧女士處方藥物的時候，使用了一些高劑量的類固醇，但卻遺忘處方預防性防止肝炎病毒擴散的藥物。
We had no idea about this until the Hospital Chief Executive of United Christian Hospital UCH came out to bow in apology . According to him when UCH reviewed Madam TANGs medical record on 6 April it was found that two renal medical staff had forgotten to prescribe antiviral prophylaxis to prevent the spread of hepatitis virus during the period when she was put on high - dose steroid treatment
這是一件嚴重的醫療事故，為何1月、2月發生的事情，到了聯合醫院在4月得悉，未公布又未在通報系統裏向大家通報呢？
It is a sentinel event . So why was the incident which occurred in January and February and came into attention of UCH in April not made public and reported through the reporting system?
這些全都是匪夷所思的。
This is utterly unimaginable
九類必須呈報的嚴重醫療事件的其中一項是，"錯誤處方藥物引致病人永久喪失主要功能或死亡"，又或是另一項，"導致病人永久喪失功能或死亡的其他嚴重事件"。然後在兩項必須呈報的重大風險事件中，其中一項是"可導致死亡或永久受損的錯誤處方藥物"。
The two sentinel events are medication error resulting in major permanent loss of function or death and other adverse events resulting in permanent loss of function or death; and the serious untoward event is medication error which could lead to death or permanent harm . Now we can see that Madam TANGs case is a medical event that requires reporting
我們明明有好像很健全的通報系統，但原來醫生和醫院可以不理會。
Although a well - established reporting system is obviously in place it can be ignored by doctors and hospitals
是否真的直至4月20日才被知會呢？
Is it really the case that it was not until 20 April that HA was notified of the incident?
高醫生是否在4月20日已經知道呢？
Had Dr KO already known it by 20 April?
為甚麼沒有人作公開道歉？
Why hasnt anyone offered a public apology until yesterday when the Hospital Chief Executive of UCH made an apology?
但是，我更擔心的是，今次的整宗事件反映整個醫療系統每個層次均出現問題，第一個層次是兩位醫生，其實他們是十分資深的醫生，是腎科專科的副顧問醫生。
Nevertheless what worries me more is that this incident reflects the existence of problems in each level of the entire medical system . The two doctors belong to the first level . In fact they are very experienced specialists as both of them are Associate Consultants in Nephrology
這是一定要調查的，所以醫生的錯誤，是第一個環節。
We definitely need to investigate why they did not do so . At the first level it is the mistakes made by the doctors
全香港的公立醫院、私立醫院，在處方重劑量類固醇時，有否跟隨用藥指引？
Do all public and private hospitals in Hong Kong comply with the medication guidelines in the prescription of high - dose steroid?
代理主席，我是議事論事，提出要削減水務署署長的全年薪酬水務署有代表在場嗎？
The reduced amount is approximately equivalent to the annual emoluments of the Director of Water Supplies . Deputy Chairman my discussion is based on the subject matter . I propose to cut the annual emoluments of the Director of Water Supplies―Is any representative of the Water Supplies Department WSD present here?
最近不斷有人問我："黃議員，其實鉛水的問題現已解決了嗎？
Some people asked me recently Dr WONG has the problem of lead in drinking water actually been resolved?
我不知道政府跟這些專家是舉行視像會議，還是他們來港開會，開會後有甚麼結論？
I have no idea whether the Government held video conferences with these experts or they were invited to attend meetings in Hong Kong . Are there any conclusions after the meetings?
為何需要1年時間，仍未能告訴大家，為何我們現在不能到屋邨再確實地根據報告所說，再一次抽驗"頭啖水"樣本，以了解清楚究竟公共屋邨的食水還有沒有問題？
After spending one year why can it not tell us the reason for not taking the recommendation from the Report on retesting the drinking water of PRH estates by taking initial draw - off samples at present in order to clearly understand whether the drinking water of PRH estates is still being contaminated or not?
主席，謹此陳辭，支持修正案。
With these remarks Chairman I support the amendment
在教育方面，今天我聽到很多議員針對全港性系統評估發言；其實，民主黨一早已表明反對TSA，並要求政府擱置，因為整個TSA已經異化，即使現在提出推行基本能力評估，實際上仍不能確保學校不會對學生進行操練。
In respect of education I have heard quite a number of Members speaking specifically on the Territory - wide System Assessment TSA today . As a matter of fact the Democratic Party DP has all along stated its opposition against TSA and requested the Government to halt its implementation because of the morbid change of TSA as a whole . Notwithstanding the Governments present proposal to replace TSA with the Basic Competency Assessments BCA there is still no guarantee that students will not be subject to drilling by schools
如果政府寧死不願增加資助大學學額，我便要問問政府，為何在預算案中沒有考慮為這些符合入讀大學資格的年輕人提供協助，以減輕其經濟負擔，讓他們能夠修讀自資專上院校的課程，特別是學士學位課程或副學士銜接課程？
If the Government steadfastly refuses to increase the number of subsidized undergraduate places in Hong Kong I must ask the Government why no consideration has been made in the Budget to provide assistance to these young people who meet the entry requirements of universities so as to reduce their financial burden in undertaking programmes offered by self - financing tertiary institutions especially bachelors degree programmes or top - up programmes for associate degree graduates?
這些學生還沒有經濟能力，其家長又怎能負擔如此昂貴的學費？
As students have yet to achieve financial independence how can their parents afford such a high level of tuition fees?
即使是最近升格為大學的香港教育大學，它其中一個課程的學費亦高達88,500元，較一般政府資助大學的學士課程學費昂貴很多。
Even for The Education University of Hong Kong which has recently acquired the status of a university the tuition fee of its programmes can be as high as 88,500 which is much higher than bachelors degree programmes offered by other publicly - funded universities in general
當然，我亦知道有些大學開設的自資學士課程，其實學費非常昂貴，例如香港科技大學有一個全球工商管理學士課程，是香港與美國和意大利跨國合辦的課程。該學士課程的學費每年要10多萬元，甚至高達30多萬元。
Of course I am also aware that some self - financing bachelors degree programmes offered by universities can be very expensive . For example The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology offers a World Bachelor in Business programme in collaboration with global partners in the United States and Italy with tuition fees ranging from 100,000 - odd to 300,000 - odd per annum
當然，更加重要的是質素監管的問題。
Surely another more important issue is quality assurance
按計劃，政府會先進行招標，由中標者根據政府的初步藍圖進行設計，然後進行興建工程，並由中標日起計，讓中標者擁有25年的經營權。
According to the proposal the Government will first conduct an open tender . The successful bidder will design and construct KTSP on the basis of preliminary blueprints prepared by the Government . The successful bidder will have the right to operate KTSP for 25 years starting from the date of tender award
代理主席，剛才廖長江議員質疑一些民主派議員提出的修正案多餘無謂。
Deputy Chairman just now Mr Martin LIAO has said that the amendments proposed by some democratic Members were superfluous and unnecessary
因此，《基本法》第四十五條提到的行政長官普選沒有落實，《基本法》第六十八條訂明立法會要由普選產生，最後更要廢除功能界別。
The election of the Chief Executive by universal suffrage as stipulated in Article 45 of the Basic Law has not been implemented . Article 68 of the Basic Law stipulates that the ultimate aim is the election of all the Members of the Legislative Council by universal suffrage; functional constituencies should eventually be abolished
然而，為何現時政改沒法根據香港的實際情況循序漸進？
However why is it that the constitutional reform has not been carried out in accordance with the principle of gradual and orderly progress in light of the actual situation of Hong Kong?
所以，真正違憲的不是廖長江議員剛才所說的公民提名，真正違憲的是人大八三一決定。
Thus what is unconstitutional is not civil nomination as just mentioned by Mr Martin LIAO; what is unconstitutional is the 31 August Decision of the Standing Committee of the National Peoples Congress NPCSC
我認為我們不需要八三一決定，但我們需要真普選。
I think we do not need the 31 August Decision but we need genuine universal suffrage
無論大家是否支持修正案，我都想回應一下，廖長江議員問為何有議員提出削減慶回歸撥款。
Regardless of whether the amendments are supported by members of the public I would like to respond to Martin LIAOs question about why Members propose amendments to reduce the provisions for celebrating the reunification
曹二寶的論述及有關另一支管治隊伍的論述，把他們破壞"一國兩制"、"港人治港"和"高度自治"合理化。
The remarks of CAO Erbao and the arguments about another governing team have rationalized their sabotage of one country two systems Hong Kong people ruling Hong Kong and a high degree of autonomy
現在真的是"有中央，無地方"，即有中央的旨意，沒有特區居民的尊嚴。
At present there is the Central Authorities but not the local authorities; meaning that the dignity of SAR residents is sacrificed under the order of the Central Authorities
原來周浩鼎議員認為，聯繫被調查人並沒有問題，也可以公然犧牲立法機關公正、獨立地進行調查的角色。
As it turns out Mr Holden CHOW thinks that there is no problem in contacting the person being investigated and this Councils role of conducting investigations openly and independently has been openly sacrificed
究竟這是甚麼世界？
What kind of world is this?